07/10/1986 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionAGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Eagan Municipal Center
6:30 - 7:00 Tour
7:00 Regular Meeting Agenda
JULY 10, 1986
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Approval of Agenda and Minutes of Meeting of June 5, and special
meeting of June 11, 1986.
C. Development Proposals:
1. Chatterton Pond - Robert Engstrom
2. Park Forest Apartments - Design Collective
3. Trails of Thomas Lake - New Horizon Homes
4. Compri Hotel - Opus Corporation
5. Fawn Ridge 2nd - Revised (Informational item)
D. Old Business:
1. Dakota County Bikeway - County Board Hearing - July 29th
E. New Business:
1. Park Shelters - Preliminary Report and Discussion
2. Park Proposal - Preview
F. Parks Development:
1. Status Report - Development Activities
2. Status Report - Land Acquisitions
G. Other Business: "Reports"
1. City Comprehensive Guide Plan
2. Trapp Farm Park - Water elevation
H. Commission Members Round Table
I. Adjournment
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JULY 8, 1986
RE: JULY 10 COMMISSION MEETING
The regular meeting of the Commission will be preceded by a visual inspection
of Chatterton Pond. Commission members should meet at City Hall for departure
by 6:30 to the site. Commission members will return at 7:00 p.m. for the
regular Commission meeting.
The City Council is meeting with the Advisory Planning Commission to review
the Comprehensive Guide Plan at 7 o'clock in the City Council chambers.
Therefore, the Commission meeting will be moved to the employees lunch room on
the lower level.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
There are four items that are development proposals for Commission review:
Item A Chatterton Pond
This was reviewed by the Commission at the June meeting. It was approved by
the Advisory Planning Commission pending Parks Recreation Commission's
recommendation.
Park Forest Apartments by Design Collective
This preliminary plat is for a rezoning of approximately 32 acres from
agricultural to R -4 multiple. Four hundred twenty (420) apartment units are
proposed. Staff will be recommending that this plat be subject to a cash
dedication, as well as a trail on Federal Drive.
Thomas Lake Heights by New Horizon Haines
This is a platting of Outlot C of Thomas Lake Heights, within the Blackhawk
Park PUD. Parks dedication within Blackhawk Park is covered by the PUD
agreement. Therefore, there is no parks dedication.
Opus Corporation Copri Hotel
A proposed rezoning, and preliminary plat is within the Eagandale Office Park,
which abutts Pilot Knob Road. This should be subject to the City's commercial
and industrial parks dedication requirement.
Also, on the agenda for Commission reviewal, as an informational item, is the
revised preliminary plat for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition. There is no
additional action required by the Commission on this item.
OLD BUSINESS
There is one item under "old business This is the Dakota County Bikeway
Plan. Dakota County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing on July
29th, at 9:00 a.m. The purpose of the public hearing is to obtain additional
public comments concerning the Dakota County Bikeway Trails Plan, and for the
County Board to approve their five -year bikeway planning document.
Commission should determine if it wishes to make an additional appearance, or
communication at the board meeting.
Commissioner John Voss contacted Director of Parks and Recreation early last
week, indicating that the County Board, in approving an asphalt overlay on
Cliff Road east of Pilot Knob, also gave direction to the County Engineering
Department to include paved shoulders to be used for a bikeway. Commissioner
Voss indicated that the approval was in a large part due to the City's
comments regarding the need for trailway to service Lebanon Hills Regional
Park and the swimming beach, that provided the impetus for this approval.
NEW BUSINESS
There are two items under this agenda heading. Staff has prepared a separate
memorandum on each item, and this is included within the packet. Staff will
be looking for direction on how best to proceed regarding these two agenda
items.
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan will update the Advisory
Commission on the progress being made on the existing contracts, and other
parks development work. He will also update the Commission on upcoming work
that has yet to be contracted out this year.
Second item under "parks development" is a status report on the land
acquisition. At the July 1st City Council meeting, the Council approved
Commission's recommendation to acquire property for athletic site purposes at
Ohmann and Northview. Regarding the Barr parcel, Council asked for additional
information pertaining to this site, before approving negotiations and
acquisitions. There have been several recent developments regarding both the
Ohmann and Northview parcels, that Staff would like to update the Commission
on.
OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
Staff currently has two items listed under "other business and reports" for
Commission updating.
Item 8 is Commission members round table. This is a new item on the agenda
with the intended purpose, that each member might be given a few moments at
the end of the meeting to bring up questions or issues, which may not have
been addressed in the meeting. Members should refrain from issues which
require Commission action, reserving those items for the regular agenda.
Rather, it is intended that the members be given an opportunity to pass on
comments regarding the parks and recreation programs which may have been
addressed to them during the last month.
Respectfull submitted,
Ken Vraa
KV /bls
ctor of Parks and Recreation
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 5, 1986
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Acting Chair Richard Carroll called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. Members
present were: Porter, Masin, Ketcham, Carroll, Bertz, Alt, Caponi and Kubik.
Commission members Martin and Thurston were excused for high school
commencement obligations, although Chairman Martin was present for some of the
discussion on Hampton Heights and Fairway Hills /athletic site. Staff members
present were: Landscape Architect /Parks Planner Stephen Sullivan; Assistant
City Planner Jim Sturm and Administrative Assistant Liz Witt. Parks
Recreation Director Ken Vraa was excused early due to illness. The meeting
was preceded by a tour of Quarry Park, Blue Cross /Blue Shield Park, Rahn Park
and a drive by of the Ohmann site.
AGENDA
Commission member Masin moved, seconded by Ketcham, to approve the agenda as
presented. The motion carried.
MINUTES OF MAY 1, 1986
Acting Chair Carroll moved, Caponi seconded, to approve the minutes as
presented. The motion carried.
MINUTES OF MAY 15, 1986
Commission member Alt made the motion, seconded by Bertz, to approve the
minutes of the special meeting as presented. All voted in favor.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
1. INFORMAL REVIEW 20 -ACRE PARCEL WEST OF MOONEY LAKE (CHATTERTON POND).
The proposal is for 26 higher priced single family homes just south of St.
John Neumann Church. The Commission was asked to review trail alignments that
would affect the proposal. At the present time, there is a trail along the
south edge of Mooney Lake. There is a sliver of parkland along the east side
of the lake, however it would be very difficult to put in a trail due to the
steep terrain and heavy forestation.
Bob Engstrom, representing Robert Engstrom Associates, suggested the
Commission consider trail links to connect the development to Patrick Eagan
Park via the south edge of the lake to the St. John Neumann and Pilot Knob
Road trail rather than construct a trail around the lake. He presented slide
pictures of the area. In reference to the trail that is under water, Mr.
Engstrom noted the control level of the lake is set by the D.N.R. and right
now the level is 2' above the high water elevation.
1
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
June 5, 1986
Parks Recreation Director Vraa said there should be a 20' easement for
construction of a 5 -8' blacktop trail. He said the trail along the south edge
of the lake is 5' wide. He stated the City would have to acquire an easement
along the high water elevation line for trail construction on the north side
and that would consume many of the lots adjacent to the lake.
There was discussion as to potential for development north of the lake.
Director Vraa pointed out there are 3:1 slopes, making it very costly or
perhaps impossible to put in a road. Commission member Masin wondered if
residents would like to be able to walk around the lake. She and JoAnn Alt
requested a field trip to the area prior to the July meeting. Commission
member Caponi thought the City should have a trail and should acquire
easements as development occurs. Acting Chair Carroll thought the trail could
be dangerous for bicyclists, possibly leaving the City vulnerable to a
lawsuit. Parks Planner Stephen Sullivan said if a wood chip path was put in,
it would readily wash out. A blacktop trail would be tempting and dangerous
for cyclists.
It was the consensus of the Commission to view the site prior to making a
recommendation. The item will be on the July agenda with a tour of the site
scheduled for 6:45 P.M. at the regularly scheduled meeting of July 10.
NEW BUSINESS
1. 1986 BLACKRAWK PARK L.C.M.R./LAWCON GRANT
Director Vraa announced that the City stands to receive a $25,000 L.C.M.R.
grant. If the grant is accepted, the City would not be eligible for a grant
next year. In addition, the project application would have to be amended to
adjust for the lesser monies received. The City could well wind -up putting in
much more money than originally planned. If the City rejects the grant, it
could apply in 1987. He recommended the Commission turn down the $25,000 on
the basis that it is too much of a financial burden to take on.
Commission members agreed with Mr. Vraa's recommendation and on a motion by
Bertz, seconded by Kubik, the Commission recommended declining the grant.
Director Vraa was directed to send a letter to the State declining the monies
for the reasons outlined above. The motion carried. Mr. Vraa was excused
from the meeting at this point.
2. 1987 1991 C.I.P. REVIEW
The parks section of the C.I.P. was distributed with the packet and Commission
members were asked to forward any comments to Director Vraa. It was noted
there was reference to possible bond referendums for a new community center.
Acting Chair Carroll moved, seconded by Bertz, that the C.I.P. be accepted as
distributed. The motion carried.
2
OLD BUSINESS
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
June 5, 1986
1. TRAMWAY HAMPTON HEIGHTS
Mark Parranto, representing Frontier Companies, requested reconsideration of
the trailway requirements for Hampton Heights. He objected to the trail
placement in the front yards of many of the lots. He stated that Coachman
Road is no longer considered a collector street and should not be subject to a
trail requirement. Mr. Parranto noted that the lots have been reconfigured to
discourage through traffic and feels that people can use the streets as a
trailway. Mr. Parranto stated further that the trail requirement for Hampton
Heights is unreasonable, is contrary to City code, and he would actively
oppose it.
Parks Planner Stephen Sullivan commented that even though the lots have been
reconfigured to discourage through traffic and Coachman Road has been
downgraded, the Commission must decide if the reasons for having a trail are
still valid. He noted that the trail policy is flexible and the Commission
must determine if this is a necessary trail link.
Acting Chair Carroll stated it is the goal of the City to provide trails to
parks. Quarry Park is a neighborhood park for the Hampton Heights
Subdivision. He said that staff had drawn up another route for the trail,
that is along Coachman to the corner of Hampton Heights, along easement
through a lot and then within road right -of -way to Ashbury Street. (There is
a trail proposed along Ashbury Road connecting to Blue Cross /Blue Shield
Park.) It was noted that the new route has some spots of 10% grade and there
is a 14' drop from the City's public works lot to the other side of the
adjacent Hampton Heights lot. Staff felt the new alignment was workable and
could serve to alleviate Mr. Parranto's concerns about an 8' trail along
residents' front yards.
Commission member Porter questioned the need for a trail. He thought the
children could use existing streets. He did not want them crossing Yankee
Doodle Road to get to the.park. Further he didn't think having a traffic
signal at that intersection would do much to insure children's safety.
Commission member Kubik wondered if we should channel people to Quarry Park.
He felt the Commission should have more information before making a decision.
It is particularly important to know if a traffic signal is planned for the
Coachman /Yankee Doodle Road intersection. Commission member Masin felt it was
much too difficult to cross Yankee Doodle Road.
Mark Parranto stated he would be at the June 17 City Council meeting seeking
final plat approval. He wondered if the Commission could recommend that
if a traffic signal is placed at the intersection, a trail will be required.
If a traffic signal is not to be installed at the intersection, then a trail
will not be required. He noted that he is working with the public works
department to berm the back lots of Hampton Heights to screen the public works
building and he plans to plant trees there also. Such activity would directly
conflict with staff's suggested new alignment of the Coachman Road trail.
Commission member Kubik observed that all of this commentary is new to the
Commission and it is difficult to make a decision without a complete staff
report. Commission member Caponi supported Mr. Kubik's contention.
Acting Chair Carroll reiterated it is a goal of the City to have trail links
between parks. He also recognized the potential traffic problem on Yankee
Doodle Road and didn't want to compound the problem. He did not know if the
proposed trail route is feasible. He concluded by stating the Commission is
not in a position to make a decision based on the information available. He
asked if staff could provide the necessary information in time for a special
meeting to be held prior to the June 17 Council meeting.
Commission member Kubik moved to table, seconded by Ketcham. All voted in
favor. Staff was requested to research information on if and when there will
be a traffic signal at the Coachman /Yankee Doodle Road intersection.
Alternate routes for trails to both Quarry and Blue Cross /Blue Shield Parks
are to be reviewed. Information on changes being considered in the public
works landscaping plans are to be provided.
On a motion by Carroll, seconded by Porter, the special meeting date was set
for Wednesday, June 11 at 7 P.M. The motion carried.
Mr. Parranto stated that the owner of Outlot B wanted the City to have the
parcel for development as a skating rink. He said that if the City was not
interested in that proposal, he would buy it from the owner. Mr. Parranto
said he intended to combine Outlots A and B for future development.
Commission member Bertz observed that the "gift" had been discussed previously
by the Commission and there was little interest in the proposal. Director
Vraa had not voiced interest in the proposal either. Acting Chair Carroll
moved, seconded by Bertz,. that Outlot B not be acquired and utilized as a
skating rink. The motion carried with Masin abstaining. She stated she did
not have enough information upon which to base a decision.
2. FAIRWAY HILLS ATHLETIC SITE
Staff had prepared a detailed report of alternatives for athletic sites.
Commission members felt the item had been fully discussed on previous
occasions. Based upon the staff report, the. Commission was ready to make its
recommendation. Commission member Bertz thought the City should have the
Ohmann site for soccer, Northview for ball fields and the Barr property for
future athletic complex. Regarding financial concerns of the Ohmann purchase
and Fairway Hills dedication, Commission member Kubik suggested staff work out
the best deal for the City. The land swap versus acquisition should be done
to the City's advantage.
Commission member Kubik moved, seconded by Caponi, the recommendation to
acquire the Ohamnn /Northview /Barr sites for approximately $600,000. The
motion carried unanimously.
In a follow -up motion, Commission member Kubik moved, Bertz seconded, that the
land swap with the developer vs. park dedication from the developer be
accomplished to the net gain of the City. All voted in favor.
1 1
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
June 5, 1986
Dated:
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
June 5, 1986
Commission member Bertz commented that the soccer fields at the Ohmann site
should be for youth; but as needs change and the population ages, the
designated use at Ohmann may have to change. She felt the residents should be
put on notice as to the possibility of lighted fields in the future. There
was general agreement among Commission members with her comments.
1. PARKS CONSTRUCTION UPDATE
Parks Planner Stephen Sullivan noted that there will be a great deal of
construction starting in the next couple of weeks. The lights will soon go up
at Goat Hill Park. O'Leary and Cinnamon Ridge Parks have been seeded and
mulched. Grading for the pavi.11ion at Trapp Farm Park will start next week.
In response to a question, there will not be a swimming beach at Trapp Farm
Park and it will be signed "No Swimming The lake would have to be dredged
in order to make a decent swimming beach.
OTHER BUSINESS
1. PARKS MAINTENANCE UPDATE 2. RECREATION PROGRAM REPORT
Both reports were included in the packet. Acting Chair Carroll, on behalf of
the Commission, spoke very highly of the professional, knowledgeable staff,
the work they have accomplished, and the reports they have prepared.
3. JULY MEETING DATE
Because the July 3rd meeting date would be held so close to the holiday, the
Commission voted to reschedule the meeting date for July 10. Commission
member Masin moved, Caponi seconded, and all voted in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Alt, seconded by Ketcham, the meeting was adjourned. Time of
adjournment was 10 :17 P.M.
Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CITY OF EAGAN
JUNE 11, 1986
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
The special meeting was called to order by Chairman Martin at 7:20 P.M.
Members present were: Martin, Kubik, Thurston, Porter, Ketcham and Carroll.
Members Alt, Bertz, Masin and Caponi had indicated they would be unable to
attend. Staff was represented by Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Steve
Sullivan and Administrative Assistant, Liz Witt. Mark Parranto of Frontier
Midwest was also present.
Chairman Martin announced that the only item on the agenda was the trailway
for Hampton Heights. He said, the Commission's concern should be for a trail,
not whether the street is or isn't a collector street.
Mark Parranto stated he had three concerns: 1. With the exception of
Riverton, there are no other trailways along City streets. The proposed
Hampton Heights trail would impact approximately 40 homes in the development.
2. Coachman road is not a collector street. Covington is the only 32' street
that has a sidewalk. 3. The City ordinance does not preclude a trail
recommendation, but it does say they should be along collector streets. Mr.
Parranto said, that he had no problems with putting a trail along Lexington as
part of his developments there, but with the change in status of Coachman Rd,
a trail should not be required.
Commission member Carroll commented that at the June 5th Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting, the suggestion was made to have Hampton Heights residents
utilize trail connections to Blue Cross /Blue Shield Park a much safer route.
Commission member Thurston felt that children are not so concerned about
safety and would take the most direct route to get to where they want to go.
Commission member Porter expressed concern with truck traffic to and from the
Public Works garage. He would like to see a trail along the east side of
Coachman Road so the residents could get to Yankee Square Shopping Center. He
did not see a need to cross Yankee Doodle Road to get to Quarry Park.
Commission member Kubik said, there are 130 homes in Hampton Heights which
should have access to Yankee Doodle Road and to a park.
There was a general discussion about the feasibility of a fairly straight
trail which would require easement from two lots in Hampton Heights. Parks
Planner, Steve Sullivan, said that four to six feet of material would have to
be removed from the crest of the hill and then there would be grading through
the two lots to construct a trail with an acceptable grade.
Mr. Parranto objected to that, as he has all of the lots sold. He indicated
he will be on the June 17 City Council agenda for final plat approval.
Construction would start soon after.
1
Members in favor: Martin, Porter, Carroll, and Ketcham
Members opposed: Thurston and Kubik
The motion carried.
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
Special Meeting
June 11, 1986
Further discussion then focused on a trail along Coachman Road as it curves
through the development. Commission member Carroll said, that a trail
fronting on 40 lots could cause a lot of interruption on the driveways.
Commission Chairman Martin said, there are trails on Blue Cross Road, Yankee
Doodle Road and Asbury Road. Perhaps there was no need for a trail in Hampton
Heights. He did not see a natural flow through the reconfigured neighborhood
nor a need to connect to Quarry or Blue Cross /Blue Shield Parks. He did feel
it was important to have a trail along Coachman Road from Yankee Doodle Road
to the northern boundary of Hampton Heights.
Commission member Kubik expressed dismay that the preliminary plat had been
changed and the Commission had only seen the first proposal. Now, the
Commission cannot make a preferred recommendation, because the lots have
already been sold.
There was general consensus not to require a trail on Coachman Road as it
winds through Hampton Heights. Further, there should be a trail to Yankee
Doodle Road along Coachman Road, north of Hampton Heights.
Chairman Martin moved, seconded by Porter, to recommend the following:
1. A trail through Hampton Heights will not be required.
2. When Outlot A/B is developed, there should be trail dedication along
Coachman Road.
The Commission members agreed that the City will still require trails as
development occurs and such trails will be required whether a collector street
or not. It was suggested that staff review and amend the ordinance as
necessary, to reflect the commission recommendation.
The Commission did not take official action, because Hampton heights was the
only agenda item. However, the Commission recommends a trail along the east
side of Coachman Road to the southern boundary of Outlot B. Then the trail
should be on the west side to the southern boundary of Public Works property.
The Commission suggested that fencing will have to be installed on the public
works property to ensure security.
Staff was requested to provide copies of the City Code to Commission members
if possible to do so.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
Dated:
Advisory Parks and Recreation Secretary
2
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT "CHATTERTON PONDS"
APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM
LOCATION: SW o, SECTION 22
EXISTING ZONING: A. AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24,1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986
REPORTED BY:
CITY OF EAGAN
PLANNING ENGINEERING
APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted re-
questing a rezoning from an Agricultural to R -1 (single family)
district and a preliminary plat for "Chatterton Ponds This
development consists of 27 new lots and an existing home site on
19.06 acres located immediately south of St. John Neumann Church.
ZONING LAND USE: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this
site R -1 (single family).
Five zoning districts abutt this parcel: Public Facilities
(church) to the north, Agricultural west of Pilot Knob Road and to
the northeast, Parks to the east, R -3 Townhouse (the "Pines to
the south and R -1 (Hilltop Estates) to the south.
The existing home site, the Chatterton residence, is situated on a
knoll where one side falls towards Mooney Lake. This portion of
the site is a grassy openland spotted with mature oak. The
Chattertons have cows in this area also. Dense understory vegeta-
tion, mature trees and ponding areas cover the rest of the site.
Most of these trees are hardwood species and special care should
be demonstrated to save as many as possible. A rather steep slope
(3:1) to Mooney lake will require erosion control attention to
assure that the water quality will not be affected.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The 20 lots give this project an overall density
of 1,47 units per acre, well within the Code requirement of 0 3
units /acre. All lots exceed the 12,000 S.F. minimum and range in
size from 16,500 S.F. to 42,370 S.F. Variances will be required
on lots 17, 18, 21, 22, 25 and 26 to allow less than 50' of
frontage at the curb line as required by Code. This will provide
access to home sites in areas where roadways are not feasible.
CHATTERTON PONDS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 2
SITE PLANNING: A single- divided access will serve this development
from Pilot Knob Road near the center of the western property line.
The original location was along the southern portion of the pond
and was shifted south after a staff recommendation. By doing so,
future development west of Pilot Knob Road could occur with the
new streets aligning and without disturbing as much of the wooded
area on that side of the road.
Proposed Chatterton Road will loop to the east, south of a large
ponding area and will then branch off to form two tear drop
cul -de -sacs with islands. It is from these cul -de -sacs that the
variance to the frontage requirements is necessary. The developer
has shown building pad locations for lots 25 and 26 to ensure Code
setback requirements are adhered to.
This development will have an association for several reasons:
1) to maintain architectural control and unity within the project.
2) to provide maintenance in "common areas" and in the cul -de -sac
islands.
3) to have trash removal on a single, scheduled basis.
4) possibly for snow clearing.
COMMENTS: The developer has met with the Parks Department several
times to discuss parks issues and dedication requirements. An
existing trail on the south side of Mooney Lake will be connected
by a 30' pathway easement to the easternmost cul -de -sac. This will
provide an uninterrupted pedestrian connection all the way to
Patrick Eagan Park once the Mooney Lake elevation is lowered.
A similar 30' trail easement from the western cul -de -sac to the
undeveloped property to the north will allow pedestrian circulation
as well as a potential emergency ingress /egress to the site. A
road connection to the north appears unlikely due to the severity
of the slopes.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: This proposed development incorporates the
majority of the low lying drainage basins receiving surface water
runoff from the property east of Pilot Knob Road between Deerwood
Drive and Berry Ridge Road. This proposed development
incorporates several knolls and side slopes surrounding the three
internal drainage basins with the maximum elevation differential
of approximately 35' occurring in the extreme northeast corner.
All drainage runoff generated from this proposed development will
be directed to the internal drainage basins (JP -36 and JP -35)
which will be interconnected through a combination of surface
drainage swales and underground storm sewer pipe. The ultimate
discharge of these drainage basins is into Berry Patch Park and
Mooney Lake (JP -7) to the east. With no positive outlet for
Mooney Lake currently existing, it has exceeded its proposed
future flood elevation and cannot accept anv additional runoff.
CHATTERTON PONDS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 3
However, Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) is proposed to be
upgraded during 1987. Part of this upgrading will require the
development of these internal drainage basins and the permanent
outlet for Mooney Lake towards Patrick Eagan Park to handle the
runoff generated from this County road improvement. This storm
sewer outlet to handle both Pilot Knob Road and this proposed
development will be discussed under Project 473 which will have
its public hearing held on July 15, 1986. If this project is
approved, downstream storm sewer facilities will be adequate to
handle this proposed development.
This development will be responsible for all internal storm sewer
laterals necessary to handle surface water runoff generated from
this development and to intercept the surface water runoff from
the Pines development located to the south. The final grading,
drainage and utility plan shall show all storm sewer pipes
constructed to the edge of existing or controlled water
elevations, whichever is lower.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth
is immediately available adjacent to the south property line
near Pilot Knob Road. Internal extensions of a sanitary sewer
lateral system will adequately service all proposed lots.
However, staff does not concur with the proposed lateral
extension along rear lot lines adjacent to the north edge of Pond
JP -35 to service Lot 16, 17 and 18 due to limited accessibility
for preventative and corrective maintenance, as may be necessary.
Each parcel should have its individual sewer service constructed
to public right -of -way.
Water main of sufficient size and capacity is located along Pilot
Knob Road to service this proposed development through an
internal lateral extension.
STREETS /CIRCULATION: Due to the existing boundaries and severe
topography of property adjacent to all three sides of this
proposed development, and the location and configuration of the
internal drainage basins, there is no other feasible alternative
for development of this property without a variance to the
City's maximum cul -de -sac length ordinance (500'). Development
boundary and topographic constraints result in the two cul -de-
sacs and one bubble being necessary for reasonable development of
this property.
The staff has no objections to the proposed internal islands of
each cul -de -sac subject to their development. incorporating
maintenance free landscaping. Final detailed design should be
subject to staff's review and requirements.
Access to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) will be subject to
approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. Its optimal
location in relationship to minimizing impact for the McCarthy
parcel across the road would result in the entrance being located
approximately 300' north of the south boundary line. This 30'
shift of the proposed center line will also better comply with
the County's intersection spacing guidelines.
CHATTERTON PONDS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 4
The proposed center island at the entrance from Pilot Knob Road
should be eliminated. Also, although the internal streets are
proposed to be publicly dedicated, they do not meet current
ordinance requirements for width (26 -28 vs. 34). These streets
should be brought up to City standards if they are to be publicly
dedicated.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF -WAY: Sufficient drainage and ponding
easements should be dedicated for the internal drainage basins
adequate to protect the necessary ponding storage volume
requirements and interconnecting storm sewer systems. The
configuration of these drainage easements will be determined upon
submission of final detailed plans for review by the Engineering
Division.
If the standard street width requirements are maintained, staff
is recommending that the public right -of -way dedication be 60' in
lieu of the proposed 50' width.
The staff concurs with the proposed 30' pathway easements from
the terminal cul -de -sac to Mooney Lake with the final alignment
being approved by City staff.
Sufficient right -of -way for Pilot Knob Road shall be dedicated
as required by Dakota County to facilitate the proposed upgrading
of Pilot Knob Road. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the
final plat for all frontage along Pilot Knob Road on either side
of the proposed street access point.
All other internal drainage and utility easements shall be
dedicated as required by City ordinance and /or final detail plan
submittal and reviewed by City staff.
ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer and water have been
previously assessed on all the land proposed to be developed
under this subdivision.
Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed under Project
473, which will have its public hearing on July 15. However, the
proposed assessment under this project does not take into
consideration the proposed development into single family lots.
Subsequently, significant credits have been calculated under the
"large lot" policy which would be voided under this proposed
development. Therefore, as a condition of final plat approval,
this development shall agree to assume its trunk area storm sewer
assessments based on a single family development. Appropriate
credit will be given for any related assessment that may be
approved under Project 473.
CHATTERTON PONDS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 5
This development has not paid its related lateral benefit
assessments from the existing 27" trunk sanitary sewer along the
south and west boundary of this plat or the 12" trunk water main
along Pilot Knob Road when they were originally installed.
Therefore, this development shall accept these postponed
assessment obligations as a condition of final plat approval
based on the rates in affect. These amounts are estimated as
follows:
Storm Sewer
To be determined based on final plat area calculations and
ponding credits.
Sanitary Sewer
580' +300' -150' (corner lot credit) 730' $14.35/FF $10,475
(Proj. 8 8II)
Water
1/2 (600') $11.88 /FF 3,564.00
(Proj. 24A)
With the restricted access being dedicated to Pilot Knob Road
other than the public street access, there will be no assessment
associated with the Pilot Knob Road upgrading.
Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to
discuss these concerns in further detail with the Planning
Commission or City Council at the appropriate meetings for formal
review and approval.
TAC /jj
CHATTERTON PONDS
PAGE 6
CONDITIONS:
1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul -de -sac
street construction.
2. All internal right -of -way shall be a minimum of 60' in
width.
3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards
for width with final cul -de -sac design being approved by the
Engineering Division.
4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in
conformance with current City engineering design standards.
5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be
dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to
accomodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways.
6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the
installation of streets and utilities to service this
subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the
additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated
with this single family development.
7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for
Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action.
8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be
eliminated.
9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance
and planting of the cul -de -sac islands.
10. The existing farm animals (cows) be removed prior to building
permit issuance.
11. Park dedication fees trail issues be resolved prior to
final plat.
12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
[NGL EAI� 1 �!F ,f� R0.3TA.
�Vf 11
'ii
WIRE
T E E. li
L
u
C J
LLS RO
FIRE
COM
T ADM
M -r I
1
l
��1°)
I 4 3 4. I
g *glib, Ro.
.._i
if.
'e
8
o
RY/000
SCOTT
CENTEREAQAN
MUNICIPAL
noon
WfNOCPA
PARK
011.
gnu
X. r i
I
�1
2 1
I
r ity
vi
ati d i
ix lir
c
priz_
s1EY50N t
ST
lS✓ L
11111ii
ovQzir
IVY
VEAk
PA Ar
�t
ST
q
17.
27,600sq.h.
11
e.0.10:410 1*.. 31"41.
sr u.
15.
19,925s
30 0 anhf.lw0
,360sq.ft
Oti
kr o
GROSSQrUARE FOOTAGE J
Site: 830,362.5 sq.ft. 19.06 Acres
Total Lots: 724,410
Number of Lots: 28
Density: 1.47 D.U. per Acre
Developer:
Engstrom
sociates Inc.
612/893-1001
beryrd M
Drawn. 1MB
Checked.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: DESIGN COLLECTIVE (EARL JESPERSEN)
PARK FOREST APARTMENTS
LOCATION: S.E. 1/4, SECTION 16
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by
The Design Collective requesting a rezoning of a 32 acre A
(Agricultural) parcel to R -4 (Multiple) and a preliminary plat
for 420 Apartment units. This site is located west of Federal
Drive and 35E in the SE 1/4 of Section 16.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as R -1 (Single
Family) and R -2 (Mixed Residential). Therefore, an amendment
to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be required.
ZONING AND LAND USE: This development is surrounded by agri-
cultural (A) land to the north, 35E to the east, Blackhawk Glen
(R -1) to the west and the northernmost portion of the Blackhawk
Planned Development. This P.D. has both R -3 and R -4 districts
bordering the proposed apartment project. An undeveloped portion
of the Blackhawk Hills single family development is to the immediate
southwest of the site.
The topography is rolling with knolls and depressions. Existing
vegetation consisting primarily of elm, cottonwood and popler
is scattered, often found in the depressed areas.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The 420 units give the project an overall density
of 13.13 units /acre. Code requires that the minimum setback
shall be increased by 1 foot for each foot of height over 35
feet. The building on the NW is shown approximately 30 feet
from the Pacific Avenue R.O.W. where a 50 foot setback along
a public street is required. Building sections and elevations
have not been submitted but staff was told that these buildings
would be similar in scale to the Lemay Lake Apartments. Therefore,
this building would need to be moved to the south to meet code
compliance. This may also be the case on the northeastern most
building that is 50 feet from the property line. All other setbacks
meet code requirements.
The 420 units will require 420 indoor parking stalls included
with the rent in order to provide the 420 10' x 20' outdoor spaces
being proposed. 1
PARK FOREST APARTMENTS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 2
SITE PLANNING /LANDSCAPING: The six dwelling buildings are serviced
by two main divided entries from Federal Drive on the east and
south and by a single access from Pacific Avenue on the north.
The drives converge to the center of the site (south of the pond)
where the 3,000 S.F. clubhouse is situated. Amenities located
in this area include a spa for 10 people, 2 outdoor raquetball
courts and 2 tennis courts. The Parks and Recreation Department
will require a trailway along Federal Drive for the entire length
of the project along with a cash dedication fee.
A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted by an out of
state architect that will need to be strongly upgraded to meet
City standards. On multifamily projects, one tree per unit is
the minimum standard. This would allow for performance standards
enabling the City to require a more dense screening from roads,
parking areas, trash enclosures and especially different adjacent
land uses. Building heights and landscape plans submitted on
proposed grading plans are necessary to provide adequate buffering.
Existing trees should be carefully located in an effort to save
as many as possible. The detailed plan required for final plat
approval should be done by a landscape architect familiar with
native species.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the developer
submitted for this development is feasible. The applicant does,
however, propose on filling some of Pond JP -2 which is located at
the north end of this proposed project as shown on Figure 1.
This pond is designated as a future City detention pond in the
Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The developer has shown on the
preliminary grading plan that he can provide the necessary
ponding area by reshaping the pond somewhat.
Before the City can approve the final plat for this development,
the City must authorize the project to construct the outflow pipe
from Pond JP -2. The City installed a portion of this pipe under
35 -E during its construction. The portion west of Federal Drive
to Pond JP -2 and the portion east of 35 -E to Pond JP -3 remain to
be constructed.
UTILITIES: City Project 432 provided for the installation of
sanitary sewer through the middle of this development to provide
service to the Royal Oaks Addition immediately north of this
proposed development. The sewer is deep enough and of adequate
size and capacity to provide service to this development.
A 30" trunk water main will be brought to the northwest corner
of this proposed development. This water main is being
constructed under City Project 451. The contractor will complete
this work this summer.
PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 3
With this development, staff recommends extending this 30" trunk
water main to Federal Drive. From there it can easily be put
across the freeway because the City had the casing pipe installed
with the Interstate construction. This line can then tie into an
existing 30" line within Duckwood Drive, west of Pilot Knob Road.
Figure 2 shows how the completion of this water main fits with
the City's Comprehensive Trunk Water Main Plan. Staff recommends
the Council not approve the final plat for this development until
the Council authorizes the installation of the 30" trunk water
main.
Also according to the City's Master Plan, the 8" water line
proposed within this development should be brought to the
southwest corner of this development to connect to an existing 8"
line servicing the Blackhawk Hills Additions. This, along with a
30" line, will complete the City's trunk water system west of 35-
E in this area.
STREETS: Federal Drive borders this proposed development along
the east with Blackhawk Road bordering this development along the
south. Pacific Avenue will be brought to the northwest corner of
this development with the platting of the Hampton Heights
Addition. Both Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road are built
to their ultimate design sections.
Staff has no problems with the two access points proposed. Both
appear to have adequate sight distance. The developer proposes
on extending Pacific Avenue about 500' east. The extension of
Pacific Avenue will require a 30' easement from the property to
the north. Because this street is proposed to temporarily
deadend, the City will require the construction of a temporary
turn around. In the future, this street could connect to Violet
Lane.
This development is responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk along
Federal Drive, its west property line.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: The only right -of -way necessary for this
development to dedicate is a 30' half right -of -way for Pacific
Avenue. MnDOT acquired the right -of -way for Federal Drive and
Blackhawk Hills Road with its I -35E right -of -way acquisition.
It may be necessary for this development to dedicate an
additional 5' of right -of -way for the sidewalk along Federal
Drive. At this writing, staff has not been able to determine the
right -of -way for Federal Drive becuase it was included with the
I -35E right -of -way acquisition.
The City will require the dedication of a ponding easement over
Pond JP -2 encompassing the 852 high water elevation. The City
will also require a 20' utility easement over the storm sewer
outflow line from Pond JP -2 and a 20' utility easement over the
8" and 30" water main.
PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 4
Also, as a condition of final plat approval, this development
will be required to obtain the necessary street easements for
Pacific Avenue and its turn around from the property to the
north.
PERMITS: This development will require permits from the
Minnesota Department of Health for water main extension. Also, a
sanitary sewer extension permit from MPCA will be required.
ASSESSMENTS:
In researching the City's assessment records, staff found that
this development is responsible for trunk water area assessment
and upgrading the trunk area storm sewer assessment from single
family to multifamily because of the proposed R -4 use. This
development will also be responsible for the lateral benefit from
trunk water main assessment resulting from the 30" trunk water
main construction as shown on Figure 3. The following table
summarizes these assessment obligations of this development.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE
Est'd 1986
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Trunk Area Water 27.2 (1) $1,190 /Ac. $32,370
Trunk Storm Sewer
Upgrade 1,186,140 (1) 0.014 /sq.ft. (2) 16,600
Lateral Benefit 618 11.88 /f.f. 7,340
from Trunk
Water
(1) Net area total.
(2) Multi- family single family rate.
All costs for the installation of all internal utilities, except
possibly for trunk storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility
of this development.
PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS
PAGE 5
CONDITIONS:
1. This development shall provide the amount of storage volume
for Pond JP -2 as required by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan.
2. Final plat approval cannot occur until Council authorizes
the installation of the trunk storm sewer line outlet, the
30" trunk water main, and the 8" trunk water main loop to
Federal Drive, unless the applicant wishes to install any
portion of these utilities under private contract.
3. The development shall dedicate a 30' right -of -way for
Pacific Avenue and be responsible for obtaining the
northerly 30' and turn around easement for Pacific Avenue.
4. This development shall be responsible for obtaining
Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT and MPCA permits.
5. Staff shall approve any phasing plans.
6. This development shall be responsible for a 5' concrete
sidewalk, and a 5' right -of -way if necessary, along Federal
Drive to the west edge of this plat.
7. A detailed landscape plan submitted on a grading plan with
the final plat submission. A bond shall be submitted and
not released until one year after the installation.
8. All standard plat conditions be adhered to.
O ACMH L7
HA.LS
HA WK'
4 SCOTT
i‘a
p0' WATER
T REATMENT
FACIL/TT
PV$L/C
WORKS
GARAGE
i n
-2
lCHSNK
E t i o
CECAR
MOUSTR■AC) :PARK:
8LA
P
1
rir1T1i fA[{d'l7! -rri l 1 Iff1
N C IP
MUNICIPAL
r
.coo TER SIR mE
J
T SPRIK[ iT
POND JP -2 E w.w
•001.11 WmlE LOAM- OM 0
000 .00S0 aaJM.` 6M S
800104• at4.lf
PRELJMINARV GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN
5 KNUTSON ASSOCIATES. IN BLACKINAWK APARTMENTS
:nf Ilnl
w\
LE&EWD
SIUSSN 16 40■1101JR4
S6 P 0 aD caa 0004
(SOO 0 00004.00 1007 S1.1001010.11
ISKOO aO anRM Saw!!
A0.0400 411.0 Y■I
V --0 604t1.16 STORM SOWS!
4. aM• 01064O04 DT0p111113 MOM
Iffri
1» SO
EROSION CONTROL.
ALl O•YU0SCD Aaa .4MU. M1
Itawrocars M1114 le OF 11:sb.. -0
4 I.1•D nJ. Cw!D w.11•.w
1:00s. Off corwurric. OP' Pa..
St It 410.04 a 1N..Y
(0.040 a. MM {pT 4aRD M%ST.
MS•
DESIGN
COLLECTIVE
2
cf)
CP-6
A- bbb
86
t 0.0
70
AP-27/ N
17802.4 p i .a., ..,2,
I 7 ,1 1'
'irk II i 7
TION I i ."111
839 8 9-,,, t :R :F *1201,% 1.
AP -38 t... ,.........N........
84/.4 HtLis
AP-5 I
8I6.27ER,',
7 E
T
Z;RCIV:1 1 7:1:1041-.1
03.6
V27.6
AP-
"Nc. 856.6 IA)
r• 868.3• -1-41
38
"77
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
c S\
796.3
100
823.5
CP 2 829.7
CP- 12
826.5
829.6
0 1. :z 1 FOX
RIDGE
iC
JP-5
823.8
834.0
HLACKHAA/K
PARK
8P-29
809.7
8/8.0
"PaRK FoRts+
CP- 11
795.0
808./
P
790.3
801.0
8P-33
886.0
A 895.2
L.1
-1 .4`
PARK
1
I DP-4
000J1 -1cAo
ri I GARDEN
I SUR NE Y
24" tEtTit4NNf
dIGHTS S 12 cs
(7.,t
c PL
2 11 d
829.7'
8P-2
792.3
80/.0
i 36'
BP-3 I
L......:. ri E
a P 35 i 905.2
889. 9 r
B-c
920
0.../ 1.'
1 1
A890.6
F886.3 e
-6.
ft I 42 ..1 _C S A L... /•,12'
I P -7 ‘---AP- 51y i 1 1 i B 978 0
890.T 1 t
923.2 -4-
389.2 15 894.10/ 4'
793.9 /1 A P-28 i c_...■;
0... i 910,0 i
7 r a011/11rP .'1 E,I,P.„, i
cu r F 411, f BP-9 .§.3
;1
AP Ab .911.3 :31 Iff °!j r/ 4
F, 893 3
AP-43 9040 le944..
BP-
2 rt.
896 .:l9 98820 /0 1- P
BP-18
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
e/-
DF:,26 1
r 874.8 73.8
j
1 DP-23 1_
D-c T./
g3;c FC'c
i• rm. •••■•11 ‘11
111
1 DP-22
L1 7../(1,1.
I 8900
ar_p_ 71:4 jp_cf67
75 C 8 E 8 NT E <=4 4.1771:41.11-1".""
1 I 8
0. 847.2 D I rd
if .fitr,•71 {7.
4 L
1
8
97. ,/ft --1.- _t_ ,4
HALL --,•-i )44i ..ie ....4,
6
1.„....
CITY
71 C-','3a1 ts:-1,:j 2
17P Afief 1
1
cr i JP
!in f....._, 1 1 8 8 3 28. 0 8
so 4
4!..,, -.4,
1
/P
a 86
8 eau :s.Kovo LE I I
I
8300
300
1 48 1.1 13-b L 0P-36
c 1 870.6 'jp,:3 e a ..-87i,7
87 4c.. 2 869 i tt
4 4 7 7re PATC ii
872 4 5 ag4
12 12.
37 jP 4
874.0 1
874.5=p-i
17 887 LP 42
892.0
850
I. -40 211
1I.
!rillP If I;
SUBJECT PARCEL
JP-8
1- 819.
830.
BP-5. 1"'"
Fp JILL: c-_.1
LP- 43
2314
-1 11
64;
11! I Tlf
approved:
J- f
830.0
Pc(
P
Ei
FIG. #1
standard-
plate
rRIAL
is2 07)1f45
5.0 /65.0
887/
106_0
BLACK HAWK
PARK
/117.0
64.0 81.0
8 l./93O 57.9/730 46.3/62.0
2 C) 0"
SCHOOL
/63.0
45.8/ 12"
59.0
05 M.G.
ELEVATED STORAGE
14.M. L. 1059 t
I75
FE
teth 74.0
CATION
53.2/68.
/74.0
ift
82.0/ 2.0/
.4 0 I e
P. 1
JoHrtseal
S1LVP
69.M
wOODHAVEN
PARK
t ffPA PtTTh
69.5/81.0
GA
C I 60.4 78.0
1 8T1
52 0'036 •4411.
.94"-■ 18
FORts
1 10 *OW
1 .4 ..,0 ft
;ID /T72.
CDTREA6ENT I i 3 S F ,t r i E e
i
68.8/84.0 P S L FI A IT E. T ri NI
32 M.G. 0.) i HE ICH rs8
4T,
'V
5.1/92.0 r 1 56.2/67.ESTL 2ND I;
a
31
1
84.7 98.0
51.7/67.0
78.7/960
fi
I
18"
am. ins stmt.
52.6/67.0.
UBJECT PARCEL
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMEN
WATER
MASTER PLAN
27 7/54.0
Ll' 0
311°A I
OME TEAD.61
pr LI
8"
551/ 7.0
8•• /4
1
7 A:e
re
16"
I
I I 1.14
20AttwrE
rat
59.9/ 75‘.0j
f
approved:
4, 4 6
48
FIG. #3
standard
plate
Y t C.:. 1
.W1. L'
C. 0 ...Ls Y1S S9
�FN•� .4t
NOTES..
ALL PLATT VI•T!l1AL LQA
T104 loss
1 A0D /Oa ADARP140 01 LA .0 IOW,.
2 ALL OLI/ow ITIDS 4.41.1.1.6 VeIDDIOT ADJUST
To 0011.0•• To 9(20) C01417170..4 05 1.0 411!
S. ALL PLAN.s 4MALL 10141001 TD TI! AP.l51CAN
4+•04•0 VOL MUES1t.1 DIDOL. /UCta•T 4OTON
A ALL RANT MAT91AL 41401.E 00MM114m 102
0(40 *01494.011 450.11"4 son..
PLANT SCHEDULE
4)0. T41F
2)1..rYemetr
01An t .4.a1a
DEVELOPMENT SUR'1MA
1441. 950CSLT A A• N1b AG.
M 41 Y51N4 43.41 AC
N RO4+ 1 41 AL
2. lOTAL MO. OF 12r•R4 40
3.0044114 D41.1.L0.A14d44•
om/L Pa AL- TOTAL RAY- 00414. SD• I.t U/A
UNIT. MGM- LM^ 540) *04 12.41. 4.7 U/A
OTT 0044.10" *ID 4410 tmT NOBS
FULL.N0.
PaPL
D
11
N
12
D
24
12
14
12
*145[10#+1 uMOa
4tai"4•.t1 U4Da.•
TA... 44. •••••mo•
4.DOOT Mat
P,..0.0
•••••T1.4.4• 1••••••■•••••
LMC105a
0.0.4 stLAh44
PM4 M"
AN05 "APES
A �..n.1.
1105.14.0 DY.1[49U1 MIa.l510F1A
C..V.•7w OA.rtM1 /0—..
3/•••111.44 1100 LILAC.
5S4A CAM
.4•Y.• 4.1&04•
490". 4040•/ CMO
A4NLT51AM ON1D
►.w•
CoLOC•D0 4taa•. 0S
P,.A. 5.."•
EDAM MILLS •540=
...A` 8'•.1.� d.•a.Y•
1R'
2Va
I n•
ZVa'
SVa•
IV•
IVY
174'
4.KI• 41R►1
■••••KOI
6.104
DOW.
'unuT. AMD
c:L•.tn•:LT
0 15 50
00
NORT% -1
200
PRELIMINARY t.ANDSCAPE /GETtERAL. DEVELiO TENT
OMBS•KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. I THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE
"aw41 v11"0" CAGAN. NUMI,E70TA
P50nM1t0D 905 (A NEW HORIZON I I NOME'S R INC. "q
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, 'THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE'
APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES
LOCATION: OUTLOT C, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NW 1/4, SEC. 2
EXISTING ZONING: R -3 IN THE BLACKHAWK P.D.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 6, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS.
ZONING AND LAND USE: Outlot C is surrounded by the recently
approved Deerfield Apartments to the north, Thomas Lake Heights
quads to the east, the .Highline Trail to the south and an•un-
developed R -4 district to the west. The Comprehensive Guide
Plan designates this area as a mixture of Parks (P) and Mixed
Residential (R -2) with a density of 3 -6 units /acre.
The site has steep slopes and drains primarily into a pond on
the southern portion of the site and off -site to the east.
SITE PLANNING: Clemson Drive will be continued west for approxi-
mately 200 feet and then proceed north forming Beacon Hill Court.
All of the quadraminium buildings exceed the 30 foot front yard
setback and have more than the 30 feet between buildings which
was required in the Thomas Lake replat in 1983. Clemson Drive
continues west to the property line where a temporary cul -de -sac
will be constructed until development in the R -4 district occurs.
The Williams Brothers Pipeline easement extends 40 feet into
this plat along the eastern property line. There are no setback
problems.
Each quad unit will be served by two private entry drives most
of which are 14' wide. Code requires 1 indoor parking space
and one outdoor space for each unit. This is provided with the
parking area in front of each garage.
COMMENTS: This development will have an association to control
trash pickup and maintain the common areas. The architectural
styling /color of the buildings will be the same as that in the
Thomas Lake Heights Addition. A preliminary landscape plan has
been submitted and should need little or no revisions.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: This development incorporates a section of
land with considerable variations in topography and elevation
with the maximum differential of approximately 40' in the center
of the plat. Approximately the northern two thirds of this
development will direct its surface drainage to the northeast
into the drainage basin within the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd
Addition which is ultimately connected through a series of storm
sewers to the system within Thomas Lake Road. The lower third of
this development will direct its surface water runoff to the
THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 2
south into the Highline Trail drainage basin Pond BP -6. This
southerly drainage basin currently receives runoff from the
Mallard Park and Woodgate Additions and does not have an outlet
presently available. A future outlet would be provided through
the installation of a storm sewer lift station and force main
discharging into Thomas Lake Road. However, at the present time,
this drainage basin is able to handle all current drainage and
anticipated future runoff from this lower third portion of the
proposed Trails of Thomas Lake Addition without requiring the
installation of this outlet.
STREETS /CIRCULATION: Due to the existing topography and property
line constraints, it is not feasible to eliminate the proposed
cul -de -sac to the north. This cul -de -sac will require a variance
due to its length exceeding the maximum 500' allowed by City
Code. Clemson Drive is proposed to be a continuation from the
Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition eventually connecting to Johnny
Cake Ridge Road through the future development of the Wilmus
property to the west. The center line of Clemson Drive is shown
approximately 625' north of the south line to allow its extension
to Johnny Cake Ridge Road to conform to the proposed future
parkland dedication associated with the development of the Wilmus
property. This stub street portion of Clemson Drive will have to
have a full right -of -way and cul -de -sac constructed until such
time that the adjacent properties develop to allow its
continuation. The staff supports the proposed configuration of
the cul -de -sac street and Clemson Drive intersection which will
help to provide continuity but yet discourage through- traffic due
to the turning movement required.
Staff recommends that the name "Beacon Hill Court" be changed to
avoid confusion with the Beacon Hill Subdivision located south of
Cliff Road.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth
has been stubbed to the east property line of this proposed
subdivision to be extended upon a future development such as
this. Althought the western boundary represents the major
drainage district divide for sanitary sewer, it is recommended
that the sanitary sewer lateral be extended to the west property
line to provide maximum flexibility for future development of the
unplatted property and park land to the west.
Water main of sufficient size and capacity is availabe to handle
this proposed development with the lateral extension through this
property. With the development of the Thomas Lake Heights
Addition, a water main stub has been provided in the northeast
corner to be picked up by this proposed development through the
cul -de -sac for proper looping and fire protection which is not
shown on the preliminary utility plans submitted. The water
lateral should be stubbed to the west property line to provide
for future extension and continuity of the water system.
Other details associated with the installation of sanitary, storm
sewer and water main must meet the current City engineering
standards at the time of final plan review and approval as a part
of the final plat process.
THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 3
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF -WAY: The drainage and ponding easement of
sufficient size and storage volume shall be dedicated over the
southern portion of this plat necessary to meet the requirements
of the Master Storm Sewer Plan for drainage basin BP -6. The
final alignment and configuration of this easement will be
defined at the time of final plat approval.
All other internal utility line easements will be defined after
final engineering review of utility plans and shall be dedicated
as a part of the final plat.
All other public right -of -way dedication meets the City Ordinance
and engineering requirements for this type of subdivision.
However, additional right -of -way or roadway easement will have to
be conveyed to the City to accomodate the construction of the
temporary cul -de -sac at the western end of Clemson Drive.
ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer,
water and storm sewer have been previously assessed under
Projects #88, 237 and 256, respectively. No new additional
assessments are required as a condition of final plat approval.
However, all costs associated with the installation of streets
and utilities to service this subdivision and its future
extension to the west boundary line will be the entire
responsibility of this subdivision.
Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to
discuss any aspect of this report during the review process
before the Planning Commission and /or City Council.
THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE
PAGE 4
CONDITIONS:
1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be
designed in accordance with current City engineering
standards and requirements.
2. Additional right -of -way and /or roadway easements shall be
conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul -de-
sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary.
3. A variance must be granted prior to final plat approval for
the excessive length of the cul -de -sac.
4. Street name for the cul -de -sac shall be changed to Clemson
Court or Circle.
5. The water main shall be looped from the cul -de -sac to the
existing stub in the northeast corner.
6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be
dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff
subject to final detail plan review and approval.
7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable
conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement.
8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of
Thomas Lake
9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions.
1Ar
A -cce
"L
A-GO
3.5 12
900.0 .j
AP- I "1
c urF
2nd a AP-12/
E r 893.3
AP 43 9040
t'. 896.0
1 898.3 �5
l8•
8 -s4!
r
B-e
886.
AP -49
881.7
889.0
s5 5� i
AP-25
AP 50 880
TP 886.0
888 i 894.0 11
4-11
l' i
.JI
li_!LJ
pn'L'E j
T 5T
CENTER; 1 N 9%8.0
%•vv, rr;- 71
AP -29
c
1 916.0. `N i
920.
s' 4 j i
b 0
P -18 1/ av „tiil�J
9255 y7 A bp
9313 '6
N
a 37t J :.x88, �I tl
AP
nr r 8036: .''tilt' �Il _i:.1 l,> ^'l
`•54 A -k. 9oT 6 1, rlk `�1tI
1 I
=1 I .ra s4 A 1 BP 29
797.3 J,c
AP r µ•N ,S, r 1 X2 809.7
800.6 a ....1 11 ,_,'j (k f l I I\ r 1( 8/8
1 f f Al 2 Y i ''''.14'
8:
1 f
1 r 8 a M t 1 1 I.
T �I I' m 1 11 1 1 BP
V 38 m I I 14,1 I I s 886.0
A-n L. ^a A_ j 895.
r ,P Jf
11 l l 1 a T a
r f �j] ±4-,-- 1 f 1 Lt1IIIti f
R pnai P IA l AIiNE- (J AN
f r 72 u LIAN 908.0
GT,t -rlJ AP-4'% f ARK 1 „a P 920.2
••g EN! PEF.88g.3 ]]y���
:J F �K E� f� j I I
i AP 35 r
1 i 1
880.6 t
A 886.0
,r,� T
1
n. II 1 lr 1 AP- 51
1�,r11 1
1 J r 8 90.0
ll 1 !AP 7 u
hilt f 8892 10 894. i
7 ;F� ,.9939
f' A: •12
46 .Lftfir
Az.
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
BP -3
889.9
1 905.2
BP 'j
9742
924 87 4. 2
8 86. 5
927 2
l
«2J A /.12 pry
k
BP -24 1
I I 1 918.0
I 93.2
AP-28
I t 1 8-d
2
9 B0 C
0� BP 23 s 1�
m fr, 931.3 {s T t 8 P 18
J BP 'N 932.3 1 882.9
911.3 :i: 892.0
9/9.6 4 't BP 6 i v .E 1 I T::
882 e M
N 9/0.7
BPIO'
9098 ,r 8 q ::::tie :TY
9/ 27 r„-•b
N i ItU ti: r L.S.-3 j 16
BP20: 2 y
'b if l I 9160;
,)trEcip 9200`8 `i BP-13
J 92 1 .4
IAP -40 N 1 P 19 9270
159200 .8-..1',...::;!6'..: 1 24
1.99.1182.2. l u I v,
BP-21: 11 I I A F
t
i r LE�R 4 �c�',/ I 1 �y. 1 t ••A.0 II EArT•.• .f
BP 6 988 d2 iS7>
9 2 6 0, r al 1 /G- j
9 274 21. l 8P 12
1.
TT (N b BP-31 ter_ s 1(- B m 908.01
i 11 rir '9376 -J 1
1 J
i il E 1 4
JOHY4.( LKf+ 1/ 57 r L.S. 221 t
tnrnl.r� -'''T i %RI�t'; F 4 2. m
rt oian
9260 AP 1511 9 235 3 4 r' z4
P 4 /1
a
/4 t[ ft'N 9
U i ri i. 1 1 P-
1 i -iii. ..r 017
9262 I t� 9 5 11∎111
aoi
i
SUBJECT PARCEL
11 at YJ<
PAliK
BP -2
792.3
80/.0
A aniCf F
Pra,/r L A
S TORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
j;
LP *6
907
1
[1L.
-=1
approved:
BALL
SK
JP -6
818.
830.0
06 'J -35!
1 773 .2, 8694
0 j
P-37J- /s
r 872:0 87c=3);1. u
875 0
BP -2 I j
P 6
8860 88821 1 1,,,.,:.;,",., n t 855
Z A rrAC L 858.6
all I l _V -I i 12..
BP r �.I, 1111
8865 I 4
1 i I t tiikDf krF�S: 8
85
I g r,f H I7 H F 1 Rn 1
8 87 .1 it sT42 :`y 8 92 0 'L 840.5 F 1 i 1 r eso o.
t 881 27 i 1 �L...
a �t I
99 89 J 5 1-1 2t1. 141:61fritiCi f i. 2y
9 `Km' s LP
90% 8 '0� t� X897'S
90 /.P ti 900.
27 BPI 1
BP•
"9°552 9 696 `k
}1'Cf a It
B -O- J s
JP-.
`859.
865.
P
BP -34
988.0
/006.0
PARK•
GOL
COUR
G. #1
standard
plate if
DATE
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT:
REPORTED BY:
CITY OF EAGAN
REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT /CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
OPUS CORPORATION COMPRI HOTEL
LOTS 1,2,3, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE IND. PARK
#1 AND OUTLOT A EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK
GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) LI (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL
24 JUNE, 1986
13 JUNE, 1986
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATIONS: Three separate applications have been submitted by
Opus Corporation requesting a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit for a six story "Compri Hotel The plat
will consist of 2 lots with the second lot a proposed restaurant
facility.
This 7 acre site will require rezoning from GB (General Business)
and L -1 (Light Industrial) to a commercial planned development on
lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 in the Eagandale Industrial Park No. 1
and Outlot A in the Eagandale Office Park. The site abuts Pilot
Knob Road to the west, Corporate Center Drive on the south and
the new 5 story Sperry Corp. Building to the northeast.
This Rezoning and Preliminary Plat will require a comprehensive
guide plan amendment.
COMPRI HOTEL: The proposed 6 story (70' tall) 190 room hotel will
be the first hotel along the 494 corridor in Eagan. Compri
Hotels contain only first class guest rooms and amenities are
limited. No large scale meeting rooms are proposed and
restaurant facilities will be provided for guests only. Since
the building is over 3 stories, a Conditional Use Permit will be
required. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will
also require the hotel to have an interior noise level of 50
decibels or less.
An application for a restaurant liquor license will be submitted
to the City in the near future.
The architectural styling of the hotel will attempt to blend with
the Sperry Building that is nearing completion. The brick and
glass exterior will be accented by the tinted glass stair tower
and canopied entries. The brick trash enclosure on the western
side of the building will be accessed by a service drive and
employee parking area. Additional plant material along with the
existing oaks will screen this portion of the site.
COMPRI HOTEL
PAGE 2
Access to the hotel will be from a separated entry drive that
lines up with Corporate Center Drive. This entry drive will loop
in front of the hotel to a canopied entrance on the east side of
the building.
PARKING AND STORAGE
City Code requires one (1) parking stall per dwelling room and
one (1) additional space for each eight (8) units. This would
require 214 stalls for the hotel alone. Due to the proximity of
the airport and that the restaurant facilities within the hotel
are private, fewer parking stalls are being proposed. 110 10' X
20' stalls (9' X 20' employee) are shown on the site plan.
No pylon signs are proposed. The main signage will be building
mounted on the stair towers. Code requires:
1) That no more than one (1) business sign for each major
street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each
business located within such building.
2) All business signs mounted on a building shall be similar
in design.
3) No signs or combination of signs mounted upon a building
shall cover in excess of 20% of the gross area of side.
4) The signage shall not project more than 10" from the
vertical surface of the building.
LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and
special care will be used to save as many of the existing oaks as
the site plan allows. Additional plant material along Corporate
Center Drive similar to that in the Eagandale Office Park (Pilot
Knob Road and Avalon Ave). All 3:1 slopes and the twin 6'
retaining wall areas will need careful landscape plant material
selection. The 2:1 slopes will require "ground covers" to
stabilize the slopes and to provide for little or no maintenance.
LOT 2: This proposed restaurant facility is not scheduled for
construction until the hotel is near completion /or completed.
Although the lot will be platted, Opus Corporation will submit
site plans to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council
for review and approval prior to the Issuance of the building
permit. The Code requires one (1) parking stall for each three
(3) seats based on the capacity of the restaurant. 79 10' x 20'
stalls are proposed thus enabling an approx. 240 seat Class 1
(sit down) restaurant to be built on this lot. The restaurant
will have a separate vehicular entry of its own and can share the
access to the hotel if so needed.
COMPRI HOTEL
PAGE 3
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The grading proposed on the preliminary
grading plan is feasible. It will require two 6 ft. high
terraced retaining walls northeasterly of the proposed hotel
building. These are required due to the large natural ravine
running down the easterly property line of this proposed
development. These retaining walls will allow the developer to
grade to 3:1 slopes. The 3:1 slopes appear to be the steepest
slopes proposed over this development. These slopes are the
minimum allowed for maintenance.
The natural topography slopes to the north and the proposed
grading plan does not change any of that. This development
lies within the center of Major Drainage District H, as shown on
Figure 1. The developer is proposing some internal storm sewer
to collect runoff from the parking lots and directed into a City
trunk line located along this development's easterly property
line. This line flows into the City's trunk line located
adjacent 1 -494, which eventually ends up into the Minnesota River
Valley. The 54" trunk line connects with a 27" trunk line from
Pilot Knob Road at Pond HP -3 as shown on Figure 1. However,
recent study of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area
indicates that the capacity of the 54" pipe cannot be exceeded
due to flow restrictions upstream. Therefore, Pond HP -3 does not
appear to be necessary. The applicant's engineer is preparing a
revision to the Master Plan for the Eagandale Center Industrial
Park area to handle the storm water runoff by adding additional
upstream ponding areas. As a result, staff has no concerns with
the encroachment into the ponding area HP -3 as shown on the
grading plan.
This project will not require any trunk storm sewer improvements
on behalf of the City.
UTILITIES: According to City record plans, sanitary sewer and
water services were extended to Lots 2 and 3 of the Eagandale
Center Industrial Park. The water service was a 2" diameter line
and the sanitary sewer service was a 6" diameter line. Both
appear to be at elevations that will suit the proposed building
sites. In lieu of this, staff questions the necessity for the
separate sanitary sewer line proposed by the developer. Because
this line connects to an MWCC collector, the developer will have
to obtain the necessary permits to connect into this line.
Also, because this proposed sanitary sewer connects two lots, it
would have to be turned over to the City with an easement
dedicated over the line.
Staff recommends using the existing sanitary sewer services if
possible. The disadvantages of the proposed sanitary sewer line
include:
1. MWCC connection permit required.
2. Access for maintenance more difficult than the existing
sewer within Corporate Center Drive.
This development will not require any extension of any City trunk
water or sanitary sewer lines.
COMPRI HOTEL
PAGE 4
STREETS: Corporate Center Drive and Pilot Knob Road abut the
southerly and westerly portions of this proposed development.
Pilot Knob Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County with
controlled access. Corporate Center Drive is a collector
street for the Industrial Park. Neither roadway will require any
upgrading as a result of this development with the exception of
possible signalization when traffic warrants it. It is presently
being discussed as a part of the County Highway 5 -year Capital
Improvement Program.
The applicant's grading plan shows the primary driveway to this
development lining up with Corporate Center Curve which is
necessitated by the potential high traffic volume associated
with this proposed development. Staff estimates the hotel would
generate about 2,000 trips per day based upon full occupancy.
The miniumum throat widths for each driveway access shall be
30'. The separation between driveways is 200' which is the
minimum separation staff would recommend on a collector street
such as Corporate Center Drive.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: This development will not be responsible
for dedicating any additional street right -of -way because the
City has already obtained the necessary right -of -way through
previous platting.
This development shall dedicate a 20' utility easement adjacent
the Corporate Center Drive property line. The remaining
easements shall be dedicated in accordance with City Code. Staff
recommends the developer dedicate a 10' utility easement lying
southwesterly of the easterly property line. The existing
easement is too narrow to reasonably perform any repairs to the
sewer line which may be necessary.
If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services
and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer
shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the portion of
sanitary sewer line designated as a City line.
PERMITS: If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer
services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the
developer will be responsible for the following permits:
1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit.
2. MWCC connection permit.
ASSESSMENTS:
All trunk area assessments have been levied.
COMPRI HOTEL
PAGE 5
CON^ITIONS
1) All standard platting, rezoning procedures be adhered to.
2) This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide
Plan amendment.
3) All signage code requirements be adhered to.
4) The trash area, perimeter parking be screened from
public streets.
5) A detailed landscape plan be submitted with emphasis on
saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover
plant materials on all 2:1 3:1 slopes. The plan will
be bonded and not released until one year after the
installation.
6) The total number of parking stalls be approved as the
site plan demonstrates.
7) A separate liquor license be issued for the hotel's
restaurant.
8) Lot 2 be subject to site plan review by the Advisory
Planning Commission and City Council.
9) The plat be subject to the Advisory Parks Recreation
Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee.
10) The main access drive to this site line up with Corporate
Center Curve
11) The two accesses into this development be separated
by a minimum of 200' and be a minimum of 30' wide.
12) A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent
the Corporate Center Drive right -of -way.
13) A 10' utility easement be dedicated adjacent the easterly
lot line for sanitary sewer purposes.
14) This development will be responsible for MPCA and MWCC
permits if required.
nom
1232112.7.4"p
T(jjEFI-I� 7l'ACR llS
S RiEy 8D'• Z HNDfR ; f J �j i_.I __�
i`A �l
SPERRP
NEW
HOLLAND
DIVISION OF
SPERRY
AMERICAN
FRUIT a
PRODUCE
Mc EE
f GND 5:11:1
nRUACDII
ID7
y
15
LEXINGTON
STANDARD
VILLAUME
BOX
LUMBER
ROADWAY EXPRESS
2.. 10
THE DONALDSON
COMPANY
•ws14
CARSON
PIRIE
SCOTT
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CENTER
RED OWL/
SNYDER
DRUG
it afiA 404
tm Eva.
KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS
t T .n12.26 d.. VG. 16. Sang, Reanbsawq, Inc.
2 DN.w1 Service Company 17. Don H.ney 2 Ms•a.In
3. L..' on St. dvd 11. Bacon Vprooa. Inc
6. F. N. Bantu 19. Sales Sen. Madero Todd.
5.uwl. raw aron 20.tloow da+�
.n
6 Da. 21. Avabn Cenw
7. Pder 11.4.0al Products 22 E.9•n Nom men School
9.6900 941000,01 SinueS 2 b W Poc role
10.
9. Eaa Supply 75. Li .bp Reran Services. d.
11. 0ulooad Maw Ca26006n 26 Don Sown. Y¢
12. N6rNo..MT Bea T.oplorr Canyon, 27. Sales MMeerp, Inc.
17. Ern Emerson.. Inc. 29. Conlern6r Solely 2.602 rant he.
1.. Bre.w0 C0L.1
15. EW.n Fee Stron
-m
aeglg.
EAGANDALE
CENTER
torDe
z e V
u IOU Apr
EAG.NDALE 01111511
SCALE
1 -600'
FOR MORE INFORMATION
CONTACT
OPUS CORPORATION
Pro Owe ee+•NW wwe•! 7. •V1 low 00•■∎∎*■ WI H.R
9000595 iNVIIED
mutt s cus
.O11'si100100110.•61s
1
1
1
N A'
PA F KING
1
6
SERVICE DRIVE
977.0'
e HDCP
J
NMI 011 I= MI Th 44440
ENtRY
DRgP -OF
15)
HOTEL *I
190 ROO S
6'STORIES
h111Lril1 11 :1
(6)
NATURAL AREA
810.76'
CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE
(6)
(1
E5 RANT
4500 eF
SE 1IICE
I
�6)
SIGN
le
Mere-Pis. UNvZ
CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE
Plant Legend
0,4
I S.
ling*
4P6
,g
l4
oti
1r._!
u
1
0111110 P.a. OIL. ANA
w 'M I
I
/i
la
i
0
L
c
URANT
J
0• L
CD SHADE TREES 2 1/2' cal. BB
AUTUMN PURPLE ASH. OREENSPIRE LINDEN.
MARSHALL'S ASH, SUGAR MAPLE
O FLOWERING TREES 1 1/2' cal. BB
CRABAPPLE, JAPANESE TREE LILAC.
SERVICESERRY. AMUR MAPLE
CONIFER TREES 6' ht. BB
COLORADO SPRUCE. AUSTRIAN PINE
EVERGREEN SHRUBS 24' dia. cont.
JUNIPER. YEW
i A LAWN
EXISTING TREES
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDI
APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION RODNEY HARDY
LOCATION: PART OF THE SA, SEC 25 PART OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SE a SEC 26
EXISTING ZONING: R -2, LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 18, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPT
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to
revise the site plan and preliminary plat of the Fawn Ridge
2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and
will contain 68 single family lots which deviate from the R -1
Residential Single District lot size requirement.
ZONING LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R -2, Mixed
Residential, with a density of 3 -6 dwelling units per acre under
the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. This agreement
was entered into by the owner of the property and the City in
1977. The Eagan Land Use Guide designates this parcel as R -I,
Single Residential District, with a density of 0 -3 dwelling units
per acre. Since there is a Planned Development Agreement governing
the land, the Development Agreement for Lexington South
Planned Development would supersede the density allowed in the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
BACKGROUND: The preliminary plat, Fawn Ridge, was originally
presented to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council
in late 1983. There was some discussion in regard to lot size
and the original plan approved consisted of 93 single family
lots, which deviated from the lot size criteria, 44 twinhome
lots, 88 dwelling units for a total of 181 dwelling units.
The applicants phased this development into two phases of which
the first phase has been constructed and built. The applicants
are now looking at the second phase for development. In the
second phase, there are 37 duplex lots and approximately 23
smaller single family lots for a total of 97 dwelling units
to be constructed.
Since 1983, the applicants have changed their development concept
and would like to develop the entire tract of Fawn Ridge into
single lots. The revised plat carries the same circulation
FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN.,
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 2
pattern, which was approved in 1983, and deviated some of the
lot lines to correspond with their new development plan. The
net reduction in the second phase of development would be 29
dwelling units. This revised preliminary plat and site plan
will now carry the connotation of all single family lots in the
Fawn Ridge Addition. The lot sizes in the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition
will exceed the lot size criteria in width and area. Most of
the lots in the second addition have a lot width of 75' with
a few lots dropping to a width of 70' at the 30' setback line.
Therefore, the lots in the second addition exceed lot sizes in
the first addition in both area and width.
In review of this revised pr e; liminary plat and revised site plan
for the Lexington Place Planned Development, the question should
be whether this is a better use of the land than what was originally
approved in the Fawn Ridge preliminary plat.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: Staff has reviewed the preliminary grading
plans submitted by this applicant and found it to be feasible.
However, staff does have a few recommendations which the
applicant should incorporate into his final grading plan.
Staff recommends the applicant provide overland emergency
drainage ways at all low points in the roadway. This can be
accomplished by grading a slight swale down the property lines in
the area of the roadway low points.
Although the applicant proposes to fill a portion of Pond LP -33,
the amount is not significant and will not adversly affect the
total amount of storage volume available for Pond LP -33. The net
reduction in high water area amounts to about one -tenth of an
acre. This equates to a reduction of about 3.0% of the high
water ponding area. In staff's opinion, this is not significant.
Besides, the available storage volume for this pond is about 12
acre feet compared with the required storage volume of 8.5 acre
feet.
This proposed development lies within Major Drainage District L
as shown on Figure 1. Based on the applicant's grading plan,
staff estimates about 75% of the drainage flows into Pond LP -33.
The remaining drainage flows into Pond LP -65. LP -33 presently
has an outlet to Pond LP -61. This pond is experiencing high
water problems because it has no positive gravity outlet.
However, Council authorized a project on June 17, 1986, providing
an outlet to this pond and several other downstream ponds under
Project 444R that will eliminate the high water problems. This
project is scheduled for completion late this fall.
UTILITIES: Staff reviewed the utility layout for this
development with the original Fawn Ridge preliminary plat
application in 1983. The minor changes and revisions that the
Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition proposes from the original Fawn Ridge
FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 3
preliminary plat do not result in any changes in the utility
layout for this development. It is feasible to provide sanitary
sewer and water service to this lot by extending the existing
utilities from the Fawn Ridge 1st Addition.
Staff does recommend, however, that the applicant extend the
water main from north Hay Lake Road to Cliff Road. This will
allow for future connection to the City's 20" trunk water main
along the north side of Cliff Road when it is installed.
STREETS: Dodd Road borders this development along the east and
Cliff Road borders this development along the south. Dodd Road
is designated as a City collector street. It is not currently
built to its full 9 -ton 44' wide collector street status. Cliff
Road is presently a two lane rural highway under the jurisdiction
of the Dakota County Highway Department. Staff discussed the
accesses onto Dodd Road and Cliff Road in the original
engineering report in 1983. Staff has no concerns regarding
these accesses.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: This development shall be required to
dedicate a 40' half right -of -way for Dodd Road and a 65' half
right -of -way for Cliff Road.
The developer shall dedicate all easements required by Code.
Also, the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over
all public utilities not located within public right -of -way.
Lastly, the developer shall dedicate the necessary ponding
easements for Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65.
ASSESSMENTS: The trunk area related assessments for this
development have been levied. However, the future extension of
the 20" trunk water line along Cliff Road will generate a lateral
benefit to this proposed development. Staff recommends having
this development assume the lateral benefit at this time rather
than waiting until the 20" trunk water main is constructed and
this development is built. In accordance with City policy
regarding lateral benefit from trunk water main, staff proposes
that this development is responsible for one -half its net
frontage adjacent Cliff Road or approximately 620'. The 1986
rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main is $11.88 making
the total estimated obligation of this development about $7,360.
The final amounts will be determined by the final plat distances
and the rates in effect at the time of final platting.
111 other costs resulting from the installation of internal
public streets and utilities for this development will be the
sole responsibility of this development.
FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN
JUNE 24, 1986
PAGE 4
CONDITIONS:
1. The final grading /drainage plan shall include emergency
overflow swales at all street low points.
2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to
the Cliff Road property line.
3. A 40' half right -of -way and a 65' half right -of -way shall be
dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Road, respectively.
4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding
easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65.
5. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' utility
easement over all public utilities not installed within
public right -of -way.
6. The right -of -way at all street intersections shall contain a
20' radius.
7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit
assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at
the rates in effect at the time of final platting.
8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the
necessary permits /approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota
Departmeant of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department.
9. All costs associated with the installation of internal
public streets and utilities shall be the sole
responsibility of this proposed development.
10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat
Commission because the plat abuts County road right -of -way.
11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements
shall be approved for the plan dated 5- 14 -86.
12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review
for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd
Road.
13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this
development.
AUDITOR'S SUED. NO. •Z
LAKESIDE PARK
L
L
--1
I 11 1 i
f i 1
1
T
POND HILL
2ND ADDITION
r
f_
L
ALIN
ROBE SONSGLTINO w LAND 080441008
ENGINEERING
COMPANY, INC.
000 SAS ,a0. STREET. Bk 00VILLE. N8lESOTA 5917 AN •30.3000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
o/
i i
i Z FAWN RIDGE 1 L J I L-
11\ :ST ADDITION h�
o\ Road r' 1 l
V 1 O 0 100 000
y` p'I I ?i QI Gl I0 T
z\
70
u..,a .l ,.1
1u..
N
.r 0.
m
CLIFF ROAD
•TNI /ISMS
FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT
/r.
1- ---1 OVE DIT ION FARM
A D DDIT GENERAL INFORMATION
1
0 01171NO 000100: •.D. TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: EE
GROSS AREA: 37.7E ACRES LARGEST LOT SIZE: 83 000 00. FT.
1, {SS.730.3{ 00.f 7.
SMALLEST LOT 5100: 0.100 SO. FT.
DENSITY: 3.00 UNITS /ACRE AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 11.000 00. FT.
ALL DIU .08100E ARE PRELIMINARY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE ON FINAL PLAT.
t
I 1
LOCATION MAP
PREPARED FOR:
FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES
MIT
.3
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JULY 3, 1986
RE: TEMPORARY PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS
BACKGROUND
The City's Parks and Recreation Department has eight (8) "temporary" park
shelter buildings, which are in poor condition. These temporary structures
were built approximately fourteen to fifteen years ago. The structures serve
as winter warming houses and summer park playground shelters.
The structures range in size from approximately 10 x 18, to as large as 10 x
20. For the last several years, parks maintenance people have attempted to
make necessary repairs. Because of the rotting conditions to structural
members, substantial repairs are nearly impossible to accomplish. Commission
members are probably aware of the "sagging" floors at Well Site and Carnelian.
In addition, there are several code violations associated with these
structures. For example: the electrical connections and electrical box at
Well Site Park. A recent painting project has helped improve their appearance
yet most remain as "unsightly
Commission and Staff have previously discussed the condition of these
temporary facilities, and where it is obvious that repairs are not feasible,
then a replacement program be initiated. Staff has done a preliminary review
of available options and presents them to the Commission for discussion at
this time.
PROGRAM USES
Of the eight (8) temporary structures, six (6) are used for warming houses in
the winter. (Highview, Well Site, Lexington, Carnelian, Woodhaven, and Pilot
Knob.) Of these six facilities, only two are used for summer playground
programs: Carnelian and Woodhaven. Oak Chase Park with a temporary facility,
is only used in the summer for summer playgrounds. The eighth facility is at
Northview Park and is being used for temporary storage. Staff intends to
remove the structure at Oak Chase Park at the conclusion of the summer
playgrounds program, and the one at Northview with the completion of the new
facility this fall.
The primary purpose of the temporary structures are for winter warming houses.
Generally, 200 to 2 square feet is an acceptable space requirement.
Obviously, heat, lights, doors, and windows are a program requirement.
The use of enclosed structures for summer playgrounds is desirable, but not
necessary. Open sided sun shelters can provide adequate space for most
playground activities. Generally, 120 to 180 square feet should be adequate.
A small, secure, and lockable box approximately 3 x 5 can hold most of the
playground supplies needed at these open shelter locations. This is currently
being used at many of the existing summer playground sites, which do not have
the benefit of an enclosed area.
IN SUMMATION
Of the six structures used in the winter time, only two are used for summer
playgrounds. More important to summer playgrounds, than enclosed structures,
is at least a covered facility providing for shelter from rain and sun.
Winter needs are heat, lights, doors, windows. In all cases appearance and
maintenance must be considered.
OPTIONS
Staff has been reviewing several options for providing replacement facilities
within parks. These include: a pre -fab concrete structure; wood
construction, rental and pre -fab wood buildings.
RENTAL.
Because of the short duration of the winter skating program, the use of
temporary, rental structures has some appeal. This past winter season the
department rented two trailer units for the winter programs: one at
Ridgecliff Park and one at Goat Hill. Rental costs were approximately $1,200
per unit. These trailers are equipped with electrical heat, lights, windows
and doors. The advantages of these structures is that they are a relatively
inexpensive way to provide for enclosed space versus a large capital
investment of several thousands of dollars. On the other hand, there are
certain limitations. The 8 x 24 size proved to be totally inadequate at major
high demand access such as Goat Hill Park, and larger sizes are not readily
available. Set -up and take down becomes a problem, with additional annual
expense incurred for hay bales and skirting around the trailer to provide some
insulation from wind. Electrical hook -up must also be done by an electrician.
Due to their light weight construction, security is also an issue of concern.
Light weight door locks and framing can easily be forced opened for entrance.
Flooring must be added amounting to additional expense for materials and
labor to install. Aesthetics and handicap accessibility also are of concern.
PRECAST CONCRETE BUILDINGS
Staff has reviewed a precast concrete building from Weiser Concrete Products,
Inc. of Maiden Rock, Wisconsin. These buildings (see attachment) are
panelized for assembly and erection. A variety of finishes can be selected,
with 2" or 4" rigid insulation. Erection can be done in two to three days,
either on a concrete slab or aggregate base. A 24 x 16 structure, with two
doors, two windows, insulated, and a broom exterior finish, including
erection, is estimated at $8,500. (To this cost, should be added heat, lights,
and flooring, which are not part of the building package). These facilities
are obviously durable, reasonably priced, with a certain ease of installation.
Costs for heating and lighting is yet to be determined, pending direction from
the Advisory Commission.
A major drawback to these facilities are their appearance within a park
location. They project a "fortress" like appearance for the neighborhoods.
Obviously, their advantage is the low initial investment, permanency, and
security.
WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION
Staff has done a materials estimate for a similar wood structure of 16 x 24.
All materials, but not including any electrical or heating, is estimated at
This does not include labor construction costs. Staff has
estimated labor cost would be between forty (40) and forty -five (45) percent
of materials cost. The obvious advantage of wood frame, construction is that
you can vary the size to meet the needs of the particular park.
Aesthetically, they would fit into each of the sites and would be much more
attractive than any of the rental or concrete pre -cast buildings. The
security could be enhanced through steel framed doors and secure locks,
minimizing the problems associated with the temporary portable facilities.
Similar to the wood frame structure is a turn -key structure. School District
#196's experience with "temporary class room structures" has generally been
successful. These outdoor classrooms are wood frame construction set up on
concrete blocks from ground level. These facilities are insulated, heated,
air conditioned, and with lights, windows and doors, are costing the school
district approximately $25,000 a structure. These buildings measure x
PRE -FAB BUILDINGS
Another alternative is a pre -fab wood facility which the Commission is
familiar with, from it's review of the current building construction program.
As warming houses, Staff does not believe that the pre -fab have any advantages
over stick -built facilities. However, as open shelters, or sun shelters, the
pre -fab could play a significant role.
INDIVIDUAL PARK NEEDS
In the next section, initial staff recommendation, an attempt has been made to
group parks together i.e., winter /winter and summer, and summer to help
identify building needs. However, we should not overlook the issue of
"individual park needs aesthetics of the park, park facilities, and use
patterns. These have an equally important role in identifying the type, size
and permanency of any structure within a park.
STAFF FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS
In terms of meeting the needs of the program elements, staff is recommending
that open space shelters be provided at parks which have only playgrounds.
For example: Walnut Hill Park and Oak. Chase Park, would require "pavillion"
type facilities.
Where "winter only" facilities are needed such as: Well Site and Highview
rental /trailer facilities must be considered.
Locations with both winter warming houses and summer 2laygrounds, and have
"high demand" needs such as: Goat Hill and Rahn a permanent structure
typical of what is now being built at Goat Hill should be considered for
other locations i.e., Blue Cross /Blue Shield and Quarry.
Staff does not yet have a recommendation for facilities /parks which are "low
demand" winter and summer. The staff does feel that a building smaller in
scale than the building going in at Goat Hill should be considered further.
The affect of this recommendation on existing "temporary" building site:
Affect on other parks under construction
Staff also recommends that an
not have a summer playground
for picnics, etc.
KV /bls
Well Site
Highview
Pilot Knob
Oak Chase
Northview
Carnelian
Woodhaven
Lexington
Blue Cross /Blue Shield
Quarry
Walnut Hill
MeadowLand
Ridgecliff
Rental trailer
Rental trailer
Rental trailer
Open shelter
Permanent facility
No recommendation
No recommendation
No recommendation
(replacement)
Pending further review
Pending further review
Pending further review
Permanent facility
Permanent facility
Open shelter
Open shelter
No recommendation Pending further review
open shelter be considered for parks, which may
program, as a park fixture for public park use
WIESER
COMMERCIAL
Precast Concrete Gives You
Before you buy check the superior features of
WIESER PRECAST OUILDIIIGS
When you invest in a building of any type
whether it be for commercial, industrial, farm,
utility, residential or storage use, you want the
best building you can possibly get for your
money. That's why it will pay you well to take
a hard look at all the features and advantages
of a precast concrete building before you
make your buying decision.
PERMANENCE
Precast concrete panels won't rust, warp, rot
or bend like other building materials. You
are assured of long life without deterioration.
MAINTENANCE -FREE
Concrete wall panels provide
maintenance -free exteriors that will save you
time, labor and expense year after year.
FIREPROOF
Concrete walls won't burn and they won't
support a fire. Non combustible building
walls mean lower fire insurance rates, and for
the storage of combustible materials, these
buildings meet OSHA requirements.
Wieser's exclusive dry cast system for manu-
facturing wall panels produces a more uniform,
denser, stronger concrete. Panels up to 8" thick
can be made on the WIESER DRI CASTER
machine, with the full complement of insulation
and exterior options available.
INSULATION QUALITIES
Wieser precast walls are available without
insulation, or with 2" or 4" rigid insulation.
Each panel features full length and width
insulation.
ENERGY SAVING
The thermal inertia of concrete effectively
controls the inside temperature of concrete
buildings, thus providing annual energy cost
savings for both heating and cooling. The
temperature retention value of concrete also
provides initial savings because of the
reduction in the size of heating cooling
equipment required.
FAST ERECTION
Unlike other construction methods which
involve more man hours, precast concrete
buildings can be erected in a fraction of the
time. Small buildings can be put up in a day or
two while larger size units may only
require 3 or 4 days.
Conventional wet cast panels provide flexibility
for custom fabrication of panels to accommodate
your specific needs, including the placement for
various size door and windows. Larger panels, up
to 8 ft. x 20 ft. x 6" thick are constructed with
this method. Solid and 2" insulated panels with
a full range of exterior finishes are available.
ore Building for
tied Ir.. •Wetcast or
cast wall has 4" insu-
.betfiVeert the 2' outer
Ad T inner wall.
Jnner wines 4" heav-
ily reinfdrced ribs for load
earing strength.
The "inside" story of Wieser's
proven quality construction
The "Superior Sleeve System" employed by Wieser in
the construction of wall panels is a method that has
been used in the building of large commercial and
industrial buildings. The "non-composite:' 2" front and
4" back panels are held together with a stainless
steel sleeve that permits the exterior panel to
expand and contract with summer heat and
winter cold. The 4" load-bearing
back panel supports the roof structure. t's
Both front and back panels are
reinforced with rodding and heavy
mesh wire. Insulation is available as
shown below.
WELDED WALL JOINTS Recessed
weld plates, imbedded in the top corners of
each wall panel, are used to fasten panels
together.
Insulated 8" Wetcast or
Drycast wall features 2"
insulation between 2"
outer wall and 4" -load
bearing inner wall.
SUPERIOR SLEEVE SYSTEM.
Stainless steel 6" sleeve with reinforcing
rods ties the outer wall panel to the inner
wall while permitting expansion and con-
traction. Stainless steel pins inserted in the
concrete hold the insulation firmly in place.
WIESER'S Attractive, Custom Designed Buildings
-Built to Meet Your Needs
Wieser precast concrete buildings can not only be
custom designed to meet your specific
functional requirements, but these modern
buildings can be constructed with contrasting
panels to provide a distinctive appearance. Panel
exteriors are available in six styles as shown
below. Each of these panels provides an exterior
finish that requires no maintenance...another
sound reason for investing in a precast
concrete building.
Light Broom
Raked
Heavy Broom
Small Agregate
An economical storage building constructed with
12' high x 8' wide waffle panels.
Stucco -Swirl
Large Agregate
Door and window panels can
be incorpr)rntod into unlit
building design to
modate your needs. Steel or
wood frames cast into the
panel won't work loose.
IIIIESE 0011GHETE PRDVOGTS. 100
3t. 2 (on U.S. 10) Maiden Rock, WI 54750 715- 647 -2311
This modern office building shows the attractive effect of
mixing three exterior finishes.
The rigidity and strength of each
wall panel permits the use of eco-
nomical pier footings. Continuous
footings are used where necessary.
Wall panel joints are caulked with
DYmeric sealant over a polyeth-
ylene joint backing to provide a
moisture proof joint.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JULY 3, 1986
RE: MISCELLANEOUS PARK PARCEL REVIEW
ISSUES
Over the past several months, Staff has been contacted by several
owners /developers regarding the City's plans for parks associated with
particular land parcels. In addition, Staff has been contacted by still
others, who are inquiring to determine if the City is interested in their
land for parks purposes.
Staff feels that it is appropriate that the Commission at least be informed
about these discussions, review each of the parcels, and provide additional
direction to Staff where appropriate. The Commission may prefer to do a more
through review by an appointment of a sub committee to meet with Staff,
detailed discussions, or by discussion as a committee as a whole.
The various parcels involved are as follows:
1. Park Section 36 W, a 43 acre parcel on Cliff and Dodd Roads (Peterson
parcel) proposed for development. A neighborhood park dedication is
expected.
2. Park Service Section 33, the parcel south of Cliff Road and east of
Beacon Hills addition (Brown property), a neighborhood parks dedication to
be combined with existing four (4) acres of Walden Park.
3. Parks Service Section 10 W, parcel of land south of Lemay Lake, and west
of 35E (Carl Olson). Possible development combined with previous
indication of acquisition by dedication, and purchase for neighborhood
and special use facility.
4. Parks Service Section 22, parcel is located adjacent to, and east of Pilot
Knob Road see attachment is being offered for sale and inquiry to City
Staff regarding City interest.
5. Parks Service Section 16, parcel is located adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road
and is being offered for sale and inquiry to City regarding interest.
6. Parks Service Section 20, Blackhawk Park: Determination of City
interest acquisition /additional property from Ed Dunn and Kathy Waldren.
7. Parks Service Section 28, parcel east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and north
of the Highline Trail (Willmus property). Development of the Willmus
property resulting in a neighborhood parks dedication.
8. Parks Service Section 15, parcel on Crestridge Lane being offered for sale
and determination of Park interest.
Attached to this memorandum are reduction of quarter sections, showing these
parcel locations.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff will provide additional information and background on each of the
parcels. Commission should determine the appropriate steps for further review
of each of these parcels, or submit to a sub committee for further, more
intensive reviewal; or make a recommendation as appropriate.
KV /bls
as.l• MO I
sE
nr
180.40-
PART OF 021-75
PARCEL 1
0 200 400
NORTH
021-08
tJo t
■4 v.;
DRIVE
HIGH -SITE
DR IVE
w.s i -r
VIEW a
iA
a
PION
5.11
LANE
A.0
a 1
a
a
00\
P
F
-55 2
0‘A
-q
1
a 44
e4
tr
e Cr
CEPtY PL� NKp09 44
INN.
�RIGH7 Of WA
PARCEL
NIP 11:7
NORTH
H
2
0
1
u
DEERWODD
s1 J 1
M•M
VE IM• Mr. Y awe 1
WESCOTT
u
NORTH
PARCEL
ROAD
r
11
200 400
NORTH
PARCEL
NMr7.
HIDDEN -OAK
t rrrn'ah.
DPC. N0.50410 ��ss
�.•.Ses
pi Lor
STRIDGE
012-00
PART OF LOT 1
r a
a TX a
K p
c 0
1 e
GRESTRIDGE
APARTMENTS
CONDOMINIUM.; 10c1 s
rb sit LANE
rr.'x axe
MM r
1s4 City of Eagan
V 010 00
NORTH
C`,. I r
2 3 z
I. fix'!
TIMBERSHORE
!a? ?I_a
4
aft
3 3
I
12
HE
PARCELS
f