Loading...
2640 Eagan Woods Dr - Reference docs for BL71133,71967PAT GEAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TILLEY Council Members city of ecigan THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Municipal Center. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Phone: 651.675.5000 Fax: 651.675.5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Facility: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community September 21, 2005 Chris Engle Commercial Property Development 1915 Plaza Drive Eagan, MN 55122 RE: CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2729 PILOT KNOB ROAD Dear Mr. Engle, We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above -referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2000 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the items checked below be addressed: 2 sets Architectural Plans 2 sets Structural Plans 2 sets Civil Plans 2 sets Landscaping Plans 1 Code Analysis 1 Certificate of Survey 1 Spec. Structural Testing & Inspection Program Summary Schedule Fire Stopping Submittals Other 1 Project Specs 1 Energy Calculations 1 Electric Power & Lighting 1 Master Exit Plan 1 Emergency Response Site Plan 1 MC/ES SAC determination letter 1 Soils Report If you have any questions regarding the above items, please feel free to contact me at 651-675- 5683. Sincerely, J. Craig Novaczyk Senior Inspector JCN/jh EAGAN� REVIEWED BY Ce* I &- DATE I 0ff0 BUILDING INSPEC I iUi\s o DEPT. PAT GEAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TILLEY Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Municipal Center: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1897 Phone: 651.675.5000 Fax: 651.675.5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Facility: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community city of eagan September 28, 2005 Chris Engle Commercial Property Development 1915 Plaza Drive Eagan, MN 55122 RE: CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2779 PILOT KNOB ROAD Dear :Chris We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above- referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2000 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed: X Designate type of construction for main & second levels. "Z. Provide detail for wall type 22. X Provide UL listing & testing for wall type 18. • Provide detail for elevator draft curtain required on the second level. Emergency lighting is required @ the exterior side of the exit discharge doorways in buildings required to have two or more exits. (SEC. 1003.2.11.2). Please feel free to call 651/675 -5683 with any questions you may have regarding this letter. Sincerely, Vl )1e7(`W" J. Craig Novaczyk' Senior Inspector cc: Todd Mohagen - Mohagen Hanson Architects October 5, 2005 Mr. Craig Novaczech, Senior Inspector City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1897 Re: Manley Land Development Corporate Woods Office Condominium - City Response Letter Mohagen/Hansen Project No. 05161.0MLD Dear Mr. Novaczech; C: Chris Engle, Commercial Property Development Encl: Revised Sheets 1415 E. Wayzata Blvd Suite 200 Wayzata, MN 55391 Telephone 952.473.1985 Fax 952.473.1340 www. mohagenh an sen.com Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group In response to your review letter dated September 28, 2005 regarding the above referenced project we would like to offer our explanation and resolution to the outstanding issues. 1. Designate type of construction for main and second levels. Response: Will comply, revised sheets attached. 2. Provide detail for wall type 22. Response: Revised sheet attached. 3. Provide UL listing and testing for wall type 18. Response: Revised sheet attached 4. Provide detail for elevator draft curtain required on the second level Response: Revised sheet attached. 5. Emergency lighting is required at the exterior side of the exit discharge doorways in buildings required to have two or more exits (SEC 1003.2.11.2). Response: Lights will be provided under the electrical design. I hope the above information satisfies all of your concerns regarding the above referenced project. Should you have any questions or require additional information please contact me at (952) 473 -1985. We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and we look forward to a successful project completion. Best regards, Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Grou ■44A Todd E. Mohagen, A Principal Mohagen Tr Hansen MA Architectural Architectural Group � 19 1415 Fast Wayzata Blvd Tel 952.473.1985 Sub 200 Fax 952.473.1340 Wayzata W 55391 emsmohagenhansen.com " � CORPORATE WOODS EAGAN, MN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CITY COMMENTS SNOW e EM PARTIAL INC 10/03/2035 05181.0 rn A0.0 ow IN SNP COMM were kVobs\mxdrAca llmods APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY GROUP FLOORS 1 AND 2: B BASEMENT ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE S -2 COMMON AREAS: ACCESSORY USE BASEMENT STORAGE: S -2 S -2 OCCUPANCY— BASEMENT (TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION) ALLOWABLE AREA UNLIMITED B OCCUPANCY— FLOORS 1 AND ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 2 STORIES MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 40' + 20' = MAXIMUM AREA 61,600 > 30,972 If = 100 (.75).667 = 50 (II —B CONSTRUCTION) 1 STORY FOR SPRINKLE 31 Aa = 23,000 + (23,000(50)/100) + (23,000(200)/100) Aa = 23,000 + 11,500 + 46,000 = 80,500 S.F. Aa = 80,500(2) = 161,000 If = 100 (1 — 0.25) BAIL INSUTANON; FRICTION FIT. (BOTH SIDES) SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS 1' -6" 3/4" FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD ANCHORED TO WALL FOR MOUNTING MISC. EQUIPMENT NEW OR EXISTING WALL CMU WALL CMU WALL 5/8" GYP.BD. MTL STUDS ® 24" O.C., SET IN RUNNERS CMU WALL m 3 HR RATED CMU W 8" CMU WALL TO STRUCTURE ABOVE UL DESIGN: U904 11 \ 18 19 20 PLY. WD. EQUIP. FURRING 4" A.F.F. TO 8' -4" A.F.F. CMU WALL 8" CMU WALL TO STRUCTURE ABOVE CMU WALL w/ 2 1/2" MTL. STD. FUR. 8" CMU WALL TO STRUCTURE ABOVE Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group 1415 East Wayzata Suite � Wayzata 11N 55391 Tel 952.473.1985 Fax 952.473.1340 litYLE OMB 103/205 mum NO. 05161.0 t&D OMAN NY: SNP COWMEN P/0H`k\kb»\INZilP\OTrPOSOLk C OR P ORATE WOODS EAGAN, MN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CITY COMMENTS PARTIAL A20 Mohagen Mir Hansen Architectural Group �■` 1415 East Wayzata 1vd Tel 952.473.1985 SuRe 200 Fax 952.473.1340 nn Wayzata MN 55391 ...�n, .co 3=1-" CORPORATE WOODS EAGAN, MN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CITY COMMENTS PARTIAL OR 1003/2305 o , 6 , A „ A8.0 ORION SW COM= PHIS .� 15 0 GLASS DRAFT CURTAIN 3" = 1 -0" MIN. 7' -0" A.F.F. CEILING PLANE METAL FRAME TEMPERED GLASS . BXUV.U904 - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Page 1 of 2 See General Information for Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Design No. U904 March 17, 2004 Bearing Wall Rating — 3 HR. Nonbearing Wall Rating — 3 HR. Underwriters Laboratories Inc.® Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSUUL 263 1. Concrete Blocks* — Various designs. Classification C -3 (3 hr). See Concrete Blocks category for list of eligible manufacturers. 7.5/8" MIN. 2. Mortar — Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not less than 2- 1/4 and not more than 3 -1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster — Add 1/2 hr to Classification if used. Attached to concrete bolcks (Item 1). BXUV.U904 4. Loose Masonry Fill — If all core spaces are filled with loose dry expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (Rotary Kiln Process), water repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated perlite loose fill insulation add 1 hr to Classification. 5. Foamed Plastic* — (Optional -Not Shown) — 1 -1/2 in. thick max, 4 ft wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). http: / /database.ul.com/cgi- bin /XYV/ template /LISEXT /1 FRAME /showpage2.html ?name =... 10/3/2005 . Minnesota Rule 1307.0045 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Rules, Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 1307 1307.0045 SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Subpart 1. Scope. The special provisions in this part apply to the design, construction, and installation of equipment governed by ASME A17.1 -1996 and ASME A17.3 -1996. Subp. 2. Number of cars in hoistway. When there are three or fewer elevator cars in a building, they may be located within the same hoistway enclosure. When there are four elevator cars, they must be divided in such a manner that at least two separate hoistway enclosures are provided. When there are more than four elevators, not more than four elevator cars may be located within a single hoistway enclosure. Subp. 3. Elevator lobby. Elevator lobbies must be installed and constructed as required by the UBC. When firefighters' service is installed and an elevator lobby is not provided, an area of the ceiling outside the hoistway opening must be provided with a draft curtain. The area of the ceiling enclosed by the draft curtain must be large enough so that it surrounds the elevator's smoke detector, encloses the width of the hoistway entrance, and has a minimum area equal to the floor area of the car. The lra,f, .., Qur,.tala.a� cc .sis ., a g ' in.: metal frames or construction comp ying_ witkl_..t.he ca4s4a ttIon type of the building. Where a seven -foot minimum ceiling height can be maintained below the draft curtain, the draft curtain shall extend down a mi ri °orf inches. -f roar they ceilLna,. Subp. 4. Standby power. Standby power when required by chapter 1341, Minnesota Accessibility Code, or UBC section 403 shall be capable of providing power to at least one elevator in each bank to serve all floors of the building. Standby power shall be manually transferable to all elevators in each bank. Standby power when required by chapter 1341, Minnesota Accessibility Code, or UBC section 403 shall be provided by an approved self - contained generator set to operate automatically whenever there is a loss of electrical power to the building. The generator set shall be located in a separate room enclosed by at least a one -hour fire - resistive occupancy separation. The generator shall have a fuel supply adequate to operate the equipment connected to it for a minimum of two hours. Note: A bank of elevators is a group of elevators or a single elevator controlled by a common operating system; that is, all those elevators which respond to a single call button constitute a bank of elevators. There is no limit to the number of cars which may be in a bank or group, but there may be not more than four cars within a common hoistway. Subp. 5. Minimum car size. In buildings with passenger elevators having 25 feet or more of travel above or below the designated level, at least one passenger elevator must be provided with a minimum clear distance between walls or between http: / /www. revisor. leg. state .mn.us /arule /13O7/OO45.html 10/3/2005 t Metropolitan Council September 16, 2005 Dale Schoeppner Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: Charges: Office 25496 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. /SAC Unit If you have any questions, call me at 651- 602 -1113. Sincerely, • t../ Jod . Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (300) 050916S3 cc: S. Selby, MCES Carolyn Krech, Finance Department, Eagan This project should be charged 11 SAC Units, as determined below. Environmental Services The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has reviewed the SAC assignment for the Corporate Woods Office to be located at Pilot Knob Road & Buffet Way within the City of Eagan. SAC Units 10.62 or 11 www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1005 • Fax 602 -1138 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer MANLEY Commercial, Inc. 1915 Plaza Drive, Suite 201 Eagan, MN 55122 Phone 651.289.5263 Fax 651.289.4329 vwew.manleycommercial.corn 12 -1 -06 City of Eagan- Inspections 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Craig Novaczyk Dear Mr.: Novaczyk I am proposing the Smoke Guard 200 System to alleviate non- compliance issues with the second floor elevator lobby at Corporate Woods Office Condominiums. The job address is 2640 Eagan Woods Dr. Please see attached documentation for specifications on the proposed system. If you have any questions, please ask. The will be placed for the system per your email consent: Respectfu osh Anderson Manley Commercial, Inc: REVIE DA'3E. for BUILQ DEC 0 5 ?flfJF System Descr tphon The Smoke Guard® system Model 200 (M200) is a code compliant smoke- and draft-control assembly when used with typical fire-rated elevator doors. The Smoke Guard screen consists of a reinforced, transparent, polyimide film. The film edge is connected to flexible magnetic strips which adhere to ferrous metal rails as the system deploys creating a tight seal. The M200 uses standard building power. The system may be connected to building emergency power if desired. Codes and Standards The M200 works in conjunction with fire-rated elevator hoistway doors to exceed the NFPA, UBC, and IBC requirements for a smoke and draft-control assembly. This enables the elevator to open directly onto the corridor. System Operation The Smoke Guard system is designed specifically to protect elevator openings and the elevator shaft from vertical smoke SYSTEM DELSPEPLY air leakage air leakage opening force flammability ESSE STANDARD Ut 1784 NFPA 105 2000 IBC 1003.3,1.2 2003 IBC 1008.1.2 ASTM 84 800.574.0330 * www.smokeguard.com * Sweet's Section 08300 SGS0-2 1/06 - Re 7 copywriie 2006 Stroke Guard, division of RociorSscal SMOKE GUARD® system Model 200 technical summary migration. The system will deploy only when the smoke detector in that elevator lobby goes into alarm (or on loss of power to the unit). As the lobby smoke detector goes into alarm, the elevator will automatically return to the recall floor. If an elevator occupant were to encounter a deployed M200, a screen rewind switch located on either side of the screen will allow for egress. If smoke is still actively being detected, the screen will then redeploy to seal the opening. If AC power is lost, the Smoke Guard system M200 operates on a fail safe secure basis, triggering screen deployment. A deployment delay is built into the system to avoid nuisance deploys on brief power outage. As power is restored, the screen will automati- catty rewind into the housing. Unit Dimensions The M200 is available in two standard screen sizes which will cover openings up to 48" wide (assuming a standard 2" elevator door frame). Consult smokeguard.com or your local- MODEL 200 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TEST PAEANS TEES max. allowable = 3 cfmtsf 0.1 inch wg 72 f and 400 max. allowable = 3 dm/4 @ 0.3 inch wg @ 400 F force < 30 lbs flame spmad< 25 smoke ge.neration < 50 Smoke Guard distributor for detailed information on this product. SMOKE GUARD SYSTEMS MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF TEST REEDIT VALUES air leakage less than 0.5 cfm air leakage less than 1.5 cfm 15 Ibs applied @ the film boundary reinforced film Exceeds doss A standards: flame spread index = 0 smoke generated = 5 Instanation All Smoke Guard system units are installed by factory recognized personnel. There is minimal preparation work. Installation requires a clear, plumb, unobstructed wall surface above the hoistway door, 120v AC power and a UL 268 conforming smoke detector. • UL 1784 "Air Leakage Tests of Door Assemblies" • UL 864 "Control Units for Fire Protective Signaling Systems" • ICC Evaluation Service Report ESR-1136 • 2000 International Building Code Section 714.2.3 a 2003 international Building Code Section 715.3.3 • NFPA 105 "Installation of Smoke Control Door Assemblies' Au SMOKE GUARD® system Model 200 technico summary US PATENT NUMBER 5,363,510 AND OTHER US PATENT PEN 1NG Ut LISTED RELEASING DEVICE The Smoke Guard system features a UL approved releasing device. FAIL SAFE SECURE The M200 operates on fail safe secure basis. The loss of AC power will trigger screen deployment. There is a deployment delay on power failure built into the system to avoid nuisance deploys on brief power outage. Upon restoration of power, the screen will automatically rewind into the housing. REWIND SWITCH The Smoke Guard System screen rewind switch may be activated from both sides of the screen. This feature allows elevator occupants to exit from the elevator car using the interior (shaft side) of the switch. The screen will then redeploy after egress, as long as the smoke detector continues to be activated, providing continued smoke protection for the elevator hois knititled Document Craig Novaczyk From: Sent: To: Subject: Josh Anderson [jnderson @manleyland.com] Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:58 AM Craig Novaczyk FW: Corporate Woods Attachments: 05161_A7_0 CHGDIR -7.pdf Good morning Craig, Attached is the revised roof hatch protective rail for 2640 Eagan Woods Dr. Thank you, Josh Anderson From: Adam Czech [mailto:aczech @mohagenhansen.com] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:11 PM To: Josh Anderson; 'Ken Schneider' Cc: 'Jennifer Kaplan'; tmohagen @mohagenhansen.com Subject: RE: Corporate Woods Josh, Attached is a pdf format of the revised Change Directive #5/ Rev -7 on the railing requirements for the roof hatch. Sheets 2 -A7.0 & 3 -A7.0. Thank you and the move went very well. We all love our new location. 12/05/2006 Mohagen Hansen Architectural 1 1 Group Adam Czech Mohagen /Hansen Architectural Group 1415 E. Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 200 Wayzata, MN 55391 Tel 952.473.1985 Fax 952.473.1340 aczech mohagenhansen.com www.mohagenhansen.com From: Josh Anderson [ mailto :jnderson @manleyland.com] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 6:48 AM To: Ken Schneider Cc: Adam Czech; Jennifer Kaplan; tmohagen @mohagenhansen.com Subject: RE: Corporate Woods REVI DATE: t V BUILDING IN • EC ONS DIVISION Page 1 of 2 Uiititled Document Good morning to all. Thank you for getting this information to me. Did anyone talk to Craig on the railing requirements? He said a one piece system is required full length at roof edge (roughly 11' long). However, I will forward this to him for his review and approval before I send this to the shop for construction. On another note, l did not see the revised cover sheet w/ new /updated fire ratings; will you please send that as well. Thank you and good luck in your move! Josh Anderson 651 - 289 -5511 From: Ken Schneider [mailto:kschneider @mohagenhansen.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:28 PM To: Josh Anderson Cc: 'Adam Czech'; 'Jennifer Kaplan'; tmohagen @mohagenhansen.com Subject: Corporate Woods Josh, Attached is a pdf format of the requested change directive #5 / Rev 7 for Corporate Woods project. Also, I have to tell you that we did not send this to the City so you will have to do so. Thanks for your patients. Page 2 of 2 If you have any additional questions or comments please email Jennifer Kaplan, my email is down until Monday morning. Mohagen Hansen Architectural 1 1 Group miniam kschneider(c�mohagenhansen.com www.mohagenhansen.com 12/05/2006 Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group 1415 East Wayzata Blvd Tel Suite 200 Fax Wayzata MN 55391 WT 952.473.1985 952.473.1340 www.mohagenhansen.com SCALE: 1 /4 � _ 1 ,_ O � SHEET DESCRIPTION: CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM CHANGE DIRECTIVE #5 / REV 7 SHEET NUMBER: 2-/47.4 DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2006 PROJECT Na. 05161.OMLD PARTIAL DRAWN BY A.CZECH cOMPUTER PATH: k:\jobs \money \corpwoods \m Mohagen 111.71 Hansen Architectural Group 1415 East Wayzata Blvd Tel Suite 200 Fax Wayzata MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com 952.473.1985 952.473.1340 3i8• - ' SCALE: °� SHEET DESCRIPTION: CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM CHANGE DIRECTIVE #5 / REV 7 SHEET NUMBER: • 3 -A7.0 DATE NOVEMBER 20, 2006 PROJECT Na. 05161.OMLD PARTIAL DRAWN BY: ACZECH COMPUTER PATH: k:\jobs \manley \corpwoods \cd TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ll Vi C MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR REGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER / /JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE (ARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER ✓CAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW - CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 27791 ROAD • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS (47 lip K:11 W0015 Oil The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Comments: Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date CD/FORMS/BLDG INSP/PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N ZONING? METER SIZE REVISED 9- 02 #21 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days, If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN CORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW — CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS „- C i f yo /suei*j G✓ ( )Jos ,Ckt The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. Comments: Ok - i - e��i1 r ( 14,„ -s - Ft1e % r/ /Y'. o - 'P- Cam, "aro v vt (, vA(41 - 7( frn.zArtf f iyrt ,a7 -Fez — 6/Z °� Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT td-/Kl 6 n i `'"""/a 49(0/5. �5 bu6<c -Por cee.&i /5) ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required ZONING? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication METER SIZE ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes Er No PRV Required gnature Date CD /FORMS /BLDG INSP /PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N REVISED 9- 02 #21 Wee62-,- 7rt 0, - 75 AC- AvAl 146,1(/ 3 2, eg yr 2 4c. ei 4 3, 7 762 217? TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW - CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2779 PILOT KNOB ROAD • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. u u7cic .-, fi Comments: N 0i rCi with (y f d EA ', Vl 5r u ✓d �. - A-cs 66ryve 2 r? 011 Lit v5. aLtsice w t v l w d.,„ Ca s-rr, Indicate any fees that are t be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT Yes ❑ No Yes �No Yes No Yes ❑ No Yes ti Ndfo ❑ Yes ❑ Via, landscape security required water quality dedication park dedication t. ID w trail dedication t. $ t. 0 cx c tree dedication PRy Required Signature CD/FORMS /BLDG INSP/PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N 15 ZONING? METER SIZE REVISED 9- 02 #21 TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW - CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2779 PILOT KNOB ROAD • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. Comments: Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature CD /FORMS /BLDG INSP/PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N ZONING? METER SIZE REVISED 9- 02 #21 TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW — CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2779 PILOT KNOB ROAD • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. Comments: Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required ❑ Yes 4No water quality dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ ❑ No PRV Re . uired Or Signatur Date CD/FORMS/BLDG INSP/PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N ZONING? METER SIZE REVISED 9- 02 #21 TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WETLAND, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RIDLEY, CITY PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: CRAIG NOVACZYK, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 RE: PLAN REVIEW — CORPORATE WOODS OFFICE CONDOMINIUM 2779 PILOT KNOB ROAD • LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANWOODS The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" request form. Comments: Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ti o Signature landscape security required water quality dedication park dedication trail dedication tree dedication V Required Date ZONING? METER SIZE CD /FORMS/BLDG INS /PLAN REVIEW CRAIG N REVISED 9- 02 #21 Technical (2) Description (3) Type of Inspector (4) Specific Report Frequency (5) Assigned Firm (6) Section Article 1704.3 Steel construction TA Table 1704.3 of 2000 IBC 1704.4 Concrete construction TA Table 1704.4 of 2000 IBC 1704.5 Masonry Construction TA Table 1704.5.1 of 2000 IBC 1704.7 Soils TA Per soils Report of Geotechnical Eng. Light Gauge Framing TA 1X Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name Corporate Woods Location Fagan, MN (1) Permit No. (2) Referenced (3) Use descril (4) Special Insl (5) Owner: Contractor. Architect. Weekly, mor _,....uun, per floor, etc. (6) Name of Fir., contracted to perform services. Project No. Permit No. Note: This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structure Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified , assurr l - 'II be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing" as contained in th- ' ed by the state adopted IBC.) * A complete spec " waded directly by visiting CASE /MN of www.cecm.org* Official section in the program. opted by Minnesota State Building Code Inspector - Structural (SIS) If requested by engineer /architect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record SI -T = Special Inspector - Technical TA = Testing Agency SI -S = Special Inspector - Structural F = Fabricator Accepted for the Building Department By Dote: BCSD 4/03 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (each appropriate representative shall sign below) l ' / u , _.• - 4 at A.1 / d Date: T/. SAS — Firm: '1A Date: 76 2/ Firm . 6 . , awl- - .t _ �: �� �.� ■ �� .�. C'a ate. s /cr � 0 Firm: 10 ' :+.... Oc.. ! Dote: C Y 24# Or Firm: Date: ? _ ! Firm: �yi Date: 9 /Z - 7/ - Firm: Date: A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Corporate Woods Buffet Way and Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Commercial Property Development Corporation Project LV -05 -04878 May 3, 2006 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN INTERTEC May 3, 2006 Mr. Chris Engle Commercial Property Development Corporation 1915 Plaza Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Project LV -05 -04878 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Corporate Woods Buffet Way and Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Engle: Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Corporate Woods and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the work being performed by the various contractors to determine if it was done in general accordance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. Copies of these reports were provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional direction and clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of Field Welds Visual examination of field welds were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 -2004, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Visual examination of the light gauge metal stud welds were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Bolted Connection Observations Bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled and if the splined end of the tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap -off load. In addition, each connection was observed for fit -up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side lap fasteners were observed and evaluated. Anchor Bolt Observations The anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully engaged and snug tight. If required by the construction documents, we also observed if the plate washers were installed. Ultrasonic Examinations Ultrasonic examinations of the full penetration welded connections were conducted in general accordance with the AWS D1.1- 2004, Section 6, Table 6.2 static loaded criteria and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Taylor Carlson at 952.995.2518 or Mary Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATIO Taylor L. Carlson ICC Certified Special nspector- tructural Steel and Welding ichael M. uer, PE Vice Presid nt- Principal Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report c: Mr. Todd Mohagen, MohagenlHansen Architectural Group Mr. Dale Schoeppner, City of Eagan Inspections Department Mr. Rob Golish, Braun Intertec Mr. Al Malacha; Voigt and Associates SS Ltr Rpt -Corp Woods Commercial Property Development Project LV -05 -04878 May 3, 2006 Page 2 BRAUN 1NTERTEC Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 1 City of: Eagan, Minnesota Date: May 3, 2006 Project: Corporate Woods Buffet Way and Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Pr iect: V -05 -04878 In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. Corrections were made as required. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection related issues. Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer, the connections were found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding related issues. The deck welding and side -lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections and testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, s prepared by me or under duly Licensed Profes 'b State of Minnesota. :A /L . 4. At : k r s ichael M. " uer, E 15 571 ,•' 1 Vice Presid: t- Princt igineer .. ., May 3 License 2006 Number: 15 S / ss u u't Y Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 9 ecification or report was ervision and that I am a r the laws of the Braun Intertec Corporation 1 1001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Attention: Mr. Chris Engle Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous PI Inspection Coverage: 111 Masonry Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No 111 ❑ Special Cases ` • • <. e! ' Al 'A 4 1-1-; nizS l rva. -ort er orw.e1C r 116 41E0 Z.-- • it r 4 art 6 Description and location of work complete - C6 r5 'D &,r Go Co 727 pe . Signed: evn. Mgt/ S5t • Are there any aiscre ides rated from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the ,Zt rent IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Print Full Name: City of .Q �� Date of This Report: 1 - 12 - ©tQ �j retr Prc +�- Woctti Project No L- ^ C55-C18 -7 8 `7r•1 •4- Krnab € 'ier y I L. -E, ro l White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report Client Project No.: Temperature: Yes ❑ No Yes ❑ No floc' F Date: 1 �V '� © ea C + I.D. No.: Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of fag( q Report No.: 4' `t..e. ( C] Date of This Report: Project Name en t` +`C—.. W Go ci S Project No.: Project Address: Client: Cewt.er bey. Weather: l ve°r Signe Print Full Name: Client Project No.: Temperature: Page of Special Inspection Daily Report -0 ( a- v- o 5 ©`ie3 7g Description and location of work completed of to SIDRPT Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ foundations Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Lx, rya, j / ^� / 4" ]� V • l S,e.C- rt„•on Ca .-1-6..1d. .e. (9. 3 (') rt WI net -e KA Zentve_e4.'o hS T'-ao s's4, c t'. t 7 t o t>lr Per/ + e,r -% sd• Gt ePetiK.t) . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observation • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Date: I.D. No.: No No To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above_ / — eta. —oco White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name. Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of (-- Date of This Report: Project No.: Ltd' -c� °fig Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) ti Per ri p. ct Vi S t, 4�. C 1;.0 -: t'1. l) °.t'i/Gt.4-. n 'S r-: a ((LT .•at 6.01. IPC3 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Trent IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: 1 Print Full Name: ` G �' I.D. No: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT2 Date: LA — CDCg Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN N RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: (.emit 4 (..'ot,( l e v• Weather: 51 - Ll, Description and location of work completed: 6e_g_1 evt. Signe • : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Print Full Name: City of di AAA_ 5+ 4t- ( r -mac. tA)od r p S a (er risar∎ Date of This Report: Project No.: m Yes Yes Date: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report tV- 65 - &YR78 Client Project No.: Temperature: 2&F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: 111 Continuous ❑ Masonry yfJ Periodic Welding & Bolting < ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases 47 r-c. 0 No ❑ D t To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /l)BC, except as noted above. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of 6 Report No_: S+c l — Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: �C eorTer --c, tk o oc 3 Description and location of work com Signed: b A Print Full Name: 4 coal' r, C 614A - z...� List tests performed: ) j 'ZCt. if1: t.(....... Pr-Vor Project No.: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Page of SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report Date of This Report•. /"` /S' — 0 CO L.V. 6S 6' 7 8 44- Client Project No.: S ° r Temperature: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous i Ffr Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry XWelding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases r z wt4w4- , -pnrLe. C4,h N Date: 1-71A.7 I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Sort. All ) iJ S .'n Z- Cbtrdi4 i . w:.t --k, w s b t, t - + t to. No firZ— No ❑ 124 —oC, To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship pros . the current BC/ C, except as noted above. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Temperature: Description and location of work completed: 23 1-„ 0 `+ rem. 0 Page e, 5 ' ' SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report City of eck..,,,,A Report No.: 3+ L° �Q 1 epo � /� Date of This Report: t � —� Project Name: ©rP..,f Z C._ W ( `,S Project No.: Project Address: Client: L c p rp We Client Project No.: Weather: r Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Periodic e' Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases 3 b `e AA-C.404n L i61 ? B —v C> 'FeAr List tests performed: V--F L� I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No - • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 4. • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: I 0 C 1/ \_ Date: _ L I - O Print Full Name: {..t to-r6/i I.D. Na.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC City of rko\ Vt.. Report No.: �`e, ( GT Date of This Report: / — A B / Project Name: CO L V' (&4^c.> Lt k X Project No: 1- v- d -' es 7r 1 Project Address: 64 1 ".wLtW c u,t c4 lr:6/Plevtie- oi Client Project No.: Client: Weather: ?C Temperature: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry /Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ {Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Description and location of work completed List tests performed: 1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance workmanship provisions of the_urrent IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Special Inspection Daily Report o6Saa Ue,i-.z r, A -- t a.re a ? c 4 \.,) ; okt- No ❑ No ❑ proved plans, specifications and applicable Page of SIDRPT Signed: Z' ®/ Date: 1'"20 '*i5 Print Full Name. T"L.. 4 - t, it 1.D. No.: White copy to Braun Interfec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry g Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Description and location of work completed Pf e v - E d'= I -23-o r e - e k f_, Ve r Q+i SPY . also E3 b s ru d : n3 rJ ' klet 4 -Ste ic C ct.f • o na W ; +k.. c' c)-t- rOtt. +1.t.reail en . , het Vta t %-t- A.( null ax 4 S 4-r0C ky ass . es No J `: cro To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordan : with the approv k pions, s. ° ' "cations -and app workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Print Full Name: QJG: De i r City of Date of This Report: t 'zj—a �o LV- o5 -© Project No.: Special Inspection Daily Report Client Project No.: Temperature: Date: 1— 2( -0(a I.D. No.: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name- Note: Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of g p -mot 7 This is a continuation of a report. continuation) Page of Date of This Report 1 2(9 — O(0 Project No.: V c 5 — © ; The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this o ff- Y > (4- i" 5 ©n L t.J lei4 bs -v %tbYt' —L 4 NJ-a_ � b ©t om 6 0 Q t° 1 ,o'YVl, (4 Cona --f:ons c-/- co ti OU nc ( r= d l o c Q -u ©,rLS 2- E C CC 6,1 .x. SIDRPT2 °tom- Ate ® e , C t S t7 ®(to i rL,._ I> , E 1( t (1. o ( rtIV6 - 614.1k etc +■ o -c exeGry bc.4_ f'_r Lb ►� Cr ?an C) , e_S Ofr___P_Fet-(`` - f/ t n .E 4.. 0 .' (t ✓lam. -P K 5 fro t>Irgt, t o_ , a tj\ 1'4V,. AU. tp4. - cn 45 'rc 1 6r ..et - �—tj ( S rn: c n. - c�� - -c �Dt�G. n S ' •1 r�,c t-+- 3 q-+: o N To the best of ou nowledge, work ins as one in accordance with the approved pteins, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. St 5 0 ruC ` . - root S44 wP-( • Signed: Print Full Name: b - r +'on cop Date: (gyp 67 I.D. No: White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Jan 31 06 04:40p r too bC _ r F 1,E ' ;cis • do �. J • 1 1 • A r tl • t4 1 `. 6 A I L . 1' r r dt P s.. £- • i a • AUL- r t ga 11 Print full Nano D -ibis Repo Proems'. Of gat page report hag i while shoute pat be, 5ep d from .t�+is � tinvat on of - �a11 Wit .Da C c o<v 0 1 ab • 14 o I it } r; t Ma� as ap,plica6le arab lire t� e�b e� o { �19s; work eaa�1 ... a �q strC C. � CE3 �"'� V as naiad ubo+s.. � �.� workmanship prrn+sions of the w 1 ID. No: While copy to B raun t file. earc.PtIO PaPied sav ' ► ' C c-"beeta 1 4343 sfiur 1957 41100 au S BRAUN INTERTEC Report t No.: Project Name: NOM: This is ocontinuofion of a continuation) p.2 siDtrn BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of a� Report No.: t .4ifr Date of This Report "10-40 L.O, e� Project Name: Q�`PC C u.)oeJ Project No_: �.-V o 5 (L©7 Temperature: 2-5'r Page _ of SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report Project Address: Client: 6.0144 wt•air CiNtkt C 'v t . n.Gekw_ Client Project No.: Weather: lJ31 ti Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers O Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 0 Special Cases Description and location of work completed: List tests performed: U CZ { • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Signe Print Full Name (,er CA,tiatik C . 111.6 7cc l tr 8,/F /p/ S- +=f W � 1 JS ® S(N)+k 1 $-t`' a vtA t4-65 - t A, a, tk. L+.),' -t-k._ 6) :d• - ��� /: t - , I . VII . - 6' • - I Yes ❑ No Yes ❑ No I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file: Blue copy to Project Site Representative. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Date: ,z 1 (✓ V • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of and Report No.: 5 f--e -e( 1 Project Name: C rTOIra+t° LOB6 S Description and location of work completed List tests performed: Print Full Na Special Inspection Daily Report Date of This Report: 3 — t 5 06, Project No.: L1/-65- 6q A7 Project Address: Client: COO& kvt et6e a ( F oFei 4 DevvtoPo“t4.4ient Project No.: Weather: Q V'c-r CQ S f Temperature: 76 F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Reber Placement ❑ Foundations Periodic 'Weldin & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases I.D. No.: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. rzt/ 41663rnr crs 1,t 4 2 ' ' il eti`©uK,e +t b . _ 14 (4•S‹ tr ;�5_ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: O � �/— t - K Date: ~ ( 5'0 Ca White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957