01/03/1985 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission TENTATIVE AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
7:15 P.M.
JANUARY 3, 1985
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES OF DECEMBER 6 AND DECEMBER 13, 1984.
3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
a. Eagan Woods Office Park Trammel Crow
b. Rahncliff Second Addition M.G. Astleford
c. Lemay First Addition
4. OLD BUSINESS
None
5. NEW BUSINESS
None
6. PARKS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. Coat Hill Park (Capricorn) plan revisions
b. Schwanz Lake Park
c. Architectural programs
d. Project time line: January March
7. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
a. Community room report
b. Recreation Committee meeting set date
8. ADJOURNMENT
l MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
X FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1984
RE: JANUARY 3 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
The organizational meeting of the Advisory Commission will be deferred until
the first meeting in February to coincide with the appointment /reappointment
of members to create a full Advisory Commission.
There are three development proposals before the Advisory Commission. The
first two are commercial properties which would require the cash dedication
requirement. The third proposal is a resubmission of the Lemay First
Addition. The Advisory Commission has already made a recommendation regarding
this plat, but because there have been some revisions, staff felt it would be
appropriate for the Commission to again review it.
There are no old or new business items for the Commnission to consider at this
time.
Under the Parks Development Program, there are four items which staff would
like to review with the Commission. The first item is relative to some
necessary plan revisions to Goat Hill Park (Capricorn). Park development is
entering into the final detail work in preparation of the bids and
specification documents and therefore, review by the Advisory Commission
guiding these changes is felt appropriate and necessary.
Items B and C refer to the architectural programs necessary for the buildings
and shelter within the parks plan. Staff will hand out the work that was
completed by the Advisory Commission at its December meeting for review and
time permitting, proceed with the drafting of architectural programs for Goat
Hill and Rahn Park.
Staff also has developed a project time line from January through March
regarding parks development and major agenda items for the Advisory
Commission.
Under "Other Business and Reports" staff has included an updating on the
community room usage at the Fire Administration Building. Staff would like to
briefly review this with the Advisory Commission relative to our existing
policies and procedures for use of this facility. Finally, a meeting date
should be set with the Recreation Subcommittee in order to consider the review
of the concessions /beer policy for parks.
Members will immediately note that this is a relatively light agenda and
certainly a rare occurrence for the Advisory Commission. As always, should
you be unable to attend, we do appreciate you calling and letting us know.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
APPLICANT: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
LOCATION: PART OF THE NEk OF THE NEk, SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -WITH AN UNDERLYING ZONING
OF RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 20, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 13, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The application submitted is a request for a Preliminary Plat,
Eagan Woods Office Park, which would consist of 6.60 acres and contain one
4 story office bldg., containing 72,000 sq. ft. The second portion of the
application is the concept approval for the total 18.8 acres to constitute
the landuse plan for the Eagan Woods PD. The total plan consists of 2 office
buildings either a hotel or office which would contain approx. 160 rooms,
or 55,000 sq. ft and be multi level. This has been the concept for the overall
18 acres and should be reviewed required to be attached in the Planned Develop-
ment Agreement.
BACKGROUND: As you may be aware, this parcel has been reviewed in the past
and there was much discussion regarding uses how they related to safety
zones created by Mpls. /St. Paul International Airport. As a result of this
review process, the City and airport initiated the airport safety zone ordinance
and also due to the uncertainty regarding safety, the City denied the original
application. The applicants then brought litigation against the City and
utimately received the PD zoning on the property. The applicants also challenged
the underlying zoning and ultimately were also granted an RB (roadside business)
underlying zoning with the PD overlying which allowed for 2 office buildings
hotel /restaurant as the uses allowed within the PD.
There are now new property owners who have purchased the site and are proposing
the same uses which have been allowed in the PD. This application would consist
of 2 office buildings a potential third office or 160 unit hotel. The uses
conform to what had been allowed in the PD and a Planned Development Agreement
will now be entered into with the new property owners and the plan submitted
for the Dec. 20, 1984 APC meeting.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Presently the total site consists of 18.87 acres -of
which the first phase would consist of 1 lot, containing 1 office building
on 6.60 acres. The property abutts I -494 on the north Pilot Knob Rd. on
the east is directly on line of the runway of the Mpls. /St. Paul Airport.
The site is heavily wooded and there's topographic relief throughout the
site. The major topographic feature is a ravine which basically runs east /west
separating office bldg. #1 from #2. In review of the overall site, the appli-
cants have spent a great deal of time doing actual tree surveys to identify
and mark the larger tree stands and trees with larger diameters on the site
and are designing the plan around the existing vegetation, preserving as much
EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 2.
of the vegetation as possible on the site. Access to this development will
be across from Eagandale Ind. Blvd. The state has provided a stub street
to the property to provide the major access to the parcel. The applicants
have reviewed this access and are working with the property owners to the
south to obtain easements in order to get a more gentle curve to provide
for better traffic movement. The applicants are also proposing this road
to continue along their southern property in order that an overall loop system
could be designed when the property to the south develops. There would be
a stub street providing access to office bldgs. #1 partially to the hotel
or office bldg. #3. The applicants are proposing -that a stub street
and a turn around for snow plowsbe provided within the parking lot of the area
for office bldg. #1 to reduce the amount of asphalt and site grading for this
development.
PRELIMINARY PLAT: The Preliminary Plat proposed consists of 1 lot containing
6.6 acres and 2 outlots which would be phases 2 3 of this development.
There would be a dedicated street right -of -way, Eaganwoods Dr., which would
provide access to Lot 1. In review of the overall site plan, the applicants
have met all setback requirements according to the zoning ordinance. The
building coverage alotted is 20 the actual site plan submitted is proposing
6.3 maintaining as much of the surrounding topography as possible. The
one area of difference is that the applicants are proposing a reduction
in the number of parking spaces per sq. ft. In review of the Eagan ordinance,
the applicants would be required to provide 360 spaces and they are proposing
280 which is based off of 1 space per 250 sq. ft. of leased floor area. The
total difference between the City's calculation and applicant is approx. 80
spaces. The applicants have provided an additional site plan increasing the
total parking area to an additional 72 spaces attached to their existing parking,
if the parking spaces would be needed. Therefore, there is adequate room
to add these additional spaces, however, the applicants feel they, would not
like to put these in until these spaces are warranted by the use or tenants
in this bldg. The second issue is parking space size. The applicants are
proposing to provide 6 handicap spaces 12 visitor spaces which would have
a dimension of 10 x 20 parking space size. The rest of the building is proposed
to have 9 x 20 spaces or 9 x 18 and would be employee spaces for the building.
The employee parking lots have been allowed with a 9' x 20' dimension for
3M and other major tenant users for strictly employee parking.
In review of the site plan, the one issue that Staff uncovered in the review
process is that the proposed building is to consist of 4 stories plus underground
parking. Therefore, the building exceeds the height which would be allowed
in the commercial district. To exceed a 3 story building, a Conditional Use
Permit would have to be obtained. In review of the Cond. Use process, the
applicants are meeting exceeding all of the additional criteria for height
and additional setbacks due to the size of the site. This additional height
should not be a problem for this particular lot. The total height elevation
.would be 4 stories and still not encroach on any of the height limitations
set forth by Mpls. /St. Paul Intl Airport. Staff will, however, review this
with the MAC office to make sure there have not been any issues overlooked
for safety or height of this parcel.
EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK,
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 3.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: This existing topography consists of very rugged and wooded
terrain. The distinguishing feature within this parcel is a very large and
well defined ravine running in a northwesterly direction and approx. bi- secting
this proposed development. Generally, the drainage pattern over this development
also follows this ravine in a NW direction. These slopes, adjacent the ravine,
approach 40 A field inspection revealed severe erosion occuring along the
base of the ravine from existing storm water runoff. The most severe erosion
was located near the westerly end.
Due to the ruggedness of this site, a proposed grading plan depicts several
retaining walls. It appears the retaining walls will be of two types. One
type will be the conventional retaining wall, built with a vertical face,
while the other is being proposed as a reinforced enbankment at a one to one
slope. Staff will. require that detailed plans and specs for this type of
reinforced embankment be submitted so that we may review the viability of
this type of retaining wall. Other grading indicates filling the easterly
one third of the ravine from approx. 100' west of Eaganwoods Dr. to the realign-
ment of Eaganwoods Blvd. Some of this grading will require obtaining permission
or easement from the parcel immediately south of this proposed development.
Because of the ruggedness of the existing topography, strict adherence to
an approved erosion control plan is recommended.
As previously mentioned, drainage over this proposed development follows the
ravine to the NW. Although this development does not propose any changes
in the existing drainage patterns, it will result in increased volume of runoff
due to the increase of impervious area, i.e. roofs and parking lots. Staff
would recommend that storm sewer be constructed from this development to the
Minnesota River Valley. This is necessary due to the existing erosion problems
resulting from the natural runoff. This may be deferred until subsequent
phases of this development have been completed, if the developer can show
that sufficient onsite ponding can be provided with a controlled outlet to
reduce the downstream flow rate to a point where erosion wii11 notbe a_ problem.
Staff will require the calculations used to determine the ponding and outflow
rate be submitted for review. If it is necessary to construct a storm sewer
outlet to the Minnesota River Valley, then it will be necessary to obtain
a permit from the Minnesota River Watershed District.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service can be provided to this proposed development
by constructing laterals and connecting into the 21" trunk sanitary sewer
located around the north and northwesterly boundary of this development.
This trunk sanitary sewer line is owned and maintained by the Metro Waste
Control Comm. and will require permits from them. This development shall adhere
to the requirements as designated by the MWCC.
A 12" watermain is in place at the intersection of Corporate Center Dr.
Pilot Knob Rd. This can easily be extended northerly into this proposed develop-
ment. Staff recommends this northerly extension be a 10" diameter waterline.
Staff recommends each building should have an individual service off the
10" main to it. Hydrants and hydrant leads shall be placed in locations so
that the front and back of all buildings are adequately protected.
It is Staff's understanding this development will petition for installation
of utilities under City Contract. If so, then the Council must approve the
utility construction project prior to or concurrent with the Final Plat approval.
EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 4.
STREETS: The existing access to this proposed parcel is off of a MnDot service
road constructed with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Rd. the 494 intersection.
This service road is 36' wide with concrete curb gutter and bituminous sur-
facing and built to a 9 ton road status by MnDot.
This development proposes relocating the alignment of this road near the south
property line of this proposed development. This will require an easement
be obtained from the parcel south of this development. This easement must
be obtained prior to Final Plat approval.
The internal public streets, Eaganwoods Blvd. Eaganwoods Dr., shall be a
minimum of 34' wide and constructed to City standards for a 9 ton roadway.
RIGHT -OF- WAYS /EASEMENTS: This proposed development indicates platting a 50'
wide right -of -way for the public streets. Staff recommends this right -of -way
be increased to a minimum of 60'. This will provide for 13' boulevards thus
providing more room for snow storage. In this instance, adequate room for
snow storage is essential since it is Staff's understanding this development
will be requesting a Variance from the 20' green space between right -of -way
and parking lot.
The easements of sufficient width will be required to be provided over all
City utilities not located within public right -of -way. These easement widths
shall be determined by Staff. Also, a ponding easement will be required to
be dedicated to encompass the high water elevation, when ultimately determined.
ASSESSMENTS: In researching our assessment records for the existing parcel,
01- 00400 010 -02, we found that this development is responsible for upgrading
the trunk area water assessment from residential to industrial, for trunk
area storm sewer assessment at the industrial rate and lateral benefit for
trunk sanitary sewer.
These assessment obligations, as they apply to this proposed development,
are outlined in the following table.
Assessment Summary Table
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Trunk Area Water Upgrading 5.97 Ac (1) $2,450/Ac (2) $14,626
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 260,050 S.F. (1) $0.068 /S.F. $17,684
Lateral Benefit From Trunk .270 F.F. $13.10 /F.F. 3,537
Sanitary Sewer
TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT $35,847
(1) Net Area 6.6 Ac 0.63 Ac (Street) 5.97 Ac
(2) Commercial Rate Residential Rate Assessed $2,830/Ac $380 /Ac
EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 5.
The final amount of assessment obligation for this proposed development will
be determined by the rates in effect at the time of final platting and the
net area calculations based on the final plat.
All other costs for the installation of streets and improvements for this
proposed development shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
The exception being the cost for the downstream storm sewer to the Minnesota
River Valley which will be distributed based upon benefitted area.
RECOMMENDATIONS EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for the overall plan
as submitted with this planning report.
2. An architectural design shall be established in order that all of the build
ings will have a common architectural theme.
3. Acoustical treatment shall be provided within the bldg. in order to
minimize any noise impacts of this site from the planes overhead or I -494
to the north. A timeframe of approx. 5 yrs. should be attached to the PD
and a determination should be made that either the PD woud include the
height of the bldg. to allow 4 stories or separate Cond. Use Permits shall
applied for each building.
PRELIMINARY PLAT COND:
4. The plat shall be reviewed and subject to MnDot's comments Dakota County
Plat Commission's comments because the plat abutts state county right -of -way.
5. The building shall be designed to take into account the Fire Dept.
comments regarding the 4 story building. This will meet all of the criteria
of a Cond. Use portion for exceed height in a comm. district.
6. A detailed lighting landscape plan shall be submitted an adequ ate bond
shall be required and not released until 1 year after the landscaping has
been completed. The plat shall be subject to the Park Comm. park dedication
fees for commercially platted land.
7. Only 280 parking spaces will have to be provided at this time but the other
72 spaces shall be provided at the request of the City.
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
8. Detailed plans specs for the reinforced earth retaining walls shall be
submitted for review.
9. Calculations used to determine storm water ponding area shall be submitted
for review.
10. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining
the necessary MWCC permits shall abide by MWCC requirements related to
these permits.
11. A public improvement project for streets utilities must be approved by
Council, including the storm sewer outfall to the Minn. River Valley, if
necessary.
EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 6.
12. A minimum 60' right -of -way shall be dedicated for public streets.
13. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary easement
for Eaganwood Blvd. from Parcel 01- 00400 060 -02.
14. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with
obtaining the necessary MnDot permits to work within their right -of way.
15. This development shall be responsible for trunk related assessments for
trunk area water upgrading, trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit
from trunk sanitary sewer at the rates in effect at the time of final platting.
16. This development assume full responsibility for all costs of public
improvements for streets, sanitary sewer, watermain internal storm sewer.
u
JAIL M r 1
idiol
!III i_,_.
SUBJECT PAR EL
77 I
T NT T V S T
—ST SPUR
I�I' cotm q
CLUB
�i I•Iq /t ti e
E 1 V
Q I i 3
Ll
)L AKE
VIE v/
r
I PA R 1%
A, Y/1 I I
D 10- y
ry
g I& E A AC R S I
6�
RIDE' l
I SUBD
E IN
ER
FIGURE 'OPPI �Rl i
Y�
JW 11 10N1
D
t :n /l.' V !.i I v I II..I _JI 1 1I I II 11 \1
I O
'u
3 MENDOTA HEIGHTS NSP
t G-
G-- G
G G
494
.z °C
f'`TERSTATE 494 Q INT RSTA
I a
EJECT ER re.
I
�i
b
LOST
3
I ^1
rr
i
SPUR
O i• 2
COUNTRY
536
CLUB 0.
U JECT PARCEL I
M r
s• :E N IND LVD
535 lL.
Q Hro. e G.v
92 9
534 FI GURE 2
82
AVALOq AVE
133 I �14I
w
0
*LOST SPUR
COUNTRY
CLUB �s /11�l�lIAA�i'IIIIII"
���ii�if�WYr IsomI�
'rF, OST NO 3
i
PIE
th
41 dog
Eft
1111
SEEN
EASTBOUND 1.494 w
i
it
arela+eur�ess la,r
e
1{ `�h�` yy C vt•, Jf ��ila2 +�'�'4, `s., +v
r,� .t P 4,Y ''L tt, Y ��s �p M.11.
fir`s +`zt+ tt a
i
i z ;••:.t i ll. Sh O
to
F k C� Nk.th �y lF� n. M a
F K F VA l i '`hK tf f.ilr.S' Jt OR
t e E� y S t� S 4 �d'QeZ .t�vgSt1�•y �h� '`'v� 4�4 OFFICE
r Rol
6W 44� j e
C t itl/ �'C i T 4 �12F} C`4 r4 r� q f yrr
k 7• c'Y4,4?Y'lN f M l'd G(`� t 3
tI
5 t _vt� 4 yy l r t y t taiG. F' t F•s lsd f 16 Yt i fs,' V`"'cR3it" e�r.•
���Ll� o r t �7• t �k, �.�it s)p11�� wr7s .n...
tK+ T .`7F b ar S tl4rf F
TAAMMFI �'i <F CRIMEN K
030Q noowll a1Fa 01x11[
R� r 4
L1 5 9i J 1
Wileonl,lenkine
C�p co
S a161,,.0 tilt/ }.1:. A�.er lr
a SITE PLAN REVIEW
B� SUBMITTAL
STATISTICS: �p uorw aueawTa
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
Site Area 18. 87 acres/821,904st
OFFICE BUILDING •1
30 Building Type Area No.StOrles or►lca PA/1K
1 Office 72,000ef 4
DEVELOPMENT
2 Office 72,000ef 3 or 4 CONCEPT PLAN
3 Hotel 160 Room Hotel Multi Level EAOAN
or or INDUSTRIAL
Office 66.00081 Office BLVD. A
64s66�l1
w r
OLP
INTERSTATE HWY. #494 TAI(
Ar4P 02.09-
a�nw.�.IrwnQrastr
';I,
I
LOT. l
C)
BLACK l
/v
k t r7 o 0
1 �r
IIr
I a� fJ j i -�:e�
OUTLOT A T CROW o0.
I000.worawmelwle
�OUTLOT. g
�IAREA• M AIWI) 3 Hansen Thorp
1� I FF I :p•...1 M.Y. ".'I
Pollinan Olson Inc.
m WileunlJenkins
;Y'� •h Ik .1.1...1..
7 SBS 38 6 W- 1240.12' R 11ljW
1, IRE PLAN REVIEW
I EAGAN WOODS BLVD.' I DUAL
l,Gl w ft.I 1110 EAGAN f/egeeTA
I )Ml art. 1 l.1 J tM W ft". IW.W 1.1 .r f.r.,w.l l.t,. tall. 1. a7,r M
vm., e.w., met. twNp, A1w...u, MprIM1 U 1.11— OFFICE BUNJ) M #1
t.�.MIM .l M. Mn..•.l pros .1 1.11 f.ctlw at 1.1.. MIM IM M. tor"
W r ,t 11 S.w,wn1 lat 11: tMM. S.O -pJ -IS •Ion, tM Ent 11M .r "'d [AeAM wOOee
,,=t at 1 1a UM• IIJ).1) IMt a tM tp.np,t tam•. a11•11 OfflCa PARR
111 51 4 1 let 1: tMnn S. -11 l t. tM Uft 11M M U11 6....sNnt
1.1 1UU�N• s t IfO.W In U tM Inempctlp NiM tM Palo IIM .I U11 I IM,w8l CJIOw CC,VM,f
19. W 1..a IMZe -J' -51 Y.In, tale twin IIM W.W Ipl Is IM �I.00I�gTON INEJOIA
Inlenlztlp .IM tM wanly rl„t•s, IIM 1 Tcl) M. 01
MIM U pINNUU p.l.rbent .I )r.n,rort•Ilsn IIStnnt .I 1.1 II.t b.0
IIIt0.0. J. 11.1 M lJl p III• .M .p•M I• M. sllln .I Ue (.pl) M[OrMr. 0.•V>f
mel. tpnln IIInMnt•. pU roMl .f 1 Mrtetlta Nlq tM plot .I M.IN.In, PRELIMINARY
1 9r 1110,11 feee U�lM wtl 11 ei H J IM FIY ,.v IMrc•
.J II.0 -ri -1J Y. 4l..1.1# w.t IIM U0.0 Trot U M• Inler,ztl.n .I1, tM .11 PLAT
tl.f..11 lar f.r lIM (•a• M I. tM w.urly IIM •I tale G.n_.nl
I.a 1 M.M• ..N- w-tJ S. •l t•le w.t.r IIM r O.•rMent tra
tat s eMaz. of 111.9 a•1 1. lM Inlvatllp lu lM twu..ry rl,nt
I y IIM sI )rp1 NI,M> b. U• .n 1.11 M.,.tl.l. 11.1 U -]t: lMZ. •.S M yy N r..�.
PRELIMINARY PLAT ;,;.J.,. J..I.n,,.Ie.IMt wy tll.w ,pt:tn.nt. .I M,
.IM4I MI •n np- a.ronll0 JLW).0 fpl nA•t t.n.. cazae U M. �•7 ���Z 11 M0. UN
I U, unlnl .MI. O-SJ -9. cMM e Mole
ntl M.M. s.Jru -m 1 l •.fa) /as
e0 •Iw, Ule .I,nl•.I+U /J).01 IMI 1. M. plot •I I.,IMIZ •M lMn UnlMlln,.
NT.O Y tti.l
EASTBOUND 1 -494
P� M
JA
I i�L.A1i.JfARIW S�911
�i
/Q!� 664 E616T FLOOR •dot J �!V?
B62 LOWER LIEVIE
X Vs
C
TRAMMlLLCROWCQ
r f�� 1.1 ti� 6,66 N66N.N 4NA...U6
TJ...- ,I.� S L S Ii,.1.vY ai'�/ �yawlaa6>Nasn
•nasn Thorp
666 MET FLOOR r J p sllinen Ol
Ogg V.O tEV F
Wilsonllenkins
6TO
SITE PLAN REVIEW
SUBMITTAL
lAOAN 16166:6OTA
OFFICE BUILDING #1
EAOAN WOOD@
OFFICE PARR
TRAMM CROW COmlP
6LOOMMO1001 6W6E60TA
GRADING PLAN
GRADING PLAN
EASTBOUND I -494 8P
TK
L
a gyp
A r' c
O ix
Cr' O o i
z
—s Y
d
lJ L• {'4.i
U
TRAMMELL CROWCQ
caiu Devi
Mart :ale
d- ■aaulElol,w000
Hansen Thorp
li s p y Q Pellinen Olson Inc.
Mzmr
W
WilwanUenkins
F.Lr /AJi�1 A�....r he
1x1u1nr
SITE FILM REVEW
SUBMITTAL
LEGEND �`O 1 A EAOAII ISISlSOTA
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OFFICE BUBAINO 1
PROPOSED STORM SEWER NAG WOODS
I PROPOSED WATERMAM OFFICE PARK
nKOShc CROW COW#"
SLOOMPOWN Meson".
rr
UTILITY PLAN
UTIL PLAN r„�, c_
I Vi SO'
I L of
M
Wi t 7� tl
9v a���. �,Itp ��p�?j �'�La 'f�f
u
w 7 r t
��;a•`/� °w is ljai i u33��:i Y '"a,Y •ra', TRAP
000 IWIUYI CORGI ON[
-s. 3' t i ✓sd�1j L r,�� i� �`rl iP3' is '�i "yk J I un no
s• 1 3 f��+.��Y uJ"�'�°,ia�Jr i�ir J `f�,' aaaw+lo�r�a�
���s �,�,'.+�LP..i�,��s'�� s sfy�y��.iV+ �3� •G Vf �j� ,(1 +,3s�,� o!f'3;,. �f;,: a`Y �C
I� y t v 3 y�i"'3�''� aa• �{j l r v'.�.i� u
J �$Jr _Hrt7� ..I+. Y S}' i •�7�iJ J�� �ia� ��'R71i d/d +YJIt 7i Sit i'� J '�l�
s�� t� r je,�• �,y'Jt�'ailp
S a r N a �a sa r,X r a {{y e J'' J
.hL• r 4 il� �t. a rif' �S Jr t 4'ti �4
4�•. J Y i E s t a 'J 7.✓a+ a 7 a t
ppt, j n 3' s•�t y i p J'S t s h-!� 7Ya u0!.'
i aaY' S x "i'sti� �.�.>.�7 r as r.•.� 3� i 3s.: r i. r i3a', r i.�. T ���a :,i_ J f}y'-,��2 �'r ��f vi47S'Y 4 A'�
y?'yt�at.a �ty� -sue." =,f'' ?�}f`m e�ay U�° •c tcoG�.'t ;..yf
;Y d�' t'�',y'�"�'�'�a4•.� i-� "d'r��s'r T.j r �l ,a�,,�,�' •3'u I `r�'�'k.,Y c F
l• i Ss3y�r., .y J' _�i ;1:'�''' d? �L, y �r ,�1 d�.rL1x+•'`. y �3d a y ,",}y��
,�v ,s✓,,j3!'+?fJ 7,7t`,.'j�� �..y'.� �h 7 f� i f ro
yr :dam e,;} d4�eGU:•+ L' i, ✓.�'�y J if �i ✓i �}'J y;
(1 WilsonlJ eokine
j �;.r K I s r. N.�.
SITE PLAN DATA
k�J
.Y'
iJ as ti' sfa�"'•� r .S` luw ILI., t.Ir3L
'frP .�.c' W AR! DATA N.rf.M.�Itul�bslNN
aj "F' INSI01 -1fN
4�'� 3 �a�3AL'+++c j J�1Y� lil';�:��ti snf a4 ,I.w w[sl N).rN N
IRU b141N
A nONS r U,NA N/1l /[.ON SI pRf ntsf Y4 (VA)
/l.lN sr LEL l l RM M4 ILIA) ITE PLAN �w
ZONING DATA
S r
w IlA1K :!Ilan yll NUUlanY �ff
AL
IMIRfrot[ w OMM If1fr0TA
ffAlf YIWYf b R b R
SITE PLAN r�T1 IIN 11, UK I. R b R DFRM BURMIM #1
o ,o sort runty utu4
d011r WIM911
ARK
HN[ Mlit [fN[lf N n N n 01 /k■ AMR
flw N Alu LR 11Y1 R R
.Rol. mt." NI G.N
IYIIIIN x1100 b If ATE PLAN
MIlIN 3wcR NI It m m lI L'AI
runb futtf
asnN u41N IR• -r 11.1 a w.n lr.
Ana mluAA u'.r Y.1 n 4
unortt vuu Ir l• Y. Rr.l [a rsrr rs. f�
rota rrA.lYi nul. NY
94SWAIN A... r
Y.
Y!
PwxM
ICJ
M'/ M
u
r v�3 fi��+) W 33t:�y a.'cmJr<.ar sr =:y-
1 .y
xl J fyri i
>ti a k f r_3src- i'rscia:
'd �i}.f� Y +y ;f� �Z�y ✓,ICJ }r a J �Ga 1 'Ya .i9 J a p
•S�j A� i�l d�ff 5 i!'f���> ?5 r� J �"��7-v:,
O
FIN
a
J
id1,
o 'y9J;. ab j�u,"Si3 A,3y�a f a o Yf y
.J: /d•': YfS Y WTI M TRAMM CROYICO.
,i� f yy 'jM ✓,;a sa %,f s'�
's�L4 r.'•y i t'I� j uoo xowu/anr!!olly!
J a.r"�Yi S f ,r .IJ,,,,f
'''JS�'y�s1+tyJ 'f✓` a'x,, J a�3 di• llnONNY)a1.rYCwn
�iL' a ��9 W�y 3 1a�1 {y�t >•4�i��3''.Sa` ".o u' y
J J3 Y 3 a' r 3' )d d'L q�• dtj>�aJ ?'i
yJ t 4 t. i i
�i3' I�l•1� 4 Z•"`. •s•�
33 Jr ;•J yr+ tw s' iJ ..J+ r m J :i,+, �a° v .v D 1 r i F`�
Yf) �a'aYr )fJ u. 5 1 i
aJ yy JJ y a r i �s� J ,LV a,.�y a'S tJS v. s r .sSi'.•. t sc
YJ i. J�; a7 .Y j• t ,y a ,rlW •4q t 4
t yw i t V4 tT� f'
-O ry n' a;5a 5 JA 7Yd 3 r d' i:i.".
y is d a b•r t �i�f }s :b
V %J '39a YJ y r s �1 r :ti:Y.3 -l p +r `4tir 4')`
�J�y ���x fJr ,Jr� !rf'�j,;,��"Lsj
.,r'! v •�'i 1 r+�s ryx .,P,";�.s? s J 1 s I
9s t v a.•, r d9 a? iJ ,J� y v J>a� 1 M ilmml enkins
Y46� JJ+�'� �.�}M• ..1 yJ; '.Y R'� .4��'Y Y fSi:." 2' ",,�i I
iJ �'.'Y I�VJ�� 3 y ;J b 3 Sys t ra�..,k.r..x x.....w.l...
�J�, !)uxl4rw.. fwur0n..,S.n.isr
PLANTING LEGEND
UTE KM REVIEW
P PRESERVATION errTAL
/jam M�CIIM YIIIU.0 rN10[. Mp1( CMYCII. OA�OY I�MWr�
OFFICE EUE.OMNi 1
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN F FOCAL /FEATURE "'BAN SIIYCCc
0 20 40 00 rf IwlI1M. AC(Inl 41x Ix 14x((5 Ir SII( office I-Ont
4x INAx Ix11n�A1 INIIx1l IIIYf
C CIRCULATION x
IOlnw: VM IZI MA KFIK ClKW?l= LANDSCAPE
xnx x4cw c+wr4cs or IY11 CONCEPT PLAN
V VISUAL RELIEF /SHADE
10111(01 I/YIY It— A/x "W11CAI I-I(
IO lY4[ xMAf 01 xllwlxr,f SYI/Lf In py rr/
B 111 lSlf
BUIL DING PERIMETER 7
runu�Yl nonY awu nun to wuslxc 4
84856 -#M Y..
YE
n', M
J M
1 i J LJJ.r+�.�' y t 3 t: i .J 1+ +y jS .,..�s,r 3y�iiii' I .r...— _'scai
i> dJ
!Y. y� 1 :Y Yl f{'fi s� 4�
p '•L4 7 y am Z
.�:s, 1 lL i a o..
i a y l J
TRA MMEL y >e 7y S i ay „i 3• ,t3 •3' J TRAMMELL CROW C
mmYUl o=.nT[” o
WTI mvE
!^l7 ,i a y. ���Y pia° JS�3:t�}. L �y �',ff( ,y
WTI xio
,�w 1. y YDl1Y�TTOI,NM1EtOTA
y,M D v f y i t� 'i:Y, r c y w
ry� fir✓ ,�i.. L eJ' yf
Y' .+,i.T,,,•��t'.di'�
y Y' R Y. L
p� ar'il .+''�r t v ,�J� ,N �1T>> l eru
�'JY3.'r )"O� a �,rjb,.a.. aS yu,° Y k4 Y.N;
i ;1•!2' y i s M'M f� t W St
4 s i�.9>�' fr d'L 7 )�yv'_ i) 1� x �i N iS9 5 +r "i's!•7 i ,s �3 '�i•i r'' f fi ac
f t, iii 3 r re i' ,ii or. ii -bwb fit, •t�I t
;r%a?iJirx� r I 8
'".ssY e> 4.;r• i"d As idsts,�dv�iw. 3,rs J1y u�`>�
Y 3'+ayu ysri 4r r� t yj rs 3 rJ i ��'il.imlJi•nkins
Y 2 w.,.l.,u,........v.l,..
ON
SITE PLAN REVIEW
SUBMrrrAL
"am E[OTA
PROOF OF PARKING PLAN OFFICE BUILDING ♦1
10 0 .0 00 FT EI1011N W000[
OFFICE PAR[
380 STALLS (1 Per 200of GFA)
PROOF OF PARKING
PLAN
12!111 4
8
04856
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
APPLICANT: M.G. ASTLEFORD
LOCATION: OUTLOT B, RAHNCLIFF, PART OF THE NWk OF SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: R.B. ROADSIDE BUSINESS
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 20 984
DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 13, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of
Rahncliff 2nd Addition consisting of one 5.7 acre lot for a 65,000 sq. ft.
3 story office building.
ZONING LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned R.B. (roadside business).
The applicant is currently pursuing a rezoning to L.B. (limited business).
That rezoning request was recommended for approval by the APC on November
27, 1984. The City Council will be considering the rezoning on December 18,
1984.
The parcel is bordered by Rahncliff 1st Addition on the north, I -35E to the
east south vacant limited business land is to the west. Rahncliff 1st
Addition consists of a hotel site, restaurant service station parcels.
The property has no significant vegetation since it has been graded previously.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The proposal meets all the setback lot coverage requirements
of a limited business district.
SITE PLANNING: The site plan shows 305 surface parking spaces 70 underground
parking stalls which exceeds the 347 spaces required City code.
Due to the close proximity of I -35E (175' from building to the south bound
lane), extensive noise control methods should be utilized. Berming, landscaping
architectural'design can help lessen the noise impact.
The site plan presented with the Preliminary Plat application is not sufficiently
detailed. It is the Staff's understanding that the applicant is in the process
of revising the site plan and will have it available for the December 20th
meeting.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: Some site grading over this proposed development has been
accomplished under Excavation Permit #32 -011 in accordance with the approved
grading plan accompanying the permit application. As it exists, the drainage
over this proposed development is southerly to a low area located near the
SE corner of this proposed development. This area is located within MnDot
right -of -way of I -35E.
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 2.
The proposed grading over this site proposes to collect all runoff generated
by this site into internal storm sewer which in turn will be conveyed to the
existing trunk storm sewer line located adjacent the NW boundary of I -35E.
The eventual discharge of this storm water runoff will be into Boesell Pond
(AP -11). Although this pond does not have a permanent overflow outlet construct-
ed from it, a temporary outlet is in the process of being constructed at this
time. If this development is approved, consideration for installing a permanent
downstream outlet from this pond should be undertaken.
The majority of the drainage from this proposed development is to be contained
within the boundary of the development, some runoff will undoubtly occur onto
MnDot right -of -way. Subsequently, prior to Final Plat approval, written approval
from MnDot should be obtained regarding the final site grading plan for this
proposed development.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer watermain of sufficient size, capacity and depth
exists within the proximity of this proposed development to provide service
to it. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the existing City utilities with
respect to this development.
As a requirement of the Rahncliff Addition, a public improvement project for
the extension of the 16" trunk watermain and laterial sanitary sewer and water
main would be required prior to Final Plat approval. The only utilities
required for this development will be water and sewer services and hydrant
leads.
STREETS: Access to this proposed development will be by way of Rahric1iff
Ct. Rahncliff Ct. is to be constructed with the Rahncliff Addition and will
be a loop street connecting to Rahn Rd. To facilitate the looping, Rahn Rd.
will have to be extended approx. 200' south. These streets will be constructed
to City standards for a 9 ton collector street status.
RIGHT -0F WAY /EASEMENTS: Right -of -way, as indicated on the Preliminary Plat,
shall be dedicated for the half right -of -way for Rahn Rd. and the full right -of-
way for Rahncliff Ct., if the entire right -of -way for Rahncliff Ct. is not
dedicated with the Rahncliff Addition.
The utility easements shall be dedicated as shown on the plat adjacent the
NE, SE, southerly westerly borders of this proposed development. All other
easements shall be dedicated as required by code.
ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area water and sanitary sewer have been assessed over
the existing parcel 00320 010 -27. Also, lateral benefit for trunk sanitary
sewer has been assessed along with a portion benefit for trunk watermain along
Rahn Rd. (Project #370). The remaining obligation for lateral benefit from
trunk watermain will be assessed upon the extension of the 16" trunk along
this proposed development. In addition, trunk storm sewer area assessments
were also levied under Project 9370.
All trunk area water, sanitary sewer storm sewer assessments have been levied
over this parcel and all costs for future lateral public improvements and
lateral benefits from trunk watermain will be the sole responsibility of this
development.
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDI'T'ION
DECEMBER 20, 1984
PAGE 3
RECOMMENDATIONS RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
1. Concurrence from MnDot regarding drainage onto I -35E right -of -way.
2. A public improvement project shall be approved prior to Final Plat approval.
3. All costs for future lateral public improvements and lateral benefit from
trunk watermain shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
4. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted for Staff approval prior to
any construction, showing plant species, size location. Special attention
should be paid to I -35E buffering interior /exterior screening of the
parking lot.
5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
/jbd
=ti�3, Z�. v s
t•
Swl
Mm
ai ���II �1��j�11�
0 4k
SO
V ��j 1�� ♦��j� III♦
'l M OJChM11u NA C LL m■ MOB
Em
oil
■�B ■t.�t�tr,■
�rr.�1- mot) 4
`i �ii�rj �%��i� X111► a ►r� AN
mining
gill
MW
x .11 ■ri�i L ►.fir„
In
a
Iw mot.
�ai N
1 LOCATION MAP
ma
1—,r 1V6 I I
1.. MIA--
WYI
uMul ee
I
Vi I i1iIllll
H
MIA` M AMU OLUT, .1?
r[t Y11 •••••••••111 AL o'
i /MUM 0
1 1►1 \1 i carol r1 101411 TV
ji
1 •Y11
IYOran P 1 I r'•/ 1 m t3 .4 O
OUTLOT A
I I ►V1'r1Y1 I I WI
i_p_ j I tl r UTILITIES LEGEND
I d 1 I +gar I.rIr1 nrlur u.0
f 1/j1 r. BI-K Z I rl s *-3y- 11x1 ■1 u1.r Inu
I ►v1 WN I 1111. M. 1 I rr r -+-r r� Ilrlrl YU11 O/�
1 IYa D'� r` 1(t �F 1.+.1� /1/11111 Y1111 Y.■
IOY N I 1. n� w l /.�IOr\ �1 .T'.r� paa71u-. �...1 1/MN /NYU 111/W D1 r.r 11
1 IIIN ..y OHN NniI �.vID
I l0
0111
RAM
MIND �rru r.. YI r1110Y1
N I a t oT 1 1 ewc I
��I r
1 RAHNCLIFF Z NO ADD.
1C4 100. I I.,x
/nl[T 1 /0O /111LL LOT
1- w Haut w
M IOU AVOk
Ill N
r11 iNlf 1 p I
Y. Wr•rNY.1 Yy
1u1c1 q Irr L�.1r
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
IN
1
1 M N.
I rr.w
71T(l
w T
.0 1/1'
I/ ✓1 I MrFe
NG!• r!I a N YW Ali no of 1.111 /6111111, real YtbrrL OF Y Mn \I ap111r WI r W rr N
ILr1
to Fier LrM.t 111W 411 NII r141'I W N.II111r 11 114 N
11 ul I.IIFIM YI111MI IIN It Old
11 W IM.l1
.1 W.11, 11tu 1111WN4, 11 rill 1.111. IIrr41. 11/IN.1 tall 0111.
j iiM �:w.w tiri S
.1 e. l a1111 111 ta 6. rI 9-11
II t1 M INUM 1111 Y•M W.4
to I LrN1, Ir. Irr.I
r 11WN4.
.N N IM N YIwM W 11.11" OF ell CINr
WY14111 tr /YIIIY W Y W.1 1+111 IN 4.1144
I G I u W 4.111. IN MII. •N 41.NI W MIYIN
[I I1� �1 1YU.MNII•.WIINWIIIUIy..Ir. 11 h W r1•. .1t.ta4111 kill.
W
I IM.. N YII Iu1 Iw r11W1 I4. .11111" FINN. 661.4 LW LYrrl 1111 1111"66., 6611 1
,1' i'1 ,V
1 Li elf LJb'X III f♦ Ylr, 1r 111. Wlt.l. 4 w.11 4N11 I4. IN 11.11 r/ 466 /Nr.. M MII NII
1 /',L A 4 11WNU W IIr11 N /N.111. 111.. N 41. 11.t'
1 r 1'.�` I. •11.\11 -1 N14 L 1. 11111.14
I 11WN11 NrINIY 11 /.1 14.1N WY N.N.I. Y Y IIIY /e 1 III.", MI.1. Lr.l1 bINN
I,r w '1/ Ilw/ 4 111 11•NI NrW; 11Y��_rr r w r r
"4q, kept$ Lr111 11.1 LIl,a
1'1`
I is 7 I. 1. /1611011 LIMIN I. 1111 d IrrY 111 I4. 66111111• rl t♦..•N P. N v...N
1 1 -Iv N W
1r1. P. I {41.14 111111/ MI Ir r W
a I 1 IIIU1 {MII (Nllllwl IIII IIIINy. W INw." 11
•1 In I W~ "41.1166 11 IN 16611 Ir1111W11 II 1N.11 LFN/,
6 1 Ir•III Filling of NI/ 11'^_6611
J V 1' 1. J 1' 1 i' IILL11 N
7 11
I, Y n1 INMIIr N4 Ir.1 rl IUrLrN MeN• B L 0 C K 1 •I
1 1 1 I IIIII IIi� Ii..1. 1 IIIWYU NItrIM11. r 11411
Wolf 11 W 1.11W1111. {•ri{� 611 lot
t
r X y 411111 N11 W 111
1141 Ir W 4r II
y I 11 IIY MIIIIW be 411 1111 11 1�111Y 111
l w- 1. A ly,` 1 11 I.4ry Ir1Y LrM11, IIrrM III bell IYI 411 Y 1_, Y/ II
RY 1"1101 1
1 1( I MINI 1.11 WI I
(ItAl1 Irnryl
i 1.WII YNII11 r
W I..1 N Wra 111 i 4/11166, 4144 {MI •1r YY
1'k ;.YRtiJI Y ;i hLV 411 ta'1 114 b 1 W I N.411N N Y. r.N1.
1". Af ::1] will 111 111 "T"0111 1 Wm 114 4.,r r IM oil, 1.
fi IIII I4. II 11 1 1.11. MIS .11 tr -1. 4.. Y Yllr/YI 4111 M W 1.WIr 466.4 YII
\J, MN (""1111 IIUN u W N♦../ 4 .1.•., WI W MI II 11�•
1 MII IM IIrr11 IIr1 141 NIIr IIr ""P. N w
V: 1 111 IN 411 1111/ 1, r 411 W. r 411..11...0
M 11111 "111 11"11 6611 At w...
G ri1"Ir« r will Lal r/IW
1i•lW MWI
1
011 MY IIIir1N ylW�n•Ir 166".1 LM/
1 1.111/ $111111 MIS tall I.Ilnw.l r1 111.1 N W
III Y 11111 WII 11111 of 1" b111 16666661 I4. --1 Sell
111 1IY1111 1�11�,� YI ri L�Ir 4004 4
M I/rINLy IYr•IM'1 4"1111.4 r/ Wr1.11.e 1111 11 Y 11p
111411 Y tall r_ 4.111 �IWNY lTirw
11 Y"le
Y 1111. (Y:II l.Vri
11411 ►Lail, IIW66Y
INN 1 IIN"
wrlll Ir1 1UIVI11 MII ry ��.•�M,N"WIr.Y 14. L".Nllr w1n1 .61L n. 166/
Mr111 1 /l• 1 W Iwl
"IVI II NI Cr 0111111
M. 1111 0 r
IM IOO1w 1rr w IN ..-op I'd No r�11 w N Nr. r INr w r.►rr
4►Wl♦ 1•.WI I..Irr! we •11`NII'1 N. .�r., r♦Y111r.+NI tiYA
I.
JAMES R. HfLI: INC
Sn 1 >S
`..r 540 c,,
r1
I(ticti {1llltl 0
Z IT
F -r� 1 1
oU7
—-1
�c`
/v
U p
rw Y J
CL
I�E R 4.,t
RT
I A �2
I &R�2 �;u4'�28
A_ it
i
r A -27��
lCLE
5 i 3
c— I I
I A- 51
IESf
s I I A J� I
CEN
-T-Y— r ,rr, 7-:T', ADDITION
I iLj �j
A7-68 L- 66
I L A DAKOTA COU Y PARK
IS
7 1 1, A -46
x,_ s a n
L- 67
FIGURE 1
i
SEE SHEET 10
i a U I i
a o
42 -C m
CLIFF ROAD
16 ie^ e
462
579
-x999 a
969
W
RAHN AY
SUBJEC ;PARCEL U HYD.aGV
X
T
p
964
n 800
W 966 �68
=MYD8 V T acv Y �V�Dy C
�6 LWI 7 3
W I
r. `L 1869 9
o41
82 89
a,
604
FIGURE 2 x.
U� A epos•
J NOT- a i0 d7-
MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1984
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
The Advisory Planning Commission reviewed Lemay Lake 1st Addition at the
September 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. This item was then scheduled
for the October 16, 1984 City Council meeting. At this City Council meeting,
the Council had issues concerning this development in regard to adjacent property
to the east. They wanted an overall concept plan as.to how this access to
Lemay Lake would tie in to the property to the east. The applicants have
worked with the adjacent property owners to provide an overall circulation
pattern as to how the property to the east will develop. In this concept
plan, there are three (3) commercial buildings abutting Lone Oak Rd. and I -35E.
The applicants have illustrated two restaurants and a car service facility.
To the south, the applicants are proposing two (2) additional office buildings
with a circulation pattern of either a "Y" design, with two cul -de -sacs looping
the cul -de -sacs through private drives, or it could be potentially converted
into an overall loop street, whichever the City would require. Also, there
have been a number of concept plans showing either two smaller office buildings
or one larger office building which could develop on the site and still provide
adequate circulation.
In review of this concept, the zoning is not exactly as what is being proposed.
Therefore, if the City agrees with the concept, the applicants should then
request a zoning to conform with this use if the City agrees with the proposed
concept in use in this location.
The second issue was regarding access to this development. In reviewing this
proposal again, it has been determined the major access will -be the extension
of Eagandale Blvd. to the south as proposed. There would be one minor access,
or right in, right out to the west of Eagandale Blvd. and between Poplar Dr.
The minor access would be a right in, right out and would provide additional
circulation to the development. However, another major access, or looping
a minor access through this development, does not appear to be feasibile for
the layout of this particular site. The applicants have reviewed this proposal
with Dakota County and it is the City's understanding that Dakota County will
allow a secondary access, however, not a second major access to this development
proposal.
Another issue the Council had was with density of this development request.
Staff has recalculated the density of this development and it was determined
that the net developable acres of the site was 17.71 acres and the applicants,
according to their mix of dwelling units, were 15,752 sq. ft. over the allotted
square footage for the 1/3 or 96 one bedroom and 2/3 two bedroom units or
192 units. In changing this mix, by reducing the number of 2's and adding
it to the number of 1's, the applicants can come within the square footage
of the ordinance for developable density. In review of the total site density,
APC UPDATE ON LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
DECEMBER 12, 1984
PAGE TWO
the applicants are at 16.2 units per net acre. Even though these units do
meet the ordinance criteria, the City -has indicated that this density is high
and would like to potentially negotiate a reduction in units. If the applicant
reduced the site density by 24 units, it would then have a net density of
15 units per acre which may be more attractive to the City for a development
proposal.
The last item that Staff would like to mention is that since the time this
application had been reviewed by the APC and City Council, the City has adopted
the Shoreline Zoning Ordinance. Staff is reviewing this development against
the shoreline criteria and has also scheduled a meeting with the DNR to review
this site plan in regard to the Shoreline Ordinance criteria. Staff will
update the APC as to the outcome of the meeting with DNR and hopefully have
letters from them regarding their concerns of this development proposal.
This meeting has not taken place, but will have occurred prior the Public
Hearing of November 20, 1984.
Staff has included the original Staff Report dated 9/18/84 for your review
because the site plan has not changed substantially and only minor revisions
have been made in access off of Eagandale Blvd. The proposed development
will consist of the 3 buildings and are in the same locations as was originally
proposed. Therefore, the Staff report will give background information on
density, setbacks, etc. in review of this request.
If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact
me at the City Hall.
Sincerely,
X leC. Runkle
DCR:jbd
ENGINEERING COMMENTS LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
The major revision from the September 18, 1984 plan, is the alignment of Eagan
dale Place. Rather than dead ending into the property to the east of this
proposed development, it now has a reverse curve which places one half of
the street right -of -way on this development with the other half of the street
right -of -way to be located on the parcel to the east. Staff has no problem
with this alignment as proposed. This alignment will provide excellent access
into the parcel between this development and I -35E. Staff prefers the looped
public street alternative over the 2 cul -de -sac alternative from a maintenance
and public safety standpoint.
As for the physical construction of the street, Staff would recommend that
Eagandale P1. be a minimum of 40' wide between Lone Oak Rd. the proposed
north extension of Eagandale P1. to the east. This width will provide for
two -way traffic with turning lanes.
The right -of -way being proposed to be dedicated for Eagandale P1. is 60'.
Staff feels that where the wider street will be required, also a wider right -of-
way should also be required. Therefore, this development shall either increase
the right -of -way width to 80' for Eagandale P1. where the above referenced
40' wide street will be required or provide a 20' utility easement adjacent
the right -of -way in lieu of the normal 10' utility easement required. In
addition, the half right -of -way for Eagandale P1., located on the parcel east
of this development, should also be included on the final plat.
All remaining information pertaining to this proposed development as reported
in the September 18th Engineering Report to the APC remains the same.
RECOMMENDATIONS (Revised)
1. No additional storm water runoff be added to the existing 48" storm sewer,
unless the existing storm sewer is increased in size accordingly.
2. Public improvements shall be petitioned by the developer and ordered in
by Council prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall be responsible for constructing a 5' concrete walk
along its Lone Oak Rd. frontage.
4. A minimum 50' half right -of -way shall be dedicated for Lone Oak Rd.
5. If a 60' right -of -way for Eagandale Pl. is dedicated, then a 20' utility
easement will be required to be dedicated adjacent to public right -of -way
as required by Staff.
6. This development shall be responsible for its trunk storm sewer area and
final benefit from trunk watermain assessments at the rates in effect
at the time of final platting.
7. Easements for ponding, watermain and sanitary sewer shall be dedicated
on the final plat.
8. All costs for public improvements associated with this development shall
be the sole responsibility of this development.
9. The access driveway to the southwesterly 114 unit complex will be required
to be a minimum of 32' in width.
F i F�'I E :..`J i i Fi Fi i h PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE ISTADDIT10t
nrm- ernrr- r N99 4VIIYE 29
6 3. LL
PROPOSE 35E-
Rt1 B E S.A. A I I f t; e6i
'p'- /�r
H OGP' ,I
11 fi 1 's. I
2 LOT 3
(PROPOSED/
ED%
i f
y-
tPROF?G
7
I I' I L. i i i <r. 'r '��wnu:wr. iLin :w
»rr,.» i::,.•r w..»wi w ,wm x. r »r w♦..»:
;Ilr�i I,
It i I
i j t�
i
r 1 i t I LOCATION MAP
zz
ICA
0i, I
it i {(i i I i 1, yL
Ilt 1111; 1
I i I
I 4K I ap I 4 1 1 1
I l,IUO11e Leek Nuf't.eylr\ nag.
919- 49'04'W M 9.09 i i f r 1 1 '`T I .r wrw.w�•�':,�w
NIB
son Boom
ism- 1 MCII
FOO lb
rw
NNW
�1
11
11
e rr jl� S�
iii
1111 �Ir
t Ilfc� p
20 f�►r1rr
P�
1•
I
I
I Y
c
Lemay Lake
A
8 Units
J
Q sK Restaurant
F K Restaurant
100K
o
17K Auto Service
X33
F
OPUS
Lemay Lake Development
Concept Plan Alt.
L
0 100 200 400 North
Lemay Lake cc
Apart� 0
2 Units
88
C
O
Restaurant
Irmn Restaurant
0 e 8K 7
200K
IL
�I I I
17K _I Auto Service
OPUS
Lemay Lake Development
Concept Plan -Alt. 1
0 100. 200 400 Nortt,
v+Crw. rl s• .......n.�,.eri.�r.. r r• .i.,nu, r+ r ;fir... 1 r
t r 'ttr (4..i: 7. t yr .ae -w Flo
u uL.
f t y h 4e..- -tr e+a +r-c.s ".r' at t. fr. 7 �z f k r•:: �..wu ,•tb.:�x�'� ti�;�.
i X -j r •1 fi r' i�- ��I Q
1 A, a�� a �l 0. 'R i �e 2 f ��Ga r �j `r
i ji Y G y,. 9 4.: ice' a.?.k rK'. T 1 I .F r 1 1J 1
�r.f�� 7rr� tl s 4y .,.f z .f I
J' r� sr t;�f.' f,, c j�- r ��Y�aat u r..r 4y'
1 f j �rr r� �,.,ye t•d.;f �r iu r� i
/r t�' �•s$ l7r'lC'1�.. �t' 1 •iw l r 1 ti Z
1 `j E t y \mss •+.....e C5.- .•�-s...• t r y F" j i.%r•.� 1 .;u 1
1: r r r 'b• 5' 1 i P �k Y t t n,r�' i 1
i .k i,. s Sn..r t a 1� i may i i C• t y' 1 cF t o I
r a �M Vi 4a y ,�y,,,� r s,.: s
i l Et'tW. Y�' r,i y .i .wF "'Y• S,r a Yr},y
L L Ate x.,'41 t` ti .rte^-
f i Sfcf�"• t K ;:'h`' 7 a .�qsa y���.
.n r ••e3 t T i r t \d� i t ti u a t�; h a
t
r.
Ali
a
l
i R t R"' 'Yr. w rtiY 1Y1r41A M �Y vllr v• !r r 4 'a'
Nft
is .4i
TI
i -t•. 1 M ,s" �r� t r f t J!� l 1t��.•'
s'Y�` 't ta" �'�`�i��. :e i-:e. z F,�S t.+l .j I I
4t.- ....a/K�lv:- '�'T`• �d t��- }�'r��i•! �or- j.. j �.c.`�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT— LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
APPLICANT: BOB WORTHINGTON TOM HEALEY
LOCATION: PART OF NEk OF THE NW'k OF SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING: R -4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 25, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 18, 1984
REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for Preliminary Plat
approval for Lemay Lake 1st Addition consisting of approximately 17.7 acres and
containing 288 dwelling units located in the NE'k of the NWk of Section 10.
ZONING LAND USE
Presently the property is. zoned R -4 (Residential Multiple) and would only allow
high density multiple development on the parcel. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designates this parcel as an R -3 (Mixed Residential) with 6 to 12 dwelling units
per acre. The development proposal consists of 16 units per acre which is
slightly higher than the Comprehensive Guide Plan, however, it is within the
guidelines of the R -4 zoning district.
COMMENTS
In review of this development proposal, there are two people that should be
mentioned. The first person is Mr. Robert Worthington of Opus Corporation.
This parcel has been owned by Opus for a number of years and has had a multiple
zoning on this property during that time. Opus Corporation's involvement is
to plat the property in order that the multiple would be allowed as proposed.
Mr. Tom Healey, President of Healey Ramme Company, are the developers of the
proposed development project. They have built multiple projects in Minnetonka
and Bloomington and are now proposing development in the City of Eagan.
The proposed development consists of 3 multiple buildings; one building contain-
ing 60 dwelling units and the remaining two containing 114 dwelling units each.
It is Staff's understanding that the mix within the project will be, 1/3 of
the units having 1 bedroom and 2/3 of the units having 2 bedrooms for a total
of 288 dwelling units. The development will be a 3 story apartment complex with
each of the buildings having underground parking. The applicants are proposing
to have 288 underground parking spaces and 288 surface parking for a total of
2 parking spaces per unit. This has been permissible with the understanding
and condition that each of the garage spaces be part of the rental price of the
dwelling unit. The applicants have indicated that this will be incorporated
into their rental package.
PRELIMINARY PLAT LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
APC SEPTEMBER 25, 1984
PAGE 2.
In review of the site plan, all buildings meet and exceed all of the setback
requirements from all property lines. Access to this development is proposed
from Lone Oak Road. They are proposing to extend Eagandale Blvd. to the south
and loop this street easterly to provide access to the property to the east.
Access would be taken from this extension of Eagandale south of Lone Oak Road.
The applicants are also proposing one additional access from Lone Oak Road on
the west side of the property. This would be a private street or drive which
would provide access to approximately 1 to 1/2 buildings. The most northerly
building would have access either the proposed private street and the access
from Eagandale extension. The site plan has been designed in order to provide
as many views to Lemay Lake as can be obtained on the site. The buildings are
angled slightly in order to maximize the number of views to Lemay Lake. The
development is also proposing an amenity package which would include a pool or
central amenity feature and pathway to Lemay Lake. They are also working with
the Park Department in order to essentially dedicate some trailway easements
around Lemay Lake. This item will be before the Park's Commission on October
4 for .their review. In reviewing the outside parking, it appears that the 288
spaces would be the number required. In scaling these dimensions, it appears
that these spaces have been laid out at a 9 foot width and the ordinance would
require that these be expanded to a 10 foot width by either an 18 or 20 foot
dimension in order to come into conformance with the Eagan parking requirements.
If approved, the Preliminary Plat should be subject to the following conditions:
1) The plat be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comments
because of the acres onto Lone Oak Road.
2) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted
and approved by City Staff prior to final plat review.
3) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate landscape
bond shall be required and not released until 1 year after the landscaping
has been completed.
4) Prior to conversion of these units for condominium or owner occupancy,
a Homeowner's Association shall be established and a copy of the Declara—
tion and Covenants be reviewed by the City prior to the condominiumizing
of the units.
5) The private drive shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and these drives
shall meet the specifications of the City for private drives. The parking
lots shall have asphalt surfacing and concrete curbing around the peri—
meter where parking will not be expanded.
6) The parking stall dimensions shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width.
7) The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review comments for
park dedications.
8) The garage space shall be attached in the rental structure of the the
dwelling unit.
PRELIMINARY PLAT LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION
APC SEPTEMBER 25, 1984
PAGE 3.
Conditions (continued)
9) The trail system between the 214 unit buildings shall be maintained and
snow plowed in order that adequate fire protection can be provided to
each of the buildings.
10) All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
i
J I I 1` lit ,,,7.
ILJ
1' I 1 I I 1 I 1, em' iii k•
v%
,1 T I I I 1 i
ea
1 ILG
nu a amoa.
v
0 1 I i r- `ice it 0% 6 F
AV
an,
T iiii��rl t
'0 1 i i•nabi _s,�," Vi i' ��.a`,1��'�i�+�
T U r i
rxvuoreR�i 'u" "m
FLJ
unur CAFf�i [OM \,1 y1+\�,'7I/ C.� �1 L V
�pryol JoUIM LCOOF IM'Y LWO v p b
M.Mi'WI.1•. uINMMOF ?I1.1� ll.•l'..�T•t yppy 'b P
mvmw M 04
i
fttG vereirnou: �t+IEC e -q cn.><:rry Du�WINV LovtrtPGG �.11L /,OVtFD!/'.
n,ouw• v»d uJ- r eana wt L I.oi 1 /IN•. A :a W'K u•I,.agA: i,ii ft. MS 1K pkIA.4 .•G,,
r1•- uwwm nuns W •11'rls L r"N4 1L4 MW D IN Yw1► ,••.•eo •us a a[e wl y0.
Ix w•alwr ewcw+ w na waw+«.n Dena a >a•a n. tvtat 16►i�gl sab( c) Rwuv wM•. I I ?,'15Q r,R.
+w•rr n ,om, c,.ae. I> r••. ..u.ow ro ti w+wrwn St0(ar kw. L. 14 ON- +wro- •..Ik. eu► c �s,o.d "o rs•1 we.r. ••ert x W. rai L.m.rf ,urn• w
vel. 110,'i'll y M.
rer.ucb In•.R�••l ,wo CMf -•s u.+r cw- •Irata •oast. ?ALL rls.an yw. •ou wa.or.1 �..IT
w 1'1.11 w. lm.f ra Luawdl m�. u+� Wowrel[6 rsteq> M. LLO••M6 NK �4OO
`e '7
IV f. WM ra wt.
u
1
IN
�1 il�riillla�illllh�l ►�li�,lll�l,ll�l_i''lllll a-
I
1 v v f• Q `v II I,I I 1 I I ..F��j"
se
0
3
1
1
aW. }d1 j
V '1 I'' ..wn 1 I I I I Ivv _c'.�
1
J
1
I I' I I {'I,f•1� C�l:f 1" I I 7 CCCI I 111 i �i ?t i��i ti' "I I�1�'Ci I I I
Q i w••ol•od c rnaes f^ OP ov
I
1
n D
m v ll A T I P M HUO
GeVGi 01'CFh Aeu MM I I U I C.=. A �S �1
wftu•Y cu►.IC 40mmuY R I y I
1•WS'DMta.. W N yt•�•r I,•n �OwGI•�
Stl7R7C.lYrY�l7 wow r •o
g..
IYLVr>eo w M M
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 18, 1984
PAGE 2
the south side of Lone Oak Road across the entire northerly boundary of
this proposed development. An 8" stub has been provided in the location
of the Eagandale Boulevard and Lone Oak Road intersection.
This development is proposing on extending the 12" sanitary sewer through
to its easterly property line with services branching from it to handle
each building. The water main layout and number of hydrants as proposed
is adequate with the exception that the water main stubbed at the fire hydrant
northeast of Building A should be continued northerly to complete an 8"
loop with the 8" stub which was mentioned previously. Also, the water main
on the west side of Building B should be extended from the termination point
at the fire hydrant to the west and continue into the dead -end water main
in place along Poppler Drive. Finally, the water main located east of Building
C should be stubbed out to the east property line to provide future looping
to the adjacent parcel.
It is staff's understanding this development proposes to install these utility
improvements under City contract. Subsequently, it shall be the responsibility
of this development to petition for these improvements. These improvements
must be ordered in by Council prior to final plat approval.
STREETS
Lone Oak Road consists of the only existing street providing access to this
proposed development. Lone Oak Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota
County and is presently built to a four -lane rural section adjacent this
development. It is anticipated that the ultimate development of Lone Oak
Road' will incorporate a concrete median with full turning access only at
the Eagandale Boulevard intersection.
The internal access to this development is being proposed by providing a
public street under the name of Eagandale Place. This proposed street will
have to be in alignment with Eagandale Boulevard. Internal access to the
apartment buildings will be by way of private drives. The private drives
shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide with bituminous paving and concrete curb
and gutter. However, staff would recommend that the private drive proposed
onto Lone Oak Road to service Building B shall be a minimum of 32 feet wide
to the north underground garage entrance since this is the only access to
this apartment building.
The petition for utility improvement shall also include a request for installing
Eagandale Place under City contract.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS
A minimum of a 50 -foot half right -of -way shall be dedicated adjacent this
development for Lone Oak Road. A 60 -foot right -of -way shall be dedicated
for Eagandale Place.
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 18, 1984
PAGE 3
Easements of sufficient width shall be dedicated over the sanitary sewer,
water main and storm sewer. Also, a ponding easement will be required to
encompass the high water elevation of 877.
In addition, a 10 foot utility easement will be required to be dedicated
adjacent all public right -of -way with a 5 foot drainage utility easement being
dedicated adjacent all remaining lot lines.
ASSESSMENTS
Trunk area water and sanitary sewer have been previously assessed over this
existing development, parcels 10- 01000 010 -25 and 26. This leaves trunk
area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk water main assessments as
the responsibility of this development. The following table summarizes
these assessment responsibilities of this development.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE
Trunk Storm Sewer Area 774,000 S.F. $0.057 /S.F. $44,118
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Water Main 663 $10.84 /F.F. 7,187
TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT $51,305
Final amounts will be determined based upon final plat net area, excluding
public right -of -way and dedicated ponding easements, and at the rates in
effect at the time of final platting.
All costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this
development.
I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in detail with
the Advisory Planning Commission at the September 26, 1984, meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
G(,
Richard M. Heft', P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
RMH /jj
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: RECREATION SUPERVISOR, PETERSON
DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION, VRAA
DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1984
RE: COMMUNITY ROOM 1984
BACKGROUND
In January of 1984 guidelines were established for the use of the community
room. The basic categories of users identified were City departments,
community youth organizations, community non- profit organizations and profit
making organizations.
The basic directions given for acceptance or denial of requests for the use of
the community room this first year were:
1. outside of City departments, accept no regular weekly or monthly
requests from community groups.
2. Assess a fee of $15.00 to profit making organizations.
3. Assign a building supervisor to be present for all events at which
City staff is not in attendance.
a. Supervisor assists with set up and take down of tables and
chairs.
10E BY CITY DEPARTMENTS
The community room is reserved for fire department training every Monday
evening of the year.
The police department has used the community room for its gun safety and
snowmobile classes. These reservations require 5 8 evening dates within a
1 3 week period of time.
The Parks Recreation Department has programmed activities such as Tiny Tots,
dance lessons, managers meetings, senior citizens, special events and dog
obedience classes into the facility. All events, with the exception of dog
obedience, occur during the day.
The community room served as a polling site for three elections in 1984.
The police and fire auxiliaries each held one evening meeting at the site and
the fire auxiliary held its Christmas party in the facility.
USE BY OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
Examples of one time uses by outside, non- profit organizations at which the
b ,,41 -ling supervisor was present, include:
League of Women voters
E.A.A. registration
Independent School District 196 bond referendum informational meeting.
Twelve reservations were accepted for which the $15.00 fee was assessed.
These reservations were usually made by homeowner management corporations for
homeowners association meetings. The building supervisor was present at all
of these events.
DENIED REQUESTS BY OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
Six requests by outside organizations were denied. Two were church groups
seeking weekly access to the community room.
One scout troup was seeking space for a weekly Monday evening meeting room.
Two 4 -H inquiries were received. One was for a monthly evening meeting site;
the other was in regard to practice space for a BB gun shooting team.
The final denied request was from the South of the River Women's Club for a
monthly meeting site.
BUDGET:
COST 1984 REVENUE 1984
10 folding, adjustable height tables $1,000. $180.
Building Supervisor to date: 190.
A bulletin board was budgeted for, but has not been purchased to date.
Revenue is slightly less than the $200 estimated. Building supervisor costs
are less than the $540 budgeted as outside use is not yet at four events per
month as was projected.
IMPROVEMENTS
The 1985 budget provides for the installation of a serving counter /sink which
would facilitate senior programs and large group activities. Plans are
already underway for completion of this work in January. A chair replacement
program should also be considered. Many of the existing chairs are in poor,
unstable condition. Stacking chairs, similar to the style at the Municipal
Center, are strongly suggested.
PROBLEMS
Satisfactory storage space is not available. Consequently, the west wall
becomes a random area for collection of chairs, tables, etc.. This presents a
visual obtrusion and occasional programming conflict.
Mq ance of the building, on a routine and as needed basis, has been
6�Effi,,ult to achieve. The addition of a one -half time maintenance employee to
the Protective Inspections Department promises to be the solution to current
problems which are attributed to lack of staff time.
SUMMATION /COMMENTS
The_ number of use inquiries denied access are fewer in number than what was
b,.,,,el gated at the beginning. Increased public awareness of the room is
anticipated with slowly increasing use expected.
Users of the facility are generally cooperative in setting up and taking down
chairs /tables. Improvement amongst City departments is expected.
The installation of the serving cabinet and sink will increase the room's
versatility and increase its acceptability for group usage. New chairs and
resolution of storage problems would go a long way towards improving the
facility, as well as resolving the cluttered, disorganized appearance.
Improving attention to maintenance of the facility is expected with the
addition of a one —half time individual.