Loading...
05/02/1985 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission TENTATIVE AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 7:00 P.M. MAY 2, 1985 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES OF MARCH 28, APRIL 4 18 MEETINGS 3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Sunset 7th Addition Randy Barrows B. Williams LaRue 2nd D.H. LaRue C. Lexington Place South 2nd U.S. Home Corp. D. Federal Land rezoning E. Norse Development Co. Peter Stalland F. Finishing Equipment waiver of plat G. Frontier Midwest (Informational) H. Thomas Lake Place Jack Safar (Informational) 4. OLD BUSINESS 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Proposed gift 6. PARK DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM A. Architect Selection Committee B. Athletic site discussion C. Spring construction contract informational 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Park Planning Cooperative discussion B. May 9th "Lights On" reminder C. Next Commission meeting 9. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION DATE: MAY 1, 1985 RE: MAY 2 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING After the Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance, the Commission is to approve the agenda for the evening's meeting. Also for approval are the minutes from the meetings of March 28, April 4 and April 18. There are eight items under Development Proposals. As always, the Planning and Engineering packets are enclosed for each of the items. The first item is Sunset 7th Addition which is a request for a preliminary plat for two single family lots. This plat should be conditioned upon a cash dedication. The second item is for a preliminary plat for Williams and LaRue Second Addition. This proposal is located on the NE corner of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. The developer is seeking to plat five lots. An existing home along Lexington Avenue will occupy one of the platted lots. Therefore, it is recommended that a cash dedication requirement be a condition of plat approval for the four remaining lots, for a sidewalk along the north side of Westwood Road and bituminous trailway along Lexington Avenue. Item three is Lexington Place South 2nd Addition. Commission members are urged to read the Planning packet concerning this item because of the significant amount of background information. The developer seeks to plat 16 additional lots within an area which was previously shown as "open space" to be utilized, in part, for ponding. The developer had previously suggested that this open space would be under a homeowners association who would control the area and its possible use. Members may recall that the developer, at one time, sought park dedication credit in creation of this open space, but withdrew its formal request prior to any Commission action. The Advisory Commission should concern themselves with the history of this plat and make its recommendation concerning the utilization of these outlots as housing sites. The fourth item before the Commission is the Federal Land Company's proposal for rezoning and P.D. agreement for 20 acres on Cliff and Rahn Road. (Attached to the Planning Department's report is the previous report by the Director of Parks and Recreation). In reviewing the proposed concept /sketch plan for the commercial planned unit development, department staff wishes to submit the following comments: The nursing home and day -care facilities appear to be appropriate uses adjacent to Rahn Park assuming that they are properly laid in the site and the structure adequately addresses the buffer between the building and the park. Relative to the proposed office buildings, staff would prefer seeing the office buildings situated closer to the park with the parking area closer to the roadway. It would be appropriate that the Advisory Commission review site layouts at the time of development to insure these issues are addressed to the Commission's satisfaction. Other issues which would be addressed at the time of development concern screening requirements for signs, rooftop equipment, and other potential visual intrusions. Staff is also recommending that this development be responsible for a cash dedication requirement consistent with the commercial /industrial dedication policy at the time of final platting, a trailway along Cliff Road and that all storm water runoff be via storm sewer to avoid overland runoff and drainage into Rahn Park. Item 5 is Norse Development, Peter Stalland, for the development of Blackhawk Plaza commercial development. As this relates to parks issues, the Director of Parks Recreation is recommending that a cash dedication requirement be a condition of plat approval consistent with the City's commercial /industrial dedication policy. Item six is Finishing Equipment seeking a waiver of plat to split 1.2 acres from an existing 3.1 acre site. The department is recommending that the waiver of plat be subject to the City's commercial /industrial parks dedication requirement. Frontier Midwest plat, Hampton Heights, has submitted a revised plan for its development. The Advisory Commission has already made a recommendation concerning this preliminary plat to the City Council which consisted of a cash dedication requirement and trailway on Coachman Road. This item is being presented as an informational item. There is no Planning packet on this item. The last item under "Development Proposals" is Thomas Lake Place. This item has been revised and reviewed again by the Planning Commission and is once more being presented to the Commission as an informational item. There are no items under "Old Business" for the Commission at this time. Under "New Business,° the Director of Parks Recreation has received a telephone inquiry relative to the City's willingness to accept as a gift, Outlot "B the proposed Hampton Heights development. This outlot consists primarily of a ponding area just immediately east of Coachman Road. As of the writing of this memorandum, staff has not been able to do a thorough review and analysis of this proposed gift. It would be appropriate for the Commission and staff to discuss this item to determine which direction should be followed. PARKS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM There are several items under the parks development program to be reviewed by the Advisory Commission. Commission members are aware that the City Council has approved the Commission's request to seek an architect. It would be appropriate for the Commission to determine who shall serve on the final selection committee. Staff is recommending that no more than five members, preferably three, serve on this group. Interviews are tentatively scheduled the week of May 20. Three to four candidate firms are expected to be reviewed. The second item under the parks development program is the third athletic site. Since the last Commission meeting, staff has received an appraisal on the site on Cliff Road and has done a preliminary analysis of the property in Section 10 owned by Opus Corporation. Staff would like an informal discussion regarding both sides. The final item concerns the spring construction contract. Bids were open�on April 19 and contract was awarded to Central Landscaping. Staff will update the Commission on this item. There are three items under "Other Business." Discussion on the future direction of the Parks Planning Cooperative with the adjacent communities is suggested so staff can do some long range planning. Commission is reminded of the May 9 "lights on" ceremony at Northview Athletic Fields at 8:15 P.M. This will be a brief ceremony. The final item concerns the next Commission meeting. It appears that the Commission has "caught up" at this time and the need for a second meeting in May does not, at this time, appear to be necessary. However, if Commission would like to schedule or make use of this time to review any particular issue, a meeting could be conducted as usual. /js SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SPECIAL ISSUES SUBCOMMITTEE ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION APRIL 18, 1985 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Roger Martin, George Kubik, and Director of Parks Recreation Vraa, discussed the conditions of the temporary park shelter buildings. General conditions -and deficiencies were noted in several of the park shelters. Jim McGuffee had reported to the Director that several of the shelters were not repairable because of wood rot. The Committee discussed which parks might still be designed for temporary shelters in the distant future. It was noted that several of the parks may have limited skating facilities such as Highview, which may ultimately be closed down. Construction techniques were discussed in addition to the size necessary to accomodate both winter and summer program uses. After additional review and analysis, members of the committee identified three areas which could be pursued at this time: 1) To explore with the Dakota County Vo Technical Institute for the construction of a wood frame 30' x 40' structure similiar to that which School District 196 uses as temporary classrooms. 2) To review the availability and construction costs associated with District 196 buildings to determine if they would be available or adaptable for park usage. 3) To review with the "to be selected" architect for park shelter buildings alternative building designs. In addition to the desirability and need flexibility with the use of the facilities, the Committee discussed funding. It was recognized that probable sources would be the general fund as well as the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund. No determination was made pending further review of cost. It was also noted by Mr. Martin that the City needed to review the replacement of these facilities on a two or three year cycle so as not to incur all of the expense in one year. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA APRIL 18, 1985 The meeting was called to order at 7:05 by Chairman Martin. Present were members Caponi, Ketcham, Martin, Thurston, Kubik, Alt and Fedde. Absent were members Bertz, Carroll and Masin. Ken Vraa, Parks Recreation Director; Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect; Scott Morgan, Parks Intern; and Liz Witt, Administrative Assistant, were also present. ATHLETIC SITE: Parks Recreation Director Vraa stated he has not received the approval on the athletic site as yet. It will probably be ready by Monday, April 22. He said the Opus Corporation has approached the City with the possibility of a 26 acre site in the vicinity of I -35E and the Eagan bulk mail facility. Opus said they would assist with access to the site and might give the land via the park dedication process. Director Vraa will discuss the proposal and obtain some cost figures. He will prepare an item for the next Commission meeting with costs for both sites. Steve Sullivan then described the analysis for the proposed site near Cliff and Dodd Roads. Most slopes are 5 -10% with a 20% slope by the pond. Drainage is to the and which is p part of the municipal drainage system. A well might have to be drilled because the site is fairly and and irrigation is a must. The City should explore the possibility of using the pond as a source of water. Grading will involve about 65,000 75,000 cubic yards which falls within a normal range. The County has given a tentative okay to access the site from Cliff Road. The County plans a trail along the south side of Cliff while the City plans a trail along the north side. Director Vraa will present concept plans on the Opus site as well as all cost information at the next Commission meeting. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Director Vraa presented the 1985 -89 C.I.P. for the Parks Recreation Department. He projected a total of approximately $10,000,000. Two million dollars of capital improvements will come through the land dedication process. Four and one -third million will come from the park bond passed in 1984. He continued saying about one million would come from the park site fund while grants will account for about $800,000. The Director explained there are unknown and interdependent activities which affect the "unfunded dollar" amount and the cycle of activities. When asked about the costs for the new athletic site, Director Vraa said they will probably appear after the five year C.I.P. period. When questioned about a more immediate need for an athletic site, Ken said that Northview and Rahn Parks should satisfy community needs through 1984, but that the City may need to move on the development of the third site by 1990. He asked that Commission members bring any they have regarding the C.I.P. to the joint Commission meeting on April 24. 1 OTHER A. Park planning cooperative A joint meeting is scheduled at Eagan City Hall on Wednesday, April 24. Commission members were requested to attend. B. The bid opening for Schwanz (Trapp Farm), Goat Hill, Walnut Hill and Fish Lake Parks will be April 19. Director Vraa announced that 29 plan holders have requested specs. C. Director Vraa also announced that the Council approved the architect selection process The Committee to make the selection should be formed very soon. Chairman Martin suggested that Ted Wachter might be interested in serving on the selection committee. He said he would contact Ted to see if he would participate. D. The ceremony to celebrate the lights turn on" at Northv iew Park will be _held on May 9 at approximately 8:15 P.M.. E. Commercial /industrial dedication fee In response to a question, Director Vraa reviewed the commercial dedication fee for the Commission. The Council voted to require a 50% commercial /industrial dedication for plats prior to 1 -1 -83 and replats. The Director stated he was in support of this change because of the uncertainty of platted and replats for commercial property. F. Park shelter buildings Director Vraa stated that the Special Issues Committee is looking at what to do with some of the existing park buildings which are no longer repairable and will have to be replaced. The Committee is looking into the possibility of having the vocational school take on the project who might be able to construct a generic type building. The Committee has also suggested that staff review the issue with the "to be selected" architect. A third alternative is to utilize the design /build structures that District 196 has for temporary class rooms. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 P.M. Dated: Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA APRIL 4, 1985 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Martin at 7 :25 P.M. A visit to the proposed athletic park site preceded the regular meeting. Members present were Alt, Masin, Thurston, Fedde, Martin, Kubik and Ketcham (arrived 10:25.) Members absent were Bertz, Carroll and Caponi. Staff present included Parks Recreation Director, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect, Stephen Sullivan; _Assistant Planner, Greg Ingraham; Liz Witt, and Gary King speaking on King Addition. AGENDA Parks Recreation Director Vraa noted three add -ons to other business Eagan 125th Celebration, Four Oaks condominiums and the Kehne House. On a motion by Thurston, seconded by Fedde, the Commission approved the agenda as amended. MINUTES MARCH 7, 1985 On page four, Fish Lake Park Plan, Commission member Kubik indicated that boats with electric motors can be allowed as long as they are consistent with the City ordinance. On page six, budget, an error in the amount shown in the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund was noted. Commission member Kubik moved, Masin seconded, to approve the minutes as corrected. All voted in favor. To circumvent a potentially long wait, the King First Addition under "Old Business" was moved up on the agenda. 4a. King First Addition Gary King Mr. King has received preliminary plat approval for ten lots on approximately seven acres. Lot lines in the southern site extend into the ponding area. Previous discussion about this site indicated that the City should acquire about 1.08 acres, all of which is below the high -water level. Director Vraa noted that a 50% credit could be given if 70% of the gross area is above the high -water mark. Such is not the case. If the 70% requirement were waived and the 50% formula applied to the 1.08 acres, the dedication would equal .54 acres or a quarter acre short of required acreage. Additional cash dedication could be recommended to completely fulfill park dedication requirements. Sandy Masin asked if it were possible to get a trail in that "area. Director Vraa responded that it probably would not be. Construction of a trail would require acquisition from numerous owners and did not appear likely. Mr. King spoke in regards to the proposed dedication. Chairman Martin moved, Carolyn Thurston seconded, the recommendation to accept 1.08 acres for a credit of .54 acres and the remainder of the dedication to be cash, with the amount to be determined after completion of a survey and final plat document. All voted in favor. Mr. King noted his agreement with this proposal. Adv. Parks Rea. Comm. April 4, 1985 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Blackhawk Glen Sienna Corporation The proposal is to rezone 61.6 acres from A to R1 for 111 lots. The site is just south of the previously proposed Hampton Heights and will be served by Blue Cross /Blue Shield Park. The developer is proposing larger lots where the site borders Blackhawk Hills and smaller lots in the center. The Planning Commission denied the proposal and the developer will probably come back with changes. The Planning Commission wants larger lots. Commission member Kubik said he was concerned with the conversion of large amounts of agriculture zoned land to more dense zoning. He wondered which had precedence the Comprehensive Guide Plan or zoning. Greg Ingraham stated that in his conversations with attorneys, the Comp. Plan and zoning carry equal weight. Commission member Kubik noted that this was a Planning Commission item, but he did want to voice his concern. Greg Ingraham said there will be a joint review soon of the Comp. Guide Plan. Commission member Alt said she was supportive of the Planning Commission action to deny the application based on the smaller front footage. Other members agreed. On a motion by Fedde, seconded by Alt, the Commission recommended that if the Council approved the proposal, the Commission requests cash dedication and trail construction along Ashbury, Coachman Road and Blackhawk Hills Road, east of Ashbury. All voted in favor. B. Splashland Water Park This proposal is located near Metcalf Jr. High School near Cedar and Diffley. The developers wish to rezone 33.16 acres from A and GB to a PD, allowing for a recreational water park and entertainment facility. It would feature a series of water slides, a wave pool, an amphitheater and a park —like area which would be open from June through August. Ken Vraa asked the Commission to consider whether credit should be given because the facility is recreational in scope. Carolyn Thurston did not think any special considerations should be given as the facility is much like a bowling alley, is of questionable recreational benefit to the City, and it will be operated by a "for profit" group. There was also discussion of the possibility that if park dedication were reduced or waived and the water park folded, the City could not require dedication from another proposed use for the same site. Ken Vraa noted that cash dedication would equal about $50,000 if the projet gains approval. It was noted that credit was given to Sperry for their ball fields, although Eagan was able to utilize the fields for City recreational programming. Commission noted that there was clearly a difference between the two developments. Chairman Martin moved, Kubik seconded, the recommendation to accept cash dedication at the commercial /industrial rate. There should be no recreational credit given because the venture is private enterprise and Eagan residents receive no special recreation benefit or consideration. The motion carried unanimously. Adv. Parks Rea. Comm April 4, 1985 C. Summerfield Addition Tri -Land Properties The proposal is for 38 single family lots with zero lot lines near the intersection of Dodd Road and Wilderness Run. The site is part of the Lexington South P.U.D. and dedication has already been given. Commission member Fedde moved, Kubik seconded, to recommend a trailway on Wilderness Run Road and a short trailway on Summerfield Lane, north to the future Highline Trail. All voted in favor. D. Art Perri Lot Split The lot split is located at Oak Chase Road and Oak Chase Way. On a motion by Thurston, seconded by Masin, the Commission recommended to accept a cash dedication. The motion carried. E. Eagan Center First Addition James Curry The proposal is part of the Lexington South P.U.D. commercial area. The Planning Commission approved the project, but noted that the landscape plan meets minimal criteria. Parks Recreation Commission members did not like the vast amount of impervious surface. Ken Vraa noted the Lexington South P.U.D. parks dedication agreement calls for a cash dedication per acre. Commission member Alt Kubik seconded, to recommend cash dedication consistent with the City's agreement, trailway on Patrick Drive and on Lexington Avenue, and that landscape guidelines as approved earlier in 1985 be imposed on this development. All voted in favor. F G. Galaxie Court Lind Addition Both proposals are for mini storage. Galaxie Court was continued by the Planning Commission upon request of the applicant. The developer was told to hold a neighborhood meeting with nearby residents. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the Lind proposal and the Council did vote to deny. There will be another mini storage proposal on next month's agenda. No action was taken pending Planning Commission action. OLD BUSINESS B. Federal Land Company Rezoning Of 20.6 Acres This is the proposal on Cliff near Rahn which the Commission discussed in March. At that time the Commission stated it preferred more compatible uses for the lots adjacent to Rahn Park. Staff has prepared a report included in the packet concerning the proposed rezoning. Federal Land Company personnel are to attend a meeting with City staff on Friday, April 5, to discuss feasible uses. Chairman Martin said he preferred to see a proposed plan before taking any action. He continued by saying the proposed development must be compatible. The item was deferred until a plan is submitted. 3. Adv. Parks Rec. Comm April 4, 1985 C. Parkland School District 196 Purchase Parks Recreation Director Vraa gave the Commission an update on the possible purchase of land for an elementary school by District 196 in Park Service Section 14. The district is considering the same site and parcel that the City has proposed as a park. The district intends to buy 15 acres while the owner wants to sell 35 acres. Director Vraa said there might be the possibility of a joint purchase by the City and school district of 25 -30 acres. Director Vraa will discuss planning strategies with the school district once they make a firm commitment to purchase this parcel. There was general discussion and agreement that staff should communicate with the school district. NEW BUSINESS A. Park Naming Schwanz Lake Park Park Intern, Scott Morgan, had researched the Schwanz Lake area and submitted a report which was part of the packet. Scott reviewed possible alternatives for park names including Schwanz Lake Park, Trapp or Trapp Farm Park, or a combination of Schwanz Lake and Trapp Farm Park. General discussion of the history, significance. of land ownership and other factors ensued. Member Fedde felt the park should carry the same name as the lake. Masin indicated that neither name was that significant and suggested a new name be found. Chairman Martin moved, Kubik seconded, to recommend the name "Trapp Farm Park" and retain the lake name of "Schwanz Lake." The reasons for the recommendation include the fact the majority of the park land was part of the Trapp Farm property. There are parks with similar names to Schwanz in nearby communities and there is precedence for naming the park after a resident, e.g. Rahn Park. The motion carried with Masin opposed and Fedde abstaining. Commission member Alt suggested the Council be given the Schwanz Lake /Trapp Farm report. B. Skating /Winter Program Report Parks Recreation Director Vraa made a few comments in addition to his and the recreation supervisor's report which was included in the packet. He noted that some warming houses are in bad condition and both a short term and long term solution should be found. He stated he did not have a recommendation at this time. Chairman Martin suggested that a replacement schedule be put together with two houses scheduled per year. Perhaps portable rinks and warming houses could be used for the lesser used sites. After some discussion, it was decided to refer the matter to the Special Issues Committee which will meet at 6:15 P.M. prior to the April 18th meeting.' The Commission commended the Recreation Supervisor on the winter programs. They were well received by the community and provided a positive experience for the residents. It was also decided that the Recreation Committee will meet with Dorothy to discuss the summer recreation program. That meeting is scheduled for 6:15 on April 24th prior to the joint Park Commission's meeting. Adv. Parks Rea. Comm April 4, 1985 C. Cross- Country Ski Report /Grooming Equipment As part of the winter report, Director Vraa and Intern Morgan presented a report on cross country ski maintenance. At the present time, Eagan has no grooming equipment. The City was able to contract with Lakeville this past year when Eagan's snowmobile was damaged. However, that arrangement was for a short term and the City must decide whether to purchase equipment or contract with an outside agency. There was some discussion regarding the use of the Minnesota Zoo equipment or buying equipment and renting it to the zoo. Scott Morgan distributed material on equipment which ranged in price from $7,200 for a used bombey to over $40,000 for larger pieces. The City could consider a .joint purchase with Apple Valley. Director Vraa will discuss these options with Apple Valley and Minnesota Zoo personnel and bring a report back to the Commission. D. L.A.W.C.O.N. Grant Application FY 1986 Director Vraa said that Blackhawk Park meets much of the criteria for a successful grant application. The one factor which could adversely affect the application is the lack of a planned access to the park. He has had discussion with a representative of the owner to the south and there is no interest in selling or deeding any road access now or in the foreseeable future. Director Vraa felt that some weight might be given if the Council were to make a commitment stating there will be a southerly access to Blackhawk Park. Director Vraa said the Commission should be prepared to provide state and federal matching funds from the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund. He also said it would be necessary to have an appraiser develop preliminary cost estimates for acquisition. After some discussion, it was decided that Blackhawk Park was the logical choice for a L.A.W.C.O.N. grant application. On a motion by Thurston, seconded by Fedde, it was recommended to make grant application for Blackhawk Park and request that the Council pass a resolution stating a southerly access to the park will be provided. All voted in favor. E. 1985 -89 C.I.P. Director Vraa stated that staff was developing a five year Capital Improvement Program. He stated that if the Commission had concerns to please express them to the staff so they may be considered. He continued by saying a draft of the C.I.P. may be available by the April 18th meeting. PARK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A. Building Design /Architectural Selection Process Parks Recreation Director Vraa outlined a possible selection process for the Commission. He suggested that staff review interested architectural firms and t screen three to four finalists. A committee could then review the finalists. r The committee might be comprised of Council, Commission and staff. The Director noted that time is short if a structure is to be constructed at Trapp Farm /Schwanz Lake Park this year. Commission members stated they want to move 5 Adv. Parks Rea. Comm April 4, 1985 quickly, but wanted to take plenty of time in reviewing building alternatives. By consensus, the Commission decided to start with a fall goal in mind, but if the process lags, then the construction can wait until spring. Commission members felt that the structure in Schwanz Lake /Trapp Farm Park will be the cornerstone to Eagan parks and it should be the best design /construction possible. Chairman Martin moved, Fedde seconded, to recommend to the City Council to proceed with architect selection for park shelter buildings under the proposal prepared by staff. All voted in favor. B. Athletic Site Acquisition Discussion, Information Staff presented several sketch plans of ball field /soccer field configurations for the athletic site to assist in the evaluation of the site. Commission member Kubik said he preferred a more intense use of the site as the need is so acute. He opted for four ball fields, two to three soccer fields, restrooms, parking lots and a few picnic tables. It appears that this site can meet this need. Carolyn Thurston suggested the City contact MnDot regarding access from Dodd Road including right /left turn lanes. Commission member Fedde moved, Ketcham seconded, the recommendation to have an appraisal made of the site. The motion carried. C. Update And Status Report Stephen Sullivan reported that lights at Northview Park will be in by April 15 and operative by May 1. Play equipment is scheduled for Highview, Ridgecliff and Cinnamon Ridge Parks this spring. Proposals for four parks will be ready next week. Some of the better water proposals for Schwanz Lake will be shown at the April 18 meeting. OTHER BUSINESS REPORTS A. Park System Plan Parks Recreation Director Vraa stated the plan was not ready for the April 4 meeting. B. Northview Lights As Stephen Sullivan stated, the lights should be ready for use on May 1. The first league game is scheduled for May 7. Director Vraa suggested a "lights on" ceremony might be appropriate. Because May 7 is a Council meeting night, he suggested the Commission schedule a ceremony for May 9 about 8 :00 P.M. The Mayor, Council, Press and interested ball players could be invited. The Parks Commission liked the idea and asked Ken to proceed with the planning. 6 Adv. Parks Rea. Comm April 4, 1985 C. April 23 Joint Community Park Commission Meeting This meeting will be held at the Eagan City Hall starting promptly at 7 :00 P.M. Representatives from Apple Valley, Rosemount, Burnsville, Lakeville, Department of Natural Resources, Met. Council Parks Open Space Committee, Hennepin County Park System, Minnesota Wildlife and the Dakota County Parks System will be present. D. Eagan Celebration Committee .Sandy Masin gave a report of the Eagan Celebration Committee. Most festivities are scheduled for July 6 a turkey roast, music by the "Ecletics" and fireworks. A logo contest is underway to commemorate the 125th birthday. It is hoped the History of Eagan will also be ready to sell on the sixth. Sandy announced that there will be another time of celebration in the fall. E. Four Oaks Condominiums In 1981, the Rosewood Corporation contractually agreed to the placement of a tot lot in Four Oaks. They are now saying that the residents prefer a picnic or open space area because there are not many children in the complex. Rosewood Corporation wants the letter of credit reduced by the $5,000 tot lot required amount. Chairman Martin felt that more information was needed. He would like to hear from the Homeowners Association as to how many and what percent of the total number of residents want an open area. He thinks the homeowners should review their options and come to a Parks Recreation Commission meeting with their recommendations. The item was deferred until more information is available. F. Kehne House Director Vraa announced that bids were approved for roofing the house and that it should be ready for occupancy in May or June. ADJOURNMENT Commission member Masin moved, Fedde seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Time of adjournment was 11:10 P.M. Dated: Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary c� SUBJECT TO APPROVAI MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 28, 1985 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Martin at 7:05 P.M. Members present were: Caponi, Martin, Alt, Carroll, Masin, Kubik and Fedde. Commission members Ketcham, Thurston and Bertz had notified the Commission they would be unable to attend. Also present were Parks Recreation Director, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan; Administrative Assistant, Liz Witt, Program Director, Dorothy Peterson and Parks Intern, Scott Morgan. Roger Sjobeck and Bob Kline made presentations to the Commission. ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAM -ROGER SJOBECK Roger Sjobeck, architect on the Kehne house, spoke to the Commission rgarding architectural considerations for park structures and pavilions. He suggested a building concept be utilized keeping in mind the particular theme of a park. He said the design should be simple and to remember that form follows function, not the other way around. He emphasized that when making cost comparisons, all costs have to be considered. These costs not only include construction costs but costs for maintenance and operations. All too often, many costs are not included as in some pre -fab structures. Commission member Caponi was concerned with costs. He said a good design would also be economical. Replaceability of materials must also be considered. He said an architect could use pre -fab products in his or her design and be responsible for associated costs. In response to an inquiry about preferred building materials, Roger Sjobeck said masonry walls are desirable and harder to vandalize. Interior floors should be concrete or quarry tile. Inside walls could be the same as outside walls e.g., burnished block. The ceiling could be sheet rock; light fixtures should be vandal proof and bathroom fixtures of aluminum alloy. He said a fireplace of fieldstone would be feasible. Chairman Martin suggested that Eagan residents contribute stones to the fireplace structure, giving them 'ownership" and decreasing the likelihood of .vandalism. Mr. Sjobeck noted that when considering a fireplace you have a "right" setting. The length of time a building is in use throughout the year is also a factor. 1 Adv. Parks Rec. Comm. March 28, 1985 Mr. Sjobeck does not think it a good idea to experiment with untried materials but to go with proven durability. Commission member Kubik said he would like to see more innovation in the park structure. He thought the material should be of a different substance than found at home or in the office. He said there was an exterior spray being tested that has an almost ceramic finish. He felt that people needed an* "adventure" when going to the park. Sandy Masin requested that specific buildings be suggested for Commission members to view. Other members agreed and Mr. Sjobeck will provide Director Vraa with such a list. SLIDE PRESENTATION STEVE SULLIVAN Landscape architect, Steve Sullivan, showed slides of park structures and buildings taken throughout the metropolitan area. Commission members noted time periods for certain type structure, e.g. small high windows with high pitched roofs. An open structure with an unusual shape (i.e. hexagon) was preferred by many members. PREDESIGNED STRUCTURES BOB KLINE PRESENTATION Bob Kline, of Cedar Forest Products Company, presented some slides and distributed a company brochure. Cedar Forest uses a five -piece laminated cedar siding with tongue -in- groove installation. The wood is dry kilned to about 12% moisture content and meets energy requirements. He noted that concrete, heating, plumbing and electrical costs are not included in estimated costs of construction. His company has a large catalog of basic plans available which will adapt to specific conditions. He noted that the paired hexagon structures in Burnsville cost an additional $2,000 to get the plan to work for that site. Mr. Kline said that his company could supply an architect or it could work with a City architect. Commission members expressed appreciation to Mr. Kline his presentation. FOREST RIDGE ADDITION G.H. GUSTAFSON Director Vraa said that the developer was coming in with smaller buildings for the site. He said the building footprint was being reduced by about 15% which greatly increased the green space. He thought the developer will eventually change the units to condominiums. He felt that another consideration in changing the buildings was the decrease in the amount of grading for the project. Director Vraa did not think it necessary to revise the earlier commission recommendation for cash and trails for park dedication. The Commission took no action to revise its dedication recommendation. PROCESS FOR ARCHITECT SELECTION Commission members discussed their role in building design. Commission member Masin said she would like to see more buildings, as those shown in the slides were not ones she liked. Commission member Kubik agreed. He said the Adv. Parks Rec. Comm. March 28, 1985 buildings will be around a long time and there should be a wide choice from which to make a selection. He continued by saying the Commmission needed to look at alternatives. There was general discussion by the Commission on how best to proceed. Director Vraa asked if the Commission wanted to hire an architect to lead members through the design selection process design, material and cost. George Kubik felt a professional could help the Commission sort out its options. Tony Caponi said that the person hired must represent the City's interests. Director Vraa said he would bring information /recommendation regarding the process and the time line to the April 4th meeting. ADJOURNMENT The remaining items of business were held over to April 4, and the meeting was adjourned at 9 :45 P.M. Dated: Advisory Parks and Recreation Secretary 3. MEMTO TO: MR. CHARLES HALL, CHAIRPERSON, THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 18, 1985 SUBJECT: APRIL 23 25, 1985 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PACKET As mentioned at the March Planning Commission meetings, Staff had received a revised sketch plan for Hampton Heights showing a townhouse concept and design as to how this property could develop with a townhouse development versus a smaller lot single family. The applicant has proposed 206 dwelling units and it seems to follow the topography as well as possible. However, some grading will also be done in order that proper street and house grades can be met on this site. As noted, the site has severe topographic relief And any type of development will require substantial grading because of the characteristics. I am not sure what the direction is with this development proposal. At the February City Council meeting, they directed the applicant to go back to the Planning Commission to look at the townhouse design. The applicant has submitted a townhouse design but has indicated that he would not construct townhouses in this location. Therefore, maybe the direction to the Council would be that a townhouse concept may take less overall grading but may or may not be a better use than what was originally proposed. Enclosed with this memo is the revised townhouse layout for Hampton Heights submitted by the applicant for review by the APC. At the April meeting I will be attending a conference in Montreal so Greg Ingraham will be taking my place at the April 23r 25th meetings. Therefore, any concerns or issues you may have please refer to Greg for the additional information. Sincerely, z Dale C. Runkle DCR:jbd FOX s EY 11-i HTS PD FY L 81-3 a V 4' r f IMI !ui HGI -5 H 0 1 Y Ys 5 O f' i l-sc is E."�.✓- i a s ,ter ',`F �')TE[ j1 <k 3j€ SLACKHAWK CE PARK 77-2 r 1 W IV n M Y %'i. =!rte i M r I \`a -,y.`. I ��.a`g•__��w..rt� 1 y_ ll! 1 lrJ /ice r� M 11 ^".ii'_ii/ `i' Ii II IJI i 1111lli f 11 `1 i /l �,•i F1 wc':_ 'i\� ���`�1\\ `J Q_� �..i_.. i 1� r�lll I UI ��ll /I� 1\111 I �'^•.T %ji I s...,:. CO t i \11`. ';r .:+,x I ll.il 1 .F S r .rte'/ I j i iU III i Fr It �fi t '"r J•Y rill 1 1 I r/ -i �:a. C p`k I I I'Il�lll� 1 �1j71t�r 1 i ,�i i'�! I \I i =ii �S' �1`"..♦ II I p ti`. ��c 1`� \r\ r /I /i r� I !1 �,•'r� 1 r� .e llla� I I It 1 L yb�; i /i /r /��i %/r t �l, d 11 IPiFi r r/ eif• j 1 10' t. I !I �*a' 1• 11 n *r F a. i 4. ��r rrN J: I 1 I I'i Illl V`� I\ �It m w 1` .ty,;•w�'X y y I! i/ i rr ,N a. t 1 i G11 1 r '1 t. pt `i T .b+a1\ ,r i i i 1- r' i 111111' Ili I^ rl/ I. 1/ I 1 !i �•i' �y �Y S:: il± %il ��Illl;;�;;\ •t 4E71 lam T• r /CIE i �r /f" �i y L te a` r f✓ r IIII 1 ..\I k .t t .0 r 'M .�r U�- .Ir r i O i yY- •"c' I as �..a -S -1 -r 1il� 'hi �i �:iv� ii r ms I rte. 1 I�[-r �-_-i r I 1 Fes' `r.' �`'�•1- +.C� I r- I t r 1 w 1 sl rl mi l' 11 I 1 11 r i- 1 1• 1� 1 I r 1 Ji .r 'I •r 1 t i t P �`���_r� i %n it laj I I I f -1 l.. p,� 1 I �f t t 1 v P w I 1 o us>� N T J �S r 5 '1 aca' 1 1 1 T�. 1 YL foSO r �q� 'ii ��'1 -t.° 7 r 1'\ r .t i j F ij I i i 7 S ,r l• y I'I ?.100 6d i' 1 I 1 Iti:\ /l t l f l r F l i 1 �1 MuJ. 1811185 .�1 .l I' hl i:�/ A 'bar j',,�T' �l�.�rr t }I rn L }=•r:• 1 I REGULAR MEETING OF THE APRIL 23, 1985 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL EAGAN MINNESOTA 7 :00 P.M. MEMBERS: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON), MICHAEL WOLD (VICE PRESIDENT), DORIS WILKINS (SECRETARY), DAVID BOHNE, JOSEPH HARRISON, PAMELA MC CREA, GARRETT MULROONEY, LORI TRYGG (ALTERNATE). ITEMS LISTED UNDER OLD BUSINESS WILL APPEAR ON THE MAY 7, 1985, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS LISTED UNDER NEW BUSINESS WILL APPEAR ON THE MAY 21, 1985, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA UNLESS ITEMS ARE CONTINUED BY THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION. I. 7:00 Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance II. 7 :05 Adopt Agenda Approve Minutes III. OLD BUSINESS A. DOMINIUM GROUP (JACK SAFAR) for a Preliminary Plat of Thomas Lake Place for 228 apartment units on 17.5 acres in part of the SE4 of 28, Thomas Lake Rd. B. FEDERAL LAND (VERNON COLON) for a Rezoning from A (.agricultural) to a Commercial Planned Development for retail /commercial uses 2 office buildings in part of the SE4 of the SE4 of Section 30, north of Cliff Rd. west of Rahn Rd. C. FRONTIER MIDWEST, for a revision from single family lots to proposed townhouses on 52 acres located in part of the Eh of the NW4 of Section 16. SE of Yankee Doodle Rd. Coachman Rd. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. INTERSTATE SIGN CO. (JOHN BODGER) for a" Conditional Use Permit for an advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park, Section 8, T.H. 13 Terminal Dr. B. NORSE DEVELOPMENT CO. (PETER STALLAND) for a Preliminary Plat of Blackhawk Plaza consisting of 9 commercial lots (hotel, shopping center) on 11.6 acres and Conditional Use Permits for a drive -up bank a service station in Hillandale No. 1 located in Section 20, Blackhawk Rd. Co. Rd. #30. C. DEAN FULMER, for a Conditional Use Permit for a self service car wash a 20' Variance to allow a 10' setback from the rear lot line on Lot 3, Block 1, Century Addition, Section 9, located at Coachman Rd. Century Pt. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION HAS LIMITED THEIR MEETINGS TO INCLUDE NO MORE THAN EIGHT (8) ITEMS PER MEETING. ANY APPLICATIONS OVER THE EIGHT (8) ITEMS MAY BE SCHEDULED FOR AN ADDITIONAL MEETING OR FOR THE FOLLOWING MONTH. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT SUNSET 7TH ADDITION APPLICANT: RANDY BARROWS LOCATION: PART OF THE NW'k OF THE NWk OF SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: PART OF THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT R -2 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 25, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of Sunset 7th Addition consisting of 2 single family lots on .8 acres of land located on Yorktown Place and Augusta Lane. ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is designated as R -2 (residential duplex) under the Lexington South Planned Development. It is located adjacent to Sunset 1st 6th Additions with vacant R -2 land and a possible church site to the north and east. The property is covered by grasses with mature trees at the north property line. CODE COMPLIANCE: The lots meet all the size and density requirements of an R -1 district. The lots are 110' and 126' wide and 16,390 square feet and 18,774 square feet in area. GRADING AND DRAINAGE: Existing topography consists of a large uniform slope beginning on the west /high side and sloping to the east. The existing drainage from Yorktown Place outlets to the same low area to the east of this project that this development drains to. Little grading is proposed for this development except to raise the house pad elevations approximately two feet. SANITARY SEWER: An existing 8" line located in Yorktown Place will provide service access for this development. WATERMAIN: An existing 6 line in place in Yorktown Place will adequately service this development. STREETS: Yorktown Place which borders this development to the south is an existing street built 32' wide with bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. This road is built to its ultimate design with a 7 ton capacity. RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: The right of way for Yorktown Place currently exists as a 60' easement dedicated for roadway purposes. This development is proposing to dedicate the easterly 165.94 feet for public right of way. Staff would recommend the westerly 70.66 feet be also dedicated as right of way on the final plat. The 60' right of way width proposed is in accordance with City Code. A 20' utility easement should be dedicated to the City over the alignment of the existing storm sewer across the southeast portion of this development. SUNSET 7TH ADDITION APRIL 25, 1985 PAGE 2. CONDITIONS If approved, the preliminary plat shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All the standard preliminary plat conditions shall apply. 2. Utility services shall be provided to both lots. 3. The westerly 70.66 feet of the Yorktown Place roadway easement shall be dedicated as public right of way on this proposed plat. 4. A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated over the existing storm sewer alignment as required. u., 'N ,1 :..i1"; f: i ��::w.r: r. .::yr AL 1.r %��r "�..r� i,..`r. r t t u22 -2 6 3 cli f H i S ll S li r c fi r .XYSr. r" Ia �Y; �✓r d�y:: r 'r�nc E.1�rw i+r iN ,_•O�.\ 7 -wM• I �y d0'� ...«rr.9 ,.Mr 71 #iV .r Lw:4 .ter -mow a_ ,Ip Nr I sw r•s.r �o 021-26 209 re•x_ •'�+w ar• li M v 7+►.r�r I 1 rr 00 2 -26 sa Z look lAlx'T N/ IYY �•1 /N lI/ YY 4 44 Z1;,, �OI r0.✓rrow/i i seACE tI w .wx�i .7 H 0 R N i =LASSO r .o 1t y M' �`�_5.� r ii•nr .r 1 ,T �,.;�,C =irk. �t ,.;',y! a 10 N �L,� t :.;0'��M!'r �}j 47n .Iaw HACK 1 HA CK MORE DRIVE INC I f r gal ,r� a t '►_.1�!.!,�"•” I po I 2 P L GO Aran r t� 'ti •tt. •yxl� +1�• (ai 3 rd 1, a O �i SUNSET ADDITION o 1 ao CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2nd ADDITION APPLICANT: DALE LA RUE LOCATION: LOTS 3 4, BLOCK 1, WILLIAMS -LA RUE ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R -1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 25, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the Williams -LaRue 2nd Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 1.9 acres. The proposal is located at the NE corner of Lexington Av. Wescott Rd. ZONING LAND USE: The parcel is zoned (R -1) residential single family and has an existing home along. Lexington Av. A .65 acre pond is next to Wescott Rd. the east property line of the parcel. A major portion of the pond area would be filled to create land for proposed'Lots 4 5. The parcel is bordered by Lexington Av. Wescott Rd. to the west south, single family houses are to the north east. CODE COMPLIANCE: The Preliminary Plat shows 80' 81' lot widths for Lot 4 5. This is due to an attempt to provide Lot 3 with sufficient width to allow for a 50' setback from Lexington Av. Lot 1 is shown with a 15' frontage on Wescott Rd. for a driveway access. City Code requires a 60' minimum frontage for platted lots. An alternative would be to create only 4 lots where each could meet the lot width requirements. GRADING DRAINAGE Existing drainage over this development is characterized by a large ridge across Lot 2 where an existing home is located. This ridge slopes at 3 :1 leading into a pond now covering the proposed pond area of Lot 1 and most of Lots 4 5 of this proposed development. This pond is connected by overland drainage to Pond JP 44 which is located to the north. Pond JP 44 has a positive outlet that was constructed under the Lexington Place South development. Proposed grading shows filling the southerly two thirds of Lots 3, 4, 5 and creating a ponding area along the rear lot lines of Lots 4 5 and in Lot 1. It will be the responsibility of this development to petition the City to install a 12" storm sewer line between the proposed ponding area and the storm sewer system in Lexington Square. Lexington Square is the development to the south. This 12" storm sewer will be the responsibility of the Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer required to serve this project was proposed under project number 442R. Project 422R was denied by the City Council due to lack of public support. WILLIAMS -LA RUE 2ND ADDITION APRIL 25, 1985 PAGE 2. Sanitary sewer could be served, to this development, by extending a line west of a sub -trunk line located along the east property line of Parcel 030 -53 (Barry Tilley). This sanitary sewer line would be the responsibility of this development to install because the property owner of Parcel 030 -53 is presently being serviced by the trunk line of its east property line and therefore would not benefit by installation of a sanitary sewer line within Wescott Rd. WATERMAIN An existing 18:' line is in place along the east side of Lexington Avenue. The City would require this development to petition for a 12" trunk line be installed down Wescott Road. Said 12" trunk line would be the responsibility of the watermain trunk fund with this development responsible for lateral benefit costs. STREETS Lexington Avenue borders this proposed development along the west and is an existing street classified as a minor arterial under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. The ultimate design of this roadway is 52' wide with bituminous surface, concrete curb and gutter and a 9 -ton load capacity. No new access to Lexington Avenue should be allowed. Wescott Road is an existing street, currently gravel, which borders this develop- ment to the south. Wescott Road is classified as a community collector. The ultimate design would be 52' wide, bituminous surface, and concrete curb and gutter with a 9 -ton load capacity. Since Wescott Road is classified as a City collector street, it will require a 6 -foot concrete sidewalk be constructed along the north side. This sidewalk would be the responsibility of this development. Staff recommends because of the projected high traffic volumes on Wescott Road that driveways be combined for Lots 3 4 and 1 5. RIGHT -OF -WAY /EASEMENTS Both Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue currently have 50' half, right -of -way which should be adequate for future improvements. A 20 -foot utility easement will be required to be dedicated over the alignment of the 12 storm sewer line. Ponding and drainage easements will also be required around the ponding area and along the lot line of Lots 1 2 to connect with Pond JP 44. WILLIAMS -LA RUE 2ND ADDITION APRIL 25, 1985 PAGE 3. CONDITIONS: 1. All standard Preliminary Plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. If the 5 lot scheme is approved, a Variance shall be granted to allow the 15' frontage on Wescott Rd. 3. The filling of the pond area shall be done in conformance with MnDot speci- ficati6ns2105 and 2451. 4. This development will be responsible for petitioning for the installation of a positive outlet from the ponding area and also the 12" trunk watermain. 5. No new access to Lexington Av be allowed. 6. A 6' concrete sidewalk along the north side of Wescott Rd shall be the responsibility of this development. 7. The driveways for Lots 3 4 and Lots 1 5 be combined with appropriate turn arounds. 8. A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated over the storm sewer line alignment. 9. Ponding drainage easements will be required around the ponding area. 10. This development will be responsible for unlevied trunk area related assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. A N R-2 Li S C p NtA R K: o' OR L B sc LB 82 R-4 Q 0 D 'WES.COT T 0;LEARY PARK-,, CARRIAGE HILLS Yt,-t A OLF GARDEN U R S E R 4 r 400c LE' XT, 70N ft Y ''-VRAILS R T F R-4 .R Q�N t V I A if R( Ti ELI r�T I T r y LEXINGTON IN 17 SQUARE t PD 75 0 R TH V I EN f e. 7 P PIK F DK p p Preliminary Plat DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC RvOgf.'PA Un4Pf Laws of The State of MonnPSOIA 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 4231769 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Li 5 Scale: 1 inch 100 feet Y" Proposed drainage 8e utility easements are to PONDING 10 ft. in width and loo _m 125 adjoining spreet lines an h 5 ft. in width and 1 E A SE ME KT� adjoining side and rear lot lines. NI 3 M�4 �i 5 150 I i1 04.92 _i L I II o ar 1 36 so ROAD EASEMENT �S 14C— I Owner Developer: Proposed Name: Joyce and Dale LaRue Williams And Larue 2nd Addition 3780 Lexington Avenue Eagan, MN 55123 Notes: 1) Area to be served by sanitary Legal Description: sever (Eagan Sanitary Sewer Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, WILLIAMS Project No. 422R), water, and AND LARUE ADDITION. r storm sever. Present And Proposed Zoning: 2) Low area on Lots 4 and 5 to b R -1 filled and equal storage capaci ty to be created by dredging ou Proposed Lot Sizes: the northerly end of pond. Lot 1 22691 Sq. Ft. Elevation of pond to be control Lot 2 21272 Sq. Ft, by proposed storm sewer outlet. Lot 3 13410 Sq. Ft. Lot 4 12000 Sq. Ft. 3) All lots to have minimirn 5.0 foot wide Lot 5 12000 Sq. Ft, utility easements on each side of lot line Road Easm. 1500 Sq. Ft. cm. ...im required. 10.00 foot wide easements along all streets. Date of Preparation 4 -1 -85 NESOTA RE ISTR TI07NO. 8625 Revised: 4- 10 -85�, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: U. S. HOMES CORPORATION, JAMES NERVIG LOCATION: PART OF W k OF SW a, SECTION 14, EAST OF LEXINGTON AVE SOUTH OF DUCKWOOD DRIVE EXISTING ZONING: R -1 PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE UNDER A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted request- ing a replat of Outlots A C, Lexington Place South to Lexington Place South 2nd Addition consisting of sixteen, single family lots which deviate from the 12,000 s.f. lot area requirement. COMMENTS In March 1984 representatives from U.S. Homes replatted and rezoned this site from R -4 Residential Multiple and consisting of 360 dwelling units to R -1 PD Residential Single District which allowed 134 single- family homes. These homes were to be construc- ted by U. S. Homes Corporation and the concept proposed consisted of a zero lot line and granting easements between the two dwelling units. Enclosed with this report are the minutes of the March 27, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission and the April 17, 1984, City Council minutes reviewing the discussion and conditions which were placed on the original approval of the 134 single- family lots. Also attached with this report is an existing plat, Lexington Place South, showing Outlot A C which are now considered to be replatted. This replat changes some of the existing lots in the Lexington Place South and the total net effect of replatting these two outlots would be an increase of 16 additional lots or a grand total of 150 single family lots which deviate from the normal lot size. In review of this new plan and the new development plans for this total addition, it is staff's understanding that the applicant is now proposing to change the concept of development from the origi- nal proposal. This new concept would eliminate the homeowners' association and the zero lot line concept and build just single -fam- ily homes with the normal setbacks as any other development. Therefore, the total development or controlled concept may not be carried through with the development plan now being su bmitted. In review of the proposed replat of Outlot A C, the lots being created are consistent with the existing platted lots. In this replat, the basic issue is regarding the continuity and control of this design for the entire development and whether this plat will be developed by one builder and sell the lots to many different builders. If this development is still controlled and developed by one entity, the O -lot line concept would not be that detrimental to this development. LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH 2ND ADDITION APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 2. GRADING /DRAINAGE The majority of the grading was completed with the Lexington Place South project. Additional lots had been proposed in existing outlots set aside for ponding areas and thus creating more drainage runoff and reducing the ponding area. Staff will require the developer to submit a revised grading and drainage plan showing the storm ponding storage which should be equivalent to what was previously approved for Lexington Place South together with what additional area this development will incur. UTILITIES The majority of the sanitary sewer and watermain required for this project were installed under City Contract 84 -14. There are two short sanitary runs need in Canary Court which can be built from the existing line presently running through Canary Court. Watermain only needs to be looped through Canary Court to complete the watermain for this project. STREETS Access to the proposed development is from Lexington Avenue on the west. Lexington Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County. The length of Canary Court cul de sac appears to exceed the maximum of 500 feet as per City Code by approximately 50 Staff doesn't feel this is a problem. RIGHT —OF— WAY /EASEMENTS The 50' public right of way proposed to be dedicated is sufficient. Portions of ponding and drainage easements will be required to be vacated resulting from grading operations around ponding areas. The public hearing shall occur prior to final plat approval. LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH 2ND ADDITION APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 3. CONDITIONS 1. The plat /development shall be controlled and developed by one company or builder as originally approved in 1984. 2. A revision should be required to the Planned Development Agreement modifying it to include this plan. 3. Plat should be subject to the Park Commission's review and comment for the newly created lots. 4. Detailed grading plan and house plan should be approved showing that homes will fit on the lots created. 5. The Engineering Department should review the grading and ponding plan in order to insure enough capacity for storm water ponding. 6. All other conditions of the original approval shall apply. 7. The loss of ponding volume resulting from grading be compensated for, if necessary. 8. Vacation of ponding easements shall be approved. 9. All costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this developer. 10. This development shall be responsible for all unlevied trunk related assessments at rates in effect at the time of final platting. :7 7 R-2 GB tA R K sc -�4 L B LB 82-2 R-4 W ES. C 0 T T L" ARK CARRIAGE A H I Ls GOLF "'A GAR-DEN CU R S E "r :3 Ica R 4 PF _1! __XtNGT0N 4x A I LS R R-4 z\ i JL .5, a-5-140ma-5 wpwr A 0 TT ROAD A r T': I j Ry 1 EXINGTON t A DD P SQUARE PK P D 44 75 NORTHVIEW BERRY RAT C H: P#K PARK J —4 p IN t CK PATRI EAGAN PAPK A. PF R I Revised Preliminary Plot: in 6 LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH CITY OF EAGAN Scole V-100 (Port of Wi of SWtof Sec 14.111,0.1)) 2 X William M. Smith I Wesley Sernlce Keyes W 00 GO GO 00 GO co 60 70 IQ 0 s0 to s0 To so l0 10 Go 70 00 eo Go "a Leo ,p 19- aO _I o 1 w a; tl L �.a M, a G K G NI 7 O s IT 5 O 2 v a 0� O I eo co co fo Gp l�fp Go 11 w p.� O IL�o i:.• 4 1 o 0 7 }v to t I E° o e/ so GLU[ J% W►Y 1 gp �/lo V•o J ru v O t" `0 10 P 0 uo -7s 1 v p° s O 0 a s SETBACKS o p d l 041,0. F is �m Ito Yd: q c O �r� \I1 V 1 1 apNT SO' 114 o V O IN1E 1p Fp fb 1 \C R1 0. 0T I ta� R. 1 3 s as u 0 If J Lao e Y C G s y Y t 6 0 a0° Gara gel LO LINES 5' L r Il g. a s 0 ,S \f.�4• O 0 e r o SIDI STREETS I 1" a J 0 II 'Ps o.,.k.+aod 0­6 )o' J J 'G a'1 0 J It q C mo q`' 1 d 4 a J i 'C 110° Ll \7 la O w Ma M i1 e 8 .,ne1ln Ave 5 0 ON O;O O Olnlr Streets lA' 1 11 11 J J uo d J 110 Y 9 3 Y�C 1, O e 7 G -1 4 t 1 a 11 19 a O D f Y ce S IRO 9 GOu 4 to I Y `e 10 C 1 C 1 Go co 6o io G Go loo O_ d 0 7 0 10 I W �02 G a .O 2< 0 0 IS s\ O 1D f1 e o. -0 14 C 110 I G G a u a K b 9' 9 se TAemel c L/ndo wellaroo4 /-,1 }Q d X4 0 1 [•.0 0 a t 'o at I+ I T 1 >a 1 1 I I O Fe0 ,eo r` or �'tT 0 0• O a1 N y N' li r 1 t1 y,} le o Is "5t: p N 4 SITE DATA' so �p L Ao s too J h a so I bo J so� 50 Acres 1 I �a g I p 5� 4 t 1° 6 8 114 Lots �p 0 $I 0 1 h p a F P J 200 2.l l01° Ptrocr° i IE la "I 11 'I I[ 1 Y 1 J A I o r 11 co'. 110' minimum M size _r� L 1_1�i •t 0 b 1! too G 10,400 Se ft elf p%e lot oreo eo I co 70 s A IO 6 O C. C00 S° Ft minimum \ol me. GLUE dAY WAY ac T —�to A a of o LAND ALLOCATION: r�0 G i4o� T4° s S 9 41 Acres St-40% I 1.00 0941" cres OP Ste 1e I M NI e I 7 !1 I G wl s •s► J T 10 PG 4 Aoe% L 0 4S rb Ee 0 Iln ••nay a« d.rr d.a• 0 11 g 1. In,4 Y...inv•. GO Go 60 110 O AG °I•n (Ceuely Road N% 41) S R•prL a a. s1 S 1 il'. FR0.N:I fi vlcl0p P.er/c*AfccactAy,.lel. C.R. WINDEN a ASSOCIATES, INC. I I I "NO SURVEYORS ISM EUST STREET ST. AUL. IS MINNESOTA 55104 Ta cas- tcee I'RELIMINAMF PLA2 LEYING10N PLACE SUUTM SECOND ADIIITIUN (yARD)11AL FOR: U.S. H.— CJfl 1712 Nopklns Crocaresd t s\ Mlanrtonka, Minnesota 5514:1 Z v 3 as s 1 1 Z P41 YD Z 31 r r ��L6 POND LoJCI Z 126 1 B N� 1• 7j; 0 118 i F l G 14 C 7 a j l 8 12 t7 4, :s p 1 55• t i 1 Q. 11 f1\�- count /o Fy Y }..�1 i 735��oi CAN Io o ARY as 4■ I r 1 '16 1 ,9 f\ 23 i; 21 i J J 18 a2 v p 1 A� ��Q 0 ho 1 SCA LE IN FEET SETBACKS: 4 t e• 22 \o SITE DATA Front 70' -.Pi �v to y 41 Single Family Lots Interior Lot Line. 1 0 (6U' x 100' Minimum) G rage S' 21 3.4 Units ;\20 h, 1p ms's 0� Q� /Acre Including Cenafy Court Sida- straat 20' Q�ND k so 3.6 Units /Acre Excluding Csesry Court 11,51{ Acres Lot■ 0,65+ Acres Canary Court t,u. n. J.,• 1 n u 1 It•'1 1,r'..j xfNOT 7 P 12.1 DE Acres Total O N 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY j Lot 1. Block 2, C oy J Lots 1 through 5, lucluslvs. Block 4; 1• L1:.'._A.s iy \1 Lots 14 through 18. Block 4; Ch., L. -I .A ;q.r.,v..l cis. fl01d A 1•' Lots 1 through Inclusive, Block 7; N N(y Lot 18, Block 7; Iy� Lots 1 through 6. Block 9; Out oaclot c, C. R. Winden i Associates, Inc. Land Bunsysrs All in Lexington Place South, 1983 Eustis St., SLPAUI,MN 65108 Dakota County, Minnesota. !hone 6 6, r PRELJR)SAN) CNOSION ti NTT)L PLAN LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH SECOND ADDITION C AA PIN I•L FCR U.S. H,,.,, 1'nrpurell.n 1]11 Ilcykini Lrassruad I 1 O Mlnn,•tun4s, Itl nn. snu 55347 I I� a '.n I I �O e r .t 94rN ^a r ty `ro. POND 1 9 I o I 1 j 3 L r1 a l I °OI,! 4�,. r' Iz l t3 ti f 1 n., I1.. i' �1QURT cA.- II NARY A. al a•�: zap Lp o U q) y PojV al te2 i 21 1 I} I., .I rhal dnn. or rr i a u 1< l /o °A� w I :p .ou ly il� n•Ilund I 1 Sv.r 1n•L.0 u. d. ��Pu( 'Ho rOA, a NOT6ft Denotes Ewiro Face& (0r [1nr R �:..77 j ECc J Equivalent Where Necessary) on -.0- D&notas Direction of Surface t /y Bp A y Dutne {e (]u. k. i 8p Me Ep 4Jl C. R. Wtndrl A ANWCIMN. 1110. Low 1381 Eustis St St. Ps g lu, IAN 1110! PAa o 648-bm swim APC Minutes March 27, 1984 JOHNNY RIDGE FIFTH DITION REYIS RELIMINARY PLA The pub 'c hearing reg ing the applica on of U. S. Hom Corporation for revised reliminary pi of Johnny Cake ourth Addition o Johnny Cake Fifth Add' ion was prese ed to the Planni Commission. T proposal is to replat portion of th northeast part o the townhouse de lopment to allow splitt' g four -plex u is for the constr etion of two doub units adjacent to each other, using a same driveway proach as origina y approved. It was un rstood the sq re footage of the nits would increa slightly when chang- g the tuck -und garages to atta ed garages at the nds of the units. Dale Runkle explai d the proposal, hich includes es ntially zero lot line Robert Hoffm attorney, app ed for the applic as did Bill Fierke, im Nervig, C ck Winden and B' 1 Allen. It was oted that the propos is somewhat f a hybrid appro without strict pr edent in the City. number of neighb ing property owners ere present with con rns about red tion in property alue, effect upon t it association, etc. r. Hoffman s ted that the dev opment could provid for a new Homeowner Association. After considerabl discussion, Mr. Hoff n requested that th application be continued to al the applicant to me `with the neighbor representatives. Mulrooney mov Krob seconded the tion to continue t hearing until the next regul meeting in April 1984. All voted in favor LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearings were then convened regarding the application of U. S. Homes Corporation to rezone approximately 50 acres from R -4 (Residential Multiple) to R -1 PD (Residential Single District) with lot sizes which deviate from the R -1 zoning standards located in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14 along and adjacent to Lexington Avenue. The second application was for preliminary plat approval of Lexington Place South containing 134 single family lots. Mr. Runkle noted that the parcel is zoned R -4 with an approved preliminary plat consisting of 360 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel R -II with a density of 6 units per acre. The proposed plan does conform as to density with approximately 7.2 dwelling units per acre. The gross density is 2.7 units per acre and the net density is about 4.0 units per acre, excluding street right -of -way and proposed open space. Mr. Runkle explained the zero lot line proposal and Mr. Hoffman appeared and stated that some roadway changes have been included in the proposal. The proposal calls for courtyard arrangements with setbacks provided at the side of each home with a perpetual easement granted adjacent for courtyard. The sale price will be $80,000.00 to $105,000.00. It was noted that there will be a homeowners association. Mr. Hoffman estimated there would be 800 fewer trips per day than the original proposal. A preliminary grading plan will be submitted if the Planning Commission recommends approval and would be avail- able before consideration by the City Council. 5 APC Minutes March 27, 1984 Barry Tilley, a neighboring owner, appeared and favored the reduction in density from 360 to 134 R -1 units. He noted the City has requested that a sanitary sewer easement be acquired, possibly across his property, and was also concerned about the pond at the southeast corner of the applicant's property, which could create additional water problems on his 5 acre parcel. The applicant indicated that there would be no additional run off to the south. Member Wilkins favored the rezoning to R -1. Twenty lots would be at the 6,600 minimum square footage, and the largest lots would be located in the southeast corner. Square footages of the units would be 935 square feet, 1,151 square feet and 1,704 square feet. Member Krob questioned whether the common area should be credited for park purposes and it was understood that the Park Committee will not do so. The frontage of all the lots are 60 feet except corner lots, and it is re- quested that interior lots be allowed a 20 foot setback from the corners, rather than 30 feet. There appear to be precedents as to the small lot sizes and it was noted that the Park Committee desires a 10 to 15 acre parcel for park purposes to the south and east. Member Wold suggested architectural review and Mr. Hof fman stated that U. S. Homes will build all the units in the development, and the developer will control the architectural style. It was recommended that the models proposed to be installed, be included in the exhibit in the Planned Development Agreement. After extensive discussion, Krob moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning application to R -1 Planned Development. All voted in favor, except Mulrooney who voted no. Krob then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the prelimi- nary plat application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Adequate rights -of -way shall be dedicated for all of the public streets in this development proposal. 2. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County rights -of -way. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and com- ments regarding the open space proposed in this development proposal and park dedication requirements. 4. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. 5. A detailed housing plan or grading plan shall be submitted prior to consideration by the City Council showing the lots can support the units proposed to be constructed. 6 S' APC Minutes March 27, 1984 6. All setbacks shall be maintained with the exception of the request for 20 foot side setback on the internal streets. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and entered into regarding the use of the smaller single family lots with this particular design and allowing only 134 single family lots. 7. An exhibit shall be attached to the PD agreement to describe the architectural theme including the models attached. 8. All interior ponds shall be interconnected to provide outlet control and the drainage plan shall be approved by the City to avoid drainage to the south. 9. The developer shall petition for a project to construct an outlet to Pond JP -45 and also construct a portion of the outlet pipe for Pond JP -46 located within this development. 10. The proposed 90 foot offset intersection shall be eliminated by either Alternate 1 or Alternate 2 as mentioned within the Engineering Report. 11. Pond easement shall be dedicated to encompass the high water eleva- tion for the proposed storm sewer retention ponds. 12. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenced in the Engineering Report. 13. This development shall be responsible for its share of trunk area storm sewer and watermain assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 14. Costs of all internal lateral streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 15. The sanitary sewer trunk easement to the south shall be acquired at the developer's sole expense. All voted in favor except Mulrooney who voted no objecting to the serious deviations in the R -1 standards and noted that topographic, location and other amenities, do not warrant the deviations. 7 Council Minutes April 17, 1984 BARD BROADCASTING CO SIGN PERMIT The applica on of Hubbard Broad sting Co. and Far a Company, for a conditional use ermit for a pylon ad rtising sign locat d south and west of I -35E and Cli Road, was presented o the Council. Mr Runkle detailed t applicatio and indicated that th application appe ed to comply with 1 City mini m requirements. The dvisory Planning ommission recomm ded approval ut had concerns abou the disposition of he sign when deve pment occurs on the property. Th a were no objecti ns. Smith moved, homas seco ed the motion to appr a the application, subject to the si meeting al criteria of the Eagan gn Ordinance. All oted in favor. LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH U. S. HOMES CORPORATION REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of U. S. Homes Corporation for rezoning from R -4 to R -1 PD in order to deviate from the R -1 zoning lot standard and preliminary plat of Lexington Place South, consisting of about 50 acres and containing 135 zero lot line single family lots was presented' to the Councilmembers. The Advisory Planning Commission at its meeting on March 27, 1984 recommended approval of both applications subject to certain conditions. Mr. Runkle reviewed the application and indicated that the number of lots as originally proposed has now been reduced and the Park Committee has not determined whether to recom- mend credits for Outlot C which will be open space. The City will require some pond storage for the general area of Outlot C, in one or more ponds. The property is currently zoned R -4 and had an approved preliminary plat con- sisting of 360 dwelling units. There was discussion concerning proposed sanitary sewer easement across the Marge and Barry Tilley property. Mr. Colbert explained that contacts have been made but no agreement to date has been made between the developer and the Tilleys. Robert Hoffman, attorney, appeared on behalf of U. S. Eomes and stated that the trees generally will be preserved. He reviewed the courtyard home proposal which would provide for an easement on the neighboring owner's lot. Councilman Egan was concerned about the 6,600 square foot lot sizes, which is about 50% below the minimum lot sizes for single family in the City. About 15 to 20 lots are at the 6,600 square foot size level, with the average lot size of 10,900 square feet. An option with zero lot line with the house on the lot line with 25 foot courtyard on the same lot was also discussed. Mr. Hoffman stated that the developer prefers the easement on the neighboring property as proposed. Thomas moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the application for rezoning subject to compliance with the applicable ordinances. All voted in favor. Thomas then moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the application for preliminary plat, subject to the Park Commission and Advisory Planning Commission recommendations as follows: 7 Council Minutes April 17, 1984 1. Adequate rights -of -way shall be dedicated for all of the public streets in this development proposal. 2. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts.County rights -of -way. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and com- ments regarding the open space proposed in this development proposal and park dedication requirements. 4. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. 5. A detailed housing plan or grading plan shall be submitted prior to consideration by the City Council showing the lots can support the units proposed to be constructed. 6. All setbacks shall be maintained with the exception of the request for a 20 foot side setback on the internal streets. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and entered into regarding the use of the smaller single family lots with this particular design and allowing only 134 single family lots. 7. An exhibit shall be attached to the PD agreement to describe the architectural theme including the models attached. 8. All interior ponds shall be interconnected to provide outlet control and the drainage plan shall be approved by the City to avoid drainage to the south. 9. The developer shall petition for a project to construct an outlet to Pond JP -45 and also construct a portion of the outlet pipe for Pond JP -46 located within this development. 10. The proposed 90 foot offset intersection shall be eliminated by either Alternate 1 or Alternate 2 as mentioned within the Engineering Report. 11. Pond easements shall be dedicated to encompass the high water eleva- tion for the proposed storm sewer retention ponds. 12. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenced in the Engineering Report. 13. This development shall be responsible for its share of trunk area storm sewer and watermain assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 8 Council Minutes April 17, 1984 14. Costs of all internal lateral streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 15. The sanitary sewer trunk easement to the south shall be acquired at the developer's sole expense. All voted yes. BRI 7TH ADDITION RELIMNARY PLAT The applicati of Tollefson Bui ers, Inc. for preli nary plat approval of Brittany 7t ddition and rez ing from A (Agric ural) to R- 1 dential Sing District), cons" ing of 30 acres d containing 50 single fZitwahseantoted as detailed to t Council by Mr. kle. Bill Dolan and Carl Th appeared on ehalf of the appl' ant. The Advisory Planning C its March 2 1984 meeting reco ended approval of both ap ca- tssue of c -de -sacs was disc sed with the Planning C fission a tha severe topography nd the mature trees on t site make the cul-de-sacs mo desirable. The P nriing Commission, howev recommended the most wester cul-de-sac be sh tened by IO feet to be compliance with the maximum gth allowed and a ariance be allowed for a center cul -de -sac for 220 fe The density w d provide for 1.5 uni per acre. Because of the grad and the large tre the developer chose t to connect the cul -de- sacs. r. Dolan portraye aerial photos showing a tree growth and noted the lar lot sizes in the roposed development. ase One consists of 32 lots on West and 18 lot in Phase Two. Stree ccess for the present would on n be from the west There was also disc ion about proposed parkland o 6e north side of a Brown property a g Cliff Road. Wachter moved, mith seconded th otion to approve th application for rezoning. All ted in favor. E then moved, Wachte seconded the motion to approve applica- tion f preliminary plat, a ording to the following conditi s, with the unde tanding that the sa ary sewer issue will be resery until a final d ermination is made as the sanitary sewer system: 1. A detail grading, drainage, erosion and ediment control plan shall be submit d and reviewed by the City s f prior to final plat approval. 2. emporary turn arounds shall be p ided at the ends of each o the stubbed treets proposed in this develop nt and setback shall be p itted assur' g no turn arounds are installe 3. One variance shall be owed on the middle cul -de- c as proposed in the preliminary plat to pre re the existing trees and t in. 4. No lot shall b elow 12,000 square feet or foot width at the 30 foot setback. 9 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY MARTIN COLON LOCATION: S' OF THE SEk OF THE SEk, SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 1985 CONTINUED THROUGH APRIL 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 16, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting to rezone approx. 20 acres located in the NW quadrant of Rahn Rd. Cliff Rd. from A (agricultural) to a Commercial Planned Development. ZONING LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned- A (agricultural) and would not allow anything to develop except in accordance with the agricultural district. The Comprehensive Guide Plan has designated this parcel as R -III (mixed resi- dential) with a density of 6 12 dwelling units per acre. The application is a request to change the Comp. Guide Plan from an R -III to an L.B. /N.B. commercial district on the 20 acres in order that all the property abutting Cliff Rd. between I -35E Cedar Av. develop as commercial versus a mixed-develop- ment of commercial and residential. COMMENTS: As stated above, the original application was submitted in January of 1985. At the January meeting, the APC requested a'continuance of 60 days so that Staff could review the inventory of commercial zoning in the City of Eagan and how this commercial zoning compares to surrounding communities. In March of 1985, Staff presented this report to the APC noting the size of the commercial study and inventory and that the City will also have to look at specific parcels and how they relate to the surrounding area. With this conclusion, the Planning Commission indicted in March that they would consider a commercial designation on this parcel if an appropriate P.D. was submitted showing a mixture of commercial uses that would not impact the parkland or trees on the northern property. Therefore, the concern of the APC was that a buffering or limited commercial district, on the north west side of the loop street, allow some neighborhood or retail facilities in the SE portion of the development. The applicants have resubmitted the concept plan of which they would provide a daycare facility, nursing home and office buildings on the north west side of the major access and a car care center, retail stores and restaurant at the corner of Cliff Rahn Rds. It is Staff's- understanding that the retail stores and office buildings would be designed similar to the property Federal Land developed- just west of this parcel. The architectural theme has somewhat been established by the high quality standards which were put into the property to the west. FEDERAL LAND COMPANY REZONING APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 2. The applicants have also indicated that they would retain as many of the trees as possible on the northern edge of the property. The nursing home and day- care center can take advantage of the open space and park in preserving as many trees as possible with these two development proposals. The property in the NW portion, consisting of the office park, additional setbacks and easements would be granted in order to preserve, again, as many of the trees as possible and take advantage of the amenity of the park and open space for the office users. All of the retail would be south east of the loop street which would provide access. There is also proposed a car care center retail stores consisting of approx. 78,000 S.F. and a restaurant site in the SE corner of the proposal. It appears that the uses do conform to the direction the Planning Commission requested in regard to uses and location of uses for the P.D. The application submitted is for the concept phase of the P.D. and once there is a specific user for one of the uses, a detailed plan would be submitted and platting would occur for the property. Therefore, the concept is to set up the broad overview of how the parcel would develop with detailed platting and development plans would come at a later date. CONDITIONS: 1. A Planned Development be entered into and that this concept be the landuse exhibit attached to the Planned Development Agreement. 2. This plan should be reviewed by Dakota County Plat Commission to insure that access being shown will be allowed in accordance with the plan submitted. 3. The term of the Planned Development should be for a 5 year period unless appropriate extensions have been requested. 4. This Planned Development shall be reviewed by the Park Commission for their comments regarding this development and as to how it affects the park directly north. 5. Detailed lighting landscape plans shall be reviewed with the first detailed phase of this development. 6. An amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan shall be completed prior to construction of the first phase of the development. .__a..�:.�� .•Lyc�, ..__Y_...•...- ......_..�......v rr.lrai4. ...lurn >._....a. PC) ZIL 1 f-�,�rA.0 siG:aisic�urFZ�eriuGrvs cs +a¢ y II bIDENgLL /TG,� I �D P�,C PgRLlub rj mur-S1uG Ooml DAY C94-M cz"Tf-G (s Acecs) �j m PALt/N6 .A� oF��c� lloawpL,c I Pass,uL ,WO SS.cric? OPVici ,a✓i..oi✓b F 1 o t RE7A/L STO¢FLS, i 0 I I Qe7Hzc. SToacS (:ie,750 s4fi.) Q 1 GAR CARE CEUT€r- Q p Q p ❑Q ❑C C7 CI G1Cl000 ❑C PAircruG O Cl 13 CI Q d C7 CJ I Q Pz,r lra t�ss; a_ c,RCULarW 3 rjr ar7sM 2F- sl SITE J. 0' 1 eso' z i Easrr .ercrr -e✓r DrLr rrna ucnar ALA ..or C L I FF f? 0 A D If sr,T>SO fMTla.gvMY OTGS Ta >gL airs AuA: Lo. 6.. acts'& /RLPy`L!G YY: 1�`V/11 ID _1, l mars- ILOpe AE'dA 71, ooa ea. Fr xwr" P q✓✓��L w&cac. s.VC. ll► 1 ��,J O e (1! \V 1 J •VHNK✓L.q: ALLSa& P/�I/R! (wo Furs.eusL ueL✓Lane �ADa00a Ogtf 1'3+uu^nL �.Ar�in.. CLI SQUAii:E PU I TJ -t i CoytE PTfSKETGN PLAAJ FO,e {j• BCpLL P�OPDSEO i=OMM /AL F -UAJI _�7EV�LO�ME/l!T u E AGAN M144l 30TA GOUG EP7 SKErry TtW OuC C11 =1 +GA 14 }s'1 Tri PERIDOT t w PD rlf. T I I -7 -r• c'. SIT. i' 82 -1 ��PF�.�� I�. r� r.:) A 4 K 1 C P JUNIOR PF tr4 v HIGH'S RB IZ B-2 SCHOOL not r IDGE PK PAC Xl� E MARI _4. K r RAH! A F PK za/ G is IrDAR w ©I CIA I PA e NO VVV{1111 .f/ P LAT "I Lp rJI R LB Ftl f A w b A T A R B F OAK CLtFF' 82 c• SAFAR I A 0. NO MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: APRIL 1, 1985 RE: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY REZONING OF 20.6 ACRES RAHN PARK BACKGROUND: Federal Land Company has previously requested a Comprehensive Guide Plan change from mixed residential to commercial and rezoning of 20.6 acres from agricultural to commercial P.U.D.. The parcel is located within the northwest quarter of Cliff and Rahn Road immediately south of Rahn Park. Adjacent land uses include the Dakota County Court Facility to the south; across Cliff Road, an undeveloped community shopping center zoned to the east and an office to the west. The initial proposal was deferred by the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission with no formal action being taken. This item was deferred because the Planning Commission had also deferred the item for 60 days. Attached is a copy of the initial layout plan submitted with the rezoning request. At the initial review, the Commission made comment regarding the large amount of impervious surface, the minimal area of landscaping and the impact to the existing parks and trees. Concern was also expressed whether a Guide Plan change to commercial from mixed residential best suited the adjacent parkland. Federal Land Company is pursuing its current request for Comprehensive Guide Plan changed from mixed residential to commercial and rezoning from agricultural to commercial planned development. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Staff has reviewed the proposed site and adjacent parkland and is providing the Commission with the following evaluated information: The adjacent parkland is characterized as rolling terrain with slopes ranging from 7 -20%. A 12 -15% wooded ridge line with a vertical change of approximately 20' lies beyond the south property line adjacent to the proposed development. Several small ponds lie within the southern one —half of the park site. These uncontrolled ponds are watershed for this area of the park. It can be assumed that the pond levels fluctuate based on the time of the year. Rahn Park is heavily wooded adjacent to the proposed 20 —acre site for rezoning. Interior to the park, the vegetation consists of poplar, elm and maple, with a few scattered oaks. Along the south property line are mainly 12 -30 oak trees. Also within this southern portion of the park are several unmaintained paths. Many of these paths were established by the public with most leading to the small ponding areas. The proposed site is characterized with a rolling terrain with slopes ranging from 5 -10 Approximately one —half of the site drains to the north into the park with the remaining drainage to a pond located within the southwest corner of the site. The parcel is covered with mostly grasses and offers minimal wildlife habitat. The northern 100' of the parcel, like the park, is sporatically covered with 12 -30 oaks. PROPOSED LAND USES: Currently, 20 acres of the 60 —acre park is under development as athletic fields. Of the remaining 40 acres, 15 -20 acres is also devoted to active park use. The remaining 20 acres, or the south half, has no Comprehensive Park Plan. The rolling terrain, ponds and heavy vegetation, lends itself to possible trail type use or scattered picnic use. Further analysis and evaluation is necessary before specified uses and layouts for the park can be determined. It would appear, however, that adequate acreage exists for any further parks development. The developer has not provided a specific site plan other than that which was originally submitted with the rezoning request. Without such a detailed layout plan, it is difficult to evaluate the developmental influences on the park either as commercial or as residential. While it is generally recognized that residential development adjacent to .neighborhood and community parks is preferred, commercial development can be compatible. In either case, it is not the zoning or the intended use that affects the park, but rather the layout and actual development itself that can be compatible /incompatible. In reviewing the initial concept /sketch plan proposed for and with this rezoning request, there are several concerns raised. These would also be considerations for multiple residential development: 1. To provide for an orderly transition of land use between the park and proposed parcel. 2. Screening of undesirable visual elements such as mechanical equipment, trash receptacles and in the case of commercial development, loading docks, parking lots and advertising signs. 3. Layout which would preserve existing land form and significant tree vegetation on this parcel. Without a revised site plan, it is impossible to determine whether the significant oaks along the parcel's north property line will be preserved or destroyed with this development. A tree inventory indicating size, type and location would provide the Commission with the necessary information to objectively evaluate the importance plant materials have to the park and to the proposed development. In the past, the Commission has shown concern for the amount of impervious surface material within a given plan. The sketch plan provided creates a significant amount of hard surface and additional runoff (approximately eight acres currently drains into the park), which is of some concern. Here the Commission may consider the following: 1. Developer shall provide for detailed storm water plans insuring that the parkland will not be influenced by having additional or concentrated water runoff into the park. 2. Impervious areas be reduced and replaced with landscape areas reducing runoff and visual impact. SUMMATION: Federal Land Company is requesting rezoning of 20.6 acres from agricultural to commercial planned development. The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan currently shows this as multiple residential. The 20 —acre site has a rolling terrain with significant vegetation consisting primarily of 12 -30" oaks along the north property line. The development of this parcel as multiple residential or as commercial could be complimentary or adversely impact the park based upon the development scheme. The submitted sketch plan for the proposed commercial area raises concern over the amount of impervious material, possible loss of significant amount of vegetation, visual impact and the significant amount of storm water draining to the park. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW ACTION: At this time, the developer is seeking only a change in the zoning and Comprensive Land Use Plan. A preliminary plat has not been submitted, and therefore, the Commission is not reviewing this for park dedication purposes. It would be appropriate for the Commission to review and discuss the rezoning and provide its recommendation to the City Council concerning parks, parks impact and possible park dedication needs. P- A+4 Al PA IZ IL /eev.ar' ,esrem you /s /cAUrlikisr /u� >tae' eeara: r I s LL.,cu COM NUIr+:YL s aL+•c.r vw. s.LU.� G/},Q CA26 e I Aceeb) DAY CAZ6 C --AJ7 I F P Ua e. c ,e CA c i I OFF /L6 ✓/••G�uG I O L•s Pllts•✓4 A✓O SCiwGQ I GoVVEeu1,. L•r /L Sro.PSS I rr+ I 1"l KETHj 37 C 33 Soo 5q fT. U p I oo ❑a ❑}�o�nc>>°r�000nr_�QO❑rt� vw rASC SVTu S c /RCUFR r/w 3r3s rxM 3= Ace5r F /A/AUC /RL G r1 u say ,2ErA /c 5ro2E5 (ZSpoo SQ.F[) t l i Vr AJ6wr• LILNr -0 uT ONtr tere2 •ec n°u P�� M4•bMLY yb K— C L I F•ff 0 A D vaL.,., r�saacrw •Y+Tea 3. /L A¢eR: L0.6= PCa3b r'RL /SgACOG JY7 j A:Srq /b P1CCG FI A:OA 7/ COC 'ra. FT. Ctiaii✓ P•a /N4 AicOa. LNG //'•1 O A 1 •VSMKY�fl4 AGL.aLb DQ,�TS �•.O SYriLY•I. GL(L.Nr.O C -l- i. S raA PaPU✓ I LLP1 L/1 'r r 111 111 {{1Y ..^^^11111 111't`_"_ I V Y V ry I may` �pV1 C L I Ff 5 Q IJA fZE PU D a CONG•EPT�SKETGH PLAAI F02 f} scw•.e: -c� o�� 1�2OROSEO GOMMc2G /AL }�lAAI,VHD UA/IT Z)E�/�LD}=ME,l1T LA�Aa M�auLe:orw coucirr sKCrc•• nw o..v CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONAL USE BLACKHAWK PLAZA APPLICANT: NORSE DEVELOPMENT PETER STALLAND LOCATION: PART OF THE SEk OF SECTION 20 EXISTING ZONING: N.B. NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS R.B. ROADSIDE BUSINESS DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 16, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: The applicant is asking for Preliminary Plat approval of Blackhawk Plaza consisting of 9 commercial lots including a hotel and shopping center on 11.5 acres located at the NW corner of I -35E and County Road 30. The report also covers 2 Conditional Use Permit applications; one for a drive -up bank facility and one for a service station. ZONING LAND USE: The SW portion of the site is zoned N.B. (neighborhood business) and the NE portion is zoned R.B. (roadside business). the Comprehen- sive Plan designates the parcel as neighborhbod business roadside business. The shopping center, bank, service station and restaurant uses are consistent with the N.B. zone as are the hotel and restaurant in the R.B. zone. The use for 2 parcels in the N.B. area is not designated at this time. The parcel is bordered by I -35E on the east, County Road 30 on the south and Blackhawk Rd. on the west. A cemetery is in the SW corner of the site. Existing townhouses are 30' from the NE property line while agricuiturai land lies to the north. The land is separated from County Road 30 by a berm and two berms lie between the parcel and I -35E. The property consists of grassland with scattered trees and brush on the north and south property lines. CODE COMPLIANCE: The site plan meets all the setback, lot coverage and parking requirements of the R.B. N.B. districts. A 4 story hotel is shown on Lot 3. City Code limits the height in a R.B. district to 35 A Variance would have to be granted to allow the 4 story building. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: The applicant is proposing a 2 bay service station on Lot 5. The station would have 3 gas pump islands covered by an overhead canopy. The circulation pattern to and through the station appears to function well. Eight spaces are shown which satisfies the code requirements. Staff suggests that the applicant provide a plan showing additional parking that could be added should the need arise. BLACKHAWK PLAZA APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 2. A drive —thru bank facility is planned for Lot 8. The drive —thru would have 4 teller islands covered by a canopy. Stacking space for a total of 16 cars if provided. City Code would require 20 spaces (5 per teller island) and it appears that the site plan could be modified to achieve the additional stacking spaces. The adjacent cemetery has a grave on the applicants property just south of the proposed bank facility. The applicant is pursuing a land exchange with the cemetery to clear up this situation. If this is accomplished the bank parcel should be redesigned to fit the revised property lines. GRADING DRAINAGE: Existing topography consists of rolling grassland. This project has been previously graded under a City approved permit. Drainage along the west is toward Blackhawk Ave. A large holding basin located in the center of the flatland with a capacity of approximately 1.9 ac /ft. collects drainage from this area. The easterly one -third drains to a low area located north of proposed lot 2 of this development. The proposed grading consists mainly of leveling the hills and filling the low areas creating a fairly level site. A large portion of this site will be bituminous parking lot where drainage would be picked up by storm sewer. This sewer would outlet into a holding pond built by this development in proposed lot 7 with a capacity of 1.40 ac /ft. This holding pond ultimately outlets into an existing storm line running south along Blackhawk Road. A large hill along the MN /DOT R/W is proposed to be lowered considerably. For any grading to be done inside their right -of -way requires a permit from MnDOT previous to such work beginning. SANITARY SEWER: An existing 8 11 line is in place along the east side of Blackhawk Road. It should be of adequate size and depth to service this project. WATERHAIN: An existing 16" trunk line is in place along the west side of Blackhawk Road. An existing 6 line is also in place stubbed from Hillandale No. 2 near the northeast corner of this development. The proposed utility plan shows a 10" line being brought in from Blackhawk to service this development and it looping to connect with the above mentioned 6" line to the northeast. STREETS: Streets abutting this proposed development include Blackhawk Road to the west, Diffley Road being under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department to the south and the right -of -way of Trunk Hwy. 35E abuts to the southeast. Blackhawk Road is classified as a community collector with an ultimate design of 44' face to face with concrete curb and gutter and a 9 ton capacity. It is currently a 25' wide bituminous road with a rural section. It will be the responsibility of this development at this time to upgrade the east side of Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road junction to its north property line to ulti- mate design. BLACKHAWK PLAZA APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 3. Internal streets within this development are proposed to be privately owned and maintained. Staff would recommend a minimum of a 36' roadway to provide adequate access to the motel. Staff estimates the hotel alone will generate approximately 1,600 trips per day. Subsequently, staff does not feel that any width less than 36 feet will provide the necessary service for this development. Diffley is presently built to its ultimate design with concrete walk located along the north side. RIGHT —OF— WAY /EASEMENT: Right in and out access from this development is proposed onto Diffley Road. our —i approval is required for access to be allowed. Apparently MnDOT has gran.ed access rights at this point. Current half right —of —way along both Blackhawk and Diffley Road are 50' and should be sufficient. A ponding easement will be required around the proposed holding pond located in the southwest portion of this development to accommodate 1.4 Ac.Ft. of storage. CONDITIONS If approved the preliminary plat shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard preliminary plat conditions shall apply. 2. All trash containers shall be stored on the interior of the shopping center and the hotel. Trash containers shall be concealed with opaque screening on all other lots. 3. Extensive landscape screening and the usage of large scale plant material along the north property line shall be reflected in the landscaping plan. The landscape screening shall be installed prior to construction on Lots 1, 2 3. 4. The discrepancy between the cemetery land and the applicant's land shall be resolved and the preliminary plat shall be adjusted to show the change. 5. Roof top mechanical equipment shall be concealed by a parapet wall or suitable screening. 6. A storm water detention pond shall be constructed on Lot 7 with a capacity of 1.4 Ac. Ft. 7. A permit shall be obtained from MnDOT to perform grading within MnDOT right —of —way. 8. The watermain shall be looped from Blackhawk Road to the Hillandale 2 subdivision. 9. The private road shall be 36' wide from Blackhawk to the hotel. 10. This development will be responsible for upgrading the east side of Blackhawk Road to Diffley Road to its north property line. BLACKHAWK PLAZA APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 4. 11. A ponding easement will be required over Lot 7 to accommodate 1.4 acre feet of storage. 12. This development will be responsible for any unlevied trunk area related assessments or any upgrading of trunk area related assessments as necessary. If approved, the conditional use permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a proof of parking plan for the service station showing how parking could be expanded if needed. 2. The bank shall provide stacking space for 20 vehicles. 3. All City ordinances and requirements shall be adhered to. L.3 j j_ HIV T IE PERIDOT Ak ..PAL ;PAC PF i i 3 t D MOK NB R v P {� iy i.`' '1 pr. PK CCpr RAHN r s 7 r r PAC Ei3AR 0 CIA io DAKOTA R B i COUNTY' r t P LAT R-2 f LB RI E A l CLIF� SAFAR I t AD 0. i ML w[ Iw11N MI M:u [I t,llrlr [rt t, NIIIw�1r u[Illw i. 1, turlr [wu, A I It1Y rrrIN.11 [u worn[ M lu tl�l [I 11.1 rl lu[I[wr EC1Lt IINCN•lOFEET f �;��tFP TIt_: S•, l T% 7[tL[ w ti ff sc.!! xxxi 1 T 9� uti ut rn QJ d T 1-10 rY co ra'si E ww r7 MEV Ii IIL 1 W 5 °.t. r b G Iw2 MdG0 fIr b xi•[ i GOUNT-Y RD. NO. ae a f C ONSULTING ENGINEER "t::::::.:7 PRELIMINARY PLAT PREPARED FDA ROBE '311,11's and LEND /USUEwsf ;Or OF NORSE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING COMPANY 5 BLACKHAWK PLAZA COMPANY, INC. w .ElIEIiN. 1000 EAST 1466 STRIKE. SWWVILLt NwNEtO[E 66351 M {3[•3000 I AREA USE SUMMARY' MAN m li- 1..1 LgML a tmm. W 1 w•p1Y wl•. 11w IY,111 11.11 Ip M i11 Ip wl Y•fwW 30,1R 1.11 Y u Y1 l Iw-trl il•1 Ip,Y1 Y.R In 1/1 Y1. {Y w1 Wt1•.M fl.N1 I.N M Y it 1 1�.11•u in, lI,IR A." 1 1 Y11 W11WI i.11 Y� i irrR..r K,w IgRTN Sc.": 1 11101.30 FEET 00 swp /Ip YY Iw,M y. IN (11.11 Y,f t a SCALE IN IFFY Sr- s a. 3 set j A tte a O 4." SERVICE AIS[! Y s O4 1� 8� SHOPPING CENTER I 11` 0 I ffifl 0 b )10� I A +ee A R 1 lr t 4tH E N �Q 1111 T y s f1jitm r\ Z j A r v N IT fnr FXCEPTION i 6 rJ -6 j 2 3ERV. CENTER 1os1 a 440W CON{S{IIN0 ENOINE[Rf ►REFAREO FOR: ROBE PARSO as [ENO IV$Vdvo S •AI t. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN NORSE DEVELOPMENT 5I ENGINEERING .4.7 BLACKHAWK PLAZA COMPANY COMPANY, INC. 1000 [A{1 1400 STIE[l, SIIRMVIt1[, "NA19{01A 11037/ FY 1))•)000 111n10M1 t. 5 ill AREA USE SUMMAeY' Yi[B• Y nw .r. r� j�ylit IIiYIY IriglYY I i `Y b 1 MME r.+ lyr° W� Ir M a' Y. I 11I M. MrVw.. KY![ li• 41 N 1 3+• N Iaati1 r-rl 1 [N[•I 1M 1 W W `,1• SAY ,1 w aj cr wra .ln r.0 4R,00 T../ V,l [C.1[ N 'Ell ♦r, t. .�C '�7.`q°'nNfi MIM� III�JI: 1 r 1, R.: I He. I iNK�{�` \BOND I';li 4 9 1 ,1 I •'�I'1� 1�P710 ��.'1�.� \.III I f D ,e I i l i 1l i T� 1+ SAY OENTER �r 1 pro PREP -10'OR CONIYl11NO INOINIIIIf ROBE flfMN[Rf IRNO 1NOwfo•t LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN' NORSE DEVELOPMENT 2 ENGINEERING �r ••..1 BLACKHAWK PLAZA COMPANY i C O MPANY, INC. .G,�•:..1 w•.l..l L moo [.11 I... 11.1[1, M[INIVH t[, NINN[101. 11111 PH 411 AREA USE SUMMARY 1 :L 11'! !1! fln I .W �y YW1W EYC19E y Y 1_,1 r,wly 1fl.li/ If.11 Ir fw N ..,L Ir -+r, uf,ul r.« w of {rM•. 1.11 1.4. Y., r... II�IM ..M E I� ��li� ICI h. nl.0 r./ or eERVI",C/.IyIE I� -'y OO.�e. _'a..1.F a r" :l r 1� .sHOS�.n�� -.rE t t, tiw,,. `ID�� IT :Y•,,.5'_..-.' 1• �aa ar•rue l •E ,,1• li, G;: "7, iT(rT1:T�MsIT1JfTTk �'f 1 1 f I I I t 1 �2 I 1 J gJ111 I /If I1T 11lF f .:M1 i•, 0,/ \I I I� I;�� 1 I I 19I 1; -yCNI i OND q \t r•ltll r� t ��NrJ «ar I a,�!,.;.• 5 oPY ti y y' l 1 Poo j• •I p -SAY LRV, CENTER ,ice::'" r 1 •1�j lv� �7e__� "i7�a. i� aEi e o u�r,_� ,/!r ./dlJi \v '^e,o' Cam- ,20 r t i EOYEYlfIMO ENOIMEERf. I r PREPARED FOR: AOOE PLANNER, «e LRNO 2YRYEYORf PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I E NORSE DEVELOPMENT 3 ENGINEERING ��s,l. COMPANY INC. Z r _T J 1 1p M.:f��x +�1 BLACKHAWK PLAZA J0 COMPANY MOO E.11 I.E. EI.IE/, eLRMY1LlE, ..Cs 'A 61 ilt FN .)2•]000 M 1 ,f.n,0,f �1 M 5 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: FINISHING EQUIPMENT, INC. LOCATION: LOT 5, BLOCK 2, CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK EXISTING ZONING: L -I, LIMITED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 25, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: .APRIL 11, 1985 REPORTED BY: GREG H INGRAHAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUMMARY: The applicants wish to split off the southwest 157' of their lot. The split parcel would be sold to provide capital for a planned building expansion on the remaining lot. The existing Finishing Equipment parcel is 3.1 acres. The split would leave them with 2.0 acres and the split off lot (parcel "B would be 1.2 acres. The existing buildings currently cover 20,400 square feet of the site. After the split, the building expansion would be limited to 10,027 square feet in order to stay under the 35% building coverage limit of an Industrial District. If approved, the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Waiver shall meet all applicable City ordinances and requirements. 2. The building expansion on parcel "A" shall be limited to 10,027 square feet and adequate parking spaces shall be provided with the addition. /jbd q j j 1 P V L Lao N C i JON A GB f GAN i�Af= Ri�CEITR J 1 '4�' i i SILL C AD CC PK PF A I A_ L�EOAR RC}VE"— c i-`'�/ 1. r� s 3p15 P.�v• LJ h T r 15. poo 4, 25, If /''L /N 1. �Ov�N/ /Nf r�' I .t Y �N tom. ✓r�� 49. f r YC•f���. 1 Sri %Q X127 I' MEMO TO: CHAIRMAN HALL ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: GREG INGRAHAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: APRIL 15, 1985 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THOMAS LAKE PLACE PROPOSAL To refresh everyone's memory, the following is a brief synopsis of the project. On July 24, 1984, this item was first considered by the Planning Commission. At that time the proposal called for 238 apartment units in 2 buildings on the 17.5 acre site. The site is located east of Thomas Lake Rd. and to the north of Thomas Lake. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat on August 28th. It was continued by the City Council in November. Alternative site plans were then considered by the APC on February 26, 1985. The Thomas Lake Place preliminary application was continued at the February 26th meeting to give Staff and the applicant time to prepare additional information. The information requested focused on three issues; a) the effects of the access road and traffic generation, b) the impact of the development on the drainage and runoff systems and c) zoning classification. a) Access Road the applicant has submitted two site plans. One with an access road on the south side of the-. site and one with the access road on the north side. The attached letter from the project architect summarizes the differences between the two plans. Also, attached is the February 15, 1985 Staff Report which reviews the plan with the southerly access. The north access road alternative would be 510' long at a 7.4% slope. The south road would be 1,000' long at 3.7% slope. The north alternative would require clearing a 1.8 acre area while the south road would require a 1.1 acre area. The 228 apartment units would generate an average of 1,390 vehicle trips per day with the peak hour (160 trips) being from 5 6 o'clock in the afternoon. This level of traffic would not generate any levels of air pollution which could conceivably violate any state or federal air quality standards. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency does not require an indirect source permit unless there are more than 2,000 cars parked in a single parking facility. Thomas Lake Place would have 460 parking spaces. b) Drainage and Runoff the Thomas Lake Place project would increase the overall runoff exiting the site by approx. 65 As a point of comparison, a standard single family development would increase the runoff by approx. 71 The alternate north access road would be 38' from the existing pond, grading would be within 10' of the pond. The southerly road would come within 122' of Thomas Lake, the closest grading would be 100' from the lakeshore. THOMAS LAKE PLACE UPDATE APRIL 15, 1985 PAGE 2. The Shoreland Ordinance would limit construction of buildings within 50' of the ordinary high water mark. The proposed apartments would be 95' from the east shoreline of Thomas Lake and 145' from the south shore. The Eagan Erosion Control Manual sets standards and procedures for controlling runoff and erosion during construction. An erosion control fence would be placed between all water areas and areas of grading activity. Strict grading limits will be established Iv city Staff due to the wooded character of this site. c) Zoning the property is designated R -4 (residential multi family) under the Blackhawk Park Planned Unit Development. The PUD was approved on June 21, 1977, and has been reviewed annually since that time. Thomas Lake Place's 228 units meet all the density, setback and lot coverage requirements of an R -4 district. An Environmental Impact Statement was done on the Blackhawk Lake P.U.D. in 1979. That EIS analyzed the impact of development on the natural environ- ment and identified the environmentally sensitive areas within the P.U.D. this site was not identified as a sensitive area within the context of the Planned Development. The attached memo from Dale Runkle summarizes the EIS report. March 28, 1985 Pfister Architects Mr. Dale Runkel City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P. 0. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Thomas Lake Housing Eagan, Minnesota Commission No. 8410 Dear Mr. Runkel: Mr. Jack Safar of Dominium Group asked that I send a copy of the letter and drawings dated March 12, 1985. This material is a follow -up of our meeting on March 7 on the above referenced project. The material evaluates the Proposed Site Plan (entry road at south) and an Alternate Site Plan (entry road at north). Mr. Safar also asked me to do two additional drawings that isolate the impact of the entry road alternatives. These drawings are attached to this letter and are dated March 28, 1985. Please give me a call if you have any questions on this information. Sincerely, PETER J. PFI ER, AIA Enclosure cc: Mr. Jack Safar 21' lliird Avcnuc North, Suite 302 \]inneapolis, Minnesota 55401 1430 612 349 6006 March 12, 1985 Pfister Architects Mr. Jack Safar Dominium Group 3140 Harbor Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Re: Thomas Lake Housing Eagan, Minnesota Commission No. 8410 Dear Jack: Based on the comments received at the neighborhood meeting February 23 and at the Eagan City Planning Commission meeting on February 26, we have reviewed the Proposed Site Plan dated January 16, 1985 and compared it to an alternate site plan (dated March 11, 1985). The Alternate Site Plan is a refined site plan based on 'Option B" discussed in my letter to you dated February 26, 1985. At our meeting on March 7 with Mr. Dale Runkel, Mr. Rich Hefti and Mr. Michael Wold, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the two site plans. It was requested that I prepare a sketch of each plan that showed more clearly the areas that would be disturbed by construction and those areas that would likely remain vegetated. I have attached those drawings as well as drawings of the Prosposed Site Plan and the Alternate Site Plan. The Alternate Site Plan shows the site access drive entering at the northwest corner of the site. Entry at this point requires the drive to climb from elevation 916 at Thomas Lake Road to elevation 952 (a 36 foot rise). We have shown this drive as an 8% grade, which is the maximum'grade allowable for an entry drive. The slope of this drive would require immediate snow removal and /or heavy sanding and salting in winter. A more desirable maximum slope would be in the 5% to 6% range, which would be difficult if not impossible to achieve with an entry at the northwest. In order to bring the entry drive in at this point, it would cross some grades sloping steeply to the north, which would require extensive retaining walls below the entry drive and above the entry drive. Re- contouring this area would eliminate many of the large trees and would leave the area between Building C and the Pond /Marsh without existing trees. The attached Partial Site Section shows this in more detail. 212'Ihird Avrnuc north, Suitc it) 2 �linnc :y�uli,, 1linnc,uLt» t01 1 00 012 3 0 0000 March 12, 1985 Mr. Jack Safar Page 2 The location of the entry drive in the Alternate Site Plan eliminates the possibility of a four building site plan. Insteadwe have shown a single 100± unit building on the west part of the site, and we have increased Building B to 66 units in order to keep the same site density. The increased building size and associated parking on the east part of the site will eliminate the group of trees between Buildings A and B that could be retained in the Proposed Site Plan. With the entry drive at the Southwest Corner as shown in the Proposed Site Plan, the drive rises from elevation 920 at Thomas Lake Road to the 940 elevation. This drive can be kept at or below the maximum recommended 6% slope. The drive would require some retainage as it turned north near the center of the site, but the retainage would not be nearly as extensive as required under the Alternate Site Plan. The major advantage of the Alternate Site Plan is that a larger portion of the south sloping hill can remain undisturbed. However, this is accomplished at significant expense to other parts of the site and to the project as a whole. Following is a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of both plans. Alternate Site Plan Advantages Less construction disturbance to west side of site along Thomas Lake Alternate Site Plan Disadvantages Steep entry drive will require more salting and sanding resulting in runoff to the pond Extensive retaining walls required along drive Removal of most large trees at the northwest corner of site Larger Building C (100± units) increase scale of project, reduces residential feeling ..Increased development on east part eliminates trees separating Buildings A and B Less desirable entry drive and building massing will reduce marketability Proposed Site Plan Advantages Entry drive is easier to deal with topigraphically Buildings are smaller, which allows vistas between buildings More buildings /dwelling units have southerly orientation to take advantage of passive solar heating. More marketable and scenic project March 12, 1985 Mr. Jack Safar Page 3 Proposed Site Disadvantages Entry drive along south property line requires construction activity in this area Traffic will occur along Thomas Lake We have tried to be as objective as possible in evaluating the two site development alternatives. Obviously each person will draw his or her own conclusion when evaluating this information. There is little question that the Alternate Site Plan will create less construction disturbance in the southwestern corner of the development, but considering the difficulty of bringing the drive in at the northwest corner and the resulting impact on the character of the site development, we feel that the Proposed Site Plan is more site and environment sensitive when considering the development as a whole, and we feel it is in character with the existing development around Thomas Lake. Sincerely, Peter J. Pfister, AIA PJP /dep encl. ..v:w. to I I 0 0', 0 0 1 1 010 0 O e 5 O 0 0 O +,y i O J 1 ar 0 0 0 14 IS 0 if I 1 �:r m 04 ,O O p ,b pa 1 i r Op u .IL_ o L K t Jf I O 1 1 I l K 52 0 r x 1 r 1 7�1atq�IF x 4 1� K I 1.• O 1 °at *0 `71 p III O r M fKfr i Y oe r K 7 1 t�� 0 1 pu\\1M1V1 \�V Ol\N111�111 ly K 01 d1N \f ,M,y� NO4 lMIlVI \111 �V!\1� _�Q/2y�y� +1�lY U10��• 6 1•`a/i one p r x jam• xR K S v +c 4? o lyrllwual Efiou� y- y sss uNCn r•�.' arm y y\� +cti fs bs iF Y ♦uv'` att M� y �n, arx Ww i^s' �ra\ w►fycus• ►w. s•t unv y�Vp�,�ylra\f�uINWW +WIk11N IlrtuAV1 to L 0•RK 2F1d� 'INAM4 L/8L 1 a lao' I I '1119 uw wousw 5can— 1 r a w i J1 99 ff k 0 N� ill ��il ,uT fs Y 00 CL r q• IL I 1 s• e O o I e+ t I T 0 I O O r o t °r t u• 1 1 I p 1 T 0 T 0 f �je At t •r t 4,4 It r I t Nm Haus 7.s ri s //q R/9H�L 30 VMN 4nwfKAy^U MM t •3.1- '141 fwfi r •rH °MAf �-Nkt o ico F /?AA +LN a Z o eL p o a i 1 0 s j r t1�3 L M 1�0'f?H T14 c µh A wE 31 1 lid A 1 it 1 p b I 0 40 1 e e I �Ji•W11ti OlIIr e° f t' G r 1 4w h, it I i ce''- O X. f t �l(5'11{# �....g 10 y O 0 1•/� I o/ 0 a o•K o +r t All t p r O M 4ii<•llff i 1 V NN6VNV1\1t1(VN' \�N \MUWIIW\ wtwr l wn It R .....M K 416 IVtIPb f 9•� ATM tc(. /fG Ff.63 '��,•,.bN11NbWINiYIulI.titok O o 10 A G ev n o j 0 0 Ipb, b p i a O VP i I 1 1 OV bL*4XWO e- loo Lwtrr a qvL 1 �u1tA►ds h 1 o o e to 60 I s t qi� o t 0 t ar t T K� Na�si �IZta>fv/1�►. •�y.s le MR�VIJflldh. M�• '14q -(rYC� =o to 0 �o�' o r o f dw s w.__,.... aQ _WD��— ...__........r.._.__..._�.