Loading...
525 Diffley Rd - Special Inspections ReportA Special Inspection Final Report Hawthorne Ridge Diffley Road and Robert Street Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Excel Development, LLC Project SP -05 -01839 October 31, 2005 Braun Intertec Corporation _� Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC October 31, 2005 Project SP- 05- 01839 Mr. Jarzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 9119 Alger Court Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Re: Special Inspection Final Report Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Szoka: Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Please find attached the Special Inspection Final Report for the Hawthorne Ridge project and the final supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records. Special Inspections and Testing Procedures The special inspection services provided for this project were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of the special inspection services is to provide a review of the work being performed by the various contractors to determine if the work is being done according to the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the result of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the site representative of the contractor for his review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Plans and Specifications The approved plans and specifications were used for our inspections throughout the duration of the project. From time to time, we have received plan modifications from the project structural engineer. When received, these have been used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Soil Observations and Testing The hand auger borings were drilled with a 1 1/2- inch - diameter hand auger. The borings were advanced in 2- to 4 -inch increments to depths of 2 to 4 feet below the bottom of the excavation. The auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings. The soils encountered in the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance to penetration of the hand auger and the turning resistance. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Excel Development, LLC Project SP -05 -01839 October 31, 2005 Page 2 Concrete Reinforcement To conduct the required observations, the special inspector initially reviewed the reinforcement and dowel requirements on the project structural and shop drawings. Information reviewed included bar size, bar length, bar spacing, bar location, splice lengths and dowel placement. We also noted if the reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil prior to placement. Concrete Placement Observations Concrete placement observations were performed to monitor the procedures being used by the contractor and to determine if they were consistent with typical industry standards. Fresh Concrete Testing Routine tests to determine the plastic concrete's slump, temperature and air content were done during each pour. In addition, concrete cylinders were cast at rates specified in the project specifications to evaluate the concrete's compressive strength and dry unit weight. Concrete Compressive Strength Testing The concrete cylinders cast were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for moist curing and testing. The results of the concrete compressive strength testing have been were forwarded to the interested parties under a separate cover as they became available. Masonry Construction Observations Prior to conducting the observations, the special inspector reviewed the construction documents and the approved submittals. As construction began, the proportions of the site prepared mortar, construction of mortar joints and the location of reinforcement and connectors was observed for compliance. The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in addition to the type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry to structural members, frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the specified size, grade and type of reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in compliance with the guidelines of Section 2104.3 and 2104.4 of the IBC. Prior to grouting, the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors, proportions of site - prepared grout and construction of mortar joints were periodically observed. Concrete Masonry Grout Testing The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C1019: Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Grout. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the grout prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available. Anchor Bolt Observations The anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were inplace, if the nuts were installed, if the treads were fully engaged and if the nuts were snug. If required, we also observed if the plate washers were installed. Visual Weld Examinations Visual weld examinations were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1- 2004, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project specifications. Bolting Observations Bolting observations were conducted to determine if the boltholes were filled and if the splined end of the tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed, the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit -up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project specifications. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side lap fasteners was also observed and evaluated. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Rob Golish at 952.469.3644. Sincerely, BRAUN 1NTERTEC CORPORATION on S. Busch ICC Special Inspector Robert A. Golish, PE Project Engineer Attachment: Special Inspection Final Report sp0501839 /specinsp -ltr Excel Development, LLC Project SP -05 -01839 October 31, 2005 Page 3 Soils. The required testing in the field and laboratory has been completed. The compaction testing done during the fill placement indicated the procedures used by the contractor were adequate to compact the fill and backfill to meet the project requirements. Observations and testing of the footing excavation bottom indicated the soils were consistent with those encountered in the soil borings and suitable for support of the design loads. No discrepancies were noted and there are no unresolved soils issues in the building area. Concrete. The required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed. The available results have been forwarded under separate cover. The compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has met the project requirements. The dry unit weights have met the project requirements. The placement procedures used were judged to have met the project requirements. No discrepancies were noted and there are no outstanding issues. Reinforcing Steel. The reinforcement placement detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports was observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. No discrepancies were noted and there are no outstanding issues. Structural Masonry Construction. The required structural masonry observations and testing have been completed with any discrepancies documented and discussed with the structural engineer. Following the required corrections, the structural masonry construction was found acceptable. There are currently no unresolved structural masonry related issues. Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the requirements of the project specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections, the connections were found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural- steel - related issues. The deck welding and side -lap fasteners detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed and found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking related issues. Bolting. The bolted connections and anchor bolts detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted various locations and the client and structural engineer were informed. These outstanding issues have not been resolved. BRAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Proiect: Hawthorne Ridge Diffley Road and Robert Street Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Date: 2005 Attention: Building Inspections Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Page 1 of 2 • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Conclusion I hereby c �� mat this plan, specification or report was pre y f' der my direct supervision and that I a a ft l + • yL•tCeri f�jfessional Engineer under the laws a,` •Sta - . f iAe+ Based upon the inspections performed and our Special Inspection Daily Reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed (with exception to the noted discrepancies) in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation Attachments: Daily Observation Reports (4) Report of Field Compaction Tests (7) Moisture Density Relationship (6) Special Inspector Daily Reports (12) Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder (10) Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout (2) Special Inspection Daily Report (3) Summary of Discrepancies (1) Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours CO 51Z4,09-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project #: P -15---°12 - - -°12 7 Location: ii/7-(.4 /WV- Areas and work performed this day Weather: c 5 GCO- DOR -01 k_t IT DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Submitted To: Report #. Date 4' - 2-l' Performed By BRAUN' I NTE RTEC ( 5 acs c.isb b6 s- .sue . ` `ifigdh P �!�_ _ _ Q _1 ,ar k _____41gjA, C'ed R‘,0,tre 5 ,, , , z";-k_s 95 gc?_c_0,..„‘If/(5-e 41:ted K e.bab 7 S Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours - 175 'Ca S( P` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project #: 9 ()\QA Report ft Location: \v) ZNae- J Areas and work performed this DOR-01 Weather: — 1 0 kc ( ep .-a 5 _ Submitted To: Date 1,\3t.p,cs;e.. PV-e\ \r\ S at - rc` L\ Pe - ceArNov(A • BRAUN' INTERTEC \ OLAVc \ S Sew t...( )\u e\r\ c-trJeA \ , A t, eP }.•\ CAVC,A c.e...scr\ (Dv-N. \-.\-`(_ cAa. _J 0 \ \e-1 (1 ) r.• DA. \isi A056\rc-c 6 \oe:rri 4ein $A 04:€k VAL-r ‘XT\-eArC \-.5\A 4 5 0 ,) . taec6 or \ \-.) ,,, k 6 67: \,, .,.. yik., , \- _ v,g-cp, \, , 0 .'.. \ \ ' 'N f -- 4 `. .,_f vrse-- .---t: :) tx..tv 1-, )‘ \,',... !Nan( •\,"\:- vvv.■.1- -e_ ,,,,,r, Performed By F: DAILY 1 Project #: ':`" e; Location: -ko._\1- DOR-01 DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Weather: Submitted To Report t Date Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Areas and work performed this day t Of, e- ?2 .....) \ 0 tocvccooNi. ,:i. 9 ( A - ' f3k 6 ri-W= -;,' "kt^e a‘r \ ike .S.Ak , bkci7N-*1 i j -) q A . 4 1 A . t x" ■ , tz1/43A 0 t A 3 aCOJXS ■-t1 t ) ...t \ ''■ As4e kNic kkpk\-e_i v t' \l 0) -1 (- --S \ e- ,..) ef ‘ , Lc\cito-4 \;.- ._L•CS ce.KKetA ^')C 4arlA-(\(A (4-g \itke ).'s k")2110n,4 4 \ 4 C \ t--u Performed By 1 BRAU N' INTERTEC F: DAILY .1 Personnel • Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project #: S? O‘q Location: \\ - ,0. oc\z gAQ �- Areas and work performed this day coxv■ocA r ow fa'1( e\c)\ s,3.\ , l are\\c\ \I-ec e \\ R cs _ L \t- * anc. 'L� o'C t SA A 'ic:. `Ye_ C, �C'`C - Sc {'- c c). ) `(`t niSS C) S r t kb - ((. \"e ( `x < o.4 n c.Q5 1 ea v.k') M i 1 DOR -01 DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Report #- c� Date S cr! 65 e,4 A BRAUN' INTERTEC Weather: - 7 o` 5 Performed By- S \ c c. (Ay x of ae-C v 1 1 1 1 Submitted To: F: DAILY 1 Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project #: 5p0c -Dig 7 Location: l G Z r ��� Areas and work performed this day br �4� r y'5& ■Li h sT1F 14 A fx cad )ft). `- � S P Lc-e_e_04 S Z6 Tr c c s h -c c- cf- ! frig) tit -w-2 (tc' p rut- 14/7 vollc P Su 6 , GcA-5 rbcJc we ( .o:0 v, zil to Weather: 6 /200-14 Submitted To: DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Report #• Date. �"_ 2 -- 2 Performed Ba BRAUN' INTERTEC X41 41117 b S tkiT i S4-C, c e� - c 'V' -eu ovAea Opce- /7 14; tA-viii 5 'fze___ ; F: DAILY 1 Test Test Location Elevation 1 Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pci) Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction ( %) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %) Comments 1 5/19/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 15 112 96 98 B 2 5/19/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 12 107 92 98 B 3 5/19/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 10 116 99 98 A 4 5/23/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 17 111 95 98 A 5 5/23/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 13 117 100 98 A 6 5/23/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 17 109 94 98 B 7 5/23/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 12 101 97 98 B Test Test Location Elevation 1 Retention pond fill, 75'N of SW building comer 51 2 Storm pipe backfill, 60'N of SW building corner 52 3 Storm pipe backfill, 50'N of SW building corner 53 4 Storm pipe backfill, 20'S of south building line, center of south end 40 5 Storm pipe backfill, 10'N of south building line, center of south end 42 6 Stoirn pipe backfill, 35'N of south building line, center of south end 48 7 Storm pipe backfill, 20'S of south building line, center of south end 38 sp0504839 \cts -1. BRAD N INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= - Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: Braun intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Braun Intertec Corporation Robert A. Golish, E1T Staff Engineer Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax 952 469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 1 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Technician: TSB Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) - -o Max. Lab Dry Density *' (Std.Proc.) (pct) -'— '---- Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction ( %) Specified Minimum Compact. (%) Comments 6A 5/23/05 N P -3: SC 10.2 127.4 10 124 98 98 A 7A 5/23/05 N P -3: SC 10.2 127.4 10 125 98 98 A 8 5/23/05 N P -3: SC 10.2 127.4 11 124 98 98 A 9 5%23/05 N P -3: SC _ . 10.2 127.4 10 126 99 98 A 10 5/23/05 N P -3: SC 10.2 .127.4 8 127 100 98 A 11 5/24/05 N = P -3: SC 10.2 127.4 12 124 98 98 A 12 5/24/05 • N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 12 116 100 98 A Test Test Location Elevation 6A • Retest of #6, removed and replaced 48 7A Retest of #7, removed and replaced 38 8 Sto.un pipe backfill, south footing line, center of pad 44 9 Storm pipe backfill, building pad fill, center of pad 46 10 Storm pipe backfill, building pad fill, center of pad 48 11 Building pad fill, east footing line, 20'N of SE building corner 50 12 Parking lot fill, 35'NE of SE building comer 50 BRAUN INTER T EC Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Report of Feld Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: sp0504839 \cts -2 Braun Interfec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Braun Intertec Corporation Robert A Goliss EIT Staff Engineer Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 2 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Technician: JSB Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 1 1 1 sp0504839 \cts -3 BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, T T,C 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way • Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952 469.3644 Fax 952469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 3 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications, B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Braun Intertec Corporation Techn'clan_ JSB Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engineer e Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test- --a —, _._......_...,., Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %). Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pcf) - Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction (%) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %) Comments 13 5/25/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 15 117 100 98 A 14 5/25/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 14 116 100 98 A 15 5/25/05 N P -3: SC 10.2 127.4 9 127 100 98 A 16 5/26/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 16 120 103 98 A . 17 5/26/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 17 117 100 98 A 18 5/26/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 14 112 88 100 B 19 5/26/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 21 105 90 100 B 1 1 1 sp0504839 \cts -3 BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, T T,C 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way • Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952 469.3644 Fax 952469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 3 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications, B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Braun Intertec Corporation Techn'clan_ JSB Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engineer e Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test- Test Location Elevation 13 Building pad fill, 25'N of SE building corner 51 ,14 Parking lot fill, 30'N of SE building comer 49 - 15 Parking lot fill, 120'E, 20'N of SE building corner 48 16 Parking lot fill, 120'E, 50'N of SE parking lot corner 52 17 Parking lot fill, 170'E, 50'N of SE parking lot comer 53 18 Parking lot fill, 170'E, 5'N of SE parking lot corner 50 19 Parking lot fill, 40'E, 5'N of SE parking lot corner 49 1 1 1 sp0504839 \cts -3 BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, T T,C 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way • Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952 469.3644 Fax 952469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 3 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications, B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Braun Intertec Corporation Techn'clan_ JSB Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engineer e Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pa) Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry Density (pcf) Relative Compaction ( %) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %) Comments 20 5/27/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 8 116 91 100 B 19A 5/27/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 9 120 103 100 A 21 5/27/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 12 112 88 100 B 21A 6/1/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 14 114 88 100 B 21B 6/1/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 15 114 88 . 100 B lA 6/1/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 14 125 98 98 p, 12A 6/1/05 N P -5: SC 10.3 127.1 3 124 98 98 A Test Test Location Elevation 20 Parking lot fill, 70'E, 5'N of SE parking lot corner 511/2 19A Retest of #19, removed and replaced 49 21 Parking lot fill, 25'E, 5'N of SE parking lot corner 511/2 21A Retest of #21 511/2 21B Retest of #21 511.A lA Retest of #1, removed and replaced 51 2A Retest of #2, removed and replaced 52 sp0504839\ets -4 BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 21, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Elevation Reference: Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 4 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Braun Intertec Corporation Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engineer Technician: TSB e Providing engineering and environmental solutions since I957 Test Date. Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pct) Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry :Density (pct) Relative Compaction ( %) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %)- Comments 22 6/29/05 N P -6: SM 9.5 130.2 9 125 96 95 A — 23 - 6729T03 — 12T - - - - - - -- X - -- . X — SM --- 9.5 — T3 9 -- . 9 BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 7, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: so0504839 \cts -5 Braun ►niertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 5 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) Eagan, Minnesota A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Test Test Location Elevation 22 23 Utility trench backfill, watermain, 5'S,.20'E of NW corner wall Utility trench backfill, storm sewer, Grid 54 51 Braun Intertec Corporation Robert A. Golish, PE Project Engineer Teclm'cian: BS a Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) . Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pcf) Laplace Moisture ( %) Iiiplace Dry Density (pcfl Relative Compaction (%) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %) Comments 24 7/13/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 13 119 102 95 A BRAUN INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 14, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: sp0504839 \cts -6 'Braun lntertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952 469.3644 Fax 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 6 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robeil Street (CR 3) Eagan, Minnesota A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Test Test Location Elevation 24 Parking lot fill, 50'W of SE comer 845 Braun lntertec Corporation Tecl m'cian: BS Robert A. Golish PPE Project Engineer • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Test Date Type Soil ID and Classification Optimum Moisture* ( %) Max. Lab Dry Density* (Std.Proc.) (pci) Inplace Moisture ( %) Inplace Dry Density (pcfl Relative Compaction ( %) Specified Minimum Compact. ( %) Comments 25 7/13/05 N P -2: SM 14.3 116.5 13 120 103 95 A BRAUN 1NTERT EC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: August 5, 2005 Client: Mr. Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 Elevation Reference: sp0504839\cts -7 Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax. 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Project: SP -05 -01839 Report: 7 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing Hawthorne Ridge Northwest of Diffley Road and Robert Street (CR 3) Eagan. Minnesota A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Test Test Location Elevation 25 Parking lot fill, 50'W of SE corner 48 Braun Intertec Corporation ` 4 Robert A. Golish, PE Project Engineer Technician: BJS Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1Y157 Moisture- Density Relationship 135 130 125 4 6 f2. N 7+ C a) 0 120 115 110 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.65 i I 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 Water content, Test specification: ASTM D 698 -OOa Method B Standard Oversize correction applied to final results Elev/ Depth Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI % > 3/8 in. % < No.200 USCS AASHTO SM 2.65 8 21.5 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 129.0 pcf Optimum moisture = 9.2 % Silty Sand, fine - medium grained, brown Project No.: SP -05 -01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P -01 Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. Onsite Material Minneapolis Lab B RAU Er I NTE RTEC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Moisture-Density Relationship 119 117 115 5 0_ >, CT) C a) a a's n 113 111 109 : . ! : : . ! , ! I , ' 1 Mir -- ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.65 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method A Standard Elev/ Depth Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI % > No.4 % < No.200 USCS AASHTO SM 2.65 4 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 116.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 14.3 % Silty Sand, fine grained, brown Project No.: SP-05-01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P-02 Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. Onsite Material Minneapolis Lab B RAU N INTERTEC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Moisture-Density Relationship 138 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.65 133 128 .- ci .', -6 c a) -ED a 123 118 113 .1.1.11P Err 11111 NIL. Il k" ' k ' Iri 11111116, - 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method B Standard 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Depth USCS SC AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. 2.65 TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density = 127.4 pcf Optimum moisture = 10.2 % Project No.: SP-05-01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P-03 BRAUN' INTERTEC LL 3/8 in. 4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clayey Sand, fine grained, brown Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. Onsite Material Minneapolis Lab No.200 Elev/ Classification Nat. OA > OA < Moisture-Density Relationship 131.0 128.5 126.0 13 0_ >; . (7 c a) 0 123.5 121.0 118.5 , ■ 1 ZAV for , . Sp.G. = 2.65 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Water content, °A Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method B Standard Elev/ Depth Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI ok > 3/8 in. % < No.200 USCS AASHTO SM 2.65 4.0 19.1 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 128.3 pcf Optimum moisture = 10.1 % Silty Sand, fine grained, brown Project No.: SP-05-01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P-04 Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. Onsite Material Minneapolis Lab B RAU N INTERTEC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Moisture- Density Relationship 135 130 125 U a C a) 120 115 110 ZAV for Sp.G. = 2.65 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698 -00a Method B Standard EIevI - Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI % > 3/8 in. % < No.200 Depth USCS AASHTO SC 2.65 2.0 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 127.1 pcf Optimum moisture = 10.3 % Clayey Sand, fine grained, brown Project No.: SP -05 -01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P -05 Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. On -site Minneapolis Lab BRAU N' 1 NTE RTEC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Moisture-Density Relationship 139 134 129 - 0 o_ .,- (7 c a , -0 o 124 119 114 ZAV for Sp.G. = I 11 Id11111Eall IIMMFAIIMIER IUIII 11 MEM KAI INININE WAI Ir I 111411 IllI I I l Mgr I Er Wille - 111 111 111111 11 1111 1111111 1111111 11U1U111 11 . 2.65 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method B Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI % > 3/8 in. % < No.200 Depth USCS AASHTO SM 2.65 3.0 37.0 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 130.2 pcf Optimum moisture = 9.5 % Silty Sand, fine grained, brown Project No.: SP-05-01839 Client: Excel Development, LLC Project: Hawthorne Ridge Eagan, MN RAG • Source: Sample No.: P Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. Onsite Material BRAUN Minneapolis Lab INTERTEC 1 1 BRAUN" INTERTEC Report Number Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Special Inspector Daily Report City of Zex -�� 2.1 v∎ Date of This Report: 6 -22 t� � Y�tr .Gs Project No.: 5 5 4; 7CD { L 0 i s Ct h Client Project No.: Temperature: Page \ of \ Type of Inspection: Ea Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting ❑ Continuous 123- Rebar Placement K Foundations Periodic ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Qther OV r Pk G '2 Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ©(L,isted Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: `" `� 40 065eefuz - v tr k f-Q�� 1 v to // A hp 8 �✓f c�-� ,�t yr. -s �.c,p g6.7 cif- Wit, t ( Or _ , odu ), S P i� 5 P S h( hee A 4? pi rt? �d�. • � ` ° f / C - f r; . veitii7610- w►0.16w �l e tisbo fre Z i1, - 6- P s-- im 9 (60 - fit_ List tests performed: Crni \specinsp.4 1/25/95 pc p‘ccti. s � i - J ferT stat.e.t-ltrert_lidtik4frui !� p ta.e.J2eitedeax el • Are there anydiscrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable work .nship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: % Date: Print F Name: v I.D. Number: 1(' BRAUN' I NTE RTEC Report Number Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Special Inspector Daily Report City of .✓rr.► -/i y ww 47,b-friA2_ eafi2. S Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: F- Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other P (-C Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ED cListed Belo) /,, o Description and location of work completed: Pee0 Ve) 5Late 0 6 - 321 1 4-c ) d p feR ; 5 ;i t c(etsa- ` rah) T ul us L s ck pZ5Lcca (' \A1,Q e tax.(2- 04 -ue,44 4 (' SY` Q- � �f7�3' t vki'e c List tests performed: A • Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes Q No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes L No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable orkmanship provision the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: // // Print Fglr Name: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) lrm \specinsp 1!25/95 Date of This Report: Client Project No.: Temperature: Date: 1q I.D. Number: Page & Project No.: s p t -bt' 1't° S17-5 s'v& BRAUN" INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous f a Periodic Inspection Coverage: g Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: City of / /4&o 6€Y 1q 3 S PLC ( Q cC. G / S 'lj -14 1 , r Pt-ear I of 6(4 p1 � 't -5 Z Gt- 3 - 5 - 5 L. Sirx ) te oc pa-J t„ivx_0 List tests performed: 04 (r5 • Are there anydiscrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No - • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. CJ,e1/0 � 64_ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable-workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Print Full' Name: i` I.D. Number: r: Inn \spe insp_4 1/25/95 Special Inspector Daily Report 1 •, s Date of This Report: iJ Project No.: 'De os= o [ , 31 Client Project No.: Temperature: Date: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) 6-43 rte -, Page \ of '.. B R A u Ns" INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: 7 G Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous - Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: ,ice► t CL2A I ..,14z,4 ) 1/C5 ffh )� 1 v b k k 1iAx 'tom( 7 ✓J Get 3J co'LQ..0 List tests performed: i56 • Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: '� Print Full Name: Crm \specinsp.4 1/25/95 1 Special Inspector Daily Report City of `Zia 6 1,2 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Date of This Report: 4-->0 Project No.: 5f) 0 5 t$31 Client Project No.: Temperature: re—tv ft (Z-t 1 54 r ritik Page No No of Date: I.D. Number: 1 sRauN- I INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Description and location of work completed: Client Project No.: Temperature: List tests performed: Special Inspector Daily Report Page City of ` I "Se i Date of This Report: - 7 —c � '124..c f iT ? Project No.: 7 j 8 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous .Masonry • Rebar Placement gl Periodic ❑ Welding ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Bolting ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ NAT fice-e2c4_ Cam-. 6, �� r-z.� �r �c roc' i ( l� iz� a --� � 6 a t F r Y t&trzt �? -�� � .�.� ..,. s- • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes El s • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Signed: Print Full Name: frm\specinsp 1/25/95 Date: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) No I.D. Number: ( r13 No 5 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable - kmanship pros- io'ns of the UBC, except as noted above. BRAUN" I NTE RTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous a Masonry `Periodic ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: List tests performed: Irm \specinsp.4 1/25 / v7 ii / Ze6 1 5 j 4 e2� '705 et. cc Special Inspector Daily Report Page_ of City of € ye) ep '✓ rv..$ , -t row' Cis leAkt -4 rA- a i,e_c9us 44 e f_ 4 c (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Date of This Report: No.: 51 kR31 Client Project No.: Temperature: k-eck4-144, L_-cp/A.)ccskka,..i4 A. • Are there anydiscrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes El s • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. No Q No la To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workn nship provisions o BC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name U l I.D. Number: f rZ BRAU ' INTERTEC 1 1 Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting • Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: s 7 ,. Special Inspector Daily Report City of � 4 1 1 1 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Irm \ spec insp.4 1/25/95 Client Project No.: Temperature: Page of I Date of This Report: 3 - 6 - 05 - Project No.: c -6 18 31 C' C , 4; 3J/G4 4e) Fri/ .ef vv��V�CS/vG � � -ct) 1 v p(l. pt— c.jt )tr, p kat226 ct,5 Lf-( d4 65.2 ( 7o ec 2 ° - List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No 7 • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed. ,� Date: Print Full Name: I.D. Number: rag BRAUN' INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Irmispecinsp.4 1/15/95 4 ti-toy 3 6/ Special Inspector Daily Report City of c.-,%C,/I Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry 0 Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Periodic ❑ Welding ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Bolting ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ r - Co 44e 0 Sr 1 cey -cc:� -c Description and location of work completed: Print Fn11 Name: e 01/4-5-Avezeji SpKtcp i-- ,s,,L.,i(e_opc.ct2 G.,,,e st_c),{ i t_ cl viii4 ✓ r P 01 List tests performed: tt t4 V1 5 - 0- 1:1€17 YL /J -) s (_ w.� E t : �'' `I rev .ti t Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes R No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 131-- No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. et 6C3( To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable r�nshp provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Date of This Report: 7 r"3 Project No.: Client Project No.: Temperature: I.D. Number: f Page 1 of 1 BRAUN" ` INTERTEC 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous L Periodic List tests performed: J. Print Full ame:'�f, 1,. 1.t 4 Crm\ spec insp 1/25/95 Special Inspector Daily Report City of f &e t' Q Inspection Coverage: In Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approvedjlans? Description and location of work completed: Date of This Report: 7 Project No.: Sp— 0 —O f e 3 7 Client Project No.: Temperature: Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 16 5 e fit) c3'6P-0-Lia lat„cats--t__Se=12d4E..-- !jet:c fry,„0„,,f ( °teat r 4 / ^ t 1 Signed: C_. Date: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Page 1 f ceV f iQS PO' S ? dQ i.'e. ceit� l W • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes Kt. No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 1 No E] • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. C)5( c'r2:05 064 P cc-7,9T'7 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. I.D. Number: ( f Zg � BRAU N" INTERTEC 1 1 1 Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: , ; Special Inspector Daily Report City of i Project No.: Date of This Report: &"d5 Client Project No.: Temperature: Page Z of Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous la Masonry L Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Ea- Periodic ❑ Welding ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Bolting ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: k. a.CSo 5-kW t..tch 1tis z c-etc-4.-c,arl rftsL. e&S i levite_dpItz-c, 'tom-- ' HkQ& u s`IQ l S -,5 - ` r` p cb°t� At List tests performed: c-c., f 0J 2 . L j, ,J u Ss t cc ` ` <fi 6e -5s - P -g23 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes El No El • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) rm \spec i nsp .4 1/25/95 Date: 7 —C) Print Full Name: I.D. Number: (7,26) 1 1 1 List tests performed: , 1 cite-cQ 1 BRAUN" INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous -- Periodic Signed: lrm \ spec insp.4 1/25/95 Special Inspector Daily Report City of ccrile-6 9(3s pZccE Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Description and location of work completed: Print F I Name: Q/ //�✓� (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Page / of Date of This Report: —/ 3 - 7S Project No.: 4410c---6(P37 Client Project No.: Temperature: pl Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ I ft1. - 6b144 pl-z_e_.12-Le2,-,-- x 2,z 64 ..42.--4-a-i-red g -6,6z,,, ---F1/4„,,i.. ,_ i \...„,„..., .._„, &,,,,,, .54-0A fe_e.,er,-t,,,..,Q_4., —,- d, - -� + k vim 3 piet—v ARK .510 i.�. f Cs --� cj4C�� �1 peSL �� t,uctUS jdi Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes Ell No El' • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable wor manship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Date: 7`13 -05 I.D. Number: ('g) ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other 1 1 1 1 1 List tests performed:. /V2 _ 1 ( -2! 614 — BRAUN' INTERTEC t 1 Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Pri , Full Name: i rmispecinsp.4 I /25/95 Special Inspector Daily Report City of .c,iet �{m Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ® Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting El Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ® Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 12 Description and location of work completed: Ii�L_I L 2i Q cam@ � i w4� ��, p-v4 o-6 A)-o-rJ;ks.4-_Bc;t Ata7;tk s A-ft -Ct9t9Z, reAretit. (5e--p tat-ed pga� s7Nb7jr-- fk1- c Ta4 - -- Mfr : } re there y discrepancies noted from this day's obse .tions? Yes • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? ,Yes • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. (White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Date of This Report: 7-15 Project No.: 5f Client Project No.: Temperature: To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Date: 719 4" I.D. Number: Page ( of g OJed Be out C1'�S �ce3 cJ No No specifications and BRAUN" I NTE RTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous gi Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting E Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ Description and location of work completed: 4 ry v+' — r ! t 1�3 - av� 69.z,414 v '_ � c.r'c i"S'✓C.E .�J�e.a3 List tests performed: Signed: cfin C i?_ Print cull Name: Inn \ spec insp.4 1/25/95 Special Inspector Daily Report City off 2 e b (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Page a of Date of This Report: 7---15 S ' Project No.: Ski? Oc5 c 1 c Client Project No.: Temperature: I.D. Number: /7( (Listed Below) • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable wor anship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Date: No ❑ BRAN NS" 1 INTERTEC Report Number: 1 Project Narne: Project Address: Client: Weather: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 86 C- Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous E.. Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting 11 Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: p -71-tek ge(o Special Inspector Daily Report City of 0 Date of This Report: ->- j g -,S Project No.: M b Client Project No.: Temperature: Page 1 of i iwl C2i� WriLfie -- j List tests performed: 1 1 1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. No Not To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicablork <ns provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed Print Ft.i11 lame: (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Inn \ spec insp.4 1/25/95 Date: I.D. Number: 0.2 1 1 1 1 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Special Inspector Daily Report City of ---' 4 Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Date of This Report: 7--(9 Client Project No.: Temperature: Yes ❑ (Listed Below Page of I Project No.: QP-O 5f Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry a Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Welding CR Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Bolting ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Other No ❑ Description and location of work completed: List tests performed: 1 1 1 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 111 No LI • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable wo kmanshis provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Print Full J (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) 1rmi spec insp.4 1/25/95 5 kx:2.,s 5/ .111ciit, (>1 . /Ze. r4e--Cae Date: 15 I.D. Number: 128 1 1 1 1 I3 ICI za (s)apop * pozpiAT syvetuall 2tnddeo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ZI 3 0 1- I I `I I 04 T I -y `Z1 -3 ZI-V `ZT-Y 02 I1 -y spuP ` `2ut>.00d `.zouo ui 2uLPltng auoM 2i utepy `ospue f t 1717OZ0 EEO SI£ 000£ parmbaa 1.oN 2IAV -t 000£ sljnsag put suoI4tpuoD Tsai, platy `u1 (Elio) IS 31o c.o2I 2 R MI A AM'I £1717tOS0 SOIOZ /L RstloD y;rago2T sJv3 an:1nS `L193 T'LLSV = S papuoqun `I £ZI0 IALLSy =N :Porp.a utdddj :.iap10 3[JOJA :a�Ea liodaZi - cp2uarls pagtoads aq; spaaoxa io slaaut 4saLAEp 8z aaelaAE 0UJ, .tg2uai1s paijtoads App 8z acT; spaaoxa JO s}aaut Tinsar 3203 AEp L acTL OZS't 8T'8Z 66'S 0965£1 08E`t 81'8Z 66'S 00££ZI 0t£`£ LZ 8Z 00'9 Ot£176 (Isd) (ut 'In) (•uL) (spunod) q3 ua3;s Pary rapcuEIQ peoi raputiAO raputif j - Xew s;rnsa' lsay uotssaaduroD :Ag 4sEO siaputjA3 :lag lad sraputTAO :raquuL1 3031011 :raqutnN �TonI j :(tsd) 11 pagtoadg :( %) ITV Pattoadg :ratiddnS :u3tsaa xty�T aaptg aulotpA 2H 6E8T0 :2oa Cora S0 /£Z /9 taE 00:OT S0 /ZZ /9 .IeownloO 3 8Z 8Z L (sSEp) any i sea4S a LZ LZ 9 (skeP) arn3 cfeZ Jea4S '2 auo0 y dIIdS '2 auoo 8 ZZISS NIA' `uE2Eg aauQ 12- 08t17 DTI `3uacadoianaa Taoxa exozS Ezra£ 3inlOV d do s3dkL auo3 V la Zia :s)1 33EarH £0 Z 0 - I 10 -oN aidmES :uotEoo'j mod : u0 P Ptnbrr :(30) 'dutas, (t 790I 3 TA LSv) :(30) 'dutaj a}arouop 08 L8 S'z (1 £Z3 NLSV) :( %) ITV PoiusvolAI t (£171D IVLLSV) :(ut) duniTS ParnssaTAT :paAiaoo aTEa :3sE0 atau, :;seD aTea uaqutnK ;as raputTA3 ZIx9 `6£D IA LSY :PocpaW2sa1, .zapu fA3 apiauoD Jo tfAua.xls ahlssa d I Wt CI 6L9170SO :1ap10 3 1 10 A . S0 /9Z /L :Q4 4loda,1 JEUWflpO 3 JEa4S a mays 91100 3 4!IdS 91.100 9 �2�n1�d2�d d0 Sad.l1 9UC3 V ti2uaxis pat toads attJ siiaaoxa Io slaaut wisal lsa; ,.ep gZ 02E1an2 au Ig •dtgsuorEiai tp2ua4s -a2E FoIddi-1 3 o} lj)1oo3E s&Ep gZ 43 lam aq kia3iq IIIM tpZua.Rs pagtoads atp.43-p spacoid ;insai isal kep L atiL Zg :sxseurag }iEa1g sdv0 , rnfIng `LI93 IALISV = S sdv0 papuoqun `T £ZI0 W sy = N :PorgaiN 8utdd'o i3 N 3 OLZ`t LZ'8Z 00'9 08L0ZI 8Z LZ I £ - Z 13 N 0 OLZ`t LZ' 8Z 00'9 0890ZI 8Z LZ I Z Zg N 0 09S`Z LZ' 8Z 00'9 0££ZL L 9 1 I (s)apoo * polsoTAI ad&,L (?sd) (•ut •bs) ( (spunod) (sleep) (sip) (si p) •oN aidUIES sveural 2utdd3O a1nao31d tp2uags Easy Ialaure1Q peo' [ a2y amp am0 Japutp 3 iapuq 'xelwi Tsa.L qE'I PI sgnsag lsai uoTssaadraoa yL puo :saloN/aoT'800'I aidureS V£ PT o} VI MID `arRoo3 `1011011 2uLPxmg :uos - eaoq mod auoN :alts 110 poppy prnbr uopuelg `Ia0aES :Jig }s33 slaPut[ 3 S8 :(d 'dura,L I?'V t :aas sad siapuqii0 tg (t901 3 IALLSV) :(30) 'dtua,I, ala10uo0 £5080 :saq Nua 6'i (I£Z0 YSLSY) :( ITV PamsvgIA1 T9Z :Iaqurum3ion1,I, 9 (£tT0IA I.Sy) :( duzunS pamsEayAI 000£ :(Isd) 1142uali -S p SO /6Z/9 :pantaoa - a al trant0 loN :( %) pagtoadS tad 00:I :1s00 auu,I, 21A_y :I2tiddns SO /8Z/9 4s-co aTEa 000£ :u2tsaQ xrp Z :iaquLLN las sTInsau pui suogrpuoD piaT.i NN `ue$a ZZISS NISI `traRa (£ 2I3) TS 1la g o 2I 2 8 Fa iC ANN aAU J urr3 08trb apt2I atuotilnl3g 0 Z `luaurdoianaQ iaoxg 6£810 :loafold E3iozS riz1f :1uat10 1 aPUIi ( 3 ZTx9 `6£3 IALLSV :PotpaJ,\ isaI aapugAj alaaauoD Jo t{ua.xls aATssaadtuoa )iL ]1N 1 fVI 2 BRAUN tT RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Sample No. 3 -1 3 -2 3 -3 Break Remarks: D2 A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: 3 Date Cast: 6/30/05 Time Cast: 10:35 am Date Received: 7/1/05 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM 0143) 1 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 3.0 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 76 Air Temp. ( °F): 65 Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid 9C to Grid 6.5C Sample Location/Notes: Grid 9C Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 1 6 7 86580 6.00 28.27 - 3,060 D N D2 1 27 28 137540 6.00 28.27 4,860 D N El 1 27 28 142350 6.00 28.27 5,030 D N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE A X 6 C D Cone Cone Shear Split Shear E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results Compression Test Results Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 7/28/05 Work Order: 0504788 3000 AVR Not Given 3000 315 02064 4 Saeger, Brandon BRAUN f NT RT EC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: 4 Date Cast: 7/6/05 Time Cast: 11:00 am Date Received: 7/7/05 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 1 1/2 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.8 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 79 Air Temp. (°F): 75 Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid 7C to Grid 3B.6 Sample Location/Notes: Grid 7C Sample No. 4 -1 4 -2 4 -3 Break Remarks: B2 A Cone Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 1 6 7 81800 5.99 28.18 2,900 C N B2 1 27 28 103690 5.99 28.18 3,680 D N El 1 27 28 127200 5.99 28.18 4,510 B N E1 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age- strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE A X 8 C D Cone Cone Shear & & Split Shear E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results Compression Test Results Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 8/3/05 Work Order: 0504876 3000 AVR Not Given 3000 357 08026 4 Saeger, Brandon zZ7 /- 2,21 / Robert A Golish BRAUN .......... ....... ...... INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Set Number: 5 Date Cast: 7/7/05 Time Cast: 2:30 pm Date Received: 7/8/05 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 3 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.5 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 83 Air Temp. ( °F): 80 Liquid Added On Site: 9 GAL Water (per 9 cu. yds.) Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Grid 2.5A.7 to Grid 1I Sample Location/Notes: Grid 3.5A.7 Sample No. 5 -1 5 -2 5 -3 Break Remarks: B2 A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 TYPES OF FRACTURE Cone & Split Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 1 6 7 77900 6.00 28.27 2,760 D N B2 1 27 28 122870 6.00 28.27 4,350 C N El 1 27 28 127230 6.00 28.27 4,500 B N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. C Cone Shear D Shear E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results Compression Test Results Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diftley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 8/4/05 Work Order: 0504948 3000 AVR . Not Given 3000 357 08051 4 Saeger, Brandon Robert A Golish BRAUN I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ( °F): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Sample Location/Notes: Grid 1I Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 6 -1 5 2 7 82880 6.00 28.27 2,930 D N B2 6 -2 5 23 28 115440 6.00 28.27 4,080 D N El 6 -3 5 23 28 121330 6.00 28.27 4,290 D N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE Cone & Split Cone Shear Building Interior, Footing, Grid 1I to Grid 3I, Grid 3I to Grid 3D D Shear Field Test Conditions and Results 6 7/8/05 11:20 am 7/13/05 2 1/4 3.1 80 80 E Columnar Compression Test Results Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 8/5/05 Work Order: 0504991 Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN 3000 AVR Not Given 3000 374 01072 4 Saeger, Brandon Robert A Golish / 1 , .-" r � v BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ( °F): Liquid Added On Site: 8 GAL Water Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Stoops: Grid 7.5C to 5.5C, Grid D.51 to 7.5A Sample Location/Notes: Grid 6.5C Sample No. 7 -1 7 -2 7 -3 Break Remarks: B2 A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Cone & Split Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 2 5 7 81320 5.99 28.18 2,890 B N B2 2 26 28 104740 6.00 28.27 3,700 C N El 2 26 28 110060 6.00 28.27 3,890 C N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE c Cone Shear Columnar Shear D E Field Test Conditions and Results 7 7/13/05 2:55 pm 7/15/05 2 3/4 2.8 88 93 (per 8 cu. yds.) Compression Test Results Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 8/10/05 Work Order: 0505174 3000 AVR Not Given 3000 248 08044 4 Saeger, Brandon BRAUN 1NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slnmp (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ( °F): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Sample Location/Notes: Grid 8B, Poured column pads and footings Sample No. 8 -1 8 -2 8 -3 A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 3 4 7 113220 5.99 28.18 4,020 B N D2 3 25 28 135250 6.00 28.27 4,780 C N El 3 25 28 122560 6.00 28.27 4,330 B N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE A X B Cone Split C Cone & Shear Building Interior, Column Pad, D Shear 8 7/15/05 10:55 am 7/18/05 1 1/2 3.5 87 90 E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Grid 8B to Grid 3B, Grid B.6 to Grid 3E Compression Test Results Report Date: 8/12/05 Work Order: 0505269 Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Dif ley Rd & Robert St (CR 3), Eagan, MN 3000 AVR Not Given 3000 306 01059 4 Saeger, Brandon Robert A Golish " BRAUN UN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ( °F): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Sample Location/Notes: Dumpster Enclosure Sample No. 9 -1 9 -2 9 -3 Break Remarks: C2 A Cone TYPES OF FRACTURE Cone Split Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 3 4 7 54660 5.99 28.18 1,940 D N C2 3 25 28 106560 6.00 28.27 3,770 B N El 3 25 28 107940 6.00 28.27 3,820 C N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. C Cone Shear Shear E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results 9 7/15/05 1:45 pm 7/18/05 4 1/2 3.0 70 90 Dumpster Enclosure and retaining wall Compression Test Results Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Report Date: 8/12/05 Work Order: 0505332 P -3368N Gemstone Not Given 3000 762 010569 4 Busch, Jon S ,6 ,/0/ Robert A Golish BRAUN NTE R LEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Sample No. 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 Break Remarks: A Cone Jerzy Szoka Excel Development, LLC 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: 10 Date Cast: 7/19/05 Time Cast: 9:17 am Date Received: 7/20/05 Measured Slnmp (in): (ASTM C143) 4 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.5 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 70 Air Temp. ( °F): 75 Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Column Sample Location/Notes: Grid 2,E 8 Cone & Split Field Lab Test Cure Cure Age (days) (days) (days) 1 6 7 1 27 28 1 27 28 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE c Cone Shear O Shear E Columnar Field Test Conditions and Results Pad, North building pad interior column pads Compression Test Results Max. Load (pounds) 95520 126940 128560 Cylinder Diameter (m -) 6.00 6.00 6.00 Project: SP -05 -01839 Hawthorne Ridge NW of Diffley Rd & Robert St (CR 3) Eagan, MN Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Cylinder Area (sq. in.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 Strength (psi) 3,380 4,490 4,550 Report Date: 8/17/05 Work Order: 0505439 3000 Pump - Footing AVR Not Required 3000 305 0533 01027 4 Busch, Jon S Fracture Capping Remarks Type Method * Code(s) -B N D2 C N El D N El Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout (Field) ASTM 01019 Date: August2, 2005 Field Data Sample Data Laboratory Data Test Results 1N1 ER EC cc: Sample Number: lA 1B 1C Average Width 1 (in.): 3.11 - 3.40 3.18 Average Width 2 (in.) 2.77 3.26 3.56 Average Height (in.): 6.48 5.93 6.82 Out Of (%): < 5.00% < 5.00% <5.00% Area (sq. in.): 8.61 11,08 11.32 Date Received: 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 Date Tested: 8/2/2005 8/2/2005 8/2/2005 Field Cure (days): 3 3 3 Lab Cure (days): 25 25 25 Test Age (days): 28 28 28 Ultimate Load (lbs.): 45,430 58,790 57,440 Compressive Strength. (psi): 5270 5300 5070 Type of Failure: Shear Shear Shear Avg. Conpresive Strength (psi): 5,190 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 Remarks The average 28 day compressive strength meets or exceeds the specified strength Braun lnteriec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Reviewe Robert A. Golisa, FIT Staff Engineer Phone: 952.469.364L1 Fcx: Q59 460 8599 Web: brcunintertec.com Project 1 iuinber: SP -05 -01839 Client: Project Description.: Mr. Jerry Szoka Hawthorne Ridge Excel Development, LLC NW of Diffley Road & Robert St. (CR 3) 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN . Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number. 1 Masonry Units Cast Date: 7/5/2005 • Type: Not given 5 Mix Design: Not given • Na. Used: Not given Slump (in.): Not given Field Cure Temperature Location: Basement, below grade walls, West building • Maximum ( °F): 80 • Minimum ( °F): 53 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout (Field) ASTM C1019 Date: August 17, 2005 Field Data Laboratory Data Test Results Ultimate Load (lbs.): 51,010 26,660 26,050 Compressive Strength (psi): 4410 2960 2840 type of Failure: Shear Shear Shear Avg. Compresive Strength (psi): 3,400 Specified Strength (psi): 3,000 cc: BRAUN INT,ERTEC Sample Number: 2A 2B 2C Average Width 1 (in.): 3.43 3.04 3.11 Average Width 2 (in.) 3.37 2.96 2.95 Average Height (in.): 6.62 5.02 5.82 Out of Plumb ( %): < 5.00% < 5.00% < 5.00% Area (sq. in.): 11.56 9.00 9.17 Date Received: 7/18/2005 7/18/2005 7/18/2005 Date Tested: 8/12/2005 8/12/2005 8/12/2005 Field Cure (days): 3 3 3 Lab Cure (days): 25 25 25 Test Age (days): 28 28 28 Remarks The average 28 .day compressive strength meets or exceeds the specified strength Sample 2B and 2C were poorly consolidated Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 "REVISED" Project Number: SP -05 -01839 Client: Project Description: Mr. Terry Szoka Hawthorne Ridge Excel Development, LLC . NW of Dif ley Road & Robert St (CR 3) 4480 Erin Drive Eagan, MN Eagan, MN 55122 Set Number: 2 Masonry Units Cast Date: 7/15/2005 • Type: Not given Mix Design. Not given • No. Used: Not given Slump (in.): 5 1/2 Field Cure Temperature Location: West building foundation wall, NW corner • Maximum (°F): . 97 • Minimum (°F): 75 Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engineer Phone: 952 469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ld2ltilS f }o aBod •a .N4n4.uasa) dad a ;as {aalaad o} Ado anig ajus oapatul unoag o} Xdoa antim 4anogr patou SP Idaoxa /D i }uauno aye }o suoisano..id dysuowDJoM algaoi�ddn puo suoa }not}iaeds `sut 1d penoaddo 11M aouopJ000a u! auop sWM papedsui Morn `aBpaimoujl ano }o .Isaq ayt al a.- V 7 i0 oN � ?iv) �' - �'� , � rrt> -31 'a} f liY1 oN ( M O �aB Pa sad Zsuold panoJddoI� 04. sa6uoyo 0zuoy ;no ieeui8ua Jo ;oe ;'yp�o aye piQ sOS 0 �uaweorald uopual 0 sJatd 's Salk! Sul }oo�dnd }uawaoold a;aa�uQJ 6ut }log Bu1P1aM pry olpc sasa� la��ads soot ;opuno ;ueweoold auged ,(auosoy,' ❑ snonui ;uo� :a6w o uo� adsul :uol4 edsul }o adAi :Sin wadwej :.ay;QaM :•oN .salad ;uail] c ualp p - a _ssaippy }oalaid _ oN polo y It∎ 1 . c1V �1 •9 N {oalwd : -QN 11°644 b�8t� .5 Jodaa M1!oG uo! ;3adsuj ja!3adS - ;says X. DWWns payats,yn aas Isar( }I tpaload s!y} uo salouoda.nstp Buwpuo;s.tno ,too aiay; aly . suogonaasgo sr(op sty; wall patou satoundanstp ALM ways a,iy ) D''rWvo :Swum li ^d }uud > c Io y :papldwoo >yam }o uoE;000i pun uoi.duo ,V.Rir.,,, caa.Q 4 s o% 2 er^ :4-loda21 st9j }° Qa -Pr \ 15. 1 6 1 I'4"' `1_ ) \ 5 cwt ., -Nom - 10 AO t pau5ts Nnviia a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b e�� • ,S v ds . alai aoaCozd • ei C L :vodall sLt�d 3o aTeu 1 7 30 a2ed 1 1 :saquitiN •Q'I 1 11 7 - 4 (io4012.1.PoD 112,12715D /doo an a1?I ontaxi unv/E o; (Zoo a2 ) 4 — — w C-03 3Q AID }aodag Am/ aopadsui IgIaadS 3a uoguituquo3 anoq� pa ;ou sE ldaaxa `ogn acts jo suoisTAoid drgsuuurxiox► ajggojddu pui suorpo�gzoads `suejd paAoadde aq1 t i aauepaooae uj auop sum paloadsuu apote `8pajnnoux xno 3a 1saq auj oZ - 75W 72 -1 s 31 / - C a l l 9 a r t • 1 ca e t 7 Z. a h9 :aureN Ting vUPd : p a un 7s siv . (•uopVtn4 luoa ssv waif pa ;vtvdas aq .you pptoljs t(ouj t uouvuawa,Cu? 3aodai p i Jo a8vd 9sc 'a> '3Jodaa v Jo uollvttu?;uoo v si sp :aloN) Z 1-f crcv :auB3N paCoad i 1 :,zaciu mN uodag D31)3311\11 Jamas 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :sagtunN Q•X 1 c "to Lio-LryIK (uoloai,tuo3 7viauaD o1 ado an7g 'a1a�oaualui unvcg o; Cdoo njhyj) :•oN 300Co.z S e , qsadag spu jo g4$(a 1 I 'anoge pQ4ou se idaaxa `3Effl alp jo suotenozd dzgsueui ion1 algtogdde suo EOg oads `suE1d pan,oiddd a q i T t aotxepzooae ttop suii paloadsui )pot ia2papnorzx mo jo asaq atp oy It - 4. ■ 1.2 fi 1 podag aopadsuq pgoads Jo uogoonfuo3 -17-A-70 (Skla —b b Fs AID 1 • 1 1 -- t Z ? 9 `ti tij fi Cr? v1 Q t Cs� j � � ` /L5 - 1 �„v✓ � � \ � : u \I TIM �ursd 1 1 `) 1f a0. id v vccret Z' (•uovvnupuoo spg waif pamwdas aq iou ipnjn1 uovvumolu sm.. modal sj p Jo a'vd 7s1f a 'iiodat DJO uognnu2 ;uoo V ss spa :pau2Is :aureN aa gal : iodaZl D11131N1 w9 N A Y U 5 cls) a hS of :saquznN - GI •aAocre palou sg ldaaxa `agn suoTsTtoid &gsuEuiia aiggatldde put suoueai i=ds `sueTd paAoadde alp dun aouapa000E aupp SEnn 31som `aopajrAoui .t.o jo Nag acii. oZ y S �n Si vviv-eq h8 } C) N.40 T1 0 -4 s . c / yli,,,$‘:: ' PTV ) 7 „so Z :l_xodaj sp.uj 3o alEc JO a. 5 =vY :MEQ popaig103 Za taua0 d_doo anig •a7g oa ;la;u% uravlg sCdoo am al.) ) 9 r d 6. s fpi - �Q A gnu v 1 d - t1 F ac 11a o.�c� 3131 1 La 9 mrdsII zul1 :auiEN 'Ind 2UJd :pautis `al vi mo w ` 07 _..g (•uoglvnuy ;uoo sly/ waif paivtvdas aq ;ou pjnozis zjo?it1rt u01jvura0fu? $vy ;aodad sizij fo a8vd 1 s,�z, • jRILL w odai v Jo uowanuptioo v sg &n :a ;oN) Lys ti+ V�S Jo A3 lxodag Sipm iopadsuj wpads Jo uopzuttpUo J 'WV vy Cfr91 :aarem 1.=cold m Yceis ;iagmn �.rodag D3A91N1 ,„Pinvaa 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' yodel! Alpo uopedsui lDPedg 1d11aiS a6od 1 n' •and }o}uasaidad is Paload o} Ado, anis .alit oapa}ui unoa8 0} ddoo a }ryM 6 Qf o 7 °N °N 6tR -.3 45 :•oN •a•i •anogo pa}ou so }daoxa '38f1 /D8i luauro ay} }o suoistnoid d!L{suaw)aoM algooHddo puo suoi }oDipDads'suold panoiddo at y }IM aDuo1107J0 ui auop s°M pa.padsw'poan'e6pahnoul ano }o }sac ay} of saA S9,` )Y: ' -'9 - pays X(aowwns payPo44o aes 'say( }i PaloJd s!g4 uo saiauodaaasip 6wpuo}s }no Auo aaay} aay suoi}oniasgo s,Aop spy} woai. papu sa!Duodaaasip AID aaay} aay 1 h Sid it )'°"-° pO l' C -Ass/4 r; r4aP z 1 .. j -)— P Pva/ 1 slt 11144.0 01 q„ 5 .-n 5 , � cl :pa4aldwoo )laom }o uoi}000l puo uoi}duDsaa o ON (mope pa4sig) sad 2suold panoaddo r(p3 o} sa6uoyp aZUOy }no aaaw6ua JO }oa }iy�ao ay} pia slios }uawaoold uopual saaid 'g salid o 6u1}ooadaaid o }uawaDold alaaouo� 61.141o9 6uipla f� �ipouad .� SaSD� Ioi�ads suoi }opunod }uawaDold aoga� (auosoy� ❑ snonw }uop :a6oianop uolpadsui :uoi }aadsul }o Gal :aan4wJadwal : paload 4ua1Q :aay}oeM (Pa { Ya ' 93200 :ssaappy paload :•oN }oaload D s r :2) 7yv►J C\ j :awoN 4D9!°-'d :}aodaN siyl io a4oa -C Oat 4 ivik ivt.} i :-o poda 0,11 1.0 A413 r L ltr�v�v� a./►-)S-, e o vJ Y(` 4D- :awoN Ilnd }uud :p u 6is :pawaojaad s}sa} }sr{ D]1I ]1N I 1 1 1 1 1 1-1`r? g 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j O b f' 00 --s-C%-15 ..5,0v0)- 6ej ° I yodel! Alpo uo!pedsui IoPedg ' 1d2lOIS }o ) a6od •anrloluasaadaj al!S loaload o4 Xdoo anjg •ajr} oapaluj unoag o4Xdoo ally/ :•oN •a•1 y - i d vcoo •anogo palou so ldaoxa `38f1 /J81 luaaano ay. }o suoisinoad diysuowopom algooilddo puo suoilooi }loads 'suold panoaddo ayl yl!M aouop.i0000 ui auop sOM pa.padsui )laoM 'a6paimoul ano }o isaq ay. of •hays Raowwns paipollo aas 'say( }l o °N SDI ipaload suyl uo sapuodaaos!p 6uipuoslno Xuo aaayl aay 0 oN 1 s9 Z suo il onaas g o sAop slyl woa} palou sepuodaaosip Xua aaayl aay t' ; " ) -►' 64 t/ wc, 41 vvo ? ,, r� 1 J �)vl'OtJdvil5 0 m s aJ ( ) ms's j� ^v0 U sesoD loioads 0 o (mom palsrl) saA ysuold panoaddo 1410 0l sa6uoyp azuoglno aaaw6ua JO paliyoao et-I4 pia silos 0 6ui}ooadaaid D suoilopunod luawaoold uopual luawa? old alaaauoD D luawaoold aogay El saa 8 sal!d o 6 u!llo8 '8 6u!plaM dauosow :a6o.ranop uoipadsul D pouad snonuy.uoD :uolpadsul }o adA1 :aanloaadwal .paload lump 1' oN 409!0-id :laodad 5191 Jo aloa Nv �aU v, a./s) S ^Q :palaldwoo )laom }o uoil000l puo uoildu 7-r )t , Ql a hp, y r v414.r+r»2 1 }o AID :awoN Iln lwad :pau6!S :pawao}aad ssal lsri :QayluaM :lump :ssaappy .paload :awDN Pal.oad :•oN podas Nnvia 96Itzto zzt (uotomtuo3 p uauao 01 (Cdoo an1g •apzf oa,atuj unvcg o ; ( ( d o . ? a u ) - S 6opoc' :aagtunN .G ) \'r :auze Lind �uizd o -o -,� •anoqu palou su ldaaxa 'Dan alp Jo suotsinoid c lsueunpoM algeolidde puu suopuottoads `suu1d panoaddu atp ipim aouepz000u ut auop sum paloadsut ATOM `o2pajmou3E mo Jo lsaq atp ad, Jo a ) , � yr S cr - °) • ) ai ■•,° )'°DP r a. , v,' 1 ?r,-121d o _ 3 :itoda su j J o OW aaud :a1uu 5410..) J0��'n h � ' E l? ; P'h °e :pauis 5 (•uouvnutjuoo spit war!paivindas aq Jou p /nois yoNevt uopvuuofui svu modal spit fo aSvd lsiyau v fo uoz vnutuoo v si siyj :azoN) : ()NI loofa'," Dsvu - 1" , 2 Jo 40 T.zodag AIuT iopadsul miaads Jo uopunutjuo3 asp: ‘d, t :auzuN 100 laid 1° s 1" ( S :zaquznN uodag J1l2111N1 ,sN flvI a u7� 0 0 r7r 2 Q O/O / ST*G^2 t�'}�� � ^� C �t 1i i\ °�) ) -) ?- j • car Sauedansia o; uor niosag r " dir a �, - • i a .) Y' r/ At-et 5 ��o �l7 ,�•a41 aM l� _` }, Go 4.1 r 'p I Sig d -V J } al _s S 3J 7 .. 1.2ry (P, -') ° 9) - G ^ - t17) d 11)S 't la- -1°) h t 54. ;j -*11 <j Q a'C'141 !. ..,a s"'' ro tad, - cam co J �"'l0� 6s 4 ta/ r fltli ' ■1 4 n1-3 , � '''i Pr lax' """) J "yam P \ -s'. tit) 82 0 -a-so - J. a te' :'— 4: J �r•� 9$ 11,8 3 uogdvasaii o. -c - 1- alza asodag . oH 3.iodag 'Tare alp anuguoa UEo xsom aiojaq palaadsut io /pue papanoa 10 /puE iaarg2ua a ,(q panoiddE io pannainai aq lsnui 2utnno ate, J.0 1atTS t palpia7:y so iaaugua uttsaa Xq �atnag .10 uoaa_uoj tuipaaK sap Jo Saturants :ssa.ippv pa fold :aui M ;aaro rd 1 ns� fVaa