12/05/1985 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
7:00 P.M.
DECEMBER 5, 1985
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
B. Approval of Agenda and Minutes of November 7 Meeting
C. Development Proposals
1. Yorkton Industrial Park South Preliminary Plat
2. Norwest 3rd Addition
3. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition Replat
4. Hardee's Restaurant Conditional Use
5. January Proposals
D. Old Business
1. Park Dedication Fees From November 1985 Meeting
2. Dakota County Bike Trails Plan
3. Park Systems Plan Updating
4. Blackhawk Park
E. New Business
1. Park Acquisition Request D. LeMay
2. Volunteer Recognition
F. Park Development
1. Park Shelters Design Considerations Schwarz -Weber Architects
2. Construction Update
3. Update Ohmann Site Acquisition
G. Other Business and Reports
1. Communications with Planning Commission R. Martin
H. Adjournment
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1985
RE: DECEMBER 5 ADVISORY COMMISSION FETING
Following the call to order, approval of agenda and minutes of meeting of
November 7, there will be four development proposals for Commission review.
The four development proposals are all commercial /industrial developments. As
always, enclosed in the packet is the engineering and planning information
pertaining to these items.
The first plat proposal, Yorkton Industrial Park South and the second, Norwest
Third Addition, should be subject to a cash dedication requirement consistent
with the City's commercial /industrial fee formula.
The third item, Eagandale Office Park Third Addition, is a replat of a portion
of the Eagandale Office Park. As a replat, a portion of this is subject to the
City's commercial /industrial dedication requirement of .02 cents a square
foot.
The fourth item is for a Conditional Use Permit for Hardee's Restaurant to be
located adjacent to Pilot Knob Road and south of Duckwood Drive. This
proposal is on an existing platted parcel and therefore, would be subject to a
$.02 a square foot commercial /industrial dedication requirement.
OLD BUSINESS
The first item under "Old Business," park dedication fees, is from the
November 1985 meeting. Included in the packet is a memorandum to the
Commission regarding this item.
The second item is the Dakota County Bicycle Trails Plan. On Monday evening,
November 2, County staff conducted an informational meeting concerning the
bikeway plan. Three members of the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission
were present, along with John Voss, Dakota County Commissioner. Members of
the Commission along with the Director of Parks Recreation, will update the
remainder of the Commission concerning that informational meeting. Briefly,
it appears that several members of the Dakota County Commission are seriously
questioning the County's involvement in the bikeway plan. Certain overtures
have been made regarding cutbacks or possible elimination of the County's
involvement in a trails plan. It would appear that Eagan, along with its
neighboring communities will have to strategize and mobilize support for the
bicycle trailways if indeed that which remains can be salvaged.
Item X63 is the Park Systems Plan updating process. It would be appropriate
for members to make comments regarding the sections that they have read in
order that changes may be collected for updating. Time line would include
staff to prepare written revisions for review at the January Commission
meeting.
The final item concerns Blackhawk Park and Commission's past discussions
concerning additional acquisition to this parcel. The City has conducted its
annual P.U.D. review at which the Blackhawk Park P.U.D. has been singled out
for additional study. The Council has requested City staff to prepare a full
review of the P.U.D. by December 12. Staff will update the Advisory
Commission on this process as well as other discussions concerning potential
acquisition of additional property adjacent to the park.
NEW BUSINESS
City staff has received a letter from Dorothy LeMay requesting the City review
potential acquisition of a parcel adjacent to Pilot Knob Road for a
neighborhood park. The Parks Planner /Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan,
has prepared a staff report concerning the parcel which, along with the
letter, is enclosed in this packet.
Volunteer recognition as discussed at the November meeting, with a staff
memorandum has been included in the packet. Staff feels that it is important
that the department establish some type of recognition procedures for those
individuals who have indeed made a contribution to Eagan's park system.
Additional comments will be made at the Commission meeting concerning the
staff report along with suggestions for discussion by the Commission.
PARS DEVELOPMENT
The architectural firm of Schwarz -Weber has prepared schematic designs for
park shelter buildings for four parks. Richard Weber will be present at the
meeting to review the schematic designs seeking input from the Advisory
Commission as to preferred alternatives, etc. In order to accomodate the
architects as well as the remainder of the agenda, it may be proper for the
Commission to adjust the agenda accordingly.
Two remaining items under "Parks Development" concern updating of the
construction progress since the November meeting and an update on the meetings
with members of the Ohmann family concerning the acquisition of this parcel.
At this time, staff would like to indicate that this has been an extremely
difficult and time consuming process because of the complexities of the
individual family members as well as settlement of the estate.
OTHER BUSINESS REPORTS
Under "Other Business Reports" is a copy of a letter prepared by Roger
Martin which was distributed to City Administrator, Tom Hedges, and City
Councilmembers. A copy of the letter also was sent to the Advisory Planning
Commission. Members will recall that Mr. Martin was requested to write this
letter at the last Commission meeting.
Should members have any questions regarding items on the agenda or the packet
material, please feel free to contact the office prior to the Commission
meeting.
KV /js
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
NOVEMBER 7, 1985
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Martin at 7:00 P.M. Commission
members present were Ketcham, Alt, Fedde, Martin, Thurston, Bertz, Kubik and
Carroll. Sandy Masin arrived at 8 P.M. Toni Caponi notified the Commission
he would be unable to attend. Also present were Parks Recreation Director,
Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan; Assistant
Planner, Jim Sturm; Administrative Assistant, Liz Witt, and Parks Intern,
Scott Morgan. Cable Administrator, Ralph Campbell, was also in attendance.
AGENDA
Several items were added to "Other Business" and on a motion by Thurston,
seconded by Fedde, the agenda was approved as amended. All voted in favor.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 3, 1985 REGULAR MEETING
Commission member Thurston moved, Kubik seconded, that the minutes be approved
as presented. The motion carried.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 31 1985 SPECIAL MEETING
Commission member Thurston moved, Alt seconded, that the minutes be approved
as presented. The motion carried.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1985 SPECIAL ISSUES COMMITTEE
Committee members pointed out a change in paragraph 4 which should read,
"...More important to use park site fund dollars to insure that existing
parks, committed to as part of the park bond fund, are developed..:' Chairman
Martin moved, Ketcham seconded, the minutes be approved as corrected. The
motion carried.
PRESENTATION RALPH CAMPBELL CABLE ADMINISTRATOR
Mr. Campbell commented that there is a high penetration of cable subscriptions
in the Burnsville —Eagan communities with many homes already hooked up. He
said some local programming is underway. City Administrator, Tom Hedges,
hosts "The Eagan Report" and will have Ken Vraa as his guest very soon. The
municipal election was covered live and featured local residents providing an
analysis of the results. Mr. Campbell suggested possible ways the Commission
might make use of cable: recreation program registration -by cable, prepare
video presentations of park issues or a question answer exchange. He asked
Commission members to contact him with other ideas they might have for cable
presentation.
1
Adv. Parks Rec Comm.
November 7, 1985
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. Debra David Bailed► lot split
The Bailey parcel is located west of the Diffley and Pilot Knob Road
intersection and is subject to cash dedication. Commission member Thurston
moved, seconded by Bertz, to recommend cash dedication for the newly— created
lot. All voted in favor.
Planning Assistant Sturm said there was a second lot split near Blue
Cross /Blue Shield on Blackhawk owned by Fred Wilson. It, too, is subject to
cash dedication. Commission member Carroll moved, Kubik seconded, to
recommend a cash dedication for the Wilson lot split. The motion carried.
B. Town Centre 70
Planning Assistant Sturm presented a brief review of Town Centre 70, a 70 —acre
commercial shopping center which will feature a Rainbow Foods store and a
strip commercial center. The project is subject to a cash dedication and
trail. Commission members expressed opposition to the vast amount of
impervious surface with no green space evident. Members said they were not
aware that an exception to the landscape policy had been granted to Town
Centre 70.
Further discussion of the proposal resulted in the following motions:
:Y Commission member Kubik moved, Bertz seconded, to recommend cash dediction,
sidewalk easement along the north side of Duckwood when that part of the
development comes in for review, and a landscape plan be provided. Commission
members felt the City Council and Planning Commission should know that the
Parks Recreation Commission is seriously concerned that the landscape policy
is not being followed and represents a dangerous precedent when exceptions are
granted as it appears has taken place with this plat. The proposal was
received without full staff review and created problems for the Commission's
decision making process. The Commission was concerned with the bypass of
normal procedures. All voted in favor.
Commission member Kubik moved, Carroll seconded, that Chairman Martin write a
letter to the Council with a copy to the Planning Commission, expressing Parks
Recreation Commission concerns as outlined above. The motion passed
unanimously.
C. Annual P.U.D. Review
Planning Assistant, Jim Sturm, announced that the annual- P.U.D. review held
before a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council will be on
Tuesday, November 12, 1985. Parks Recreation Commission members were given
copies of the agenda and invited to attend. No action was necessary.
Adv. Parks Rec Comm.
November 7, 1985
OLD BUSINESS
A. Blackhawk Park (Aeguisition) Discussion
Director Vraa reported on his meeting with the State grant administrator
indicating that grant monies for the Blackhawk Park acquisition was not as
readily available as monies for development. He did not feel that the status
would change in 1986. He said the City could resubmit the same proposal in
1986 and take its chances or could consider acquiring parkland with park fund
monies and request a development grant. The development grant would have
greater chance of source because of the selection criteria favor, development
over
acquisition.
The Commission discussed possible parcels to buy the small lakeshore site
belonging to Mrs. Waldron and a larger one belonging to Ed Dunn. Additional
parkland will be acquired via parkland dedication from Mr. Dunn as part of the
Blackhawk P.U.D.
Vraa noted that the asking price is about $20,000 an area with marketing at a
much higher value. The land is zoned R -4, multiple housing. He reminded the
Commission that road access may have to be acquired from Leo Murphy to the
south or Ed Dunn to the W /SW.
Chairman Martin felt access to the south was a necessity. Commission member
Alt thought this might be the City's only opportunity to obtain land
surrounding the lake and that the City should acquire as much as possible.
Members Ketcham and Fedde agreed that acquisition was necessary. Commission
member Carroll suggested the department not buy the parcel surrounding the
eastern shoreline, but bridge across from the Waldron parcel or that a smaller
portion be acquired. Commission member Bertz was concerned with the high cost
to acquire and source of monies needed to develop. She felt the City could
better spend its money on needed recreational facilities.
After additional discussion and review of possible options and alternatives,
on a motion by Masin, seconded by Thurston, the Commission recommended that
staff negotiate on the Waldron property and review various configurations for
possible acquisition of the Dunn property. Staff is also to discuss access
easement off Ed Dunn's development. All voted in favor.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Annual Review Parks Dedication Requirement
The Commission discussed the existing fees, fee increase and the possibility
of an escalating fee schedule for greater density residential developments.
Director Vraa was directed to bring some fee alternatives to the December
meeting based on the formula used in other communities.
3
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
November 7, 1985
B. Annual Update Park Systems Plan
Chairman Martin assigned sections of the plan to Commission members who are
to review and return with commentary by December 1, 1985. Assigned sections
are:
Ponds Lakes Masin Alt
Inventory Analysis Carroll
Trails Ketcham Fedde
Special Use Facilities Martin
Public /Private Recreation Martin
Parks Recreation Standards Kubik Caponi
Acquisition Development Plans Thurston Bertz
Funding Implementation Vraa
PARKS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
A. Update Parks Development
Landscape Architect /Parks Planner, Sullivan, said that trees and shrubs have
been planted at Walnut Hill, Goat Hill and Fish Lake Parks. Tree planting
will continue until bad weather forces a halt. The parking lots at Ridgecliff
and Rahn Parks are done and the trails should be completed in a few days.
Work has started on the lights for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks hockey
rinks. A contract will soon be awarded for the reseeding of Cinnamon Ridge
and O'Leary Parks. Staff will be working on contracts for next spring with
design plans for Blue Cross /Blue Shield Park a priority item.
B. 1986 Work Program
Included in the packet was a preliminary report /outline for 1986 park
development and construction. Five parks that may be targeted for 1986
include Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Quarry, Meadowland, Pilot Knob and South Oaks.
Some projects which may be undertaken include grading, play equipment
installation, landscaping, backstops and fences, park signs and graphics,
tennis courts construction, trails, lighted parking lots, security lights,
park shelter buildings and hockey rinks. Director Vraa said that staff will
review these work projects and provide additional information to the
Commission concerning the scope of the projects as plans develop. Commission
and staff agreed that the 1 86 program is very aggressive.
C. Report Predesigning Phase Park Shelter Building
Director Vraa announced that the next meeting with the architects will occur
in a few days and that some schematic drawings will be presented to the
Commission at the December meeting.
fi
4
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
November 7, 1985
OTHER BUSINESS A REPORTS
A. 1986 Budget
Director Vraa said that the 1986 budget had been approved by the Council
although copies will not be available until after the first of the year. He
said that approval had been given to hire additional staff a recreation
supervisor who will be responsible for summer playground, skating and the tots
program, additional clerical help, a full —time "Parks Manager" and a full —time
maintenance person. Director Vraa noted that the recreation program budget
was approved as requested. There was discussion concerning timing, job
responsibilities and inter— department relationships.
B. Fall Recreation Aetivitg Report
Recreation Supervisor, Peterson, submitted a report which was included in the
packet. There was much favorable comment about the spook trail and the
recommendation that it be continued as an annual event. Commission members
commended Dorothy Peterson for her fall program efforts.
C. Winter Program Planning
Recreation Supervisor, Peterson, also provided the Commission with a report on
upcoming winter programs. The popular "Specials Event Weekend" will be held
in February. She announced a Breakfast with Santa, updated the Commission on
warming house attendants, noted the cross— country ski lessons are set as well
as dance lessons. There will be a full slate of winter activities for Eagan
residents.
D. Volunteer Recognition
Director Vraa is looking for ideas to appropriately recognize those volunteers
who physically or financially give to the Parks Recreation program in Eagan.
The item will be on the December agenda.
E. Ohmann Property Update
Director Vraa announced a meeting the week of November 18th with three family
members to discuss acquisition of the middle 33 acres.
F. Water Management Study
Director Vraa said that a study of all Eagan ponds and lakes will be
undertaken to improve the water quality and reduce algae. Public Works
Director, Tom Colbert, will head up the study. Members commented on the need
to include those lakes which have recreation potential.
G. Murr Property
Director Vraa announced that the Murr property has been acquired.
S
Adv. Parks Rec. Comm.
November 7, 1985
H. Joint Commission Meeting Burnsville, Apple Valley
The next joint meeting is scheduled for January 28, 1986. Charlie Smith will
discuss recreation trends. Fort Snelling will also be on the agenda. The
meeting location has not yet been set.
I. Correspondence from Dorothy LeMay
Dorothy LeMay informed Parks Director, Vraa, that she would like to see a 2 -3
acre parcel be acquired for park purposes. The item will be on the December
agenda.
J. Horse and Surrey Owner
Director Vraa has received a request from a horse surrey owner that a place
is needed to run the horse and was a park available for such a use? The item
will be on the December agenda. The request prompted discussion on having a
place to hit golf balls and a place for batting practice. These too were
placed on the December agenda.
K. Publicitx on the Eagan Park Plan
Director Vraa announced that the reverse side of the Eagan City map will
feature information about Eagan parks. Staff is preparing the graphics to be
included on the 1986 maps which will be out in February.
ADJOURNMENT
Tom Ketcham moved, Martin seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. All voted
in favor. Time of adjournment was 10:40 P.M.
Dated:
Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary
i
a
6
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT:: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: YORKTON DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: SEA# OF SECTION 13
EXISTING ZONING: L -1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985
f
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 7, 1985
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for Preliminary
Plat approval of 2 buildings on 2 lots east of state highway
49 and south of Becker Road.
ZONING LAND USE: The entire site is ±43.2 acres and zoned
Light Industrial. The applicant is platting 2 lots, lot 15
2.2 acres and lot 16 ±2.3 acres and leaving the remaining
38.7 acres as an outlot. The topography generally flows to
a rather large low area near the center of the entire development.
A proposed pond is shown on the site plan in this area and will
act as a detention area for all of the proposed lots within the
development. An existing slough near the souteast portion of
the site will be used as a building site in the future.
Adjacent land uses in Eagan are industrial as well except for
an agricultural strip fronting on Hwy 49. West Publishing and
part of the Gopher -Eagan P.D. are also to the west. Inver Grove
3, Heights (Delaware Avenue) forms the eastern property line.
SITE PLANNING: Lots 15 16 will share .a single common access
on to Hwy 49. Staff has asked the applicant to widen this drive
to 36' to allow for easier turning by large trucks. Both buildings.
meet all setback requirements. At this time, the parking stalls
are shown to be 9' x 20' 41 per building.
Both buildings will have the same floor plan with the 4,320 S.F.
office area in front of the 18,432 S.F. warhouse area. The office
area will have a brick exterior, dark glass with annodized aluminum
framing. The rest of the warehouse area will be block wall and
below the 30' height restriction of City Code. The loading bays
will be approximately 5,000 S.F. and the curbed bituminous surface
appears to be of ample size for easy vehicular movement.
Yorkton Development typically desires to lease to high tech
industries. One of the proposed tenants for these buildings
is a printing company. These 2 platted lots will be subject
to the Parks Dedication fee of .04 at the time of building permit
issuance.
YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH
NOVEMBER 26,-19$5
PAGE 2
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The grading over this proposed development
proposes to maintain the existing drainage patterns in general
The developer proposes on filling a slough area presently located
over proposed lots 12 13 and expanding a low area over proposed
lot 9 to incorporate the storage volume lost in filling the slough.
This is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan as illustrated in figure 1. The pond this development proposes
on relocating is pond GP -7 on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan,
This pond has a normal water elevation of 864- with a 100 year
storm elevation of 872. The corresponding volume this pond requires
amounts to 63.9 acre. feet. This development will ultimately
be responsible for the necessary regrading to provide the required
storage volumes. Staff does not expect the need for this ponding
area until further development of this site occurrs.
The preliminary grading plan appears feasible with the exception
of lots 15 16, the two lots proposed with this development.
The proposed grading and the proposed common lot line of lots
15 16 will not allow for a -common access from Hwy 149. The
preliminary grading plan proposes a 5' drop accross lot 16 to
lot 15 in this area. The developer must revise his final grading
plan to facilitate a common access if allowed by Mn Dot for final
plat consideration. The grading plan for the final plat must
also be on a drawing to scale so that Staff may determine the
amount of storage volume proposed in the new pond.
SANITARY SEWER: The City has a 12" trunk sanitary sewer main
running northerly through this property about 400' west of Delaware
Tr (C.R. 63) This line is deep enough and of sufficient capacity
to provide service to this development. This line discharges
into a MWCC controlled and operated lift station at Becker Rd.
Staff reviewed the capacity of this lift station with MWCC for
the U.P.S. development located immediately to the north of this
proposed development. The consensus of that meeting is that
MWCC will not require any upgrading of this lift station in the
immediate future. MWCC is considering upgrading this lift station
within the next 5 years.
Because the 12" sanitary; sewer line is in place, the developer
will have only to construct services off of it to both lot 15
and lot 16.
WATERMAIN: The City has an existing 16 trunk watermain along
the east side of Hwy 149. The City also has an 8" watermain
along the west side of Delaware Tr. This line ends where it
provides service to the trailer park in Inver Grove Heights.
As a part of the U.P.S. development,' the City upgraded C.R. 63A
(Becker Road) and also constructed an 8 watermain within it
from Hwy 149 to Delaware Tr. All of these lines are of sufficient
size and capacity to provide service to this proposed development.
YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK,SOUTH
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 3
However, Staff recommends that the 8" watermain within Delaware
Tr be extended to loop into the newly constructed watermain within
Becker Rd when the developer develops the lots adjacent to Delaware
Tr.
To provide service to lots 15 16, the developer will be able
to tap services off the existing 16" watermain within the Hwy
149 right -of -way.
STREETS: State Hwy 149 borders this proposed development along
the westerly boundary with C.R. 63A (Becker Rd) and C.R. 63
(Delaware Tr) bordering this development on its north and east
respectively. The County is in the process of turning Becker
Rd back to the City. Otherwise, Delaware Tr is under the jurisdic-
tion of Dakota County, T.H. 149 is under the jurisdiction of
Mn Dot and Becker Rd will be under the jurisdiction of the City.
The City recently completed upgrading Becker Rd to 9 ton standards
resulting from the U.P.S. development and expected increased
traffic because of it. If Mn Dot allows access to these proposed
lots, this development should provide for a right turn lane in
addition to any other conditions it may require. Because Delaware
Tr is a County road and also is located within Inver Grove Heights,
upgrading this road to City of Eagan standards from Hwy 149 to
Becker Rd may be difficult. The City cannot hold a developer
responsible for upgrading his half of the roadway because it
is currently a rural roadway section and upgrading to an urban
section will require lowering of the grade line. Also, coordination
with Inver Grove Heights may present a problem. For these reasons,
Staff recommends the developer prepay street upgrading assessments
for Delaware Tr when the time comes for development of the property
along Delaware Tr.
RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate the
entire right -of -way for Becker Rd over the westerly 562' and
the southerly- half 40' right -of -way for Becker Rd over the
remainder. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 40' half right-
of -way for Delaware Tr.
This development shall dedicate a 20' permanent easement for
future trunk storm sewer west of the existing sanitary sewer
easement. Also this development shall dedicate a 10' utility
easement along the rear lot line of lot 15 for the future storm
sewer. To make construction of this storm sewer line easier
in the future, this development shall dedicate a 30' temporary
easement westerly of the previously mentioned storm sewer easement.
This easement shall expire -upon completion of this 'particular
section of trunk storm sewer. This development shall also be
responsible for dedicating the required ponding easement for
YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 4
63.9 acre ..feet of storage along with necessary easements to con
struct the future outlet to pond GP -7. Finally, this development
shall be responsible for dedicating all other easements as the
City Code requires.
ASSESSMENTS: The City's record indicate this area being assessed
for trunk area water and trunk area sanitary sewer at the appro-
priate rates. This leaves trunk area storm sewer and lateral
benefit from trunk sanitary sewer and trunk watermain assessments
as the responsibility of this proposed development.
The following table lists the assessments Staff proposes this
development is responsible for.
Est'd. 1985
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 196,020 S.F. $0.072/S.F. $14,113
Proposed for Lot 15 16
Lateral Benefit from 545 F.F $19.57/F.F. $10,666
Trunk Watermain
Proposed Lots 15 16
Lateral Benefit from Trunk 685 F.F. $14.35/F.F. $9,830
Sanitary Sewer
Proposed Lots 15 16 TOTAL $34,609
The City will determine the final amounts based on the assessment
rate at the time of the final plat approval and final plat areas
and dimensions. This development shall be responsible for all
costs associated with this development.
YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 5
CONDITIONS:
1) This development shall provide for 63.9 acre ft. of storage
for pond GP -7 and the necessary easements for it.
2) Access on to Hwy 149 must be approved by Mn Dot and if approved,
this development shall construct a right turn lane off of
Hwy 149 into this development.
3) This development shall dedicate adequate rights -of -way for
Becker Road and Delaware Trail as referenced in the engineering
report.
4) This development shall dedicate a 20' permanent utility easement
for trunk storm sewer west of the existing sanitary sewer
easement over proposed lot 15 along with a 10' utility easement
across the northeasterly lot line of proposed lot 15.
5) This development shall dedicate a 30' temporary construction
easement westerly of the permanent utility easement for the
storm sewer.
6) This development shall be responsible for prepaying or entering
into a waiver for trunk area storm sewer, lateral benefit
from trunk watermain and trunk sanitary sewer assessments
at the rates in effect at the time of final platting.
7) All costs associated with this development shall be the sole
responsibility of this development.
8) All applicable standard engineering conditions shall apply.
9) Submittal of landscape plan.
10) 10' x 18' parking stalls required.
1
FIGURE 1
YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH
_l. E u a2 E \p�E� BOO P 3!i 4 G a �\r
P ss EP- r L nu 5 5
8 5610 829.0 r y
CENTEi� 856.0
8644 •RIAL PAHtf" 15 I
L GP -8
1876 4e
87 3 E E 0 f: t- 886.0
1 ry 1 7 2 i
z 'I Nis rt r GP 45
'E-
�:�7�
k_�-0_Rp
4 E -e a2
844.0
Lo 848. DP`_ 27 E f ae. j iou5ialatr B5�3
RRK :_y
TO Q6Q0 .8 862 ti ESCOTf i HILLS�� y
Dq p�. p wESCOTT 866.0 GP 9 L
D 879.3 iu, 8560
CARRIAGE
12" r -0LF E n GARDEN JP 14
1 IOREN 1 B6B0
SE I� ��PLACE,
8730 I 8540,:,\\
j LEX'1CGTCN 882.0 874 6 7 1
•�P =33 JP -17
858.0
JP 5 a 832.0 8710
1.0
f� ��4�� 2 X70 61 B54.Q 2"
P x't
�1 /�Q
i�894 5 UI' 864.0 7
i
•8973 2879. .tiE5C0T;
886.1 J8860 !T STATIe? _7
f1 935 S
12 JP-41 L..-1 JP12 l 8600 ?.O =I
8530 E 87L0 V`
i ry 885.3
887.
JP -63 0 i� WI
8997 c 7 JP -32 21 V ISf1iN,
9007} 885.7 a JP -31 y
P=44 Be8. i a 876.3 JP 39 1st ADL 0 0
8804 8840 Ni(LS I i GP 4 1
8957 a a 8950 aC� I 883.
ROA h I
:J�TT D/ L_L -n I 1 887.
J-m 4
1J JP-19 30 r
JP-58� 874.0 )I
877.5 �1 882.0
J q L 8822
JP 30 fJ o JP
8794 1 �1 8960
j roT 6 864.4
SQUARE W' 855.6
H a L.S.-17
z
J815.3 'mod i M v JP-23
840.0 .:3 e Ida I 7 857.4 1
SUBJECT PARCEL
city of eagan a standard
PUBLIC STORM SEWER ap p roved: pate
WORKS
N
D PA TMEN MASTER PLAN
n
tz
Co Rd, N, 6 A
*ESCOTT
Scu H ILLS OR.
I
ILL! WAY LA
OR
cr
RD
�Gd� Iv
Nm
P r
"17 71
A 340(
ou
3
'D
JS
wisc6T
Ftj� D
I I U4
C
A I
soc
B-3
I P
LLI
z
4000
P4;
c S89044'W
S a h j a .0 te 212.20 i
N
N
7
E 1 8 t t a I I
PIC
EASEN
l I I I TYPICt
9 ti
1 ProPOSed eql� I 1 I ��I (I'`6.
'`•~iv\ r \,.µ0
NAIL 862
AWL• 8$B I
E e 3 e• 6.,,,i Q/� d
i ti ti aottom\PSH I I al 0
r'
12 if
V
'A V °S
0 COO
O I fn
TRUNK AREA Z
v 1 5
lop 1 j I I e5
I
8
-i—
S t o r m 1311 =,t',
C%
v. =tea i A� II
'1 i 1 11 �iI
CIL- 1 1 Sanitary
I
Scale= I inch
z SCALE IN
Water
If 1z
v
E.G. RUD a
i\ 1 624.6. 0 i LAND SURVE`
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK I' I Circle Pi nes Lexingt
d'� Telephone 1 (612)
A
Preliminary Grading plan h s r
YORKTON SOUTH ses• rw
\o
J GQVNir )HIG
CITY OF EAGAN COUNTY OF DAKOTA i�
o
DESC OF PROPERTY wr«... q� `t I �.•C• �i S�� i f y L. I
r.wnal .a
M.
u e u4 «n. r r w.u« ml.t.m u7. 7.rw4a Tw•y \ti S i'+� y t /�l 4 t� ....��li. o I I
It em 7�n ntr ur.• »S tr•n•• u bf.l zoa an• t» 1� f"' f
1t�1.) rr.a t• a•. IIr f H• fafrr n(■A» 11. T. r•4.1. 1
rwN».Nr17 •iM{ t■• 11n• a ••lf ■ltl..•r ;S.1 I»t, Um•• w•t 1
t Set
tnrne• w•aM� t•rlI •l.M all Fru I t ■7 t»t t• tn• ••rN ll» I i A
t .l .at s«u« 1), u.M. l.a Y4.f t..a t. u. u•t 1tA. 1
•I »lf r»tl M. wrtA 1)19.6 z••t 4 N• MMt •r Mp.1nUF �'t I i`6 1 w 1 1 I
N. tell«,n{ w »rlNf w. r•na• ae•N1M 4 t■. Den j
1•r�•ra
.r u.n.r. t I I
.'•rul 1 w Lml Nt••t »ru •r tM u•t 1/4 nw•I •t t••a/« 1). t. \1 1 I 1
r .n,i n. lm {.!)r t t3t.t rot. d.oln{ YY 44• ...U. t■•••• a i`\ t yw •n I V 1 -4' .T._ .�J�l. E U
I
wrN )10.4 t»t. N• »Ir•.t tY.t z••a, t11m•• MuY 7q,4 [•.t. 4 tM
rant .z w /lr.1M. •mt•/aM 1.3 «n•. ,6 J� r .�y 6� I
r•nr1 ■.pm1N s IM a .M 771.1 r..a w•t •I P i 1 11
«lnt 711.1 I F•
•a 1/4 •r �r t.sal•n i), i 4l. tt% Amt• r) r., u• M"u f7• Y• t♦ 1 'Y 1 I M
•l T EASEMENTS Is
.all).'10 f•.t t» w.a•rl. it pt f w1 S/n• nN Irl tM.• Yf
I I•lfr•w 4 a �i I TYPICAL LOT
irrw,•yy N.n•. ■eran.r•a•r1I l.nt ••Il t••nnt r.f 2 rttt, 4
esrG i) 40• u•l I)NI••t. Nme. w•N IO' u•t 400 I•.a1 um w•ne
f)• 1,0• Wt 70 ha tn• rand •r Nt1r1M, .u. in 04.4 C«.1b.Nr»•, �l ��r I; �ICF;I', 9 l 'I !�'f n.� l �I' �Iy •1
Ai» uureln0 b.ImiM •t plot
1711., r v., »t• raM A.
ft4 !••a r.ralr r tn• u•t 1/1 I 171 (1' 1 I i 1 I
w•a1m, tA•ne 1 �•ln< atwl w"4 1« I[ 4•t I.t 4MIa•4� 111 1 1
.rnna w L•H...t ..n.
n. a a tn. i.ra et• 4• u.a.»..r 47.1 n.a a• e• s.ru» 1 e..1..9 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 l 0 +_�i 1 I I
M.4 l:s. 1)4 1•l. t W IN, N•M• ••ll•.t 4 t1N l.tt Y' 71•
q•M tl•• c• •ril» a ul• r«f f0i.7 z»t w tl.• N {lrgln{ It• W' urg 1 J
ar an. 1•ra. m r 1 «.1. •t 79• !s•r N• a.16 1. nrw w it• +1 l l-
InNr•.e tl« r!G N• S Sln• f «If {»tl« 17 tr• •ran •1•M N•'L• Y2
w.111•• Y Yr• «lot .f \•{lM1M. «41Mn{ 1.14 »n•. rn •r 1»•. ♦t\ 1 Y�`\i ..I ass i� I i n..• 1 i S
wN..a ....•.na M ltnta ..w b t1.. ea.a..l lur....a.....a 1.1 y •a.\\ l wrb.rrl. l 1 a I .tiy am
Lran 1n N• retln H lt• i•Mme In ,w I n..l... r
0••. c•wy •n O•ter.r iL, 19>0 7.00 A.)1. M Nat 1Y .t RL• I a•pt• 1z kiu y I I I 1
).H t wa 707 W )Ie..• Os•r»na w. S1osY 1.M• 1!�0 ...lp•aN !n W
•Mcrae rr.arreln[• r•re•1 1.r. (]91f -09 (M -1) 901 M t•r N•
u. wr••a•..na •r .lc"•'.r. a tM i4M •r lN1w•»Y Y •iMUw.t M N• t I' fti 11 L -J STREET
OWNER Q DEVELOPER R o •;1; +i S ,y\\ 11 1 9 NORTH
Yorkton Development `1, r, 0
1
1690 U.1 -sit) A•... St. P.W. N 53104 1
A,...*. /V
YORK70N LTD Inc (612) 484.9000 Z t •i 1
%6 1 ['Vales
V /....�.w. y L.r»,.I I l I I 1 1 11 �att I 4.
w 1 I 13
uJ...d R.., i ar..w.uJ ;IT 11 •4 1 a, 1 F 1 111
3 1
Vt a 1 I 1 I
1 4 I 1. I, I cm.• 1 Inch I 0 1Yt
II' 11 �1 a I II; a 1 l( I
7 r e \a� I SCALE IN FEET
01. 1 LOCATION
1�. I a l •kR>_ I E.G. RUD 9 SONS. IN(L
1 .,,r• i 6V j I LAND SURVEYORS
r I b.rt ✓..lX; 11 9560 Le ■melon Ave."No/tA
✓s,r. /4 r4'.ets I Clrcle Pines. Minnesota 5601*
Ilt� Telephone' (612) 766 -6566
LOCATION MAP
a
1
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: NORWEST 3RD ADDITION
APPLICANT: MILO PINKERTON, NORWEST PROPERTIES
PAT RYAN, RYAN CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: SW'h OF SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING: LB LIMITED BUSINESS UNDER THE
NORWEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 20, 1985
p REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPTS.
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application had previously been submitted
requesting a preliminary plat for Norwest 2nd Addition which
originally consisted of one lot and one outlot. The application
has been amended and the outlot is now being proposed as Norwest
3rd Addition which will consist of one lot and contain 123,710
square feet on 2.84 acres.
ZONING LAND USE: Presently the parcel has been designated
as a LB (limited business use within the Norwest Planned Development).
The Comprehensive Guide also designates this parcel as an LB,
limited business designation, therefore, the Comp. Guide and
development land uses are consistent with each other.
BACKGROUND: As you may recall, during the past month the applica-
tion originally started` out as two lots. The medical clinic
was proposed on one lot and a strip commercial on the other.
At the time the medical clinic was approved, the other lot had
not progressed far enough with uses and design so that the review
could be done. Rather than holding back on both parcels, the
application was split with the medical clinic lot continuing
and outlot A, the 2.8 acre parcel, being now under consideration.
The City has reviewed this parcel with the Advisory Planning
Commission informally in regard to the strip center use and also
defining the types of uses that would be allowed in the LB district.
It was Staff's understanding that the proposed facility would
be made up of office, restaurants and up to 30% of the building
would have some sort of retail use as long as these uses were
reviewed and approved by the APC and City Council. The direction
was that the APC would consider 'the potential for some retail
as long as the retail would lend itself towards the LB nature
and would have a low turnover of persons per square foot. With
that the direction was to Staff and the applicant to proceed
with a detail plan and also determine the types of uses being
proposed with this strip center.
NORWEST 3RD ADDITION
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 2
SITE PLAN ''REVIEW: Lot 1, Norwest 3rd Addition, will consist
of 123,710 square feet on 2.84 acres and contain one (1) lot
for development. The development proposal would consist of one
building with 24,000 sq. ft. and would be a one story, strip
facility containing multiple tenants with uses that should
be spelling out so that the City can determine if this facility
will meet the limited business criteria of the ordinance. The
applicant has proposed 130 parking spaces with a 9' x 18' dimension.
The applicant has provided the number of spaces but the dimensions
must be modified to meet City standards. Staff has passed on
these comments and the applicant-is working on the revisions.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The applicant did not provide any grading
plan for the Engineering Dept, for review and comment.
The only concern Staff can think of without a plan is that MnDot
should review any plans to drain runoff from this site onto I -35E
right -of -way. The City should receive documentation from MnDot
approving of such drainage prior to final plat approval.
UTILITIES: Without a preliminary grading plan or building elevation
Staff cannot determine how best to serve this development with
sanitary sewer. The City has a sanitary sewer line within Norwest
Court that could be extended depending upon the building elevation.
Otherwise, sanitary sewer will have to come from Sherman Ct.
This development will be responsible for extending the exiting
watermain to the Norwest Bank facility, northeasterly and connect
to the existing deadend watermain on Sherman_ Ct. This was an
original condition that the City placed on the original Norwest
lst Addition.
STREETS: Norwest Court is the only public access for this develop-
ment. The Norwest 2nd Add will relocate and realign Norwest
Ct to provide access to this development. Staff has concerns
with the traffic volume this development will generate with respect
to only having one access from Pilot Knob Rd, that being Norwest
Court.
In reviewing the internal circulation, Staff has two comments.
1) This developer shall provide a minimum 24' wide driving aisle
around the north and southwest end of the proposed building.
2) This developer shall provide 10' x 20' parking stalls. Where
parking abuts curb or sidewalk, the length of the stalls may be
18' using a two foot overhand for the curb or sidewalk. The
Engineering Dept is not aware of the type of uses the developer
is proposing for this urea. Because the use is still unknown,
it is difficult for staff to estimate what type of traffic this
development will generate. It may generate enough traffic that
extending Sherman Ct this development's north lot line might
be necessary.
NORWEST 3RD ADDITION
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 3
ASSESSMENTS: The City's records indicate that only trunk area
storm sewer is left over this parcel to be assessed. This develop-
ment will be responsible for the trunk area storm sewer rate
for commercial /industrial property at the rate in effect at the
time of final platting.
All other costs associated with this development, including any
necessary easement acquisitions if the City determines the extension
of Norwest Ct is feasible and necessary, shall be the sole responsi-
bility of this development.
CONDITIONS:
1) All of the standard plat conditions shall be applicable.
2) The building will be constructed to be compatible with the
other buildings within the Norwest Additions. All four sides
of the building will have the same architectural treatment.
3) A detailed landscape- plan shall be submitted and berms shall
be included to screen parking areas from public roadways.
A landscape bond shall be required and not released until
one year after the landscaping has been completed. The parking
spaces shall be redesigned to be in conformance with the
Eagan parking policy.
4') The uses percentage of uses shall be reviewed and approved
by the APC and City Council.
5) This development shall meet all applicable standard engineering
conditions.
6) The 8" watermain from the existing bank building to Sherman
Court shall be the responsiblity of this development to con-
struct.
7) A minimum 24' driveway around the north and southwesterly
end of the building shall be required.
8) This development shall provide for'10 foot wide parking stalls.
9) Any storm water runoff onto I -35E right -of -way shall be approved
by MnDot.
10) This development_ shall be responsible for trunk area storm
sewer at the commercial /industrial rates in effect at the
time of final platting.
11) If the City determines that access is necessary and feasible
by extending Sherman Court to this development, then it shall
be responsible for acquisition costs of such easement.
12) This development shall be responsible for all costs associated
with this development.
j
NORWEST COURT
i 7t.. EEN BARBER I -r 0 CAR
TRASH
0 100 CARS.3.: Z•
co X
i•
n�
0
s
AUSTgAN PINE
i
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD NORTH
f 40•
i
�HPO SKYIRY, RD`
,t au
DAK RD
I R
5�IC
M11S DR ANNE o
tI r i
u/ R
.o a< Nu 2i1 p
'ED CEDAR R PORK T^wEWV�EW C� r
no
I
i,,,. MOONSHINE PARIS/
q
y 'j I wiGM Sir[ ORI ,o�� F;..._ E.
vra FL"E i• L: 4
.—CE Q
QUARRY PARK iR
L.Ja
vLD i T
:T
YANI, .00001
Rd
rE ,V
&LEARY PARK
N
s W
I R iC.ER^
Rasr <c T
p
3 ICOACNwNI e J r't.'
OAKS 1� Ci
�?4 R-3
R-31 N
IGHlANO b7'•z I
DDITION
i R-4
iYO" OACH <4N
r.4•nrMV r. fox C.s
RIDGE F Cl E A
r N ane
F 3re SURREr Ga
�g I15i1r rr.
pC N i I oT SC]CSC
Ip L
o� R;7.4 a .I CSC 1' ',btiEX
P1LOT Oe R,
L__ CRQ SROAD a'
OF
I6 Li3 s t CENT I R:
f' 1
:KHP A
Fl
KILLS
�A
h fPF
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT)
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION
LOCATION: L 2, 3, 4, BL 2, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK
3RD ADDITION, NEh OF SECTION 3
EXISTING ZONING: L-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 7, 1985
REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPTS
APPLICATION:- An application has been submitted for Preliminary
Plat (Replat) approval in the Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addi-
tion. This plat combines the 4 existing lots into 3 new lots
north of Corporate Center Drive and west of Trapp Road.
SITE PLANNING: The Sperry office building approved by the City
Council in June 1985 is under full construction. This property
just south, of I -494 and surrounded by L -1 (Light Industrial)
use is approximately 22.7 acres. The desired replatting will
allow all of the parking for this building to be on the same
Lot l parcel. A cul -de -sac, Trapp Court, will provide a secondary
access to this lot. It will also have the capability to service
replatted Lots 2 3. Lot sizes will be: Lot 1 ±10.4 ac, Lot
2 f4.4 acres, Lot 3 t7.4 acres. Staff has requested that the
applicant submit a detailed plan demonstrating the parking layout
to ensure site compliance in terms of sizes and numbers. The
utilities are in and all setbacks meet Code requirements.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The building contractor is performing the
site grading over this property under Sperry's building permit..
The grading plan is feasible and appears to be within City Code.
The grading plan proposes boulder retaining walls at various
locations along the southwesterly boundary of this site due to
the existing valley located along the southwesterly boundary
of this development. As long as the height of these rock retaining
walls does not exceed 5 Staff does not have any problems with
them.
This development is located within major drainage district H
as shown on Figure 1. Because the location of this site is near
the down stream end of this major drainage district the existing
trunk storm sewers should be able to handle the runoff from this
site.
WATERMAIN: The City has an existing 12" watermain along the
south side of Corporate Center Dr and an 8" watermairi within
Trapp Rd to provide service to this proposed development.
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 2
This development proposes to loop an 8 watermain from Trapp
Rd through this development and connect to Corporate Center Dr.
The developer proposes to install this public line privately.
This is feasible as long as the developer constructs this watermain
in accordance with City standards
SANITARY SEWER: The existing sanitary sewer that can provide
service to this development is the Eagan North Interceptor.
This line runs down the southwest property line of this development.
The MWCC owns and operates this existing 21" trunk sanitary sewer
line.
This development is proposing to tie its sanitary sewer service
into this trunk line. To do this will require a permit from
the MWCC. Any necessary fees or bonds required with the permit
will be the responsibility of this development. This development
cannot connect to the sewer line until the City is in receipt
of a copy of the permit from the MWCC.
STREETS: Corporate Center Dr and Trapp Rd are existing city
streets bordering this proposed development. Corporate Center
Dr and Trapp Rd are both 44' wide 9 ton urban streets. This
development will not require any upgrading of these city streets.
This development is proposing the cul -de -sac off of Trapp Rd
to provide access to the easterly point of the Sperry property
and better access to lots 2 3. Staff recommends constructing
this cul -de -sac in accordance with City standards for a tear
drop design with center island. The developer will have to make
minor adjustments to the right -of -way dedication to suit the
tear drop cul -de -sac. Staff is recommending this different' type
of cul -de -sac because it will help channelize the traffic. if
left open, there would be a 90' paved area with no channelization
providing many conflicts for vehicles attempting to reach Trapp
Rd. This design forces traffic in a one -way movement around
the cul -de -sac and will be much safer.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: The City has adequate right -of -way for
Corporate Center Dr and Trapp Rd. The proposed 60' right -of -way
for Trapp Ct will be adequate provided the developer dedicates
a 20' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the public right-of-
way. This is in line with previous right -of -way dedications
in this area.
The City will require this developer dedicate a 20' easement
over the proposed water line from Trapp Rd through this property
to Corporate Center Dr. The developer shall dedicate- all other
necessary easements in accordance with City Code.
ASSESSMENTS: A review of the trunk area related assessments
for' utilities indicate that the City has levied all trunk area
related assessments for this proposed development.
EAGANDALE OFICE PARK 3RD
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
PAGE 3
CONDITIONS:
1) The retaining wall and grading of the parking lot along the
southwesterly boundary cannot encroach upon the City's storm
sewer and sanitary sewer easement.
2) The watermain the developer proposes on constructing shall
be built in accordance with City specifications and properly
verified that the contractor adhered to City standards.
3) This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary
MWCC connection permits.
4) The cul -de -sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance
with City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards.
5) This development shall dedicate a 20' utility and drainage
easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right -of -way.
6) This development shall dedicate the appropriate right -of -way
necessary for the cul -de -sac to conform to City standards.
7) If approved, the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all
applicable ordinances.
PRELIMINARY PLAT 0F:
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
.3,
LOT
1\ jam..• __a X; c-
i• \t 'maw^ I I I �l 1 1 r u o =j Now to. wom w H nrw
A l/l lit
11 I I g nmxrww
1• 1��1�
N
ILL I I ir r�
�..li.. 1 ly
l 1
t J I E
ri A l
r .�r'yl Yr♦ r
Mw.N �.rwti Mevr� /rQ cr¢.
GEN
;;;7•••A¢¢¢ INTERSTATE 494
LOST SPQR
COUNTRY
cl-ue
o ROAD C TE
c o
uW AV f 0� P dr H w4
V'.Ew
AVE. 9L. NENNETN k O L
Pa�l`GEVI HICHVIEW w° CL'U Y ME
E PARK R �O AN ID
P SOUTNRI m
AVE •E 59 M E
63 -r� L p v y NE -F LEX /NOT L
ST, I PAR/!
FIRE
tI7 NO T
P O
LA
OAK RD LJ LONE ORN
Rd N, 61 (r- Rd. 2
i
g W
Q "(J KNOB ARpllb
I CEDAR -D PAPK *_pwERV Ew 1 �j,� i I d a
GE MINI
MOONSHINE PAR
PJ A HTS.
eoe
-2
I N
PD
$LOST SPUR ,74,7 5 w f. 1 r
COUNTRY
CW8 °r 0i
Z PF
LB RB
VT NO 1 A
7Al fCQH VIEW i M x
AEN`' a ACRES I CQU T�Y PARK i�i�.
�c
R I P ita l tda K Le%
i io
T(EFkLE .ACRES, EAGANOA
,y
1 IAG FCC
f1E1 T9 11 .e.�.,L[�l •.:y LON
��ppF 7
ST PD'O R4 c W A j I a (N Gg 7
l A
H
17 1 K-" R 3 x A
,PF 3r e r•r< A
.POSTAL T
4fif.SERVICF.
f4 G 4 dOLrA-. 3
FIGURE 1 f
I
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
s MENDOTA j HTS.
w._•��_+ I F.
=rs
4': tiFJC A DALE
rH'D i 8 .5
LOST SPUR :g43
J
k COUNTRY
:H i ••:83�.:;: Q� I�' H f a
y 7 -t CLUB
tT,• II oA Q k ro
832
83
w e �PCiST NO 3� 1 _n s 1
b
_A� t�3Tf r r1r
—LA 'EST C TRY
G
PARK
Y
IL
-1 1 r
L 42�i �.RcR ie 4;Qj 6 se \.�Si� /OP -f2 _x
b 4 488 0
C L
�S, D 872.0 EAGANDA TET�
i
RtF1E T i DP -1
D a tl TTT
8660 7�8 0 1_} �1 -!VE) 2
EHNbER t
I- y A di, 6 E-s E -r E-►LONE
D t3� D-d V AC 24 9I c C 8782 12• t
t 11
S_ _CHOOI. U� PPL
2?7
HOME' TEAD I
'pD�Cr a solo
0
874.0 iA i4 LS: 30 z
ys.
ir
-k L.E1K 15: 884.(2. S. P cT I
COACHMAN o 890.
1
oAX$ e. u N Q SEM DP 3 E-P
p X as5.0 I
OP.q f �1� 14 87/.7 j
—a27 -7 .1`:r, i 75.0
SUBJECT PARCEL
City of eagan a standard
PueLlc STORM SEWER pproved: plate
t, WORKS
N
DEPARTMENT1 MASTER PLAN
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: HARDEES RESTAURANT (STANLEY SCHULTZ)
LOCATION NWh OF SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: CSe (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 12, 1985
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting
a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 'drive -thru' facility and
pylon sign for a proposed Hardee's Restaurant east of Pilot. Knob
Rd and south of Duckwood Dr.
CODE COMPLIANCE /SITE PLANNING: All building and parking setbacks
meet City Code requirements. 82 parking stalls are pr=ovided
80@ 10' x 20' and 2 12' x 20 The drive -thru area provides
staking for 6 cars and additional space for another 5 cars along
the south side of the building. The site plan indicates a future
building pad only to demonstrate the ample size of this parcel,
and the possibility of another building. Hardees will have two
access points from Krestwood Lane, each being 25' wide and providing
entrance /exit service. The drive area .between the 20' parking
stalls will be 25'' and along with the 10' width stalls should
provide safe, freely moving vehicular activity.
The proposed sign location is approximately 20' from the property
dines thus meeting City Code. The sign will be very similar
to the approved sign at the Nicols Road Hardees. As with that
sign, a variance is needed 'because the total sign area will be.
143 S.F. per side due to the 32 S.F. appendage sign. City Code
allows 125 S.F. per side. This appendage sign and the main-
'Hardees' sign 111 S.F. are pre- manufactured with the next smallest
sign being 50 S.F.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1) The sign shall be at least 10' within the property line.
j 2) A variance shall be granted to allow a maximum 143 S.F. of
sign area per side.
3) The sign shall be no taller than 27'
4) The trash area be enclosed.
5) A landscape plan be submitted for Staff review before issuance
of the building permit.
F P (ABWUM R Ep i CEDAR I Ru. PCRK T MIEW
R LA
V GEMIN
MOONSHJ VC PARK
i 1 AR,TE� e
J OUARRY PARK
T
YanNE DOODLE
CA RJ. No 28
l O'LEARY PARK
BL/C
RK$ IIV 334. r 'J B�LU -E�J4
?AGf CuC 0 y
��l'ICLET'i
OR AIL
11
'L t,
cT GE LA
T
NG JI0 ESC �I
�1 R- IJI'f KOL aTAU �'JiE Gt.
ACKHAWx I .I
D:
H.LLS R "rh•'� �E AR I E
EPT ADM 9 ifAIL F 5 1 v�ARx TpAIL E L
M. u
Y J CO —a_ $A' :aEe..� oD.
AKpi t`w'r.`.
L
Y. 4kF
MU NI CIP AL ?oE L�. z IvBAr
CENTER SAVa
w h�REST WE WINDCREST I> I x
GI
AC 8 A
Geis
A a< r PD A T R
pp Y raw n n.;nm
31d .;SURREY 4 I RB
'GARDENS
i i -�34�` SC 82 2
I
�R L R
e T
1st CR7A ^1� CSC r��T 1 .0. 1 ER TY �P RK sna
poor r,oe R R -I4
FSSQES _Yr S
B.. ENT R,', GA, t.
16 `T
R -4
A ��'R= Rl'+1
A
R FI ,woo R =3
Fria
y 1
Y
F ALL w ti P sateal' W
I s
1
3 13.32'
p o tir�fZ tx
fr�v: roof 7'
�AKDtlC. 1
4A s l G 0 4 X2234 2 25 16 5
T T
4 1_
IL
O oo
67- 1 7TAL�S
is x 2 0' o!
r IMe huh
�o(.A110C�
N
312.34'
P�LoT ►�r�o�
f
ME
SPECIFICATIONS:
ftTir
SIZE: 7'2 3/4" x 15'5" x 1'2 518"
AREA: 111.44 sq.
ft
WEIGHT: 1,025 lbs.
ELECTRICAL:
LOAD: 1 •20 Amp, 120 Volt Circuit:
13.4 Amps Maximum
LAMPS: F84T12CWHO- OTY 14
BALLAST: FRANCE 388 D 3 lamp- OTY 2
FRANCE 488 D 4 lamp- OTY 2
SWITCH: 1 20 Amp
I CAL 1 Approved
r
I I
ti
'Il
,<7:;;:;;: J::::,:'� oft`:" J`; j. r.> .JJ:; ".JAJJ:: ?::::JJ:ja:
I %i4f•:
sh:
2
U
6� ✓i
f a
z2
I
la,
.r ��,��yi' i #:<u::: :TSX;J, Yi,£ iJ /:i'�-•:�`::..��..L:: %�:�2�:: •�'W
Hardee's Model 816 road sign is the primary sign used for the
main identification of the store. It is usually installed at 16' to
20' ,grade clearance. A Breakfast /Drive Thru appendage sign is
usually used. See appendage sign sheet.
Tj
MODEL 816
SZE: 5'1 x 6'2"
REA: 31.61 sq. ft.
WEIGHT: 390 I bs.
ELECTRICAL:
LOAD: 1 -15 AMP 120 Volt Circuit
9.2 AM? Maximum
s r LAM PS: F60T120�'JHO Oty, 12
BALLAST: France 663D, 6 Lamp Oty. 2
SWITCH: 1.15 AM7- Oty. 12
UL Approved
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1985
RE: PARKS DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
BACKGROUND
At the November meeting of the Advisory Commission, Commission reviewed a
staff report concerning a possible increase in the City of Eagan's parks
dedication requirements effective January 1, 1986. During the discussion of
this item there was a general concensus by the Commission that fees for
apartment units appear to be too low, and that there was a need to review the
existing parks dedication fee formula for possible modification.
The Commission then directed staff to prepare an additional report for the
purpose of reviewing parks dedication fee formulas which may be used in other
communities and address the problems as discussed by the Advisory Commission.
CURRENT STATUS
The Director of Parks Recreation has begun and completed nearly two thirds
of this requested report by the Advisory Commission. Work has not continued
on the report at this time pending a meeting of area parks recreation
directors to discuss this issue.
This meeting is a result of discussion with the Director of Parks Recreation
from Maple Grove. This community is also reviewing its parks dedication fee
formula with the intent of making some significant changes. Apparently the
City of Eden Prairie is also contemplating some changes. Therefore, it was
determined that a meeting of area directors of growth communities would be
appropriate to review the entire issue of parks dedication formulas and fees.
I expect the result of such a meeting(s) to be a more thorough review and
analysis of legislation and court cases involving parks dedication fees with
resulting ordinance or resolution which could be adopted to each individual
community.
Since the affected community directors have not yet met, it is anticipated
that a report will not be available until the second quarter of 1986. Results
could be produced sooner or later dependent upon a number of factors.
1986 DEDICATION FEES
It appears that the Advisory Commission has several options regarding 1986
fees.
The Commission could adopt as its 1986 dedication schedule, the same as is in
effect for 1985. This would remain in effect pending review and modification
until it receives the staff report. If the Commission then felt a change was
necessary, it could make such a recommendation.
The second alternative for the Commission would be to increase the 1986 fees
as it sees fit and wait until 1987 to restructure the entire fee schedule,
thus allowing more time for area directors to meet and for Commission and
Council review. This would reduce the time pressures for such a review
insuring that it is thorough and complete.
The third option would be to increase the apartment fee from the current $278
amount to a higher fee. Members will recall it was this fee that appeared to
be too low in comparison with other communities.
STAFF RECOMMATION
Staff is recommending that the Advisory Commission increase the apartment unit
fee from $278 to $300. Fees for single and multiple family units will remain
at their current level of $440 and $365 respectively. That the Commission
keep open its option for modification of these fees pending staff report and
possible adoption of a new dedication formula.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
Advisory Commission to discuss its options relative to parks dedication fees
effective on 1/1/86 and make its recommendation to the City Council.
KV /js
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1985
RE: STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND
Dorothy LeMay of 1385 Jurdy Road requests City evaluation for the acquisition
and purchase of two (2) parcels for parkland use. The properties are located
east of Pilot Knob Road and south of Jurdy Road (see figure #1). The
neighborhood is concerned that a potential for a high density land use would
not be compatible with the surrounding existing land use. As explained in the
attached letter, Mrs. LeMay feels the parcel could be developed into a
municipal neighborhood park.
EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
The agricultural zoned parcels comprise a land area of 2.5 acres. The
Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts an R -2 for approximately the south 170' of
the south parcel. The north 60' of the south parcel and the entire north
parcel is designated R -4.
Single family residential exists north and east of the parcel. South of the
property is a large apartment complex with Pilot Knob Road and the Sperry
Corporation campus to the west.
The north parcel is undeveloped. Currently a single family home is being
utilized as a day care facility on the south parcel. The topography is gently
rolling with slopes ranging from approximately 2 -5 A majority of the
drainage is to the south to a ditch section east of Pilot Knob Road. No
significant vegetation exists on the property with the exception of several
12" diameter deciduos overstory trees.
The park service area of this neighborhood is served by Moonshine Park.
Moonshine Park is currently undeveloped with a land area of 4.9 acres.
Approximately 2.5 acres is usable. An additional acquisition of four (4)
acres southeast of the park is necessary in order to provide additional
facilities such as open play fields, free skating rink and tot lot. Moonshine
Park is located approximately 1,000' from the subject property.
The subject parcel is approximately 450' x 250 This land area is inadequate
for the typical number and type of facilities associated with a neighborhood
park and does not meet the standards previously established for the "model"
neighborhood park. The property could support a small fields game area and a
tot lot. Pilot Knob Road would need to be separated from the park facility
for safety. A trail exists along the east side of Pilot Knob Road and
provides access to the parcel.
STAFF COMMMS
It is staff's opinion that City acquisition of the two (2) parcels for park
use is not in the best interest of the Park Systems Plan at this time. The
parcels location and size do not meet the City's neighborhood park design
standards. The eventual development of Moonshine Park should provide park
facilities for the subject service area. The addition of this parcel does not
appear to significantly enhance the park /play opportunities of this area when
combined with the proposed Moonshine Park development or by itself.
/js
1385 Jurdy Road
Eagan, Minn. 55121
November 4, 1985
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minn. 55122
Dear Mr. Vraa:
I am writing as you suggested as per our telephone conversation November 1, 1985•
This is regarding my suggestion that the Park Board consider a city park for the
approximate 22 acres facing Pilot Knob Road between Jurdy Road and HighSite Drive.
The property is now split zoned agriculture and residential and has a small house
located on it used currently as the Sniffles Day Care facility.
This residential area of Section 10 has no usable public playground land now and
is literally isolated by Interstate 35E. The Sniffles Day Care people have informed
us, as adjoining property owners, that they would like to buy the little house and
move it and their business to a new location. And Mr. Larry Wenzel, owner, has
vocalized his intentions of building a large apartment complex on this acreage.
We, as neighbors, feel strongly that a large apartment building would be a mistake
and would saturate this neighborhood. The access to this isolated property would
probably be Jurdy Road. And we feel that, if monitored, it would be apparent that
this is a disagreeable and unsafe situation that would add more behicles using the
Jurdy Road, Pilot Knob Road intersection, especially during peak hours.
I feel that the 2 acres, which is landlocked on three sides by residential buildings,
would make a fine park. It could easily be divided into a tennis court, play area,
and perhaps a small ball field, using attractive fencing to separate each part. Of
course, a tall chain -link fence would be required to keep children and balls off of
Pilot Knob Road.
Please consider this whenever possible and please keep me informed of the outcome.
Thank you,
Dorothy eMay
I IVI�t•�L.v
a•• S
!ADD-
0 TOWFP w Ow. No. 929887
w
ROAD 0.092283 n.
`$i? -tat w I
ptMSO 010-!1 03E-31
,t•
2 080 -30 a 03030 040-30 !r'Z
033-31
cFs-I a
P ip•
R a -T RtY a QUARRY oa LANE xt�
010.32 i e •b •e b• ....r'. 04h311
IeF li r••.M -f l .a :LF
MOONSHINE
1. 1 City of
(d 030-32
ci
t 'tta_.__ .�k PARK
Ma .wort f ,�Cn d `���'+M.i� o y�+ f
i. -r•r o\ ,/1� a °•�•x iJ i..:'DO 'y. SF e
040.32 oso -a2 r F e-. KF •'Jti ,Q''
�'s 9 il w: i •o„G AA .'1 y� o .'q0 •ws
Ii i JA i
C DOC. lDOC. s, ,..-en tr .S�' "t- r �t e t r'e.`..
I 1I R Y tt .'G _cQS,��, fir•. I A ppf f l .:t 1, .w...
0 F'010"6 x i •Y W! F',1e�' Yt Pc• 1•,r y.mr r
u �t e i, 6 r �i �i i'•� ...:L- +.kt .•!aT
a I ..J u r i al.•tRD 0 D 4' t
PAW Of a$
020
w�
fArc I Y
c
u
o a
.u•.•'�re'
ta•a
HIGH -SITE o DRIVE
III( i •a 1
F IGU R E 1
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DOROTHY PETERSON, RECREATION SUPERVISOR
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1985
RE: RECOGNITION OF VOLUNTEERS
BACKGROUND:
At the November meeting of the Advisory Commission, there was a discussion
concerning the recognition of volunteers who assist the Department of Parks
Recreation in various activities. Volunteers often assist with recreation
programs, parks development or other action oriented project or may have
served on a Citizens Task Force. A means to recognize those individuals for
their interest, assistance and support of Parks Recreation and the City of
Eagan, appears to be in order.
There are several options and alternatives in regards to what form the
recognition is given. These alternatives include the object to be given, time
of year, place the recognition is given and the people involved in giving the
recognition. The purpose of this memorandum will be to cover some of the
issues involved with recognition in order to begin the process of determining
who, what and where of the recognition issue.
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Staff proceeded with this report under some basic assumptions concerning
volunteers and recognition.
1. That Parks Recreation or City logo should appear on the object(s) to be
given.
2. That the object(s) should be attractive and distinctive to reflect
importance and significance of their volunteer efforts.
3. The object(s) should carry a purchase price that allows a significant
number of items to be purchased in those cases where there have been a
significant number of volunteers who have participated in a particular
project, i.e. free planting.
4. That volunteers are different and provide assistance for a variety of
reasons. Recognition should, therefore, reflect the differences in order
to be appropriate, i.e. separate objects for recreation program
volunteers, parks- oriented volunteer, citizens task force volunteer, and
volunteers who may be young, old, male or female etc.
It should also be assumed that there may be alternative times and places for
this recognition. Presentations and recognition might take place at:
1. The site of an event following its completion.
2. At an Advisory Parks Recreation Commission meeting.
3. At a City Council meeting.
4. At a special time and place specifically established for this particular
recognition, i.e. a luncheon, a prearranged photo session, or seasonal
opportunities such as "Volunteer Recognition Week."
Objects that could be used to recognize volunteers are as follows:
1. T- shirts. T- shirts are available in an array of colors and sizes. On the
average a shirt can be purchased and printed at approximately $6.50.
Larger quantities may result in a lower unit cost. T- shirts are probably
most appropriate for the youth and youthful minded or those who
participate in outdoor activities. Sizing may be a problem unless a
significant number are purchased.
2. Caps. Caps are also available in an array of colors and are easily
adjustable to sizing. A cap with a two color logo will cost approximately
$4.50 per cap and like t- shirts, are very popular with a large majority of
people.
3. Polo shirt or golf shirt. A more distinctive and upgrade from the t-
shirt, this shirt is also available in an array of colors and sizes, but
is obviously more expensive. Shirt and logo are estimated at
approximately $15 each. Sizing and immediate availability of this, as
well as t- shirts, can become an issue.
4. Badges, buttons and emblems. Department heads previously used badges
which cost about .75 cents each over a coat pocket flap or a pin or
button. A special design could be developed for such a badge /button.
5. Lapel emblems, printed with a baked enamel finish, can look attractive and
are available for approximately .75 cents to $1.00 each.
The emblem can be upgraded with the use of materials with a high gloss
coating improving the appearance for possible other users. Such a price
might become as much as $1.50 per emblem.
6. Pins. The quality of pins is numerous and varied. The major difference
between a lapel emblem as previously mentioned and a pin is that the pins
can be engraved, enameled and are on gold or silver plated brass rather
than on plastic or aluminium. An example of price based on a quantity of
upwards of 500, custom shaped two colors, will be between $2.50 and $3.00
each. This would be very similar to the new City of Eagan pin recently
introduced.
OTHER POSSIBILITIES:
There are numerous other alternatives which could be presented as a means of
recognition. These include: pen sets, plaques, momentos of unusual
characteristics purchased for a special occasion, pennants, photographs,
coffee cups or mugs, ribbons, and the list goes on. It appears that these
items might be of a special character and nature that their use and
presentation would be identified with a special situation and circumstance.
To review, the basic decision to be made regarding recognition of volunteers
includes: 1) who is to be recognized 2) where will they be recognized 3)
what object(s) will be used to convey recognition and is (are) most important
to the individual and the service performed 4) when should the recognition
be implemented 5) individuals who are to present the recognition.
FOR COMUSSION ACTION
Commission is to review and discuss the appropriateness of recognition for
individuals identifying categories and objects for recognition, establishing a
proposed budget for same.
KV /js
J EEE ag
�111101 city of eagan
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Maya
PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City AdmiNstrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
TO: Mayor Blanquist and City Council Members FROM: Roger J. Martin
CC: Advisory Park and Recreation SUBJECT: Landscaping
Commission Members DATE: November 19, 1985
Advisory Planning Commission Members
Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Ken Vraa, Park and Recreation Director
Advisory
The Park and Recreation Commission has expressed concern regarding the need for
a landscaping and open space ordinance for the City of Eagan. We believe this is
necessary so development within the community will be balanced and aesthetically
pleasing. Several months ago the Park Commission made a recommendation to the
City Council that a landscape ordinance be implemented. This ordinance would be
designed to provide developers with an objective set of the standards which they
must meet. Staff has already conducted a great deal of research on this subject.
The Commission reviewed the initial findings and made several comments and
suggestions. We anticipate that we will have a proposal for a formal landscaping
ordinance for consideration within two months. Other Metropolitan communities
with similarities to Eagan have landscaping ordinances in effect.
In the absence of a formal city ordinance, members of the Park Commission main-
tain that, in the interim, the city must still include some type of land-
scaping and screening requirements from developers.
At the November meeting, the Park Commission reviewed the Federal Land Company's
Town Center 70 development. Commission members expressed a great deal of concern
regarding the apparent lack of landscaping proposed for this development. The pri
mary areas of concern are the large parking lot and the loading dock area of the
Rainbow grocery store. Neither of these areas appeared to have appropriate
screening planned.
In questioning staff on this issue at the November Commission meeting, it was
evident that staff didn't have sufficient time to review this development in
regard to landscaping requirements.
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Mayor Blomquist and City Council Members
19 November 1985
Page Two
Members of the Park Commission feel that staff and the Advisory Commisssion need
sufficient lead time to review all pertinent issues to insure orderly, well planned
i
developments for our Star city.
In light of the short review time, we respectfully request that staff be allowed to
address this issue on the Town Center 70 development, in order to establish minimum
landscaping criteria for this development and to prevent precedent setting for
future development.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
f
i Martin
Chai rrron
Eagan Park Commission