12/10/1981 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMII°FLE
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 10, 1981
The regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Parks and Recreation committee
was held on December 10, 1981 at the Eagan City Hall. Those members present
were Martin, Schumaker, Thurston, Thomas, Carroll, Masin, Fedde, Johnson.
Absent McNeely and Tilley.
Also present were the Planning Director and Director of Parks and Recreation.
Council members Wachter, Paranto and Egan and the City Administrator were
also in attendance at a joint meeting beginning at 7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
On a motion by Carroll, seconded by Thomas, the minutes of November 5, 1981
meeting were approved unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Committee member Carroll requested that the official naming of River Hills 9
Park be placed on the agenda immediately following the item on park names.
There being no other items, on a motion by Thurston, seconded by Masin, the
agenda for December 10, 1981 was approved.
ED DUNN -KNOB HILL DEVELOPMENT
The City Planner reviewed the request from Ed Dunn /Blackhawk Park Associate for
a preliminary plat of approximately 40 acres located in the northwest corner
of intersection of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road. He indicated that the
plat contained approximately 19.6 acres of residential and 10.2 acres for
office and commercial. The planner reviewed the number of units within the
proposal, potential densities, the need for a home owners association for
the condominiums and town house units proposed and other development and
site characteristics within the proposed area. He further explained the
possibility of the internal trail system within the development, and that
the developer was planning to provide for small open space areas with
informational gazebos. It was also pointed out that a recreational space
was being planned within the development which would contain tennis courts.
Mr. Runkle estimated, using recent school census data, that based on the number
and type of the housing units that there might be a population of 129 youths
ages 1 to 18 who would be living within the fully developed proposal. In
response to a question, Mr. Runkle indicated that the planning commission
has shown some concern with the high densities within the proposal which is
greater than the R -2 land use plan. He indicated that this 129 population
would, therefore, be on the high side of an estimate. The Advisory Committee
asked several questions in regards to the density, proposed play areas and
timing of the development.
In response to a question the Planning Director and Director of Parks and
Recreation reviewed the location and timing of the neighborhood park to
meet the needs within the park service section. It was indicated that this
was the first development within the service area. The proposed park area to
be located within the neighborhood would be located further to the north and
west of this proposed development. Such proposed park land would be either
purchased, or received as park dedication, with a proposed elementary school
Advisory Parks $ Recreation Committee Minutes
December 10, 1981
Page 2
site. This had been identified in the City's comp guide plan. Member Martin
stated that the 1.9 acre parks dedication is very small, and it would not
be within the area previously identified for a park. Member Thurston
questioned the suitability of topography on this site for a park immediately
to the north and west of the development. After additional questioning and
discussion a motion was offered by Thurston, seconded by Carroll that the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee recommend to the City Council that:
1. Parks dedication be satisfied by a cash dedication based on the
amount at the time of final platting.
2. That the developer provide trails along Pilot Knob and Diffley Roads
for bicycles as identified in the City's trails plan.
3. The developer provide the tennis courts and open space amenities as
shown throughout the development proposal.
4. The developer provide one tot lot or play area to be approved by the
Director of Parks and Recreation to be located within the development.
On a vote on the motion, the motion carried unanimously. The Advisory Committee
indicated that the minutes should also reflect that the size of park could not
be met within the development and that the more suitable park location was
further to the north and west of this plat to be acquired next to a future school.
PARK LAND- SECTION 33
Dale Runkle, City Planner indicated he has met with a developer concerning
preliminary discussion over a 30 acre parcel east of Brittany Manor. After
some explanation and questioning, he stated the City had no legal authority
to require parks dedication adjacent to or within the designated park area if
the development does not contain this land. He further indicated that staff
was informing developers and current owners of the property the City's de-
sire to obtain park land. In response to a question Mr. Runkle indicated
that the staff was also concerned about park land near Carriage Hills which
is in park service area 14, stating that no development has taken place yet,
but is is conceivable that this might happen and then exclude the most de-
sirous parcel for park. There was further discussion by the committee on these
two areas with no action being taken.
PARK NAMES
Committee member Dick Carroll reported on the sub - committee's on parks naming
which had met on December 3, 1981 explaining that good discussions and thoughts
were expressed on how the committee would like to proceed, indicating that a
letter in the spring issue of the Eagan Newsletter with a map showing the park
areas would be attempted. If this input process is not successful, at least
the attempt had been made by the committee who would then proceed with its
naming suggestions. It was also suggested that the Committee meet with Council
member Wachter and others that are familiar with the historical aspect of the
City. The sub - committee outlined several action steps to be taken during the
next month. There was no action taken on this item by the Advisory Committee.
RIVER HILLS PARK
Committee member Carroll stated that the sub - committee had received suggestions
on River Hills Park from the neighborhood association. After discussion the
committee recommended to the City Council that they adopt the name "River
Hills Park East" as the official name, motion by Carroll, seconded by Thurston,
Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes
December 10, 1981
Page 3
all voted in favor.
DATA COLLECTION NEEDS
The Director of Parks and Recreation explained the purpose and intent of the
item in the packet entitled - Data Collection Needs - as it relates to the
Master Plan. Following the explanation of the purposes, the committee agreed
to review and make revisions as necessary, and return to the office by
December 17. At that time the director would develop a composite of all
of the members suggestions. Members would be called to assist the pulling
together of the material as may be appropriate.
VIENNA WOODS
The director informed the committee on the action taken by the City Council
concerning the recommendation on Vienna Woods. He indicated that letters
have recently been sent to MnDOT and Unisource Corporation indicating the
City's desires to secure both the MnDOT property and the 21/2 acre parcel for
parks purposes.
WINTER PROGRAMS
The director explained the progress on the winter programs. He said that some
flooding had begun but that there was insufficient frost in the ground to do
heavy flooding. He also stated that he had met with the hockey associations.
Both associations have two additional teams, and have requested additional
ice time. He indicated that the growth of the hockey may add to the usage
conflict problems and that he anticipated calls in this regards.
After a brief recess, the committee met jointly with the City Council to dis-
cuss the Master Parks plan.
The Director of Parks and Recreation indicated some specific agenda items
that should be reviewed by the Committee and Council. In addition to the
review of the "Scope of Services" it was hoped that a review of role definition,
and of the time sequence of the first portion of the Master Plan should be
agreed upon. He also indicated that the decision as to who should serve on the
final selection committee, and who should comprise the "task force" should be
considered. The director then thoroughly reviewed each segment of the "Scope
of Services ", explaining the intent. In response to questions, he responded
that the Master Plan would enlarge upon the park section of the comprehensive
guide. And, that a priority listing of park development, along with its
cost estimates, would be included in the plan. In response to another question,
the director indicated that in sectioning the "Scope of Services ", it would
allow for the cost estimating by the consultants, and allow the Committee and
Council to determine whether that section should be included within the Master
Plan study. He indicated however, that segmenting the plan may cost greater
dollars in the long -run. Much of the trails section would be under study
while reviewing the park service needs for the neighborhood and within a
district area. Councilman Egan indicated that the consultant is to be studying
both neighborhood needs, community needs and service needs within an area that
it would seem that the consultant would from necessity be reviewing pedestrian
and other linking aspects. After further explanation and review of the "Scope
of Services" Committee and Council began a discussion concerning ways and
methods to involve the community in the planning process. It was generally
felt by all concerned that this was necessary element within the plan.
Advisory Parks 4 Recreation Committee Minutes
December 10, 1981
Page 4
After further review and discussion of the "Scope of Services ",the Director
of Parks and Recreation reviewed the time sequence. He indicated that he was
currently doing a pre- screening on approximately 8 consulting firms with the
intent that this would reduce down to five for interviews, He is recommend-
ing that the first interviews be conducted by the City Administrator and the
Director of Parks and Recreation along with either a third staff member or a
member of Council /Committee. From the first interview it was hoped that
three firms would then be interviewed by the final selection committee. The
selection committee should be identified soon and might consist of staff/
council /committee members to hear the proposals by consultants. The Director
of Parks and Recreation indicated that once this committee is made known
that they could develop the ranking criteria for the firms.
The director explained that the "task force" should also be identified. • He
indicated that the identification of the "task force" might indeed be the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee but may be enlarged upon to include
either other members of the community, staff and members of the City Council.
He further indicated that the "task force" would probably have to meet on
a specified evening each month to review the progress of the consultant and
to make intermediate decisions and recommendations on the plan.
Members of the Council and Advisory Committee discussed the "task force" con-
cept and its purpose. There followed a general discussion of the process
of the Master Plan with no action being taken at this time.
There being no further actions to be considered by the Advisory Committee
the committee adjourned at 8 :50 P.M.
Dated: December 10, 1981 KV
Secretary
Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee