Loading...
03/02/1989 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionMEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1989 RE: MARCH 2ND ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING Following the call to order, presentation of a plaque with our thanks to former Commission members, Bob Porter and Jo Anne Alt, will be in order. Both former members have been contacted and asked to be present so that Commission and staff can extend their appreciation for their service to the Commission. A second presentation will be a plaque to the Department of Natural Resources. The plaque is in appreciation and thanks for their previous CORE grants to the department, which have provided both aeration and fishing piers for the department. It would then be in order for the Advisory Commission to: approve the agenda, the minutes of the regular meeting of February 2nd, and the special meeting of February 16th, 1989, concerning Autumn Ridge. There are two items on the consent agenda for the Advisory Commission, and three development proposals. Staff has prepared a separate memorandum on the consent agenda items and each of the development proposals. The Planning Commission information on these items are contained in the later pages of this packet. The first item under "Development Proposals" is the Coventry Pass proposal by Frontier Companies. This item was reviewed by the Advisory Commission previously for parks dedication. Members will recall that the preferred park site was then discovered to have been a previous dump site. Braun Engineering has done some soil testing. Staff has prepared a memorandum which discusses this testing and the alternatives to the Advisory Commission. This preliminary plat will be appearing on the Planning Commission meeting, Tuesday evening, February 28, 1989. Actions of the Planning Commission will be brought to the attention of the Advisory Commission members on Thursday evening. It is necessary for the Commission to take action, due to the time requirements permitted by ordinance for processing of plats. The developer has agreed not to proceed to the City Council at this time, due to the uncertainties associated with the park site and the dump site issues. However, due to other issues involved with the plat, the developer agreed to proceed through the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission; but will not proceed to the City Council for a preliminary plat approval until issues with the dump site have been resolved. This meets the City's requirements,;(for processing plat applications in a timely 1 manner, yet still provides the Parks Recreation Commission of assurances that dump site issues will be resolved completely and to the satisfaction of the City before this plat is acceptable for parks dedication. OLD BUSINESS There are two items under "Old Business one is the Unisys Trail and the other is the Remick Addition, which has appeared before the Advisory Commission at least three other times in the last two years. A separate memorandum has been provided for both of these issues. NEW BUSINESS There are no items under "New Business" for the Advisory Commission. PARKS DEVELOPMENT There are no new items under "Parks Development" at this time for the Commission's attention. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS 1. Department Happenings are again included in the packet for your review. Should members have questions concerning any of these issues, please feel free to bring them to the attention of staff. 2. Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson, would like to speak just briefly on parks concessions to obtain direction from the Advisory Commission regarding concession operations in the parks for this summer. 3. Item three includes a memorandum concerning the baseball /softball and soccer facilities available for the summer of 1989 and the status of the proposed relationship between the Eagan Athletic Association and the Rosemount Athletic Association. Staff's prospective is that this issue has done a complete reversal from the direction previously initiated and is something of a disappointment for staff. 4. The fourth item is the Citation Award that was presented to the department by the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association. This was given to the department for its work with the Passport to Health Walking booklet, done in cooperation with Blue Cross /Blue Shield of Minnesota. 5. Staff is seeking some direction from the Advisory Commission regarding the need for and the appropriateness of having satellites in parks. There has been a request by the Athletic Association for the City to provide these satellites within parks for athletic events. Again, direction from the Advisory Commission is sought. If there are no other items for the Advisory Commission, it would then be appropriate for adjournment. As always, if members of the Advisory Commission are unable to attend the Commission meeting, notification to the department would be appreciated. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks Recreation KV /bls Thursday, March 2, 1989 7:00 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center I. New Business J. Parks Development L. Adjournment AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Appreciation Presentation to JoAnne Alt and Bob Porter C. Presentation to DNR D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 2, 1989 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of Feb. 16, 1989 Autumn Ridge HUD Parcel F. Consent Agenda (1) Rahncliff 3rd Addition Rahncliff Crossing, Inc. (2) Eagan Center 3rd Add. Tri -Land Partnership of Eagan G. Development Proposals (1) Frontier Companies Coventry Pass (2) Argus Development Oak Chase 7th Addition (3) Sterns Addition Ind. School District #196 H. Old Business (1) Unisys Trail (2) Remick Addition Highview Park K. Other Business and Reports (1) Department Happenings (2) Park Concessions (3) Baseball, Softball and Soccer Facilities for Summer, 1989 (4) Citation Award (5) Extended Hours for Shelter Buildings Thursday, March 2, 1989 7:00 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center I. New Business J. Parks Development L. Adjournment AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Appreciation Presentation to JoAnne Alt and Bob Porter C. Presentation to DNR D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 2, 1989 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of Feb. 16, 1989 Autumn Ridge HUD Parcel F. Consent Agenda (1) Rahncliff 3rd Addition Rahncliff Crossing, Inc. (2) Eagan Center 3rd Add. Tri -Land Partnership of Eagan G. Development Proposals (1) Frontier Companies Coventry Pass (2) Argus Development Oak Chase 7th Addition (3) Sterns Addition Ind. School District #196 H. Old Business (1) Unisys Trail (2) Remick Addition Highview Park K. Other Business and Reports (1) Department Happenings (2) Park Concessions (3) Baseball, Softball and Soccer Facilities for Summer, 1989 (4) Citation Award (5) Extended Hours for Shelter Buildings S Subiect to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 2, 1989 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, February 2, 1989 with the following Commission Members present: Dick Carroll, Ted Billy, Sandy Masin, Wayne Sames, Michele Swanson, George Kubik and Shawn Hunter. Staff present included Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLinde; Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson; and Parks Secretary, Cherryl Mesko. Commission Member Jack Johnson was not present. Director Vraa introduced Ted Billy as a new Commission Member and Shawn Hunter as the newly appointed alternate. Jack Johnson, another newly appointed Commission Member was not able to attend the meeting. Chairman Carroll welcomed the new Members and asked Director Vraa to continue with the meeting for the election of officers. After describing the responsibilities for each officer, Director Vraa opened nominations for the Chairperson. George Kubik nominated Dick Carroll and Wayne Sames seconded the nomination. Dick Carroll nominated George Kubik and Michele Swanson seconded the nomination. Ted Billy moved, Shawn Hunter seconded with all members voting in favor to close nominations. Written ballots were submitted, counted and George Kubik was appointed as Chair. Director Vraa opened nominations for Vice Chair. Sandy Masin nominated and Wayne Sames seconded the nomination of Dick Carroll. George Kubik nominated and Dick Carroll seconded the nomination of Sandy Masin. Ted Billy moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members voting in favor to close nominations. Written ballots were submitted, counted and Dick Carroll was appointed as Vice Chair. Director Vraa opened nominations for Secretary. Wayne Sames nominated and Ted Billy seconded the nomination of Sandy Masin. Sandy Masin nominated and George Kubik seconded the nomination of Wayne Sames. Dick Carroll moved, Shawn Hunter seconded with all members voting in favor to close nominations. Written ballots were submitted, counted and Sandy Masin was appointed as Secretary. Director Vraa then turned the meeting over to Chairman Kubik for the appointment of members to the various standing subcommittees. Mr. Vraa noted that those subcommittees were Recreation, Development /Finance and Park Names. He suggested that Water Quality be added as a standing subcommittee for the next year to continue the work that has been done to date. Mr. Kubik asked if the Commission wanted to elevate Water Quality to a standing committee. Wayne Sames felt it was a good idea for this group to ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 2 to continue meeting since the task force has been meeting regularly over the last year and has accomplished some very positive things. Dick Carroll moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members voting in favor to have Water Quality as a standing subcommittee. George Kubik asked for volunteers to serve on the Recreation subcommittee. Those members volunteering include Sandy Masin, George Kubik and Michele Swanson. Mr. Kubik then asked for volunteers for the Development /Finance subcommittee. Those members volunteering included Wayne Sames, Ted Billy, Dick Carroll and Shawn Hunter. Those members volunteering for the Park Names subcommittee included Sandy Masin, Ted Billy and Dick Carroll. Those members volunteering for the Water Quality subcommittee included Jack Johnson, Dick Carroll and Wayne Sames. AGENDA Ken Vraa asked that the report on the HUD parcel be stricken from the agenda since all of the information was not available for presentation to the Commission. Sandy Masin moved, Wayne Sames seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 1, 1988 MEETING Ted Billy moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as presented. MINUTES FROM JANUARY 5, 1989 MEETING Sandy Masin asked if a letter of appreciation has been sent to Northwest and Unisys regarding their contributions to the Park Ranger Explorer program. Ken Vraa stated that a letter would be sent shortly. Wayne Sames then moved, Dick Carroll seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as presented. CONSENT AGENDA The following consent items were presented for approval. On a motion by Dick Carroll, seconded by Michele Swanson with all members voting in favor, the Commission approved recommendation to the City Council of the following: 1. WAIVER OF PLAT JONATHAN R. (RANDY) IVERSON. That this applicant be responsible for a cash parkland dedication on the 4200 sq. ft. lot conveyance. 2. OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION (REPLAT) ROBERT SCHLANGEN. That this applicant be responsible for a cash parkland dedication on the additional square footage added to Lot 1,Block 1 and for Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition. 1 ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2,1989 MEETING PAGE 3 3. BLUE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION L.A. LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT CO. That this applicant be responsible for a cash parkland dedication. TOWN CENTRE 100 7TH FEDERAL LAND Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan explained that Federal Land Company has submitted a request for the preliminary plat of two lots and one outlot on 19.5 acres currently zoned Limited Business. The parcel is located north of O'Leary Park and Duckwood Estates and fronts Town Centre Drive with the proposed Waterford Apartments to the east. The Commission has previously recommended that trails /sidewalks be placed on the north side of Town Centre Drive from Lexington Road to Denmark Avenue; on the west side of O'Leary Lane from Yankee Doodle Road to Town Centre Drive; on the south side of Town Centre Drive from Denmark to the western boundary of Waterford apartments; on the west side of Waterford Apartments from Town Centre Drive to O'Leary Park; on the north side of O'Leary Lake from Widgeon Way to the spur trail on the west side of Waterford Apartments; on the east side of Yankee Place from Yankee Doodle to Town Centre Drive. The three issues for the Commission to review include what the pedestrian transportation needs are; what the visual impact on O'Leary Park is; and what the developmental impact on water quality of O'Leary Lake is. Regarding pedestrian transportation needs, Steve Sullivan noted that the proposal is currently responsible for 5 foot wide sidewalk along the south side of Town Centre Drive. Staff suggests that the trail area designated within the Waterford development in combination with a 20 foot easement along the east property line of the current proposal would provide greater flexibility for a pedestrian link. Waterford Apartment and Town Centre 100 -7th Addition would be responsible for compatible grading and installation of a 5 foot wide sidewalk from Town Centre Drive towards O'Leary Park The western end of the east /west trail currently ties to existing 20 foot trail easement tying to Widgeon Way and staff suggests that this trail tie into the easement approximately 104 feet west of it's current terminus. The proposed office building is located approximately 145 feet north of O'Leary Park and 110 feet of the lake. The finishes of the building as it faces the park will be brick and glass with a metal roof band. On the south side of the building is a proposed service drive to a below grade storage area. Since the storage area in intended for building tenants, unloading would typically occur internally. Shawn Hunter asked how much of a rise it would be from the lake. Mr. Sullivan responded that it was approximately 14 feet from the normal water elevation. Steve also noted that the one area where one could see the parking lot of the building would be just east of the building and that planting could mitigate the impact. George Kubik asked if cut and fill would be required and Steve responded that some fill would be necessary for the trail link. ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 4 The third issue of storm water run -off has been addressed by the City's Engineering Department as well as the Dakota County Water Conservation District which has recommended that a portion of the parking lot run -off, which is proposed to outlet directly into O'Leary Lake, be redirected to holding pond DP -20 north of Town Centre Drive. Pond DP -20 would then outlet into O'Leary Lake. Shawn Hunter asked the distance to the pond and Wayne Sames responded that it was a couple hundred feet. Mr. Kubik asked how much of the parking lot would go to DP -20 versus O'Leary Lake. Steve Sullivan responded that approximately 1/2 of the parking lot to the north would go to DP -20 while the west portion will continue to go to O'Leary Lake. Sandy Masin asked if a filter could be built so that run- off doesn't go directly into O'Leary Lake. George Kubik stated that the major issues have been discussed previously and wanted to review some of the discussions the Commission had a year ago to make sure they are still in agreement. Steve Sullivan responded to the question of further development by stating that a bank is planned to the east of Burger King. Noting that there were two entrances off Town Centre Drive Wayne Sames reminded the Commission that that was one of the reasons for not extending the trail in that area. Responding to questions, Steve Sullivan noted that the 20 foot trail easement is typical but that no easement has been worked out as yet for Waterford Apartments; some additional land would need to be acquired from them. When asked if a 5 foot sidewalk was wide enough for use by bicyclists, Steve noted that this width is consistent with a typical sidewalk. He also noted that whatever grading problems may occur can be worked out. The question of the difficulty of the 8 foot east /west trail was brought up by George Kubik. Mr. Sullivan responded that it will be difficult but that the developer will place the trail to the end of their property. It was also noted that there already is an easement on the southwest end of the trail between lots on Widgeon Way. Wayne Sames suggested that signs be installed to indicate that an easement exists so that people can use these areas until the trails are actually constructed. George Kubik agreed indicating this could provide some good PR for the parks, in general. George Kubik asked what kinds of plant material would be provided and what special measures were taken for erosion. Steve Sullivan responded that coniferous trees would be planted and that plant materials can be placed on a 3/1 slope. After further discussion, Dick Carroll moved, Shawn Hunter seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the following 9 recommendations for this project: 1. A 20 foot wide trail easement be placed along the easterly property line. 2. The developer, in conjunction with the easterly property owner, be responsible for providing a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk from Town Centre Drive north /south to the proposed eight foot east /west bituminous pathway. ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 5 3. The eight foot wide east /west trail proposed in the rear yard be revised to be directly tied to the proposed trail within the Waterford Apartment proposal. Also, the westerly trail terminus extend approximately 140 feet to the southwest property corner. 4. The developer extends an eight foot bituminous trail to O'Leary Park from the proposed eight foot east /west bituminous trail. This north /south trail link be field staked and approved by the City's Landscape Architect prior to installation to insure compatible linkage to O'Leary Park pedestrian system. 5. A five foot wide sidewalk be placed along the south side of the Town Centre Drive. 6. Additional plant material be placed south of the building and southeast parking lot corner to provide additional buffer /transition to O'Leary Park. 7. The storm water plan be revised to re -route parking lot stormwater to pond DP -20. 8. Secondary filtration pond to be added. 9. Special control be used to provide erosion control. AUTUMN RIDGE ADDITION Steve Sullivan described the parcel which lies directly north of Lakeside Park, east of Dodd Road and south of County Road 30. The site is within Park Service District 25W which includes both Lakeside and South Oaks Parks. The issues for the Commission to review included the influence of the proposed sanitary sewer alignment through Lakeside Park, determining what the pedestrian transportation needs are and what the park dedication requirement should be. The first issue regarding the sanitary sewer alignment through Lakeside Park was reviewed giving Commission Members some alternatives to consider. Alternative A shows an alignment between Lots 11 and 12 along the east property line of Lakeside Park with marginal tree loss occurring adjacent to the easterly residential lot within the Highline Trail corridor. If tree loss is to occur, the developer would need to provide a tree replacement plan approved by the City and the adjacent resident. Alternative B shows the sanitary sewer alignment between Lots 7 and 8 extending to the existing stub in Atlantic Hills Drive which shows no impact to parkland but results in additional development costs to the developer as the need to obtain an easement from an adjacent owner. Alternative C locates the sanitary sewer connection from the westerly end of Street B to Dodd Road but this would require an agreement by the land owner for the extension and to date, nothing has come about from this discussion. /0. ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 6 Dick Carroll asked what the Engineering staff recommendation was and Steve responded that they were waiting for the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation. Sandy Masin asked why there is a preference for Alternative A to which Mr. Sullivan responded that because there was an open space to work with, it would make for easier access by the developer. Shawn Hunter asked what has been done to date regarding Alternative C. Mr. Sullivan stated that there is a home on this lot and the homeowner has not shown an interest at this point in pursuing this alternative with the developer. The second issue Steve Sullivan reviewed was the pedestrian transportation need. Directly adjacent to Autumn Ridge is the site for a proposed elementary school with Street A becoming the primary circulation link to and from the school site. Considering that approximately 100 residents within this proposal could have walkers using this street daily, staff suggests the consideration of a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk be placed along the south side of Street A. A 30 foot outlot between Lots 1 and 14 could provide a pedestrian link to Lakeside Park. After further evaluation staff feels that a trail link between Lots 11 and 12 would serve as a better access to Lakeside Park. Both locations warrant steps to minimize grading and loss of trees however a trailway between Lots 11 and 12 would provide approximately 8 feet less vertical differential than at the proposed Outlot C. The third issue relates to the parkland dedication issue and staff is recommending a cash dedication. Sandy Bertz, 550 Atlantic Hills Drive, who is a neighbor of Lakeside Park addressed some unresolved issues for the Commission to consider and respond to. She noted that this parcel is planned for 99 homes on 38 acres and is very much concerned about the impact this development, and future development will have on Lakeside Park. Currently Lakeside does not have a ballfield and since all the houses along the park are planned to be built this year there is concern as to whether Lakeside Park can absorb the additional development unless there is more work being planned for the expansion of the park facilities. Another concern was the impact this development will have on the wetland area that abuts the park. Additionally there will be another 200 homes in the parks service district and Ms. Bertz was concerned that both Lakeside and South Oaks parks were perhaps too small to serve the needs of the population being planned in this park service district. George Kubik thanked Mrs. Bertz for her valuable input and opened the issue for further discussion by the Commission. Shawn Hunter stated that he felt Alternative C was out due to the third party negotiations that would need to occur, Alternate B involved obtaining an easement and the removal of some trees that he would hate to see, thus Alternative A seems to have the least impact and is the path of least resistance. Wayne Sames asked how much tree loss would occur using Alternative A and Mr. Sullivan ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2,1989 MEETING PAGE 7 responded that they should be able to complete the work without significant tree loss. It was also determined that if Alternative A was used, any damage done to the turf could be replaced with sod so that the park would continue to be available to the public. George Kubik noted that if a utility easement is required the Commission should decide if compensation should be provided. The Commission consensus was that compensation should be provided and that staff should negotiate based on the total content of the easements with engineering also involved in this review process. Sandy Masin indicated that she would prefer that the developer not go through the park. As another alternative for consideration, Director Vraa suggested looking at the proposed elementary school to see if land could be acquired adjoining the school property and perhaps a joint park project could be considered. George Kubik inquired as to the timing of this development for the City Council and was informed that it would be scheduled on the Council agenda the second meeting in February. Ken Vraa suggested that staff contact School District #196 to see if there is any possibility of working out a joint park project with the new school. George Kubik suggested that with that information, the Commission members review this issue before the Joint Commission /Council meeting on February 16th. With a quorum of members able to attend a meeting at 6:00 P.M. on Thursday, February 16, that date was set to review this issue further. After further discussion, Wayne Sames moved, Shawn Hunter seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend the following: 1. To approve Alternative A sanitary sewer alignment with sod restoration and maintenance of new sod and that steps be taken to prevent the loss of trees in this installation. 2. The developer be responsible for compensation to the City for a utility easement based on a negotiated value with both the Parks and Recreation Department and Engineering Department to be involved. 3. A 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed along the south side of Street A The motion further stated that the issue of cash versus land dedication will be addressed at a special meeting at 6:30 P.M. on February 16, 1989. 12, ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2,1989 MEETING PAGE 8 COVENTRY PASS Coventry Pass was reviewed at the January Commission meeting in an attempt to locate a park site on the property. With a possible dumping site being located under the property proposed to be dedicated as parkland, follow -up testing and research has been planned to find out the extent of the damage, if any, to the area. At this time there have been no test results available to enable the Commission to review this issue again. UNISYS TRAIL Steve Sullivan updated the Commission on the recent meeting with the neighbors surrounding the proposed trail link from Quarry Park to Pilot Knob Park. The proposed trail was staked to enable the neighbors attending the meeting to visualize the actual placement that was being considered for this trail. The trail would lie in the 15 foot area along the north and westerly side of the Unisys property and would require the removal of approximately 20 trees and several feet of hedges. After the 11 residents had an opportunity to walk the proposed trail, they all opposed the trail link because of the loss of vegetation, privacy and interference to their property. Mr. Sullivan noted that one of the questions the residents asked is whether the dollars from TIF that were designated for a trail link could be used for other improvements such as additional plantings to buffer the Unisys property from the surrounding residential homes. Steve noted that staff would be researching this issue and will present the results to the Commission at the March, 1989 meeting. George Kubik, having attended the meeting, noted that there was representation from 3 associations and 2 petitions were presented asking if the land could be used for another use other than a trail link. Mr. Kubik also stated that Steve Sullivan did an excellent job in presenting the situation to the residents. CORE APPLICATION John VonDeLinde explained that the Department of Parks and Recreation received application materials from the DNR in connection with Cooperative Opportunities for Resource Enhancements program. The City has been successful with two previous applications under the Core programs in which the DNR allocated $27,000 in funding for the development of portable aeration systems for Fish and Schwanz Lakes. The fishing pier applications were withheld and the DNR suggested they be resubmitted under the 1989 program which it has done. In August of 1988 the Department was informed that it would be receiving a fishing pier for Fish Lake under the program but that the proposal for Schwanz Lake was being rejected. ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 9 Mr. VonDeLinde asked that the Commission make recommendations as to whether staff should submit new applications under the fiscal year 1990 program. Staff also requests Commission's recommendations for prioritization of fishing piers at Schwanz Lake, Thomas Lake and Heine Pond and for an aeration system at Thomas Lake. After further discussion George Kubik moved, Dick Carroll seconded with all members voting in favor to proceed with an application under the fiscal year 1990 CORE program for fishing piers and aeration systems in the following priority order: 1. Aeration system at Thomas Lake 2. Fishing pier at Schwanz Lake 3. Fishing pier at Heine Pond 4. Fishing Pier at Thomas Lake COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE Director Vraa brought the Commission up to date on the information provided to the public to date regarding the proposed community center. He indicated the newsletters were sent out approximately two weeks ago via the mail versus being distributed by ADS. The 3rd cable TV show has also been taped and will be available for viewing the last two weeks before the referendum. Mr. Vraa also noted that Bryce Hastings was in town on Tuesday working on a project in Plymouth and stopped to review the elements of the contract so that work could commence providing the bond referendum was successful. HAPPENINGS Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson stated that the response to the new Recreation Supervisor position was exceptional. The review process narrowed the field to 13 very qualified individuals who participated in the interview process. Those 13 were reduced to the top 5 who were then narrowed to a final 3 candidates. After follow -up interviews, staff has recommended to the City Council that they hire John Oyangi who is currently a recreation superintendent in St. Peter, Minnesota. He has 8 or 9 years of experience and has been involved in a variety of things so will add a fresh new insight into the programs he will be working with. He will primarily be responsible for the softball program and will help with special events. His starting date will be February 21, 1989. George Kubik suggested that a date be scheduled for the Recreation subcommittee to meet with recreation staff to brainstorm about new recreation program offerings. After further discussion it was decided to meet on Tuesday, February 14th at 5:30 P.M. /4 ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1989 MEETING PAGE 10 John VonDeLinde also updated the Commission on the Park Operation Supervisor which will be filled shortly also. There were 63 applications received, 18 of which were tested and screened down to 9 interviewees. Three of those individuals who were interviewed were current staff members. After the interviews were completed, Rick Pellitier who is currently on staff, will be recommended to the City Council for hire. Dorothy Peterson noted that staff was worried a week ago that the weather would be too warm to continue with the Winter Weekend but now the concern is that it will be too cold! Everything has been prepared and there are 22 softball teams ready to play in the snow softball tournament, however if the wind chill is -35 or colder the tournament and activities may need to be cancelled. Radio station WLOL is scheduled to broadcast live from the sliding party on Sunday. Commission members are welcome to participate in any of the activities planned. George Kubik noted the change in policy allowing tube sledding only at Trapp Farm Park. Dorothy Peterson responded that the change has worked very well and is a much safer, more controlled environment for participants and staff. WATER QUALITY John VonDeLinde updated the Commission on the most recent Water Quality Task Force meeting regarding water level assessments for lakes and ponds. The results have been summarized in a chart which has been given to Bonestroo for their assessment. This will pertain to water quantity, not water quality. The Task Force has also been working on the framework for the planning process and suggested a Water Quality Subcommittee meeting with the new members prior to the joint Council /Commission meeting scheduled for February 16th. A meeting time of 6:00 P.M. on February 16th was set for the Water Quality Subcommittee. George Kubik thanked the past members of the subcommittee as well as staff for all the work and excellent results to date on this project. He also stated a high priority was to continue with good communication with the City Council on this important issue. With no further business to conduct, Michele Swanson moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 P.M. SECRETARY DATE /5- Subiect to approval MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 16, 1989 6:30 P.M. A special meeting of the Eagan Parks and Recreation Commission convened at 6:30 P.M. with the following Commission Members present: Wayne Sames, Dick Carroll, Sandy Masin and Shawn Hunter. Staff present included Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa and Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan. The Advisory Commission reviewed the HUD parcel and the general agreement was that this property should be used for park use rather than for residential use. AUTUMN RIDGE Director Vraa explained that he had contacted the Director of Elementary Education for School District 196 who was of the opinion that the school district had not sacrificed any of their needs in their plans for the elementary school proposed near Autumn Ridge. Therefore, the school district did not see the need for additional park space nor the need for a joint park project with the City of Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. After further discussion, Dick Carroll moved, Shawn Hunter seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend a cash parkland dedication for the Autumn Ridge development rather than a land dedication. SECRETARY DATE MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989 RE: MARCH 2, 1989 CONSENT AGENDA 1. RAHNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION RAHNCLIFF CROSSING,INC. A preliminary plat consisting of Outlots A, B, and C of the Rahncliff 2nd Addition located south of Cliff Road and east of Rahn Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32. RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 2. EAGAN CENTER 3RD ADD. -,TRI -LAND PARTNERSHIP OF EAGAN A preliminary plat consisting of two lots on 48.37 CSC (Community Shopping Center) district acres located within the Lexington South Planned Development and a special permit to allow a golf driving range located south of Diffley Road and east of Lexington Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 26. RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposal has previously fulfilled its parkland dedication obligation with the Lexington South Planned Development. /1• MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 RE: COVENTRY PASS ADDITION PROPOSAL An application has been received requesting re- zoning from Agricultural to R -1 Single Family and the Preliminary Plat of 225 lots on 122.4 acres. BACKGROUND The parcel is located east of Dodd Road approximately one -half mile north of County Road 30. The adjacent land uses are as follows: North Central Fence Company Light Industrial Zoning South Country Hollow Subdivision R -1 Zoning Clarkson Place Addition Limited Business Zoning East Inver Grove Heights (undeveloped) Light Industrial Zoning West Hills of Stonebridge R -1 Zoning p fi. v�,�' .±.11 1lt�:► adii wia i i it i ::1 Vii' 1 /S The Commission has previously reviewed the proposal at the January 5th Advisory Parks Recreation Commission meeting. The Commission preferred the parkland acquisition located within the southeast portion of the parcel adjacent to Pond JP -24. A neighbor at the meeting explained that the proposed parkland parcel was once a dumping site. The Commission requested an environmental geotechnical analysis of the proposed parkland acquisition. Braun Engineering has taken several borings within the potential parkland acquisition and confirmed a 100 foot by 200 foot buried dump site. The dump is approximately 15 feet deep. Braun Engineering intends to complete a comprehensive environmental analysis by the March 2, 1989 Commission meeting. Braun's preliminary evaluation indicates an organic soil with some glass particles. The boring results indicate no buried car bodies. (See Figure #1) ISSUES The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following issues: ISSUE #1 1. Is the park layout acceptable? 2. What is the required parkland dedication and should credit be provided? 3. How does the landfill influence the development of the park? 4. What are the pedestrian transportation needs? IS THE PARK LAYOUT ACCEPTABLE? The park layout is basically the same as reviewed at the January 5, 1989 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. The facility program includes: *Softball field *Open Playfield *Hard Court *Playground *Parking Lot *Loop Trail *Picnic Area *Boardwalk The proposal places two lots to the northwest of the parkland parcel. The southeast corner of the southern lot is within 35 feet of the ponds high water elevation. The 35' dimension creates a bottleneck which bisects the park layout. Staff suggests that the southerly lot be omitted and the rear lot line of the northerly lot be realigned to provide additional area between the terrestrial portion of the park and the residential lots. (See Figure #2) 2 19 ISSUE #2 WHAT IS THE REQUIRED PARKLAND DEDICATION? The developer is subject to a 10% land dedication. This equates to 12.24 acres of parkland. The current proposal provides approximately 5.1 acres of parkland above the pond's high water level and less than a 12% slope. The 5.1 acres is equivalent to 41.6% of the parkland dedication obligation. Therefore, the balance would be a cash contribution of $68,985.00. The Commission may consider giving credit towards the pond and steep slopes according to the Parks Dedication Policy. The credit portion of the policy reads as follows: Land dedicated is to be located outside of drainways, flood plains or ponding areas after the site has been developed. Grades exceeding 12% or are unsuitable for parks development can be considered for partial dedication. Where ponding has been determined to have a park function, credit can be given at a rate of 50% of the pond and adjoining land area below the high water level; a minimum of 70% of land above the high water mark shall be dedicated before pond credit is granted. Other City park dedication policies relating to pond dedication must also be complied with. The steep slopes within the proposed parkland equals approximately 5.5 acres. The steep slopes are primarily along the northern and southeastern portion of the park property. The proposed loop trail alignment is through these areas. The northern steep slopes with the significant oak woods can provide satellite picnicking opportunities. Parkland credit for steep slopes is based on a partial acreage credit. The pond is primarily a visual and interpretive resource. Approximately 50% is shallow open water with the remaining a cattail marsh. Based on the proposed 5.1 acres of developable parkland the total credit for the pond can not exceed an additional 1.53 acres. Staff has provided the Commission with several scenarios based on a 1.53 acre pond credit plus a percentage range for steep slopes. Total Total Pond Credit Steep Slope Cr. Acres Credit Cash Credit 1.53 acres 10% .55 acres 2.08 acres $20,200.00 1.53 acres 20% 1.10 acres 2.63 acres 25,397.00 1.53 acres 30% 1.65 acres 3.18 acres 30,713.00 1.53 acres 40% 2.20 acres 3.73 acres 36,029.00 3 Park Ded. Cash Bal. $48,785.00 43,588.00 38,272.00 32,956.00 ZU ISSUE #3 HOW DOES THE LANDFILL INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARK? The completion of the geotechnical environment analysis by Braun Engineering will indicate whether the buried debris will need to be removed or remain. The developer has agreed to assume all responsibility for removal and clean -up therefore assuring quality parkland development conditions. Assuming that site correction is necessary the developer would typically excavate poor materials and backfill with good soils. Subsurface correction normally takes place at the time of grading. Therefore it appears advantageous that the developer perform the grading and associated subgrade correction. The common excavation quantity for the park is 24,000 cubic yards. This volume is relatively high for a park with 5.1 developable acres. The City's past park projects of similar scale have a cubic yards of common excavation per acre ratio as follows: PARK ACRES Lakeside Park Walnut Hill Park Slater Acres Park South Oaks Park Pilot Knob Park Meadowland Park AVERAGE CUBIC YARDS /ACRE 1,487 /CY /Ac. The 5.1 acres of developable parkland at the 1,487 average cubic yard /acre equivalent equals 7,583 cubic yards. This is the typical amount of grading for a park that has 5.1 developable acres. Therefore, staff suggests that the City pay for 7,583 cubic yards at a fair unit value of $1.15 per cubic yard equaling $8,720.45. The developer would pay for all grading exceeding this volume and all subgrade correction. ISSUE #4 2.5 Acres 11.0 Acres 6.0 Acres 3.5 Acres 3.0 Acres 12.0 Acres WHAT ARE THE PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION NEEDS? COMMON EXCAVATION CUBIC YDS /ACRE 2,800 Cu.Yds. 18,950 Cu.Yds. 8,490 Cu.Yds. 5,950 Cu.Yds. 4,460 Cu.Yds. 17,783 Cu.Yds. 1,120 CY /Ac. 1,722 CY /Ac 1,415 CY /Ac. 1,700 CY /Ac. 1,486 CY /Ac. 1,481 CY /Ac. The Developer indicates a trail corridor between two isolated neighborhoods. Staff suggests that the developer grade and install an 8 foot bituminous path along this corridor (See Figure #3) The Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan indicates a trail along Dodd Road. 4 2 FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: 1. Omit the southerly lot located adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed park. The northerly lot's rear lot line be realigned according to Figure #2. 2. The developer provides parkland dedication and the remaining obligation in cash. 3. The developer receive a parkland credit at a rate determined by the Commission. 4. The developer assumes all responsibility in correcting the buried debris providing a quality park development condition. 5. The developer place topsoil and fine grade the park. The City pay $8,720.45 towards the common excavation and the developer be responsible for the balance. 6. The developer grade and install an 8 foot bituminous path along the trailway corridor. 7. An 8 foot bituminous trail be installed along Dodd Road. SS:cm rd!!!-1011 he S- van dscape chitect /Parks Planner 5 ZZ. Petition of the Residents of Country Hollow Regarding the Proposed Coventry Pass Development I. Country Hollow Country Hollow is a neighborhood of single family homes located immediately south of the proposed Coventry Pass Development. Home prices in Country Hollow range from $130,000 to $180,000, and all homes must comply with specific covenants regarding home sizes and exterior treatments. All our homes are less than one (1) year old. Due to the proximity of the Coventry Pass development to our neighborhood, the residents of Country Hollow have a vital interest in that proposed development. Therefore, the residents of Country Hollow submit the following comments and proposal to the members of the Advisory Planning Commission: II. Comments Regarding the Proposed Plat for Coventry Pass The residents of Country Hollow have reviewed the proposed plat for Coventry Pass, and we are excited about the size and arrangement of the homesites, as well as the plans for the park area. III. Comments and Proposal Regarding the Construction of Homes in Coventry Pass A representative of Country Hollow has discussed plans for the construction of homes of Coventry Pass with a representative of Frontier Midwest Homes. Frontier told our representative that they expect to construct homes in Coventry Pass similar to the homes they are currently constructing in the Stafford Place development. These homes are selling for $81,000 to $110,000. The residents of Country Hollow are concerned that the construction of homes in this price range on lots immediately adjacent to our neighborhood will have a serious, negative impact on the value of our homes. PIONEER engineering February 22, 1989 Mr. Ken Vraa; Director of Parks Mr. Jim Sturm; City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen: Civil Engineers Land Planners Land Surveyors Landscape Architects RE: Coventry Pass Refuge Disposal Site P.E. Job 88135.4 Due to the discovery of a refuge disposal site on the Coventry Pass parcel, United Mortgage is in the process of determining its impacts on the entire development and especially on the proposed park in which the disposal site is located. Braun Environmental Laboratories, has been hired to investigate the disposal site limits and area, whether or not it contains hazardous waste materials, and monitor the ground water for pollutants. As of this date all of the information gathering and testing is not complete. Therefore, we are requesting that we be removed from the city council agenda, and a continuance be granted so all pertinent data can be collected, analyzed, and a course of action formalized. If the disposal site is evaluated to be hazardous, the removal and clean up will take place under strict rules and guide lines of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. If the disposal site is inert and non hazardous, Braun Environmental Laboratories have been asked to determine its ability to support park facilities, such as playground equipment, back stops, playing fields etc.. Based on their findings United Mortgage, is prepared to do whatever is necessary to assure the long term useability of the property, as a park facility. We are proceeding as rapidly as possible to complete the testing and provide reports to all concerned. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. WRT:blh 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 (612) 681 -1914 wn, Dote: 2 1* Drawing Title 25. F)GURE NO. 5 J r cif 1 48)4 I 1 1 t 1 1\ 1 1 1 1 �r��ii i i 's r /e' i,, I /ii 11%!I I j /i'�i 1 //,/••••:;"•:-.),11, i I f I„. \i f j I X1 I ip/'-' --J I1i11; %o o f J ,3 j i 7 /�i /.lam •ra ,0A i ..eie —ew• .wal' N \2 i 1 I) 1 "I it CD MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1989 RE: OAK CHASE 7TH ADDITION PROPOSAL The request is for re- zoning from agriculture to R -1 single family and preliminary plat of 22 lots on ten acres. BACKGROUND The parcel is located; south of Ravine Park, north of Cliff Road, east of Oak Chase 6th Addition and west of Ches Mar East Fourth Addition. (See Figure #1) ISSUE The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following: 1. What are the pedestrian transportation needs? 2. What is the park dedication requirement? Issue #1 What are the pedestrian transportation needs? The parcel is within Neighborhood Park Service Area #27. The area is served by several small neighborhood parks including Oak Chase, Carlson, Well Site, Goat Hill and Ravine Park. The intent is for several parks of less acreage to provide the services of a typical 10 to 12 acre neighborhood park. As a result, the pedestrian transportation network reflects a combination of trail linkages along boulevards and within the parks. Ravine Park has a designated trail corridor to Oak Chase Park, a trailway outlot in Ches Mar East 2nd Addition, and is directly adjacent to trails on Lexington Avenue. This network of trailways through Ravine Park will be primarily boardwalks running within an aesthetic wetland basin. (See Figure #2). The current proposal lying south of Ravine Park provides the opportunity for a southerly access to the trails network by a trail easement extending from the northern cul -de -sac. As well, a short trail connection via an easement from the southern cul -de -sac to Cliff Road would provide efficient access to Lebanon Hills Park and other primary boulevard trails. (See Figure 3) ZJ The southern edge of the parcel fronts to Cliff Road. The Comprehensive Trails System Plan identifies a bituminous pathway along the northern boulevard of Cliff Road. This improvement would occur with the upgrade of the road. Issue #2 What is the park dedication requirement? The proposal will be subject to a cash parkland dedication. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission may consider the following recommendations: 1. The developer grade a trail pad and provide a 20' trailway easement between Lots 7 8 from the cul -de -sac to Ravine Park. 2. The developer grade a trail pad and provide a 20' trailway easement between Lots 3 4 from the southern cul -de -sac to Cliff Road. 3. A bituminous trail be placed along Cliff Road. 4. The parcel be subject to a cash parkland dedication. i de St-,y en ul l i dr SS /bls andscape Architect /Parks Planner Y tfly Dote: ait J1111 9 wig f2 r� i as ter, a i E��isr, s1 ''iir, �f rt11t>sil 121/ 1//11111 CHASE EAGAN KENSI PLACE 1st ADD. DAKOTA COUNTY PARK WALNUT' HILL PARK Drawing Title i Fl GURE NO. 1 11111111111111111111111111111111 11111 1 11111111111111111 111111111111 t »1111, �T cIL 10 Dote: Drawing Title FIGURE NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OAK CHASE SEVENTH Drawing Title m um 0m T1� 3d FIGURE o 5 MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989 RE: STERNS ADDITION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 PROPOSAL The proposal requests a rezoning from Agricultural to Public Facilities and a preliminary plat of one lot on 16.46 acres for an elementary school. BACKGROUND The parcel is located north of Autumn Ridge Addition and east of Dodd Road. The property is within Park Service Area 25W, which includes South Oaks and Lakeside Park. The Commission has reviewed Park Service Area 25W at the February 16th meeting. The Commission concluded that the area is adequately served by parkland and recreation facilities. ISSUES The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following issues: 1. What are the pedestrian transportation needs? 2. What is the parkland dedication requirement? ISSUE #1 What are the pedestrian transportation needs? The Commission previously recommended that the Autumn Ridge Development provide a sidewalk along the south side of Street A and provide an outlot to the southerly trail spur within the elementary school property. The school site plan indicates a southerly trail alignment which does not align with an outlot or easement within the Autumn Ridge proposal. Staff has discussed the situation with the Autumn Ridge developer. The developer has agreed to work with the school district to assure continuity in the spur trail linkage to the sidewalk along Street A. The current proposal indicates the continuation of the proposed Street A sidewalk to the primary drive entrance of the school. Pedestrians would then walk along a sidewalk adjacent to the driveway to the school entrance. The proposal also indicates the continuation of the Street A sidewalk from the school to Dodd Road. The alignment is internal to the school site and doesn't follow the Street A boulevard. The alignment is efficient for the school user, but not for general pedestrian circulation with destinations to Dodd Road and beyond. (See Figure #1) Staff has provided two alternatives for the 3/- Street A to Dodd Road trail link. Alternative #1 places the sidewalk within the boulevard. This alternative requires the pedestrian to walk an additional 200' to the school entrance. The trail provide efficient circulation to Dodd Road. (See Figure #2) Alternative #2 uses the exiting trail layout but also includes a short spur trail; this provides continuity in the boulevard trail linkage. The school bound and the Dodd Road destined pedestrians are both effectively served. (See Figure #2) The Comprehensive Trail Systems Plan identifies an 8' bituminous trail along the east side of Dodd Road. ISSUE #2 What is the parkland dedication requirement? Elementary schools are not subject to providing parkland dedication. Future changes in the land use from a public facility would result in an obligation for parks dedication. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: 1. To approve the existing pedestrian system OR To approve pedestrian system alternative #1 OR To approve pedestrian system alternative #2 2. An eight foot bituminous trail be placed along Dodd Road. 3. The proposal be waived of the parkland dedication. The parks dedication fee would be implemented when a change in land use occurs. phe S van ndscape chitect /Parks Planner SS/bls J9� Drawing Title 2 4E 4.17N11014 cYSTehk 44 Fl GURE NO. MEMORANDA TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1989 RE: UNISYS TRAIL T.I.F. AGREEMENT PROPOSAL The pending Tax Increment Agreement with Unisys provides $32,000 for a trail link from Quarry to Pilot Knob Park. A trail easement is proposed along the northerly and westerly 15' of the Unisys property. The agreement includes the condition that if the trail is not implemented within one -year the easement is terminated. BACKGROUND The Commission has previously reviewed the proposal and has been updated routinely on the status of the T.I.F. Agreement. The memorandum therefore does not deal with past history of changing trail locations nor Unisys /neighborhood relations. Staff's analysis and recommendations are based on the pending proposal, "should a trail be placed from Quarry to Pilot Knob Park per the designated alignment The trail would be 1,800 lineal feet and require over 250' of retaining wall. Approximately 19 trees and 100 feet of hedges would be lost with trail implementation. Several hundred feet of trail would be located within a drainage Swale. A neighborhood meeting was held at Pilot Knob Park on January 30, 1989. Chairman Kubik, City staff and eleven residents attended the meeting. Staff explained the pending trail proposal and conducted a site inspection along the trail corridor. Staff had provided stakes for both the'15' easement and the centerline of the trail alignment. Upon the completion of the field review, we reconvened at the Pilot Knob warming house. The neighbor's concerns and comments were as follows: 1. No resident at the meeting was in favor of the trail. 2. The proximity of the trail alignment to the adjacent residences results in a loss of privacy. The trail would be within 30' of the westerly townhomes; the trail being located on the resident side of the berm. This location is inconsistent with the berms intent to provide privacy to the adjacent homes. 3. The trails proximity to the residents property could result in trespassing and a reduction in security. 360 4. The adjacent residents purchased their properties when no trail was to be included. 5. The loss of trees would have a negative visual consequence. 6. Trail use would reduce the wildlife quality. The residents questioned if other improvements could occur with the T.I.F. funds if the trail was omitted? Also, is it possible to ensure no further development within the trail easement if the trail was omitted? ANALYSIS The T.I.F. Agreement does not allow funding of non designated improvements. If the trail was not implemented, these funds would be utilized for designated improvements or directed towards the payment of the outstanding bond. The funds could not be used strictly for landscaping. Staff has contacted Unisys and questioned if the trail was omitted, would they consider placing restrictions for future development within the easement area. Unisys felt there was no benefit to restricting the use of this portion of their property. Unisys would be subject to typical set- back requirements, yet would be able to install landscaping, irrigation, signage, lighting, etc. Unisys expressed their intentions were to maintain the property in its current condition. The introduction of the trail will, obviously, change that which is now present. There will also be a loss of some vegetation. Some of this loss can be mitigated with new landscaping plantings. Staff doubts that the quality of wildlife will be seriously impaired as a result of the trails installation. The proposed trail corridor would provide a 3/4 mile length of trail between the subject parks. The omission of this trail link would result in pedestrian circulation via 1 -1/2 miles of trails along Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Road. The additional 3/4 mile equates to fifteen minutes walking and less than five minutes biking. Omission would also eliminate the circulatory system within this service area. Pilot Knob and Quarry Park support Park Service Area #9. Both parks have facilities which include playgrounds, open play fields, hockey rinks and free skate areas. Pilot Knob Park contains tennis courts. Quarry Park facility program includes a park shelter building and picnic area. Each park can function independently of each other servicing different users within the P.S.A. SUMMATION The proposed trail link would provide a convenient pedestrian circulation between Quarry Pilot Knob Parks. Omission of the trail would result in additional time for pedestrians using the trails along Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. The facility program of each park, with the exception of tennis and a picnic area, would support the typical park user needs. Lastly, the proposed trail easement burdens the adjacent land owners with loss of privacy, security, mature plant material and wildlife habitat, although this could be mitigated with additional plant material /landscaping. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission shall consider the following recommendations to the City Council. 1. To place a trail within the Unisys property from Pilot Knob to Quarry Park according to the T.I.F. Agreement. 2. To omit the trail from the Comprehensive Trail System and the Unisys T.I.F. Agreement. SS/bls Ivan rchitect /Parks Planner MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1989 RE: REMICK ADDITION HIGHVIEW PARK PROPOSAL The Commission will review and make recommendations regarding the alternative alignments of utility services for the Remick Addition based on their impact to Highview Park. BACKGROUND The Remick Addition is a single family, one lot subdivision, located north of Highview Park. (See Figure #1) The Commission has previously reviewed the proposal making recommendations that the developer provide additional parkland south and east of the subject parcel. Also, the Commission requested a 25' building setback from the parks northern property line. The City of Eagan Engineering Department has completed a draft copy of a feasibility report for utility service to the Remick Addition parcel. The report identifies two alternatives for sanitary and water service alignments: Alternative #1: West to High Ridge Terrace Alternative #2: South through Highview Park to Skyline Road The report also identifies a storm sewer alignment through Highview Park. WATER SANITARY SERVICE Alternative #1 (See Figure #2) Sanitary sewer service is available from an existing 9" line on High Ridge Terrace. The lateral line within the road would be extended 75' south to a new manhole. The Remick Addition parcel could extend 315' of sanitary sewer service to this manhole. Water service is available from an existing 6" water main on Highridge Terrace. The water main would be extended 55' and an additional hydrant would need to be installed. The Remick Addition parcel would run 300' of water service to the extended main. ADVISORY PARK RECREATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9, 1989 PAGE TWO The single lot subdivision would be responsible for all costs including extensions, hydrant, manhole, street restoration and both services. The cost for sanitary sewer and water service is approximately $16,990.00. Alternative #2 (See Figure #3) Sanitary sewer and water service could extend from the Remick Parcel to future improvements within Skyline Road. The improvement would include approximately 210' of water and 200' of sanitary sewer service. This alternative utilizes Highview Park as a conduit for sanitary and water service to future improvements within Skyline Road. The alignment for both utility services is west of the playground within an undeveloped portion of the park. The developed portion of the park is approximately 120' X 140' of primarily moderate and steep slopes. (See Figure #4) The construction of Alternative #2 provides minimal tree loss and with restoration, no visual impact would result. The locating of a sanitary and sewer service through the park would prohibit the placement of a future structure over the alignment. Open play spaces and ballfields can be located within the utility alignment. The current use of the undeveloped parcel is primarily conservation with picnic area development in the future. Staff does not foresee potential significant grading or the locating of a structure within the proposed alignment. The steep and moderate slopes inhibit major recreational facility development. The Commission may consider recommending the developer pay for a utility easement for the use of Highview Park, based on a 20' X 170' area at .50 per sq.ft., the developer would be responsible for $1,700.00 easement costs. Utility easements are negotiable, therefore the Commission may look at considerations other than cash. The single lot subdivision would be responsible for all costs. The costs for sanitary sewer and water service is $6,420.00. This does not include any costs for obtaining a utility easement. STORM SEWER The feasibility report identifies one alignment for a storm sewer lateral line. The location is along Remick Additions easterly property line, south through Highview Park to future improvements in Skyline Road. (See Figure #5). The proposed alignment is located east of the existing play area, tying to an existing depression located within the Remick parcel and partially within Highview Park. The depression has no outlet and is currently used for disposal of grass clipping, tree trimming and miscellaneous debris. �G ADVISORY PARK RECREATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9, 1989 PAGE THREE The report suggests that the developer construct a section of the storm sewer to drain the depression. If the existing large lots north of the park subdivide, the storm sewer line would be extended and paid for by this future development. The Commission could consider an alternative to install the entire storm sewer line with the development of the northerly large lot parcels. This alternative would have construction occurring within Highview Park only once and not at two separate occasions. The depression can go without an outlet with the development of the Remick Parcel, but not with the future development to the north. The construction of the storm sewer line provides for minimal tree loss and visual impact to Highview Park. The construction would include restoration and replacement of a portion of a bituminous trail. The Commission may consider the developer paying for a utility easement for the storm sewer. The cost for the storm sewer is $13,230.00. SUMMARY The feasibility recommends Alternative #2 based on an economic saving of $12,000 to the developer. The cost breakdown is as follows: Alternative #1 Street and Total Sanitary Sewer Water Main Restoration Work Storm Sewer Assessment $9,110.00 Alternative #2 $3,210.00 $7,880.00 $2,450.00 $13,230.00 $32,670.00 $3,210.00 $1,340.00 $13,230.00 $20,990.00 As a consideration to this review, the Commission may want to evaluate and define their policy for placement for both private and public utility lines through City parklands. This situation requests a private utility service for a single parcel through Highview Park. The Commission previously reviewed a request for a public sanitary sewer lateral through Lakeside Park. Based on a historic perspective this situation will more than likely occur again. Do we continue our present approach in which we take each situation as it comes or should a policy for utility alignments through parks be established? ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9, 1989 PAGE FOUR FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: 1. To approve Alternative #1 OR To approve Alternative #2 2. The developer install the first phase of the storm sewer to the existing depression. OR The entire length of storm sewer be installed at the time of development of the northern parcels. 3. The developer be responsible for paying for a utility easement OR The developer shall not be subject to paying for a utility easement. Steph: S llivn, Parks Planner /Landscape Architect SS /bls 4 Mr. Ken Vraa Chairman, Advisory Parks Commission City of Eagan Eagan City Hall Eagan, Mn. 55121 GARRETT E. MULROONEY 2300 WORLD TRADE CENTER 30 EAST 7TH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -4904 March 1, 1989 RE: Unisys Trail Dear Mr. Vraa: We, the Battis and Mulrooney families, respectively own our homes at 1466 and 1470 Red Cedar Road. As you know, these properties border Unisys on the north. The Unisys land abuts our back yards. We write to reg- ister our opposition to the establishment of a walk- ing /biking path, proposed as "Unisys Trail." First of all, we question the fundamental rationale for the trail. The Pilot Knob and Quarry parks are essentially already "connected" by way of the existing walks and trails which adjoin Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob roads, and also by the Unisys interior road scheme which has been being used by walkers /bikers, etc for years apparently without objection from Unisys. It would appear that the proposed trail is simply not needed, particularly when it would require upwards of an estimated $35,000 for construction and more expense for ongoing maintenance of the trail itself and a proposed retaining wall. Secondly, since your staff and crew recently placed the supposed property line and highlighted the proposed centerline of the trail, the following constitute our very grave concerns and objections: The anticipated location of the trail would require the removal of protect- ive /screening hedges and numerous trees at the rear of our particular lots. Many, many mature trees would have to be removed along the entire expanse of the trail. These trees act as some screen to the activities on the Unisys land. Advisory Parks Commission p. 2 The primary purpose of the berm along the property line, which we fought for from Unisys,- to screen and buffer activities on that property would be obviated. With the trail proposed north of or "outside" the berm, the traffic of users of the path, with its attendant litter, animal residue, noise, etc., would be fully exposed to our back yards. The back yards of all of the eight to ten Red Cedar Road homes which bound the Unisys northerly property line would suffer this exposure and consequent breach of privacy, potential trespass and property damage. Although we understand that Unisys has somewhat forced your proposed locat- ion of the trail because Unisys has refused to dedicate an easement over the existing East /West road or otherwise within its property south of the berm, we respectfully suggest that the path's location as proposed for all of its consequences as above outlined is inconsistent with the normal, commendable concern of your Commission and the City Council avoid removing trees at all costs; insist on buffers and screening between single family residential and other property users, e.g. multiple family, commercial, industrial, or public purpose. Finally, you should know that we contest what Unisys has apparently advised you is its northerly property line as it abuts our lots. Your staff has "staked" this supposed line by installing "blue ribbon" stakes in the ground. In fact, by virtue of the legal doctrine known as "adverse possession," that northerly line is at least ten feet to the south of where those stakes have been located. Please see our letter to Unisys (Sperry) dated Aug use 8, 1985 (copy enclosed). Although there were subsequent conversations and negotiations, Unisys ultimately chose not to follow through to resolve the situation. Thus, the proposed location of the trail behind our houses would trespass or "take" property to which we make claim. Advisory Parks Commission p. 3 For all the reasons set forth herein, we request that you abandon /reject the project known as "Unisys Trail at least in the locat- ion presently proposed. Thank you for your attention and considerat- ion. If you have questions, please contact us. _3 at Ri hard 'J Battis 1466 Red Cedar Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55121 454 -3663 Very truly ours, Garrett E. Mul,00 ey 1470 Red Cedar Eagan, Mn. 5512 454 -4591 Mr. Ken Vraa Chairman, Advisory Parks Commission City of Eagan Eagan City Hall Eagan, Mn. 55121 Dear Mr. Vraa: GARRETT E. MULROONEY 2300 WORLD TRADE CENTER 30 EAST 7TH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 4904 March 1, 1989 RE: Unisys Trail We, the Battis and Mulrooney families, respectively own our homes at 1466 and 1470 Red Cedar Road. As you know, these properties border Unisys on the north. The Unisys land abuts our back yards. We write to reg- ister our opposition to the establishment of a walk- ing /biking path, proposed as "Unisys Trail." First of all, we question the fundamental rationale for the trail. The Pilot Knob and Quarry parks are essentially already "connected" by of the existing walks and trails which adjoin Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob roads, and also by the Unisys interior road scheme which has been being used by walkers /bikers, etc for years apparently without objection from Unisys. It would appear that the proposed trail is simply not needed, particularly when it would require upwards of an estimated $35,000 for construction and more expense for ongoing maintenance of the trail itself and a proposed retaining wall. Secondly, since your staff and crew recently placed the supposed property line and highlighted the proposed centerline of the trail, the following constitute our very grave concerns and objections: The anticipated location of the trail would require the removal of protect- ive /screening hedges and numerous trees at the rear of our particular lots. Many, many mature trees would have to be removed along the entire expanse of the trail. These trees act as some screen to the activities on the Unisys land. August 8, 1985 Mr. G. W. Tank Manager, Real Estate Defense Products Group Sperry Corporation Sperry Park, P. O. Box 64525 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0525 Dear Mr. Tank: We have conferred about the subject in your letters to each of us dated July 10 (post- marked July 15), 1985. Our research concludes that the portion of each property involving the hedge(s) and north to the original prop- erty line(s) has been possessed adversely to Sperry's interests for more than the requisite fifteen (15) years, per Minnesota law. Thus, we expect Sperry to do nothing concerning the hed- ge(s) or otherwise to violate our rights to the subject property. We would be happy to work with you to try to resolve any dispute. Very truly yours, Garrett E. Mulrooney 1470 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Tel: 454 -4591 Richard J. Battis 1466 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Tel: 454 -3663 SPERRY CORPORATION DEFENSE PRODUCTS GROUP SPERRY PARK. P.O. BOX 64525 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55164-0525 TELEPHONE (612) 456 -2222 July 10, 1985 Garrett E. Mulrooney, Esq. 1470 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. Mulrooney: This letter is a follow -up to our telephone conversation regarding the property line between Sperry's and your property. As I stated; Sperry, as part of its ground maintenance program, is contacting bordering property owners where it is apparent Sperry's property is being used for that property owners' benefit and prevents Sperry from establishing a uniform grounds maintenance program. Therefore, the hedge on Sperry's property, south of your property, will have to be removed. Sperry has no objections should you desire to remove any portion of the hedge for transplanting onto your property. However, Sperry would like to know if you wish to do so in order for Sperry to complete that phase of its maintenance program within 30 days. Very truly yours, G. W. Tank Manager, Real Estate Defense Products Group GWT/rbc cc: R. E. Falstad Assistant Counsel P E T I T I O tV TO: Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation City of Eagan WHEREAS the proposed construction of a bituminous trail addition thru Unisys property will constitute a potential increase of pedestrian and non motorized vehicle traffic along the easterly Four Oaks Court Association property line. WHEREAS that increased traffic could result in unauthorized trespassing thru Four Oaks Court Association property, thereby creating added maintenance and police service calls to the property. WHEREAS the edge of the bituminous trail will only be seven feet from the Four Oaks Court Association property line. SIGNED: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY PETITION; The Four Oaks Court Association residents and homeowners each owning an undivided one eightyth of the association property hereby declare their unqualified opposition to this particular or any proposal for a trail along it's east property line. NAME 4 r)/2-dYLLioi 7/ ADDRESS 3/ f/ 1 yc/.1 2 Oj 3( 208 R L>r 31/6 3/9�C /A7 ,3; 3 116 3h -�✓i i /1,6/2 O c //a ratr, I VOX (1, u-ArYk.._> 3io F L.. /yam ��ct HOME PHONE 6 SG df 76 y s y- 37O 1 /5k/ -3 7 QS -P-P-00 1 —a X02 ob i 4/y cf a,---96-2 9 ter to zi5;2-o3o yy NAME ADDRESS `1 3 40 ‘&21-ubi4/ htkvir? /5 c. tit 3 I I Jv -v_s& 141 c-314J %1/7 dt61 J/-5 ea.4, 3/AY _?7 /CI 3/SOB Fe M Min, 3/ 30 A Ca/i-ite.4,-,) 1Q &I3 Fir L Z 1 1 HOME PHONE 1 66 DV 4 1/ 1 V 1 Vs12 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21 -199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attention: Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation Subject: Proposed Trail (Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park) Dear Mr. Vraa: My name is John Chapuran. I am a Timberline home owner and live at 1460 Red Cedar Road (1st house west of pump house). My wife, Katherine, and I have lived here almost 15 years. First of all, my wife and I are adamantly opposed to this proposed trail. I attenLed the November 28 meeting and also took the January 30 walking tour of the proposed trail. If this trail were constructed, as proposed, we (my wife and I) would lose 7 trees which have provided a barrier and shield between the Unisys building and our property. I am not talking about 7 young trees, but mature trees which have been growing at least 20 years. These trees have been tagged and would be removed. Many other mature trees have been tagged for re- moval along the trail route as you proceed west along the northern perimeter of the Unisys property. The removal of these trees appears injonsistent with the agreement between Unisys(Sperry) and the Timberline residents regarding the construction of the semi conductor plant. Unisys agreed to berm and provide suitable landscaping which has been done. Now, when these trees have or are maturing,they are tagged to be cut down. Further,the proposed trail is to be constructed on the north side of that berm i.e. between thRe berm and the homeowner's property. If the berm is to act as a buffer, it would seem the trail should be on the south side. I don't understand. I know affected homeowners are concerned about the close proximity of this trail to their homes. This trail would obviously infringe upon privacy. Further, the use of the trail by people walking their dogs would create another problem i.e. dog droppings. I am quite aware of this problem because of the path from Red Cedar /Woodlark to Pilot Knob park. You always have to watch your step and this is very irritating to say the least. In closing, I want to re- emphasize our strong opposition to this proposed trail. Cutting down mature trees for the sole purpose of constructing a trail which most people do not want seems illogical. I would suggest that if money is available from Unisys for this trail, that the money be used to augment the ex- isting landscaping between Unisys and the affected homeowners. Si er 14a4AL,k, hn E. Chapu an atherine A. Chapuran cc: Tom Hedges City Council February 26, 1989 We, the undersigned, being residents of the Timberline area and adjacent property owners to a proposed trail connecting Park and Pilot Knob Park, express our opposition to the locat n of such proposed trail, as presently configured. We believe that the trail, as proposed in its present location, would be detrimental to the full and peaceful use and enjoyment of our property. Name If IP 4 1 1 3 PEce. 0-)yi 0 lr4, 6 4 l jef 6,e a t,r)_a_31cL PETITION 3• 1.8R Address /5 1410 deee 4/8to kid delaA)44.., /1-/c1;_ /Pe -/Q r lic' 040 &e (/2 X257 )5,)o •1 CeJ 1� l /j /216/ (d ,ed /J702 i2,o CILIA, 2 e s? 2 Tszee CsLak.a/, Mr. Ken Vraa Chairman, Advisory Parks Commission City of Eagan Eagan City Hall Eagan, Mn. 55121 Dear Mr. Vraa: GARRETT E. MULROONEY 1300 WORLD TRADE CENTER SO EAST 7TH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-4904 March 1, 1989 RE: Unisys Trail We, the Battis and Mulrooney families, respectively own our homes at 1466 and 1470 Red Cedar Road. As you know, these properties border Unisys on the north. The Unisys land abuts our back yards. We write to reg- ister our opposition to the establishment of a walk- ing /biking path, proposed as "Unisys Trail." First of all, we question the fundamental rationale for the trail. The Pilot Knob and Quarry parks are essentially already "connected" by way of the existing walks and trails which adjoin Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob roads, and also by the Unisys interior road scheme which has been being used by walkers /bikers, etc for years apparently without objection from Unisys. It would appear that the proposed trail is simply not needed, particularly when it would require upwards of an estimated $35,000 for construction and more expense for ongoing maintenance of the trail itself and a proposed retaining wall. Secondly, since your staff and crew recently placed the supposed property line and highlighted the proposed centerline of the trail, the following-constitute our very grave concerns and objections: The anticipated location of the trail would require the removal of protect- ive /screening hedges and numerous trees at the rear of our particular lots. Many, many mature trees would have to be removed along the entire expanse of the trail. These trees act as some screen to the activities on the Unisys land. Advisory Parks Commission p. 2 The primary purpose of the berm along the property line, which we fought for from Unisys,- to screen and buffer activities on that property would be obviated. With the trail proposed north of or "outside" the berm, the traffic of users of the path, with its attendant litter, animal residue, noise, etc., would be fully exposed to our back yards. The back yards of all of the eight to ten Red Cedar Road homes which bound the Unisys northerly property line would suffer this exposure and consequent breach of privacy, potential trespass and property damage. Although we understand that Unisys has somewhat forced your proposed locat- ion of the trail because Unisys has refused to dedicate an easement oVer_the existing East/West road or otherwise within its property south of the berm, we respectfully suggest that the path's location as proposed for all of its consequences as above outlined is inconsistent with the normal, commendable concern of your Commission and the City Council avoid removing trees at all costs; insist on buffers and screening between single family residential and other property users, e.g. multiple family, commercial, industrial, or public purpose. Finally, you should know that we contest what Unisys has apparently advised you is its northerly property line as it abuts our lots. Your staff has "staked" this supposed line by installing "blue ribbon" stakes in the ground. In fact, by virtue of the legal doctrine known as "adverse possession," that northerly line is at least ten feet to the south of where those stakes have been located. Please see our letter to Unisys (Sperry) dated Aug use 8, 1985 (copy enclosed). Although there were subsequent conversations and negotiations, Unisys ultimately chose not to follow through to resolve the situation. Thus, the proposed location of the trail behind our houses would trespass or "take" property to which we make claim. Advisory Parks Commission p. 3 For all the reasons set forth herein, we request that you abandon /reject the project known as "Unisys Trail at least in the locat- ion presently proposed. Thank you for your attention and considerat- ion. If you have questions, please contact us. Very truly ours, 1 Ri hard Battis Garrett E. Mul oo ey 1466 Red Cedar Rd. 1470 Red Cedar -d Eagan, Mn. 55121 Eagan, Mn. 5512 454 -3663 454 -4591 August 8, 1985 Mr. G. W. Tank Manager, Real Estate Defense Products Group Sperry Corporation Sperry Park, P. 0. Box 64525 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0525 Dear Mr. Tank: We have conferred about the subject in your letters to each of us dated July 10 (post- marked July 15), 1985. Our research concludes that the portion of each property involving the hedge(s) and north to the original prop- erty line(s) has been possessed adversely to Sperry's interests for more than the requisite fifteen (15) years, per Minnesota law. Thus, we expect Sperry to do nothing concerning the hed- ge(s) or otherwise to violate our rights to the subject property. We would be happy to work with you to try to resolve any dispute. Very truly yours, Garrett E. Mulrooney 1470 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Tel: 454 -4591 Richard J. Bettis 1466 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Tel: 454 -3663 p SPERRv CORPORATION DEFENSE PRODUCTS moue SPEPNY PARK P.O. BOX 64625 BT. PAUL. MINNESOTA 561644626 1BEnnONE (512) 456.2522 July 10, 1985 Garrett E. Mulrooney, Esq. 1470 Red Cedar Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. Mulrooney: This letter is a follow -up to our telephone conversation regarding the property line between Sperry's and your property. As I stated; Sperry, as part of its ground maintenance program, is contacting bordering property owners where it is apparent Sperry's property is being used for that property owners' benefit and prevents Sperry from establishing a uniform grounds maintenance program. Therefore, the hedge on Sperry's property, south of your property, will have to be removed. Sperry has no objections should you desire to remove any portion of the hedge for transplanting onto your property. However, Sperry would like to know if you wish to do so in order for Sperry to complete that phase of its maintenance program within 30 days. Very truly yours, G. W. Tank Manager, Real Estate Defense Products Group GWT /rbc cc: R. E. Falstad Assistant Counsel City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21 -199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attention: Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation Subject: Proposed Trail (Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park) Si =er /4da/t /t 4 E. Cha P u an�therine A. Chapuran cc: Tom Hedges City Council Dear Mr. Vraa: My name is John Chapuran. I am a Timberline home owner and live at 1460 Red Cedar Road (1st house west of pump house). My wife, Katherine, and I have lived here almost 15 years. First of all, my wife and I are adamantly opposed to this proposed trail. I attenLed the November 28 meeting and also took the January 30 walking tour of the proposed trail. If this trail were constructed, as proposed, we (my wife and I) would lose 7 trees which have provided a barrier and shield between the Unisys building and our property. I am not talking about 7 young trees, but mature trees which have been growing at least 20 years. These trees have been tagged and would be removed. Many other mature trees have been tagged for re- moval along the trail route as you proceed west along the northern perimeter of the Unisys property. The removal of these trees appears in„„ consistent with the agreement between Unisys(Sperry) and the Timberline residents regarding the construction of the semi- conductor plant. Unisys agreed to berm and provide suitable landscaping which has been done. Now, when these trees have or are maturing,they are tagged to be cut down. Further, proposed trail is to be constructed on the north side of that berm i.e. between the berm and the homeowner's property. If the berm is to act as a buffer, it would seem the trail should be on the south side. I don't understand. I know affected homeowners are concerned about the close proximity of this trail to their homes. This trail would obviously infringe upon privacy. Further, the use of the trail by people walking their dogs would create another problem i.e. dog droppings. I am quite aware of this problem because of the path from Red Cedar /Woodlark to Pilot Knob park. You always have to watch your step and this is very irritating to say the least. In closing, I want to re- emphasize our strong opposition to this proposed trail. Cutting down mature trees for the sole purpose of constructing a trail which most people do not want seems illogical. I would suggest that if money is available from Unisys for this trail, that the money be used to augment the ex- isting landscaping between Unisys and the affected homeowners. February 26, 1989 Name J ■4...4(4l g, PETITION We, the undersigned, being residents of the Timberline a and adjacent property owners to a proposed trail connecting Park and Pilot Knob Park, express our opposition to the locati ®n of such proposed trail, as presently configured. We believe that the trail, as proposed in its present location, would be detrimental to the full and peaceful use and enjoyment of our property. Address /1. ti7 ya ice, x.e 1 410 Peed b_de WIT 1 eO 6.e0(q/2 v2TT CeJe -r Rc. /2 /X4' ,eJ /5'aa l2 i t ae s u C (sue,, g yeelreenn t< Dote; oc iates. Iac. sa e.r' in n... 1 V 23/89 as si....pr. M.a a .raa 4... Drawing Title AFFECTED PROPERTY LOCATION MAP REMICK ADDITION PROJECT NO.551 Comm. No. 4 307 FIGURE no. 1 w 2 I 1 1 1 HIGHVIEW AVE. W W 5 1 VALLEY 6 O 2 VIEW 7 3 PLATEAU 8 4 SOUTHRIDGE VALLEY 1 o PLATEAU Grown By: S.G.L. 011 -77 W Q CG w 1— cc 0 10 4, 0 0 t 0 HIGHVIEW o 0 o o SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 27, RANGE 23, CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY MINNESOTA 032-00 031 -00 022 -00 SKYLINE ROAD 021 -00 AVE. G 074 -00, 43 SCALE :1 "•200' cr W 1— 0 IT HIGHVIEW AVE. 6 5 •VALLEY 1 O 2 PLATEAU 1 VALLEY 6 0 2 7 VIEW 3 PLATEAU 8 4 SOUTIIRIDGE, VIEW EX. 9" 3 No.2 011 -77 10 1 3 1 6" 0 0 u 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 N to 0 0 0 N 0 HIGHVIEW 091 -00 Drown By: S.G.L. Orr Schelen ltayeron D ote= Associates, Inc. V s.ii...r. Surveyors Flamm, /..c s....p• sw.es altaseripseks. iu WU is w•rt4r.. 10 -75 SKYLINE 0 0 1 0 0 0 M 0 032 -00 030 -75 EX 0 9 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EX l 6" 1 EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN ALTERNATIVE NO .1 062 -00 031 -00 J 092 -00 020 -75 PARK 0 0 M co 0 Drawing Title SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN REMICK ADDITION PROJECT NO.551 022 -00 ROAD AVE. G 074 -00 HIGHVIEW 094 -00 O 021 -00 1 SCALE :1" -200' et w 1- N 0 Comm. No. 4307 FIGURE no. 2 1 1 1 HIGHVIEW AVE. w Q cc w 1- town By: S.G.L. Dote: V25/89 5 VALLEY 6 0 2 VIEW 7 3 PLATEAU 8 4 SOUTHRIDGE VALLEY 1 0 2 PLATEAU VIEW 3 No.2 011 -77 EX. 9" Ex. w a cc w 1- L. C0 0 10 3 1 020-02 0 0 M t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 Orr Scbelen Mayeron G Associates. Inc. [.giamers IlearvItyere so Masers .en a..1 •..ag1. MOWS, rt. I 11 WO «2411:•.. 0 0 N 0 HIGHVIEW AVE. 091 -00 0 0 0 0 030-75 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAI N 032 -00 A LT ER NATIVE NO. 2 062-00 031 -00 092-00 020 -75 PARK 0 0 M 0 0 022 -00 G� P 074 -00 Drawing Title SANITARY SEWER AND W AT ER MA IN REMICK ADDITION PROJECT NO.551 021 -00 HIGHVIEW 094 -00 O 2 1 e SCALE: "-200' w 1— 0 COMM No. 4 307 FIGURE no. Dote: 2/0/89 V 1 2 rn -4 gil, in i s., 4 7, r e gi A■ml 4 t Drawing Tjtip HIGHVIEW PARK PROPOSED UTILITY ,ALIGNMENT '2 HIGHVIEW PAi r 410. Comm. No. Fl GURE NO. 4 Dote 26/89 (MIL r c Bin llareroen at Associates. Inc. Bashi/we Ser.e7... n.••.r. ...}I. &yaM le.M.eata. sI 1M Drawing Title STORM SEWER REMICK ADDITION PROJECT NO.551 Comm. No. 4307 FIGURE no. 5 i HIGHVIEW AVE. w U w t- 3 w 2 VALLEY 1I o PLATEAU 1 _rown By: S.G.L. 5 1 VALLEY 6 O 2 2 VIEW 7 3 PLATEAU 8 I 4 SOUTHRIDGE VIEW 3 No.2 011 -77 w 1- w 0 0 10 1 3 1 020 -02 O O •r O o o o 0 0 in in o 0 091 -00 010 -75 0 0 0 t O 03( 032 -00 -75 062 -00 031 -00 022 -00 HIGHVIEW AVE. 020 -75 PARK 0 0 0 0 --o STORM SEWER ON PROJECT NO. 543 R --o SANITARY SEWER ON PROJECT NO. 543 R WATERMA IN ON PROJECT NO. 543 R PROPOSED STORM SEWER 021 -00 G (2- 074 -00 HIGHVIEW 094 -00 0 1 w F- 0 1 'r ti fk. Q ROAD .0 1 I 1 1 I 47 SCAL.E :1" ■200' DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS 1. The 1989 Adult Softball Season is shaping up to be an even bigger year than 1988. Already, the lists of new teams indicate that the Women's and Co -Rec Leagues will be near capacity. The Softball League Leadership committee met February 22 to discuss budgets, use of a new ball, furnishing the concession stand at Northview, rule changes and the timeline leading up to the start of the new season. Registration for returning teams begins March 6 and runs through March 17. New or late returning teams can register March 20 -24, depending upon openings. Games begin the weeks of May 2 and May 8. 2. Winter programs will be ending in two weeks. Our focus will then turn to spring and summer programs. 3. An additional section of Tiny Tots has been added for the spring session for a total of five sections. Denise King has been hired as a contractual Tiny Tots instructor to each this class. Denise will also be teaching the Me Two!, Fitness Fun and Games Kids Play classes. Dawn Peterson, who has taught these classes for the past 2 -1/2 years is moving and no longer able to teach. We will miss Dawn's creativity and enthusiasm and wish her well in her new home. 4. The 1989 speedskating season has ended, twenty -four participants braved the cold winter weather every Tuesday and Thursday evening for lessons. On week -ends, optional meets were held in the Twin Cities area. Charlotte Kim Kostron, from St. Paul, did an excellent job of keeping the children interested in coming back each week. A pizza party is being planned to wrap up this season and brainstorm for next year. 5. March 5, subject to weather conditions, has been set as the final day for the shelters being open for skating and sliding activity. The 1988/89 season has been the longest in the memory of the department. 6. Look for the City Newsletter on approximately March 12. Spring recreation programs with names such as Kite Flying and Pizza Party, Win A Rose for Mom, Spring Golf Lessons; Discover Us! will leap from the pages! 7. Six NYSCA coaches clinics have been scheduled. All three recreation staff are certified to conduct the clinics and will be providing this service to the community. 8. Eagan seniors are going out for lunch for one meeting this month and will go to the Old Log Theatre in April. The deaths of Mary O'Neill and Violet Friberger in February impact our seniors group. 9. The Eagan Stagedoor Performers are planning a wine and cheese reception at the Municipal Center on March 30 from 5 7 P.M. Commission members are invited to come to this event to meet leaders in the community and Stagedoor Performers folk. zi-s S 10. Bids for concession room equipment for the Northview shelter are being solicited. The goal is to have the concession operational on the first night of play, May 2. 11. The broomball leagues have completed their seasons. Teams will be participating in state tournaments this month. 12. Likewise, the men's basketball leagues are approaching competition. Their state tournaments are also in March. 13. Distribution of the City telephone directory will happen soon. Please not the back side of the map. Discover Us! 14. Work on the summer /fall volume of the Activities Calendar will begin this month. A May distribution is targeted. 15. Interviews for the department's new half time clerical position will be held on March 3. Assistance is needed with computer entries for registrations and facility reservations, and with the daily typing load. 16. Recreation staff are giving of their time to MRPA committees. Mel Bailey and Paula Nowariak are on the Walk Minnesota Committee. The walk will originate from Sky Hill Park on Saturday, April 29. Paula is on the playground workshop committee. Mel, Dorothy and Jon Oyanagi are on the membership committee. (Would you guess that we control the committee!) 17. Staff has received /reviewed a sketch plan for a residential development south of Patrick Eagan Park access road, and immediately adjacent to Lexington Avenue. Access to the development would come from the current park road. Staff will be reviewing this proposal, and its implications to the park, if the proposed is formalized and presented as a preliminary plat. 18. Bids for construction of the well house /park shelter building at Evergreen Park were approved at the recent Council meeting. The building will be under construction this spring. 19. Staff will be preparing a letter to go to the residents of the Wescott Station Park area for the purpose of conducting an initial planning meeting for the park. A tentative schedule would provide for an "input" meeting in March /April; with alternative concept plans developed April /May followed by a 2nd neighborhood meeting. Plan or plans to be revised with a 3rd and final neighborhood meeting to review a master plan. Construction plans and documents to be prepared during the fall /winter of 1989/90, with anticipation a spring (April) 1990 bid opening. Willmus Park, not yet acquired, would follow a similar review process except that an initial meeting may not be necessary because a preliminary plan has been developed during the land acquisition phase. 49- 20. Staff will be meeting with residents west of Blackhawk Park on Thursday, March 9th. Residents are opposed to the preliminary park plan that has been developed for the grant application. Residents appear to prefer a nature park. There is also concern for water quality in Blackhawk Lake. Staff expects to hear residents concerns in order to address them in a master plan. 21. Staff has received the necessary information required to prepare for a negotiation meeting with Leo Murphy for road access into Blackhawk Park. A meeting will be set up in March to discuss this roadway /park acquisition. 22. Forestry staff completed the clean -up of dead trees and stumps along the shoreline of Mooney Lake during the month of February. This work was concentrated on the west end of the lake, adjacent to the Chatterton Ponds Development. This project essentially completes clean -up work within Berry Patch Park and opens up possibilities for new landscape plantings following the completion of the bituminous trail this year. 23. Maintenance of all hockey and pleasure and skating rinks continued through the month of February. Commission members may recall that in late January the weather was unseasonably warm and did considerable damage to the rinks. This was followed by a period of extremely cold temperatures which allowed maintenance staff to rehabilitate many of the rinks providing good skating surfaces for the public throughout the month of February. The favorable weather made possible one of the longest skating seasons in recent years. 24. The warm -up of late January destroyed most opportunities for cross country skiing at Patrick Eagan and Blackhawk Parks, however by mid February snowfalls improved the cross country skiing surfaces and the City of Lakeville was able to provide grooming services in Eagan's parks. 25. Maintenance staff continued to work on construction of picnic tables, soccer goals, batting tunnels and park identification signs during the month of February. These projects will continue as the season comes to a close in preparation for installation in the City's parks this spring. 26. The lake aeration systems continued in operation at Fish and Schwanz Lakes. As reported in the January Happenings, both of these systems are working to the satisfaction of the Department of Natural Resources and should provide a sound basis for future fish management and stocking programs. In fact, recently the department learned that the D.N.R. is considering the complete rehabilitation and re- stocking of Schwanz Lake in the spring of this year. 56 27. Maintenance workers Steve Taylor and Dan Curtin completed the annual maintenance to the department's two gang mowers and seven groundsmaster mowing units. This work included the re- sharpening of reels, rehabilitation of mowing decks and annual preventative maintenance work. The department is now in the process of acquiring an additional set of replacement reels to provide for better efficiency in the weekly grinding and sharpening operation. 28. The department has been busy writing specifications and taking quotations on a number of capital equipment purchases authorized in the 1989 budget. Included among these are a 3/4 ton maintenance truck, gang mower replacement reels, groundsmaster mower, weed spraying unit for the Cushman Truckster, chain saws, back pack blowers and 500 gallon tree watering tank for the Forestry Division. 29 In February, maintenance personnel completed re- certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and participated in a basic welding refresher course. Jim McGuffee, Steve Taylor, Tom Schuster and Dan Curtin also completed re- certification in the pesticide applicator course at the University of Minnesota. 30 Maintenance workers Rich Pelletier and Dan Curtin contributed several days towards the unloading of 14,000 plastic bins for Eagan's new waste recycling program. The private refuse haulers will be responsible for distribution of the bins to the City's residential areas. 31. Department staff have been assisting the architectural firm of B.R.W. with a space needs analysis and program statement for future expansion of the public works building. The City Council has authorized funding in the 1989 budget for expansion of the front office area. Included in this study will be an examination of on -site storage needs, vehicle equipment bays and other maintenance service rooms for a planning horizon to the Year 2000. A final report on Eagan's public works and parks maintenance spacial needs is expected sometime in April or May. 32. On February 13, Rich Pelletier assumed his new duties as parks operation supervisor. Rich was formerly a maintenance worker with the Parks and Recreation Department. The City is pleased that one of its own personnel was best choice among 63 applicants for this position. Advertising for Rich's replacement has already begun with an applicant deadline of March 3rd. 33. Recruitment for seasonal maintenance employees and park attendants was begun in February. This year the department anticipates the hiring of close to 20 maintenance employees and up to 6 park attendants. One of the major changes precipitating this increase in seasonal help is the addition of the parks operation supervisor position. This position will be responsible for overseeing extended maintenance activities on week -ends and evening hours. An increase in staffing will also be required with the soon to open Thomas Lake Community Park facility. 6 34. February 5th through February 8th, John VonDeLinde, Park Superintendent, attended the third year of the Executive Development Program at Indiana University. The focus of this educational session was on promoting use of the private sector in parks recreation development and maintenance. John has brought back several good ideas related to philanthropic support, foundations and fund raising. 35. At the request of the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission, staff completed and filed the City's 1989 CORE application to the Department of Natural Resources. This application is requesting technical and financial assistance for the placement of fishing piers at Schwanz Lake, Heine Pond, Thomas Lake and the development of an aeration system at Thomas Lake. Final rankings on these applications is expected sometime in August or September. 5d; MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: RECREATION SUPERVISOR, DOROTHY PETERSON DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RE: YOUTH BASEBALL, SOFTBALL AND SOCCER FACILITIES FOR THE SUMMER OF 1989 BACKGROUND As the Commission will recall, department staff have been regularly meeting with a Facilities Steering Committee. Representatives from Eagan Athletic Association, Rosemount Area Athletic Association and Community Education,district 196 have joined city staff to discuss the growth in youth athletic programs and the status of facilities. During the course of the past year and a half, discussions have ebbed and flowed from maintaining all current alliances (RAAA standing alone and EAA programming jointly with the Burnsville Athletic Club) to possible new alliances (Joint EAA /RAAA programming, common flyers and registration) to EAA standing alone. The bottom line is that for 1989, the associations plan no changes for youth athletic association alliances, marketing of programs or in their expectations for field space. RAAA will stand alone and EAA is aligned with BAC. ISSUES The Eagan Athletic Association and the Rosemount Area Athletic Association both market their programs in Eagan elementary schools. The result is that while EAA's participants approximate 100% Eagan "kids RAAA's participants, from Eagan comprise 45% of that association's total. The drought during the summer of 1988 has created severe facilities problems. New parks, hoped to be available for use in 1989 will not be ready. Additionally, several parks used in 1988 may be required to be taken out of service this year in order that they can "recover How far reaching that will be will only be known when the grass begins to grow in the spring. Requests to use city facilities will be issued by both EAA and RAAA. Each association will cite their numbers of Eagan participants in anticipation of being assigned an increased number of facilities. DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE Travel soccer requests will come first. A Facilities Steering Committee meeting will be called to receive those field requests. In conjunction with school district 196, an allocation of facilities will be made. The City's free standing soccer fields at Northview Athletic, Quarry Park and the Blue Cross Blue Shield fields are the facilities in question. A small field at Oak Chase Park could be considered. Baseball and softball requests will be heard at another Facilities Steering Committee meeting. Again, in conjunction with school district 196, field allocations will be made. The age of participants and size of field will be carefully considered. The youth athletic associations have been advised to consider Friday and Saturday games to maximize the use of the fields. FOR COMMISSION INFORMATION: It is anticipated that despite all efforts by the department to be impartial and fair during the allocation process, there will be residents who will be not pleased with where their child is scheduled to play. The Commission should be advised that in those instances, a parent is far removed from and it is not likely that he /she is informed of the ongoing attempt by the department to search for solutions to this on going dilemma. In addition, Parks and Recreation does not create the youth athletic association game schedules! Staff will continue to keep you appraised of how difficult it is to balance existing space with the demand for use. DP:cm cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Mayor and City Council 5*. 3830 PLOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 ity of Cagan FEBRUARY 13, 1989 GLENN WYNN DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SECURITY NORTHWEST AIRLINES 2700 LONE OAK PARKWAY EAGAN, MN 55121 RE: EAGAN RANGER EXPLORER PROGRAM Dear Mr. Wynn: THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On behalf of the Eagan Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission we would like to take this opportunity to extend a sincere thank you for your company's past contributions to the Eagan Youth Explorer Post. As I'm sure you know, the Eagan Police Department and Park and Recreation Department have been working closely, since establishment of the Explorer Post in 1987, in what we have come to know as our "Eagan Park Ranger Program Through your assistance, the City has set up a program whereby these young adults can patrol Eagan parks and learn in a real life setting what it is like to deal with the public and confront realistic law enforcement situations. To assist them, these young people have been given thorough training sessions, on many aspects related to "police work." They have been afforded their own uniforms and a "patrol car" for their activities. Since the beginning of the program, in June 1987, these young adults have contributed over 3,000 hours of volunteer time doing public relations work in Eagan parks. Their efforts have contributed to a noticeable decrease in the incidence of vandalism and depreciative behavior in the city's parks. They have been instrumental in enhancing the public's knowledge about the park and recreation system and in making our users feel welcome and safe in their pursuit of leisure activities. 55 GLENN WYNN PAGE 2. FEBRUARY 13, 1989 At the January meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, officials of the Police Department and members of the Youth Explorer Program were given plaques and lapel pins as a token of appreciation for their fine efforts. But the Commission recognizes that this program has been a "team effort," going beyond just the walls of City Hall. Only through the contributions of local businesses could this program have become a reality. Because it has been such a success, we would be greatly remiss in not extending the sincerest of thank you's for your company's past participation. We only hope that Northwest Airlines will continue to be involved in the months and years ahead in supporting this fine effort for our growing community. Sincerel Ke Vraa Di =ctor f Parks and Recreation r 1 Jahn K. VonDeLinde S perintendent of Parks JKV /nab ity of acugarn 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 VIC ELLISON EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 mayor PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 FEBRUARY 13, 1989 LINDA MILLER COMMUNICATIONS UNISYS CORPORATION P.O. BOX 64525 MSA5B11 ST. PAUL, MN 55164 -0525 RE: EAGAN RANGER EXPLORER PROGRAM Dear Ms. Miller: On behalf of the Eagan Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission we would like to take this opportunity to extend a sincere thank you for your company's past contributions to the Eagan Youth Explorer Post. As I'm sure you know, the Eagan Police Department and Park and Recreation Department have been working closely, since establishment of the Explorer Post in 1987, in what we have come to know as our "Eagan Park Ranger Program Through your assistance, the City has set up a program whereby these young adults can patrol Eagan parks and learn in a real life setting what it is like to deal with the public and confront realistic law enforcement situations. To assist them, these young people have been given thorough training sessions, on many aspects related to "police work." They have been afforded their own uniforms and a "patrol car" for their activities. Since the beginning of the program, in June 1987, these young adults have contributed over 3,000 hours of volunteer time doing public relations work in Eagan parks. Their efforts have contributed to a noticeable decrease in the incidence of vandalism and depreciative behavior in the city's parks. They have been instrumental in enhancing the public's knowledge about the park and recreation system and in making our users feel welcome and safe in their pursuit of leisure activities. THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk LINDA MILLER PAGE 2. FEBRUARY 13, 1989 At the January meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, officials of the Police Department and members of the Youth Explorer Program were given plaques and lapel pins as a token of appreciation for their fine efforts. But the Commission recognizes that this program has been a "team effort," going beyond just the walls of City Hall. Only through the contributions of local businesses could this program have become a reality. Because it has been such a success, we would be greatly remiss in not extending the sincerest of thank you's for your company's past participation. We only hope that Unisys Corporation will continue to be involved in the months and years ahead in supporting this fine effort for our growing community. Sincerely, Ke4 Vraa D} ector of Parks and Recreation Cd John K. VonDeLinde Superintendent of Parks JKV /nab 643 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW RAHNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION APPLICANT: RAHNCLIFF CROSSING, INC. LOCATION: OUTLOTS A, B, C, RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 21, 1989 COMPILED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Rahncliff 3rd Addition consisting of three lots located near the southwest intersection of Highway 35E and Cliff Road. The final plat of the Rahncliff 2nd Addition was approved on November 1, 1988. Platting these three outlots in one addition will eliminate future 4th and 5th Additions in this Planned Development. This should not pose any problems as the overall engineering design was completed with the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. No specific users have been identified for Outlot A (2.7 acres) and Outlot B (1.8 acres), however the Planned Development Agreement specifically requires that all Outlots (A, B, and C) be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. Outlot C (.8 acres) will be developed immediately for a Bakers Square restaurant. The plan, as submitted, is consistent with the overall development plan except a pick up drive lane has been included along the south side of the building. The detailed landscape plan is very well done and ties in nicely with the overall plan. The Planned Development Agreement required that all trash facilities be contained within the building except for the fast food facility in the 2nd Addition (Burger King). This plan shows an enclosure attached to the building that would be consistent with all other restaurants recently approved. PARKS RECREATION ISSUES: Staff will be recommending a cash parkland dedication at the March 2nd Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has been previously rough graded and minimal site grading is required for site development. The drainage is planned to be intercepted internally and conveyed to the southwest to the existing storm sewer located in Rahncliff Court. The storm sewer in Rahncliff Court is of sufficient capacity to convey the site generated storm water to Pond AP -44. Pond AP -44 is a designated ponding area in the City Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond AP -44 drains northeast to Pond AP -42 located north of Cliff Road. Adequate erosion control measures are proposed to limit the sediment leaving the site through the storm sewer system. It is important that all erosion control measures are properly installed and maintained throughout the construction period. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to serve this site is readily available in Rahncliff Court. The development proposes to connect to the existing 6" service located in the east boulevard of Rahncliff Court. Staff recommends that a manhole be installed over the existing service as a means of access, then eliminating the need for the proposed clean -outs. Horizontal alignment and access are the factors for the proposed manhole installation. Water main of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available along the east side of the proposed building. The development proposes to take its water service from this existing water main. Sufficient fire hydrant protection was provided as a part of the Rahncliff Plaza Development. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Improved public street access to serve the proposed site is readily available from Rahncliff Court. All entrances into parking areas from public street right of -way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to be 30' wide. The proposed internal parking lot circulation maneuvers are subject to a detail review. EASEMENT /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Sufficient right -of -way for Rahncliff Court was provided with the platting of Rahncliff 1st and 2nd Additions. The development is responsible for dedicating all appropriate cross easements for traffic circulation and utility easements for water main and storm sewer. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: The proposed parcel has fulfilled the necessary financial obligations associated with public infrastructure improvements in accordance with present city policies. RAHNCLIFF CROSSING, INC. CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Bl, B2, C1, C2, C4, and E1. 2. The undeveloped lots shall be reviewed by both the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The buildings will be constructed on all sides with brick consistent with the building approved in the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. 4. All signage shall be subject to the one time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 5. The trash enclosure shall be permitted next to the restaurant on Outlot C and shall be constructed of the same materials. The Planned Development Agreement shall be modified to reflect this change only on Outlot C. 6. The development is responsible for dedicating appropriate cross easements for traffic circulation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO D. Public Improvements 1. I f any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Nay 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (p1 STREET MAP ZONING MAP COMP PLAN MAP DAKOTA COUN1 4 tro 35 30 NW COR. THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW I/4 OF SEC. 32, T.27, R. 23 35 30 14 t 4 ,5,1*. '31.42 1 73.00 6 9(7.0000, R -20.00 31.42 a R' 20.00 I C- 90 00'00" 31.42 8 90.0000" R. 20.00 Sk !OR. OF THE l:I• 4 or THE NIY! /4 SEC. 32 W OUTLOT IN 92.99 3 -g s es• ri or w 330.00 7 193.00 89 W 241.00 247.00 24700 2 1 o OI SU COR OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 32, T27, R 23 ile, 1 2' IRON PIPE WITH CAST IRON CAP) 339.99 S 89•17'10° w N 89'17'07" E 339.99 340.00 N 09 E U'IUTY EASEMENT AS PER 00C.N0S 112555,112556,11255 O •,nr, ii•iI Rn 2 20.42 N 8 "x•49„ W 4 11� \.`1I�,i1 X11 p 99.50'24" W 310.00 4, SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 32,'.27, R.23 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES 4/2 INCH 8Y 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED BY REGISTRATION NO. 9.'.93, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN UHA"YAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ARE SHOWN THUS* 1 0� \y ti 0 453.22_ 2 100 N) SCALE THE SOU 11. IF ASSUME Z 0 Z W 0 0 z a J W W C] Y N L.l.I Rry r7 rrr 111111111Ii1111111S.•. 1 L ei a.ry ••aV. ••••••••11 w— .■.•u •a•N WIN M. SIIO+l3Ni nS Sd331M9N7 saweirm 'Dui 1I!H 21 ref 1 Z W W 0 cc 0 a ma,a.00ar n.os:a.o.. sal rma7r araas ea 1NVNIWI13N 1 4. v 11 i f f I =S._ ow: me :I, wows IA M t I I II. gg33 G. 1 4 i M 1 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, SPECIAL PERMIT (EAGAN CENTER 3RD ADDITION) APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PARTNERSHIP OF EAGAN LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECTION 36 EXISTING ZONING: CSC /GB /LB WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 22, 1989 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of 48.37 commercially -zoned acres within the Lexington South Planned Development into one lot containing 19.9 acres for a golf driving range with the remaining acres being platted into eleven Outlots for future development. Golf driving ranges are not specifically listed as permitted Conditional Uses, or as Special Uses; however, if the use is deemed appropriate by the City Council, the Special Permit will allow the City to monitor the situation on a regular basis and that use would only be allowed to this applicant. The use would not run with the land as is the case with a Conditional Use Permit. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: Currently this site is flat, open grassland and would be well- suited for the proposed use. Platting is necessary since no development can occur on Outlots. The applicant feels that the ultimate commercial development will not happen in the near future and that this temporary use would be appropriate for the site. A modular wood building will house the maintenance equipment and rental shop /cashier. State Building Code requires that permanent bathroom facilities be constructed in that building. Similar buildings were used at Northview Elementary School a couple of years ago. Those buildings also required Special Use Permits. The parking lot will need to be curb and guttered to meet City Code requirements and 24 stalls have been provided for the 20 tee facility. Access will be directly onto Lexington Avenue at Patrick Road just south of the Lexington Center Mall. PARKS ISSUES: The parkland dedication requirements were previously fulfilled with the Lexington South Planned Development. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary plans for the proposed golf driving range located at the southeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road proposes minimal grading for the site development. The grading includes a proposed parking lot located at the northwest corner and berm construction around the perimeter of the site. The proposed fence will be located on the proposed bermed areas. The entire site with the exception of the proposed parking area will surface drain primarily in an easterly direction. The proposed parking area will surface drain westerly to the existing catch basins located at the easterly end of Patrick Road. The storm runoff is then conveyed to the west to the existing storm sewer trunk line located in the Lexington Avenue right -of -way. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this preliminary plat application. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: No public streets are proposed for the construction of the proposed site. Access to the proposed site will be from Patrick Road, a public right -of -way approximately 350' in length east from Lexington Avenue. Patrick Road is presently not maintained by the City. UTILITIES: Existing sanitary sewer is located at the east end of Patrick Road. No direct hook up to the existing sanitary sewer is proposed for this project. Portable toilets are proposed to be used. An existing water main is also located at the east end of Patrick Road. A 2" tap is proposed to serve the proposed sprinkler system for the area south of the parking lot. A staff recommendation for the water system is that a curb stop and a water meter be installed. No water service for human consumption is proposed for this project. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: No easements or right -of -way is required for this proposed development. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A review of City records show the following pending assessments: DESCRIPTION PROJ. RATE Storm Sewer Lateral 508 $2,106 /ac Street (Daniel Drive) 508 $51.01 /ff Water Main 508 $33.74/ff Storm Sewer Trunk 518 $.079 /sf QUANTITY AMOUNT 31.1 $65,488 260 $13,261 260 8,773 1,244,405 $98,308 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS $185,830 The following additional financial obligations associated public infrastructure improvements necessary to serve development are identified in accordance with present policies: DESCRIPTION Sanitary Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Water Availability Charge Storm Sewer Trunk TOTAL EAGAN CENTER 3RD CONDITIONS: 1. RATE $1,365/ac $1,380 /ac $2,115 /ac $.083 /sf 3. The golf driving range facility three -year period from the date of specified by the City Council. 4. The Planned Development Agreement this temporary use and conditions Final Plat approval. QUANTITY 19.9 3.1 19.9 135, 300 with this City AMOUNT $27,164 4,278 $42,088 $11,230 $84,760 All final financial obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15,1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, and El. 2. No development other than a golf driving range facility on Lot 1, Block 1, shall be allowed without replatting or Advisory Planning Commission and City Council review. shall be approved for a final plat approval or one shall be amended to show placed on it prior to the 5. The development will he required to install a curb stop and a water meter in accordance with the City standards for the proposed sprinkler system. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. a STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO LTS #2 STANDARD 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: STREET MAP ZONING MAP COMP PLAN MAP ■T HILL N. W. 1/4 SEC. 26, T27, R23 PARK 1. SITE AID 'HIGHWAY DIFFLEY ROAN ROAD PM 1 C K 07 Sr i WALNUT HILL PARK SO M REVISE LOON 1, SURVE YON D*O1N COUNT Y, MINN SEPTEMBER 1977 I J. DiFFL RO AD I 9 L O C y I 1 1 J Let I 1 �1 O V T L O 1 Q� t� F 0 y 1 W w m N V' ,-CAi I 1 Q V I 1 W I r A w r 7 K;- 1- 4-- 47 f O U T.LO T I l-- 1 4 0 c -1 N. W. I/4SEC.26 T27, R23 cans" INIMYI NWt1 OOYNtr. mein rtrnYru pm SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 19.9 ACRES REVISED I2 SEC. .W. I/4 26,T27, R 23 �IIMII $UNVtr Nuota COUM1T. MIMM K. lift" MITT REVISED 12 N W.1/4 SE 26e T27, R23 ti 4 t WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE 19.9 ACRES COu1su usivtTu4 $a01* COUMIV. MINN NEICINNEN REVISED 12-1-8t N. W. I/4 SEC. 26, T27, R23 5 ti li4 ;AA: L3, 1 i; h OSMNII SUOMIYUM N■OL COMMN. WMM IMIT►MM[U 1ST/ REVISED 12 LP- 43 851.1 853.8 NW' pA rRlOi EAGAN Pa RK s- 1 -ft 9 a;., 11)D F— x *6& -126 city of ea PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT G P -51 1976.0 980. !KEN3IN PACE 1st ADD c ----'s< I Itz JP-3 ..01 884.0 89/.9: JP 29 926.0 945.0 N I ro `.1P -28 1 9694 7. z ex JP 50 'V 964.0 arm% 97/.7 WALNUT HILL ci.P 3 0 93.6 LP -38 S ?ON -S V/ER MASTER PLAN cr a L- ti tr J -l. N1 I V NM SUBJECT p.ARCEL mowed: FIG *I steward plate fp: SANTARY SEVER MASIIR 'PLAN 1 77.5/ 84.0 SMOG 45.0/52.01 72.4/ A 2 21 5/ Wei E Nf 1 33.0 1 rT 1 4 Mai GROLIN6 ti ii STO AGE NwL mg. Vtt• Ot 10 A 4 flk 50; 56,0 T:T 'ti 43. /60.0 -7- 2 I s J. '74 1 MARE TER city of sagaA 3 ,1 t1 zras PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 81.6/100.0 WATER MASTER PLAN i- 14 1. 3H CHCCL ICOtTION 110201 .1 1 i5t P7 17 0 55:0 11■111! -741.1-1-(;.....1: n\.,1 i I 1- 1 :7 4 7 7,. t V;•", 11 18 sta.onoto SUBJECT PARCEL 1 4 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE (COVENTRY PASS ADDITION) APPLICANT: FRONTIER COMPANIES /UNITED MORTGAGE LOCATION: NE 1/4 SECTION 24 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 21, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 106.9 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R -1 (Single Family) district and 15.9 acres to PF (Public Facilities) for City parkland and a Preliminary Plat for the Coventry Pass Addition consisting of 225 lots. This large triangular site of 122.4 acres is located east of Dodd Road abutting Inver Grove Heights to the east, the R -1 Country Hollow Additions and General Business zoned Clarkson Place to the south. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE GUIDE PLAN The Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan is the City's statement of goals, objectives, and policies for guiding future development within the City. The Land Use Plan designates the types and locations of future land use for all property in Eagan. The boundaries of these future land uses are generally located for undeveloped or under developed parcels. When a specific development project is proposed for such parcels, the locations and boundaries of the land use designations should be refined to reflect appropriate developments. The proposed project includes property designated in the Land Use Plan for D -II (Mixed Residential, 0 -6 units per acre), P (Parks), and IND (Industrial). The proposed development contains,, 225 single family lots plus a 15 -acre (approx.) park, and would be consistent with the D -II and P designations. However, the location for the proposed park is different from the area designated for P on the Land Use Plan. As such, the proposed project requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment within the project boundaries to: 1) change the area designated P to D-II, 2) change portions of the area designated D -II to P, and 3) change the area designated IND to D -II. The amendment changing the land use designation from D -II to P and P to D -II is basically a relocation of the same uses within the project area, rather than a change in land use types. Likewise, given the current location of the D -II area to the south of the existing IND area, the amendment changing the land use designation from IND to D -II is essentially a refinement of the land use designation boundaries. BACKGROUND: The original plan was reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission on December 22, 1988 and continued for a variety of reasons. One of the most important issues was the parkland dedication. The Comprehensive Plan, as well as the Parks System Plan, recognizes the need of a neighborhood park in that portion of the City. That area was previously illustrated between Dodd Road and the large pond near the center of the site. This revised application proposes to shift the park to the southeast adjacent to Industrial -zoned Inver Grove Heights and the Clarkson Addition. The City's Parks Department reviewed this site and a conceptual development plan submitted by the applicant to determine whether the proposed layout met the City's neighborhood parks requirement. It did not. Soon after that December meeting, United Mortgage became involved in the project and a new design /engineering firm was brought into the project. The old plan was dropped and a new conceptual plan was submitted for staff review. Planning and Parks departmental staff met with the applicant to review the plan and it was agreed that the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission would review the concept plan at the January meeting. However, no specific action regarding the dedication requirements would be allowed. The Parks Commission generally agreed that the revised parkland dedication may meet their park service district requirements. At that meeting, a neighbor brought out the fact that dumping had occurred on the proposed parkland parcel. This was an issue that City staff, as well as the applicant, was unaware of. As a result, the Parks Commission continued this item until an Environmental Geotechnical Analysis of the proposed parkland could be obtained. Braun Engineering has taken several borings within the proposed parkland and confirmed a 100' x 200' buried dump site approximately 15' deep. This comprehensive review is not complete, but should be prior to the March 2nd Parks Commission meeting. At a meeting held on February 21, the applicant, and City staff, agreed to place this item on the February 28 APC meeting so the land use question could be resolved while the environmental analysis is being completed. Action by the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission will be taken only when the Environmental Analysis is completed by Braun Engineering and reviewed by City staff. If the site can be cleaned up to City and MPCA standards, the item will then be scheduled for the next available City Council meeting. The applicant has agreed in writing to this process. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: This site consists primarily of open grassland, with scattered oaks near the pond and the farmstead east of the large central pond. The farmstead will remain initially on two lots. The home will need to hook up to City utilities immediately since the lot area is below the one acre minimum R -1 lot size for well and septic systems. The overall site plan is an improvement over the original plan most of the double fronted lots have been eliminated and the access along Dodd Road has been shifted to the north. All lots meet, or exceed, R -1 requirements, but some of the lots along Dodd Road will be tough to build on without reducing the setback to 40'. This would be similar to Whispering Woods Additions along Slater Road where no direct access is taken. The lots vary in size from 12,000 square feet to 65,100 square feet with the largest adjacent to parkland. The average size is 15,960 with a net density (excluding park and R.O.W.) of 2.74 units /acre. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted as a part of this application proposed cut and fill areas ranging from 31' to 10', respectively. Fill of approximately 10' is proposed to be placed over an existing 12" PVC sanitary sewer, 6" water main and 12" storm sewer force main in the southwest corner of the development. Staff recommends that the existing 6" water main be removed and replaced with a new line installed at the proper depth. The other two lines should be tested before and after the fill is placed to check for damage to the existing pipes. The preliminary street grades as shown on the grading plan meet the City's standards. This development is required to match the existing grades provided in the adjoining Country Hollow development. The grading plan shows slopes steeper than a 3:1 slope in four areas. If the grading plan cannot be revised to show a 3:1 slope, then retaining wall construction is required. Staff recommends that the grading plan along the north end of Pond JP -25.3 be revised to show that the pond be excavated to the normal water level. The grading of the lots abutting Dodd Road shall be designed to match the future street grade of the upgraded Dodd Road. Two sets of retaining walls are shown on the grading plan along the east property line ranging in height from 2 to 10'. The design of the retaining walls will be reviewed by City staff. The development is proposing to convey the site generated storm water runoff from the north end of the site to Pond JP -56 as per the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The preliminary drainage plan proposes to provide an outlet for Pond JP -56 to Pond JP -23, which also receives storm water runoff from the central portion of the development. As shown on the drainage plan, Pond JP -23 is required to have a storm sewer outlet draining to Pond JP -24. Pond JP -24, located in the southeastern area of this development, and Pond JP -25.4 shall have storm sewer outlets draining to Pond JP -25.3. A majority of Pond JP -25.4 is located on parcel number 010 -79, which is currently undeveloped. The development will be required to provide emergency overland outlets from all low areas. Staff recommends that a storm sewer inlet be added in between Lots 17 and 16 of Block 7 on Lantern Lane to collect the runoff water in the backyard swale. The storm sewer inlet shall have sufficient capacity to handle 7 cfs. The two existing culverts that cross Dodd Road north of Elrene Road collect runoff from the northwest side of Dodd Road and convey it to the southeast side. Staff recommends that storm sewer lines shall be extended along Dodd Road to collect the runoff from the two existing culverts and convey the runoff to one of the ponds in the development. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the plat application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to the southwest corner of the site. An existing 12" PVC sanitary sewer is shown to be utilized for connections from two proposed 8" sanitary sewer lines and for connections from services from 9 lots in the southwest corner of the site. An existing 12" PVC sanitary sewer is also available to the site on Prairie Ridge Road in the Country Hollow development. The 12" sewer is 85 feet south property line of the site and has sufficient capacity and depth. In order to connect to the 12" sewer, the developer will be required to remove 85' of existing 8" sanitary sewer on Prairie Ridge Road that does not have sufficient capacity. An 8" sanitary sewer and 6" water main will also be available for connection on the south property line of the site when the Country Hollow 2nd Addition development is constructed. According to the utility plan submitted for review, the development will be constructing approximately 3000' of 12" sanitary sewer on the site. The 12" diameter pipe is required in order to handle the flow of the 42 lots in the Hills of Stonebridge development that is shown to be directed into the system draining through this site plus the flow from the undeveloped area to the east in Inver Grove Heights. Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available along the south side and west side of the development. The development is proposing to connect to the existing 12" water main on Dodd Road and loop through the development and connect to three existing 6" water main stubs that have been provided by the Country Hollow 1st and 2nd Addition developments. The 1988 City Water Distribution System Plan shows an 8" trunk water main be installed through this development from the existing 12" water main on Dodd Road to the southeast corner of this development. As shown on the utility plan submitted for review, sanitary sewer and water main stubs shall be provided to parcel number 010 -79 in the northeast corner and along the south property line of the parcel. 1 STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is readily available from Dodd Road on the west and three streets on the south that circulate through the Country Hollow 1st and 2nd Additions to Diffley Road. This development will improve the access to the Country Hollow development, which has access off Diffley Road in only one location. Temporary cul -de -sacs will be required on the ends of all stub streets. Staff recommends that the developer work with the southeasterly adjacent property owner (parcel numbers 012 -76 and 017 -76) to determine if street access should be provided to the west half of the parcels from Country View Drive. Due to the steep slopes on the parcels, street access will be difficult to be obtained from the east to T.H. #3. Staff also recommends that the developer work with the southwesterly adjacent property owner (parcel number 010 -53) to determine if street access should be extended to the west on Street M. The steep slopes along Dodd Road will make access difficult for this parcel from Dodd Road. The additional traffic generated from this development will accelerate the need for Dodd Road to be upgraded within the next 2 -3 years. Dodd Road is currently a rural section roadway is on the Municipal State Aid Street system. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAYS /PERMITS: The development will be required to provide the appropriate ponding easements for all the ponds in this development to the required high water level and storage volume requirements in accordance with the City Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Temporary easements will be required for all of the temporary cul -de -sacs. A 50' half right -of -way is required for Dodd Road. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A review of City records shows the following current pending assessment of record: DESCRIPTION PROJ. RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Storm Sewer Lateral 541 $1,250 /ac 3.5 $4,373 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $4,373 The following charges relating to City infrastructure improvements necessary to serve this development are proposed in accordance with present City Policy #82 -1: DESCRIPTION RATE Sanitary Sewer Trunk $655/lot Water Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk Street (Dodd Road) TOTAL $1,380 /ac $.053 /sf $20 /ff All final financial obligations will with final plat areas and dimensions time of the final plat approval. QUANTITY AMOUNT 144 $94,320 33.9 $46,782 2,144,894 $113,679 2,608.54 $52,171 $306,952 be calculated in accordance and rates in effect at the k1 FRONTIER COMPANIES CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, and El. 2. The existing farmstead shall connect to City utilities. 3. If the farmstead is removed, the well and septic system shall be abandoned to WPC 40 /City standards. 4. A Variance shall be allowed for Street K in excess of 500'. 5. No direct driveway access onto Dodd Road shall be allowed. 6. 40' setbacks shall be allowed along Dodd Road. 7. The development is required to maintain a maximum depth of 8 feet of cover on the existing water main in the southwest corner of the development. 8, The development is responsible for any damage which may occur to any existing City public utility line which results from the proposed site grading and development. 9. The development will be required to match the existing street grades provided in the adjoining Country Hollow development. 10. The development is required to adhere to the City's maximum 3:1 slope criteria. 11. The development is required to submit plans and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval. 12. The development is required to provide storm sewer to adequately accommodate the storm water runoff which currently conveyed by the rural ditch section along Dodd Road. 13. The development will be required to provide emergency overland outlets from all low areas. 14. A storm sewer inlet is required between Lots 16 and 17 of Block 7 on Lantern Lane to collect the runoff water in the backyard swale. 15. A 50 foot half right -of -way is required for Dodd Road. 16. The development is required to limit post development phosphorus export levels to predevelopment levels. 17. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main stubs to all adjacent properties as determined by City staff. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Nay 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfuli its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD T PIONEER engineering February 22, 1989 Mr. Ken Vraa; Director of Parks Mr. Jim Sturm; City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Coventry Pass Refuge Disposal Site P.E. Job 88135.4 Gentlemen: Civil Engineers Land Planners Land Surveyors Landscape Architects Due to the discovery of a refuge disposal site on the Coventry Pass parcel, United Mortgage is in the process of determining its impacts on the entire development and especially on the proposed park in which the disposal site is located. Braun Environmental Laboratories, has been hired to investigate the disposal site limits and area, whether or not it contains hazardous waste materials, and monitor the ground water for pollutants. As of this date all of the information gathering and testing is not complete. Therefore, we are requesting that we be removed from the city council agenda, and a continuance be granted so all pertinent data can be collected, analyzed, and a course of action formalized. If the disposal site is evaluated to be hazardous, the removal and clean up will take place under strict rules and guide lines of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. If the disposal site is inert and non hazardous, Braun Environmental Laboratories have been asked to determine its ability to support park facilities, such as playground equipment, back stops, playing fields etc.. Based on their findings United Mortgage, is prepared to do whatever is necessary to assure the long term useability of the property, as a park facility. We are proceeding as rapidly as possible to complete the testing and provide reports to all concerned. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. Wa e R. Tauer WRT:blh 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 (612) 681 -1914 1.0.eov 1,6 r t.A,IJ Aticoe-,r 1 -°701- a;c, .,APPLE VA LLEY rr a%) 4.4aN1044 440 a wwt "�JI 2 F> fi r future park sites future park site in a development Project future site. size and shape future joint park /school site existing park site 1 winkler /Jackson addition 2 p ule ina woods /mission hills 3 pit lake 4 ta m ey I cross/ blue shield p.d. blackhawk north p.d. blackh wk south p.d. 8 mallard park plat willmus Properties 9 schwanz lake addition 10 patrick eagan additions 11 north athletic field 12 south delaware hills p.d. 13 oleery addition *as approved by previous planning decisions Revised November 1984 1982 r w. »w .t•w MIN OW OIONIO•111/ .11 t INOSEtl1I1 •1•••EENIMIMI EMEC..MN I.OLIO .N* 11•■••••WWU SAO ow reaYNM1 •a OW a •w•11011•nWM•WE.wr .11 It •ONILN.IWI•NRW •.Y \S),bb 0111oo0DJ, 1. MIS rM•O.1LL wan e W MIMS 0• O O 1 1 1 f 1 L� -w -ice 1 goo P 1 VERITY MAP PNEUMINARY PLAT OR COVENTRY PASS EAGAN. MINNESOTA OVERALL PLAN- •1: ME DMA utt of oaa llat n11s O. 1 M ON •1I...1.1I1 wa• NOM N0I.NM1N• MSN11.tN•M•M MMN w uawNr M1.O•ISENY.M .WORM •1I0.1EISNt WRITES KNOW •1IM.0••N► WRITE• .1EN1w MOWN MSIStt N.M1.10L 1•■ M ..w 1.1 •11 1 1S I 711.•rl ••IM ..IM 1...0 mow sr l•n•we 0111. 1r 1..1 •1.111.1. 1.1 •..n•1.• 1.1 LOT DATA I11MI1 M I.N•M .1.••111 0.0• ..M. Sw. woo .1 1•./.• .“11.1100 SLOW ..n. n11. 1 M I 111111 1w 1...I 1.n. •1•I. ow n.I. ..n. 111 ~KIM 11111. ••111 NO MOM rI ISM w NOWMIONt .1•lr .0 MOM. .••I.• •1.•• 0101110 •1MMIMI1e. 1M01 w 1n1. n.■ MII•.Ow 1 11. 1F•0 1•-. 1 1.4 .11111•101. MENNEN* IM111•110 ONO SECOMPOISINI r..11 .111■•■•••••• ECU,/ 1 ti ISPONINA COMPANIES SOMA M11M '988 COVENTRY PASS WYK 11111.1101• PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 Y Erosion Control Detefs WOK rl •IrY rrl ••.t earn r 1 lore r wart /1•.r. •N•1� MNr t• 44• we r 1441114 •ul••r 1•111110. bwurw• 11 t0. se, Ow". Mr u•w r rrw 101 44100 we saw 011111 N•1• Ammo 44 W r•N Y 11411114 MOMS awe WWI r wog rlI .r 44M 1 -14 r tr tw •l 0110.1 .w 0111. r.•-1 ar. 111 r•rr r 0101.14.1. Mr• 44N r 11111414 r rr •••1•1•1 4•44 •••••1410 O•naral Notes let aanohlno Oaten 1141. r� Oravol ConstruotNn Intros.* 1. 11/ II* •Yr. Pn1ar terrier Csnstrwtlaa 1. I4lJ 110., 144, 0141•1 a. 114411 N 1•4 W4.~ 41I. Site Location Site Site Date •r r 111.41 W. 1• r• PAW r. WY. 0 11.4 r. OM Ma CO r Ir11vr 1t.• 12. 0 N.• r. ULM ors Ir raw ea .4 tier aural arm WM WY/ 410 11•111 W. N• 41 rr rlr 011114 IMMO IN Lspsnd Legal Description W a tit S.W./ 80•111 r W W& ••1 •a•• r.1.•• 11 Coventry Pass w O rr ••••41•W as •••-11•1 Date Shoot 110/• S •f•t• mg, .44mi 1 R atcry. HEIGtsTs ti Typical Lot Grading 1sMtor WON Intro Walkout WaWool Lend I... N.. IV N•• .M.• .M N... I.MM..I S* ..NI *Marl MOD M••• I 4.I /N..MM of SM...M.. N *woo Wood M..NI.• N Nome /r 1 1 t 1 1 I II INYCPI (MOVE HtI:.NT6 ISO M. r••.M Y M.. owls Al. •1 MOW. r.n. n. de t BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: MEDICAL INCORPORATED eo awn In N. win wan. nonnenneek Coventry Pees inn. any n. was mon el•en Ono MIMMII• wow., Oa •0411 nn.n.. ea IIMMINIM IOW IV UMW... IMIIM MOM 014 41. MOW sunny Or tt.:..max. gene s nen neon* noon Gionnb• IOI en an ens or On MO Of OW won r.rr so. now enT mole am 4•411 s ter m•... Jam e«O_'.. .ada.. Lit Y 1 Boundary surrey �L Wiser,- rL.z:r� BOUNDARY NM VEY PON s MEDICAL INCORPORATED area. Ye..... r Ie- is r r•....rar wa...�.. r L� 7{'�'.. r..aa�• YIN Ile Yawn le =My 0•1••• ebellle• eileYNY i r..— YIN. PO NOM "eye T i ter rev ere l iweik Coventry Pees Bounder/ Survey =Ma :i.ian Yemen& eye Yee, arr. r f.r.. IMII•411■ 1St rram— aa WIN WATER TRUNK 33.9 ACRES 4 BOUNDARY SURVEY POR s MEDICAL INCORPORATED r ow. r. M. Coventry Peso _il••• r =4= WOW WWII.* OW MOD 0.410•1110 W. In• OM OEMS. 40.00 SURVEY of Y 6 rr3S'rr...�L••.• Or ma. Sawa Mow 1rL.tz.T� w• L.: fi r W.• lb .:=1. Wows. ".•s:Z"' .t.` r Wow 9. Grow rT' :ter r Wow. M 11100 Ims 00100 M. Warm. •a•.•. Z• *Naas w•. e 4•11 rr ,WAVIlly1 C R 1 N. �w I t I Vii■— BOUNDARY SURVEY !OR t MEDICAL INCORPORATED owe. ere. .w 1.. •..s• I�w�..r•._.r. Lam.••. I.. M. 1.#: ONO OP ORMOND OD t t C G UuNN Mal Coy. i O 0.11. G... E Il 11.1 1 4 1 k% 1 J ij .%1.. 1 r 1 SpE, it I a I€ r lamolmiLT Doo m.. oIND re VOID. MO. OID WON. 1=0 Oa OIDIO mo. MONO= .r".^i.. Coventry Pees .Boundary Survey IMMO MED 4141•11.1 O now Weds se dm.. se. Yuma. Id... N. mane i+ I ..Cry Sm./NM 111111.1111•0•11 fir_ too olo• =Ammo w DODD ROAD 2608.54 F.F. JP- 58 ‹t E 1P-30 8730 979.4 city of eagaA 885.3 8 870 k. r. 1 a 876.3 JP-39:,;, tk JP-3 1 -4 880.4 884.0...t i 41 8 95 .0 is T-: 4= 1:2 1 ..i[ 'Ali 1 L 1 •4 1;74_ .1: h .5. 21 •T r .......-4,-......-- JP-20 .91i2 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JP19 7 3° 874.0 882.0 4 J-o 5' JP-21 I 5. 3 840.0 at/ J-r 884 0. L.S.-17 .9 As JP 2 1 3 /.7 JP-25 e JP- 53 .0 1 JP-22 8 I 7.0 864.0 9 1 820.7 8400 '1/4 8 24.0 7' JP -2r I s .1 :!‘JP-26 rc--- 133.2 I Ltirf:a ..t. :7.: i ------1 *---•■••ir---- J i J-z 1 um r s su e NO 4 2177 to_ --I JP-28 i _I) n t__ .1tptlormoop 44444 1 T.. i JP JP 862.0 I 0= -.71=. -7 1 878.0 1 4 I J-Db- 1 kte's0Cii9 7. mtre-' i VS JP 50 \,..i 964.0 L1 7C7-4 --....t.......-- i• 12 411111411 erimieft r .11 e■%.... .112---5o 1 EAR i4 O_P EL./ t Rye C ''''r- 61111■11•11.1= 8194 `""sy: 2-41 i I e $TORM SEWER MASTER PLAN SUBJECT PARCEL NJ. ?311;-4 8874 FIG*' Stimard piste 04- 1 city of eagaA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 111WEIUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG*2 standard plate 1 1 e Ns e y,'1 Uri sn tisk fi�:3�i.. e ery 41 y f 11-41 Cr: 72 MINIM 416. 411 ��Rw►q 1 46.0/62.0 N9. u /Chf Vi i R 1 71.9H60 city of eagar\ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN approved' FIG *3 standard g5. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: DAVANNI'S PIZZA LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CLIFF LAKE CENTER ADD. EXISTING ZONING: CSC (WITHIN EAGAN HILLS WEST PD) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 21, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow on -sale 3.2 beer and wine in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district at the Cliff Lake Center. Code specificallly lists on -sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, however, the applicant is not requesting the liquor portion. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1. Approval by the City's Police Department through the investigation process. o.to 1 I 1 1 I I f� FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL CUFF ROAD OOra Or PINNING NIOVINIG OM1.0.. O.IINI 10111 M tIGI1M M0010I. 1.0. 11 .111 ON /.11 1 CC Y �r PROJECT DATA 10101 MOULDING MIA 11111.000 or AANOOT 110.1100 SF COO 117.000 Sr 711.711 OP O.N. sr CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE (OAK CHASE 7TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: ARGUS DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 27 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 21, 1989 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of ten agricultural acres to an R -1 (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Oak Chase 7th Addition consisting of 22 lots located along the north side of Cliff Road between the Oak Chase and ChesMar Additions. The Variance is for a 550' length cul -de -sac where Code allows 500'. This single family proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan (D -1, 0 -3 units /acre). EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: Adjacent land uses are: Ravine Park to the north, R -2 ChesMar Additions to the east and single family Oak Chase Additions to the west. Currently, there is a farmstead near the center of this parcel that will be removed with this development. The well and septic system will need to be abandoned to City standards. The site is open grassland except for a stand of trees along the west side of the northern cul -de -sac. If the cul -de -sac was shifted to the east or shortened, some of these trees may be saved. Otherwise, virtually all of them will be destroyed with the submitted grading plan. The lots vary in size from 12,003 sq. ft. to 33,477 sq. ft. averaging 15,117 sq. ft. The overall grass density is 2.2 units per acre. PARK ISSUES: At the March 2nd Advisory Parks Recreation Commission meeting, staff will be reviewing several trail alternatives connecting to Ravine Park and they will be recommending a cash land dedication. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plans submitted as a part of this application proposed cut and fill areas ranging from 11' to 14', respectively. Backyard slopes and slopes along roadways are required to adhere to the City's maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria. The existing house and farm buildings are proposed to be removed. Also, a majority of the trees on the site are proposed to be removed. The grading plan shows a 50' strip along the north end of the site that will not be disturbed and the trees in that area will remain. The grading plan as submitted does not reflect the grading work that has occurred along the west side of the site and in the adjacent Oak Chase 6th Addition. The grading plan should be revised along the west side of the site to add fill on the first two lots north of Oak Chase Way in the backyard area to match the backyards of the adjoining lots to the west. Also, the grading plan should show a drainage swale with a minimum slope of 1.5% along the backyards of the lots that abut the Oak Chase 6th Addition. The preliminary street grades as shown on the grading plan meet the City's standards. This development is responsible for matching the existing grades provided in the adjacent Ches Mar East 5th and Oak Chase 6th Additions. Staff recommends that a storm sewer outlet be provided for a landlocked low area located on the southeast corner of the site. The area draining to the low area is approximately 2.4 acres. Staff also recommends that storm sewer stubs be provided to Cliff Road along the south end of the development. The storm sewer stubs will serve as the drainage system for Cliff Road to the west to the high point near Dunberry Lane. The area draining to the future storm sewer system on Cliff Road is approximately 16.4 acres and the proposed storm sewer system draining northerly through this development should be designed to handle the flow from this area. The existing 18" storm sewer that drains easterly along the lot line between Lots 4 and 5 of Block 2 of Oak Chase 6th Addition currently discharges into the drainage swale in the northwest corner of the proposed development. Staff recommends that the proposed storm sewer system to be constructed along the west property line of the development be extended to connect to the existing 18" storm sewer. The area draining to the existing 18" storm sewer is approximately 10.3 acres and the flow from this area should be conveyed all the way to the proposed pond in the northwest corner of the site. The proposed pond currently is a low area that drains to the north through an existing 18" C.M.P. culvert and then through an eroded ditch to Pond LP -70. Pond LP -70 is a designated ponding area in the City Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Staff recommends that a new storm sewer outlet pipe be constructed from the proposed pond to the north for approximatley 200' to Pond LP- 70. An incomplete Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was submitted with this application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity to serve the proposed development is readily available in Oak Chase Way to the west. The 1988 City Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan shows that this development should be served by sanitary sewer to the east on Oak Chase Way. However, a sanitary sewer stub was not provided to this development from the Ches Mar East 4th Addition. The sanitary sewer line that has been provided to this development from the Oak Chase 6th Addition to the west has sufficient capacity to accept the additional 10 acres of flow from this development. Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to the site from two locations. The existing 6" water main stub on Oak Chase Way to the east is in the high level pressure zone. With the water main layout as shown, a pressure reducing station is needed near connection to the existing 6" water main on Oak Chase Way to the east. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is provided from the Ches Mar East 4th Addition to the east and Oak Chase 6th Addition to the west. Due to intersection spacing guidelines adopted by the Dakota County Highway Department, the County is requiring the dedication of restricted access along the entire length of CSAH 32 (Cliff Road). The design of the cul -de -sac and the horizontal and vertical alignment of the proposed streets shall conform to City standards. The temporary cul -de -sacs on the existing streets ,shall be removed by this development when Oak Chase Way is constructed. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The development will be required to provide the appropriate ponding easement for the proposed pond in the northwest corner of the development. The proposed right -of -way widths for the streets and cul -de -sacs are in accordance with City Code requirements. A 75' half right of -way as proposed meets County guidelines for Cliff Road. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. epq FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: The proposed development has been previously assessed for only the benefit received from the sanitary sewer trunk area charge. The following additional charges are identified in accordance with present policy: RATE QTY AMT $660 /lot 22 lots $14,520 .056 /sf 435,600 sf 23,087 6.88/ff 421 ff 2,896 TOTAL $40,503 All final financial obligations will be calculated in accordance with the final approved site /grading plans, final plat dimensions, and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. DESCRIPTION Water Trunk Rate Storm Sewer Trunk Lateral Benefit Water Trunk OAR CHASE 7TH ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of Council action on September 15, Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, plat approval as adopted by 1987 shall be complied with: D1, and El. 2. The Variance for the 550' cul-de -sac shall be approved. 3. The development is required to submit a grading plan which accurately shows the existing adjacent topography. 4. The grading plan is required to be revised along the west side of this site to add fill on the first two lots north of Oak Chase Way in the backyard areas to match the existing backyards of the westerly adjacent lots. 5. The drainage swale with a minimum slope of 1.5% along the backyards of the lots that abut Oak Chase 6th Addition is required. 6. The development is responsible for matching the existing street grades provided in the adjacent Ches Mar East 5th Addition and Oak Chase 6th Addition. 7. A storm sewer outlet is required for the landlocked low area located in the southeast corner of this site. 8. The development is required to provide a storm sewer outlet to the southerly boundary of the property adequately sized to handle approximately 16.4 acres of runoff. 9. The development will be responsible for intercepting the existing 18" storm sewer that drains easterly along the lot line between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2, of Oak Chase 6th Addition. 10. The development is required to extend its storm sewer outlet to the normal water level (NWL) of Pond LP -70. 11. The development will be required to loading to Carlson Lake to predevelopment 12. The proposed water main layout as shown and subject to further review by staff. limit phosphorous levels. is not acceptable STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights- -ofWay 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE ,TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD q 1 STREET MAP ZONING MAP COMP PLAN MAP S.E. 1/4 SEC. 27,T.27, R.23 RAVINE PARK POND BERNARD FL LARSON COUNTY MONCTON IMNOTA COUNTY. MINN OCTOOER, OPT PRELIMINARY FOR oar CHASE PLAT SEVENTH e t ISM N lent l She 111 O. Yet M M. I ll*l. ian rt.N.a Seeley .....a. M/o U. haw Cm... M ••y Mw a.... Gaye Ye a Mr 1awult... MI MAIM Mma b...NI 1.. MI 111117 H w1 N Aye e very. w Imam. Ytta W mew tn 1 tr... wit.. MUM* w I lun 111 1* 11* mamma Mama mit maw* N 1t OA Y■1. 1t tl t N tww.. •1w. mN.t M tat: 1 w 1. Y1wurN 1— Mr.... W J1. I W. Y. SIC sp.: 'era .11. brood! s.,I.ssrl., t i.r.glq t70$ woods !roll ►.ur.11ls. at 1. 15337 1 (bit) 435 -10*4 A21 -8-88 1 SHEET! OF? SHEETS: T t. Woad! ee0laeeela0 i iaeie0lq 905 woods hall ►aeaesllls. SUIT (01!) 435-10011 INC SO 3C 0 50 100 100 GRADING t UTILITIES azl -e-es 1 SHEET? OF SHEETS 1 OAK CHASE s■ So PRELIMINARY FOR ..ws•N(' LATERAL BENEFIT WATER TRUNK 421 F.F. PLAT SEVENTH X011 soglasedei N.N1N1 170S weeds hell AIsee,N• !!!!1 (611)4$11•1•011 N MI SO Ism r .iI NI 11..••••• n. 1 •V• u. I••... 4.i•� newness I�f•AYY•r Immo 114011 F•.•s w+•• r .n.. bI•••u• Wan M Yenta.. wane ww nap OONSII• 11111411, MINIM NI Wane la MIMS I orr ••w•• IaV• .■ww Iru •w• en m IV... M►. ••I►I MIS MOMS V IMP PMM w wet 1 001 y..... I••I I••••• w. wane «•r. •.r• ,A 214 e I SHEET! OF? SHEET' OAE( CHASE SEVENTH PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR s —•■•.r7 swiWMT so so wo wee /1 •ntleeerlet 1 ne.glq 170$ weeds bell w1..ssN• 31331 Olt) en-M• 1 ••wu IIM V IM 111 Iw N w •N)•• I.. .N.W N w l.••.• 3`. 31. In•u .w.. 4.•••••■• 1.1.• F.n.•N••. 1113) •N•. No M 11•••••••••. 11)34 MMICAMMUILIM r .w• N.s. •l•• ...•••w•n {••N 11r 14•••••• SWUM r I1I1n MBINIMIS w UMW.. r11Yp• w •Irr1) 1 Wm. r io. O.1 M• •.•w.. N•.. ow .••.•l r1 Or r Vile. or •4•0 Savlelv• w Vt.. IV.. r •..w.0 rr I.r/ nn ��in r A2I -84 SHEET! OF 2 SHEETQ 1 OAK CHASE SEVENTH MAW soo STORM SEWER TRUNK 435,600 S.F. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 11 Moh miglesetkie 1 /e.Ngio11 1110$ w.•* bell b.....NIS. abN•MN SIH1 (111) p$ -I•S 1.i iwY NO Y. 4.4.44••• 1' M I ••l lwrl. r. .r• N. rw l.u....... Ore ore 1wrN. Nl 1. INY11/6.8/40.!r •.w.4...w r l.•...w 1 lw.. 44•...1114. 114 Mr Y 1•444 ........1. ..•w 1..� .1 Wean* w ..w. w .Ni.1 •.Yww •�w..r._ 1..14 11,144.-•.• -4.1 •4440•044.4 4 4444.4.4 .a.n ..w.. .4••N. •.ww l••• 448141144 r 111m 1Y•11111 r 11•1414 1114141•11 111141141111 /...4•. Mw. 0.1•1 141 ,1 I Ow•w MM11 M 1— 1 ..1/ WI.1• W twerp as 1141 w w 11•0 w wwwn. 4444 ad Um, 1111 So 1. O4 AV4- II !SHEET OF? SHEE. 1 BP -34 988.0 /006.0 GOLF COURSE city of eagai PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TL L; 2 7 .N .NL LP- 20 915.4 9/7.3 LP-13 920.4 922.0 SUBJECT PARCEL JAOTA COUNTY PARK. 1 12 STORM- SEWER MASTER PLAN antoved: 1 ExCEPp.), (NOT IN C N; LI F, 90E 9/0 5 IG*I stendsrd piste 2 l rf I I A 9 .tr t 57.6/74 N0 STORAGE .BOOSTER 1055 PARKVIEW GOLF TOUR S E 64.V IG .6/1 L DAKOTA COUNTY SUBJECT PARCEL zU all /60.c 88. FIG *3 City of eagari PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate it: qb CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (STERNS ADDITION) APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 LOCATION: NORTH 1/2 SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 22, 1989 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located along the east side of Dodd Road just south of Diffley Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The project site is designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan for D -II (Mixed Residential, 0- 6 units /acre). The proposed elementary school would be consistent with a PF (Public Facility school) land use designation. As such, the project requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use designation from D -II to PF. This amendment should not adversely impact the surrounding Residentially- designated land since Public Facility uses are generally compatible with Residential uses. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: The site is surrounded by Agricultural and R -1 (Single Family) properties on all sides. The Autumn Ridge subdivision received Preliminary Plat approval on February 21, however the access issue involving all adjacent property owners needs to be finalized before any development can occur. Also at that meeting the school site plan was shown to the Council as all parcels were being reviewed on an overall basis and there was concern expressed that the parking lot /drop off area for the school was much too small for bus movements. The school district architect will review that concern at the February 28 APC meeting and will be able to respond to the building orientation and the number of parking lot stalls provided. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The referendum was approved in October 1988 and the architects began schematic design in December. The design development began on January 23 after approval by the school board. The district hopes to complete the contract document stage and bidding stage by May 22; actual grading would begin as soon as possible after Preliminary Plat approval. Occupancy is anticipated on June 1, 1990 with the first students that fall. q1. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted as a part of this application proposes cuts and fills that range up to approximately 18 to 20 feet, respectively. The proposed primary excavation areas lay in the south and west areas of the site. The majority of the excavation material is proposed to be fill material for the school building and parking area. No slope easements are required as all proposed sloping is within property boundaries. All proposed sloping meets the City's maximum allowable 3 to 1 slope criteria. The development proposes to drain approximately 95% of the site, either by surface drainage or pipe to the northwest corner of the property to a newly created ponding area. The outlet direction for this proposed pond located on school property is proposed to drain northeasterly to Pond JP -26 located within the Country Hollow Development north of Diffley Road. The alternative to the northeasterly drainage direction would be outletting the pond to the south across school property, then crossing the proposed plat of Autumn Ridge picking up additional drainage then draining into Pond LP -48. The Ponds LP -48 and JP -26 are designated ponding ,areas identified in the City Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of adequate capacity and depth to serve this development is located at the intersection of Dodd Road and Golden Meadow Road. Approximately 300 feet of the proposed sanitary sewer would be located in the east boulevard of Dodd Road. The approximate depth of this construction would be 30 -35 feet. Construction and slope easements would have to be obtained from the private property owners for this construction. The proposed sanitary sewer layout proposes to serve only the school site. The alternative to this would be to extend the sewer line along the northwest side of the proposed building to the centerline of the proposed access road then running west and southeast from that point serving the abutting properties lying north and east of the proposed school site. Any sewage directed to the southwest rather than northeast would mean less sewage lifted through the lift station located in the Country Hollow Addition north of Diffley Road. The acreage served with this sewer extension would be approximately 15 acres. Water main service of sufficient size and pressure is available in Dodd Road, westerly of this proposed development. It is proposed to loop a water main through the proposed development to the south and tie into the proposed Autumn Ridge development for future extension and looping. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Public street access to the proposed site is presently not available from Dodd Road. The construction of the proposed street lying north and east of the proposed site will serve as its major access to Dodd Road. The design and construction of this proposed street is required to conform to City standards for horizontal and vertical alignment. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Slope easements will be from the adjacent properties where the proposed grading the boundaries of the development. The development is to provide appropriate public utility, street and easements as required by the City. A minimum of 80 feet of public right -of -way will be required for Dodd Road because of the future widening. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City records show the parcels included for development at this time have no pending assessments of record and the following public infrastructure improvement charges are proposed in accordance with City policy: DESCRIPTION `Sanitary Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Water Availability Charge Storm Sewer Trunk Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main Dodd Road Trailway TOTAL RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT $1,365/ac 10.66 $14,551 $1,380 /ac 10.66 $14,711 $2,115 /ac 16.46 $34,813 $.083 /sf 716,998 $59,511 $8.95/ff 494.91 $38.15/ff 494.91 $8.10 /ff 494.91 required exceeds required ponding 4,429 $18,881 4,009 $150,905 All final financial obligations will be calculated in accordance with the final approved site /grading plans, final plat dimensions, and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. PARKS ISSUES: The elementary school proposal will be waived of parkland dedication. The parks dedication fee would be implemented with a future change in land use. Staff has provided the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission with several alternatives for the trail along Street A. l�' STERNS ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, D1, El, and Gl. 2. The development will be required to limit post development phosphorus export levels to predevelopment levels. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Basements and Rights of Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. qq STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD. STREET MAP ZONING MAP COMP PLAN MAP 1 1 -J C=== 1-- 1 N �.1M Olt O! 0.11.1 0 Ian 1.1•ta =VT* '0t01 .K• MN. .•.•01 Properly being developed by Robert lawmen' Companies Proposed *eAeon Autumn Ridge James Development Co. 7808 Creekridge Circle Suite 200 Bloomington. MN 55435 941-7805 opment Autumn Ridge ti• 1 ;•M e .40M) 1 11.0• T 1 M V 0.• M l 1•••••■• 0 10• 010 1 Preliminary P' ""1 -_I Hac Dthe I (Coun ty Rd/ I I I I 1 I I 1 meadow Road f I I I I I 1 1 1 II ISD #196 Elementary Schools The Wold Association Architects RECEIVED JAN 1 7 1989 200 Sterns Site Plan January 12, 1989 i I 1 I Meadow Road I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I ISD #196 Elementary Schools The Wold Associa Architects Sterns Site Plan January 31, 1989 =ii J N uO? Fe 2. N n et w 0 N o UJ z c•: w J 0- 0 n INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 196 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DODD ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA UTILITY PLAN c 01111.-1 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 10.66 ACRES mow sae NOON W. 0 1111......V..14.....1... w.✓ ...wo IMP WWW MOO SOS i MIN OM. w A .r°..✓ .w MINIr MOW r.. MEMO. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IMPOSED SCHOOL to MC •elr 4. t.a.Wl...i1W...w «.•••.•..«.«....•A....M•......... t n MON TRAIL 494.91 F.F. N SCALE. r 50 Ar ROOM •••••••••141110, w�:� a S r Mwww• Yww 6.nw.1•a J/ DODD ROAD UPGRADE 494.91 F.F. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ~Pogo SCHOOL MT uERNaorr VIM 1157 7Oaf No Ws r•••■•■•••■wrs.1. ...rr■••••••••••■••■•••ww.. w.r.f. r •�..•..w r.w... rw..r OM Omer G.. E_• b_s 0 _+a+a. Vass, S�.aa. 4 .oasaa AN NM! We MtwO saw NOMM LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK, WATER UPGF E 494.91 F.F. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROMSED WOOL on roevoovr sam asn AN fts go r II SIM --MM. WWII warm IINOMANI fr. If MD w--- •..v rw•••• w..m• -■••10 ~may was r• I•M••■••■•• .141.1% l MY meas Y•M a.r Maine ab• •N STORM SEWER TRUNK 716,998 BOUNDARY AND TCPOGRAPMC SL VEY m s W on fir rows M► ...M. OMB =no ARID .IMININII=IMUMUIVZIP.1:10. ee iw.••• .1 WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE 16.46 A ES •1 WATER TRUNK 10.86 ACRES a Ill Icy r t •.I/: i? 40 8 4 4 -z r s T O i■ NI /li1 I s qa, la •,,.t p i.-i� L 4i! PT. f 1 1 an ..1.S 1 rte'; m i11tl 111111K11 D city of eagar PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT :.SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG *3 approvod standard 8*44 114116 \1 JP-t2lt I I I I 111111( 0 t 0 rooir tit city of eagari PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME LP-45 LP-65 So OAKS l'AfiK I. A ii JP-6 STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN JP-52 1 862.0 I 878.0 J-bb 4* 12 -ad SUBJECT PARCEL LtP0- /6.0 8 approved: FIG gli I standard plate It: /b1 city of eagar PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN ;SUBJECT PARCEL approved: FIG*2 standard Plate Recreational Components: 1. Park Classification Development Level 2. Service Area 3. Park Development Theme Philosophy 4. Picnic Facilities 5. Recreational Vehicle Camping 6. Tent Camping 7. Unique Recreational Facilities 8. Recreational Programming 9. Hiking Trails 10. Nature Trails 11. Ski Trails 12. Bike Trails 13. Snowmobile Trails 14. Horse Riding Trails 15. Lake Accesses 16. Other Warm- weather Recreation 17. Other Cold weather Recreation 18. Facility Siting 19. Landscape Design of Facilities 20. Swimming Areas Management Components: 1. Management Philosophy 2. Park Boundary Adjustment 3. Land Acquisition Within Park Boundary Management of Residual Manmade Structures Fencing and Marking of Park Boundaries Access Points and Routes Safety of Park Visitors Handicapped Access 9. Architectural Theme 10. Signage 11. Grounds Maintenance 12. Powerline and Pipeline Route Usage ATTACHMENT 1 LIST OF PROPOSED PLAN COMPONENTS f Environmental Components: 1. Natural Resource Protection Philosophy 2. Development Impact Analysis 3. Soil Erosion Control 4. Urban Runoff Control 5. Lake Level Management 6. Lake Restoration 7. Fish Management 8. Waterfowl Management 9. Deer Management 10. Wildlife Habitat Preservation and Enhancement 11. Feral Animal Control 12. Songbird Population Enhancement 13. Small Plant and Animal Re- Introduction Program 14. Special Resource Restoration 15. Environmental Intrusions 16. Fire Control 17. Use of Compost Material 18. Reforestation 19. Oak Forest Preservation 20. Natural Prairie Restoration/ Preservation 13. Impact of Roads 14. County Road Underpass 15. CIP Breakdown by Project Year 16. CIP Timeline 17. Passive vs. Aggressive Schedule 18. Staffing Plan 19. Provisions for Continued Public Involvement 20. Park Studies Schedule Background Studies: 1. History of Area 2. Park Development in the Past 0 Neighboring Recreational Facilities 4. Geology 5. Topography 6. Wildlife Species of Importance 7, Fish Populations and Angling Pressure 8. Lake and Wetland Characteristics 9. Water Quality Assessment 10. Soils Evaluation 11. Vegetation Mapping 12. Ecology of Oak Woodlands 13. Financial Resource Evaluation 14. Existing Land Use 15. Future Land Use F -Leban Technical Data Appendices: 1. Local Review Process 2. Recreational Analysis 3. Metropolitan Review Process 4. Metropolitan Funding Process 5. Capital Improvement Program Tables 6. Public Utilities 7. Soils Data 8. Tree Inventory 9. Shrub Inventory 10. Grassland Inventory 11. Woodland Herbacious Plant Inventory 12. Vertebrate Animal Inventory 13. Lake Depth Contours and Water Quality Data 14. Summary of Applicable Laws 15. Ownership History of Parkland Parcels., for is and IMMEI I Background Studies H Recreational Issues III Environmental Issues IV Management Issues V Graphics and Format VI Appendices Feb. March A ril 111111111111111111111 2222222- c333333333333333333333333 11 11 11111 11111111 1 11 111111111111111 '2222222. c 33333333333; 111111111111 x'22222222 :3333333333333333333 111111111111111111111111111 ?2222222 2222222222222 c 3333333; 222222222222222222222222222222222222 .:33333 1111111 11 1 1111111 ATTACHMENT 3 t First Draft -Parks 2 Second Draft—PAC 3 Revised (3rd) Draft --PDC 4- Hearing (4th). Draft Public Hearings June Jul Aug. Sept. 4444 44444444 4444 44444444 4444 44444444 4444 44444444 4 4444 4444444 222222222222222222222222222222 .:333333333333333 444 i 1