The URL can be used to link to this page

3206 Sibley Memorial HwyCITY OF EAGAN Remarks Addition Letendre #2 Lot Owner Street 3 Parcel 10 44901 050 03 Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK IN SEWER LATERAL 171 1 WATERMAIN WATER LATERAL WATER AREA 1974 1 1525.00 1 1 STORM SEW TRK STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC 275-00 8753 B-14-73 PARK J??jaZ HOUSE HEATING TEST RECORD ADDRESS APT. FLOOR CITI =SUBURB OCCUPANT _L?e_ N CA? My OWNER HEAT LOSS DATE HTG. INST. SOLD BY t? !? L ( , d " r INSTALLED BY t° ?C Electrical Work By Gas Line By TYPE OF HEAT GA FA ?HW STEAM SPACE HTR. UNIT HTR. OTHER GAS DESIGN CONVERSION MAKE MAKE OF BURNER _ Model 14 / 6 Model Seria I Max. BTU Rating - INPUT O O ( MAKE OF FURNACE Model CONTROLS THERMOSTAT Heat Plug Va Iva Limit Limit Setting -12- = Vent Size KIND OF LINE Draft Hood - Filters Fan Setting Chimney Location Pilot Type Chimney Construction Pilot Make Pilot Model Smoke Bomb Pilot Timing Draft v L.W. Cut Off Door Pressure- Pressure ::5 I / ! Percent CO Date Tested - Input CFH d 2 Percent 02 Company Tes1Q Stack Temp. Percent CO d2iS Name of Tester Form 235 Outside Wiring y Test Tag Lighting Inst. ?I Receipt l; 1. Date 11'1' 3. Job Address 4. Owner ?rfy 5. Contractor MECHANICAL PERMIT CITY OF EAGAN Fill in Permit No. Feed SAC .4W A ?S Tot. Lot i Blk. Tfa`ct J.> {yam Phone - eJ? 6. Address V CJ ''' >? • r "{l Lf?' 7. City State l/ Zip '- 8. Building Type: Residential ? Commercial '»1 Institutional ? 9. Work Description: New Add ? Alter Alf Repair ? 10. Describe Fuel Type 11. No. Eguiipment, BTU - M. Ea. Forced Air No. Equipment CFM Ai dli H Mfg. r an ng: Boilers Mfg. Mech. Exhaust Unit Heater Mfg. Other Air Cond. Mfg. Gas, Piping Outlets 12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply with all-ordinances and code* governing this type of work. Signed : +t ! l for Rough Final Inspections: Date Insp. Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved f CITY OF EAGAN 464-8100 4 %a ?V-), ? 5.0--v CITY OF EAGAN »• 5795 PBet Knob Reed Eagan, MH SS122 PHONES 454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT OVER TANKS Receipt # TO [x?n?r1 To be wed for{;O ICRETE SLAB Est. Value $1500.00 Date June 2 1y83 , Site Address 1206 gihley MAm_orial Hichwa y Erect ? Occupancy B-2 Lot - 5 Block 3 Sec/Sub. Letendre 2nd Alter ly Zoning GB l # 10 44901 050 03 P r Repair ? Fire Zone a ce l En arge ? Type of Const. cc W Name Ton Mar_Intyre Move ? # Stories Address 3206 Highway 13 Demolish ? Length 6 cif„ Eagan 55121 o,,,,,,. 452-8060 Grade ? Depth Sq. Ft. p Name owner r- u Address f t.., M..__ Assessment Water & Sew. Police Fire Eng. Planner Permit LJ.UV Surcharge 1.00 Plan check SAC Water Conn. Water Meter Council Road Unit 1 hereby acknowledge that I hove read this application and state that Bldg. Off. the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable APC Total $26.00 State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances Signature of Permi"ee * s 1 A Building Permit Is issued to: Tom MacIntyre on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official - Permit No. Permit Holder Misc. Permit No. Holder Plumbing H.V.A.C. Well Water Disp. Sewer E lectric Inspection Date Insp. Other Footings Foundation Framing Rough Plbg. Rough HVAC Insulation Final Plbg. Final HVAC Final Water Describe Location: Well Sewer Pr. D"isp. Receipt MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit No. CITY OF EAGAN Fee Fill in numbered spaces S/C Type or Print legibly Tot. 1. Date 2. Installation Cost 3. Job Address Lot Blk. Tract 4. Owner 5. Contractor Phone 6. Address 7. City State Zip _ 8. Building Type: Residential ? Commercial ? Institutional ? 9. Work Description: New ? Add ? Alter ? Repair ? 10. Describe Fuel Type 11. No. Equipment BTU - M. Ea. Forced Air ?l Coll No. Equipment CFM A H Ec? Mfg. ir andling: -r- -71 (01 y Boilers Mfg. L4rr (EC i Mech. Exhaust Unit Heater S- ,? Z C 7 Mfg. Other Air Cond. Mfg. Gas, Piping Outlets 12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply with all ordinances and codes governing this type of work. Signed for Rough Fin Inspections: Date Insp. Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved CITY OF EAGAN 464-6100 CITY OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROA DATE Lot Add CRY PHONE TYPE OF WORK Forced Air Boiler Unit Heater Air Cond. Vent Gas Piping Outlets # Other CommAnd. Contract a. L-. 4-1, /1_ M BTU M BTU M BTU M BTU CFM For City Use PERMIT # MN 55122 RECEIPT # r DATE: BLDG. TYPE WORK DESCRIPTION Res. New Const. Mult. Add-on Comm. X Repair Other FEES RES. HVAC 0-100 M BTU - $24.00 ADDITIONAL 50 M BTU - 6.00 (RES. HVAC INCLUDES A/C ON NEW CONSTRUCTION) TOWNHOUSE & CONDOS - RES. RATE APPLIES MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL FEE - ALL ADD-ON & REMODELS (INCLUDES GAS PIPING) - 12.00 GAS OUTLETS (MINIMUM - 1 PER PERMIT- NEW CONST.) - 1.50EA. COMM/1ND FEE -1% OF CONTRACT FEE APT. BLDGS. - COMM. RATE APPLIES MINIMUM COMMERCIAL FEE - 20.00 STATE SURCHARGE PER PERMIT - .50 (ADDA,50 SIC PER EACH $1000.00 OF PERMIT FEE) w x1%$ PERMIT FEE. -10 SIC: • 5v F TOTAL: 50 I ?) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # - To Ise used for FIRE DAMAGE Est Value $8,000 Date NOVE Site Addre Lot Parcel No. HWY W Name COUNTRY STANDARD Address SAME City Phone ':. 97,13 i Erect _ Occupancy Remodel ? Zoning Repair ® Type of Const. Enlarge ? No. Stories Move ? Length Demolish ? Depth Grade ? Sq. Ft. Name Address Assessment ERS 497-3900 Water & Sew. Phone City Police W Name Fire O Address Eng. u <W City Phone Planner Councl I Permit Surcharge 4.00 Plan check SAC Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that Bldg. Off.11/ 19 t34 Parks the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable APC Total ? 7 2. 50 State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances Var. Date Signature of Permittee A Building Permit is issued to: DACO INC on the express condition Choi all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official Permit No. Permit Holder Date Plumbing H.VA.C. Electric Softener Inspection Date Insp. Other Footings ? ?? II-? C ?`ao JJ C,-e= „ Foundation Framing lbg. VAC [ n Final g AC Final Cert/Occ. Water Describe Location: Well Sewer Pr. Disp. 3795 Photo EAGA Roa4 WATER SER 27? PERMIT PE Eagan, MH 55122 Z R-1 RMIT?VO.: _ DATE: ?53 12129 oo"72 oning: , - Owner: R»ber?Q 1 No. of Units: Address: ?= ??Q Site Address: -1206 -Sib1ev Memori$ 1 Highwa Plumber: ei r m a Trenchi -- ng & Excavati Meter No.: _ 51 n _ Size: I" m ee Rockwell _ Connection Chargearea chR. aksess 2 Reader No... Account Depos' ' agroe to comPlr with the Village of Eagan Permit Fee: Surcharge: 50 ? ? Ordinances. --- -----___ __ Misc. Charges: 108.07 meter pd By Total Y . A , . , ? Date of Insp.: . Date Paid: ?? +•'s. L' Insp.: . -1?06 sie.?Er 9•4 ??'OW ?a yY?o? os'o ?,3 .. Art _ John ?nelson PROPANE* L.P. Gas 448-2991 Chaska Office7 448-2900 r 2 n CSC)qS CITY OF EAGAN Include 2 sets plans, (?%')(V{' T l b 1 site plan w/ele levations & BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAT ON 1 set of energy cc?alculations. To Be Used For a p luation Date Site Address C /c O J? OFFICE USE ONLY Lot .57 Block sec./S u kk rt -)A--Erect occupancy Parcel #: to g q Q O i 0S p a Alter _ Zoning Repair Fire Zone Owner: Enlarge _ Type of Const. Address: ` Demolish # Stories _ Front ft. City/Zip Code: Grade Depth ft. Phone #: Contractor: Address: City/Zip Code: Phone #: Arch./Eng.: Address: City/Zip Code: Phone #: -f'D/"4 Water/Sewer Surcharge _ Police Plan Check Fire SAC Eng. Water Conn. Planner Water Meter Council Road Unit _ Bldg. Off. APC TOTAL .;? (47 ' 00 EAGAN TOWNSHIP BUILDING PERMIT G Owner .... ? Address (present) ------ ?.3-O .. -1` _• BLS:I ------------- r , Builder -------- ...................................................... _............_..._.....---- Address DESCRIPTION N° 2133 Eagan Township Town Hall . Dale ------ --------- -....... Stories To Be Used For Front Depth Height Est. Cost Permit Fee Remarks v " LOCATION Street, Road or other Description of Location I Lo! Block pp Addition or Tract J- This permit does not authorise the use of streets, roads, alleys or sidewalks nor does it give the owner or his agent the right to create any situation which is a nuisance or which presents a hazard to the health, safety, convenience and general welfare to anyone in the community. THIS PERMIT MUST B EPT O THE PREMISE WHILE THE WORT{ IS IN PROVE?SS. This is to certify, that........r.4.,_..... Y:(KC? ........................has permission to erect a._ the above described premise subject to the provisions of the Building Ordinance for Eagan Township adopted April 11, 1955. .. -----................°_ .?-r.- - -- - -?? _- ----------------- Per ------------ ?1?...? -------_... ChairmsrY of Tnwn Board Building Inspector .± KS 9 1. } Eagan Township / Dakota County, Minnesota Application for Building Pernut Type of building or work contemplated. Circle correct descriptions. Residential Commercial Industrial Other ............................................. .:............... uil Enlarge Alter Repair Install Move Wreck Other........... Dimensions ...1....-.x:._y..,/.:? ............. Cost..._L.. Details or remarks........... . d,P:.->-_ ' "- / Location cross PERMIT NO. ............. Date Lot Block Addition Rearrangement or Tract J ------- ..-_y.: ?.'.._..1 .7:?0w --------....°..... ... -.... '..'... Owner .....>"Lc ?........_l`..._._...._.°.....°.----°.'°.'°' --- . ....... Address -?.°- .. . . . . .......... Contractor Address The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit to do work as herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict $-' ?'e'" ll0cls"d." accordance with the building ordinance adopted April 11, 1955 Total fee collecte by the Eagan Township Board of Supervisors. Permit fees are not refundable.r -_!?' * """'--_-•;' :......................_.-..........-.-...... Sinned GEo, //vDPa s*llNVf7sa SrFc 4 Zi 33 " y %1 s7 pecrEr?r rJr Aga CE3q N?" s ?Oc) r T - rf?Ai TV w 2 I- T CNI21(r t2 1-2 1 • • ALL CONTRACTORS MUST BE LICENSED WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN G? ? INCLUDE © SETS OF PLANS, / J © CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY fl4r Der G e SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS To Be Used For: G REPP-I(j Valuation: QOO. •' Date:- -p V Site Address :3a /, • • Lot: _S Block: Se t/ b: 2 Parcel #: / d- qq 0 ) J D So- Q Owner: e v'V Sze Od a Address: City/Zip Code: Phone #: Contractors 2Add -7-/V(i, Address: 9 7 City/Zip Code: A'Goe,4? S5-3? Tz Phone #: y97 9aC2 Arch./Eng: Address: City/Zip Code: Ph^nr 4 Erect: Occupancy: Remodel: Zoning: Repair: Type of Const: Enlarge: # Stories: Move: Length: Demolish: Depth: Grade: Sq. Ft.: Assessments: Water/Sewer: Police: Fire: Engr.: Planner: Council: Bldg. Off.: APC: Variance: Permit: (of?j.? Surcharge: ?Zd Plan Rev.: SAC: Water Conn: Water Meter Road Unit: Ea-IT Parks: a.5o CITY of EAGAN ?/ BUILDING PERMIT Owner ... .`.?`.?.^.:` ..1.?•=•-" ....:..... 1-1 ...!"....................... ''- Address (present) J?o.(i.... Builder Address ......... r: i• N2 3278 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. Minnesota 55122 454.8100 Date .... -...7.x.7..7......._....... Stoxiec To Be Used For Front Dapth Haigh! Est. Cost Permit Fee Remarks or This permit does not authorise the use of streets, roads, alleys or sidewalks nor does it give the owner or his agent the right to create any situation which is a nuisance or which presents a hazard to the health, safety, convenience and general welfare to anyone in the community. THIS PERMIT MUST BEFf)XEPT ON THE PREMISE WHILE THE WORK IS IN PROGRESS. This is to certify, .......................has permission to erect a.......... :itq................. ............. upon the above described premise subject to the provisions of all applicable Ordinances for the of Eagan ..........?.:......il.....'...'! ....................................... Per .............. Z:'?(...._V.................................................... Mayor . Building I7-Pector CITY OF EAGAN Np 8095 9793 Pilot Knob Rood • Eagan, MN 55122 PHONES 434-0100 BUILDING PERMIT OVER TANKS Receipt # To be used forCONCRETE SLAB Est. Value $1500.00 Date June 2 1?3 Site Address 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway Erect ? Occupancy B-2 Lot 5 Block 3 Sec/Sub. Letendre 2nd Alter XX Zoning GB Parcel # 10 44901 050 03 Repair ? Fire Zone Enlarge ? Type of Const. c Name Tom Mac Intyre More ? # Stories z Address 3206 Highway 13 Demolish ? Length_ Eagan 55121 ?___ 452-8060 Grade n Depth Sa. Ft- Name Owner 0 Address u r r-:... 06....- Name _ Address I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eof; Or mnces. Signature of Permittee y, *,t- A Building Permit Is Issued to: Tom McIntyre all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of "r Building Official Assessment _ Water & Sew. Police Fire Eng. Planner Council _ Bldg. Off. . APC Permit """ Surcharge 1.00 Plan check SAC Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit Total $26.00 _ on the express condition that City of Eagan Ordinances. CITY OF EAGAN M 9733 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 454.8100 BUILDING PERMIT Receipt * T. be wed for FIRE DAMAGE Est. Value $8,000 Date N OVFMRF,R 2D ]9_84 Site Address 3206 SIBLEY MEM HWY Erect ? Occupancy Lot 5 Bl ock 3 sec/Sub. LETENDRE II Remodel ? Zoning Parcel No. 10-44901-050-03 Repair 19 Type of Const. Enlarge ? No. Stories Name COUNTRY STANDARD Move 11 Length Z Address SAME Demolish ? Depth Grade ? Sq. Ft. City Phone Anerovel? iww. DACO INC Name OX Address City ROGERS Phone 497-3900 W Name xO Address u ? Qz City Phone < I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City 9(+E9gon OrjjnanceLA Assessment Water 8 Sew. Police Fire Eng. Planner Council Bldg. 0111.11/19/84 APC Var. Date Permit '....'.,.. Surcharge 4-00 Plan check SAC Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit Parks Total _ Signature of Permittee I A Building Permit Is issued to: DACO C - on the express condition that all work shot] be done in occordorce w all appli le S to f 'anesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official This reqs t void L S 641 o c a c ?c? 1 -10 1 Sa[Atlm f.Dm bD J 1 O -? ?y oS e Date of this Request 6 ' 1L?v Fire No. 91307 I, as 0-t)censed Electrical Contractor ? Owner, do hereby request inspection of the above electri- cal wiring installed at: c > //_ l a'N Street Address or Route No. 6?, /'! yy,Gets l?fi ?i.4'ity Section Township Range County Which is occupied by _ a 6 ?fe a <]% t Is a roughin inspection required on this job? No O Power Supplier O l Electrical Contractor 9i-I? e- L2? (Company Name) Mailing Address cr/ Yes ? Ready Now ? Address Will Call ? A Z/U f/ yJ-? Contractor's License No. Authorized Signatures ?rs Z c-v Phone No.?/?/J 'f (Electrical Contractor or Owner Making This Installation) ??® ??? - This inspection request will not be accepted by the State Board unless proper inspection fee is enclosed. Minnesota state Board or Wecrtoity Griggs, Midway Bldg. - Room N191 EB-00001-02 .:163"x' Jnivarsity Ave.. St. Paul, Minn. 55104 - Phone 297.2111 ?O ,y •5 ^ IS EQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION \7 91307 CHECK BELOW WORK COVERED BY THIS REQUEST 4 Type of Building New Add. Rep. Check Appliances Wired For Check Equipment Wired For Home ? ? ? Range ? Temporary Wiring ? Duplex ? ? ? Water Heater ? Lighting Fixtures ? Apt. Bldg. ? ? ? ? Dryer ? Electric Heating ? Commercial Bldg. ? ? e0 Furnace ? Silo Unloader ? Industrial Bldg. ? ? ? Air Conditioner ? Bulk Milk Tank ? Farm ? ? ? List ) List Other ? ? ? Qehers} -? 'flt COMPUTE INSPECTION FEE BELOW f?k V. Service Entrance Size: # Fee Feeders&S b rs7 -? Circuits: # Fee 0 to 100 Amps. 1 1 0 to 30 Am"ores 0 to 30 Amperes 101 to 200 Amps. 1 131 to 100 A Peres i 31 to 100 Am eres Above 200_Amps. Above 100 Amps. Above IOILAm s. Transformers 1 Remote Control Circ. Partial or other fce Signs 1 S ecial Ins eetion Minimum fee v`?b Remarks "iAO , - Cc AX r fy il??Hi? TOTAL FE 'dJ I, the Electrical Inspector, hereby certify that the above inspection has been made. (Rough-in) Date (Final) / ,,.Date This request void 18 months from W.' d L5 Sat (F?tndrE ?- rySZ 18?? Q QQQ??J Date of this Request_ 9?/? ?? Fire No. ? v Y J 1 I, as (Licensed Electrical Contractor ? Owner, do hereby request inspection of the above electri. cal wiring installed at: 3 2 0 (Q s1blF'? titeM. (i-w?J- I ; Street Address or Route No.t ?.`? .12t /- , J: Section Which is occupied by Range County Is a roughin inspection required on this job? No ? Yes ? ' Ready NowW Will Call ? Power Supplier Address Electrical Contractor Ld/ Contractor's License No.. (Company Name) Mailing Address / Authorized Signature (Ele "cal Co for or ner K1149 This Inz[ tion) aga' Phon (Elect M C rector or aking This installation)) a No. - STATE DOA 0 CppY This inspection request will not be accepted by the State Board -- nlxs Minnesota State Board of Electricity Griggs Midway Bldg. - Room N191 ^ EB-00001-02 A$kl Universi tv Ave., St. Paul, Minn. 55104 - PhoC 297.2111 ( `RftUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPEMION CHECK BELOW WORK COVERED BY THIS REQUEST 5 8 5 4 9 7 Type of Building New Add. Rep. Check Appliances Wired For Check Equipment Wired For Home ? ? ? Range ? Temporary Wiring ? Duplex ? ? ? Water Heater ? Lighting Fixtures ? Apt. Bldg. ? ? ? Dryer ? Electric Heating ? Commercial Bldg. ? ? ? Furnace ? Silo Unloader ? Industrial Bldg. ? ? ? Air Conditioner ? Bulk Milk Tank ? Farm w? 11 ? pLList y) pLList ? Other ? ? ? Hehers)' Heiers COMPUTE INSPECTION FEE BELOW Service Entrance Size: 0 to 100 Amps. 101 to 200 Amps. # Fee Feeders&Subfce Mt 0 to 30 Ampeng 11 31 to 100 Am r " k* F 4 I&W El 190 t &1 ircuits: 0 Amperes 00 Amperes # Fee Above 200 Amps. Above 100 Am s. Above 100 Amps. Transformers Remote Control Circ. FT= Partial or other fee Signs Special Ins ection I Minimum fee $5.00 Remarks ?..?1 .?p??F..?v+•+?? ,?b? TOTAL FEE I, the Electrical Inspector, hereby certify that the above inspection has been t adff, 00 (Rough-in) --? r Date OO (Final) icDge ?Q b(/ This request void 18 months from See This req oid I? LJ( ?if? `p4e ti.?? ?8 nwnth ,n ll /o, o 0 `J -94 Raq ue t Datn Fire No. f ns portion h ?yy ' ed Roug ?M1leady Nuw ? Will Notify, Inapec,- Q ?yes 04N, T1 4tr When Ready iC sad Eleclri I Contract.' 1 hereby request inspection of above ner electrical work installed at: SireeT dress, Box or Route No. / C/'ty ecL On o. Township Name or No. Range No. Cnunty Occupant (PRINT) s2C?? ?L u/.. ?C+L Phune No. Power Supplier Address Electrical Contr+rtpr (Company Name) r-^ /C?C 1 -hr L" Contractor's License No. Mailing it ss (CO tJ,tnr or Owner Ming Iryy?latfonu` Authorized Signature ( ontucttor Owner aJcing In Calla P cn Number WZ? 'INS MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY THISP ON REQUEST WILL NOT BE ACCCCEEPTTED ED E STATE BOARD Griggs-Midway Bldg. - Room N•191 UNLESS PROPER R INSPECTION FEE IS 1821 University Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104 Ph... (6121 297-2111 - ENCLOSED. REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION ; EB-00001-03 q T i JT 9 /1/ See instructions fur completing this form on hack of yellow copy, ?11 "X" Below Work Covered by This Request 3p? Ne Add Rep. Type of Building Appliances Wired Equipment Wired Home Range Temporary Service Duplex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Building Dryer Electric Heating Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm Other pan y the, (Speoify) t ,nr Bpeofy. Other Other N Fee Service Entrancs e Size k Fee F eetlers?Subfeetlers b Fee Circuits 0 to, 00 Am 0 to 30m t As 0 to 30 Amos 101 to 200 Amos 31 to 100 Amos 31 to 100 Amu- Rough-in Date l,the Electrical Inspector. hereby' tif th t h Final '?te2 cer y a t e above pectiun has been ` made. t This request void 18 months from Thic:eguest void Cj .?? LSD B7JIl ?P ?d,{`?.Ztiv*- o„ 18 M"-. from l? Request ate I Fire No. RsQNh-in Inspection Ready Now [8V'11 Notify IosPZC- [P as No for When Ready censed Electrical Contractor 1 hereby rag uest inspection of above ] Owner electrical work installed at: Street Address. Box or Route o. 3 sw t? 5: b /YI enr laity -? s? iv ecUOn No. Township Name or No. Range No. Comity Occupant (PRINT) ! (' Phone No. Power Saplilier Address Elect/cal)Contractor (Co" ny Na/me) ?d/CfC ?l??7?LL4 Contractor's License No. O L/ Mailing Address (Contractor or Owner Making Installation) Author ze igna re (C ntractor/Ow el Making Installation) .02? Phone Number y52- - "1 br MINNE OTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT I - Gri99s-Midway Bldg. - Room N•191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE BOARD 1821 University Ave., St, Paul, MN 66104 UNLESS PROPER INSPECTION FEE IS o.--- 1a111 ogli.rt11 ENCLOSED. REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION 1 See instructions for completing this form on back of yellow copy. n?40616 ? "X Work Covered by This Request 3 S S 7 (O e Add so. Type of Building Appliances Wired Equipment Wired Home Range Temporary Service Duplex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Building Dryer Electric Heating Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm Omar puce v the, lSUeci fyI t pr pomiy Other Other Compute Inspection Fee Below N fee Service Entrance Size k Fee Feeders/Subfaeders N Fee Circuits 0 to 100 AMPS 0 to 30 Amps T -0 0 to 30 Am 101 to 200 Amps 31 to 100 Amps 31 to 100 Am Above 200 Amts Above 100-Amps Above 100_Amps Transformers Remote Control Circ. Partial/Other Fee Signs Special Inspection ^ two G?pJ ? TOTA Remarks L Rough-in j r _ - Dale -L M 7?d/ the Electrical Spector, hereby A , certify that the above Final / A ha spection has been J y O 4; 7/ 3 D Q de. This request void - ` ,a months hom This request void 1 8 This rsq months from m j? V f l g ll ? 3 Q/ l/! g- V 1 I t A X 02647 L 5 /? ? ? ??Z? ?5. o v Request Oa to / 2 e, / J (j / I Fire No. RoogP-in Inspection Requlretl? []Reatly Now ill Nolify, InsPe o f Wh H / Z ?Yes o or en eady lcensed Electrical Contractor - I hereby request inspection of above ? Owner electrical work installed at: Street Address, Sox or Route No. City 3 Za 6 411 e-h, / a -- ecuon o. To wnship Name No. ckf Ran a No. Coun / A Occupant (PRINT) / GoU. t Se y? S a?40y-a D Phone No, Power Supplier Address Electric Co tact (Company "me Contractor's License No. Mailing Address (Contract r or Owner Making lasts lat `rl /V Authors o Si atur fGon ractor/Ow r M ing Installation) hone Number MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT Griggs-Midway Bldg. - Room N•191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE BOARD 1821 University Ave., St. Paul, MN 66100 UNLESS PROPER INSPECTION FEE IS Fire- 18121 297.2111 ENCLOSED. (} 01) ON Ea-00001:04 ON n back of vellow copy. I W r f A n y This Request Add Rep. fired Ho Water Heater Pt. B Iding Dryer Equip'mene wired' Temporary Service Lighting Fixtures Electric Hearin Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm Other PeO v [her (Specify) o ther Compute Inspection Fee Below # Fee Service Entraneesize # Fee Feeders/Subfeeders # e L Circuits Z0, a-O 0 to 200 AMPS 0 to 30 Amps 7 0 to 30 Amps Above 200 Amps 31 to 100 Amps 31 to 100 Am Swimming too] Above 100 Am s Above 15T- Alp, Transtormer5 Irrigation Booms Pa rt is l/0ther F Signs Special Inspection 5 G T , Remarks S O OTAL EE p J Rough-in Datey((/?j? I, the Electrical r-y(+/ Inspector- hereby Final D'te/ r4iV that the above ^?s inspection has been e e( made. This request void 18 months from i r IThis II ?rV ftfl wid 5b a 3b ' B 172 t- 5 A 3 Lzu.-? T 1 0, 66 Request Date ??p^ Fire No. Rough-in Inspection Regmred? ? Ready.". (?.wil l Nptify Inspec- e7 Q' Oyes ONO Inr When lOeady icensed Electrical Contractor 1 hereby request inspection of above Owner electrical work installed at: Street Address, Box or Route No . City L I vv ecOOn Township N. o. Range No. County Occupant (PRINT) Phone No. fewer Supplier Address Eleclrica Contract r (Co Name) ConttaCWf s License No. l?L 0 g Mailing Ad ess (Contrac r or Ourner Makin Instailation) "? ?iJiL ?ti fUG Authorized Lure Contra r ing Installationl Phone Needier A STATE BOARD tOF Et?CTRIC ITIf' THIS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT Bldg -Room N-1 1 BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE BOARD ve., St. Paul, MN 65100 UNLESS PROPER INSPECTION FEE IS ENCLOSED. 5 00 3 (,o REQUEST FOR EI-ECTRISAL INSPECTION See instnctims Tar rnmpletithis farm an beck of Yellow mpy. 01;2 "X' - Below Work Covered by This Bequest EB-00001-OA Add Rep- Tv" of naildirg Appliantee Wired Equipment Wired Horne Range Temporary Service Duplex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Building Dryer Electric Heatin Commercial Bldg_ Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm her ismcity) the, ISm iryl Other pedfy other Othc, Compute Inspection Fee Below k Fee Service Entrance Size e. Fee Feaders/Sabteeders p Fee Circuits Om200 Am A Ot0Am 2 Above 200 Am A 11 V01- 0100 A 31 Swimming Pool Above 100-Amps Above 100-Amps Transformers litigation Booms Partial•`Other Fee 10, C_Srgts I I 'Special Inspection w?1 S TOTAL FE Remarks /A/!ifY1 -fie ?Q Rough-in Date 1• the Elect Hector, hereby Firgl ^^ Dale certify that the above /r .7?/ inspection has been 1Nerequesi ?. F 1? i.:.. ,. ?- ? , _ -- , 'r" r.'?' :. city of eagan PAT GFAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TILLEY Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Municipal Center: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Phone: 651.675.5000 Fax: 65 1.675-5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Facility: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 ws xiryofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our Communin• August 27, 2003 Mr. Scott Lyons Dakota County Assessor's Office 1590 Hwy. 55 Hastings, MN 55033-2372 Re: 3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy Dear Mr. Lyons, I am writing in response to your inquiry regarding the above property, specifically the zoning and land use designation for the property, and conditional use permits that have been issued to the property. The City has issued several conditional use permits to the property. All of these permits should have been recorded at the County Recorder's office. Following is a summary of the conditional use permits: • December 4, 1996 - Pylon Sign. (Doc. No. 1402989) • December 4, 1996 - Outdoor storage of rental trucks. (Doc. No. 1402990) • December 4, 1996 - Amended April 1995 CUP allowing auto repair service and outdoor display of new and used tires. (Doc. No. 1415038) • December 4, 1996 - Amended Oct. 1994 CUP allowing outside storage of vehicles and concrete storage bins for landscaping materials. (Doc. No. 1415037) • April 18, 1995 - Auto accessory sales and service. • October 4, 1994 - Outdoor storage of trucks and landscaping materials. In February 2001, the City adopted an update to the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan, in which the land use designation of this property was changed from D-I, Single- Family Residential, to NO, Medium Density. The Medium Density land use designation allows residential development at densities of 4-12 units per acre. To achieve consistency between the zoning and land use designations for this property, the Transitional zoning designation was applied to this property on October 17, 2002. Prior to that, the property had been zoned GB, General Business. The Transitional zoning district is intended to allow existing uses to be maintained as conforming uses, while providing for orderly transitions and redevelopment over time to uses consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. A copy of the Transitional zoning district ordinance is enclosed for your reference. Generally speaking, conditional use permits run with the land, so a change in ownership does not result in termination of the permits. Therefore, a new owner may continue with the same use of the property. A conditional use permit may lapse and become null and void, however, if the use is discontinued for a period of six months. In that event, the use may not be reestablished on the property, and any new use of the property would then need to conform to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan and zoning codes in effect at that time. Please let me know if you have any further questions. I can be reached at 651-675-5691. Sincerely, Pamela Dudziak Planner s city of eagan MEMO TO: Mike Ridley, Senior City Planner FROM: Mary Granley, Code Enforcement Technician DATE: September 29, 2000 SUBJECT: Richfield Blacktop 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway On September 28, 2000 a site inspection was conducted at the above referenced address to determine compliance with three Conditional Use Permits for the property. Please be advised the following violations were noted: U-Haul Storage CUP • No violations Auto Service & Repair CUP The CUP states there shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles or equipment associated with the repair service, and all repair service shall take place within the principal building only. In an area directly south of the building, two auto mechanics had just removed the engine from a dump truck. I was informed this vehicle was in the process of being repaired. Bin & Vehicle Storage CUP All vehicles on the property were currently licensed and appeared operable. A snowmobile was being stored on the property and the owner was informed it required removal. t -. __. - ? , 1.•T ?1 W T i?Y !!'1?1.'?.. .. _ - ? ? 9/28/2000 c w?Tt .S V 9128/2000 f nkb+b ? ?f ?y ti'?•TtT. ?1(,i Ww- . , II.. -_ -. { } i .r _ ivx ?+r...:....nr.?y 3 9d `t < aerie ?C ?S. ' k W V i .u'V Y i vl'A ,:1.. 9 ? ? j .vr ? rnYr t ? .? 3 'i •' rC ?fi "d';. ?? Ci 9/28/2000 0 0 0 N lV a, J? 4 'Y t i a All 3 -Spy f - ;y o--- 74yx o. ? r z 'F f X ? s' t ?J y iF ?v quo f` w ? ? t Y ` Iy..` 7 s y s_ 4 ' r ? ? k 4 1• ? ? F - ? 2 - . 1 9/28/2000 9/28/2000 I 9/28x2000 I ?I lY1R ?I? :" 9128+2000 i N W N O O - ao' IV Oo N O O O 0 o Qz CM N s? s.c j ¢ .t ;a e n - ? r oooa/SF/6 r • ? l t Y Ni N O O O 9/28/2000 9/28/2000 i M", sa4V".?''.$WC'tk4'? ` SIT,-_Y? i?r!'Qw:+c3! $..?t O O O N OD N m r. ? v 1s ?. Date: To: From Re: July 1, 1999 Mayor Awada, City Council & Advisory Planning Commission John & Penny Johnson Zoning._ Miller's letter to the City dated 5/6/99 Members of the Eagan City Council and Planning Commission We are owners of the property at 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway in Eagan. For the past three years we have been subjected to the obsessive, relentless and irrational attacks ti'vm our neighbor Ronald Miller. He feels that his property value has been impaired and that gives him justification to do anything which will put us out of business so the use for our property can be chanted to suit his idea of what is best for him and his property. This crusade was his entire basis for running for the city council. It was his reason for getting on the planning commission and now that he has achieved that position of power, he has commissioned his wife, Barbara Miller, to be their family spokesman for their perceived loss of property value. It is obvious that her name must be used in complaining to. the city because it would be a dircet and obvious conflict of interest for Mr. Miller as a member of the planning commission to try to use his influence in the same way she tries to do. Are you able to see through this very transparent use of Mrs. Miller's name? Needless to say, her complaints should be treated as is they came from Mr. Miller and, as such, they should be disregarded because of the bias froth which they are conceived. When we purchased our property we were told it was available for general business use. The neighbors and the city were happy to have us come in to restore a rundown property and to give vitality to a site, which had degenerated into a public nuisance. We have done everything reasonable to run a law-abiding orderly business and to be good neighbors. .Recently, because of the Millers' obsession with trying to get rid of us, we participated with the City of Eagan and the Millers in a mediation session, which resulted in a mediated agreement allowing us to use our property for our business so long as we complied with certain conditions. One of the terms of that agreement was that if the Millers had trouble with our operation, they would deal directly with us, rather than going through the city. We have complied with the terms of that agreement; we presented a check to the Millers to pay for our half of a fence, which was agreed upon to screen their property. Now we have Mrs. Miller's letter to the city in which she and her husband are again trying to put us out of business and down cone our property to suit their shortsighted views of what is best. for their property, -> CITY OF EAGAN ,TEL°6516814612 07/13199 15:27 Mr. and Mrs. Miller keep talking about their loss of valuation simply because a neighborittg property continues wish a commercial use which everyone knew was there before their houses were built. Isn't it ironic that having a business bordering the millers property was never a problem when they needed and used our services? We submit that their perceived loss of value is not true. On the other hand, it is certain that if the Millers gat their way, our property will be down zoned and its value will be reduced by approximately 75%. The investment we have trade and the improvements we have made to make our property useable will be severely depreciated. Everyone knows that residential property is worth less than commercial property, which has good visibility and access to a major traffic stream. We understand that the City has a duty to balance the interests of property owners when discordant uses abut, Nonetheless, we suggest that the best way to accomplish that is.to preserve the status quo and allow everyone to have the expectations they should reasonably have had when these present uses were established. In that regard, please see attached memo and map of the neighbors that surround our property. Out of 13 property owners 1.2 supports this property to remain General Business now and on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. • Your unbiased consideration of our Yours truty, '. F .. John & Penny Job so is greatly appreciated. => CITY OF EAGAN ,TEL=6516814612 07/13'99 15:27 Date: MEMO TO: From: RE: May 15, 1999 City of Eagan Mayor Awada City Council Planning Commission Property Owners Adjacent and Surrounding Johnson's Richfield Blacktop Zoning We ate all neighbors of Johnson's Richfield Blacktop at 3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy. in Eagan.. Prior to the time the Johnsons purchased this property it had been used for commercial purposes and that use had been in place for many years- While it was vacant, the property was a public nuisance, being a natural attraction for people who wanted to do things out of the vision of the law and law-abiding 667vos. We expected the property to be used for commercial purposes; we believe the use of the property is reasonable and proper and we do not believe that there is any creed to change the General Business zoning. We want the Comprehensive Guide Plan to be General Businew now and in the future. . d 310 sl?a?.c;i tywY. 2 ?fcJ ?P< c'a'r car e 1 6.1 R L t?-ke n Ecuyn VY--,-:?-` Z' 4 Z O , I-Ii?S I K? Cam. ?rn-y? 'a! 551-f M SS +?l AIAI 3151 'maid ?uC ?o,oJptrt P-ltiJ $51?.f ?.ts?l - z, so 31,12 13D Si 61 r• tc,•• is CITY OF EAGAN 'MI 2-i La? - tec. _ L ?t? 3 t -.o G ?brtc. l }l?'? ,TEL-6516814612 07/13'99 15:28 r-,li zL?o y*3 ??• ? f - P-r???so DW V y ,'?or)I+vG ?On?In,G /Vbty 1 L'ar??. /VoW 1 h ol?? 4 w NO 03 wAw?rs _LA-AA s u, ,rs PAAL4r r # G. r a ? , N r U4M E R wA..vrs G. 6 .Z 0AU/w ,fibcv ?- ? o? ©?N sous p Y? Ilj it ,VOW E. r.A.. ). q W"13 Puy w>??`s 6 r ?. zoN„?? AJ 4,v V UE F E W?w7'S .zov?•v6 o rr?ro whvT: G . P> ?{ttW ? G'ant? . PoFETT-E6 WA-AMS . Naw •- ?oMp, V c :u /_ I,- '? " 4-2- 1;` Data May 6.1999 fo. City Council d'c Advisory Planning Commission From: Barbara Millor?# Kc: Qimpreheusive (iuide !'lair a? it rclnics to Richiield lilaoktop located al 32W tiiblew Memorial Hwy to today 's mecung and the Hagan Cotnprol,ensive Cuidc Plan, i Aft0rlookingatnmlcrislsrelated Our home is have several concerns related to the above described properly. locate at3217 Donald Avenue, directly test and shove Richfield filacktup at 3206 Sibley MOmOrial 1lwy. it is our undcrstaitding that ilia city is reviewing the Comprehensive Guide in Order to iLtfl11 the legal requirement and iho Metropolitan Council ovOrall plan to apyievu consistcnax within the municipalities with regards to land use and `Orrdi ??requd zoning the updated • We also understand that the purpose of the Metropolitan Comprehensive Guide flan and 'coning is to achieve both consistency and balance thivullhout the area of existing land use and future land use. The changes, as proposed by the subcommittee, with regards to Richfield Blacktop (3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy.) from Dl (ainglc flimily) to MD (Cedncm d sitty;4 112 nits per not acre) do not sl e n to meet the intent of the Metropolitan consistent with all sulrounding properties which are Ul. ,rho pl (R 1) designation has been in effect at this location for nearly 40 years. We were told by city staff in the early 77a. when we were deciding to build, that the parcel in quostiun lied along rafgo C Dire MD-R3 designation of RI (bl) single familyy.Chan ng the designaiod property ctatiuns will advoncly affect the surrounding property values and the investment backed expo of the adjacent home owners' designated No-neighborhood Allowing the property to remain 0131GOneral Business] (n was cot designation business when we purchased our proporty in 1974) with k n planned ddoyvrenl terms of property will and he% affected those of us whose property adjoins values and ability to sell end replace our current homes and lifw•tyles. 1 du not believe that hrou ibis PYOOess the Metropolitin Council intends to cause hardship for families 1 sttl at since the early 704: The 3206 Sibley Memorial property was comp Si when most of the homes wero being bulb, and had received a designation of NA (Neighborhood Business) at the tvquest of the gas station owner. We. were made aware of c made rtltO Of e this this long range comp guide use, the Von Winkle's indicate thttthe we hmade designation when they bought In the 90'9 slid surely, the city ld also 1 ust as we betted out current owners of the property aware of the comprohensiwt. tine p be Single family purchase on the words ol'the city that the long range of this property would on what had damily dwellings, so the .tohnson's should have based their purchase and plans been dosignated. The "promise' of Rl to surrounding residential homeowners is a very big yrorniso to break and dais not take into account the lives of the fatstiltasaff0et?colinging the • As for pD (planted dcvelopincnt) in the proposal, t hit; also inappropriate. t+c o nodes and owners to continue business without regard to compliance es, o .. J 4 their current CUP is certainly not appropriate. The property has not come into complete compliance with their CUP since its issuance in December, 1996, CVCrt though we have requested enforcement on several occasions. 'The city now has the oppolilunity to make right the many errors which hwvc occurred and not make the same nlislake again. We would like to belicvr that a compromise could be made among the owners of Richfrold Blacktop. the City of 1a11an and those property vwrtcrs di foAly. kffMtcd (i.e. homeowners who share lot houndariet with the propeny) allowing the property lo continue operation as Ni3 (Neighborhood Business) as long as there is full compliance with all current city ordinances, utdes and their CUP. Responding to the "neighborli(W letters," Mr. Gross indicates that the UB dcsignation was in place heihre the homes were built, when in fact it was NB with a Comp Guide ofR 1. VanWinkles indicate that they wcrc made aware of the comp guide designation of Rl when they purchased thch properly. We also agree that there ara too many townhomos in this area, and that 1) 1 is the appropriate designation. Ms. O'Kecfe indicates that the property is "currently zoned light commercial" when in fact it is not. Ms. A'Kcxfe lives on LcTcndre on the other side of the hill _rVorn The property and can neither we nor hear any Pali of that property and is not directly aifectod by this plan. Mr. Billmeier, living next dour to the O'Keefes, is also unaffected by the use of the property. We agree that tuvrnbornes would not be appropriaw. That would surround our property and that of our neighbors with townhomcs and make us an R 1 island. He also indicates that "all The people ...exohiding one want this neighborhood to remain as it is." 'Phis is a pretty strong statement when there are only three written responses, two of which live on 1,OTendre and do not share lots linos nor can they acc or hear activity on the )ohnson properly. Lastly, l would think It Incomprehensible fbr the city to keep this an island of arty typo of business over the long haul when all surrotmding property is residential. lrrom a moral and othitel perspective, it is nut the same treatment given to other business owners or others who have different ideas about how their properties should be zoned for the lung range good of this city. Single family (as stated in ilm Eagan Comp Oujda) or at a maximum, twin homes is The only appropriate and fair way to treat ibis property for the long range vision of the oily and for tho consimcncy :sought by the Met Council and the law. liesod on the above concerns and issues that r do not believe have boon thoroughly investigated, I would reyuca! that This portion of the plan be pulled for rbrther review and consideration prior to being scrd forward to other entities for approval. t .:idyl r. •=?? iii. TOTRt_ P.03 ,C 5 /631 c:'-? ?? city of eagan March 19, 1998 JOHN & PENNY JOHNSON RICHFIELD BLACKTOP 3206 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HW_ Y EAGAN MN 55122 Dear John & Penny: THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA BEA BLOMQUIST SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk I would like to take this opportunity to thank both of you for meeting with me on Thursday, March 12, to discuss violations to approved Conditional Use Permits for your property. As we discussed, we have forwarded the Tamarack Noise Monitoring Study to the MPCA and are still waiting for their response. We will inform you of the results of that review when that information is available. To summarize our meeting, I would like to reiterate our discussion regarding the following: 1) Outdoor lighting that shines off site and impacts adjacent properties. The City Code requires that all site lighting be defused and directed downward and that the source of the light is not visible from adjacent properties or public right-of-way. 2) Storage of items in the area east of the bins. After researching this with the City Attorney's Office, it was determined that based on the approved Conditional Use Permits for the site, storage in that area is not allowed regardless of whether it is landscape materials or personal property. 3) Cars/tires/miscellaneous items stored behind/between three accessory buildings on property. Outside storage is allowed only as permitted under the approved Conditional Use Permit. Since the Conditional Use Permit does not provide for outdoor storage in this area, these items must be removed or stored within a structure. Used tire storage and the trash dumpster must be within an existing structure unless/until the dumpster/tire bin enclosure is constructed. MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 681-4600 FAX: (612) 681-4612 TDD: (612) 454-8535 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity Employer MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX: (612) 681-4360 TDD: (612) 454-8535 4) Display of snowplows for sale. Selling snowplows is not a violation of the Conditional Use Permit; however, any display of items to be sold needs to occur in the designated display area. 5) U-Haul Rental Units. The Conditional Use Permit limits the storage to five items at any one time (two U-Haul trucks and three U-Haul trailers). Our site inspection on January 30, 1998 revealed that there were five items (two U-Haul trucks and three U-Haul trailers). 6) Location of semi-truck and trailer storage on-site. All trucks, trailers, and equipment must be stored in the southeastern portion of the site as required by the Conditional Use Permit. You indicated that you could accommodate any outstanding issues relating to the Conditional Use Permit in a reasonable amount of time. A site inspection to verify compliance will be performed by City staff no later than March 27, 1998. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of these items further, please do not hesitate to contact me at 681-4689. Again, thank you for taking the time to sit down and discuss this matter with me. Sincerely, Michael J. Ridley Senior Planner MJR/js cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator 3600 Kennebec Drive Suite 7S NATHAN & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW DALE C. NATHAN ATTORNEY AT LAW June 20, 1996 Mr. Mike Ridley City of Eagan Maintenance Facility 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Richfield Blacktop Highway Dear Mr. Ridley: Pte' RENEE SCHAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT ,Al? /0 q (,? 96/ U SO 03 - 3206 Sibley Memorial Mr. Ron A. Miller has consulted me to advise him on a problem he and his neighbors are experiencing in connection with Richfield Blacktop - 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway. He asked me to respond on his behalf to your letter to him dated June 13, 1996. Mr. Miller has advised you of the situation and you have very kindly given it youriattention. Your letter dated June 13, 1996, suggests that Mr. Miller provide you with a letter and other materials that describe the problem Mr. Miller and his neighbors are experiencing and advise the City of Eagan of the specific relief they desire. I am presently out-of-state and will return the week of June 24, 1996. After I return, I will be conferring with Mr. Miller to prepare a further response to your letter. In the interim, Mr. Miller and I respectfully request that it would be useful for city officials to observe the operations of Richfield Blacktop and view the area they are occupying. We believe this will be useful in demonstrating the seriousness of the problem for homeowners adjacent to Richfield Blacktop. Sincerely, 4a& C Dale C. Nathan ,Kl) DCN/rs CC: Ron A. Miller Tom Hedges, City Administrator 0231Ridley.ltr - 0 - 41y901 OSz7 -03 _'XTRACT OF MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN -3-2 ya DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was duly held at the Eagan Municipal Center located at 3830 Pilot Knob Road in said City on April 18, 1995 at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: Egan, Wachter, Awada, Hunter, and Masin; the following were absent: none. x w w • • : • • + w a r • • Hunter introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF EAGAN Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit allowing Johnson's Richfield Blacktop an auto accessory sales and service facility for the property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and attaching conditions thereto WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Eagan has adopted zoning regulations to control land uses and performance standards throughout the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that a Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved subject to the conditions as set forth in the Conditional Use Permit attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this 18th day of April, 1995. CITY OF EA.GAN (Seal) S By: \,t. J. VanOverbeke Its City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Masin and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Egan, Wachter, Awada, Hunter, and Masin; and the following voted against the same: none. ?e STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) ss On this 18th day of April, 1995 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared E.J. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the City Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. This Document was drafted by: City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 EXHIBIT A CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, Johnson's Richfield Blacktop has complied with all the requirements of the City of Eagan necessary for obtaining a Conditional Use Permit. NOW THEREFORE, By order of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, and by virtue hereof a Conditional Use Permit is authorized as follows: 1. Permitting a Conditional Use for an automobile service facility within the confines of a "General Business" zone. 2. Said Conditional Use Permit shall apply to the following described property: Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd Addition 3. Said Conditional Use Permit shall run with the land as long as all conditional use standards are met. 4. Said Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to conformance with the Eagan City Code and with the conditions set forth herein to include, but not limited to: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of the date of approval and proof of its recording provided to the City. 2. The installation and repair service shall be provided only for automobiles and trucks with a payload rating of three-quarter ton or less. 3. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment or supplies associated with the auto and truck service. 4. All installation or repair service shall take place within the principal building only. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of May, 1995. CITY OF EAGAN A Minnesota Municipal Corporation By: Mike idley Project Planner STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF DAKOTA) ss. On this 8th day of May 1995, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Mike Ridley, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Project Planner of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and said Project Planner acknowledged said instrument to be the f ee act and deed of said municipality. ? , • d /J /, J A i / MARILYN L. wUCHE NeSOTO IG KOTAR NOTANY P UBIIGMINNE50TA DAKOTACOUNTY 31, 2000 My Commission Expires Jan. I hereby verify that the above said Conditional Use Permit was recorded at the County Recorder's Office on JUNE 23rd, , 1995. BY: ITS: ? COPY D',r-_--L'D y D m i n >M T z 9 jn T N o D M 71 O T8 m ? 00- M 0$O Z Z ? 0 Q S H T n a k 2- C n c.) fr+ s "' -Zi O C ) M s o z z Z r = z 3 O 0 m m c) m9 . r - M Z Z n c m ^ 0 M MN ` 0 W;;1b >C 00 ? tm 4!1 ° D m a y z Mm JAMES N DOLAN COUNTY RECORDER N - EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN ]ip ?C •-c{c(gC(-eS7? t? DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was duly held at the Eagan Municipal Center located at 3830 Pilot Knob Road in said City on October 4, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Egan, Wachter, Awada, Masin, and Hunter; the following were absent: none. r r x r r r x r r x r x x r Hunter introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF EAGAW----"--'•------ Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit allowing Johnson's Richfield Sod & Blacktop outdoor storage of trucks and landscaping materials for the property described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and attaching conditions thereto WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Eagan has adopted zoning regulations to control land uses and performance standards throughout the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that a Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved subject to the conditions as set forth in the Conditional Use Permit attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this 4th day of October, 1994 CITY OF EAGAN (Seal) *Byr:J. LVanOdveee?k-e Its City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Wachter and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Egan, Wachter, Awada, Masin, and Hunter, and the following voted against the same: none. i i STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) ss On this 4th day of October, 1994, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared E.J. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being by me duly swom, did say that he is the City Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City'Council and said City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 MAO A+PUBiL 11C. KOTA?NPUNTY?IMO MY eammlee n A o gplre? 288i This Document was drafted by: : 1 EXHIBIT A CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, Johnson's Richfield Sod and Blacktop has complied with all the requirements of the City of Eagan necessary for obtaining a Conditional Use Permit. NOW THEREFORE, By order of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, and by virtue hereof a Conditional Use Permit is authorized as follows: 1. Permitting a Conditional Use for outdoor storage of trucks and landscaping materials within the confines of a "General Business" zone. 2. Said Conditional Use Permit shall apply to the following described property: Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd Addition 3. Said Conditional Use Permit shall run with the land as long as all conditional use standards are met. 4. Said Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to conformance with the Eagan City Code and with the conditions set forth herein to include, but not limited to: 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall become effective upon the recording of said permit and Council resolution with the Dakota County Recorder and documentation of said recording provided to the City within 60 days of Council action. 2. Submission and implementation of a landscape plan for the berm area north of the site and the area along Highway 13. 3. The applicant should upgrade the parking and storage areas with bituminous surface and bituminous curbing around the entire area, to be phased in over two years. 4. The applicant shall properly maintain all surfaced areas, curbing and premises. 5. Customer parking spaces shall be striped and drive aisles delineated. 6. The applicant shall construct a berm along the north property line and railroad ties/timber bins to screen the proposed storage. 7. Storage of vehicles not to exceed 20 shall be located in the northeast portion of the property up against a hill. Dump trucks, pickup trucks and sod trucks and trailers will be permitted. One tractor trailer vehicle will be allowed. 8. The City shall inspect the site for compliance with the conditional use permit one year after approval and shall determine whether the storm drainage system is creating any erosion or other problems. As a result of this review, additional conditions may be imposed by the City Council. 9. The applicant shall record the conditional use permit at the Dakota County Recorder's Office within 60 days of Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of October, 1994. CITY OF EAGAN A Minnesota Municipal Corporation By: James L. Sturm Its City Planner STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF DAKOTA) :ss. On this 24th day of October, 1994, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared JAMES L. STURM, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the City Planner of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and said City Planner acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. 0 NTpN PLUBUf. • A DAKOTA COUMIY 4r eamnMYaw WMy •iN I hereby verify that the above said Conditional U e Permit was recorded at the County Recorder's Office on ? 19 BY: N dec ,te ITS.--- suer ESn ?o? ;33 ?-?`c;-ems Gay 0??`o nSbS, N?S?? Council Minutes May 17, 1983 ?'CQUNTRY STANDARD. STATION 0C IZ68 A petition from neighboring property owners requesting review and upgrad- ing of the conditional use permit for the Country Standard Station on Highway 113 was submitted to the Council. Mr. Hedges recommended continuing con- sideration of extension to the permit until the June 7, 1983 meeting. There were concerns about use of the property for a truck stop and a number of neighboring property owners were present. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to direct the staff to make contacts with the owners and with the neighbors prior to the next meeting and to have it rescheduled to the June 7, 1983 meeting. All voted in favor. 4TH OF JULY ASSOCIATION A request from the 4th of July Association for contribution from the City was discussed by the Council. Wachter moved, Smith seconded the motion to authorize the sum of $500.00 from budgeted funds for the Eagan 4th of July Celebration. All voted yes. POLICE AND FIRE AUTOMOBILE DISPOSAL The staff recommended that the Council authorize the sale of the 1974 Ford, which has been used both as a Police and Fire auto, to declare it excess property and authorize its disposal on a high-bid basis. Thomas moved, Smith seconded the motion to accept the recommendation. All voted yes. OF EDUCATION - DR. RUTH RANDALL City Administrator Hedges announced that Governor Perpich has appointed Dr. Ruth Randall, Superintendent of I.D.S. #196, as the Minnesota Commissioner of Education and Councilmembers acknowledged their congratulations to Dr. Randall for the appointment. DONN SCHUMACHER - PARRS AND RECREATION - RESIGNATION Donn Schumacher submitted a letter to the Council indicating he was forced to resign from the Parks and Recreation Commission because of his travel schedule. Upon motion by Wachter, seconded Egan, it was resolved that the Council accept the resignation and authorize the staff to advertise for a replacement and also to express thanks from the Council for his service on the Commission. All voted yea. 3 ®F aagan 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 REA BLOMOUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Moyor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER June 1, 1983 CW.ail Me,, e,s THOMAS HEDGES City Atl idstrota EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Countryside Standard - Review of Conditional Use Permit Dear Letendre Residents: On June 7, 1983, the City Council will be reviewing the condi- tional use permit for Countryside Standard. Hopefully this will provide sufficient notification for this review as directed by the City Council at their regular meeting on May 17, 1983. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle City Planner DCR/jach cc - Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Mailing list for Countryside Standard Conditional Use Permit Notification Ron A. & Barbara Miller 3217 Donald Ave Todd Laubis & Bob Wayhelonis 3225'Donald Ave Pauline & Jeff Michaelis 3233 Donald Ave James & Susan Freseman 3241 Donald Ave Ray Miller 3251 Donald Ave Michael & Joanne O'Keefe 1679 Letendre St Dave &'Sandra Olson 1685 Lentendre St Helen Altman 3240 Heritage Ln Lester Bundrock & wfe 3170 Sibley Mem. Hwy Michael & Joanne Billmeier 1673 Letendre St MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JUNE 2, 1983 SUBJECT: COUNTRY STANDARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Staff has met with Mr. Tom MacIntyre who is the present owner of the Country Standard located on=-Lot-S; Block 3, Letendre Second Addition-on Highway 13. Mr. MacIntyre has indicated to staff that at the present time he has no intention of upgrading or expanding the present service station in the immediate future.' Mr. MacIntyre has indicated some time in the future he would like to add an addi- tional service bay in order to increase the service business to the existing service station. However, these plans are down the line and are not expected within the next year. Staff has also brought to Mr. MacIntyre's attention the complaint the City received regarding tractor-trailers parked on his proper- ty at night leaving diesel engines running which disturb the sur- rounding residential neighborhood. Mr. MacIntyre has indicated to staff that this has happened occasionally, but is not intended to be a practice for his present facility. Mr. MacIntyre has in- dicated that some tractor-trailers have pulled into his lot at night, and when the service station opened in the morning, fueled and left the service station. Mr. MacIntyre has indicated that he does not intend to run a truck stop, but only provide gas and ser- vice to the motorists using T.H. 13 or Eagan residents. In reviewing this application, this conditional use permit has some history involved with the existing building. It is staff's under- standing that the original building predates 1950 and was operated as a country store, and in 1966, Mr. Huber obtained the property and submitted an application to rezone the property from R-1 (Res- idential Single District) to C-1 (Light Commercial) in 1966. The Town Board approved this rezoning with certain stipulations. En- closed is a copy of the minutes dated March 1, 1966 for your re- view showing the conditions applied to the zoning which were approv- ed in 1966. Since 1966, the City of Eagan revised ordinance No. 6, the Zoning Ordinance in 1975. In 1975, six commercial zoning classi- fications came into existence. In 1975, this property was desig- nated GB (General Business) which would allow a service station as a conditional use within that zoning district. In reviewing the minutes of the approval of 1966 and reviewing the conditions placed on that conditional use, staff is working with the City Attorney to see what additional conditions can be placed on this permit over and above what was agreed to in 1966. It is staff's understanding that Mr. MacIntyre would be agreeable to place as a condition that no tractor-trailers be parked on his property or any diesel engines be running at night to mitigate the impact that this noise may have on the residential neighborhood. Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Country Standard Conditional Use Permit June 2, 1983 Page two . It is staff's understanding that Mr. MacIntyre is in agreement with this condition which may resolve most of the controversy between Country Standard and the surrounding residents. Enclosed with this memorandum is the petition submitted to the City on May 8, 1983 for your review, and also the minutes of the March 1, 1966 meeting stating the conditions of approval of Mr. Huber's facility and the conditional use requirements in ordinance No. 6 for your review. If you have any questions or would like further information, please feel free to contact me at the City Hall. S* ncerely, Dale C. Runkle City Planner DCR/jach ?vl CL Tc7;Ea9ar? C'?y Counc!l ll-(embers: The. ?ollo?U?nq raqQ.ues+anc@ peL&IOn ?a vEU??u? (ncL ?pll??tono,A1 USap?r?r.,?-' ?0.r?rlC?rd StirJrGG. c rad e -rh c ?1 o C o u p+r (31ack3, S L-o+ 5 ?+'e-ndre 6ba- 6n loco+ecC on e -?otlow,r?c? Add,+,an f?o.2 ?s hire by vv,e by +h tjroX,r?n+ly homc,Ownc%, s I,v,r?c? Irl close }o said Cc u,nC.r 1 On Marsh lct(0?: ?hL ?,ght Commercial) (,`QQYOJ.ec? i'gz oninq ?rom b Geor Said .fat w.,th feIa,+r%c,+1ons reecS .'?o y. I -f ?u kic r 4o b e P assed or', +V ary gl,L., Secru6n EJ?+?ers. }h E p E i.U O W n'e- r's O -? y+.IS our e61ir,q +ha for, have a- 0-0ry" 2 C,outti?-r'.y S?ar?dCcrcl Sao- ?h1's erg ow r, e,?-s rl r d;sre uCArd oY' adjo?l^Ir,c? drop y c.?-btd?n9 T?? +Y?e Con?orNc?) t Ctncf 4ha `IRIy (kce i,? C?ovrr,yerclo?l Use.. ulretrnerrts a f ?"l; ?'S SP?G;?,cally f?-q,ulreme,nt ..?8 : C?asol,ne U ski-tor, 6.03 ,5{-a,hor parts ? rrnd TJ. u.nd?r g?G?'o-ra brouht Lie r`?nest 'N`eat i of PcrmIt b? 9 ?I E}r)r) I RL,Y)?w a {,at Lc 11 ?ubdivlslor > ?, F? Cour?u u.nd +b eiore .?, Ea ? a.r1 ? ?, art cc.c1 vu.ncQ . n?rs be no+? G?c??olntnc? propey our al hear,n ? yea S D???I?l?.? v?J?2 . 32- Z wi _ 6g?S' cz; «5 Gt?i 3 3.3 o 0-,_.,?- 3V"t, Qin?Q? GL.?c ?l?_????oa? ?w.??9c?+..??,,,<<oZ3 ?Te?are S?, ?{5?(-usO .p,rX 9 V 1 /.•..._ ...a - - 1 t0? l 1? G'Y ? n ? ? e J ? . ?'I J Y "?v 2t JGor 01S?m azi/ 1 G ?s Ln c% d, s'y 3233 t ff MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS y EAGAN TOWNSHIP, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ' // March 1, 1966 A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors was hold on March 1, 1966 at 8:00 o'clock P. M. at the town hall at which all members were present. Chairman Rahn presided. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as read. The following building permit application was submitted. Air Liner Motel on Highway 055, for 2 foot by 8 foot addition and remodeling, $2,100 plus equipment $6,100. Upon motion by Supervisor Schwanz, seconded by Chairman Rahn it was RESOLVED that the foeegoing building permit application be,and it hereby is, approved. A public hearing concerning the application of George W. Huber, 6100 Eleventh Avenue South, Minneapolis, for rezoning Lot 5, Block 3, LeTendre Addition No. 2 from R-1, Residential to C-1 light commercial was first f presented.- Certain neighbors appeared in respect to the application concerning the upkeep and maintenance of the property. Mr. Huber verbally agreed in the presence of the Board of Supervisors that he would keep the grass cut, that no junk automobiles or other junk would be left on the property and that the old building in the rear of the property would be removed as conditions. for approval of his application. Upon motion duly made by Supervisor Schwan and seconded by Chairman Rahn it was resolved that the foregoing rezoning application be, and it hereby is, approved subject to the foregoing stipulations which applicant agrees will include any subsequent buyers or assignees of the property involved. The application of William O'Neill, 2060 Dodd Road, St. Paul, Minnesota for the rezoning of 50 acres in Section 2-21-23 from A, Agricultural to C-2 Heavy Commercial was next presented. Mr. Max Goracke of MDS } Development Company and Mr. O'Neill appeared and upon motion by Chairman Rahn, seconded by Supervisor Klein it was RESOLVED that said application - 1 - u t r' . Subdivision 6. ?- C-1, C-2, COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. r 4 ' L. C-1, ' LIG::T C^.iVZRCIAL. - Fa land classified light com- mercial shall be used for any other than the following uses: PERVITTED USC2 1. Retail Stores 2. Automobile showrooms and garages. 3. Indoor Theaters. 4. Financial institutions. 5. Motels and hotels. 6. Professional and business offices. 7. Restaurants. 8. Beauty and barber shops. S. Churches. 10. Hospitals. 11. Private Clubs. CONDITIONAL USES PERLNIITTE-? 1. Mortuaries. 2. Drive-in restaurants. 3. Drive-in Theaters. 4. Outdoor Advertising. 5. Laundries. 6. Animal Kennels, stables, gun clubs and riding academies. 7. Used car and vehicle lots. 8. Gasoline service stctions. a. Notwithstanding any other lesser requirement contained in this ordinance, the minimum front- age on any street side of any such station -9- =1 shall be 250 feet with setback from such frontage (excluding gas pumps) of not less than 60 feet and side and rear yard setback of not less than 50 feet where contiguous to any residential area and 30 feet where contiguous to any other area, b• till such stations shall require the issuance of a special use permit prior to the construction and operation thereof. C. All such service station structures shall be faced on all sides with suitable facing material so as to give them an architectural quality commensurate with other similar structures constructed at or about the same time, All such structures# where located on property con- tiguous to any residential area shall be completely screened by suitable landscaping so as not to be reasonably visible from any adjoining residences. e, Ali gasoline service stations which are located along any major street or thoroughfare at an inter- section shall be set back from such intersection in accordance with intersection engineering details of © the Town'of Eagan. The conditional use permit required under section 6.03, Subdivision 4 of this ordinance shall be renewed annually by application to the Board of Supervisors prior to January 1st of each calendar year following issuance of the original permit. 9. Truck stops. a. Notwithstanding any other lessor requirement con- tained in this ordinances the minimum frontage on any installation shall be 300 feet with setback from such frontage (excluding goas pumps) of not less than 60 feet and side and rear yard setback of not less than 50 feet. -10- b. All requirements as hereinabove set forth in subparagraphs 8b, V-c, 3e, 3e and 8f shall also apply to true:- stops. B. C-2, itvx C03f[dERCIAL. No land classified heavy commercial shall be used or occupied for any other than the following uses, PERiiITTED USE. 1. All uses permitted under C-1 classification. 2. Shopping Centers.. 3. Wholesale and jobbin-, houses. 4. Commercial indoor recreational enterprises. 5. Any establishments serving intoxicating beverages including 3.2 beer. 6. Lumber yards, printing establishments. 7. Plumbing, electrical and building contractors shops ' and yards. -J 8. Storage facilities and warehouses for soft goods. 9. Public utility yards, shops, warehouses and stations. C. GENEREL C011NIERCIAL PROVISICNS. In all commercial dis- tricts, all structures shall be set back from any boundaries contiguous to agricultural and residential districts at least thirty (30) feet which shall be considered a buffer zone and suitably landscaped to screen said commercial district from said residential districts. IATo such buffer zone shall be used for part-.in:-,, driveway or loading areas. ?.'here adjoining lots or parcels of land are used coamercially, there shall be a setback from any such boundary line of at least ten (10) feet unless any such adjoining lot structures shall be joined by a party wall or so close as to approximate a party wall. In any event, the use of any lands so classified shall be subject to section 6.03, Subdivision 3, herein. -11- SEC. 10.41. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL. The Air Pollution Control Rules, promulgated by the Minnesota Pollution Con- trol Agency, are hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein. Three copies of said Rules shall be marked CITY OF EAGAN - OFFICIAL COPY and kept on file in the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer and open to inspection and use by the public. It is unlawful to violate a provi- sion of this Section or of the Air Pollution Control Rules hereby adopted by reference. SEC. 10.42. NOISE POLLUTION REGULATIONS. Subd. 1. Adoption of Regulations. The Noise Pollution Control Section of the Minnesota State Regulations published by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, are hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein. Two copies of such Regulations shall be marked CITY OF EAGAN - OFFICIAL COPY and kept on file in the office 'of the City Clerk-Treasurer and open to inspection and use by the public. . Subd. 2. Unlawful Act. It is unlawful for any person to create or maintain levels of sound in excess of those permitted by the Noise Pollution Standards. Subd. 3.. Alternative Remedy. The City may, at its option, seek civil injunctive relief to enforce the Noise Pollution Regulations adopted in this Section. Source: City Code Effective Date: 1-1-83 (Sections 10.43 through 10.49, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) 250 (1-1-83) ,..I. n n F P,. r:.. -a y -- TREFFLE iACRE; / -- --1 ?E NDf? I A I rh : ? J OFi N m/ Ist -4 I / ADD. R-4 ' ? SI T MINA a LI R_4 RD N U IA RK / } i LI A j R-4 /...-._ . key a . h-Np i,, f/ u a s- ¢g i% A A - .1 RIDGE R-4 I R-4 N B N drrA RD -4, 2 ?. SU EY gg?? EI ENT H&T5H ADD D / / oo?? ?I P Bi Ffs 7 -3 ?„BP PD _ >nl? OG. I 81-1 ' A l.. LI R-4 11 ., w 0 R DG v'I Q - A d R-1 ,. TA K Q? BL K ADDITION A J !, A -4 R F CK R S IL I i R- F I i ,I o.n _ ?. _ 17 Council Minutes June 7, 1983 U'd1' $692,594.95 under the total base bid, and that the assessment be spread over a 15 year period. A number of affected residents appeared and asked questions about the project and the alternate. It was noted that the Council has adopted a Resolution to install concrete curb and gutters for reconstructed or new installation of street improvements are made throughout the City. Councilman Smith stated that he favored the reconstruction of the streets in the Cedar Grove area for two to three,years and was originally opposed to concrete curb and gutter. He noted that the assessments had been reduced about $500.00 per lot with the recommendation that the assessments be spread over a 15 rather than a 10 year period, with the alternate of paying the assessment in full and avoiding interest on the assessments. The estimated assessment based on the low bid for 15 year spread with 25% city participation would be $1,250.00 per lot, rather than $1,716.00 per lot originally estimated in the preliminary report. A large number of persons indicated they favored the concrete curb and gutter primarily because of the reduction in assessments. Councilman Wachter was concerned about the precedent that would be set if concrete curb and gutter was not installed, including the long-term impact in other areas. Mayor Blomquist indicated she would abstain from voting because the Council had indicated residents could make their own decision as to whether concrete curb and gutter was to be installed, and noted that residents at earlier meetings had generally favored concrete curb and gutter, but persons responding to a recent survey generally were opposed. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the low bid of McNamara Vivant Construction Co. in the sum of $692,594.95 to provide for the installation of concrete curb and gutter with the City paying 25% of the cost and the assess- ments spread over 15 years. All voted in favor except Blomquist who ab- stained. COUNTRY STANDARD - SERVICE STATION RENEWAL The application of Country Standard for renewal of its conditional use permit for service station located on Highway #13 was next discussed by the Council. Tom MacIntyre, together with his attorney were present, as well as other neighboring property owners who were objecting to the extension of the conditional use permit. It was noted there had been no basic changes in the Ordinance and a report prepared by Dale Runkle dated June 2 was distributed and reviewed by the Council. Also, a Petition objecting to the alleged exten- sion of the use of the property from neighboring property owners, was dis- cussed. The attorney for MacIntyre indicated that the tractor/trucks do not turn off their engines in the winter for fear of freezing, but no trucks are permitted overnight. New diesel fuel pumps and tanks have been installed and it was indicated that they may be an extension of the current use. The uniqueness of the site being a low depression adjacent to single family homes was discussed and various possibilities for screening were also reviewed. Mr. MacIntyre indicated that he would not allow tractor/trailers to be running all night on the site. Ron Miller of 3217,Donald Avenue spoke on behalf of .neighboring property owners who objected to the view of the trucks and also 7 Council Minutes June 7, 1983 001 `32 Ja a leaving trucks running all night. He cited certain alleged ordinance viola- tions and questions arose as to whether there was an increase in the use and whether a permit holder was allowed to change the use. In 1975 a public hearing was held on the rezoning to General Business from C1 and question arose as to whether the standards applied in 1975 for service stations should be implemented. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue the application until the next regular meeting to allow the staff time to review the following issues: 1. Whether the renewal of the conditional use permit under the 1976 Ordinance can be modified to include conditions in later versions of the ordinance. 2. Can the Council change the conditions such as those relating to ingress and regress. 3. Whether parking of tractors and trailers can be allowed for non- business purposes, such as storage. 4. Should landscaping and grading be required to buffer the neighboring single family owners. 5. Whether the addition of a diesel fuel pump was an expansion of the use. 6. Whether the people living on site is a violation of the conditional use permit under the GB zoning. 7. That the staff review the fencing and screening, entrance issues concerning safety and the storage of trucks and trailers on the site. All voted yes. SUPERAMERICA - PRELI1IINARY PLAT/PERMIT EXTENSION The preliminary plat and special use extension of Superamerica was re- viewed by the Director of Public Works. At the last City Council meeting questions were raised by the Administrator and Director of Public Works re- garding the existing conditions and whether other conditions ought to be imposed on the preliminary plat. Mr. Colbert introduced the subject and Lewis Schuette of Ashland Oil, the owner, was present. He indicated that they have tried to contact Mr. Vogelpohl about potential sale to Mr. Vogelpohl of the small parcel of land on the east side of the restaurant, adjacent to Super- america, but that Mr. Vogelpohl has not responded. It was also noted that it appears there is a driveway over the Superamerica property adjacent to the restaurant. Mr. Schuette stated that he agrees with the conditions but noted the 75 foot right-of-way may vary according to the state acquisition require- ments from 73 to 79 feet. Egan moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the extension of the preliminary plat and special use permit, subject to the following conditions: 8 of 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 June 8, 1983 RON A MILLER 3217 DONALD AVE EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Countryside Standard=Review of Conditional Use Permit Dear Ron: BEA BLOMOUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Atlmi,.trotor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clork As referenced at the City Council meeting last night, the City Planner and City Attorney will be reviewing and compiling a report in reference to issues raised by the City Council in their action for a continuance of the Country- side Standard conditional use permit renewal until the June 21 meeting. Enclosed are the pictures you asked to be returned. A copy of the report will be available during the late afternoon of Friday, June 17, for your review and circulation amongst the neighborhood. Sincerely, t-4- Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd Enclosure LS I? 31(-&.-4-8 i I d w@ 3 tm -WIC-t?Ale, ?_ THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY ATTENDANCE FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING HELD AT CITY HALL, JUNE 20, 1983 - RE: COUNTRY STANDARD --TCtn, .,&Ap4A) U& Agenda Information Packet June 21, 1983 City Council Packet Page Eleven SERVICE STATION RENEWAL/'COUNTRY STANDARD A. Service Station Renewal for Country Standard -- At the last regular City Council meeting on June 7, 1983, Mr. Tom MacIntyre, representing Country Standard, along with his legal counsel and operating partners appeared, requesting renewal of their service station license. Also in attendance were several adjacent neighbors to the Countrv Standard property who voiced objection to aspects of the Country Standard operation which according to the neighbor- hood has changed under the new ownership from George Huber to Tom MacIntyre. The spokesman for the neighborhood was Mr. Ron Miller, also an adjacent neighbor. At the meeting, there were a number of questions raised by the neighborhood and members of the City Council as they relate to the interpretation of the grandfather clause and whether a conditional use permit renewal can be amended; and once that question was interpreted, several other questions were raised and became pertinent to the question of a license re- newal. The City Administrator recorded ten (10) questions that were raised as a result of the discussion and directed a memorandum to the City Attorney and City Planner to research, review and pro- vide a memorandum to the City Council to further clarify these questions and provide information to further consider the service station renewal application. A copy of this memorandum is enclosed on pages 22 through 23 . The City Planner and City Attorney have indepen ently written comments which are enclosed on pages _a?- through 3a for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the ser- vice station renewal for Country Standard as presented for con- sideration. Z1 MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE CITY ATTORNEY 11AUGE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 8, 1983 SUBJECT: COUNTRY STANDARD Dale, the Country Standard agenda item was discussed in some length by the City Council with a great deal of participation from Tom Mclntyre's attorney and Mr. Ron Miller, adjacent neighbor. Follpwing the discussion, a motion was made to continue the item until the next City Council item asking City staff to review and research the following items: 1. Can a conditional use permit renewal be amended? This pertains to the "grandfather clause" that is normally recognized by City Councils. 2. Are the entrance access points to Country Standard adequately designed to minimize safety hazards, especially at the inter- section of Letendre? 3. Is a residential occupancy allowed in the second story of the existing building? Is this d permitted use? 4. Can the City restrict the hours of operation? 5. Can the City provide and require additional screening for the residential property? 6. The 1966 permit that was issued to George Huber should be re- viewed in detail. Apparently, a letter or permit does exist that is more explicit than the minutes. 7. Can the City restrict overnight parking of tractor trailer rigs on site by requiring signage and the like? 8. Can the City restrict the storage of vehicles such as semi-trailers on the property? 9. Was the addition of another fuel pump regarded as an expansion of conditional use permit? 10. Can the City require the grading and bituminous surfacing of the property, realizing the expanded use? These are the questions that I listed as a result of the City Council's dis- cussion with the property owner and surrounding neighbors. Paul rtav have an addi tional question that requires research to add to this list I would like a report prepared by both of you add ressing these issue . s to accompany the next City Council agenda packet so it is possible for the Z2. Country Standard Memo June 8, 1953 Page Two Citv Council to: 1. Know specifically what legal avenues they have regarding the exisitng conditional use permit of record, and 2. 1 they are able to amend an existing conditional use permit with- out any public hearings, then what conditions are reasonable to attach to the conditional use, permit? : ' City Administrator TLH/hnd 23 HAUGE, SMITH, Emirs ; & iir•.r.LEf?. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL 1'IIGHWAY EAGAN, NIINNEEOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE AREA CODE 612 BRACLEY SMITH TELEPHONE 454.4224 KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER CITY COUNCIL RE: Country Standard Conditional Use Permit Renewal City Council Members: The staff has been asked to research a number of questions that arose at the Council meeting on June 7 concerning the application of Country Standard and Tom McIntyre for renewal of its conditional use permit for service station purposes. Dale Runkle submitted a Memorandum dated June 2, 1983, and outlined much of the history of the site including the fact that the building predated 1950 but was operated as a grocery store until 1966 when George Huber received approval of an application to rezone the property from R-1 Residential Single, to C-1 Light Commercial. 1. The then Town Board imposed conditions upon approval including the following: a. That the owner keep the grass cut. b. That the owner would not allow junk vehicles or other junk to be left on the property. c. That the old building at the rear of the property be removed. Further, the Board required that any subsequent buyers or assignees of the property would be regulated by the same conditions. 2. The property was operated by George Huber until approximately 1982 when it was purchased by Tom McIntyre. During that period of time it is our understanding that it was operated basically as a gasoline service and repair station and also sold diesel fuel both for automobiles and trucks. We also understand that the conditional use permit has been renewed on an annual basis and to the best of the staff's knowledge there have not been objections to the a4 use of the property until recently. 3. A petition was submitted to the Council dated May 8, 1983, signed by several property owners on Donald Avenue and LeTendre Street, Heritage Lane and Highway #13 requesting that the Council review and upgrade the conditional use permit claiming that the current owners have a complete disregard for adjoining property owners' rights and are not abiding by the requirements of C-1 zoning under the old Zoning Ordinance #6. They also requested that the annual renewal permit be brought to the City Council and that'all owners be notified of the hearing. A hearing was held on June 7, and was continued for additional information. 4. At the hearing on June 7, Mr. McIntyre and his attorney appeared and stated that the business is not a truck stop, it has sold diesel fuel and continues to do so and that new diesel fuel pumps have been installed. The station closes around 9:00 p.m.?and he.admitted that some trucks will be parked on the site at night if they are in for service. They also argued that the site is unique because of its depressed physical location, and although there is some natural screening, additional buffering is difficult because of the location. They indicated they would do everything in their power to avoid diesel trucks from being parked and running overnight on the site. 5. Ron Miller and other neighbors were also present and objected to what they termed an expansion in the use, the running of trucks overnight and also the view of the trucks on the site. 6. City Administrator Tom Hedges distributed a memo dated June 8 with the questions that arose on behalf of Councilmembers at the meeting, and this letter is intended to answer those questions to the best of our ability. 7. In 1975, when Ordinance No. 52, Zoning Ordinance, was adopted, the property was designated General Business. Fuel sales and motor vehicle repair requires a conditional use permit under GB zoning. The station had been 2 as grandfathered prior to the 1975 Ordinance so that some of the restrictions imposed in 1975, including the 10,000 square foot retail shopping center preceding the opening of a service station would not apply. 8. Motor fuel station design, Class I and Class II, are now found at page 282 of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 11, placing a number of setback, landscaping, lighting and screening provisions. 9. Former ordinance No. 6, Zoning, required a special use permit for service station use (6.02, Subd. 6). 10. The definition of a conditional use permit is as follows: Section 11.03, Subdivision 13 states that it is a permit that is specially and indi- vidually granted by the Council after review thereon by the Planning Commis- sion for any conditional use so permitted in any use district. 11. Can a Conditional Use Permit be amended? Relate this to the grand- father clause normally recognized by the City Council. The general rule is that permits for businesses are not, per se, protected against revocation, in effect by subsequent enactment of an amendment of zoning regulations. Where the owner has not materially changed his position, the provisions of the permit may be changed, and if the conditions could be met without undue hardship and the operation could continue, reasonable amendments may be im- posed. 12. Is a residential occupancy allowed in a second story of an existing building and is this a permitted use? It is our understanding the reason for the residential occupancy is that the residents are on a 24 hours towing call, and if so, an argument may be made that the rooms are offices and thus, permitted uses. ?? Spellings, however, are not provided or permitted under conditional uses under general business zoning. 3 26 13• Can the City restrict the hours of operation? Cities where duly authorized, may constitutionally regulate businesses where such regulation does not impair the constitutional right to pursue a lawful business. McQuillin, Section 19.211. However, ordinances regulating hours of business must be reasonable and unarbitrary. The Ordinance must affect all persons pursuing the same business. The Eagan Ordinance found in Chapter 11, page 80, a states any motor fuel station shall be confined to the period from 7:00 a.m. M to 1:00 a.m. unless 200 feet or more from. residential use.' See also Heil vs. Kauffman, 354 Missouri 271, 189 SW 2nd 276. 14. Was the addition of a diesel fuel oum`o regarded as expansion of the conditional use ermit? 'The question that must be raised is whether the use is substantially different or whether the addition of one additional fuel pump did change the use of the property. It is our understanding that diesel fuel was sold both for automobile and truck use,:prior to the recent sale to Mr. McIntyre. This may be deemed simply an increase in business rather than a change in the nature of the business. These are answers to certain of the qusetions raised by the Council and Dale Runkle's Memo of June 16, 1983 reviews all of the questions. Very truly yours, HAOGE, SMITH, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. PHH: ra s Paul H. Flauge ?).-7 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JUNE 16, 1983 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR COUNTRY STANDARD The Planning Department has received a memorandum from the City Ad- ministrator dated June 8, 1983 requesting answers to ten questions that the City Council addressed at the June 7, 1983 Council meeting. In review of these ten questions, it appears that most of the ques- tions will be answered subjectively where there is nq one exact an- swer to the question. With that in mind, the Planning Department will go through the ten questions and try to provide additional in- formation for the City Council to review on June 21, 1983. QUESTION NO. 1 - CAN A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL BE AMENDED? THIS PERTAINS TO THE "GRANDFATHER CLAUSE" THAT IS NORMALLY RECOGNIZED BY CITY COUNCILS. In reviewing the typical conditional use permit process, the condi- tional use permit is a use which is normally approved with certain conditions attached to that use. Some of these conditions could deal with size and scope of the proposed use and also the timing or a time frame put on that the conditional use permit would be good for. This would then enable the City to review the conditional use permit periodically to see if the conditions agreed to are being . complied with or, if there are problems, that additional conditions could be attached to mitigate problems which have occurred in the past. This is typically the function of a conditional use permit. However, this particular conditional use permit, when approved in 1966, included rezoning and did not specifically spell out a condi- tional use permit. However, the zoning was approved subject to "the upkeep and maintenance of property, and Mr. Huber verbally agreed in the presence of the Board of Supervisors that he would keep the grass cut, no junk automobiles or other junk would be left on the property and that the old building in the rear of the proper- ty would be removed as conditions for approval of this application." Therefore, it appears that the zoning was granted to Mr. Huber in 1966 with the implied conditional use for the service station which was provided for in Subdivision 6, C-1, C-2, Commercial Districts. The subjective part of this question is in regard to whether this renewal can be amended. In reviewing this aspect, it appears that if the City and the owner of the property can come to terms and agree on certain items to be included as additional conditions, this item could be amended to include these conditions. However, it be- comes more of a legal issue when both parties do not agree to amend- ing or additional conditions to be placed on a conditional use per- mit. STION NO. 2 - ARE THE ENTRANCE ACCESS POINTS TO COUNTRY STANDAR ADEQUATELY DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SAFETY HAZARDS, ESPECIALLY AT ION OF LETEND acd Thomas L. [Sedges, City Administrator Additional Information for Country Standard June 16, 1963 Page two Staff has checked with the Police Department to see if there had been any traffic problems with the intersection of Letendre and T.H. 13. According to the Eagan Police Department, there are no more accidents occurring at this particular intersection than there are at any other major intersections in the City. In reviewing access to Country Stan- dard with the design contraints existing for the property, it would mean either direct access to Country Standard or the access to the service road onto Letendre and then to T.H. 13. The present access, design-'.vise, is better than providing direct access onto T.H. 13. Therefore, in review of this question, it appears that the access is adequate with the present design to provide access to Country Stan- dard. TION NO. 3 - IS A RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY ALLOWED IN THE STORY OF THE EXISTING BUILDING? IS THIS A PERMITTED According to Chapter 11 of the Eagan City Code, if the building would be constructed under these requirements, a residential unit, or fa- cility would not be allowed in connection with a service station or a commercial use. However, again, one has to look back into the his- tory of the project and determine when this building was constructed and how long this use has been in existence prior to any zoning com- ing on line. It is staff's understanding that this building was con- structed prior to Ordinance 52, Ordinance 6 or before any zoning or- dinance, and if there was a commercial use with a residential use as a second story, it would be a legal nonconforming use in accordance with Ordinance 6, Ordinance 52 or the newly revised Chapter 11 of the Eagan City Code. Section 11.10, Subdivision 3, Nonconforming Uses, addresses this issue in regard to nonconforming uses. (see attached) QUESTION NO. 4 - CAN THE CITY RESTRICT THE HOURS OF OPERATION? In review of this question, it appears that there could be two ways in which the City could restrict hours of operation. The first way the City could restrict the hours is placing this as a condition within the conditional use permit. Since this was not done or a condition of the conditional use permit, it would be difficult to restrict the hours without first having it agreed to by the owner of the property. The second way to restrict hours would be an over- all policy for hours of operation for service stations in the City. This would mean that not only Country Standard would have to adhere to the hours of operation, but would mean any service station in the City would have to conform to these same hours of operation. There- fore, if the City wishes to create and adopt a new policy or ordinance regarding hours of operation for service stations, the hours could be controlled in this manner. ESTION No. 5 - CAN THE CITY ING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL 'ROVIDE AND REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ; RTY? In reviewing the approval on March 1, 1966 for rezoning, there was no mention of a conditional use permit. Assuming the rezoning also included the conditional use permit request and reviewing ordinance C 1Ct Thomas L.-Hedges, City Administrator Additional Information for Country Standard June 16, 1983 Page three 6, Subdivision 6, Subparagraph D, "all such structures where located on property continuous to any residential area shall be completely screened by suitable landscaping so as not to be reasonably visible from any adjoining residents". Since this provision was in effect at the time of rezoning, the City may have some latitude to require some additional screening. However, the minutes of March 11 1966 stating the conditions of approval, the conditions only relate to keeping the property clean and the grass mowed on this particular lot. Therefore, it becomes more of a legal interpretation as to what the City can enforce or require in regard to this particular case for landscaping and screening for Country Standard. ION NO. 6 - THE 1966 PERMIT THAT WAS ISSUED TO GEORGE HUBER SHOULD BE REVIEWED IN DETAIL. APPARENTLY. A LETTER OR PERM Staff has researched the original application file for the rezoning request in 1966. In this particular application, there was no letter or additional information except the request for rezoning to C-1 (Light Commercial). Staff has also reviewed the parcel file for Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre Addition No. 2, and in the file there is no additional letter or information that requires additional controls than what has been spelled out in.the minutes of March 1, 1966. Therefore, staff has reviewed all documents pertaining to this re- zoning application and the only conditions of approval are stated in the March 1, 1966 minutes. QUESTION NO. 7 - CAN THE CITY RESTRICT OVERNIGHT PARKING OF TRACTOR TRAILER RIGS ON SITE BY REQUIRING SIGNAGE AND THE LIKE? Ftaff has reviewed Chapter 9 of the City Code, Parking Regulations, ?r and Section 9.10, Truck Parking and it appears that truck parking is regulated on public streets, rights-of-way and in regard to re- sidential property and does not regulate truck parking in commercial zoned districts. Therefore, it appears that truck parking on commer- cially zoned property is not regulated by Section 9 of the City Code. Therefore, the regulations do not cover truck parking on commercial- ly zoned property, and it would be difficult to enforce a section of the ordinance where truck parking is not addressed. However, if the City can work with the owner, Country Standard, and both parties can agree to a solution regarding truck parking might be best. QUESTION NO. 8 - CAN THE CITY RESTRICT THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES SUCH AS SEMI-TRAILERS ON THE PROPERTY? According to Chapter 11, Subdivision 11, General Business District, it appears that the City does have control for storage of vehicles such as semi-trailers on property. According to this section of the City Code, it does require a conditional use permit for outside sales or storage of motorized vehicles. Since there had not been a speci- fic conditional use issued for this outside storage, the City does have control in regard storage of vehicles outside the Country Stan- dard facility. The staff would also like to review this particular 30 Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Additional Information for Country Standard June 16, 1983 Page four provision with the City Attorney to make sure that staff is interpret- ing this portion of the ordinance correctly. QUESTION NO. 9 - WAS THE ADDITION OF ANOTHER FUEL PUMP REGARDED AS AN EXPANSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT? In reviewing this particular question, it appears that this question is more subjective than there is a particular right or wrong answer. In reviewing this particular question, one could interpret any im- provements to the facility or adding-additional storage of gas as an expansion to the facility. Normally, an expansion would be increas- ing business or service and would be looked at in regard to an addi- tion to the building to create the space for additional service. Since there was no building constructed but added gas capacity, would this increase service or business to this particular facility. There-C fore, the Planning Department would rely on the City Attorney's opin- ion if additional fuel pumps or tanks would constitute an expansion to this facility. N NO. 10 - CAN SURFACING O UIRE THE GRADING AND BITUMINOUS REALIZING THE EXP Question No. 10 relies on the answer to No. 9. Normally, if staff would process an application where a building would be. added onto or a new addition or facility would be constructed, staff would then be requiring upgrading of the property to present ordinance standards or requiring a time specified that the.property should be upgraded to meet present ordinance standards. Therefore, if the owner of Country Standard applied for a permit to add on to his present fac- ility, staff would then be looking at upgrading the present facility to meet the present City Code. Therefore, the City will have to de- termine if the additional fuel pump constitutes an expansion, and if 4u this expansion is going to increase additional use on the property, then the City may want to require upgrading of the property. A solu- tion to this particular question could be working with the neighbor- hood and the owner of the property and try to set a realistic time schedule in which the owner of the property could upgrade his pre- sent facility to meet present City standards. Realizing it may not occur overnight, at least the City could have a time schedule in which the City can require the owner to upgrade his present facili- ty and not be an overall hardship to the owner of Country Standard. The Planning Department has tried to address the questions regarding Country Standard as logically and realistically as possible. The Planning Department tried to shed some light on these particular is- sues, and hopefully this will provide some additional information as to the concerns the Council addressed on June 7th with the understand- ing that some of these questions may stimulate more discussion. I will be available at the June 21st meeting to try to discuss any ques- tions that the City Council may have in addition to this memorandum. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle, City Planner 31 TIM SEC. 11.10. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subd. 1. Application. A. In their interpretation and application, he provisions of this Chapter shall be held to be the inimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, afety, morals and general welfare. B. Where the conditions imposed by any pro- isions of this Chapter are either more restrictive or less ?strictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other 'aw, City Code provision, statute, resolution or regulation f. any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or hick impose higher standards or requirements shall prevail. C. Except as in this Chapter specifically rovided, no structure shall be erected, converted, nlarged, reconstructed or altered and no structure or land hall be used for any purpose nor in any manner which is not n conformity with this Chapter. Subd. 2 e the intention -f this Chapter ollowing: Separability. It is hereby declared to of the Council that the several provisions are separable in accordance with the A. If any court of competent jurisdiction hall adjudge any provisions of this Chapter to be invalid, t:ch judgment shall not affect any other provisions of this hapter not specifically included in said judgment. B. If any court of competent jurisdiction hall adjudge invalid the application of any provision of his Chapter to a particular property, building, structure, uch judgment shall not affect the application of said rovision to any other property, building or structure not pacifically included in said judgment. W Subd. 3. Non-Conforming Uses. Any lawful use of ny structure of land existing at the time of adoption of his Chapter or any amendments thereof which do not conform o the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to the ollowing: A. The adoption and provisions of this hapter shall not prohibit the continued use or expansion or abuilding of any use or building existing upon the date of doption of this Chapter which would have conformed to the rovisions of Sections 6.01 through and including 6.06 which .as repealed by this Chapter. Said expansion shall not be nterpreted to permit an initial development in accordance ith said repealed ordinance. Said expansion or rebuilding hall only relate to existing buildings or uses. CODIFIER'S NOTE: Sections 6.01 through 6.06, referred to erein were provisions of the Zoning Ordinance repealed when rdinance No. 52 was adopted.) (1-1-83) 273 71 B. Where any non-conforming use otherwise permitted by the provisions of this Subdivision is discon- tinued for more than one (1) year for any reason, said discontinued non-conforming use shall not be permitted unless specifically permitted by the Council. C. Any non-conforming use that is not sub- ject to the provisions of Subparagraph A above, shall not be altered or expanded unless specifically approved by the Council. D. None of the foregoing provisions of this Subdivision shall in any manner prohibit the reconstruction of an existing dwelling or accessory buildings destroyed to any degree by wind, fire or other natural cause which is classified as a non-conforming use because it exists on an undersized lot. Subd. 4. Lot Provisions. A duly created lot of record shall be deemed a buildable lot provided all of the following are met: A. The lot shall have a minimum of sixty (60) feet of frontage on a public street or the lot shall have been approved in platting a condominium project or an attached dwelling project wherein a contiguous lot, owned in common, provides said frontage. B. There shall be no more than one (1) principal building on one (1) lot except when approved as a part of a Planned Development. C. The lot shall be capable of supporting a building(s). D. The lot shall be of sufficient size to accommodate a building(s) within the minimum required build- ing setbacks for the particular zoning district in which it is located. Subd. 5. Accessory Buildings and Structures. A. Accessory buildings and structures related to a farming operation and on a farm may be located anywhere on the lot except that a building for housing more than two (2) animal units shall be not less than fifty (50) feet from lot line and all buildings shall conform to yard regulations. Source: Ordinance No. 52 Effective Date: 4-25-75 D. No accessory building or structure other than a fence or a temporary construction office shall be permitted on any lot in an "E" or "R" district prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory, except a residential garage, which prior to the construction of a residence can be used only for storage 274 City Council Minutes June 21, 1983 VC:lii 4 eUNTRY_STANDARD SERVICE STATION - CONDITIONAL-USE PERMIT RENEWAL City Administrator Hedges explained that a meeting had been held between the owners of the Country Standard Service Station, neighboring residents, Dale Runkle and Paul Hauge on June 20, 1983 concerning proposed conditions for the approval of the Country Standard Conditional Use Permit. He noted that progress had been made and it was recommended that the Council continue the application until the regular July 19, 1983 meeting. Upon motion by Egan, seconded Thomas, it was resolved that the recommendation be implemented. All voted yea. Ron Miller, a neighbor, was present and commended all involved for their cooperation and he favored the continuance. AIR TRAFFIC NOISE Mr. Hedges reviewed with the Council the action that was taken by the City Council at its last meeting of June 7, 1983 directing a letter to Tim Anderson, the manager of Noise Abatement Environmental Affairs of the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding the City of Eagan's strong concern about increased noise by aircraft takeoffs and landings over the City in recent weeks. A copy of the letter from Mr. Hedges to Mr. Anderson dated June 8 was discussed, as well as the reply of June 15 from Tim Anderson. A number of interested persons were present and it was noted that the MAC is experimenting for a period of about two years to disburse traffic to a greater extent around the airport. John Gustafson of Woodlark Lane requested that a Resolution be prepared and submitted to the MAC requesting the MAC restore the former traffic pattern. Don Giblin suggested that more information be required concerning the percentage of traffic in the area and also that a possible hearing be scheduled for and interested residents. Tom Baker, the Eagan MASAC Board Member, explained the MACs action in recent months, including a proposal to lengthen one of the runways, but indicated that proposal had now been abandonded. He stated that Eagan has born about 55% of the airport traffic in the last two years and had strong concerns about the future of air traffic proposed to be disbursed across Eagan. Other residents also spoke in opposition to the recent experiment of traffic patterns and it was noted that Eagan's Comprehensive Plan was prepared prior to the current air traffic patterns being set up. It was also suggested that there be more publicity in the local newspaper regarding the matter. Blomquist moved, Thomas seconded the motion that the staff prepare a Resolution covering the City's position expressing its strong concern regarding air traffic over the city and further, that a legal memorandum be prepared concerning liability and property rights issues regarding the increased disbursal of traffic over the City, including the remedies of the City due to the increased number of flights and resulting airplane noise. All voted in favor. PHILLIP SWIGGUM - WAIVER OF PLAT The application of Phillip Swiggum to subdivide a duplex home for owner/occupancy on Lot 4, Block 1, Wilderness Run 5th Addition, was recommended for approval by the Advisory Planning Commission on May 24, 1983 subject to certain conditions. Mr. Swiggum was present and there were no objections. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the waiver of plat application, subject to the following recommendations: 4 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JULY 15, 1983 S- 3, L.4ekd"_ Z ),)14 SUBJECT: UPDATE OW COUNTRY STANDARD:CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT On June 20, Paul Hauge and I had met with the owner of Country Stan- dard, their attorney and residents of LeTendre who brought up the concerns regarding the use of Country Standard. At this meeting, there were a lot of issues brought out in regard to conditions and suggestions which would make the operation of Country Standard more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. From this neighbor- hood meeting, the City Attorney had drafted a resolution with con- ditions which were discussed at this meeting. After this draft was prepared, the City Attorney had sent a copy of this draft to Mr. Tom MacIntyre, the owner of the Country Standard facility, and to Mr. Ron Miller, a resident of LeTendre to review and to see if these conditions would be agreed by both the residents and the owner of Country Standard. Staff has sent this resolution out to all people concerned for their review. At the present time, staff has talked with Mr. Jan Susee, the attorney for Country Standard, who has in- dicated that they have some concerns regarding the conditions and how the conditions would be placed into an agreement. Since this time, staff has also talked with Mr. Ron Miller, a resident of Le- tendre, and it is staff's understanding that they are not in agree- ment with the resolution and conditions that staff had drafted on June 22, 1983. Therefore, City staff has scheduled a meeting for Monday, July 18th with the residents of LeTendre and Country Stan- dard to see where the differences are in this resolution and to see if there can be a compromise solution to the issues regarding the Country Standard conditional use. Therefore, at the present time, staff thought that the resolution would have resolved some of the issues. However, it is now staff's understanding that these is- sues are not resolved and are still trying to work with the group to mitigate the situation. Staff will give an update at the Council meeting to indicate if the residents and Country Standard have come to an agreement or if the Council will have to be the mediator of the dispute between the two parties. Attached to this memorandum is a letter prepared by Paul Hauge, City Attorney, June 22, 1983 listing the concerns and condi- tions that were brought forth at the meeting held on June 20, 1983. DC /jach W____ HAUGE, Sturm, HIDE & HELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 53122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER June 22, 1983 AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 434-4224 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Country Standard Conditional Use Permit Dear Tom: On June 20 Dale Runkle and I met with Tom MacIntyre and his attorney, Jan Susee, of Country Standard as well as a number of neighbors at the City Hall to discuss the conditional use permit application for the service station. There was extended discussion concerning conditions that could be placed upon the renewal of the conditional use permit and there seemed to be general agreement upon certain conditions that I have drafted in Resolution form and am distributing copies to Ron Miller, Jan Susee and Dale Runkle. I would suggest that each of you review the conditions and you will note that at the end of the Resolution I have inserted spaces for signature by several neighbors in addition to the operators of the Country Standard so if the terms are generally agreeable, they can be submitted to the City Council for review and the ultimate decision. It may be that the Council and others will have other recommendations and if so I would suggest they be admitted well in advance of the City Council meeting on July 19 when it is suggested that the matter be placed back on the agenda. If there are specific comments I ould suggest that each of you submit them in writing and Dal e Runkle and will review them prior to the July 19 meeting. ery t ly yours, i i a auge City Attorney - City of Eagan skk enclosure cc: Ron Miller Jan Susee Dale Runkle (.-a3-83 RESOLUTION COUNTRY STANDARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on July _, 1983, at the Eagan City Hall, at which all members were present except ; and WHEREAS, the owners of Country Standard Service Station located on LeTendre Road and Highway $13 in the City of Eagan, have submitted an application to the City for approval of a conditional use permit for the operation of an Amoco service station; and WHEREAS, certain residential neighbors in the area of the Country Standard, submitted a Petition to the Eagan City Council objecting to the operation of the Country Standard in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the parties have all met informally and before the City Council and desire that the City Council approve the conditional use permit, provided that certain conditions are imposed upon the grant of the permit; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by , seconded it was resolved that the application of Country Standard for conditional use permit for the operation of the service station until 1984, be and it hereby is approved, subject to the following conditons: 1. That the owners and operators of Country Standard be subject to all conditions imposed upon George Huber, the prior owner of the service station by the then Eagan Town Board, at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors on March 1, 1966 as follows: a. That the owner keep the grass out on the presmies. b. That no junk automobiles or other junk would be left on the property. 1 f, c. That the old building on the rear of the property would be removed. 2. The owners and operators shall restrain any tractor/trailers from operating any motors or engines parked on the Country Standard premises after the normal closing time, or during any nighttime. 3. The operators of Country Standard shall not permit the storage of any tractors or trailers on the presmises overnight, except those that are being serviced, and that are reasonably being stored prior to the completion of the normal maintenance or service on the tractors or trailers, provided however, that the tractors and trailers maintain current licenses, and that no more than 8 trailers will be kept on the premises on any one night. 4. It is understood that the City of Eagan will contact the Minnesota Department of Transportation and request a right-turn-in lane northeast bound on Highway $13 at LeTendre Road and will review the propriety of installing weight limits on LeTendre Road at its intersection with Highway #13. 5. The owners and operators of Country Standard will take all reasonable steps to encourage and require tractor/trailers to both enter and exit from the Country Standard site at the most northeasterly access to the site, including reasonable signing on the premises to enforce such entrance and exiting. 6. The owners and operators agree that they will not maintain or service any tractor/trailer trucks after 9:30 p.m. on any day except in emergencies. 7. The second floor of the service station shall be primarily used for residential occupancy by tow truck operators. 8. The owners and operators shall plant and install a reasonable buffer of evergreens along the bluff, adjacent to the residential homes along the 2 . easterly border of the property, so as to serve as a buffer between Country Standard and the residential parcels. 9. It is understood that the conditions imposed hereunder shall run with the land and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the owners and operators of the Country Standard service station site. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: COUNTRY STANDARD By: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Mayor 3 , , .. , FJusee & XPr, INEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 220 - RICHFIELD BANK BUILDING 6625 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH JAN HENRY SUSEE RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 TELEPHONE DAVID W. LEE 1612) 866-8]11 LUTHER M. AMUNDSON KRIS L. MASER SHARON M. BACHMEIER -E LEGAL ASSISTANT July 18, 1983 TO: Paul H. Hauge, Esq. Mr. Dale Runkle Thomas L. Hedges RE: Country-.Standard-Conditional-Use-Perinit- - My client, Mr. MacIntyre, and I have now had the opportunity to review the proposed resolution in the above matter. We had responded orally to Mr. Hauge and Mr. Runkle previously and have been requested to put in the objections we might have in writing. This letter is that written response. Our primary objection is one of overall import concerning whether the eventual agreement should be a condition of the conditional use permit. As we have indicated, our client is attempting to resolve this matter in an amicable manner which satisfies his needs as well as those of the surrounding neighborhood. We have agreed to several compromises and changes which may have con- siderable economic impact on the operation of the Country Standard. We do not want to foreclose the possibility that changes may be required in the future. To make all of the agreements conditions of the conditional use permit and to run with the land as provided in Paragraph 9. would, in our opinion be somewhat unfair given the concessions which are being made. This might well be true from the neighborhood standpoint as well. In the alternative we would ask that the conditional use permit be issued as requested and that the remaining items be simply the subject of a letter agreement between the Country Standard and the surrounding neighbors for the coming year to give all parties an opportunity to assess their effectiveness. As to specific items to which we would object or request changes, I would note the following: a. In Paragraph 2., crossing out the last phrase "or during any nighttime." Nighttime might well mean any period of darkness which obviously would cause considerable problem during winter months. b. In Paragraph 4., as to the weight limits on LeTendre Road, the Country Standard has not increased the weight applied to that intersection at any given momemt over what has been for many many years. We have been attempting to route traffic away from the LeTendre intersection as much as possible with our repeat customers and have had some success in doing so. The Coke account which was providing a good share of the increased traffic was also allowed to expire partially on the basis that the profit made was not worth the difficulty which it caused to the neighborhood. It is our opinion that Paragraph 5. covers this particular issue. c. As to item 6., we would request a change to 10:00 p.m. rather than 9:30 p.m. since present operating hours result in a closing time of between 9:00 and 10:00 p.m. and we would like the additional leeway to insure that we do not make technical violations of any agreement reached. d. Item 8., obviously needs some rather specific definition as to what will be installed. We would hope to cooperate in coming up with an acceptable solution to this problem. The neighbors obviously do not want something to extent to such a height that it would cause a blockage of their view of the Minnesota River Valley and the Country Standard obviously wants something within a reasonable budgetary constraint. Perhaps this can be ironed out at the meeting this afternoon. As to each of the matters discussed in this letter, we would hope that we can discuss and resolve these matters at the meeting with the neighbors this afternoon and would expect to provide any additional information necessary. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Very truly yours, SUSEE EE, LTD. BY Jan Henry Susee JHS/sb -2- JAN HENRY SUSEE DAVID W. LEE LUTHER M. AMUNDSON KRIS L. MASER SHARON M. BACHMEIER LEGAL ASSISTANT TO: Paul H. Hauge, Esq. Mr. Dale Runkle Thomas L. Hedges July 18, 1983 RE: Country Standard Conditional Use Permit TELEPHONE !6121 866-8711 My client, Mr. MacIntyre, and I have now had the opportunity to review the proposed resolution in the above matter. We had responded orally to Mr. Hauge and Mr. Runkle previously and have been requested to put in the objections we might have in writing. This letter is that written response. Our primary objection is one of overall import concerning whether the eventual agreement should be a condition of the conditional use permit. As we have indicated, our client is attempting to resolve this matter in an amicable manner which satisfies his needs as well as those of the surrounding neighborhood. We have agreed to several compromises and changes which may have con- siderable economic impact on the operation of the Country Standard. We do not want to foreclose the possibility that changes may be required in the future. To make all of the agreements conditions of the conditional use permit and to run with the land as provided in Paragraph 9. would, in our opinion be somewhat unfair given the concessions which are being made. This might well be true from the neighborhood standpoint as well. In the alternative we would ask that the conditional use permit be issued as requested and that the remaining items be simply the subject of a letter agreement between the Country Standard and the surrounding neighbors for the coming year to give all parties an opportunity to assess their effectiveness. As to specific items to which we would object or request changes, I would note the following: a. In Paragraph 2., crossing out the last phrase "or during any nighttime." Nighttime might well mean any period of darkness which obviously would cause considerable problem during winter months. b. In Paragraph 4., as to the weight limits on LeTendre Road, the Country Standard has not increased the weight applied to that intersection at any given momemt over what has been for many many years. We have been attempting to route traffic 16uner & Err, 110. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 220 - RICHFIELD BANK BUILDING 6625 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 away from the LeTendre intersection as much as possible with our repeat customers and have had some success in doing so. The Coke account which was providing a good share of the increased traffic was also allowed to expire partially on the basis that the profit made was not worth the difficulty which it caused to the neighborhood. It is our opinion that Paragraph 5. covers this particular issue. c. As to item 6., we would request a change to 10:00 p.m, rather than 9:30 p.m. since present operating hours result in a closing time of between 9:00 and 10:00 p.m. and we would like the additional leeway to insure that we do not make technical violations of any agreement reached. d. Item 8., obviously needs some rather specific definition as to what will be installed. We would hope to cooperate in coming up with an acceptable solution to this problem. The neighbors obviously do not want something to extent to such a height that it would cause a blockage of their view of the Minnesota River Valley and the Country Standard obviously wants something within a reasonable budgetary constraint. Perhaps this can be ironed out at the meeting this afternoon. As to each of the matters discussed in this letter, we would hope that we can discuss and resolve these matters at the meeting with the neighbors this afternoon and would expect to provide any additional information necessary. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Very truly yours, BY JHS/sb SUSEE & LEE, LTD. Jan Henry Susee -2- Dear Mr. Hauge: In response to your Country Standard letter, and proposed resolution, to Thomas Hedges dated 6/2.1/83 1 have the following comments. A) In general the resolution you supplied is too vague e.g. par, 2 "normal closing time, par 4 "r'eview the propriety on Lentedr•e" par 5 "Including reasonable or during any nighttime" of installing weight limits signing on the premises" 8) Paragraph 3, no more than 8 trailers will be kept on the premises, you could just as well have said keep as many as you can cram in. 8 must be near capacity, 3 would be much more realistic. Keep in mind you are talking about an extension of use here, in no way was George Huber's `i oper-ation a semi-truck repair center, this isi C) Paragraph 4 a turn lane for Letendre, does not address even half of the problem. You propose a right turn lane for Letendre to me this is'nt even a token effort to resolve the problem. At a very minimum there must be a LEFT TURN lane for Country Standir if you are going to continue to allow semi-truck traffic. I don't understand your statement: "review the propriety of installing weight limits on Letendre". 1 think this statement must say "weight limits will be installed on Letendre in keeping with the capacity limits of the road and possibly precluding-any truck traffic at the corner- of HWY 13 and Letendre D) Paragraph 5, reasonable steps to encourage truck enter and exit from the north entrance, sound nice but what are these signs going to say? "SEMI-TRUCK ENTRANCE AND EXIT VIA THE LETENDRE INTERSECTION IS PROHIBITED BY THE CITY OF EAGANu Be specific) E) Paragraph 8, plant trees along easterly border, what about the rest of the borders? If 1 am not mistaken the city ordinances would require fencing on all residencial borders in this case. 1 think the southern border must be considered as well. Everything 1 see, hear and read about this issue seems to avoid the main issue, is this an exstention of use? It is, in two ways George Huber's operation was not a semi-truck refueling facility and it also was not a semi-truck repair- facility. If the City of Eagan is going to allow the continued semi-truck traffic at Country Standard, then they must have thier own entrance and exit directly to HWY 13. It is absurd to think that Letendre can handle the continued load of semi-trucks. if 1 can be of any help in resolving this problem please contact me. nc r ly j1 e y Poetter -2- Our su..[estions Perhaps an occasion t'?ere may be a need to Iceep.one or t:,ro trucks over night, cut this area ` not intended to be l- seni-truck storage facility and thatshould be made clear to ?'r. ,'-a cIntyre in the ner:ait. . Paragraph -',`4, page 2 re£e-?s to the City asking the State to construct a right turn lane northeast bound on HiChway 13. This would only allow the truc'.s to cross LeTendre Ave, rtrr. a higher speed, increasing, the chance of a.tcldents at the inter- section of LeTendre Ave. and Hig::way 13. The problem, at that intersection is making a left turn onto LeTendre from southbound Highway 13 without the fear of being run down by southbound traffic. Perhaps a left turn lane at LeTendre Ave. and a right turn lane at the northern entranrn open letter to the Fagan 'City Council from, the residents of LeTendre Ad6.1tion, in response to Paul Hauge letter of June 22, 1983. Res Country Standard Conditional Use Permit. I•tadane Mayor and Council Members s On June 20, 1983, a number of residents of Donal' Ave. and LeTendre Ave. net with Yr. Dale Runkle and I'r. Paul Hauge along with Ton FacIntyre and his attorne--,'Jan Susee of Country Standard. for the purpose of attempting to solve the .problen of Coun$r3*:Standaxd doing business within the bounds of the Conditional Use permit issued by the Cit-r of Fagan without affecting the surrounding neighborhood's living conditions and property values, The. majority of the residents believe that the original intent of the Conditional Use permit issued to George. Huber in 1966 has not been complied with in regards to the increased amount of semi-truck storage and service. It is our feeling that the City Council of 1966 and the existing City Planning Committee of 1983 would not allow a semi-truck repair and storage facility ne::t to a zoned R-1 residential area. We cannot see any legal reason, nor has one been brought forward to show us why the City and the neighborhood should allow this to continue. However, because-mr.-I•IacIntyre has already gone forward with his intention to turn the Service Station into a se-i-truck oriented business and it ray cause undue hardship on him to do a conplete turn-around at this time, -^e , as a neighborhood, agree to meet along with the City in order to attempt to work out some reasonable solution with them. The attached letter, drafted by K=. Paul Houle an June 22, 1983, is tae result of this meeting. After reviewing this letter, the general feeling throughout the neighborhood is that not much has changed. Paragraph 02 on page 2 -refers to the restrained operation of motors after normal closing time. It is our understanding that the cloning time is 9s3O p.TM.. This would mean that the surrounding nei:Shbors would be asked to live with the noise and the air pollution of large deisel engines running during evenings and weekends normally reserved for -relaxing and enjoyment of honelife. rre do not believe this to be the intent of the Conditional Use permit granted to VT. Huber in 1966. Our suggestion: There be no ^aintainence or repair done on any heavy deisel equipment or trucks after the hour of 6soop.n., Ilonday thru Friday and r_ene at all on weekends. Paragraph u3, page 2 refers to storage of 8 semi-truc?cs and trailers. This most certainly seems to be an unjust number. The 1966 permit refers to the renoval of unsightly junk and an old building. Are we to believe that the 1963' Council would have allowed truck storage and at the sane tine insisted that an old building be removed and the -ta.ss be kept cut? fY $AUGE, SMTM, L' IDE & FELLER. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3906 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE AR[A CoD[ 612 BRADLEY SMITH T[L[PHOR6 454.4224 KEVIN W. EIRE DAVID G. KELLER' June 22, 1983 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MIN 55122 Re: Country Standard Conditional Use Permit Dear Tom: On June 20 Dale Runkle and I met with Tom Maclntyre and his attorney, Jan Susee, of Country Standard as well as a number of neighbors at the City Hall to discuss the conditional use permit application for the service station. There was extended discussion concerning conditions that could be placed upon the renewal of the conditional use permit and there seemed to be general agreement upon certain conditions that I have drafted in Resolution form and am distributing copies to Ron Miller, Jan Susee and Dale Runkle. I would suggest that each of you review the conditions and you will note that at the end of the Resolution I have inserted spaces for signature by several neighbors in addition to the operators of the Country Standard so if the terms are generally agreeable, they can be submitted to the City Council for review and the ultimate decision. It may be that the Council and others will have other recommendations and if so I would suggest they be admitted well in advance of the City Council meeting on July 19 when it is suggested that the matter be placed back on the agenda. If there are specific comments I would suggest that each of you submit them in writing and Dal e Runkle and I will review them prior to the July 19 meeting. Very truly yours, Paul H. Hauge City Attorney - City of Eagan skk enclosure cc: -fin Miller ,Jan Susee Dale Runkle ry RESOLUTION COUNTRY STANDARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on July 1983, at the Eagan City Hall, at which all members were present except and WHEREAS, the owners of Country Standard Service Station located on LeTendre Road and Highway #13 in the City of Eagan, have submitted an application to the City for approval of a conditional use permit for the operation of an Amoco service station; and WHEREAS, certain residential neighbors in the area of the Country Standard, submitted a Petition to the Eagan City Council objecting to the operation of the Country Standard in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the parties have all met informally and before the City Council and desire that the City Council approve the conditional use permit, provided that certain conditions are imposed upon the grant of the permit; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by , seconded , it was resolvedthat the application of Country Standard for conditional use permit for the operation of the service station until , 1984, be and it hereby is approved, subject to the following conditons: 1. That the owners and operators of Country Standard be subject to all conditions imposed upon George Huber, the prior owner of the service station by the then Eagan Town Board, at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors on March 1, 1966 as follows: a. That the owner keep the grass cut on the presmies. b. That no junk automobiles or other junk would be left on the property. 1 retr.?il rdmsnLr ?A•Wr.»'n..va«:d..r.. Nea .:a4 JI e.MI..k ..r .:' ?..e r.< .:.. , ::.i "? ' aa. ... ..t ??:e. _ .r. b e 4 That the old building on the rear of the property would be removed. 2. The owners and operators shall restrain any tractor/trailers from operating any motors or engines parked on the Country Standard premises after the normal closing time, or during any nighttime. 3. The operators of Country Standard shall not permit the storage of any tractors or trailers on the presmises overnight, except those that are being serviced, and that are reasonably being stored prior to the completion of the-normal maintenance or service on the tractors or trailers, provided however, that the tractors and trailers maintain current licenses, and that no 140 WWA.ThAo more than(8)trailers will be kept on the premises on any one night.* 3 '& V+A*4 r1? It is understood that the City of Eagan will contact the Minnesota ???? Department of Transportation and request a right-turn-in lane northeast bound i on Highway X13 at LeTendre Road and will review the propriety of installing weight limits on LeTendre Road at its intersection with Highway 0130 - 5. The owners and operators of Country Standard will take all dA reasonable steps to encourage and require tractorkailers to jeth enter and O/FF exit from the Country Standard site at the most northeasterly access to the site, including reasonable signing on the premises to enforce such entrance and exiting. 614%??? it The owners and operators agree that they will not maintain 3in! The owners anal operators agree that they will not maintain service any tractor/trailer trucks after 9:30 p.m. on any day except &100 47-roe MA - emergencies. $. The second floor of the service station shall be primarily used for residential occupancy by tow truck operators. ®b1 The owners and operators shall plant and install a reasonable buffer f evergreens along the bluff, adjacent to the residential homes along the ?ar'Ne- a.N6b bx G'A??3e' 41u?++lp? ?'- jai P, ?' ?4.F?u^.`?'i .4.j.G- rv. _ ''. N - j j rS 4?>?`- r.K' a``'te v- ? ?.? vnd1? a ..: ... .... .-?. ?.... :.... „ :. '. easterly border of the property, so as to serve as a buffer between Country Standard and the residential parcels. 9. It is understood that the conditions imposed hereunder shall run with the land and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the owners and operators of the Country Standard service station site. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: COUNTRY STANDARD By: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Mayor 3 . 00238 Council Minutes August 16, 1983 ""'- SYANDARD SERVICE STATION 'PEA?IIT RENEWAL Mr. Hedges stated that further negotiations have taken place between neighboring owners of the Country Standard Service station and recommended continuance until the next regular meeting. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the permit renewal until the September 6, 1983 meeting. All voted yea. BRITTANY 4TH ADDITION - SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE The application of Tollefson Builders, Inc. for 5 foot side yard setback variance for Lot 14, Block 1, Brittany 4th Addition was submitted. It was noted that the Advisory Planning Commission, at its public hearing on July 26, 1983 recommended denial. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Council and indicated that apparently the staff had reviewed the wrong lot and that the property in question needing a variance already had a home begun. How- ever, because the garage was located in front of a family room, the variance did not appear to be noticeable and recommended approval of the variance. There were no objections and because of the misunderstanding and the hardship involved, noting the builder had found the error and requested staff approve a variance, Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to grant the variance because of the hardship involved with the understanding that Lot 13 would be required to have a 10 foot setback and that the garage be located adjacent to the Lot 14 property line. All voted yea. SUNSET 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING The application of Tri-Land Company for rezoning and preliminary plat approval of Sunset 3rd Addition was submitted to the Council. The Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the application to rezone from Agricultural to Single Family and for preliminary plat approval. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Council and noted that Lot 7 which includes the existing homestead, consists of 3 acres and stated it would be very difficult to subdivide that parcel. Brad Swenson was present and further stated that Lot 7 cannot feasibly be subdivided, but it was suggested the plan for subdivision be submitted prior to final plat approval. Egan moved to approve the rezoning of the property as requested, Thomas seconded the motion. All voted in favor. Smith then moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application for preliminary plat approval with the following conditions: 1. That the developers submit a proposed overlay for Lot 7, consisting of the 3 acre lot. 2. No variances shall be allowed for side yard setbacks except for topographic or vegetation reasons. 8 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1983 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE COUNTRY STANDARD CONDITION- AL USE PERMIT Since April, 1983, staff has been working with the residents of Le- Tendre and Mr. Tom MacIntyre, owner of Country Standard, to see if the concerns that were brought out by the neighborhood in April could be resolved prior to coming back to the City Council. With this attempt, there have been many meetings with the neighborhood and Tom MacIntyre.to resolve the issues and concerns that the neigh- borhood had brought forth. The City staff has also been meeting with the representative of the neighborhood, Mr. Ron Miller,and Tom MacIntrye to keep abreast of the progress and try to provide information to both parties to work out the issues and concerns of the residents. Since April, staff has met twice with the entire group to resolve these issues. Staff has also met with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to look into additional access to Country Standard which would resolve some of the problems the neighborhood has addressed. Since these meet- ings, the neighborhood and Country Standard have been discussing the problems and are trying to work together to resolve the issues and concerns which were originally brought out. With this, it is the staff's understanding that the neighborhood and Mr. MacIntyre of Country Standard have worked out conditions which they believe are suitable to both the neighborhood and Mr. MacIntyre. These condi- tions for the conditional use are as follows: 1) All of the conditions originally established for the condition- al use permit of George Huber's station be incorporated into the conditional use permit. 2) The existing hours of the station which are 6:30 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. be changed to allow the operation from 6:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. with the exception of weather or emergency situations. 3) Mr. MacIntrye has agreed to place signs on the premise stating that there will be no parking without permission. 4) There will be no running of diesel equipment including refrig- eration units after 7:00 P.M., and that very minor repairs and operations be allowed on Saturday mornings with the understand- ing that this would not be intrusive to the neighborhood. 5) Mr. MacIntyre and the residents review the screen buffer area and work a suitable landscape plan which is agreed to by Coun- try Standard and the neighborhood. This landscape plan will be completed within one year from the time the conditions have been approved. Additional information for the Country Standard Conditional Use Permit September 1, 1983 Page two 6) There shall be no storage of tractor-trailers overnight except the ones which are being serviced by Country Standard. There shall be no more than 4 allowed to be stored at any one time .with the exception that in case of an emergency or an unusual condition shall occur. These. basically have been the conditions which have reviewed by representatives of the LeTendre neighborhood and also the owner of Country Standard, Mr. Tom MacIntyre. However, the question has ari- sen as to where these conditions shall be placed. The owner of Country Standard would like to have a separate agreement not bind- ing these conditions to the conditional use permit. However, the neighborhood has insisted that these conditions be placed as a part of the conditional use permit. In reviewing this issue, it has hope- fully been resolved that the conditions listed above should be plac- ed with the conditional use permit. However, these conditions should also be renewed annually. Hopefully, this resolves the issue as to where the conditions shall be placed and also allows some flexibili- ty for change on a year-to-year basis knowing that all parties in- volved will be notified if any changes were proposed to be made on the above six items. The last item staff would like to bring up in regard to this matter is in the discussions going on.between the neighborhood and Country Standard. They have both indicated the need to get turn lanes and a safer access on LeTendre and T.H. 13. Since this is not a direct concern regarding the conditional use permit, the neighborhood and Country Standard have both asked that this item be addressed at the Council. What this would entail would be to determine what the costs would bein providing turn lanes on T.H. 13 for LeTendre. At the present time, staff does not have a cost, but has talked to MnDOT, and MnDOT has indicated that turn lanes could be installed. However, it would be a City expense, and therefore, the City should look into the cost of this project and determine the feasibility of this re- quest. D C R V/J UU4,13 Council Minutes September 6, 1983 RIMECLIFFE - VACATION OF EASEMENTS The public hearing regarding the vacation of drainage and utility ease- ments over portions of Ridgecliffe 1st and 4th Additions was convened by Mayor Blomquist. Director of Public Works Colbert requested that the Council con- tinue the easement vacation hearing to October 4 to insure that the property is replatted to provide for replacement of the easements to be vacated. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue the hearing to October 4, 1983. All voted yes. PROJECT #29T - HORNE ASSESSMENT APPEAL The Horne assessment hearing was next convened by the Mayor. Director of Public Works Colbert advised the Council that this item was to have been on the Council agenda so that the matter might be continued. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue the hearing to September 20, 1983. All voted in favor. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT - KNOB BILL OFFICE SITES The first item of old business concerned the application of Edmund B. Dunn for a revised preliminary plat of Knob Hill office sites. Discussion n centered around the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions requested by the Council at the hearing on August 2, 1983 prior to approval of the revised preliminary plat. Staff had not had an opportunity to review the draft Decla- rations submitted due to its arrival on the afternoon of the hearing. Blom- quist moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the application to September 20, 1983 and recommended the staff work out the final details of the Declara- tions specifically as they relate to street maintenance, snow removal, and upkeep of developed and undeveloped lots. All voted yea. CO _STANDARD-SERVICE-STATION PERMIT RENEWAL The applicastion for conditional use permit renewal for Country Standard Service Station which had caused considerable concern amongst neighboring landowners was next considered. Several conditions had been agreed upon after several meetings with neighboring owners, Mr. Maclntyre, and City Planner Dale Runkle. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the conditional use permit application subject to the following conditions: 1. All of the conditions originally established for the conditional use permit of George Huber's station be incorporated into the conditional use permit. 2. The existing hours of the station which are 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. shall be changed to allow the operation from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with the exception of weather or emergency situations. 6 Council Minutes 00254 September 6, 1983 3. Signs shall be posted on the premises stating that there will be no truck parking without permission. 4. There will be no operation of diesel equipment, including refrigera- tion units after 7:00 p.m., and only very minor repairs and operations will be allowed on Saturday mornings, with the understanding that this would not be intrusive to the neighborhood. 5. The landscape plan approved by the residents and Mr. MacIntyre shall be completed within one year of the time the conditions have been approved. 6. There shall be no storage of tractor-trailers overnight except those which are being serviced by Country Standard. There shall be no more than 4 allowed to be stored at any one time overnight with the exception of an emergency or an unusual condition. All voted yes. Turn lanes on to Highway $13 from LeTendre were also discussed and upon motion by Smith, seconded Thomas, the staff was directed to investigate the feasibility of such turn lanes. All voted in favor. Enl NATIONAL ADVERTISING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGN The Council next considered the conditional use permit application from National Advertising for an outdoor advertising sign on Trunk Highway 477. City Administrator Hedges advised the Council that a representative of National Advertising had contacted the City and requested that this item be continued due to serious illness. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the application to October 4, 1983. All members voted yea. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGN Council then considered the application for conditional use permit from Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. for an outdoor advertising sign on Trunk Wighway #77. Mr. Hedges indicated that no one was present on behalf of Naegele with the understanding that the Naegele and the National Advertising sign would be discussed at the same meeting. Egan moved, Smith seconded the motion to continue the matter to October 4, 1983. All voted yes. 7 LS=?, ??4?xdNe znd ®F 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 19, 1983 MR RON MILLER 3217 DONALD AVE EAGAN MN 55121 COUNTRY STANDARD - EAGAN MR TOM MCINTYRE 3206 SIBLEY MEM HWY EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Conditional Use Permit for/Country Standard BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER C.Ur 'I Members THOMAS HEDGES Gtv Adminstrato EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city cle'k At a regular City Council meeting held on September 6, 1983, the City Council reviewed the staff report listing the conditions which were proposed to be placed on the Country Standard conditional use permit. The City Council reviewed these conditions and noted that there were no objections from either party at the September 6th meeting. There- fore, the City Council approved the conditions listed in the staff re- port subject to the conditions being reviewed each year and renewed with the conditional use for Country Standard. At this time, staff would like to thank Mr. Tom McIntyre, owner of Country Standard and Mr. Ron Miller for their cooperation and time they have spent in trying to resolve the problems which have arisen in the neighborhood. Hopefully, the conditions set forth in the staff report can be adhered to by both parties and both the neigborhood and Country Standard can continue to work together on these issues. As a note to both parties: the City staff has drafted a letter to MnDOT requesting that they do a feasibility study and costs associat- ed with construction of turn lanes on LeTendre and T.H. 13. Once the City receives a response from MnDOT, we will contact you with the re- sults. If anyone has any questions or concerns regarding these conditions, please feel free to contact me at the Eagan City Hall. S' cerely, Dale C. Ru kle City Planner cc - Paul Hauge DCR/jach THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY city of eagan THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator DATE: June 22, 1994 E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk SUBJECT: Lot 5, Block 3, L.etendre Addition No. 2; zoned General Business (GB). (3206 Sibley Memorial Highway) FACT: 1. Outside storage is a Conditional Use in the GB zoning district. 2. The above referenced property is currently owned by Mr. George Huber. As owner's of Richfield Blacktop Inc.: We understand that due to our urgent need to vacate our previous place of business, the City of Eagan is allowing us to relocate our business, which includes outside storage, to the above referenced property without first receiving City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for outside storage. We understand that we are required to submit an application requesting CUP for outside storage no later than July 1, 1994. We understand that the City is not guaranteeing that this permit will be approved. We understand that if approved, conditions of approval will include site/building improvements to meet current City performance standards. We also understand that without City approval, we are risking all costs that we have/or will incur associated with preparing this property for our use. MLYN L NOTARY L VOMOMMAN DAKOTA CO Y 7FN;5o ryTblic MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 681-46W FAX: (612) 681-4612 TDD:(612) 454-8535 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Actlon Employer MAINTENANCE FACIL17Y 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681.4300 FAX: (612) 681-4360 TDD: (612) 454-8535 - ? ? ? CC) S,Cn(\- V?- ?u /s ,-o„ ' I L I l I l 1 ? ? .1 1 -l I ' I I / KF_ o' i BS L Rlj0C;lE TONE lv? ?.l_ ?YEO ?oAY .. J I, .l . REVISIONS DATE I APPROVED YE??.Oc.?1 ?'F?CKC?ROUN,d i-T r? r 9 ,I,AS ?c?cJ ??HIE?,D ?` •: AV e 01HEAt'5 NO. ,SIGN CR?3;NET% ? f AC725: ? All-L //JS?FIAl f/T/C/l% lSf.'.*lJiA t f//?? 61J?(? Eb T F Q ON?C. y 9?- ?- ? n? ?. c a4:.5 r CartJOiri oNS /bc0.67' 4E cHECK?a ?ffn,?E //'J.?rr1??'T; a?1. `. CJfLGL 0490 -- ..._?_. . WA TS._ Y.O.C. s _?... _a X!o FACE TRA x:?Y A , pUAIITE F3"Q!,CI$, INC. WILLiAM , Jf,a, ?Ei ? SCALE: DATE DRAWN BY DRWO. NO. 3zo(p 5?bl?t'?' peimp and Mete* se"'ker Ztc. SERVICE & SALES* INSTALLATION 1800 2ND STREET SO. - (612) 933.4800 - HOPKINS, MN 55343 (On Cty. Rd. 3 - Just West of Cty. Rd. 18) March 111, 1983 Division of the State Fire Marshal 12116 University Avenue St Paul, Minn 55104 Dear Sir: Submitted herewith for your anproval are necessary plans for the installation of one 12,960 gallon underground storage tank for #1 diesel and one 6,000 under- =,,,nd storage tank for #2 diesel at ?tacIntyrels Country Store,'3206 Sibley "Memorial Hwy, St Paul, Mnc This job will be installed by Pump & Meter Service, Ihc., Hopkins, Minn. Tanks will not be installed in the driveway area. Vent lines will be 2" and will termininate 121 above ground and will be anchored together to maintain proper elevation above ground. Tanks will be installed with ( ) 17# magnesium anodes and coal tar spoxy coating for corrosion protection. All piping to be coated with Bitumastic #50 where galvanized pipe coating is nicked or threaded. Tanks will have 4" fills with 3" vapor recovery pipe each At oppdsite7end8eof.$ank, In our opinion, the installation of magnesrim anodes along with coat tar epotw coating will be the most effective means of corrosion protedtion that can be used at this to cation, Resistivity test dated 3-11-83 is attached. Yours 3 -MtlNirr of PAM WOW '-e Marsha! ON Joseph B.'1:6d'eimacher p PV,_INC. - e , Ei'i} L GI ?.., t •, .? 7 t I - Q (; . 4. i`.r, N' T !' _ C f EiJCi T.7 lit. IL IN di y P Y- r;i;".' [ prc? Ii=i, HI'L By: Fueling Systems - Electronic Gauging & Inventory Controls - Fiberglass Tanks & Pipe lost. Self Serv Equipment - Compressors `?,' Auto Lifts & Parts - Service Station Pumps ?I Yt :: - ' - I " t~" I GENERAL INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS x ` SELF CONTAINED PUMPS Typical Installation Diagram r VENT PPE TENMINTRO M . - .PRIOVED VEM CM -? - _ .. POWEA.M1Cl10N p% t VF OFT RrTRO .. _ Milm map= LOM oox y , r r ? JI .r" .-. BWRO TVPE JORfB - ... Pl1 PPE '. SL?Yuw CIECx VKVE-.__ ? pp C*aff InoM GW w C IN 611LON0 POp POWER ? eTOnnm rxRc mom SUP* Pkw M" do tb lla. Pkwy . .. ? . ' ro ater•w r.lw. txh on.x - r n •aI ;. :. ' • TW Yq OP TAM( To POCK oom omx. r--'-"- GENERAL ",- ?? rv R m q?$ a _a r \ I !'G 4? I p Z Md. d \f.NYIt 1•. 1800 20 6TRBBT SO. (612) 933.48110 HOPKINB, MN 53343 (lht CUP. RO 3 Jstt Rhrr o/Cry. Rd. 18) EARTH RESISTIVITY DATA SHEET. To, SKATE FIRr MARSHALL, 1246 Univerdt ""A' fttu ST PAUL, !IN 55104 *141 3-11-83 308 LOCATIUNt MA871NTYBEtS.ROUNTRY STO ':,"' 2*q*blW Memorial H wy.. St Paul -MhWY* 81lB WTI eisc:VZXy? t was aaccompilinso rough the use of a four point "<.•:..,., , broground tester that works on a null-balance principle of operation. This teat measures resistance of a hemisphere of soil. RESULTS:- PkOBE PLACEINENT REMINC ?P -- TEST A. . ?Z 3 2 ?? ?( I . ( 3 3 v TEST Bt I? !` ((? ?' . ?2^ ?. b I i rmula Probe Placement in fetet x reeding x 191.5 ohm/cubic centimatece Data Fowling Systems - Electronic Oas/in/ m Sr•il Sera E Conwrmaan lawnwy Contreim - FiA.rrlaxm Tmtkm & Pipr Auto 141, r= - %vviro Station pynpr - ---------- - -- MEMO TO: DIANE DOWNS FROM: ED KIRSCHT, SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN DATE: AUGUST 3, 1990 SUBJECT: Plat and Parcel'No.'i0-44901-050=03 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway- - - Standard Station - Change REF (Residential Equivalent Factor) I have recomputed the REF for Standard Station for 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway, plat and parcel #10-44901-050-03. The total REF's for that parcel should be 5.7 instead of the 8.6. The impermeable area was reduced from 504 to 324. Ed Kirscht Sr. Engineering Tech EK/jf (51 53, L.e}4ri.A,rc. z a PS 06013-01 (08/79) DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL 1245 UNIVERSITY AVENUE HT. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55104 '/?, TELEPHONEI (5121 296.7541 W STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Control No. Re: '-: T*VJW*4gWtry StAvwr bbley toporial.-Nwy., I ? . `, To Whom it may Concern: The plans for the above installation have been reviewed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 1974, Chapter 299F.19. Preliminary approval is given for the aforementioned project subject to compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, State Fire Marshal Regulations, and local ordinances and permits. Construction shall be in conformance with the standards contained in National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code (1973 edition as amended). Final approval will be given following an inspection of the facility by either your area State Fire/Arson Investigator and/or local fire authority. Approval of the project described in this letter does not relieve the applicant of responsibility to other Federal, State or local agencies regarding adherence to regulations or the need to obtain necessary approval. Questions concerning this project should be addressed in writing to our office for a formal response. Please refer to the control number listed above in all future correspondence concerning this project. Yours very truly, Wes Werner, State Fire Marshal COPY DISTRIBbTION: White"Facility, Blue-Fire Department, Green-Central Office, Pink-Codes/P ans Specialist,_ d-Fire/Arson InvesUgator, Yellow-Portion Control Agency AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER MASTER CARD LOCATION OWNER C9 Ptl It?P1? %?Hd STRUCTURE AND LAND USED AS F, Permit No. Issued Issued To Contractor Owner BUILDING 12 7?00' r- 2 PLUMBING . CESSPOOL - SEPTIC TANK WELL ELECTRICAL HEATING GAS INSTALLING SANITARY SEWER OTHER OTHER Items Approved (Initial) Date Remarks Distance From Well FOUNDATION SEPTIC CESSPOOL FRAMING TILE FIELD FT. FINAL ELECTRICAL HEATING DEPTH OF WELL GAS INSTALLATION SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOL DRAINFIELD PLUMBING WELL SANITARY SEWER Violations Noted . on Back COMMENTS: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORTS TO BE USED ONLY IN EVENT OF OBSERVED VIOLATIONS PERMIT CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AT THIS INSPECTION ? NO EVIDENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE OBSERVED. ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTIONS OR DEVIATIONS. DATE OF INSPECTION ? NON-COMPLIANCE. BUILDER WILL COMPLY WITHOUT DELAY. ITEMIZED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1:1 NON-COMPLIANCE. BUILDER DOES NOT INTEND TO COMPLY. ? COMPLETION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE DELAYED BY CONDITIONS BEYOND CONTROL. ? REINSPECTION REQUIRED REINSPECT ION DATE OF REINSPECTION CERTIF I CATION -I certify that I have carefully inspected the above in which I have no interest present or prospective, and that 1 have reported herein all significant conditions observed to be at variance with ordinances of the Town of Eagan, approved plans and specifications, and any specific require- ments for off-site improvements relating to the property inspected. ? ALL IMPROVEMENTS ACCEPTABLY COMPLETED BUILDING .49P as J.0t 3, sKl EAGAN TOWNSHIP 3795 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55111 Telephone 454-5242 PERMIT FOR SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DATE: 12/29/72 -(8/14/73) NUMBER 1396 OWNE 1i ??/ rG- Address -f a ` ?!/?- +? .ter .. PLUMBER Weierke Trenching & Exc. TYPE OF PIPE heavy cast iron DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Industrial Commercial Residential Multiple Dwelling No, of units xx Location of Connections: Connection Charge X7,5 ??• ???? Permit Fee 10.00 pd 12/29/72 .50 p Street Repairs Total Inspected by: Date Remarks: By Chief Inspector In consideration of the issue and delivery to me of the above permit, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the rules and regulations of Eagan Tocmahip, Dakota County, Minnesota By Weierke Trenching & Exc. Please notify when ready for inspection and connection and before any portion of the work is covered. 4 OC 19G Special Council Minutes July 13, 1983 UNITOG - INDUSTRIAL REVENUE FINANCING A request had been received from representatives of Unitog Corporation to increase the amount of the industrial revenue bonds from 1.8 million to 2 million because of additional equipment. However, Paul Hauge stated that contact with the attorney for Unitog had resulted in a withdrawal of the request for the increase, so no action was required. COUNTRY STANDARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The City Attorney discussed with the Council the negotiations that have been taking place between representatives of Country Standard and its neighbors concerning its conditional use permit application. Another meeting is scheduled for Monday, July 18 concerning the issue and the matter is scheduled to be heard before the Council on July 19, 1983. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. All voted yes. PHH City Clerk 3 REQUEST FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS I/We hereby request of the Board of Supervisors, Eagan Township, Minnesota, utility improvements on and over property owned by me/us as follows: (Mention type of improvement, e.g. water, sanitary sewer, etc.) WATER AREA The location of said utility improvements shall be generally as follows: LeTendre 2nd Addition Parcelb3350 Lot 5 Block 3 $1525.00 2.5 acres at $610.00 per acre I/We hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary for the installation of said improvements and further consent to any assessments necessarily levied by the Township of Eagan for such improvements. I/We further agree to grant to the Township of Eagan any easements neces- sary for the installation of such improvements. It is further understood that this request shall be revieoied by the Board of Supervisors of Eagan Township or its agent and I/we will be given reasonable notice as to whether this request is possible under present utility planning as to timing, location, etc. Dated: Aueust !1 , 1973 '`° Request accepted by 66,4 ? Date Eagan Township Request referred to Town Engineer: Date Copies: 1. Township 2. Town Engineer 3. Applicant 1994 MECHANICAL PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN MN 55122 (612) 6814675 PLEASE COMPLETE FOR ALL COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS. ALSO COMPLETE FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS OR OTHER MULTI-FAMILY BUILDINGS WHEN SEPARATE PERMITS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. - DATE: 0) - )- (? ' X114 CONTRACT PRICE: $ Z ,':5DO •?? NEW BUILDING INTERIOR IMPROVEMENT WORK DESCRIPTION: 1% OF FEE PROCESSED PIPING: MINIMUM FEE: STATE SURCHARGE TOTAL SITE rl?_lo V - FEES ?Cwr t W Q C C ?,O?s 2. $25.00 ?, r s? ?p cS1?a\ U v`1 ` 1ba ?k $25.00 $.50 FOR EACH $1,000 OF PRI FEE. $ c5'Leit,_- ?a urv®ticp9 t? Jft`f , lGc9?av?, ?'tl? OWNER NAME t ?v f5- v TELEPHONE #: ?f7k?q - 2-35 3 TENANT NAME: (IMPROVEMENTS ONLY Ta4o owl Q lh(-QS CITY: ?? Pa v STATE: IY? ZIP CODE: 551De? TELEPHONE #: ?15? - X0'6 I o SIGNATURE OF P RMITTEE CITY INSPECTOR PLEASE COMPLETE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. ALSO, FOR TOWNHOMES AND CONDOS WHEN PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH UNIT. NEW CONSTRUCTION ADD-ON A/C ADD-ON FURNACE FIREPLACE INSERT DATE FEES HVAC: 0-100 M BTU $ 24.00 ADDITIONAL 50 M BTU 6.00 GAS OUTLETS (MINIMUM I @ $3.00 EACH) ADD-ON/REMODEL (EXISTING CONSTRUCTION) $ 20.00 STATE SURCHARGE .50 TOTAL SITE ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: TELEPHONE #: INSTALLER: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE #: SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE 1994 MECHANICAL PERMIT (RESIDENTIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN MN 55122 (612) 6814675 ,, i D SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO PLAT Name of Plat: Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505. 174 Laws of Minnesota, 1957 the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows: 1. That I prepared the plat of _LE I E N DR F- AD/) i 710 W dated nl n ? ?Rt2m?er 12i 14fo?L and filed on C3et bar- 1 19l i; in the office of County Recorder -+ a ofa County, Minnesota, in Book - a. of Plats, page 2_ 2. That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in the following particulars, to-wit: +I,,,, j._ r , - - -? k,- Ls nerepy corrected in the following particulars, to-wit: ?c plat ;? ??-? )i ?„ ??t?1d?7'? a? ?a?.. _ ??>? Dated Registered Land Survey. No. ? ? G a State of Minnesota The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of _a T??ll?,c FADDIO. Z has been approved by the _Ci+v n,-..nn' (Governing Body of Twp, or City) at a regular meeting of the -n?ip _LL.51tn 0 i? of ? as n Minnesota held on the r7 day of LZ Township, or City Clerk This Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this j day of t4L2 12_?19 7,5 . L \f Iiy Bernar H. Larson MAR 6 1978 "' Dakota County Surveyor -30- 1 D SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF ORRECTION TO PLA? , Name of Plat: -------------- Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505. 174 Laws of Minnesota, 1957 Z%11.4. l/ d&* I, the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows: 1. That I prepared the plat of 1 F T NI F7R ADD) Tlnr,l r.ln ? dated ._a¢nf2rnlx r I Z, 1904 and filed on ?tnhor 1.2 ? Ai24 in the office of County Recorder s OaK b'ta County, Minnesota, in Book of Plats -? page 2?, 2. That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in the following particulars, to-wit: +k. _ f Dated Registered Land urveyo No. _ 't'? a State of Minnesota The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of -L4 MOTE D ZT W A/0. z has been approved by the (?; , n?nr' I i (?uvex-ning Body of Twp, or City) at a regular meeting of the -??ilaL t v,oil of Eagan Minnesota held on the `J -day of Tli,a c /? i 7 S' Township, or City Clerk This Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this j - day of 19 79 By ct, IZECE?`l Bernar H. Larson MAR 6 1978 Dakota County Surveyor -30- 3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the followin V g particulars, rr,_,,.;t. 08-10-11 11:30AM FROM -volt companies Date: City of Eaali 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 T-037 P.001/003 F-859 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office use Permitil: G 0 Pend Fee: -* pate Received: /O - Staff: F -10 -ti 2011 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLicATIONzinctuid 6 -//-it Sibley Memorial Hwyeerad �J_ /Yl (Tenant is: New/ x Existing) Su1te #:Ctl6 OW" 8/10/11 Slte Address: 32 06 Tenant Name: _ Dakota County CDA 1i1guru mor der Tenant-. '/ 6 Name: • C r• Address I City / Zip: 1228 Town Centre Dr Applicant Is: Owner x Contractor Phone: 651.675-4464 Description of work: Demolish a commercial structiAre and 3 sheds (w/out Foundations) Construction Cost: $23 400 .0 0 Name: Veit & Company. Inc . Address: 14000 Veit Place State: MN Zip: 55374 Contact: Jessica Anderson Phone: License #. City: Rogers 763-428-2242 Email: Janderson@veitusa.com Name: N/A Address: State: Zip: Phone: _ Contact Person: Email: Registration #: City: Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone #: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. CaII Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecali.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan In the case of wok whicquires a review and approval of plans. �( .Tpgai r•a Andercnn Applicants Printed Name x Applicant's Signa Page 1 of 3 City of Earn 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink Permit #: Permit Fee: * Ss CC Date Rec�iged: Staff: 2011 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY 1 Address: 0 — \ r— 1�i/ OFFICE .USE ONLY ., Property Owner: PRV required Telephone #: Plumber: Permit City + County ROW Pmit / Date of Inquiry: / 3 , .-. 1 I j Contact Name: �e 1 1 �' 5 (AAf�� 5c w�\. SEWER ` WATER Sewer Service Sewer lateral charge Sewer trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt #: , Date: Water Service Water lateral charge Water trunk Water supply storage Receipt #: $ 100.00 $ 1,230.00 $ 2,230.00 , Date: Treatment Plant Permit Fee State Surcharge `Plumbing Permit Required acquired with building $ 765.00 Septic abandonment Permit Fee State Surcharge $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 — water meter to be permit TOTAL: TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge @ $65.25/ff Water lateral charge @ $65.85/ff Sewer trunk @ $1,325/connection Water trunk @ $1,380/connection City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # , Date l 5 CLQ n A r G $ 100.00 $ 2,230.00 A� , „Ai V tSr u1 -J' Water supply & storage Receipt # , Date $ 1,230.00 Treatment plant Septic abandonment Permit Fee State Surcharge `Plumbing Permit Required — water acquired with building permit $ 765.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 5.00 meter to be TOTAL: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.orq