992 Coneflower Ct - Site Survey
69i09i93 14:49
SU?VEYOR'S GORTIFIC.ATE PARISH MAIItE71N0
Ci) 6FLqWfl _ (:QUR-T_'K__979.8__-
.
980A in
?O w60n.?? ?y?e?L.'?"'?'e
N vD'bV G? ..... .'..nent
981.P I
Ra$DAO n? J I i
A?{I'?26????5?z.._ ? i--
O?'iS
v..1928?
I - 0. T 2 \2
M
o?
?
884.6
f1 ?
W rmo?ui
? e
?
?
002
I?
? I
,r9e4. 7)
N I L?+? I e197Y ! I ?
L ?i l 9
/$?TST•d}?,
?
.
7.0
88
6
-80,00 N 890 0W 23" E? ?
i..() T 101
Rts?QAN
NO7Ha 6{11LOING OIMEHSiONS SHOWN ARE NDTB?
oOF°a r?ot??? v. ?
ARCNI'TECfUAL Pl.ANB FOR BU?INa
0 FOUNUA710N DIMENSItlNS.
-o- DENOTES I'ROPOSEO SURFACE DRAINAGE
O DENOTES IRON MpNUMENT 3E1'
• DENOTES IRON MONUME.M1IT FCJUNd
X000.0 pENOTES EXISTIN(3 ELEVATIqN
(OOO.P) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION
No SPECFIC sOILs INVE9YIGATION HAS BCiN CbMR.ETEI)
ON '1'Ni9 LtlT 8Y 7WE BURVEYUq. TNE BkIl7X+81LIfiY OP
80IL8 TO SUPPORT 'CHB BPeCIFIC HDUBE ?'1i0P0E6p IS
NDT TNE pEs?NSIBII.IYY OP THE SURVEYOa
SCAI.E: 1 INCM - 30 FEE7
PFOF'05Ed QARAGE FIOOR -^ 9-0'#• $ PEET
PROP05ED LOWL8T FLpOR = '97 7- 6 FEEf
PROPOSFD 70P OF BLOCK = 985, 9 FEET
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO PARISH MARKETIiJG THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT
REPRESENTATIOIV OF A SURVEY QF THE BOUNDARIE$ OF:
Lot 19 1 Blbek 21 ,LEXBV(3TpN PUIN1'E E1dM1'tH ADbIT10N, accordinp to the racvrdsd
plof theraof, bakrno Cou?Aly,Mihndaota. •
IT CJOFS NOT PURPORT TO 3HDW IMPFipvEMENTS OR ENCROIkCHMENTS, EXCEP'f A8 SHOWN. A9
993.
1
SURVEYED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT SUPERVISION THI531 S7 6A22'
pqDpoBEp QRqpE3 SHOWN WERE SIQNE :?A ?S . NILL., IIdC.
'rn+?n t7i?M TNB ORADINO S .
R?? eJOHN C. LARSOfJ, LANb SURVEYOR
MINh1ESOTA WCENSE NUMBER 19828
James- R. Hlll, inc.
PLANNERS I ENQINEERS 1 SURVE'YORS
2600 W. CTY. RQ. 42 a SURNSVILIE, MN. 55337 & 612•890$044
? pRIVE
M9
R-91% 1 612 890 6244 09-09-93 02:56PM P002 3t43