Loading...
2965 Lone Oak Dr - Research docs for BL78515Mike Maguire MAYOR Paul Bakken Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Thomas Hedges CITY ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. 4 City of Eapli May 10, 2007 Jason Miller RJ Ryan Construction 1100 Mendota Heights Rd. Mendota Heights, MN 55121 RE: WATERS VII WAREHOUSE /OFFICE SHELL 2965 LONE OAK DR Dear Mr. Miller, We have completed our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above- referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2000 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed: Provide a list of all the applicable codes on the code analysis. "2! The accessible curb ramps shall be located on the accessible route per Chapter 1341.0422, Subpart 2, Item A. "The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide the route for the general public." The City of Eagan interprets this to mean that the curb ramps shall be at the head of the access aisles. All accessible parking spaces shall have access aisles. Detail 10 -A1.0 shall comply with Section 1003.2.12.1 for height. The graspable handrails shall comply with Section 1003.3.3.11 for height. A guard complying with Sections 306.5, #6 and 304.9 of the Minnesota State Mechanical Code, (MSMC) is required to be installed adjacent to the roof hatch on the roofs edge. ,€'The overhead drive through door into the warehouse may lead to a ventilation requirement per Section 404.1 of the MSMC. The bottom 10" on the push side of all doors shall be a smooth uninterrupted surface. (Chapter 1341.0442, Subpart 13) 8. Plumbing and mechanical plans shall be submitted with their respective permit applications. Please feel free to contact me at 651/675 -5683 with any questions or concerns you may have regarding this letter. y J. Craig Novaczyk Senior Inspector Cc: Paul DeVetter, CSM Corporation, 500 Washington Ave S, #3000, Minneapolis, MN 55415 JCN /pf May 8, 2007 Jason Miller RJ Ryan Construction 1100 Mendota Rd. Mendota Heights, MN 55121 RE: WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DR. Dear Jason: We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above - referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2000 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be provided: SAC Determination letter 2 Special Inspection and Testing Schedule (form enclosed) X . Emergency Response Site Plan (example enclosed) 4. Fire Protection System Plan Review Information (form enclosed) Please feel free to call 651- 675 -5683 with any questions you may have regarding this letter. Sincerely, J. Craig Novaczyk Senior Inspector cc: Paul DeVetter, CSM Corporation Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official JCN /ce City of Eagan YaMo TO: Dale Schoeppner, Building Inspections Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Craig Novaczyk or Mike Lence, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Carol Tumini, Utility Billing Dale Wegleitner, Fire Department Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tim Pahr, Engineering Paul Olson, Maintenance Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Terry Zelenka, Building Inspector DATE: Friday, October 5, 2007 SUBJECT: Final Inspection for 2965 Lone Oak Road (EA 78515) The Protective Inspections Division will be performing a final inspection at the above referenced property on Friday, October 26, 2007. If you have cause for not granting the Certificate of Occupancy, please submit a "hold request" to my attention. The person/department requesting a hold is responsible for notifying and resolving problems with the affected parties. CD /Bldg Insp/ /Forms /Comm Bldg/ /Final Inspection For Updated 2 -07 City of Eaall melo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning --- Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering / John Gorder, Engineering a1 Dave Westermayer, Engineering. Leon Weiland, Engineering ,,/ Paul Heuer, Utilities • Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance V Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: "Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Comments: Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount # 24 ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms //Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 CityofEaau TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Paul Heuer, Utilities Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Signature Date 4'4% # 24 iirQA4 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: _ tk va 'tak4 Pe-t/P52d 4° —C44--t f Sinai-'b l n� cic�a.c.e 1,10 cL e 7 Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the b ing permit. y 464;6 Ou Amount ❑ Yes `S. No landscape security required LAG wI clevd. caltlYadz o n i n g ? ❑ Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes No park dedication ❑ Yes No trail dedication ❑ Yes No tree dedication 41 CS. 6 acre +u 4.4e1 ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 Hoy ) zz77 -es V itot h oat- d 't A, .a4 City of Eaall memo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Paul Heuer, Utilities Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: he.,r y. ✓i '' fla 6P■ f ile 1h El. 7L ro ✓rub Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount 6a CD /Bldg Insp/Forms //Plan: Review For 7r 44 f ?4 f No landscape security required No water quality dedication No park dedication No trail dedication No tree dedication Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes C No PRV Required '" (p-12- gnature Date # 24 Zoning? Meter Size REVISED 2 -07 City of Eaall MeMo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Paul Heuer, Utilities V Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Ye j ❑ No PRV Required �� /a 7 # 24 Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 City of Eago demo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Paul Heuer, Utilities Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance+# Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes 1. No tree dedication El Yes i011 No "' V Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp /Forms / /Plan eview For REVISED 2 -07 c YO? # 24 Z001 9 1 AVV11 City of Eaau TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Paul Heuer, Utilities Tom Struve, Maintenance / Eric Macbeth, Maintenance ✓ Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: May 7, 2006 RE: Plan Review For WATERS VII BUSINESS CENTER 2965 LONE OAK DRIVE The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ es ❑ No tree dedication es ❑ No PRV : -• uired CD /Bldg Insp/Forms //Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 Date # 24 Technical (2) Description (3) Type of I (4) Report Frequency (5) Assigned Firm (6) Section Article 1704 in Structural Welding S1 -S Per Inspection 1704 Ei 111 High Strength Bolting 51-3 Per Inspection 1704 En Concrete Placement Per Inspection 1704 .4 Bolts in Concrete NMI Per Inspection 1704 1.111 Reinforcing Steel S1-S Per Inspection INIIIIIII_ 1704 NMI Masonry INEM Per Inspection Schedule M- Testing Concrete TA Per Inspection all Masonry Per Inspection �� Project Name: Waters Vii Baines Center Location: Eagan. Minnesota (1) (2) ( (4) ( (6) Owner: Conte Archi SER: SI-S: TA: Special Structural Testing and inspection Proizrarn Summary Schedule ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS shall sign below: Firm: Cdr1 COC.p Firm: RJ Ryan Firm: CSM Corporation Firm: Innovative Structu Film ?: Firrn: Project Number: Permit Number: Notes: This schedule shall be filled out and included in the Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. Permit Number shall be provided by the Building Official. Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the IBC. Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17. as adopted by the Minnesota State Building Code. SI = Special Inspector - Structural, TA = Testing Agent. Weekly, monthly, per test/mspection, per floor, etc. Firm contracted to perform services. Date: Date: Date: Solution. Date: Date: Date: G (U If requested by engineer /architect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified. Legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record TA- Testing Agency SI -S = Special Inspector - Structural Accepted for the Building Department By: Date: A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report White House Custom Colour Lone Oak Parkway and Lone Oak Drive Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for R.J. Ryan Construction Company Project LV -07 -00409 May 21, 2007 Braun Intertec Corporation - [5)LCEOMIE f MAY 2 3 2001 BRAUN INTERTEC May 21, 2007 Mr. Matt Gwost R.J. Ryan Construction Company 1100 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Gwost: Special Inspection and Testing Procedures Braun Intertec Corporation 1 1001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Project LV -07 -00409 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal White House Custom Colour Lone Oak Parkway and Lone Oak Drive Eagan, Minnesota Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the White House Custom Colour facility and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractors work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. Visual Examination of Field Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in general accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 -2006, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Visual examination of the light gauge metal stud welds was conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Bolted Connection Observations Bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled and if the splined end of the tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap -off load. In addition, each connection was observed for fit -up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. • Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side lap fasteners were observed and evaluated. Shear Studs In areas where shear studs were placed over the supporting structural steel members, the size, spacing and soundness of the stud welds were monitored. Soundness was determined by impacting each stud with a six -pound maul. Sound studs "ring" if they are fully attached to the steel member, whereas unsound studs "thud." Unsound studs were broken off and marked for replacement. The replacement studs were testing in the same manner. Finally, selected sound studs were bent in accordance with the project requirements to further evaluate their soundness. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Taylor Carlson at 952.995.2518 or Mary Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 7 Taylo _ lson ICC Certified Special Inspector - Structural Steel and Welding Michae . Heue ' E Vice C esident- Principal Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Mr. Brian McCarty, Welman Sperides Architects Mr. Ron LeMere, BKBM Engineers Mr. Dale Schoeppner, City of Eagan Inspections Department Mr. Jim Samuelson, Braun Intertec R.J. Ryan Construction Company Project LV -07 -00409 May 21, 2007 Page 2 BRAUN INTERTEC Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan, Minnesota Project Address: White House Custom Colour Lone Oak Parkway and Lone Oak Drive Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: LV -07 -00409 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Date: May 21, 2007 Attention: Mr. Matt Gwost Phone: 952995.2000 Fax 952995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection related issues. Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer, the connections were found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding related issues. The shear studs detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed and tested in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved shear stud- related issues. The deck welding and side -lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking - related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections and testing performed, and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael M. ' euer, PE Vice President - Principal Engineer License Number: 15571 May 21, 2007 Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 6 Celebrating 50 years of growth through servi and trust BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of t...a ✓L Report No.: S - i -- e- .-( 1. Date of This Report: t q — 07 Project Name: I1,1T'4-- OS e. C Je 0/O 1ect No.: 1_-- V 61, -eoLi Project Address: Lelei j CJ a KV K. W 4 .0.. — �, (� 0.i . c K "L Client: Q F G. to Client Project No.: Weather: v Description and location of work completed: List tests performed: Print Full Name: 0 is n Temperature: ;;L& za 'e,5 7? (at v•464 -cS cvtA4 J c3 b 5 r'�c Cs VI ri C avt Cr�� - - b. r A 1-Lo ►toy - ,s o ae -i -ay • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes El No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Special Inspection Daily Report 35'1; -- Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry Welding & Bolting Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement El Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ El Special Cases -r©S WL, `LA, 'E' tz'Lizk ✓ 61 HD it - B !- '( -5'l� Ld3 _..1 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: I.D. No.: • fr kiw i(} y White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 • BRAUN I NTE RTEC City of Report No.: S 4- 1-4- -4- I 2- Project Name: W h. c r 4 'L (4 ('i3 C _ u` m A k ( No.: Project Address: LOIN tr Qc C Q . ( oekt D r, Client: Weather: List tests performed: Print Full Name: mot' Description and location of work completed (�3a Date of This Report: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. 3 t5--o7 L L - c 5 7 4 1 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UB except as noted above. Date: 3 - L S- 0 I.D. No.: Z — S White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report Client Project No.: Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases a ro©W Ef.eek ribs -a' v ,•,27 A 1 - G. ; ! --- ( A - -o r t v3ttete5 SE t � - 54 - et --(',rS r,+ifet.t• ( r8(5 4 1- I N„5 :4-fi r` @ 1 tie - c -1 t _,_t 6,t,„ p Ins e ti onS 'P d f.- .,, 4 Q d .'i 2 Y-(,Z/(sqi.c Q Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous je Periodic List tests performed: Signed: Print Full Name: City of 6:1, V‘ - Date of This Report: Project No.: L t l L W' 1pd►g P(c tnla� ] . Client Pro No.: Temperature: © F Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers Description and location of work completed: ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? ( beixrins(m).0 -(d*nn c.6S,PxM r R/ e4.' 4 roof t&;'i -‘ /`L C-0 v3311 lei ®A %-&C L° ?wt.0 -e.. e.Gk ; 6vbse • co+� .S ' '•e)t -. -ir - ariteviet Gt.t A -6. 6 ''' tg• s i • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Special Inspection Daily Report 1t/- B7 e)lee( ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ No� No 3 -fit -© White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of ❑ Special Cases I.D. No.: 5Z i (0 SIDRPT Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN NTE RTEC C City of EapytiV\. Report No.: , J ` N e.- +'{. Date of This Report: I Project Name: 1- t' �'t0t) € e e ,,vt Pro No.: Project Address: L ®12 ti extk Q � +L & ®otlC 1>?C,W y Client: Weather: Lto �a� Description and location of work completed lec - Car 0 . :Screea,KG -ids -ID S- Client Project No.: Temperature: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry Vr Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases d d�c s Ter- Z` 4"195+ oc aJetso$- tL -1.3 — Ruts G G YK • `. _ •M • to w • • 4-1n. 40 ere j _ ( +&C .'' -e. ) � ;60ett u) (S ® lC��A+ v Yer OrWJJ PIte,u)% �t 1esr 1455 -t OX (LI 6 K. ( r- lY if P((et- cA>e a5. u-t t; - 31'c 4„c d �,-t-c .• C • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Special Inspection Daily Report 4 -3 - qt To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 4t- 3 -dB Print Full Name: _ / (4,," +L Vt. I.D. No.: ".., White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. i Page of SIDRPT 3 ,4v.,, / " /'f. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1 957 '- -(...0 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Cit of q� a, h Report No.: f �S ' +'�tC Project Name Q 'IL -'5 Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report Date of This Report: Project No.: bar 'd; -F 3iecsq wl etd c Q K4`1G, eeo f 4e0-e.,( Cz l - 8 r G Li t(tOct:S cr-e ev-S _VCOV olviS�'1pt,4• ^ova ,r- er © Wiya, recr t t.e. J tc e Ct .Ser',s ;tA. - "? (a Li) . vie ci :SC re? -tee - S,ctAso d .cck t.��'?42.r: r) "a� bt - 4-" YID d•SGr•e_Ta .c.'S beit4 obSeS"v'& --4 -ews ' e,tro rtp C& '- A 1- Co Q -v 47A4-ef . 1 i'e1Ms - 'v . - kr:A z - rrowL bo �V t ¢ - av AAA .e.S or o AAA-- eern etC.# ri .4756 re ?av& O•e.s . 1A-k- z Si .'L.4 & � a - �,�.>> 14 Sc ,moo re_,Fa,>A.C; ms s. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Signed: LI'QvL Date: e- 3 -411 Print Full Name: 7 h 4 r I L I.D. No: t'ilfg.c.08z. White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. 4---3 -07 Page 2 of X SIDRPT2 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC City of E cicav , Report No.: //t � Date of This Report: Project Name: V • h0O5>�, c. i)5415ii# GLW-Olrect No.: L �/ V 7--030 id/ Project Address: Client: Weather: Description and location of work completed: � j4 ro,. 6,1-4 e_a (31,44 23 � List tests performed: Signed: Print Full Name: :' : S(.`d. C.( - E" ■ a d.c re"?a•1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No El • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. � orCar ix on. Client Project No.: Temperature: Special Inspection Daily Report Date: q " /Lp .A 1 70 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑{ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases ik t-J • t. _4311M111610:4 it440.c.igagor c44,4 41-.%•4 Vtoor duatbac To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. I.D. No.: 3z 9Z 35 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. G� Page 1 of SIDRPT • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC City ofe Report No.: -ee ( *Co Project Name. WL.:4'`e.- Not15., Ct ovK Colour Project Address: Client: T� p J cw�_ Weather: S Uwwn Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry fer Periodic Z Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Description and location of work completed: Co Cy 4." Or new ne d.tee'- e_Fewe2..,5. Project No.: a 4 $r c t : x t,c.t 71-0 o . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Signed: C' Print Full Name: 7 Esc)/ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Special Inspection Daily Report Date of This Report: 1 . t. -07 Client Project No.: Temperature: d, ec 7d E To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: 4 1 — C 1 1 • I.D. No.: s2ligt0 `•j x+..85 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page of 1 SIDRPT Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957