The URL can be used to link to this page

10/03/2000 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING OCTOBER 3, 2000 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS r aA. P13 B. p, • BUILDING Quality Communities Week video ISD 196 levy referendum presentation DAKOTA COUNTY Environmental Education Program, recognize City efforts with water resources education V. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR & DEPARTMENT HEADS VI. CENTRAL PARK UPDATE VII. CONSENT AGENDA $ A. PERSONNEL ITEMS "070 q B. APPROVE Convention & Visitors Bureau 2000-2001 Marketing. Plan and Budget C. REQUEST for public hearing — certification of delinquent false alarms —November 6, 2000 fo / () i / D. REQUEST for public hearing — certification of delinquent utilities — November 6, 2000 i� E. PURCHASING Policy amendment — increase threshhold for contractual bidding to $50,000 fo f5F. PROJECT 806, receive petition/authorize feasibility report, Kennerick Addition (Pond HDP- 1 Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) 1 /7 G. PROJECT 751, authorize application for MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Program Funding 1 b (South Dodd Road — Upgrade) 1-1 H. CONTRACT 00-07, award contract (Hwy 13, 4 -lane Upgrade) .REEIVE petition, order public hearing, easement vacation (Murphy Farm) tc, J. CONTRACT 98-24, approve final payment/authorize City maintenance (Blue Gentian Road & Blue Water Road — Street & Utility Improvements) 04K. FINAL Change Order Cascade Bay L. PROCLAMATION, Minnesota Manufacturers Week, October 16-22, 2000 M. RENEW agreements for contractual services (Winter Trail Maint. & Street Snow and Ice Control) 03 ti N. ACKNOWLEDGE completion of construction of Cascade Bay SO. APPROVE list of judges for the November 7, 2000 General Election VIII. 6:45 - PUBLIC HEARINGS TAX RATE certification PROJECT 790, Central Parkway (Street & Utility Improvements) PROJECT 768, Northwood Parkway (Street & Utility Improvements) PROJECT 742, final assessment hearing (Wescott Woodlands — Streets & Utilities) MINOR SUBDIVISION (Turnquist Addition) Brian Turnquist, of approximately 1.25 acres to create two single family lots on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Pond Hills Second Addition, located at 4545 Oak Pond Road in the SE Y4 of Section 26 MINOR SUBDIVISION (Helen Kennedy Addition) Helen Kennedy, of approximately one acre to create two single family lots on property legally described as Lot 13, Block 1, Letendre Addition, located at 3300 Heritage Lane in the SW 1 of Section 9 IX. OLD BUSINESS p/3B. FLOOD debris pick up PROJECT 779, authorize revised feasibility report (Dodd Rd. Upgrade - Diffley to Wescott) X. NEW BUSINESS V 1 y 6 A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Metals USA, to allow two above ground 1,500 gallon fuel tanks on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan -Industrial Park 13, located at 3101 Sibley Memorial Highway in the NW Y of Section 9 • i 6 B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT — Frauenshuh Companies, amending the land 1 use of approximately 4.14 acres from Commercial Planned Development to D -IV Mixed Residential (12+ units/acre), located across from Metcalf Jr. High on the NW corner of Diffley Road and Cedar Avenue Freeway in the SW 1 of Section 19 pi 9y C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT & FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - Access Lifts, Inc., to allow an elevator or lift sales and service facility on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition, located at 1195 Town Centre Drive in the NE of Section 15 gf D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — Realcor, Ltd., to allow construction of a storage r building on Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition (Lexington Hills Apartments), located at 4116 Lexington Avenue South in the SW 34 of Section 23 P 03 E. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT & FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - RJM Construction, Inc., to allow an in-line retail mall, with a drive-through facility on Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center, located on Courthouse Lane next to McDonald's in the NW'/ of Section 12 XI. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE XII. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA XIII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XIV. ADJOURNMENT XV. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. Updated 9-29-00 — 2:25 p.m. Special Citi' Council Minutes September 19, 2000 Page 1 of 4 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA :;September 19, 2000 A special meeting of the Eagai:CSiCii?Cf;iti:J#i#'An Tuesday, September 19, 2000, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of tb 14agan Nfiiiifirfpaf• enter Building. Present were Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Blomquist, Carf Bakken and Masin. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Director of Parks and Recrea'iiiili Vraa, Administrative Specialist Wielde and Administrative Specialist Hertel. VISITORS TO BE HEARD Mayor Awada acknowledged l?SSitors tci:t heard. There were no visitors present interested in speaking on items not listed on the aa. APPOINTMENT QIk.Cap t»'jIy CENTER FOCUS GROUPS City Administrator Hedges gave an overview o 'tlie progression and process with the Community Center task force, highlighting that citizen involvement is the next step forward. City Administrator Hedges pointed out to the Council that they may want to reconsider the appointment of teens, noting that the teens v, lyi.ggtre es appeared as candidates were not mix aware of the process and had been not kf:• .cher at Eagan High School. He further noted that Paula Nowariak in the:: ? :tiiiikecr4tion Department works with a group called YELP (Youth of Eagan Leaders &ii ,P1awers) tl> may also have interested teens. Councilmember Masin asked if the city is pA anything different in its recruiting attempts than previous attempts to involve teens and aslikd l # Le:.teens from the Youth Summit held in Rosemount had been contacted. City Administrator flges clarified that the YELP list had come almost entirely from the Youth Summit meeting and mentioned that letters had been sent to the principals of each middle school and high school that served Eagan students. Councilmember Bakken stated that the Council should either decide what to do about the teens or decide to decide later, expressin, .p> ;Reference between the two. . Mayor Awada proposed ointin $i#tiits to the focus group and involving teens in an advisory capacity. Councilmenj) 4 Masin d1 ected, stating that "buy in" from the teens would be the only way the center wou1loe succei$i1; she counter -proposed a 50-50 split of adults and teens or an all -teen focus group R}fI i iiie C# i4that there should be a representative from each major high school. Director of Pariksgtion Vraa stated that it was his opinion and the consensus of the staff that achieving age diversity among the teens, including especially the middle school age students, is more important than achieving geographic diversity. Councilmember Masin stated that difigpt:.§Oools have different programs. Councilmember Bakken:, gested add-in . teen spots to the focus group in addition to the six adult spots; he proposed'sol'iciting a represeIative from each grade to obtain age Special City Council Minutes September 19, 2000 Page 2 of 4 diversity. Councilmember Blomquist stated that there were no ages listed on the focus group applications, but noted that Preston Dean was a middle school student and listed individually. City Administrator Hedges clarified that Preston Dean submitted his own application and was not part of the groups of teens recommended to the City. Councilmember Carlson stated that staff should go to the groups of teens f:;and gauge their interest before appointing them; she proposed considering this at the next n e l'ng. City Administrator Hedges stated that staff would prepare a letter and recruit teens for the ;kick-off meeting on October 2. Councilmember Masin asked that the Youth Summit teens be i} i i t £`•r...* strator Hedges stated that the Youth Summit students were part of the list oi''rittl'ppti4s:: City Administrator Hedges gac* n overview of the balloting process and asked the Council to determine if they wanted to vote for focus groups individually or all at once. Councilmember Carlson stated that she was comfortable voting on them all at once; her sentiments were echoed by the rest of the Council. Mayor Awada asked the Council if it was an option to put one person on more that.i0e focus Group. Councilmember Carlson responded by saying that one focus group was enoii's;per pez3; her sentiments were echoed by other Councilmembers. Councilmember IVin note0at there was not an unmanageable number of applicants and asked the Council if tlie3;'would:6knterested in giving everyone a spot. Councilmember Carlson stated that t k: ii'"3s bep,•,�rd that Changig the structure of the focus groups was not necessary. Cotigafiii:eifiligViigiffiiiiiressed displeasure regarding the spouses and relatives of Councilmembers on the list and commented that their input would be included via the Council and suggested choosing alternate members for a variety of perspectives. Councilmember Carlson stated that it was too late to eliminate candidates. As the first round of ballot tallying be f;f';iiil continued discussion about the composition of the design teams. C91.1.9 1sn i iei s: r1son and Bakken stated that the appointments were fine "as is." Mail :it ada mov,O, Councilmember Bakken seconded, a motion to approve the design teams wit:i 2 gh.w.atla and Councilmember Carlson on the Site Design Team, Mayor Awada and Councilmei 1rEa p on the Partnerships/Operations Team, and Councilmembers Bakken, Blomquist and Caris'oi'ii: j e Facility Design Team. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 City Administrator Hedges stated that the architects (TKDA) and the park planner (Damon Farber) would be together for three days in early October and suggested scheduling the first focus group meeting for Mondanfti§rnr 2.,. q) imember Blomquist noted a potential conflict in her schedule. The Cousi4WiiiiitiOiiiWwould meet at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, October 2, 2000 at the Eagan Muni6ipcal Centtit id noted that they would officially vote on the meeting at the Regular City Counc#€; leetingeduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. RENtirW= t#: y • iNitENA BUDGET City Administrator Hedges gave an overview. Mayor Awada stated that unless there were serious extenuating circumstances, the budget should be balanced as it has been in years past. Councilmember Carlson asked j,f4iti.MAImAent and Renewal fund earned interest. City Administrator Hedges answered injOifi th ik. lncilmember Carlson asked what the Civic Center Fund was and inquirti lout the curreii dance. Director of Parks and Recreation Special City Council Minutes September 19, 2000 Page 3 of 4 Vraa stated that there are two funds: the Capital Replacement Fund, which has a balance of $115,000 and the excess revenues from the operations of the civic center, which totaled $235,000 at the close of 1999. Mayor Awada asked if the Citg#id increased the rates for ice time in 1999. Councilmember Carlson stated that thiiaies were increased to match Apple Valley's rates, noting that the Eagan Hockey Associa0o } g! bye, ;$..0 9Q0 per year to the city on top of their fees. Mayor Awada asked if EastvievitiW$• 0 t ' irector of Parks and Recreation Vraa stated that the base rate is $135 whour, but tliat'tlie're is a surcharge of $5 per hour as an agreement with the E.H.A. on the EasO;lena. Mayor Awada inquired about the balance of accumulated budget surpluses. Directof of Parks and Recreation Vraa stated that the gross accrued earnings with interest since 1995 totaled $235,000. Councilmember Carlson expressed displeasure with the profits that would be realized in twenty years at the expense of the people currently paying to use the facility. Councilmember Blomquist sSd that ligwas satisfied with taking the $19,855 outstanding balance from the budgetWt t of thea t revenues. Mayor Awada stated that she supported the option of increasing tig:k4p:x.:�.ntat,rate to $145 per hour to match Apple Valley's rate and take the remaining balance $;i txi #i e2 $u {i :. Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded, a motion to ncrease'fti base ice rental rate to $145 per hour for the school district to offset the budget imbalance and to. further withdraw funds to cover the remaining balance from past budget surpluses. • Aye: 5 Nay: 0 APPOINTMENT OF,COM ...TVeENTER FOCUS GROUPS • Administrative Specialists 1.1i-.4gclWielcleported the results of the first round of balloting. The Council began a second' ft o.;bgl•IAting and submitted ballots for tallying. REC)ES`S The City Council recessed at 6:20 p.m. and continued all items of business until reconvening following the Regular City Council Meeting. Mayor Awada called the Sial City • Ouncil meeting back to order at 8:20 p.m. APPOINTME•Fc`E;flli l:# ,`•: CENTER FOCUS GROUPS City Administrator Hedges gave an overview of the balloting progress. He noted that Mr. Clyde Thurston, who had been appointed to the Bandshell focus group, had indicated in his letter that he was more interested in a role worki?1g. yti the design teams. He stated that the Council could either leave his appointment *f a t; ,gve him and re -open the matter for additional balloting. Councilmen ? Carlson sihi itat there were no places for participation• on the design teams and that there were no designati6i :for floaters. City Administrator Hedges Special City Council Minutes September 19, 2000 Page4of4• clarified Mr. Thurston's general interest, citing both his letter and a recent conversation with Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa. The Council chose to re -open the balloting for the Bandshell focus group and include Mr. Thurston's name in the candidate group for the remaining focus groups. • At the conclusion of four rounaiiiif balloting, City Administrator Hedges reported the results to the Council. By ballot, the -Ci' •Council appointed the following focus groups: ' ••' Ki r omputers/Meeting/Conference/ Gyms, Health and Fitness '•'f Playground/Child Components Behnke, Keith • • Carlon, Ann Crary, Amy Gieseke, Lynae Dean, Michael Gustafson, Kay Hamling, Patty Heffner, Douglas James Klekner, Dan Johnson, Cindy Rudolph, John :�vliller, Cathy Swenson, Scott'ickrell, Catherine Seniors 4/Festivals Bari, Joseph • • .........:�atkf� Carlson, Gloria Danner, Margo Johnson, Barbara Marko, Jerry Lawrence, Shirley Seelig, Raleigh Lawrence, Wally Stewa,Tx,; Judy Nardi, Joseph ;Lti; Pat chter, Ted Teens• Bandshell Bakken, Alison :•flo, John Elsenheimer, Don 1ef#'iennis Stackhouse, Julie Hutson; Quinn Staley, Tim Peterson, Dorothy Thurston, Clyde Seitz, Jim Wagner, John Wilson, Tom "?t?'RNFENT The City Council adjourne g 9:00 nor: .........:::... MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota September 19, 2Q00 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. PresegWere Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Masin, Blomquist, Carlson and Bakken. Also pre8were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tofit'Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. Mayor Awada noted that the scherigiing of a special City Council meeting for October 2, 2000 for the purposes of meeting with commuiiitY center/central park focus groups for a kick-off event would be placed under the Administrative Agenda. Councilmember Bakken moved, Mayor Awada seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MINUTES OF THE TEMB5, 2000 REGULAR. MEETING Councilmember Masin requestec'tilie folloAfg change in the sixth sentence in the first paragraph on page seven, "Councilmen ?.. clOc5m.not in favor of rezoning the SE Eagan/Gun Club area but was open to theYeYI iit$•o t kei:.fikeparcels depending upon specific development proposals." Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember.Carlson seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMS .*L• JiSPECIAL MEETING Councilmember Masin noted tr•Wief iftyClerk;3farb Hand was in attendance at the special meeting and said her name should be listgd;$udeT those:fresent. Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Caiiet?4?ded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VISITORS TO''BE HEARD Meg Tilley, representing the Eagan Foundation, stated that the Foundation has collected $113,000 to date for flood relief. She ackns0.. ed several individuals for their efforts with regard to the establishment of the Interfaith DisapffitiltMqfgaliikitijf County organization. Margaret Schreiner provided additional informWregar' 't'ee1!5IIt5's function as it relates to helping Eagan residents with their unmet needs. SheWied that :office has been established at Mary Mother of the Church and a caseworker has been lusAtt ull-time:tq work with residents regarding their unmet needs. Mike McCormick, representing # $ K #13 i iiipdate on the financial impact to the community and also commented on the number of 16£ft's'tiirltihave been processed to date. Julie Stackhouse commented on the efforts of a local Girl Scout Troop and the troop leaders who sold cotton candy at Lone Oak Days and raised $230 for flood relief. Mayor Awada mentioned that 400;itiiiiNigNoop also helped to raise funds for flood relief at the recent Family Fun Days held at;# ie:Civic Arena Thomas Eykyn, 1953 Jade L ,stated that he had t a letter to the City regarding a claim for flood damages and has not received i s once. Director cg''•ublic Works Colbert noted that the City is conducting a study of the entire i3ed that he is aware that the claim was EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE 2 forwarded to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for their review and response. City Administrator Hedges noted that he would contact Mr. Eykyn regarding his claim. Kristin Barge, a resident in the Cedar Grove area, commented on the flood damage to her home and requested the Council take action to in#I%fae storm sewer repair and/or the buy out of her home. She also requested the City update its EmeYgi icy Action Plan. ECOG • 'L • • ONS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUU 2000-2001 MARKETING PLAN AND BUDGET City Administrator Hedges provided an overview on this item. Ann Carlon, Executive Director of the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau, provided additional information on the marketing plan and budget. (Inadvertently, action was not tak2fkon this item. The item will be placed on the October 3, 2000 City Council agenda.) COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL x ALISSNISTRATOR & DEPARTMENT HEADS Councilmember Masin encoura ..• > •••t8:to.is i#c.c tavailable flood assistance. She asked for an update on whether sealed bids were going t:'d $Q''Sougllf'foi':the City Attorney and the City's engineering consultants. City Administrator Hedges stated that an update would be provided next week. Councilmember Masin stated that typically the Council meets with the Telecommunications Commission and the Burnsville Cable Access staff. City Adrator Hedges stated the purposes for the previous meetings. He added that he would.pmq fJZ eak to the Burnsville City Manager to see if there is a desire to meet again. Cc j i iist•!Vt4 suggested that a meeting be scheduled to review the partnership. Councilmember Carlson asked if the'tily:Cd t; t ::wpuld be willing to consider discussing the election sign policy prior to the November 21, 2000 sp680i g.ouncil meeting in order to define some parameters before the meeting. She asked about the City's pi'c2ss for dealing with complaints regarding signs that are placed on fences. Mayor Awada stated that staff was directed to send a letter to all Council candidates informing them that political signs on fences needed to be removed. City Administrator Hedges added that a copy of the sign ordinance was also sent with the letter. He further added that non -conforming signs are typically removed with notification generally given to the candidate prior to their removal. He said.th4M$City car�not.cemove signs on fences located on private property. He further said that tj .dIair • cticvk�8f:j : igtified that the sign is in violation of the Sign Ordinance. •: Councilmember Blomquist saic l at the ppss r should provide input regarding election sigfls 'absent defined parameters. She stated; . e,ftt i .Mz i Awada had a conflict of interest in selling political signs to at least three Ccc '� Mayor Awada responded that her company sells a variety of items and one division sells signs. She added that the main part of her business is phone verification services. She further added that the company also does telecommunications work, prepares corporate direct mail pieces and some political mailings. She also noted that her compan:90E•i oducts. She said that every expert who has been consulted with regard to this mattet : ltRlf t };she does not have a conflict of interest. • Mayor Awada moved, Counciiiember Carlson sec ciiided a motion to schedule a special City Council meeting for the purposes of cOssing the election sip policy prior to the November 21, 2000 special City Council meeting. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE3 Councilmember Masin asked if the research and information that had been compiled previously could be provided to the Council for their review. City Administrator Hedges stated that the information is still useful and would be provided to the Council. Councilmember Masin said that she recalled that staff was supposed to make anadjustment to the sign policy based on Burnsville's model. City Administrator Hedges stated that thif: i s discussed; however, no action was taken. Councilmember Blomquist said she.w4s cpncprned that this was not an official agenda item. She said she expected to take the input fro e. o .. :• i from there. Councilmember Bakken stated that he did not feel that there was r(eces9�r,i 2• r�i •sick 'problem but rather there is an enforcement problem. • Councilmember Masin said that she.did not think it would be appropriate to schedule this meeting since the Council's rules require it be added to an agenda prior to the meeting. Councilmember Carlson stated that the item could be placed on the special City Council agenda for discussion next week. Mayor Awada added that the motion to direct the scheduling of a special City Council meeting is not the same as a motion directing a part3ar action. Councilmember Bakken said that technically it would be sufficient to provide direction Ekigaff by gpitncil consensus. • Councilmembers agreed to direcgiis item ti jlaced on an upcoming special City Council agenda. City Administrator Hedges mentioned that the architecrand park planner have been retained. He added that a kick-off celebration is planned for October 2 at City Hall. He said that it is anticipated that a web site will be developed to provide the public with an opportunity to follow the progress and will also provide an opportunity for the public to provide,git ;*►put. He stated that some of the focus groups were appointed at the special City Council•p edj •i ito&dding the regular meeting. He noted that the special meeting would be recompged; i?lic;ftq ie regular meeting to complete the appointment process. Gi'31 8•. fl NPA A. Personnel Items Item 1. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Thomas Murry as a seasonal park maintenance worker. Item 2. It was recommended to approve tk.04 • g of Guy.l ayvson as a seasonal touch football official. Item 3. Jt was recommended to apprGv...$3iehirirlitkkglierns as a seasonal recreation leader. Item 4. It was recommended to apprei4he Melissa Franson as a seasonal preschool • instructor/recreation leader. ''• B. 2000/2001 D.A.R.E. and Police LiaisonAgreement School District #196 and the City of Eagan. It was recommended to approve the 2000/2001 D.A.R.E. and police liaison agreement between School District #196 and the City of Eagan. C. Final Subdivision, Slumberland. It. was; •Mitfl ed to approve a Final Subdivision to create two lots on 6.7 acres located on Northwood". t; ay' i it ▪ ' tMyerly's and south of The Home Depot m the SE 1i4 of Section 10. D. Findings of Fact Conclusions & IfOlution of Denial - g•ritne Creek Addition. This item was continued to the October 17, 2000 Ci C w iil met;t�ng.• EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE4 E. Final Plat and Final Planned Development - Life Time Fitness Addition, FCA Real Estate Holdings, LLC. It was recommended to approve a Final Planned Development to allow a 159 stall parking lot upon 2.4 acres of land located north of Cliff Road and west of Thomas Center Drive (comprising the northern one third of Oudot A, Safari at Eagan 2nd Addition) within the southwest 3 of Section 28 and a Final Plat (Life Time Fitness Addition) combining the northern one third of Oudot A, Safari at Eagan 2nd Addition with adjacent Lot 1, Block 1, Safaii:4. Eagan 2nd Addition. F. Submission of the 2001 Funding Application to Dakota County for the Community Landfill Abatement Funds. It was recommended to:irgiAgifitlitig;#4).Mq of the Cities of Burnsville/Eagan 2001 funding application for $83,560 from 13dityti1,6i'4te a recycling program for the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan. G. Project 784, approve Easement Acquisiiioli Agreement (Louis Lane - Street & Utility Improvements). It was recommended to approve an Easement Acquisition Agreement for Parcel 10-03800-011-01 (660 Lone Oak Road) regarding said easements for Project 784R (Louis Lane - Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. H. Purchase data network equipment forlig Instituial Network (INET) along with Independent School District 191 and the City of Burnsv #1. It was;>igommended to approve the purchase of data network equipment for the Institutional 1' work (IN ) along with Independent School District 191 and the City of Burnsville. I. Project 99-1, acknowledge completion/2iiiiIiii a a€.}:'iM ce (Southern Lakes West - Street & Utilities It was recommended to acknowledge the completion of Contract 99-J (Southern Lakes West - Street & Utility Improvements) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. J. Hiring of Stahl Construction Company as the Construction Meager of the Central Park Community Center Complex. It was recommended to approve St010;Wction Company as the Construction Manager of the Community Center/Central P±}; • K. Metropolitan 9-1-1 Board Non-DisclQsuig Agreements�ft was recommended to approve the Metropolitan 9-1-1 Board Non -Disclosure ;4gsq }t:443,4 authorize the Mayor and Deputy Clerk to execute all related documents. L. Contract 00-01, approve Change Order #2 (Water Treatment'acilities - Masonry Restoration). It Has recommended to approve Change Order #2 to Contract 00-01 (Water Treatment Facility - Masonry Restoration) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. M. Telecommunications Antenna Lease Agrpenents - Metricom. It was recommended to approve the telecommunication lease agreements witk;>iMil etsn f9.pasmoit installations on the Safari and Yankee Doodle Reservoirs and authorize theM* rp �aiici L yc;i trkti ecute all related documents. N. Extension for recording the Final PlA� •Northwog Business Park 2nd Addition (Rock Cliff Development). It was recommended ti* iprove op::day extension for the recording of the Final Plat for Northwood Business Park 2nd ........:::... O. Receive petition/order public hearing - right-of-way vacation (Robert O'Neill Homestead). It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate public right-of-way and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 17, 2000. Councilmember Bakken moved,, Consent Agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • ;?AA, ]son seconded a motion to approve the EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE5 OLD BUSINESS ...................... ............ ....... CLARIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MEGA EXCAVATING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Administrator Hedges providt#an overview on this item. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. - - Mark Pieper, applicant, explained•} e f * lIfI ; 3}? stalled as required in the conditions of the CUP. He stated that there was no lot. He added that the removal of the berm would be necessary if the fence woes installed in the middle of the property. He said that the intent of the berms was to provide screenk from Red Pine Lane. Mayor Awada asked what authority the City has to revoke a Conditional Use Permit. City Attorney Dougherty said that the City Council has the ability to revoke a CUP based on sufficient findings. Mr. Peiper said it was his undersing th.he had one year to meet the conditions of the CUP approved in May of 2000. Senior Planne>:; .,Maley staff# that the minutes reflect that the conditions of the most recent CUP needed to be met by the of Alit. He added that there were also zoning violations related to items being stored tral'were n&tpermitted with either of Mr. Peiper's CUPs. Councilmember Carlson suggest4#,fiet:tliii ; hued for one month to allow staff time to compile all of the relevant information to be forwarded to the City Council and to Mr. Peiper with regard to the status of the property and the outstanding zoning xiolations. Discussion occurred regarding the status of CUPs and that the Council has the right to revoke the CUP for noncompliance of the conditions. Councilmember Carlson stated that,t•1 . SA of �i-tie fence is to ensure that certain uses are restricted to particular parts of the propik • Mayor Awada stated that it was eiipei . rat.the asphalt surface be installed prior to October 17, 2000. Councilmember Blomquist moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to continue the request for clarification of the conditions of approval for a Conditional Use Permit allowing the outside storage of various construction, landscape and refuse (hauling) related equipment on property located at 4841 Biscayne Avenue, legally described as Lot 4, Block 1 Halley's Addition in the SE Iia of Section 36 to the October 17, 2000 City Council meeting. 2th the understanding that the asphalt surface be installed prior to that time. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .. REZONING & PRELIMIN RY SU tVISION - MENDOTA HOMES, INC. City Administrator Hedges provided an overview on this item. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report noting that the City Forester recommended the addition of the following condition: To ensure the survival of many large p ie xi ...intended to be preserved within this site, the applicant shall have a Tree PreservationAgg6tik414kprepared by a certified consulting forester or arborist with experience in tree preser. % in as it relate5:t{ ipt?nstruction activities. This tree management plan shall be submitted approved by thy Forestry Department prior to commencing any grading or construe sl activity and priorAct.final plat approval. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE6 John Mathern, applicant, was available for questions. Pam Larkin, 1747 Galaxie Court, said that her main concern with the development was the access off Galaxie Avenue. She requested that signage be installed stating that no passing is allowed on the shoulder. • Mayor Aw"ada suggested that a hi the installation of the sign. driveway sign be installed. Councilmembers agreed to Mayor Awada moved, Councilmeg§;i t kQ0#00 ► motion to approve a Rezoning from A, Agriculture, to R-1 Single-family ResidRttkial, for appioximately 1.25 acres located at the southeast. corner of Galaxie Avenue and Cliff Road q.ie NE 1/4 of Section 32. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Preliminary Subdivision (Cliff Woods of Eagan) to create 3 single-family lots on approximately 1.25 acres located at the southeast corner of Galaxie Avenue and Cliff Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 32, with a Variance to create two lots with access provided only.:k private easement, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comj ji with th $ tandard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3gD 93: Al, Bl, B2, B3, 2. The property shall be platted 3. Grading for the proposed house pads shall maintain slopes of a minimum of 2%. 4. A cash water quality dedication will be required in lieu of on-site ponding. In accordance with City policies, the am9.1.0• : icash dedication is based on the cost of the land and pond volume ne0xt1; ilii. clWfiliosphorous export to undeveloped conditions. 5. The final plat shall dedicate:; at• h4onal len feet of right-of-way to the County for Cliff Road. Restricted access along of the development adjacent to Cliff Road shall be dedicated on the final plat:::::;:;:•::::::; 6. Cross easements for use and maintenance of the private drive shall be executed prior to final subdivision approval and recorded with the final plat. 7. The applicant shall install 12 Category B trees (Sugar Maple and Greenspire Linden) throughout the site as sktoicfi';t▪ 'tt gie play n dated 8/8/00, which shall be revised to show no trees plantip 0it1Hi"i:t%e: ti i it -of -way. • 8. To maximize survival .chances of tree large oak trees that the applicant is attempting to preserve on this site, t:;protecti Cfencing shall be installed at the greatest distance possible from the tree8 fid;&i,►dF' ; •h! 434 !ifited by the City Forestry Division before any grading or constritiC diii&Ift 9. A cash park and trail dedication will be required and is payable prior to recording of the final plat at the rate in effect at that time. 10. To ensure the survival of. syy 3a *.t J -ees intended to be preserved within this site, the applicant shall hav,� ii; iI Pres2rva% }Management Plan, prepared by a certified . consulting forester or t 'gist with exper a in tree preservation as it relates to construction activities ;,Alis tree manageniiiit plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Forestry Def,ent prior to com[icing any grading or construction activity and prior to final p140'. .. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE7 Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ............................................................................ ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA SCHEDULE SPECIAL CITY CO.I:NCIL MEETING TO CANVASS BALLOTS FOR EVE.ION RECOUNT Mayor Awada moved,Councilmeti}}ref $j3s8lr},�',,y�'�'lBt:� motion to schedule a special City Council meeting for September 21, 2000 at::i(3}5:i:qut�,�'}pser 22 at 12:00 p.m., if necessary, in the Council Chambers for the purposes of:g: anvassing the ballots from the September 12, 2000 Primary Election. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SCHEDULE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO MEET WITH COMMUNITY CENTER/CENTRAL PARK FOCUS GROUPS Mayor Awada moved, Councilnv b*,er Bakken seconded a motion to schedule a special City Council meeting for October 2 at 6:30 p.rti .p meet 4 the Community Center/Central Park focus groups for a kick-off event. Aye: 5 PROJECT 7.6$, NAR TflWOOD PARKWAY (STREET A, # `I X Z1 :.MMENTS) Director of Public Works Colbert provided an overview on this item. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to schedule a public hearing for Project 768 (Northwood Parkway - Street and Utility Improvements) to be held on October 3, 2000. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.n to: .,xecutik:k Session to discuss labor negotiations with the dispatcher unit. Present were Mayor Ai a :Cc ncilmembers Masin, Carlson and Bakken, City Administrator Tom Hedges, and City Attorney MikMAri.. MLK Date City Clerk If you need these minutes in an al ternative: iCisuch a$'e'pririC,v$raille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, M?Ai'5122, (65=1-4600, (TDD phone: (651) 454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the polio is at a1I2 NorIs have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard tggg;:co/§};• ; Tyf8n, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regaf$'fi pi7'filfc tsliaicd. ;: MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA September 22"d, 2000 A special meeting of the 4•••• i3an City.Council was held on Friday, September 22nd, 2000 at 12:00 p.m., at the Eagan Munic *pt = RO dere Mayor Awada, and City Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson and 1V asiil'"ASo'pfsei t ds City Administrator Hedges, Deputy Clerk Barb Hand, and City AttOky Mike Dougherty. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. CANVASS OF BALLOTS/SEPTEMMER 20!;000 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY RECOUNT Peggy Carlson called tficmeetingtoSorder at 12:00 p.m. City Administrator Hedges submitted the results of the M i' } a l i ; §, t tt held on September 21', 2000. City Councilmember Carlson moved aid'1Vlri yo'r'::AicIW':S & tided a motion to approve the results of the Municipal Primary Election Recount, with all members voting in favor. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:05 p.m. Date • • Deputy City Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road. Eagan, MN 55122, (651) 681-4600, (TDD phone: (651-454-8535). The Cit} of Eagan is committed to the policy tbaI 4 .9ersons have equal access to its programs, services, activities. facilities and employment without regard toi l cradda$tiait►, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with reJii to pub l`ol sfancd'"' �t f city of eagan MEMO MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2000 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 3, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the October 3, 2000 City Council agenda, the minutes of the September 19, 2000 regular City Council meeting and the minutes of the September 19, 2000 and the September 22, 2000 special City Council meetings, the following items are in order for consideration. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS A. MINNESOTA CITIES WEEK "BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES" VIDEO ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To show the League of Minnesota Cities -produced video that promotes quality communities. FACTS: • October 8-14 is Cities Week in Minnesota. The League of Minnesota Cities is,using Cities Week as the kick-off for its public relations campaign, "Building Quality Communities". • At its meeting on September 5, 2000, the City Council passed a resolution recognizing October 8-14 as Building Quality Communities Week in Eagan. Staff is committed to highlighting the specially designed BQC Eagan logo and the BQC theme as an on-going public relations effort. • The video emphasizes the important role that local government plays in creating and maintaining the quality of life that citizens desire in their communities. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting B. ISD 196 LEVY REFERENDUM PRESENTATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: No action required. FACTS: • Independent School District 196 contacted the City of Eagan and requested an opportunity to present information on the upcoming levy referendum. A representative from ISD 196 will be present at Tuesday's Council meeting to provide additional information concerning the levy referendum. ATTACHMENTS: 8 Levy for Learning flyer enclosed on pages through , . 3 evyor LEARNING ovember 7 -2000 On November 7, District 196 residents will vote on a levy referendum to reduce class size and keep quality opportunities for students Educating our students to reach their full potential Serving Apple Valley, Burnsville, Coates, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Rosemount, and Empire and Vermillion Townships Operating Expenses Per Pupil 1998-99 0 4, 0 0 i D I s 0 V1 Q) $1, .ti 6 C y 0—`4 p a= a).2= oz--=0z'a, U o il Q U h o ¢' 0 u a) 0 w 0 °� E n ei °? = o a, o boo Ti,u a b, U (,4. ti O y ,s21. w „= p O b+4 .6... c.) U bo O y O N 'L5 N— > ci 43 0 P. Sy p a) a Cp N a) .�. v, ; O 0 w a,• -bo N�� co�69 i) 6.� >� 511 = 3) 's. y sem. >+ t"u 2 'CI On v' 0 z~ s.. o `E "C� O v z 0 s.. p a� s, s.r yUj s. z O d U c� U a Ll '.^�, vs U 0 s.. E N _ vs z .- -� • �, ,moi, pe., 'v� •,..)— U �^ y CA O ..�... 8 .i :� sem. :. '� . it _ ,...., .z zUU � F 'v� ij � •° � g� a x� a 5� g '� vi 4 c/J �"' U'''' sem. U Zt = 44 0 h h a) U Z y vii •� ++. a) it Z U O L_, 13 el Z Z N U� O13 .°?z-'� N °mow 4O A . . °d 0 N a)75O=U O.5.1 4.) Tr. a) U p c o 1:17:1, .4 Q c,) N ... W w cn •-... ,......cR3 3,. Vivi 1 FIR SIM FRI11,4r. AN& P Account Expenses 1110 S.4 a) w . iz,h U a) - = , -8mt •~ U aS • cA ?, ° •� bo cumEZ a3 0 74 vi g. 3w 0 18 .� Z 1. • O O .)) s� tt al LI tIV ct - . L ' 'mow a)� O•Q ai w 00ta o='cnvi •5 o c# 4. 0) o z°4 a)3 Et0 T .cn v) v) � Z a) a, E 0 . t t 0.) O ""' Z s4 U 2• v w WHAT IS THE COST? The table below shows the projected annual and monthly tax increases based on the taxable market value of residential or commercial property. S ..4% 'I ■Rn11u�; i Estimated Market Value $10Q,000 144/13,5* r, �159�000 200,000 _250,000 `- 500,000 1,000,000 Estimated Tax Impact/ Year $718 :. 315 1?27 436 645_' 1,090 _ 2,181 Estimated Tax Impact/ Month 26 .., ."Le27,. 36 .:45 __ 91 182• `Value of average home in District 196 POLLING PLACES AND ABSENTEE BALLOTS For election information, including locations of polling places and where to obtain absentee ballots, please call the Dakota County Auditor/Treasurer's Office at 651-438-4380. LEVY INFORMATION Additional information about the levy is available on the school district website at www.isd196.k12.mn.us or call the District 196 Levy Information Line at 651-423-7776. VOTE — November 7, 2000 Comm/Levy2000, Levy Brochure - 150 196 Graphics/8-15-00 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting C. DAKOTA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, RECOGNIZE CITY EFFORTS WITH WATER RESOURCES EDUCATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: No action required. FACTS: • The Dakota County Board of Commissioners has requested an opportunity to recognize the City of Eagan for being an active partner in helping to implement the 1994 Dakota County Water Resources Education Plan. • The City of Eagan has been an active partner in providing water resources education to residents of Dakota County since the plan was prepared in 1994. • Dakota County Commissioner Patrice Bataglia and Environmental Education Coordinator Charlotte Shover will be present at Tuesday's Council meeting to present a plaque to the City for its contribution to meeting countywide goals to protect water resources. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Seasonal Skating Instructor -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kelly Kratzke as a seasonal skating instructor. Item 2. Seasonal Recreation Leaders/Puppet Shows -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Damon Brook and Bret Hemmerlin as seasonal recreation leaders/puppet shows. Item 3. Resignation/Administrative Secretary/Deputy Clerk -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of resignation from Maria Karels, Administrative Secretary/Deputy Clerk. 9 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting B. CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 2000-01 MARKETING PLAN AND BUDGET ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the 2000-01 Marketing Plan and Budget for the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau. FACTS: • This item was heard by the Council at the September 19, 2000 City Council meeting. • Inadvertently, action was not taken at that meeting; therefore, it is on the agenda for approval at this time. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting C. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING, CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS — NOVEMBER 6, 2000 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set a public hearing for November 6, 2000 to consider the final assessment of the delinquent false alarm bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • On a semi-annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent false alarm balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. • The City currently has 13 delinquent accounts in the amount of $2392.50. Additional information will be provided at the time of the public hearing. /o Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting D. REOUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING CERTIFICATION OF DELINOUENT UTILITIES - NOVEMBER 6, 2000 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To schedule a public hearing for November 6, 2000 to consider certification of delinquent utility balances to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • On a semi-annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent utility balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. • The City currently has 315 delinquent accounts in the amount of $46,601.26. Additional information will be provided at the time of the public hearing. // Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting E. PURCHASING POLICY AMENDMENT — INCREASE THRESHOLD FOR CONTRACTUAL BIDDING TO $50,000 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To amend the City's purchasing policy to reflect the State's increase of the threshold at which contracts must be formally bid from $25,000 to $50,000. FACTS: • At its last session, the Minnesota Legislature amended Statute Section 471.345 by increasing the dollar threshold at which cities must solicit sealed bids for contracts from $25,000 to $50,000 effective August 1, 2000. • The City's purchasing policy typically has reflected State limits. The policy was last amended in 1992. • The current policy states "competitive bidding must be used when the amount of a contract is estimated to exceed $25,000 for the sale or purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance or real or personal property." The action to be considered changes the amount from $25,000 to $50,000. ATTACHMENTS: • Minnesota Session Laws — 2000, on pages ji through / . Minnesota Session Laws 2000, Chapter 328 Page 1 of 2 Minnesota Session Laws Minnesota Session Laws - 2000 Key: ...new language Change language enhancement display. Legislative history and Authors CHAPTER 328-S.F.No. 2905 An act relating to municipalities; increasing certain dollar limits in the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law; providing an exemption for certain cooperative purchasing; authorizing county purchases on credit cards; providing for personal liability for county officers and employees for unauthorized credit card purchases; amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 471.345, subdivisions 3, 4, and by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 375. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. [375.171] [CREDIT CARDS.] A county board may authorize the use of a credit card by any county officer or employee otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the county. If a county officer or employee makes a purchase by credit card that is not approved by the county board, the officer or employee is personally liable for the amount of the purchase. A purchase by credit card must otherwise comply with all statutes, rules, or county policy applicable to county purchases. Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 471.345, subdivision 3, is amended to read: Subd. 3. [CONTRACTS OVER $25,000 $35,000 FOR MUNICIPALITIES OF LESS THAN 2,500 POPULATION; $50,000 FOR ALL OTHERS.] If the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed ;447000 $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population, or $50,000 for all others, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject to the requirements of the law governing contracts by the particular municipality or class thereof provided that with regard to repairs and maintenance of ditches, bids shall not be required if the estimated amount of the contract does not exceed the amount specified in section 103E.705, subdivisions 5, 6, and 7. Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 471.345, subdivision 4, is amended to read: Subd. 4. [CONTRACTS FROM $10,000 TO $25,000 $35,000 FOR MUNICIPALITIES OF LESS THAN 2,500 POPULATION; $50,000 FOR ALL OTHERS.] If the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed $10,000 but not to exceed $25,004 $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population, or $50,000 for all others, the contract may be made either upon sealed bids or by direct negotiation, by obtaining two or more quotations for the purchase or sale when possible, and without advertising for bids or otherwise complying with the requirements of competitive bidding. All quotations obtained shall be kept on file for a period of at least one year after receipt thereof. Sec. 4 Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 471.345, is amended t adding a subdivision to read: /3 http://www.revisor.leg. r..e.mn.us/slaws/2000/c328.html 9/15/00 Minnesota Session Laws 2000, Chapter 328 Page 2 of 2 Subd. 15. [COOPERATIVE PURCHASING.] A municipality may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials, or equipment without regard to the competitive bidding requirements of this section if the purchase is through a national municipal association's purchasing alliance or cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that purchases items from more than one source on the basis of competitive bids or competitive quotations. Presented to the governor March 31, 2000 Signed by the governor April 4, 2000, 3:24 p.m. Pi' http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/slaws/2000/c328.html 9/15/00 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 F. PROJECT 806, KENNERICK ADDITION (POND HDP -1) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report by the City Engineer for Project 806 (Kennerick Addition, Pond HDP-1—Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet). FACTS: • On May 16, 2000, the City Council adopted the Public Works Department's 5 -Year Capitol Improvement Program (2001-2005) including the construction of a storm sewer outlet for Pond HDP -1 in 2001. This schedule anticipated the development of the proposed Kennerick Addition. • On September 15, city staff received a petition signed by Brad Swenson, developer of the Kennerick Addition, and Eileen Kennedy, 1415 Lone Oak Road, requesting the installation of a storm sewer outlet for Pond HDP -1 on the north side of Lone Oak Road (County Road 26), west of Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31). • City staff had previously encouraged the developer of the Kennerick Addition to have these storm sewer improvements installed as part of said development. Due to the proposed pond outlet improvements having an alignment that is not within the developer's property, the developer has chosen to request a public improvement to construct said outlet. • Based on the CIP schedule and the need for said pond outlet to enable the development of the Kennerick Addition, it would be appropriate for the City Council to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report to determine the scope, cost, schedule, and method of financing the construction of the requested storm sewer improvements. • All of the pond outlet improvements and associated work that staff is proposing to include within the feasibility report would be attributable to the Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. Trunk storm sewer assessments would be proposed to be levied against all of the adjacent properties, including the proposed development. ISSUES: • In signing the petition, the petitioners have stricken the portion of the standard form that guarantees the petitioners' payment for all costs incurred in the preparation of the feasibility report. ATTACHMENTS: • Petition, page g . PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION Ktnneric.k Adel►lion I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to FOR CI[Y USE ONLY Petition No. Date Received q-15- oo Presented to Council /D -. -nr1 Lone_ Oak Rd. (Street) or within Z e finder Acres Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply Storm Sewer Street Lights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements but, rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner AProperty of Proper 1. / S`/g. ('i -rt. , ��.�ii /mac ¢.- u� ) 1 •1`.1 -z � 01 /AO 1v YL W 7- , 2.el.,.kiy. �c _ I/We hereby waive our rights to the public hearing and request that detail plans and specifications be prepared simultaneously and also guarantee their respective costs if the project is not awarded. (Signature) (Signature) G: Forms&Lists/FeasdevFm.doc - 5/97 /6 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 G. PROJECT 751, DODD ROAD, CLIFF ROAD TO BUTWIN ROAD COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution requesting funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) through their Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for Project 751 (Dodd Road, Cliff Road to Butwin Road — Street & Utility Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The upgrade of Dodd Road, from Cliff Road to Butwin Road, including sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer improvements, as well as the street reconstruction to urban standards, is programmed for 2001 in the 5 -Year Capitol Improvement Program (2001-2005). • Three neighborhood meetings have been held regarding South Dodd Road since October 1998. The City Council has received comments and provided direction to staff in response to these meetings. • On June 29, 1999, the Council directed staff to include a street connection between Highway 3 and Dodd Road with an option to cul-de-sac the south end of Dodd Road as part of any future feasibility report. • On June 5, 2000, the City Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 751. • The alignment of a new street between Highway 3 and Dodd Road would intersect TH 3 at the Red Pine Lane traffic signal, and could include additional access management improvements. The addition of a fourth leg to this signalized intersection would eliminate the intersection of Todd Avenue with TH 3, in accordance with the Red Pine Lane traffic signal agreement completed between the City of Eagan and MnDOT in 1994. • Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2002. If the funding application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2001. ISSUES: • Although the City hasn't yet held the formal public hearing nor approved this project, the application for this funding does not commit the City to approving the project. However, the deadline for application for the 2002 fiscal year (July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002) funding cycle is October 15, 2000. If the City is successful in this funding application but the project is not approved, there are no penalties. ATTACHMENTS: • Cooperative Agreement Resolution, page RESOLUTION TH 3 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT City Project 751 WHEREAS: The City has prepared a Cooperative Agreement for a new street connection from Dodd Road to State Trunk Highway 3 at the existing signalized intersection of Red Pine Lane and TH 3; and WHEREAS: WHEREAS: Financial participation for the improvements is available from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement; and The City is committed to providing the local share of the costs if the project is selected by Mn/DOT for the fiscal year 2002 Cooperative Agreement program. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City of Eagan requests funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement. Dated this 3`d day of October, 2000. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Mayor Attest: Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Dakota City of Eagan I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Eagan at a meeting thereof held in the City of Eagan, Minnesota, on the 3" day of October, 2000, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. Deputy City Clerk • ir Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 H. CONTRACT 00-07, TRUNK HIGHWAY 13 4 -LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve Contract 00-07 (TH l3Blackhawk Road — Divided Four -Lane Upgrade) with Palda & Sons, Inc., for the Base Bid in the amount of $3,389,678.73, and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City of Eagan is the lead agency in partnership with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) in the proposed upgrade of State Trunk Highway 13 to a four -lane divided highway between Silver Bell Road and Yankee Doodle Road. • On May 6, 1997, the City Council authorized the upgrade of TH 13/Blackhawk Road Traffic Signal (Project 709R) and directed the preparation of detailed plans and specs. • On May 16, 2000, the Council approved the plans for Contract 00-07 and authorized the advertisement for solicitation of competitive bids. At 10:00 a.m. on August 8, formal bids were received for this project. • On August 15, the City Council forwarded said bids to the Minnesota Department of Transportation recommending formal approval of said contract and award to the successful low bidder. A copy of the bid tabulation is enclosed. • On September 8, the Minnesota Department of Transportation awarded said contract to Palda & Sons, Inc. • All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and accuracy on unit price extensions and summations by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid Tabulation, page ao . 1'/ BID SUMMARY Trunk Highway 13 Improvements S.P. 195-010-04 & S.P. 1901-137 City Contract No. 00-07 Bid Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2000 Bid Time: 10:00 a.m. Contractors Total Base Bid 1. Palda & Sons, Inc. $3,389,696 2. Valley Paving, Inc. $3,645,534 3. Danner, Inc. $3,732,799 4. Ames Construction, Inc. $3,735,019 5. Shafer Contracting, Inc. $3,774,475 6. Richard Knutson, Inc. $3,789,960 7. Hardrives, Inc. $3,869,849 8. Frattalone Excavating $4,159,463 9. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $4,195,651 10.Ryan Contracting, Inc. $5,999,644 Low Bid $3,389,696 Engineer's Estimate $3,672,188 Percent Under (-) Estimate -7.7% U Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 I. MURPHY FARM (LOT 2, BLOCK 21 EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the petition to vacate public right-of-way and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 6, 2000. FACTS: • On September 14, 2000, City staff received a letter from Joe Wright, 1693 Galway Lane, requesting the vacation of a portion of the existing rear lot drainage and utility easement on Lot 2, Block 2, northwest of the Deerwood Drive overpass of Interstate 35-E. • The drainage and utility easement was originally dedicated as part of the Murphy Farm plat as a typical rear lot easement for Lot 2. • The purpose of the request is to allow the Wright Family to construct a swimming pool in their backyard. The vacation of this portion of the drainage and utility easement would allow the construction of the pool deck in this area. • The request would vacate a 5' section of the existing 10' wide easement on Lot 2. The remaining 5' width is adequate for public drainage and utility easement purposes. • Notices will be published in the legal papers and sent to all potentially affected and/or interested parties for comment prior to the scheduled public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Legal Description Graphic, page aII) . • Petitioner's Letter, pages 3 and ay . Lot 9 AREA TO BE VACATED 1 L 0 Lot 1 Bock 2 Lot 2 #1693 /55/ I I I I II II I I L Galway Lane c) City of Eagan Proposed Drainage & Utility Easement Vacation Lot 2, Block 2, Murphy Farm 9-21-2000 Fig. 1 a FRRGD' Date: 9/14/00 To: John Gorda — Engineering Technician, City of Eagan Department of Public Works 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 From: Joe and Heather Wright, 1693 Galway Ln Eagan, Minnesota 55122 (651) 452-8187 Ref Petition to Vacate Easement Dear Mr. Gorda and the City of Eagan, I would like to thank you for your efforts in communicating the "process" for a petition to vacate easement. My wife and I are new to this type of procedure and appreciate the extra time and effort in explaining the process, preparing paperwork:: and listening to our concerns. Our goal is to add an in -ground pool to our backyard. My wife and I have two sons (Jake=3-1/2 & TJ=2) and identical twin boys on the way! (Due in December). With four boys and my wife home alone quite a bit, we need many activities to keep them busy. A pool will help solve some of these fun issues we will face. Our immediate concern is the ability to fit the pool in such a way that we still allow space for our kids to play ball, games and other activities on grass. By looking at the drawing provided, it makes the most sense for my family to fit the pool from the backside of our home extended to the lot line. This should provide us ample room for our pool, the surrounding cement and play area for our boys. Under the current Eagan guidelines, we have a (10ft) easement on the back lot line. At (l Oft), we do not have enough room to fit the size pool requested. We are asking for a vacant of easement to reflect a (5ft) requirement on the back lot line. This extra (5ft) will provide the necessary space to fit our pool and give our four boys the fun, room and space to grow. 6533 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA • (800) 459-5636 • (612) 941-9470 FAX: (612) 941-7836 • Web: www.fargo.com • E-mail: salesetfargo.com a3 FRRGO® Please consider our request and let me know if additional paperwork is needed. I value our relationship with Eagan, enjoy living in this suburb and will respect your final decision. My wife and I hope this decision will be in our favor. We hope to begin construction on the pool immediately— this fall if possible. If there is anyway we can help speed up the process to a decision we are glad to help. We do have neighbors with pools and some with prior approvals for (5ft) easements. I hope this helps your decision process. Thank you for all your help and we look forward to your reply. Joe, Heather, Jake, TJ, Twin Boy #1, Twin Boy #2 — The Wrights! 1693 Galway Ln, Eagan, MN 55122, 651-452-8187 6533 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA • (800) 459-5636 • (612) 941-9470 FAX: (612) 941-7836 • Wleb: www.fargo.com • E-mail: sales©fargo.com ay Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 J. CONTRACT 98-24, BLUE WATER ROAD/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the final payment for Contract 98-24 (Blue Water Road/ Blue Gentian Road - Street and Utility Improvements) in the amount of $87,622.59 to Northdale Construction Company, Inc. and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • Contract 98-24 provided for the new construction of the street and utilities for Blue Water Road as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report for Project 746 and a portion of the realigned Blue Gentian Road as presented in the feasibility report for Project 745. The installation of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer, as well as new street construction, was completed for the development of Grand Oak 2. • The improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. as Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting K. x. CHANGE ORDER #10, CASCADE BAY. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve Change Order #9 for Cascade Bay in the amount of $7,891.00. BACKGROUND This is the final closeout and completion of all punch list items associated with the final payment of Cascade Bay construction. FACTS: ■ Change depth markers from 4" to 6" per Health Department (Olympic Pools) $1,307.00 • Sawcut and add expansion joints in the Lazy River walls at the direction of the structural engineer. (Olympic Pools) 2,132.00 • Replace defective high limit switch on lower pool heater. (Olympic Pools) • Move temporary heat blankets during winter construction. These costs for additional expenses during winter construction have been challenged by the Construction Manager and staff. A compromise has been agreed to that splits the requested amount of $9,233. (Kellington) ATTACHMENTS: • None a6 (165.00) 4,617.00 Total $7,891.00 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting L elp, PROCLAMATION, MINNESOTA MANUFACTURERS WEEK OCTOBER 16-22, 2000 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To proclaim October 16-22 to be Manufacturers Week in the City of Eagan. FACTS: • Governor Ventura has proclaimed October 16-22 to be Minnesota Manufacturers Week and has invited communities around the State to recognize this event as well. • At the recommendation of the Economic Development Commission, a proclamation has been prepared in this regard. ATTACHMENTS: • Proclamation attached on page e(8 . CITY OF EAGAN PROCLAMATION MINNESOTA MANUFACTURERS WEEK WHEREAS, manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector in Minnesota. Providing $18 billion in 1998 wages; and WHEREAS, manufacturing produces $28.3 billion for the state economy and is the largest single share (18.9%) of our gross product; and WHEREAS, manufacturing exports brought nearly $9.2 billion into the Minnesota economy in 1999; and WHEREAS, manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs which significantly contribute to Minnesota's high standard of living and economic vitality; and WHEREAS, manufacturing contributed nearly $232 million in corporate income taxes in Minnesota, more than any other business sector, about 30 percent of total corporate income taxes in 1999: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council hereby proclaims the week of October 16-22 to be Minnesota Manufacturers Week in the City of Eagan. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk CERTIFICATION I, Maria Karels, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 3rd day of October, 2000. Maria Karels, City Clerk 028 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting M. RENEW AGREEMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SNOW AND ICE CONTROL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve a 2 -year extension to the agreements for Contractual Services for Winter Trail Maintenance with Kieger Enterprises and for Street Snow & Ice Control with Gallagher, Inc. FACTS: • In 1996, the City entered into an agreement with Kieger Enterprises for the winter maintenance of approximately 54 miles of City trailways. This contract was awarded based on a competitive solicitation of quotes. The agreement stipulates that the contract can be renewed annually with mutual consent of both parties. Since 1994, Kieger unit prices have increased by 3.0% in 1999 only. They are requesting an increase of approximately 5% for a 2 -year extension due to wage and fuel increases. They have provided excellent service and their contract extension request is being presented to the Council for favorable consideration. • In 1994, the City entered into an agreement with Gallagher, Inc., for the winter maintenance of approximately 15% of the City's street and cul-de-sac snow and ice control operations. This contract was originally awarded based on a competitive solicitation of quotes. The agreement stipulates that the contract can be renewed annually with mutual consent of both parties. Since 1994, Gallagher, Inc. has not increased their unit prices at all. They are presenting their first increase of approximately 5% for a 2 -year extension to cover increases in wages and fuel costs. They have provided excellent service and their contract extension request is being presented to the Council for favorable consideration. ATTACHMENTS: • Memos and extension request letters, pages 30 through . a9 city of eagan MEMO TO: Tom A. Colbert, Director of Public Works FROM: Arnie Erhart, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Contractual Street Snow Plowing - 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 Season For the past six snow seasons, we have contracted with Bill Gallagher to plow a portion of the City streets. During the 1999/2000 snow season, we contracted street plowing on eight snow events and received excellent results. I have received quotes from Bill Gallagher for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 snow seasons requesting an approximate 5% increase from last year's rates due to an increase in wages and fuel costs. He has guaranteed these rates through the spring of 2002. This is the first increase in six years. Recommendation I recommend that the City accept the quotes from Bill Gallagher and renew the street -plowing contract for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 snow seasons. The following types of equipment with accessories are to be used as directed by the City. Equipment Loader with s low Loader with bucket Tandem dump truck with plow, wing and underbod . low 1999/2000 $87.50/hr. $82.50/hr. $70.00/hr. 2000/2002 $91.50/hr. $86.50/hr. $73.50/hr. % Increase 2000/2001 2001/2002 4.57 4.85 5.00 0 0 0 Attachment 30 I:/ml/snow plowing contract 09/:72/2000 08:16 6125121 Gallaghers' Inc. 6125121 PAHLS SUPERETTE PAGE 01 • 23631 Natchei Ave r.ai eville Mn 55044 Phoric (r)52) 461-2453 Sept 21, 2000 Arnie Erhart City of Eagan Street Dept. 3501 Coachman Rd. Eagan, MN. 55122 Dear Mr. Erhart, Here is the up dated price list you requested from Gallaghers' Inc. for the 2000/2001 Snow plowing season. We are raising the prices to cover the increase in fuel costs. Loader with plow Loader with bucket Truck ( tandem ) $91.50 per hr. $86.50 per hr. $ 73.50 per hr Gallaghers' Inc. will guarantee these prices for two years. If you have any questions feel free to call us at 952-461-2453 or page Bill at 612-901-4670. Thank you for your business. Sincerely, Bill Gallagher Gallaghers' Inc. 3/ city of eagan MEMO TO: Tom A. Colbert, Director of Public Works FROM: Arnie Erhart, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Contractual Trail & Sidewalk Snow Plowing - 2000/2001 & 2001/2002 Season Kieger Enterprises has performed the contractual plowing of our trails and sidewalks for the last four snow seasons. With our expended program last season, there were 13 plowing events that were completed by Kieger. We received excellent service from Kieger and many positive comments from our residents. I have received quotes from Kieger for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 snow season requesting an approximate 5% increase from last year's rates due to an increase in wages and fuel. They have guaranteed these rates through the spring of 2002. Recommendation I recommend that the City accept the quotes from Kieger Enterprises and renew the trail plowing contract for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 snow seasons. The following types of equipment with accessories are to be used as directed by the City. Equipment 1999/2000 $48.50/hr. 2000/2002 $51.00/hr. % Increase 2000/2001 5.15 2001/2002 0 John Deere 855 w/Plow John Deere 855 wBroom $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 John Deere 855 w/Blower $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 Trackless MT/Holder w/Plow $48.50/hr. $51.00/hr. 5.15 0 Trackless MT/Holder w/ Broom $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 Trackless MT/Holder w/Blower $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 Truck w/Hydro Turn Plow $40.50/hr. $42.50/hr. 4.90 0 Truck wN Plow $50.50/hr. $53.00/hr. 4.95 0 1 Ton Truck w/Hydro Tum Plow $50.50/hr. $53.00/hr. 4.95 0 1 Ton Truck wN Plow $60.50/hr. $63.50/hr. 4.96 0 Posi Track w/Plow $48.50/hr. $51.00/hr. 5.15 0 Posi Track w/Broom $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 Posi Track w/Blower $84.50/hr. $88.50/hr. 4.70 0 Skid Steer w/Plow $48.50/hr. $51.00/hr. 5.15 0 Skid Steer w/Broom $58.50/hr. $61.25/hr. 4.70 0 Skid Steer w/Blower $84.50/hr. $88.50/hr. 4.70 0 Attachment .3a I:/ml/snow plowing ontract2 FROM : KIEGER ENTERPRISES INC ENTERPRISES 651 429 3330 PHONE NO. : 651 429 3330 Sep. 22 2000 10:59AM P1 KIEGER INCORPORATED Corporate Offices: 5885 165th Street North, Hugo, Minnesota 55038 • Phone 651-426-0033 • Fax 651-429-3330 September 19, 2000 City Of Eagan Arnie Erhart 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651-681-4300 Fax 651-681-4360 Snow Season Rates 1999/2000 John Deere 855 w/ Plow John Deere 855 w/ Broom John Deere 855 w/ Blower Trackless MT / Holder w/ Plow Trackless MT / Holder w/ Broom Trackless MT / Holder w/ Blower Truck w/ Hydro Turn Plow Truck w/ V Plow 1 Ton Truck w/ Hydro Turn Plow 1 Ton Truck w/ V Plow Posi Track w/ Plow Posi Track w/ Broom Posi Track w/ Blower Skid Steer w/ Plow Skid Steer w/ Broom Skid Steer w/ Blower Above pricing is valid thru Spring of 2002_ $48.50/hr $58.50/hr $58.50/hr $48.50/hr 558.50/hr $58.50/hr $40.50/hr $50.50/hr $50.50/hr $60.50/hr $48.50/hr $58.50/hr $84.50/hr $48.50/hr $58.50/1ur $84.50/hr Please feel free to call me at 651-426-0033 with any questions. working with you again this season. General Manager 24 HOUR SERVICE NAT/ONW DE 1-800-426-0033 '1 Disaster Response Services • Wildiand Fire Services • Equipment Rental • Commercial Sweeping • Construction Specialties 33 2000/2002 $51.00/br $61.25/hr $61.25/hr $51.00/hr $61.25/hr $61.25/hr $42.50/hr $53.00/hr S53.00/hr $63.50/hr $51.00/hr $61.25/1u $88.50/hr $51.00/hr S61.25/hr $88.50/hr I look forward to 24 HOUR SERVICE 1-800-426-0033 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting N. COMPLETION OF CASCADE BAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the completion of principal construction and contracting of the Cascade Bay facility, with the exception of the landscaping contract. FACTS: • There are no construction projects remaining on the facility that lie within the scope of the original project. • Cascade Bay has recently completed its second year of operation. • Landscaping contracts have not yet been completed. ATTACHMENTS: • None 3y Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting O. APPROVE LIST OF JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000 GENERAL ELECTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the list of election judges for the November 7, 2000 General Election. ATTACHMENTS: • Attached on pages _ _ ___ through 94 is the list of election judges for the General Election. 3s November 7th, 2000 - General Election Judges Last Name First Name Agrimson Lois Amundson Gen Amundson Leo Astleford Sharon Bahr Darlene Baker Marion Barabas Kathy Bari Joseph Bassett Elizabeth Beatty Dick Bellile Grover Benjamin Patti Black Neal Bohlig Joan Bolke Alyce Brastad Vivian Breuer Penny Bruce Larry Bruce Eleanore Bruce Sharon Thursday, September 28, 2000 344 Page 1 of 11 Last Name First Name Busch Margaret Byrnes Gladys Carlson Delores Casselman Jeanne Christensen Clarence Christensen Trudy Christopherson Judy Collier Harold Combs Pam Cook Larry Danner Margo Defrang Marilyn DeJoy Pat Denny Kelly Dodge Gerianne Driscoll James Dzielsky Shirley Engen Bonny Erickson Cyndi Erickson Dave Erickson Nancy Thursday, September 28, 2000 3? Page 2 of 11 Last Name First Name Erikstrup Grace Erikstrup Carl Fairchild Caralyne Fink Linda Fischer Elaine Fischer Gretchen Fischer Charles Flood Karen Flynn Angie Foster Linda Fournier Karen Fredlund Roger Fredlund Ellen Frost Thomas Frost Celia Gary David Geagan Sue Giblin Don Giblin Maureen Gignac Millie Glander Judith Thursday, September 28, 2000 3 8' Last Name First Name Glander Charles Gobar Debbie Goetz Ruth Good Patti Goodell Dave Grimmer Eleanor Guetzlaff Marti Hagen Lori Hamernik Frank Hansen Mari Hansen Judy Hansen Paul Harmon Jean Hartleben Mildred Hash Herdis Hash Orlando Hausladen Nancy Hausladen Ray Hawley Judy Hazel Kim Healy Bea xL*s+nx! 3rs�0vti6igCseFw:R'caa'.e�ei•cxvSYn•..� � .-..... e�. ; �>..3� .• > a..w•.s..a, a'Rs,. �_;6.va+� . ,v -x rt\r -:� .�w . - - _ S .sem .: "e-.;�},y. <.. p -x-: �.L 'vryk#�:s0i� •: .rY.nx;�C±YA9.o'm Thursday, September 28, 2000 Page 4 of I1 .39 Last Name First Name Heir Donna Hetterick Dave Hiremath Sunil Hove Ruby Hove Luther Huard Marian Hubbard Marlys Hval Norman Iffert Richard Jabbra Vickie Jackson Betty Jackson James W. Jacobs Marge Jadoonath Mona Johnson Lucia Johnson Meribeth Johnson Penny Jones Carolee Kaeder Patricia Kahn Carrie Kahn Joseph Thursday, September 28, 2000 Page 5 of 11 Last Name First Name Kaufman -Boom Julie Kennedy Helen Kimber Jean Kivi Deanna Klang Shirlee Koehler Jeanne Koehn David Kreitz Alice Krisnik Yvonne Kuehn Jan Kuller Abbey Lane Marie Larson Sonya Larson Pat LaVictoire James Lawrence Walter Lee Lorene Leean Don Legler Herb Legler Marilyn Leibel Arlene Thursday, September 28, 2000 9/ Page 6 of 11 Last Name First Name LeMay Bernice LeMay Richard Lund Donald Lundstrom Sue Lyness Dick Mackey Betty Manthey Phyllis Markee Wayne Mazierski Roseanne McGuire Mary McKinley Sue McLaughlin Laverne Meckley Robert Medin Emily Meyer Jennifer Miller Sharon Minor Eleanor Mirick Zelia Molitor Larane Munson Ruth Myers Christine Thursday, September 28, 2000 Page 7of11 Last Name First Name Nelson June Nelson Judy Nicolay Richard Nicolay Virginia Nitti Clarice Ohm Eldoris Opris Dorothy Otterness Evelyn Paskett Jim Paul Patti Pedersen Mary Jane Pellerin Margaret Perin Ruth Peterson Judy Poppler Pat Porter Marilyn Ramsey Betty Rask Pat Reisdorfer Stan Reisdorfer Kathy Restad Arlen Thursday, September 28, 2000 y3 Page 8 of 11 Last Name First Name Reyman Pat Ricke Patricia Rieger Lorraine Roach Ann Ruzicka Martie Saima Judy Sandison Betty Schmitz Pam Sebert Christine Sektnan Donald Severson Jody Shay Sheila Sirotiak Andrew Smith Nancy Speranza Marlene Squiers Phyllis Stark Lorraine Struble Dawn Swedean Dick Swedean Joyce Taylor Ceylon Thursday, September 28, 2000 Page 9 of I1 1,7Y Last Name First Name Thomas Ann Thurston Carolyn Twomey Ruth Uecker Karen Uselmann Joan Vandyck Lois Vihovde Carol Vihovde Fred Vimr Rose Vogel Bob Volk Ardith Vondelinde Sue Vossen Betty Wachtler Gloria Wagner Bonnie Washington Mary Waters Coni Wilkes Anthony Winder Dan Wisnew Frank Witzell Diane Thursday, September 28, 2000 Last Name First Name Wolff Lisa Woolley Marilyn Zimmerman Robert Thursday, September 28, 2000 Page 11 of 11 i-/‘ Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting A. TAX RATE CERTIFICATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Resolution Authorizing a Tax Rate Increase for the 2000 Tax Levy, Collectible in 2001. FACTS: • A law passed by the 1999 Legislature requires that all cities over 500 population and all counties must pass a resolution if the tax levy is increased from the prior year. The resolution must be adopted at a public hearing. • Since the required calculation completed by the county auditor uses the proposed levy compared to the previous year's levy, nearly every city over 500 population will be required to pass the resolution. • The resolution must be filed with the County Auditor by October 20 of each year. If a city or county fails to file the resolution, the county auditor is prohibited from spreading a higher levy, except in a few very specific situations. • If a city files the resolution, it may still certify a final levy that is the same as or lower than the prior year levy. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page qy is a copy of the resolution. 97 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION Authorizing a Tax Rate Increase for the 2000 Tax Levy, Collectible in 2001 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the County Auditor is authorized to fix a property tax rate for taxes payable in the year 2001 that is higher than the tax rate calculated pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §275.078 for the City for taxes levied in 1999, collectible in 2000. Adoption of this resolution does not prohibit the City from certifying a final levy that will result in no tax rate increase or a tax rate decrease. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Dakota County, Minnesota. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: CERTIFICATION Its Deputy Clerk I, Maria Karels, Deputy Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 3rd day of October, 2000. Maria Karels, Deputy Clerk Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 B. PROJECT 790, CENTRAL PARKWAY STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve Project 790 (Central Parkway—Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications, and authorize the acquisition of right of way through quick take condemnation, if necessary. FACTS: • On April 17, 2000, city staff received a petition from Robert Falk, representing Duke -Weeks Realty, requesting the installation of sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer improvements, as well as street construction and street lighting, for the development of the Perron and Country Joe Miller properties west of Lockheed Martin, near the corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. • On April 18, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule of the new street construction of Central Parkway between Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) and Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31), including utility improvements to serve the adjacent developing properties. • On June 6, the residents of Eagan passed a tax referendum for the construction of a community center on the property the City of Eagan acquired from Duke -Weeks Realty north of the Central Parkway alignment. • On September 5, the feasibility report for Project 790 was presented to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for October 3 to formally present and discuss the report with the neighborhood. • An informational meeting was held on September 21 at 3:00 p.m. at City Hall. Of the 4 Research and Development parcels and 1 Agricultural parcel proposed to be assessed, 11 persons attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages (Qthrough 9� • Letters from Property Representatives, pages 94 through 98 . 4,1bib city of acigen FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT FOR CENTRAL PARKWAY CITY PROJECT NO. 790 AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY CITY PROJECT NO. 768 EAGAN, MINNESOTA REVIEWED BY: City of Eagan Departm t of Public Works City of E: gan Finance Department SRF SEPTEMBER 2000 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �-�� M tthew D. Hansen Date: '9 - � 7 - -t 0 o o Reg No. 21364 SRF No. 0003840 :C ONSULTING GROUP, INC. One Carlson Parkway, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 • (612) 475-0010 Pli CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Transportation • Civil • Structural • Environmental • Planning • Traffic • Landscape Architecture • Parking SRF No. 0003840 September 26, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: SUBJECT: CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY PROPOSED STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EAGAN PROJECT No. 790 AND 768 Enclosed, please find the Feasibility Study Report for Street and Utility Improvements for Central Parkway and Northwood Parkway. The project proposed herein is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plans, and is feasible from an engineering standpoint. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council, staff and other interested parties to review any aspect of this report. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 74-1444<-- tthew D. Hansen, P.E. Senior Associate Ive 'James R. Dvorak, P.E. Vice President MDH/JRD/b1s Enclosure One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Telephone (763) 475-0010 • Fax (763) 475-2429 • http://www.srfconsulting.com An Equal Opportunity Employer CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 790 AND 768 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Page No. I. Introduction 1 II. Summary and Recommendations 2 III. Project Description 3 A. Street Improvements 3 B. Storm Sewer Improvements 6 C. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Improvements 7 IV. Right -of -Way and Easements 9 V. Permits 10 VI. Estimated Costs 11 Table 2 — Estimated Costs 11 VII. Affected Properties 12 VIII. Assessments 13 IX. Revenue Sources 14 X. Project Schedule 15 APPENDIX • Preliminary Engineers Cost Estimate • Assessment Summary and Calculations • Figure 1— Project Location Map • Figure la — Project Area Map • Figure 2 — Proposed Street and Storm Sewer Improvements • Figure 3 — Proposed Typical Street Section • Figure 4 — Proposed Landscaped Typical Section • Figure 4a — Heavily -Landscaped Median Option • Figure 5 — Proposed Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Improvements • Figure 6 — Assessment Parcel Map • Traffic Study Report 3a I. INTRODUCTION A Feasibility Study has been authorized by the Eagan City Council to consider proposed roadway and utility improvements. The study area is located north of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Interstate 35E and includes the construction of Central Parkway (City Project No. 790) and Northwood Parkway (City Project No. 768) (see figures 1 and la). The proposed improvements are necessitated to accommodate the proposed development of the Eagan Community Center, Duke Weeks property, and the expansion of the Glen Pond Apartments. These improvements are consistent with recommendations to complete the proposed ring road as described in the Yankee Doodle Corridor/Ring Road Traffic Study prepared for the City by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in April of 1994. This report identifies the construction of streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main necessary to serve the proposed community center and developments while maintaining safety, mobility, and adequate access to adjacent properties. This report also estimates preliminary construction costs as well as potential assessments to adjacent properties. S3 II. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS City Project Nos. 790 and 768 as outlined herein, are feasible from an engineering standpoint. The proposed roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main improvements are consistent with the recommendations outlined in a previously completed traffic study (City of Eagan Yankee Doodle Corridor/Ring Road Traffic Study, April 8, 1994). The improvements also follow recommendations contained in the Traffic Study Report prepared for the project area (included in Appendix). The improvements are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan and Utility Plans. The estimated cost of City Project No. 790 is $4,238,800 and City Project No. 768 is $1,456,200 (see Preliminary Engineers Cost Estimate in the Appendix). The following recommendations are presented for the Council's consideration: • It is recommended that the City Council receive the Feasibility Study and schedule a public hearing for the proposed project to consider proceeding with the project, as the project is necessary to provide street and utility service to the adjacent developments. • It is recommended that the City of Eagan review this report with Dakota County to discuss possible funding participation and initiate the permit process. • It is recommended that, if approved, the City of Eagan begin the right-of-way and easement acquisition process in order to meet the schedule of the proposed adjacent developments. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City of Eagan is planning the construction of a community center on a 60 -acre site west of Pilot Knob Road and north of Lockheed -Martin. Duke Weeks has prepared a business park development plan north of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Lockheed Martin. The previously mentioned traffic study report (Yankee Doodle Corridor/Ring Road Improvements, 1994) described improvements to the Yankee Doodle/Pilot Knob area of Eagan including the addition of collector streets to serve as relievers to Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. The current traffic study report (see Appendix) identifies roadway improvements necessary to serve the development and to complete an important link in the ring road concept. These improvements include the construction of Central Parkway and Northwood Parkway, as well as a traffic signal at the Pilot Knob Road and Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway intersection (currently High Site Drive). 1. Central Parkway (City Project No. 790) Central Parkway is the proposed segment of the ring road concept northwest of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. Currently, there is a two lane private access road around the north and west boundaries of the Lockheed -Martin property (Lot 1, Block 1 Unisys Park 2nd Addition). A portion of the east -west leg has curb and gutter and is directly adjacent to the north end of the Lockheed -Martin parking lot. The north -south leg is a rural design bituminous roadway approximately 25 feet wide. Under City Project No. 790, it is proposed to construct Central Parkway along the same general alignment as the private access road (see figure 2). Central Parkway is proposed to be a divided 58 -foot wide, 10 -ton bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter and a raised landscaped median with a 10 -foot bituminous trail on the west and north side only. (see figures 3 and 4). Turn lanes will be provided at major intersections as recommended in the traffic study report (see Appendix). The proposed alignment will be centered within a 115 -foot to 140 -foot right-of-way corridor, and has been located to minimize impacts to the adjacent parcels. The side slopes of the proposed roadway can be as steep as 2:1 with landscaped retaining walls, thus minimizing impacts to adjacent wetland and tree areas. In conjunction with the roadway construction, it will be necessary to re -align and reconstruct portions of existing driveways to maintain proper access for adjacent property owners (see figure 2). It will also be necessary to widen approximately 600 feet of Federal Drive south of Yankee Doodle Road to allow for proper intersection geometrics with Central Parkway. Full access (allowing both right and left turns in and out of a property) is proposed at three (3) locations: The Lockheed -Martin north parking lot, the Lockheed -Martin west parking lot (intersection with a potential new east -west public roadway) and the new community center site. In order to improve safety and to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) in traffic operations, the installation of a traffic signal is proposed at the Central Parkway and Pilot Knob Road intersection as recommended in the traffic study report (see Appendix). Central Parkway is proposed to be a pedestrian -friendly corridor with landscaped medians and boulevards complimented with trees, trail lighting and roadway lighting (see figure 4). The City may wish to consider the option of constructing a heavily landscaped median to add to the aesthetics of the Parkway and to discourage pedestrians from crossing at uncontrolled areas (see figure 4a). As part of the planned Community Center, the City may enter into cross -parking agreements with Lockheed -Martin to allow public parking on the Lockheed -Martin property during certain City events. The option of constructing a pedestrian underpass to convey pedestrians from the Lockheed -Martin parking area to the Community Center site under Central Parkway was looked at, and due to the sanitary sewer conflict, the cost was deemed prohibitive. The estimated cost for the Central Parkway street improvements, including 50 percent of the traffic signal at Pilot Knob Road and 100 percent of the traffic signal at Yankee Doodle Road is $2,920,100. 2. Northwood Parkway (City Project No. 768) Under City Project No. 768, Northwood Parkway is proposed to be constructed from Pilot Knob Road to the east and southeast to existing Mn/DOT Right -of -Way for Interstate 35E (see figure 2). Future C,‘ construction as discussed in the previously described traffic study (Yankee Doodle Corridor/Ring Road Traffic Study, 1994) will extend Northwood Parkway via a proposed bridge over Interstate 35E. Northwood Parkway will be a 40 -foot wide, 10 -ton roadway with concrete curb and gutter and 10 -foot bituminous trails on both sides of the roadway (see figure 3). In order to improve safety and provide an acceptable intersection LOS, turn lanes and the installation of a traffic signal are proposed, as discussed previously, for the Pilot Knob Road and Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway intersection. The alignment will be centered within a 100 -foot to 105 -foot right-of-way corridor to be dedicated as part of the Glen Ponds — Phase II Development. The proposed alignment is located to minimize the impacts on the adjacent wetland at Pilot Knob Road and to coincide with the future alignment of the Northwood Parkway Bridge across Interstate 35E. Northwood Parkway is proposed to be complemented with landscaped boulevards and roadway and trail lighting. High Site Drive is proposed to be realigned to intersect Northwood Parkway approximately 300 feet east of Pilot Knob Road to provide adequate room for turn lanes on Northwood Parkway and to reduce the intersection skew. Also, Sherman Court will be extended north to intersect with Northwood Parkway and Marice Drive will be removed and vacated from Sherman Court to High Site Drive. This realignment will increase the intersection distance west from the future Northwood Parkway Bridge, and minimize the embankment construction on adjacent roadways as the profile for Northwood Parkway will be raised considerably to match the required future bridge profile. Also, it will be necessary to realign and reconstruct the underground parking driveway for the existing Glen Pond Apartment complex (see figure 2). The estimated cost for the Northwood Parkway street improvements, including 50 -percent of the traffic signal at Pilot Knob Road, and all grading costs, is $1,200,800. Right-of-way and related acquisition costs incurred to date are approximately $170,000. 5 S7 B. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Construction of an urban roadway with curb and gutter requires that the drainage of the roadway and surrounding area be accommodated. Therefore, storm sewer systems are proposed to be included in City Project Nos. 790 and 768 (see figure 2). 1. Central Parkway (City Project No. 790) The proposed Central Parkway roadway lies almost entirely within drainage Subdistrict C-18, as outlined in the Eagan Stormwater Management Plan (1990). The existing storm sewer system provides a gravity outlet of Pond CP -5 (Glen Pond Apartments) that discharges into Pond CP -4 within the City Community Center site. The Lockheed -Martin property also drains directly into Pond CP -4. Currently, there is not an outlet for Pond CP -4. It is proposed under City Project No. 790 to construct a storm sewer system to accommodate storm runoff from the Central Parkway improvements. Runoff will be directed into proposed and existing detention basins, removing the majority of sediment. The proposed ponds will be designed to 100 -year rainfall recurrence standards to accommodate the roadway and adjacent drainage area prior to discharging into Pond CP -4. The existing stormwater system which provides an outlet for Pond CP -5 and collects runoff from Lockheed -Martin will remain in place. Additionally, as discussed for stormwater District C in the Eagan Stormwater Management Plan (1990), a stormwater lift station will be required for Pond CP -4 due to adjacent development. As recommended, this lift station will provide a direct outlet from Pond CP -4 and discharge stormwater to Pond CP -3 (along the west edge of the community center site), which ultimately discharges to Pond CP -9 and ultimately the Minnesota River. The estimated cost of the Central Parkway lateral storm sewer system proposed under this project is $271,100. The cost for the trunk stormwater lift station and force main from Pond CP -4 to Pond CP 3 is $194,900. 2. Northwood Parkway (City Project No. 768) The proposed Northwood Parkway project area lies almost entirely within Drainage Subdistrict C-19, as outlined in the Eagan Stormwater Management Plan (1990). Local drainage is directed into Pond CP -5 that discharges into Pond CP -4. The proposed improvements to Northwood Parkway require that a storm sewer system be provided to convey water from the street and adjacent drainage area. The Northwood Parkway storm sewer system will discharge directly into Pond CP -5. The estimated cost of the Northwood Parkway storm sewer system proposed under this project is $85,400. C. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Sanitary sewer and water service are currently in place along the perimeter of the project area (see figure 5). A 15 -inch trunk sanitary sewer system exists along the north boundary of Lockheed -Martin. A 12 -inch line which services areas north of the project area connects with the 15 -inch trunk sanitary sewer northerly of the proposed Duke Weeks site. A 9 -inch sanitary line parallels the northerly side of Yankee Doodle Road and crosses southerly to provide service to the Surrey Heights Addition. Both Mance Drive and High Site Drive have 9 -inch sanitary sewers and 8 -inch water mains which encompass the Glen Pond Apartment site. Water main is available to the proposed Community Center and the Duke Weeks site via a 10 -inch water main that extends through the Lockheed -Martin site. An 18 -inch water main exists within Coachman Road and a 16 -inch water main exists within Pilot Knob Road. 7 9 1. Central Parkway (City Project No. 790) Under City Project No. 790, it is proposed to provide water main and sanitary sewer service to the Community Center and to the Duke Weeks development. It is proposed to connect into the existing 10 -inch water main located on the Lockheed -Martin site and extend water main west and north within Central Parkway to the Community Center entrance. The main water line will be 10 -inch ductile iron pipe with 8 -inch service lines. A 10 -inch water main is also proposed to be extended to the new parcel in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Central Parkway (Duke Weeks), and along the future roadway to the Perron property. Hydrants will be provided as required by City Standards (see figure 5). The Community Center and most of Duke Weeks will be provided sanitary service lines from the existing 15 -inch trunk sanitary sewer lines (see figure 5). An 8 -inch sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended easterly along the north side of Yankee Doodle Road to serve the new parcel in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Central Parkway and the Perron property. The sanitary sewer service lines are proposed to be 8 -inch PVC pipe. The estimated cost for water main proposed under City Project No. 790 is $76,700. The estimated cost for sanitary sewer service for City Project No. 790 is $41,100. 2. Northwood Parkway (City Project No. 768) Sanitary sewer and water main service to the proposed Glen Pond Apartments will connect into the existing lines in Marice Drive. These connections will be included under the proposed Glen Pond Apartments development. Neither water main nor sanitary sewer extensions are proposed under City Project No. 768. 8 60 IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS Permanent right-of-way, permanent drainage and utility easements and temporary construction easements will be required from properties along the proposed Central Parkway. The approximate right-of-way and drainage and utility needs are summarized in Table 1 and shown in figure 6. During final design, any temporary easements required to complete the project will be identified and obtained. Right-of-way and easements for the proposed Northwood Parkway are assumed to be dedicated as part of the Effress 2nd Addition (Glen Ponds) final plat. TABLE 1 Estimated Right -of -Way and Easements City Project Nos. 790 and 768 Central Parkway and Northwood Parkway PARCEL (3) PERMANENT RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA (ft2) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA (ft2) F 143,700 37,700 G 94,200 2,100 I(') 8,200 -0- K(1) 109,000 -0- L(2) 21,000 -0- M(2) 18,900 10,300 N(2) 115,400 2,500 p(2) -0- 4,100 R 200 -0- S 200 -0- (1) (2) (3) Right -of -Way and Drainage and Utility Easements to be dedicated by the developer of the property. City Property Parcel Designations correspond to those shown on Figure 6, Assessment Parcel Map. 9 g V. PERMITS A permit from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) will be required for the sanitary sewer construction, and a permit from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will be required for the water main construction. A permit from the Dakota County Highway Department will be required for the construction of the traffic signals in Pilot Knob Road (CSAH 31) and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28). A wetland permit from the Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) will be required for any construction that impacts wetland areas. VI. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated cost of City Project Nos. 790 and 768 are summarized in Table 2. The total project cost is based on a preliminary construction cost estimate including a 10 percent contingency, plus an additional 30 percent for legal, administrative, engineering design and inspection, contract administration and capitalized interest. A detailed estimate of preliminary construction costs is included in the Appendix. TABLE 2 Estimated Costs City Project Nos. 790 and 768 Central Parkway and Northwood Parkway IMPROVEMENT COST CITY PROJECT No. 790 CENTRAL PARKWAY CITY PROJECT No. 768 NORTHWOOD PARKWAY Streets $2,598,300 $1,093,500 Traffic Signal $ 321,800 $ 107,300 Lateral Storm Sewer $ 271,100 $ 85,400 Sanitary Sewer $ 41,100 -0- Water Main $ 76,700 -0- Storm Sewer Lift Station $ 194,900 -0- Right-of-Way/Easements $ 734,900 $ 170,000 SUBTOTAL $4,238,800 $1,456,200 TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,695,000 ‘3 VII. AFFECTED PROPERTIES The properties in the area that are affected by the proposed improvements and require notification of the public hearing are listed as follows (see Figure 6 for parcel identification). PARCEL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION E 10-00900-010-79 Unplatted (Perron Property) F 10-79951-021-01 Lot 2, Block 1, Unisys Park 2nd Addition G 10-79951-010-01 Lot 1, Block 1, Unisys Park 2nd Addition Hcl> 10-23100-021-01 Lot 2, Block 1, Effress Addition I(l) 10-23100-020-02 Lot 2, Block 2, Effress Addition Jo) 10-23100-010-02 Lot 1, Block 2, Effress Addition Kw 10-23100-011-02 Lot 1, Block 2 Effress Addition Lc' 10-23100-030-03 Lot 3, Block 3 Effress Addition M(2) 10-79951-022-01 Lot 2, Block 1 Unisys Park 2nd Addition N(2) 10-79951-023-01 Lot 2, Block 1 Unisys Park 2nd Addition O 10-79950-020-01 Lot 2, Block 1 Unisys Park p(2) 10-79951-024-01 Lot 2, Block 1 Unisys Park 2nd Addition R 10-72995-020-01 Lot 2, Block 1 Bicentennial 2nd Addition S 10-14001-010-01 Lot 1, Block 1 Surrey Gardens T(4) 10-79950-030-01 Lot 3, Block 1, Unisys Park (1) These properties are to be re -platted under the Effress 2nd Addition plat. (2) City Property. (3) Unisys Property located at 3199 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Minnesota. (4) Northwest Airlines Property located at 1500 Tower Drive, Eagan, Minnesota. VIII. ASSESSMENTS A. Assessment Summary The cost of City Project No. 790 is proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties on a front -foot basis. Street and lateral storm sewer improvements will be assessed to the Duke Weeks and Perron properties for Duke Weeks' frontage, and assessed at a rate based on area. Sanitary and water utility improvements will be assessed 100 percent to only the benefiting properties. No street improvements will be assessed to the Lockheed -Martin property as a result of a previous agreement between the City and Lockheed -Martin. However, Lockheed -Martin will be assessed the cost of upsizing the lateral storm sewer in Central Parkway used to accommodate their site runoff. Trunk storm sewer charges are proposed to be assessed to the properties of Lockheed -Martin, Unisys, Northwest Airlines and Duke Weeks based on the established rate for these properties. The property owners affected by City Project No 768 will not be assessed as a result of a previous agreement with the City. B. Assessment Financing Options At the time of the Assessment Hearing, property owners will have the option of paying any portion of the assessment following the Assessment Hearing or, including the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included in the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over a 15 -year period at an interest rate determined by the bond sale financing this improvement. IX. REVENUE SOURCES Revenue to cover the costs of City Project Nos. 790 and 768 are estimated as follows: CITY PROJECT NO. 790 Note: Refer to the Assessment Calculations and Assessment Summary in the Appendix for specific assessment revenue. CITY PROJECT No. 768 PROJECT COST ASSESSMENT REVENUE CITY CONTRIBUTION COUNTY CONTRIBUTION CENTRAL PARKWAY A. Streets $2,598,300 $ 716,500 $1,881,800 -0- B1. Traffic Signal (Yankee Doodle Rd.) $ 214,500 -0- $ 107,250 $107,250 B2. Traffic Signal (Pilot Knob Road) $ 107,300 -0- $ 53,650 $ 53,650 C. Storm Sewer $ 271,100 $ 108,100 $ 163,000 -0- D. Sanitary Sewer $ 41,100 $ 37,400 $ 3,700 -0- E. Water Main $ 76,700 $ 56,000 $ 20,700 -0- F. Storm Sewer Lift Station $ 194,900 $ 763,000 -0- -0- G. Right-of-Way/Easements $ 734,900 $ 202,600 $ 532,300 -0- Total $4,238,800 $1,883,600 $2,762,400 $160,900 Note: Refer to the Assessment Calculations and Assessment Summary in the Appendix for specific assessment revenue. CITY PROJECT No. 768 14 66 PROJECT COST ASSESSMENT REVENUE CITY CONTRIBUTION COUNTY CONTRIBUTION NORTHWOOD PARKWAY A. Streets $1,093,500 -0- $1,093,500 -0- B. Traffic Signal (Pilot Knob Road) $ 107,300 -0- $ 53,650 $53,650 C. Storm Sewer $ 85,400 -0- $ 85,400 -0- D. Right-of-Way/Easements $ 170,000 -0- $ 170,000 -0- Total $1,456,200 -0- $1,402,550 $53,650 14 66 X. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for City Project Nos. 790 and 768 are as follows: Present Feasibility Study Report to the City Council Neighborhood Meeting Hold Public Hearing. City Council authorize preparation of plans and specifications and right-of-way acquisition. Approve Plans and Specifications Right-of-way acquisition complete Advertise for Bids Open Bids Award Contract Begin construction Substantial construction complete Final construction complete Hold Assessment Hearing First payment due with real estate taxes 15 id 7 September 5, 2000 September 21, 2000 October 3, 2000 January 2001 February 2001 February 2001 March 2001 March 2001 April 2001 November 2001 June 2002 Summer 2002 May 2003 APPENDIX • Preliminary Engineers Cost Estimate • Assessment Summary and Calculations • Figure 1 — Project Location Map • Figure la — Project Area Map • Figure 2 — Proposed Street and Storm Sewer Improvements • Figure 3 — Proposed Typical Street Sections • Figure 4 — Proposed Landscaped Typical Section • Figure 4a — Heavily -Landscaped Median Option • Figure 5 — Proposed Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Improvements • Figure 6 —Assessment Parcel Map • Traffic Study Report 0 r 0 w F Q 2 Q CA g m z W 0 n a O J r F 0�I- 2 O } W ~F az CP A z r W O o. u D a 67Q 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION X 1- § N S 24,750 I S 14.500 O< NNNC, MNNN O N§? 5 4,400 I S 2.800 O N N O§ N N S 84.800 S 96.100 S 193,500 f 7.875 OO Qvi , N 0 O§ p pNNNN,NN S 199,500 S 5,320 S 7.875 S 38,400 O O§ Q V N N n f 4,920 S 129.375 N O N N O § NNe N b N N 8 7,200 100 §ocv °0-0- N,_�m8N8Mt0O ttf 1QigOIpO ri mg'vr vi8 -p e-(O.-� -•ay.tai0,0 gZON -AS _ N 8 8 8 N 8-ooY88f O^ 10 N O ' Yi N N $ 8,200 S 270 S 150 S 24,500 i 35.700 S 52,0001 S 42,500 S 24,000 S 24,800 8 52.500 S 2,100 S 30,200 8 3,600 i 46.200' S 760 8 4.400 888i08Q O O§ O6 44 44 N .- N NNN14, O 4 N O N 44 8N N O N f N S 17,5001 $ 2,000 I re N oleo $ tV 8 8– V 1 7,000 5,100 5O� 25�$g tD N S 34,400 8 54.000 gp8 M P 4.400 20 �a$$810. ri O N Oi A y� N 30 2,400 7,000 200 N N 'I') N N §§§ N S 9,000 8 9,500 5 9,000 S 6,200 S 1,000 5450 8450 S 2,100 S 73,500 S 94,500 ri Of N S 60,800 S 71.300 S 141,000 S 5,775 S 90.000 S 333,000 S 30,700 8 5.400 S 153,300 f 4,560 S 7.875 S 34,000 §. R N N S 4,800 S 4,200 g82i88§28 N 0 N N M 46 `"' N N l M C N 8 O n § 8 ? O O - r) t0 re ''N C� q! m to §? § § N p OI § o § e- IV Q t7* § § _ 8 g tD § g8 175 850 Ott 06 IO - Yi P IV N Q iD " s "+ N Pi e) Itf fV 8.8 $888888g58 N N N 64 N N 00'L LS OS_98_ 888g 888 N o8 S 8$0Ng8828 88 NN 8N.M N w5hti.5i,5i 28 ei LUMP SUM ACRE LIN FT LIN FT SCI YD SO YO SO YD EACH EACH CU YO CU YO CU YD CU YD TON TON TON GALLON LIN FT SO FT SO FT LIN FT 1- 0 LL r 2 0 0 r r EACH EACH 1- L LL co) J LIN FT TREE EACH LIN FT SO YD CU YD 0 r aO J CLEARING AND GRUBBING REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) ,REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK REMOVE PIPE APRON REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN COMMON EXCAVATION SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) COMMON BORROW (CV) AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CL 5 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TYPE 41 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT METAL RAILING FOR BIKEWAYS MODULAR -BLOCK RETAINING WALL 2" BITUMINOUS WALK CONC CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN 8612 CONC CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN 8618 CONCRETE MEDIAN (NOSE) CONCRETE MEDIAN (DESIGN SPECIAL) 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT LIGHTING UNIT - STREET LIGHTING UNIT - TRAIL F&I SIGN PANELS TYPE C 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&B BALE CHECK SILT FENCE, TYPE HEAVY DUTY SODDING TYPE LAWN SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Subtotal Street pr N NO N e- pp r� o o Y7 1.: N 10 N Yf 1 O P4 P4� P4 P4 N N N N N N N p a♦. . U1 YNf O P4 0 0 N N N N r) M p 1E100 t0 0 N N N O O N o N Np Yf P4 P4 1'f M N N N N 1-f � ii p p 10 N tff O f N N N N N N 1-f o p Yf tff o o N N 1-f n p p t0 t0 o b N N � � N h P4 P4 N N r� tff Ifp P4 N N N 1-f p 10 P4 1f N N 10 p p N N ii N N N Pf N N N N 11 1l N �9 0 0 M D N O pO N 0 8 N N 8 8 N 8 8 N H (n to co h 44) N 8 §§§§.§4§§ 5 4,400 I S 2.800 N R R O O1 Y N N N' N N N N N N M §ocv ttf 1QigOIpO ri vi8 S 1,800 S 38,100 8 O m 8 8 8 N O a N A N N 0 2 10 N 4- §1? -§1§§ S 34,400 8 54.000 § g N ri O N Oi rf ri pI N N N 'I') N N N N D V- 64 10 ,.5 3 2 2,085 150 ger g0g 8§88888$M8§ NN N N N N 0 = = Irl 1- LL 2 = 0 36666 668 (EXCAVATION SPECIAL (0)1 18" RC PIPE APRON 48" RC PIPE APRON 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 48" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 48" CONNECT INTO EXISTING STORM SEWER HAND -PLACED RIPRAP ,Subtotal Storm Sewer 3Sp w5hti.5i,5i N O pill. p O O 10 10 1O 1O N N N N N N N N N N N Y- 0 O J F D O 0 2 O W d 22 2 Pg NO J rD 0 rQ O 0y Qr 2z Fj y0 8 A 2 W 0 O a U J ~ Q0 d 0 W r r- d2 2 d N r W 22 =a 2 N 2 1- 8 8 0 0 0 N 8 8 0 n 0 M 8 8 8 8 8 M 8 8 N N 8 x Q W 2 2 2 J 2 x W 18" RC PIPE APRON U a ee z 2 W U O W D N a U 6 pN N N N N N N N h 0) 04 N 8 N h 04 M n N 1 w 01 8 V9 4- M 8 8 8 N 2 Qx 8" PVC PIPE SEWER N 2 6 8 8 0) N 8 N N 8 N 8 N 0 n ro N N N 8 8 h N 8 N N 8 8 w r N 8 8 40 8 8 8 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N 8 1,1 0.0 8 N x 1 x Q W U UJ x Q W 4- 2 2 2 0 z a 10"X10" WET TAP 0 m 2 1 6 0 m 0 Wa J W 6 m 04 J U 0 K 4- 0 0 2 2 W e 3 m N U 0 K 2 2 K w 3 b z K z 2 1' w 3 Subtotal Water Main 8 8 8 8 8 A N 8 80 N A 8 N ne 0) 0 a 8 N 0) T m N N aiT N 64. 8 N CO 0 00) N 8 A 8 N A 8 M 8 N 0 0 N 2 7 0. 7 O N g 2 0 0 m N U O 2 2 F z W 2 6 4- b O i 0 "7o A reN $ 20,250 $ 70,000 $ 100,000 $ 210.750 $ 21,075 $ 231.825 S 69,548 $ 301,373 270 2,000 A N 0. N O N N N N pO 2 N N N $ 21,075 $ 231,825 I $ 69,548 $ 301,373 270 2,000 8 �$ N N 8 8 N N pq8 o8 N INDIRECT COSTS (30%) 'TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FOR HEAVILY LANDSCAPED MEDAIN OPTION 2 D (4)01 accE5a m MO D on 2 N IRRIGATION SYSTEM DECIDUOUS TREE 4" CAL BAB (E) DECIDUOUS SHRUB T HT STREETSCAPE MATERIALS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10%) SUBTOTAL N evo 82 0 N NN SRF CONSULTING GROUP. INC H: 1CML1047138401EXCELIASSESS-SUM XLS COMM NO 0003840 DATE PRINTED 9/26/00 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN PROJ NO 790 CENTRAL PKWY CITY OF EAGAN NOTES. (A) INCLUDES ESTIMATED COST FOR STREETS AND RIGHT -OF WAY ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.52936 PER SQ. FT. (8) ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.04305 PER SO. FT. (C) ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.12900 PER SO. FT. (D) ASSESSED FOR COST TO UPSIZE STORM SEWER FROM 24 -INCH TO 48 -INCH TO ACCOMMODATE LOCKHEED MARTIN RUNOFF. (E) SIGNAL COST IS PROPOSED TO BE SPLIT 50/50 BETWEEN CITY OF EAGAN AND DAKOTA COUNTY. (F) COSTS ASSIGNED TO CITY OF EAGAN ARE FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER SITE. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS Assessments for City Project 790 street and lateral storm sewer improvements are assigned on a front footage basis for parcel F and divided between parcels E and F on an area basis. Assessment rates are computed as follows: STREETS: [Street costs + ROW costs] x [Parcel F frontage] x 1 = Rate ($ per SQ. FT.) [Total Frontage] [Total area of Parcels E+ F] STORM SEWER - LATERAL: [Storm Sewer costs] x [Parcel F frontage] x 1 = Rate ($ per SQ. FT.) [Total Frontage] [Total area of Parcels E+ F] Assessments for City Project 790 trunk storm sewer improvements are assessed at a City based rate of $0.12900 per SQ. FT. for parcels F, G, 0, and T. CENTRAL PARKWAY C.P. NO 790 TOTALS PARCEL EAGAN MAJOR STREET FUND E PERRON 10-00900-010-79 F DUKE WEEKS 10-79951-021-01 G LOCKHEED- MARTIN 10-79951-010-01 0 UNISYS 10-79950-020-01 T NORTHWEST AIRLINES 10-79950-030-01 LOT FRONTAGE (LIN. FT) 5,788 1,596 LOT AREA (SO. FT.) 1,009,696 726,558 2,088,449 1.400,561 1,699.065 IMPROVEMENT: ASSESSMENT: STREETS (A) S 3.333.200 S 534,500 S 384.600 5 2,414,100 STORM SEWER - LATERAL (B)L i 271,100 5 43.500 (B) S 31.300 (B) 533,300 (D) S 163.000 STORM SEWER - TRUNK (C) 5 194,900 S 93,700 S 269.400 S 180,700 5 219,200 TRAFFIC SIGNALS (E) S 321,800 S 160,900 WATERMAIN (F) 5 76.700 S 56,000 5 20.700 SANITARY SEWER (F) S 41.100 S 18.700 S 18,700 S 3.700 TOTAL S 4.238,800 S 596.700 5 584,300 S 302.700 5 180.700 $ 219.200 S 2.762.400 NOTES. (A) INCLUDES ESTIMATED COST FOR STREETS AND RIGHT -OF WAY ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.52936 PER SQ. FT. (8) ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.04305 PER SO. FT. (C) ASSESSED AT A RATE OF 50.12900 PER SO. FT. (D) ASSESSED FOR COST TO UPSIZE STORM SEWER FROM 24 -INCH TO 48 -INCH TO ACCOMMODATE LOCKHEED MARTIN RUNOFF. (E) SIGNAL COST IS PROPOSED TO BE SPLIT 50/50 BETWEEN CITY OF EAGAN AND DAKOTA COUNTY. (F) COSTS ASSIGNED TO CITY OF EAGAN ARE FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER SITE. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS Assessments for City Project 790 street and lateral storm sewer improvements are assigned on a front footage basis for parcel F and divided between parcels E and F on an area basis. Assessment rates are computed as follows: STREETS: [Street costs + ROW costs] x [Parcel F frontage] x 1 = Rate ($ per SQ. FT.) [Total Frontage] [Total area of Parcels E+ F] STORM SEWER - LATERAL: [Storm Sewer costs] x [Parcel F frontage] x 1 = Rate ($ per SQ. FT.) [Total Frontage] [Total area of Parcels E+ F] Assessments for City Project 790 trunk storm sewer improvements are assessed at a City based rate of $0.12900 per SQ. FT. for parcels F, G, 0, and T. 0 NORTHLAND TRAPP AVE. CORPORATE 2000' — ---MI 11111 PROJECT LOCATION T27N 5 i 4 8 9 R2317 HIGHVIE KENNETH BEATRICE MCKEE KEEFE 0 u BRIDGE VIEW = . J _y TER. _ m •SOUTHRIDGE ., 'SKYLINE QP c",.. ,t LINE RD. ° fid`" `- w .1" STEPHANIE $KY N CIR. -- -r IA_ 0 MEA DO 5- GEMINI RD EAGAN 0 1990 POP. 47,409 "4944w000 T27N 111 10 11 15 14 NORWEST DOODLE T27N IBI9 e�. 7 16 R23W uj j C 40.BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY vim 11. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL..'*ALK6 GRY R0. R4CIFIC AVE. b' A tJek CV. IWK HIL• MONTEREY 36 MERGAN< 37 KITTIWAI JE JAY INGO 42. RED ROBIN LA.' 43. GREY DOVE DR. 41. ta• WESCOTT SRF Coo.u1Noa Grasp, Loc. Job •0003840 Ilia 384OGRI CITY OF EAGAN C.P. NO. 790 and 768 CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 SRF r —.klegGawp,I c. Jap •00O31140 flier 3840GRIA CITY OF EAGAN C.P. NO. 790 and 768 CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY PROJECT AREA MAP rJ3 f FIGURE 1A PROP R/W 60' PROPOSED ROADWAY 50' PROP R/W 6' PROP R/W 10' TRAIL 2.08 5' 4' 14' 11' 11' 14' BLVD HLC THRU 8618 C&G 2.07.k. A 4 . 7. MEDIAN 4.0% THRU 4.08 8618 C&G .0% 4' SHLC 21' BLVD 4.07. TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED CENTRAL PARKWAY E PROPOSED ROADWAY 60' 50' t PROP R/W 10' TRAIL 2.08 PROP R/W 15' 4' BLVD �HLC 4.07. Ion 14' THRU 8618 C&G 07. 10' MEDIAN 4.07. y 50' 14' LT. TURN 2.07. 12' THRU 2.07. 14' RT. TURN 2.07. 11' BLVD 4.07. 8618 C&G TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED CENTRAL PARKWAY with TURN LANES E PROPOSED ROADWAY 50' ai 8618 C&G PROP R/W 10' 15' 14' 6' 6' 14 15' 10' TRAIL 2.08 BLVD THRU 4.08 2.07. TURN LANE THRU 2.08 Mao 8618 CLG TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED NORTHW000 PARKWAY 8618 C&G BLVD 4.07. TRAIL 2.07. Phi 44 SRF Job '00173840 1710 3840.GRJ CITY OF EAGAN C.P. NO. 790 and 768 CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS FIGURE 3 W W D U CENTRAL PARKWAY Z 0 0 uLI V) J 6 D W a 8 L1 a t 1 E TRAL PARKWA I VILY LANDSCAPED MEDIAN OPTIOk 0 O 5 O ; s O g z NZ LL z UL Q Q 3 QJ OG Z W V H I I 0 90 43,44,J. _ z 0 0 .10 NYPI3HS < 01:1 BONN 101Id Z 0 4. 0 o 0 z w I 0 E w •g w< L 0 ijj .au NVMH3V03 l7 '2 ( ASSESSMENT PARCEL MAP Pli C ONSULTING G ROUP, INC. Transportation • Civil • Structural • Environmental ■ Planning • Traffic ■ Landscape Architecture • Parking SRF No. 0003840 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Russ Matthys, P.E., City Engineer CITY OF EAGAN FROM: Marie Cote, P.E., Senior Associate Cortney Weber, Engineer DATE: September 27, 2000 SUBJECT: CENTRAL PARKWAY TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction As you requested, we have completed a traffic study for two proposed development scenarios located north of Yankee Doodle Road between Coachman Road and Federal Drive in the City of Eagan (see Figure 1: Project Location Map). Scenario 1 includes approximately 430,000 square feet of office/commercial development. Scenario 2 includes 319,000 square feet of office/commercial development. In addition, both land use scenarios include a community center/park and senior housing development for future conditions. For purposes of this study, the proposed development is planned for completion in the fall of 2001. This traffic study includes a traffic operations analysis during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for existing and future build conditions (one year after construction and year 2020). The following key issues have been addressed in the study and are discussed within the memorandum: • How will the traffic generated by the proposed development scenarios impact the operation of the adjacent intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour? Are there any intersection improvements that may be needed to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed developments? • Are there any roadway improvements that may be needed by year 2020 due to construction of the ring road system? One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Telephone (612) 475-0010 • Fax (612) 475-2429 • http://www.srfconsulting.com An Equ ritunity Employer 0 cL G ▪ TER. m`' Oc' SOUTHRIDGE t' rSKYLINE 0,, '%' L\ STEPHANIE SKY CIR. co a c zl 0 AVE. LINE RD. NE TR. OP� ' w 0 CC w w , 0 RANIER LONE ,/c co .2.tAc CPR • to o 0 _ ,� 4) MEADOW VI F Fp CEDAR U M Ir 4''' FPRN OR w RD. V RD. O I 00 w 0 13 s• o▪ � 0 LETENDR W C7 CC UJ ST. 0 0 0 cc O E FOUR LU CC J0 S _35_1 ,0? V Q RNER Gam. U J DONA CENTURY 5I YANKEE DOODLE 0 z 0 Z w 0 OWF PT. RD. CI) J ix C./ 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY cn 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. ..044L Kt) O ce CRESTRIDGE MONTEREY 0 0 KYLLO 5 UEBILL DR. GRY RD. LA. Ft 0 LA. O UBIRCHPOND m COVE C Q 1�� 49 f;RFY 42. RED ROBIN LA. f OVF f)R SRF PA LAKE DR. i R0. a Ir co z g T. C TOWER-- VIEW SITE / 0 J a Le May's /o1• Lake 0 J w RD. O� G,Q t HIGH S TE DR. av 0 tP a 0 MARICE Q 2 m NORWEST CT. y O U�z Ct.�p,NDER W Z Q1 DR. C'a x GREENV00 J+Et COS DR. 39. PARK CT. S. O L. AVE. 1fAWK 0 l ROYAL 3-- J OAK CIR. W VIOLET LA. w o--- U o w 117 LL FlL 0 CV. RD. BLACMP g gRID LAKE Q'(• �ZK 41 ST. 1- to W 0 0 w 0 1- z w 0 0 w 49. FOREST (JCENTER NORVY DUCKIO CRESTRIDGE LA. DR. a Y r TAMARAC PT.\�Cz O� PT. � �. w oy �i 51. 36 ENGLERT RD. IS 0 BRAUN C 0 KOLSTAD RD. 52. QOTANANG y .CT. — y U `W1' KOL STAR TIMBEi 4''y OE LA. Lak- ��. � DEN MPRK CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 CITY OF EAGAN PROJECT LOCATION CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY tR G FIGURE 1 Russ Matthys, P.E. 3 September 27, 2000 Existing Conditions Traffic operations for existing conditions were analyzed at the following key intersections: • Yankee Doodle Road and Coachman Road • Yankee Doodle Road and Federal Drive • Pilot Knob Road and High Site Drive Current traffic controls include traffic signals at the Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersections and side -street stop control at the Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive intersection. SRF Consulting Group collected a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at the key intersections. Existing geometrics and peak hour traffic volumes for the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. A traffic operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at each of the key intersections to determine how traffic currently operates within the project area. The unsignalized intersection of Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive was analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software and the signalized intersections along Yankee Doodle Road were analyzed using Synchro. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. LOS A through D are generally considered acceptable by drivers. LOS E indicates that an intersection is operating at, or very near, its capacity and that vehicles experience substantial delays. Results of the analysis are shown in Table 1 for the key intersections with existing traffic controls and geometric layout. Current operations indicate that the intersection of Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive currently operates at an unacceptable LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. Table 1 Existing Capacity Analysis — A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE A.M. P.M. Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road B B Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive A C Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive* A/F F/F * Indicates an unsignalized intersection. The overall level of service is shown followed by the worst approach level of service. 4, cc. TER. mW v Oc" SOUTHRIDGE AVE. 0 'ZSKYLINE &LINE RD. KY C1 4' `'.P w STEPHANIE S ‘" u~i U CIR.r K LA. O N ?�,.`I NE TR. OP RANTER Od S y w 0 01 OJ LONE LA. OAK RD. cae J�'�C� ►0-0RO • o o R�?y z U 2 z� Me GP O O J O MEADOW VI E �O CEDAR y RD. NUM o re ��Ey- FPS\R w 9NOlep FOUR OAKS RD. 0 Rp • 41— 89 (299) 4— 779 (690) r 20 (45) 0 z Oa C W OWF LAKE 1 13 (84) 26 J (922) 626 (13) 6 4r' z a 0 RY PT. YANKEE DOODLE DR. w 0 RD. WOOOIAR OQ 0 Z a�c�, D R Li,2Q 0� GREENV00 I4 1 GAS DR. J J CT. s. 4).39. CJ 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY y Q a �J� 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. LKU Q ( ROYAL `' OAK CIR. 0 VIOLET LA. ‘),,NDE A, = was cc m 0 z iT. C TOWER- VIEW 4101. Le May'T OQ' 0 -J W NORWEST 0 co n v N 0 CO 54 (20) CD N 3 (0) .- 1 37 (20) (115) 8 __to. 1 (1) 0 (147) 5• l,o� LU HI DR. MARICE CT. I- cn N Pel 1- z w 0 0 49. FOREST 1st p ST. ?G CRESTRIDGE ("RY RD. 0 LA. 0 PARK L. U 0 MONTEREY w LA. O e O Z BIRCHPOND m a. KYLLO cc LA m PL z) ySE Y Ge hYAWK �Y UEBI XX = AM PEAK NI(XX) = PM PEAK LA. 'J 14'1 C.IRFY t)C)VF C)R SRF e� 1 L 274 (8) 817 (871) 4— r- 28 (88) g U w 0 LU LL F,/, RD 41. CT. (7) 119 _5 (1074) 737 —► (28) 33 11 • ENGLERT RD. 4 r' t+f °' 0 ao Er IS 0 ORW o z 'Q O DGE LA. DR. a ,,1 w TAMARAC Q� vy i 51.3 `t PT. 52 0 W o0s ow z Lk cc��a lc 0 BRAUN C Lak 5 Q w rp � O�?J pEN ORE. tR ct- ao TANANG aC CT. h O,ck 0 CC STAD = TIMBE DE ENCT CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 CITY OF EAGAN 1 FIGURE EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 Russ Matthys, P.E. 5 September 27, 2000 Proposed Development This traffic study included the analysis for two proposed development scenarios. Scenario 1 includes a 91,120 -square -foot office building, a 215,300 -square -foot industrial building, two 60,000 -square -foot office buildings, and one 7,000 -square -foot restaurant. Scenario 2 consists of a 185,000 -square -foot big box retail, two 120,000 -square -foot office buildings, and two 7,000 -square -foot restaurants. The existing roadway that provides access to Lockheed Martin and connects the intersections of Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive and Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive will be reconstructed and named Central Parkway. Another east/west roadway, Quarry Road, will be built to connect Coachman Road to Central Parkway north of Yankee Doodle Road. For Scenario 1, there will be no direct access onto Yankee Doodle Road. Three right-in/right-out driveways will provide access to Central Parkway. Several full -access driveways will also be constructed along Quarry Road. For Scenario 2, a right-in/right-out driveway along Yankee Doodle Road will provide direct access to the big box retail parking lot. An additional right-in/right-out driveway along Central Parkway will provide access to/from the restaurants. Additional driveways will be constructed along Quarry Road to provide development access. The proposed ring -road system was assumed to be constructed by year 2020. This project includes connecting Federal Drive and Duckwood Drive across I -35E and constructing ramps to provide access to/from south I -35E. It also involves extending Northwood Parkway across I -35E to meet Pilot Knob Road at the current High Site Drive intersection. High Site Drive would then be a T -intersection onto Northwood Parkway. Traffic Forecasts For purposes of this study, the proposed developments are expected to be constructed by the year 2001. Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2002, one year after full development, and year 2020. Year 2002 background volumes were developed based on a two -percent yearly growth of existing traffic. Year 2020 baseline turning movements were modified to account for the change in travel patterns due to construction of the ring road system. For instance, residents who live east of I -35E and south of Duckwood Drive with a destination to the west near TH 13 could now avoid the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road/Pilot Knob Road and use the new Federal connection. The diverted baseline volumes were then grown by two percent per year to the year 2020. Trip generation estimates for Scenarios 1 and 2 were calculated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and weekday based on the trip generation formulas from the 1997 ITE Trip Generation Reports. Trips were also generated for the senior housing currently under construction and the proposed community center/park and included as background traffic for both scenarios. Year 2020 traffic volumes also include future trips generated by the potential components of the community center, as identified in the final report from the Eagan Community Facilities Task Force dated March 31, 2000. The trip generation estimates are displayed in Table 2. Russ Matthys, P.E. 6 Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates — Scenarios 1 and 2 September 27, 2000 LAND USE TYPE SIZE DAILY Total Trips A.M. Trips In PEAK Trips Out P.M. Trips In PEAK Trips Out Scenario 1 General Office 211,120 sq. ft. 2,324 287* 40 53 257* Industrial 215,300 sq. ft. 1,498 155* 34 42 153* Restaurant 7,000 sq. ft. 912 34 26* 39* 30 Community Center 82,007 sq. ft. 1,876 71 37 49 95 Park 46 acres N/A -- 25 25 Senior Housing 71 units N/A 5 7 11 8 Total 552 144 219 568 Scenario 2 Big Box Retail 185,000 sq. ft. 13,000 265 215* 497* 585 General Office 240,000 sq. ft 2,642 279* 45 61 252* Restaurants 14,000 sq. ft. 1,825 67 52* 77* 61 Community Center 82,007 sq. ft. 1,876 71 37 49 95 Park 46 acres N/A - - 25 25 Senior Housing 71 units N/A 5 7 11 8 Total 687 356 720 1,026 * Reduced by 15% for multi -use trips. The directional trip distribution of the site -generated trips was developed based on the regional distribution of households and employment, as well as existing and forecast travel patterns in the study area. Figures 3 and 4 display the directional distribution percentages for commercial and retail developments for year 2002 and 2020. The combination of background traffic and trips generated by the proposed land use scenarios are displayed in Figures 5 and 6 for year 2002 a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Year 2020 a.m. and p.m. traffic volumes are shown in Figures 7 and 8. PIP • MEADOW VI E RD. x.14, Rp ff' 13 e LETEND 0 E STEPHANIE s CIR. K N `'��N .k40 • NE TR. OP �d r a Co E� 0 ca Ro. o 05 JI O CEDAR OR w RD. 0 <49- 0 FOUR OAKS 5 w 0 s w ST. 11 LU J DU COACHMAN �v RIVER k• z Io p DONA CENTURY 5 0 z 0 a W5 0 Q OWLAKE PT. 5% (5%) DR. PINE 1 RIDGE w z 0 -J 0 0 RD. LA. w o O tY RANIER LONE 1;0 OAK RD. 40 i TOWER►= YA : DOODLE 15% (30%) 2% (2%) RD. p ° O Wl O z N c wza1 GREENVOOu' '61 COS ,p�NDER a DR. w W Q.� N Ir 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. s v4LK NRY RD.0 AFj CRESTRIDGE 0 LA. O G 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY J a MONTEREY o O KYLLO it U 1► Q BIRCHPOND PL. COVE a. J X% = Office Distribution (X%)Commercial=/istribution DR\/ / s UEBILL SRF • HAWK CT. S• 39. • ( ROYAL • OAK CIR. O U L. AVE. q- 1-1\- m HI\- CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 co VIOLET LA. g ~ U D w 0 W 6)1, Ir a CV. RD. U BLACMP, Lu RIO ao• m 0 z CT. VIEW O J 0. J Na O w a yt.P RDg Le May's $- Lake a N., R trat 15% (25%) NORWEST 60% o (35%) s HIGH SITE DR. Oce MARIC.E a ct U CT. c iQ tt a 0 w IL CRESTRIDGE DR 0 0 5 ENGLERT RD. 5 CENTER ui NORWAY OUCKVI(� Q O O,Q W CRESTRIDGE LA. ci IS .. U BRAUN I C CITY OF EAGAN YEAR 2002 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION cc 0 W z 0 F KOL N 4. J Y Lak 04 DEN D Q CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 3 ,019 1 0 cn RANIER OAK g RD. cu��O� ~ RD 0 I 0 w 0 �r� �Cr rn�GP� 0 °I 0 ii A. MEADOW VIE ckO CEDAR ).. w RD. q� q RD. 4 FPRN��R = a NoF,o FOUR OAKS RD. 5 LETEND 49. FOR (13 NORWEST (15%) Y KEE DOODLERD. O U 15% o al c ,,pNDER 81st (30 /o) 2% w z<� c DR. e�C' (2%)CD 15 s wAs� GREENV00 9 tiFl COS DR. w S. 0. 3 . 20% it zT '' (13%) 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY In ' 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. LK U ROYAL Q OAK CIR. w 0 VIOLET LA. /9NZ� m < L. O GRY RD. ;RESTRIDGE 0 • LA - MONTEREY c. 0 KYLLO it LA. L. a:. 0 z 0 a. ✓ 0 J m � fF� X% = Office Distribution • (X%) = Commercial Distribution DR./ CRESTRIDGE LA. *. yl 5 CV. 17YAWK hi N=.' t O , t 8LAC L RID VICONSULTING GROUP, INC.1 SRF NO. 0003840 ENGLERT RD. 0 3 CITY OF EAGAN YEAR 2020 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY ST MEADOW VI E e4 oG A- TER. _ 0,44/ •• SOUTHRIDGE my rSKYLINE [1_ L� N el - STEPHANIE SKY CIR. ��`A yLl >4 � r vi ° �'� AVE. LINE RD. CC 2 �C Wit 0 J CC 0 Z RANIER �" NE TR. OPK `A'— 0 J LONE J RD o.o EPRNUM oR FOUR OAKS RD. .Z 95 (310) 4— 835 (800) r 25 (50) O ct 0 13 (95) 55 _j (1000) 720 —0. (15) 5 4r' , co 0 0 0 G 0)' v 0 U p1 z 0 z w OWF LAKE DR. 0 0 0 RD. CEN RY PT YANKEE DOODLE'' 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. GRY RD. CRESTRIDGE ° LA. K UEBI w co f ALKO m '< PARK O V W y Wza 0v GREENV00 CT. S. x Q 0 U o , MONTEREY w I.A.. o Q 0 Z BIRCHPOND m o. KYLLO E LA. U PL. cc m COVE e_ Y , `P IfAWK U .G 55 �� 0 XX = AM PEAK (XX) = PM PEAK Le;. J 1 43 C;RFY rC1VF CIR +EI PACIFIC AVE. a re eJr . ° �pNDER ( DR.� cc 0 Y 2T. /C TOWER VIEW 0 Le May'T O 0 0 g s o 0 0 r N w -J 55 (20) 5 (0) 40 (20) w W (210) 35 ...J (5) 0—► (155) 5 HI DR. 42' MARICE ° Z U w NORWEST CT co n I t IC, Ill III m 0 �n 0 0 TIN 2 0 49. FOREST 1st LT. WAS GvccSSR 39. ROYAL OAK CIR. VIOLET LA. O 0 ML Q�. CV. RD. x 5 BLACMA RIO 5 LAKE 41. A0 Gt z v ... co o i c .J.144 t- 600 (110) 855 (915) 30 (90) 4t r" 0 lam.) u� �0 (50) 195 (1115) 765 —+ (30) 35 4,0 ENGLERT RD. IS U BRAUN C CENTER DGE LA. DR. a w W z Lak CC F KOL ' LA. Jn Y Y Q TAMARAC PT.\QG' z0 PTS 9s! � 51.3 < 52. ao TANAnG C/7 C• y U O STAD F3 TIMBE Q` cki ' 03 (4,41‘P* � ' os OReSDENCr DE ¶CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 CITY OF EAGAN 2002 SCENARIO 1 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 5 8 O 4. 2P MEADOW V( f , RD. 6;t14,OFR Rp A. TER. 0Lu . Off. SOUTHRIDGE by =SKYLINE 41.. ~' U( STEPHANIE SK's r �IR.��_ cn 2• k aQrN z OD S O �� J AVE. LINE NE TR. oP, LA. RD. aC_ w o O RANTER LONE 0 G LA. — OAK Ao J R0. re o z5 O 0 44 0I FO CEDAR Ere PSkNUM OR w FOUR OAKS RD. ♦i 100 (320) ♦— 900 (915) r 25 (60) m 13 (225) 130 _1 (985) 705 —► (10) 5 "14" r In 0 en .. N in 0 In 0 0 0 z 0 b z w OWF L0 NA CEN RY PT. lI 51 .. YANKEE DOODLE111.-Q .• 0'r 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY J� 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. CRESTRIDGE o LA. MONTEREY 0 KYLLO LA. GRY RD. T. J - �P v .YG 0 UEBI XX = AM PEAK . ie (XX) = PM PEAK LA. v QJ 141 r1RFY lnVF lR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. w I" IX \SALK° PACIFIC AVE. 8 LAKE w 0 5 0 O w z E. RD. m 0 z 4 CT. TOWER►= VIEW /o1. - Le May's N vin 'a o3 ix: N 0 C 4)11�- (350) 95 (5) 0 —P. (155) 5 55 (20) 5 (0) 40 (20) in In in co o in 0 •O v z W y wa zAc U' ; GREEMI00 ,,ANDER V BIRCHPOND m2 PL. CAVE I4 17YAWK ' Q1 a � �1 Q II 1•E( CENTER WAS OS DR. CT. S. ��.39. i C ROYAL X OAK CIR. O LVIOLET LA. SRF NO. 0003840 0 CV. RD a� Y 5 U BLACMp, RIDG 5 LAKE 41 w 0 w LL pp. 0 (75) 185 (1070) 760 —► (30) 35 • ENGLERT RD. . ern n In Cr" o !1 IS c 0 BRAUN C CITY OF EAGAN 2002 SCENARIO 2 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY B'9 w r r Z U w 0 49. FOREST TAMARAC PT o'rz 0q- O PT Q�. � q9 � 516 5-1i. TAN DGE LA h U CT ✓ cc b co It0 rr P O 0 ct w o 1--KOl STAD = ..-- z 2 co O TIMBE N- DE Lak O��J DEN RESDENCr FIGURE jR 6 MEADOW VIE rt - RD. ,r qty H 4-)O�c R RO O 0 0 r v ,- O 0 0 cAi ci.o 4 TER. m o- SOUTHRIDGE AVE. oco '=SKYLINE oin Vim' L; (STEPHANIES 0 CIR. �� K LA. N �Nk Ll NE TR. pP �dk.ae r'0 z� y o I OJ LONE ..INE RD cc w w o- 0 RANIER LA 0 OAK RD. Q C ' R Ce CO co zSv w O0 0 JI 0 C' FO CEDAR 3 01/404 OR w FOUR OAKS RD. U O — 130 (440) 4--1200 (1140) r 30 (70) (140) 70 j (1430) 1020 --I. (20) 10 13 r 0 0 0 r- 0 0 0 5 CEN Q 0 0 RY YANKEE DOODLE 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY J44' 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. °RY CRESTRIDGE • LA. UE81 0 MONTEREY 0 LA. 0 O 2 KYLLO E LA. 0 cc _.1 m Y z• / U 0,O 0 (----\0 rt XX = AM PEAK ; (XX) = PM PEAK L. ( 1 43 CRFY IIOVF lR SRF RD. 0 z 0 Z .] w 0 a OWF LAKE cc 5 0 0 DR. IL/ RD. a PT. D. 0 z V' LLLa 00 GREENVO0 n'%I COS DR. T S ^.> 0. 39. C Q 0 U ANDER DR. 0 w _ CO i� a z INALK0 PACIFic AVE. BJ H� 0 w �t• �zK 0 Q BIRCHPOND PL. VE L. /AYWK S � S 5 m ROYAL OAK CIR. VIOLET LA. ce 0 CV. ce m 0 z iT. C TOWER= VIEW Le May'T 0 w C N 0 w m _o o 't_ 110 (70) N 4— 70 (40) 60 (40) UJ • Z W 0 (290) (80) L(220) HI DR. 50 4 I 1 �► 30 10 '—i MARICE cc 0w 2 h NORWEST CT. cC r- N I) uj /)49. FOREST 1st p ST. WAS NxG C-' L 550 (70 v v FA 4 1090 (1230) 44 r 40 (130) CENTER RD. 0 BLACkAN Y RIDG 5 LAKE 41. cc w 0 w u. GT� (70) 270 t (1440) 990 —► ib o (200)160 0 0 0 o ' o 0 O 4F� ENGLERT RD. N1 0 IS 0RWAY cc z • o GE LA. DR. a w 0 w Z KO/. LA. U \ BRAUN C Lak- G 2 - 01.1... MPRK y 3 oc. OEN 1 0� DRESDFNCr tR Q } TAMARAC PT.O\4c w PT. 99 �i ®51.3 < 52. TANANG NICr.— N O cc TAD 0 TIMBE Q` DE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 CITY OF EAGAN 2020 SCENARIO 1 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 7 co MEADOW VI E RD. C��NDFA N M N o o o (270) 150 (1490) 1050 —I► (20) 10 13 L150 (470 4--1290 (1330) r 40 (90) r o N 0 0 0 0 CNI CO 0' 7. Y 4co ce C1 ac > TER. _ o...‘44/ SOUTHRIDGE m J0 coo -f q, G;. y STEPHANIE $KY CIR. AVE. LINE RD. �( NE TR. OLA. P w cc w w co h O RANIER 0 m LONE z OAK RD. m Q" tit SFO CEDAR 3 �N�‘R w FOUR OAKS RD. O' �. C1 0 a O w \ Q OW LAKE DR. } rx m 5 YANKEE DOODLE" 0 O 0 0 0 0 CEN RY PT. q - 5o cj 40. BLACKHAWK RIDGE WAY 41. BLACKHAWK RIDGE PL. tr CRESTRIDGE 0 UEBI MONTEREY c7 a. m GRY a G LA. o o i KYLLO E LA. 0 O ]C G•% XX = AM PEAK (XX) = PM PEAK LA, 1 49 rRFY novF nR SRF RD. m y \TALK° LI RD. a a. - PNDER wzQ� DR. cc I-, I _ GREENVOO +EI a CT S cc 2 TOWER m 0 z / CT. VIEW f1 0 w 1 Le May's ock. too 0 o N CD v ID (70) I-- 80 (60) w 4-)1 1 �► NORWEST 0 1st o ST. ti +G WAS GyccS DR. 39. ROYAL V_____ O 0 U VIOLET LA. OAK CIR. AVE. w O a. w LL cr BJH G co CV. RD. 171AWK H\ - Q BIRCHPOND PL. o\lE C!F/ a 30 r Q,� 5 9LACk1A 5 LAKE 41 p0• Ci 0 r 90 (70) (430)110 1 t (120) 50 o 0 0 o (220) 10 N m0 N o CO HI DR. ff. MARICE ILji o rn CV ID 0 0 0 ID i0 CO X144 L 480 (50 4--1220 (1430) f-- 50 (140) CENTER (100) 260 4 (1470) 1020 —► 210) 170 N R N 0 // 'T'O A' 4<I IS ENGLERT RD. 0 BRAUN C • ORvV,Vt cc i z 'Q o GE LA. m w 1- z w 0 0 49. FOREST DR. a w a } TAMARAC PT 0� zz o PT.O Ty! o 51. 36 c 52. y w 0 w z KOL Lq. a0 ci5TANgNG v •CT. U w STA 0 = 0, TIMBE "- CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SRF NO. 0003840 CITY OF EAGAN 2020 SCENARIO 2 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CENTRAL PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY DE LFIGURE 8 9/ Russ Matthys, P.E. - 13 - September 27, 2000 Year 2002 Traffic Operations Analysis To determine how well the existing roadway • system will accommodate each development scenario, a traffic operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for year 2002. The signalized intersections along Yankee Doodle Road at Coachman Road and Central Parkway/Federal Drive were analyzed using Synchro. The Highway Capacity Software was used for the analysis of the unsignalized intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Central Parkway/High Site Drive. No geometric improvements were assumed for existing roadways for year 2002. Central Parkway was assumed to be a two-lane roadway with right- and left -turn lanes at the intersections with Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road. The following table shows the level of service results for year 2002. Table 3 Year 2002 Capacity Analysis — A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results INTERSECTION SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road B B B B Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive B D (C) B E (C) Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive* C/F (A) F/F (B) C/F (A) F/F (B) (X) Indicates the expected level of service with recommended improvements. * Indicates an unsignalized intersection. The overall level of service is shown followed by the worst approach level of service. The results of the analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive will operate at an unacceptable LOS E during the p.m. peak hour for Scenario 2. The intersection of Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive is expected to operate at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour for both scenarios. The following recommendations are expected to improve operations at the key intersections in the p.m. peak hour. Figures 5 and 6 display the recommended intersection geometrics for each scenario. Scenario 1 • While the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Central Parkway/Federal Drive operates at an acceptable overall LOS D, southbound dual left -turn lanes are recommended based on the high volume of left -turn vehicles and the queuing analysis. Construction of southbound dual left -turn lanes would improve the overall intersection operation to LOS C. • The installation of a traffic signal at Pilot Knob Road and Central Parkway/High Site Drive will improve p.m. peak operations from a LOS F to LOS B. Scenario 2 9a Russ Matthys, P.E. - 14 - September 27, 2000 • The construction of dual southbound left -turn lanes at Yankee Doodle Road and Central Parkway/FederaI Drive will improve overall operations from a LOS E to LOS C. • The installation of a traffic signal at Pilot Knob Road and Central Parkway/High Site Parkway will improve p.m. peak operations from a LOS F to a LOS B. Year 2020 Traffic Operations Analysis Geometrics at the intersections of Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive and Pilot Knob Road/Northwood Parkway are expected to change with the construction of the ring road system. Yankee Doodle Road east of Coachman Road is also proposed to be a six -lane roadway by year 2020. Table 4 compares year 2002 (existing conditions) to year 2020 baseline geometrics assumed in the operations analysis. Table 4 Year 2002 and 2020 Assumed Geometrics Intersection APPROACH South North East West LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Year 2002: Yankee Doodle Rd/Federal Dr 0 >1 1 1* 1 1 1 2 1 1 2< 0 Year 2020: Yankee Doodle Rd/Federal Dr 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 Year 2002: Pilot Knob Rd/High Site Dr 1 2< 0 1 2 1 0 >1< 0 1 1 1 Year 2020: Pilot Knob Rd/Northwood Dr 1 2< 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < Indicates a shared lane. * Dual southbound left -turn lanes are recommended for year 2002. Assumed to be constructed for year 2020. A traffic operations analysis was conducted for year 2020 a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Proposed improvements for the construction of the ring road system include installation of a traffic signal at Pilot Knob Road/Northwood Parkway. All key intersections were analyzed using Synchro. Table 5 shows the level of service results for year 2020. 9 3 Russ Matthys, P.E. - 15 - Table 5 Year 2020 Capacity Analysis — A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results September 27, 2000 INTERSECTION SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road C C (C) C D (C) Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive" B C B C Pilot Knob Road/Northwood Parkway(-) B C B D (C) (I) Includes southbound dual left -turn lanes. (2) Includes a signalized intersection. As shown, all key intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better in the year 2020 for a.m. and p.m. peak hours for both Scenarios 1 and 2, with recommended 2002 and ring road system improvements. Figures 7 and 8 display the recommended (required) intersection geometrics for year 2020. However, the City should consider the following improvement: • For both scenarios, due to the high volume of westbound right -turn movements at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road, the construction of a westbound right - turn lane should be considered. This will improve the overall LOS D to a LOS C for the p.m. peak in Scenario 2. The overall LOS for the p.m. peak hour in Scenario 1 will remain unchanged. • For Scenario 2 only, based on the high volume of eastbound left -turn movements and heavy queues at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road/Northwood Parkway, 300 -foot dual eastbound left -turn lanes should be considered. This will improve the overall LOS D to a LOS C for the p.m. peak in Scenario 2. The overall LOS for the p.m. peak hour in Scenario 1 will remain unchanged. Summary and Conclusions Based on the findings and analyses, it is concluded that the proposed developments can be supported if the following recommended roadway improvements are implemented. Year 2002: The following improvements are recommended (required) for year 2002 (Scenarios 1 and 2): Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive — Construction of dual left -turn lanes on the north approach. The overall operation of this intersection for Scenario 1 is an acceptable LOS D in the p.m. peak. However, dual left -turn lanes are recommended based on a queuing analysis. For Scenario 2, the intersection would improve from a LOS E to LOS C in the p.m. peak hour with dual southbound left -turn lanes. 99 Russ Matthys, P.E. - 16 - September 27, 2000 Pilot Knob Road/High Site Drive — Installation of a traffic signal. The intersection currently operates at LOS F in the p.m. peak hour and will improve to an acceptable LOS B or better with the installation of a traffic signal. Year 2020: All key intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better in the year 2020 for the proposed development scenarios with year 2002 and ring road system improvements. However, the City should consider the following improvements for the year 2020: Yankee Doodle Road/Coachman Road — For both scenarios, addition of a right -turn lane on the east approach. Pilot Knob Road/Northwood Parkway — For Scenario 2 only, addition of a left -turn lane on the west approach to provide dual left -turn lanes. MC/CW/smf Lockheed Martin Naval Electronics & Surveillance Systems -Eagan P.O. Box 64525 St. Paul, MN 55164-0525 September 28, 2000 Mr. Russ Matthys, P.E. City Engineer Department of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Matthys: LOCKHEED MARTIN After review of the Feasibility Study 9/1/00 Draft for the proposed Project 790, Central Parkway Project under consideration by the City of Eagan, Lockheed Martin would like to identify through this correspondence several issues or concerns for the public record at the October 3, 2000 Public Hearing on this project. Lockheed Martin intends to cooperate with the City of Eagan on the proposed project in accordance with the terms and conditions of all agreements and covenants covering public improvements in the Unisys Park area. The various lots in the Unisys Park 2id Addition (which now includes Eagan's Central Park) are subject to a recorded perpetual declaration of easements, covenants and restrictions regarding roadway improvements. Based on the 9/1/00 Draft Feasibility Study, the project plan for the most part appears to be in agreement with the terms and conditions of this perpetual agreement. The issue which we feel needs additional attention is whether the proposed Central Parkway provides adequate ingress and egress from our parking lots. In previous meetings with City Staff and their consultants, a number of alternative approaches were discussed. We believe that the design of the Parkway must consider the safe and convenient access and egress for our parking areas. We appreciate the City's offer to assist us in planning and the actual modification of our internal parking lots to facilitate traffic flows within our complex. Because our parking areas are not separate from the Perimeter Road, the construction of the Parkway necessitates a significant modification of our parking area usage. To ensure that we retain as much of our parking areas as possible, at the appropriate time and if needed, we would like the City to consider a variance to set back requirements. A second issue regarding the project is the proposed Trunk Area assessment for the construction of a lift station and force main. We believe that the Storm Sewer Ponding Agreement dated February 7, 1989 between the City and the property owners in Unisys Park is the controlling document which governs the timing of construction and the manner in which the actual cost of the lift station and force main will be recovered from the benefiting parties. As was discussed with City Staff on Wednesday, September 27, 2000, we believe the proposed assessment approach is inconsistent with the conditions and agreement in the Ponding Agreement; and therefore, we are not prepared to accept this approach. If you have any questions, please contact me at (651) 456-2210. Thomas R. Lindquist Director of Communications 96 Richard B. Peterson Attorney 1584 Chatham Avenue Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 (612) 867-9803 dick petersonAusa.net September 28, 2000 Mr. Russ Matthys: City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 RE: Unisys Corporation Dear Mr. Matthys: RECEIVED SEP 2 82000 I am representing Unisys Corporation in connection with the proposed Project 790, Central Parkway — Street and Utility Improvements, currently under consideration in the City of Eagan. Thank you for the information provided at the Informational Neighborhood Meeting held on September 21, 2000, including the Copy of the 9/1/00 Draft of the Feasibility Study and Report. I have had the opportunity to review that and other relevant information with my client. Based on review of current information and prior agreements affecting the "Unisys Campus" we do not believe that the construction of a Storm Sewer Force Main is necessary at this time.If the City elects to construct a Force Main for the purpose of maintaining a maximum elevation of Pond CP -4 at 827.7 feet as stated at the Informational Neighborhood Meeting, no assessment should be levied on the property owners within Unisys Park and Unisys Park 2"d Addition. The Storm Sewer Ponding Agreement dated February 7, 1989 between the City and the property owners in Unisys Park governs these matters. There is no evidence that there is or will be insufficient capacity in Pond CP -4 caused by "future development of Unisys Park" which is the triggering event for construction of the Force Main in the Storm Sewer Ponding Agreement. Unisys as a prior owner of the land upon which Pond CP -4 is located suffered significant limitation of value of that land because of the very specific requirements relating to storage capacity and the maximum 100 year high water elevation imposed by the Storm Sewer Ponding Agreement. The only discretion given to Property owners was to agree to a higher water elevation for the Pond. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this. Sincerely, Richard B. Peterson Cc: Rich L'Ecuyer Don Schlafer 97 .Duke weeks REALTY CORPORATION September 27, 2000 Mayor Pat Awada, Eagan City Council, Attn.: Russ Matheys, PE 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 RECEI VED SEP 2 2000 RE: Feasibility No. 790 Central Parkway, Dear Mayor Awada and Members of Eagan City Council: Duke -Weeks Realty Corporation has a substantial interest and investment in the 20 acre parcel of land on the east edge of Central Parkway as referenced in the Feasibility Study City project number 790. Our intent is to develop that parcel to its highest and best use. Duke -Weeks Realty Corporation has participated in the planning and design process of the Central Parkway project over the past few months and generally endorses the roadway. However, the Draft Feasibility Study as reviewed leaves several issues unclear, and of concern. The utility layout proposed in the Draft Study has not provided for direct sanitary sewer or water main service to the 3.8 -acre area adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. To develop this area efficiently these services must be extended to that area through this project. Additionally, Duke -Weeks Realty Corporation desires to be provided with 2 driveway access points on the east side of the roadway between the City Park and the proposed street accessing the Perrin property. Lastly, the feasibility study has identified 4.16 acres of land to be acquired by the City for right- of-way and ponding purposes. The City's land acquisition value as identified in the Draft Study should be in line with the price per square foot paid by the City for the park land. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to many more successful developments in Eagan. Since ..Iy, Du eeks ' e : Ity Corporation s Gray or Vice President Robert P - D= • - opment S; ices Manager c: Tom Hedges, Tom Colbert, P.E RPS:rps eneral Manager ., Russ Mathys, P.E., Matt Hansen, PE, Jim Dvorak, P.E. 1550 Utica Avenue South Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone: 612.543.2900 9s' Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 C. PROJECT 768, NORTHWOOD PARKWAY STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve Project 768 (Northwood Parkway—Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications, and the acquisition of right of way through quick take condemnation, if necessary. FACTS: • On April 28, 1998, the City Council authorized the preparation of an Official Map to define the proposed alignment of the future extension of Northwood Parkway over Interstate 35-E from Denmark Avenue to Pilot Knob Road. This was in response to a proposed development expansion of the Glen Pond Apartment complex. Larry Wenzel, owner of the property, requested the City define the alignment of Northwood Parkway to assist his future site planning. • On January 18, 2000, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule of the new street construction of Northwood Parkway between Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) and Interstate 35-E, including storm sewer improvements. • On September 19, the feasibility report for Project 768 was presented to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for October 3 to formally present and discuss the report with the adjacent property owner. • Discussions have been held with the adjacent property owner, prior to the Public Hearing to review and discuss the proposed improvements. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report (Combined with Project 790), pages‘e) ) through 95 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 D. PROJECT 742, WESCOTT WOODLANDS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 742 (Wescott Woodlands Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 742 provided for the installation of streets and utilities for the upgrade of Wescott Woodlands in conjunction with the development of Royal Oaks (North Y2 of Section 14), as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. • The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on September 5, 2000, with a public hearing being scheduled for October 3 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. Based on these final improvement costs, the final assessments came in significantly less than the estimate contained in the Feasibility Report presented at the Public Hearing held on July 7, 1998. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. In addition, an informational meeting was held September 25, to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 49 parcels being assessed, 3 persons representing two parcels attended the meeting. Telephone conversations have occurred with 2 additional property owners and numerous meetings have been held with the Carriage Hills Golf Course representatives. All objections received to date have been included as attachments. ISSUES: • The Final Assessment Roll has been prepared based on the City's current Special Assessment Policy. Per the Council's direction at the time of the public hearing, the City hired an appraiser to evaluate the value benefit of this improvement to the various properties proposed to be assessed. On many parcels, the appraiser indicated that the value benefit is significantly less than the proposed assessments contained in the Final Assessment Roll. Enclosed is a modified Final Assessment Roll for the Council's consideration showing the reduced assessment based on the appraisal. Staff's authority is limited to preparing an assessment roll based on the current policy. The City council has the authority to modify the Roll within the limits of the law. Recognizing an appraiser's value benefit and reducing an assessment accordingly is permissible and recommended. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages /0 / through /// . • Proposed Appraiser's Modified Assessment Roll, Page %/c2 . • Written Objections, pages //_1 through // . /DO FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NUMBER - 742 NAME - Wescott Woodlands was Wescott Hills Dr Street Reconstruction and Utlilities IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED F.R.=Feasiblity Report FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY SEWER 0 Trunk $1,780.00 $1,780.00 /Acre 0 Lateral $22.76 $20.44 /F.F. O Service $633.71 $797.50 /Svc O Lat. Benefit/trunk HEARING DATES ASSESSMENT - October 3„ 2000 IMPROVEMENT - March 2. 1999 FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS STORM SEWER O Trunk $.082 $.082 /Sq. Ft. O Lateral $24.45 $35.48 /F.F. O Vinge/Golf Course $9.485.11 /Parcel WATER O Trunk $1,875.00 $1,875.00 /Acre O Lateral $20.33 $13.75 /F.F. Service $557.65 $1,836.67 /Svc 0 Lat. Benefit/trunk $20.33 $13.75 /F.F. O WAC STREET ❑ Gravel Base 0 Surfacing $77.64 $78.76 /F.F. Golf Course Driveway $3.262.00 Multi. Equiv. ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ Trail/Sidewalk L.S.. SERVICES Service to Clubhouse $23,865.00 N/A L. S. Service to Clubhouse $4,459.01 N/A L.S. STREET LIGHTS ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $1,121,984 F.R $1,544,374 F.R 98-16 49 15 Year 7.0% $882,175.55 $297,790.68 COMMENTS: No assessments were allocated to Lot 1, Block 1, Carriage Hills Club House Addition. All Assessments are assigned to 10-01400-011-25 and 10-01400-011-50. Allocation will be completed upon resolution of assessment agreement. /o/ 4/1 MEMO TO FROM DATE SUBJECT city of eagan MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL GERALD R. WOBSCHALL AUGUST 31, 2000 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT NO.742 WESCOTT WOODLANDS STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND UTILITIES MEMO The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on July 7,1998 ordered Project 742. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are: sanitary sewer lateral, sanitary sewer trunk, water lateral, water trunk, sanitary sewer and water service pairs, storm sewer trunk, storm sewer lateral, and street improvements. According to the feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the following: sanitary sewer trunk, water trunk, storm sewer trunk using area methods of assessment, water and sanitary sewer lateral and street improvements using linear methods of assessment, sanitary sewer and water service pairs using a unit method of assessments. The methods of assessment proposed in the feasibility report are used in this report. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No. 98-16. The construction is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 3, 2000. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $697,696.76 paid to the contractor for the construction of the following detailed improvements. Easement costs in the amount of $158,780.94 and other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing; legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $323,486.72 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $1,179,964.42. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. The easement cost is allocated to trunk storm sewer, trunk water main, street, storm sewer lateral and water lateral improvements. The other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement. IMPROVEMENT EASEMENT CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST FEASIBILITY REPORT Sanitary Sewer Lateral $47,344.95 $21,951.46 $69,296.41 $100,746 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 4 In. Sanitary Sewer Svc $2,597.80 $1,204.47 $3,802.27 8 In. Sanitary Sewer Cross $1,848.75 $857.17 $2,705.92 Clubhouse Sewer Service $20,278.30 $9,402.02 $29,680.32 Water Lateral $73,949.30 $34,865.55 $108,804.95 $135,604 Water Trunk $160,616.26 $137,117.11 $297,733.37 $282,695 1 In. Water Services $3,048.00 $1,413.20 $4,461.20 8 In. Water Cross $3,339.50 $1,548.36 $4,887.86 6 In. Water Stub $1,072.00 $497.03 $1,569.03 Clubhouse Water Service $3,046.50 $1,412.51 $4,459.01 Storm Sewer Lateral $68,360.53 $38,380.63 $106,741.16 Storm Sewer Trunk $67,630.49 $114,868.00 $182,498.49 $1,672,509 Vinge/Golf Course Storm $12,960.90 $6,009.31 $18,970.21 Street $219,925.98 $107,336.46 $327,262.44 $465,734 Storm Utility $11,677.50 $5,414.27 $17,091.77 Bituminous Trail $9,070 TOTAL $697,696.76 $482,267.66 $1,179,964.42 $2,666,358 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS Trunk assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer were proposed in the feasibility report for this project. These assessments are proposed at the rates quoted in the hearing of July 7,1998. Those rates are Sanitary Sewer Trunk at $1,780 per acre, Water Trunk at $1,875 per acre and $.082 per square foot for Storm Sewer Trunk. B. UTILITY TRUNK AND LATERAL AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1.Sanitary Sewer Improvements la. Sanitary Sewer Lateral The sanitary sewer lateral improvement installed in Wescott Woodlands consists of 1,553 1.f. 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer line, structures and appurtenances. The construction cost was $47,344.95 Other costs in the amount of $21,951.46 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable cost of $69,296.41 to the benefited properties. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $69,296.41 3,044.69F.F. $22.76/F.F. lb. 4 inch Sanitary Sewer Service 6 each 4 inch sanitary sewer services were constructed at a cost of $3,802.27. Other costs in the amount of $1,207.47 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $3,802.27. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a unit method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $3,802.27 6 Services $633.71/Service lc. 8 inch Sanitary Sewer Crossing The 8 inch sanitary sewer crossing improvement was constructed at the intersection of Wild Rose Ct and Wescott Woodlands. The crossing has a construction cost of $1,848.75. Other costs in the amount of $857.17 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $2,705.92. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $2,705.92 2 Units $1,352.96. /1y ld. Clubhouse Sanitary Sewer Service At the owners request the City installed a sanitary sewer service to provide service to the Carriage Hills Clubhouse. This improvement was not included in the feasibility report for this project. The service was installed at a construction cost of $20,278.30. Other costs totaling $9,402.02 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $29,680.32. The City and Property Owner entered into an agreement that limited the assessment for this improvement to $23,865.00. Therefore it is proposed to assess the $23,865.00 to the property owner and the City will finance $5,815.32 with a transfer from the Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund. 2 Water Improvements 2a. Water Lateral An 8 inch water lateral was installed in Wescott Woodlands from Yankee Doodle Road south to a connection at the southern border of the Wessel Addition. 2,895 L.F. of watermain was installed at a construction cost of $73,949.30. Other and easement costs totaling $34,885.65 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $108,804.95. The resulting improvement cost is calculated in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST IMPROVEMENT UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $108,804.95 2,895 L.F. $37.58 /L.F. To determine the assessable cost for this improvement, lateral benefit from trunk is added to the improvement cost because 120 lineal feet of water trunk line is included in this frontage. The assessable cost is determined in the following manner: ASSESSABLE COST Improvement Cost Lateral Benefit from Trunk Assessable Cost 120 L.F. X's $37.58/L.F. AMOUNT $108,804.95 4,509.60 $113,314.55 The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $113,314.55 5,574.46 F.F. $20.33/F.F. 2b. Water Trunk Line The water trunk improvements consist of the installation 2,118 1. f. of 16 -inch diameter water main and appurtenances and the replacement of the previously existing golf course driveway. This installation was from the east terminus of Duckwood Drive easterly to a connection on the west boundary of Verdant Hills. The construction cost including the driveway replacement was $160,616.26. Other and easement costs totaling 5137,117.11 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $297,733.37. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be assessed using area and lineal methods. The area assessment rate used is $1,875 per acre, as presented in the feasibility report. Lateral benefit from trunk is proposed to be assessed at $20.33 per f. f., the same assessment rate developed for the water lateral installed in Wescott Woodlands. According to the terms of an agreement between the City and Carriage Hills Golf Course an assessment in the amount of $3,262.00 is proposed for improvement of the driveway from the clubhouse to Duckwood Drive. 2c. 1 inch Water Service 8 each 1 inch water services were installed at a construction cost Of $3,048.00. Other costs in the amount of $1,413.20 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $4,461.20. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a unit method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $4,461.20 8 Services $557.65/Service 2d. 8 inch Water Crossing The 8 inch water crossing improvement was constructed at the intersection of Wild Rose Ct and Wescott Woodlands. The crossing has a construction cost of $3,339.50. Other costs in the amount of $1,548.36 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $4,887.86. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $4,887.86 2 Units $2,443.93/Unit 2e. 6 inch water stub A 6 inch water stub was constructed to provide water looping to the Mother of Mary Shelter. It cost $1,072.00 to construct the stub. Other costs totaling in the amount of $497.03 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $1,569.03. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $1,569.03 1 Unit $1,569.03/Unit 2f. Club House Water Service A 4 inch water service was constructed to provide water to the Carriage Hills Club House. It cost $3,046.50 to construct the service. Other costs totaling in the amount of $1,412.51 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $4,459.01. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $4,459.01 1 Unit $4,459.01/Unit 3. Storm Sewer Improvements 3a. Storm Sewer Lateral The storm sewer lateral improvement is for the installation of 1,640 L. F. of 15 inch, 28 inch and 24 inch RCP, manhole structures and appurtenances at a construction cost of $68,360.53. Other and Easement cost in the amount of $38,380.63 resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $106,741.16. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $106,741.16 4,365.21 F. F. $24.45/ F.F. 3b. Storm Sewer Trunk The storm sewer trunk improvement is for the outlet of Pond DP -9. The construction cost of the varied pipe sizes and appurtenances is computed at $67,630.49. Other and easement costs in the amount of $114,868.00 were allocated to the construction costs resulting in an improvement cost of $182,498.49. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be assessed using an area method. The assessment rates being used are those presented in the feasibility study. 3c. Vinge/Golf Course Storm Sewer The City constructed a storm sewer that provides drainage to these parcels. The cost to construct the improvements is $12,960.90. Other costs in the amount of $6,009.31 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $18,970.21. This improvement was not considered at the public hearing. It is proposed to assess this cost under the terms of agreements between the City and the property owners. 4. Street Improvements 4a. Wescott Woodlands The improvement consists of the construction of Wescott Woodlands with a 32 -foot width and 7 -ton rating. The construction costs include curb and gutter with a paved bituminous asphalt surface. The construction cost of these improvements totals $219,925.98. Other and easement costs in the amount of $107,336.46 were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $327,262.44. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $327,262.44 4,215.21 F. F. $77.641F. F. 4b. Golf Course Driveway The improvement consists of the extension of the golf course driveway. The driveway was extended from the Clubhouse westerly to Duckwood Drive. The owner of the clubhouse agreed to pay $3,262.00 for this extension. The assessment rate is computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $3,262.00 5 Storm Sewer Utility 1 Unit $3,262.00/unit. The Storm Sewer Utility improvement consists of the construction of a treatment basin for Pond DP -9 on the Carriage Hills Golf Course. The cost of the construction was $11,677.50. Other costs in the amount of $5,414.27 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $17,091.77. This improvement will be financed by the Water Quality Division of the City's Public Utility Fund. job C. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 15 years. The interest rate is 7.0% per annum on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) CITY IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT REVENUES IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITIES) Sanitary Sewer Trunk -0- $57,280.00 $57,280.00 Sanitary Sewer Lateral $69,296.41 $69,296.98 $.57 8 In. Sanitary Sewer Cross $2,705.92 $2,705.92 -0- Clubhouse Sewer Service $29,680.32 $23,865.00 ($5,815.32) Water Lateral $108,804.95 $113,312.06 $4,507.11 Water Trunk $297,733.37 $121,640.56 ($176,092.81) 8 In. Water Cross $4,887.86 $4,887.86 -0- Clubhouse Water Service $4,459.01 $4,459.10 -0- 1 In. Water Services $4,461.20 $4,461.20 -0- 4 In. Sanitary Sewer Svc $3,802.27 $3,802.14 ($.13) 6 In. Water Stub $1,569.03 $1,569.03 -0- Storm Sewer Lateral $106,741.16 $106,742.45 1.29 Storm Sewer Trunk $182,498.49 $18,660.83 ($163,837.66) Vinge/Golf Course Storm $18,970.21 $18,970.21 -0- Street $327,262.45 $330,522.30 $3,259.85 Storm Utility $17,091.77 -0- ($17,091.77) TOTAL 51,179,964.42 $882,175.55 $(297,788.87) %a 8 The following City Funds will provide noted financing of the City Responsibilities for the Project: FUND Sanitary Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk Storm Utility TOTAL Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed: Public Works Department Dated: CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITIES) $51,465.12 ($168,325.85) ($163,836.37) ($17,091.77) $(297,788.87) Reviewed: Finance Department Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Tom Pepper, Assistant Finance Director Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I io9 cn m O N m oe/31/200( W 2 A I8282:2:2 f0 1010 fm :2:2288188:2:2:2 1 f 2 88 ,13 8 1f0 fm 10 b 10 10 V 2 10 m m 10 m 10 O♦ND, 2 A O O n ID g N mc8(wJ si*g*OaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaagVi '�� ` Z OD m A A A n3z IG m + C'! Pl Pf /7 Pl l'� Pf 17 /7 Ol Nl Pl P! 17 t7 1'7 l') l'1 P! l7 P1 17 t7 17 l'/ 1'f Pl P) 17 17 P'1 Pl Pf !1 t7 l'1 Of l7 Pl fV O Oi Pl Pf C ♦ N w Z 2. Mm-terntgE LL sm.:38aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8aaNaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa7-SS:2° �2,N6AAAAaaaa aaaaaaaaaiaaaataaaaaiaaAaaaAaa;66.; • N r NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN NNNNOWN H e^m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 8 W.-02 .6p2 h O O 08 Q0 p8 8p p8I pOH Op p8 8 q0 p8 p8 p8. p8 08 p8 p8 8 p8 8 p8. p8 p8 p8. pOH p$ $ Op p� p�1 q$ $ pg p$ p$ $ $ /fp O �I8p O m of z�J < C m E 0 0 0 0 8 O O 8 O O O O 8 O 8 O O O 8 O 8 O O O O O O O 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 8 8$ 8 f N N f 8 110 4 V O : E ` h A l7 OI Pl Pf P/ tM t7 IA t7 P) P/ t7 Pl {'7 t7 N1 Pl f7 Pl Pl t7 !1 Pl t'1 l7 l7 Pl Pl f7 l'! !7 1'> l+l O fA Ol ' fy r 1� 00 u m x 8 O O m o 0 0 0 O m O m m o O o O m o O o m m O O m...... m m O m to O to m m N s 8 8 O N N J II N 0 O N O m m m m m m m m m m OG m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 10 m m m m m m m m g 4 0 0 0 <-0 S 11 m IAO I f If IAO N IAO IAO W h N N N IO IAO W I f h N N W N W W I.......O IO ID N IAO h IAO IAO h 1AO IAO N OD A N N m m 0 Z II Is 17 11 i1V48R8;a4.I4;;4;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; <a113- 2 O L 11 1- :: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 11 8iH II p p p p 88P12800 ii 0 x 0 0 8 8 J d II o Z 11 IN a 11 ii 8si!&888888888s88lic015.6 88888888888888888888888888888888888.8888x8s18 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o A8 N o 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 10 U Nm O 10 t. A A A A A A A A A I- A A A A A A A A A A A A A ti A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 t7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N /V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A O N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mo h 11 8 P, 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 8 N Yi < O C C C O O O G O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 J d II Nga 1'13O 2 11 O m r" II �j o m m m p� p1 m p m m m m p1 m p� p1 p1 p� p� p1 m p p m p� m m p1 p p 11 s m W 8 8 2 8 8 8 8 2 8 m m 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 01 2 01 v s m n O IO J 11 N O7 A N O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mo A m O N ,cm xi � H U u m m w 4 PPPP' O 2 u 1—dg 0.. ii 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888885 l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:888NNNNNNNNNNNAmmmmmmmmmmmmNANNNNmmmmmmm0N888800 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm-$aooA Ma S 8888$8888888$88.8$88888888288$88888888.8888888888$8 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p � N W Et Z O O rc1wmw0�00m F00 U z Z Z Z z J m N N m m m m N N N m m m m m m m m Mg 000W N""013N0mfigigiligigg0ggligggiggiggu«mm 0000 >> p>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> r>>>>r �ml {e {�{�1 1W/I1W/ ow mwmcrcemm=====mKKC¢mcema'CKCKCCKmmcemmxtrmi,s55S as=- Piiiiii11111111111111 a a?ai aS al aB �?�-ga s 08/31/2000 PROJECT 742 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL REC SUPPL'MNTL OWNER NAME NMBR DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN 1 RAHN FAMILY LTD PTSHP 2 RAHN FAMILY LTD PTNSHP 3 MARY MOTHER OF MERCY SHELT 4 RAHN FAMILY LTD PTSHP 5 THORPE BRYCE 6 THORPE BRYCE 7 THORPE BRYCE 8 THORPE BRYCE 9 THORPE BRYCE THORPE BRYCE BAUER TSTE WALTER F SANTANNI HOMES INC THORPE BRYCE SANTANNI HOMES INC BAUER TSTE WALTER F SANTANNI HOMES INC ZESBAUGH MARK SANTANNI HOMES INC ROYAL OAKS HOLDING CO BAUER TSTE WALTER F DRELLING JOSEPH S THORPE BRYCE PARISH MKETING & DEV. CORP THORPE BRYCE ZESBAUGH MARK THORPE BRYCE SANTANNI HOMES INC BAUER TSTE WALTER F BAUER TSTE WALTER F THORPE BRYCE THORPE BRYCE THORPE BRYCE THORPE BRYCE SANTANNI HOMES INC THORPE BRYCE BAUER TSTE WALTER F SANTANNI HOMES INC NICHOLS DAN A BAUER TSTE WALTER F BAUER TSTE WALTER F ROYAL OAKS HOLDING CO THORPE BRYCE THORPE NEWMAN RACHAEL THORPE MARY L WESSEL FREDERICK VINGE DWIGHT VINGE DWIGHT HESSE DONALD E PROPERTY IDENT# 10-01400-010-02 10-01400-011-25 10-01400-012-50 10-01400-020-02 10-16500-010-01 10-64800-010-00 10-64800-010-01 10-64800-010-02 10-64800-010-03 DIVISION NAME SECTION 14 SECTION 14 SECTION 14 SECTION 14 CARRIAGE HILLS CLUBHOUSE ROYAL OAKS ROYAL OAKS ROYAL OAKS ROYAL OAKS 10 10-64800-020-00 ROYAL OAKS 11 10-64800-020-01 ROYAL OAKS 12 10-64800-020-02 ROYAL OAKS 13 10-64800-020-03 ROYAL OAKS 14 10-64800-030-00 ROYAL OAKS 15 10-64800-030-01 ROYAL OAKS 16 10-64800-030-02 ROYAL OAKS 17 10-64800-030-03 ROYAL OAKS 18 10-64800-040-00 ROYAL OAKS 19 10-64800-040-01 ROYAL OAKS 20 10-64800-040-03 ROYAL OAKS 21 10-64800-050-01 ROYAL OAKS 22 10-64800-050-03 ROYAL OAKS 23 10-64800-060-01 ROYAL OAKS 24 10-64800-060-03 ROYAL OAKS 25 10-64800-070-01 ROYAL OAKS 26 10-64800-070-03 ROYAL OAKS 27 10-64800-080-01 ROYAL OAKS 28 10-64800-090-01 ROYAL OAKS 29 10-64800-100-01 ROYAL OAKS 30 10-64800-110-01 ROYAL OAKS 31 10-64800-120-01 ROYAL OAKS 32 10-64800-130-01 ROYAL OAKS 33 10-64800-140-01 ROYAL OAKS 34 10-64800-150-01 ROYAL OAKS 35 10-64800-160-01 ROYAL OAKS 36 10-64800-170-01 ROYAL OAKS 37 10-64800-180-01 ROYAL OAKS 38 10-64800-190-01 ROYAL OAKS 39 10-64800-200-01 ROYAL OAKS 40 10-64800-210-01 ROYAL OAKS 41 10-64800-220-01 ROYAL OAKS 42 10-64800-230-01 ROYAL OAKS 43 10-64800-240-01 ROYAL OAKS 44 10-76200-010-01 THORPE WOODLAND GARDENS 45 10-76200-02001 THORPE WOODLAND GARDENS 46 1083623-010-01 WESSEL POND ADDITION 47 10-83700-034-03 WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS 48 10-83700-036-03 WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS 49 10-83700-038-03 WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS /1 PROPERTY PROPERTY TOTAL TOTAL POLICY APPRAISAL 17,680.18 17,658.82 404,870.55 364,104.84 123,987.91 123,160.30 52,313.74 39,737.84 0.00 0.00 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 3,109.99 34,486.40 26,832.48 36,248.93 27,046.16 7,265.56 6,265.00 9,422.90 8,336.62 13,187.66 13,187.66 64,532.10 56,897.50 882,175.55 801,406.84 1 APPRAISER'S VALUE BENEFIT ROLL W LL .is woLL N N cr gO g O RP8S2OIa2222$mS2822 221^fS2$O2222 ID1OIO222220O! m f g Oi w• ; ' t7 17 Oi f'1 17 Al /�i Pi I+i Pi 17 1`7 /7 Pl 1'1 Mi Pi t7 l7 t�f tai Oi t�! Pi 17 Pi 17 [7 1�i Pi Pi tai N1 e�1 �+i O lel ^ ' f m so.Qta0;a;aaaaaa;aaaaa;;33;;33;.*;;;a;aa;a.a.a��aNs-114" AAAAAMAAAMMAAMAAEAAAAMT 2.i? 2 rl a 8 3. $ $ $ $ $ $ 8 8 8 $ g g $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S $ S P P $ $ & & $ $ O W + 8 m $ Y! m §3S"85 888$�FigSS8�8888F�88$88F8g8$�8F8R8mli51fmmf .. 'M erieiririririeeiririririririririririririririririririririvieeriririorig e0e0gi8$ i R♦O 8X80000000a0000a00o as0ama0of0e0pap01�0'00 en a en ea 00 a 8088800 O 2 II H 11II Ii��8883333333333.3333=333333333333 i 110:!;888888888888888888888888888 0 Z II f O 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888813888 so 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 06 06 0 0d 0 0 ei O O O 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 P. s0 i a II 0 O 0 „ n :EAN I- C I n II 8X8 11 p t3 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 R R m I I 8 X O O 8 r^ n e- e4 6 6 e4 n n ey n A n r n e4 n e4 n n e` e` n 6 n 6 0 11 O a O� O m m t0 O m m t0 tN0 tNC iNC O m fNO m t0 m m esi m m m m t0 VD ci e4 m m m m m m m m 0 m m iND � m a a�� 0� J 4 11 0z II so 808888888888888888888888888888888888888888888X82 of -� 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n8 0 qe8 . el p 0 II II El 3333333,383rz.388:=.8 *P3813883 Egg SiraRn 09/21/2000 V Y og aSS(488888888888282RRRRR88R2R 88R88R88888S888XN8�3 gm$�0n,CTAO.ra.�itm`P°RmnmtC :OArom^me;olnPLP:f mmmnmmmeOo �8m6'aclIP n v In ev `I�i 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888g 0616 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {1 81; 880(0(0mn(Dn666L36(min0(0 0(0 m6 L566(0 W ommmL3ti;6 0 ID r 0000'0 �<a s0m00on^ s000I in aomammoamm000momoaoma000amaoaaoa6004s8sI eon v 511.1 '2 e- i ii 11 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 -1 C G $ 0 0 O 0 O 0 G 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 06 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O6 06 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 N .11g 11 N 0 11 N 1 9-Eil DIVISfON NAME N O Y YY<aazzgazzz N 0005 gOD] J =NNNi(YK2NNXNXNYNYYYNyYNYYYYYXYYYY oaaa Z6OON N N 0 ZZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000ww-s 0000‹ - 000 0 O 0 U a > Y > > Y > Y > > Y > > > > > Y Y > > > > > } > Y > > >)- > > > > > Y Y > 0 pa y /I/ N N W W W W< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S z W W W W N t0 N W 0 C C a 00 C C 0 a C a C a a C a C C a C C C a C C Cr a a a a a a a a C a I- H N N Z z ZZO Z w < O 0p-~17‹p,T,T1y- 0 0 g 0 0- 000 .An!Q2Ft22 11"11'""minuilini o„ dd§ Fred Wessel 3590 Wescott Woodlands Eagan MN 55123 September 28, 2000 Russ Mathes City Engineer City of Eagan Dear Mr. Mathes, This letter is regarding the proposed assessment to my property for the water trunk main. I feel that these assessments are not entirely fair. It is my understanding that if a water main is needed to complete a "loop" in order to be an efficient circuit, it is not normally assessed to property owners, but the cost would be paid by the city. At this time I have no need for a water utility. It should be noted that if I did need this service, it was available at the cul de sac to my south. Furthermore, I feel that the cost is not reflected in additional value to my property. Thank you. Sincerel , r i ii " Fre Wessel 651-454-4042 1/3 r MflDY'S S11fITfD 3430 Wescott Woodlands • Eagan, MN 55123 • (651) 456-9110 Fax (651) 456-9244 Serving Women and Children Who are Homeless September 28, 2000 Russ Matthys, City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Matthys: RECEIVED SEP 2 3 no I would appreciate it if you would forward this letter to the Eagan City Council prior to October 3, 2000. Mary's Shelter benefited from the street and utility improvement of Wescott Woodlands, Project Number 10P742. As the Executive Director of the property/organization (10-01400-020-02, I am writing to say that we object to the assessments proposed to us for this property. We understand the need for the improvements, the improvements are great. But Mary's Shelter had some utilities in place that others on the street did not...therefore, the true benefit improvement as a result of Project 742, is not the same for each property. We would appreciate your further investigation and consideration of the costs assessed to us and assumed benefits to our property. Sincerely, R(yne Branchaud-Linsk Executive Director /19 BOARD OF DIRECTORS President - Ed Usset • Vice President - Kak Jarvis • Secretary - Kathy Woodward • Treasurer - Jeff Pearson Pat Callahan, Brenda Connors, John Edgerton, Karen Reioux, Candyce Wisner EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Deann R►enrhe, ,r1-1 ine4 RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2000 D. TONY AND LYNN K. VINGE 3544 WESCOTT WOODLANDS OBJECTION TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT NUMBER 10P742 TO: City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 D. Tony and Lynn K. Vinge hereby makes objection to the proposed special assessments of the City of Eagan against Parcel No. 10-83700-034-03 and Parcel No. 10-83700-036-03 as more particularly set forth on Exhibits A and B. _ Dated: September 26, 2000 D. Tony and Lynn K. Vinge G c le s /I, (0 to C September 26, 2000 City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Donald and Carol Hesse, 3536 Wescott Woodlands, Eagan, Minnesota, hereby make objection to the proposed special assessment of the City of Eagan against Parcel 10-83700-038-03 as more particularly set forth on the attached. On several occasions we were informed verbally by Russ Matthys and Stan (?) that we would not be charged by the City of Eagan to run this water trunk line through our property. In running the trunk line through our property at this location we, in fact, saved the City thousands of dollars in man hours, equipment, etc. We do expect that you will honor your verbal contract. Sincerely, Donald Hesse4444— /y4,1,2_,....e, 7 Carol M. Hesse 3536 Wescott Woodlands Eagan, MN 55123 / /6 September 13, 2000 CITY OF EAGAN NOTICE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Project 010P742 The EAGAN CITY COUNCIL will meet at 6:45 PM on the 3rd day of October, 2000, at the Eagan City Hall, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN, 55122, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the following described property: 10-83700-038 HESSE 3536 WESCOTT EAGAN MN -03 DONALD E WOODLANDS 55123 The special assessments are: TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT SANITARY SEWER TRUNK SANITARY SEWER LTRL WATER TRUNK WATER LATERAL 8/A 4 3155 3147 3148 3149 TOTAL ANNUAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL $0.00 $0.00 $7,027.15 $468.48 $0.00 $0.00 $6,682.50 $445.50 MATER LATERAL -TRUNK 3150 $8,823.22' $588.21 WTR AND SAN SWR SVC PRS STORM SEWER TRUNK STORM SEWER LATERAL STREET TOTAL 3151 $1,191.36 $79.42 3152 $13,370.92 $891.39 3153 $6,571.74 $438..2 3154 $20,865.21 $1,391.01 $64,532.10 $4,302.13 FIRST YEAR INTEREST $0.00 $614.88 $0.00 $584.72 $772.03 $104.2} $1,169.96 $575.03 $1,825.71 $5,646.57 FIRST YEAR INSTALLMENTS $0.00 $1,083.36 $0.00 $1,030.22 $i,36C.24 $193.66 $2,06:.35 $1,013.15 $3,216.72 $9.948.70 The City of Eagan will accept payment for any portion of these special assessments free of interest charges for a period of 30 (thirty) days. The interest free period begins on October 4 and ends on November 2, 2000. If you choose to pay after November 2, 2000, interest will be charged from October 3 to December 31, 2000. Please make your check payable to "City of Eagan". Mail your payment to, or pay in person at, the Eagan Municipal Center, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Mn. 55122. Any unpaid portion will be collected in annual installments of principal and interest for the next 15 YEARS on your future property tax statements, which will be issued through the Dakota County Auditor's office. The annual installments include interest at the rate of 7.0 PER CENT per year on the unpaid balance. Please Tura Over 1/ Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting E. MINOR SUBDIVISION (TURNOUIST ADDITION) BRIAN TURNOUIST ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Minor Subdivision (Turnquist Addition) located north of Oak Pond Road and west of Oak Pond Circle in the SE 1/4 of Section 26. FACTS: D The property is currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Pond Hills Second Addition. ➢ The site is surrounded on the north, east and south by single family residential uses that are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and designated D -I, Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) and on the west by the Trapp Farm Park. ➢ The subject site is presently occupied by a single family dwelling. While the lot in question is considered "oversized" (being more than four times the size of the minimum R-1 district lot size requirement), it is comparable in size to most single family lots in the area. ➢ The subject site lies in an area characterized by "oversized" lots. The subdivision's proposed lots do however, satisfy minimum R-1, zoning district area requirements and are similar in size to those within existing development to the east. ➢ The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into 32,457 and 21,780 square foot lots. D The proposed subdivision will not result in the creation of any non -conforming setbacks. ATTACHMENTS (1): Staff report, pagesJ!gthrough /�2' /181 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 25, 2000 CASE: 26 -MS -05-08-00 APPLICANT: Brian Turnquist HEARING DATE: October 3, 2000 PROPERTY OWNER: Brian Turnquist PREPARED BY: Tanda Gretz REQUEST: Minor Subdivision LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Pond Hills Second Addition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D -I, Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Brian Turnquist is requesting Minor Subdivision (Turnquist Addition) approval to allow the subdivision of a 1.25 acre single family residential lot located north of Oak Pond Road and west of Oak Pond Circle in the SE 1/4 of section 26. QUALIFICATION To qualify as a minor subdivision, City Code Section 13.10 Subd. 1 states that the following conditions must be satisfied: A. The application shall involve the division of one (1) platted lot into not more than two (2) lots, both of which meet all minimum dimensional requirements of the Zoning Code. B. The proposed lots shall have access to an improve street(s) and shall connect to municipal sewer and water facilities. C. The subdivision shall meet all dedication and other requirements of the City Code. D. The lot shall not previously have been subject to minor subdivision. The proposed lot division satisfies the preceding qualification criteria. //9 Planning Report — Turnquist Addition October 3, 2000 Page 2 AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. The physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision of the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That the completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bond, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan." Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the iao Planning Report — Turnquist Addition October 3, 2000 Page 3 same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The subject property is currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1 Oak Pond Hills 2nd Addition. The Oak Pond subdivision was originally approved in 1978 and consisted of 6 lots. In 1978, a home was constructed on the eastern portion of the subject property which was provided access from Oak Pond Circle. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is presently occupied by a single family dwelling on the eastern portion of the property with access from Oak Pond Circle. SURROUNDING USES The site is surrounded on the north, east and south by single family residential uses that are zoned R-1, single family residential and designated D -I, Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre). The western edge of the property borders a small strip of park land that is part of the Trapp Farm Park. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The subject site is immediately surrounded by lots of a similar size, all being an acre or more in size. The sudivision's proposed lots, however, do satisfy minimum R-1 zoning district area requirements, and are similar in size to some lots in the general vicinity. The compatibility of the proposed subdivision to the immediate area is considered a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Lots — Both proposed lots comply with minimum R-1 district lot size requirements, the minimum 12,000 square foot lot area and 85 foot lot width requirement (as measured at the required front yard setback line). Lot 1 measures 32,457 square feet and Lot 2 measures 21,780 square feet. Setbacks — The proposed subdivision will not result in the creation of any non -conforming setbacks (including accessory building setbacks). Planning Report — Turnquist Addition October 3, 2000 Page 4 Density — A density of 1.6 units/acre has been proposed, which is consistent with the D -I density requirements (0-3 units/acre) of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Airport Noise — The subject site lies outside the Airport Noise Zone. Grading/Topography — The site is moderately to heavily wooded and moderately slopes from northeast to southwest. Grading is not proposed on Lot 1 with the existing house. Grading for Lot 2 will occur at time of building permit. Storm Drainage — No additional storm sewer system improvements are necessary with this subdivision. Utilities — Sanitary sewer and water main service stubs were constructed for both lots under the Oak Pond Hills street and utility project (City Project No. 732). The existing house on Lot 1 is connected to the City utility system. Streets/Access — Public street access for the proposed subdivision will be from Oak Pond Road to the south for Lot 2, and continued access from Oak Pond Circle for Lot 1, although public street access for both lots is available from Oak Pond Road. Easements/Permits/Right-of-Way — Public drainage and utility easements should be dedicated on the Final Plat 10 feet in width adjoining street right-of-way and 5 feet in width along adjoining lot lines. Parks — Proposed lot 2 will be subject to a cash parks dedication of $1,272 and a cash trails dedication of $168 to be collected as a condition of minor subdivision approval. These totals reflect the fees set for the year 2000. Tree Preservation — Tree preservation issues will be addressed as part of building permit issuance. Water Quality/Wetlands — Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication of $2,091. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed subdivision is consistent with the R-1 zoning requirements. Baa Planning Report — Turnquist Addition October 3, 2000 Page 5 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve a Minor Subdivision entitled Turnquist Addition located north of Oak Pond Road and west of Oak Pond Circle in the SE 1/4 of Section 26. If approved the following conditions apply: 1. The subject property shall be platted. 2. The applicant shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council February 3, 1993: B1, B3, and El 3. Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash park dedication. 4. Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash trail dedication. 5. Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope • easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /a y 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 LTS%5 STANDARD.CON /as Revised: February 2, 1993 Location Map • C.za wCGr7��kNMI� p� 4 I I+1 C l Ov n v GCD:GGv_ • L nil RG, ^fYA viAer.'c� ' °see �o o��°?�s� �� tc....'-:�� ' 4�,,,,tvl tl.°4,'..i!;44 0 •GL-1;C:i;PcalGV4) 04 V4*. gi4.>.it.f 4. /7 *air 1.461.— • 1 4 p . 9 Eagan Boundary Stro•t Centerline L J Parcel Area 1111 Building footprint • MB i • moms irs.a..mcV:SiV% O 1 • rdi a r• de • • • e ,.. • .1. 1 Sub ect Site 111111 1t • • do 14r 1.!.1517:111`) `' .:' ��,. ='' �,��P��fiGP� L74�©•41.1 �,:�� ;.VA ► ..rrr7` �. rs �r cozoD Ar17"I '. �;.• ;acv;t� , c._._..�o �,, [[b)la• �►� <,��►�j Aft4P4tAikfd1u�iih ��f•�■; �;�i.�icd:E..ir1lr� I��`\V� V��i�jf' t kygrAwrs;3, cg:::: ��e De�o�� gLarwt4,14.4,31,�4.1o ■foo s`��vv°oov©o oD QIn �'�C��Q*y OOlb 41Kt•� OD 60 OP �%� . �a� fiL,,,,,,tsfaiii,„„iii. ms©oeevdt�� r• �OPiIil� mel i ��i07 �:.�i 1 • • 1000 0 tf :•• \ gaL �e 1 • in Mita e5 veer • 4 gki144 • WarlGrrEa�° e•'. • 1• a • -- - 51 a 1 1000 2000 Feet 44 Development/Developer: Turnquist Addition Application: Minor Subdivision Case No.: 26 -MS -05-08-00 a6 City of Eagan MINNESOTA C.rnm.alty Dsvel.pnraet Department Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVMw 3.1. Parcel bas. map data provkt.d by Dakota County Land Survey D.partm.nt and is current .s or August 2000. THIS MAP 1E INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and aro not Ible for errors or omissions. • /a � 44111. 1. I- 3 z 1 II Idi ��i I ii Ite1 1 1 Abliii►ir'iii{iiii 1....o._...• 1:177! II ; ILi 0' ifildi .1 gill Jliali IT ib; 1 IOt'( h' MC LAGAM 1•01,• Y 11/••! I... •••••rI • iamb. •••ea ..... ed. •rr• w 4—AMMO ---- ` if 1 PROPOSED TURNQUIST ADDITION i • • • • �E 1 I: 211 1 ihpit mi ig r: T. IA • \ •- O 7' �R ill Kill c. 1 • \• , / \ ill 1) ' ,� ► !t 1 0- 1 baa Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000, Eagan City Council F. MINOR SUBDIVISION (HELEN KENNEDY ADDITION) — HELEN KENNEDY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Minor Subdivision (Helen Kennedy Addition) of .82 acres to create two single- family lots on property located at 3300 Heritage Lane, currently platted as Lot 11, Block 1, Letendre Addition, located in the SW'/4 of Section 9. FACTS: • The subject site is located at 3300 Heritage Lane, and is currently platted as Lot 11, Block 1, Letendre Addition. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into two parcels. • The site contains an existing single-family home, constructed in 1955, with a swimming pool in the rear yard. The topography slopes down from the existing home to the east where a new house would be constructed. • The site is surrounded by single-family residential uses that are zoned R-1 and guided D -I. • The proposed minor subdivision satisfies the lot requirements for the R-1 zoning district. • The site plan shows that setbacks can be accommodated for both the existing house, which will remain on Lot 1, and a new house to be built on Lot 2. • The grading plan shows a retaining wall off the northwest corner of the structure proposed for Lot 2. All grading is within city standards for minimum and maximum slope. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Report, pages X30 through /4'/ /a9 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 27, 2000 APPLICANT: Helen Kennedy PROPERTY OWNER: George Kennedy Rosann Kennedy CASE: 09 -MS -06-09-00 HEARING DATE: October 3, 2000 APPLICATION DATE: Sept. 1, 2000 REQUEST: Minor Subdivision PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 3300 Heritage Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D -I, Single -Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) ZONING: R-1, Single -Family Residential SUMMARY OF REQUEST Helen Kennedy is requesting approval of a Minor Subdivision of .82 acres to create two lots on property located at 3300 Heritage Lane, legally described as Lot 13, Block 1, Letendre Addition, in the SW 1/4 of Section 9. QUALIFICATION To qualify as a minor subdivision, City Code Section 13.10 Subd. 1 states that the following conditions must be satisfied: A. The application shall involve the division of one (1) platted lot into not more than two (2) lots, both of which meet all minimum dimensional requirements of the Zoning Code. B. The proposed lots shall have access to an improved street(s) and shall connect to municipal sewer and water facilities. C. The subdivision shall meet all dedication and other requirements of the City Code. D. The lot shall not previously have been subject to minor subdivision. The proposed lot division satisfies the preceding qualification criteria. /30 Planning Report — Helen Kennedy Addition October 3, 2000 Page 2 City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as /3/ Planning Report — Helen Kennedy Addition October 3, 2000 Page 3 fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY Letendre Addition was platted in 1949. The site contains an existing single-family home that was constructed in 1955 with a swimming pool in the rear yard. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing home is located on the west half of the site. The site slopes up to the east from Heritage Lane and the home is situated at the top of this hill. Behind the existing home the site slopes back down to the east and the house on Lot 2 will be about 12 feet lower than the existing house on Lot 1. There is a shed located at the southeast corner of the site, and the plans note that the shed will be removed. SURROUNDING USES Surrounding uses are single-family residential. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area— The single-family use is compatible with the surrounding area. This block from Yankee Doodle to Letendre Street contains three lots with double frontage on Heritage Lane and Donald Avenue; most of the others on the block have previously been subdivided in a manner similar to this proposal. This proposal is different in that the proposed subdivision line is angled to encompass the existing swimming pool within Lot 1 and is parallel with the existing fence line that surrounds the pool. Lots — Both Lots 1 and 2 satisfy the minimum R-1 zoning standards. Lot 1 is proposed to be 20,851 square feet in area, and Lot 2 is proposed to be 14,868 square feet. The site is 109.94 feet in width, which exceeds the minimum 85 -foot lot width for the R-1 zoning district. Setbacks — Minimum required setbacks in the R-1 zoning district are 30 feet for front yards, 10 feet for side yards (five feet for an accessory structure), and fifteen feet for rear yards. The existing structures on Lot 1 appear to satisfy these minimum setbacks. Lot 2 also appears to be able to accommodate required setbacks. City Code Section 11.10, Subdivision 19.B requires that in residential zoning districts where 50% or more of the lots are developed, the required front yard setback shall be the average setback established by the existing dwellings located in the block. The site plan for development of Lot 2 shows a proposed front setback of 45 feet, which appears to be consistent with the front setbacks of houses to the south along Donald Avenue. The front setback for Lot 2, based on the average of other developed lots /3 2 Planning Report — Helen Kennedy Addition October 3, 2000 Page 4 on the block, will be determined at the time of building permit application. The rear yard setback on the site plan shows about 50 feet at the structure's closest point to the rear lot line. Since the zoning code does not allow an accessory structure to occupy a lot without a principal structure, the existing shed on the southeast corner of the site will need to be removed. The shed must be removed prior to release of the plat for recording rather than at the time of construction as noted on the plans. Density — The proposed two -lot development on .82 acres has a resulting density of 2.4 units per acre. Airport Noise — The development site lies outside of the airport noise exposure zones established by the Metropolitan Council. Engineering Issues — Lot 1 generally slopes to the west while Lot 2 slopes to the north. The site is moderately wooded. All proposed grades shown on the preliminary grading plan are within City standards for minimum and maximum slopes. The grading plan for development of Lot 2 includes a one- to four -foot retaining wall off the northwest corner of the house extending out about 20 feet. No storm sewer improvements are necessary to accommodate drainage from the proposed subdivision. Sanitary sewer and water main are available within Donald Avenue for service connection by Lot 2. The connection will involve the removal and replacement of a section of Donald Avenue. Parks — A cash park and trail dedication will be required for Lot 2 and is payable prior to release of the plat for recording at the rate in effect at that time. The 2000 dedication rates are $1,272.00 for parks and $168.00 for trails. Water Quality/Wetlands — Because of the size of this site is relatively small, on-site water quality treatment of stormwater is not practical. Therefore, in accordance with City policies, the development is responsible for a cash dedication equal to the cost of the land and pond volume needed to reduce phosphorous export to undeveloped conditions. The amount of the cash dedication for the subdivision will be $1,255.00 and is payable prior to release of the plat for recording. Tree Preservation - An Individual Tree Preservation Plan will be required with the building permit application and compliance with the tree preservation ordinance will be determined at that time. /33 Planning Report — Helen Kennedy Addition October 3, 2000 Page 5 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is proposing a Minor Subdivision of .82 acres to create two single-family lots on property at 3300 Heritage Lane in the SW '/4 of Section 9. The proposed minor subdivision appears to meet the R-1 zoning district requirements for lot size and setbacks. The existing house and swimming pool will remain on proposed Lot 1. The existing shed on proposed Lot 2 will need to be removed from the site prior to recording of the plat. Utilities are available to serve development on proposed Lot 2. Cash dedications are required for parks, trails and water quality. Tree preservation will be reviewed at the time of building permit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve a Minor Subdivision entitled Helen Kennedy Addition creating two lots on .82 acres located at 3300 Heritage Lane in the SW 1/4 of Section 9. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, and El. 2. The proposed house to be built on Lot 2 must satisfy a front yard setback from Donald Avenue as required in City Code Section 11.10, Subdivision 19.B, which is the average setback established by the existing dwellings in the block (along Donald Avenue). 3. The existing shed on the southeast corner of the site shall be removed prior to release of the plat for recording. 4. Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash park dedication of $1,272.00, payable prior to release of the plat for recording. 5. Proposed Lot 2 shall be subject to a cash trail dedication of $168.00, payable prior to release of the plat for recording. 6. The development shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication of $1,255.00 payable prior to release of the plat for recording. 7. An Individual Tree Preservation Plan will be required with the building permit application and compliance with the tree preservation ordinance will be determined at that time. /3,9 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /3S 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. if any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTSIS STANOARO.CON /36 Location Map Eagan Boundary Street Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint - 9 4. r Alm �` i ��t��© ��e F4 r�lo!ac>, ooIoo .,_. ©©©© __at .©Jo0 ©ae�lbmai®E� 1- { EI0 0o to T , vill. 1 El IP S a3 444* 1® it I/\ gitt# N Sub ect Site „......_.11?.44, 41E71,* id N , A tt fit tbrv4z), A:Er La:: ,,,,t, /dr OIL 0 Ilr Or 1111 1 N it 41 I P44 B 1 . 1111:1 i la URI mu Num iimuJ Er '4 are iI • / © au�u� aria ,a nr .. 41111 riii IL n tl E�1EE�1 1 11 41r mmeII `f� s I). � i t a. .... :., ''.- C1:7=N-s\ � 1' 1 . gig 1411101 • IV i 0' I yr 111111 zz 91 Ial MA �iA, Viliztai EJf'y E1 IJ C !1 ill _ oWiwi",± ■ 4111110illit ; GU [01114 ` • 1/...i > 41//diu-<-7.7.-. ..�.. ©mak 41.3P MItta �� • • ♦ . • . �. z . 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Helen Kennedy Application: Minor Subdivision Case No.: 09 -MS -06-09-00 City of Eagan MINNESOTA C•mm••ny D•r•t•pm.at DNattm•ot Map Prepared using cast ArcVlaw 3.1. Parcel baa map data provided by Dakota County Land Survey Department and is commas of August 2000. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are not responsible far errors or omissions. N W E S Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Helen Kennedy Addition Land Use Map Case No. 09 -MS -06-09-00 Zoning Map 1111* ,�' /G 0RD r Alf 04 .t t 44, Wit/ iii ` is Location IG 0 Current Zoning: . _ !'--1EN : e�0 NM .4 Ell MB aaaaa� R-1 Single -Family Residential 1-t' , r • ' C po - ..... • / r 91 MT% mi MOO IWZ,..Plr All A MM.PD ..NM Ell {00 0 000 1200 Feet .s G'= 11 114 nl Comprehensive Guide Plan . • 1/4"\---- Ca IND �04 Land Use Map Br �'G 05 V IT 12 -IV PA 741LDM 0��•G I Current Land Use Designation:. fa ■ IR. `a D-11 s, III■' _IN Ir. Ii am ` ■ Single Family Residential _ANso ; ;; : i N 10 ll♦Il,� N MI • IND NEler `:.. \ n 0.11 V4.14+: r/ 0.. fklii: 000 0 {.{ 1:00 Feet e C ►i�� 0 O C _ Parcel base map Information p Zoning info City of Eagan THIS MAP IS INTENDED Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County de by Da eta Co nd Surrey Department 0N1/00. N nod by City Staff. V. E FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. S .11 14 1 1 1311, !it, 1111 sill ;�1 s —_z_— i ll' i 1 f rl�t 1 c 1 DONALD 0111110 Y a .:.t:::::... ADDI...... 1 a a -p o • �E t if Ill l; 1 i!1 /3? PRELIMINARY PLAT I M13NN3)I z f 11 it t J EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 Pii 1 • HERITAGE ) LANE / • / •�I'•` ,1\i ?�;• i �i _ •g. / !177 { ,I. t?'• SITE PLAN Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS A. FLOOD DEBRIS PICK UP ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To consider extending the schedule for hauling and disposal of storm -related debris at residential properties. FACTS: • At its meeting on September 5, 2000, the City Council directed staff to continue coordinating hauling and disposal of debris related to the super storm of July 7-8. • Debris removal through late August was reimbursable as part of the FEMA disaster declaration. All debris disposal activity since then is being paid for by the City of Eagan. Waste Management estimates that debris collection in the month of September will cost approximately $12,000. Additional costs for roll -off containers and special materials recycling will probably push that figure closer to $15,000. • Storm debris pick-ups have been scheduled only on Fridays. The number of residents requesting removal has increased each week in the month of September, from roughly 15 in the first week to nearly 50 on September 29. The increase seems to be due to two factors; homeowners are receiving financial assistance and scheduling contractors for repairs, and visits by the Inspections Division to do moisture monitoring have caused some homeowners to do repairs that were not originally anticipated. • The Inspections Division has monitored 115 homes for moisture. Fewer calls have been received lately and the inspector performing the moisture monitoring only expects about one hour per day for such work. /ya Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting 13, PROJECT 779, DODD ROAD (DIFFLEY TO WESCOTT) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Define the scope of study and authorize the preparation of a revised Feasibility Report for Project 779R (Dodd Rd. Upgrade — Diffley to Wescott). FACTS: • On September 26, The City Council held an informational workshop with interested residents of the Dodd Rd. area regarding a proposal to upgrade Dodd Rd. to urban design standards between Diffley and Wescott Roads. With 75+ citizens in attendance, the Council summarized and identified approximately 5 options and 6 research issues for further evaluation and incorporation into a new revised feasibility report. This information was to be summarized and presented to the Council at the regular meeting of Oct. 3 for their ratification and scheduling. • Staff has prepared a summary of the options and issues along with an estimated cost, recommended time frame and proposed process to complete the identified tasks and presentation of the draft report to the Council and public. ATTACHMENTS: • Summary of Options and Issues, pageN/ and / Vc. • Cost and Schedule proposal, (to be included as part of the Administrative Agenda) Project 779 DODD ROAD UPGRADE OPTIONS (Provide Plan, Profile and Cross Sections showing est. construction limits) A. CITY STANDARD 1. 36' wide with concrete curb and gutter (two lanes with 8' safety/parking lane on one side) 2. Turn lanes at Diffley, Elrene, and Wescott Roads. (40' wide, but with no safety lane) 3. 8' Bituminous Trail on both sides 4. 8' boulevard between trail and curb 5. Storm Sewer and catch basins B. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY EXISTING SURFACE ONLY 1. Pavement currently structurally sound, therefore not needed until 2006 at the earliest. (In essence, this would be a "Do Later" proposal). C. MODIFIED CITY STANDARD (Councilmember Carlson's Proposal - Similar to Elrene Rd.) 1. 38' wide with concrete curb and gutter (two 14' lanes with a 10' safety/parking lane on one side) 2. Turn lanes at Diffley and Wescott Roads only. (40' wide, but with no safety lane) 3. 5' concrete sidewalk on one side only 4. 4' boulevard between trail and curb 5. Storm Sewer and catch basins D. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY (RURAL SECTION) WITH PAVED SHOULDERS (Note: Dimensions based on State Aid Standards) 1. 40' total width (36' wide bituminous surface consisting of 2-12' travel lanes and 2-6' bike/safety lanes with a 2' gravel edge shoulder on each side). 2. No curb or gutter 3. No Storm Sewer 4. No off road trail E. HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 1. Maintain road in current configuration (In essence, this would be a "Do Nothing" proposal) 2. Install historical informational signage Page 1 of 2 / v RESEARCH ISSUES A. TRAFFIC COUNTS & PROJECTIONS 1. Take new 48 hr. traffic counts with road tube mechanical counter. 2. Perform manual intersection turning movement counts on Dodd Rd. at Elrene Rd./Coventry Pkwy, Stonebridge Dr./Esk Lane, and/or Camberwell/Ethen Dr. intersections? Council needs to clarify/designate. 3. Inform neighborhood representative one week in advance B. SPEED LIMIT 1. Explore options to decrease current speed limit. C. MAINTENANCE COST COMPARISON 1. Compare the longterm maintenance costs of a rural road design to an urban design section. D. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 1. Research recent (?) history of accidents on Dodd Rd. 2. Provide breakdown of intersection (Diffley & Wescott) vs. non -intersection. E. HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 1. Review and comment by the City's Historical Society. 2. Review and comment by the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO). F. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 1. Compare the runoff impacts of an urban section (curb, gutter, storm sewer) to a rural design (ditches) with the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Page 2 of 2 G:Tom C/Proj/779/F.R. Options Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting X. NEW BUSINESS A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — METALS USA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow two above ground fuel storage tanks on property located west of Highway 13 between Alexander Road and Meadowview Road (3101 Sibley Memorial Highway) and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan 13 Industrial Park in the NW '/4 of Section 9 subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. FACTS: ➢ The subject site measures 2.6 acres in size and is occupied by a 38,400 square foot industrial building. Metals USA leases the northern one half of the building. D According to the applicant, Metals USA is the nations third largest steel conversion company. The primary purpose of the Eagan Facility is to convert raw materials into components for local original equipment manufactures (OEM's). ➢ The applicant is proposing to install two 1,500 gallon, cryogenic tanks. One of the tanks will hold liquid nitrogen and the other tank will hold liquid oxygen. The proposed tanks are necessary for the operation of the company's laser systems. D At their regular meeting on September 26, 2000, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Conditional Use Permit and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. ISSUES: ➢ At the public hearing, area property owners raised concern in regard to odors, property upkeep, and separation from residential uses. ➢ In response to various concerns, the APC made a motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit with the following additional conditions to the staff report dated September 19, 2000: #8. Parking shall be allowed only within designated off-street parking stalls. #9. There shall be no outside storage upon the property, except as otherwise noted. #10. A maximum of one waste container shall be located at the facility's dock door. #11. The scrap metal container shall be screened and enclosed by a chain link fence. ATTACHMENTS (2) September 26, 2000 APC Meetin Minutes page / Staff report, pages /SQthrough 16/ Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — METALS USA DRAFT Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow two above ground 1,500 gallon fuel tanks on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan - Industrial Park 13, located at 3101 Sibley Memorial Highway in the NW 1/4 of Section 9. Planner Kirmis introduced this item and highlighted the background / history, existing conditions and surrounding uses of the subject property. He stated that provided the proposed fuel storage tanks comply with the seven conditions of approval listed in the planning report dated September 26, 2000, the proposed fuel storage activity appears compatible with existing and future uses in the area. The applicant was present to answer questions of the Commission and public. One resident spoke, expressing concern over the overall condition of the property, stating there is outdoor storage, debris and parking on the grass. He also stated there is an odor that is emitted from the building and there are pieces of sheep's wool that blows from the site onto area properties. There being no further comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. The applicant, Robert Ward, stated that the company has spent in excess of $3,500 in the past 90 days installing a filter system to alleviate the odor problem. He also stated that the problem of wool blowing out of the trash dumpsters when the dumpsters are being emptied is an on-going problem and efforts would be made to control the problem. He further stated that there had been some outdoor storage but the items were being moved inside and that efforts would be made to keep the grounds neat and keep cars parked only in designated parking areas. Member Kaess asked the applicant how many employees the company currently has. Mr. Ward stated currently they have 32 but expect the number to be 64 in the near future. Member Steininger asked about measures being taken to prevent cars from hitting the fuel tanks. Mr. Ward explained that bollards would be placed to prevent such accidents. Member Nosbush asked if the area property owners had been notified. Staff stated that notices had been mailed. Chair Heyl asked what the distance is to the nearest residence. Planner Kirmis responded approximately 100 feet. Chair Heyl asked if City staff had received any complaints. Planner Kirmis stated that the only complaints had been from the resident that spoke earlier in the meeting. Chair Tilley asked what could be done to regulate the odor problem. Planner Kirmis stated that odors issues are regulated by the State. He stated that the Fire Marshal had /Ve1 Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 6 DRAFT visited the site and was satisfied that the applicant was making a good faith effort to eliminate the odors. Member Steininger asked about additional parking spaces. Mr. Ward stated there will be three parking stalls added. Steininger further suggested there be no parking on the grass and that a condition be added to the conditions listed in the planning report. The Commission and applicant discussed screening of the dumpsters. Member Tilley moved, Member Steininger seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow two above ground fuel storage tanks on property located west of Highway 13 between Alexander Road and Meadowview Road (3101 Sibley Memorial Highway), legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 Eagan 13 Industrial Park in the NW '/4 of Section 9 subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of its approval by the City Council. 2. The tanks shall be located north of the site's principal building as identified on the site plan. 3. The proposed fuel tank storage shall be subject to review by the City Fire Marshal per the Uniform Fire Code for Flammable and Combustible Liquids. 4. The proposed storage of fuel tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the State Fire Marshal. 5. A 24 foot wide drive aisle shall be maintained along the north side of the building. 6. There shall be no net loss of off-street parking stalls as a result of the fuel tank location on the site. 7. The fuel storage area shall be screened from Meadowview Road via a slatted, eight foot high fence. 8. Parking will be allowed only within designated off-street stalls. 9. There shall be no outside storage upon the property, except otherwise noted. 10. A maximum of one waste container shall be located at the facility's dock door. 11. The scrap metal container shall be screened and enclosed by a chain link fence. All voted in favor. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2000 APPLICANT: Metals USA PROPERTY OWNER: RLJ Properties LLC. CASE: 09 -CU -07-08-00 HEARING DATE: September 26, 2000 PREPARED BY: Bob Kirmis REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Above ground fuel storage tanks) LOCATION: West of Highway 13 between Alexander Road and Meadowview Road (3101 Sibley Memorial Highway) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Limited Industrial ZONING: I-1, Limited Industrial SUMMARY OF REQUEST Metals USA has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow two above ground fuel storage tanks on property located west of Highway 13 between Alexander Road and Meadowview Road (3101 Sibley Memorial Highway). The property is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 Eagan 13 Industrial Park in the NW 1/4 of Section 9. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to install two 1,500 gallon, cryogenic tanks. One of the tanks will hold liquid nitrogen and the other tank will hold liquid oxygen. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Conditional Use Permit: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivisions 4C and 4D provide the following. Subdivision 4C states that the Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. /So Planning Report — Metals USA September 26, 2000 Page 2 B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property, which does not create traffic congestion, or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Subdivision 4D, Conditions, states that in reviewing applications of conditional use permits, the Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable. conditions they deem necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses, to protect the value of other property within the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In all cases in which conditional uses are granted, the Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditions stipulated in connection therewith are being and will be complied with. BACKGROUND /HISTORY Eagan 13 Industrial Park was platted in July of 1974. The building that exists on the site was constructed in 1973 and later expanded in 1982. According to the applicant, Metals USA is the nations third largest steel conversion company. The primary purpose of the Eagan Facility is to convert raw materials into components for local original equipment manufactures (OEM's). The proposed nitrogen and oxygen storage tanks are necessary for the operation of the company's laser systems. /57 Planning Report — Metals USA September 26, 2000 Page 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site measures 2.6 acres in size and is occupied by a 38,400 square foot industrial building. Metals USA leases the northern one half of the building. The subject property is accessed from the south via Alexander Road and the north via Meadowview Lane. There are no wetlands or significant vegetation on the property. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Lull International; zoned IND, Limited Industrial and designated IND, Limited Industrial South - Lull International; zoned I-1, Limited Industrial and designated IND, Limited Industrial East - Water Heater Inovations; zoned I-1, Limited Industrial and designated IND, Limited Industrial West - Single Family Residence; zoned I-1, Limited Industrial and designated IND, Limited Industrial EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area - According to the submitted Site Plan, the proposed storage tanks are to be located on the on the north side of the site's principal building. While the tanks will not be visible from the adjacent Alexander Road right-of-way, they would be visible from Meadowview Road to the north without screening. Site Plan/Off-street Parking - As shown on the submitted site plan, the property's principal building is centrally located on the subject site. Off-street parking is dispersed along the perimeter of the property. The fuel tanks are proposed to occupy a 480 square foot (30' x 16') area along the north side of the building which is presently utilized as a drive aisle for adjacent off-street parking stalls. To continue to accommodate two-way vehicle circulation on the north side of the building, the row of off-street parking stalls on the north side of the building are to be converted to a drive aisle and conversely, the existing drive aisle will be converted to off-street parking stalls. The two fuel tanks will basically occupy three parking stalls. The applicant has indicated that stalls lost on the north side of the building (as a result of the tank location) will be replaced elsewhere on the site. Planning Report — Metals USA September 26, 2000 Page 4 As a condition of CUP approval, there should be no net loss of off-street parking on the site as a result of the fuel tank location. Screening - According to the applicant, an eight foot high chain link fence will be installed around the fuel tanks. To fully screen the tanks from the adjacent Meadowview Road (to the north), it is suggested that the chain link fence be slatted. Engineering Issues - There are no engineering issues associated with this proposal. Fire Code Issues - As a condition of CUP approval, the City Fire Marshal must determine that the fuel storage tank meets the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code for Flammable and Combustible Liquids. The fuel storage tank must also be reviewed by the State Fire Marshal. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Provided the proposed fuel storage tanks comply with the conditions of approval listed in this report, the proposed fuel storage activity appears compatible with existing and future uses in the area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow two above ground fuel storage tanks on property located west of Highway 13 between Alexander Road and Meadowview Road (3101 Sibley Memorial Highway), legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 Eagan 13 Industrial Park in the NW 1/4 of Section 9. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of its approval by the City Council. 2. The tanks shall be located north of the site's principal building as identified on the site plan. 3. The proposed fuel tank storage shall be subject to review by the City Fire Marshal per the Uniform Fire Code for Flammable and Combustible Liquids. 4. The proposed storage of fuel tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the State Fire Marshal. 5. A 24 foot wide drive aisle shall be maintained along the north side of the building. /S3 Planning Report — Metals USA September 26, 2000 Page 5 6. There shall be no net loss of off-street parking stalls as a result of the fuel tank location on the site. 7. The fuel storage area shall be screened from Meadowview Road via a slatted, eight foot high fence. /5v FINANCIAL OBLIGATION Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan -13 Industrial Park Conditional Use Permit There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $11,812 on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT Water Lateral USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT C.I. $28.40/F.F. 400 F.F. $11,360 TOTAL $11,360 Acceptance of this financial obligation is not a condition of approval of the conditional use permit. Location Map Eagan Boundary Street Cent*,Una Parcel Ana - Building Footprint nun if tit 1 1 4 `•C7iii !tF, 8i , • 11' ,.. f �xx�QQC�'��'=i _ di Ailtai _ • r ectiC 411 eta! i 111 r / '• Nie G 1e iii `,_ �`'ili�+�� '' L7[1 i,ii Sub ect Site0� EM if .__iluau./,_4 * ' ♦ set 1 ++w1. '',' 1 1 • *Nato . 40 411V r '�.r 11 Ii I i IVA.I4,-ai.,44.. 1 .4•�., 1l a in ,.. Au r'. { io %,` Fr • 111 I 1 I I I 4 ' 1 0 I OP r-- • f 1 1 •. InesIniI E + 411 T24 No 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Metals USA Application: Conditional Use Perm Case No.: 09-CU-07-08-00 f S�6 *My of Eagan MINNESOTA c•neasaaf e...ara..r a•pwre••r ttep t3i91AreNas31. ParalhermQdRaprodded byaafs as�rLsdrgaP/tr�isandisDantearriPrGAt O1 . / THIS MAP 1f INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan sad Dakota County de net Euareatee the accuracy of this infonn.tloa and an not responsible for errors or endssions. N Wcillm•E S Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Metals, Inc. Land Use Map Case No. 09-CU-07-08-00 Zoning Map Wan MAIIIPIIPEII.. � I,II • kir CurrentM1 Zoning: QIF f 4R-3 :• PD Planned Development O �, \� 4)(410 %VI" AV ® Ltt ;$IY R-4 Art 11* 4, iltGB , R-4IR atm an 1� •• /Liu hthi ... ... .... Poet Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map IND Albo �_ iv, .' Ausallt B�� AiVAI _,........ /muff, ,; Current Land Use Designation: ..,„%zi 41,7 i ®i... -- f • CA/►� Central Area 744r11%,4�D-IV fir 1* , ® g !lit A Y.wra.a tr. armywr•ee�.M 1,11104.N r.raM.wamp t..rt yr pep.tr. City of Eagan W E 2, THIS MAI 1! INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY TM CNy of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S SITE VICINITY 1 N N isq Ip SITE PLAN ID 11 /6d SITE PLAN DETAILS f1 b N t Y g s rr • 1 N co N -- 0 H W z 0 0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT — FRAUENSHUH ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To direct that a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to establish a D -IV, Mixed Residential (12+ units per acre) land use guide plan designation upon approximately 4.14 acres of land located west of Hwy. 77 and north of Diffley Road across from Metcalf Junior High School, in the SW 1/4 of Section 19, be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. FACTS: • The applicant is requesting the land use change from Commercial Planned Development to D -IV, Mixed Residential (12+ units per acre). • The property has been guided for commercial use as far back as 1974 and appears to have been rezoned to Planned Development in 1990 to accommodate a mixed use development. The subject site retained the commercial designation with the 1990 PD. • The applicant has indicated that the site has not been attractive and marketable to commercial users and they are therefore seeking the change to D -IV land use designation to allow for an apartment building to be constructed on the site. The applicant has indicated that there is a market for apartments in Eagan and that an apartment would provide an acceptable buffer to the townhomes from Diffley Road. • The APC held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and failed to recommend approval of the land use designation for reasons stated in the minutes. ISSUES: • Several residents of the adjacent townhomes spoke at the public hearing and objected to the proposed change in land use. They stated concerns about possible negative effects on their property values, additional traffic at Old Sibley Highway, safety of children crossing Diffley Road to get to the school property, and an inability to evaluate the D -IV use without specific plans. • One resident spoke in favor of the change, stating that Eagan should consider the long-term and broader community -wide impact of providing apartment housing for people who work in the city who cannot or do not want to live in a single family home. ATTACHMENTS: September 26, 2000, APC Minutes ages through Lil_ Staff Report, pages through / 73 /6.2 Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 7 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT — FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment amending the land use of approximately 4.14 acres from Commercial Planned Development to D -IV Mixed Residential (12+unites/acre), located across from Metcalf Jr. High on the NW corner of Diffley Road and Cedar Avenue Freeway in the SW 1/4 of Section 19. Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the background/history, existing conditions and surrounding uses of the subject property. She stated that this site has been designated for commercial use as far back as 1974, however, the applicant has indicated they have had difficulty selling the property for commercial use. The applicant, Richard Wicka, representing Frauenshuh Companies stated that the property is an underutilized piece of property and given the current market place, a residential use of the property seems best. He stated that his company had recently participated in a neighborhood meeting to inform the neighbors of Frauenshuh's plans for the property. There were five residents who spoke, expressing their concerns regarding the decrease in property values; increase in crime due to the type of residents rental property would attract; possible drainage problems; increased traffic from Old Highway 13; safety of children crossing Diffley; and access to the property. One resident spoke in favor of the rezoning, stating that Eagan has a need for more multiple unit housing. There being no further comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. Mr. Wicka responded to the concerns of the residents stating the plans that have been presented are only conceptual. He went on to state that the property is just a vacant lot and should not be viewed as green space. He stated his company is trying to provide a type of housing that is needed in Eagan. Member Tilley asked what type of residents the complex would target. Mr. Wicka responded that there would be a mixture of single residents and families. He stated there would be one, two and three bedroom units. Chair Heyl pointed out that the Commission should only address the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and not the concept plan for the project. Member Segal stated that designating the property as Mixed Residential would be consistent with the comprehensive plan for the area. He further stated that property owners need to be aware that undeveloped property has the potential to be rezoned /63 Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 8 DRAFT Member Steininger stated that he felt the property should have a specific plan presented before the Comprehensive Guide Plan is amended. Member Kaess stated that he agreed with Member Segal in that the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be consistent with the surrounding area. Member Huusko stated he had no problem with a multi -family use on this property but would like to see a specific proposal due to the size of the parcel. Senior Planner Ridley stated that it is City Council policy that the Comprehensive Guide Plan be reviewed before specific plans for an area are presented for review. Steininger and Nosbush both agreed that the property should remain commercial. Member Huusko moved, Member Kaess seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 4.14 acre site located north of Diffley road across from Metcalf Junior High from CPD, Commercial Planned Development, to D -IV, Mixed Residential of 12+ unites per acre. Motion failed 5-2. Members Kaess and Segal voted in favor of the motion. The Commission explained their reasons for voting against the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment as lack of a park nearby, lack of service businesses in the area, and the property is too small to accommodate an apartment complex as proposed. Member Tilley stated that the property could possibly be designated as high density but she did not feel it should be R-4. /6 y PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2000 APPLICANT: Frauenshuh Companies PROPERTY OWNER: Diffley LLP CASE: 19 -CG -04-08-00 HEARING DATE: September 26, 2000 PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment LOCATION: Northwest corner of Diffley Road and Hwy. 77 (Cedar Avenue) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CPD, Commercial Planned Development ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Frauenshuh Companies has submitted a request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 4.14 -acre site located north of Diffley Road across from Metcalf Junior High from CPD, Commercial Planned Development, to D -IV, Mixed Residential of 12+ units per acre. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW The city's Comprehensive Guide Plan was prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864. As defined by statute, the Land Use Plan is a guide and may be amended from time to time as conditions change. The city's Guide Plan is to be implemented by official controls such as zoning and other fiscal devices. The creation of land use districts and zoning is a formulation of public policy and a legislative act. As such, the classification of land uses must reasonably relate to promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. When a change to a city's Comprehensive Guide Plan is requested, it is the city's responsibility to determine if the change is in the best long-range interests of the city. The standard of review of a city's action in approving or denying a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment is whether there exists a rational basis. A rational basis standard has been described to mean having legally sufficient reasons supportable by the facts which promote the general health, safety and welfare of the city. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The site consists of two parcels located between Hwy. 77 (Cedar Avenue) and Old Sibley Highway north of Diffley Road. The larger of the two parcels extends across Old Sibley Highway to the west to encompass the area between Super America and Old Sibley Highway. /63" Planning Report — Frauenshuh Companies September 26, 2000 Page 2 The applicant has indicated that it is not the intent to include that portion of the parcel located west of Old Sibley Highway in this Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. However, the applicant should be aware that upon development of the property, regardless of use, platting will be required. In the platting process, the ultimate disposition of the remnant east of Old Sibley Highway will need to be determined. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site was previously graded and is open and relatively flat. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Condominium Townhomes; zoned PD, Planned Development; guided CPD, Commercial Planned Development South - Metcalf Junior High; zoned P, Public Facilities; guided PF, Public Facilities East - Cedar Ave. (Hwy. 77) West - Super America; zoned RB, Roadside Business; guided RB, Roadside Business EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The current Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this property as CPD, Commercial Planned Development. The CPD designation allows for development of mixed residential and commercial uses. The Draft Comprehensive Guide Plan (1999) suggests RC, Retail Commercial, use of the subject property. Retail Commercial is the land use category in the Draft Comp Plan that corresponds to the commercial element of the current Commercial Planned Development category. If the proposed D -IV land use is approved, upon adoption of the Draft Comp Plan, the corresponding designation of HD, high density residential, would be applied to the property. This site has been designated for commercial use as far back as 1974, including the area to the north that has since developed as townhomes. These townhomes were constructed during the latter half of the 1990s. The PD zoning of this property appears to have been adopted in 1990 to allow for a mixed-use development. However, this site remained designated for commercial uses in the 1990 PD. The applicant is now proposing to change the land use designation of this site to D -IV, mixed residential of 12+ units per acre, to allow for the construction of apartments. The applicant indicates in his narrative that Frauenshuh has been unable to "market, development and sell said site for commercial/retail uses" since 1995. Frauenshuh asserts that apartments appear to be the _ highest and best use for the site "based on the location of the site and the shortage of [apartment] housing product in the metro area ...." Frauenshuh believes that apartments would "provide an /66 Planning Report — Frauenshuh Companies September 26, 2000 Page 3 appropriate buffer between Diffley [Road] and the townhomes" and has submitted a concept plan to support their proposal. Airport Noise Considerations - The City of Eagan considered airport noise as a factor in its Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. The Metropolitan Council has adopted an Aviation Chapter of its Metropolitan Development Plan that anticipates the impacts from the continued operation of the airport at its current location. The noise policy contours in Eagan place the subject property within Noise Zone 4. Within this area, multiple residential development would be provisional, meaning that it must comply with certain structural performance standards to be acceptable according to MS 473.192. In particular, the building plans, materials and construction should be such that they will insure an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. Topography — The site has been previously graded and is open and relatively flat. Storm Drainage — Storm water runoff from development of this site will drain north via public storm sewer to a storm water basin within the Eagan Heights Townhomes development. Utilities — Sanitary sewer and water main are available within Old Sibley Highway along the west edge of the site. Streets/ Access — Public street access is available from Old Sibley Highway (City street) to the west. The existing access onto Diffley Road (Dakota County Road 30) in the southeast comer of the site does not meet current County access spacing guidelines. Dakota County will not allow full access at this location with development of the site. Any development of this site will be subject to Dakota County ordinance requirements. Easements/Rights-of-Wav/Permits — An additional 25 feet (in addition to the existing 50 feet) of one-half right-of-way for Diffley Road will be required by Dakota County to be dedicated for development of this property. Site Plan — The applicant submitted a conceptual site plan for a three-story, 93 -unit (33 one - bedroom, 52 two-bedroom and 8 three-bedroom) apartment building. The density of the conceptual 93 -unit building on a 4.14 -acre site would be 22 units per acre. Comparing this to the R-4 (apartment) zoning requirements in the City Code, the building would require a total site size of 6.7 acres, for an overall density of 13.8 units per acre. This calculation is based on the number and mix of units shown in the concept plan submitted. Additionally, the concept plan does not account for the additional 25 feet of Diffley Road right- of-way that will need to be dedicated at the time of platting, which will further reduce the site size and consequently, the number of units that the site can support. Wetlands/Water Quality — There do not appear to be any jurisdictional wetlands on the site, however, this should be verified prior to any development of the site. /6% Planning Report — Frauenshuh Companies September 26, 2000 Page 4 Tree Preservation — There is little significant vegetation on the subject site, and compliance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance will be determined at the time a specific development proposal is submitted. Parks and Recreation — This site will be subject to park and trail dedications. It is likely that such dedications will take the form of cash, however, City Parks staff has indicated that construction of trails may be necessary with such a development. Also, the City's zoning code requires a certain amount of on-site recreational space to be provided in multiple dwelling developments. The specifics of trail needs and on-site recreation space will be further evaluated and determined during review of a specific development if the proposed change in land use is approved. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION This site has been designated for commercial use as far back as 1974, however, the applicant has indicated they have had difficulty selling the property for commercial use. Consequently, Frauenshuh Companies has submitted.a request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 4.14 -acre site located north of Diffley Road across from Metcalf Junior High from CPD, Commercial Planned Development, to D -IV, Mixed Residential of 12+ units per acre. Most of the development issues identified in this report such as platting, additional right-of-way dedication, and restricted access to Diffley Road, apply to any development of the property, whether commercial or residential. Therefore, consideration should be given specifically to those issues related to the proposed residential use, such as compatibility with the surrounding development and airport noise impacts. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 4.14 -acre site located north of Diffley Road across from Metcalf Junior High from CPD, Commercial Planned Development, to D -IV, Mixed Residential of 12+ units per acre. /6 A Location Map Eagan Boundary Str..t Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint Sub -act Site ©;Wioid *i*, , ��•�Ja- icV - lPi?: 1 O,!♦e1a j0 ��ss♦P4ii oifj* EE; SssSl♦`♦i'`ce '�*Q :a 11, A liiiiipS2 Low Vqa1V." litsSs! ettp e6�ya Ji, r V j i KHAI WH [Ni, lb i 1. 1, Ebp 1011 Bl [> C7 [a C] Is to td C:SSG:::GS000 r #• L5555222222!t0 1105550553 as CEO CM air, ,r [i[ IMPLI [ IIISI ram LBFJ NMI LM1 VIEW [EN !►�c1•c 1aPJ L.1a1 cast [c11 , 1 Lyr L. 11 r■i1 LIE/ LIICI 'r y� to LRPJ L9rJ NC1 N1U r, Lt'[FJ L•FJ LRPJ [IVJ IiNt y�eC VRI 11111U ua L!P t Asa d.S�CD� a 4' %V X12 ��'�;��; sS��ww 'S!♦w... 4A7 riEJ w:rof� -=:,,i4;14:::4:$ 644 . <0 re v-ul° s�'� 4.1.4Ps et c fi W [rest Val . �._U tet . t id v�� E.' fai<1 ▪ GJ `re�iiliiil�' y r4� l• r !l E! Pr,' r, ma -1- tBEU UMW . . 44"1'41• F1.1"1,11 1000 0 1000 Development/Developer: Diffley LLP/Frauenshuh Companies Application: Comprehensive Guid = . a mendment Case No.: 19 -CG -04-08-00 4City of Eagan MINNESOTA Cennnralty Development Department 2000 Feet Map Prepared using ERSI Arc w 3.1. Parcel Gas map data provided / by Dakota County Land Survey Department and b current as of August 2000. /, THIS MAP 1S INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Tho City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarant.. the accuracy of this Information and aro not responsible for.rrore or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Pian Frauenshuh Companies Land Use Map Case No. 19 -CG -04-08-00 Zoning Map II6- 1401 , Al, - , ■ .\ r m. - .. mm Current Zoning: PP I O CIN MIR PD Planned Development PD ='.%fig■ di PF PD C.e.A.N. NO. 30101 ROAD) a PF i RB R-3 ' Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map IND . 1' �� 1 moi• i•i• r I.... NM mum °WI me ILA iv maw Current Land Use Designation: B mitNum �� ain ",� A ■ CA Central Area ti • PF C.a.A.N. NO. SO (• MeV ROAD) . 1 a Me hot waa t ki D -III boos by rand loop b1o��ealos pm.1441 Dakota Comely Iasi M`my D.Farkm.ml 1011/00.N Zeiss Worm/M...rwd..0 by CNy SUN. City of Eagan 2-, THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w E Community Dave/omen/ Department The Cky of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. S BS 1 C • // F W a r ci co el in CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RECEIVE° AUG 1 P,111t. IL�, v i I:a'i1..1 ■■ 1. , r iirua man /9c)-- 1 9 F J CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION eDi -a- CD Q U w v w FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES Commercial Real Estate August 09, 2000 Mr. Bob Kirmis Planner CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Bob: On behalf of Diffley LLP, we are submitting the enclosed application for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for the site located on Diffley at Cedar Avenue. Under this application, we are requesting a change from the site's current land designation of CPD to a designation of D-4, which would allow a density of 12+ housing units per acre. Since August 1995, Frauenshuh Companies has tried unsuccessfully to market, develop and sell said site for commercial/retail uses, pursuant to the current land use designation. Although we have had numerous initial inquiries; all interested parties have passed after further reviewing the site's geographic market area and transit patterns. Despite continued best efforts, we are convinced that the site will unfortunately remain a tremendously unproductive asset under the current land use designation. As this situation is not in the best interest of the owners or the City of Eagan, in terms of tax base and the creation of a sense of community, we have explored alternative uses. Based on the location of the site and the shortage of housing product in the metro area, apartments appear to be the highest and best use for the site. We have included concept plans for a potential project which could make economic sense and be viewed acceptable by the marketplace. From a land planning perspective, this type of project seems to be a natural use along Diffley and would provide an appropriate buffer between Diffley and the townhomes to the north. We thank you for your consideration on this matter and hope the City of Eagan concurs with our request. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 952/829-3471. Sincerely, Enclosures RVW:nkg NIES 7101 West 78th Street, Suite 100 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55439 • Tel: 612.829.3480 ■ Fax: 612.829.3481 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - ACCESS LIFTS INC. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Planned Development Amendment to allow the operation of an elevator or lift sales and service company upon 1.7 acres of land located north of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane on property currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition in the northeast 1/4 of Section 15 subject to the conditions in the APC meeting minutes. FACTS: ➢ The proposed use would occupy the former Vehicle Emissions Center building. • The subject site is included in the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development that was approved in the summer of 1985. The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement stipulates that CSC, Commercial Shopping Center district uses are intended on the property. ➢ At the time the emissions testing facility was proposed (November 1990), the subject property was zoned PD -CSC .(Planned Development -Community Shopping Center) and the use was accommodated via a conditional use permit. Because the property is still zoned PD, Planned Development, a change from the previously approved use (emissions testing facility), must be processed as a Planned Development Amendment. ➢ Access Lifts is a company that services and installs chair lifts, wheel chair lifts, residential elevators and dumbwaiters. D Approval of the requested amendment would simultaneously constitute approval of a Final Planned Development to be incorporated into a forthcoming Planned Development Agreement. ➢ At their regular meeting on September 26, 2000, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Planned Development Amendment and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. ISSUES: ➢ Approval of the Planned Development Amendment shall be subject to the execution of a Final Planned Development Agreement. //2 ATTACHMENTS (2): Minutes of the September 26, 2 meeting, pages P 4hroughop Staff report, pageshrough Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 13 DRAFT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — ACCESS LIFTS, INC. Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow an elevator or lift sales and service facility on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition, located at 1195 Town Centre Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. Planner Kirmis introduced this item and highlighted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. He stated that with 50 percent of the building being devoted to office/retail use, the proposed activity appears generally consistent with the Preliminary Planned Development Agreement which calls for CSC, Commercial Shopping Center, use of the site. He further stated that the acceptability of the proposed use is considered a policy matter to be determined by City Officials. The applicant, Steve Marstad, owner of Access Lifts, was present to answer questions from the Commission and Public. He stated that he felt the existing facility would meet the needs of his already existing business. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. Member Kaess asked how many employees the business would have. Mr. Marstad stated there is currently seven employees. Member Tilley asked about the use of the rear of the building. Mr. Marstad stated it would be used as a staging area where the products will be uncrated and prepared for installation. Member Nosbush asked what means they would use to unload equipment. Mr. Marstad stated they would use forklifts. Member Steininger moved, Member Huusko seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the operation of an elevator or lift sales and service company upon 1.7 acres of land located north of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane on property currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition in the northeast 1/4 of Section 15 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant and/or developer shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City prior to building permit issuance. 2. The following exhibits are required for the Final Planned Development Agreement: A. Final Site Plan B. Final Landscape Plan C. Final Building Elevations and Signage Plan D. Lighting Plan /76 Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 14 k'ak F 3. Not less than 50 percent of the building shall be devoted to office and/ or showroom space. 4. No service or assembly of products shall take place on site. 5. There shall be no outside storage (including company vehicles) on the property. 6. All building, parking/drive aisles, and landscaped areas shall be properly maintained. 7. The site plan shall be revised to illustrate three additional stalls as required by Code. The City shall reserve the right to require the construction of the three additional stalls if the need is to arise. 8. All exterior lighting shall be hooded and directed to deflect light away from adjacent properties and rights-of-way. All voted in favor. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 18, 2000 APPLICANT: Access Lifts Inc. CASE: 15 -PA -10-08-00 15 -FD -14-08-00 HEARING DATE: September 26, 2000 PROPERTY OWNER: Envirotest Technologies, Inc. PREPARED BY: Bob Kirmis REQUEST: PD Amendment/Final PD LOCATION: North of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CA, Central Area ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Access Lifts Inc. is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the operation of an elevator or lift sales and service company upon 1.7 acres of land located north of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane on property currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition in the northeast Y4 of Section 15. The proposed use would occupy the former Vehicle Emissions Center building. Approval of the requested amendment would simultaneously constitute approval of a Final Planned Development to be incorporated into a forthcoming PD Agreement. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for it's consideration and recommendation. Planning Report — Access Lifts September 26, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND/HISTORY The subject site is included in the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development that was approved in the summer of 1985. The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement stipulates that CSC, Commercial Shopping Center district uses are intended on the property. At the time the emissions testing facility was proposed (November 1990), the subject property was zoned PD -CSC (Planned Development -Community Shopping Center) and the use was accommodated via a conditional use permit. Because the property is still zoned PD, Planned Development, a change from the previously approved use (emissions testing facility), must be processed as a Planned Development Amendment. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is presently occupied by the former Vehicle Emissions Center which was constructed in 1991. The single story building measures 4,800 square feet in size and is finished in brick. The site is accessed from the south via two curb cuts from Town Centre Drive. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Office building (Blue Cross Blue Shield); zoned PD, Planned Development and designated CA, Central Area. South - Multiple Family Residential (0' Leary Manor); zoned PD, Planned Development and designated CA, Central Area. East - Undeveloped (Future office building proposed); zoned PD, Planned Development and designated CA, Central Area. West - Undeveloped; zoned PD, Planned Development and designated CA, Central Area. EVALUATION OF REOUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area - In order to determine the compatibility of the proposed use within its surroundings, it is important to gain an understanding of the proposed site activities. /79 Planning Report — Access Lifts September 26, 2000 Page 3 According to the applicant, Access Lifts is a company that services and installs chair lifts, wheel chair lifts, residential elevators and dumbwaiters. More specifically, the applicant has proposed to use the subject property as follows: ➢ Add approximately 600 square feet of office space via remodeling (resulting in approximately 1,800 square feet of total office space). ➢ Construct a showroom to assist in product demonstration, training and sales via remodeling (approximately 600 square feet). ➢ Utilize the balance of the building (approximately 2,400 square feet) as a staging/storage/receiving area. ➢ No service or assembly of products will take place on site. ➢ The company presently utilizes four service vans and one delivery vehicle. The service vans are assigned to service personnel who take the vehicles home with them at night. The delivery truck will be stored indoors at night. ➢ There will be no outside storage on the property. ➢ Excepting the elimination of a median within the parking lot and the erection of a new sign, no exterior changes to the building or site are proposed. The proposed re -use of this property includes retail, office and warehouse components. The acceptability of the proposed use is considered a policy matter to be determined by City Officials. Site Plan - Other than the elimination of a parking lot median, no changes to the existing site layout have been proposed. As shown on the Site Plan, the building is located on the southern one-half of the site. The northern -one half of the site is comprised of off-street parking (15 stalls) and vehicular drive-through lanes (previously used by the Vehicle Emissions Center). Landscaping - The subject site is fully landscaped with trees and shrubs scattered throughout the site. No changes to the site's existing landscaping have been proposed. Building - No exterior changes to the building have been proposed. The applicant is however, proposing to convert a portion of the building's interior (the easternmost drive -though bay) into office and showroom space. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to add 600 square feet of office space and 600 square feet of showroom space. Trash Enclosure - A trash enclosure is attached to the northeast corner of the principal building and satisfies City requirements. Off -Street Parking - Based on the proposed uses within the building, a total of 18 off-street parking spaces are required. Presently, 15 off-street parking stalls exist on site. The applicant believes that the existing off- street parking supply will be sufficient to accommodate the proposed use. As a condition of Final Planned Development approval, the site plan should be revised to illustrate three additional /�o Planning Report — Access Lifts September 26, 2000 Page 4 stalls as required by Code. The City will reserve the right to require the construction of the three additional stalls if the need is to arise. Ample area does exist on site to accommodate such additional parking. Site Lighting - No exterior lighting presently exists on site. If at some future point exterior lighting is to be provided, all such lighting should be hooded and directed to deflect light away from adjacent properties and rights-of-way. Signage - The applicant plans to utilize the former Emissions Center monument sign located along Town Centre Drive to advertise his business. As a condition of Final Planned Development approval, all applicable requirements of the Sign Code must be satisfied. Engineering Issues - Engineering related issues were addressed as part of the initial development of the site in 1991. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow the operation of an elevator or lift sales and service company within the former Vehicle Emissions Center building located north of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane. With 50 percent of the building being devoted to office/retail use, the proposed activity appears generally consistent with the Preliminary Planned Development Agreement which calls for CSC, Commercial Shopping Center use of the site. The acceptability of the proposed use is considered a policy matter to be determined by City Officials. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the operation of an elevator or lift sales and service company upon 1.7 acres of land located north of Town Centre Drive and west of O'Leary Lane on property currently platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition in the northeast 1/4 of Section 15. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The applicant and/or developer shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City prior to building permit issuance. /I/ Planning Report — Access Lifts September 26, 2000 Page 5 2. The following exhibits are required for the Final Planned Development Agreement: A. Final Site Plan B. Final Landscape Plan C. Final Building Elevations and Signage Plan D. Lighting Plan 3. Not less than 50 percent of the building shall be devoted to office and/ or showroom space. 4. No service or assembly of products shall take place on site. 5. There shall be no outside storage (including company vehicles) on the property. 6. All building, parking/drive aisles, and landscaped areas shall be properly maintained. 7. The site plan shall be revised to illustrate three additional stalls as required by Code. The City shall reserve the right to require the construction of the three additional stalls if the need is to arise. 8. All exterior lighting shall be hooded and directed to deflect light away from adjacent properties and rights-of-way. goz— f 1 Location Map m.ippl Pri t IN 11 L r Ii II carioni Ir-ONNIO.S. NON nm,; LJIALJ a /14; tl fi i�wJ 4;•l{7 l I O •• raw �J� 1 Li �L 1 /4 Ragan Boundary Street Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint ■ 1 ■ V 0 1. 1 Sub ect Site 1 IRON 1.,t mom Com- i 4,• Ptle> <',$fik �u oi3 MU uaJ 0_t1 mum .._....f.- 7e ri . �` nnnnr�1 an ` LJLJLJLJt,.AD 151= t LA/�J % LJL^ ^�� r� El I gt4:35 riririri;�;�; .�Qw� I di Ai11m nnnr�� u� CID •UV( D r rlrlr1rl LJLJLJLJ .r,,P, .....1 ...oil .--11 r•-1 1000 0 n1...• .fl P E' f..... f. rI L.... n _J Le . :. )� "F ii ..ProarXwak* <700, Minna; tSv �1i i 1000 fletS r.A� -r .� riau r — 2C00 Feet Development/Developer: Access Lifts, Inc. Application: Planned Develop Case No.: 15 -PA -10-08-00 41tity of Eagan MINNESOTA c.■.■..ny s.wwrw..r a.•.wr..M dment MopPr�p�sd 31. Parol taus tripods praldrd by aCai=Y krveg DopirInvrt ant 18 auris adAupat2000. / THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR RAFIRINCI USA ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do net guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are net responsible /or ewers or omissions. E Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Access Lifts, Inc. Land Use Map 15-PA-10-08-00 Zoning Map Ld 1 J) y TT a0AD 110.21 (YAM= DOODLE GOAD) ] • Current Zoning: PD ip LBr PD --,sir—�fp\t 11 .� ■ Planned Development _ PD O P° P° i _. ' 6 0/01411& en IP &iii .1.14* if- rAga•Apr, i •• 1 I.t N. • NN 1.... �� IMO ,,4'•• r 1 Comprehensive Guide Plan ts Land Use Map 1 OA 1 1 1 , IP , Current Land Use Designation:,i 1 --imr CA O Central Area �o iproc A_- get& re-41 11/F4Ml-ry suIrm .4P ..O lift 06 e4 lik e-IV as • SAM NetProof ' I= AMP W Iwo„ by Dakota O.wwty LW Storey D.I..rw.wt I11/00. 1.1vwoOm city IOWACity isOutila.d y of Eagan 2, W > THIS IMP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY CarrmilIy °f7d1< DIPerfrnent The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantor, thr, accuracy of this Information. $ •ra:T,:s = DFM /LAN PENT SITE PLAN 2 O d BUILDING ELEVATIONS FLOOR PLAN 4 g not 7-17-1 • i' 4 'p i ISI , i a---- " II 11 I II _ S 11 u 11 . � II .Q O 11 • W t 1 ®©o - ®CE •04 :D uPC) J' 24:11 r - 1111111 ... I._ � I O 0 FLOOR PLAN Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — REACOR, LTD. (LEXINGTON HILLS APARTMENTS) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Planned Development Amendment to allow the construction of a two-story 3,850 square foot storage facility within the Lexington Hills Apartment complex located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road, legally described as Lots 1-11, Lexington Hills First Addition, located in the SW '/< of Section 23. FACTS: • The site contains 168 dwelling units in seven apartment buildings, with 11 detached garage buildings. • The proposal is to construct a two-story storage facility in the southeast corner of the complex site. The storage building would be available for use only by residents of the apartments. • The storage building would be located east of the existing garage buildings. Some grading would be required, and additional landscaping provided. The building architecture and materials would match the existing buildings on the site. • The APC held a public hearing on July 25, 2000, and recommended approval of the Planned Development Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: September 26, 2000, APC Minutes, pages 1 Y7t ettg- Staff report, pages / 90 through a0002 /8t Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 18 DAFT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — REALCOR, LTD. Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow construction of a storage building on Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition (Lexington Hills Apartments), located at 4116 Lexington Avenue South in the SW '/4 of Section 23. Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the background/history, existing conditions and surrounding uses of the subject property. The applicant was present to answer questions from the Commission and public. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. The Commission agreed that the proposed amendment would be an improvement to the property. Member Tilley moved, Member Kaess seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to construct a two-story 3,850 square foot storage facility within the Lexington Hills Apartment complex, located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road (north of Ss. Martha and Mary Church), legally described as Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded against the property within 60 days of Council approval. 2. The storage building shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site, building and landscape plans. 3. The storage building shall be used only by residents of Lexington Hills Apartments. 4. The storage building shall be constructed using brick and vinyl siding to match the existing apartment buildings. 5. The applicant/owner shall work with City Police Crime Prevention Unit to incorporate additional appropriate security measures for the storage building. 6. A more detailed landscape plan identifying specific species and planting specifications shall be submitted for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. All exterior lighting should be shielded and directed downward so that the source is not directly visible from off the site. All voted in favor. / 89 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2000 CASE: 23 -PA -08-08-00 APPLICANT: Reacor, Ltd. HEARING DATE: September 26, 2000 PROPERTY PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak OWNER: South Carolina Employees Retirement Trust REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment LOCATION: Lexington Hills Apartments 4116 Lexington Avenue COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-lIl, Mixed Residential (6-12 units per acre) ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Reacor, Ltd. is requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow construction of a two- story 3,850 square foot storage facility within the Lexington Hills Apartment complex. The 17 -acre site is located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road (north of Ss. Martha & Mary Church), and is legally described as Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for it's consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Lexington Hills Apartments were constructed in 1987. The complex consists of seven apartment buildings with 11 detached garage buildings. The seven apartment buildings contain a total of 168 dwelling units (7 studio, 56 one -bedroom, and 56 two-bedroom). / 90 Planning Report — Lexington Hills Apartments September 26, 2000 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The storage facility is proposed to be located in the southeast corner of the site, adjacent to an existing garage building. The land is flat and open to the east. Northview Elementary School is located well to the east. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - The proposed construction area is in the southeast comer of the apartment complex, with apartment buildings to the immediate north. North of the apartment complex is a single-family residential development which is zoned PD, Planned Development, and guided D -II, Mixed Residential of 0-6 units per acre. South - Ss. Mary and Martha Church; zoned P, Public Facilities; guided P, Public Facilities East - Northview Elementary School; zoned P, guided P West - Since the proposed construction area is in the southeast corner of the apartment site, detached garage buildings serving the complex are located immediately to the west. West of the apartment complex, across Lexington Avenue, is Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church, which is zoned P and guided P. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant indicates that the proposed storage facility would serve only residents of the Lexington Hills Apartments, and is needed to provide additional storage space for personal items of residents on site. The City Code regarding accessory buildings and structures (Section 3, Subdivision 5) was amended earlier this year. Subdivision 5.A, General Standards, and 5.D, Other Uses, apply in this instance. The specific standards in these two subdivisions are listed below in bold, followed by an evaluation of the proposal relative to each standard. Subdivision 5.A — General Standards 1. .... (this provision is not applicable) 2. Accessory buildings greater than 150 square feet in size shall exhibit finish materials similar and compatible to those utilized on the principal building and match the principal building in color. The existing apartment buildings and garages have brick and light blue -gray vinyl siding. The applicant's narrative states that blue vinyl siding and red brick will be used to match the materials on the existing buildings. The architecture of the building is similar to that of the garage buildings, but the two-story height is taller. 3. Accessory buildings shall be maintained in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and does not present a hazard to public health, safety and general welfare. / 9/ Planning Report — Lexington Hills Apartments September 26, 2000 Page 3 Subdivision 5.D — Other Uses 1. Buildings and structures accessory to uses other than farms and single family detached dwellings shall conform to the principal building setback requirements specified for the respective zoning district in which they are located. Since this is a Planned Development, setbacks are as approved by the City Council. The storage building is proposed to be set back 34 feet from the east lot line. This exceeds the typical required side yard setback of 30 feet for apartments. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to uses other than farms and single family detached dwellings shall not exceed the district height limit or the height of the principal building, whichever is less, except as otherwise allowed by this chapter. The existing apartment buildings are two stories in height, and the detached garages are one story. The proposed storage building is two stories and 22 feet in height, as measured to the highest roof peak. Site Plan — The storage building is proposed to be located at the southeast corner of the apartment complex, near an existing garage building. The bituminous surface and existing curb would be extended to the east and a retaining wall constructed north of the proposed building. A 24 -foot wide bituminous area would be maintained between the two buildings and also east of the storage building. The new curb line would be set back ten feet from the east lot line, allowing for landscaping to be installed. Grading — The proposed area of grading extends onto the adjacent school property to the east. The applicant will need to obtain an easement from the owner of that property (ISD #196) for this off-site grading. Landscaping/Screening — There is little existing landscaping in the area proposed for construction. The plans show "new evergreen trees" to be planted along the east edge of the property adjacent to the storage building. The plan does not identify species or planting specifications. A more detailed landscape plan indicating the species of trees and planting specifications should be provided for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking — The proposed storage building will not displace any existing parking areas. With 24 - foot drive aisles maintained between buildings, access to existing garages also should not be hindered. Lighting — Lighting is proposed to be provided by wallpacks attached to the building. All exterior lighting should be shielded and directed downward so that the source is not directly visible from off the site. Security — The City Police Crime Prevention Unit has expressed some security concerns about the proposed storage building. If the storage building is approved, the Crime Prevention Unit would like to see measures taken in design to enhance security of and around the building. For example, providing only partial landscape screening on the east side to allow greater visibility of the building, ensuring adequate lighting, adding a fence to restrict access to the site from adjacent /9� Planning Report — Lexington Hills Apartments September 26, 2000 Page 4 properties, and the method of controlling access into the building. The applicant/owner should work with the Crime Prevention Unit to incorporate appropriate security measures for the storage building prior to execution of the PD Agreement and issuance of a building permit. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Reacor, Ltd. is requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow construction of a 3,850 square foot two-story storage facility within the Lexington Hills Apartment complex. The 17 -acre site is located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road (north of Ss. Martha & Mary Church), and is legally described as Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition. The storage building is proposed to be located at the southeast corner of the apartment complex. The building is two stories in height and would be constructed of materials to match the existing buildings. Grading and the installation of a retaining wall is required to accommodate the proposed building, but the building will not displace existing parking or landscaped areas. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to construct a two-story 3,850 square foot storage facility within the Lexington Hills Apartment complex, located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road (north of Ss. Martha & Mary Church), legally described as Lots 1-11, Block 1, Lexington Hills First Addition. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded against the property within 60 days of Council approval. 2. The storage building shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site, building and landscape plans. 3. The storage building shall be used only by residents of Lexington Hills Apartments. 4. The storage building shall be constructed using brick and vinyl siding to match the existing apartment buildings. 5. The applicant/owner shall work with City Police Crime Prevention Unit to incorporate additional appropriate security measures for the storage building. 6. A more detailed landscape plan identifying specific species and planting specifications shall be submitted for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. All exterior lighting should be shielded and directed downward so that the source is not directly visible from off the site. / 93 Location Map Eagan Boundary Street Cont.rlina Partial Area - Building Footprint rarie LnMd u %BMW r ..... V. u rm. VIA Ogle �.�<c C► i k 141 era 11111110LEV P 1111 IMP �,•. UP! 4rtf; d� ,3494 V Neddel A74:4 GUM 4rAirl 1MaL tat EM 44/ ATMBrrl VA ars $4. t‘Ztlas1 ilr. li VA • "1112r.■ 1 C AL1 J ri LAW MI r■ r. r. r■ r• r■ r. lr •. L. L■ L■ L■ L r■ r■ LLE iAk. L.* L7 lennem. *an 1 1 V • 1 f .►r t a • 4 • 1 i ; r at 1 t A Pik* 7#;:37;a:,>©O`�C �yv .. gr.6. <,,N; 04;'41 to *,„it ,,, -..:1Enenti> (.?„1.0.;\ '.► chi 0•. A. :Z..-- - ,, 4/11* WO .11 4/6213 er.:CCI:,40:1Ail. i tifiie w140"--111 ell al1.e ie rAoki 7 am LY • WI gg ■ a.: e • Mc7 u 111_1 Ir M b I 1111 vi 11AT— EMU MR I rail . . it'i31n s tillirta two WI Nadal VIII IIIIIMJ -..—GI 4 1 r 1- Jr - 1 • 11 • 9 • 111 t pada 11000 ar. V • as Sub ect Site p0LI s* I roam �r caai u . 1 . • L 1111 i j-11 ..J JJ J`J— „,111,..,-.4 ir ,r. i 4A.. +r+ h7� _ON a. tit 1� �```��iL NEI IlLga /iI • % C� • Minn. WNW..a a vh f, �w 04,4 t3 , TIMM!! ��I 04.kif to d ��— t.l Tor �if , I ' •n t • r ilk ✓ . ` �`' 1 CardiaM;SIIItt`A f Ali r,_v�� LITEIZZIV • i 1000 0 1000 2000 Fest Development/Developer: Lexington Hills Apartments Application: Planned Developme i r r ; dment Casd No.: 23 -PA -08-08-00 City of Eagan MINNESOTA Cantime.ity Dwel.pme.t Department Map Prepared using - e sew 3.1. Pared base map data provided by Dakota County Land Survsy Department and is momma as of August 2000. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantor' the accuracy of this information and are not r.sponsibl• for errors or omissions. W+E Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Lexington Hills Apartments Land Use Map Case No. 23 -PA -08-08-00 Zoning Map Current Zoning: PD Planned Development w• • Me 1200 r..t PI Pr 0 Pr PU ;� . art%l di %-1 . ■ ■■ ■� to ■ Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Current Land Use Designation: D -III Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) 001 • ••• 1200 r..t 1 • P w M u 00 el Wit sam le .1111M11111111111 AIWA, ‘11•111111T :7 ■—III mr=r. —1111 I-T_ rata = . - ; • ali1 :: - Mel:001,7 �. u _ ■'.lIU tIM • � : „i ;: �-E m111.g!i "' o�)1� P Location PP S Ir» �11111,2r ib ./11111 1111641= 1 & 1111 IIIV :e Winn 1m►t. : tie<•111u 1111. ;N :�� I� 4 ��.,+ leoWei ♦.i■ 164, r W w .t d City of Eagan Community Development Department •4. t 1 rid.u11 11111► i 1UI Ifr LAu►I le 4- it VIII kifiee 44,4,71 eiu Pidli ^:•!!1111■ *van e.o.10111p ram mra memo a. •.. ■��//ifsiOd wra ;mom �; . = ■IU: ais.It/'4 ►JiIlritalriiu.i�� 11�.1ii au . Proal Mw ay 1 Dakota Caatty LW Sammy Department 0/11/00. Zoning Imr raae•a aakrtalnN by City etatt. .2, THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE U$! ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. W+ E a Ma,.,. 011114.•••• .1.••••••••••• % a4 s r r■ wr r 8 SITE STATISTICS 1 NO SCALE 111111 Illill Will ; *lid 171 N & S ELEVATIONS F VS'•r NI BEAST ELEVATION 1 +is•.r co co • r I ra ` I' %slCc� �I .1 E — ! 111111°01 111111111 1 in o D d3:1 40, ,111111 Mil 111 utntinniununum ma 1 , F SOS=M r 41 - " i EES — t �` a .11,101 P1PriFe ib hili 1101111= 11021110II 101 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION W/STORAGE FACILITY(LITTLE IMPACT VISUALLY) 1 r.20 LJ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION W/OUT STORAGE FACILITY 1 re! GRADING p NM AVOW !:�wi MAW- 40011 1140°- lr9l ill ir II Weal �I 7.\' 1 %� ll Z=11r iso L� ` 1 ii D � � �o wT ►ice 1110. !rq al P otleimi �� let ri,....„ AMU i ,,,II .......... I a m i a LIIIIIM f ' ; , il r a 1 i yy 3 I FIRST FLOOR PLANT lira 1 I I- 4 I mr—or _ 4 _ _ ....wr eHrell eare11MLtrollreare II relIMltreilrett• .. IA tet YY y} +e re 4 M . lei 11 11 _411 SECOND FLR PLAN 1 i/r .i I 111111 ,,,iii._,....zo ,......:44, 7lrr 4 01 ,,.,4, 4,41 -r -i ►%, .x._ ao ‘,.„,„4. �,r,�-= .#•.+r -- i is r 0 b a. .+ i 1 f ! a LEXINGTON HILLS APTS. EAI[ L[xEaTOM AVENUE SOUTH [ADAM, IN i t �; j{' f i is I$� E' t WI E i II.I :ga 1 a ARCHITECTS INC MW MOT COWRY rn/o • COM/ 63, -OM • PAZI. µ-... [ITE PLAN. PLANS ELEVATION[ •Err a�aar a /q6 STORAGE BUILDING PLANS LEXINGTON AVENUE I • Y • sc. 11.00, 9* .68 N .:� � � — iii ',...-....,-51- a i� j.%i ice! _ Z\ 1• I - // i C� �..... ^1 / l • I1w .--:;,%,/c'•:<.,,;.-,-;-. 11 1 / iii%/i;d/ �r eta `� '. \ ' °I;, /%//�r��• i%/. / // ///r,/ ./..„..... .../.. ... ::. 1 IIS 0. 04'133E / 1/// I 11 11 1\ I\\�\ Ali/ / I I 1 �\ Nz //1 / /I I11� l\\\s St w bra R 1 0 t f. 4 g it 1 _N /947 g, SITE/GRADING PLAN ‘.) ,p'11' �// l.iie: / i, / !/..., /1/ / m X30 ; �'� �� i/'/ Z '/ , ! / • ) ....., ..._ .. x .....7. i —2--.. in 0 / - . r \ sso /\ f8' E •s. 1s :1 f f icP13.-tc 1 :� 3 ,� t r s a t .' \ .. i v."/"? II 4 \1---...z-1\- \ icsci\ ..... CSS --•t"W'aYL I 1 1 Malt-- iti •• int I iii • . • • log 'itiIli tin!gt�j-- 0: —?� i 1.!! 1111 • 4i /9Y' UTILITIES is AN N w 13: glq 111 1 /9* pz,„STORM SEWER PORTFOLIO DESIGN SERVICES INC. 2500 W. COUNTY ROAD B ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 (651) 631-1300 • FAX (651) 631-1500 August 16, 2000 Mr. Bob Kirmis, AICP City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Application Narrative Addressing Impact on Site Private Storage Facility Lexington Hills Apartments 4116 Lexington Avenue South Reacor Ltd., Applicant Dear Mr. Kirmis: The following is a brief narrative in support of the requests addressing the impact of the new storage facility on the above referenced site. Surrounding Property The project will have minimal impact on the surrounding property for the following reasons: 1. The view from the surrounding property would improve due to the use of landscaped screening to be planted on the southeast comer of the site. Any additional light levels would also be screened by this landscape. 2. Sound levels would not change because it is merely a storage building. 3. The building would not affect any functions of the surrounding uses. The surrounding properties are not dependent upon any easements on this property. Subject Property The project will have very little impact on the subject property for the following reasons: 1. The 3,850 square foot building footprint will be placed on a site that is 17 acres. The location of the footprint will be in an area that has already been developed, containing a parking lot and a flat area of grass. 2. No wildlife and landscape areas, other than the lawn area, will be affected. 3. The function of the existing buildings will not change. City Services The project will have almost no impact on the city services for the following reasons: 1. There will be no water supply run to the building. 2. There will be no sewer service to the building nor is a sewer line running through that location. 3. Again, the square feet of roof and drive aisle will have a negligible impact in storm water run off in relation to the amount and size of the catch basins on the entire property since most of the development is placed over existing asphalt. www.rosewoodportfolio.com AN EQUAL OP ORT.UNITY EMPLOYER P2o/7. Improved Use of Land The project will improve the overall use of the site for the following reasons: 1. It will cure the storage shortage on the property. 2. It will improve the aesthetics and maintenance of the site because currently tenants are storing their personal property on the balconies. 3. It will decrease the safety hazards from storing items on the balconies. 4. It will offer the current residents the convenience of being able to store their belongings near where they live. Summary As demonstrated, the project has very little impact on its surroundings except for the improved quality of life for the tenants on the property. The applicant respectfully requests approval of the Planned Development Amendment as presented. If any further questions arise, please feel free to contact us. • Dan O'Mar Architect -AIA-Architect ingen-Reacor LTD. W. Bhatti, M.D. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2000 Eagan City Council E. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT — RJM CONSTRUCTION (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, OAKVIEW CENTER) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Planned Development Amendment and Final Planned Development to allow an in-line retail center including a Class II restaurant with a drive-through service for Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center, located at 3090 Courthouse Lane in the NW '/a of Section 12. FACTS: • The in-line retail use was approved in the Preliminary Planned Development in 1998. The proposed Class II restaurant with drive-through service is a change from the Preliminary PD. • The site plan was modified from the Preliminary PD to located the building on the east side of the site with parking to the west. • The final plans will require some revisions to the landscape plan for effective screening and to provide the required tree mitigation. The building architecture and materials and pylon sign are consistent with the Preliminary PD. • There was some discussion about wall signage during the APC meeting and the APC's recommendation regarding wall signage is listed in conditions #11 and 12 in the APC minutes. • The APC held a public hearing on September 26, 2000, and recommended approval of the Planned Development Amendment and Final PD, with the conditions listed in the APC minutes. ATTACHMENTS: September 26, 2000, APC Minutes, pages Oti through aOs Staff report, pagesthrough a,Df f Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 19 DRAFT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — RJM CONSTRUCTION, INC. Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow an in-line retail mall, with a drive-through facility on Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center, located on Courthouse Lane next to McDonald's in the NW 'A of Section 12. Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the background/history, existing conditions and surrounding uses of the subject property. She stated that the final landscape plan requires some changes to comply with tree mitigation requirements and enhance screening in some areas. She further stated that building architecture and lighting appear to be consistent with the Preliminary PD, but there is a question for the Commission about the appropriate amount and location of building wall signage. Steve Merz, RJM Construction was present and stated he had no objection to the recommendations of staff. He stated that regarding the issue of signage, he would prefer that signs be allowed on the west and east sides of the building as well as the north side should there be a tenant that would face the north. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. The Commission agreed that an 8' x 3' sign be allowed on the west side for each tennant and a 4' x 1 '/z' sign on the east side of the building for each tennant and should a business face the north, an 8' x 3' sign be allowed on the north side in lieu of such signage on the west side for that tenant. Member Steininger also stated that he prefers the 50' setback from Highway 55. The Commission agreed to modify condition number 12 of the planning report to read as follows: 12. All wall signage shall be individual back -lit letters. Member Segal moved, Member Tilley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment and Final Planned Development for a 9,504 square foot in-line retail center including a Class II restaurant with a drive-through facility for property located at 3090 Courthouse Lane, legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center, located in the NW '/4 of Section 12 subject to the following conditions: 1. An amendment to the Oakview Center Preliminary PD Agreement shall be executed which clearly identifies this change in use for Lot 2, Block 2, and eliminates retail as an allowable use for Lot 2, Block 1. 2. The applicant and/or developer shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City prior to building permit issuance. Advisory Planning Commission September 26, 2000 Page 20 Liii; tic 3. The following exhibits are required for the Final Planned Development Agreement: • Final Site/Signage Plan • Final Building Elevations/Signage Plan • Final Landscape Plan • Final Site Lighting Plan 4. The site shall be developed in accordance with the above referenced final plans. 5. This development shall be responsible for constructing the proposed east service drive to its ultimate width for its entire length. 6. The developer shall prepare ingress/egress easement documents covering the shared access drives for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit for this development. 7. The development is responsible for cash park and trail dedications and is payable at the time of building permit at the rate then in effect. 8. The final site plan should be revised to provide a 50 -foot building setback from the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. 9. A final landscape plan shall be submitted that has been revised to show grading contours and reflect the required tree mitigation and screening enhancements identified in the planning report. The revised final landscape plan will be subject to review and approval by City staff for incorporation in the PD Agreement. 10. A detail of the menu board sign shall be included in the final signage plans. 11. Wall signage for each tenant shall be allowed on the west side not to exceed 8' x 3', and on the east side not to exceed 4' x 1 '/2'; signage not to exceed 8' x 3' shall be allowed on the north side should a business' entrance face north, in lieu of such signage on the west side for that tenant. 12. All wall signage shall be individual back -lit letters. a06- PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2000 CASE: 12 -PA -09-08-00 12 -FD -13-08-00 APPLICANT: RJM Construction, Inc. HEARING DATE: September 26, 2000 PROPERTY OWNER: Holiday Station Stores, Inc. PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment Final Planned Development LOCATION: 3090 Courthouse Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CPD, Commercial Planned Development ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST RJM Construction Inc. is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow an in-line retail center with a drive-through facility for a Class II restaurant for Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center, located at 3090 Courthouse Lane in the NW 'A of Section 12. The proposed Class 11 restaurant with drive-through service constitutes a change from the previously approved Preliminary Planned Development. Approval of the required amendment would simultaneously constitute approval of a Final Planned Development to be incorporated into a forthcoming PD Agreement. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for it's consideration and recommendation. Do' Planning Report — RJM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND/HISTORY In 1998, the City approved a subdivision and Planned Development for Oakview Center, which includes this site. The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement specified that either a retail building or a Class I restaurant would be acceptable uses for this lot. The Preliminary PD approval did not include a Class II restaurant or other drive-through facility. The Preliminary PD identified two lots, Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 1, as being approved for either retail or a Class I restaurant. The intent was that the either lot could be developed for either use, but both lots would not be developed as the same use. In other words, if Lot 2, Block 2 develops as retail, then Lot 2, Block 1 would be a Class I restaurant, and vice versa. Therefore, if this Final PD for Lot 2, Block 2 is approved as a retail use, then the Oakview Center Preliminary PD Agreement should be amended also to specify that retail is no longer an allowable use for Lot 2, Block 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is vacant and was recently graded with the overall Oakview Center development. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Residential; zoned A (Agriculture); guided RR (Rural Residential) South - Hwy. 55/fuel station; zoned GB (General Business) guided GB (General Business) East - Vacant (future office/clinic); zoned PD (Planned Development), guided CPD(Commercial Planned Development) West - Holiday convenience/gas; zoned PD; guided CPD EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed in-line retail use is consistent with the Preliminary Planned Development. The addition of a Class II restaurant providing drive-through service requires an amendment to the Preliminary Planned Development. According to the applicant, the proposed retail building will accommodate four to six tenants, with Cousins Subs as an anchor tenant. The applicant has modified the site plan to locate the building on the east side of the lot, with the front of the building facing west. The applicant has indicated that this allows better access and visibility from Hwy. 55. Cousins Subs proposes to locate the drive-through window on the south end of the building. Density — The 9,504 square foot building results in a lot coverage ratio of 13.5%. 7o7 Planning Report — RJM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 3 Parking — The Preliminary PD Agreement left the parking for each lot to be determined based on the size of the building and standard zoning requirements. At one stall for each 150 square feet for retail use, a minimum of 63 parking stalls is required. The plans provide for 88 parking stalls, nine feet in width. Although it is a deviation from typical City standards, the nine -foot parking stall width is consistent with the Preliminary PD. Grading — The site was graded with the overall Oakview Center development and is open. Storm Drainage — Storm water runoff from the development will drain via existing storm sewer to a storm water pond installed with the Oakview Center development. Wetlands/Water Quality — Wetland and water quality issues and requirements were addressed and satisfied as part of the overall Oakview Center subdivision and development. Utilities — Sanitary sewer and water main were stubbed to the site with the Oakview Center development and are available for connection. Access/Street Design — Public street access is available from Courthouse Lane along the north edge of the site. The site design utilizes two access points at the east and west edges of the lot, each designed as a shared access with the adjacent lot. This development should be responsible for constructing the proposed east service drive to its ultimate width, which extends onto Lot 3, Block 2, and for its entire length. Easements/Rights of Way/ Permits — The developer should prepare ingress/egress easement documents covering the shared accesses for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit for this development. Parks and Recreation — A cash park and trail dedication will be required and is payable at the time of building permit at the rate then in effect. The 2000 dedication rates are $3,476 per acre for parks and $948 per acre for trails. Setbacks — The site plan shows the building set back 40 feet from Hwy. 55. The City's zoning code requires a minimum setback of 50 feet from a major thoroughfare. The 40 -foot setback is a deviation from standard code requirements, and was not approved in the Preliminary PD. Therefore, the final plans should be revised to provide a 50 -foot building setback from the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. Parking and pavement setbacks satisfy the typical 20 -foot minimum from a public right-of-way. Zero setback is provided for parking from the east side lot line because of the shared driveway with Lot 3, Block 2. Tree Preservation — Tree preservation was addressed with the overall Oakview Center development. This lot is responsible for providing its share of required mitigation plantings for the Oakview Center Development. Mitigation is to be provided in addition to required .2oe Planning Report — RJM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 4 landscaping. The landscape plan does not identify any of the plantings as satisfying mitigation purposes. Therefore, landscape plan should be revised to include the required mitigation trees. Landscaping — The landscape plan was modified from the approved Master Plan for the changes made to the site plan. For the most part, the proposed landscape plan uses species consistent with the Master Plan for this lot. However, as proposed, the landscape plan does not satisfy screening requirements from public rights-of-way. While some shrub beds are shown in conjunction with shade trees on the north side of the property, additional shrubs, including some evergreens, should be placed so that they better fill in the areas between the deciduous trees, and the spruce trees located so that they do not interfere with the parking lot as they grow and spread. Also, although screening is proposed on the south side of the property between the drive-through lane and Hwy. 55, such screening should extend further east where the drive-through window is proposed to be located in the building. In addition, the red oaks located at the southwest corner of the site are insufficient to screen the parking area and this area should be enhanced with a shrub bed or evergreen trees to achieve parking lot screening. The applicant does not wish to screen the building from highway views, hwoever, additional tree plantings will need to be provided to satisfy tree mitigation requirements. Finally, the landscape plan should show underlying grading contours and make use of berming to help achieve effective screening to the north and south of the site. A final landscape plan revised to reflect these changes should be provided for review and approval by City Staff. Trash Enclosure — The trash enclosure is proposed to be located attached to the building at its northeast corner, and accessible from the service drive east of the building. The walls of the enclosure are proposed to be constructed of rockface concrete masonry units to match that used on the lower portion of the building, and wood screening gates. Building Architecture/Materials — The building architecture is consistent with that shown in the Preliminary Planned Development. The primary material is brick, with rockface block and EIFS accents. The color scheme also follows one of the four combinations approved in the Preliminary PD -- bronzetone brick with burgundy rockface block and "champagne" E1FS. prefinished metal trim is to be "emerald." All four elevations show use of the same finish materials as required in the Preliminary PD. Signage — A monument sign is proposed for the southwest corner of this site. The Preliminary Planned Development approved 12 -foot monument signs, and the sign design approved for this site had nine feet of sign area divided into an identity panel with a readerboard below. The proposed sign has a three-foot brick base with nine feet of sign area for a total height of 12 feet. Since this will be a multi -tenant building, the sign area consists of several individual tenant panels rather than a single identity panel, but otherwise is consistent with the Preliminary Planned Development. Free-standing signs also include a menu board at the beginning of the drive-through lane. A detail was not provided for the menu board, but should be included in the final signage plans. 49' Planning Report — RIM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 5 Wall signage is proposed on all four sides of the building. The City Code allows one business sign for each major street frontage on a lot. This lot has two street frontages to the north (Courthouse Lane) and to the south (Hwy. 55). However, maximum visibility of the building appears to be from the west and east, and the building is situated such that the front of the building faces west and is not directly facing a public street. Therefore, staff suggests that signage be allowed on the front (west) elevation to identify each tenant's space. Additionally, staff requests the Advisory Planning Commission's input on whether signage should also be allowed on the east (rear) side of the building for each tenant, and/or on the north and south ends of the building. The final building elevations plan should be revised to show sign areas consistent with the wall signage approved. The typical wall sign area is shown on the building elevations plan, and is approximately 8 feet long by 3 feet in height. Each wall sign should not exceed this size. Also, the plans note that wall signage is to be individual back -lit letters, which complies with the Code requirement that all signage on a multi -tenant building be similar in design. Lighting — Site lighting is proposed to be provided by building mounted wall packs and parking lot lights will be mounted on 25 -foot free-standing poles. Light levels appear to be less than one footcandle at the property lines. The pole -mounted fixture is a box fixture mounted at a 90 degree angle so that the light is directed downward. Wall pack fixtures are also shielded to provide sharp cutoffs and diffuse the light source. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION RJM Construction Inc. is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow an in-line retail center including a Class II restaurant with drive-through facility for Lot 2, Block 2, Oakview Center. The proposed Class II restaurant and drive-through constitutes a change from the previously approved Preliminary Planned Development. The final landscape plan requires some changes to comply with tree mitigation requirements and enhance screening in some areas. As proposed the development plans include a setback deviation from Hwy. 55, with the building set back 40 feet rather than the required 50 feet. Building architecture and lighting appear to be consistent with the Preliminary PD, but there is a question for the APC about the appropriate amount and location of building wall signage. The applicant has simultaneously applied for approval of the Planned Development Amendment and a Final Planned Development. Therefore, approval of the Planned Development Amendment constitutes approval of a Final Planned Development, which will be incorporated into a forthcoming PD Agreement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment and Final Planned Development for a 9,504 square foot in-line retail center including a Class II restaurant with a drive-through facility for property located at 3090 Courthouse Lane, legally described as Lot 2, Planning Report — RJM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 6 Block 2, Oakview Center, located in the NW 1/4 of Section 12. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. An amendment to the Oakview Center Preliminary PD Agreement shall be executed which clearly identifies this change in use for Lot 2, Block 2, and eliminates retail as an allowable use for Lot 2, Block 1. 2. The applicant and/or developer shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City prior to building permit issuance. 3. The following exhibits are required for the Final Planned Development Agreement: • Final Site/Signage Plan • Final Building Elevations/Signage Plan • Final Landscape Plan • Final Site Lighting Plan 4. The site shall be developed in accordance with the above referenced final plans. Access/Street Design 5. This development shall be responsible for constructing the proposed east service drive to its ultimate width for its entire length. Easements/Rights-of-Wav/Permits 6. The developer shall prepare ingress/egress easement documents covering the shared access drives for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit for this development. Parks and Recreation 7. The development is responsible for cash park and trail dedications and is payable at the time of building permit at the rate then in effect. Setbacks 8. The final site plan should be revised to provide a 50 -foot building setback from the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. Landscaping/Tree Preservation 9. A final landscape plan shall be submitted that has been revised to show grading contours and reflect the required tree mitigation and screening enhancements identified in the planning report. The revised final landscape plan will be subject to review and approval by City staff for incorporation in the PD Agreement. air Planning Report — RJM Construction, Inc. September 19, 2000 Page 7 Signage 10. A detail of the menu board sign shall be included in the final signage plans. 11. Wall signage shall be allowed on the front (west) elevation to identify each tenant's space as shown on the building elevations plan. OR Wall signage shall be allowed on the front (west) and side (north and south) elevations, as shown on the building elevations plan. OR Wall signage shall be allowed only on the front (west) and on the east (rear) elevation as shown on the building elevations plan. 12. Each wall sign shall not exceed a size of eight feet long by three feet in height. All wall signage shall be individual back -lit letters. ata Location Map Eagan Boundary - Striae!arllna Parcel Area Building Footprint ..\.*44S a .i rj P. /> 4111110 0 ... ../.. ti at Sub ect Site /' I .- • ilirriA LATA • Jr's, .., I"' . ... a I .. ' 1 . e W alpir A4\"11111m .1. . {: j• k .4 _i, _ed_isiiiwwill101111 .., Fill ati lig IP: Aon V — --a - R S1 MCI 1141 _ . , 1111*,<1 s Vilglailir r • at f 1111, • r tAt EIP.:11 i .11111-.Lf-1 VIE - IN Itil • go • 4, Vit NW ; VS*9 4 * WI mal0011111"" n �CriII �r� •..,'�0 • ' De Olga DIP Irli 1 1 t_ #L,% ilkifi 41447Qoac I 41/4 n a gill ��77 4 ^ � � 1"0".. l inC 411k.tl Gan _r ..-MIMS •�e0irG0�rGG000OGGGG BMW 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: RJM Construction Application: Planned Development Amendment and Final PD Case No.: 12-PA-09-08-00 & 12-FD- - -1 : -1 • x13 City of Eagan MINNESOTA C..sma■Ity Development Department Map prepared using ER5I ArCVNw 3. Aral bus • provid.d by Dakota County Land Survey ()apartment nt as of August 2000. /, THIS MAP 1S INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and aro not responsible for errors or omissions. N w E S Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan RJM Construction Case No. 12 -PA -09-08-00 and Land Use Map 12-FD-13-08-oo Zoning Map PF D P PD _■- t Current Zoning: 4111i1 PD Planned Development • :, � lli 1 O..i�•� k rik, d!: 1�.1 'gym Nv II,- IS ivii, iieri ham gw, illi i me III • / ..., •e• • •00 1200 Feet o® WO ilii Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map a PF S. OOP ).... ti liqui•-1, Current Land Use Designation: ititSIAII CPD Commercial Planned Development,- `y�K �� Klnyy aO. 11E1Ik 4 ; Imo 1., 41 V Irk 1101 : boil L. ' 2 . 00• • ••• 12M root \ pi 4 1 at Parer Mase . Carry land �y Oep•rin 1111100. N nrp er Zoning Interurban by Gtr 0t•n. *City .Wnlalned of Eagan Z W E i THIS MAP N INTlNDlD FOR R!P!klNC! USE ONLY Community Development DepaRment The City of lagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S '',fallif j *Its vf1! _------ _ —-anafaaa to„ ELEVATIONS/SIGNAGE 4) SEE LIGHTING PLAN (AI.1) FOR FIXTURE OETAILS. S310N NOUYA313 ' � 'P...Rolm � REATAIL DEVELOPMENT LAMN MINNESOTA ELEVATIONS' NY Some Sun. One. Wa :� s. w Z. j �jjjj�::�N tj1�iZ lid3 11,1 }j}��,�� 3i�� 1 3 i Fir fAiiiiir°.°- r L' : r r r c : M Y �. T Y Lr .• r r r rt r e Y + r r± r. t. r r N• w r r r I. e. y Y �' 9 - i1�11111�It7U `~ r iY i - r r 0 9 i F tN�+ _ Z C+ +a = N -4 LIGHTING PLAN 4411 001 a 0 I<I it 11 Ihn liislili;Itlshhh i`fo2e OILIMI A PD gas. gz.sur, BLDG. COVERAGE 9.5% t tx Axx BLDG. AREA .PL 6,900 ��++• WI w= LOT AREA (SC. FL/ 71,915 2.3gRm 0 Q n (1 mot imawstam BSA ivvvntnc nen !!!gP d Ithg 1 1itI 1 !rggl��` nj11�li I!j! LiMi r iii; Nish I d 1.ii tU d MASTER - SITE PLAN (REVISED 6/11198) �.l V! tvi LtJ (t. SOUTH !_.NATION - It•TAIL (LCT 2, BLOCK U MS r.w EAST ELEVATION - RLSTAURANTMETAIL (LOT 2, BLOCK 2) rut. •Amp` MOST ELEVATION - OMTIGE/GUNIG (LOT 9, BLOCK 2) .1.14.110, ma, /.ae... ro I';,' 1,7111111 iI ► ; i Ilii'i ,ii ,li 111111;il' F i0.17 iOUTM ELEVATION - DAY GAME OAT 4, MOCK 2) PRELIMINARY PD /' . (REVISED 4/10/981 VIM Said 4TC►QMSA ti r hr ••••••• 11•••{1k Flhom S. 11/S OW. 111111•••••• OAK VIEW CENTER r11111M, r, IOMmMIMIP r.On.wr Mw ti1111161111 RIi11O.111f Wialrrwr•, 1W11111 r.r.w�n Air RECE.IVED MAY 1 1 IS:TS rn rn TIM E A 2Z- . 31-0" 3,-4" 41-0" 41-0• 41-0" 41-0" 41-8. I 5i52 54 11 31-0. 31 Q. 61-0. HHH 1 31-0' 7,-0. Li; PRELI ARY PD MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN, (REVISED 5/8/98) If! , , ft , , I- 1 ,. KVIEWI 31-0. 31 Q. 61-0. HHH 1 31-0' 7,-0. Li; PRELI ARY PD MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN, (REVISED 5/8/98) If! ft I- 41./. , Aztec Properties, LLC 4560 Hemlock Lane • Plymouth, MN 55442 • 952-544-1717 Development Narrative Oakview Center Eagan, MN August 16, 2000 Summary Aztec Properties, LLC is proposing to construct an in-line mall of approximately 9500 square feet at Lot 2, Block 2 Oakview Center (near Loan Oak & Hwy. 55) in Eagan Minnesota. This new retail center will be next to an existing Holiday Station Store and feature Cousins Subs as an anchor tenant. Objective Aztec is purchasing this property from Holiday Corporation and following approval from the City Council of Eagan, expects that construction will be completed by February 1, 2001. Aztec intends to build this mall to accommodate four to six retailers including a Cousins Subs restaurant and other complimentary tenants to serve the business and residential community that surround the area. The lot is currently zoned for commercial retail and not developed. Access roads, sewer, water, and storm run-off are in place and ready for expansion into this proposed development. The proposed development conforms to the Master PUD with the following exceptions: 1) This site was to be a single, full-service restaurant; we are proposing a multi - tenant building including a quick -service restaurant. 2) Aztec is proposing to re -orient the building from the west side of the property to the east, with the storefronts facing west. This change will allow for better access and visibility from Highway 55. 3) Cousins Subs is proposing a drive-through lane on the south side of the project facing Highway 55. Conditional Use: Cousins Subs Drive Through The proposed drive-through lane for Cousins Subs has been designed to make the best use of the property while leaving ample parking for the other tenants and providing excellent traffic flow through the area. Cousins Subs would hie to serve the already mobile consumers patronizing Holiday and the proposed McDonalds and hotel in addition to the other retail stores located in this development. Cousins' drive through menu is a strategically limited "express menu" featuring ready-made standards designed to efficiently move traffic through the lane. RPC:= „j, 1 F •1S aanidq 9Cj :32II1ZVN9IS NOIZVZINIOHIfIV :NOS)Iad SarIVS :MANN ZJVINOD :jIA L2IVdaU 7.1