Loading...
06/14/1994 - City Council SpecialAGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday June 14, 1994 5:00 p.m. Eagan Municipal Center Building I. ROLL CALL & ADOPTION OF AGENDA II. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UPDATE III. DISCUSSION OF 1993 FINANCIAL STATEMENT IV. PARKS SYSTEM PLAN V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT city of eagan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 10, 1994 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING /TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1994 At a recent meeting of the City Council, a Special City Council meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, June 14, at 5:00 p.m. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UPDATE Director of Community Development Reichert will provide a brief update on current community development projects. DISCUSSION OF 1993 FINANCIAL STATEMENT The City has recently completed preparation of its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 1993. The City Administrator and Director of Finance would like an opportunity to review the document in more detail with the City Council. Staff will be meeting with representatives of the auditing firm, Deloitte & Touche, on Monday, June 13, to review the audit in advance of the Special City Council meeting. Deloitte & Touche will make a brief formal presentation to the City Council at a regular meeting but will not be present at the workshop. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the financial report and two (2) letters (inside the front cover) from Deloitte & Touche covering the audit. While the report is lengthy and detailed, the transmittal letter on pages ix through xxviii provides a good overview and is reasonably user friendly. Please bring the report to the meeting on Tuesday as it will be the basis for the financial review. PARKS SYSTEM PLAN The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be available between 6:30 -6:45 p.m. to meet with the City Council in regard to the next section of the Parks System Plan. Attached without page number for Council review is Chapter Ten; Land Acquisition & Facility Development. The APRNRC reviewed a previous draft at its work session on June 6 and gave direction for revisions to this document. MEMO Following the consultant's review and clarification for the City Council, additional text will be presented to discuss the context for investment within the park system. Comparisons of how much to spend, system benefits, funding criteria, and potential financial resources will be reviewed. Although these items were discussed by the Advisory Commission at their June 6 workshop, they will be reviewing the text for the first time, as will the Council. OTHER BUSINESS There are no items under Other Business at this time. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH /vmd 40 0. MEMO — clty of eagan DATE: JUNE 10, 1994 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION Id/ SUBJECT: JOINT COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETING - JUNE 14, 1994 The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be available between 6:30 PM and 6:45 PM to meet with the City Council in regards to the next section of the Parks System Plan. Attached for the Council's review is Chapter Ten; Land Acquisition & Facility Development. The Advisory Commission reviewed a previous draft at its work session on June 6th and gave direction for revisions to this document. Following the consultant's review and clarification for the City Council, additional text will be presented to discuss the context for investment within the park system. Comparisons of spending, system benefits, funding criteria, and potential financial resources will be reviewed. Although these items were discussed by the Advisory Commission at their June 6 workshop, they will be reviewing the text for the first time with the Council. KV:cm CHAPTER 10 LAND ACQUISITION AND FACILITY DEVELOPMENT REVISED June 9, 1994 jrtroduction As Eagan nears the year 2000, the park system will be challenged by three capital intensive aspects. These include: • Land acquisition for active and passive uses and open space • New facility development • Redevelopment or renovation of existing facilities Each of these needs is important to Eagan's residents given continued community growth, increasing facility needs, land absorption trends, and aging park facilities within mature neighborhoods. This chapter provides an overview of potential land acquisition, anticipated facility development, and a continued response to park redevelopment. In tandem with Chapter 11, Financing, the chapter summarizes the general timing and financial implications of m park system improvements. The justification and rationale for these recommendations occurs earlier in this park system plan. Chapters dealing with Needs and Demands Analysis, Recreation Programs Review and Analysis, Natural Resource Assessment and Trail System Planning should be consulted to provide more depth regarding parcel and facility locations, the potential timing of facilities, and community need, both present and future. Land Acquisition Future land acquisition needs are driven by a variety of factors reflecting both active and passive recreation demands. A summary of the influencing factors follows. Refer to Table 10.1 and Figure 10.1. 10 -1 N d = d S 1 > a t.^. cu c 0 • m - .0 8 as 0 Qr 4... m y E 2 no = `o c c ` :r to d a a 8 E m -o 2 o •5 = c ? s cv y . d 0 m . m 0 0 0. d m = ., a) . _ :r, o _ = y H o = p_ 0 IC O ti C� �-1 0. W "C a w m 0 .3 v 0 a — - S � w 2 in w +' • — ' _ _ o o m o a a c c C 'O -0 m w a A a; d o t t m m = a Q a 'i ' 0 2 E E m ' . . a � Br' a m am> E ^, O i O O O rl .N.i E O O N O D1 E crs 0 Z as 0 z a 4- m 0- y _ C a F 8 0 0 8 • N 0 .r m 0 • 2 • 40 .r •r So 75 5 0 M O • m a _ a E 8 0 0 0 0 t0 0 _ 0 • • 40 Cs1 O CC1 CO CD CD r ■•I 40 .r 2 10 0 8 4- 0. 0 0 m a. m s 0 0. 0. m E O m a 7.2 -rpm !MARY") Page 2 of 2 'igure 10.1) Comments Site and acreage are not determined; joint opportunities exist Site and acreage are not determined; explore city /school development Linkage between Windcreet and II Patrick Eagan Linkage between Barbara Curry and I Patrick Eagan Develop looping trails, preserve pond II edges Trail connection to Lakeside Park II 11 puel ;a,N punoae (teal Outdoor' Potential public/private partnership 11 Trail connections in Lebanon Hills II Trail link between Ohmann and Lebanon Hills Operating historic farm site II aanlea3 puellant anaaeatd Complements elementary school site; joint city /school development Priority for Acquisition Long Term (2003 -2010) • • L( Mid -Term 1998 -2002) • • • Near Term (1994 -1997) • • • • • • • • Purpose/Function Neighborhood common or neighborhood park Neighborhood common or neighborhood park, potential school site athletic fields Linear park, alternative neighborhood park Linear park Open apace, linear park Linear park aoeda uad0 I Open space or historic farm/historical site Open apace or linear park, addition to Walden Heights Park Linear park or G. Ohmann expansion Historic farm site aoede uadO Neighborhood park site Au G-1 9 - t 1 9I OI 011 OZ Z ZI Parcel Owner/ Name '00 aalalg L 431e03141 i43aeo1N 'Aa(I sRaw I Shiela ue I Peaoa l Diamond "T' Ranch Doering/ Schindeldecker I ;aiwaIPPIw / .. West End I Hunting - - - 1 I I I I i3 �I V9Z II a9Z II a6Z II I I I .s .v 1 9 su 14 • >m R1 Z m m C r Z m m > m Z 0 > cn v m 0 T_ n 0 -0 0 m m � =in om Z r T 0 n 0 0 Z 0 Z 1. Neighborhood Service Area Demands -- Chapter 5, Needs and Demands Analysis, identified five neighborhood areas where acquisition will be required for neighborhood common or neighborhood park development. These include Areas 15, 18, 21, 22, and 36E. Each neighborhood is described more fully later in this chapter. 2. Community Parks -- Acquisition of parcels for community park purposes is needed to meet future population demands (refer to Table 5.5 in Chapter 5). Existing community park active area acreage meets current population levels. However, anticipated community growth will likely generate demand beyond current capacities. This need is also apparent due to the lack of existing community park acreage in Eagan's northeast quadrant. 3. Community Athletic Fields - -Land acquisition may be required for a future youth baseball complex, girls softball fields, and youth soccer. The exact need is contingent upon timing of community growth, participation rates, and community demographics. 4. Linear Parks -- Chapter 8, Community Trail System, identifies linear park corridors as a component of the off -road recreation trail system's continued development. Eagan has made a commitment to several off -road corridors. Additional acquisition would infill missing links and greatly enhance the usefulness of shared use with MnDNR and Dakota County Parks. 5. Passive Open Space - -A detailed summary of remaining community open space is described in Chapter 7, Natural Resources. Priority parcels for preservation were identified, of which select parcels should be purchased. Non - acquisition methods may also be employed to preserve other parcels' resource character. Table 10.1 summarizes potential parcels for acquisition and their future role within the system. Alternative sites are noted where appropriate. Additional detail regarding parcel needs, related facility development, and project intent follows. 10 -2 Penland for Land Acauisition and Facilities This section provides a summary of those facilities or park system components for which land acquisition or facility development must occur. Included in this summary are active facilities, passive elements, and special use components. Active Facilities Quantitative and qualitative measures exist within the Needs and Demands Analysis chapter that have identified the need for active park facilities, primarily in response to athletic service demands and organized activities. Existing or future needs are likely to exist for the following facilities or system components: 1. Adult Softball Complex -- Development of Lexington- Diflley Park as an adult softball complex has been initiated. This facility will be comprised of a minimum of six softball fields designed to meet and surpass official softball regulations. Support facilities including parking, comfort buildings, storage, maintenance, and other amenities will be incorporated into the park's development. Layout and design of the complex should accommodate future ballfield lighting to maximize the facility's use and capacity. Lighting of both softball and soccer fields should occur by the year 2000. 2. Northview Park Lighting Improvements -- Maximum use of the Northview ballfields should be obtained by adding field lighting. This improvement will extend the playability of these fields into the evening hours, thereby maximizing their efficiency and increasing overall capacity. Lighting should be completed by the year 2000 and in conjunction with Lexington- Diffley lighting to obtain the lowest installation cost. 3. Youth Baseball Complex -- Population growth and changing demographics may continue to pose facility needs for youth baseball activities. In response, a four- to six -field complex should be constructed if adequate user demand exists comprised of fields rated for each of the various age categories and activity groupings. Ideally, this facility would be best developed as a joint use complex with a school 10 -3 district. Joint development would maximize the facility's use, produce efficiencies for both development and operation costs, and likely obtain a location convenient to the user groups. The key to such a solution, however, is obtaining adequate land at a location agreeable to both the City and school district. Blackhawk Middle School in Section 21 would serve as a candidate site for joint development. A City - owned site could occur at other locations including Parcels 2, 9D, and 11B /12A. This facility would include ballfields of flexible design, responding to varying age groups for both existing and future populations. Ballfields would not be lighted initially. Support facilities including bleachers, storage, parking, and restrooms should be considered. The following measures could be considered to delay or take the place of a youth baseball complex: A. Alternative game scheduling could occur that extends field use into afternoon or weekend hours currently not utilized. B. Extending the season of play could also be considered. This approach would produce additional capacity from existing facilities and allow for "early summer" and "late summer" leagues. C. An alternate approach to extending the capacity of existing facilities would be the lighting of middle school and/or high school facilities. This approach could benefit both student programs and community recreation programs. Funding between the school district and the city could be prorated based upon use. 4. Softball (Girls) -- Additional softball fields for girls' use may ultimately be required. Existing and near -term needs may be met at Rahn Park once adult softball uses are redirected toward Lexington-Diffley. However, ultimate community needs may require two to four additional softball fields for girls' use. Once again, the most efficient solution may be a joint use facility at a middle or high school site. Current school construction programming should address this 10 -4 issue. City and school district staff should cooperate in obtaining adequate land area as a part of school development to allow for future girls' softball field construction. Eight to 16 acres may be required assuming joint use of existing school parking. 5. Soccer Facilities -- Near -term soccer facility demand will likely be met by informal open space within the City. Near -term soccer field use should be accommodated at the Lexington-Diffley Athletic Complex including three full -size and one overlay field. Soccer fields or overlay fields should be considered within the Blackhawk Middle School complex meeting near -term to mid -term needs. Alternate sites include Ridgecliff and Wescott Station Parks. Long -term soccer needs are contingent upon soccer participation rates. Increased participation and an increasing population may pose the need for additional full - size fields. These fields should ideally be incorporated into an athletic complex such as the youth baseball complex. Independent fields are desirable rather than overlay fields due to lengthy and variable soccer seasons conflicting with ballfield use. 6. Facility Distribution -- Specific active use facilities such as hockey and tennis have traditionally been dispersed through the community to achieve uniform neighborhood access and service. Standards and needs discussed earlier in this system plan examine the location of these facilities and areas where additional development may be required. A discussion of the primary activities follows: A. Ice Hockey -- Standards suggest hockey rink distribution within the commu- nity with a 10- to 15- minute service area. Placement normally would occur within a neighborhood park, and potentially be located in pairs to reduce maintenance costs. As diagrammed in Figure 5.21, a substantial portion of Eagan is adequately serviced, however, the central and southeast neighbor- hoods should have improved access. This may be accommodated by: • An exterior hockey rink adjacent the proposed civic arena (Service Area 22) or inclusion of a hockey rink in a future Service Area 15 neighborhood park. • Development of a future neighborhood park in Service Area 36E adjacent the proposed elementary school. B. Pleasure Skating -- Distribution patterns and service area standards (3/4 to 1 1/4 miles) are similar to ice hockey. Eagan's central and southeast neighborhoods are currently inadequately serviced. Future pleasure skating facilities should coincide with new hockey facilities to maximize maintenance efficiency and obtain uniform service. A free - standing pleasure rink in the South Oaks Park area should be considered. C. In-Line Hockey -- Current trends and excitement for in -line hockey will require on -going monitoring by staff. If in -line hockey is a long -term interest, then Eagan must determine whether a public response is needed or if the demand can be met by private enterprise. If public actions are appropriate, initial rinks should be centrally located such as the future civic arena. Paving of one hockey rink would test community demand. Future locations could include Rahn, Skyhill, Bridle Ridge, and Goathill Parks. D. Tennis -- Eagan's standards suggest tennis court distribution for a 3/4 to 1 1/4 -mile service area or one court per 2,000 residents. Figure 5.20 illustrates current court distribution and voids within the central community and southeast the southeast corner. Future courts could be considered in future park facilities adjacent the: • Blackhawk Middle School (Service Area 21) • Elementary School (Service Area 36E) E. Volleyball -- Revised volleyball standards suggest a minimum of one court per 5,000 residents. Actual sand court volleyball use within the City varies 10 -6 somewhat due in part to user leadership and spirit for the activity. Future volleyball sand courts should be added, if adequate demand exists, at Lexington/Diffley, Northview, and the future youth ballfield complex. F. Unique Activities -- Requests for space to conduct unique or unusual recreational activities are regularly received by staff. Model airplaning, dog trials, and off -road mountain biking are examples of such activities. City ordinance prevents uses such as model airplaning from City parks. Other uses such as dog trials may conflict with other traditional park activities. Real demand for space to host these activities will not justify a separate, designated parcel. Staff should monitor requests and gauge the actual demand. Once real needs for space and facilities become apparent, opportunities for these activities should be identified and time slots should be designated. For example, model airplaning could be conducted during those weekend hours when youth ballfields are not scheduled. Other activities such as off -road mountain biking could be directed to single -use sites such as former gravel borrow pits that can tolerate additional environmental impact. G. Other Fields -- Demands for football and rugby play should be met by school district facilities or shared use with other traditional field activities such as soccer. Community Park Development Need for community park development occurs due to the lack of facilities in the community's north - central and northeast portions and continued population growth. This need could be met by the development of a north- central or northeast park facility. These facilities would provide additional community park space and further distribute community uses to those areas of the community lacking larger community park elements. Northern Tier Community Park The need for another community park, based upon the needs analysis, population growth, and community desires, will likely become apparent in the near to mid -term. Additionally, opportunities for necessary land acquisition are quickly diminishing as private development consumes potential candidate parcels. Community park location criteria should include the following items: • Location within a portion of the community currently underserved by other community park facilities. • Location where future population or employment is likely to increase. • Proximity of attractive resource base including water basin or wetland areas, woodland cover, topographic relief, or other natural amenities. • Convenient access and proximity to nonresidential roadways. • Parcel size 25 to 60 acres. This size may be increased if a youth ballfield component is included. The most probable community park candidates include (refer to Figure 10.1) Parcels 1, 11A, and 11B /12A. These parcels have been carefully reviewed by the Commission in light of existing development trends and ongoing development proposals. Commission priority for a community park has been established as site 11B /12A. Neighborhood Park Development Options and conclusions contained within Chapter 5, Needs and Demands Analysis, examine park service areas that will likely require future neighborhood facilities. These neighborhoods include Service Areas 15, 18, 21, 22, and 36E. Future residential develop- ment and changing land uses will almost certainly require neighborhood park develop- ment within these areas. However, exact solutions to location and facility development 10 -8 cannot be prescribed at this time. Land development patterns, land use changes, roadway and infrastructure development, and timing each pose critical influences for the most preferred solution. In each of these service areas, land acquisition is likely to complement existing parcels or to provide for neighborhood park development. Facility development should respond to individual design solutions and park classification, that being a neigh- borhood common or a neighborhood park. Classifications contained within the Needs and Demands Analysis depict the facility development associated with each category. A summary of each service area follows with a depiction of likely land acquisition or facility development. Moonshine Park Expansion -- Surrounding neighborhood needs are currently met by Moonshine Park. Lying adjacent LeMay Lake is a 4.9 -acre parcel (9D -- Figure 10.1) that could serve as an initial building block that transforms the existing undeveloped neighborhood park into a special use facility /neighborhood park. Opportunities for expansion exist east and south of Moonshine Park in the vicinity of I -35E. The expansion parcel has limited woodland with the dominant area previously used for agricultural purposes. Future facilities could include: • Access and parking • Trails • Lake exposure and access for non - motorized watercraft • Fishing piers • Picnic facilities • Restroom and maintenance/storage • Play apparatus • Looping trails Landscaping and earthen berms may be necessary to buffer noise intrusion from I -35E. However, LeMay Lake provides one of the few opportunities in the north- central portion of Eagan incorporating natural resources, open space, and park expansion opportunities for park development. 10 -9 Service Area 15-- Resolution of Service Area 15's neighborhood park requirements will primarily be determined by the area's future development configuration. Park dedication requirements should be directed toward parcels adjacent the existing water basin and to interconnect existing parks and planned parcels for acquisition. Six to ten acres should be sought within Service Area 15 for future development with traditional neighborhood park amenities and winter activity facilities. Interconnecting trails between Barbara Curry, Fish Lake, and O'Leary should be developed to the greatest extent possible, thereby providing an open space network with a variety of park activities. Park dedication and acquisition should maximize the opportunity for interconnections with adjacent parks, to preserve water basin edges for public access, to maintain woodland cover, and provide an open area for active park uses. Service Area 18-- Potential redevelopment opportunities, changing land use, and development infill will determine the future need for neighborhood park facilities within this service area. For example, a significant increase in multifamily units would heighten the need for neighborhood park facilities. On the other hand, nonresidential uses would pose moderate requirements. This service area's substantial variables pose difficulties for resolving at this time the exact facilities and park parcels required. Park and Recreation staff should closely monitor private development activities and those of Community Development studies to determine future park needs. Opportunities for shared use or a public/private venture should be considered. Service Area 21-- Ultimate park development within Service Area 21 will be determined by future development configuration, land use, roadway layout, and the design of Blackhawk/Deerwood Schools. Many of these variables will become more apparent with the resolution of current litigation. Shared use or joint partnership with the school district should be strived for to maximize active parcels and neighborhood park facilities within the service area. Resolution of Johnnycake Road and Thomas Lake Road alignments must take into consideration future park opportunities. For example, alignments swinging to the west would create the 10 -10 greatest opportunity for park parcels that abut school district property. Consolidating parcels could provide space for neighborhood park and athletic facilities. Additional school district acquisition will likely be required to meet school facility needs. A neighborhood common or small neighborhood park should also be pursued in the vicinity of the fire administration building. Although parcel space is limited, this location would increase access to the northern service area and future multiple family. Four to six acres would be desirable for the park development. Service Area 22-- Tremendous opportunity exists for interconnection of existing and future public facilities within Service Area 22. Park sites, the elementary school, public library, civic complex, and future civic arena would all benefit from interconnection by trails and linear parks. Park dedication should seek to preserve these opportunities in developing a system strengthened by the collective public parcels. Existing undeveloped parcels located within the central, north- central, and southeast portions of the service area will determine actual park needs. While park acreage within this service area appears abundant, it is difficult to uniformly service the area's residential neighborhoods due to their distribution and difficult access. Therefore, additional acquisition and facility development within the service area should: • Rely on interconnecting trails for convenient access to neighborhood facilities. • Maximize opportunities for shared recreational use including Glacier Hills Elementary. • Minimize duplication of facilities but strive for equal distribution within the service area. • Utilize open areas for active recreation rather than impacting woodland and sloped areas. Service Area 36E -- Proposed elementary school development within Service Area 36E holds the key for neighborhood park facilities. Twelve to 13 acres will be acquired by the 10 -11 school district for site development. An additional two to four acres should be acquired through park dedication in the Pine Ridge Addition to complement school district property. This shared use venture can meet the area's neighborhood park requirements in the most effective manner while providing a centrally located facility. Joint facilities of the city and school district should meet the intent of Eagan's neighborhood park standard (refer to Chapter 4). Winter activity facilities should be incorporated to meet the community's southeast skating/hockey needs. Special Use Facilities A survey of City Council members, Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission members, and Park and Recreation senior staff conducted during the planning process in April 1994 identified general needs regarding community special use facilities. The survey format queried participants regarding the importance to the community of numerous activities or facilities and subsequently asked them to establish comparative ratings regarding the community's current ability to meet that facility's intent. For each facility, participants were asked to identify that element's importance to the park system on a numeric rating from 1 to 10. Qualitative ratings of excellent, good, fair, and poor were used to evaluate Eagan's ability in meeting that facility or activity's need. Responses of the three survey groups were somewhat varied. However, distinct conclusions could be drawn regarding several specific activities or facilities that participants felt were important to Eagan's park system and yet poorly met in terms of existing facilities. Specific facilities of high importance included a nature or interpretive center, nature trails, outdoor amphitheater, historical or operating farm, swimming, fishing facilities, arboreta, public golf course, community center, community gardens, BMX/off -road biking, and community bandshell. Several other elements were also identified, but to a more moderate extent including a community historical museum, small craft water access, skateboarding facilities, recreation trails, group picnicking, cross - country skiing, trails around lakes, football, in -line skating, and gymnasium space. The vast majority of these items are specific facilities necessary for select activities. For example, bocce courts and frisbee golf are tailored to specific activities rather than free- 10 -12 standing park components. These facilities are generally located within community parks and, as a result, may not require additional land acquisition. Other facilities such as a historical farm and public golf course are unique, individual park components and would necessitate land acquisition in addition to facility development to meet the activity needs. A summary of the desired or important elements according to survey response is found in Table 10.2. Prior to special use facility development, the City of Eagan should undertake a broader survey of the community to verify the desire and need for facility development. Select special use facilities may require minimal expenditures for development. These include frisbee golf, fishing, and community gardens. However, other special use facilities may require substantial investments such as the public golf course or community center. Revenue bonds should be considered for special use facilities where user fees are used to pay for or offset development costs incurred. Prioritization of Land Acquisition and Facility Development Contained within Table 10.1 is an initial prioritization suggesting timing for land acquisition. Numerous factors contribute to the timing of actual acquisition and facility development. Such factors include community activity demands for facilities, recreation programming, available grants and funding, and private sector development pressure. Of these criteria, the greatest variable may be private sector development timing as it relates to land acquisition. Eagan's opportunities for additional park and open space parcel acquisition are rapidly diminishing as continued private sector development occurs. Pending residential and commercial development continues to absorb existing community open space in rapid fashion. It is critical that the City continue to concentrate its efforts on land acquisition if it is to meet future activities and programming while preserving key open space and natural resource parcels. This prioritization should be reflected in the department five -year capital improvement program (CIP). 10 -13 Long -Range Facility Maintenance/Renlacement Eagan's park system's rapid growth and development has focused available resources toward land acquisition and development of new facilities. However, many of the park facilities are at an age where their long -term maintenance and replacement must be anticipated and provided for. This need will increase as the system ages and matures. In April 1991, staff prepared a "Long -Range Facility Maintenance and Replacement Program" that provides a systematic approach to maintaining facility integrity and anticipates the "capital" investment necessary in the future. The most recent update to the plan covers the years 1995 - 2016. Elements contained within this program are those with a life expectancy set by material quality, maintenance, or necessary replacement. Specific items addressed include park lighting, backstops, hockey rinks and fencing, park buildings, play structures, foot bridges, and irrigation systems. Life expectancy of these items and necessary replacement or substantial rehabilitation is identified based upon manufacturer information, staff experience, level of use, and material construction and composition. However, other factors contribute to facility life span including environmental conditions, vandalism, and changes in use or activities. The program does not address items such as grills or park benches due to their relatively short life span and low capital investment. A summary of each major item follows. 1. Bituminous Maintenance -- Bituminous surfaces, parking lots and trails, are to be seal coated five years after installation and then five to six years after each seal coating. Overlays may be necessary for parking lots and trails every eight to ten years. Tennis courts and hard courts have similar maintenance requirements. However, color coating and striping is applied four to six years after installation and then four to six years thereafter. Court overlays occur every eight to ten years. 2. Park Buildings -- Maintenance is required for items prone to wear including carpeting, roofing, furnace, water heater, and so on. 10 -14 TABLE 10.2 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL SPECIAL USE FACILITIES (1) Comments Refer to Chapter 7-- Natural Resources 11 Volunteer assistance is required; rehabilitation of farm building Refer to Chapter 8 -- Community Trails for locations Flexible facility for small to large groups 11 Multiuse site 11 Site varies contingent upon manmade versus natural basin Environmental programs 11 Incorporate fishing pier and non - motorized access, shoreline fishing Outdoor pool and/or wave tank Visible, accessible site; incorporate into historic farm 1 satltlp lu 11 Slmau3 anbiun Incorporate rugby and other field games Public or public/private venture Acquisition required Consider gymnasium and indoor pool Annual plot rental, consider historic farm site Alternative to amphitheater Potential Location vud uu2uJ 3ta?alud' Historical farm site, i.e., Holz site Dispersed sites Community park(s) -1 Holtz Farm site -1 Free - standing, civic campus or community park uu2uJ )aulud ao )jnnutpjaujg-- )Fed iCliununuoD ,clijiau3 asn iepads ao Maud Xliunummo Civic area or community park klijiau3 asn juiaads ao Naud Spunuiu op Community park or public open space Community park alts loogas jo asn lutor Civic arena in civic complex Existing private course Free - standing, civic complex Remnant open space I I Community park Activity/Facility 11 Nature/Interpretive Center Community Historical Museum Nature Trails/Trails Around Lakes 1 Amphitheater 11 Historical Farm Swimming (Outdoor) dump Xucji1 Fishing Juiuiucimg Arboreta Small Craft Water Access 1 Skateboarding Football [Hockey (Indoor) 1 Public Golf Course Community Center Community Gardens 1 Community Bandshell b 0 as a MI 0 as d 0 rn tn 5 0 U 0 v 0 0 a) Ri cd c, cd . 0 0 as a) s. v i r.. cd U Z 0 U U� w • - ■ 0 ,—t 0 _ A cd C ,.° a~ , 5 m o 0 "CI cn c o .0 cn e t' b c, za4 3. Fencing -- Tennis and athletic field fencing is anticipated to last 30 to 40 years prior to replacement. Backstop fencing will require replacement within 7 to 20 years depending upon activities and amount of use. Athletic complex backstops will require replacement more frequently than typical neighborhood parks. 4. Foot Bridge -- Prefabricated metal and wood foot bridges are anticipated to last 20 to 25 years; with wood planking, 10 to 15 years. Regular structural inspections are needed to identify potential failures and minimize liability. 5. Hockey Rinks /Fencing -- Tentative life span for hockey rinks and fencing is 10 years. This time frame varies with use and amount of activity. 6. Irrigation Systems -- System maintenance and replacement is contingent upon the various components from which it is comprised. Valves and pumps are expected to have a 10 to 14 -year life span, while piping and controllers will generally last 15 to 17 years. Incremental replacement will occur to maintain system quality. 7. Park Lighting -- Security lighting is generally the responsibility of Dakota Electric with the exception of poles, which are to be maintained by the City, and the system should last approximately 40 years. Activity and athletic field lighting is the City's responsibility. Fixtures for hockey and tennis will likely last 15 to 20 years, whereas ballfield fixtures may last 20 to 30 years. 8. Play Structures - -Life expectancy for play structures is 10 to 15 years based upon levels of use, ongoing maintenance, and weather conditions. Actual replacement, however, may be shortened depending upon safety criteria and specific designs. The preceding summaries provide a concise description of those elements requiring regular maintenance and replacement or rehabilitation. The "Long -Range Facility Maintenance and Replacement Program" should be consulted for additional detail (refer to appendix). In addition, the program anticipates capital investments necessary to maintain element integrity and the likely timing of these reinvestments. 10 -15 Special use facilities will be added to the park system as it matures and when adequate demand exists. These facilities, such as swimming pools and indoor hockey facilities, will require a different level of maintenance and replacement. Capital necessary to maintain their quality will also increase and must be anticipated prior to their development. Ongoing facility maintenance and replacement is a critical component to Eagan's park, recreation, and open space system. Deterioration of the system will decrease usage and the ability to service Eagan residents. Delaying maintenance or facility replacement will likely increase related costs and may require total facility replacement or redevelopment rather than corrective maintenance. Adoption of Facilities for Other Purposes Eagan's park and open space system has made a commitment of facilities to meet the recreation and programmic demands asserted by its population. Existing programs reflect the popularity of existing activities in terms of facility type, capacity, and quality. However, the composition and capacity of these facilities may change over time due to recreation trends, changing per capita interest and participation, and new products or activities that evolve over time. In addition, the community's demographics will evolve and change the demands from one facility type to another. For instance, softball participation among Eagan's adults has increased over the past decade and stabilized in the early 1990s. As a result, the City has made continued investments in athletic complexes and fields to meet this demand. It is not known whether the community's population and aging demographics will continue to support the need for additional expansion of these facilities. The advent of in -line skating has rapidly increased and may also challenge community leaders for special trails or in -line hockey rinks necessary to meet this demand. Their long -term popularity and resulting facility commitment cannot be determined at this time. It is extremely difficult to predict with accuracy the demand and capacity for specific facilities within the next decade and certainly for any period of time beyond 2005. Limited land, facility, and capital resources will challenge community decision- makers to maximize the usability of existing facilities while meeting community demands. 10 -16 Therefore, facility flexibility may be paramount to successfully meeting future facility and activity demands. The following approaches to facility flexibility should be considered to enable reuse or adoption and maximize facility flexibility: 1. Park Layout -- Future park layout should take into consideration uses other than those currently programmed for. Space allocation, circulation, access, and parcel geometry pose opportunities or constrictions for adapting parks to changing uses. 2. Engineering and Construction Practices -- Traditional engineering applications normally take into consideration a single use or activity. For example, hockey rinks and tennis courts are designed for their respective activities rather than to accommodate other events. Flexibility might be sought in the types of hard surface, removable fencing, and relocatable athletic goals. Bituminous cross - section design and other standard details should also be examined for their compatibility with other activities. 3. Infrastructure -- Grading, drainage, and utility design for parks should anticipate future uses. In select cases, sleeving for future utilities such as irrigation might be considered during initial park construction to preserve park flexibility and minimize future cost expenditures. 4. Standards -- Important for park design and development, however, they can also curtail creativity in adapting park facilities for alternative uses. Standards should be reviewed and revised recognizing that parks and their facilities may evolve over time and host alternative activities. Timing and Financing This chapter has recognized the primary land acquisition and facility development aspects of Eagan's future park system. The timing and financing of these improvements are dealt with in Chapter 11, which should be consulted for supplementary information. 10 -17