Loading...
10/06/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionMEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 RE: OCTOBER 6, 1988 - ADVISORY MEETING The Commission will again tour two parks before the Advisory Commission meeting on October 6th. We will meet at the Municipal Building at 6:30 P.M.; since darkness is setting in earlier, we will first visit Ohmann Park and then the Thomas Lake shelter building project. The next stop will be the Public Works building to show you the new portable warming house that recently arrived. You will recall that this was purchased in lieu of renting a temporary facility. We will be returning to City Hall at 7:30; the Commission will meet in the lower level of City Hall. Due to the Jewish holiday on October 4, the Council moved its Council meeting to the 6th, and therefore we will not be able to use the Council Chambers that evening. One other brief note: I will be absent from the City beginning October 5th, through October 10th, to attend the National Recreation and Park Association conference in Indianapolis, Indiana. I have reviewed with staff the agenda and each of them have been assigned a particular item for presentation purposes. (Just don't get too accustomed to having me absent!) There are three items under "Old Business" in which staff has prepared brief memorandums on. The first under "New Business" is the annual review of parks dedication. Again, a separate memorandum has been prepared for your review. It would be appropriate for the Advisory Commission to review the proposed parks dedications for 1989, directing staff to prepare the revisions to the parks dedication policy for adoption at the November or December Commission meeting. PARKS DEVELOPMENT Steve Sullivan will update you on the progress reports for parks projects that are currently underway. A number of things have been happening in the last several weeks and are rapidly moving towards late fall completion. We have also provided you with a parks project matrix which will update you on the work completed through the 1984 Parks Bond Referendum. You will note that in addition to the items that we have completed, there are also items on that list which were not initially identified in the referendum as projects. Steve will also present to you the proposed 1989 project priority for development. 1. This is a first draft, and we would appreciate comments from the Advisory Commission so that we may begin to put this into a final format in order to begin work this winter and early spring on these projects for completion in 1989. COMMUNITY CENTER There are several items under the "Community Center" including the "progress report The Commission should appoint two members of the Commission to serve on the Reaction Committee at this time. Staff expects the committee will first meet on October 13th, for a background briefing concerning the project and then on October 27th, for a meeting with the architects to review the first concept plan. Steve will be reviewing that concept plan with the Advisory Commission. Chairman Carroll and Member Kubik, had an opportunity to meet with the architects to review the concepts for comment. Staff has already had one session to review the plans and has made several comments which will be sent to the architects, collectively with the Commission's and that of the Focus Groups. There are several items under "Other Business and Reports" for your review. It may be necessary for you to take official action on an item entitled "Lillian McCarthy If not, certainly direction from the Commission would be appropriate. I trust your meeting will be successful. I have great confidence in the staff in presenting the items on the agenda. We have discussed these in some detail and I have complete confidence in their capabilities. Res ge�tf /11y submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks Recreation KV /bls Thursday, October 6, 1988 6:30 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center AGENDA ADVISIORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA A. 6:30 P.M. Tour of Ohmann Park, Thomas Lake Shelter, Portable Warming House B. 7:30 P.M. Regular Meeting Lower Level of City Hall C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance D. Introduction of Newly Appointed Alternate; Theodore Billy E. Approval of Agenda F. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 1, 1988 G. Consent Agenda (1) Waiver of Plat Kraft, Inc. (2) Roseagan Addition Holck Company H. Old Business: (1) Report RAAA and EAA merger /facilities use (2) Snowmobile Position of Commission for 1988 -89 Season (3) Proposed Lake Classification (Map) Defer to Special Meeting (4) Wading Pools I. New Business: (1) Annual Review of Parks Dedication (2) Town Hall J. Parks Development: (1) Progress Report Parks Projects (2) Parks Project Matrix (3) First Draft: 1989 Project Priority for Development K. Community Center: (1) Progress Report (2) Appointment of Members to Reaction Committee (3) Time Line for Community Center: Oct. Feb. /Pre -Bond 3. L. Other Business and Reports: (1) Department Happenings (2) Set Date for Park Representative Meeting (Thurs., Oct. 20) (3) Update: Maintenance Management Program (4) Informal Discussion Warming Houses (5) McCarthy House (6) Rahn Road Trail (7) Unisys Trail (8) Sitko Closing Interview (9) Evergreen Park Well #12 (10) Roundtable M. Adjournment Subject to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1, 1988 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, September 1, 1988 with the following Commission Members present: Michele Swanson, Wayne Sames, Sandy Masin, JoAnne Alt, Bob Porter and Dick Carroll. Staff present included Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect /Parks Planner Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLinde; Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson; Parks Secretary, Cherryl Mesko and Parks Intern, Mel Bailey. Commission Member George Kubik was not present. AGENDA Director Vraa asked that Rahn Trail, identified as Item #8 under New Business, be added to the agenda. Sandy Masin moved, JoAnne Alt seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES FROM AUGUST 4, 1988 MEETING Page 11, paragraph 6, the term "Purple Stripe" should be replaced with "Purple Strife Wayne Sames moved, Michele Swanson seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes from August 4, 1988 as amended. MINUTES FROM AUGUST 18, 1988 MEETING Page 3, paragraph 4, last sentence, should be changed to reflect the change from "to" to "too JoAnne Alt moved, Bob Porter seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes from August 19, 1988 as amended. CONSENT AGENDA The following consent agenda items were presented for approval. On a motion by JoAnne Alt, seconded by Wayne Sames with all members voting in favor, the Commission approved recommendation to the City Council of the following items: 1. T.F. James Co. That this plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication and that developer be responsible for an 8 foot wide bituminous trail along the north side of County Road 30 and the east side of County Road 31. 2. Opus Corporation That this proposal be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 3. National Minerals Corporation -NSP That this proposal be subject to a cash parkland dedication and a 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed on the south side of Lone Oak Road. 5. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 2 WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION Steve Sullivan reacquainted the Commission members with this issue noting that the Commission at it's August meeting has instructed the developer to provide an open space within the Wescott Square Addition development and show what recreational amenities they were going to include in this area. The Commission also asked to see a layout of the proposed amenities to determine if there was any basis for allowing a parkland dedication credit. In Mr.Sullivan's conversation with the developer, the developer has expressed his interest in providing these amenities at the beginning of the development. Mr. Steve Behnke was present to represent the developer and New Horizon Homes. He noted that they have adjusted 5 buildings on the site to have less impact on the existing trees and vegetation. They feel that in providing the recreational amenities in the development from the beginning this will help with the marketing of the townhomes. The model building is in the southeast portion of the development and the proposed recreational amenities include a 20' x 20' sand pit which will accommodate a plat structure at a later date. Further planned amenities include a second sand pit of comparable size and a gazebo that would be placed in the area with trees which is being planned as an outlot. The sand pits are designed for possible expanded use depending upon the occupants of the townhomes. If the neighborhood becomes primarily adult the pits will allow for the expansion of amenities such as volleyball, horseshoes, etc. Once the homeowners association takes over they can determine their priorities for amenities based on the residents' needs. Member Sames questioned the distance from Wescott Station park. Steve Sullivan responded by stating that Westcott Station was one -half to three quarters of a mile and that the distance to the Woodlands School park was three quarters of a mile. Mr. Sames asked what was going into Westcott Station Park. Again, Mr. Sullivan responded by stating that this was a neighborhood park and would have facilities similar to other neighborhood parks but that a master plan had not yet been done for Wescott Station. Steve Sullivan asked Mr. Behnke when the determination would be made as to the placement of these amenities. Mr. Behnke responded by stating that the first sand pit area would be planned and provided during the grading of Phase I. During Phase II the gazebo, second sand pit and play structure would be added. The plan is to have the amenities put in by the developer concurrent with the development. Mr. Behnke noted that the size of the outlot in this development was approximately 4000 square feet. By adding the initial recreation amenities at the beginning of the development and allowing for some flexibility in developing the future amenities the developer feels this will best meet the needs of the future homeowners since it is unclear at this time if that will include families with children or primarily adults. 6. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 3 As clarification, Dick Carroll noted that it was standard procedure for the Commission to ask that play structures and recreational facilities be provided in a multi family development of this size and could not see why a credit should be given in this case. Mr. Behnke noted that they were not looking for a parkland dedication credit, rather the developer wanted to included the amenities up front instead of escrowing funds to do it at a later date. After further discussion, JoAnne Alt moved that the Commission recommend acceptance of the plat as shown including two sand areas, one playground structure and a gazebo. The motion further stated that the developer was to be responsible for a cash parkland dedication and the installation of a 5 foot wide sidewalk on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. The motion was seconded by Sandy Masin with all members voting in favor. OAK MEADOWS Director Vraa explained that the information in the packet relative to Oak Meadows located north of Kingswood 2nd Addition was informational only. The parkland dedication requirements have already been met thus no action is required. BRIDLE RIDGE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVES Parks Planner Steve Sullivan briefed the Commission on the background of the neighborhood interest in the development of Bridle Ridge Park. Steve stated that he met with the neighbors on August 9, 1988 and discussed the results of a neighborhood survey that Robin Fluin and Dale Ford spearheaded in determining the needs of the neighborhood for their park. Mr Sullivan explained to the residents that the plans were to grade the parking lot and establish the trails this year. The residents' concern was the need for playground equipment, the possibility of incorporating an open skating area for this winter and the discussion of a wading pool. Dale Ford representing the neighborhood addressed the Commission by explaining that the neighborhood had formed an Ad Hoc park committee that included Stone Bridge, Stone Bridge Hills, Stone Bridge Meadows area and the Eagan Hills Farm area. Mr. Ford noted that based on the survey only they showed 44 children in the 0 -4 age range indicating the need for facilities to accommodate this age group. Their survey also noted the neighborhood's interest in tennis courts and a wading pool. Based on their meeting with Steve Sullivan they understand that the plans call for the turf to be developed this fall with the playground being scheduled for next fall. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 4 Member Dick Carroll wanted to clarify for the residents the reasoning behind this particular time frame. He noted that the turf needs to be established before any of the long term park amenities can be installed. The Commission takes a long hard look at the demographics each year in determining priorities for park development and the Commission appreciates the understanding of residents in accepting the timing of park development. Member Alt stated she was pleased to see such interest in a neighborhood park. She noted that the Commission has not in the past looked at the option of installing a wading pool and asked if Staff could research this possibility. Director Vraa stated that Staff would pursue this option and report back to the Commission. Members of the Commission expressed their concern about considering an amenity of this type in a neighborhood park rather than a community park. The concern was based on the number of people that would want to use an amenity like a wading pool resulting in more traffic than a neighborhood park is designed to handle. Mr. Ford asked about tennis courts since there was a strong interest shown by the residents. Director Vraa stated that the nearest courts would be at Northview Park after they are completed. He further stated that there are existing established thresholds for facilities based on a per thousand capita (one court per 1750 people). Currently the city is close to the threshold on tennis courts but with the completion of Northview we should be over the per thousand capita requirement. There will be a joint use agreement for the use of the courts with School District 196, however this should not greatly impede the use of the courts by the public. Understanding the importance of playground equipment in this neighborhood park, Director Vraa indicated that the residents shouldn't be expecting this to be installed until closer to fall, 1989. He felt that the possibility of having an open skate area for this winter was good. The skating area could be placed in such a way so as to utilize the parking lot lights for security. Chairman Carroll congratulated the residents for their interest and thanked them for their input. The Commission and City Council continues to try to give the best facilities as fast as they can and the support and understanding of the community is crucial. Director Vraa noted for the record that a skating area will be installed at Bridle Ridge Park this winter and if residents want more specific information regarding the timing of playground equipment, that information will be made available in the spring of 1989 after park schedules are completed. Advisory Parks and Recreaion Commission Minutes of September 1,1988 Meeting Page 5 NORTHVIEW PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION Director Vraa explained that a petition was received on Friday afternoon, August 26, 1988 from the neighborhood surrounding Northview Park requesting that the planned lighted softball fields not be allowed to be constructed. Mr. Vraa had had a conversation with Mark Schuldt who would be representing the interests of the signers of the petition. Mark Schuldt addressed the Commission and stated that he lives directly across Northview Park Road from the proposed lighted ball fields. He stated that the petitioners want to see how they can change the plans since the people he's talked to have indicated they don't want the fields; specifically the lights being planned for the fields. He further stated that the sign doesn't say "Lighted Ball Fields it only says "Athletic Field" and his real estate agent told him it would be a park. Chairman Carroll noted that when someone is ready to purchase a homesite the best source of information for any development plans surrounding a given area would be the City. The plans were always there, from the time the land was purchased, to develop lighted softball fields. There was a great deal of time and money spent in researching sites that would be conducive to an athletic facility. Flat level land is necessary for athletic fields and this type of land is at a premium. Some of the only other options would be to purchase commercial /industrial land which is cost prohibitive for this purpose. Mark Schuldt stated that the petitioners concern is not for the existing fields; they want to know how they can stop the proposed expansion of lighted softball fields. One suggestion he offered was to combine fields on school property in conjunction with S.D. 196 so that the athletic facilities would not come so close to residential areas. As history, Director Vraa noted that there were a total of 20 sites that were available to look at for possible athletic sites. May, 1986 was the first time the Northview site was looked at for expansion purposes. In July, 1986 the Council approved the acquisition of this parcel with the closing occurring in October, 1986. When the 3 softball fields were planned the adjacent property was zoned R -4 and later downzoned to residential. The developers of this property directly west of the expansion property were aware of the planned lighted baseball fields at the time they decided to develop the residential lots. Lexington Square Addition came to the city for the first time in 1984. The plats first came in for the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th Addition after the expansion property was considered for athletic facilities. The sign designating this property as an athletic complex with lighted fields has been in place for some time. In answer to the question of sharing school field space, a drawing of the planned fields was shown to the audience noting the school district has facilities packed as tightly as possible in the space available and they, too, are short of fields for their planned uses. The City and School District have entered into joint use agreements so as to use /share facilities as much as possible. q Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 6 Mr. Schuldt asked why there were no facilities for neighborhood families. Mr. Vraa stated there are none at the present time but they are being planned for this area. 9 to 12 tennis courts will be going into the Northview Park, playground equipment will be installed in the park area as well as a trail extension and picnic area. Some other possibilities being considered are horseshoe pits and perhaps a volleyball court. A skating rink will not be located in this park. Another resident asked if it was possible to move the proposed softball fields closer to the existing softball fields or put something else in it's place feeling that there were enough fields already. Director Vraa explained that the City has already spent in excess of $125,000 in grading the site and the intention is to continue the development of this parcel as athletic fields as was originally planned. The City is looking for additional sites for athletic facilities because the growth of the city dictates the need for expansion in this area. In response to a question regarding the timing for development of this site, Mr. Vraa stated that the fencing would be installed in the spring /summer of 1989 with the lighting being proposed for 1991 -1992 depending upon the need. Another resident asked if the city would be looking at some new technology regarding the lighting of the field so as to have the least impact on the adjacent neighborhood. Director Vraa assured the residents that the city would be looking at all possibilities and the most current technology in lighting would be considered providing it is not cost prohibitive. The traffic was another concern to the neighborhood; specifically the impact the athletic field has on the constant flow of traffic. Again, Mr. Vraa explained that Northview Road was built to a community feeder road standard in anticipation of the traffic that would be generated by an athletic facility. Mr. Schuldt stated that he had moved into his home in December, 1987 and although there was a sign denoting an athletic field site there was no indication on the sign that there would be lighted fields until approximately two weeks ago. Parks Superintendent John VonDeLinde noted for the record that the existing sign with the words "lighted fields" was placed before the park was graded in 1987. Chairman Carroll thanked the residents for their interest and assured them that the Commission was sensitive to their concerns. There will be facilities installed in the future for small children in Northview Park and the residents can also use Patrick Eagan Park just across Lexington Avenue for family activities. Member Masin stated that the Commission could use any help it can get in acquiring property for athletic sites and thanked the residents for sharing their concerns with the Commission. /0. Advisory Park and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Page 7 SKATEBOARDERS PETITION Eight skateboarders addressed the Commission with their request and a petition to support a skateboard park in their neighborhood. There are 43 names on the petition indicating a genuine interest in this type of facility. Tim Brummer stated that they cannot put ramps on the streets and the space available for them to use their skateboards was very limited. They brought copies of some ramps they would be interested in seeing constructed in a park of this type. Larry Frank spoke on behalf of the skateboarders noting that he had constructed a small ramp /half -pipe in his back yard for his son and friends to use. He stated he has an appreciation for the athletic abilities of skateboarders and is concerned that there really isn't a place for them to expand their skills. They are all aware of the liability issues but noted that there were a number of successful skateboard parks in various parts of the country that are currently operating. After much discussion regarding the research that had been done to date on the skateboard liability issue Director Vraa suggested that perhaps a special event for skateboarders could be considered during the summer months. This would give the Commission a feel for the number of people that would like to participate in this sport. JoAnne Alt asked if Staff would look at this option as a special event during the summer. Bob Porter suggested that the 4th of July may be a good time to do this. ATHLETIC LIGHTING Craig Gallop of Musco Lighting was present to update the Commission on some of the newest technology in athletic lighting. He indicated the major concern regarding athletic lighting was the light spillage onto adjacent homeowners property. Until recently the only way to reduce the light spillage was by use of louvers however this also resulted in the loss of light on the field. Mr. Gallop also differentiated between spill light, the light that is measurable from adjacent property and glare light, the light you see when you look at a fixture. In the last six years there has been a great deal of research done to try to control the amount of spillage. Their theory is that the spill light comes from the lower 1/4 of the fixture whereas the field light comes from the top 3/4 of the fixture. They feel that by redirecting the lower 1/4 to the top 3/4 of the fixture it will then be directed down onto the field. Mr. Gallop then showed a video to substantiate this theory. Member Masin asked if this type of lighting is currently being used to test out the theory. One of the systems has been installed in Rochester and another is being planned for Minnetonka where homes are within 600 feet of the fields. The question of extra cost was addressed by stating that installation on a new field would cost approximately 5 -7% over sportscluster lighting; Sportscluster 2 would be 5 -6% more whereas Level 8 would be 6 -8% more. Member Carroll noted that it was important to look into this lighting option and that l/• Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 8 perhaps a test site would be a start. Director Vraa indicated that time would be spent looking into this lighting option and current installation would be monitored for effectiveness. MCCARTHY HOUSE Director Vraa noted for the Commission that per the memo on this item, it had been determined, after inspection, that this house had no historical value. The house had been used in the past as storage for the Eagan Athletic Association but it has since been emptied. Staff has researched the cost for demolition which has been estimated at $3400 $4700. Additionally the well will have to be capped. Member Masin questioned if Dakota County or the Minnesota Historical Society had been contacted to inspect this property in the event it had historical value. After further discussion, Sandy Masin moved that if after checking with Dakota County and Minnesota Historical Society there is no historical value to the home that the building be demolished. The motion was seconded by Dick Carroll with all members voting in favor. DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION Director Vraa explained that the information provided on this issue was the preliminary report and the classification of ponds in the Eagan parks. John Barton notes in his letter that there will be a public hearing on these water bodies. Noting the magnitude of the information it was suggested that a work session be scheduled to review it. A date has not been set for the public hearing as yet but it was suggested that the work session take place before the public hearing so the Commission could have some input. Wayne Sames noted that there had been three meetings and that this was just a partial list of the pond classifications. He asked if the Commission could get a map showing all the ponds and their classifications. Mr. Vraa noted that a storm sewer map would be prepared for the next Commission meeting. TRUST FUND Director Vraa explained that John VonDeLinde had prepared a position paper and tried to broaden the range of possibilities in the use of this fund. Mr. VonDeLinde noted that the report addressed various issues including funding, the need for long range planning and the prioritization of management. The report explores a wide range of alternatives at this point and the Commission needs to direct Staff on how they should proceed. Member Masin stated this was a tremendous idea but felt the Commission needed more time to cover the many issues addressed in the position paper. Dick Carroll commented on what an excellent job staff had done in putting this together but concurred this item would take much more review and discussion along with a great deal of cooperation with the City Council in making this work. One Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 9 priority would be to make sure dollars were expended each year so that the public would see that the money was being used for the purposes intended. Wayne Sames recommended setting up a subcommittee after the Commission has had an opportunity to review the position paper further. After further discussion the item was tabled and would be reviewed further at a work session. RAHN ROAD TRAIL Director Vraa reminded the Commission that a request had been made to install the trail link on Rahn Road south of Diffley to the Highline Trail now that work was progressing with the realignment of Rahn Road. After further discussion, Sandy Masin moved, Dick Carroll seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend the installation of a bituminous trail on Rahn Road south of Diffley to the Highline Trail. PARKS DEVELOPMENT An update of pending parks development shows that Thomas Lake shelter building is still awaiting laminated beams in order to continue with the construction. Slater Acres park has been rough graded and the rock has been laid for the trailways. Ohmann Park is currently undergoing bulk grading and the preliminary indication is that there will be sufficient topsoil to complete the park. TURF RESEEDING With the extensive damage done to the turf following the drought this summer, John VonDeLinde outlined for the Commission the procedure that would be followed to try to re- establish turf. Aeration would be the first step, followed by seeding, fertilization and broadleaf herbicide. Central Landscaping will be doing the shallow disking and seeding but one full year of turf establishment has been lost. The greening up of the parks after the last rains is due to the crab grass that has grown. The new seed would not be able to compete with the crab grass thus it will be destroyed with Round -up and then seeding can begin. NORTHVIEW PARK TENNIS COURTS Steve Sullivan reviewed for the Commission the site at Northview Park just south of Field 5 near the pond where the proposed tennis courts will be installed. It is possible to get 12 tennis courts in this site but it may be cost prohibitive because of the amount of grading necessary to make that configuration work. Mr. Sullivan reviewed Diagram A which shows 11 staggered courts similar to the configuration of Blue Cross /Blue Shield courts. The playground area would go directly adjacent to the tennis courts, pond and picnic area. This plan is more a "pod" concept rather than "bank" style courts with two pods containing 4 courts and one pod containing 3 courts. I3• Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 10 Diagram B showed 10 courts in a "bank" configuration with the picnic area to the north of the courts. Diagram C again shows a "pod" design for 10 courts; one pod of 4 courts and two pods of 3 courts. The stagger in this configuration allows the use of the existing grade or with less grading than the other layouts require. The playground would stay in the same area as Diagram A. Mr. Sullivan noted that he felt Diagram C was the most cost effective option at this point based on these preliminary drawings. In reference to the cost for lighting and fencing, it would be more cost efficient to do a bank of courts rather than the staggered layout but all other factors should remain the same. The school district will be making the final determination on the number of courts to be installed based on the cost estimates. Mr. Vraa noted that in their considering more than 10 courts they may have to look at extensive grading and development costs because of the topography of the land. The consensus of the Commission was that the "pod" configuration was more aesthetically pleasing and would tie into the existing topography better. Mr. Sullivan noted that there was further work necessary on the plan and he will proceed with the plans based on the Commission recommendations and comments. COMMUNITY CENTER Director Vraa reminded the Commission members that the next scheduled design charette for the community center would be September 21, 22 and 23. An agenda would be provided as soon as it became available. HAPPENINGS Director Vraa mentioned that the City of Burnsville would be hosting the 1989 Summer Star of the North Games and they have approached the communities of Eagan, Apple Valley and Lakeville for field space during the event. Mr. Vraa wanted to alert the Commission to the possible request from Burnsville for Eagan facilities. There is some concern, however, regarding stopping the use of Eagan's planned field use for this period of time. Sandy Masin asked how Burnsville could have been awarded this bid without first having been able to provide the facilities needed. COMMISSION PICNIC The date of Friday, September 23, 1988 was set for the annual Commission picnic at Trapp Farm Park. The invitations will be sent out shortly and a committee will be set up to handle the food. Volunteers will be needed to man the grill! /4. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of September 1, 1988 Meeting Page 11 OCTOBER AGENDA Just as a reminder, Director Vraa advised the Commission that the Parks Dedication Review and 1989 Parks Project Review will be handled at the October Commission meeting. Chairman Carroll stated the Commission was pleased to see that Dorothy Peterson was back in action again after her recent surgery. With no further business to conduct, Sandy Masin moved, JoAnne Alt seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 P.M. DATE SECRETARY /5. 1. WAIVER OF PLAT KRAFT, INC. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PARKS PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 RE: CONSENT AGENDA OCTOBER 6, 1988 A waiver of plat in order to split Lot 2, Block 1, Eagandale Industrial Park #8, into two lots for separate ownership located on Eagan Industrial Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 3 located on Eagan Industrial Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 3. RECOMMENDATION This proposal be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 2. ROSEAGAN ADDITION HOLCK COMPANY A Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land use designation from D -11 (24 acres approximately) to D -1 (15.5 acres) and GB (7.5 acres). A rezoning of 24.78 AG (agricultural) acres to 15.5 R -1 (Single Family) acres and 7.5 GB (General Business) acres. A preliminary plat consisting of six single family lots and one general business lot on 24.78 gross acres located along the west side of Hwy. 3 south of Farm Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 36. RECOMMENDATION That this proposal be subject to a cash parkland dedication and an 8 foot bituminous trail be placed along the east side of Dodd Road. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, RECREATION SUPERVISOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1988 RE: FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE BACKGROUND The Commission may recall that in September of 1987, the department hosted a meeting, the focus of which was to discuss growth and its impact on facilities. Participants at the meeting included the boards of directors of the Eagan Athletic Association, Rosemount Area Athletic Association, Community Education directors and /or staff from School Districts 191, 196 and 197. Mend -Eagan Athletic Association did not send a representative. The primary result of that initial meeting was the formation of the facilities steering committee whose membership represents the organizations named above. The goals established for the committee included short term objectives such as numbers of participants, field space available and equitable allocation. Long term focus was identified as the integral purpose for the steering committee. The construction of Eagan High School presented opportunities for changed, co- operation and vigorous leadership. PROGRESS TO DATE The facilities steering committee has met six times in the past year. Immediate facility needs have been identified and the needs of the associations have been met. Additionally, the annual growth of programs has affirmed the need for facilities under construction and for those in the planning stages. The short and long term are being addressed in the following manner. Committees of three have been formed by the Rosemount Area Athletic Association and the Eagan Athletic Association. These individuals have met and have begun to form a base for co- operation and understanding. Additionally, the issues that need to be addressed have been identified. The boards of directors of the two associations have reached consensus regarding vigorous pursuit of co- operation. 1 11. ISSUES EAA and RAAA are pursuing co- operative programs as early as January 1 with their in -house basketball programs. This could include a common flyer, interchangeable registration and divisions of play Eagan and Rosemount based. Spring and summer programs will be addressed as soon as the elections for board positions have been held in October and November. This information, while positive and exciting, is included as an issue because the long term aspects have not received significant discussion. Vision for the future, unless carefully tended, could be overshadowed by the details of the immediate. THE NEXT STEPS The Facilities Steering Committee will meet monthly for the next several months. Membership will be expanded to include the four additional youth athletic association members. The primary reason for this is to ensure that meeting takes place, experience to date has been that individuals with very busy schedules find it necessary to set and re -set meetings. Focus on the long term can be accented at meetings with the City. This can occur by asking devils advocate questions, proposing options and directing the scope of the discussion. By way of example: Participants listed the following desired outcomes for the October meeting: Develop a strategy for basketball, develop a calendar for 1989 registration, consider a preliminary outline for spring and "where do we go from here? The agenda will also include a recap of goals for 1989. Staff is of the opinion that the aura of consensus will be served by identifying the issues to be resolved in 1989 the "where do we go from here" part. Strategy will be to focus attention to brainstorming to 1992 etc., as part of each monthly meeting. The desired outcome would be the identification of lines of convergence and divergence. Additionally, the ultimate decision of co- operative programs /two distinct programs oriented to City /two distinct programs open market will find a forum for discussion and foment. This approach outlines an active role for staff. That role is in reference to process as facilitator, as spur perhaps, not decision maker! Of ultimate importance in this entire process is serving the needs of Eagan youth who participate in youth sports recognizing that in this time of dynamic change in the community new alliances, new approaches and new ideas are to be expected and courted. DP /bls 2 MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, RECREATION SUPERVISOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 SUBJECT: EAGAN SNOWMOBILE TRAILS BACKGROUND For a number of years, snowmobiles were authorized to operate in the corridor of the Highline Trail and on Johnny Cake Ridge Road trail. At the December 3, 1987, Advisory Parks Commission meeting, the recommendation was made to discontinue use of the Highline Trail and Johnny Cake Ridge as snowmobile trails. City Council action on January 19, 1988 was to approve the recommendation concerning snowmobile trails. ISSUE The Police Department has inquired as to how snowmobiles will be addressed during the 1988 -89 season. FOR DISCUSSION The Commission may wish to review its 1987 recommendation and determine whether the consensus remains. The Commission may wish to discuss other snowmobile issue concerns. FOR COMMISSION ACTION A recommendation concerning snowmobile use in the City is appropriate at this time. iR. TERfAT1VC'- tft`TN {t94. a 1 V 31L aLsA MENDOTA -11 - 7/ 46.0/72. 7.0 TENTATIVe •'tW'W' Ei GENT' N ROAD UQ TOR,5( Safi S'ks, 31 - 12" mop 4168 "64 At • 4- ' UN CLUBI \1\`LAKE ,., et; 7,/6 o nrlaYln i. 12" EA GANDA o W Y 1... �� `, . Op 14 `I° e -Q) W . .1 0 . ` 7Y- `78.0 715/98 0 7,/ 'f, • 7/54.0 SLHOO • 38.0 Y6, -' Rfifif.o I a; PP GME•; E !7 49.2/ 74.0 16" 62.4/8 .0 M 28 50.0/ 76.0 AUUITOR' S W A JI - 820/820 .4 MV1®Q F. L. // JOHP$ �7C 4-4.0 SI EK T US481A A 993!/117.0 45.8/ _ 12" 590 AS 0 6 11.0. ELEV,3TEO STORAGE Vt.VA L. 1069 $ 64.0/ : 10 51.2 7 ! 67 y 54 5/91.0 67.0 U.S. POSTAL • 9 /68.0 SERVICE MINA 50 3/75.0 DITION UTHHILLS DE4A 4- 51.4 / 72.0 44" A,. / / / 60 7/ / 61.0 95 ,2+ d76/I0 1 1419/60.0 41 0 \y, 703//" 7 ' 71.4/6,90 ( 960( i 0 IN OU d• 78 TREATMENT' 688/84.0 PLANT SITE r 132 U.GD.) I Pt.,131,.ICIj nyo' I56.2/67.66T 2N0 5.1/92.0 [_DG 30" Er °TI+ ADO HEIGHTS -+ 69.5/81'0 67 /86.0 496/66075/43.0, 2 63 24' 62 1141 e' L__ 24" 406 HILLS 48. ADDITION CARRIAGE 18 HILLS GOLF 1:OURSE 17I/32.0' , /10Y.6. OUNO STORAGE M.W.L 1059 6" 8 F 72.6/74.0 KW000, AILS 69.Q/70.0 .4 / A7 /q^3.0/65.0 73.3/ 74.0 75.3/ • LC _�,l'D% dei , Y / \ A SILVC- 4'3 7r7 L !Tr - {• 4 " RED galT . 1' ./31 57•/6 a': / r 1'„ I 112r--_- `---r-_` , !� - ;III I ;,' `iii HALO CITY I1 I _ i /1 /% ! I 12" L� i / '� �'�r �f_ - 7/e7.0 '- (2 3) - 1211 I 18" { w 4. aro mat mom 52.6,67Ar 11 moi. r.." i'e!"I�` �__� / ¢ 3T bawl,Y 124 44.6/590 116 7 i�ELI v� 58.F 60 iS ill t NaUSTAIp'Li 9/66 78.7/ 96.0 64.3/84.0 56.2/77.0 LLACKH.1WK PARK 9 50.3/6701 LOREN PL' AC6, K J D \5A11 Ie63AIT 5.3./710 WEST PL'BLISKIN 191 ADD 2" i Z 0 UJ to 51. 53 2/68. 38.4/56.0 54.6/ 71.0 53.1/68.0 W Z 38 3/94.0 88.2497.. 12" i/ 66,7/ 85.0 PA (RICK EAGAN PARK ChCUL Illl!IIQ 6110. GROUND E �I 1 6000 G.P.M 100R ,Ft 1 H.W.L 1050 183 24" "' �► WI `68.0/ r. 0/ 72.0 172.91 20" " 1 ryw 0.3IVal 18 14158 9" SCHOOL 346 -T.a rJl` fJ 43.3.(700 80.7/92.0 68.7/ 74.0 74-4/82.0 h i_20) 7jjjr7- 2.2 /58,0 110Jj:\:1139.0V %4'4 N 44 !2 16" ii AUD 5..../V8D. N0. 42 845/944_._. 189 12" 85 2/95.0 D,.:DLE 4- 941 81 t/72.0 46.0/ 72.0 SCHOOL 93,¢/104:0 MAS LAKE ARK 39.0/65.0 f/I 86.0/1 45.6/58 0 2a 10.0 P+' :� c .203 4313/58.0 'Psu ids f ryt; IFy n - .u1111.1 .. .: 4111111 47.6/ • 3.0 74.4/070 12<; 4J Lti DRIVER TEST CENTER 25/56.0 83.4/ 91.10\ / 970 20' 2 M.O. ORO 3000 O.P. R.W. 70.5/ 740 NO STORAGE . BOOSTER . 1055 8 3)950 41111rir 11r `NEN-W.10'85 8"t 223 85.8/9 224 86.0/95. 4r 4� SLS R PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE 1,91 1 1 ✓ / 1 .4 1 112,• 8 78.7/9L 65.6/ 74.0 EN CEPTi('N (N07 INCLUDED IN PARK) DAKOTA! COUNTY PARK 4 M.8 GROUND STORAGE N. W. L. 1150 1 1 ! MARQT2 E ADO - 9/ 74.0 DAKOTA -r'IJNTY PARK R23W DA K A COU 1Y PARK 48 0.1 4- R23W 25.8/ 33.0 (1 1 APPLE � VALLEY z ---- Existing Trunk Water Main - Proposed Trunk Water Main Existing Lateral Water Main Proposed Lateral Water Main Existing Storage Reservoir o---- Proposed Storage Reservoir • 0 • 411111111111. LEGEND \\ ROSEMOUN ED Point Designations Pressure Zclne Boundary Existing Pressure Reducing Station Proposed P'essure Reducing Station Pressure RF ducing Station Control Elevations Residual Pressure p.s.i / Static Pressure p.s.i. --"4---- 1 950] 78.7/910 CITY OF EAGAN Water Distribution System yVor^t1Z ✓ ` CaW 4lA/V 1 01-----1.1111111111111* O 1/2 MILE 1 NILE Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minnesota FIGURE NO.10 1981 sl 1�1,41I► �_� t OD CL /4 55I F Ttov 'Rec4 1-a4. 4! lcl l f e 1,4t f I elnt DWI!' top"'' 1,4A-1fe [) a. BA3 eK't;d TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION MEL BAILEY, INTERN DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 RE: WADING POOLS ISSUE The purpose of this memo is to inform the Commission of the relevant issues with respect to wading pools. DEFINITION OF A WADING POOL A wading pool defined by the Department of Health means a pool used or designed to be used exclusively for wading or bathing and having a maximum depth of 24 inches. BACKGROUND As requested by the Commission at the September Advisory Commission meeting, Mel Bailey, Parks Recreation Intern, under the direction of Ken Vraa, Director of Parks Recreation, completed a study on wading pools. Five area communities were contacted with known wading pools in operation. Also, a local pool manufacturer was contacted to obtain an estimate on current construction costs. COMMUNITY INFORMATION MEMORANDUM The City of Minneapolis by far has the largest number of wading pools in the metropolitan area with sixty -three (63). With a population of 372,000, this breaks down to one (1) pool per 5,905 residents. This is a substantial number compared to other communities. It should be noted that Minneapolis has forty two (42) recreation centers which are strategically located to service every neighborhood in the City. That converts to a recreation center within every six block radius of a neighborhood. Compare this to the three block radius that the wading pools service and it can be said that the City has a substantial amount of pools. This figure can be justified somewhat considering Minneapolis has a highly dense population. Also, these pools were built at a time when cost and liability issues were more readily over looked. St.Paul is on the other end of the spectrum of large cities with only four wading pools currently in operation. These pools are typically larger than Minneapolis, having an average of 25 ft. in diameter compared to 15 foot diameter. This allows St. Paul to service a few more residents per pool than Minneapolis, but not even close to the total volume of residents in 2 I- Minneapolis. The largest difference between the two cities is the philosophy of supervision. Minneapolis has a policy in which children must be accompanied by adults to use the facility. St.Paul requires every wading pool to be supervised by qualified lifeguards. The low number of pools is therefore attributed to St. Paul's reluctance to pay for personnel and not to assume liability in the way Minneapolis does. On a smaller scale the City of Bloomington has two wading pools in operation. One is part of a bigger pool complex, while the other is attached to a school. The pool is used exclusively by groups, with a large percentage of these being day care centers. The particular large group use is not surprising due to no fee being charged. Richfield is similar to Bloomington in that their wading pool is attached to their larger swimming pool. Also, like Bloomington the wading pool has indirect supervision. This means that the lifeguard at the larger pool also has the responsibility of occasionally checking the wading pool. St. Louis Park is the most unique of the smaller municipalities. Not in the fact that they have a wading pool connected to a larger pool, similar to Bloomington and Richfield, but by also having a separate and complete wading pool facility. This complex has two twenty five diameter pools connected by a 30' winding area. The City emphasizes a high amount of care in requiring the pool to be supervised by a qualified lifeguard whenever in operation. During peak use the City has two lifeguards on duty. RESIDENTS SERVICED By using a typical wading pool of 24 feet in diameter, a service number can be estimated by using the standard of one swimmer per every five (5)square foot area. The formula used for this estimation is 3.14 x 12 squared T 25= 18. So the typical pool of 24 feet in diameter can service eighteen (18) people at any one time. SUPERVISION As mentioned above, the cities contacted have varying degrees of supervision. On one end of the scale there is Minneapolis who requires no supervision by staff. In the middle there is Bloomington and Richfield who provide indirect supervision by having lifeguards nearby, supervising their larger pools. On the other end of the spectrum is St. Paul and St. Louis Park, which require direct supervision whenever the wading pool is in operation. The Minnesota Department of Health requires a qualified attendant, trained in first aid and resuscitation, to be on duty at all times that the wading pool is open for use. An exception to this rule is when no lifeguard service is provided, a warning sign must be placed in plain view and shall state "Warning No Lifeguard On Duty" with clearly legible letters at least four inches high. In addition, a sign is required to state "children shall not use a pool without an adult in attendance." Instruction regarding emergency calls shall be prominently posted. 2,2. In order to compute the cost of supervision the hours of use must first be determined. The typical season runs from Memorial Day until Labor Day, which converts to ninety -eight (98) days. The time the pools are open varies. Minneapolis pools are open all day, Bloomington has the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 8:45 P.M., and St. Louis Park is open from 11:00 A.M. until 7 P.M. A lifeguard's salary varies from $4.50 to $5.50 an hour. The cost of supervision is obtained by multiplying the Average days X Time X Hourly rate (98 days X 11 hrs X $5.00 hr.) resulting in $5,390 as a yearly supervision cost. Other direct costs associated with these types of pools are maintenance, electrical, and repairs. Some indirect costs are design and engineering, park rangers and administration services. WADING POOL COMPONENTS The typical wading pool is 25 feet in diameter, with a depth varying from 18" to 24 A continuous deck, free from obstructions, must be at least five feet (and preferably eight or more feet wide and shall extend completely around the swimming pool. The Minnesota State Health code requires, in an addition to the above components, dressing rooms, toilets, showers and a drinking fountain. Dressing rooms are required to be used simultaneously by both sexes and must be divided into two parts and separated by a partition, each designed for men and women. Lockers are also to be provided and must be properly vented. Toilet and shower facilities must meet the following fixture schedule. Males Females Urinals 1/75 Lavatories 1 /100 1 /100 Showers (minimum of two) 1/50 1/50 All persons using the wading pool are required to take a cleansing shower, using soap and rinsing off. A bather leaving the pool to use the washroom must take a second cleaning shower before returning to pool. The layout of the building must be such that the pool users on leaving the dressing room must pass the toilets and showers on route to the pool. This forces users to take a shower before entering the pool. A minimum of one drinking fountain is required to be located in walking distance of the wading pool facility. Access to the pool is required by the State Health Department to be controlled by fencing. The fencing shall effectively prevent the entrance of children and be without hand or foot -holds that would enable a child to climb over it. The fencing has to be at least four feet high and entrances need to be equipped with a self closing latching gate which is capable of being locked. 2 3. MAINTENANCE Every wading pool is required to be operated under the close supervision of a designated operator. The Commissioner of Health may require a certificate of competency obtained through attendance at a successful completion of a swimming pool operator training course. Proper operating records, as required by the Commissioner of Health, is required to be kept daily showing: A. bather loads, totals B. Peak bather load C. Volume fresh water added D. Operating periods of re- circulation pumps and filters and corresponding rate -of -flow meter readings. E. Amounts of chemical used F. Disinfectant residuals G. PH readings H. Maintenance and any malfunctioning of equipment These requirements are fairly extensive, thus requiring a substantial cost in maintaining these facilities. Most of the communities contacted spend approximately two (2) hours a day on maintenance tasks. This does not include the time when the wading pools are closed due to repairs. VANDALISM FEES One consideration worth mentioning is vandalism. This is evidenced more readily in facilities with no direct supervision, and is compounded by many wading pool facilities leaving the entrance gates open during the evening hours. Also, surveillance during the evening hours is also sparse. Minneapolis has had numerous problems with vandals. Their greatest problem is from juveniles who often have beer parties near the facilities. From this undesirable use, maintenance personnel often find broken glass in the wading pools. When this occurs the pool has to be completely drained and thoroughly cleaned and filled usually taking one full day. This past year Bloomington has encountered problems by vandals who have poured paint into the wading pools. This has caused down time in cleaning the pool and also the cost of repair to the filtration system. For the most part wading pools are offered free of charge to the public. This encourages group use and it is found that most of the communities encounter exactly that, a high proportion of group use, with day care facilities being the most frequent users. The wading pools in which a fee is charged are connected to a larger swimming facility. Even then, only a nominal fee is charged. It is felt by the operators of these connected facilities that if the wading pools were separate facilities they too would be free of charge to the public. COSTS The cost of construction of wading pools vary substantially from community to community. The most recent pool built that was inquired about was done in Minneapolis in 1986. The cost was $102,000 and included a somewhat larger than normal pool (40' diameter) and deck (12' continuous). Other inclusions of this facility included a 4 ft. high fence enclosing the pool, pump house, and on one side additional deck space and landscaping area. One component of the pool which is required and the City did not provide for was a shower and rest room facility. As often is the case in Minneapolis, the wading pool was located near a recreation center which in turn has the above State Health Code required components. A less costly, but still larger than normal facility is the one built by St. Louis Park in 1980. The cost of this wading pool was approximately $45,000. This included two wading pools, 25 feet in diameter with a 30 ft. long winding area (4 feet wide) connecting the two. Gene Boyer, of Quality Pools and Spas of Savage, Minnesota was contacted to give a cost estimate on wading pools. A rather low $10,500 price was quoted for a pool which would be 24 foot in diameter. This estimate is for the pool only. It would meet all state and local codes, although its use is primarily for residential. Staff has included a rough estimate of a wading pool using current construction standards and costs. Pool (complete) 8' deck (continuous) 6' fence electricity (used to heat pool) water (3/4" copperline) Drain Misc. Furnishings Total: MB /bls 24" Round Pool $10,500 1,600 1,250 1,500 2,000 1,800 1,000 $19,650 X 1.25 11 1. II 11 It 24' Square Pool $13,125 2,000 1,563 1,875 2,500 2,250 1,250 $24,563 These costs, considering what other communities have paid for their wading pools, might be on the low side. Especially since, the above cost estimate does not include a building which would include rest rooms, showers, and a dressing area. FOR DISCUSSION As requested, staff has compiled this report for the Commission. Hopefully, the information will allow the Commission to give staff further direction on the matter. 26 filit,4111 W 5 g 4 )1r11 4 00 111* kt2 2, b TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 RE: PARK DEDICATION FEES ISSUE The Advisiory Commission annually reviews for recommendation to the City Council adjustments to the Park Dedication Fees /Charges. Attached is the current policy relating to those fees. The Commission is asked to again review the fees and make a recommendation. Adjustments, if made, would be effective January 1, 1989. Adoption of the recommendation would be at the November 3rd Commission meeting, allowing staff time to revise the dedication policy to reflect changes made. OTHER COMMUNITIES Staff has contacted other communities to review their fees as follows: Plymouth Lakeville White Bear Single Family Duplex Apartment Commercial /Industrial Woodbury MEMORANDUM 1987 Single Family 575.00 Commercial /Industrial 2700 /Ac. Single Family 500.00 Duplex 1000.00 Apartment 335.00* Commercial /Industrial 2500 /Ac *Beginning in 1988 Lakeville also charges $135 per unit for a "Trail Construction Fund *Add $75 for each additional Single Family Duplex Apartment Industrial Commercial Office 375.00 750.00 250.00* 1500 /Ac bedroom over one. 400.00 300.00 200.00 1988 575.00 2700 /Ac 550 135 $685 550 /Unit 2500 /Ac 500.00 1000.00 325.00* 2500 /Ac 450.00 350.00 200.00 1200 /Ac 1500 /Ac 1800 /Ac 1987 1988 Maple Grove Residential 394.00 454.00 Industrial 1350 /Ac Commercial 2400 /Ac Eagan Single Family 492.00 Duplex 462.00 Townhouse 396.00 Apartments 404.00 Commercial /Industrial .046 sq.ft. ($2003 /Ac) Eagan's cash dedication is based on estimated land values for that zoning class. For example, the 1987 and 1988 values by class and the resultant unit dedication is as follows: Class Value Single Family $11,000 Duplex 13,000 Townhouse 15,000 Apts /Multiple 17,000 1987 1988 *Apartment fees may be reduced by up to 25 if the developer provides for significant recreational facilities for its apartment dwellers. LAND VALUES Although there is no hard data to review on land values and if there was, there would be exceptions to the contrary it appears that single family and apartment property continued to show increasing values during 1988. Townhouse or medium density housing continues to have a soft market. Consequently, values are soft and increases in value are relatively small. If each of the land values were increased by $500 (Five hundred dollars), the resultant cash dedication would be as follows: Single family Duplex Townhouse /Quads Apartments $514.00 480.00 408.00 415.00 471.00 445.00 382.00 392.00 .044 sq.ft. Unit Dedication Value Unit Dedication $471 445 382 392 $11,500 $492 13,500 462 15,500 396 17,500 404* S Increase Increase $22.00 4.4% 18.00 3.7% 12.00 2.9% 11.00 2.7% ALTERNATIVES /DISCUSSION There are many alternatives for establishing the land value, i.e. straight dollar increase, percentage increase, etc., but what is important is a consistant rational for establishing their values. 21• Although no policy determination has been made regarding the Natural Resource Trust Fund discussed at the last Commission meeting, the Commission may also want to consider adding a straight dollar amount to each living unit, with those funds marked for the "Future Trust Fund Adding $5, or $10 assuming such a fund becomes operational. COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL An increase in commercial /industrial property is appropriate to be considered at this time. 1988 rates are 4.6 cents per square foot and 2.3 cents per square foot for property platted prior to January 1, 1983 $2,003 an acre. An adjustment of approximately 5% to these rates would be .002 (4.8 cents per square foot) resulting in a fee of $2,090 /Ac. (Each .001 is equal to $43.56) FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission is asked to comment /review the park dedication for 1989 for adoption at the November 3, 1988 Commission Meeting. Direction to staff in preparation of revisions to the parks dedication policy is sought at this time. Respectfully Submitted, a Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation KV:cm �.a GO=R HILL NcizrriivioN t 1 HILL Y C rt3-1D c414-1411c1-4 12 41Pee i-tI6HVf�h/ Me 4 Y LA D Vetaiar 1 Dr V cLJFV- 4vElz HiL1 i W l t�hl N0164-1% WcWI 1S LbKe weLL sr spipt_eizicE X X X X X X- ';X X g X I 60 Xi' x X X X X X X X X ft x 0:; 0 0 it 4r x 0 o o, X X X 4' X'X X 0 X' X 0 X X X X X X X X: X// 0 0 0 0 0 /0 0 00 X X 0 0 0 0 0 X gip*: 0 0 0'/ X X X X X X 0 0 x X X /XO 00 KEY PARKS DEVELOPMENT STATUS JUNE 1984 TO SEPTEMBER 1988 45c:ND/ doMP f k D// 1 SK u1.tpe A F1 alp/ Tisrlz- It•NCCAr nX j p`L pAp 1 1. caArLei `L_ T- Yom( Q ,A.DP`L t srV CS/. 1 11JC.GMi a t:SY: s..eL3LLjVNJ t T S 3 0/ b 6 ,0 t,j MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 RE: COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE II By way of these periodic memorandums, I have attempted to keep you abreast of the progress being made on the community center and its planning. This is the second such memorandum. DESIGN CHARETTE #2 The second design workshop with Hastings Chivetta on September 22, 23, went very well, despite the fact that we were not able to accomplish all that we had set out to do. For example, that section of the architectural program dealing with energy conservation, heat reclaim, and maintenance was not reviewed, as prepared by the Focus team. The program statements dealing with general spaces and administrative /office areas was covered in sufficient detail; as were other program spaces previously covered but in the first charette. Staff will be doing a final review of the energy maintenance systems package before sending them off to the architects for their incorporation into the architectural program. The first concept plan for the building was developed and although it meets many of the program criteria previously established, there remain several issues that must be resolved. Perhaps this is why they call it the first concept plan and not a final concept plan. It may be that the program will have to be re- planned to delete certain spaces or ideal situations abandoned due to unresol vabl a conflicts. At this time, it is too early in the review process to abandon these ideal situations and relationships while reworking the concept plan to accomplish these objectives. Some success was achieved in reducing square foot needs by "stacking" and combining functions. This is one of the tasks that staff and architect gave serious thought to. Unfortunately, the square footage for many of the given facilities are absolute requirements and can not be reduced. However, by combining and stacking there has been an effort to consolidate and save on square foot costs. For example, the space requirements for the ice arena are a given, but team locker rooms can be housed beneath the seating sections thus reducing some square foot costs. Another example is stacking the gymnastics area over the locker rooms for the swimming pool. Stacking may 1 Jo SITE PLAN stacked over slightly smaller areas. This causes the smaller areas to actually increase in size to meet the structural wall components, etc. Staff will again be reviewing the first concept plan, as will the individual focus teams. The Advisory Parks Recreation Commission will be making its comments at the October 6th meeting. A workshop session to review the concept plan with the Council is suggested. It is our expectation that a new cost calculation will be done on this first concept plan, using gross costs per square foot. After comments are received by the architect, staff, Commission, Council and the Citizens Reaction Committee. (See timeline) On October 27, the architect will begin to break out costs by divisions. That is, cost estimating will be broken down into units such as site work, grading, utilities, etc. It is during this critical period in which hard -line decisions will need to be made regarding the construction /development budget. The architects have also been asked to consider how a concept plan could be "phased if necessary. As future concept plans are revised and developed, they will give this consideration and it will become more of a focus in their work. The site plan was revised, incorporating changes from the Police Department, Engineering and Parks Recreation Department. This plan is to be reviewed by Dakota County, Gary Erickson, of the Physical Development Division, to try to obtain their consensus of the shared roadway between the City Municipal Center and the Library. This meeting is tentatively scheduled for the week of October 3rd. Revisions to the plan also created an additional twenty (20) parking stalls. Originally, the program requirement was between 300 and 350 stalls for parking. The site plan also proposes to close off the current access on Pilot Knob Road. The County Engineering Department has been strongly urging this to happen; the Police Department feels that this can be accomplished as long as the access onto Wescott Road is maintained at its current location and the proposed traffic signals at Wescott and Pilot Knob Road can be adapted to allow for police emergencies. STATE OF MINNESOTA SWIMMING POOL REGULATIONS Your director recently meet with the senior engineer, Milt Bellin, for the Minnesota Health Department, on swimming pools to review state regulations and the recreation concept vision for Eagan. Regrettably, the Minnesota rules are 1971 vintage, and recognition of advances in technologies and pool designs are not recognized by this code. It appears as if we will be expending a great deal of effort with the state in design review and in seeking approval for the Eagan pool. I've asked our architect to seek out a qualified and recognized leader in pool regulation /health and sanitation of water field to provide assistance should this become necessary. 2 31. COMMUNITY CENTER TIMELINE A tentative timeline has been developed and is continuing to be enlarged upon, covering the next several months or pre -bond referendum. On October 6th, the Council will be asked to appoint a reaction committee, with their first meeting scheduled for October 13th. That meeting would involve background information on how the City reached this stage in the plan. The second meeting of the reaction committee would be on Thursday, October 27th, which would include the architects, and a review of the concept plan(s) as well as a suggested revisions. A third meeting of the reaction committee would be on Tuesday, November 22nd, at which time the architect should have a cost estimate for the project. Staff is strongly recommending that a City Council and Advisory Parks Recreation Commission workshop session be set for Tuesday, November 29th, with the primary objective to review the architectural designs, costs, and the action committee's recommendations. It will be at this time that final direction to the architects concerning the schematic plans should be made by the Council. By Tuesday, December 20th, the architects will be able to respond to the Council's direction from the November 29th workshop session and provide the revisions as requested, also final cost estimates for the construction phase. It would be at this time, and certainly no later than the first Council meeting in January, that the bond referendum date could be set with a target date for the referendum between February 21st and March 14, 1988. As staff enlarges upon the timeline over the course of the next several weeks, a copy will be provided to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks Recreation KV /bls 3 32- 9/20/88 COMMUNITY CENTER TIME LINE Thurs., Oct. 6, 1988 Council appoint Reaction Committee Thurs., Oct. 13 First meeting of Reaction Committee Background information or..How did we get to this stage? Thurs., Oct. 27 Meeting with Architects /Reaction Committee Refinement of Program Thurs., Nov. 3 Review by Advisory Commission Tues., Nov. 22 Review of architectural design /cost estimate by Reaction Committee Tues., Nov. 29 City Council /Commission meeting: Workshop Session Review architectural design, cost and Committee's comments. Provide final direction to architects Thurs., Dec. 8 Reaction Committee Review and make recommendation to City Council: Bond costs /total costs for project. Funding. Tues., Dec. 20 City Council to review proposal and recommendation from Committee. Set up referendum. Thurs., Jan. 12 Reaction Committee to react /discuss Council action. Target Date for Referendum: February 21 to March 14, 1988 35. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 RE: DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS 1. The softball managers fall meeting was held on September 20th. 23 managers attended. The summer's softball season was evaluated under the general topic areas of communication, facilities and equipment. Local rules, tournament and play -offs and "other Time was spent discussing Northview Athletic /neighborhood issues. The softball managers are interested in being good neighbors and suggested that a speed limit sign be installed on Northview Park Road, curfew information be posted in the park, strict observation of game time limits to ensure that field lights are out soon after 10:00 P.M. 2. Work on the 1989 Activities Calendar has begun. Gold Star Printing, Inc. of Lakeville submitted the successful quote. Graphic artist Rollie Brandt is working on new collages for the cover, a design for 2 months on a page and for the incorporation of "Discover Us!" on the cover and to highlight activities. 3. The department will, in essence issue two Activities Calendars for 1989. Volume I will be distributed in late November, covering December through May; volume II will be distributed in May covering June through November. The intent is to be as current as possible and to move creativity closer to the time of the activity. Distribution of the calendar will be improved to include apartment residents this year. It will be exciting to provide the anticipated increased demand for programs! 4. The department will be reviewing an umpires training tape. The intent is to work with the umpire's association to provide improved preparation for rookie umpires! 5. Parks and Recreation Director, Vraa; Recreation Supervisor, Peterson and Parks Superintendent, VonDeLinde recently met with the users of the Goat Hill Park baseball facilities. The results looked for include more timely and complete communication, improved assistance from teams and less costly time commitments for the department. A policies statement is being prepared to clarify responsibilities. 6. The Eagan Stagedoor Performer's production of "End of the World" although an artistic success, was not successful financially. The department will calmly advise this creative, enthusiastic group of volunteers as they evolve in the community. 7. Attention will soon be directed toward the hiring of seasoned staff for the skating rinks, organizing the basketball and broomball leagues and reviewing the policies and procedures for training and supervising the winter outdoor recreation staff. Growth demands new vigor! 8. Beth Mundy has joined the department as an intern from the University of Minnesota. She will be doing the Halloween Spook Trail and assisting with other department functions. 9. The City attorney's office has made several contacts with the HUD office in Washington trying to expedite the process of clearing title to the property. A decision on a suggestion to sell the property to Eagan while HUD retains any rights that it feels it may have against the bank, has been suggested. 10. Fall programs began this past week with an overwhelming response. All sessions of Tiny Tots filled as well as all Image That! classes. Fitness and Fun and Games Kids Play were also popular classes for preschoolers. The alternative for adding sites needs to be addressed for winter. 11. A new class for 2 year olds and their parents was offered. One class was offered and filled up and another class was added to accommodate people on the waiting list. 12. Staff is gearing up for the Halloween Spook Trail on October 31st (Volunteers are needed!) and also the children's Halloween Party to be held on October 29th. 13. Registrations have been received for the School's Out Party to be held on October 21st at the Rahn Park building. This is a new offering that will allow participants to play games, have a pizza party and socialize with their friends. 35 MEMO TO: EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 SUBJECT: PARKS MAINTENANCE UPDATE The following report is provided as an informational item for the Commission. It is intended to highlight some of the more notable projects and activities of the Parks Maintenance division during the month of September. Maintenance employees Gary Skogstad and Rich Pelletier completed installation of supplemental irrigation heads and lines at Goat Hill Park. These sprinklers were installed along the corridor between the major and junior league fields and in the area of the bullpen and batter's tunnel. This work was done to improve the quality of turf growth in these areas and to enhance the overall appearance of this athletic site. Work began on the Rahn Athletic irrigation installation as per authorization of the Commission at their September meeting. Central Landscaping was hired to install the mainline loop and water stub to the irrigation mechanical pad. Maintenance crews have since begun work on installation of the lateral lines and sprinkler heads and should be completed with this work, including site cleanup, by the second week in October. The next installation will be at Ohmann Park. Maintenance workers Scott Eppen and Don Buecksler finished the new playstructure within Rahn Park during the month of September. Included with this is a main creative playstructure unit, reinstallation of an existing arch swing and merry -go- round. This completes the cooperative work installation agreement betweem the school district and the City at the Rahn Park /school site. Staff also completed installation of the new playstructure, pearock base and perimeter at Meadowlands Park. This has proven to be an extremely popular and heavily used site given the tremendous number of youth in the Meadowlands Park service area. The only remaining item in conjunction with the playground is installation of a backhoe digger. Electrical service for operation of lake aerification equipment at Fish and Schwanz Lakes was completed in September. It is anticipated that these systems may be in use as early as December. Aeration equipment will be located on the peninsula at Fish Lake and on the north side of Schwanz Lake near the volleyball beach in Trapp Farm Park. Delivery was taken on 40 new concrete waste containers in late September. 22 of these units were set out in the parks, on concrete pads that were poured this summer. The remaining 18 will be installed as time permits this fall. 36. KEN VRAA PAGE 2. SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 Minor grading was done on the Ridgecliff Park pleasure skating rink area. The objective of this work was to provide a flatter, more uniform surface for flooding and ice maintenance purposes. There had been problems in the past with sheet drainage towards the hockey rink. A new permanent bulletin board was installed at the entrance to the Trapp Farm Pavilion. This board will be used to post announcements about park activities and reservations of facilities. The colorcoating of tennis courts, was implemented in September. Courts which are being cracksealed and resurfaced are: Woodhaven, Evergreen, Pilot Knob and Oak Chase. Along with this work, ajustments are being made to barrier gates with new concrete pads installed at the tennis court accesses. This work is expected to be completed by early October and conclude all items contained in this year's portion of the five -year bituminous plan. The archery range at Walnut Hill was put into full operation in September bringing the number of available standards to the five. Central Landscaping began work on the reseeding of parks contained under the 1987 grading contract. Northview Park was regraded, seeded and mulched, and work continues on the other parks including Carnelian, Vienna Woods, Lakeside and O'Leary. Excellent progress was made on implementation of the department's fall turf maintenance program. Included in this was the reseeding of all drought- damaged turf, as previously discussed with the Commission. This work has now been completed with the exception of soccer fields, and Rahn Athletic Park which will be seeded following irrigation installation. Other components of the program, including aerification and weed spraying, were completed in their entirety. Fall fertilization should be completed by the first week in October. Dormant fertilization will be made on Class I turf sites in late October. Six temporary employees were hired for fall maintenance and forestry work. These new employees have been primarily responsible for continuing the mowing of parks, boulevards and public buildings. It is anticipated that mowing will continue through the third or fourth week in October at which time these employees will assist with other construction projects such as irrigation. The department was fortunate to find six good candidates this fall. Support of the fall soccer leagues has been an important aspect of the parks maintenance program. This year bantam soccer has expanded to include ten sites and regulation soccer is being played at Rahn, Quarry, Northview and Walnut Hill. Maintenance staff have been busy laying out fields and maintaining lines. 37. KEN VRAA PAGE 3. SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 Fall maintenance on ag -lime infields began in September. Efforts will be directed at the Class A sites first (Goat Hill, Northview, and Rahn Athletic) followed by the school sites and neighborhood parks. In September, Dakota Inc. completed a thorough cleaning of all park shelter buildings and litter pick up throughout the park system. Begining the last week in September, Dakota Inc. initiated their routine maintenance of buildings in support of the Tiny Tots and other youth programs. Maintenance on lighting systems was completed in September. This included aiming, adjustment and replacement of lights at hockey sites, parking lots and security lights. City Forester Tom Schuster and his assistant concentrated on tree replacement (resulting from the drought), pruning, fertilization, and machine moving of stock from the Northview nursery. u�„ additional questions or concerns that Commission members may have d be directed to the Superintendent of Parks. John VonDeLinde Supe intendent of Parks JKV/ ab TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1988 RE: LILLIAN MCCARTHY PROPERTY BACKGROUND MEMORANDUM This City has previously identified the 3.5 acre parcel owned by Lillian McCarthy on Lexington Avenue and adjacent to Patrick Eagan Park for acquisition. Approximately two years ago Mrs. McCarthy considered selling her property, but then decided against it. Recently the City and County have attempted to negotiate a temporary easement for storm sewer work and a permanent road right -of -way for planned expansion of Lexington Avenue. The City Attorney and Director of Parks Recreation recently met with Mrs. McCarthy's attorney and daughter to discuss sale of the parcel to the City, with an agreement allowing Mrs. McCarthy to remain in her house. Recently, through her attorney, she decided not to sell the property. ISSUE Given the fact that Mrs. McCarthy is seeking some $48,000 for temporary road easements of approximately 40,000 square feet for temporary and 13,500 square feet for permanent; the department has considered trying to gain the parcel through condemnation, and in effect pool the cost for acquisition between the Engineering, County and Parks Recreation Departments. (See attachment for easements) DISCUSSION The City and County have been in negotiations, and are in process of condemnation for the needed easement and right -of -way for the above mentioned projects. As mentioned, the cost for this is $48,000. Again, this is for both a temporary and permanent taking of property. It appears the department has several options, one of which is not to pursue acquisition at this time, preferring to wait until some future time. Or, on 1 3q Mrs. McCarthy's demise attempt to negotiate acquisition of the property with the heirs of the estate. Another consideration might be to initiate condemnation actions on the entire parcel, in hopes that Mrs. McCarthy would reconsider selling, with the right to stay on in her home. However, the City must be prepared to follow through with the condemnation action should one be started, if there is no attempt on Mrs. McCarthy's part to negotiate. The Commission should also understand that condemnation actions can be expensive. It is certainly not the desire of staff to acquire the property only to dislodge Mrs. McCarthy from her home. At the same time, we must look at this as an opportunity to acquire the property; it will only become more expensive in the future and possibly as difficult to acquire from her heirs as from Mrs. McCarthy today. Further, the City will be paying for a temporary easement, only to pay again at the time of acquisition. It would be more feasible to join with the County, Engineering and Parks funding to acquire the entire parcel at one time, rather than piece meal over the years. RECOMMENDATION Staff's recommendation is that we direct the City Attorney's office to begin condemnation proceeding in conjunction with the Engineering Department and County Highway Department, for the entire three and a half (3 -1/2) acre parcel. Further, the City should be prepared to negotiate at any time with Mrs. McCarthy providing for a life estate allowing her to stay and reside in her home. FOR COMMISSION ACTION To recommend to the City Council a course of action in the acquisition of the Lillian McCarthy property. These options include: 1. Not pursue acquisition at this time. 2. Begin condemnation proceedings, while seeking a settlement on acquisition by negotiations. KV /bls 2 4)0 s aMO >2Idd M3IAH12:1ON 09 N CV W W W 2 u. O J 4 0 Q 0 Z 0 Z 0 I/1 tZ £E E ri A r r ;.c.. cop 0 bE re O O ZZ 93S d0 WI 3N 3H1 AO) >'I 35 3H1. j0 3NI1 H1.f105 f40i1f114O 1 S 100H13IN 0311 N f 1 1NBAOV AO 3N11 H1l05 q L W Y 0 7 N O w :Owi V q O y N 0J O O C) y 1 0 0 N O O w Y Q O O y O 01 0 O C N N Q 01 4 L q aJ C L O q Y L a, y O 7 a/ o W Y N d g O a y O d C y N C p 0 a L X T W V b O L q k0 0 0 .0 i Y O Y N y y d O L y w C C C a W 0 �-0 c C L a, i O v ay V 0) L O y L a q q G 0 y O V V L L Y Y Y O E a L Y V y 'TO 0 0 N -o 0) 'ma M O I T Y es: L 0J f- a) Q W �a L Z o 0 0 0 C 0 a0 0 C ^J 0 N O 0 0 W 0, a 1— C Y M 0 L C L G r Y O N L vo v 0 0 Y O 0 L N 0) 0 O 0N a, y O' so O Y y O q q C L Y 0) O y -J N 0 0) a av �a N o p V, T q q o CC V C L V C r N q 0 O L Y O el iJ-1 f al O C 0 y. 0 M13 Z 0 W 0 L) G 0 0 Y O. q y 0 0 co 0 September 27, 1988 Mr. Ken Vraa Parks and Recreation Director Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Vraa: This letter Is written for two reasons. First, I want to let you know how much our neighborhood has enjoyed the tennis courts at Riddecliff Park. I hope you have seen how popular the tennis courts have become. They are beautiful! Thank you for your contribution in making these tennis courts possible. Secondly, I am enclosing a copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Colbert concerning the traffic problem on Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Covington Lane. Because it is so hard to safely cross Johnny Cake, our use of Ridgecliff Park is being compromised. Thank you for your hard work in getting tennis courts in our neighborhood. I also appreciate your time and consideration concerning our traffic situation on Johnny Cake. I am anxious to hear from you. Sincerely, .5Zwg> Ann Uzendoski 1627 Covington Lane Eagan, MN 55122 452 -0266 enclosure ,�E 2 g 1988 3t) o ec cn 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE (012) 459 -8100 September 28, 1988 Mr. Theodore Billy 4338 Sequoia Drive Eagan, MN 55122 THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRErGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrotoi EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Dear Mr. Billy: On behalf of the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission members, department staff and myself, I welcome you to the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission. As you know, the City Council appointed you as an alternate member to the Advisory Commission to fill out the unexpired term of Mr. David Hennes. As an alternate member, you will continue to receive all of the packets and agenda's that the Commission receives. However, your vote on issues will not count unless there is an absentee of one of the seven Commission members. As I am sure that you are aware, the Advisory Commission meets on the 1st Thursday of the month, here at the Eagan Municipal Center. Our next Commission meeting is on Thursday, October 6th. You will receive an agenda and packet of information on the Tuesday preceding the Commission meeting. During the summer months and up until October the Commission has traditionally has taken a tour of the parks from 6:30 to 7:30 and then meeting at 7:30 for the regular agenda. This will be the case for this next Commission meeting. To help you get acquainted with the Advisory Commission, I am enclosing some information for your review. I will also have available for you at the next Commission meeting a copy of the City's Park Systems Plan, which was completed in 1984. Mr. Hennes still has that document, but I am sure he will be returning it shortly, and we will pass it on to you. If you would like, I would be happy to meet with you at your convenience to go over some of the issues that the Commission has been facing, and will continue to face over the next several months, in order to acclimate you to the Commission. Again, this is entirely up to you. Mr. Theodore Billy September 28, 1988 Page Two Finally, if you are ever unable to attend the Commission meeting, please contact the department secretary, Cherryl Mesko. Again, welcome to the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission. We hope that you'will find your tenure enjoyable and a worthwhile experience. S y el iC en Vraa Director of Parks Recreation KV/bls cc: Richard Carroll, Chairman Advisory Parks Recreation Commission rt September 22, 1988 Woodeate Homeowners Association City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 ATTENTION: DALE RUCKT Dear Mr. Buckle: 1691 Hickory Hill Eagan, Mn. 55122 The Board of Directors for the Woodgate Homeowner's Association wish to state we are completely against the sidewalk and bike paths proposed for Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Woodgate has its own network of bicycle and hiking trails available and we feel we do not need another system. We feel it is extremely unfair to access the townhomes for this system when we are not the only ones who would be allowed to use the sidewalk and bike trail. We strongly urge you to reconsider your decision. Yours truly, WOODGATE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION Kathy Anderson Secretary 4-5 ov August 18, 1988 Mr. William Assistant to City Manager City of 43 Avenue, N.E. MN 55 RE: Skateboarding Activity on City -owned Premises Dear Mr. I just had a telephone discussion with the City's agent -of- record, advising me of concerns on the part of the City of due to some skateboarding activity that is taking place in an area near the City Hall building. Mr. requested that I correspond with you concerning this situation and provide advisement to you from a loss control /risk management standpoint. This is a quite timely issue since we have encountered a number of other communities in recent weeks who seem to be faced with a "skateboarding dilemma" where skateboarding is either taking place on city property or has become an intrusion to citizens because of skateboarding activity occurring on street and sidewalk areas, as well' as peripheral city parks. There have even been some instances where organized skateboarding groups, parents of youthful skateboarders, etc., have approached city government requesting that the municipality provide a skateboarding area under the theory that this will alleviate the problems of "skateboard congestion" in public thoroughfare areas. As part of your deliberations for handling this potential liability exposure, I would like to present some thoughts and recommendations in this regard. First, in your particular case, it should be recognized that the City could be construed to have actual and /or constructive notice of the existence of this skateboarding activity on City property. 9 4 o,.. o 7\ fr North Star Risk Services, Inc. 1401 West 76ch Street. Suite 550 NGnnezpolis, Minnesota 55423 (612) 861.8600 FAX (612) 861 -86+3 Mr. William City of August 18, 1988 Page Two Because of the inherent extremely hazardous nature of skateboarding activity in an uncontrolled environment (or even a controlled one, for that matter!), it would seem imprudent to ignore this situation and let it continue. Hence, it will probably be necessary for the City to enact some increased enforcement of prevention of skateboarding activity on City property. I'll be the first one to admit that this is not necessarily going to be one of the most pleasant tasks to undertake. The Minneapolis police department began upscaled enforcement of skateboarding on the Nicollet Mall more than a year ago and received some press and television /radio media coverage which didn't always place them in a good public relations light. However, I think the City can take some steps to create a positive light for enforcement of this activity. It is suggested that the City look into initiating contact with citizens through the use of such things as the official newspaper used by the City, community access channels on the City cable TV system, and any other appropriate media sources, such as a newsletter that may be printed by the City for distribution to the citizens. Announcements can be done in a positive manner to indicate the City's concern for the safety of its citizens and the need for enforcement of this skateboarding activity as it may affect City property. I would also suggest that you keep close contact with your police department and administrators (or other. City employees who may be doing enforcement work) so that the best possible positive enforcement activity can be accomplished. Again, the most serious violators will probably be facing some type of fine or confiscation of their skateboards, and this can lead to a nasty confrontation if it's not handled properly. I mentioned earlier in this letter. of the fact that several other communities have been approached by outside groups to petition city government for creation of a skateboard facility, such as in a city park, to provide a skateboard area for skateboard users.: This quite often is done under the indication that such a facility would then allow for a place for these people to go and would help to get them off the streets, sidewalks, parking lots, and other public areas. From a -loss control /risk management standpoint, I see a lot of flaws in this type of .approach. 4 Mr. William City of August 18, 1988 Page Three First, I question whether creation of such a facility is going to significantly impact the use of skateboards in other public areas. If a facility was created that presented a significant challenge to draw a large number of skateboarders, taking them off the public ways, the facility would have to be so large and complex that it would create an administrative and risk management nightmare for the city. A facility of this type would require full security arrange- ments so that it could not be used unless it was under proper and complete supervision by experienced persons. Even with that in place,the exposure, because of the type of sport that this is, would, in all likelihood, dictate an increased premium and /or deductible structure to recognize the exposure from the standpoint of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. On the other hand, if only a minor type facility is created say a flat area which has been paved smooth to allow for skateboarding activity, you would still have an increased exposure to public property under the control of the city, and I really seriously doubt if a minimal facility such as this would serve to attract significant numbers of skateboarders to take the pressure off other public areas. It seems from our initial research, that this type of exposure is better handled in the private sector. Even with that, research indicates that many, if not most, of the private skateboard facility operators are currently operating without any significant liability insurance coverage. This speaks at least briefly as to the type of exposure presented here and raises the question as to why a municipality should be expected to ignore that exposure simply to provide a facility for what amounts to a limited number of individuals in comparison to the total population who must face the exposure as citizens and taxpayers. Again, to the skateboarding enthusiasts this seems like a "bah humbug" approach, but we have to keep our sensibilities and recognize what type of serious exposure this is, and whether public at large should be expected to support such an exposure, financially or otherwise. Mr. William City of August 18, 1988 Page Four For your information, we are in the midst of a researching process at this time, both through our offices and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust legal department. This includes research into accident and injury statistics involving skateboarding activity, as well as what other governmental entities and programs are doing to address this situation. Once that research and data has been compiled, we should be in an even better position to provide advisement in this area. I hope that these comments and suggestions will give you some insights to help you in your deliberations on this matter. I do recommend that steps be taken to address the situation as soon as possible to avoid potential claims from this hazardous activity. Sincerely, D vi L. rDr u g Loss Control Manger North Star Risk Services, Inc. DLD /cp cc: Ellen Longfellow /Jack Hennen, League of Minnesota. Cities George O'Connor, North Star Risk Services 1 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: KRAFT, INC LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 APPLICATION SUMMARY REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split lot 2, block 1, Eagandale Industrial Park 8th Addition into two parcels for separate ownership located southwest of Eagan Industrial Road. There are no buildings on this 9.9 -acre lot at this time. The southern 3.3 acres (parcel B) will be purchased by Kraft, Inc., the parent company of American Fruit and Produce which occupies the lot to the west. The additional land is for future expansion possibilities. Parcel A, the northern 6.6 acres, will continue to be marketed as a buildable Light Industrial site. In March 1987, revisions to the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan were recommended by the engineers for Opus Corporation for this area. These revisions provided for additional ponding due to the limited capacity of the existing storm sewer system. i was recommended that a pond be provided on this site and a drainage and utility easement was dedicated in the northeast corner of proposed parcel A. However, the pond was never built. Design considerations for the future pond are as follows: Pond Drainage Area Storage Outflow High Water Elevation HP -3E 12.5 acres 1.4 acre ft 6.7 CFS The future development on either parcel A or necessitate the need for the development for the area. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be applicable Ordinances and; 895 parcel B will proposed ponding subject to all 1. Parcel B shall be attached to the American Fruit and Produce lot at the County Recorders Office (lots 2, 3, and 4, block 5, Eagandale Center Industrial #1). 2. Development of proposed pond HP -3E is required prior to any further site development on either parcel A or parcel B and shall be in accordance with City storm water storage volume requirements. 50 ly .NDALE BOULEVARD in T- 7 71 L ti 1 NU r •110Itx 1 1 11 tri /A 11110141.104 INS W. S. •[w «r •Ir le W racr.. .rl. t«, 1. .4rr• tr., Atoms/AA. oo~DSID MtttAll r3<111•IIr 101 IM<I< A 1 rr[ l W <I<1.101 IOOUS!IiN r Aso. 1. [«AIni I au rr tr. 1DY t. trot. x 1,1I of r•IS t of ot t. tie 1!) loot rrtor.. .I N u Dtlltl .Ito 1M vtMU 1 t �r11M2 INtlt sSt1Ni. /OA /OA 1r(IS lit Aar I. Iu t. S 1 «s 1, tA (tit Im:111r MA r. A. •tor 1 I H.• 1 Orr, (arty. Arormr. 1tt southwesterly at )A.W tor t rotor oor r parallel AIM w1Mt1•r! ll t r w o l tt 4th 1. r 1 o.‘ WAIVER OF PLAT SURVEY FOR NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. KRAFT, INC. ire /o.1' l/ ,—.._.,-k\-\- i.. L r Ai /A 1 s‘...\\ 4 290 400 SO Ff. —7/ A 6.667 ACRES c,[_fv TF R r P A R D EL po i /:::i i IN !USTRIE +i__ i j�.. .�7 s 0 sP rl i j v 1 B 144,928 SO R C E L ...327 ACR NO z •r ,to.,�'�/ 0 4? „it e M r oor) s•r111/ 111 this 11 Ors W corer trr lortlr s• non, of too r o W 1 lroolt load ore Om/1.1 M of W loon. N •11 Mltir•. 11 A....ar rr%Ir. Mr AMA IMO •r 11 Pros. Ir11. WO o. Moth. IL ir l. l s t A..). Mr MY err sorer r •••••M NXI urr m _o WALL 11.0.11t. bran rr•. •.r• Orris 0.4.11144. brrt.I rrJorrAW lo.rr• 1o..). br1•. A sot so t. solo 0.1. Moore cat. ss.ls 1.0. Moolr, too at [H Aloo•tlr 51.1. Moot, store w1. Mons *la 1o.. Mots 11n Curt M Irons Pltor rlrolr .113 I.) (solo M ell .tarn•, Oar Is Arno.lr sot. 114. errs( .1111,0 [i pool Ire .4411 Iacono oolrr• ..Dlrlr r• •rlrulr. 0.) ,.0 Is oo a sr r .10r r•r•.l «I re. IM err M11tr4 NM- I 1s. Sieges 1..WI.[t t rte I.lr r rrlrlr s 111, lr.rrs am. r WI r Irrp title 00•1•• Iwt lotli. .1 «1 ) frG1D1l{ LIAI(� iWSiAy sr� ri''A w 1� o ...op 11111 «.sort rl[«r r W olu ...wow ((11111 Ir1I*l 1 IIM r. 1*0. corm( Ir.I bwl7rlr M r port mural. I I Lords ■..1rtl /rrsemy$o. Nom. APPLICATION SUMMARY SITE PLAN EXISTING ZONING: CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (ROSEAGAN ADDITION) APPLICANT: LOCATION: HOLCK COMPANY SW 1/4 OF SECTION 36 A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 77, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 24, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 24.78 Ag (Agricultural) acres to 15.5 R -1 (Single family) acres and 7.5 GB (General Business) acres, and a Preliminary Plat for the Roseagan Addition located between Dodd Road and Highway 3. This plat incorporates a small area in Rosemount and consists of six Single Family lots and a General Business lot currently occupied by a landscape contracting business. The City's Land Use Plan designates this area D -II (Mixed Residential, 0 -6 units per acre); therefore, the commercial request requires a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Four of the six Single Family lots will have access onto the existing gravel Dodd Road and the other two will share a driveway onto Highway 3. The Rosemount VFW abutts this plat to the southeast. The site consists of open grassland and most of the proposed house pads will provide nice off -site views into Lebanon Hills Park to the west. These lots vary in size from 2.5r to 2.9 acres and will-have well and septic systems. Code minimi;um lot size in unsewered R -1 areas is one acre. Since the proposed GB lot does not have City utilities, an expansion of the existing operation is not desired!. The existing use could remain in the Ag zoning but if GB zoning is granted, the landscaping business could be removed and replaced with any other GB- permitted, use. 51 GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: No site grading is proposed as a part of the preliminary plat application. The existing topography of the proposed site'ranges from a low elevation on the northeast corner of the site of approximately 923 to a high elevation of approximately 975 in the west central portion of proposed Lot 5. The majority of the site generated storm water run off is conveyed generally overland to the existing low area (Pond LP -22) located in the westerly adjacent Dakota County Park. Pond LP -22 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. UTILITIES: No water main or sanitary sewer service is available to the proposed development. The development is proposing on- site well and septic systems to serve each platted parcel. The development will be responsible for obtaining all the City, County and State approvals /permits associated with well and septic system installation. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Driveway access from State Trunk Highway #3 is proposed in one location to serve proposed Lots 1 2 (see attached letter from MnDOT). Local street access is readily available from Farm Road and Dodd Road on the north and west respectively, and 120th Street West in Rosemount along the south. Farm Road and Dodd Road are presently under public contract to be upgraded to a 24' wide bituminous surfaced rural section roadway. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The City will be requiring a 40' half right -of -way dedication for the westerly adjacent Dodd Road and the northerly adjacent Farm Road. The development is subject to additional requirements from the City of Rosemount and the Mn Dept. of Transportation. The development is responsible for obtaining all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: A search of City special assessment records shows that the parcels proposed for platting at this time have not fulfilled any, or have been levied, any assessment for public streets and utilities. The following pending assessment is identified for the bituminous surfacing of Dodd Road under Project #515: PROJ. DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT 515 Dodd Road surfacing $5.80 /ff 1,370 $7,946 515 Farm Road surfacing 5.15 /ff 568 2,925 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT OF RECORD $10,871 The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROJ. DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT Future 11 11 11 u 11 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk Street WAC Rate Street Storm Sewer Trunk ROSEAGAN CONDITIONS: $1,365 /acre 1,315 /acre .056 /sq ft 48.05/fr ft 2, 015 /acre 111.70 /fr ft .083 /sq ft 23.3 $31,804 23.3 30,630 688,248 36,477 1,100 52,855 7.5 15,112 270 30,159 326,700 27,116 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $224,153 y I All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions in the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 1. A shared driveway easement shall be provided for ,lots 1 and 2. 2. The well and septic system shall conform to WPC 40 standards. 3. No expansion of the existing landscaping business shall be permitted. 4. ,These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be compled with: Al, B1, B3, C2, and El. 53. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and ttility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes .and __engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with ;current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. R. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other Approved: Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 1,fe-,1P0 f't • '•fit 0 1111101 como.on .1 UN1 0. 2 .1 1 Li L 6 (2 1 17::;.7.17,"' )3,0 Z nor STREET ASSESSMENT AT SINGLE FAMILY RATE 1100 F.F. ""m" STREET ASSESSMENT AT COMM./INDUSTRIAL RATE 270 F.F. PRELIMINARY FLAT. ROSEAGAN 4 00N C BUSHNELL HEA. veksr 100 IISHiNG *NO HUNTING CLUB, Let 11 e•••• Mt 11 Pt 11.1 Let Let I Me 1.1 M OWNER. 1 LINTON C. 001.• Male.1.11.1 MAIM Poo *Am, DELMAR H. SCHWANZ emata *mem .44 Mao.... m.o.. Palm 0....ne A. onnnorwmosounc..0 M... L../ Ms MO •14.111. 11..../1. 1 1.• MI 11.11 t. .1 o. .1 B.O. 10. 110. 1.1. •1 40. 1••• 1. 111, 111 1 1 1 e1 O. .11. 44 1/0. Oem .1••11 1.m. O... feel. 11••••• la Cam M1116.6. 1111 •a11. .40 NA ifratee••• 1 ea aa 1.+11..C.1.1.6■• AL* *ow 114•/0•10 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS IN •0*.N111 owNts• en.uho 1. DUNN ANECH I LANNth IASALYThuSt MOUIVT •VFW e ?I% I le 1411./ CIN.1•01, PACLIANNANY ALAS L i ONNth• sus,o4u. 32 .D3:Kor r 0 NEN. ve ST thD fiSN.N6 ANO N.TING CLUD.NC ONNER. 1 c1..11TON C. ROL, ROSEAGAN rm. DOLMAN K. SCUWANZ Yrs •••••••ass No••••••■ IINNIN111 Oa aro .1 Oa... .1. poota••••■• Noo. INN .1..1 of Nf of NoNoo NI S.. s. wil• ost• So. Not L. 1. Nos s. s. INN 4..4 oo. Ora am.. No IN s. 11. 61 •Nt. •.•oos ta• 1.11 roo• ••1 NS 1 II mosso No 1 ol..•• 114 L. .00• .1 Nis DO osoo• •-1 IN 1.11 141.1o. -1,• Not.* 'NO.. 6.1.. 1.11 1 Nvoss. •Nolo goo.. NO ;pt wt.. .111Soo• .1 osSil 11.• lo• .01 Aloe.. "„.41 I 11.01 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC A I ...r• k. :A.' r''., 4. t• ss .ts ,4 I 1 i ECIOUt Ell..3E 7 --',-1.ci---- ---.•,-.0 '-i N. S// -t.....,.,,,.., ROE MOUN .i g T ,..4 ss •N‘ ..3,44 '.:‘f CI T VFW W ?'s..".•:' s v 14 A g 7.y n'...i 1 v t 1 --1 ,;....3. "A 4 2 11 eel I TY URN! R t 1 a.i .....r..H. :lid ...,,S .-14..tup:_:..... E Va .k IL. i. 11 4.1 1 —,.'.."..1!..1'..1f1. ..r L 11.11. /MS IM MN eV MS. IIM IV 11 kk' •ov.mT ..TM•11.11 1 7 .1 OwNr• L: JOHN p 4us CR. J Ly_t!_1(E__ „a” ?"-i IS 111L11 COHUTHINT OWNER EDEAUNO O. OUNN PRELIMINARY rE•17. OWNER ROSEAGAN 7. 1011N E. BUSHNELL '371% R DIPER PEWE'= NER• W ST ENO fiStN6 AND HUNTING CLUO.NC OwNEN Emi ON C KOLB MS.... Mott 11m1m. Mom km Omotm Mmlamm. balm, m M. Memomm• Mt. M 0.•••••••■ 1mm. ItIt •M-SIII DELMAN H. SCHWANZ MU vs.. Masa. 11..4 eaeo.... Wm, IMIMMI“MoMoMIS Sol Moo sad M M. soll••••Me MI••• Moo. MM. 1M WA 1 1.1 Mt 1.II rum lom 1., am MS II 11 M• Mt II, mom 04 If -Ai tow.. R.Habe IS•1 ••I •-I 11•I let 1 V.S co. ••••••••4 1 At. AL. Jazt2 OLMS• Som. /ma •1 M• MI la IIM 14•0•• 114.00, 00000 MSS km, •H• m•• of 11•••••••••• Mt 1. M•tm• S. SUS. SIC 1,1•4 obstmo0, •1 .1 am moo ma, mom. tam1 9••• M 11. 14.•••••••• Ilo 114, M ■•••••■•••1. Som.. r••••••• ImImi 0.••••• oomm 11••• m Mt fk• Mt, •••111••• 1.• ••111 *MM.. So1 1 It lk H. tHisa.e Mid MG SM“ImOS IS• mmmio likmo• 1.••■••• si•••••/. IIM• Mkt mom. bto Mt..% •It• 1.1•■■•••• DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS IN I 1 "A 1) '41.; .1,Vi kr 4 ,6 47, 4;4. 4. ity jj 01 Lae 40114 WATER TRUNK 23.3 ACRES it 6 ;o H N ntj; 41Cus 117, I. Aq -N.: L 0.1-.1,12 ,c soc. I 1:1-fl .4 „1,f C 7 -1-•777-.-• +1- +40.A ..-'-':•.•fillif.!...PNrlIL' ii11AVEI. i L s, .c s --..i..... ...IL' ',v.!, .3- 1 ..j..- A ;la..." ...s1A4::.,.. toi•NI, 14.: ur r 4.0 41 firg•T MN 0 fati. OWNER (DmuND S. DUNN a 16 :OIL r...111•11.1a 1AHNER 'FAIRLYTRUST r F I r 0 i 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT. OwNER ROSEAGAN ioHN C ButdINCLA. t 3ZILR al:KM RURR= OwNLR. CLIFTON C. ROL r.• DELMAR li. SCHWANZ 1.0.01.1.1••••• ••••••••010 non 114•MM•NO 8•0010.7•017111.1.1.111 110.010•••• PIA. 11....1 11.0. 11•••10.... 01. 00. Alto 11.0.••••1 P.•. tn. 60 M. .1, 1.1. 10. .1 11.01... 0 NCR. T111. •19. 10. •••■•01, WiST END FISHING V. 1. 1...0 08 •••••••••••1. •••1 10. 1.•• 1 6 AND HUNTING Cimel, INC A•••• 0 I/ PI... 11.1. et.. 1..64. L. 1 13 .1 11.. I I .s. ••1 1.6 1 11.0. 11.1 11 1. 1. 11.11 1.1.1. 11••••• A..11.•• L•00 .s.mis 0•1 •••••••■.1 .1 ••••••••11.00••• 11.00 10. *I <1..611... .1 1.• .11 1•••• 1.01.0 .1. a. •101.6. 1. 1.1•••• fl arr, 11.■ 1..11 1•• .0 on 1..4.1 L... os• )0. of I /fill DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS IN .t1 w. S 1 t A •1• ti RO1EMOUNT `•VFW SIR�T. It OWNER. D B. OUNNLY CANNER /Aw TNUST c f' ^4 4 r O 44.0440 mil 1•OwNt_t. 1 u._ 1 0 11ILC 40•4041•0 v" E •1E1 /If Iw I.. •7c n 11 PACLIANNAIIY PLAT. OWNEN• OUN t OuS11NELL 36•441A .alaIEF7iE7N1= 4 .4 O AEA. *EST END FISHING AND HUN71NG CLI .NC OWNER. SLI4TON C. KOLA ROSEAGAN ••Iw 1.4 ..•4•. Lot 1 1.1 Y• 1 1 1 Lot 1 1.1 RN. 441 WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE 7.5 ACRES STORM SEWER TRUNK 326,700 S.F. OILMAN H. SCHWANZ 4.....•.• r•• 14. 4_ 41 •...x.1 r'. -.•r 4 141441•4 •r :•41.•_.. ,1 1 •4•_� 111444.. •11 I• 441. 1:.1.4w.1 •4144 r....1 DEL.MAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS It LP -50 t jLP -61. ___...8913 884 4 LP-69 8 3 6 888.5 887.8 893.0 1 2" LP -35 LP LP-36 87p 5 879 0 34 864 5 885.0 J 888.5 L 27 _P -38 865.0 878.5 LP -2I 1' LP -24 N 902.5 883.2 903.0 r 886.0 LP -18 908.6 9/0.7 '.441.16 111111111•1111.% wA l r' LP -46- 879.2 LP-37 '1�, 5 r.c_ u 878.3 8806 LP -17 1 1 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \4e LP -l9 900.2 903.0 LP -66 LP -45 882. LP -22 901.0 904.0 LP-64 8 940 LP -33 886.3 889.6` 12 1 2" LP -65 LP-25 924.7 9270 MOW LP -26 920.2 923.6 .1=06 MINN000 STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN LP -28 910.7 915.0 LP-47 908 9/0.6 LP-29 912.0 9/5.0 LP -23 925.3 LP -27 922.0 925.4 approved: 930.0 I 1 F I G I standard plate it 0.8/ 76.0 3.3 /58.0 020 2" 47.5/63.0 50.6/66.0 MID 20 =Ilk IMP MD 78.7/91.6 16" 112" 1 110201 88.4/99 0 S, 1 47.6/63 0 1 74.6/87C 1 93.7/104.0 1 1112"i 6" 1 1 112" SUBJECT PARCEL .7 83.5/94.0. I/ 8 3/95.0 194 1 awr.•• 11111-- IMID ONO I 112" 1 1 1 1 i-'3r 12" .•.•'17 1 EOM MO MIN Ma ONO 60.9/ 74 0 FIG 3 N city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate It: 56) C- BB c -z city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 30" C -DD 1 =MEM ._..1 1 IR SUBJECT PARCEL S&NITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN C LL 18 t L_1 1157‘ 7 C -FF GG approved: N FIG *2 standard plate