Loading...
07/19/1994 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA JULY 19, 1994 MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:30 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:35 - VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) 2-A. PERSONNEL ITEMS B. LICENSES, Plumbers /7',..5C. 3C. RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Committee, Revised Aviation Chapter, Metropolitan 1°(0,Development Guide D. RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Committee, FAA Interpretation of Part 150 Sound (7'Insulation Program �� E. PROJECT 672, Approve Cost Participation Agreement with Dakota County and MnDOT (C.R. y 1( F. 32 and T.H. 3 - Signalization and Intersection Improvements) CONTRACT 88-36, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition repo,-. - Utilities) CONTRACT 88-36, Approve Final Payment/Authorize Maintenance (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition - Utilities) �3 H. CONTRACT 88-09, Approve Final Payment/Authorize Maintenance (Manor Lake Trunk r.,4(i. Utilities) RESCHEDULE, Request by Linda and Bruce Dahl to Reschedule Refuse Pick-up g17 J. RESOLUTION for Vacation of Egan's Carriage Hill ,11 K. MODIFICATION of Fire Department C.I.P. for purchase of Heavy Rescue/Air Supply Vehicle v L. FINAL PLAT, Blue Ridge 3rd Addition 1 VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) JpB:tAPROJECT 656, Cedarvale Access Improvements (Silver Bell Road and T.H. 13) (. PROJECT 666R, Waterview Addition (Trunk Utility Extensions) ^.) C. PROJECT 673, T.H. 3/School Road (Street and Utility Improvements) VII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, I.S.D. #196 - Elementary School #18, changing the land use from D -I Single Family Residential (0 -3 units /acre) to PF (Public Facility, Quasi- Public) for 13.97 acres, a REZONING of 13.09 acres of A (Agricultural) and .88 acres of 1-1 (Limited I es u for l one lot and (Public wo Outlots located L ed in the N j2 consisting of 13.97 acr 1/4 of Section 36 SITE PLAN REVIEW and FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Park Center Fourth Addition, Lot 2, Block 1 - 24th & Hennepin Partnership, for Boston Chicken located in the SE 1/4 PRELIMINARY PLAT, Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition - 24th & Hennepin Partnership, of Sec 30 for Boston Chicken, Payless Shoes, and Kinkos, consisting of 1.76 acres for two lots on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition located in the NW 1/4 of Sec 15 CONTRACT 94 -11, Approve Plans /Order Ad for Bids (Waterview Addition - Trunk Utilities) R. %I. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) LEGISLATIVE /INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XIII. ADJOURNMENT to The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons w tho have rega�d to race col and pr services, activities, facilities employment creed, religion, national origin, assiistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities or status with regard to p ublic vill be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES JULY 15, 1994 AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE JULY 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ►pOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the July 19, 1994 City Council agenda, regular meeting minutes for the July 5, 1994 City Council meeting, and special meeting minutes for the June 14, 1994 and July 5, 1994 Special City Council meetings, the following items are in order for consideration. DATE: SUBJECT: ( Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS -- CONSENT AGENDA'' PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. School Resource Officer for Blackhawk & Metcalf Middle Schools -- After interviews by an interview panel consisting of the principals of Blackhawk & Metcalf Middle Schools and a member of the Eagan Police Department, it is the recommendation of Chief of Police Geagan that Officer Stefanie Bolks be approved as the School Resource Officer for those schools. The appointment would be effective August 15, 1994. Funding for the position was included in the City of Eagan's 1994 budget. 50% of the funding comes from the City and 25% each from the two school districts. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Officer Stefanie Bolks as School Resource Officer for Blackhawk and Metcalf Middle Schools effective August 15, 1994. Item 2. Seasonal Basketball Coach /Referee -- After interviews, it is the recommendation of Youth Development Coordinator Ashley that Andre Sparkman be hired as a seasonal Basketball Coach /Referee. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Andre Sparkman as a seasonal Basketball Coach /Referee. Item 3. Food Preparation Instructor -- After interviews, it is the recommendation of Youth Development Coordinator Ashley that Juanita Kulhanek be hired as a Food Preparation Instructor. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Juanita Kulhanek as a Food Preparation Instructor. PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Licenses, Plumbers - -There are no plumbers licenses for approval at this time. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AVIATION CHAPTER COMMENTS C. Recommendation, Airport Relations Committee, Revised Aviation Chapter, Metropolitan Development Guide - -At its meeting of July 12, 1994, the Airport Relations Committee considered a request by the Metropolitan Council for comments concerning the revised a ion chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Enclosed on pages 5 through is a memo covering the action recommended by the committee. Comments concerning the revised guide are due to the Metropolitan Council no later than Wednesday, July 27. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the recommendation by the Airport Relations Committee for comments regarding the revised aviation chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide as presented. 3 MEMO _ city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: JULY 14, 1994 SUBJECT: ARC RECOMMENDATION - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE COMMENTS - AVIATION CHAPTER At its meeting of July 12, 1994, the Airport Relations Committee reviewed the Proposed revisions of the Metropolitan Development Guide Aviation Chapter. The Committee is recommending that the City submit the following comments in its regard: 1. The Aviation Chapter should maintain policies supporting the completion of the Dual Track Airport Planning Process. The City of Eagan is unique in the metropolitan area in the extent to which it will experience benefits and impacts from expansion at the current location or relocation to a new location. The study should be completed because of the substantial investment which has been made in the study process to date and because it is important for the City and the region to have the best possible information about all aspects of each alternative to make an informed decision on a preferred alternative. 2. The City remains supportive of the Land Use Compatibility Guidelines and the planning considerations in the noise zones. The City supports the continued differentiation between major new development and infill to prevent the need for spot zoning in substantially developed areas while retaining defensible standards to guide noise compatible land uses for major new development. . 3. The City supports the modification of the Policy Contour Map to take into account the impacts of post deregulation traffic growth at the airport. The policy contours have been useful in the past to take into account the fact that noise nuisance extends substantially beyond the 65 DNL contour recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration. It is imperative that the revised policy contours be analyzed for their consistency with the existing contours so that new impacts and land use restrictions are not spread disproportionately among communities. Council policies should take into account, however, the likelihood that new contours will encompass areas not previously in the contours which are partially developed. Such areas will require a level of local flexibility to ensure that build out is both consistent with noise environment and with existing development. 4. Although the Metropolitan Council does not have authority over the FAA, land use compatibility southeast of the airport largely depends upon the effective application of flight tracks and aircraft operating standards which coincide with the traditional noise compatible corridor as defined by the current policy contours. The FAA cites noise compatible land use as the best method of noise abatement for all airports. The MSP Runway Use System designates the area southeast of the airport for the highest proportion of operations due to compatible land uses and lower population density. A part of the Council's work program in support of noise compatibility must be to encourage the FAA directly and through the MAC to insure operating standards which confine aircraft noise to the maximum extent possible to the noise compatible areas. 5. The Aviation Chapter should make clear the extent to which its assumptions for Tong -term noise compatibility depend upon the federal phase -out of Stage II aircraft. The City of Eagan strongly supports the phase -out requirement and supports its incorporation in regional policy statements as well. If you have any questions concerning this item, please let me know. As tant to the City Administrator s' Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting MODIFICATION /PART 150 SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES D. Recommendation, Airport Relations Committee, FAA Interpretation of Part 150 Sound Insulation Program - -On June 16, staff forwarded to the Metropolitan Airports Commission the list of eligible homes in Eagan for the Part 150 program based on the criteria established by the City Council in this regard. As you will recall, Council indicated that applications should be prioritized on the basis of land use, first; pre -1978 ownership, second and distance from runway end, third. On July 1, 1994, staff received the correspondence which is enclosed on pages . 7 through indicating that pending a final approval by the FAA for the MAC's revised Part 150 doc ment, the homes which are outside of the Ldn 65 contour would not be insulated. The letter goes on to say that these homes may be grandfathered the City's priority list such that they could be done as soon as final FAA comments are received. Enclosed on page is a memorandum covering the committee's recommendation in this regard. In addition, the affected residents are being contacted to inform them of the situation and the Council's consideration of it on Tuesday evening. Staff anticipates that a number of these residents will be extremely displeased by having their expectations raised based on previous years' criteria, only to find their project is now being placed on hold. Staff will respond to those concerns that are forwarded to City Hall. A certain number of residents may contact Councilmembers directly. As noted in the memo, the committee is recommending that the City strongly support the right of these residents to have their properties insulated as soon as possible, with the understanding that the MAC will not voluntarily do them until such time as approval is received from the FAA. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the recommendation of the Airport Relations Committee regarding a revised submittal for the MAC Part 150 sound insulation program for 1994. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION July 1,1994 Mr. Jon Hohenstein City of Eagan Eagan Municipal Building 3836 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear John, Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450 -2799 Phone (612) 726 -8100 • Fax (612) 726 -5296 This letter is to inform you that yesterday I received confirmation from Mr. Bob Huber, FAA -ADO Assistant Manager that the FAA has certified the 1991 and 1996 MSP DINT Noise Exposure Maps, based on a recent notice in the Federal Register. However, MAC is still awaiting FAA's comments on the Part 150 document, including the policy that will determine the eligibility of homes near the outermost DNL65 contour boundary. In the interim, Mr. Huber suggested that MAC delay the insulation of any homes near the outermost DNL65 contour boundary in all cities until official receipt of FAA's decision. Since the homes located in on Highview Avenue, as well as, the block surrounded by Vilas, Avalon and Pilot Knob Road are not completely contained within the contour boundary, MAC must delay insulation projects in these areas until further clarification is received from the FAA. However, the City of Eagan could begin insulation of homes within the McKee Addition since this development is well within the DNL65 contour boundary. Aside from this delay, it is important for the City of Eagan to be aware of MAC's new prioritization method discussed in detail at the 11/22/93 and 3/14/94 PAC meetings. Effective in 1995 grant projects (beginning with Jan '95 bids), MAC will be insulating homes in all cities based on a prioritization method that uses both the certified 1996 DNL contour and Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) arrival and departure flight track data. First, using the single increment DNL zones from the 1996 DNL contour (DNL 75 ,74,73,72,71,70,69,68,67,66,65 zones), eligible blocks in all cities will be assigned a DNL zone. Once this process is completed, blocks within the same DINT zone will be further prioritized using ANOMS flight tracks. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer Reliever Airports AIRLAKE • ANOKA COUNTY /BLAINE • CRYSTAL • FLYING CLOUD • LAKE ELMMO • SAINT PALL DOWNTOWN 7 This two -step process, which should be completed by late August, will produce a city - specific master list of prioritized blocks from which MAC will implement the sound insulation program. A preliminary look at the single- increment contour (see attached) seems to indicate that the blocks in the McKee addition will be assigned a DNL66, while homes in the Highview and Vilas areas would be DNL65. Therefore, similar to the City of Minneapolis situation with the List of drawn lottery names, the City of Eagan has the ability to "grandfather" homes that are located in the Highview and Vilas blocks. Upon approval from FAA, these homes could then be insulated fib, regardless of their location within the 1996 DIN contour zones. I will contact you as soon as MAC receives FAA's written comments regarding this issue. Please contact me with any additional questions that you may have. Sincerely, Steve Vecchi Manager, Part 150 Programs NAME 1. Daniel & Linda Szewczyk 2. Edward Folisi 3. Mark & Gail Schmitz 4. Jon Rehwaldt 5. William & Sandra Nelson 6. Robert & Sharilyn Loushin 7. Melvin & Martha Metz 8. John & Danielle Plut 9. Jeff & Diane Larsen 10. Joseph Polski 11. Dolores Rodenborg 12. Muriel Strese 13. Duane & Elizabeth Gott 14. Roger & Shirley Olson 15. Neal Black 16. Roger & Carolyn Sperling 17. Alan Drenckhahn 18. Frank & Patricia Pavlik 19. Marilyn Sandford 20. Loy & Avis Bergh 21. Ella Nielsen 22. Ken Wavra 23. William & Donna Leseman 24. Judy Lindgren 25. Evelyn Peterka 26. June Myhre 27. Vivian Jackson 28. Martin & Hattie VanBeck 29. John & Phyllis Webb 30. Lorraine Tobias 31. Robert & Darleen Formanack 32. Roland Johnson 33. Patrick & Kathleen Carney 34. Judy Peterson 35. Anastasia Ouradnik 36. Ronald & Laurie Anderson 37. Carla Barr 38. Marlys May 39. Robert & Helen Sauter 40. Ray Anderson 41. Ruby Carrick 42. Joseph & Patricia Reymann 43. Joseph & Barbara Yourczek 44. Deloris Schirmer 45. Donna Fleetham ADDRESS 2840 Pilot Knob Rd. 2829 Vilas Lane 2804 Pilot Knob Rd. 1384 Avalon Ave. 2841 Vilas Lane 1451 Highview Ave. 1439 Highview Ave. 1390 Avalon Ave. 2857 Vilas Lane 1447 Highview Ave. 2820 Pilot Knob Rd. 2835 Vilas Lane 1445 Highview Ave. 2850 Pilot Knob Rd. 2825 Vilas Lane 1421 Highview Ave. 2811 Pilot Knob Rd. 990 Blue Gentian Rd. 1020 Blue Gentian Rd. 1023 Blue Gentian Rd. 454 -4184 1030 Blue Gentian Rd. 2868 So. Lexington Ave. 454 - 2407 2836 So. Lexington Ave. 454 - 1755 2862 So. Lexington Ave. 454 - 5149 2824 So. Lexington Ave. 454 -5321 2876 So, Lexington Ave. 454 -4748 2849 So. Lexington Ave. 885 1078 Kenneth St. 454 -454 -12801 1081 Beatrice St. 454 1078 Beatrice St. 454 - 4186 1077 McKee St. 454 -2135 1076 McKee St. 1077 Keefe St. 454 -6560 1074 Kenneth St. 454 -4023 1077 Beatrice St. 454 -4587 1073 McKee St. 452 -6535 1073 Keefe St. 454 -3842 1072 Keefe St. 454 -5344 1073 Kenneth St. 454 -1694 1070 Kenneth St. 456 -0475 1070 Beatrice St 454 -3472 1068 McKee St. 454 -4702 1068 Keefe St. 454 -3622 1066 Kenneth St. 454 -1270 1064 McKee St. 454 -4185 PHONE 454 -348 688 -6362 452 -797 687 -931 683 -950 454 -9124 452 -4020 456 -9007 686 -8236 454 -1675 454 -5167 452 -1541 452 -5277 454 -5435 454 -5928 454 -9601 452 -6724 454 -2813 454 -3188 454 -3133 MEMO city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: JULY 14, 1994 SUBJECT: ARC RECOMMENDATION - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE COMMENTS - AVIATION CHAPTER Background At its meeting of July 12, 1994, the Airport Relations Committee reviewed correspondence received of the Metropolitan Airports Commission indicating the need to postpone sound insluation improvements for homes located on Highview Avenue, Pilot Knob Road and the west side of Vilas Lane pending official FAA approval of the MAC's revised Part 150 Land Use Compatibility Application. As the Council may recall, these homes were included within the City's approved list of Part 150 homes for 1994 because they lie within blocks which are intersected by the 1996 65 DNL contour. In previous funding cycles, the FAA has permitted City's to "square off" blocks and include all of the homes within a partially eligible block so that program boundaries fall at street rights of way, not between adjacent homes. Recommendation The Committee recommended that the City strongly indicate that the Highview, Pilot Knob and Vilas homes be insulated as soon as possible after FAA approval is received. This is predicated on the MAC indication that this is a postponement and not a denial of eligibility for these homes. To avoid forfeiting a portion of the City's 1994 allocation, the Committee further recommended that the City prepare and submit an additional set of eligible addresses in lieu of those which have been postponed. In addition, the committee provided input with respect to staff correspondence to the residents affected by the postponement to make clear the City's commitment to their inclusion in the program, the conformance of the City's approved list with previous MAC and FAA guidelines and the responsibility of the FAA and MAC for the decision to postpone. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting APPROVE COST PARTICIPATION AGMT W /DAKOTA COUNTY & MNDOT (COUNTY ROAD 32 & TH 3) E. Project 672, Approve Cost Participation Agreement With Dakota County & MnDOT (County Road 32 & TH 3 - Signalization & Intersection Improvements) -- Dakota County, being the lead agency, is trying to move the signalization of TH 3 & Cliff Road along as quickly as possible due to the safety concerns associated with this intersection highlighted by the two fatalities within the last week. Because the signalization of this project requires significant reconstruction of TH 3 and the manufacturing of the signals and hardware to interconnect with the railroad signal crossing, the remaining construction season for this year is very short. Subsequently, Dakota County hopes to be able to award a contract on August 2. In order to do so, it is necessary for the City to enter into a Cost Participation Agreement for the road work and signal improvements on TH 3 with both the County and MnDOT. Because of the short turn - around time, this formal agreement has not yet been prepared. However, Dakota County is requesting the City Council to authorize the City to enter into and execute these agreements upon receipt. Staff will be reviewing these agreements to ensure compliance with standard cost participation between the 3 agencies. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the Cost Participation Agreement with Dakota County and MnDOT for Project 672 (County Road 32 & TH 3) for both roadway improvements and signalization and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreements. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (EAGANDALE CTR INDUSTRIAL PK 3RD ADDN) F. Contract 88 -36, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition - Utilities) -- Contract 88 -36 provided for the installation of water main and storm sewer to serve the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition (Armstrong Business Center - West). Unfortunately, the contractor (M &M Sewer & Water, Inc.), went bankrupt before the project could be completed. The completion responsibilities were then assumed by the bonding company who provided the performance bond. Needless to say, this created a very complex process. In closing out the paper work, it was deemed appropriate and necessary to process a change order acknowledging additional payment due the contractor due to extra costs incurred in constructing these utilities. It consists of two parts described as follows: Part A - Storm Sewer -- Opus Corporation had not graded the site to the approved grading plans that were used to bid the work. Subsequently, the contractor incurred extra costs in overdepth excavation. (Add $2,056). Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting (Change Order - Continued) Part B - Watermain -- The connection of the watermain to the existing system shown on the developer's plans could not be made due to an inaccurate location causing the contractor to leave the site and return at a later date resulting in remobilization and reconstruction of some of the previously placed watermain. (Add $2,599). The total cost of this change order ($4,655) is the full responsibility of this development and has been assessed in its entirety when this project had its final assessment hearing on October 17, 1989. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 88 -36 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition - Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. G. Contract 88 - 36, Approve Final Payment /Authorize Maintenance (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition - Utilities) - -If Change Order #1 for this contract is approved, it would then be appropriate for the Council to acknowledge the request and authorize final payment for the above - referenced contract. All work has now been completed in accordance with the City- approved plans and specifications by the bonding company on behalf of the contractor (M &M Sewer & Water, Inc.) who went bankrupt during the progress of this contract. All costs incurred by the City have been reimbursed by the bonding company or deducted from the final payment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the second and final payment for Contract 88 -36 (ECIP 3rd Addition - Utilities) in the amount of $5,608.77 to Capital Indemnity Corporation, accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting APPROVE FINAL PYMT /AUTHORIZE MAINTENANCE H. Contract 88 -09, Approve Final Payment /Authorize Maintenance (Manor Lake - Trunk Utilities) - -The above - referenced contract provided for the extension of trunk and lateral sanitary sewer, watermain, and services along Cliff Road to serve the Manor Lake Addition. Unfortunately, the contractor (M &M Sewer & Water, Inc.) went bankrupt before the project could be completed. The responsibilities of this contract were then assumed by the performance bond company (Capital Indemnity Corporation). Although it took a considerable amount of time and effort, all work has now been completed in accordance with the original plans and specifications and have now been found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion and final payment to the bonding company. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 6th and final payment for Contract 88 -09 (Manor Lake - Trunk Utility Extensions) in the amount of $11,318.17 to Capital Indemnity Corporation and authorize the acceptance of the improvements for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. / 3 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting RESCHEDULE REFUSE PICK- UP/4134 BLUEBERRY KNOLL I. Reschedule, Request by Linda and Bruce Dahl to Reschedule Refuse Pick -up- -City Code Chapter 6.37, Subd. 4.A.4 requires garbage haulers to only operate in daily hauling districts defined by Council resolution. Linda and Bruce Dahl of 4134 Blueberry Knoll have requested a temporary variance from the Monday hauling district as defined by the City Council for their area for reasons outlined in their letter which is enclosed without page number for your review. Technically, the action will be a temporary modification of the daily hauling district requirement for the Dahl's garbage hauler, BFI. Staff is recommending that if this item is approved, it should be for a period of no more than four months to cover the time period noted in the applicants' letter. To date, the City has not varied this requirement for any hauler or property. Typically, this request has been raised by residents who are out -of -town periodically or for a shorter term vacation. In those circumstances, staff has recommended that the materials be held for an extra week or that residents work with their neighbors to either put out or pick up refuse containers while the property owner is not present. This item is being brought forward to the Council because of the extended period of time associated with the request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a variance from the hauling district requirements allowing garbage collection on Wednesday in the Monday hauling district for Browning Ferris Industries for property located at 4134 Blueberry Knoll, owned by Linda and Bruce Dahl as presented. l(7 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting RESOLUTION FOR VACATION OF EGAN'S CARRIAGE HILL J. Resolution for Vacation of Egan's Carriage Hill-- Dakota County has petitioned the District Court to vacate all of the Egan's Carriage Hill plat except for Lot 39, Block 2, and the dedicated right -of -way for Carriage Hill Drive. The property will be developed as a portion of the Lebanon Hills regional park. At the July 5, 1994 City Council meeting, a resolution was approved requesting that Dakota County assume the jurisdictional and maintenance responsibilities of Carriage Hill Drive. The County Board will act on that resolution in August or early- September. City staff has no concerns with this vacation request as long as it is conditioned on the Dakota County Board of Commissioners formally acknowledging the City's July 5, 1994 resolution. The property will have its own parcel number and a Metes and Bounds description. The entire Lebanon Hills Park is approximately 2,000 acres. Typically, the City does not issue building permits on unplatted property, but has done so in the past with the County Parks Department. Staff is req esting approval of the City Council to issue building permits. Enclosed on page is a resolution covering this matter. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the vacation of the Egan's Carriage Hill plat subject to the approval of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners acknowledging the City Council's July 5, 1994 resolution and authorize staff to issue building permits to the County. RESOLUTION EGAN'S CARRIAGE HILL VACATION OF PLAT WHEREAS, Egan's Carriage Hill plat was approved by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on November 28, 1962; and WHEREAS, Dakota County owns the vast majority of the property contained within the plat and intends to improve the property as a portion of the Lebanon Hills Regional Parks System; and WHEREAS, on July 5, 1994, the Eagan City Council approved the Resolution requesting that Dakota County assume the jurisdictional and maintenance responsibilities of Carriage Hills Drive; and WHEREAS, Dakota County has petitioned the district court to vacate the plat except Lot 39, Block 2, and the dedicated R.O.W. for Carriage Hill Drive as set forth in said plat.. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MN., does not object to the vacation of the plat subject to the County Board of Commissioners formally acknowledging the jurisdictional responsibilities and obligations for maintenance, repair, reconstruction and other matters which are implied by ownership of Carriage Hills Drive. ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATION Thomas A. Egan, Mayor I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting therefore assembled this day of 1994. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting FIRE DEPARTMENT /HEAVY RESCUE /AIR SUPPLY VEHICLE PURCHASE K. Modification of Fire Department C.I.P. for Heavy Rescue /Air Supply Vehicle Purchase - -At its workshop meeting of July 12, 1994, the City Council met with Fire Department personnel to discuss a proposed revision of the 1994 capital program for the department. The revision would entail the replacement of Pumper #3 with a heavy rescue vehicle by combining 1993 budget allocation serves with the 1994 allocation for that pumper replacement. Enclosed on page (J is a diagram of the vehicle which is proposed. It would be equipped with airbags for lifting objects off of victims and air tanks /cascade refilling system, the ability to transport 5 - 6 people, self - contained air packs and hazardous material equipment and supplies. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve modification of the capital improvements program for the purchase of a heavy rescue /air supply vehicle by the Fire Department as presented. M u j nq�au ; mqp p�' WUU i I If11�1U 1: UIII'WI It 1w1 41gy1� I11 1 1111011 4114Ih131;;1111 111l!' II Inl i q ;1 /8 . via HARM DIME C I e r s li i Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT /BLUE RIDGE 3RD ADDITION L. Final Plat for Blue Ridge 3rd Addition -- Review of the final plat documents has been completed and the development contract has been drafted for the Blue Ridge 3rd Addition final plat. Requisite financial guarantees have also been provided. Approval of this final plat would therefore be in order. Enclosed on pagee3Q is a copy of the final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Blue Ridge 3rd Addition. l9 Q F- 1 X W 1 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS CEDARVALE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS (SILVER BELL RD & TH 13) A. Project 656, Cedarvale Access Improvements (Silver Bell Road & TH 13) - -In response to a petition and financial contribution from the Cedarvale Merchants Association, the City Council authorized the study and preparation of a feasibility report to investigate improving the access to the greater Cedarvale business area. There have been several informational meetings held with the Cedarvale merchants during this process to investigate various improvement options. Subsequently, the only viable concept is to relocate the present 'T' intersection of Cedarvale Boulevard with Silver Bell Road further to the south near the intersection of Silver Bell Road with Beau d'Rue Drive creating a new 4- legged intersection. Two alternates to this concept have been provided with one providing better design alignment but resulting in the acquisition and removal of the Express Donuts facility, with the other alternate slightly revising the alignment to allow the building to remain in place. A copy of this feasibility report is enclosed on pages .4 through for the Council's information and reference. Once the best transportation related improvements feasible had been identified, the City Council then held special workshops to determine how to propose financing these improvements. Staff then met with the City Attorney's Office to devise a supportable and defendable method of spreading 50% of the proposed cost as a special assessment over a defined assessable area. The project was then consolidated into the feasibility report and another neigh orhood informational meeting was most recently held on July 7. Enclosed on pages through are summary notes of that meeting. In response to the suggestion that the ass ssment area should incorporate all of the recently approved special service district, page shows in shading the special service district in relationship to the assessment boundaries. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all assessable properties informing them of this public hearing. Besides the comments received at the informational meeting, staff has received a phone call from a Shannon Glen condo owner stating their belief that they receive no benefit from the project or the resulting increased traffic. We have received several subsequent requests for copies of the feasibility report since the neighborhood meeting. In a report prepared by the McComb Group, Ltd., (April 1992) entitled "Cedarvale Area - Retail Redevelopment Recommendations ", it is recommended that the improvements proposed under this feasibility report "should be pursued ". Mr. Len Newquist, the City's consulting engineer (SEH, Inc.), will be presenting the details of this project and, along with the Public Works Director, will be available to provide additional information and respond to any questions that may arise. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting Cedarvale Access Improvements (Cont'd.) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve /modify /deny Project 656 and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans /specifications, property appraisals, and property acquisitions for alternate 1/2. a�. Cedarvale Area Access Improvements city of acigctn City Project No. 656 SEH No. A- EAGAN9401.00 June 16, 1994 a3 Date: Date: Reviewed by Reviewed by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (612) 490 -2000 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements for the City of Eagan Eagan Minnesota City Project No. 656 SEH No. A- EAGAN9401.00 June 16, 1994 1 hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. June 16, 1994 Reg. o. + 9402 7 G12? C 1 1l 97' June 16, 1994 Reg. No. 9089 AK Public Works Department Date 7 Finance Department a.L.( Date June 16, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attn: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works Attached is our report for the roadway reconstruction /realignment to improve Trunk Highway 13 access to the Cedar area. This report discusses existing conditions, proposed improvements, estimated costs and estimated assessments. We will be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this report. Sincerely, wrc Attachment Leonard C. Newquist, P. E. SHOUT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC MONNE ArOL IF MN 3535 I' ADNAIS CENTER ORII -E ppn SFH CENTER ST FALL MN 55 'C 612 49 2,222 pr ARCHITECTURE • ENGINFFI7iNC; • ENIIRONkfENTAI. 7R4N Fnhr.17 . RE: Eagan, Minnesota Cedar Area Access Improvements City Project No. 656 SEH No. A- EAGAN9401.00 5T CL nrrJ,./ Certification Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Scope 1 Background 1 Feasibility and Recommendations 2 Project Discussion 2 Existing Conditions 2 Proposed Improvements 3 Estimated Traffic Projections F Easements 7 Permits 7 Cost Estimates 7 Assessments 8 Revenue Source 10 Project Schedule 10 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401 00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page i a(42 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimates Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll List of Appendices Appendix C Figure No. 1 - Location Map Figure No. 2 - Typical Roadway Section Figure No. 3 - Proposed Improvements - Alternate No. 1 Figure No. 4 - Proposed Improvements - Alternate No. 2 Figure No. 5 - Assessable Properties Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page ii June 16, 1994 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements Eagan, Minnesota Scope This report considers the reconstruction and realignment of portions of Silver Bell Road, Cedarvale Boulevard and Beau -D -Rue Drive to improve access and increase intersection traffic capacity from Trunk highway 13. The location of this project is shown on Figure No. 1. Background In 1965, the Cedarvale Shopping Center was built in the southeast corner of Trunk Highway 13 and Cedar Avenue. In 1979, Trunk Highway 13 was relocated to the north and a restricted access cloverleaf interchange was built with the new alignment of the Trunk Highway 77 (Cedar Freeway) further to the west. Cedarvale, which originally had several direct access points from both major roadways, was now reduced to one controlled access at the Silver Bell Road intersection. Subsequently, the Greater Cedarvale area declined. In 1993, several merchants donated $4,000 to the City to conduct a study to try and obtain additional and /or improved access. After several meetings with representatives of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT), it was determined that the current roadway configurations of Trunk Highway 13 and Cedar Freeway cannot safely accommodate any additional access points. The study then looked at ways to improve the current access at Silver Bell Road with Trunk Highway 13. a\, A- EAGAN9401.00 Page 1 Feasibility and Recommendations This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and can best be carried out as a single construction project. Project Discussion As stated previously, this project proposes reconstruction and realignment of City roadways to improve access and increase traffic capacity from Trunk Highway 13. Existing Conditions Silver Bell Road crosses Trunk Highway 13 at a right angle and is aligned in a northwesterly /southeasterly direction as shown on Figure No. 1. Cedarvale Boulevard connects in a tee intersection to Silver Bell Road approximately 150 feet southeasterly of Trunk Highway 13. Beau -D -Rue Drive connects to Silver Bell Road at the point where Silver Bell Road alignment changes from a southeasterly to an easterly direction, and is located less than 200 feet from the Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. A three way (all way) stop condition exists at the Silver Bell Road and Beau -D -Rue intersection. Cedarvale Boulevard is stopped at its connection to Silver Bell Road. A traffic signal controls traffic and turn movements at the Trunk Highway 13 /Silver Bell Road intersection. Trunk Highway 13 is a four lane divided highway at the Silver Bell road intersection. Trunk Highway 13 narrows down from a four lane divided roadway to a two -lane undivided roadw a`• approximately one - quarter of a mile northeasterly of the Silver Bell Road intersection. The traffic signal at Trunk Highwav 13 and Silver Bell Road controls single lane left turn movements from both Trunk Highway 13 to Silver Bell Road, and Silver Bell Road to Trunk Highway 13. Silver Bell Road, Cedarvale Boulevard and Beau -D -Rue Drive are all Municipal State -Aid (MSA) streets. All three roadways are bituminous surfaced. Concrete curb and gutter exists on Silver Bell Road and Beau -D -Rue Drive. Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard are rural type roadways with storm water drainage ditches on both sides of the roadways. Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 2 Public (City) and private utilities exist within the right- of -wav of this improvement. Sanitary sewer, watermain and a 26 -inch NSF gas line exist within Cedarvale Boulevard right -of -way. Sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer besides buried electric, gas and telephone, exist within the Beau -D -Rue Drive and Silver Bell Road right -of -way. A 16 -inch watermain crosses Trunk Highway 13 to the northwesterly side of Silver Bell Road intersection. Proposed Improvements This project proposes the reconstruction and realignment of Cedarvale Boulevard, Beau -D -Rue Drive and Silver Bell Road southeasterly of Trunk Highway 13, and the widening of Silver Bell Road northwesterly of Trunk Highway 13. Silver Bell Road, Beau -D -Rue Drive and Cedarvale Boulevard are proposed to be realigned to converge at one intersection instead of the two intersections that now exist. The purpose of the realignment of the roadways is to: provide easier access from Cedarvale Boulevard to Trunk Highway 13; provide greater distance between Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard; provide northbound dual left turn lanes on Silver Bell Road at Trunk Highway 13; provide a free flow movement from northbound Trunk Highway 13 to Cedarvale Boulevard; provide more capacity to the new four -way intersection; • provide more capacity to the Trunk Highway 13 intersection; provide widening for the future development in the northeast quadrant; • provide a more easily understood circulation pattern for the area; • provide better access to and from the Cedarvale shopping area; Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 3 3� • reduce delays to traffic on Cedarvale Boulevard at Silver Bell Road; • provide additional right and left turn lanes at both the Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard /Silver Bell Road/ Beau -D -Rue Drive intersections; • reduce potential accidents by reducing conflicts and delays; • provide opportunity for future traffic signal at Cedarvale Boulevard /Silver Bell Road /Beau -D -Rue Drive intersection; • provide more storage for stopped vehicles on Silver Bell Road at the southeasterly side of Trunk Highway 13; and • provide opportunity for future double left turn from westbound Trunk Highway 13. The proposed roadway widths vary from their existing width to widths from 48 feet to 92 feet at the intersections. The roadway sections proposed are shown on Figure No. 2. Roadway sections are a 20 -year, 10 -ton design based on the estimated traffic projection presented elsewhere in this report, and an estimated R- value of 20 for the underlying soil. Concrete curb and gutter is proposed to be installed on both sides of all roadway reconstruction and widening. Raised concrete medians are proposed to be constructed in that portion of Silver Bell Road between Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard /Beau-D-Rue Drive. Medians on Beau -D -Rue Drive and Silver Bell Road northwesterly of Trunk Highway 13 will be painted. Dual left turn lanes are proposed for traffic entering onto Trunk Highway 13 from northbound Silver Bell Road. Left turn and combination left turn /thru lanes are proposed at the Silver Bell Road /Beau-D-Rue Drive /Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. The traffic signal at Silver Bell Road and Trunk Highway 13 will remain. A four way stop is proposed for the. Silver Bell Road /Beau-D-Rue Drive /Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. Two roadway alignments are presented in this report and identified as Alternate No. 1 and Alternate No. 2. Alternate No 1 is shown on Figure No. 3. This alignment impacts the Donut Express property to the extent that the purchasing of the entire property is necessary. Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 4 Alternate No. 2 is shown on Figure No. 4. This alignment avoids the Donut Express building but requires the purchasing of approximately 40 percent of the property where parking now exists. The Beau -D -Rue Drive entrance to Donut Express may need to be abandoned because of its close (approximately 100 -foot location to the intersection. If the Beau -D -Rue Drive access is closed, an easement across the property to the south of Donut Express will be needed for the use of their driveway as an entrance from Beau -D -Rue Drive. Both Alternate No. 1 and Alternate No. 2 are feasible but each have their unique advantages and disadvantages. The following is a list of comparisons for both Alternate No. 1 and Alternate No 2 alignments: Alternate No. 1 • Silver Bell Road southeasterly of Trunk Highway 13 aligns Silver Bell Road north of Trunk Highway 13 so that the roadway widening northwesterly of the highway is nearly equal on both sides of Silver Bell Road allowing the existing crown line to remain at or close to the center of the road; • Silver Bell Road crosses Trunk Highway 13 at a 95 degree angle; • The crossroads at the intersection of Silver Bell Road, Beau - D - Rue Drive and Cedarvale Boulevard intersect at an angle of 78 degrees, which is close to the maximum deflection from a right angle crossing considering the curvature of the roads on each side of the intersection; • Silver Bell Road between Trunk Highway 13 and the intersection has stacking length for 12 cars in a single lane; • The closest commercial driveway to the intersection is the most westerly driveway to McDonalds that is located within 140 feet; and • Traffic signal modifications at Trunk Highway 13 amount to signal phase modifications and mast arm extensions. Alternate No. 2 • The widening of Silver Bell Road north of Trunk Highway 13 will be mostly to the easterly side setting the crown of the road off center; Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401 00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 5 • Silver Bell Road crosses Trunk Highway 13 at a 100 degree angle; • The crossroads at the Silver Bell Road, Beau -D -Rue Drive and Cedarvale Boulevard intersection cross at an angle of 74 degrees, which makes the alignment less desirable than Alternate No. 1; • Silver Bell Road between Trunk Highway 13 and the intersection has stacking length for 10 cars in a single lane, two less per lane than Alternate No. 1; • The closest commercial driveway to the intersection is the most westerly driveway to McDonalds that is located within 90 feet (50 feet closer than Alternate No. 1); and • Traffic signal modifications at Trunk Highway 13 require a complete relocation of the existing signal system. The only known public utility work to be done, is storm sewer extensions, to provide drainage facilities to the realigned roads and Silver Bell Road /Beau -D -Rue Drive / Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Nin /DOT) is proposing improvements on Trunk Highway 13. According to Mn /DOT personnel, they are proposing to extend their westbound left turn lane to increase traffic capacity from Trunk Highway 13 onto Silver Bell Road. Also, there is the possibility of extending the four lane divided highway design further north to reduce traffic congestion at Silver Bell Road. Although there has been no firm commitment by Mn /DOT personnel, the work on Trunk Highway 13 could be done while the Silver Bell Road improvements are done. We are still in the process of working with Mn /DOT personnel on the coordination of these projects. Estimated Traffic Projections Estimated 1994 traffic volumes on Silver Bell Road between Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard are 17,000 vehicles per day Other daily volumes are 6,300 on Cedarvale Boulevard, 6,000 on Beau -D -Rue Drive and 8,500 on Silver Bell Road adjacent to their intersections. Increased traffic volumes are anticipated to he generated by additional development in adjacent areas and on the few vacant parcels near the intersection, and from a more intense use of many buildings in the Cedarvale area. Anticipated volume Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 6 in 20 years is 25,000 vehicles per day on Silver Bell Road between Trunk Highway 13 and Cedarvale Boulevard. The other three legs of the new intersection will have 10,500 vehicles per day on Cedarvale Boulevard, 10,000 on Beau -D -Rue Drive and 12,000 on Silver Bell Road by the year 2014. Easements The general location of right -of -way and easements are shown on Figure No. 3 for Alternate No. 1 and on Figure No. 4 for Alternate No. 2. The cost for right -of -way is estimated to be as follows for the two alternates: • Alternate No. 1 $259,200 • Alternate No. 2 $29,000 Permits The known permits for this project are from Mn /DOT, for work on their right -of -way and Watershed District. Cost Estimates A detailed cost estimate is located in Appendix A of this report. The estimated cost includes contingencies and indirect costs. Indirect costs are estimated to be 35 percent and include legal, engineering and administrative costs. This estimated cost does not include the cost of work to be done by Mn /DOT on Trunk Highway 13. We anticipate that the Trunk Highway 13 work, except for the signal modifications at Silver Bell Road, will be done by Mn /DOT at no cost to the City of Eagan. The estimated cost of the Trunk Highway 13 signal modification is included in the estimated cost for this project. The total project cost is estimated to be as follows for the two alternates: Alternate No. 1 Roadway $535,800 Easements 259,200 Total Est. Cost: $795,000 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 7 3y� Alternate No. 2 Roadway $663,500 Easements 29,000 Total Est. Cost: $692,500' Included in the contingencies for both alternates is the cost for two street lights. Assessments Assessments will be based on final construction costs plus related indirect expenses estimated to be 35 percent of the construction cost and all costs associated with right -of -way acquisition according to the City's special assessment policy. The assessments will be spread over a 15 -year period with the interest rate determined by the results of the bond sale. It is anticipated that Mn /DOT will participate in some of the costs of this project. However, the amount of their participation is not known at this time. Besides Mn /DOT participation, the City of Eagan will participate in one -half of the amount remaining after Mn /DOT participation. The City of Eagan participation will come from the City's Major Street Fund. The purpose of this project is to improve access to Trunk Highway 13 at Silver Bell Road. Properties located closer to the intersection receive a greater increased ease of access to Trunk Highway 13 than those properties located further away from the intersection. In addition, the increased ease of access to Trunk Highway 13 is different to those properties located northwesterly of Trunk Highway 13 than to the properties located southeasterly of Trunk Highway 13. As stated previously and as shown on Figure Nos. 3 and 4, most of the work is being done southerly of Trunk Highway 13, and these properties southerly of Trunk Highway 13 receive a greater increased ease of access to the highway than the northerly properties. A multi level assessment district is proposed to consider the above described levels of benefit. A two -level assessment district is proposed for the properties to the southeasterly side of Trunk Highway 13. Level A district are those properties located within a one - quarter (1/4) mile radius from the Silver Bell Road and Trunk ' Does not include possible costs for business losses from Donut Express or easement access across the property south of Donut Express. Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 8 Highway 13 intersection. Level B district are those properties located beyond the Level A district but within a one -half (1i) mile radius from the Silver Bell Road and Trunk Highway 13 intersection. A single -level assessment district is proposed for those properties to the northwesterly side of Trunk Highway 13, and is proposed to be a Level B district for those properties located within a one - quarter (V4) mile radius from the Silver Bell Road and Trunk Highway 13 intersection. The following zoned properties are proposed to be assessed within the districts described above: • Multiple - Family R -4 • Commercial LB,NB,GB,RB,CSC & RSC • Light Industrial L1 • Planned Development PD All other properties within the districts will not be assessed. The following assessment guidelines are proposed for this project: • Properties will be assessed on an area basis, square foot of land. • Level A district will be assessed at a rate of hvo times Level B district. • Commercial, light industrial and planned development properties will be assessed equally and at a rate of four times multiple- family zoned properties. Parcels will be assessed based on their location and zoning within the districts described above. Preliminary assessment rolls for each alternative are located in Appendix B of this report. The preliminary assessment roll does not consider any participation by Mn /DOT. Final assessments will be adjusted to take into account Mn /DOT participation. Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401 00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 9 3� The following is a tabulation of the unit assessment rate per acre for both alternates: Alternate No. 1 R -4 Commercial, L1 & PD Alternate No. 2 R -4 Commercial, L1 & PD Level A $1,513.20 $6,052.80 Level A $1,304.20 $5,216.80 Level B $756.60 $3,026.40 Level B $652.10 $2,608.40 Revenue Source All of the costs for this project including easement costs will come from assessments, City and Mn /DOT sources. Project Schedule Present Report to Council June 21, 1994 Public Information Meeting July 7, 1994 Hearing July 19, 19 Approve Plans and Specifications 1995 Award Construction Contract 1995 Begin Construction 1995 Complete Construction 1995 Assessment Hearing 1996 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 10 37 3S Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimates Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City Project No. 656 Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Saw Bituminous Surface L.F. 800 3.00 2,400.00 Common Excavation C.Y. 7,210 5.00 36,050.00 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 830 10.00 8,300.00 Aggregate Base Ton 8,060 8.00 64,480.00 Type 41, Wearing Course Mixture Ton 1,040 24.00 24,960.00 Type 31, Binder Course Mixture Ton 1,460 23.00 33,580.00 Type 31, Base Course Mixture Ton 1,910 20.00 38,200.00 Bituminous Tack Coat Gal. 1,900 2.00 3,800.00 15" RCP L.F. 200 22.00 4,400.00 36" RCP L.F. 400 30.00 12,000.00 42" RCP L.F. 60 80.00 4,800.00 42" Aprons Each 2 300.00 600.00 Catch Basins L.F. 24 150.00 3,600.00 Catch Basin Castings Each 6 300.00 1,800.00 Curb and Gutter, Type B -624 L.F. 5,240 6.00 31,440.00 4" Median Concrete S.F. 5,300 2.00 10,600.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 Traffic Signal Modification Each 1 40,000.00 40,000.00 Signing and Stripping L.S. 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 Silt Fence L.F. 2,000 3.00 6,000.00 Sodding S.Y. 1,000 2.00 2,000.00 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City of Eagan, Minnesota Preliminary Cost Estimates Project No. 656 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements Alternate No. 1 A- EAGAN9401.00 Page 1 Description Unit Est. Oty. Unit Price Amount Seeding Acre 2 $400.00 $800.00 Mulch, Type 1 Ton 4 200.00 800.00 Disc Anchoring Acre 2 100.00 200.00 Subtotal $360,810.00 10% Contingencies 36,081.00 Estimated Construction Cost $396,891.00 35% Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Bond Interest 138,909.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ALTERNATE NO. 1 $535,800.00 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401 00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 2 Description Unit Est. Oty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 $22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Saw Bituminous Surface L.F. 800 3.00 2,400.00 Common Excavation C.Y. 7,210 5.00 36,050.00 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 830 10.00 8,300.00 Aggregate Base Ton 8,060 8.00 64,480.00 Type 41, Wearing Course Mixture Ton 1,040 24.00 24,960.00 Type 31, Binder Course Mixture Ton 1,460 23.00 33,580.00 Type 31, Base Course Mixture Ton 1,910 20.00 38,200.00 Bituminous Tack Coat Gal. 1,900 2.00 3,800.00 15" RCP L.F. 200 22.00 4,400.00 36" RCP L.F. 400 30.00 12,000.00 42" RCP L.F. 60 80.00 4,800.00 42" Aprons Each 2 300.00 600.00 Catch Basins L.F. 24 150.00 3,600.00 Catch Basin Castings Each 6 300.00 1,800.00 Curb and Gutter, Type B -624 L.F. 5,240 6.00 31,440.00 4" Median Concrete S.F. 5,300 2.00 10,600.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 Traffic Signal Modification Each 1 120,000.00 120,000.00 Signing and Stripping L.S. 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 Silt Fence L.F. 2,000 3.00 6,000.00 Sodding S.Y. 1,000 2.00 2,000.00 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City of Eagan, Minnesota Preliminary Cost Estimates Project No. 656 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements Alternate No. 2 A- EAGAN9401 .00 Page 3 Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Seeding Acre 2 $400.00 $800.00 Mulch, Type I Ton 4 200.00 800.00 Disc Anchoring Acre 2 100.00 200.00 Subtotal $446,810.00 10% Contingencies 44,681.00 Estimated Construction Cost $491,491.00 35% Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Bond Interest 172,009.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ALTERNATE NO. 2 $663,500.00 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 4 qc 3 Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City Project No. 656 Map No. Property 1. D. No. 10. 01900. 011 -02 Prope ty Area (Acres) A Level 8 Estimated Assessment 6,779 Level R -4 Comm.,LI,&PD R -4 Comm.,LI &PD 2.24 1 2 10-19600-010-01 8.30 25,119 1,097 3 10-68060-010-01 1. 45 4 10-68060-020-01 1.10 832 5 10. 68060. 010.00 0.83 628 8 10-68060-030-01 1.87 1 ,41 5 7 10. 68060- 050.01 1 .51 1 , 142 8 10. 68060. 040 -01 1.47 1,112 9 10. 68060- 020 -00 1.07 3,238 10 10. 19601 - 010.01 2.88 8.716 11 10. 19601. 020.01 4 89 14,799 12 10. 19601- 030 -01 7 75 23,455 13 10- 68060- 031 -00 6.98 21,124 14 10- 01700 - 020.54 1.18 7,142 15 10-68100-010-01 6.45 39.041 16 10. 22450- 020.01 4.80 8.52 13,710 Eagan Metro Center 2nd Addn Shannon Glenn Condo IV(No.43) 17 110- 22451. 401- 01Thru464.01 3 95 2.989 Shannon Glenn Condo Itt(No.42) 18 110- 22451. 501- 01Thru564.01 4.95 3,745 Shannon Glenn Condo II (No.33) 19 10- 22451.110.01Thru173 -01 And 10. 22451.250- 01Thru313.01 2.85 2,156 20 10- 13300 - 010 -01 6.24 3.11 11,795 21 10-13300-010-02 0.67 507 22 10- 13300. 020.02 1.21 915 23 10.13300. 030 -02 6.71 5,077 Countryside Villa 24 10- 18350- 100- 01Thru118.01 0.14 2.16 1,846 25 10-02000-010-28 2.94 2,224 26 10- 84700- 010.00 0.98 741 27 10. 01900. 031.10 12.37 9,359 28 10-72840-010-10 2 16,5 29 10- 72840- 010.01 1 8 2.18 6 6,598 30 10-72840-020-01 0.84 2,542 31 10-01900-011-11 4.71 1 92 14,254 5 81 1 32 10- 01900 -012- 1 1 33 10. 01900- 041.12 0 42 1,271 34 10. 01900- 011.07 029 878 35 10- 01900- 080 -06 0 08 242 36 10-01900-020-07 0 28 847 37 10-01900-051-06 11 06 34,4 38 10- 16850- 040 -01 0 06 194 1 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City of Eagan, Minnesota Preliminary Assessment Roll Project No. 656 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements Alternate No. 1 A- EAGAN9401.00 Page 1 Map No. Property I. D. No. Prope ty Area Acres Level A Leve B Estimated Assessment R - 4 Comm.,LI, &PD R -4 Comm.,LI&PD 39 10-16850-050-01 0.07 203 40 10-16850-060-01 0.21 623 41 10.16850. 090.01 0.06 194 42 10-16850-031-01 0 17 524 43 10-16850-081-01 0.09 281 44 10-16850-082-01 0.03 100 45 10.16850- 1 1 1.01 0.01 27 46 10-16850-122-01 0.09 284 47 10-16850-123-01 0.12 351 48 10-01900-071-06 0.15 454 49 10- 01900 - 074 -06 0.15 454 50 10-01900-072-06 0.18 545 51 10- 01900- 073 -06 0.18 545 62 10-01900-010-06 0.87 2.40 12,529 63 '10-01900-010-04 0 54 10-01900-020-04 1.11 6,719 55 10-01900-030-04 0.99 5,992 56 10-01900-050-04 1.00 6,053 57 10. 01900. 060 -04 0.79 4,782 58 10-44800-010-01 0.84 5,084 59 10-16901-010-01 3.49 0.07 21,336 80 10- 16901. 020 -01 1.46 8,843 61 10-16901-030-01 1.33 8,074 62 10-16901-040-01 1.13 6815 63 10-13700-020-01 0.80 2,421 64 10-13700-030-01 0 90 2,724 65 10. 13700. 040.01 0.86 2,603 66 10-13700-050-01 0.86 2,603 67 10-13700-060-01 0.46 1,392 68 10-13700-070-01 0.86 2,603 69 10-01900-011-02 1.32 3,995 TQTAL City of Eagan, Minnesota 20.64 (1) Rate per condominium unit = $47 ($2,988 - 64 units) (2) Rate per condominium unit = $59 ($3,745 - 64 units) (3) Rate per condominium unit = $34 ($2,156 _ 64 units) (4) Rate per condominium unit = $97 ($1,846 - 19 units) 58.65 69.81 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 Page 2 397,500 Map No. Property 1. D. No. Property Area Acres) Leve B Estfmated Assessment 5,843 Level A R - 4 Comm.,LI,&PD R - 4 Comm.,LI&PD 2.24 1 10. 01900. 011.02 2 10-19600-010-01 8.30 21,650 946 3 10- 68060. 010 -01 1.45 4 10-68060-020-01 1.10 717 5 10-68060-010-00 0.83 541 6 10. 68060 - 030 -01 1.87 1,219 7 10-68060-050-01 1.51 985 8 10. 68060. 040 -01 1.47 959 9 10-68060-020-00 1.07 2,791 10 10-19601-010-01 2.88 7,512 11 10-19601-020 01 4.89 12 755 12 10-19601-030-01 7.75 8.98 20,215 18,207 13 10-68060-031-00 14 10- 01700. 020 -54 1.18 6,156 15 10- 68100. 010 -01 6.45 33,649 16 10-22450-020-01 4.80 8.52 11 816 Eagan Met o Center 2nd Addn Shannon Glenn Condo.IV(No.43) 17 110- 22451 - 401- 01Thru464 -01 3.95 2,576 Shannon Glenn Condo. III(No.42) 18 110. 22451. 501- 01Thru564.01 Glenn Condo. II (No.33) 1 4.95 3,228 Shannon 19 10. 22451. 110- 01Thru173.OlAnd 10. 22451- 250.01Thru313 -01 2.85 1 858 20 10-13300-010-01 6.24 3. 1 1 10,166 21 10- 13300 - 010 -02 0.67 437 22 10-13300-020-02 1.21 789 23 10- 13300. 030.02 6.71 4,376 Countryside Villa 24 10.18350.100.01Thru118 -01 0.14 2.16 1,591 25 10-02000-010-28 2,94 1 ,91 7 26 10-84700-010-00 0.98 639 27 10-01900-031-10 14.37 8 087 28 10- 72840- 010 -10 3:50 9,129 29 10-72840-010-01 2.18 5 686 30 10-72840-020-01 0.84 2 191 31 10-01900-011-11 4.71 12,286 32 10-01900-012-11 1.92 5 096 33 10-01900-041-12 0.29 1,56 34 10-01900-011-07 0.08 7 209 35 10-01900-080-06 0.08 209 36 10-01900-020-07 0.28 730 37 10-01900-051-06 11.06 29 658 38 10-16850-040-01 0.06 167 1 Preliminary Assessment Roll Project No. 656 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements Alternate No. 2 Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City of Eagan, Minnesota A- EAGAN9401.00 Page 3 Map No. Property I. D. No. Property Area (Acres) Level A Leve 8 Estimated Assessment R-4 COmm.,L18,PD R-4 Comm.,LI&PD 39 10- 16850- 050 -01 0.07 175 40 10- 16850. 060.01 021 537 41 10-16850-090-01 0.06 167 42 10-16850-031-01 0.17 451 43 10-16850-081-01 0.09 243 44 10- 16850- 082 -01 0.03 86 45 10-16850-111-01 0.01 23 46 10- 16850- 122 -01 0.09 245 47 10-16850-123-01 0.12 303 48 10- 01900- 071 -06 0.15 391 49 10-01900-074-06 0.15 391 50 10-01900-072-06 0.18 470 51 10- 01900. 073 -06 0.18 470 52 10-01900-010-06 0.87 2.40 10,799 53 10-01900-010-04 0 70 3,652 54 10-01900-020-04 1.11 5791 55 10- 01900. 030 -04 0.99 5,165 56 10. 01900. 050 -04 1.00 5.217 57 10-01900-060-04 0. 79 4 121 58 10-44800-010-01 0.84 4382 59 10-16901-010-01 3.49 0.07 18,389 60 10-16901-020-01 1.46 7,822 61 10- 16901- 030 -01 1.33 6, 959 62 10-16901-040-01 1.13 5,874 63 10- 13700- 020 -01 0.80 2,087 64 10-13700-030-01 0 90 2,348 65 10-13700-040-01 0.86 2,243 66 10-13700-050-01 0. 86 2,243 67 10 -13700 -060 -01 0.46 1,200 68 10-13700-070-01 0. 86 2,243 69 10. 01900. 011 -02 1.32 3. 443 TOTAL 11.18 21.34 (1) Rate per condominium unit = $40 ($2,576 ± 64 units) (2) Rate per condominium unit = $50 ($3,228 _ 64 units) (3) Rate per condominium unit = $29 ($1,858 - 64 units) (4) Rate per condominium unit = $84 ($1,591 _ 19 units) 58.65 69.81 Cedarvafe Area Access Improvements A- EAGAN9401.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota 346,250 Page 4 Appendix C Figures Cedarvale Area Access Improvements City Project No. 656 t-4 CEDAR POND PARK PROJECT LOCATION DARVALE ACCESS EAGAN, MINNESOTA LOCATION MAP w co w 0 Z m w J CI CI CI CI CI N N N C, N ▪ N .- -J w w ET) U- 0 I- D 0 co w Q 0 w cSEN C DARVALE ACCESS EAGAN, MINNESOTA TYPICAL SECTIONS W 2 1- W 0 w z S Q Z U_ • W O O CL U CO Z O Lu 0 g w D -� m > U < a J • w a w m • co o U � a z PROJ. NO. 656 FILE NO A -EAGAN 9401.00 FIGURE NO 2 LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIM wisp RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN RIGHT -OF -WAY NEEDED SILVER BELL RD. PROD. NO. 656 FILE NO. A -EAGAN 9401.00 5EH DARVALE ACCESS A AN MINNESOTA E G PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, ALT. I FIGURE NO. 3 PROJ. NO. 656 LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS •1■111111 RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN RIGHT -OF -WAY NEEDED DARVALE ACCESS •� EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, ALT. 2 N SILVER BELL RD. FIGURE NO. 4 NIS! II BEE " VW "m11 .14171 r i • R, eis A areitus- 440,getta <twee/ t 43 e ir r 17441: #iisa cas Antbannunai rosnommom■ ( Arits Attb 071111111191111111111111111111111 torinlinerin 11111 1■0% _ _ _ EAGAN, MINNESOTA Airsve C DARVALE ACCESS ASSESSABLE PROPERTIES FIGURE NO. 5 city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 8, 1994 SUBJECT: SUMMARY MINUTES, INFORMATIONAL MEETING PROJECT 656, CEDARVALE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS At 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 7, 1994, an informational neighborhood meeting was held in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Center. The attached sign -up list documents those interested property owners in attendance. The meeting was hosted by Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works /City Engineer; Len Newquist, Project Engineer (SEH, Inc.); and Glenn VanWormer, Project Manager (SEH, Inc.). The meeting began with an introduction by Mr. Colbert, explaining the history of the Cedarvale area, the changes in the transportation patterns resulting from the relocation of Cedar Avenue and TH 13, the petition and financial contribution by the Cedarvale Merchants Association to investigate transportation improvements, and MnDOT's response regarding additional access from TH 13 and /or Cedar Freeway. Mr. Colbert also explained the public improvement process (public hearings, notices, etc.) and the related time frames. An executive summary was handed out at the meeting providing details of the cost estimates, assessment rolls, graphics of the two proposed alternates, and a map of the assessment area. Mr. VanWormer then spoke to the current and projected traffic volumes in the TH 13 /Silver Bell Road /Cedarvale Boulevard area as well as pending improvements to TH 13 by MnDOT. He also spoke to the two alternates that were presented at previous informational meetings during this past winter regarding a potential cul -de -sac of Beau D'Rue Drive along with the proposed 4 -way intersection of Cedarvale Boulevard /Silver Bell Road /Beau D'Rue Drive. In response to a question, Mr. VanWormer indicated that the new proposed 4 -way intersection would not be signalized as a part of this project, but would have conduit installed to accommodate signalization at a later date if warrants were met. 1 MEMO Mr. Newquist then identified the two alternatives presently being considered regarding the two different alignments of Cedarvale Boulevard involving the issue of whether the Express Donuts building would be acquired and removed or left in place. The various advantages and disadvantages of each alternate were discussed in detail. Mr. Newquist also identified the cost participation proposals between MnDOT, the City's Major Street Fund, and special assessments. He then went on to discuss the special assessment area along with the rationale and method for calculating the various assessment obligations and explaining the time frame for levying and collecting said assessments. After this presentation, the meeting was opened up for general questions. The following represents several of the comments and questions that were raised. Because MnDOT created many of the transporation related problems, they should be paying for all of these proposed improvements. (Staff explained that MnDOT's participation is limited to State right -of -way and the competition for limited State funds makes that even questionable at this time.) • There are areas beyond the assessable ring that will benefit from this project. They should also be assessed. (Staff explained that the City Council recognized this greater area benefit and has agreed to finance 50% of the cost to be financed through the City's Major Street Fund.) • Atter making such a significant investment, what guarantee is there that the Cedarvale business area will improve? if it doesn't, these improvements are worthless. (Staff agreed that there is a certain amount of risk in any effort to improve the Cedarvale area. However, if nothing is done, it will be very difficult to accommodate any improvement. In addition, these improvements will provide better access for others in this area.) • What is the value of the land that was used to estimate the right -of -way acquisition costs? (A rough "ballpark" estimate was used as detailed appraisals have not yet been performed due to the project not being ordered. Also, without detailed field surveys, the quantity and impact of right -of -way acquisition has not been defined.) 2 • A Shannon Glen condominium property owner indicated satisfaction with the small proposed assessment and agreed that some transportation improvements were needed in the area. • Another Shannon Glen condo owner objected to the special assessments being limited to R -4 property and not including any other residential properties. (The staff explained the rationale that it was based on zoning, with R -4 properties generating significantly more traffic per acre than other residential types. • Express Donut Shop inquired about the limits in area proposed for acquisition. (Without project approval, staff has not performed the detailed surveys to provide more information than what's available in the feasibility report.) Representatives of Twin City Poultry indicated that their expansion plans are on hold until they can determine the extent of the property being taken and whether the improvement and related assessments will progress. (Staff indicated that if the project is approved on July 19, staff will proceed with detailed surveys and appraisals and will provide that information in a timely manner.) A local business owner indicated that the assessment area is not large enough - it should be expanded to incorporate at least all of the Cedarvale business area over to Nicols Road and should definitely include the recently approved special service district. At approximately 5:30 p.m., with no further questions being offered, the meeting was adjourned. erector of Public Works TAC /jj Enclosure: Sign -up List 3 117111 - 5 5 1 - c 111 4iv 7 & &-1Ak i s M,/v � �C- y c el) A R v A L C 4 Cc m / pia4hi + &e r- Pn_a J l' S lie ~trop_ 4 r , a ,s' Ltii i 6 Tit-7 7 /S9Y • 1.071 lge/l .303 ' /cT / . J Ay e .662:s � o U A S I A ( 9 2 / 1 ( � — T , l p . ) 1 , - ? ; 3 F/ o b l ej` / . 7. k I C K ii Rf HHy /qi 4 / v s2 3 �8 5I U & c � orJ N g_ r4F. g iav !D RPNo I Q4 (E7_L-t) ozo■Naii'?) 39Z5 c.FB ' v i€►,J NE I/ 3, 3u ra / 7 7 $ / (C L tax 17 �eu -r< s9 i 9 77 ‘‘,21 s SMT. BOUNDARIES V SPE IAL ERVICE DISTRICT ARE Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting WATERVIEW ADDITION (TRUNK UTILITY EXTENSIONS) B. Project 666R, Waterview Addition (Trunk Utility Expansions) - -In response to a petition resubmitted by the developer of this subdivision, the Council authorized the preparation of a revised feasibility report to extend trunk utilities to service this development. This report was presented to the Ci Council on June 21 with the public hearing scheduled for July 19. Enclosed on pages (dO through 7(D is a copy of this report for the Council's review and reference. Notices have been sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. In accordance with Council's direction from special workshop reviews, the utility improvements were designed in this feasibility report to minimize the impact on the existing S. Dodd Road properties. Mr. Mark Hanson, of the City's consulting engineering firm (BRAA, Inc.), will be presenting the details of this project. He and the Public Works Director will be available to provide additional information and respond to any questions that may be raised. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 666R, Waterview Addition (Trunk Utility Extensions). (Q0 city of eacjan Report for Waterview Addition Utility Extensions City Project No. 666R Eagan, Minnesota June 1994 File No. 49548 • ji Bonestroo Rosene il Anderlik 3 Associates tsnp /news a Architects St. rain Ylnn.aota Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects June 14. 1994 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan. MN 55122 Re: Waterview Addition Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Extensions Project No. 666R Our File No. 49548 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for the Waterview Addition Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extensions. The proposed utility extensions are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Yours very truly, BOI�'F�STROQ• ROSENE. ANNDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:pr Encl. Reviewed by :, Reviewed by: Date: Department of Public Works finance Department -/7-9 / Otto G Bonestroo PE Robert W Rosene. PE • Joseph C Anderiik PE Marvin L Sorvala, PE Richard E Turner. PE Glenn R Cook. PE Thomas E Noyes. PE Robert G Schunicht. PE Susan M Eberlin. C PA •Senior Consultant Howard A Sanford. PE Kerr! A Gordon PE Robert R Pfeffene. PE Richard W Foster. PE David 0 Loskota. PE Robert C Russek. A A Jerry A Bourdon, PE Mark A Hanson. PE Michael T Rautmann, PE Ted K Field PE Thomas R Anderson A IA Donald C Burgardt PE Thomas A Syfko. PE Freder. J Stenborg. PE Ismael Martinez, PE Michael P Rau, PE I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State ot- Minnesota. Date: June 14. 1994 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612 - 636-4600 Agnes M Ring A IC P Thomas W Peterson PE Michael C Lynch PE James R Maland. PE Jerry D Pertzsch, PE Scott J Arganek. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE. Mark R. Rotfs. PE Mark A Seep. PE Gary W Monen. PE Paul J Gannon. A A Daniel J Edgerton. PE A Rick Schmidt PE Philip J Caswell. PE Mark D Wallis. PE Miles B Jensen. PE Mark A. Hanson Reg. No. 14260 L Phillip Grave; PE Karen L Wiemen PE Gary D Knstofitz PE F Todd Foster. PE Keith R Yapp PE Douglas J Benoit PE Shawn D Gustafso^ PE Cecil* Oliver PE Paul G Heuer PE John P Gorder PE Charles A Enckso^ Leo M Prwelsky Harlan M Olson James F Engelhardt WATERVIEWADDTTION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 666R TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 SCOPE 3 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 3 DISCUSSION 3 SANITARY SEWER 3 WATER MAIN 4 COST ESTIMATE 4 EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 5 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 5 ASSESSMENTS 5 REVENUE SOURCES 6 PROJECT SCHEDULE 6 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 7 APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 9 FIGURE NO. 1 - LOCATION PLAN FIGURE NO. 2 - SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION FIGURE NO. 3 - WATER MAIN EXTENSION FIGURE NO. 4 - WATER MAIN LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FIGURE NO. 5 - TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT 4 Scope This project provides for the extension of sanitary sewer and water main to serve the southeasterly corner of Eagan adjacent to T.H. No. 3. The project is being considered at this time due to the proposed Waterview Addition located south of Pond LP -26 between T.H. No. 3 and Dodd Road, as shown on Figure No. 1 located at the back of this report. A similar report (Project No. 666) was presented at a public hearing on December 21, 1993. However, that project was denied until further study of this area could be done to review future development. Since that time additional development has been proposed in this area requiring the utilities to be constructed differently than previously proposed. Waterview Addition includes one existing platted parcel (Dodd View Addition - Outlot A) and three existing unplatted parcels (Parcels 010-07,020-06,070-27). Twenty (20) single family residential lots are included in Waterview Addition. Feasibility and Recommendations REPORT FOR WATERVIEWADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 666R The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectives established in the Eagan's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans. The project can best be carried out as one contract or a portion of Project 673 (T.H.3 /School Road). Discussion Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer proposed herein is shown on Figure No. 2 located at the back of this report. It's proposed to construct the sanitary sewer along the east side of T.H. 3. The construction on the east side of T.H. 3, as opposed to the west side, will reduce the impact and the need to reconstruct T.H. 3's bituminous shoulder and existing utilities (gas, electric, telephone) located west of the existing TH3 shoulder. The edge of the easterly bituminous shoulder along T.H. 3 is approximately 27' from 49548.rpt �3 Mn/DOT's easterly right -of -way line. Therefore, it's hoped the sanitary sewer can be constructed within the 27' and not disturb the existing bituminous shoulder. To construct the sanitary sewer along the east side of T.H. 3 and serve Waterview Addition will require the sanitary sewer to be jacked /augered beneath T.H. 3 at two locations shown on Figure No. 2. The sanitary sewer in T.H. 3 will be sized and constructed at an elevation to properly serve the remaining portions of Eagan in its southeast corner. Water Main Water main proposed herein is shown on Figure No. 3 located at the back of this report. The 8" water main in Dodd Road will be located approximately 20' east of its existing centerline to eliminate the need to reconstruct existing Dodd Road. However, it is expected bituminous patching of Dodd Road will be required and the water main in Waterview Addition will connect to the proposed water main in T.H. 3 from School Road and will provide proper supply for fire protection. It's not proposed to construct water services to serve existing parcels along Dodd Road similar to the previous water main construction in Dodd Road (Lakeview Trail Addition, Project No. 635). The Waterview Addition is located in the high pressure zone and is expected to experience static and residual pressures of approximately 91.0 and 63.2 psi (pounds per square inch), respectively based on an existing ground elevation of 940 located in Dodd Road near Carol Street. Homes in the Waterview Addition below elevation 950 may require individual pressure reducing valves because it's expected their static pressures may exceed 85 psi. Cost Estimate A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below. The total estimated project cost is $225,340, which includes 5% contingencies and 30% for indirect costs. Indirect costs include administrative, engineering, interest, and legal expenses. 49548. rpt Sanitary Sewer $171,660 Water Main 53.680 Total Estimated Project Cost 225,340 Easements and Permits The proposed sanitary sewer and water main construction in T.H. 3 and Dodd Road does not require permanent easements. However, permits are required from Mn/DOT to work in the T.H. No. 3 right -of -way. It's not expected a permit will be required from the DNR because no work is required below their NOHW. However, because the work is directly near a DNR wetland, the plans will be sent to the DNR for their review. Plans will also be sent to CP Rail System for their review for the sanitary sewer construction adjacent to their right -of -way. Permits are also required from the MPCA, MWCC, and MHD for sanitary sewer and water main extension. Area to be Included Section 36 Dodd View Addition Parcel 010 -07 (Waterview Addition) Outlot A (Parcel 020 -04 Waterview Addition) Parcel 010 -51 Parcel 020 -06 (Waterview Addition) Parcel 020 -28 Parcel 031 -27 Parcel 030 -28 Parcel 040 -27 Parcel 040-28 Parcel 050 -27 Parcel 050 -28 Parcel 060 -27 Parcel 070 -27 (Waterview Addition) Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with Eagan's assessment policy for utility work. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Sanitary sewer and water main proposed herein is trunk, as identified in Eagan's Comprehensive Sewer and Water Policy Plan. It's proposed to assess the lateral benefit from trunk rate for trunk sewer and water, based on a parcel's assessable footage shown on Figure Nos. 2 and 4. It's also proposed to assess trunk area charges of this time to those parcels shown on Figure No. 5, which includes only the Waterview Addition. The 8" sanitary sewer in T.H. 3 to serve Waterview Addition 49548 . rpt and the 8" T.H. 3 jacking /augering is proposed to be assessed on a lump sum basis to Waterview Addition. Listed below are the 1994 trunk rates for lateral benefit and area charges. Lateral Benefit Rate /Area Sanitary Sewer $18.60/F.F. $1610 /acre Water Main $16.50 /F.F. $1685 /acre Revenue Sources Sanitary Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Lateral Benefit Sewer T.H. 3 8 "/8 "Jacking Lateral Benefit Water Trunk Area Sewer Trunk Area Water Total Project Cost Revenue Balance $171,660 $ 53,680 $225,340 The estimated project deficit is $139,350,which will be the responsibility of the trunk sanitary sewer and water main funds. It should be noted trunk area charges for sanitary sewer and water main as part of the T.H. 3 /School Road Improvement Project No. 673 will finance the deficit for this project. Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids /Receive Easements /Award Contract Substantial Completion Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 49548.rpt PROJECT SCHEDULE $ 3,813 20,065 32,127 14,651 15,334 $85,990 - $139,350 June 21, 1994 July 19, 1994 July 19, 1994 August 16, 1994 September 1994 October 1994 Spring 1995 May 1996 Sanitary Sewer 40 LF 880 LF 545 LF 75 LF 75 LF 6 EA 40 LF 8 LF 1,800 LF 1 EA Lump Sum 20 LF 2 AC 49548.rpt APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WATERVIEWADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666R 8" PVC sanitary sewer 0' -15' deep @ $30.00/1f $ 1,200.00 10" PVC sanitary sewer 0' -15' deep @ $45.00/1f 39,600.00 10" PVC sanitary sewer 15' -25' deep @ $50.00 /If 27,250.00 Jack or auger 8" PVC sanitary sewer @ $180.00/1f 13,500.00 Jack or auger 10" PVC sanitary sewer @ $200.00 /lf 15,000.00 Std 4' diameter MH w /cstg @ $1,200.00 ea 7,200.00 MH depth greater than 8" deep @ $80.00 /1f 3,200.00 10 "/8 "outside drop @ $150.00/1f 1,200.00 Improved pipe foundation @ $3.00/1f 5,400.00 Connect to existing MH @ $600.00 ea 600.00 Traffic control @ $5,000.00 5,000.00 Remove and construct 15" RCP @ $30.00/If 600.00 Restoration/erosion control @ $3,000.00 /ac 6,000.00 Subtotal $125,750.00 + 5% Contingency 6,290.00 Subtotal $132,040.00 + 30% Indirect Costs 39,620.00 Total Sanitary Sewer $171,660.00 ( J7 Water Main 20 LF 1,010 LF 1 EA 3 EA 1,500 LB 2 EA Lump Sum 80 TN 200 SY 1.5 AC 49548.rpt 6" DIP water main @ $16.00ilf $ 320.00 8" DIP water main @ $20.00 /1f 20,200.00 Connect to existing water main @ $700.00 ea 700.00 8" gate valve & box @ $700.00 ea 2,100.00 Fittings @ $1.60/1b 2,400.00 Hydrant @ $1,400.00 ea 2,800.00 Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00 1,500.00 Class 5 aggregate base @ $10.00 /tn 800.00 Bituminous patch @ $20.00 /sy 4,000.00 Restoration/erosion control @ $3,000.00 /ac 4.500.00 Subtotal $39,320.00 + 5% Contingency 1.970.00 Subtotal $41,290.00 + 30% Indirect Cost 12,390.00 Total Water Main $53,680.00 Section 36 Parcel 010 -07 Parcel 020 -06 Parcel 070 -27 I. Sanitary Sewer A. Lateral Benefit (T.H. 3) Parcel Description Dodd View Addition Outlot A (020 -04) B. T.H. 3 8" & 8" Jacking Parcel Description Dodd View Addition Outlot A (020 -04) C. Trunk Area Total Area Pond Street Assessable Rate Total Parcel Description (acre) Credit Credit Area (acre) Acre,Lot (acre) Dodd View Addition Outlot A (020 -04) Total 49548.rpt APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WATERVIEWADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666R Assessable Footage 205 F.F. Rate /F.F. $18.60 0.6 0.6 $1,610 $ 966 5,8 3.3 2.5 1,610 4,025 6.5 2.5 20% 3.2 1,610 5,152 2.8 2.8 t� 9 Total $3,813 Lump Sum $20,065 1,610 4 $14,651 II. Water Main A. Lateral Benefit (Dodd Road) Assessable Parcel Description Footage Rate /F.F. Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -51 60 $16.50 $ 990 Parcel 020 -28 313 16.50 5,165 Parcel 031 -27 40 16.50 660 Parcel 030 -28 170 16.50 2,805 Parcel 040 -27 250 16.50 4,125 Parcel 040 -28 170 16.50 2,805 Parcel 050 -27 100 16.50 1,650 Parcel 050 -28 280 16.50 4,620 Parcel 060 -27 129 16.50 2,129 Parcel 070 -27 435 16.50 7,718 Total 1,947 $32,127 B. Trunk Area Total Area Pond Street Assessable Rate Total Parcel Description (acre) Credit Credit Area (acre) Acre,Lot (acre) Section 36 Parcel 010 -07 Parcel 020 -06 Parcel 070 -27 Dodd View Addition Outlot A (020 -04) Total 49548. r 0.6 0.6 $1,685 $ 1,011 5.8 3.3 2.5 1,685 4,213 6.5 2.5 20% 3.2 1,685 5,392 2.8 2.8 1,685 4,718 $15,334 Section 36 Parcel 010 -07 Parcel 010 -51 Parcel 020 -06 Parcel 020 -28 Parcel 031 -27 Parcel 030 -28 Parcel 040 -27 Parcel 040 -28 Parcel 050 -27 Parcel 050 -28 Parcel 060 -27 Parcel 070 -27 Dodd View Addition Outlot A (020 -04) 49548 . rpt $3,813 APPENDIX B SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WATERVIEWADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MALN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666R Sanitary Sewer Water Main T.H.3 Lateral 8" & 8" Lateral Parcel Description Benefit Jacking Trunk Area Benefit Trunk Area Total $20,065 4.508 11 $ 966 $ 1,011 $ 1,977 $ 990 990 4025 4,213 8,238 5,165 5,165 660 660 2,805 2,805 4,125 4,125 2,805 2,805 1,650 1,650 4,620 4,620 2,129 2,129 5,152 7,178 5,392 17,722 4. 718 33.104 Total $3,813 $20,065 $14,651 $32,127 $15,334 $85,990 1 '000 2000 Scare m feet LOCATION PLAN ROSEMO UN T EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERVIEW ADDITION, CITY PROJ. No. 66 49548F02.DWG JUNE 1994 COMM. 4 DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd.30 FIGURE 1 ■ C ) V Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates • JYLULd 1Cciri 4," f..ud# 1 --`"---- i CLIP, ROAD( Co. t?dT _• ..` T, -.. i few • `'.. . 4 n } , fl PROJECT LOCA770N C PROPOSED WATERMIEW ADDITION ;?� ; i 1 '000 2000 Scare m feet LOCATION PLAN ROSEMO UN T EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERVIEW ADDITION, CITY PROJ. No. 66 49548F02.DWG JUNE 1994 COMM. 4 DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd.30 FIGURE 1 ■ C ) V Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates 022-79 I MAMLWO BISCAYNE AV 1 JACK OR AUGER 8" SAN. SEWER 021-79 PINES ADDITION —7 f'ROPOSED 1_1 NEW W.M. BY OTHERS 5 cc a. 5 010-8 ---D PROPOSED 010-82 PROPOSED cc SANITARY SEWER 0 015-76 C ELEM ENTARY I SCHOOL ( /80 PLAT ) SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERMEW ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 666R L:\ 49\49548\ 49548F05 JUNE 1994 ( 021-75V 015-76 Li EDGE / ■ 205' COMM. WESTONj HILLS DRIVE PROPOSD FIGURE 2 021-27 ECT TO Ex. I ; 4 1t / SEWER MH LEGEND ---LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE Bonestroo Rosene Soaks In foot Anderlik Associates 0 150 300 4 020 -28 O i O ti ; 030 -28 f` 040 -28 050 -28 010 -51 Connect to Ex. : " - Water Main 070-27 0 150 Seale in feet 300 0 CAROL STREET Future 8" Water Main Waterview Addition to School Road WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERVIEW ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 666R 49548F07.DWG JUNE 1994 COMM. 4 FIGURE 3 PROPOSED SCHOOL ROAD JL z U • Bonest roo Aosene Anderlik Associates Engineers & Architects St. Paul • Milwaukee 040 -28 020 -28 050 -28 010 -51 O — 00 N r',4RCL ST LEGEND 435' LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE WATER MAIN LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERVIEW ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 666R 49548F08.DWG JUNE 1994 COMM, 4 f .. ;/ FIGURE 4 r r J i / r ROPOSED WATERVI EW ADDITION ■ TAMiE . ALLAN LA 0 200 Scale 'eel Bonest roo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers 4 Architects St. Paul • Milwaukee 1 QP 020 -28 040 -28 030 -28 050 -28 010 -51 010 -51 2 020 -51 030 -5 012 -55 SEE 040-27 5 RD 010 -57 PRO WA AD C 030 -27 0 0 G 030 -81 1' , • 40 * • a-Not rO 021 -7 , li� g ■ i • ,: - gFri POND LP -23 021 -79 010 -82 5 4 2 0 022 -08 010 -81 3 010 -75 01 7- 76 015 -75 k -4 A 2 016 -78 014 -76 010 -50 010 -52 0 300 600 Seats in foot TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEWER /WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATERVIEW ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 666R 49548F06.DWG JUNE 1994 .� Ohl � pf COMM. 4 J11 LEGEND smomm ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY FIGURE 5 ■ 018-76 010 -77 010 - Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting TH 3 /SCHOOL ROAD (ST & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS) C. Project 673, TH 3 /School Road (Street & Utility Improvements) - -In response to a petition submitted by ISD #196, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to investigate the proposed improvements necessary to serve the proposed new elementary school and future development in the area east of TH 3 and south of Weston Hills. On June 21, this report was presente, to the City Council with a public hearing scheduled for July 19. Enclosed on pages through /3 / is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and reference. Mr. Mark Hanson, the City's consulting engineer (BRAA, Inc.) will be presenting the details associated with this improvement. An informational neighborhood meeting was held on Thursday, July 14, to present this information t interested and /or affected property owners. Enclosed on pages_ through /3s is a summary memo of that meeting. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this neighborhood meeting and public hearing scheduled for July 19. This project has three special aspects to it not common with other typical public improvements: Closure /abandonment of existing Gun Club Road and Farm Road at approximately 200 feet either side of TH 3. Access would be retained for existing businesses as a private entrance only. • Right -of -way acquisition for the new School Road alignment /access to TH 3, storm sewer and ponding easements. Financing the cost of TH 3 and School Road intersection improvements on an area - wide basis to all properties east of TH 3 and south of Weston Hills. The consulting engineer and Public Works Director will be available to address additional issues and respond to any questions during this public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve /modify /deny Project 673 (TH 3 /School Road - Street & Utility Improvements) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans /specs, property acquisition and appraisals. '72 City OF eagan Report for T.H. 3 /School Road Street and Utility Improvements City Project No. 673 Eagan, Minnesota June 1994 File No. 49553 • n Bon estroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers 6 Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Bonestroo Rosene 11 Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects May 31. 1994 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. MN 55122 Re: T.H. 3 - School Road Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 673. File 49553 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G Bonestroo PE Robert W Rosene PE' Joseph C Anderlik PE Marvin L. Sorvala PE Richard E Turner, PE Glenn R Cook. PE Thomas E Noyes. PE Robert G. Schunicht. PE Susan M Eberlin C PA 'Senior Consultant Attached is our report for T.H. 3 /School Road Street and Utility Improvements. The proposed improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly. BON E : STRQ0. ROSE -E. A_ti�DERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson Reviewed by: � Department of Public Wor s Fin nce Department Date: '6 r17 -y' V -- //2 2.-/ti/,' 29 Howard A Sanford PE Kenn A Gordon PE Robert R Pfefferle PE Richard W Foster PE David 0 Loskota. PE Robert C Russek. A I A Jerry A Bourdon. PE Mark A Hanson, PE Michael T Rautmann. PE Ted K Field. PE Thomas R Anderson. A I A Donald C Burgardt PE Thomas A Syfko. PE Frederic J Stenborg, PE Ismael Martinez. PE Michae! P Rau PE 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612 - 636 -4600 Agnes M Ring A I C P Thomas W Peterson. PE Michael C Lynch. PE James R Maland. PE Jerry D Pertzsch. PE. Scott J Arganek. PE Kenneth P Anderson, PE Mark R Rolls. PE Mark A. Seip PE Gary W Morten. PE Paul J. Gannon, A I A Daniel J Edgerton PE A Rick Schmidt. PE. Philip J Caswell PE Mark D Wallis. PE Miles 8 Jensen. PE L Phillip Grave. PE Karen L Wremer, PE Gary D Kristotu PE F. Todd Foster PE Keith R Yapp PE Douglas J Benoit PE Shawn D Gustafson. PE Cecilio Olivier PE Paul G Heue' PE John P Gorden PE Charles A Erickson Leo M Pawesky Harlan M Olson James F Engelhard; I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mar c�A. Hanson Date: Mav 31. 1994 Reg. No. 14260 Item Page Number LEI "I ER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 2 DISCUSSION 3 Sanitary Sewer 3 Water Main 4 Services 4 Storm Sewer 4 Street Improvements 5 T.H. 3 5 School Road/Weston Hills Drive /Concrete Sidewalk 6 Street Lights 6 EASEMENTS/PERMITS /COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 7 COST ESTIMATE 9 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 10 ASSESSMENTS 10 REVENUE 14 PROJECT SCHEDULE 16 FIGURES 1 -14 REPORT FOR T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 673 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX C - SCHOOL ROAD OVERSIZE COST v 19553 rpt REPORT FOR T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 673 SCOPE: This project provides for utility and street improvements to serve the area east of T.H. 3 near Gun Club Road and Halley's 1st Addition as shown on Figure No. 1 located at the back of this report. Rosemount School District No. 196 is acquiring land to construct an elementary school immediately east and north of Halley's 1st Addition. Pines Edge Addition is also proposed in this area and is located immediately south of Weston Hills and east of the elementary school. The Pines Edge Addition includes approximately 50 single family lots. Presently, it's proposed to construct School Road and a short portion of Weston Hills Drive in proposed Pines Edge Addition (Parcel 016 -76) as part of this project. This project provides for sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and street improvements in T.H. 3 and School Road. School Road is a proposed new street connecting to T.H. 3 and having a new railroad crossing over the CP Rail track, shown on Figure No. 1. The alignment for School Road was determined after consideration was given to upgrading Gun Club Road, Farm Road. Biscayne Avenue, and evaluating the existing connection of Gun Club Road with T.H. 3. The existing connection of Gun Club Road with T.H. 3 is in a curve and warrants reconstruction of T.H. 3 while not improving the sight distance. The reconstruction of Gun Club Road and Farm Road would also impact adjacent wetlands and not provide any benefit to adjacent land for future development. The proposed School Road alignment provides for a connection at T.H. 3 with better sight distance and provides direct benefit to adjacent land for future development. Therefore, the new construction of School Road is recommended over upgrading Gun Club Road and a portion of Farm Road west of T.H. 3 including the reconstruction of T.H. 3. For purposes of this report, the new street serving this area and the new elementary school is called School Road. It's felt the future name for School Road will change and be similar to the name for the new elementary school. FEASIBILITY & RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Eagan's Comprehensive Plans for utility and streets serving this area. The project, as outlined herein, can best be carried out as two contracts as shown on Figure No. 1, based on the following: • It's recommended the proposed improvement in T.H. 3 be submitted to Mn/DOT for their review to determine if Mn/DOT will participate in the reconstruction of T.H. 3 as part of their 1996 Fiscal Year Improvements which begins July 1, 1995. The proposed improvements in T.H. 3 must be submitted to Mn/DOT along with a City resolution approving the project by January 1, 1995. The improvements in T.H. 3 will be considered by Mn/DOT in February/March 1995 to determine if they will participate. If Mn%DOT approves the School Road connection at T.H. 3 and elects to participate in the cost to reconstruct T.H. 3, it will be based on the following: Better control of accesses onto T.H. 3 by combining and eliminating existing driveway and street accesses. It's recommended Mn/DOT and the City of Eagan review platted street and driveway accesses in this area to determine which accesses can be combined /eliminated to allow the proposed School Road connection to T.H. 3 and Mn/DOT's participation in reconstructing T.H. 3. Presently, it's felt, based on preliminary discussions, if right -of -way for both Gun Club Road and Farm Road are vacated as street accesses to T.H. 3. Mn/DOT will support the School Road connection to T.H. 3. The driveway accesses to the existing businesses could remain. - Mn/DOT may find benefit in raising the elevation of T.H. 3 along Fitz Lake (Pond LP -26) to improve the separation between the road elevation (existing 926) and the 100 year HWL (925) for Fitz Lake. • Mn/DOT seldom participates in the cost of a traffic signal based on future development and estimated warrants. Therefore, it's recommended the City of Eagan do a warrant analysis and review the data with Mn /DOT to determine if they will approve and participate in the cost of this traffic signal which will provide safety for school bus access to a 700 student elementary school. Mn/DOT's participation would equal two thirds the cost of the traffic signal. if they elect to participate. 49553,rpt 49553 rpt • It's recommended the City of Eagan submit the necessary documentation to Mn DOT's Office of Railroads and Waterways to evaluate and determine if they will participate in the cost of railroad signals and street crossing at the new railroad crossing. In addition, approval of the new railroad crossing by Mn/DOT and CP Rail System may warrant changes to other driveway and street crossings in the area. The railroad signals and street crossing will be constructed by CP Rail System. • The required easements for School Road and a portion of Weston Hills Drive will be acquired by the School District and City. Presently, it's proposed the City of Eagan will acquire easements from Parcel 010 -82, 021 -79, and 016 -76 for School Road and Weston Hills Drive. In addition, the City is proposing to acquire the pond easement for Pond LP- 27. All remaining easements will be dedicated by the School District. • The schedule for reconstruction T.H. 3 and Cliff Road by Dakota County should be reviewed to determine if the construction of their project can be coordinated with the construction of this project (T.H. 3 /School Road). • This report assumes the project will be constructed as two contracts. Contract I will include the improvements in School Road between Biscayne Avenue and the Weston Hills Plat. while Contract II will include the improvements in T.H. 3 and School Road between T.H. 3 and Biscayne Avenue. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer proposed herein is shown in Figure No. 2 located at the back of this report. A 10" diameter sanitary sewer is proposed to be constructed in T.H. 3 to School Road to serve all property in Eagan east of T.H. 3 and south of Weston Hills as part of Waterview Addition Project No. 666R. A 10" and 8" sanitary sewer will be constructed in School Road and a portion of Weston Hills Drive to properly serve Halley's 1st Addition and the abutting property along School Road and Weston Hills Drive. A 10" sanitary sewer stub will be extended south immediately east of CP Rail System right -of -way to serve the remaining land in Eagan not served by the sewer in Pines Edge Addition. X3' Water Main Water main proposed herein provides for constructing an 8" diameter water main in School Road and across T.H. No. 3 as shown on Figure No. 5. It's also proposed to construct a 12" water main in Weston Hills Drive. The 8" main in School Road will cross T.H. No. 3 and connect to an 8" main proposed to be constructed in Waterview Addition. The proper number of valves and hydrants are also included. The proposed 8" main is located in the high pressure zone and will experience residual and static pressures of 45 & 74 psi respectively at ground elevation 980 east of Halley's 1st Addition. It's presently proposed the existing 12" main in Pines Edge Addition only extend to School Road where an 8" main will extend south in Pines Edge Addition and west in School Road. However, if the City feels commercial/industrial development will occur south of Pines Edge Addition or along T.H. 3, it's recommended the 12" main be extended to serve the commercial/industrial development. The fire flow required for residential development (1,000 gpm) can easily be provided with an 8" main, however the fire flow required for commercial/industrial (+ 3,000 gpm) must be provided by a 12" main. Services Services are proposed to be constructed from School Road to serve the abutting land. Residential services (4" sewer, 1" water) are proposed to be constructed on the north side of School Road spaced approximately 100' apart. The only exception is the utility service to Parcel 021 -79 and the service to the elementary school which are sized 8" water and 8" sewer. The utility services proposed herein shall be reviewed, before construction, with the property owners to determine if single family homes along School Road or if lateral stubs anticipating future street extensions should be constructed. In addition, future service to Parcel 022 -08 must be considered as part of the future development of Parcel 010 -82. It's assumed for purposes of this report Parcel 022 -08 will receive sanitary sewer service from the sewer in T.H. 3 while it's water will be served from the 6" water stub in School Road located along the east line of Parcel 010 -82 (Figure No. 5). Storm Sewer Trunk storm sewer proposed herein is shown in Figure No. 8. The trunk storm sewer in School Road will serve as the outlet for the ponding areas located east and west of the elementary school. It's assumed the ponding areas located east and west of the school will be designed and constructed by the school district in conjunction with the developers of 19553 4 Pines Edge Addition. At the time of this report writing, the specifics for each of these ponds has not been determined. However, it is expected a 12" diameter storm sewer will be adequate to serve as the outlet pipe for each pond. As noted on Figure 8. the trunk storm sewer in School Road will discharge into Pond LP -27. Therefore, it's proposed as part of this project to construct the trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond LP -27 by extending a 12" diameter storm sewer from the existing storm sewer located immediately west of Pond LP -27. Pond LP -27 is DNR Wetland 307W. Pond LP -27 NWL HWL Storage Outflow 924.5 927.5 21.5 Ac. Ft. 1.0 cfs The lateral storm sewer in School Road is shown on Figure No 10 and includes two storm sewer sections. The lateral storm sewer located at Biscayne Avenue will discharge into the ponding area developed by the school. The lateral storm sewer at T.H. 3 will discharge directly into the easterly open ditch along T.H. 3 and convey storm water to Pond LP -26. Street Improvements T.H. 3 - The improvements in T.H. 3 are shown on Figure No. 11. The improvements provide for a left turn lane in T.H. 3 at School Road and raising the elevation in T.H. 3 to provide an acceptable grade between the railroad crossing and T.H. 3. Figure 13 shows the intersection of T.H. 3 and School Road including the railroad crossing. To accommodate the left turn lane layout in T.H. 3 based on a 55 mph design speed approximately 1500' of T.H. 3 is proposed to be reconstructed. In addition, T.H. 3 will be raised approximately 4' at School Road. The material required to raise the grade and provide the widening in T.H. 3 is expected to come from the grading of School Road. The proposed section for T.H. 3 assuming 9,000 AADT is noted below: 11/2" bituminous wear course 2 bituminous binder course 2 bituminous base course 10" class 5 aggregate base 2' subgrade excavation (cut section) The cost to construct a traffic signal at T.H. 3 and School Road is included in this project. However. it is likely if the School District desires Mn DOT's participation. the signal 49553 rpt construction may have to be delayed until a Signal Justification Report (SJR) can be prepared based on existing conditions warranting the traffic signal. School Road/Weston Hills Drive /Concrete Sidewalk - The improvements for School Road and Weston Hills Drive are shown on Figure No. 11. The right -of -way for School Road and Weston Hills Drive does not exist. Therefore, through right -of -way acquisition and platting the alignment will be established. It's expected the alignment through Parcels 010 -82, 021 -79, 016 -76 (proposed Pines Edge Addition) and Lot 5 Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition will be acquired by the City of Eagan while the remaining alignment will be established through the platting process by the School District. It's proposed to construct School Road to a 36' width in a 66' wide right -of -way except at T.H. 3. As noted on Figure No. 13, left turn lanes are proposed to be provided at T.H. 3. A 6' wide concrete sidewalk is proposed to be constructed between T.H. 3 and Weston Hills Drive. In addition, railroad signals and street crossing are also proposed to be constructed at the new railroad crossing. It should be noted the work associated with the railroad crossing will be constructed by CP Rail System as force account work. The proposed section for School Road estimating 3600 AADT based on ultimate development is noted below: -19553: t 11/2" bituminous wear course 3" bituminous base course 8" class 5 aggregate base Weston Hills Drive is proposed to be constructed to a standard residential section and width. Street Lights - It's proposed 5 -1500 watt street lights be constructed by Dakota Electric along School Road. EASEMENTS /PERMITS /COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT: Easements are required for School Road, a portion of Weston Hills Drive, the trunk storm sewer between School Road and Pond LP -27, Pond LP -27, and the driveway access over Parcel 010 -82 to serve Parcel 022 -08. It's assumed for purposes of this report, the easement required for School Road east of Parcel 010 -82 and the pond easement over Lot 5 Block 2 Halley's 1st Addition will be platted by the School District, while the remaining easements will be acquired by the City. Listed below is the estimated square footage of easement required from each parcel to be acquired by the City and the estimated cost for easements based on $25,000'acre permanent and $2500 /acre temporary. The estimated cost is separated between School Road, Pond LP -27, and the street easement for Weston Hills Drive /School Road included in Parcel 016 -76. Item Estimated Easement Cost School Road $49,450 (1.5 ac. x 25,000 /ac. + $11,950 - temporary) Pond LP -27 54,000 (2.16 ac. x 25.000 /ac.) Parcel 016 -76 13.750 (0.55 ac. x 25,000 /ac.) $117,200 39553,rpt School Road permanent (sq. ft.) School Road temporary (sq. ft.) Drainage/ utility (sq. ft.) Pond LP -27 (sq. ft.) Private driveway (sq. ft.) Parcel 016 -76 street permanent (sq.ft.) Parcel 010-82 51,100 43,000 4,400 17,000 Parcel 021 -79 7,800 16,000 Parcel 022 -08 5,500 50,000 Halley's 1st Addition Lot 5 Block 1 6,000 7,200 Parcel 010 -75 14,000 Parcel 021 -75 30,000 Parcel 010 -08 6,000 Parcel 016 -76 24,000 TOTAL 64,900 66,200 9,900 94,000 23,000 24,000 EASEMENTS /PERMITS /COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT: Easements are required for School Road, a portion of Weston Hills Drive, the trunk storm sewer between School Road and Pond LP -27, Pond LP -27, and the driveway access over Parcel 010 -82 to serve Parcel 022 -08. It's assumed for purposes of this report, the easement required for School Road east of Parcel 010 -82 and the pond easement over Lot 5 Block 2 Halley's 1st Addition will be platted by the School District, while the remaining easements will be acquired by the City. Listed below is the estimated square footage of easement required from each parcel to be acquired by the City and the estimated cost for easements based on $25,000'acre permanent and $2500 /acre temporary. The estimated cost is separated between School Road, Pond LP -27, and the street easement for Weston Hills Drive /School Road included in Parcel 016 -76. Item Estimated Easement Cost School Road $49,450 (1.5 ac. x 25,000 /ac. + $11,950 - temporary) Pond LP -27 54,000 (2.16 ac. x 25.000 /ac.) Parcel 016 -76 13.750 (0.55 ac. x 25,000 /ac.) $117,200 39553,rpt Permits are required from the MPCA, MWCC, and MHD for sanitary sewer and water main construction. In the event, trunk storm sewer construction is required below the NOHW for Pond LP -27, a DNR Permit will be required. A cooperative agreement will be required between MnDOT and the City of Eagan if Mn/DOT determines they will participate in the reconstruction of T.H. 3 and the traffic signal at School Road. An agreement will also have to be established between CP Rail System and the City of Eagan to allow the new railroad crossing. The funding for the railroad crossing may also warrant an agreement dependent on the funding source (Federal Funding= Regional Transportation Plan or State Funding= Transportation Regulation Board). 49553 /rot 8 COST ESTIMATE: A preliminary cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below: Contract I School Road Improvements Sanitary Sewer $ 58,290 Water Main 56.000 Services 21.910 Trunk Storm Sewer 116,400 Street /Storm Sewer 220,670 Concrete Sidewalk 17,440 Parcel 016 -76 Utility, Street 87,170 Total School Road $577,880 Contract II T.H. 3 /School Road Improvements Sanitary Sewer - T.H. 3 Sanitary Sewer - School Road Water Main - T.H. 3 Water Main - School Road Services - School Road Street /Storm Sewer - T.H. 3 Street /Storm Sewer - School Road Concrete Sidewalk - School Road Traffic Signal School Road Railroad Crossing Total T.H. 3 Right- of -Wav Permanent $105,250 Temporary 11,950 Total Right -of -way $117.200 49553 TOTAL $1,659,070 es 9 $ 30,670 26,880 34,820 23,960 12,840 320,720 213,850 12,200 141,750 146.300 $963,990 The total estimated project cost is $1,659,070 which includes contingencies. indirect costs. and right -of -way. Contingencies are estimated at 5% except for the Railroad Crossing which is estimated at 10 %. Indirect costs are estimated at 35% which include legal. engineering, and bond interest. Indirect costs are not included for the School Road Railroad Crossing because it's expected CP Rail System will manage /design the work. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 Parcel 010 -75 Parcel 021 -27 Parcel 021 -75 Parcel 021 -79 Parcel 022 -08 Parcel 010 -82 Parcel 014 -76 Hallev's Addition Lot 1 -5 Block 1 Lot 1 -5 Block 2 Dodd View Addition Outlot A Section 36 Parcel 015 -76 Parcel 016 -76 Parcel 017 -76 Parcel 018 -76 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010 -78 Parcel 010 -80 Parcel 011 -81 Parcel 012 -81 Parcel 030 -81 ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for utility and street construction. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. Estimated assessments associated with lateral utility and street costs will be revised based on final project costs. 1955: rpt 96° Sanitary Sewer - The 10" sanitary sewer in T.H. 3 and School Road crossing the CP Rail System right -of -way is considered trunk. Therefore, it's not proposed to assess this cost as lateral. The lateral sanitary sewer in School Road is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis dividing the project cost ($85,170) by the assessable footage (3161 f.f.). The assessable footage and corner lot credits are shown on Figure No. 3. The estimated rate is $26.94/f.f. Trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer are proposed to be assessed to those parcels not previously assessed for trunk sanitary sewer shown on Figure No. 4. The trunk area rate is $1610 /acre. Water Main - The water main in T.H. 3, School Road, and a portion of Weston Hills Drive is trunk. Therefore, it's proposed to assess residential /agricultural property the lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with Eagan's Fee Schedule (1994 rate = $16.50 /F.F.). Parcels not zoned residential /agricultural will be assessed the front foot rate ($25.29/F.F.) based on the project cost for the water main in School Road ($79,960) divided by the assessable footage (3161 F.F.). Trunk area assessments for water main are proposed to be assessed to those parcels not previously assessed for trunk water main as shown on Figure No. 7. The trunk area rate is $1685 /acre. Services - Services are proposed to be assessed to the benefitted property they serve. It should be noted if adjustments are made based on service construction proposed herein, the assessment will be revised based on the project cost for each service constructed to serve each property. Storm sewer - The trunk storm sewer in School Road and serving as the outlet to Pond LP- 27 is shown on Figure No. 8. Trunk area assessments for storm sewer are proposed to be assessed to those parcels not previously assessed as shown on Figure No. 9. The 1994 trunk area rate for residential zoning is $0.074/sq. ft. and commercial zoning is $0.112 /sq. ft. Lateral storm sewer in School Road is included in the street cost. 49553 /rot � 1 l Street: T.H. 3 - The reconstruction of T.H. 3 including storm sewer ($320,720) is proposed to be assessed on an area basis to all properties east of T.H. 3 in the City of Eagan excluding Weston Hills and one unplatted parcel (Parcel 022 -79) located immediately east of T.H. 3. It's assumed Parcel 022 -79 will continue to maintain direct driveway access to T.H. 3. Therefore, it would not benefit from the reconstruction of T.H. 3 or the new railroad crossing proposed at School Road. The area assessment for each parcel is calculated similar to area assessments for trunk utilities which provide for a pond credit and future street credit (2010) if the resulting parcel after pond credit is larger than 3 acres. The area proposed to be assessed for the reconstruction of T.H. 3 is shown on Figure No. 14. The estimated rate is $2,794 /acre. In the event Mn/DOT elects to participate in the cost to reconstruct T.H. 3, Mn/DOT's participation will not be assessed. School Road Oversize - The project cost for School Road Contract I ($220,670) and Contract II ($213.850) minus the equivalent assessment ($164,174) proposed to be assessed to the abutting property based on zoning plus the estimated right -of -way cost ($49,450) is proposed to be assessed on an area basis similar to the area assessment for T.H. 3. The area oversize rate for School Road is $2,786. School Road - Equivalent Assessment (Street/Storm Sewer) - The equivalent assessment for School Road based on zoning east of CP Rail System right -of -way is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to the benefitted property in accordance with Eagan's Assessment Policy for street. Figure No. 12 shows the assessable footage per parcel and corner lot credits. The estimated rate is $46.72 /front foot for residential property (32' width. residential section) and $83.20/front foot for non residential property (36' width based on design section). The project cost for each equivalent section is presented in Appendix C. School Road Concrete Sidewalk - The cost for the 6 wide concrete sidewalk along School Road will be the City's responsibility. Traffic Signal/Railroad Crossing - It's assumed for purposes of this report. the entire cost for the traffic signal ($141,750) and railroad crossing ($146,300) will be assessed to the elementary school (Parcel 015 -76). In the event funding is available for the railroad crossing or Mn/DOT elects to participate in two thirds of the signal cost, the assessment to the school would be reduced based on funding and participation. 19" "3rpt R 12 Parcel 016 -76 Utility /Street - The project cost for utility and street included within Parcel 016 -76 (proposed Pines Edge Addition) is proposed to be assessed on a Lump sum basis to Parcel 016 -76 which also includes right -of -way cost. i9Sg3;rp1 REVENUE: A summary of project costs and revenues is summarized below: Project Cost Revenue Balance Sanitary Sewer T.H. 3 (Trunk) - Contract II $30.670 School Road (Lateral) - Contract I 58,290 School Road (Lateral) - Contract II 26,880 Lateral School Road 85,170 Trunk Area 63,767 $115.840 $148,937 +.$33.09 Water Main T.H. 3 (Trunk) $ 34,820 School Road (Lateral) - Contract I 56,000 School Road (Lateral) - Contract II 23,960 Lateral Benefit Trunk - T.H. 3 $ 3,383 Lateral School Road 63,874 Trunk Area 66.726 $114,780 $133.983 +$19203 Services School Road - Contract I $ 21.910 School Road - Contract II 12.840 Lateral School Road $ 34,750 $34,750 $ 34,750 0 Storm Sewer (Trunk) School Road/Pond LP -26 (Trunk) $116.400 Pond LP -27 Easement 54.000 School Assessment Pond LP -27 Easement 54,000 Trunk Area $ 91.592 $170.400 $145.592 - $24.808 Street/Lateral Storm Sewer T.H. 3 $ 320,720 T.H. 3 Area Assessment School Road - Contract I 220.670 School Road - Contract II 213.850 School Road Area Oversize School Road Equivalent Assessment School Road Right -of -way 49.450 School Road Concrete Sidewalk - Contract I 17,440 School Road Concrete Sidewalk - Contract II 12.200 Traffic Signal/Railroad Crossing 288.050 School Assessment (Signal/R.R. Crossing) 1.122.380 4 rpt 't4 4 $ 320,720 319,796 164,174 288.050 1.092.740 - $29.640 Parcel 016 -76 Utility /Street Utility/Street $ 87,170 Street Right -of -way (Parcel 016 -76) 13,750 Parcel 016 -76 Assessment $100,920 $100,920 $100,920 0 1,659,070 1,656,522 -$2.148 The anticipated project deficit is - $2,148 which will be financed by the respective utility and sidewalk/trail funds. 495`j/rp[ Present Feasibility Report June 21, 1994 June 21, 1994 Public Hearing July 19, 1994 July 19, 1994 Submit Resolution to Mn/DOT for Cost Participation N/A December 1994 Mn/DOT Determine Participation N/A February 1995 Approve Plans /Specification August 16, 1994 May 16, 1995 Award Contract September 20. 1994 July 5, 1995 The above schedule for Contract II assumes Mn /DOT will participate in the reconstruction of T.H. 3. In the event Mn/DOT elects not to participate, Contract II could be approved and awarded early spring 1995. The above schedule for Contract I assumes right-of-way and easements are acquired in a timely manner. If not, Contract I could be awarded in the spring of 1995 possibly with Contract II. 19553 rpt PROJECT SCHEDULE Contract I School Road 9 _ (e 16 Contract II T. H.3 CONTRACT I I School Road Improvements Soaab aoPXa wbi A) Sanitary Sewer 1180 LF 7 EA 30 LF 10 EA 500 LF B) Water Main 1250 LF 100 LF 3 EA 3 EA 2400 LB 3 EA APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 673 8" PVC Sanitary sewer 0 -20' deep Std 4' diameter ME w /cstg @ MH depth greater than 8' deep @ 8 "x4 "wye@ Improved pipe foundation @. Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL 8" DIP water main 0 6" DIP water main @ 8" Gate valve & box @ 6" gate valve & box @ Fittings @ Hydrant @. Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL $24.00 LF $1,200.00 EA $80.00 LF $50.00 EA $3.00 LF 20.00 LF 16.00 LF 700.00 EA 600.00 EA 2.00 LB 1,400.00 EA $28.320.00 8.400.00 2,400.00 500.00 1,500.00 $41.120.00 2,060.00 $43.180.00 15,110.00 $58,290.00 $25,000.00 1,600.00 2,100.00 1,800.00 4,800.00 4200.00 $39,500.00 1,980.00 S41,480.00 14,520.00 $56,000.00 .1o«1 =or, wh i C) Services 470 LF 100 LF 2 EA 600 LF 10 EA 10 EA D) Trunk Storm Sewer 1660 LF 100 LF 6 EA 1 EA 3 EA Lump Sum 200 LF 2AC 300 SY 300 SY 4" PVC sanitary sewer service @ DIP water main 2w /fittings @ Gate valve & box @ 1" water service @ 1" corporation stop @ 1" curb box & stop @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL 15" RCP Storm sewer @ 18" RCP Storm sewer @ Std. 4' diam. ME w /cstg @. 18" RCP apron @ Outlet skimmer @. Clear & grub trees @ Silt fence @ Seed w /mulch fertilizer @, Seed w /wood fiber flanket Sod @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL 9 $8.00 LF $30.00 LF $800.00 EA $10.00 LF $30.00 EA $80.00 EA $32.00 $38.00 $1,200.00 $700.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $3.00 $1,500.00 $2.00 $2.00 LF LF EA EA EA Lump S LF AC SY SY S3,760.00 3,000 00. 1,600.00 6,000.00 300.00 800.00 $15,460.00 770.00 $16.230.00 5,680.00 $21,910.00 $53,120.00 3,800.00 7,200.00 700.00 7 ,500.00 5,000.00 600.00 3,000.00 600.00 600.00 582,120.00 4,100.00 $86,220.00 30,180.00 51 16,400.00 1.553 JonxJ w - ri E) School Road Street /Storm Sewer a) Street Lump Sum 8000 CY 2000 CY 1000 CY 3100 TN 840 TN 420 TN 75 TN 1440 LF 1440 LF 4 AC 3000 SY 300 CY Lump Sum b) Storm Sewer 230 LF 280 LF 40 LF 3 EA 4 EA 1 EA Clear & grub trees Common excavation @. Subgrade excavation @ Granular borrow (cv) @, Aggregate base Class 5 @ Bituminous base course @. Bituminous wear course @ Bituminous material for mixture @ B618 concrete curb @ Surmountable concrete curb @. Seeding w /mulch fertilizer @ Sod @ Topsoil borrow Stripping @ . 15" RCP Storm sewer @ 18" RCP Storm sewer @. 21" RCP Storm sewer (a� Std. CBMH w /cstg @ .� Std. CB w /cstg 21" RCP apron Subtotal TOTAL (Street/Storm Sewer) +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL F) School Road Concrete Sidewalk (6' wide) 700 SY Subgrade preparation 160 TN Granular subbase (4" thick) @ 6000 SF Concrete sidewalk @ Subtotal +5% contingency + 35 Indirect Cost TOTAL qc( $4,000.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $6.70 $13.00 $14.00 $110.00 $6.00 $5.00 $1,500.00 $2.00 $8.00 $2,000.00 $30.00 LF $32.00 LF $34.00 LF $1,200.00 EA $1,000.00 EA $800.00 EA $1.00 $5.00 $1.80 Lump S CY CY CY TN TN TN TN LF LF AC SY CY Lump S SY TN SF 34,000.00 32,000 00 10,000 00 6.000.00 20.770.00 10,920.00 5,880.00 8,250.00 8.640.00 7,200.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 2,400.00 2 ,000.00 3130,060.00 $6,900.00 8,960.00 1,360.00 3,600.00 4,000.00 800.00 $25,620.00 3155,680.00 7,780.00 $163,460.00 57,210.00 $220,670.00 $700 00 800.00 10,800 00 $12,300.00 620.00 $12,920.00 4.520 00 317.440 00 app: wn G) Parcel 016 -76 Utility/Street a) Sanitary Sewer 370 LF 4 EA 5 EA b) Water Main 450 LF 2 EA 1000 LB 1 EA c) Services 230 LF 220 LF 5EA 5 EA d) Street Lump Sum 100 CY 100 CY 700 TN 180 TN 140 TN 19 TN 880 LF 0.5 AC 100 CY 8" PVC sanitary sewer @ Std. 4' diameter M1-{ w /cstg @ 8" x 4" wye @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Costs TOTAL 8" DIP water main equivalent @ 8" Gate valve & box @ Fittings @ Hydrant @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Costs TOTAL 4" PVC sanitary sewer services @. 1" water service @ 1" corporation stop @. 1" curb box & stop Subtotal +5% Contingency +35 %% Indirect Costs TOTAL Grading/clear & grub @ Subgrade excavation @ Granular borrow @. Aggregate base, Class 5 Bituminous base course Bituminous wear course @ Bituminous material for mixture @ Surmountable concrete curb Seeding w /mulch, fertilizer @ Topsoil borrow @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Costs TOTAL TOTAL PART F Parcel 016 -76 $24.00 LF $1,500.00 EA $50.00 $20.00 LF $700.00 EA $2.00 LB $1,400.00 EA $8.00 LF $10.00 LF $30.00 EA $48.00 EA $10,000.00 $5.00 $6.00 $6.70 $13.00 $14.00 $110.00 $5.00 $1,500.00 $8.00 8,880 00 6,000.00 250.00 $15,130.00 760 $15.890.00 5,560.00 521,450 00 9,000.00 1,400.00 2,000.00 1,400.00 $13,800.00 690.00 $14,490.00 5,070.00 519,560.00 $1,840.00 2 , 2 00.00 150.00 240.00 $4,430.00 220.00 $4,650.00 1,630.00 $6,280.00 10.000.00 500.00 600.00 4,690.00 2,340.00 1,960.00 2 ,090.00 4,400.00 750.00 800.00 528,130.00 1.410 00 529, 540.00 10,340 00 539,880.00 587,170 CONTRACT 11 I T.H. 3 /School Road Improvements 4QS53 anp.a A) T.H. 3 Sanitary Sewer 200 LF 10" PVC sanitary sewer 15' 25' de S40 00 LF 8,000.00 50 LF Jack or auger 10" PVC sanitary_ sew S200.00 LF 10.000 00 1 EA Std. 4' diameter ME w!cstg $1.200 00 EA 1,200.00 8 LF MH depth greater than 8" deep @ S80.00 LF 640 00 400 LF Improved pipe foundation @ 33.00 LF 1,200.00 I EA Connect to existing MIF1 @ S600.00 EA 600 00 Subtotal $21.640.00 + 5% Contengency 1,080.00 $22,720.00 +35% Indirect Costs 7,950.00 TOTAL $30,670.00 B) School Road Sanitary Sewer 580 LF 8" PVC Sanitary sewer 0 -20' deep S24.00 LF $13,920.00 2 EA Std 4' diameter MH w /cstg @ $1,200.00 EA 2.400.00 12 LF MI-1 depth greater than 8' deep @ S80.00 LF 960.00 6 LF 8" Outside drop @. 3120.00 LF 720.00 6 EA 8" x 4" wye @, S50.00 EA 300.00 1 EA 8" x 6" wye @ S60.00 EA 60.00 200 LF Improved pipe foundation @ 33.00 LF 600.00 Subtotal $18.960.00 +5% Continency 950.00 $19,910.00 +35% Indirect Cost 6,970.00 TOTAL $26,880.00 C) T.H. 3 Water Main 10 LF 6" DIP water main @ 16.00 LF 160.00 480 LF 8" DIP water main @ 20.00 LF 9,600.00 50 LF Jack or auger 8" DIP water main 120.00 LF 6.000.00 1 EA Connect to existing water main w 700.00 EA 700.00 3 EA 8" gate valve & box @. 700.00 EA 2,100.00 2 EA 6" gate valve & box @ 600.00 EA 1,200.00 1000 LB Fittings @ 2.00 LB 2,000.00 2 EA Hydrant @ 1,400.00 EA 2,800.00 Subtotal $24,560.00 +5% Contingency 1.230 00 $25.790 00 +35% Indirect Cost 9.030 00 TOTAL $34.820.00 io pxa D) School Road Water Main 520 LF 50 LF 1 EA 2 EA 1200 LB 1 EA E) School Road Services 280 LF 40 LF 50 LF 1 EA 350 LF 6 EA 6 EA 8" DIP water main a) 6" DIP water main Cu) 8" gate valve & box @ 6" gate valve & box @ Fittings @ Hydrant @ Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL 4" PVC sanitary sewer service 8" PVC sanitary sewer service @ DIP water main 2w /fittings @ Gate valve & box @. 1" water service @. 1" corporation stop @ 1" curb box & stop @ . Subtotal +5% Contingency +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL 1 20.00 LF 16.00 LF 700.00 EA 600.00 EA 2.00 LB 1,400.00 EA $8.00 LF $15.00 LF $30.00 LF $800.00 EA $10.00 LF $30.00 EA $40.00 EA 10,400 00 800.00 700 00 1,200.00 2.400.00 1,400.00 $16,900.00 850.00 . $17,750.00 62 10.00 $23,960 00 $2.240.00 600.00 1,500 00 800.00 3,500.00 180.00 240.00 $9,060.00 450.00 59,510.00 3,330.00 $ 12.840.00 - ° •+vr F) T.H. 3 Street/Storm Sewer 7600 SY 560 CY 3400 CY 15000 CY 6300 TN 1450 TN 1450 TN 900 TN 220 TN 30 LF 80 LF 600 LF 400 LF 3 AC 2000 SY Lump Sum Lump Sum Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.20 SY 9.120.00 Subgrade excavation @ $5.00 CY 2,800.00 Granular borrow (cv) @ $6.00 CY 20,400.00 Common borrow on site @ $3.50 CY 52.500.00 Aggregate base Class 5 @ $6.70 TN 42.210.00 Bituminous base course @ $12.00 TN 17,400.00 Bituminous binder course @. $13.00 TN 18,850.00 Bituminous wear course @ $14.00 TN 12,600.00 Bituminous material for mixture @ $110.00 TN 24,200 00 24" RCP storm sewer @. $32.00 LF 960 00 15" CMP storm sewer driveway @ $24.00 LF 1,920.00 Silt fence @ $3.00 LF 1,800.00 Floatation silt curtain @. $10.00 LF 4,000.00 Seeding w /mulch, fertilizer @ $1,500.00 AC 4,500.00 Sodding @ $2.00 SY 4,000.00 Traffic control @ $2,000.00 LS 2,000.00 Striping @ $7,000.00 LS 7,000.00 Subtotal $226,260.00 +5% Contingency 11,310.00 $237,570.00 +35% Indirect Cost 83,150.00 TOTAL 5320.720.00 G) School Road Street /Storm Sewer a) Street $6,000.00 Lump S $6,000 00 Lump Sum Clear & grub trees @ $6, .50 CY 56,000.00 $ 16000 CY Common excavation @ $3.50 CY 5,000.00 .00 1000 CY Subgrade excavation @ $ CY 3,000.00 $6 $5.00 500 CY Granular borrow (cv) @ 2200 TN Aggregate base Class 5 @ 70 C TN 14,740 3 0 .00 4,8 0.00 760 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00 TN ,320.00 00 TN $14. 5 380 TN Bituminous wear course @. 5 150.00 65 TN Bituminous material for mixture @. $110.00 TN 960 00 160 LF B618 concrete curb @ $6.00 LF 1 160 LF Surmountable concrete curb @ .00 LF 5,800.00 .00 $ $555 5,000.00 300 LF Driveway realignment @ $10.00 3,000.00 500 LF Abandon Gun Club Road @ 3,000.00 2 AC Seeding w /mulch fertilizer @ $1,500.00 AC 1000 SY Sod @ $2.00 SY 2,000.00 200 CY Topsoil borrow @ $8.00 CY 1,600.00 5128,450.00 b) Storm Sewer 150 LF 15" RCP Storm sewer (� $ 30.00 LF $4.500.00 500.00 10 LF 18'" RCP Storm sewer @ 532.00 LF 100 LF 24" RCP Storm sewer @ $36.00 LF 3,600.00 00.00 7, 0.00 LF 5 50 LF Jack or auger 18" storm sewer @, $1 $15 15 0.00 LF EA 3,600.00 3 EA Std. CBivII w/cstg g $1,000.00 EA x,000.00 2 EA Std. CB w /cstg r'. $900.00 EA � 900.00 1 EA 24" RCP apron $22,420.00 Subtotal TOTAL (Street /Storm Sewer) $l5o.s7o.00 7,570.00 +5% Contingency $158,410.00 55,440.00 +35% Indirect Cost $213,850.00 TOTAL 0 H) School Road Concrete Sidewalk (6' wide) 450 SY Subgrade preparation @ 120 TN Granular subbase (4" thick) @ 4200 SF Concrete sidewalk @ Subtotal +5% contingency 1) Traffic Signal Lump Sum +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL J) School Road Railroad Crossing , o«3 aoosa .eh 1 EA 46 LF +35% Indirect Cost TOTAL Traffic control signal Subtotal +5% Contingency Railroad signals @ Railroad street crossing @ Subtotal +10% Contingency TOTAL $1.00 SY $5.00 TN $1.80 SF $450.00 600.00 7,560 00 38,610 430.00 $9,040.00 3,160 00 $12,200.00 $100, 000.00 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 5,000.00 S105,000.00 36, 750.00 $141,750.00 $110,000.00 EA S110,000.00 $500.00 LF 23,000.00 $133,000.00 13,300.00 $146,300.00 I. Sanitary Sewer A. Lateral (School Road) SE' /4 Section 36 Parcel 010 -75 264 26.94 7,113 Parcel 010 -82 North Side 950 26.94 25,597 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (School) 185 (1) 26.94 4,985 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (021 -79) 70 26.94 1.886 Parcel 015 -76 South Side (School) 635 26.94 17.109 Parcel 015 -76 North Side 194 26.94 5.227 Parcel 021 -75 165 26.94 4.446 Parcel 021 -79 290 26.94 7,814 Hal lev's 1st Addition Lot 5, Block 1 252 (1) 26.94 6.790 Lot 5, Block 2 156 26.94 4,203 (1) Includes 150' corner lot credit 495.3 /APPYB APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 3,161 85.170 B -i C. Trunk Area Total Pond Assessable Rate/ Parcel Area Credit Street Area Acre Description (Acre) (Acre) Credit (Acre) Lot Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 1 lot 1 lot 775 775 Parcel 010-75 2.2 0.22 1.98 1,610 3,188 Parcel 021 -75 3.0 0.54 2.46 1,610 3,961 Parcel 022 -08 4.85 1.06 20% 3.03 1,610 4,878 Parcel 010 -82 9.41 20% 7.53 1,610 12,123 Parcel 015 -76 7.9 20% 6.32 1,610 10,175 Parcel 017 -76 5.03 20% 4.02 1,610 6,479 Parcel 021 -79 8.2 1.4 20% 5.44 1.610 8.758 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.69 0.69 1.610 1,111 Lot 2, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 3, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 4, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 5, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 1, Block 2 0.69 0.69 1,610 1,111 Lot 2, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 3, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 4, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 Lot 5, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,610 1,401 49553 /APPXB B - 63,767 II. Water Main A. Lateral Benefit (T.H. 3) Parcel Description E 1/2 Section 36 Dodd View Addition Outlot A Total B. Lateral (School Road) (1) Includes 150 Corner Lot Credit. (2) Rate equals 1994 Fee Schedule Rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main for single family. (3) Rate equals water main cost in School Road ($79,960) divided by assessable footage (3,161 F.F.). 49553, APPXB Assessable Footage 205 Assessable Total Parcel Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment Parcel 010 -75 264 16.50 4,356 Parcel 010 -82 North Side 950 16.50 15,675 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (School) 185 (1) 16.50 3.053 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (021 -79) 70 16.50 1,155 Parcel 015 -76 South Side (School) 635 25.29 (3) 16.059 Parcel 015 -76 North Side 194 16.50 3,201 Parcel 021 -75 165 16.50 2,723 Parcel 021 -79 290 25.29 7.334 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 5, Block 1 252 (1) Lot 5, Block 2 156 3,161 B -3 Total Rate /F.F. Assessment 16.50 (2) 3.383 3.383 25.29 25.29 6.373 3.945 63,874 C. Trunk Area Total Pond Assessable Rate/ Parcel Area Credit Street Area Acre Description (Acre) (Acre) Credit (Acre) Lot Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 1 lot 1 lot 810 810 Parcel 010 -75 2.2 0.22 1.98 1,685 3,337 Parcel 021-75 3.0 0.54 2.46 1,685 4,145 Parcel 022 -08 4.85 1.06 20% 3.03 1,685 5,105 Parcel 010 -82 9.41 20% 7.53 1,685 12,688 Parcel 015 -76 7.9 20% 6.32 1,685 10,649 Parcel 017 -76 5.03 20% 4.02 1,685 6,773 Parcel 021 -79 8.2 1.4 20% 5.44 1,685 9,166 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.69 0.69 1,685 1,162 Lot 2, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 3, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 4, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 5, Block 1 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 1, Block 2 0.69 0.69 1,685 1,163 Lot 2, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 3. Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 4, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 Lot 5, Block 2 0.87 0.87 1,685 1,466 39553 /APPYB B -4 oc 66,726 III. Services Parcel Description Section 36 Parcel 010 -82 9 1,400 (1) 12.600 Parcel 010 -75 2 1.400 2.800 Parcel 021 -75 2 1,400 2.800 Parcel 015 -76 North Side 2 1,400 2.800 Parcel 015 -76 South Side (School) N/A 8,240 (2) 8.240 Parcel 021 -79 N/A 4,110 (3) 4.110 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 5, Block 1 1 1,400 1.400 34.750 (1) Service Cost = { 4" Sewer (400) + 1" Water (500 + 30 + 80) } x 1.05 x 1.3 = 81,400 (2) Service Cost assumes 2 -8" Water and 1'8" Sewer (3) Service Cost assumes 1 -8" Water and 1 -8" Sewer IV. Storm Sewer (Trunk Area) Number Services Cost/Service Total a) Trunk Area Total Pond Assessable Assessible Rate/ Parcel Area Credit Street Area Area Sq. Description (Acre) JAcre) Credit LAcre (Sq.Ft.) Ft. Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 0.41 0.41 17,860 0.074 1,322 Parcel 010-75 2.2 0.22 1.98 86,250 0.074 6.383 Parcel 021 -75 3.0 0.54 2.46 107,160 0.074 7.930 Parcel 022 -08 4.85 1.06 20% 3.03 131,990 0.074 9,767 Parcel 010 -82 9.41 20% 7.53 328,000 0.074 24.273 Parcel 015 -76 7.9 20% 6.32 275,300 0.074 20,373 Parcel 017 -76 5.03 20% 4.02 175.110 0.074 12.959 Hallev's lst Addition Lot 5 Block 1 0.88 Lot 5 Block 2 0.88 TOTAL 49553 APPXB 0.88 38,330 0.112 4.293 0.88 38,330 0.112 4.293 91.592 B -5 ��o b) Pond LP -27 Easement Parcel Description Section 36 Parcel 015 -76 (School) (1) Amount = 2.16 Acre x $25,000 /acre 49«3 APPXB B -6 Total Assessment $54,000 (1) V. Streets A) T.H. 3 Area Assessment Total Pond Assessable Rate/ Parcel Area Credit Street Area Acre Description (Acre) f Acrel Credit (Acre Lot Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 0.41 0.41 2.786 1,146 Parcel 010 -75 2.2 0.22 1.98 2.786 5,532 Parcel 021 -75 3.0 0.54 2.46 2,786 6.873 Parcel 022 -08 4.85 1.06 20% 3.03 2,786 8,466 Parcel 010 -82 9.41 20% 7.53 2,786 21,039 Parcel 014 -76 5.95 20% 4.76 2.786 13,299 Parcel 015 -76 7.9 20% 6.32 2.786 17,657 Parcel 016 -76 5.24 20% 4.19 2.786 11,707 Parcel 017 -76 5.03 20% 4.02 2.786 11.232 Parcel 018 -76 14.0 20% 11.2 2.786 31,292 Parcel 021 -79 8.2 1.4 20% 5.44 2,786 15,199 Parcel 010 -77 20.18 20% 16.14 2.786 45,094 Parcel 010 -78 20.18 20% 16.14 2.786 45,094 Parcel 010 -80 19.25 8.7 20% 8.44 2,786 23,581 Parcel 011 -81 12.44 1.2 20% 8.99 2.786 25,118 Parcel 012-81 4.95 20% 3.96 2.786 11,064 Parcel 030 -81 1.44 1.44 2,786 4,023 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.69 0.69 2.786 1,928 Lot 2, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,431 Lot 3, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2.786 2,431 Lot 4, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,431 Lot 5, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2.786 2,431 Lot 1, Block 2 0.69 0.69 2,786 1,928 Lot 2, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2.786 .7 ,431 Lot 3, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2.786 2,431 Lot 4, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,431 Lot 5, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2.786 2,431 395 /APPYB B -7 l�z 114.79 320,720 B) School Road - Oversize Area Assessment Total Pond Assessable Rate/ Parcel Area Credit Street Area Acre Description (Acre) Acre) Credit (Acre) Lot Total Section 36 Parcel 010 -08 0.41 0.41 2.786 1,142 Parcel 010 -75 2.2 0.22 1.98 2,786 5,516 Parcel 021 -75 3.0 0.54 2.46 2,786 6,853 Parcel 022 -08 4.85 1.06 20% 3.03 2,786 8.441 Parcel 010 -82 9.41 20% 7.53 2,786 20,978 Parcel 014-76 5.95 20% 4.76 2,786 13,261 Parcel 015 -76 7.9 20% 6.32 2,786 17,607 Parcel 016-76 5.24 20% 4.19 2,786 11,673 Parcel 017 -76 5.03 20% 4.02 2,786 11,199 Parcel 018-76 14.0 20% 11.2 2,786 31,202 Parcel 021 -79 8./ 1.4 20% 5.44 2,786 15,155 Parcel 010 -77 20.18 20% 16.14 2,786 44,965 Parcel 010 -78 20.18 20% 16.14 2,786 44,965 Parcel 010-80 19.25 8.7 20% 8.44 2,786 23,513 Parcel 010-81 17.39 1.2 20% 12.95 2,786 25,045 Parcel 012 -81 4.95 20% 3.96 2,786 11,033 Parcel 030-81 1.44 1.44 2,786 4,012 Hallev's 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.69 0.69 2,786 1,922 Lot 2, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 3, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 4, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 5, Block 1 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 1, Block 2 0.69 0.69 2,786 1,922 Lot 2, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 3, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 4, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 Lot 5, Block 2 0.87 0.87 2,786 2,424 (1) Oversize cost equals Contract I ($220,670) plus Contract II ($213,850) minus School Road equivalent assessment - Part C ($164,174) plus right-of-way acquisition ($49.450). 495531APPXB B -8 i\ 114.79 319,796 (1) C. School Road Equivalent Assessment (Street/Storm Sewer) Assessable Total Parcel Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment Section 36 Parcel 010 -75 264 46.72(2) 12,334 Parcel 010 -82 North Side 950 46.72 44,384 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (School) 260 (1) 83.20(3) 21,632 Parcel 010 -82 South Side (021 -79) 70 46.72 3.270 Parcel 015 -76 South Side (School) 635 83.20 29,667 Parcel 015 -76 North Side 194 46.72 9,064 Parcel 021 -75 165 46.72 7,709 Parcel 021 -79 290 83.20 13,549 Haley's 1st Addition Lot 5, Block 1 327 (1) 83.20 15,277 Lot 5, Block 2 156 83.20 7.288 3.311 $164,174 (1) (2) (3) Includes 75' Corner Lot Credit. Rate equals residential equivalent cost including storm sewer (154,690) divided by assessable footage (3311 F.F.) see Appendix C. Rate equals street/storm sewer cost ($275,460) for School Road between CP Rail and east line school divided by assessable footage (3311 F.F.). See Appendix C. D. Traffic Signal (T.H. 3) & Railroad Crossing (School Road) Parcel Description Total Assessment Section 36 Parcel 015 -76 (Elementary School) 288,050 (1) (1) Assessment equals total cost for traffic signal (141,750) and railroad crossing ($146.300). In the event Mn/DOT participates in traffic signal and /or funding is available for railroad crossing, the school's assessment would be reduced based on participation and funding. VI Parcel 016 -76 Utility /Street Parcel Description Section 36 Parcel 016 -76 (1) Amount includes $13,750 for easement acquisition (0.55 acre x $25,000 /acre) +$87,170 for street/utility. 49553; APPXB B -9 Lump Sum Assessment $100,920 (1) V.I.c )1 II 600'5 11 1 50•05 II LC6'90 II 0(10'66 II LL 5'S1 II S58'OL I 1 498' 02 I II ZZb'l95 122.8117 II II 60Z.Lt II £05'85I II LOC'08 I LOC'08 -_ L811'00 I 816'90 1 - I 089'112 I ZS' L I 9( - 9111 lil:)flV 1 paJ 1S 0 I OZb'001 17721.LS TH 3 Traffic Signal /R.R. Crossing I 050'88Z 1 pgos Iuo4as nlnb_i le1luapisall 1C6'ZI 180'8 59C0C IC5'90 686'58 peon loO4aS apisran0 1 186 9CL'0 088' S I 110'[1 LtZ'L I ISC'0 1 I S8C'II I 911'SI I 110'01 519'6 88L'91 £09'8[ 1 COWS{ L81'0Z ZOS'IZ ZLO'6 Italy C tit. z I L09'5 I 996'9 51117' S I I 085'8 I 066'91 I 6L0'CI I 968' LI L 98' I 1 1 I CSC' II SlL'IC 00L'50 1 VOL St 006' CZ 9S0'SZ 1 211'11 1 LLO't a7MIS wa(uS lu j LZ "I puOI 001 -1'51 t:aJ \/ >Ie1U1 I za CliC'9 I C1C6'L I L9L'6 1 10£'61 ti 656'ZI I S] )IANAS School Road 008'i; (1()8' 011'17 CK19'ZI 000' I I NIVW HAINM VaJ )1u1u1 018 LCCC 501 991'6 SOPS 011'01 609'01 CLL'9 951'17 CZL'Z 686'8 SL9'SI CIC'ZZ e c "u I � _ 3 SANITARY SEWER SLL 881 196'1: 8SL'8 8L8'0 099'6 5 LI'01 6Lt`9 peO21 I ICJQI171 900'0 OOL 6 L6S'SZ I I'arcrl Description I 9[ uo!paS II 1 80 13 "d I II Parcel 010 -75 SL Iaa "d 11 6L 1 ZO la'Jed 11 II Parcel 022 -08 18-010 1.).)"d 11 9L - 01(1 Ian "d I II Parcel 015 -76 1 II Parcel 1116 -76 9L - L 111 IaaJed 11 9L P d I LL -0 1 O 1 a3Je d I 8L - 010 la'Ju'I I 08 laJ1ed I 18 la'Jed I 18 1J3" l I I8-0111 laDJed SUMMARY II LL8' ZI4' Z1P Z14 L I El 'OS 8L8' I Z1 4'L II z , ZIP'L IL SBI u II ESE'E OS4'6S i 9L "73JaVd Iaai1S /41111th 0Z6'OOl i .L33 a.1.S 111 3 Traffic Signal /R. R. Crossing 0S0'88Z� peon IoopS Iequap!saa S46'LZ ZEE' EI SLS Override .School Road I 059I I 180'Z 180'Z I80'Z 180' Z OS9'I 180'Z iun•Z 80 Z I80'Z i S68'OLZ n P. E� 4S6'I P96' P9b'Z 494'Z P94'Z 4S6'I b94'Z 494Z P94'Z OZ I STORM SEWER I Pond LP -27 Easement O(xl' 4S ea, V Io1u E6Z'4 6Z'P i 19998 1 S1JIAHAS PeoH wog as d IISL'bE WATER MAIN �J v lon'L Z9II 994' I 994' 1 994' l 994' I 191'1 994' I 99P' 1 1 99b ' I 994' I 841'49 EL£ 9 S66'E tL8'£9 . E E EWE I ERE'£ SANITARY SEWER 1 eai V ) IuNj 104' 104' I 1 104' I 104' I 104 104'1 104' I 1 O I POI I9 PeOa Ioorps leialrl 06L 9 EOZ OLI'S8 L 1Io1 ldu Js act pDie,l IIo!PPPV s,��llel1 I II� ' I l II II Lot 2, Block I I'olli'E log II I `WoIB'4 w"1 11 1 1 "IU'S Io1 II II Lot I, Block 2 Z 1 'Z I1T1 II I l II II Lot 4, 01ock 2 I Z 1 'S ■. 11 �_ 11 n!I!PPV ."a!A PP V 1011110 II __ APPENDIX C SCHOOL ROAD BREAKDOWN COST A) School Road Residential Equivalent (CP Rail to East Line School) 7,500 CY Common excavation @ $3.50 /cy $26.250 2,500 TN Aggregate base. Class 5 @ $6.70 /ton 16,750 660 TN Bituminous base course C $13.00 /ton 4,620 330 TN Bituminous wear course $14.00 /ton 6,600 60 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $110.00 /ton 7.700 3,220 LF Surmountable concrete curb @ $5.00/If 16,100 2.0 AC Seed w /mulch, fertilizer @ $1,500.00 /ac 3,000 200 CY Topsoil borrow @ $8.00 /cy 1.600 Subtotal $83,500 + 5% Contingency 4,180 $87,680 + 35% Indirect Cost 30.690 Street $118,370 Street ($118,370) + Storm Sewer - Contract I ($36,320) $154,690 B) School Road 36' width (CP Rail to East Line School) 24,000 CY Common excavation @ $3.00/cy $ 84,000 3,400 TN Aggregate base. Class 5 @ $6.00 /tn 22,780 1,100 TN Bituminous base course $13.00 /tn 14,300 550 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00 /tn 7,700 100 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $110.00 /tn 11,000 3,220 LF B618 concrete curb @ $6.00/lf 19,320 2.0 AC Seed w/mulch. fertilizer @ $1.500.00/Ac. 3,000 200 CY Topsoil borrow @ $8.00 /cy 1,600 LUMP SUM Stripping @ $5,000.00/ls 5.000 Subtotal $168,700 + 5% Contingency 8.440 $177,140 + 35% Indirect Cost 62.000 Street $239,140 Street ($239,140) + Storm Sewer Contract I ($36,320) $275,460 '1 CUFF ROAD (C. S.A.N. 32) _ ` \ • I PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACT IF �"?��� / irc 0 900 1000 S . In fest !PROPOSED T.H —3 I IMPROVEMENTS !- E SCHOOL ROAD LOCATION PLAN r EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 .9553F :2.DWG MAY 1994 t NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACT I PROPOSED WESTON HILLS DRIVE or Bonestroo Rosene In Anderlik Associates 022-79 ' ileFARLINE T.H. YSAN. SEWE WATERVI ADD. CITY 1D PROPOSED — 1 1 ; 11:11 r 021-79 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 314 r- L ' NSCAYNE AV 5 L.. ' 1 1 41 NEW ELEMENTARY PROPOSED A —. / 1 \ I I I 1 1 1 I 1 L PINES L. PICS1UT !'N "SAN. SEWER :Y OTHERS / k • / „, ,‘ ‘ _...." , ‘ ‘ e ' - ' ' 8" \ ` , i ..; _ L. / \ 1 \ tir -rt 1 2 t t 1 L 1 ..7 - - - L / \ / % k ......' --/ -- — — — -- I I 1 015-76 SCHOOL 1\ , 1 \ \ \ \ \ I 1 1 s 1 1 ; `, \ \ 010—'2\ EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 L:\49\49553\49553F01 MAY 199 CONNECT TO Ex. SAN. SEWER MANHOLE ti 4 LJ ; 010-82 ADDITION 1 I 1 1 i . . PLAT / PROPQSD i; WATERY EW 010-75 021-75V* 010-08 015-76 1 zz WESTON SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS HILLS DRIVE 022-08 -49 LP-26 LP-27N /- diNNECT TO Exi SAN. SEWER 7" .11 , - 76s 021-27 T.H. 31 SAN. SEWER - WATERVIEW ADD. CITY PROJ. 666R ■ ' / Ex. 8" PVC / SAN. SEWER / \ re - 0 150 300 IZiMa■iaMEN Stele in fee Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates —_y 022 -7 licFMLANE 021 -79 � NE79US) � _•J -..1 010 -82 70' r, I I: I I I I I I �\ � ,� �� 31 I 1 4 1 1 5 i LJI LJ I J LJ A . � 01 C- 82 —�_> • iIi i t t r \.T_ 7' ; 1 _" 1 a 010t-45 % - -- ' gt N ; as 015 -76 m a 021 -1,5 Au co NEVV ELEMENTARY �� ` --1 \, .." \ r : 1 ,' \ SCHOOL 1 I ��' I I 1 I PINES , EDGE PROPOSED; ADDITION SANITARY SEWER LATERAL ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 _: \49 \49553 \49553F01 MAY 1994 JI cr 010 -82 r J �r � WESTON PLAT 16 (PARCEL 016-L76) i • 1 LUMP SUM ASSESSMENT r I t 0 id 015 -761 Huss I DRIVE 010 -08 022 -08 DRIVEWAY /EASEMENT - 1 "I I LJ GURE 3 COMM. 49553 PROO 'ED • LEGEND 021 -27 f y ,, 156' asses a ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE • 150' CORNER LOT CREDIT / _ "/ // `�,, ... � . \, _'_'- 1 w 0 150 300 5oatt In feet POSSIBLE FUTURE LOT UNE Bonestroo _ Rosene Anderlik & Associates 300 600 sto In feet TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 67 49553F08.DWG NAY 199 COMM. 4 9553 IGURE 4 LEGEND utiu'auuul ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY ■ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates / 022-79 McFARLMIE 021-79 3 ats cArtvE LiLi 3 PROPOSED PROPOSED!' EDGE • , ADDITION - 1 I I I I I * 6 3 • NEISIUS" , 'CONNECT TO PROP. TER IN 010-82 PROPOSED WATER MAIN 4 / 010-82 r ( r 7)1 5 - N 7-51 J / By Oth NEW MENTA07 PRoPCISEO\ 015-76 SCHOOL PINES EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 6 L:\ 49\ 495-53\ 49553F06 MAY 1 ■ Future 87 By Others 1JT LPLAT WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1 PROPOSED I b! (t) WATE'RVIEW WATER IMAIN r \BY OTHER..5- \\ —A N- ,- , // I ‘, ,/</".• ....,../../ ". A ( / / r.:•=7-`="-: ' 010-82 I( r 0 LJ 1 0 r -J 010-7,5 7 4.'11 84 021-75.1 : , . , „ • . . . , . . ;..4. , . . • :......,....._____, ..L..,.. ,; .. , •,..,.. , . . 1 • -/-' '-'- '-•.,, , ; / f , \ ; , / , •••-,,:, / I ' Ex. _____ ,,/ 4 , WESTON ! ;A._ __,:. J 010-08 r L J 022-08 LP-26 CA) 1 'k 1 2” '3- i I HILLS \ I DRIVE ; , Ex. r , , CONpLIECT TO Ex. 12" 1 WATER MAIN 1 M. Fl RE 5 49553 021-27 • C ••I 4 9— . , . -•., —,,,„ , ,. -•-•,,,,, ,-., , voo■moni-- 0 150 300 5■72!eiR Seals in feet Bonestroo Flosene Anderlik Associates 022-79 IleFNILAN BISCAYNE AV 3 1 PROPOSED ( NI ELEMENTAR* :Is: / al SCHOOL ::: 1-015-76 1 10011- , t Nam r' ‘ / 1 . i 1 1 MN / 1 \ 3 / 3 WESTON NEW 021-79 0 4 / 1 1 01 PROPOSED , 3 / \ / ‘ ' ... \ PINES NESUr N ". \ 010-82 70' L el 156' Mizusi , i ADDMON tr)2 e 015-76 , / ( 1 _ 1. /' \ .1 I. 0 - EDGE EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROA CITY PROJECT No. 6 L:\ 49\ 49553\ 49553r06 MAY 1 010-82 / 't , % 11; .5 11 1 \ 1 410 1 0 1 la • I IN vr (PARCEL 016-76) LUMP SUM WATER MAIN ASSESSMENT LATERAL ASSESSMENTS /' r ) 7 , 010-08 r '1 I LJ HILLS \: I DR/VE PROPOSED , WATERI/IEW ---- • \ , I ADDITION I 022-08 DRIVEWAY EMEts/T 156' mania CMm. ag553 1GURE 6 -,a LEGND ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 150' CORNER LOT CREDIT POSSIBLE FUTURE LOT LINES n Bones troo Rosene Anderlik Associates \ ; ../- - ', T't : \ /"•', . . ■J ' e 0 150 3t0 Sonia in foot 300 Scale n feet 600 TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 67 49553F08.JWG MAY 199 FIG RE 7 ( 1 4 9553 LEGEND mausI,' ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY • Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates 032-79 lieFARLANE 021-79 ALTERNATE STORM SEWER ALIGNMENT FOR POND OUTLET AT SCHOOL 34 • BiSCAYNE AV 1 ' I LJ 3 4 NEW POND GRADED BY SCHOOL/DEVELOPER PROPOSED/ \ / 1 PINES ADDITION '-„ 010 010-82 EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 6 -.\ 49553\ 49553F0.3 MAY POND GRADED, OUTLET BY SCHOOL PROPOSED1 , 3. Th 5-76 PROPOSE - STORM SEWERT EEMENTR* SC}-100L 1 - ■ ------ _ t / i t i 1 . , "WATER , , OU TLET -----, SKIMMER ) - 7 ---- - - I 1 1 PLAT \ TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS / / PROPOS 3 turs10 ge ROPOSED O2 1-7\I STORM SEWER_ 5 ti* POND tP -27 EAS EMENT 015-76 fl 5" I 1 , 2" WESTON HILLS DRIVE" COMM. 4 9553 ••■■••■••••• RE 8 021-27 z 4 i ',., t .• , -- , , , „---,:--------,--, ' - 9.,, : ,' „” --< ,,‘ i i ,, % ; , r \ \ / / / ' 0 150 300 GanSgREEESNaa Soaks In fiat AA Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates , 300 SCO r1 f «t 600 TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER LEGEND ilmalsom ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD D CITY PROJECT No. 6 3 Q 4 9553F08.DwG MAY • •4 MM 49553 URE 9 Bonestroo Rosene at Anderlik d Associates 022-79 Mc:PAM-ME ( T N PROPOSED' STORM SEWER-\6c 3 H 5 BiSCAYNE ' I NEW PROPOSED STORM SEWER 021-79 010-82 r n 7 I 1 I ! 3 I STORM SEWER BY OTHERS PROPOSED; 4 2 I 015 EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 L:\ 49\ 4 9553\49553F03 MAY , 994 Li v, WATEIEW (--- EI_EM ENTAR,* - ,..,\ /4- -` \-, „..„../ PROPOSED/ ), , , SCHOOL , , _. -- ...--, PINES EDGE ,- r [ , r : 0 , ‘ i , 1 DRIVE 1 , , s ----L. r , , „_', PLAT ADDMON -----i----., i -,, _ .. \ '. \ , 1 • PROPOSED LATERAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 'I S 021-27 • '1 r Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates 4 0 150 300 Scow in tem r / ix ( ‘ , ■ , ..-:, \ \ ___ T \ i , --,. - •-,: - .4b ,/ / , ---., „,, WESTON! „.., ).', 015-76 - \ .-t” sly -‹ 7 7 ' \ -...,,, ,.. \'-`N-,' --,‘, ...„, , .." , -PROP. STREET 36' F-F I; r CURB_ & GUTTER IN 66:' -7R /W 010 DRIVEWAY c' EASEMENT TO PARC L (022 -08 END T.H. 3 STREET_. '1 CONSTRUCTION 0 , i 1 BEGIN 4 ........ PROPOSED' 021 -79 6' WIDE CONCRETE WALK Y--, r -, 3t 1 LL SCHOOL ROAD TREET CONST,: CONCRETE 015 -76 !, EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 L: \49 \49553 \49553F04 MAY 1994 • NEW ELEMENTARY PROPOSED, SCHOOL 1 1 1 1 1 PINES EDGE __ ;END; SCHOOL ROAD STREET CONST.1 ADDITION ` - - - -- PLAT ;', STREET IMPROVEMENTS I PROPOSED J F5. 11 1 j WATER �I , 'SECTION -- J . - -< 1 • IEW SEE FIG] M3 � �, ADDITlON >,1 1 1 4' - AY � o10-7, PROPOSED I DRIVEWAY R L4GNMENT 021 7''r}+ PROP •,\ S7RFET 32' F -F \ CONCRTE CURB 13c GU 015 -76 E--- i I 1. _ WESTON 7 h 1ILLS IDRNE WESTON HILLS DRIVE STREET ;CONSTRUCTION 'TYPICAL' RESIDENTIAL E 11 PL /So. 3' \ \� 35' 8' 18' • 021 -27 y' 13 BEGIN T.H. 3 STREET CONSTRUCTION 'Lo PL/ 66' CL 31' 18' 13' CONC. WALK TYPICAL SECTION SCHOOL ROAD No Scc,e Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates 0 +SO 300 Stmis in feet 022-79 ; 3 7 71 3 € 3 021-79 PINES ADDIII1ON 10 ' BISCAYNE AV • f. NOWA 7 '‘'•• ..\"•• 010-82 4 . , PROPOSED' 70' ; • I 111 I • 156': ' 0 tin 1 • ev3onse t ri5V`Nta, 5 • 4. No. 1 © L. EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 49\ 49553\ 49553F04 MAY 1994 • •-• J IS :43 111 010-82 SCHOOL ROAD RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT STREET ASSESSMENTS ' 1 ' WATERI/IEW ■ sa ' 01 0-1-15 VI "ttr i 1011 lk • „ 010-08 I-5—A 51 015-76 ' wa 021125 Lo 44.1 .._...., -.....ig 1 NEW ELEMENTARY i -, -‘\ 7' : PROPOS 05 EDA ,/ is g -- a 015-761 , \ SCHOOL "4' ..: —7 r AMINMA j • ... 4 " . ,...• , I I ,/' { ■ , I I 1 , . te- WESTON 1 , , • ., , 4 _. r , ..A.:€ le L N, EDGE , PLAT \_,\ (PARCEL 016-76) LUMP SUM ASSESSMENT 156' mamas te PROP9SD 022-08 URE 12 • N. LEGEND ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 75' CORNER LOT CREDfT ••••.I • ■;:) • `-•-•••,,,,' rt 'Z. 021-27 / , 7 .., ; -‘, ''..... •• , ...••,„,„ --,,,, 7 "•---,...... . , ).. / . -... --(.1 75 ' / '"•••.. / / / , \ 1 / / / '‘( '\N. ■••," 1- ' ..---"..-L'...—"''.--.1N' ' •/' k \ •••••.........„---•• N. \ ..,t s .•., ...„ \ 'N.,_,/ , ' \ \41' 5 • N - ' • . .."... ''''' ••• ,,,,/ -7 ' ' s, 7\ "•••,-, • % 0 150 SOO GM■■S Sado In test ki Bones troo Rosene Anderlik Associates SCIENCE DR INTERSECTION LAYOUT EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 49553F05.DWG MAY 1994 STATE TRUNK HWY No. 3 10' PAVED SHOULDER 10' PAVED SHOULDER 12' 12' 12' 12' 7 12' 10' PAVED SHOULDER 13' CANTILEVER SIGNALS w /STREET CROSSING PAD :U.= MINN AM Mil MR MOS SIMI IMO MIN INS SYSTEM zi Bones troo Rosene Anderlik Associates P P LO 010 -50 O -c 050-28 0 -51 0 -5 030 -51 020 -28 2 020 -51 SEE 5 RD PRO WATE ,7f x '16 sr 15 1 t/E 1 3 12 c kn EW ON 0 21 -79 GUN CLUB ROAD LP -23 010 -80 011 -81 /MI • 6 • LP -27 010 -82 2 5 4 (7 022 -08 ri BM 011-81 012 -81 1 (321-75 -z- 010-75 017 -76 -z 015-75 01 6- 76 018 -76 010 -52 0 300 600 Scot• In ?wt 040 -28 030 -28 012-55 EAGAN, MINNESOTA T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 673 49553F08.DWG MAY 1994 ff® aliam__t R miibipwl/sat rto mar 040 -27 030 -27 010 -57 030 -81 NH T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD OVERSIZE AREA ASSESSMENT M. 49553 LEGEND _ainiu i ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY ■ DRIVEWAY ACCESS T.H. 3 FIG RE 14 ■ 010 -77 010 -78 11111111111151141111511111 izji Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates 014 -76 a 3 a a a 0 a 8 c 8t 61 1 a 8E 0 1 88 0 8 31 i0 , II ar 1 6 10 6Ff • MEMO city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 15, 1994 SUBJECT: SUMMARY /MINUTES - INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MTG PROJECT 673 (TH 3 /SCHOOL ROAD) At 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 14, an informational neighborhood meeting was held in the Municipal Center Council Chambers. The attached sign -up sheet documents those interested /affected property owners in attendance. In addition, the following staff were present: Public Works Director Colbert, Community Development Director Reichert, City Planner Sturm, Project Planner Tyree, and Consulting Engineer Hanson (BRAA, Inc.). Tom Colbert opened the meeting by explaining the history of development in the area, the recent school bond issue resulting in the construction of a new elementary school combined with recent preliminary plat approvals necessitating the installation of streets and utilities to service the southeastern corner of Eagan primarily south of Weston Hills and east of TH 3. He also explained the public improvement process of petitions, feasibility reports, public hearings, MnDOT involvement, construction timetables, final assessment hearings and special assessment payment schedules. Then, through the use of graphics, Mark Hanson walked through each of the proposed improvements (sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer /ponds, signals and street improvements). MnDOT financial participation for TH 3 improvements was discussed in detail with the extent not being known until March of 1995. The reasons for constructing a new school road intersection with TH 3 in lieu of upgrading the current Gun Club /Farm Road intersection was discussed in detail. Also reviewed were MnDOT requirements to close the Farm Road connection from TH 3 to Dodd Road and the railroad requirements to abandon /relocate the existing private drive access to TH 3 from the east (also referred to as Farm Road). The estimated quantity of right -of -way and permanent /temporary easement acquisition for each of the utilities was also discussed in relationship to its impact on individual properties. Mr. Hanson then walked through the preliminary assessment roll and the methods and rationale used for calculating the various assessment revenue for each of the various proposed public improvements. After this 45- minute introduction, it was opened for general comments and questions. 1 Strong reaction to potential delay or elimination of signalization of TH 3 at proposed new Gun Club Road due to history of accidents in general area. (Staff explained that before signals can be installed on a trunk highway, MnDOT must justify its need through a detailed study once the intersection is open. The schedule for the signal at Cliff Road @ TH 3 was discussed.) • Two property owners objected to proposed trunk area assessments when they have already been assessed. (If they have been previously assessed for a specific trunk utility, they will be deleted from the final assessment roll.) • Weston Hills should be included in the assessment area for the area -wide roadway improvements. (Based on current law and past experience, the City Attorney's Office has indicated that the City will not be able to sustain assessments against platted residential Tots currently served with streets and utilities to current City standards.) • School Road should be payed for entirely by the school district. (The City Council has determined that the school shall be fully responsible for all signalization costs at TH 3 and the railroad crossing and they are paying their share of area -wide assessments and the oversizing of School Road. Special assessment law does not allow the City to assess the entire costs of a project to a single property owner while excluding other properties that can receive benefit by the improvement.) • What is going to happen with the Halley's Addition land use /zoning designation and how will this affect the assessments. (The City staff and Planning Commission have requested the City Council to authorize a study to evaluate the ultimate proper land use for the industrial zoned property in this area. Presently, the assessments are based on their industrial zoning classification. If that land use /zoning should change, the final assessment roll will properly reflect the proper land use classification.) Objection to relocating the major access from the current Gun Club Road intersection to the new School Road. (Staff explained the safety concerns with the Gun Club Road intersection being located on a super - elevated curve of a 55 mph highway and the extent of roadway improvements to Farm Road and Gun Club Road that would not provide any benefit to adjacent wetlands. The proposed School Road intersection will provide direct access to the Halley's Addition and school property while providing direct benefit to adjacent undeveloped property which is anticipated to develop in the near future with the completion of the elementary school.) \3 3 • Will 100% of MnDOT financing be directly applied to the costs of this project? (Yes. Assessments will be based on the balance of construction costs remaining after all MnDOT funds have been applied.) • Objection from Dodd Road property owners to the closure of Farm Road's access to TH 3. (Dodd Road's access to TH3 will be via 120th Street in Rosemount to the south or Cliff Road to the north with secondary access available via Todd Avenue in the Manor Lake Addition.) • Will Carol Street be built? (No. A public hearing to consider the vacation of Carol Street is scheduled to be heard before the City Council on August 2.) • Speed limit on TH 3 should be lowered through this area. (The speed limit on trunk highways is set by the Commissioner of Transportation and the City has no jurisdiction or control.) • Why isn't the proposed School Road alignment further north to match up with the private driveway access (E. Farm Road)? (Mr. Finch responded that he did not want that alignment through his property and wanted it located to the south of his property.) • What financial benefit is there to the Halley's Addition from these improvements? (The benefit accrues to the property and not necessarily to the current use. It is based on the premise that the value of the property has increased by having City streets and utilities available allowing the property to develop to its highest potential meeting City standards.) After the general question and answer session, the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. with several property owners lingering to discuss various issues as it relates to their personal situation with various staff members. Respectfully submitted, A /� irector of Public Works TAC /jj Attachment: Attendance List NAME :6' YO / Aim- 12. 1 ,,„ 4 13.W 1 jJ 15. 16 20. LTS#5 SCHOOL ROAD /TH 3 THURSDAY, JULY 14, 1994 -- 5:00 P.M. A DDRESS L/ $7o , e 4- / 7S h#'.o/s.) ,d tic .. La11.4 -/ 1 71/.4.,;:h 17. • t 4 / i/ �► 18. L� & � 19 . ArAWASA aj PI.c 6-73 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 595 flee-um e :04- Q SF/ /4444v-,7 yes = p..�� k/ e 'llefeA,/ - Vor 4 8 6 k) pl S3 5' ,,LA- C)04-6 /( (Atclkt,A).,<00 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT /REZONING /PRELIMINARY PLAT ISD #196 - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #18 A. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, I.S.D. #196 - Elementary School #18 changing the land use from D -I Single Family Residential (0 -3 units /acre) to PF (Public Facility, Quasi- Public) for 13.97 acres, a Rezoning of 13.09 acres of A (Agricultural) and .88 acres of I -1 (Limited Industrial) to P (Public Facilities), and a Preliminary Plat, consisting of 13.97 acres for one lot and two Outlots located in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 36 -- Independent School District #196 is requesting a comprehensive guide plan amendment, a rezoning and a preliminary plat for the new elementary school #18, located in the SE corner of Eagan just east of T.H. 3. The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on these proposals at its meeting of June 29, 1994. The minutes of the Planning Com ission meeting along with the staff report are enclosed on page/ 3? through lG( The Planning Commission recommended approval of the comprehensive guide plan amendment, changing the land use from D -1 (single family) to PF (public facility) for 13.97 acres located in the north half of the SE 1/4 of Section 36. The Planning Commission also recommended rezoning of 13.09 acres zoned agricultural and .88 acres zoned I -1 to P (public facilities). The commission also recommended approval of the preliminary plat for one lot and two outlots subject to the six conditions set forth in the commission minutes. The Advisory Planning Commission also considered the entire area surrounding the proposed school and noted that the area zoned industrial to be west of the proposed school is not consistent with the City's long range plan for this area which designates it as D -2 (residential). The Planning Commission therefore recommends to the City Council that a study be initiated to consider the rezoning of the I -1 districts within the area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a comprehensive guide plan amendment changing the land use from D -1 (single family) to PF (public facility) for 13.97 acres located in the north half of the SE 1/4 of Section 36; to approve or deny the rezoning of 13.09 acres currently zoned agricultural and .88 acres currently zoned R -1 to P (public facilities) involving the same property; to approve or deny a preliminary plat consisting of 13.97 acres including one lot and two outlots subject to the six conditions recommended by Advisory Planning Commission; to initiate a study to consider the rezoning of the areas currently zoned I -1 located to the west of the proposed school site. \ �4 PAGE 12 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - I.S.D. #196 - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #18 Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use from D -1 Single Family Residential (0 -3 units /acre) to PF (Public Facility, Quasi - Public) for 13.97 acres, a Rezoning of 13.09 acres of A (Agricultural) and .88 acres of I -1 (Limited Industrial) to P (Public Facilities) and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 13.97 acres for one lot and two Outlots located in the Nz of the SE; of Section 36. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. She highlighted that information presented in the City staff's planning report dated June 22, 1994, noting the subject property's background and history, underlining the street location issue for the subject property and the surrounding developments, the surrounding uses, the compatibility of an elementary school, the size and setbacks of the proposed lots, the tree preservation and landscaping plans, and the grading, storm drainage, water quality improvement requirements and utility extensions. Ms. Tyree briefly described the proposed improvements, including the school and play fields. Ms. Tyree further noted that the primary street access for the subject property is proposed to be provided from the west by Red Pine Lane, connecting to State Highway 3. She advised that the street extension is proposed under City Project No. 673 and is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on July 19, 1994. Ms. Tyree further advised that the proposed Red Pine Lane in the school's plat does not align with the proposed Red Pine Lane within the Pines Edge development to the east. Ms. Tyree concluded that the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment is compatible with the surrounding area and the rezoning and proposed use is consistent with the City's plan for the area. Finally, Ms. Tyree requested the Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council to order a study for consideration of rezoning the I -1 zones within the area to R -1 zones. Eric Linner, a representative of Independent School District No. 196, was present for any questions. A resident, who resides north of the development, inquired as to the City's plan for the storm drainage into the pond on his property. John Wingard advised the resident that the July 19, 1994, City Council meeting will address the acquisition of easements for the pond and that the property owners will be notified. PAGE 13 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 Rick Packer, a representative of Shamrock Development Company, which is developing the Pines Edge development, objected to the non alignment of Red Pine Lane in the proposed Preliminary Plat with Red Pines Lane in Pine Edge Preliminary Plat. He further stated that the Pines Edge developer refuses to waive its right to object to any assessments for Red Pine Lane. A representative of the Finch property, expressed concerns regarding the location of Red Pine Lane, and whether proper notice was given regarding the proposed Preliminary Plat. He stated that the proposed location of Red Pine Lane diminishes the flexibility of development for the Finch's property and thus diminishes the value of their property. Another resident, who owns property within the I -1 zone, inquired as to whether the City intends to change the zoning of the I -1 properties, due to the location of the school. City Attorney Michael Dougherty advised the resident that the Commission is requested to consider a recommendation to the City Council to consider the rezoning of the I -1 zones within the area. Should the Council direct a rezoning, there would be public hearings with opportunities for public testimony in that process. Another resident, who resides north of the proposed Outlot B, inquired as to whether Outlot B is proposed to be zoned Public Facility, to which Ms. Tyree responded in the affirmative. The resident further inquired as to whether the underlining easement to the farm access road will terminate to which Community Development Director Reichert answered in the affirmative. Chairman Voracek advised that the remaining unanswered questions raised thus far in the hearing are: the location of the alignment of Red Pine Lane, future development plans for the Outlots and whether notice was proper. Mr. Linner advised that the proposed Red Pine Lane within the proposed Preliminary Plat is a result of locating the road within the land already owned by the School District. He noted that it is 60 feet south of Pines Edge's proposed Red Pine Lane. Mr. Linner further stated that with respect to the Outlots, the School District intends to sell the property for residential development. Community Development Director Reichert added that the Pines Edge Preliminary Plat was approved despite the unknown location of the roadway within the School District's plat pursuant to the developer's request. Discussion ensued regarding the location and alignment of Red Pine Lane. PAGE 14 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 Member Merkley expressed concern regarding the School District bringing preliminary plat applications to the City with unanswered questions and unknowns. Member Merkley indicated that this seems to be the case with every preliminary plat brought before the City by the School District. Member Wallace suggested the Commission move on the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment request, but defer the Preliminary Plat application for a couple of weeks to allow the street issue to be resolved. Member Miller stated that he was not in favor of delaying the Preliminary Plat process because it would cause delays to solving the crowded school issue. Discussion ensued as to how to proceed with resolving the location of the street and the timing of the City Council public hearing on the street improvement project. Chairman Voracek stated that this matter simply involves two developments side -by -side, each of which must work together to resolve the street location issue. He further stated that the Commission must consider the public's best interest, but also because it is the School District, the Commission must consider an accounting for the school's needs. He concluded that it is not in the best interest of the kids or the public if the Commission delayed the building of the new school. He stated that it is a balancing act. Member Segal stated that he believed the Commission had a duty to the City Council to resolve the location of the street issue before sending it to City Council. Chairman Voracek stated that he believes that the road alignment issue can be worked out between the two developers before final plat, to which Member Merkley agreed. Member Merkley inquired with respect to the recommendation to the City Council to order a study on rezoning the I -1 district properties, whether there is a City - incentive program to the users of the I -1 district properties to locate to other industrial sites within the City. Mr. Merkley stated that he believed the area "needs to be cleaned -up" and that it is currently "an eye sore ". Member Isberg stated that he agreed with Member Merkley. Miller moved, Segal seconded, a motion to approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use from D -1 Single Family Residential (0 -3 units /acre) to PF (Public Facility, Quasi - Public) for 13.97 acres located in the Nz of the SE; of Section 36. All present approved in favor. Miller moved, Segal seconded, a motion to approve the Rezoning of 13.09 acres of A (Agricultural) and .88 acres of I -1 (Limited Industrial) to P (Public Facilities) located in the N2 of the SE; of Section 36. 1 PAGE 15 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 All present approved in favor. Miller moved, Merkley seconded, a motion to approve the Preliminary Plat consisting of 13.97 acres for one lot and two Outlots located in the NZ of the SE; of Section 36, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, F1, Gi, and Hi. 2. The development be subject to an on -site ponding requirement to treat all runoff leaving the site. The design of the treatment pond systems must be acceptable to City water resources staff. 3. No filling or draining of the wetland on the site to be allowed. 4. This development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. 5. The developer shall be responsible for terminating the private access easement across the north property line of Outlot B. 6. Additional landscaping shall be provided on the west and south property lines. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. All present approved in favor, except Member Wallace opposed. Member Heyl directed to the developer her concerns as-raised by some residents that there has been recent burning of trees on elementary school properties. Ms. Heyl stated that she hopes the School District will have consideration for the environment in developing the school and play fields. She further stated that she hopes the School District will take every effort to ensure the safety of the children with respect to the wetlands and ponds on the school property. Mr. Linner responded that the School District did not burn trees on any School District property and that the on -site ponding will be designed pursuant to City requirements. J PAGE 16 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 Member Segal further noted that he is displeased with passing onto the City Council all the unanswered questions with respect to the Preliminary Plat and would have preferred to at least attempt to resolve the unanswered questions by the Commission. Member Wallace stated that he voted against the Preliminary Plat because of the unanswered access issue. Segal moved, Miller seconded, to recommend to the City Council that it order a study to consider the rezoning of the I -1 districts within the area of the subject property. All present approved in favor. REPORT DATE: June 22, 1994 36. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN CASE #: 36- CG- 6 -6 -94 36- RZ- 13 -6 -94 36- PP- 21 -5 -94 APPLICANT: Independent School Dist. #196 HEARING DATE: June 28, 1994 PROPERTY OWNER: ISD #196 & Wm. Loomis PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree Earl & Doris Marotzke REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat LOCATION: N1 /2 of the SE1 /4 of Section 36 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D - Single Family (0-3 units /acre) ZONING: A - Agricultural and I -1 - Limited Industrial SUMMARY OF REQUEST Independent School District #196 has applied for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the designation from D -I single family residential to PF Public Facilities , Quasi Public for 13.97 acres; a Rezoning from A - Agricultural (13.09 acres) and I -1 Limited Industrial (.88 acres) to PF Public Facilities; and a Preliminary Plat of one lot and two outlots located on the N1 /2 of the SE 1/4 of Section City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of all platting, the Planning Commission and City Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. $ACKGROUND/HISTORY: On May 17, 1994 School District #196 passed a bond referendum authorizing the construction of the district's eighteenth elementary school. It is District #196 intention to have the school open for classes in the fall of 1995. Since that time, the school district has been involved in the acquisition of land necessary for the development of the school. Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 3 VVALUATION OF REQUEST: Introduction: With the development of Westin Hills Addition and the platting of Pines Edge Addition and now the proposed elementary school, this "rural" area of Eagan is experiencing urban development. The level of coordination required is great, and each of these projects, though separate developments, are interdependent with one another. Access and utility extensions to serve Pines Edge Addition and the new elementary school are two major issues that will require an orderly progression of events to properly serve these developments. A. Surrounding Uses. The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - South - East - West - single family, Weston Hills Addition; zoned R -1 and A; guided D -I single family. vacant; zoned A and I -1, Hally's Addition; guided D -I. vacant, Pines Edge Addition; zoned R -1; guided D -I. single family dwelling; zoned A; guided D -I. B. Comprehensive Guide Plan and Rezoning Review. Compliance with Comprehensive Guide Plan. School District 196 is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the designation from D -I to PF public Facility, Quasi - Public. The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the entire area south of Cliff Road, north of the boundary with Rosemount, east of Highway #3 and west of the Inver Grove Heights boundary as D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 units /acre). School District # 196. This area has been developing according to the City's Plan of low density residential and it would appear that the remaining developable land will continue to follow in the same manner. Approving the amendment would be consistent with the City's practice of locating elementary schools in residential neighborhoods. Rezoning Review Schools are permitted in a Public Facilities district. District #196 is proposing a Rezoning from Agricultural and Limited Industrial to Public Facilities. Elementary schools and low residential uses are compatible. The areas surrounding the proposed elementary school are zoned A, R -1 and I -1. There are approximately 19 acres zoned I -1 in the vicinity between Highway #3 and the proposed school location. Halley's Addition was rezoned and platted into lots in 1972. The remaining 9 -10 acres abutting Highway #3 was rezoned in 1968; and with the exception of one small lot on the corner of Gun Club Road and Highway #3 has remained vacant. This industrial zoning is not in conformance with the City's Plan of D -I low density residential. 1 g Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 4 The Industrial area is in conflict with the City's Plan and low density development is occurring around the Industrial property. For example, one of the lots in Halley's Addition has even been incorporated into the school district's development. It may be necessary at this time for the City to initiate a study and a rezoning of the I -1 property to come into conformance with the City's established Plan. If the City were to rezone the Industrial land it would allow the existing business to remain, but not intensify their uses. Preliminary Plat Review. Lot 1 is 12.02 acres, Outlot A is 7,520 s.f. and, Outlot B is 38,610 s.f. Setbacks. As proposed the proposed school building meets all setback requirements. On -Site Improvements. The school is proposing a 82,022 s.f. walkout style brick building in the same design as the Glacier and Pinewood Elementary School. This school is approximately 3,000 s.f. larger. The school itself has 30 kindergarten through fifth grade classrooms and approximately 12 other specialty rooms. It will accommodate 825 students and 43 professional teachers. The main entrance to the building is located on the west site of the building between the two parking areas. A total of 96 parking spaces are proposed. The visitor parking and drop off area has 13 9'x 20' parking spaces and there are 83 staff 9'x 20' parking spaces. The bus drop off /pick up area encircles the staff parking lot. Both lots share their access from the proposed Red Pine Lane on the north. The plans also show joint park and school fields. Approximately 2.5 acres was dedicated with the Pines Edge Addition preliminary plat (final plat pending). This area will share softball and soccer fields. This area will be fenced along the west side with a 5' chain link fence. North of theses fields are the soft and hard surface play areas. A trail is proposed to extend through the Pines Edge Addition for connection to Spruce Wood Place. Landscaping. The landscape plan submitted appears to substantially meet Code. Staff is requesting additional screening type material along the west property line to reduce the exposure of the Industrial district. The plan does not include any added landscaping on the south property line. The revised landscape plan should be revised to include landscaping along the south property line. Tree Preservation Significant trees are located on the southwest portion of the site and are the result of a tree nursery. Terms of the purchase agreement for the site allow the owner to relocate the pine trees prior to closing of the property by the school district. Any of the remaining trees will be relocated on site. Planning Report - Elementary School # 18 June 28, 1994 Page 5 Gradine/Wetlands - The preliminary grading plan submitted with this application shows that the entire site will be graded. Approximately 18 feet of cut will occur on the west edge of the site where a pond will be located. Ten feet of fill will be needed along the north edge of the proposed building. A wetland survey of the property identified a type 1/3 wetland approximately 0.3 acres in size located along the east edge of the property lying partially within the Pines Edge plat. No filling or draining of this wetland is proposed, but it will be excavated to create the first cell of the two -cell detention basin for the treatment of stormwater generated by both the proposed Pines Edge development and a portion of the school. No mitigation is required by the Wetland Conservation Act under these circumstances. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion /Sediment Control Manual Standards. Storm Drainage /Water Ouality - This proposed development is located in the extreme southeast corner of Eagan within drainage basin L that has an exceptionally high concentration of recreation- classified lakes. The proposed development will generate runoff that will be directed to the north. This runoff will first discharge to Pond LP -27, a state - designated protected water which is classified for wildlife habitat in the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan. Discharge from Pond LP -27 will then travel through three indirect contact recreation water bodies (including Manor Lake and Hay Lake) before reaching Schwanz Lake in Trapp Farm Park. To maintain the quality of downstream lakes and ponds as well as minimize the water level fluctuation in Pond LP -27 during storm events, it will be essential to assure that stormwater from the school site is routed through a properly designed ponding system before discharge off-site. To accommodate this need, the school site plan includes construction of Pond LP -27.3, a two -cell pond to treat runoff from about 14.5 acres of the school grounds and adjacent rights -of -way. The remaining area of the school property will drain to Pond LP -27.4, a proposed two -cell pond along the east edge of the property that will also be used to fulfil water quality ponding requirements for the Pines Edge residential development to the east. The proposed storm sewer layout for the school shows that the proposed parking lot and building will drain to the west to proposed Pond LP -27.3. This pond will be located on Lot 5, Block 2 of Halley's 1st Addition and on property owned by E. & D. Finch. The City will be negotiating with the Finch's to purchase enough property for the street extension of Red Pine Lane and for the north cell of Pond LP -273. The seven acres of the site south of the proposed building will drain to the northeast to Pond LP -27.4. This drainage area includes the ballfields, hard play surface and soft play surface areas. The Pines Edge development will convey all of their site to this pond and they will be constructing the pond. Planning Report - Elementary School # 18 June 28, 1994 Page 6 The storm sewer outlets for Pond LP -27.3 and LP -27.4 are proposed to be trunk storm sewer lines constructed by the City under City Project #673. The outlets for the ponds are proposed to drain northerly along the east property line of the Finch property to Pond LP- 27. Sanitary Sewer - An 8" sanitary sewer of sufficient size, depth and capacity is available at the south end of Weston Hills Drive in the Weston Hills 2nd Addition. The 8" sanitary sewer stub has an invert elevation of 940.7 and it is located 400 feet away from this site. The extension of the 8" sanitary sewer from Weston Hills 2nd Addition and through the Pines Edge development to serve this site is expected to be installed this Fall. Watermain - A 12" trunk watermain of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is also available at the south end of Weston Hills Drive. The extension of the 12" watermain from Weston Hills 2nd Addition and through the Pines Edge development to serve this site is expected to be installed this Fall. The extension of the watermain across the north edge of the site in Red Pine Lane is proposed to be constructed by the City under City Project #673. The school intends to construct an 8" watermain around the building to provide adequate fire protection to the site. The public hearing for Project #673 is scheduled for July 19, 1994. kccess /Street Design - The primary street access for the school is proposed to be provided from the west by Red Pine Lane, a new street connecting to T.H. 3 and having a new railroad crossing over the CP Rail track. The alignment for Red Pine Lane was determined after consideration was given to upgrading Gun Club Road, Biscayne Avenue, and evaluating the existing connection of Gun Club Road with TH 3. The reconstruction of Gun Club Road would also impact adjacent wetlands and not provide any benefit to adjacent land for future development. The proposed Red Pine Lane alignment provides for a connection at T.H. 3 with better sight distance and provides direct benefit to adjacent land for future development. The extension of Red Pine Lane to T.H. 3 is proposed under City Project #673. The public hearing for this project is scheduled for July 19, 1994. This project may also include the construction of a traffic control signal at the T.H. 3 and Red Pine Lane intersection. It is proposed to construct Red Pine Lane to a 36 foot width with a 6 foot concrete sidewalk along the south side. At the T.H. 3 intersection, a left turn lane is proposed to be added to Red Pine Lane. The preliminary alignment of Red Pine Lane from T.H. 3 to the school site follows through the south edge of Parcel 010-82 which is currently owned by E. & D. Finch. The City will be negotiating with the Finch's to acquire the necessary easements and right -of -way to allow for the completion of Red Pine Lane by the fall of 1995. \Y1 Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 7 The development of the new school is obviously dependent on the provision on provision of the new primary access to TH 3. Similarly, development of the Pines Edge plat requires this access as does any further development in this southeast corner of Eagan. Therefore, approval of final plat will need to be conditioned on the City Council ordering this project (standard plat condition #D1) A secondary street access to the northeast is proposed from Weston Hills Drive, a 32 -foot wide street that was constructed in 1993 through the Weston Hills 2nd Addition. The stub street is located 400 feet away from the northeast corner of this site. The extension of the street through the Pines Edge development will be the responsibility of Shamrock Development. Easements/Right -of- Way /Permits - A pond easement will be required to be dedicated over Pond LP -27.3 and LP -27.4. In addition, the final plat shall dedicate 66 feet of right -of -way for Red Pine Lane. This development will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired prior to final plat approval. The developer will be responsible for terminating the private access easement across the north property line of Outlot B. Parks And Trails. A park will be created by combining the school district's land with the approximate 2.5 acres of dedication from the Pines Edge Addition. This will serve Park Service Section 36E. This item was heard at the June 20, 1994 Advisory Parks, Recreation, Natural Resourses Commission where it was determined that the proposed development would be responsible for a cash trails dedication. Compatibility with Surrounding Area. Locating elementary schools in or near residential neighborhoods is typical and are compatible land uses. In this instance the school will be located south of the existing Weston Hills Addition and west of the Pines Edge Addition (final plat pending). The existing industrial uses, located along unimproved Biscayne Avenue, are small and generally contained within the buildings. However, some of the businesses do not confine the activity inside the buildings and this tends to have a blighting effect on the area. The Plan for this area calls for low density residential and is developing as such. An elementary school in the area has typically less intrusive qualities when compared to the characteristics of any type of industrial uses located near low density residential. By developing the area abutting the rear of the four Industrial lots with soccer and ball fields, this acts as a buffer between the rear portion of the residential and the industrial. Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 8 ,SUMMARY /CONCLUSION Comprehensive Guide Plan, The school district has determined this proposed location to be necessary for its next elementary school due to their increased service demand in this area. The site is located in an area which is developing in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan of D -I, single family residential. The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment appears to be compatible with the surrounding area and the City's Plan. Rezoning. The rezoning and proposed use are consistent with the City's Plan for the area. Providing an elementary school for this developing residential area has been determined to be necessary by the school district and appears to be suitable for this site. Because of the impending developments it would be an appropriate time for the City to study and rezone the Industrial area to conform to the City's Plan. Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat appears to meet the required findings as listed on pages 1 and 2 of this planning report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D -I to PF of 13.97 acres, the Rezoning of .88 acres zoned I -1 and the 13.09 acres zoned A to PF and the Preliminary Plat of one lot and two outlots for Independent School District #196 Elementary School #18. If approving, the Preliminary Plat shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action February 3, 1994 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3 ,B4, Cl, C2,C4,D1, El, Fl, G1, and Hl. Water Quality & Wetlands; 2. The development be subject to an on -site ponding requirement to treat all runoff leaving the site. The design of the treatment pond systems must be acceptable to City water resources staff. 3. No filling or draining of the wetland on the site be allowed. Park and Recreation: 4. This development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. Planning Report - Elementary School #18 June 28, 1994 Page 9 Easements; 5. The developer shall be responsible for terminating the private access easement across the north property line of Outlot B. Landscaping: 6. Additional landscaping shall be provided on the west and south property lines. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. (sD A. Financial Obligations STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights -of -way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. AN public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead -end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. H. Other 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. if any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25. 1987 LTS #5 STANDARD. CON City Council September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Elementary School #18 There are pay -off balances of special assessments totaling SO on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay -off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Sanitary Sewer Trunk PF $1610 /Ac 12.02 Ac $ 19,352 Water Trunk PF 1685/Ac 12.02 Ac 20,254 Storm Sewer Trunk PF .112 /sq ft 523,746 sq ft 58,660 Water Availability Charge PF 2660/Ac 12.02 Ac 31,973 TOTAL $130,239 1 � Elementary School No.18 1 4 iytE9 Rn 1 c T�\ pv n t� Rd. No - l — A — - .r N M ri r t / f' _ L` J HACK rr w te O 0/ R n • 2 • rZ vV� #'+. � / y Il� lr'r ritIM50N 411f.$ r 25-i OP if - - p r( O . Z A \'0- \ F � ( K+ ' p . jj / SLAM / C j` ' /(� • l C --- No t _ l^ HAT LAKE REE EAr S O4 r rE • 1 l _ o Ix AnAt al, Cr R4 N \,) l 717 R r - J, I 7 71..i W OAK / c ripA ! F `I 4 N • NW o I 1:1 T^r F_. /. te dUt 1/11 11 ROAD tARM Cinr r h 1 F 11 1 \ . i6 _ , .. i _L (. 7 C 1 j � ' ` \t \w m;4,•. , 4. 1 1' , Z 1,\I ` a , o �I 1 I, 1 ,, 1 1 � ,\ 1 1 , 11 1 , , 1 „ ; t 1 1 ' ( 1 I 4 1 1 1, t 1 t _ 1 ' ',/,„� V ,, 1 t ' ' 1 1 ! / 1 1 ' I t1 1 � I I i l 1 • S 1 I 1` i t JI I JA(fl U JAH I Jo )\11i l �' ° Gr • n 1 1 1 1 1 ,. • : / / II, I 1 , 1 /,. 2„ 1 a1 t ' I ,' 1 , , 11 s. 1 -. r. , u, r. "T Z 1 •j4 1 1 I �• 11 1 I , I L I 1 `t 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -, , \ 4. 1,,111 1 I I I :L I , l, I I .. , 1 1 ��� 1,1,' f , 1 , 4 .. 1� Li ' _ / 1, I I '41 1 2 / t 1 r ' , ,y, 1 1 \ ! 1 � , C7 , ; � �'' R , j I 'i r - , i — -- -- - — - - - -%_ - - I I I T \ 9 1 , \ 1 ' 1 ' C / ' ' .• I 1 1 7 i t u. r _-'r" % ` . `-� =: ._ _ 1 ' . - - r 1 FN / •• L. � :. .. ` , 0 %: -'' a t e ms. - ' ,I, / _ _ - . P � l -- �� 110 i 11 ( . , jiIf = t f I ::: d hi iiii i i 1 1 .il I = a :1 ,i. !'ir-! ,_ : t ' - 1.1 1 .1 i i : I �3_,i " 1 1 1 t, 1 �, 111 1 I I �� ,,j_ r 1It i1 F � i I I I } - t1- ; }i i;il ; 1! - 1 t ar i; i = :iii ;.: i 1 l ; hail 3 _ 1 j:1i s r tt , II. : ! 11: =1}31}111: 13111 1 II 1 ( j _II , • 1 � 1 `•. i ,i • i 1 ) ' • OD ! i ,' } r —I —.� b .i all • 1P i''�`,�':t r i I I . 1 1 i=i its :Is I• sili t - ii ti! i Iiii f ( a �ief ' lit,i Li o �-- , ®} 3 o n @@ � ! i ( E !hill ;ill i i IIII 1I1,l1 ... IC • 1 41 I it' . o : o . o 7 L r r L L- 11111111M111 i J 1.1.0 I III Sala ®, L r r L L- 11111111M111 i J t11.61. • !;. WW1 lit - r r r — r - - - ` I I I I I , \ mo . ' �/ T L L / W 3 L 01'470 NW' •01 i • 1 3 414. Wino alo b '1 g III I I I 1 1I 11III 1111 1 1+1-1+ I V .3 • Ai a 0 .3 l 0 nrr O^ 0 8sgt1,11:48 — r r ■ r I I I I I I I I I I r — r L iJ U r I •••••11.4 I ::: 1133MIS 1 1 ,1 11 i s ai I� Ns* n1111111 1-FR _I- - ` I / I / / L T / L r r - L------- L- ______ L _______ 1-_____ i .uat �.'TT ^ „e�s��q ► I n CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP /// LEGEND POMEN0 AREA. STORM SEWERS *AMMO .. . . . . . • STORY SEWERS (Ergrrsm STORY LIT STATION (rMM1 • S TORY LIFT STATION Erwomb 0 S TORM FORCE NAM MAJOR EIVEMON aw•■■ POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL . . . . . . . 900.0 POND WOW WATER LEVEL • fOO.O OVERLAND MANAGE ROUTE EAG FIG. NO. 8 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CITY OF EAG(7 ( FIG. N0. 7 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT CITY OF 1111 ■ I_ 1 1111 I t ill 1 ' 1 1 3111 1111 z 0 • o Ow W Q J ✓ z z LL 1: 1 11# Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting SITE PLAN REVIEW AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARK CENTER 4TH ADDITION B. Site Plan Review and Final Planned Development Amendment, Park Center Fourth Addition, Lot 2, Block 1 - 24th & Hennepin Partnership, for Boston Chicken located in the SE 1/4 of Sec 30 - -The 24th and Hennepin Partnership is requesting a final planned development amendment /site plan review to allow a restaurant use (Boston Chicken) on Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition currently designated for a freestanding retail use. The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposal at its meeting of June 29, 1994. The commission conducted quite a lengthy discussion of the incremental revisions in this planned development. When initially approved this planned development was to include a 86,600 square foot retail strip center with a 4,500 square foot class I restaurant, a 6,000 square foot retail building and a 4,800 square foot bank. To date we have seen a Taco Bell and Blockbuster Video developed. The major retail strip center has yet to be developed. The current proposal is to replace the proposed retail building with another restaurant. The 86,000+ retail strip center is still a concept. The minutes of the PJ pning Commission and staff report on this item are enclosed on pages /66through The Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval of the final planned development amendment /site plan review subject to the ten conditions set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting. Note that the commission modified the staff recommended condition #4 and is recommending that the Boston Chicken be permitted to display its company logo sign in its windows. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a site plan and final planned development amendment for Park Center 4th Addition, Lot 2, Block 1 to allow development of a Boston Chicken Restaurant subject to the ten conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. ce-5 PAGE 17 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 BITE PLAN REVIEW AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - PARK CENTER FOURTH ADDN. LOT 2, BLOCK 1 - 24TH & HENNEPIN PTNSHP Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Site Plan Review and Final Planned Development Amendment for Boston Chicken located in the SE; of Section 30. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley briefly highlighted that information presented in the City staff's planning report dated June 20, 1994, noting the background and history of the subject property and the Planned Development Agreement, the surrounding uses and existing uses within the development, the proposed size and setbacks of the lot, the parking, landscaping, signage, and tree preservation plans. Mr. Ridley further advised that the proposed use is a 3,000 square foot, 54 -seat Boston Chicken Restaurant. Mr. Ridley concluded that the proposed use is not in compliance with the Planned Development Agreement's use designation of the building. Peter Hilger, a representative of the applicant, introduced Chris Lombardi, a representative of Boston Chicken, and then described the applicant's proposed site plan. Mr. Hilger advised that the only objection the applicant has with the staff report is to Condition No. 4 regarding window signage. He advised that Boston Chicken, as a trademark and a marketing concept, places permanent logo signs within the buildings' windows. He noted that the photo brochure of the building depicts the use of the window signage. Chris Lombardi briefly described the marketing and concept design of Boston Chicken, analogizing it to a LeeAnn Chin. Member Segal inquired as to the presence of food odors outside the establishment, to which Mr. Lombardi responded that the odor is typically a result of deep frying, which Boston Chicken does not do and therefore will not have the odors. Member Miller inquired as to whether it was the City's intent at the time of approving Taco Bell that no more fast food establishments would be an approved use in this Planned Development. City Attorney Dougherty advised that an amendment to the Planned Development Agreement was executed in which Taco Bell was approved in exchange for a Class I restaurant in the main retail building. Member Miller again inquired as to whether the Commission discussed at the time of approving Taco Bell its intent to keep the development cohesive and maintain a campus -like setting. Member Merkley and Voracek agreed with Member Miller. Mr. Merkley stated that Boston Chicken is a fast food in his opinion and is not l�� PAGE 18 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 what was originally proposed for the development. Mr. Lombardi stated to the Commission that Boston Chicken is not a fast food business. Discussion ensued regarding whether the proposed use, Boston Chicken, is within the development's original approved concept. Member Miller inquired with Vern Colon, who owns the property, whether he could promise that the 86,000 square foot building proposed for retail will not be split in the future. Mr. Colon stated that he could not give any assurances that the building would not be split because there may be different needs and markets in the future requiring the building to be split. Mr. Colon further noted that the site appears to be non - cohesive because it is not complete at this time, but once the main retail building is built there will be continuity to the entire site. Member Merkley inquired with Mr. Lombardi as to the use of window signage, citing such use by Taco Bell. Mr. Colon stated that as a developer he cannot control window signage by the user. Mr. Lombardi added that Boston Chicken does not use temporary promotional window signage, as Taco Bell does, but that Boston Chicken does have its logo signs which hang permanently in the restaurant's windows. Wallace moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to approve the Site Plan Review and Final Planned Development Amendment for Boston Chicken located in the SE4 of Section 30, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement reflecting the amendment for Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition. 2. The building exterior shall be constructed of masonry brick, to be laid on -site; and all brick shall be a brown tone in color that is comparable with the rest of the PD. 3. The pylon sign base shall be constructed with two 20" x 20" brick columns; the brick color shall match that of the building. 4. Any and all window signage shall be restricted to a permanent, company logo sign as shown in Boston Chicken's brochure. 5. All trash /recycling containers shall be contained within the building or in an enclosure attached to the building and constructed of the same exterior materials. 6. Landscape berming shall be provided along the public streets. PAGE 19 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 7. All landscaped and green areas shall be served by an underground irrigation system. 8. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the public streets. 9. The final utility plan shall include a manhole at the connection to the existing 6" sewer service stub. 10. The developer shall submit the following final detailed plans: building elevation plan, overall landscape plan on an approved grading plan, overall signage plan, and a grading, drainage, and erosion control plans to be part of the Final PD Agreement with the building permit submittal. All present approved in favor, except Miller and Merkley opposed. REPORT DATE: June 20, 1994 CASE #: 30- RI- 12 -6 -94 APPLICANT: 24th & Hennepin Partnership HEARING DATE: June 28, 1994 PROPERTY OWNER Vernon R. Colon PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Final Planned Development Amendment /Site Plan Review LOCATION: Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addn (SE 1/4 of Section 30) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD) ZONING: Planned Development (PD) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Mr. John Trautz, 24th & Hennepin Center Partnership, is requesting a Final Planned Development Amendment /Site Plan Review to allow a restaurant use on Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition designated for a free- standing retail use. BACKGROUND/HISTORY PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN The two lot Park Center 4th Addition was platted in 1993. Blockbuster video developed on Lot 1. Only a conceptual building layout was shown on Lot 2 because the property owner did not have a tenant The Park Center Planned Development (PD) Agreement entered into in August 1989, designated specific uses for four sites within the Park Center Plat. These uses and the subsequent developments are listed below: Site 1: 4,500 s.f. class I restaurant (Taco Bell) Site 2: 86,600 s.f. retail strip center (undeveloped) Site 3: 6,000 s.f. retail building (proposed restaurant) Site 4: 4,800 s.f. bank (Blockbuster Video) The existing uses within the Park Center PD are visually tied to one another with brown tone brick building exteriors and dual 20"x 20" brick column bases for each pylon signs. (�9 Planning Report - Park Center Planned Development June 28, 1994 Page 2 SURROUNDING LAND USES The site is surrounded by Park Center Drive and undeveloped commercial property to the north and east; Cliff Road to the south; and Blockbuster Video to the west. The senior housing site is located northwest of the subject property. EVALUATION OF REOUEST A. PD Amendment Review. The existing fast food restaurant and video store uses within the planned development do not reflect the original agreement for location or land use. Cliff Lake Centre; Rahncliff Crossings; and Outlot D, Park Center Addition provide an assortment of existing and future retail space available in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Amending the use of this parcel from retail to restaurant will have no discernable effect on this PD in particular, or the area in general. In fact, the inventory of existing and designated retail space to serve this area appears abundant. B. Site Plan Review. The applicant is proposing a 3000 s.f., 54 seat, Boston Chicken cafeteria style restaurant. - The subject site is the previously platted 0.9 acre Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition. Setbacks - As proposed, all building and parking setbacks will be met. Access /Circulation - The lot has two access points from Park Center Drive, one of which is a shared access with the Blockbuster Video site. As proposed, no internal circulation movement conflicts are expected. Paring - Based on 54 restaurant seats, the City Code requires 18 parking stalls. The site plan provides 44 spaces. In addition, there is a reciprocal parking agreement between the proposed restaurant and the video store sites. Landscaping - With minor modifications the Landscape Plan submitted is acceptable. The Plan provides landscaping that is consistent with that in place for both the Taco Bell and video store sites; however, more berming should be added along all public streets to help screen the parking areas and an underground irrigation system should be provided for all landscaped and green areas. 1 7 0 Planning Report - Park Center Planned Development June 28, 1994 Page 3 5ignage - The Signage plan is acceptable. Building elevation plans submitted call for a 27' tall pylon sign and building signage on the north, south, and east sides of the structure that is consistent with the City Sign Code. These same plans do not show any window signage and it may be appropriate to prohibit this type of signage because it will detract from the aesthetics of the brick building. Site Preparation/Tree Preservation policy - The lot has previously been graded and utilities are available. There is no significant tree resource on this site. Grading /Wetlands - The existing terrain of the site is fairly flat with no trees. Since the site was previously graded in the late 1980's, a minimal amount of grading will be needed to prepare this site for development. The preliminary grading plan should be revised to show the construction of a berm along the north, south and east property line to screen the parking area from Cliff Road and Park Center Drive. The maximum cuts on this site are 2 feet and the maximum fills are 2 feet. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on the site. Therefore, no action is necessary with regard to wetland issues for this parcel. Before grading the lot, the applicant will be responsible for preparing a final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to be submitted to the City for review. The developer will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion /Sediment Control Manual Standards. Storm Drainage /Water Quality - Water quality requirements for this parcel have already been met through the construction of a detention basin (Pond AP -50) to serve this and other portions of the Park Center Planned Development. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on the site. City staff recommends that the drainage of the proposed parking lot slope to the concrete curb and gutter and then to the proposed storm sewer. The developer believes this would be difficult to accomplish along the east edge of this site. Therefore, the developer is proposing to construct a concrete valley gutter swale through the middle of the bituminous parking lot along the east edge of the building. This alternative is acceptable because the valley gutter will collect runoff water from the parking lot and convey it to a catch basin. The stormwater runoff from Lot 2 of Park Center 4th Addition will be conveyed by a new privately maintained storm sewer system that will connect to an existing 30" storm sewer system that drains northerly in Park Center Drive to Pond AP -25. Pond AP -25 is a pond in the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, and the pond has an outlet. Planning Report - Park Center Planned Development June 28, 1994 Page 4 Utilities - Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity has been provided to Lot 2 from the sanitary sewer lines in Park Center Drive. A 6" sanitary sewer service stub has been provided to the lot. The final utility plan should include a manhole at the connection to the existing 6" sewer service stub. Watermain of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this development from the existing 8" watermain in Park Center Drive. A 6" watermain stub has been provided to Lot 2 from Park Center Drive. The existing hydrants along Park Center Drive will provide adequate fire protection to the development. Streets /Access /Circulation - Street access for the proposed development will be provided from Park Center Drive which is a publicly maintained street constructed in 1990 by the City for the Park Center development. The preliminary site plan shows the parking lot layout connecting to existing concrete aprons that were provided with the Park Center Drive project. The west leg of Park Center Drive connects to Cliff Road where a full access has been provided with median openings. The east access of Park Center Drive connects to Cliff Road as a right -in /right -out only access. The proposed development on Lot 2 will share the northerly access with the existing development on Lot 1. Fight -of- Way /Easements/Permits - The Park Center 1st Addition dedicated sufficient right - of -way for the construction of Park Center Drive. The final plat for Park Center 4th Addition dedicated the south 15 feet as right -of -way as required by Dakota County for Cliff Road. Also, restricted access was dedicated along the south property line as it abuts Cliff Road. The developer will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, Mn. Department of Health, Dakota County, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. Building Materials - The applicant has provided elevation plans showing a brick building exterior, a dual column 20'x 20" brick base pylon. Brick color is not identified on the plans; however the developer should use a brown /earth tone color to be consistent with the established color scheme within the developed portions of the PD and this exterior should be masonry brick that is laid on site. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION The proposed use is not consistent with the Park Center PD Agreement use designation of "free- standing retail "; however, there is a supply of existing retail space and raw commercial land available for development in the area. Planning Report - Park Center Planned Development June 28, 1994 Page 5 The restaurant site layout provides adequate parking, sound internal circulation, and the aesthetic elements required in the PD Agreement. Access and utilities are available to serve the site and there are no tree preservation or water quality issues pertaining to this property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve /deny a Final Planned Development Amendment and Site Plan for Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement reflecting the amendment for Lot 2, Block 1, Park Center 4th Addition. 2. The building exterior shall be constructed of masonry brick, to be laid on -site; and all brick shall be a brown tone in color that is comparable with the rest of the PD. 3. The pylon sign base shall be constructed with two 20"x 20" brick columns; the brick color shall match that of the building. 4. Window signage /advertising is prohibited. 5. All trash /recycling containers shall contained within the building or in an enclosure attached to the building and constructed of the same exterior materials. 6. Landscaped berming shall be provided along the public streets. 7. All landscaped and green areas shall be served by an underground irrigation system. 8. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the public streets. 9. The final utility plan shall include a manhole at the connection to the existing 6" sewer service stub. 10. The developer shall submit the following final detailed plans: building elevation plan, overall landscape plan on an approved grading plan, overall signage plan, and a grading, drainage, and erosion control plans to be part of the Final PD Agreement with the building permit submittal. i r ♦ I�' C lj Via i t e C• taxa ry \ / � 1. - • • �" /wu►•c c't�-2 ary'''t► 11114¢ Cif ± r *woo •• wet r ti • 14•tr r • OAK r I! • atic1 r i •• WPC R •• fI••pur n ••tea* r tf - TT.vt r � f• KIK:"•u r w••at•L r • DfA.Ot •• 1 rRTA •' 7 . SKr r u IT• r • •• wing • r DC maim. r •••qt••y r D rJVt1• R IC. •••. Mr r t • T. r . I. • fMltyf• Sr, ! 0 C TI it • f!• YAM • £;,:.a:. _ '7 1 smyt iC,) "I11`1 • am* : ,.. •• GUIDE •• 7. - 'c . .R-1— ••1 • • 1 . . _ • mite 1: Site 2: Site 3: Site 4: EXHIBIT B: DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SKETCH PLAN) 4111111 IMO .99 acres 9.87 acres .94 acres .93 acres • EXHIBIT C: USES • rrrrrrrrru SI ?8 3 1 :SITE 1, IzLi 111111 IMO ale 3 • 4,500 sq. ft. Class I restaurant 86,600 sq. ft. retail strip center 6,000 sq. ft. retail building 4,800 sq. ft. bank r) MOTE: internal road right -of -way not included in area) ORIGINAL PROPOSAL NW 'NVDd3 N3)l 3IN3J N id 1HJ ND1 OE w elm wt. hjli�ll M I ION %.MS 1 =Y L11 w A .M •.1 NM .1 MEND MN No •1 Mr t aMRF.IMM11 ►►N� N .Y 1 1 MO r331/43I NO1.130 E 0I MI 'wv73 lr31N37 xervd ■•R R•)P.$ w bnRPPnn -r. NMI . w .•.4 IS ••■ • e{ wit 4 t J H t I t t • w.ww Oft w •w. I • a e rw wr a nmrorryn rra Nrw O P. 1r M I nor vu+Pee 1 01 Nl 'W D3 Y3.0437 Mbvd •mIaig3 •.,..a 1 c ! ;�slj' " t 7 ggigirthi o1 wrs w \ ..M •.1 a — SI oft UR AI r so w/ rw wr a nmrorryn rra Nrw O P. 1r M I nor vu+Pee 1 01 Nl 'W D3 Y3.0437 Mbvd •mIaig3 •.,..a 1 c ! ;�slj' " t 7 ggigirthi OM la r KK P. l I011V 1001* T. M • MM. /OK 1 K N1_3153C i '>N13133N1_1,3 INnoVY biivd -0 rr u, �, 1 . 1 1 - -k ./ f sit u NN NVJ3 b 31N33 HbVd ua1a1g1) u r ~1 •� .s - ;x( -c I i / FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN 6: LECIEM MOON MIA• . . . . . . . . • . • • STOW SEMERS (.l ^ STOMA ••MERS Wombed . — STORM L/T STATION (ambling) • ROHM (PT STATION Goes s& 0 STORM FORCE IAN 44 • 4* ♦ ♦♦ MAJOR OIYIaON =or • • NO NORMAL MATER LIVE!. • • • • D HON MATER LEVEL • OLAND DRAMAS! ROUTE 900.0 S00.0 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT /TOWN CENTRE 70 SEVENTEENTH ADDITION PAYLESS SHOES /KINKOS /BOSTON CHICKEN C. Preliminary Plat, Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition - 24th & Hennepin Partnership, for Boston Chicken, Payless Shoes, and Kinkos, consisting of 1.76 acres for two lots on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition located in the NW 1/4 of Sec 15- -The 24th and Hennepin Partnership is proposing a preliminary plat consisting of two lots on 1.76 acres for a Boston Chicken Restaurant, a Payless Shoe Store and a Kinkos, located on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition along the east side of Town Centre Drive and the NW 1/4 of Section 15. The Planning ommission minutes and staff report on this item are enclosed on pages throug1 $ . The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting of June 29, 1994. The commission's review focussed primarily on the issue of access to Town Centre Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to the 13 conditions set forth in their minutes. The commission is recommending the prohibition of direct access from this plat to Town Centre Drive, however, the commission is also recommending that additional building mounted signage be permitted to facilitate customer access. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat consisting of 1.76 acres for two lots on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition located in the NW 1/4 of Section 15, subject to the 13 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. PAGE 20 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOWN CENTRE 70 SEVENTEENTH ADDITION - 24TH & HENNEPIN PTNSHP Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of 1.76 acres for two lots on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition located in the NW; of Section 15. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree briefly highlighted the information presented in the City staff's planning report dated June 22, 1994, noting the history and background of the subject property, the surrounding uses, the size and setbacks of the proposed lots, the tree preservation, grading, storm drainage and water quality improvement, and utility plans and the proposed usage of each lot. Additionally, Ms. Tyree noted that the lots will not have curb cuts into Town Centre Drive, but rather will have access to Town Centre Drive via private drives along the east, north and south property lines of the lots. Ms. Tyree further noted that the developer requested a postponement on the Commission's decision regarding the second pylon sign. Ms. Tyree concluded that the proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and zoning. Peter Hilger, the representative of the developer, stated that both buildings are compatible with the other. Mr. Hilger stated the developer objects to Condition No. 12 and Condition No. 13 in the staff report. With respect to Condition 12, he stated that the service has existed as such for eight years and sees no reason to change it at this point. With respect to Condition No. 13, he advised that the development was based on the belief that it had direct access to Town Centre Drive. He further advised that retail marketing requires direct access to Town Centre Drive to prevent potential customers from having to approach the store from its rear. Mr. Hilger stated that the developer is willing to accept the elimination of curb cuts into Town Centre Drive if the Commission would approve signage for the side of the buildings. He stated that side building signage will be necessary for store identification before potential customers pass the access. John Wingard stated the elimination of curb cuts onto Town Centre Drive was to keep consistent with the surrounding development. Mr. Wingard noted that access on the internal roadway will be close to the intersection with Town Centre Drive, but that it is a better option than access directly onto Town Centre Drive. Member Miller agreed with the developer that original development plans called for direct access to Town Centre Drive access from Applebees. He further stated that direct traffic access is a must for high marketing. PAGE 21 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 Mr. Trouts reiterated the developer's request that the Commission consider side building signage in lieu of curb cut to Town Centre Drive. Member Merkley inquired with the developer whether a pylon sign is needed if they are granted side building signage. Mr. Trouts stated that the developer prefers to have both. In response to Member Merkley's inquiry, Ms. Tyree stated that it is more important to close the access to Town Centre Drive in order to prevent additional congestion than to prohibit side building signage. Chairman Voracek expressed his concern regarding pylon signage, analogizing the appearance of Robert Street in West St. Paul. Mr. Voracek stated that too many pylon signs overcast each other anyway and cause traffic problems. Member Segal agreed with Mr. Voracek with respect to Robert Street but stated that the street in the proposed development is curved and will not have the same result as Robert Street. Mr. Wingard advised the Commission that with respect to Condition No. 11, the City does the work and the developer pays for it. Heyl moved, Segal seconded, a motion to approve the Preliminary Plat consisting of 1.76 acres for two lots on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition located in the NW; of Section 15, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions as approved by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, Bl, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, G1, and Hl. 2. The development shall be subject to a water quality cash dedication. 3. The Certificate of Exemption issued by the City in November 1992, which authorized filling of wetland on site without a replacement obligation, remain in effect. 4. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from any public right of way or internal drive. 5. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated in accordance with the City's Landscape Ordinance. 6. All trash /recycling shall occur within the building or in an attached trash enclosure made of similar building materials as the principle building. PAGE 22 /ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1994 shall be recorded easements for Lots 1 and 2 7. Cross parking of the final plat. with the recording with additional Plan and revised Landscaping Town Centre Drive, B. A plantings along Town Centre ehowi gensiteersnes P oints along showing site lines from both access p Drive• on the side of the Centre 9. Building mounted signage is permitted Drive and on the north side of facing Town the north side and the south building Lot 1, and on on Lo the building on Lot 7.. side of the building square foot be paid when 10. A one time sign fee of $2. per sq the sign permit is issued. provided he existing 1�" water services ihathallhave been be removed and 11. to t at the existing water t this r ot n re top turned utilized, off the corporation stop main in Town Centre Drive. openings shall be a 12. All three of the proposed driveway minimum of 30 feet wide. 13. Direct access to Town Centre Drive will not be allowed. d. All present approved in favor, except Chairman Voracek oppose AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: June 22, 1994 CASE #: 15- PP- 20 -5 -94 APPLICANT: 24th & Hennepin Prtnshp. HEARING DATE: June 28, 1994 PROPERTY OWNER Brian S. Mangine PREPARED BY: Shannon,Tyree Hall & Convention Ctr. REQUEST: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CSC - Community Shopping Center ZONING: CSC - Community Shopping Center SUMMARY OF REQUEST 24th & Hennepin Center Partnership is proposing a Preliminary Plat of two lots on 1.76 acres for a Boston Chicken Restaurant, a Payless Shoe Source, and a Kinko's. Located on Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Second Addition, along the east side of Town Centre Drive in the NW Section of 15. City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of all platting, the Planning Commission and City Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan ". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY; In 1992 this parcel was preliminary platted (Town Centre 70 14th Addition) into one lot and an outlot with the intended use as a 13,600 s.f strip shopping mall with ten potential store sites and a drive thru feature on the north end of the building. At that time it was the intention of the developer to relocate several of the existing mall tenants into this "satellite" strip center, developing the mall with two larger tenants. The 14th Addition was never final platted. (ff Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 3 EVALUATION OF REQUEST: A. Surrounding Uses. The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - South - East - West - Pizza Hut, MnDOT Right of Way; zoned CSC; designated CSC. Parking for Kohl's and Walmart; zoned CSC; designated CSC. Town Centre Shoppes; zoned CSC; designated CSC. Applebee's Restaurant; zoned CSC; designated CSC. B. Preliminary Plat Review. Lots The 1.76 acre site is being platted into two lots; lot 1 is 31,238 s.f. and, Lot 2 is 45,707 s.f. Setbacks, As proposed all building and parking minimum setbacks have been met. Tree Preservation There is no significant tree resource on site. Grading /Wetlands - The site is a grassy area with a wetland of 0.3 acres in the middle of the site. The grassy area around the wetland has been mowed and the wetland area contains cattails and some small trees. On November 9, 1992, the City approved the developer's request for an exemption from regulation under the Wetland Conservation Act as per Article 6 Paragraph 10c of the WCA. The action was taken based on a critical review by staff of the supporting documentation submitted by the developer and an affirmative recommendation by the Parks Commission. The exemption remains in effect for this proposed development and will allow the developer to fill the created wetland without replacing the wetland's functions and values. To prepare this site for the building and parking lot, the area will need approximately 4 feet of fill. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion /Sediment Control Manual standards. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - This proposed development is located in Drainage Basin D. Runoff from the site will discharge to a series of ponds classified as nutrient traps which lie just north of Yankee Doodle Road. Eventually, the runoff from this site will reach LeMay Lake, a Class I direct contact recreation lake. The site and drainage area for the proposed development are too small to accommodate a water quality pond that meets recommended standards for depth. In addition, there are better opportunities for protecting water quality in LeMay Lake. Thus, staff is recommending a cash dedication in lieu of onsite ponding for this development. Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 4 City staff recommends that the drainage of the proposed parking lot slope to the concrete curb and gutter and then to the proposed storm sewer. The preliminary utility plan shows that the drainage from this site will be conveyed by a privately maintained storm sewer system to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive. The existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive drains in a northeasterly direction to Pond DP-4, which is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Utilities - Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth, size and capacity is readily available to serve this development from an existing 8" line on Town Centre Drive. An existing 6" sewer service has been stubbed to the middle of this development from Town Centre Drive. The preliminary utility layout plan shows extending the 6" sewer service to the proposed building on Lot 1. The City will require that a manhole be added on the sewer service at the edge of the easement to allow City Maintenance crews to inspect the sewer service. The proposed building on Lot 2 is shown to connect to an existing 6" sewer service stubbed off Town Centre Drive near the new private street located along the south property line of Lot 2. The City will also require that a manhole be added on this sewer service at the edge of the easement. Water main of sufficient pressure, size and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 8" water main in Town Centre Drive and from an existing 8" watermain located in the private streets southeast of this site. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the existing 8" water main in the southeast corner of the site and constructing a 6" DIP water service to the proposed buildings. The proposed 6" water main would provide adequate pressure to feed the sprinkler systems in the buildings. The existing one and one half inch copper water services that were provided to this lot in 1985 shall be removed and the corporation stop turned off at the 8" main. The existing hydrants located northwest of the lot and in the southeast corner of the lot will provide adequate fire protection to this site. Streets /Access /Circulation - Public street access for the proposed development will be provided from Town Centre Drive which is a 48 foot face -to -face road with two lanes of traffic in each direction. Access to this site is available from private drives along the east, northerly and south property lines of the lot. The preliminary site plan proposes one access to the west onto Town Centre Drive, one access to the east and one access to the south from the private through streets. All the driveway openings shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide to facilitate turning maneuvers. Since access to the proposed development is available from the adjacent internal shopping center drives, direct access to Town Centre Drive will not be allowed. Accessing the site from the internal drive aisles is consistent with the existing development pattern of the Town Centre area. 1 �� Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 5 Right-of-Way/Easements/Permits - This development shall dedicate a 10 foot drainage and utility easement around the outside of Lots 1 and 2. 66 feet of right -of -way is currently dedicated over Town Centre Drive and no additional right -of -way is needed for the existing street. The private through streets on the north and east edge of the development will not require any right -of -way, but private cross easements will need to be provided to allow access for this development to be used on the private streets. The final plat shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement over the proposed 6" water main that will serve both lots. Also, a drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated over the 12" storm sewer line that serves both lots. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, MnDept. of Health, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. On -site Improvements Lot 1, The site plan shows the development of a 3,000 s.f Boston Chicken Restaurant on Lot 1, Block 1. This cafeteria style restaurant is new to the Twin Cities market and specializes in rotisserie chicken. The restaurant has a maximum seating capacity of 54. The building is oriented west, toward Town Centre Drive and is constructed of grey brick, stucco and rock face block. A red, black, and white awning wraps around the majority of the building; above the awning is the building mounted signage. Again this is shown on all three sides. City Code only permits building mounted signage on major street frontages, therefore the signage proposed on the north and south elevation of the building is not permitted. The proposed pylon sign for Boston Chicken is in an approved location according to the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement. The size and location of the pylon meet City Code requirements. The trash enclosure is located on the southeastern portion of the building and is shown to match the building material of brick and block. By code, 54 seats requires 18 parking spaces; the restaurant has shown 37 10'x 18' parking spaces, more than double their parking requirement. Lot 2 The applicant has proposed a 10,642 s.f. building to share both a Payless Shoe Store (3,802 s.f.) and a Kinko's (6,840 s.f.). Kinko's will occupy the northern portion of the building and Payless Shoe Store on the south. The main building entrance for both tenants is from the west facing Town Centre Drive. Additionally, each is proposing building signage on their side of the building not facing Town Centre Drive. Again the City's Sign Ordinance prohibits building mounted signage when not facing a major street frontage. Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 6 A shared pylon sign (Payless Shoe Store and Kinko's) is proposed along Town Centre Drive at the southwest property line. This pylon does not appear on the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement (see attachment). The applicant has requested an amendment to that agreement for the following reasons. First, the sign agreement was created eight years ago, since that time Town Centre has developed differently and the developer has suggested that perhaps it is necessary to deviate from a plan made that long ago. Secondly, the pylon would meet the sign code performance standards the requirement of no more than one sign per lot. Lastly, the developer believes it would be more aesthetically pleasing to have three retailers on two signs rather than on one sign. The T.C. Sign Agreement states that any additional pylon sign, not part of the original agreement requires a Conditional Use Permit. The developer is aware of this and will proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process to the amend the T.C. Pylon Sign Agreement. The shared trash enclosure will be located on the rear portion of the building and will be constructed of brick and block. The proposed landscaping is basically consistent with the Town Centre area. However, additional evergreens/ understory plant material will be required along Town Centre Drive. Prior to final plat, it will be necessary to revise the landscape plan to show plantings where the access point is currently shown. Additionally, staff is requesting a plan to show site lines from both access points along Town Centre Drive due to the 4' berms along Town Centre Drive. Staff is recommending the height of the berm be lowered and modified. it will be necessary to show how the berms with the plantings do not interfere with site lines for safe turning movements. All landscaping areas are required to be irrigated and shall be subject to all ordinance requirements. The number of parking stalls required by Code for these uses is 57. The developer is proposing 48, which is 9 below the required amount. To alleviate parking the parking shortage for Lot 2, the developer is proposing to utilize cross parking easements between Lots 1 and 2. Lot 1 has 19 more parking spaces than required by Code and the developer believes that both lots could share the combined parking total rather than their individual amounts. Parks And Recreation The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission at its June 20, 1994 recommended a cash parks and cash trails dedication for the development. Compatibility with Surrounding Area. The entire area is guided Community Shopping Center and the proposed development is consistent with that land use designation. 7 he proposed uses are also consistent with the Community Shopping Center zoning district. �Q Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Pagel SUMMARY /CONCLUSION The proposed preliminary plat for two lots on 1.76 acres substantially meets the required findings listed on pages 1 and 2 of the planning report. The proposed uses are consistent with those permitted in a CSC zoning district. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Town Centre Pylon sign agreement and has acknowledged the requirement to proceed through the Conditional Use Permit process if the City agrees to amend the agreement. Lastly, the developer is requesting to use, cross parking easements to satisfy the deficit parking on Lot 2. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny the request for a Preliminary Plat of Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition for two lots on 1.76 acres. If approving, Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. These standard conditions as approved by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, Gi, and Hi. Water Quality and Wetlands 2. The development shall be subject to a water quality cash dedication . 3. The Certificate of Exemption issued by the City in November 1992, which authorized filling of wetland on site without a replacement obligation, remain in effect. Site Plan 4. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from any public right of way or internal drive. 5. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated in accordance with the City's Landscape Ordinance. 6. All trash/ recycling shall occur within the building or in an attached trash enclosure made of similar building materials as the principle building. 7. Cross parking easements for Lots 1 & 2 shall be recorded with the recording of the final plat. 8. A revised Landscaping Plan with additional evergreen/ understory plantings along Town Centre Drive, and showing site lines from both access points along Town Centre Drive. Planning Report - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition June 28, 1994 Page 8 5ignage 9. The Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement be amended to permit an additional Pylon sign for Lot 2 (Payless and Kinko's), and subject to the agreement a Conditional Use Permit be approved for this pylon. 10. Building mounted signage permitted only on side of building facing Town Centre Drive (as per City Code). 11. A one time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot be paid when the sign permit is issued. Utilities 12. If the existing 11/2" water services that have been provided to this lot are not utilized, then it shall be removed and the corporation stop turned off at the existing 8" water main in Town Centre Drive. Access /Circulation 11. All three of the proposed driveway openings shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 12. Direct access to Town Centre Drive will not be allowed. A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights -of -way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead -end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /y� 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication H. Ditgr 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 LTS #5 STANDARD.CON h" City Council September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition There are pay -off balances of special assessments totaling $9,200 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay -off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None IQ 24TH & HENNEPIN CENTER PARTNERSHIP Thursday, May 26, 1994 Ms. Shannon Tyree City of Eagan 3860 Pilot Knob Rd E agan , MN 55122-189 Re: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Town Centre 70 17th Addition Dear Shannon: preliminary plat, 1 part of my submission package for the above referenced Agtegment , dated September 11, As pa Ion am requesting the Town Centre -Eagan 1986 the'Agreement') be amended to include a second pylon sign. Currently, only one is allowed• meet was created 8 I have several reasons for my request. First, the Agree years ago in 1986. The Town Centre area has developed to der e slightly ghtl from envisioned at that time. 1 think it makeseSense to do sotimes a plan created that long ago, if it n criteria that sign at would apply in other areas of Eagan. eratel platted property and there is at e a Second, it fits the pY sign and the other pylon is on the same side of the street. The additional sign would be on a sep 1 p sig {east 340 linear feet between the second PY Ion si n from will be more aesthetically pleasing to h th sepcp1e Payless g Third, it the standpoint that to have 3 retailer signs on a wkward. The second pylon sign y ShoeSource, tCinkos, Boston Chicken} would look like it belonged there. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. John C. Trautz Tower • 527 Marquette Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55402 Rand To 612- 338 -1000 • FAX 612-338-8971 C L OAK RO Pa CT KNOB 7./C/S-W090 ;;I Cr r ••■■■••- ( 1- LON( ;IN Acat/ CT: QUARRY - - I i Fri7r Fry if Z f .J t __Dssympioq''' = - L, w " fi U A r • i 7, 1 AGAN Lli[-' ] E ,L 7 NuroctrAL [''‘.^ C1 :` , wr,r7rm Ty g a z LT; Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition f PAP* k ' tIVI r\ c' oft' P rr L j i 22 r f.irf 111'7 P Fri y I rfyf) 't PE 1 • 1- • Irnc 1 tor., r 2 1,1(y / 3 InR; wr 7 evr, or r r, e / ) i n't or rA/7K t E ODODI.F. - ‘c- CFNI R j E i w EL! t Grum; 616 LOI norm H , t rw a 7 : t w r r Cr PAK A lI E 1! Tr WN CNT 13 � ADD ot co fv) FRANKS NURSERY ,1• L t'+ � AND � �e CRAFTS ,. c. ADD. SQUARE Town Centre 70 Seventeenth Addition DUCKWOOD &LocR , �+ :• �, R AND -' 1 8 RMT(R ADDITION - - - -= ... � , ----- ADDITION • M. — 40 • - ■ 1. � 9 0/ , ''f . :.. • ..... -. OUT LOT A • D R IVE t W ( ( DuCKWJ r_ • • ||! 111 / ff | 22; 22 :2 1 1. | 2 1 y it i ► \ ` , i�11 : 1r I I til i y ‘lift' ` I 9P i.) 1 ■`! � �� I I I r , r .,,, k ..,� � 44� ' i I I I(1 i Vf 1 ... 'ocii ,l_ : 1:- l�4 << ,i,,, ' '' - 111 1 1 111 11 1 L1- -� ilIgniiiiilii! l 1 � Piiitilhalitili 6 II II d 104 Oil !b'2 ` su 1 (Y m o „ Ili' 4 • b 1 1 I is is 1 %\ iii r 1' �tt 11 i -� ‘, 11N , WWI U' N,.1 ILA Y.1 e in OM-ON tussle it -My 1UN MIN ry •• OI'InL2IOd LL MINX tun 4 1.'10 ecat4Ifiji •' .I J ••tt. \ i - 1Ul ssriP43S led 1� PAT - -.. , �, 1 11111111 W n N) 1 1111/11.1113 iN3O,l„X1 /LS1 I 1 1; a - ftlT 1 1 R 1 ( - 'pt2 CIS LuIi T• �fl -M 't711- W 18.91 �n 1 i 2aNO+N 'tt46N V au ; tWOj ■ .11- ..1 ^- 9 4 NY -�M p1tMP11it -t�l it ltl 5171.U31 II,1S70 0110:1D10 I CL r z 0 1- LJ J LJ z 0 �o>n• uo fl N Atl MEI i Owl r i gH•M• 11111 • Y w I +I ww..1 I O UI L 1 1 t �11 _ - -- ` -- 7 U a LI 1 IJ L t i uw -en 18.011•11 um •. M 1M. Y NM MAIM O OFIO.1 ?R)d M '-+►fA .r rc wJ 14.2 V611 twos .• L 7uwna��+, I1ttI,�It J. z 1 7 -J 1 w• MV, f.• •1101. T, /1.1.1 M.14 1 111 1.4:)15)O :)N WI).417N7 INnoY♦ V2JVd _J � ^ R € U 0:yi t w,'itstJ . 1.0.01 f� • •. I _I I i) Il r w I ftilri CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP LEGEND FCIENNO AREAS WORN MINERS *MIN•, STOW S•wER. (rINI.Ie S- — — STORM LIT STATION (J • S TORM LIFT STATION rw.IO 0 S TORM FORGE MAN -. ♦ -R ♦.a♦ INVMPION POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL . . . . • . . 900.0 ISON WATER LEVEL • ,00 . PILAW MANAGE ROYTE a= Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1994, City Council Meeting APPROVE PLANS /ORDER AD FOR BIDS (WATERVIEW ADDITION) D. Contract 94 -11, Approve Plans /Order Ad for Bids ( Waterview Addition - Trunk Utilities) - -If Project 666R is approved as a part of the public hearing process earlier on the agenda, it would be appropriate for the Council to approve the detailed plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise for competitive bids. These plans have been prepared simultaneous with the public hearing process at the petitioned request of the developer and all costs have been guaranteed if, for some reason, the project is not approved as a part of the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 94 -11 (Waterview Addition - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Friday, August 12, 1994. all city of eagan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: PROJECT 673 - T.H. 3 /SCHOOL ROAD Attached is additional information prepared by the Director of Public Works relative to Project 673 - T.H. 3 /School Road - Street and Utility Improvements. This information was prepared specifically for the City Council and will be shared with the City Attorney. '\\,- City Administrator cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Attachment TLH /jeh MEMO MEMO city of eagan TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL C/O THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: PROJECT 673 (TH 3 /SCHOOL ROAD - STREETS & UTILITIES) As discussed with the Council at the Special Workshop meeting on July 12, there are strong objections from the developer of the Pines Edge Addition (Shamrock Development) as well as several of the most affected property owners (Finch, Lumis, Frattalone, Marrotzke) regarding the Council's proposal to assess the non -MnDOT funded costs of the TH 3 reconstruction as well as the oversizing of School Road on an area -wide basis. Not only do they object to being assessed for what they perceive to be collector street improvements, but also the fact that it is not being spread into the Weston Hills Addition which will use this access as well. This memo will provide some insight to both issues for Council's consideration during the public hearing on July 19. Collector Road Improvements - Area - Wide Assessments Many of the property owners in this area perceive the improvements to TH 3 ($320,720 - $2,832/acre) and the oversizing of School Road ($270,900 - $2,392 /acre) to be more of collector road improvements and the responsibility of the Major Street Fund rather than being assessed on an area -wide basis. Historically, the City has only once previously assessed roadway improvements on an area basis, that being Skyline Road (Project 543R) where 50% of the street improvements were assessed on an area basis. Also, the Council will be considering spreading 50% of the costs for the Cedarvale Access improvements on an area -wide basis under the public hearing for Project 656. Previous trunk highway improvements to TH 3 for the St. Thomas Becket Addition, Manor Lake Addition and TH 149 for the West Publishing Addition were assessed or assumed in their entirety by the development without City contribution. There is general consensus that the school district should definitely participate in the oversizing of School Road. As proposed, ISD #196 will be contributing approximately $29,280 for TH 3, $62,650 towards the oversizing of School Road and an estimated $288,000 for the TH 3 and RRxing signal costs. If the City Council chooses to modify any portion of TH 3, School Road oversizing and /or RRxing signal costs, it would not set a precedence or create an assessment policy due to the unique circumstances associated with this project. However, if the assessment method is changed as a part of the public hearing process, it will be applied equally to all properties including the school. An option may be to adopt the project and assessment methods as proposed but agree to cap the assessment for the Pines Edge development through the final plat process. However, this will not provide any relief to the other undeveloped property owners. Areawide Assessments to Weston Hills Another alternative would be to maintain the area -wide assessment philosophy but include the entire Weston Hills development as an assessable area (reduces the per acre rate) with the City's Major Street Fund picking up the allocation of the Weston Hills development recognizing our inability to collect it through special assessments. This would reduce the area -wide assessment rate by $742 /acre (26 %) for the TH 3 improvements, and $627 /acre (26 %) for the School Road oversizing costs. Many comments have been made that the Weston Hills development will benefit by and use this second access especially since it has been relocated further north than the Gun Club Road intersection. There was considerable discussion during the Weston Hills development about the need for second access. At that time, it was deemed that Weston Hills would be the limit of development with a single access from Cliff Road and that any further development would require a second improved access to T.H. 3. Therefore, it is the City Attorney's opinion that based on Council's determination that the Weston Hills Addition could develop without the need for a second access. It would be difficult to sustain an argument that the individual single family lots would increase in value as a result of this second access. There was not an opportunity to have pre - collected any financial contribution at the time Weston Hills developed because there was no approved project of record or proposed for the upgraded second access to T.H. 3. As mentioned previously, if the City Council wanted to justify some City participation, it could be on the premise that the City will cover the equitable participation of the Weston Hills as if it were to be included under this project or had previously prepaid its obligation with the development in 1993. Process Many of the comments and objections pertains to the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of payment for right -of- way /easement acquisition by the City. City staff is not able to refine these amounts until a detailed property appraisal has 2 been performed for both acquisition costs and maximum assessment benefit. Although this project is proposed to be 100% assessed as contained in the feasibility report, historically the City has had to absorb any costs that are not sustained through the appraisal process. Therefore, although there may be strong objections to the proposed /pending assessments, if the Council is comfortable with the method of financing this cost through the various special assessment formulas, it would be best to approve the project as submitted and authorize the appraisal and property acquisition process to proceed. Staff would then present adjustments to the pending assessment roll as appraisal information is received. Respectfully submitted, Director of Public Works cc: Peggy Reichert, Director of Community Development Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer TAC /je /jj 3