11/01/1984 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
7 :15 P.M.
NOVEMBER 1, 1984
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES OF MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1984.
3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS:
a. Lunka Addition Rose Lunka
b. Oakwood Addition Vince Kennedy
c. Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments Doug Johnson
d. Johannas Addition John Trapper (Gopher Eagan P.U.D.)
e. Cedar Space Center Addition Norse Development
f. C.T.C. Business Campus Scott Anderson (Informational)
g. Northwestern Bell
4. OLD BUSINESS
a. System Plan Study updating System Plan Tim Erkkila
b. Kehne House Council action of 10/30/84, Roger Martin
c. Natural Resource Amenities Roger Martin
5. NEW BUSINESS
a. Annual Review parks dedication
b. Beer /food concession, policy discussion
6. PARK BOND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. Accounting and Commission review process
b. Update on construction projects
c. Discussion Park Structure Committee
7. OTHER BUSINESS REPORTS
a. Discussion of "twice per month" meetings.
b. National Recreation Park Association Conference report.
8. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1984
RE: NOVEMBER 1ST ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
After the Call to Order, Approval of Agenda, and the Minutes of the October
Parks Commission meeting, the Commission will review seven development items.
The first development proposal is the Lunka Addition which consists of a one
acre parcel of land to be split into two single family lots. Staff is
recommending a cash dedication for this development. The second preliminary
plat is for the Oakwood Addition, consisting of 14 lots immediately north of
Lone Oak Road, just west of Pilot Knob Road. Again, staff is recommending.a
cash dedication for this preliminary plat.
The third plat application is for the Blackhawk townhouse apartments, which
consists of 168 apartment units located east of Blackhawk Road and one quarter
mile south of Diffley. This development is located in Park Service Section
30E, with nearby access north of Diffley Road. Staff has reviewed this
preliminary plat application and would recommend that a cash dedication be
required. Discussion by the Advisory Commission relative to the necessity of
a tot lot is suggested.
The Johannas Addition is within the Gopher Smelting P.U.D.. Under this
planned unit development, the City has already received its park dedication,
representing a portion of Windtree Park.
The preliminary plat for Cedar Space Center Addition, proposed by Norse
Development, consists of three industrial lots on approximately 13 acres. The
commercial and industrial plat should be subject to cash dedication. At the
time of the writing of this memo, staff is continuing to review the need for
a trail on the east edge of this parcel which abutts old Cedar Avenue.
The next application is within the Blackhawk Park planned development for a
preliminary plat for C.T.C. Business Campus. This proposal involves a portion
of land within the Blackhawk Park P.U.D. and a portion of the parcel is
outside of the P.U.D.. At the time of the writing of this memorandum, staff
has not had an opportunity to review in sufficient detail, the area of land
within the P.U.D. and that which is outside of the P.U.D. for determination of
park dedication responsibilities. This item has been deferred to the November
Advisory Planning Commission meeting, and therefore, a recommendation by the
Advisory Parks Recreation Commission is not necessary at this meeting.
Staff will be reviewing this item with the Commission as an informational
item.
The final preliminary plat application is by Northwestern Bell Telephone
Company for a special permit to construct a telephone utility building north
of Diffley Road. This structure is similar to the one proposed for ChesMar
Park on Lexington Avenue several months ago. The planned development is within
the Lexington South P.U.D. which has fulfilled its land dedication. As
always, the planning packets for each development proposed are enclosed.
OLD BUSINESS:
The first item under "Old Business" is the updating of the Parks System Plan.
Members will recall that as part of the System Plan Study, a methodology was
included for keeping the plan current. Mr. Erkkila has submitted a text in
processing the updating techniques to be reviewed on Thursday evening. Mr.
Erkkila, or a member of his staff, will be present to guide the Commission
through this material. It should be noted that this is a recommendation, and
the Commission should determine whether they are in agreement, and what
priority should be assigned to updating of the plan by section. Also to be
discussed is the assignment of responsibility for the updating of specific
elements within the plan. Members are requested to thoroughly review these
pages prior to the meeting.
The second item under "Old Business" is the Kehne House. Chairman Martin was
to be present at the City Council meeting on October 30 to present the updated
version of the Advisory Commission's proposal relative to the disposition of
this house. Mr. Martin will report on the Council's actions relative to this
item. Enclosed in the packet is the information which was distributed to the
City Council for the October 30 meeting.
The third item under "Old Business" was discussed at the October 4 Commission
meeting and at a special meeting of the Special Issues Subcommittee. Enclosed
in the packet is a memorandum from Chairman Martin to the City Council,
discussing the natural amenities and the Commission's concern for landscaping
and screening within the proposed developments. Mr. Martin presented this
item to the City Council at the October 30 meeting. He will provide the
Commission with a review of the Council's direction regarding the memorandum.
NEW BUSINESS:
There will be two items for Commission discussion under "New Business." The
first is the annual review of the parks dedication fees. Included in the
packet is a separate memorandum concerning this item. The second item under
"New Business" relates to the City's general policy regarding beer and food
concessions. Again, a separate memorandum has been prepared which provides
the Commission with background information on this topic. Staff is asking
that the Commission discuss this information and provide it with any direction
that it feels is necessary.
PARKS BOND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM:
Enclosed in the packet is information relative to the financial accounting and
Commission review process of the parks development program. This was an item
of discussion at the last several Commission meetings, and it is hoped that
this will answer the Commission's questions. Staff will supplement this
memorandum with additional information which will hopefully clarify the
intended process. The second item under the "Development Program" will be to
update the Commission on the various construction projects now going on.
The third item under the "Parks Bond Development Program" is a discussion
staff would like to have with the Advisory Commission relative to park
shelters and building design. As way of introduction of this topic, members
of the Commission are aware that many elements within the Park System
Development Program have already been identified and standards established.
For example, we know which parks will have ice rinks, the size of those rinks,
lighting levels that will be necessary, etc.. However, as it relates to park
shelter buildings, the Director of Parks and Recreation and Landscape
Architect feel that there are a host of variables that need to be considered
in the designing process. For example, should the structure be brick or wood?
What about economics of maintenance versus the economics of construction?
What about preengineered and prebuilt buildings versus architecturally
designed buildings? Staff would like to discuss this in further detail with
the Advisory Commission, suggesting that a subcommittee, or committee on the
whole, be established. This committee would then review /research with staff,
alternatives in construction material and design relative to park
shelters /park buildings.
OTHER BUSINESS REPORTS:
As the Advisory Commission is very much aware, its meetings have continued in
to late evening hours over the past several,months. In addition to these late
night meetings, the frequency of special meetings, or the calling of
subcommittees to deal with specific issues, has been frequent and regular
throughout the last several months. There has been some discussion about the
need to meet twice a month in order to conduct Advisory Parks Commission
business. Chairman Martin and the DirecCtor of Parks Recreation have
discussed this alternative as one way of dealing with lengthy meetings.
Commission is asked to discuss this, as well as other alternatives for
streamlining Commission meetings, in order to complete the many tasks
confronting the Advisory Commission. The last item under "Other Business
Reports" is relative to the National Recreation Park Association Conference.
The Director of Parks Recreation recently returned from the conference, and
if time permits, would like to share with the Advisory Commission some
insights gained at that conference.
Staff apologizes for the late arrival of this agenda and hopes that the
Commission will have had an opportunity to review it with this relatively
short time frame between its arrival and the Commission meeting.
Direc or of Parks Recreation
KV /js
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
MINUTES OF A SPECIALIMEETING OF
THE ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1984
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Chairman Martin.
Members present included Martin, Fedde, Carroll, Kubik, Masin, Alt, Bertz and
Ketcham. Also present were the Director of ;Parks Recreation Vraa and Steve
Sullivan, Landscape Architect. Chairman Martin lead an on -site tour of the
proposed LeMay Lake lst Addition. It was indicated that the purpose of the
meeting was to determine whether the shoreline of LeMay's Lake, within the
proposed plat, is suitable and useable for possible parks purposes. Landscape
Architect Steve Sullivan distributed a prepared analysis of the site
indicating slopes, setbacks, property corner's and extent of parkland
dedication if this was to be the selected alternative.
There were numerous questions and discussions regarding the
potential opportunities for parkland useage, maintenance, zoning of adjacent
parcels, and the possibilities of acquiring scenic and trail easements.
Members indicated that acquisition by dedication would assure the City
absolute control and provide for protection of the site. It was noted,
however, that this parcel would then be landlocked and access for development
and maintenance would have to be through private property. Development of the
trail would be contingent upon successful acquisition of additional property
to the east and south. After considerable discussion by the Advisory
Commission, on a motion by Carroll, seconded by Alt, with all members voting
C in favor, that the Parks Recreation Commission recommend to the City
Council that a cash dedication be a condition of plat. Further, that the
developer provide for a 75 -foot, scenic easement along the shoreline which
would prohibit the development of any man -made structure including docks,
gazebos, floating rafts, without prior approval of the Parks Recreation
Commission and City Council. The developer is also responsibile for providing
a tot lot within the development and for the designation of an open, green
space area suitable for adult free play. Thee developer is also to provide for
a trail easement within the 75 -foot, scenic basement for possible future trail
construction by the City.
KEHNE HOUSE
Chairman Martin indicated that he was proceeding with the writing of
a draft for uses of the Kehne House to be presented to the City Council along
with the estimated cost for a security system. He indicated that he would be
distributing this to other members of the subcommittee on the Kehne House for
their review and scrutiny. He indicated he'd hoped to prepare this for
presentation to the City Council at its first meeting in November.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct by the Advisory
Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 8 :00 P.M.
C' Dated:
Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary
S UBJECT TO APPROVAL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION•COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 4, 1984
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
was called to order at 7:10 P.M. by Chairman Martin. The meeting was preceded
by a ground breaking ceremony at Rahn Park. Members present were Alt, Fedde,
Masin, Bertz, Martin, Thurston, Ketcham, Carroll and Kubik. Ken Vraa,
Director of Parks and Recreation; Greg Ingraham, Planning Assistant; Steve
Sullivan, Landscape Architect; and Liz Witt, Administrative Assistant, were
also present. Tom Healey, developer, was present for discussion on St.
Francis Wood 4th Addition and LeMay's Lake 1st Addition.
AGENDA
Parks and Recreation Director Vraa added two items to Other
Business. Commission member Carroll moved, Fedde seconded, that the agenda be
approved as amended.. The motion carried.
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1984
A typographical error was noted,on page two of the minutes of the
September 6th meeting. A correction on page 4 deleted "heating and plumbing"
from the $30,000 improvement cost proposal. Commission member Masin moved,
Bertz seconded, that the minutes be approved as corrected. The motion
carried.
RESIGNATION OF BILL JACKSON
Commission members directed staff to write a letter of appreciation
to Bill Jackson on behalf of the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission The
members also included the suggestion that if Bill has an opportunity to
reapply sometime in the future, the Commission would like to have him back.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. Bell Lexington Addition NW Bell Telephone
Assistant Planner Greg Ingraham explained that Bell Telephone is
platting their property into three, one-acre lots. They have a building on
Lot 1, will leave Lot 2 for a possible parking lot and construct a digital
switching office on Lot 3. The preliminary plat has been approved by the'
Planning Commission and the City Council subject to park dedication.
Commission member Masin moved, Kubik seconded, the recommendation of cash
dedication for Lots 2 and 3 and that trail easement along Lone Oak and
Lexington Avenue be required for future construction of a trailway. All voted
in favor.
,J
APC Minutes
October 4, 1984
B. Millwork at Fagan Don Prettyman
The developer proposes to rezone 9 acres from A to CSC and build
five office /warehouse facilities. All of the area has been designated as
outlots. The developer must plat each parcel as he develops it; therefore,
the Parks Recreation Commission will review only Outlots B C which will
be platted for the first two buildings.
Commission member Carroll moved, Kubik seconded, that a commercial
industrial cash dedication be recommended for the two outlots with
consideration given to the other lots at the time they are platted. All voted
in favor.
C. Cedar Cliff Commercial James Durning
Under discussion was Outlot H, Cedar Cliff Commercial, which lies
along the east side of Scott Trail near Cliff Road. Mr. Kubik questioned the
amount of parking and lack of green space, indicating the site was very much a
blacktop surface. Planning Assistant Ingraham noted Planning staff had recom-
mended some green landscape islands to alleviate the heavy concentration of
blacktopped parking for the two proposed office buildings. He reported the
developer didn't want to make the snowplowing operation more difficult by
including the islands and his wishes prevailed with the Planning Commission.
Parks Commission members noted they did not like all of the blacktop area and
the lack of green space shown in the proposal. It was noted that some parking
spaces on either end of the pond are at right angles with one another making
it easy to cause dents in cars when doors are opened. Commission members felt
that green islands should be placed there to provide a buffer for cars as well
as an aesthetically pleasing area. There was a discussion by the Commission
relative to its role and responsibility for this type of issue, noting that
landscaping and aesthetics are important to the community. George Kubik
moved, Bertz seconded, to recommend: cash dedication at the commercial-
industrial rate; a trail to be constructed on Cliff Road; and a sidewalk on
Scott Trail. The Commission asked for the consideration of the preservation
of as many hardwood trees as possible; the consideration of including green
islands at either corner of the pond area to better define the parking area;
and moving or screening the trash site visible from Cliff Road. The motion
carried unanimously.
D. Rahncliff M.G. Astleford
Planning Assistant Ingraham gave a presentation of the plat proposal
noting service stations, restaurants and a 200 -room hotel are included in the
plans. Commission members again expressed concern with so much building and
blacktop area and so little green space. Commission member Fedde questioned
the direct access to Cliff Road as it afforded the opportunity for cars to
cross and park on the existing trailway. Commission member Kubik felt the
Special Issues Committee should review a policy for a set percentage of green
space required per development as soon as possible. Such a policy could then
be jointly discussed with the Planning Commission and City Council.
2
APC Minutes
October 4, 1984
After further discussion, Commission member Fedde moved, Alt
seconded:
1. To recommend commercial- industrial cash dedication for the
platted lots with consideration given to the outlot when it
comes in for platting;
2. Because there is so much concrete and asphalt, the Commission
recommends the developer delete the three -car space at the north
end of the lot and put in a green island;
3. Access should be off Rahn Road with none at Cliff because the
latter would conflict with the existing trail; and
4. Staff should review trails along Rahn Road and require a
sidewalk with this plat.
The motion carried unanimously.
Commission memb -r Thurston moved, Carroll seconded, that staff be
directed to review the trail plans for Rahn Road south of Cliff with the
County. If a County trail is not proposed on the east side of Rahn Road, then
the trail will become the responsibility of the developer. Commission member
Kubik then requested of staff that trailways be shown on development proposals
as presented to the Commission.
E. St. Francis Woods 4th Addition Tom He aley
The developer plans to construct 218 townhouse units which would be
for sale. The site, near Duckwood and Lexington, is heavily wooded. Mr.
Healey stated it is the developer's intention to preserve as many trees as
possible. He said a swimming pool was to be installed with the second phase
of development. It was noted by the Commission that the area is to be served
by O'Leary Park, which will have great demands placed on it with so many new
units now being proposed within the service area there. Director Vraa said
that trail dedication for Lexington Avenue is required. Commission member
Kubik commented he'd like to see an internal pathway in the development which
would link all of the amenities. Mr. Healy stated he would be developing a
pathway to interconnect the development to the pool location.
Richard Carroll moved, Fedde seconded, the following
recommendations:
1. Cash dedication for the development,
2. A trailway along Lexington Avenue,
3. A tot lot be constructed with staff approval of the location,
4. A $5,000 bond for the tot lot,
5. An internal pathway be constructed of natural materials, and
6. Consideration be given to providing an adult recreational space
which would be unimproved.
All voted in favor.
APC Minutes
October 4, 1984
F. LeMay's Lake 1st Addition Tom Healey
Planning Assistant Ingraham described the proposal which is for 288,
one and two- bedroom apartment units. The developer also proposes a pool,
gazebo, adult recreation space but no tot lot as few children are expected to
live in the units. Questions were raised about a trail between buildings and
use of the shoreline. Mr. Healey said he would like to put in a private
trailway to access the proposed future park to the east. He continued by
saying he would discourage the general public from walking along the lake
shore and enter into the apartment area complex land.
Chairman Martin noted the shore area had originally been shown as
proposed future parkland in the systems plan study and he did not want to
relinquish it for private development without a thorough review. Parks
Recreation Director Vraa said if we were to acquire the lakeshore as
parkland, it would dead end at the apartment complex. He thought chances of
acquiring parcels around the lake were extremely remote as they were already
platted into lots. He said the developer moved the buildings away from the
shore as the City requested and perhaps that is all we should ask.
Discussion continued for some time and the Commission could not
reach a consensus. It was decided to hold a special meeting to view the site
and then reach a decision. George Kubik moved, Martin seconded, to continue
the item to the special meeting. The motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Kehne House
Chairman Martin and Director Vraa went before the City Council to
explain the $30,000 option recommended by the Advisory Parks Recreation
Commission. The Council was concerned with security of the building. They
also wanted assurances the Parks Recreation Commission would use the
building in three years, what the uses would be and how they would fit in with
plans for Patrick Eagan Park. The Council indicated agreement with the,
dislike of the role of landlord. City staff is to research the costs of a
security system and report back to the Council. Member Kubik questioned ways
in which the Commission could impress upon the Council the uniqueness and
value of the home for recreational use. After dicussion, staff was directed
to check with other communities to see how they handled similar situations.
The Special Issues Committee will continue to study uses and building
security. They will put together a report for future presentation to the_
Council on uses for the house.
B. King 1st and 2nd Additions
Director Vraa reported that the City Council did not approve this
development due to high road costs. Mr. King is preparing revisions to the
proposed plat which would still provide for a land dedication to Schwanz Lake
Park.
APC Minutes
October 4, 1984
NEW BUSINESS
A. Jim Curry Open Space Name Request
The Commission discussed Mr. Curry's request to name an 8 -acre open
space parkland gift for his wife. The Commission discussed the current policy
regarding such requests. After a review of alternatives, it was the consensus
of the Commission that a plaque should be placed in the area designated by
Mr. Curry with the inscription: "DONATED IN HONOR OF BARBARA CURRY as a
fitting honorarium.
PARK DEVELOPMENT
A. The Director reviewed several models and diagrams which were on
display for Commission viewing exhibiting play equipment for various parks.
Staff and Commission expressed concern that the dollar amounts allocated for
neighborhood parks may not be sufficient. Consideration for increasing these
amounts shall be considered.
B. New North Park Acquisition
Director Vraa reviewed the site parcel near Yankee Doodle and 35E.
He said formal negotiations had not commenced but various possibilities for
acquisition were being discussed. The City has two approaches buying one
parcel at a fairly high price or picking up landlocked remnant properties at a
lower price. There are no cost figures available as yet.
C. Rahn Park
Ground breaking ceremonies were held prior to the meeting. The
$146,000 contract had been let with rough grading expected to take three to
four weeks.
D. Other
Bituminous mats have been laid in three tennis courts and the fence'
contract for Northview Park was let.
COMMISSION REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS
A. Recreation Committee
Committee Chairman Kubik reported that the Committee had met with"
Dorothy Peterson to discuss present and future recreation programs. In a
requested report, it was noted that several programs are growing and Dorothy
spends over 40 hours a week on programming alone.
In reviewing summer playground programming, the Committee plans to
expand the location of Summer in the Park to provide better opportunities.
The Committee suggests more amenities be in place at Fish Lake Park before
Summer in the Park is held there again. Other changes were also discussed.
w
APC Minutes
October 4, 1984
The Committee looked at winter programming and suggested an ice
fishing contest together with a treasure hunt and a winter picnic as a
possibility. They are considering a permanent sliding hill at Schwanz Lake.
Suggested for consideration is the purchase of a mobile "chuck- wagon" at a
cost of $1,000. The wagon could be rented out to groups for block parties,
etc. George Kubik will report back to the Commission on this and other items.
B. Maintenance
Director Vraa included a maintenance report in the packet. There
were no further questions regarding maintenance activities.
C. Parks Acquisition and Development Fund
The fund currently has $540,000, most of which is not earmarked for
specific projects. Director Vraa noted that more money might be needed for
the North Park acquisition than originally anticipated.
D. November Agenda Items
Agenda items include "beer in park" policy, park dedication review;
a timetable for park construction, park bond accounting, and methodology for
updating a system plan.
E. Composting
The City Council approved the City's providing leaf composting for
residents. The drop -off point will be at Rahn Park with treatment to be at a
site in Wedgewood Park.
F. Jim Curry, Lexington South P.U.D.
Mr. Curry will be giving the last deeds for over 70 acres of
parkland to the City at the October 16 Council meeting. Members are asked to
be at the Council meeting to take part in the presentation.
G. Special Meetings
A special meeting to review Kehne House uses and view the Le May's
Lake site will be Thursday, October 11 a' 6:00 P.M. at City Hall.
The Special Issues Committee will discuss a policy for green space
requirement at a meeting on October 18, 6:30 P.M. at City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT
Tom Ketcham moved, Fedde seconded, that the meeting be adjourned.
Time of adjournment was 11:20 P.M.
LW
Dated:
Advisory Parks Recreation Secretary
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: LUNKA ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT VARIANCE
APPLICANT: ROSE LUNKA
LOCATION: PART OF THE NWk OF SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 15, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the
Lunka Addition consisting of 2 single family lots on approx. 1 acre of land
located along Towerview Rd., east of Pilot Knob Rd. A 20' variance is also re-
quested to allow a 30' front setback from the 50' average setback existing along
that block.
ZONING LAND USE: The property is zoned R -1 (residential single family) and
there is an existing home on the proposed Lot 1 which will remain. Lots 2 is
vacant land with a low area at the rear of the parcel. The variance request
stems from a desire to keep the house away from this low area.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The proposed lots meet all the lot size and setback requirements
of an R -1 district, except for the front setback on Lot 2.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: Grading and drainage over this proposed development
can be best accomplished in conjunction with the building permit and house
construction.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main have been installed within Towerview
Road. This proposed development has water and services stubbed to each
lot as a result of the previous sewer and water construction.
STREETS: At issue here is the improvement of Towerview Road to City
standards. In the past, Council has deferred the improvement of Towerview
Road until development occurs along it. This is the second development
to occur along Towerview Road since that time. The first being Holmes
Addition. Subsequently, staff would recommend the improvement of Towerview
Road be initiated in conjunction with this development.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: Right -of -way for Towerview Road presently exists
as a highway easement. Subsequently, staff would recommend that a 30 -ft.
half right -of -way be dedicated for Towerview Road along with this plat.
The remaining 3 ft. can be transferred to this development by way of a
quit claim deed if the applicant so desires.
ASSESSMENTS: All assessments for trunk area related facilities have been
levied over this development.
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS LUNKA ADDITION
1. A 30 -ft. half right -of -way for Towerview Road be dedicated with this
plat.
2. Towerview Road be upgraded to City standards.
X1370 �Op tU HOC
3+ 1 v
1 IL
8
Y u
t, g OIC -27
Ol
K
19
010-28
Y
.e
li
IX
m
Z
y
P
i�RCE� H O LKI�
I .Loam
I ADD.
3
O
n Doe.No. 424887
RQA D Doc. No. 442283
010-30 030 -30 :010 31
vim' q r r E
=080%0 t 030-30 t 04PSO jrlZ .r..
1
Z
OUAI7RY .r- �Or+. LANE 2 -4g �►v�'
1 010-32 3
5 1 r r•• rw.rr O>1NM .>I a pa
ter
020 t '•r D
r 1 t �r r[ e• DM
l �7 •rMlrt
l oso -ate= db
1 Y
r
—T90 on �vrut 1 X T 9 o
bl
lop
C
9 13 J T./ 09 n
)C
V4
1 -9 /v
3
551,63 i
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: OAKWOOD ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: VINCE KENNEDY
LOCATION: PART OF THE SEk OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 16, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of
Oakwood Addition consisting of 14 lots on approx. 7.4 acres of land located north
of Lone Oak Rd. just west of Pilot Knob Rd.
ZONING LAND USE: There are currently 4 single family residences on Lots 4,5,
6 of Zhender Acres which make up the 7.4 acre parcel. The 3 lots are zoned
R -1 (residential single family) and are accessed from Lone Oak Rd. The land
to the north of the existing homes is primarily grassland with scattered hardwood
trees.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The proposal meets all the density, lot size and setback re—
quirements of an R -1 District. The net density is 2.2 units per acre with the
smallest lot being 12,700 sq. ft.
SITE PLANNING: 13 of the lots are proposed to front on a public street (Oakwood
Dr.) which would run from Lone Oak Rd. to the north property line. Lot 3, Block
1 would continue to have a private drive to Lone Oak Rd.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: Grading over this proposed development will not adversely
impact any drainage or adjacent land if adequate erosion control methods
are undertaken.
This proposed development is located within major drainage district D with
all its drainage eventually ending up in DP -1, as shown in Figure 1. However,
this pond presently has no controlled overflow outlet. Subsequently, staff
recommends that the lift station required for Pond DP —1 to provide a positive
control outlet be constructed concurrent with this proposed development.
The downstream storm sewer required to convey the overflow from this pond
into the Minnesota River Valley is in place. In reviewing the applicant's
proposed drainage plan, staff would recommend that the storm water runoff
collected at the north end of this development be transmitted westerly to
a point approximately 150 ft. west of the northwest corner of this proposed
development. This will help reduce erosion and allow for the development
of the land to the north. However, adequate utility easements will be required
to be obtained by this developer, depending upon the alignment, from either
the property to the north or the property to the west.
Engineering Report Oakwood Addition
October 18, 1984
Page 2
UTILITIES: Figure 2 illustrates the location of existing utility lines
with respect to this proposed development. Although a sanitary sewer line
is in place along Lone Oak Road, it is not deep enough to provide service
to this entire development. Subsequently, sanitary sewer will have to be
extended from the existing manhole located at the northeast corner of Lot
8 of Zhender Acres. The preliminary alignment as submitted by this applicant
follows a proposed street alignment which was prepared by this applicant
in 1980. This alignment will require easements from Kenneth and Melvin
Erickson across the northern portion of Lot 7 of Zhender Acres, Rosemary
and Eva Wood and Ed Bosela and Francis Wood across the southerly portion
of Lot 6 of Treffle Acres.
Water main should be looped as proposed by this applicant from the existing
trunk line located within Lone Oak Road to the existing water line stubbed
at the northeast corner of Lot 7 of Zhender Acres. As with the previously
discussed sanitary sewer line alignment, the water main alignment will also
require easements from the above referenced property owners.
The only other feasible alternate alignment to provide sanitary sewer service
to this proposed development would be by coming directly east from the stubbed
sanitary sewer located in the northeast corner of Lot 7, Zhender Acres,
thereby bypassing the route through Lot 6 of Treffle Acres. This route
is not recommended due to the future duplication of sanitary sewer line
installation, however it may be necessary if easements cannot obtained from
the property owners of Lot 6, Treffle Acres. This statement would also
be true for the water main.
STREETS: This proposed development abutts Lone Oak Road. Lone Oak is
a County road which has been constructed to its ultimate design with abutting
the frontage of this proposed development. The proposed intersection of
the internal public street with Lone Oak Road is set back approximately
450 ft. west of the Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road intersection. Staff
feels this setback is sufficient. However, staff would recommend shifting
the centerline of the proposed Oakwood Drive 7 ft. east. This will allow
the area southeast of this development, formerly proposed as Lone Oak Heights,
to provide ap access onto Lone Oak Road thereby creating a four —way intersection
with Oakwood Drive. This minor shifting should not impact the Oakwood Addition
proposed development adversely.
Lot 3, Block 1, of this proposed development does not conform to City Code
regarding frontage on public right —of —way. The City Code requires a minimum
frontage on public right —of —way of 50 ft. Since this lot contains an existing
house with access by way of an easement onto Lone Oak Road, the Commission
may wish to waive this requirement. Staff would recommend that if this
requirement is waived, the easement across the easterly portion of the southerly
portion of Lot 6 be shown on the final plat. Otherwise, all City maps and
records will indicate this lot to be landlocked.
Engineering Report Oakwood Addition
October 18, 1984
Page 3
RIGHT —OF— WAY /EASEMENTS: A 55 ft. half right —of —way should be dedicated
for Lone Oak Rd. The proposed 60 ft. right —of —way for the internal public
street is sufficient.
A utility easement will be required to be dedicated across the north portion
of Lot 1, Block 1, of this proposed development of sufficient width to accomodate
at least the storm sewer and possibly the water main as previously discussed.
All other easements will be required as per City Code. Obtaining the necessary
utility easements as previously discussed should be the responsibility of
this proposed development.
ASSESSMENTS: This proposed development will be responsible for the following
trunk area related assessments as listed in the table below. The final
amounts of these assessments will be based upon the final rates and areas
as determined at the time of final platting.
OAKWOOD ADDITION
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE
Trunk Area Water Main 11 lots (1) $535/lot 5,885
Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer 11 lots 535/lot 5,885
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 280,52.6 S.F. 0.047 /S.F. 13185
Lateral Benefit from 340 F. F. 10.84 /F.F. 3,686
Trunk Water Main
Total Estimated Assessments $28,641
(1) Net increase in lots 14 proposed lots 3 existing
This proposed development shall be responsible for all costs of all public
improvements with the exception of the public improvements performed benefitting
Lot 6 of Treffle Acres.
RECOMMENDATIONS OAKWOOD ADDITION
1. A public improvement project for streets utilities including the lift
station outlet for pond DP -1, be authorized prior to final platting.
2. The centerline of Oakwood Drive be shifted seven (7) feet easterly.
3. (a) A 50' frontage on public right -of -way be required for Lot 3, Block 1, or
3. (b) The access easement across Lot 6 of Zehnder Acres be shown on the
Final Plat.
4. A 55' half right -of -way be dedicated for Lone Oak Rd.
5. This development shall obtain all easements necessary for extension of
public utilities through property not included within this development.
6. This development shall be responsible for all costs of public improve-
ments except those benefitting Lot 6 of Treffle Acres.
7. This development shall be responsible for trunk area water sanitary sewer
upgrading, trunk storm sewer and lateral benefit.from trunk watermain assess-
ments.
8. Block 1, Lot 7 and Block 2, Lot 7 shall relocate their driveway access
onto Oakwood Dr.
i
i
iii iii �d' I�
ii■ Ii�i1lr..i
CASE
mm
Oil
rr CC jj °VIII rr
10 rp-
//1�N�� t V 'iii ■i
LL .4 1
r
K
iP
K4[ 1 [p'
2
I
pcv 1 .,e .r.
917E LOCATION MAP
Itsio I.P.
1 P
•rJ
1
1 14
LP i y I ooao u.•
w•[ oM Y.f t I I O i i a' 2 2 f :t.
6
"S V.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
•Iwf.rn. Y 6 1.
HOLD V. I I
cc
to fr. O I 1
GENERAL INFORMATION 1
r Lam._ E• -OAK
iN_r r.. u,lr.r 1.
CO. iio'a's)
I
i
EclnrE,lrlu .M01 r[[al OAKWOOD ADDITION r"lr101a TOM
RODE K/NN[ll w 10019 {oil WORN
ENGINEERING VINCE KENNEDY
L COMPANY INC. PRELIMINARY PLAT
3
1000 CARS r g1E9I. MMYRIr, M.C.-TA BASS? ON 418.1000 ......0 ll�M
1
t a i!'��,ti i�'.
1
4 ao qn i>o t aY 11 i 1 ,J 1 1f� rl 11 1 1,, 1
Kul 1 b' 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 r 1
1 1 1 1 1 i 7 i j I
1 1 111 1 �/1 I.' ``1 1 V I 1
fi
If
Ir111 rj i a 2:
I VIII rr i I r -Mr I
1 NI11 1r r'
T,
O 1
1 1 0,l
1 I 1
�y=
i
OAKWOOD ADDITION N
ROBE INNd&A s p.
i K "NNIOf MI ION° YYOYIIIOOf
ENGINEERING "':C:a PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN VINCE KENNEDY
COMPANY INC. s
CON I
I 104114 1"T IaaN ITNIIT. 01YIN11rI11f. YINNffOIA 0!717 M 1)!•1000 "y "KI"""a Y "°11N r01
1
„K
P ter, .u. i ^•;I A.
r
I
M�'•1
i.
1. 2
7 I O I
.J L..
LON E O AK ROQb
(co. Ao.. s y
P R
[OMIYUINO fwO" OAKWOOD ADDITION
OBE MNNNf[f «r lNMO �YNY[YONf .M` 2
NGINEERING VINCE KENNEDY
COMPANY INC. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 3
L 000 [11iT .INUI. NOIwWILL[. 0-1661A &Sny ►Y [ff -food r.,ro+.
■.uw MM
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT BLACKHAWK TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS
APPLICANT: SHAREVEST DOUGLAS JOHNSON
LOCATION: PART OF THE NEk OF SECTION 29
EXISTING ZONING: R -4 (MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 17, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSED SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval
of Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments which consists of 168 apartment units
on 11.7 acres of land located east of Blackhawk Road, k mile south of Diffley Rd.
ZONING LAND USE: The parcel is zoned R -4 (Residential Multifamily) while
the Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the parcel R -III with a density
range of 6 12 units per acre. The land is covered by sumacs and mature
oak trees. Two low areas occur on the property, one on the north property
line, the other along the 35 -E R.O.W. to the east. Four existing residences
lie between this parcel and Blackhawk Road.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The project consists of.21 eight -unit, three -story structures.
Each unit has a tuck -under garage and an additional outdoor parking space.
The proposal meets all the setback and lot coverage requirements of a R -4
district, except for the setback to the 35 -E R.O.W. which is shown at 30
instead of the required 50'. Due to the topographic constraints, the applicant
is requesting a 20' variance to allow for better usage of the slopes. Additional
evergreen landscaping should be provided to help mitigate the freeway noise.
SITE PLANNING: The units work well with the rolling topography of the site.
The garage side of the building is two stories, while the rear side is a
three -story walkout style.
A tennis court, swimming pool and common building provide a recreation area
near the center of the development. The large low area on the northern
edge of the property will remain and would act as a buffer to the north.
of Units 168
Approx. Unit Mix 63 one bedroom -725 sq. ft.) 105 two bedroom 930sq.ft)
Site Area 11.7 acres gross Density 14.4 units /acre gross
Public R.O.W. .2 acre
Private R.O.W. .4 acre
11.1 acres net 15.2 units /acre net
Building Coverage 15.8% Parking Garage 168
Surface 231
Total 399 spaces
PLANNING ENGINEERING REPORT BLACKHAWK TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS
OCTOBER 17, 1984
PAGE TWO
GRADING /DRAINAGE: This proposed development is proposing to fill a depression
located in the vicinity of the Northern Natural Gas easement and the westerly
right of way line of I -35E. According to the preliminary grading plan,
this area is to be filled from an 888 elevation to a 903 elevation. This
filling will encroach upon the Northern Natural Gas Company easement and
onto MnDOT right of way for I -35E. Subsequently, this developer must obtain
permits from MnDOT and Northern Natural Gas Company allowing the encroachment
of placement of fill material.
With the exception of the southerly most portion of this development, the
remainder drains northerly into AP -74. A positive overflow gravity outlet
is in place for this pond. The subsequent downstream storm sewer is scheduled
to be completed with the Suncliff 4th Addition. The portion of this development
which drains southerly will drain onto property owned by MnDOT. A portion
of the existing depression at the MnDOT property line will be filled in
by this development to accommodate cluster H. Subsequently, MnDOT should
be informed of these grading and drainage plans in conjunction with the
permit for filling the previously referenced depression located northeast
of this low area. A written response from MnDOT regarding the two encroachments
onto their right of way and property should be received prior to final plat
approval.
UTILITIES: Utilities have been stubbed to this property at points adjacent
Blackhawk Road. Water main and sanitary sewer can be extended from these
stubs into this proposed development. The water main will be required to
be looped throughout this development and connected to the existing 16 -inch
trunk water main located within Blackhawk Road at the south end of this
development. This will require an easement from MnDOT be obtained by this
developer.
STREETS: The access onto Blackhawk Road will be required to align with
the future street from the Suncliff 3rd Addition. The internal, private
streets shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide with the access drives being
a minimum of 32 feet wide.
RIGHT OF WAY /EASEMENTS: Right of way required to provide a 50 foot half
right of way for Blackhawk Road will be required to be dedicated with this
plat.
A 20 -foot utility easement will be required to be obtained from MnDOT for
the water main looping as previously discussed. In addition, utility easements
will be required over the sanitary sewer and water main located within this
development. Also, a drainage and utility easement will be required to
be dedicated over pond AP -74 encompassing its high water elevation when
determined.
ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area related assessments have been levied over this
proposed development. Therefore, all costs associated with the installation
of public improvements within this development will be the sole responsibility
of this development.
kf
RECOMMENDATIONS BLACKHAWK TOWNHOUSE AP ARTMENT S
1. Permits for filling within MnDOT right -of -way and Northern Natural Gas Company's
easement must be obtained prior to final plat approval.
2. A 20 -ft. utility easement will be required from MnDOT for the water main construc-
tion.
3. A ponding and utility easement shall be dedicated to encompass HWL for Pond AP -74.
4. The private drive entrance shall line up opposite to the Dear Hills Trail intersec-
tion.
5. Right -of -way shall be dedicated to provide for a 50 -ft. half right -of -way.
6. All costs associated with the public improvements for this development shall
be the sole responsibility of this development.
7. Additional evergreen landscaping and berming shall be provided along the north
and east_ property lines to help mitigate noise and screen automobile headlights.
A landscaping bond shall be issued and not released until 1 year after planting.
8. A 20 -ft. variance shall be granted from the 50' building setback to the 35 -E
right -of -way.
=126
SOON
imam du
oil
tttttttttt�. a i il� 3 i•
9 arms
Caz
�i 1111
Irk■ �1�1�l�
���z �����ri mss, �r� •IY■■■
WO
IN
XA
Ml rd
awn ■'i�l t ■r�� %i
■Jf� s X11 1
�i 1 11 1�1 iA7�ii N� �►�_-�t�`
mu ■■=j■ I ■11111
ME
A
Iwo
��j���1 iii ♦1 M
Iw ��I�1: i!�
J■u ..1 ■v mom
su Am
Sol
rw
N a E. 1/4 SEC. Z'3, I Z
S E L/4 SE 2C., T27, R23
1 e.•awlra
•t u,ou
IESw7 i
e
4�
50 60 r=• PART OF k PART OF b
L t 020-06 G
Q coLep r
FM OF
1 II Q cul 090 06 Y
P f• I O 1 ..r .P
L
1 w o i I
040-06
010-10 I Y
060-06
A l
FART OF
1 7o -os e a
4 L 1
e olo-oa
ow a U) 01I 09 d
0 I `J
min
049
,•a w�°'��-Y1 '`�'i� i�" m FART OF 011-07 FART
y "g oia•Jr �Qi9Q" e.r•Ito; I
,�V a 4>i5 i �j7 �K I ?q�y L I Q
Y wY ^dell: N >i'� j iRm'f _i•J00' x y
un �x7 1> OIO-06 C6
vN 1 H u6N I
It
tlLl`-' 2 !•0,00 I
sm :np >y
0 1 I X Q• 30 o
V� p YY YG vrMr
A l
eN gXu•YO f 1 iK:s °m 11711 fo•so
b I B7: m a fJl mY'i, i 10
lI41,
o rb 8w x 8. �L p e$ ^o ':i e A�y
N o GI
a• so5s°_ 'GspR =Q o
nm V` e♦
4.
fix/ 4...a, u� e 6Pwmf/
>Ydk tx, CANVA$6
a y N 4ii�v �Cmb/ "�.N �y' .'1►� o AN b
J O Y 2
fp
40
r
't339! IY64��,,`�.
tcm: t
3F?Ettf'Y�, N •..�5x,� �A,' I E Q Y 6 BS•
1 Tsa �'._1!? •t•i.rb:f nos, •t•e•r•o'If eo. ea
3f4 ?5— •••e.0 Irlll
5 89 *Msrw
i T r
1
45` I I r YLwr I l NORTH
f r SCALE: 1"•60•
r
'�ATe^1n't I 1 I 1'� y_,L�/ 11 .1 wrr ..a�. •.I'i .n• w w .i.. n• wu•l" i w .:.r �.��r
4 1 1 I pi Idl•1 r M ni It1Y J u Z.
11.31 I..t .1 YID .1 u..n
14 i.y .ii... '.':.awn.. .1.. I.un I ur 'yr.... r
I I i i .�fr .1.. ..al .1 u:�.• ..`Iln 1 a..r. .IA..
Irr 1.•. .i. a....;,'; .uo:ul� :.0 u. ..n Iw.i :.i u :i
ii wr.f.w alw.
I'.::�.:.°
.A }.A :,Z• w i.n rnr •`I r.i ;.i.. .1'�.� n .r Iw 1..�. u n n i.
n.IY •.V 11 n. N 1.1.. •1 IY Irn .4�Nn M .rs r lN.r Ir. qr.•
`n� a.a.., u rs rnl••
d"y,• I .0 l.•.�r.Y. ::i:.'. �.�.a
_n•' u'
M 'w. Ir I..t•ul' ,.n�' I .I 111 wYr nllvt1Y i11 r r.r i n.rrWMll WI
r•1 I 'tom I
.�k �.1 f •i .j •IrY
�r. I, I I •.n•nr Ir I s "s.l
I I
I
i
qi• Nw••frn•r rr« ..n �r u .r. .n.. r r•r. w ...n; rr•J
YI ,F LOCATION YAP
r•r1. a rY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Root
[ONTYLTNI• [NOW 1 YInn1
NYNNw1 W l[NY w r[ w YT
f ENGINEERING OF
COMPANY INC. _.r• BLACKHAWK APARTMENTS 2
0" 9"T I401 TNI[lt. YI�OYYN.I[. YYNI[MTA 56331 M •71.3000 IInI1MS
:.y, i
�v"4y r•
po4.
y1ATEp i
"TER T
a LUS
NORTH
SCALE: 1--50'
4 RIF
�j .•.,r!.. �d..• A LUSTS
T 1r
CLUB X10 w Y W
Q 0:C7
Z
w 1 12 6j7
r w m
go
'm X
Va
SITE DATA
r a wrn w au•r..• r
some •fir•. a wwerr n`
►YfH.VC 16 wr...r uMrs
't 11 bw .r ur■ r•u.r. w
Fit
17
p ,rV IUSTE 0 he PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN i
11�1 a0 M
CLU EA H: 21
v .1 u, ED aNia'ara
KORSUNMY t d r.rn n,an.+ M -4• W-UE lap'
yy y L
W 7
f
AR N CHKTE r°r BLACKHAWK APARTMENT$
M1 of oav ol
l,,r .r,
11'y r•rr a rrwr rrw .r.w -•w w EAOAN. MINNESOTA —r
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: JOHANNES ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: GOPHER SMELTING JOHN TAPPER
LOCATION: PART OF THE SW'k OF SECTION 13
EXISTING ZONING: P.D. UNDER THE GOPHER -EAGAN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 17,1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the
Johannes Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 5.4 acres of land. The
lots would be located west of Elrene Rd. and north of Elrene Ct.
ZONING LAND USE: The land is part of an area designated for multiple family
housing under the Gopher -Eagan Planned Development. The PD should be amended
to allow a single family use. The property is covered by oak trees and rapidly
slopes down from the road toward the west. To the south is Windtree Addition,
a single family development, vacant multiple family land (under the PD) is to
the north and east, agricultural land lies to the west. The Comprehensive Guide
Plan designates the parcel as residential with a density range of 3 6 units
per acre.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The project meets all the setback and lot size criteria of
an R -1 zone.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The grading over this proposed development will have a minimum
impact on the overall existing drainage pattern of this proposed development.
All drainage over this proposed development eventually reaches a depressed
area bordering the west edge of Lot 2. This inundated depression is incorported
in the City's master storm sewer plan as pond JP -33. This pond presently
has no positive gravity overflow outlet.
Staff recommends that the existing 18 -inch storm sewer presently outletting
onto Lot 1 of this proposed development be extended to the normal water
elevation of pond JP -33. This project must be performed under City contract
since it is a part of the City's trunk storm sewer system. Staff also recommends
the proposed storm sewer draining Johannes Court be connected into this
trunk storm sewer extention.
UTILITIES: The existing 9 -inch sanitary sewer within Elrene Road can provide
sanitary sewer service to accommodate basement elevations of approximately
880.
Water main may be supplied to this development by connecting into the existing
16 -inch trunk water main located along the westerly side of Elrene Road.
PLANNING ENGINEERING REPORT JOHANNES ADDITION
OCTOBER 17, 1984
PAGE TWO
STREETS: This proposed development will be responsible for upgrading its
half of Elrene Road to City collector streets standards. Johannes Court
shall be constructed to City standards for residential streets.
RIGHT OF WAY /EASEMENTS: Right of way for Elrene Road presently exists as
a highway easement deed. Therefore, staff would recommend that this 80 -foot
right of way be dedicated with this proposed plat. Right of way as shown
Johannes Court meets all City minimum requirements.
A 20 -foot utility easement will be required to be dedicated over any existing
storm sewer, its extention, and this development's proposed lateral storm
sewer. In addition, a ponding and utility easement will be required to
be dedicated to encompass the high water elevation (848.0) of pond JP -33.
ASSESSMENTS: The following table lists the trunk area and trunk related
assessments which are the responsibility of this proposed development.
Final assessment rates and amounts will be determined by the rates in effect
at the time of final platting and the net final platted area. The final•
rate for the lateral benefit from the trunk storm sewer will be determined
based on final construction costs.
Johannes Addition
Assessment Summary Table
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 217,800 S.F. $0.045 /S.F. 9,801
Lateral Benefit from 460 F.F. $10.84 /F.F. 4,986
Trunk Water Main
Lateral Benefit from 460 F.F. $13.10 /F.F. 6,026
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Total Estimated Assessments 20
All remaining costs for all public improvements to this proposed development
will be the sole responsibility of this development.
kf
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS JOHANNES ADDITION
I. A public improvement project for storm sewer extension shall be authorized
prior to final plat approval.
2. A 20 -ft. wide utility easement shall be dedicated over all storm sewer
lines along with a ponding and utility easement dedicated to encompass
the HWL for pond JP -33.
3. An 80 ft. right -of -way shall be dedicated for Elrene Road.
4. This development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer and
lateral benefit from trunk water main and sanitary sewer.
5. All costs associated with internal lateral utility improvements and
street improvements, indicating the widening of the west half of Elrene
Rd.,shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
6. This preliminary plat shall become an amendment to the Gopher Eagan
Planned development to allow the R -1 use.
s
f< •gay, Yt• a4/ /..T
GUN CLUB
yu
LAKE fnU F
i
COMMERCIAL r"
PLANNED pEVELOPMENT
I I.1[ AC nEQ c.C:�.L 7T 7
Ind
EExvDEA afS }'1
Q i I f rt CE1R r
Ind.
E7 N j i
a F14
Ind.
yJLSTF..✓Pi1%s R(.71D
R -N .rA
'R} P R -III .x4
Ind.
Ind. J R-111 _R -III
P Ng LB R -IQ R III
LB R -II R-II CSC
R-11 RII RL P' Y LEL R-11
LB QI r R -I
Ind.
R-111 '75 J 4?Miv R -I R-1 N, P
E
R -1 .cH1,5xx
R -11 a•ax� R-11
R-IV tj uj
R-1
f R -11 R -II N
NS
R -II R-1
rXE
+�r3 ��l7 2� 24
R -11
.r �tiE,' RT Kam, R -Q
E R -I
R -II—
1:
R -1}
II G7 i Nom'" E; Ng
R411
R
R 11f ►stil CSC /GB
Ilf R li:�� t _i R -III_ R -II
P
R -Ifl M fi
(fit tl�:.r.� P
R R-1
i L..•, E II
A.
1
.oki• .w�
E�•I r F /�I CJ1.. .A ,1 .Ai f U .;•P. G
R -I r: R -I
R -1 P
R -II UP r, R -II
R -f R -II
w
r
x+
d
iROSEMWN I
LEY
4" R ��c -174 F LO 0 Y� >4<I.'`�
i I
1 1 J
R -1
y
R 3 P K a K �L, A
sco -4 HILL L I L
WE COTT PD
i. f�E
a
GARDEN Lf TS
T.
S.A. R. 63A
PWOL-
PK L
V jam♦ ;,��w'.•
WEST PUBLISHIN s
1 D _y Ist ADD.
A
1
1
,mo �c Y ..yr•�, "r F'-�y 7w.�
1 y C., 1 T •'a 1 b. a�•�. r �.Z •r 'r.p
Y ti r 1{ ,1 I l 1 l� 1• q0. f•rKf, 1
rN at.
.1 1 'or 10STAIAL
w•. -y a r :1�. ''�7 Y r ti '}b 17 1{ .i_ Z I 146 1
t rr'� I OFFICE
r _—�61 ,JEa►�.'�.•'� .ti+..�. 'e v:, is 1..1 i .'O .L:3 �u t
i t
d 4 1 7! 1 MIXED
f 11 S 111 Now
h�� �.'3 ;:.I� Vii/ `ti t 4; 13 12: 6 :J- PARK -PI
•r. 3 F* t�? INDUST
I� I 3 c� `L i 1y 111 ....a_.__.._.i 1
i 't V t STREETS
�.ta TOTAL
5 13
21 4 r 7 13 sr 1
'4 ;�1.`1 .J •1 .1 l,. i i 1�:( 711, .1•;�•
Industrial 40 �L nort P
e�tf•
revised Park
Gopher
-Eagan i„:�oo'
g Residential
o :oo eoo i000
i
Co
Hol
1 I I I I I I 1 gym\ b I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 11 I
J a I I 1� j I I I I I I I 1 w V 1 c�•
Op
I A
xP
zx
o
Lf
I
*�Q
7 I I I I I 1' I I I I I I l I i I I w Gov��c
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III �o s
I I I I I I X 1 1 1 1� N a �o`��' ��11
I I 11 I 1 I 1 o
NOTE:
o_
r
�E- 9'
I L S
o
i I
i i i r I I I
i 0
I Cj I
-12
2 s E -14 GbP -AN
s PAR K
�E- I
ESC M ILL
Q SiC )TT
WE I
CAF +95 E 16 I G 7 LQREN`
HILLS -26 J PLACE
CO G R S E GARDEN LOTS
K.S.-
j J-27 s..
J -13 j\
4-20
Al
ah
-18
9 ADD
J-22
J 1� 6 1�1-- L 11 l 1
t AD/
4
23
R
J -34 i J -37
J 21
J -35
J 3 2
Uj
t
23
Z LEGEND
SAN. SEWER 12"
Over 9"
Monhole
N WATER MAIN
B
Over 6"
Hydrant
Gate Valve --ice
GV TIE CARD N0.
182
12" STORM SEWER
Over 12" 15"
18• Manhole
Catch Bann --0
i
1
gip'
F 1,G 2 !878
I 48
I HIL S. LANE
BOUT i
H 11 L S
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CEDAR SPACE CENTER ADDITION
APPLICANT: NORSE DEVELOPMENT PETER STALLAND
LOCATION: PART OF THE SWk of SECTION 18
EXISTING ZONING: L -I (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 16, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for
Cedar Space Center Addition consisting of 3 industrial lots on approx. 13 acres
of land located between New Cedar Ave. and Nicols Rd., south of the C,St.,P,M, &O
railroad tracks. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 10 self- storage buildings with a
caretaker's residence and office along Nicols Rd.
ZONING LAND USE: The proposed self storage use is permitted in a Light Indust-
rial District. A special permit would be necessary for the.caretaker's residence.
This land is bordered by L -I land with a residence to the SE of the property along
Nicols Rd.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The proposal meets all the setback and lot coverage require-
ments of a L -I District. The 74,560 sq. ft. of buildings cover 29% of the site.
A turnaround area will be required at the end of Space Center Rd.
SITE PLANNING: Access to Lot 3 is off of Nicols Rd. while Lots 1 2 take access
from a proposed dead end street (Space Center Rd.) The land gently slopes from
Nicols west toward a small creek at the rear of the property. The property will
be enclosed by a security fence with a gate along Nicols Rd.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: Grading over this proposed development will maintain
existing westerly drainage patterns. Presently, all drainage is directed
into an existing drainage way bisecting Lot 2. This drainage way flows
through a 54" diameter culvert under the railroad tracks and eventually
into Pond AP -39. A positive gravity overflow outlet is in place for this
pond.
Because the existing drainage corridor bisecting Lot 2 accomodates drainage
from approximately 25 adjacent acres in addition to this development, it
appears that oversizing of a storm sewer system for this development is
necessary. City policy considers any storm sewer diameters in excess of
24" to be the responsibility of the City's Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. Preliminary
calculations indicate that a 30 diameter storm sewer may be required.
Subsequently, the oversizing from 24" to 30 will be the responsibility of the
City's Trunk The impact on the Storm Sewer Trunk Fund will be determined
upon completion of detailed design of the storm sewer system and site improve
ments for this proposed development.
Engineering Report Cedar Space Center Addition
October 16, 1984
Page 2
It appears that a portion of this proposed development is located within
the flood plane district. Although it is not clearly defined on our flood
plain map, staff has ascertained that the flood plain elevation is at 720.
This elevation juts into this development to encompass most of the drainage
Swale through Lot 2. This flood plain area can be filled in provided proper
storm sewer is constructed.
UTILITIES: Figure 2 illustrates the location of this development with respect
to existing utilities. This figure shows a 15" trunk sanitary sewer line
running into the Metro Waste Commission's meter station. However, this
sanitary sewer line is not deep enough to provide service to this proposed
development. Subsequently, this developer will be required to obtain a
permit from the Metropolitan Waste Commission to connect into the Burnsville
interceptor.
Water main will have to be extended along Nicols Road from the Silver Bell
Road intersection. Staff recommends that the 12 existing trunk water main
be extended across Nicols Road with the lateral water main being constructed
along the west side of Nicols Road to service this development. Since this
main will be a dead end line and it is unknown as to what will develop on
Lots 1 and 2, staff recommends this water main be an 8" diameter main to
provide for proper fire flows and pressures.
STREETS: Existing access to this proposed development will be from Nicols
Road. This road is under the City's jurisdiction and is presently a rural
two —lane bituminous surfaced roadway. Staff does not feel this development
would merit the upgrading of Nicols Road at this time.
Staff recommends the proposed internal street, Space Center Rd., be a cul —de —sac
and renamed Space Center Court. The cul —de —sac will provide better turning
movements for snow plows and emergency vehicles. This proposed roadway
shall be constructed to City standards.
RIGHT —OF— WAY /EASEMENTS: A 60 —ft. right —of —way for Space Center Ct. shall
be dedicated along with a 60 —ft. radius cul —de —sac. No additional right —of —way
will be required for Nicols Road. The reason for this being that MnDOT
has turned back the right —of -way of old Cedar Ave. (Hwy. 36) to the City.
All easements shall be dedicated as required by code.
ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments have been levied over this proposed
development. Subsequently, this development shall be responsible for all
costs of public improvements within and adjacent to it, with the exception
of trunk storm sewer oversizing and the extension of the 12" trunk water
main to cross Nicols Rd.
If this development is approved it is likely assessments would result for
the water main extension for parcel 010 -55, 011 -59, 012 -59, and 020 -60 of
the southwest quarter of Section 18. Preliminary assessment amounts will
be available when a public hearing is held for the water main extension
for this proposed development.
ii
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS CEDAR SPACE CENTER ADDITION
1. A public improvement project for water main /storm sewer installation
shall be authorized prior to final plat approval.
2. This development's grading and drainage plans shall be reviewed by the
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with
internal streets and utilities and all lateral benefit from water main
and storm sewer improvements.
4. One residential unit for on -site caretaker shall be allowed for securing
purposes.
5. A detailed landscaping plan and adequate landscape bond shall be submitted
for City approval and not released until one year after completion of
the planting.
6. Space Center Drive shall either be a cul -de -sac or a provision for adequate
vehicle turnaround, approved by the City, shall be provided. Space Center
Drive shall be named Space Center Court.
�f
Ou
a
I
'r. {iii ti� �t.������
r
A Mp
i'�1� R7��� •*r
son t�
J//
w Olson
r S I r1 moss
so
�1► I�� �vi� iiu ■■■fir• n�111?��::��::
a 1 Cif .T'T .ow
1
A
o
P� r� O
�a� tr t i '7�
2
3 MN. 04
R/W PL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
i
V 4w•r
�4 r._�. -_._M .w�+. lr .'.r Wr .a.r .r �r.._w~�rr .w~_r
N• wMr w.rr. r.r. rr..l wr!u�
_u .r......
M r. i ✓r rr .•i.r .v.r rr w tir....r_ w
yr w rr r r..• r. ur r rr a1.. V rY r..rr r' i.�.�rr. y r r�
r• O1•a M{F.000 FOR:
i0»f01T1 {MOIM lw NORSE
7a»
a -d L0» wro r._.��:� PRELIMINARY PLAT
PNGINEERING ROBE
i" CEDAR SPACE CENTER ADDITION :'s= DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, INC.
0100 {YT 9460 {T0{ {T. {IM ML{. »IMLIOL SSW? /M .H -7000 rtr.aro.a _r {AOA» »»M.
f
M
f�
r.Iw� rr ru wr•
rr. -rr. w._ rr. ru r __r GJ i�
r r rM1 r r.rM .r. r •.ft�
i
y� y o
C i
DOT r
4 `a, qFP
MEI •L /ON:
i fl08E wE•u6EE w LAND fwE6folE PRELIMINARY GRADING d1 UTILITY PLAN NORSE
ENGINEERING CEDAR SPACE CENTER ADDITION s'' DEVELOPMENT
COMPRNY INC. s
n0. 9661 1466 $MIT. E1•MYNAE. MWKWIA SAW M 46E �1•N .tr•NN !A•AN WNN.
I
I
I
It
A.
TEE CT QQ O"A OIU 110E .'0 i
vu
ol
IL
J I ti`s w
•••`I M Nu
J
r" T
VV ILINT
1 I
1
a NEOl1100 E IME.E{ n. y,. r
RO E newrEEE tamp EOE YOSS f MI ►1G j1'UT1LITY� I»
C ED N i r ITIO .Q -99 NT 1
T*Q Etll 1.{. ETE941 ".61IL YIMMEE all M 22• *IV' •f 1 YINN
iNDI
du,
A -53
X A
54
L& f
;LL A -55 Ss
rl A
wO C
O
0
A
\r
GPS Q),
A �58 AG4N
t�U. /�i, N TAE
RE IN
I 'CHO L
JUNIOR I
I I
01 118
HIGH ODj
let
`l 1
U r f,
r_. :7 v fist
LEGEND I
N i SAN. SEWER 12,.
Over 9..
Manhole
C WATER MAIN g^
r J
Over 6
Hydroni
Gate Valve
i GV TIE CARD NO.
18
STORM SEWER 15"
Over 12'
Manhole
Catch Bosm
BLOOMINGTON
INTERCEPTOR
r
'A� is
BURNSVILLE
INTERCEPTOR
65'4
1
654
1 2°
I
F
IG.2
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE BLACKHAWK PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
APPLICANT: ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. SCOTT ANDERSON)
LOCATION: PART OF THE EAST'k OF THE SEk SECTION 16,
LYING BETWEEN I -35E PILOT KNOB RD.
EXISTING ZONING: R -II UNDER THE BLACKHAWK PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 23, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 18, 1984
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The first application submitted is a request to amend or change
the zoning in the Blackhawk Park P.D. Presently, the landuse designated in this
P.D. is R -II (mixed residential) with a density of 3 6 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is requesting to amend the Planned Development to allow '.a
72,000 sq. ft. high tech production building. Located on Lot 1, consisting of
6.6 acres and is requesting that R -4 (residential multiple) be allowed as the
use on Outlot A, 13.4 acres. The second application submitted is a request for
Preliminary Plat. The plat will consist of approx. 20 acres of which Lot 1 would
be 6.6 acres and contain the 72,000 sq. ft. high tech production building. Out
lot A, 13.4 acres, would be the remainder of the parcel presently not proposed
for development with this application.
ZONING LAND USE: In review of this 20 acres parcel, it appears that a portion
is within the Blackhawk Park P.D. north and a small portion of the property could
be outside of the P.D. determining where the actual road right -of -way is for
I -35E. In either case, the property would either require amending the zoning
to allow the high tech production facility as a permitted use within this area,
or a new P.D. which would spell out the high tech production building as a per-
mitted use. Amendment of the Planned Development or a rezoning to a P.D. would
be required.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this parcel as an R -II (mixed residential)
with a density of 3 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposal submitted is a
deviation from the Land Use Guide, therefore, an amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan would be required if this were approved and accepted as a permitted use
within this geographical area.
CODE COMPLIANCE: The proposed 72,000 sq. ft. building covers approx. 25% of the
lot area. The lot coverage allowed in all of the zoning districts range from
20 35 therefore, this would be within the perimeters of the coverage allowed.
The only setback problem that Staff forsees, would be the NW corner of the
building abutting I -35E. In review of this setback requirement, 50' would be
required and the applicant is showing a 40 This is the least impacted area
of the site putting the building and parking as far away from the residential
property along Pilot Knob Rd.
PLANNING ENGINEERING REPORT CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
OCTOBER 23, 1984
PAGE 2.
PARKING: In trying to relate the parking spaces to this building, the applicants
indicated that 30,000 sq. ft. would be used as office and approx. 40,000 sq.
ft. for warehouse. A.D.I has indicated that they have worked with 3 parking
spaces per 1,000 and should be adequate to serve parking for this facility.
It is also Staff's understanding that there will be an initial 120 employees
with a potential of 225. In calculating the 3 spaces per 1,000, you only arrive
at 216 parking spaces. Staff suggests that a minimum of 223 with a potential
of 250 should be provided which would be approx. 3.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.
ACCESS: The proposed access was originally off of Pilot Knob Rd. South of
Crestridge Lane. Staff suggested that the original access should not be allowed
and minimum access should align with Crestridge. Staff is suggesting that the
main access should be off of Englert Rd., which is a dedicated public street
running on the south property line of this 20 acre parcel.
Outlot A. The applicants are proposing that a land use designation or zoning
be granted to Outlot A at this time. They have requested that R -4 be the zoning
permitted or. this remaining parcel. The applicants have done no site plans or
preliminary layouts as to how many units would fit on this specific parcel.
The options Staff can see is that the applicant submit a tentative site plan
showing locating of buildings, number of units and parking prior to the R -4
zoning that no zoning be given at this time until a plan is brought in or that
a less intense land use be granted more in conformance with the Comprehensive
Guide Plan.
SUMMARY: There has been a specific request for a high tech production building
containing 72,000 sq. ft. The APC should review this request as to how it would
fit at this loction. If the proposed building and land use makes sense, then
the APC should review this zoning change and Comprehensive Guide Plan change
for this specific location.
GRADING /DRAINAGE: The proposed grading plan for this development reveals en-
croachment onto pond JP -3 ponding area. This encroachment occurs along the
northern portion of JP -3 and results in a 12% reduction of storage volume for
a 100 year frequency storm. Staff would recommend this 12% loss of storage
volume be compensated for by enlarging the pond where practical.
Internal drainage will be collected by a laterial storm sewer constructed as
a part of this development and directed into pond JP -3. Pond JP -3 should be
able to accomodate this drainage since it is connected by a positive gravity
outlet to Fish Lake and subsequently to the Minnesota River valley.
UTILITIES: Figure 1 reveals existing utilities located within the proximity
of this proposed development to provide service to it. Sanitary sewer service
can be provided from the trunkline located within Englert Rd. Watermain may
be supplied extending it from the trunkline located within Pilot Knob Rd.
Staff recommends the extension of watermain along Englert Road from Pilot Knob
Rd. to the east entrance of this development. This is because later on in this
report, Staff will require the only access to this deveopment be from Englert
Rd. Staff also recommends Englert Rd. be upgraded to handle the traffic from
this proposed development. It is advisable that the watermain be installed at
PLANNING ENGINEERING REPORT CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
OCTOBER 23, 1984
PAGE 3.
that time. Otherwise, the preliminary utility layout appears adequate.
STREETS: This proposed development abutts Englert Rd. on its south and Pilot
Knob Rd. on a portion of its easterly boundary. Englert Rd. is currently a
gravel surfaced City street while Pilot Knob is a bituminous paved, two lane
rural, County highway.
Staff strongly recommends against access to this development off of Pilot Knob
Rd. as proposed. The offset intersection created by this proposed driveway and
Crestrigde La. would, in the opinion of Staff, create a traffic hazard. The
average daily traffic volume of Pilot Knob Rd. is 5,300 per day according to
the 1983 traffic count. Adding up to 600 more trips per day (200 employees x
3 trips /day) in this vicinity, would pose traffic hazards. Staff is recommending
the only access to this development be off of Englert Rd. until such time right
of -way can be obtained opposite Crestridge La. to provide a 4 way intersection
at this point.
Now that Englert Rd. is proposed to be the major access point for this develop-
ment, it would be appropriate for Englert Rd. to be upgraded to City standards
to the entrance for this development. With this increased traffice, Staff
further recommends that a right turn and left turn lane be established along
Pilot Knob Rd. at the Englert Rd. intersection. This will require Staff and
the Developer to work closely with the Dakota County Hwy. Dept.
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENTS: Staff would recommend that adequate right -of -way as
determined by the Dakota County Highway Engineer be dedicated with this plat
for Pilot Knob Rd. Staff will require a 33' half right -of -way be dedicated for
Englert Rd. along with this plat.
Adequate easements shall be required to be dedicated over all the public utilities.
A ponding and utility easement will be required to be dedicated to encompass
high water elevation of 845 of pond JP -3. Other easements shall be dedicated
as required by code.
ASSESSMENTS: This proposed development will be responsible for the assessments
as listed in the following table. The final assessment amount will be determined
by the rates in effect at the time of final platting and the areas of the final
plat.
This development shall be responsible for all costs of constructing utilities
within this development and its share of the Englert Rd. street and watermain
improvements. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in detail
with the APC at the October 23, 1984 meeting.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE
DESCRIPTION Quantity Rate Amount
Parcel 01600 010 -76
A. Trunk Area Water Upgrading 4.69 Ac $1,710 /Ac 8,020
B. Trunk Area Storm Sewer Upgrading 204,300 S.F. $0.023 /S.F. 4,700
C. Lat'l Benefit from Trunk Watermain 60 F.F. $17.87/F.F. $1,072
PLANNING ENGINEERING REPORT CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
OCTOBER 23, 1984
PAGE 4.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE (continued)
Parcel 01600 010 -78 Quantity Rate Amount
A. Trunk Area Water 1.64 Ac $2,830/Ac 4,641
B. Trunk Storm Sewer 71,440 S.F. $0.023 /S.F. 1,643
TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS $20,076
(1) Difference between Comm. /Ind. Residential Rates
RECOMMENDATIONS CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
1. The applicant /owner enter into a Planned Development Agreement or
Amendment to the conditions of this specific development plan.
2. The archtectural rendering used at the October 23, 1984 APC Meeting,
be attached as an exhibit to the P.D. agreement.
3. That 219 parking spaces be provided with this facility with an expansion
area showing 30 40 additional spaces which could be constructed at a
later date..
4. Only 1 access from Englert Rd be allowd to this facility.
5. A detailed landscape plan and adequate landscape bond shall be submitted
and not released until 1 year after the landscaping has been completed.
6. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment be accepted by the Metropolital Council.
7. The plat should be reviewed by MnDot because it abutts state right -of -way.
8. The loss of storage volume of pond JP -3 resulting from site grading must
be compensated for.
9. Englert Rd. should be upgraded, including watermain extension, to City
standards.
10. Adequate half right -of -way as determined by the Dakota County highway
Engineer along with a 30' half right -of -way for Englert Rd.
11. A 20 utility easement shall be dedicated over the sanitary sewer,
watermain storm sewer.
12. A ponding easement encompassing the H.W.L. level for pond JP -3 be
dedicated with this plat.
13. This development shall be rexponsible for trunk area water, water storm
sewer upgrading laterial benefit from trunk watermain.
14. All costs associated with the installation of the internal public improve-
ments shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
w 4 MENDOTA TS
j RB LwL Ind
CENT
CLUB,
LAKE }yam•
�I LT05L
o/
j9E[RL aC [i. 141 1.HN�F
,W L-�? r y- Ind
L a 2[NNCEII •q+-1
s III L.
Ind.
j R
R N RI
!E!�[irWl Ind.
R&D R -IV
<2 LN
R.111
F L
Ind. NB B R 111 R
RI
r.-- R411 R-11 P L
-A
LB R-II CSC
t P
'.NW6Mi >L D RIC R- 11 7
RII R li •1
P LB I w R -1
1 RIII R -I
R L� r
RII RA r
ti
T=
Ind L ALL RIf R -N
C F�La S
R -IV r 2
i1
x N
nE
R -II n'• Rl A i
R 11
:��t R -III tJ
I�
;N Rg
R111 R -Iil R -Ilf R 1j r ..tji,*� R411 SC, /GB/
i Z 2
Ni
2
CSC -E R�I y•`
RtI .KRII RII ;a
N R -II
J RII NB ti. i 2 2 r Fa I
CSC
LB LB
RB RI
R-1 P b r
R,
:s m R -r R -tl
R-1. II;� R "1I
DNA
ROSEIAOtJN
tii n APPLE VALLEY 1
1, �..1, t+ EXHIBIT E
blackha
1 u� T P per
6�
414 171 j!t1\
93 67 3 628
al r o �z
1 le l+Y 1 1 1z� 3 �4 �`v, $T{. 8 8 r•.1�.. era., ae.. >�,•�ar
1 -35E Al
11y1 I yl N,�
�t� ,1 ,r Land Use
Residential
-F
R 1 S. F. (o -3
/a)
R-2 Mix. Res. (3 -6 eta)
R-3 Mix. Res. (6 -12 u/a)
R-4 Multiple (12+ u/a)
r l v l a�.
1 T Commercial
A N
f N.B Neighb. Bus.
GB Gen. Bus.
vm CSC Community Shop. Cntr
Park &Open Space (p)
N L' R 3
r t'* �n rr Trail 11{ IIIIIUUt 1111111Y11N1111111tl1
rte /�1 .•'1f
iz
A t
C M
e1 9v e. tK rf. ✓`�i^ V 111
,.�I' 1'• fy, i j 1. i 1
N-
VIOLET LANE vlolET
0 O 1
D
r
i
n
PROPOSED
BUILDING CRESTRIDOE LANE
0
0
t
0
c
m
W POND O
t
m a
n
a
PTSN
ENOLERI ROAD El
t
1 LANf
m
m t
W
0
O
u
S
a
V
J
II
K.LI 10 1!!T
I I...w snlry nw tN. Nw.0 PP.d 1lC61 BURNMN/EN DRIVE
PROGRESS ENGINEERI NG� INC.
twt I Al1l114 OOlwr uir
M IM d Oo lull N Mm.w. MITE 10.7 IIlVIMONO
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
BIMTSVILLE, MN 8091
LAND SURVEYORS IBIZI 435-&W nu N0 SHEET OF SHEETS
INT ER ST ATE 35 E PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
�s�
M 1. a.fY CY[Y
wlllOf N IN I[NY
B
O K
lD I
1
0
6Tt O�/
T
Z A
s I/IY YnIrI1M
w IY M IN H 111 N f.[tlw N, IYN1.1Y 21, 1«p tf,
N[ YYn.
troll, YIrY.nr, Y[-I, Y IN Nrywl furw, IIwW; tIL[rl tY Y
11 Y 1/i M IN N 1/1 N IN N 1/t I,Iry .11.1. .Ir[YI. YYYINII 01 IW6-
INI.IIIY .IMI N WI IL11 N. N -fl, ..[NIry Y N [vW YIN W[N[,
YII YYe4 6rw11.
Y Nt YMt M tN 1 1/t w N N IA M tY N i/. It ftt1Y 11 I—wo 91
Y 11 1ir I «1 t MY M IN N,l� 1!? IW INI �[Nt t Nt II" 'N Ij1 1 r t l l'
I /.r f..Y w I Z 1 I nw tN NCI Yp ll.l .I1.
IN11 H I /I, YI.tY /w1 Y b ti �Ip INrpf. w[pl1 N p Y N t Y t l
1 N1. k «l Swt1, IM y.[. ��.It M. DIY
W Nrt. Ilry n ..11 L 1/., NY Iwl: tNp. b,t. -.11.1 °1t. N
Y Ilt Iwt; two[. l..l Yn.11rl .14 N 4q I Iw M [.11 H
1 tW IW b N 4rt Ilry IwIW; lwn[. N,w Ih Iwt Y Y1.1 If Ipl Nlry.
9
G
3�
d� NO.
r wo
DEVELOPER-
C 5 P N•
NILIWID AIOENSON, IN4
w sole s3
MN 163
[DEN MWNIE, M
Sunimfon 1 Y
M� DNVE' WG
FIINtlY1LLL MN 06337
0•;f YV[.c Yt rcn
PILOT
"'^Y/ w^ "Y Y'« Y• P i PROGRESS ENGINEERING,INC. No61 NmNHwEN DISVE AD 1
s
ti N w p W wn rpM.1N CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
Nt 1 N. WI I.Y..1 tryl wYn SUITE q) NNYNNY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS PRELIMINARY PLAT
w' suRNsvlLLE, MN 06331 Y.« EAGAN, MINNESOTA
LAND SURVEYORS M21435_105% ME No SHEET a sNEErs
39 E R.O.W.
ACCESS .I I
ALTER E
rF w.
r m
w c
ra
r"
6
u
rw
ir rt'
r.
0
C
n
f
r
9
A
0
9
O
a°
C
•:.M.MWL IDS
I
I ..Mr .nlrr .i..... N. ADI
PROGRESS ENGINEERING,INC. WO ewrouvEN DWW CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
W f .yl. <«•1 1y�.w•. r srrvw
PILOT i.. s CONSULTING ENGINEERS wrtE 103 10Mf PRELIMINARY SITE UTILITIES
y •URNSwLLE, MN 00337
LAND SURVEYORS EAGAN, MIN
16121 •30 -6000 flt[ NOS SHEET Of SHEETS
i
�rl
OPP lo
I
1 I ►►1111 I I fl I 1
J
lt l Ito p° 6 IJOMT POLE
wN 0
IS O
rF rule rnr
'I 1 ti°'� ""'"'•rl"�•r.o.� PROGRESSENGINEERING,INC.
6wEH tlr� CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS
4.1 1 t•. Vir nrl.t.r.1 L�Iti.. '.8r Kt'IraH.
o r y CONSULTING ENGINEERS S pf PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
u:
LAND SURVEYORS WMAVILLE .N 55mr WN MINNESOTA
16121435 MLE Ho- �It2 SHEET OF. q SHEETS
s�
now
WA imawsm
u■■■
Sol
It
a
a u ■/I
1
For
old
Mir
d e
it A M
■1
r r1 ��n �I�1►,
LEGEND
SAN. SEWER t2
Over 9"
Monnole
WATER MAW B
WET D UCK�v
Over 6" TAF
Hydrant 4
Gate Valv 849 G.V. TIE CARD N0.
STORM SEWER 182 85C
Over 12° —Y 15
Manhole
Catch Basin
�Q
CRESTRI
Ot 2
�LV Z a
CC
o r�
Q7
Q WET TAP
947
15
O
RD.
FISH LA roc.
s•
FIG. 2 1.3
1
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT UTILITY BUILDING
APPLICANT: NORTHWESTERN BELL COMPANY
LOCATION: PART OF THE SW'k OF THE SWk OF SECTION 23
EXISTING ZONING: UNDER LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 17, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 23, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG INGRAHAM, ASSISTANT PLANNED
REVIEWED BY: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a Special
Permit to allow a 290 sq. ft. telephone utility building on 6,750 sq. ft. of
land located along the west side of Lexington Ave., 300' north of Diffley Rd.
COMMENTS: The 14' high brick building would be accessed by a 12' bituminous
drive off of Lexington Ave. The structure would be setback 50' from the Lexing-
ton right -of -way and 15' from the site property lines.
If approved, the permit should be subject to the following conditions:
1) A minimum 50' building setback shall be maintained from the R.O.W. of
Lexington Ave.
2) All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
..ari
r
B out
110
■WT ff
C
,ow 01111
off
Noll
inn
.i����•!!
aisle X111___
Wank
lillit-
AT
i
T .i d
d
8o, Q I.
1 1
3
Ma
1
m
560
7
PROPOSED..
17 8 DCT
TEC4aN`( GtOSE
5Q-O
NOR :THWESTERN BELL
-.S ITE PLA N
E A A N S LC
0
0
f In Suite 100, 2611 Central Ave. N.E.
0 h o Minneapolis, MN 55418 781-6696
OC�OQ 1��� LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN
UPDATING SYSTEM
PARK SYSTEM PLAN
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
The method of updating the Park System Plan may vary from section to
section depending on the level of activity in each.. Some sections,
specifically Inventory and Analysis, Acquisition and Development,
and Funding and Implementation, will require major effort over one
and two year cycles to keep them accurate (at least during this
active stage of Eagan's development). General updating techniques
are outlined below followed by a section by section application of
the techniques.
UPDATING TECHNIQUES
1. Addendum.
This method involves a yearly review of each section. In
sections with minor activity, the review should result in the
completion of an addendum inserted at the end of each section.
These addenda may consist of a summary of new information,
issues, problems, and developments that have occurred over the
year as discussed by the Park Commission. The task of creating
an addendum will be far less laborious if Park Commission
members make pencil notes in the margin of their plans all year
long. Addenda information will then be readily available at the
time of revisons or rewriting.
2. Revised Pages.
Certain individual pages of plan, particularly charts and
figures, will need to be revised in order to communicate
progress and current status. These will actually replace
original pages in the plan. These pages should be dated and
possibly even printed in a different color to highlight the fact
that they are updates.
3. Sectional or Complete Plan Rewrite.
There is no definite time period at which all or parts of a park
system plan need rewriting. However, a rewrite should occur
when a City is reaching the end of the planning period or when
the park system progresses to the point that plan or individual
sections no longer seem to address the real issues relating to
park and recreation. Rewrites of this entire plan are expected
to occur in five year intervals (which coordinates with the 10
year interval of the U.S. Census). This would place the first
rewrite in 1987.
UPDATING SYSTEM EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN
October 20, 1984 Page 2
Any updates or additions to the plan should be recorded on a log
located in the front of the plan document (probably just before the
Table of Contents). The record should include the date of the
update, the section in which it is located, page number, and some
identifying reference.
Example UPDATES AND ADDITIONS SINCE ORIGINAL PRINTING
Date I Section Pagel Subject
1 -12 -85 Trails E -29 Fig. E -4 Comp.
Trails Plan
1 -30 -86 Pk. Rec. Stand. H -15 1984 Addendum
UPDATING TECHNIQUES APPLICATION
SECTION A TACTICS STUDY: The tactics section is a statement of
major issues and directions of the park system. It is not
recommended that this section be rewritten until embarking upon a
complete rewrite of the plan. A yearly review of the section for
familiarity, discussion of margin notes, and issuing an addendum
(noting possible new issues and directions) is recommended.
SECTION B PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: This section is basically a
history, or documentation of specific activities, and not subject to
revision. However, yearly updates on public involvement activities
should be added to the back of the section, e.g. the public
involvement in the bond issue process, the priorities expressed by
the public with regard to development, and public comment regarding
master planning of the park sites.
SECTION C INVENTORY ANALYSIS: This section should be updated
relatively frequently since it is an indicator of the rate of
progress in the development of the park system. The section is
divided into three parts planning context, demographic context,
and park and recreation inventory. Updating the planning context
may be in the form of a yearly addendum summarizing major
.developments in the City's planning goals and ordinances. The
City's planner can be asked to help with this. Every two or three
years Chart C -1, the comparison of park dedication fees in the
metropolitan area, should be reviewed..
Figure C -1, Population Projections and Distribution, should be
revised every 2 years, since this information is vital to gauging
the validity of recreation projections. The revision should be
based on the best information from the City's planner. Much of the
rest of the information in the demographics is based on U.S. Census
information and can't be reliably revised until after the next
census.
UPDATING SYSTEM EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN
October 20, 1984 Page 3
The charts and figures of the park and recreation inventory should
be revised every two years to accurately assess trends. An addendum
noting changes in the system may be issued every other year. A
rewrite of the text analyzing the chart and figure information
should be done every four years.
SECTION D PONDS AND LAKES: Chart D -4 and D -5 of this section set
out the potential uses and recommended management techniques of each
pond and lake. The Park Commission may want to prioritize the lake
uses and actually set some goal dates. Prioritizing and goal
setting could be done every 3 to 5 years. A complete pond and lake
study won't need to be done more often than every five years except
on lakes with particular use potential. For example, the clarity of
a lake may be retested yearly if it is felt to have good swimming
potential in a desirable location. Retesting results or any
progress made toward achieving better water quality, access, or fish
management should be noted in a yearly addendum.
SECTION E TRAILS: Developments to the trail system should be
noted in a yearly addendum. Such developments could include new
trails built within the year, new problems encountered with proposed
trail corridors, new problems with existing trails, etc. Every two
years Figure E -4, Comprehensive Trail System, and Figure E -5,
Snowmobile and Horse Trails, should be revised if a significant
number of changes have taken place.
SECTION F SPECIAL USE FACILITIES: This section of the plan states
that the development of most special use facilities will depend on
impetus from strong interest groups, public requests, and Council
decisions. This will probably not occur until the city is well on
the way to providing the basic park facilities. The status of the
park standards is a good indicator of the readiness of the City to
support a major special use facility. The list of recommended
special use facilities in the plan should be reviewed for
familiarity and an addendum consisting of the collection of observed
new or unusual activities should be made up yearly. The S.C.O.R.P.
is reissued every five years and is a valuable tool in evaluating
this section.
SECTION G PUBLIC PRIVATE RECREATION: This section, particularly
the policies, should be reviewed yearly. An addendum should be made
up noting possible changes in policies, availability of recreation
facilities, and programs under other jurisdictions.
SECTION H PARK AND RECREATION STANDARDS: Review standards (chart
H -2) yearly and note in an addendum any possible ideas on
appropriateness of the standards for Eagan. Do not change the
standards capriciously as it will affect the facility needs
projections and distribution plan.
UPDATING SYSTEM EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN
October 20, 1984 Page 4
However, if the standards become obviously meaningless, revision of
several sections should be embarked upon simultaneously.
SECTION I ACQUISITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Review this section
yearly and document the current status in an addendum. Typically
this section would be evaluated and rewritten in five years (halfway
to the 1990 planning goal). Due to the bond issue in Eagan, and the
speed at which development will be occurring, this section will
probably need to be evaluated sooner and more frequently. In fact,
development should be evaluated during this coming year and then
every 2 years after that during this highly active period.
SECTION J FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION: The evaluation of this
section should be a yearly task. This will, at the minimum, include
reviewing the policies, updating all charts to reflect the current
.financial and economic situation, reviewing the park dedication fee.
schedule, review development priorities, and status of funding
sources.
SECTION K MAINTENANCE Yet to be written.
SECTION L INDIVIDUAL PARK PLANS: Copies of new individual park
plans should be added to this section whenever they have been
accepted by the Park and Recreation Commission. For economy
reasons, printed copies can be made once every 1 or 2 years when
reprinting other parts of the Plan.
YEARLY YEARLY PAGE RED
SBMCN REVIEW ADD2UWADDTTICNS MUICNS SBMCN OQTffNIS
TACTICS Quick Probably not No When rewriting Watch for major
total plan changes in attitudes
PUBLIC When rewriting
INVCLVEMENT Quick Probably No total plan
INVR=
ANALYSIS
Pl=d% Chart G1, When rewriting
Context Moderate Probably every 2 -3 total plan
years
Demographic Charts, After 1990
Context Quick Maybe every 2 years census
Park Recreation. Charts Every 4-5
Inventory Thorou# Definitely Figures, years
every 2 years
PUCS If improvements Every five City may wish
LAKES Quick or retesting No years to set improvement
occurred. goals on lakes
TRAILS Moderate Definitely Charts, Whenever changes
every 2 years or problems
warrant it
SPBCTAL USE At time of When rewriting Review S.C.O.R.P.
F ACTL= Moderate Probably significant total plan every 5 years
development
PLELIC/PRIVATE At time of When rewriting
rmazEATICN Quick Probably si gnifican t total plan
development
PARKS R82ZEMON No, unless Every 4-5
STANDARDS Moderate Probably revising years
projections
distributions
ACQJZS CN Charts Fig. Every 2 years
DEVIICFM W Thorough Definitely every two during active
years stage
FUNDD G Every 2 year's
DIUM 9ATICN Thorough Definitely Every year during active
stage
MADURWU
DUPENDENT Add whenever accepted
PARK PLANS reprinted
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROGER MARTIN, CHAIRMAN ADVISORY PARKS REC COMM
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 1984
RE: KEHNE HOUSE
At the October 2 City Council meeting, a report was presented on the Kehne
House. At that time, the City Council asked that the Advisory Commission
determine the feasibility of installing a security system at some time in the
future and the probable cost for that system. I would like to proceed and
present you with the following general information, a map of Patrick Eagan
Park, the Commission's proposed plan and general cost estimate by phase,
potential uses for the house and the letter from Mr. Geagan concerning the
cost for a security sytem.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Patrick Eagan Park is a 105 acre park which was acquired in several large
parcels with the last acquisition some time in 1977 or 1978. It is a park
which will undoubtedly be used for passive purposes such as hiking trails,
cross country skiing, nature study, etc. rather than athletic purposes. The
buildings within the park include the old McCarthy House, currently used by
the Eagan Athletic Association for meetings and storage. Because it is a log
cabin and one of Eagan's first houses, it is possible that a historical site
could eventually be established for this structure.
s Y T4e other building is known as the Kehne House after the original
designer /owner. This house is currently occupied by renters. The house is
designed so it could be converted into a public use facility. The data
included herein is provided so the Mayor and City Council members may make a
decision concerning the ultimate resolution and disposition of the Kehne House
which will be in the best interest of the citizens of Eagan.
PROPOSED PLAN:
The Parks Recreation Commission proposes that the Kehne House be upgraded to
a public facility for parks and recreation purposes needed within the next
three to four years. While the structure has its limitations and problems,
its structure is sound and stable, holding limitless potential for use.
The renovation program can be accomplished is two phases. The first phase
would upgrade portions of the building that would not require the renters to
move out. The second phase would be done at a time when the building could
not be occupied. Use as a public facility would begin at the end of the
second phase of the renovation program.
The first phase is recommended to be completed as quickly as possible to make
the structure more energy efficient and therefore, reduce the cost to the City
for heating. The second phase would be completed when the facility is
required for use by the City Parks Recreation Department and programs. This
is estimated to be three to four years away when the need for the facility is
evident. The cost to replace this structure would be about twice that of the
proposed renovation. We estimate the renovation cost to be about $30 to $33 a
square foot.
The work accomplished in the two phased approach to improvement would not be
redundant. In other words, work completed in the first phase would not have
to be changed in the next phase. A breakdown of the items which could be done
in each of the phases, including the architect's cost, are shown on the next
page. The funding source is recommended to come from the park site fund.
Work Completed by Phase
Phase 1
Insulation 4,000
Built up roof 8,000
Door, window replacement 7,000
Septic system 5,000
Fireplace improvement 3,200
$27,200
Architect fee (10 2,720
Contingency (10 2,720
$32,640
Phase 2
Demolition 8,450
Ramp (for handicap access) 7,000
Rough carpentry 2,600
Ceramic floors (in bathrooms) 1,500
Carpet 5,000
Floor tile (Kitchen) 4,000
Painting 1,500
Folding partitions 2,000
Plumbing 4,000
Drinking fountain 400
Electrical 3,500
Heating 4,000
Security system 2,000
$45,950
Architect fee (10 4,595
Contingency (10 4,595
$55,140
PROPOSED USES:
The Parks Recreation Commission has identified a range of potential uses for
the Kehne House. These potential uses are intended only to identify general
areas, but uses beyond this are probable.
A CENTER FOR ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES:
1. Environmental learning, i.e. classroom setting for review of outdoor
experiences.
2. Crafts skills development, i.e. nature identification, natural food
preparation, birdhouse construction, etc..
3. Special interest groups meetings, i.e. senior citizens, clubs, sporting
groups, social organizations or other.
4. Focal point for seasonal activity, i.e. Easter egg hunts, winter sledding
parties, the Haunted House for Halloween tours.
5. Cultural arts crafts, i.e. seasonal craft programs, wood carving classes
or other craft related activities.
FOCAL POINT FOR NON— ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES:
1. Chalet /warming house for cross country skiers and snowshoers.
2. Check in point for hikers and bird watchers in summer programs.
RESOURCE OPPORTUNITY WITH EDUCATIONAL, RECREATIONAL CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS
The Parks Recreation Advisory Commission is convinced that a renovated house
could provide for a host of unique and desired recreational opportunities for
virtually every age range within the community.
s y
Chairman, A visory arks Recreation Commission
RM /js
CC: Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks Recreation
P1 lice department
JAY M.BERTHE
ChM of FWW
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
AbNnYntM GOWe
1ty of eaga KENNETH D.AS2MANN
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
15 October 1984
TO: Ken Vraa, Parks Director
FROM: Administrative Captain
SUBJECT: ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE of the KEHN HOUSE, 1200 Deerwood
After looking at the plans for the Kehn House, I would suggest
using a motion detector. A motion detector would give you the
greatest range without having to place detection devices on
each window and door. I called Electro Watchman, who is our
service contractor for the police department, and they gave
me the following prices:
1. Installation of motion detectors approximately $1,500
to $2,000.
2. Module free.
3. Monthly maintenance charges on per -call basis.
4. Northwestern Bell private phone lines $14.10 per month.
Northwestern Bell installation charges $350 plus time and
materials.
I think to be on the safe side you should consider budgeting
approximately $2,300 for alarm installation at the Kehn residence.
Keep in mind while looking at these figures that they are estimates
and Electro Watchman did not look at the property.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Patrick J. Geagan
PJG /vk
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
+J
UNIMPFO'�ED
McC RTHY i
DEERWOOD ROAD
a� HOUSE''
XW
Hi6Hw.r
i
TO PILOT K o6 RO KEHNE
H OUSE
",Golf, 1".
ar, N E.".
PATRICK O.CROSSS C0UN,7R SKI TRAILS
EA�AN
PARK
CHI M E•... M [.p.
MARK I..
NcRrti
FIGU E1
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROGER MARTIN, CHAIRMAN ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1984
RE: NATURAL AMENITIES GREEN SPACE
The City of Eagan is fortunate to have many natural amenities such as lakes,
woodlands, rolling hills and picturesque settings that make our community a
very attractive place in which to live and work. This is part of the reason
that we are the fastest growing community in the state. As members of the
Advisory Parks Recreation Commission(as I am sure members of the City
Council are), we are concerned about the preservation of existing trees and
the problems caused by erosion in several of our lakes. We have been
concerned about developments which have provided very little "green space" in
relationship to buildings and parking lot coverage. The Commission is also
concerned about inadequate landscaping and screening measures with some
developments.
Several recent preliminary plats have focused our attention on this problem.
This subject has been discussed with an increasing frequency at our Commission
meetings and we have requested staff to provide us with some background
information, as well as finding out what other communities in the metropolitan
area were doing. We will be discussing this issue in more detail at our
Commission meeting on November 1.
Many of the developers and developments in Eagan have done an excellent job in
developing a good landscape plan; for example, the recently completed
buildings by Opus in the Eagandale industrial development. Others, however,
have appeared to provide only the minimal amount of landscaping and screening.
If the Mayor and members of the City Council share our concern and think it is
appropriate, the Advisory Commission would like to meet and discuss this issue
further. Perhaps the possibility of establishing an objective set of
guidelines by which definite landscaping plans can be developed could be
established. A joint meeting could serve as a mechanism for the Advisory
Commission to receive direction from the City Council on this issue as well as
other parks recreation related items.
Chairman, Advisor Parks Recreation Commission
RM /js
CC: Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks Recreation
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1984
RE: ANNUAL REVIEW
PARKS DEDICATION FEE
BACKGROUND:
It has been a policy of the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission for the
last four years to annually review the parks dedication fee formula for
possible modification. This item is being presented to the Advisory
Commission in adherence of that policy.
RECENT HISTORY:
Park dedication fees were increased in 1982 and again in 1984. In 1982
residential fees increased to $400 per single family unit, $332 per townhouse
unit and $252 for apartment units. The approved cash dedication requirement
was based on the formula in which the per acre cost of raw land was valued at
$10,000. Previously the parks dedication formula was based on a $7,500 figure
per acre. Effective on January 1, 1984, these fees were adjusted 5 This
yielded a per acre cost of raw land valued at $10,500 per acre, single family
units at $420, $348 per townhouse unit and $265 per apartment unit.
OTHER COMMUNITIES:
Recent telephone contact with several other communities regarding changes in
cash dedication was made. In March 1984, Eden Prairie raised its single
family cash dedication to $400 per unit and multiple family units to $305.
Previously Eden Prairie was at $325 and $250, respectively. Those fees had
not been increased for a period of approximately five years.
Apple Valley changed its formula for calculating residential cash dedication
in early 1983. At that time, they raised their dedication formula to $10,000
per acre. They do not anticipate, nor is there a proposal far, an increase of
this base figure in 1985. The City of Plymouth last raised its park
dedication fees in January of 1983 from $390 to $400 per single family unit.
Department staff there are reviewing the possibilities of a $10 increase for
1985, but are uncertain that they will approach this increase until mid -1985.
The City of Lakeville has not changed its fees for approximately four years.
Currently, their fee structure provides for $300 per single family dwelling
unit. There has been some recent discussion about increasing this fee,
although no plans are under way at this time for any adjustments.
LAND SALES:
In the past, the Parks Commission has reviewed land sales to assist them in
determining the "average" per acre cost and the resulting impact on dwelling
units. Although the City does not have actual sales figures, the Planning
Department is aware of asking prices on several different parcels of land in
the following zoning classifications:
R4 land from $25,000 to $20,000 per acre.
R3 in the $16,000 to $20,000 range.
R2 in the $12,000 to $14,000 range.
Again, the Commission is reminded that these are asking prices for land;
actual sales price is affected by many variables including location,
availability of trunk utility lines, topography, conditions of sales, etc..
For example, staff has been made aware that one 40 acre parcel currently zoned
agricultural, but shown in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan as probable R2,
has recently been sold for $5,000 per acre.
ADDITIONAL CONVENTS:
Park dedication fees were increased in 1984 by approximately 5 Previous to
this, the last time fees were increased was in 1982. Other communities appear
to be holding to their most recent dedication unit charge which runs in the
neighborhood of $400 per single family dwelling. Consequently, it appears
that Eagan's cash dedication formula remains consistent and comparable with
other communities who are experiencing comparable growth.
CONNISSION ACTION
The Advisory Commission is to again review the information presented,
determining if a change in the dedication fee is warranted, and the amount of
any change, if deemed necessary and desirable.
1� --1
Director of s Recreation
Wis
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1984
RE: BEER POLICY SOFTBALL
BACKGROUND:
Department staff has been "informally" approached and requested to review and
determine whether the City's adult softball leagues /teams could establish a
beer and food sales concession at the Northview Athletic Fields. Staff would
like to paint out that this is still an informal inquiry and is not a direct
request for the Softball Association to sell beer or establish a food
concession. Staff has been directed by the Commission to compile information
from other communities, as well as to review existing City ordinances to
determine if a change in the existing ordinance, policies and rules and
regulations appears to be warranted. With a park building proposed for
Northview, the issue of concessions (food /beer) are considerations that need
to be addressed. Policies such as who, when and under what circumstances,
will provide staff with direction.
OTHER COMMUNITIES:
Staff has conducted an informal telephone survey of eight communities relative
to their approach to beer sales. The communities and general policies are as
follows:
BLOOMINGTON
A non profit organization may receive a special permit from the City Council
to sell 3.2 beer. Permit fee is approximately $48. All tournaments are
required to sanction ASA and for a $25 fee are covered under the City's ASA
liability dram shop insurance. Beer has only been sold on weekends at
tournaments; however, it is not restricted to weekends. Special events rarely
happen midweek where a special permit has been requested.
Beer is not allowed by ordinance during the regular season. However, the
police do not enforce. Therefore, teams may drink beer in the parking lot,
but not at the fields.
RICHFIELD
By ordinance, beer is not allowed at all. Each team posts a $100 drinking
deposit. If any team member is cited, the deposit is forfeited; the player is
expelled. A second incident and the team is gone. The ordinance is enforced
by the police.
There is a movement afloat by the 11 14th of July Association" to approach the
City Council for temporary licensing for next year. As of now, no temporary
license is available to any group or individual. (NOTE: THE COUNCIL HAS NOW
VETOED THE JULY 1 4TH ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST).
BROOKLYN CENTER
Only civic groups may apply for a beer permit, for tournaments only. 3.2 only
beer is not specified. Dram shop insurance is required. To date only the
Jaycees and the Fire Department have applied for a permit.
By ordinance, no beer is allowed in parks. During the season, any team caught
drinking is out of the league.
BROOKLYN PARK
Temporary beer licenses for 3.2 beer are issued to civic groups only. To
date, that is the Lions and Jaycees. They must provide dram shop insurance.
The City negotiates for a percentage of the profits, usually 15 -20 but it
has been as high as 40 The City uses that revenue for park
improvements /operations.
During the regular softball season, beer is allowed only in "community picnic
areas." Softball complexes have picnic areas. Beer is not allowed in parking
lots.
A park patrol is used, primarily for public relations; but also to enforce
where beer is used. Three part time people at $6 per hour constitute the park
patrol. These individuals do have cadet or other liaison connection with the
police department. Cast is $6,000 per year; the parks are patrolled from 5 -10
P.M. each day.
FRIDLEY
A "temporary" special permit for 3.2 beer may be issued to any group of
Fridley residents for tournaments or special events. Proof of dram shop
insurance is necessary. The City does not share in the profit.
During the regular season, beer is now allowed. An eligibility /conduct
deposit is required, as in Richfield. The police do assist in enforcement of
the ordinance.
LAKEVILLE
Allows the sale of beer. The softball association, an independent group,
takes out licenses for the dates of weekend tournaments. Only beer may be
sold. Specification on only 3.2 is not made. The association also purchases
the dram shop insurance. The City does not receive any direct revenue,
however, the association does contribute towards improvements to the softball
complex.
During the regular season, beer is allowed in the parking lot, shelter, and in
the stands at the fields.
MAPLE GROVE
By ordinance no beer or alcohol is allowed in the parks. The police enforce
the ordinance much the same as "no dogs in parks."
A special permit to sell 3.2 beer may be purchased only by non— profit
organizations that have been incorporated for at least one calendar year
Lions, Knights of Columbus, Jaycees, etc.. Dram shop insurance must be
provided by the special permit holder. Only three permits have been issued in
the last three years.
For season play, softball teams are required to provide a $50 deposit which is
forfeited if the team drinks in the park. The only time a team has forfeited
the deposit has been when litter was left behind or when a noise complaint was
received. In reality, despite the ordinance, teams do have one or two beers
after a game in the parking lot. At the present time, no written policy
exists to define when a team receives a warning prior to forfeiture of the
drinking deposit. Judgment is subject to the severity of the behavior.
PLYMOUTH
Anyone, including non— residents, may apply for a special permit to sell 3.2
beer. Proof of insurance is required. Only two permits were issued in 19$4
to a softball team and to a legion post.
During regular season play, by ordinance no beer is allowed. A $50 per team
eligibility /conduct deposit is required. (It previously was $100 which seemed
to be too high). Field attendants report on teams in violation. In addition,
the police will ticket each player in the amount of $25 if the behavior is
spotted by the police. A team may have a "hearing" on the field attendant's
report. The usual excuses are, "we didn't know" or "we've changed managers."
Generally, however, teams admit it and forfeit their $50. The team must then
redeposit another $50!
SUMMARY:
1. All cities contacted indicated general pleasure with their policies and
feel there are no changes necessary to them at this time.
2. Communities that issue permits for beer limit them to civic or non— profit
groups, except Fridley which simply says that the applicant must be a
resident.
3. Communities generally limit the sale of beer to weekend tournaments or
special events only. Beer sales during the week have generally not been
approved.
EXISTING CITY ORDINANCE:
The attorney's office has been requested to review the regulations relating to
beer sales in Eagan parks. Attached to this memorandum is a copy from the
attorney's office relative to this question.
In brief, the existing City ordinance prohibits liquor or beer in kegs,
barrels or case lot quantities except where authorized by written permit from
the City Council or Parks Recreation Director. The City does require
temporary licenses for sale of alcoholic beverages. Under current state and
local law, beer could be sold in Eagan parks, if licensed for sale. Such a
license would require the granting of a temporary license of not more than
four days duration.
SUMMATION:
From reviewing ether communities and their existing policies, it is obvious
that there are a range of ordinances and policies regulating beer sales and
beer consumption in parks. On the one end of the spectrum, several
communities strictly prohibit the sale of beer in their parks, as well as the
consumption of beer. Other communities allow beer sales, but only by special
temporary licenses, and often restrict the issuance of licenses to residents
or civic groups. In some instances, a percentage of the profits may go to the
community, as in the case of Brooklyn Park, or as indirect donations for
athletic field improvements, as in the case of Lakeville.
THE EAGAN EXPERIENCE:
The Department of Parks Recreation has seen an improvement in the behavior
of softball players over the last several years as it relates to the
consumption of beer at the softball fields. This has been brought about by
various circumstances. Several years ago Sperry had some difficulties
following softball league play, in which excessive beer drinking and littering
was a factor. Sperry adapted a policy which prohibited beer entirely from
its athletic complex. The adult softball leagues adapted a rule, within its
league structure, which prohibited beer for players during the game. Further,
the Department of Parks Recreation "clamped down" on beer drinking during
and after softball play. Effective enforcement of the "no keg" and case lot
beer limitations seemed to have had a positive impact and significantly
reduced behavioral problems. At this time, the Department of Parks
Recreation's staff is reasonably pleased with the behavior of the players
relative to existing beer policies, although continued improvement is hoped
for.
Relative to food concession, the various City leagues have operated
concessions two to three times per year at their play -offs or mid season
tournaments. At these concessions, a tent is set up from which they sell hot
dogs, pop, chips, coffee and various purchased food products. The proceeds,
arranging from $300 to as much as $450, have gone to the league treasury. The
leagues utilitize this funding for various purposes, one of which has been to
supplement City improvements to Northview Athletic Fields. For example, the
leagues have contributed to the purchase of permanent bases and paid a portion
of the outfield fence project.
As previously mentioned, City staff has been approached by the leagues
concerning the future of concession sales at Northview Athletic Fields. With
a proposed future park shelter building at Northview, the possibity of the
inclusion of a concession area has heightened interest in this type of
operation.
ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION:
A concession operation raises several policy questions. Previously
concessions were operated by the league /teams themselves for the benefit of
all teams. However, this could change and determination of "who" and "what
priority" groups wanting to sell concessions should be considered.
What policies should be adapted or guidelines developed regarding concession
sales? What if a "for profit" enterprise wished to run the concessions?
While staff believes that the concessions operation would probably only be
held at such times as tournaments or special events (based on experiences of
other communities), it would seem appropriate that the Advisory Commission
discuss these policies because of the rising interest in concessions
operations. This interest in concessions will increase as Northview improves
and softball continues to grow.
Beer sales concessions could become a major part of a concessions operation.
This product has a higher profit margin and has often provided a considerable
amount of revenue to sponsoring organizations. It can also be subject to
abuse and can contribute to behavioral problems. (Tournament sponsors in
other communities who have sold beer have often promoted beer sales by
offering a "beer drinking" trophy to the team that consumes the most beers).
What guidelines do we need to deal with this, if any?
The Commission may feel that Eagan's policies should be more restrictive, or
more lenient than other communities, and develop appropriate policies adopted
to relate to the Commission's concerns. It would be appropriate for the
Advisory Commission to review and identify the various issues relating to beer
and food concessions. Before making any decision, a discussion with the City
Council regarding their concerns would be suggested.
Director PVFarks Recreation
KV /js
HA,UGE. SM=. EIRE K ELLER, P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
2909 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55114
PAUL N. NAUGt September' ll .19$4 AR coo. 612
BRADLEY SMITH T[LSrmons 454.4224
KEVIN W. SIDE
DAVID G. KE LLER
Mr. Ken Vraa
Director of Parks, CITY OF EAGAN
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Beer Sales in City Parks
Dear Ken:
Our office has been asked to review the rules and regulations relating to beer
sales in Eagan parks. With the onset of lite'alcohol (LA) on the market,
several questions have been raised as to what regulations the state has and what
regulations a city may supplement these with.
1. To begin with, under state law, Minn. Stat. 6340.01 to §340.07 regulates
non intoxicating liquors. These are defined as malt liquor containing not less
than 1/2 of 1% alcohol by volume nor more than 3.2% alcohol by weight and is a
fermented malt beverage. Minn. Stat. §340.07 and on regulates intoxicating
liquors. These are defined to include any ethyl alcohol, distilled, fermented,
spirituous, vinous and malt beverages containing in excess of 3.27 of alcohol
by weight.
2. The state law sets limitations on both intoxicating and non intoxicating
liquors. These include times and places of service, licensing requirements and
control of sale to or by minors. See Minn. Stat. §340.02 and Minn. Stat. §340.11.
3. Both the selling and distributing of alcoholic beverages (intoxicating and
non intoxicating) are subject to legislative regulation. Legislative power to
regulate by the state has always been considered susceptible to local control
by municipalities.
4. Eagan Ordinance Sec. 10.23 Subd. 2(a) regulates the bringing of wine,
liquor or beer in kegs, barrels or case lot quantities except where authorized
by written permit from the Council or Park Director. The City of Eagan also
requires licenses for sale of alcoholic beverages (intoxicating and non- intoxi-
cating.)
S. Under current state and local law, beer could be sold in Eagan parks if
licensed for sale. This would require the granting of a temporary liquor
license. Section 5.32 provides for a temporary beer license of not more than
four days duration. This license could be limited to sale of non intoxicating
liquors. In addition, if the beer was brought in case lot, kegs or barrel
quantities, then permission would need to be obtained by a written permit from
the Council or Park Director.
Mr. Ken Vraa
September 11, 1984
Page 2.
6. Eagan currently has no specific regulations regarding beer sales in its
parks. Other cities have set further regulations in their ordinances. The
City of St. Louis Park allows no beer at all in its parks. Bloomington allows
sales by firemen when a certain percentage of profits goes to the city.
7. This may be an area in which Eagan may want to revise its ordinances. Eagan
could set further restrictions on sale of alcohol in its parks. However, the
City may want to leave the ordinances as they stand and control the sale of
beer in parks through limiting the granting of liquor licenses for sale of
alcohol in parks. Whether Eagan should set further limitations in its ordi-
nances is something that should be considered by the Eagan Parks Committee
and the Eagan City Council.
Please contact our office with any comments you may have regarding this issue.
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE KELLER, P.A.
Paul H. Hauge
PHH:me City Attorney, City of Eagan
cc: Jay Berthe
Thomas L. Hedges
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1984
RE: PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
BACKGROUND:
Staff has been asked to familiarize the Commission with the financial
accounting of expenditures for parks development and the process to be used in
the parks review process. Staff is proposing the following structure for
Commission review and input.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING:
Utilizing existing financial controls established in the City, the City has
already established a separate fund for the parks bond money. This fund is
completely separated from the park site fund and general fund money for
general City operations and department operations.
Within the fund (437), there are 32 programs each relating to a specific park
location. i.e. Ridgecliff 44575, Rahn 4552, etc.. There is one additional
program number which is entitled "general The program numbers will allow us
to charge to each park site those costs which are directly attributable to
that park location. The general program number is to be used for work or
expenditures that cannot be identified by a specific park, but is attributable
to the cost associated with the parks development program. In addition to the
fund and program number, there are 13 account codes. These account codes are
used to better identify the type of expenditure. These codes are as follows:
4650 Administration
4651 Design Engineering (External)
4652 Engineering (Field Services)
4653 Grading
4654 Utilities
4655 Parking
4656 Building Structures
4657 Seeding
4658 Plant Material
4659 General Landscaping /Furnishing
4660 Play Equipment
4661 Athletic Furnishings
4662 Special Features /Furnishings
4663 Trail
Again, an administrative account code is used for those expenditures which are
general in nature and not directly attributable to one of the other account
codes. For example, the landscape architect's time, when not chargeable to a
park, would be charged to administration or perhaps the purchase of general
suppply items used in the design process.
For an example of this coding process, the recent expenditure of funds for the
installation of play equipment at Ridgecliff Park will be used. When the
purchase order was initiated, the order was identified by fund number #37, the
program number for Ridgecliff Park #575, and the account code for play
equipment which is #4660. Under the City's financial reporting system, staff
will receive from the City's computer system a printout on each program
(park), expenditures charged to that park by account code number, and total
expenditures to date. This information can then be assembled for Commission
review as needed or quarterly.
COMMISSION REVIEW /FUNDING ALLOCATION:
When the parks bond program was proposed, a working proposal was developed for
the numerous neighborhood and community parks. The working proposal was
refined several times and was based on some preliminary cost approximations as
developed by the consulting parks planner. In the development of these cost
allocations, two methods were used. The first method was a unit cost method.
For example, when the number of lineal feet of a trail within a park could be
measured, and the per foot cost known, a good allocation could be achieved.
Unit pricing was used whenever possible, but there were a number of times in
which both the number of units or the unit price, was not as precise as
desired. In costs that were not identified by a unit and unit price, funds
were either "lump sum" or a dollar allocation was made.
Lump sums /dollar allocations were made in the cases of playground equipment,
landscaping, signage, or where a unit dollar amount could not be easily
identified. Each development item which could be identified was grouped into
one of eight categories. These general categories were acquisition, site
preparation, equipment, building shelters and accomodations, lighting and
utilities, roads, trails and parking, miscellaneous landscaping, and
engineering /contingency. In summary, funds have generally been allocated to a
particular park which reflects the best cost allocating at the time for the
degree of detail and specificity known.
UPDATED ESTIMATING:
During the next several months staff will be doing further detail /design on
each specific park. When this design work is completed, and with the
presentation to the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission, staff will prepare
an "updated cost estimate" based on the detail design. Hopefully, these new
cost estimates will come close to the former cost projections and the funding
provided within the park development /bond fund. If not, the Commission may
have to make the determination to eliminate or reduce portions of the parks
project development or to provide supplemental funding from the park site fund
or bond interest earnings to meet the cost estimates. After the design
approvals and cost estimate approvals, staff will then proceed with
development of specifications in bidding the project. Should there be
significant changes between the bids and the updated estimate, staff will
return the issue to the Advisory Commission for additional review and
discussion.
In order to keep the process streamlined, it is assumed that staff would not
return any portion of the project to the Advisory Commission /City Council if
the project stays within, or near, the update estimate. This would allow
staff to proceed with the various purchases, whether by quote or bid, of the
many items that will go into the development of the park. (NOTE: By State
statutes, staff must advertise and receive sealed bids on dollar amounts over
$15,000. Under this amount, quotations based on general specifications must
be received. Amounts under $2,000 are items that are budgeted or identified
within the project and can be purchased by purchase order.)
INVESTMENT EARNINGTS:
All monies, i.e. bond, park site fund, received are invested in Certificates
of Deposit along with other City funds by the City's Finance Director.
Interest earnings are credited to the appropriate funds on an annual basis,
based on monthly fund account average. This is done at the time of the
closing of the books on the 31st of December. Quarterly estimates could be
provided if the Commission feels it necessary.
COMMISSION REVIEW:
Staff will provide additional information to further clarify the accounting
procedures and process for parks review. Staff would be happy to make
revisions as appropriate.
Direc or of Parks Recreation
KV /js
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
While a trail could be developed around the lake assuming all dedications
are received it will be difficult and costly. Any park development of the
property (Lemay) would probably duplicate that which is proposed to the south,
benefiting only the apartment residents. These residents will benefit from
the development as is now proposed. Therefore, staff is recommending
Alternative #1.
Director of Parks Recreation
KV /js
MEMO TO: AbVI t? PARIM RMCREAT140 COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1984
RE: SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS REC COMM
OCTOBER 11, 1984
LEMAY FIRST ADDITION
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this special meeting is to make an on -site visit and inspection
of the site being proposed for the Lemay First Addition and to determine
whether the shoreline of Lemay Lake within this proposed plat is useable and
suitable for possible park purposes.
SYSTEMS PLAN REVIEW:
Attached to this memorandum are the pages from the Systems Plan Book
referencing Donnywood Park and the possible inclusion of the area adjacent to
Donnywood, including this parcel for parks purposes.
ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSION:
The Commission has basically two alternatives, or a combination of them, for
review and decision.
Alternative #1 is to accept a cash dedication of approximately $76,000. The
Commission could also ask for a scenic and /or trail easement in order to
preserve the shoreline from development and overuse as a result of the
multiple family development with this plat. This alternative would preserve
the shoreline for scenic purposes, but would not provide for any potential
development for parks purposes.
Alternative #2 is to accept a parkland dedication. This would amount to 1.7
acres. However, because the dedication would involve water, dedication would
be larger than 1.7 acres. This approach would assure the City absolute
control and provide for protection of the site. However, utilization of the
site is premised on the City's ability to acquire additional property to the
south and east. This is currently zoned commercial. Until such time as this
dedication is received (and if it can be obtained), any land received with
this preliminary plat would be "land locked The only access for development
and maintenance would have to be through private property.
ATTENTION
A brief "ground breaking ceremony" for Rahn Park is scheduled
for 5:30 P.M. on Thursday, October 4th.
Members of the Council and Commission are asked to meet near
the northwest corner (Shale Lane /Nicols Road) for the photos.
donnywood SIZE AND DEVELOPMENT: 4.9 total acres; 2.5 useable acres;
no development.
background EXISTING CONDITIONS: Mostly pond and lake; east side
solid shoreline on LeMay Lake, steep access off of Jurdy Road,
minimal street frontage; West side narrow, paved access path
to steep, eroded, bank; Old stone structure located 100 feet east
of park boundary.
EXISTING FACILITIES: Path worn in grass
PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood park; secondary
classification as a special use site
issues analysis PROBLEMATIC CONDITIONS:
Limited amount of useable land; acquisition potential to
east of site
Need for additional street frontage and good access point
POTENTIAL FOR SITING ATHLETIC FACILITIES: None, unless
additional land is purchased.
SPECIAL USE OPPORTUNITIES: Boating and shoreland uses.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: Site needs greater visibility.
CLASSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: Site needs a 250' x 250' open
field games area, paved hard courts and trails, play equipment,
passive or natural area; more land
recommendation Attempt to acquire 9.0 additional acres of land to east of site
as shown on concept sketch; north portion to be used for
community park uses and southern portion to be for neighbor-
hood park uses
Place major access at south end of acquired land
Northern portion should include following facilities:
picnic area
paved trails
parking area
boat launch facility (ramp and trailer parking)
Consider acquiring additional shoreland property adjacent
to park, particularly along eastern shore of LeMay Lake
donny concept sketch
po�raly acc�virr�
1 inch 200 feet additioraJ �1
nd le ►a 1
a qom northern Parwl for 1
Z community 10ke 4r 1
Shore u� 5 u�a au� .4�
1 n�q ion
i.
Naga tx�fi 1aur -h
1
'G+'11G 4r2A
1
acqu ire; ;,c ►yard court G�Irllsrt�
acqu
r
c�.l for
ixxt�zl
1�
u�eh
i
park P
a boundary
ry
existing
air
tin
facility s ac li rr�
t I
9 Y
fie d
proposed Y
existing trail II 4cce"
t�
hT 6 &Nc P►" m ry
proposed trail north
Southern (neighborhood park) portion should include the
following facilities:
250' x 250' open field games area
play equipment
hard court games area
skating rink
C