Loading...
3440 Washington Dr CITY OF EAGAN Remarks Diy 0 wgL ' -.ze? Addition BI(7.~rAT, 8111 ,'qDEN Lot Blk 1 Percel 1044007-020-01 Owner + R Stree - EAGAN U'W 55122 S,i F „ 1D Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Paymcnt Recefpt Date STREETSURF. 1978 6440.56 644.05 10 STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK 1970 496.90 19.88 25 * SEWERLATERAL 312, 1977 11,182.6111 1118.26 10 WATERMAIN * WATERLATERAL 1977 IO * WATER AREA 1977 lO * STORM SEW TRK 1977 10 * STORM SEW LAT 1977 lO CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC PARK , city oF aagan THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIF. AWADA . SHAWN HUNiER SANDRA A. MASiN THEODORE WACHiER October 10, 1996 counwi mremcera THOMAS MEDGES Ctly AtlmfN111FG101 , E. J. VAN OVERBENE MR CFtAp SANDEN ciw cierk FEDERAL LAND COMPANY 3440 WASHINGTON DR EAGAN MN 55122 Dear Mr. Sanden: This letter is a follow•up to our October 2 meeting at 3460 regarding fve sprinklers under the ytairs on the south end of tltis building. Section 4-4J.73.2 ofthe 1991 cdition of the N.F.P.A. 13 5[ates: 1n non-combustibie sta'v shafrs with non-combustible slairs, sprinkkrs shall be installed at the top of the shaft nnd under the first landing above the bottom of the shaft. xce' n: Sprinkkr shall be installcd beaeath landings or stairways when the area beneath is used for swrage. The exceplion doea apply in this building as there ie sturage uf recycling containers under the stairway. [ here was also some question reguding the distance of sprinklers from one another. The 1991 edition of N.F.P.A. 13, Section 4-4.1.1 explains the maximum and minimum spacing which is 6' on center. Section 4-4.1.7.8 BaFttes axplains that a bafFle must be used whenever sprinklers aze closer than 6' (see attachmeat)- lf you have any questions, please contact me at 681-4774. Thank yoa Sincerely, Dale Weglel er Fire Marshal fJW(s snndeacha MUNICIPAL CENTER iNE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACRITY 3830 PIL01 NNOB RDAD 3501 COACHMAPI POiNi EAGAN. MINNESDiA 55122~1897 . TNE SYMBOL OF SiRENGTH AND GPOWTH IN OL1R COMMUNITY FAGAN, MINNESOTA S6122 PHONE: (612) 681 4600 PMONE~ (612) 681 •0300 FA7(; {612) 6844612 Equal OpportunNy/Aylrmotlve Action Employe( FA%; (612) 691-4360 iD0-. (612} 456-8535 14D; (612) 4544515 INSTALLrT10K REQUIRENENTS 19_~7 , 4A.1.7.6.2 Sprinklers shall be installed under exterior r combustible roo£s or canoples erceeding 4 ft{1.? m) in g S width. 5 okk 4•4.1.7.7 Dwelling Units. 4•4.1.7.7.1 5prinklen are not required in 6athrooms that are located within dwelling units, that do noc exceed 55 sq SEC7IoN ft (5.1 m'), and that havt walls and ceilings of noncomhus- tible or limited-combustible macerials with a 15 minuce thermal 6arrier rating intluding the walls and ceiiings behind 6xtures. L Exteplion: Sprinh(ers art required in bathrounu 5f nursmg horrtas ond in bathropmt ppen(ng direttlro onlo publu cm+idon or ~ exttwaYf. L 4.4.1.7.7.2 Sprinklers are not required in dothes closets, lirten closets, and paatries wi[hin dwelling unia in hotds Meawree on siooe and morets where the area nf the space does noc exreed 24 sq tt (2.2 m'), the least dimension does not exceed 3& (0.9 m), and the walls and ceilings are surfaced with non- eor si umu: i in. = 25,4 mm: I fi = 0 .304e M. com6ustible or limiced-combus[ible materials. Faun 49.1.7.9.4(e) sprinWere u puehad rooF.; b,uce iioa enn up dro dape. '4•4.1:7.8 Baf9es. BatAes shall 6e installed whenever sprinklers are less chan 6 ft (1.8 m) apan ro prevem oper- S~~S3 h max. anng spnnklers from wecting adjaceni ,pnnklers, thus deiaying or preventing their operatioa. BafHes ehall be oeck located midway be[ween sprinklers and arranged to pro- cect the acmating elements. BafAes shall be of noncombus- tible or limired-combus[ible material ihat wiil xay in place before and during sprinkler operation. Thc haflies shal] be appraximately 8 in. (203 mm) wide and 4 fn. (152 mm) SECTiON high. The tops of batAes shall extend ? io 3 in. (51 w 76 mm) above the deflecrors of upright - sprinklers. The 6ottoms oEbafHes shall extend downward to a 3evel at teast even with the deflec[ors of pendenc sprinklers. (See =i L A-4-4.1 J.3.4. y Exupaon Na. I: Fnr in•rack ipnnWers, see A'fPA 237C. Staa- dard fm R¢ck Stor¢ge of Materials. I Exceptiaa No. 2: 8affits are aot required for old•ttyle sprinkle+l protecting fur starage vautts. Measured on siope 44.1.7.9 Speciag under Pitthed Snrfaces. ' For SI lJnita: 1 in. : 25.4 mm: 1@= 0.9098 m, 4-4.1.7.9.1 The distance 62twcen sprinklers either on che Figure 4-4J.7.9.2(b) SprinYhx at piahN roofq 6roeh Ilae@ mr branch linea ur between ehe branth lines, running up or "Pt10thir°' down the slope of a pitched surface, ;hall be rneasured along the slopr. 4-4,1.7.9.20 Sprinklers under or near the peak shall have deAectors lo[:a[ed not morc than 3 Et (0-9 m) ver[ically y.a.. down From the peak. (See Figures 9•4.1.7.9.2(a) and 9-9. / J.9.2(6).] Min imum ~ J016[ ~ Exception Na. 1: G'ader saw-touthed rooJs, ;qinklers al !he higbest elevation shal[ rto6 ezueQ a disaance oj j ft (0.9 m) rrtea- sured doum the siape jrom tlu peak. Exeepfion Na. 2: Undtr a sfteply ditthed iurjace. the distance from the peak to the deJietton shall be permiUed io be irzcrraseE to Fo.:I u,.j.« i In. -:S.i mm: 1[7 - 0.3014 m. maiatain u honzonlal clearance a/' wi less than 2/i l0.6 m.) f+om Fu,,,. 4..4.1.7.9.2(cl o<.:r.nte horiwnw ek...ece tm spriouen u othrr struttntal membeis. /See Figure 44.1.7.9 2(r.) I peat at pirchN not. t99i EOaian Council Minutes 0(:152 June 15, 1982 ~ affected partially because of the terrain involved. He further indicated the cost of platting is too burdensome and requested the waiver. Mr. Terry Votell a neighboring property oxner, together uith numerous property owners uere present and submitted a petition from all other owners in the subdivision objecting to the split. He stated that most lots are larger than the Odell lot, the latter of which is barely one acre, the lot is nearly in the center of the subdivision, that all other owners ob,ject, that it would become a precedent if the lot split took place and could create problems relating to adequacy oP the utilities and traffic issues. He stated the purpose of the subdivision ordinance is to protect an attractive and stable neighborhood and this would not be aecomplished by the lot split. He further stated that it was his opinion that the covenants filed on August 29, 1952 were continued in effect because of the 1982 Minnesota Legislative appeal to the 30 year expira- tion statute for private covenants. The Advisory,Planning Commission on May 25, 1982, recommended denial of the application unanimously for reasons stated in its minutes. It was noted that it would have been more appropriate for the applicant to have submitted an application for preliminary plat approval. Wachter then moved, Egan seconded the motion to deny the application for the reasons stated by the Advisory Planning Commissions including those reasons stated above by the ob,jecting and neighboring property ownersg the fact that it crould appear to change the charaeter of the neighborhood, the precedent issue appears important and that there is no hardship that has been noted by the applicant. All voted in favor. ' /FEDERAL I,AND COMPANY - YYLON SIGN i The applieation of Federal Land Co. for pylon sign located on!IIutlot B,1) Bicentennial 7th Addition,or Lot 2, Block j, Bicentennial 8th Addition was then considered. The Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval sub- Jeet to certain conditions. Mr. Tim Murnane appeared for the applicant and stated that the applicant Will comply uith all ordinances and other criteria of the eity. There was a question as to compliance with Ordinance No. 16 regarding pylon signs for major shopping areas. It Was noted that the propo- sal is for a pylon sign for one tenant in one building consisting of Edina Realty and the council members indicated it did not appear to comply with the , Ordinance No. 16 provision, noting that there may be other requests for pylon signs in the area ineluding.the same side of the Bicentennial subdivision. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to deny the application to allow one area identification sign per side, based upon the ordinance provision re- garding one area identification sign per side of a ma,jor complex, and noting further that the identification sign is only for single use rather than to ~ identify the entire pro,ject. All voted yes. 6