10/18/1994 - City Council RegularREGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
OCTOBER 18, 1994
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30
II. 6:30
III. 6:35
IV. 6:45
AGENDA
- ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
- VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT)
- DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
P- -�- A.
I
,o.Z B.
0 C.
rS D.
,-0.2-C E.
r 21 F.
G.
C ,/ I.
j7J.
c, 46( .
FL (1QO .
e -
9 SUQQ
(aOR.
40S.
(•61(1
U.
V.
t,4W.
44X.
(,4Y.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
LICENSES, Plumbers
RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Committee, Support for Part 150
Funding Allocations
RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Committee, Comments regarding MSP
Airport Long Term Comprehensive Plan
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, James Bartizal, to sell Christmas trees
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Boy Scout Troop 510, to sell Christmas trees
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Boy Scout Troop 345, to sell Christmas trees
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Pines Edge Addition (Southeast Eagan)
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Elementary School 7t18 (Southeast Eagan)
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Bachel's Backyard (West of Pilot Knob Road on Lone
Oak Road)
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Praise Lutheran Church (Northeast corner of Dodd
Road and Diffley Road)
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Amundson Addition (Cliff Road and Lenore)
FINAL SUBDIVISION, Yankee Plaza (New Horizon Day Care)
CONTRACT 88 -FF, Acknowledge Completion, Country Hollow 2nd Addition
Streets and Utilities
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, South Metro Drug Task Force
ADD ALTERNATE #1, Police Department/Municipal Center Project, Emergency
Generator Screen Wall
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
Z SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT,
Rebecca Maurer
Richard R. Maurer, Jr.
Scott E. Olson
Jeffrey J. Steltz
Kevin McGrath
Judy Freudenberg
Darrell Hyndman
Jon Cornwell
Jonathon Yanta
James Yanta
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
,O.G0I A. PROJECT 648, Final Assessment Hearing, Woodlands North 3rd Addition -
Trails End Road Streets and Utilities
V1,0
1,0 B. PROJECT 607, Final Assessment Hearing, Diffley Road
C. VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, Birch Street
f7.,8):6011. ASSESSMENT of delinquent utility hills
VII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
VIL1,. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
/0"2-
p- `Q` — A. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, Red Oaks Addition (Northwest of Woodlands)
G) 7 B. CONTRACT 94-16, Receive Bic}s/Award Contract, Red Oaks Addition Streets
r/J and Utilities
£7
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Transport America, to allow a truck and freight
terminal and PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION consisting of approximately 10
acres at the northeast intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal
Drive
(d( D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/EXTENSION, Eagan Heights Commercial Park,
for Town Centre 100 Addition
( 5 E. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, Town Centre 100
Fourteenth Addition, Triple S. Investments
IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
X. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY)
XI. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
XII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access
to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard
to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital
status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice
of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City
of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1994
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO FOR THE OCTOBER 18, 1994 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING
P Y T AGENDA APPROVE MINUTES
After approval is given to the October 18, 1994 City Council agenda, the regular meeting
minutes for the October 4, 1994 City Council meeting and the Special City Council meeting
minutes of September 27, 1994, the following items are in order for consideration.
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
MINT ACNDA.
There are twenty-six (26) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one
(1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in
further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL:
Item 1. Parks Maintenance/Forestry Worker --After interviews, it is the recommendation
of Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa, Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde, Park
Maintenance Supervisor McGuffee, Forestry Supervisor Hove and Assistant to the City
Administrator Duffy that Jeffrey Perry be hired for the new Parks Maintenance/Forestry
Worker position approved in the 1994 budget, subject to successful completion of the
physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Jeffrey Perry
as a Parks Maintenance/Forestry Worker, subject to successful completion of the physical
examination requirement.
Item 2. Planner --References are currently being checked on two finalists for this position.
A recommendation from Director of Community Development Reichert and Assistant to
the City Administrator Duffy will be forwarded with the administrative agenda on Monday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To hire a person to be recommended
as Planner.
Item 3. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker—After interviews, it is the recommendation
of Supervisor of Streets Struve that Brian Nelson be hired as a seasonal street maintenance
worker.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Brian Nelson
as a seasonal street maintenance worker.
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Licenses, Plumbers—The City Code requires that plumbing contractors operating within
the City be licensed on at least an annual basis. There is one plumbing contractor, Whelen
Company, Inc., to be licensed at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plumbers license for
Whelen Company, Inc., as presented.
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
PART 150 FUNDING SUPPORT
C. Recommendation, Airport Re ations Committee, Support for Part 150 Funding
Allocations --Enclosed on page 1* is a memorandum covering action by the Airport
Relations Committee relative to adequate funding of the Part 150 Sound Insulation
Program. It is the recommendation of the committee that the Council authorize staff to
prepare correspondence to the City's congressional delegation as well as regional FAA
officials and the MAC Board, supporting levels of funding for the program consistent with
MAC's capital improvement program. Such funding levels will permit the City of Eagan to
continue to process Part 150 applications at a rate similar to that done in 1994.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize staff to prepare corres-
pondence to the City's congressional delegation, regional officials and the MAC Board in
support of funding for the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program, consistent with MAC's capital
improvement program.
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1994
SUBJECT: PART 150 SOUND INSULATION FUNDING
At its meeting of September 12, the Airport Relations Committee considered the
Metropolitan Airports Commission's Part 150 Program budget for 1994. The MAC had
budgeted $11.4 million for the program anticipating a $9.1 million FAA grant and 80-20
participation. The MAC began the 1994 program prior to the grant award. In mid-1994,
the MAC was informed that the grant would be limited to $3 million. Instead of reducing
the scope of the program the MAC allocated additional funds to make up the difference
and permitting the program to continue in 1994.
For 1995, the MAC is programming over $11 million dollars for sound insulation again.
Unfortunately, it is no more certain of the 80 percent FFA funding this year than last. It
has been suggested by MAC staff that communities consider contacting their
Congressional delegations and regional FAA officials to encourage adequate funding.
The Committee concurred with this suggestion and is recommending it for Council
consideration. In addition, the Committee is recommending that the MAC board itself be
encouraged to continue its support for the program.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL: To formally support additional funding
for the FAA Part 150 Program through appropriate parties and agencies as presented.
As tant to the City Administrator
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
AIRPORT LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMENTS
D. Recommendation, Airport Relations Committee, Comments Regarding MSP Airport
Long -Term Comprehensive Plan --At its meeting of October 11, the Airport Relations
Committee considered comments relative to the MSP Airport long-term comprehensive
plan. A memorandum covering the committee's discussion is enclosed on page for
your review. It incorporates a staff memorandum on pages .7 through which
includes the executive summary of the alternative environmental document and r ated maps
and attachments. The committee is recommending that the comments within the report be
forwarded to the MAC as part of the public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt comments regarding the MSP
airport long-term comprehensive plan alternative environmental document as presented for
submission.
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1994
SUBJECT: MSP LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMENTS
At its meeting of October 11, the Airport Relations Committee reviewed the attached staff
memorandum covering the Alternative Environmental Document (AED) for the
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Long Term Comprehensive Plan. The AED
covers the anticipated impacts of the airport expansion track of the Dual Track Airport
Planning Study. The Committee is recommending that the Council adopt the comments
as presented and submit them as part of the MAC's public hearing process.
Both of the runway alternatives considered in the expansion plan have adverse
environmental impacts on the City of Eagan. The north -south runway will introduce
additional noise impacts in south and west Eagan while a third parallel runway will likely
force additional traffic out of the corridor causing additional impacts in north and east
Eagan. When the previous draft of the AED was available for comment in 1991, the
Committee and City declined to support either alternative due to these impacts and
focused comments on the need for adequate environmental controls and mitigation
through broadened sound insulation and potential buy-outs of severely impacted areas.
Environmental comments are being made in the AED. The AED indicates that a
discussion of mitigation will occur in the final Dual Track EIS.
While it is not a part of this recommendation, the Council may wish to review the relative
impacts of the two alternatives as outlined in the differential impact matrix and in Figures
16 and 18 attached. The environmental and economic impacts of these alternatives and
those of the new airport alternative will be compared in the Dual Track EIS as well.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COUNCIL: To adopt and submit the comments
outlined in the staff report regarding the MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan AED.
As ¶.tant to the City Administrator
(7
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: CHAIR MIRICK AND ALL AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE
MEMBERS
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: OCTOBER 5, 1994
SUBJECT: MSP LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - AED ISSUES
In its review of the draft AED, staff has identified the following issues which may be
appropriate for comment regarding the adequacy of the environmental review. These
issues correspond with the ten areas which are listed in the Executive Summary and the
map figures which are attached.
1. Bird Aircraft Hazard - The bird strike hazard for alternatives 5 and 6 may be evn
more significant than indicated by the draft AED as a consequence of waterfowl
habitats in southwest Eagan not noted in Figure 11. While these lie more than
10,000 feet from the proposed runway ends, the City has attempted to manage
high concentrations of waterfowl in these areas. In particular, these habitats
include Cedar Pond and Kettle Park Pond. In addition, the AED anticipates north -
south runway operations over some of the larger water bodies and waterfowl
habitats in Eagan, including Blackhawk Lake, Fish Lake and Thomas Lake at much
lower altitudes than is the case under current operations. (p. III -15)
2. Land Use - Regardless of the alternative selected, the City remains opposed to the
relocation of the terminal from the east side of the airport (p. III -30) and feel that
the reinforcement of existing commercial development patterns should be
maintained. While the costs of maintaining terminal operations during construction
are greater than with a replacement terminal, the potential dislocation to major
employers east of the airport should be factored into this situation. It would be
inappropriate to suggest that the City reinforce and maintain its compatible
commercial -industrial land use planning southeast of the airport while substantially
altering the economic advantage for business formation in that area by relocating
the airport's front door.
3. Noise - The population counts within the 65 and 60 DNL contours are probably
fairly accurate. The assertion that the impact of Alternatives 5 and 6 in southwest
Eagan would be confined to vacant land and the river valley (p. III -30) is
inaccurate. The 60 DNL contour ends within a few hundred feet of one of the
more densely populated and well established neighborhoods of Eagan, the areas
south and east of Cedar Avenue and Hwy 13 (Figure 18). The same is true of the
60 DNL contour for Alternatives 1 and 2 (Figure 16) in the north part of the City,
although the impact of these alternatives will vary depending upon the
effectiveness of corridor procedures.
4. Socioeconomic - The estimate that Alternatives 2 and 6 (West Terminal) would cost
approximately $167 million more to develop than Alternatives 1 and 5 (East
Terminal) is further exacerbated by the lost opportunity costs for induced
development outlined in the land use comments above (p. iii).
5. Groundwater - The statement that groundwater is less susceptible under
Alternatives 2 and 6 (West Terminal) than 1 and 5 (East Terminal) (p. iii) due to
bedrock and soil conditions is inconsistent with the Aquifer System depicted in
Figure 35 which shows levels of medium and high susceptibility in the development
area of the West Terminal while the East Terminal is almost entirely within the low
susceptibility area. In addition, the east concourses would actually be expanded
under the west terminal alternative, meaning that potential fuel contamination would
occur whether the terminal relocated or not.
6. Planned Land Use - Figure 13 is tabled Planned Land Use, but in the areas
southeast of the airport, it depicts only existing developed areas. A copy of the
City's comprehensive guide map is attached to depict planned land uses more
accurately.
7. Map Scales - The scales of figures depicting contour comparisons between the
alternatives should be reproduced at the same scale so that the relative size of
contours can be more readily compared. For example the L10 65 contour for
departures southeast of the airport for Alternatives 1 and 2 in Figure 20 appears to
be substantially smaller than the same contour for Alternatives 5 and 6 in figure 19
although they are of essentially similar size when compared to land features.
8. Flight Tracks - Figures 21 and 22 indicate Runway 11R flight tracks south of runway
centerline. The City of Eagan does not condone the use of any flight tracks south
of centerline within three miles of the runway end and insists that the FAA be
required to comply with the spirit of the corridor procedures rather than
Inappropriately spreading traffic and noise impacts. Correction of procedures in
this regard will modify the AED contours slightly and will correspond more
appropriately with Eagan's land use plan.
9. Other - The Committee may wish to add, delete or modify comments as
appropriate.
MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
Draft Alternative Environmental Document
Executive Summary
Purpose of the document
This document contains the results of evaluation of the impact on the environment of four different
plans under study by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to expand Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport (MSP). The MAC is updating its 30 -year development plan for the airport — known
es a long-term comprehensive plan — to meet the requirements of the Legislature in the Dual Track
Airport Planning Process. .
The 1989 Minnesota Legislature directed the MAC and Metropolitan Council to engage in s seven-year
planning process to determine how best to meet the region's future aviation demand. The agencies
were directed to compare expansion of the current airport with building a new replacement airport, and
make a recommendation to the Legislature in July 1996.
The MAC will use the environmental evaluation found in this document, along with operational and cost
data developed for the long-term comprehensive plan, to select a best development plan for expansion
of the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. That decision will occur in February 1995. That plan,
along with a new airport plan, a no -action option and other feasible alternatives will be compared during
1995 for the 1996 report to the Legislature.
Alternatives studied
As required by law, this is the second comprehensive plan study done by MAC for MSP since the Dual
Track process began in 1989. This second MSP comprehensive plan study is an update of an earlier one
completed in 1991. The MAC and Metropolitan Council in July 1993 revised and updated the region's
30 -year forecasts of aviation demand. The MAC is required by Dual Track legislation to update the 1991
plan to take into account any changes that might be necessary es a result of the revised forecasts .
Changes in the forecasts were not substantial enough to warrant altering the concepts behind the six
development alternatives for MSP which were previously studied. However, two of the plans — those
proposing a second south parallel runway (No. 3 and 4) — were dropped from consideration this time
because of significant operational and noise concerns discovered during the last study.
The basic concepts of the four remaining alternatives evaluated in this environmental study ere:
Alternative 1 Construction of a new 7,700 -foot north parallel runway and an
additional passenger terminal east of the existing terminal.
Alternative 2 — Construction of a new 7,700 -foot north parallel runway and a
replacement terminal which would be developed on the west side of the airport.
Alternative 5— Construction of a new 8,000 -foot north -south runway to be located on
the west side of the airport and an additional passenger terminal east of the existing
terminal.
Draft AFD - MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
Alternative 6 — Construction of a new 8,000 -foot north -south runway to be located on
the west side of the airport and a replacement terminal which would be developed on
the west side of the airport.
An illustration of each of these alternatives can be found in Figures 2-4 in Appendix B.
Environmental evaluation
Each of the four alternatives was examined for environmental impacts in 19 areas, and where necessary
and possible, potential mitigation measures are discussed.
The 19 areas of evaluation were: air quality; archaeological resources; biotic communities; bird -aircraft
hazards; construction impacts; endangered and threatened species; energy supply and natural resources;
flood plains; historical and architectural resources; land use; noise; perk and recreation lands;
socioeconomic; transportation access; visual; surface water quality; groundwater; wetlands, and wildlife
refuge.
The environmental evaluation did not reveal any critical finding that would preclude development of any
of the alternatives. It did reveal differences between the four MSP development alternatives. Areas of
significant differences between the alternatives are as follows:
• Archaeological — The construction of light signals in the approach zones leading up to
proposed runways would result in some disturbance of archaeological sites in Fort
Snelling State Park. Alternatives 1 end 2 would impact two sites; Alternatives 5 and 6
would impact one site.
• Bird -Aircraft Hazard — A bird -strike occurs when birds collide with aircraft. Alternatives
5 and 6 have a higher potential for bird strikes than do Alternatives 1 and 2.
• Construction — The alternatives which include a west terminal (2 and 6) have fewer
construction impacts than the alternatives which include a second terminal just east of
the existing terminal (1 and 5). That is because of the problems associated with
continuing smooth operation of the existing terminal and roadway system in the middle
of a major construction area.
• Historical/Architectural — Federal law prohibits the harmful use of National Register
historic properties/districts by federally -funded transportation projects unless there is
no feasible and prudent alternative. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require destruction of
buildings in the Fort Snelling National Historic Landmark District and the Old Fort
Snelling National Historic District. Alternatives 5 and 6 would have no impact on these
districts. Each alternative would remove the old Wold -Chamberlain terminal district.
• Noise — More people will be impacted by noise under Alternatives 1 and 2. Within the
DNL 60 noise contour for the Year 2005, 3,030 more people will be impacted by noise
under Alternatives 1 and 2 than under Alternatives 5 and 6. Within the DNL 65 noise
contour, 670 more people are impacted under Alternatives 5 and 6, than under
Alternatives 1 and 2.
• Park and Recreation Areas — Federal law prohibits the use of publicly -owned park and
recreation areas for federally -funded transportation projects unless there is no feasible
and prudent altemative. Alternatives 1 end 2 would adversely impact two park and
recreation areas; Alternatives 5 and 6 would have no impact.
Draft AED • MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
"n
10
• Socioeconomic — More residents would be displaced by Altematives 1 and 2; more
businesses would be displaced by Alternatives 5 and 6. Alternative 5 would displace
a low of 402 residents, Alternative 2 would displace a high of 1,144 residents.
Alternative 1 would displace a low of five businesses with a total of 60 employees;
Alternative 6 would displace a high of 77 businesses with a total of 2,919 employees.
Altematives 2 and 6 would cost about $ 167 million more to develop than Alternatives
1 and 5.
• Transportation Access — Average travel times for the alternatives are essentially the
same during the peak period, for the metropolitan area es a whole. Alternatives 1 and
5 are six minutes slower than Alternatives 2 end 6 from downtown Minneapolis and five
minutes faster from downtown St.Paul during the peak period. The west terminal
requires construction of a new interchange et Highways 77 and 62 Crosstown to
provide access from the regional highway system.
• Groundwater — Bedrock under the area where a new west terminal would be built
makes Alternatives 2 and 6 preferable to 1 and 5. Bedrock would make the
groundwater Tess susceptible to potential contamination during fueling operations than
the softer ground below the area where the second east terminal would be built.
• Wetlands — Each of the alternatives impacts wetlands. Alternative 1 fares the best in
this category, impacting 29.1 acres of wetland, while Alternative 6 is the worst,
impacting 46.9 acres.
A chart summarizing the findings for all 19 evaluation criteria follows et the end of this
summary.
Hearing and Approval Process
The contents of this draft environmental document will be reviewed by the Metropolitan
Airports Commission, a public hearing will be held on it, a final version of the document will be
reviewed by the Commission, and the environmental analysis will be part of the decision to
adopt one of the development altematives for the Tong -term comprehensive plan for the
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Below is the schedule for that process.
Commission Reviews Draft Document September 1994
Public Hearing on Draft Document October 1994
Commission Reviews Final Document January 1995
Commission Adopts MSP Long- February 1995
Term Comprehensive Plan
As was stated earlier, similar environmental analysis and comprehensive plan development is being
conducted for a potential new replacement airport end will be completed early in 1995. Evaluation end
analysis of both of these options and any other feasible alternatives will take place during 1995, with
a recommendation to the Legislature in July 1996.
Draft AED - MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
Bi
SUMMARY OF DIFFERENTIAL IMPACTS
CRITERION
IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE
1
2
5
6
Air Quality
1. Number of violations of air quality standards in year 2020.
2. Difference in total CO emissions in year 2020 (tons).
0
0
0
0
1,540
0
1,540
0
Archaeological Resources
3. Number of archaeological sites eligible for the National Register
that would be disturbed.
2
2
1
1
Biotic Communities
4. Number of acres of wildlife habitat displaced.
Differential Impactl"
5. Difference in monthly aircraft overflights of waterbird habitat at
low altitudes.
29
42
34
47
O
13
5
18
350
350
0
0
Bird -Aircraft Hazards Mother Lake
6. Difference in monthly aircraft operations
less than 500 feet over lakes in
close proximity to MSP where birds Wood Lake
congregate.
Gun Club Lake
• Long Meadow &
Black Dog Lakes
0
0
1,550
1,550
0
0
0
0
2,010
2,010
0
0
0
0
3,230
3,230
Construction
7. Degree of adverse impact on airport users during construction.
major
minor
major
minor
Endangered and Threatened Species
8. Number of endangered and threatened species displaced.
9. Potential adverse impact on nesting bald eagles.
0
0
0
0
0
0
minimal
minimal
Energy Supply end Natural Resources
10. Difference in fuel consumption in year 2020 (millions of
gallons)
3.7
2.0
1.7
0
Floodplains
11. Adverse effects of floodplain encroachment.
negligible
negligible
negligible
negligible
Historical/Architectural Resources
12. Number of known historical/architectural properties/districts on
or eligible for National Register that would be displaced.
•Includes a National Historic Landmark District
2•
2•
1
1
13. Number of individual properties and historic districts within the
DNL 65+ noise contour requiring further study to determine
National Register eligibility.
17
17
17
17
m
Values shown are the difference of acres displaced between the alternative with the least impact (Alternative 1) and
the other throe alternatives.
Draft AED . MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
W
CRITERION IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE
1
2
Land Use
14. Number of municipalities requiring changes in existing or
planned land use.
4
4
5
2
6
2
Noise MpIs.
15. Number of persons residing in the year 2005
DNL 65 noise contour. Richfield
Bloomington
Inver Gr Hts
Mendota Hts
Eagan
TOTAL
Differential Impact
16. Number of persons residing in the year 2005 Mpls.
DNL 60 noise contour.
Richfield
Bloomington
Inver Gr Hts
Mendota Hts
Eagan
TOTAL
Differential Impact
17. Difference in number of noise sensitive land uses in Year 2005
DNL 65-75 noise contours.
3,610
3,610
4,410
4,410
600
600
290
290
30
30
370
370
0
0
0
0
150
150
0
0
10
10
0
0
4,400
4,400
5,070
5,070
0
0
670
670
16,270
16,270
16,870
16,870
2,310
2,310
1,750
1,750
3,320
3,320
1,520
1,520
20
20
0
0
810
810
140
140
960
960
350
350
23,690
23,690
20,660
20,660
3,030
3,030
0
0
0
0
3
3
Section 4(f) Park and Recreation Lands
18. Number of Section 4(f) park and recreation lands displaced.
19. Number of Section 4(f) park and recreation lands within DNL
65 noise contour.
2
2
0
0
7
7
6
6
Socioeconomic
20. Number of residents displaced.
21. Number of households displaced.
22. Number of off -airport businesses and
employees displaced.
Differential Impact
Businesses
Employees
1,003
1,144
402
543
601
702
0
141
468
530
146
208
3
20
10
27
32
157
1,372
1,452
t
Draft AED - MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan
v
CRITERION
IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE
1 2 5
6
23. Number of businesses and employees on Businesses
MSP property displaced.
Employees
24. Difference in total businesses and employees Businesses
displaced
Employees
25. Difference in estimated development costs (construction,
demolition, acquisition and relocation). (Millions)
2
2
50
50
28
28
1,467
1,467
0
17
55
72
0
125
2,779
2,859
$0.8
$167.6
0
$166.8
Transportation Access
24. Difference in average peak -hour travel time to terminal
(minutes).
0
0.3
0
0.3
Surface Water Duality
25. Difference in impacts on surface water quality.
0
0
0
0
Groundwater
26. Ranking of altematives for potential to adversely impact
aquifers used for drinking water.
4
(worst)
2
3
1
(best)
Wetlands
27. Number of acres of wetlands affected.
Differential Impact
29.1
41.9
34.1
46.9
0
12.8
5.0
17.8
Wildlife Refuge
28. Number of human use areas in the Minnesota DNL 65
0
0
1
1
National Wildlife Refuge affected by aircraft noise.
DNL 60
0
0
0
0
Draft AED - MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Paan
vi
1
!
MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COSTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
9/19/94
oko
4100, .; : -_, -_ - � spy . tCancirr carrVIcar
ior
ArRFLELD COST
CONCEPT RELATED COSTS
Ammer. and Timbre":
166,380,000
$73,130,000
974380,000
985,880,000
Acquisition. 0.moIkbn and Rwbtatbn
1122.S47_Aoe
1121.1410012
19.168000
0Do
1116.1.6L022
Subtotal
9195.627,000
9203,327,000
1164.644.000
9172,044,000
CURRENT ClP COSTS
Taxlw.y Mvwmwnts
114600,000
912,600,000
912,500,000
912,500,000
Dakin Aprons/Taxiways
110.620- Ao0
11.2322.22‘2
j,1 G_600-100
11.0.11112.000
Subtotal
623, 000, 000
923, 000, 000
$23,000,000
$23,000,000
TOTAL AIRFIELD COSTS
1218,827,000
1226,327,000
1187,644,000
4196,044,000
TERMINAL COSTS
7ERMI?ML COSTS
Existing Structures Ownolkion
$15,342,800
$13,560,400
615,342,800
913,660,400
Tarrnhal Buida Q s/
6108,943,500
$155,463,500
9108,943,600
$155,463,500
RS
$13,435,000
915,135,000
913,435,000
$15,135,000
Concourses
*267,30.3,000
*271,646,600
$267,303,000
9271, 646, 600
P.opbnuovw+ Tuan./
9143, 600,000
9137,145,000
4143,600,000
*137,645,000
Nwpler ovwr Stations
119.095-000
911-910-000
11S.Q95.A00
1 fd.910.000
Subtotal
1561,719,300
9612,560,600
*561,719,300
1612,560,500
PARKING COSTS
Parkes; 1 Cy
1255_280-000
12S2.L5-20O
j
1262-455_bOO
9264455,000
$262,455,000
lubtotal
9255,380,000
6265,380,000
APRONS/TA70WAYS
Torre alAprons
*108,750,000
1108,750,000
4108, 750,000
$108,750,000
Turas
126,250,000
926,250,000
637,600,000
$37,500,000
Atpuisidon, Oensomkon, Rwbcat ion
10
10
10
10
Subtotal
4135,000, 000
1135,000,000
*146,250,000
4146,250,000
TOTAL TERMINAL COSTS
4962,099,300
11,010,011,600
*163,345,300
11,021,265,600
.10.401f1“01:121
EAST TERMINAL
Rodw.y
44, 727,000
44, 727,0001
Svvctur.
411,636,000
611,636,000
Rataiib Will
12.640.000
62,640,000
Wally ! Slinky Costs
61,200,000
91,200.000
Moblitation & Temic Control
81 8.067.000
111.057.000
SAST TERMINAL ROADWAY 9LSTOTAI
431.160.000
431,160,000
WEST TERMINAL
Rodway
94739,000
95,739,000
Strtums
126,161,000
126,961,000
Mobllratbn & oonripancy for roads dimmer
*Winds
311-42L12012
491.92=02
Subtotal _
442,125,000
42 1 6 000
4
MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COSTS
PRELIM/NARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY*
• E CL tcciearS-
1. Local/State Tiaras
2. Abaternont and/(or Task Waste inspeedon or Reports
3. MAC Admin Coats !Program Management, Site Surveys,
4. Immo Systmn
6. Ieop+1rnover Wades and Contra Systema
6. ALaraf Leading fridges
7. Tenant Mnprovamants Nike, Co,cwWm, Aeh,i,J
S. Arbil. Revenue Contra Systems
Etc.) 9. Aifisld Roadways
10. NAVA/OS 6 Agp+vac/► Lbhts
f 1. Owtin and Contingencies
12. Mal of America prvparty oast of 24M Avenw
13. Carpa/Aili a Mai,tenanot Aridly Costs &Inc Added
�; =—■ON[PT _l
- — -. a ' -- ; !
ELEMENT -�
,ONC�T
r' 2 :ora tS
=
Other R+oedways f Gliding
!Mlles, Removals, Drei,age, etc.
Structural Costs
L.bhtiv 5 Mainline Signkig Costs
Mobliabbn 5 Traffic Control
Subtotal
WEST TB[MtNAL ROADWAY SURTOT4j
60
615,000,000
*0
*0
*0
*31,500,000 !
*0
446500.000
$15,506,000
*4,962,000
$20,967,000
*3,130,000
113.620_0X
15.1.588.222
4100,710,000
90
615,000,000
60
*0
*0
*31,500,000
10
448.600,000
*0
*26,250,000
*0
*0
*0
633,750,000
*0 ,
460.000.000
$15.506,000
*4,962,000
$20,967,000
13,630,000
113_12VIAD
/51.1_1.I_
4100,710,000
*0
$26,250,000
*0
*0
*0
*33,750,000
10
610.000.000
• I./7. , /• • Yf-
Ai Carpo
Ay Carpo Apron
Alpert Aarni,isratio,
fuel facilities
Aldine Maintenance
Airline Maintenance Apron
Acquisition, Demollbn, Relocation
TQT.L - 0THER FACILITY cas7s
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS' $1.248.586300 $1.383 552.500
$1,242,053300 *1,377.079,500
Mt11GATION COSTS - -
*0
1D
*0
*0
I 1D
! *0
Noes M4Qetion
.Safety Ions Mitigation
TOTAL - AN770A710N COSTS
*0
1D
♦0
*0 .
1D
*0
•
• E CL tcciearS-
1. Local/State Tiaras
2. Abaternont and/(or Task Waste inspeedon or Reports
3. MAC Admin Coats !Program Management, Site Surveys,
4. Immo Systmn
6. Ieop+1rnover Wades and Contra Systema
6. ALaraf Leading fridges
7. Tenant Mnprovamants Nike, Co,cwWm, Aeh,i,J
S. Arbil. Revenue Contra Systems
Etc.) 9. Aifisld Roadways
10. NAVA/OS 6 Agp+vac/► Lbhts
f 1. Owtin and Contingencies
12. Mal of America prvparty oast of 24M Avenw
13. Carpa/Aili a Mai,tenanot Aridly Costs &Inc Added
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
r
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
III-� i
Im...Ir1■r..►
I..r.r...URUEMM I
Slr.......r.MI
112:111=111:::::r/1r■..es
r��11•/
/PEEVMV
12:111=111:::::rmou mimmu.e mr•
ar i AIEMERMOSSENV
�� ■.Irlril....1ACOMPOINEMEEMO
►\rr1/MM.I.r�
■..
?...o.Im---------- - —
/.. .a•
�/I\.Mmmoss1I/,'
II...M.r1r■W
A►aa.mra\■.r.r
f/.f...G\^51 a`��
..rsa■rreuremmr
m.enammeirceizsema,
pk4.asnrmancr..►m■I
womarmaammarsommui
r.....rw...11711cr.r
:11111111,101,21 M MMM MEV/.
■ma.. !savor s./ ammo! :...,
r -=1 ..tares1rar..rmlmm•.. '1
il
:1i15 g0:..aa. �_� s:�i�.mr i.mw 164 OrrimeaA.InsmaturAms. �'
�
i surammommim,Ir N.1
ili.a./r/a.1.���'♦
r
di•
Or :EP tiiiiiiiiiirean71:41 , ilia
��I.uum...wo..r
me 1 m.e.�,.. _�ea.c.is
ered..-
Ir.I\13`t...1\;rte ���'
lEymmessman MM of MM r
7.21MMrmmsm:a71 (!MOM MMMMM Si•
a.r1.:..cc:a;
�I.11SIMML NSIMEY re
mwmtssii
.-isqffirensor /��i��1I� ma
11 , ir
11111111 1111 I 1111
III $10100,tallr.
4111111111 EiZUMNW
' " ""
A� pJl!Iaro
r� F,
'�'�� Miiiiii
‘4121.11111 III
VISA 44
Ftl WR:1r far arc•+
•err. G col
1r... d I
item,' �r..r..•r..ac.sr.
•.rr►4`� :...• rr•:
-+
dP!■..r• rN.yU...•:
•rrr... r.v •• Al..r
%i• .a•n
..r.var,.. art
-,- i.7 11 tares vrr r.r►i/'' c t ,
1t .rrr.:.- -MONWAM.OS»...: !/ I:--: :epi % _ �i►..•. 'omen's. . ,._!,.��i ., _ -� �
��. ton r..r:..rrs..• Girt .-- �111
'r -e6i� wtiM ,wrr,, r.
''�'a � •11F , !.reerilm. -.rr.-ar�.•rrrirrrsrrrr-'.41111111111
��1�'' �� i� 1
e.r..rer.-..aa.s.4 1 1
rerr...+vi• r!•r �r_+r.r.aliq,
11 nl.=J - .0r. rip-1.—imirgAm ►. r..•
- I IIIE�"T=....:s.r...-•-...110111A AN' 1`
ani_ - ..�..... , r... �i ,
......If. i aviii f er .r..1
1 IIIIIIIIrj-4-- 111/011.1hritli IIP P5
:--41'11:0. 1111111
1/(7.:-.!!!!
C •-� ..���`Iil ?EI "�-+-=-. 1:4:47.,.. ." C � lig =iii'.}:moi..1 = ;;;*:.'...iii
M
M
i
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
c3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
r
•
r
r
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/.TAMES BARTIZAL
E. Special Use Permit, Jame.s, Bartizal, toell Christmas Trees --The staff report on this
item is enclosed on pages o) 1 through a5.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special use permit for
James Bartizal to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on an undeveloped lot in the
Thomas Lake Center shopping mall subject to the three conditions set forth in the staff
report.
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 28, 1994 CASE #: 28 -SP -14-9-94
APPLICANT: James Bartizal HEARING DATE: October 18, 1994
PROPERTY OWNER: Eagan Center Association PREPARED BY: MarilynWucherpfennig
REQUEST: Special Use Permit
LOCATION: Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CSC (Community Shopping Center)
ZONING: PD -CSC (Planned Development -Community Shopping Center)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST : James Bartizal has submitted an application requesting a Special
Use Permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on an undeveloped lot in the Thomas Lake
Center shopping mall
BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The applicant has been granted a Special Use Permit for
temporary tree sales at this site for the past six years. The applicant would begin set up around
November 18, 1994 with sales beginning on November 25th. The sales operation tear down and
clean-up will be completed by December 31, 1994.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the
following:
1. The permit is temporary and shall expire January 1, 1995.
2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50/sq.ft.
3. The permit shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements.
r
0
C)
0
z
0
r
- n
33
0
>
v
- 1
0
0
m
z
m
33
to
33
m
THOMAS LAKE ROAD
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/BOY SCOUT TROOP 510
F. Special Use Permit, Boy Scout 510, to Sell Christmas Trees—The staff report on this
item is enclosed on pages , O through :3/ .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special use permit to
allow the temporary sale of Christmas trees, wreaths, garland, tree bags and tree stands by
Boy Scout Troop 510 in the Walmart parking lot in Town Centre subject to the three
conditions set forth in the staff report.
a�
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: October 6, 1994
APPLICANT: Boy Scout Troop #510
PROPERTY OWNER: Wal-Mart
REQUEST: Special Use Permit
LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 Eleventh Addition
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CSC (Commercial Shopping Center)
ZONING: CSC (Commercial Shopping Center)
CASE #: 15 -SP -15-10-94
HEARING DATE: October 18, 1994
PREPARED BY: Marilyn Wucherpfennig
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use
Permit to allow the temporary sale of Christmas trees, wreaths, garland, tree bags, and
tree stands.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Boy Scout Troop #510 has received permission from Wal-
Mart to sell Christmas trees in their parking lot abutting Town Centre Drive. Troop #510
has received a Special Use Permit to sell Christmas trees in the Town Centre 70th
Addition for the last five years. Setup will begin around October 28th with sales starting
Friday, November 25, 1994. The sales operation tear down and clean-up will be
completed by January 1, 1995.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the
following:
1. This permit is temporary and shall expire January 1, 1995.
2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of
2.50/sq.ft.
3. This permit shall be subject to all applicable code requirements.
r-n--�=-,
1.v—y,*1S 1
I At ri
4
1•P r1-
J4
•eV
11'
•
•
•
�S
ti:\i11•� `tsxt
•! •� r• e:ll�:
1•
•
110
w•►• w1 .
.. .
1
• . l a t.f.�l+ J r77b1" . 44I
"ti‘titt,1!;
071.0
3,0
t
OMR
er
ir
i. a .. s N • •
1 �!
I_-
•
•
•
i
10011 VENIRE TO R1tlki1iR AUDI
1
I
Pi
r
1
4
vfm
\I.
I"(
VIA 1811 1►t
law 1.4 1ri
1
1
1
h• N
10'
T111
,;v•••::541 III a•
•
•
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/BOY SCOUT TROOP 345
G. Special Use Permit, Boy Scout 345, to Sell Christmas Trees—The staff report on this
item is enclosed on pages through ,__(.1(
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special use permit to
allow Boy Scout Troop 345 to sell Christmas trees, wreaths, garland, tree bags and tree
stands on vacant property in the Park Center Addition subject to the three conditions set
forth in the staff report.
3
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: October 5, 1994
APPLICANT: Boy Scout Troop #345
PROPERTY OWNER Federal Land
REQUEST: Special Use Permit
LOCATION: Outlot D, Park Center Addition
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
ZONING: PD (Retail)
• CASE #: 30 -SP -16-10-94
HEARING DATE: October 18, 1994
PREPARED BY: Marilyn Wucherpfennig
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use
Permit to allow the temporary sale of Christmas trees, wreaths, garland, tree bags, and
tree stands.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Boy Scout Troop #345 has received permission to sell
Christmas trees on vacant property owned by Federal Land Company in the Park Center
Addition for the last five years. The site is north of Cliff Road, east of the Oak Woods of
Eagan, south of Rahn Park and east of Rahn Road and Target. Setup will begin around
October 28th with sales starting Friday, November 25, 1994. The sales operation tear
down and clean-up will be completed by January 1, 1995.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the
following:
1. This permit is temporary and shall expire January 1, 1995.
2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50/sq.ft.
3. This permit shall be subject to all applicable code requirements.
t
5{
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL SUBDIVISION/PINES EDGE ADDITION
H. Final Subdivision, Pines Edge Addition (Southeast Eagan) --Final plans for the
subdivision and utilities to serve the Pines Edge Addition have been reviewed by staff. The
security agreements and development contract have be n prepared. Approval of this final
subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page be
a copy of the final plat as it
appears for recording at Dakota County.
The final plat for the Pines Edge 1st Addition Subdivision has been revised somewhat from
that depicted at the time of preliminary approval. These revisions were necessary to
accommodate the appropriate parkland dedication as well as ensuring compatibility with the
streets extending westward toward the new elementary school. In addition, the northeast
corner of the subdivision has now been removed from the subdivision, because the sale of
that parcel has not been consummated. Street and utility stubs have been provided to this
property, however, to allow for development in the future. Outlot C will be subdivided and
platted as part of a second plat that will include remnant school district property as well.
This will be Pines Edge 2nd Addition and should be forthcoming in the near future.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Pines Edge Addition.
J� �
i
b
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL SUBDIVISION/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #18
I. Final Subdivision, Elementary School #18 (Southeast Eagan) --Final plans for the
subdivision and utilities to serve Elementary School # 18 have been reviewed by staff. The
security agreements and development contract have be8nzprepared. Approval of this final
subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page is a copy of the final plat as it
appears for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Elementary School #18.
3?
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO.
1111 :;3 :j : 23
'iIli 1: 2 ii
4 If
l• iI 1 1 i/
s1 tt P w II 1 111
3:
1 il 11 3I1=
r 33 3: 341
y
ia 1! ii ! Ilea
11' ii l° i lil.
is lii 1 isi
Z` 3•` 3zi • 3s1
3l i&1 :� _ :i
11= la 11: i lit
10. : 13 ' :1
. ;i1 f 3
! i il:1 lil
ill d : Iii 1 3a Irs
t
r
3
1
1.
i
1
i
1
_ 1
1�
I.
i
It s
a
i
r
1
1
•1
tits
i% !
sab
tiffs
1='31
1
ITP
i
3it
111 .-f
[1Ir
vny. .0 ••••
1
w
z
•••
•
0
0
1
1
3
1
Yy
5
_JM _, a• P •. I••\
ww. 3 £
1
1
1
1
i
3
•'1
1 � I
.t
+ Ita
N43 d
•U• • __
}
M•
. w .. �yt
x 3 0 1 6 f
W. •almm•
W1•. air 1..311rw In
11••• . .g 4WD •
1 7'• )\.•3L.•
t�
1
is
3I r
3
11
U•
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL SUBDIVISION/BACHEL'S BACKYARD
J. Final Subdivision, Bachel's Backyard (West of Pilot Knob Road on Lone Oak Road) --
Final plans for the subdivision and utilities to serve Bachel's Backyard have been reviewed
by staff. The security agreements and development contract have be} prepared. Approval
of this final subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page `FY is a copy of the final
plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Bachel's Backyard.
EXHIBIT "A"
.r
0
Q
r
V
CO
1
7
1
11
i1
11 i
111
�! 1
,I
I1 l
,1, 77
1
Is 1ri �1
1
1'
,
I!
7
1
7
1
1,
it
I 11
1
1
11
it
1�
,
1•.
1=-
11
1!
I
z U 11
oz
INEII
t
libu
g
I
-7:3i
1
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL SUBDIVISION/PRAISE LUTHERAN CHURCH
K. Final Subdivision, Praise Lutheran Church (Northeast Corner of Dodd Road and
DiMey Road) --Final plans for the subdivision and utilities to serve Praise Lutheran Church
have been reviewed by staff. The security agreements and development contract have be n
prepared. Approval of this final subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page--
is a copy of the final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Praise Lutheran Church.
EXHIBIT "A"
1 1 =
1 1 '1 I +�
tit ,hip
, 1 1 ; 1 �r
1! 1
��1t1 1 :11141111 :11 -, 1 , ,1 , ,1 , ( ,_ I
,,11"i1, � 11 1•1 ,s Is+ 1',
1111;=111 1 , P Pj 111 ,,;;ilii i 1 1ii; a11i: ! Ii 1 .I
iiiiiIii,1111,11 flail'', 1 11 1
iji
1 1I1 1 j •
i'.
Ii111111 1 f f 11
11j= i,111' , , 1i,,,, i ,1 1 11 , J,
i=ii=li 11; ; ! I, 1 ,,
1.111111-1''111 1 11 i
_�=�,i1 i1 I 1
I =_:_, 1 11. _
i= ,11.11
;so1s,11111111i 1111 !� �t i1
i, + ,,i a ilii i 1J —
PRAISE : LUTHERAN CHURCH 2ND ADDITION
,
Is:
Pj
Ii
1
i
• .
1
i
,
1
1
.-
L1
1
,
o{
�J
1
1
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL STJBDIVISION/AMUNDSON ADDITION
L. Final Subdivision, Amundson Addition (Cliff Road and Lenore) --Final plans for the
subdivision and utilities to serve Amundson Addition have been reviewed by staff. The
security agreements and development contract have bee repared. Approval of this final
subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page is a copy of the final plat as it
appears for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Amundson Addition.
i-3
EXHIBIT "A"
4s+
4;
•
1
4. kill d
1
3 .00.00.0 N
00'082
s
1
AN
0
T
• •)
v on
L .�
/ aJ
N
00'082
3 .00.00.0 N
NISI
.'0
8 1t
11. 1 V1
zavv 1
4:11 kJ /1►t1'1
Ja%lI . 1
8
0
CJ
0 ')
•
0
_p
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL SUBDIVISION/YANKEE PLAZA
M. Final Subdivision, Yankee Plaza (New Horizon Day Care) --Final plans for the
subdivision and utilities to serve Yankee Plaza have been reviewed by staff. The security
agreements and development contract have been re ared. Approval of this final
subdivision is therefore in order. Enclosed on page is a copy of the final plat as it
appears for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final subdivision for
Yankee Plaza.
EXHIBIT "A"
YANKEE PLAZA
•
.J't. 4-.{.4.
•
\ wyy yt Y.
•
•
1
1
1 ' s
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
1
r
j
a
' jIII!;i1V.
ti' . K; Iit• v1 •Lf.L1J._J
'111III.II IL—Li—L-4
•
-- —_.,._1-----.— 1'41►J..M,7Y- . .XJf1.WV4.N I , 1XX:I
.v.1:+7a 7Yw.Y'7.v.i
J.X .K:.y7. :a XYO 7V.4 fi
1
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994, City Council Meeting
ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION/AUTHORIZE MAINTENANCE
(COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDN)
N. Contract 88 -FF, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Maintenance (Country Hollow
2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The installation of public streets and utilities to service
the Country Hollow 2nd Addition was installed privately by the developer under the terms
and conditions of the development agreement and referenced as Contract 88 -FF. All work
has now been completed, inspected by City representatives and found to be in order for
formal Council acknowledgement of completion and authorization for perpetual
maintenance by the City subject to appropriate warranty provisions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract
88 -FF (Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual City
maintenance subject to warranty provisions.
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
DRUG TASK FORCE JPA
O. Joint vers Agreement, South Metro Drug Task Force—Enclosed on pages
through is background information from the Police Department relative to the rendwal
of the South Metro Drug Task Force Joint Powers Agreement. As the Council is aware, the
task force comprises law enforcement personnel from various cities in northern Dakota
County which focus on enforcement against controlled substance crimes.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt the Joint Powers Agreement
for the South Metro Drug Task Force as presented.
4
1995 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
SOUTH METRO DRUG TASK FORCE
THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT are units of government
responsible for the enforcement of controlled substance laws in
their respective jurisdictions. This Agreement is made pursuant to
the authority conferred upon the parties by Minnesota Statutes
471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned governmental units, in the
joint and mutual exercise of their powers agree as follows:
1. Name. The parties did establish in 1988 and hereby maintain
the South Metro Drug Task Force.
2. General Purpose. The purpose of this joint powers agreement
is to establish an organization to coordinate efforts to apprehend
and prosecute drug offenders.
3. Members. The members of this Agreement shall consist of the
following units of government:
City of Burnsville
City of Eagan
City of Apple Valley
City of Lakeville
Dakota County
4. State and Local Assistance for Narcotics Control Program.
The City of Burnsville, acting on behalf of the South Metro Drug
Task Force and its members, shall apply for funding under the State
and Local Assistance for Narcotics Control Program ("grant funds").
The Burnsville City Manager shall be the "authorized official" as
defined in the general policies and procedures for the program.
5. Administrative Board.
5.1. The governing body of the Task Force shall be a Board
consisting of six members. The police chief or sheriff of each
party shall appoint one Board member to serve at the chief's or
sheriff's pleasure. The Dakota County Attorney shall appoint one
Board member to serve at the County Attorney's pleasure. Board
members appointed by the police chiefs and sheriff must be full-
time supervisory peace officers of the jurisdiction or office that
appoints the Board member.
Page 1 of 6
5.2. Board members shall not be deemed employees of the Task Force
and shall not be compensated by it.
5.3. In January of each year, the Board shall elect from its
members a chair, a vice -chair, a secretary/treasurer, and such
other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and
affairs. The Board may adopt rules and regulations governing its
meetings. Such rules and regulations may be amended from time to
time at either a regular or a special meeting of the Board provided
that at least ten (10) days' prior notice of the meeting has been
furnished to each Board member. The Board shall operate by a
majority vote of all members present. A quorum of four (4) members
shall be required for all meetings.
6. Powers and Duties of the Board.
6.1. The Board will formulate a program to carry out its purpose.
6.2. The Board will coordinate intelligence between the members
and the Task Force.
6.3. The Board shall appoint and supervise the Agent -in -Charge of
the Task Force.
6.4. The Board may cooperate with other federal, state, and local
law enforcement agencies to accomplish the purpose for which it is
organized.
6.5. The Board may make contracts, incur expenses and make
expenditures necessary and incidental to the effectuation of its
purpose and consistent with its powers.
6.6. The Board shall cause to be made an annual audit of the books
and accounts of the Task Force and shall make and file a report to
its members which includes the following information:
(a) the financial condition of the Task Force;
(b) the status of all Task Force projects;
(c) the business transacted by the Task Force; and
(d) other matters which affect the interests of the
Task Force.
6.7. The Task Force's books, reports, and records shall be open to
inspection by its members at all reasonable times.
6.8. The Board may recommend changes in this Agreement to its
members.
6.9. The members may not incur obligations or enter into contracts
that extend beyond the term of this Agreement.
Page 2 of
6.10. The Board may decide to purchase liability insurance which
shall be payable from Task Force funds.
7. Finances.
7.1. The members intend to fund the 1995 cost of operation of the
Task Force totaling $401,909.50 as follows: (1) $145,000.00 from
1995 grant funds, and (2) $256,909.58 in matching funds from member
cities and County. The matching funds shall fund the continued cost
of maintaining the replacement officers hired during 1988 for the
officer assigned by each member to the Task Force. All funds will
be spent in federally authorized program areas.
7.2. The Task Force's funds may be expended by the Board in
accordance with this Agreement in a manner determined by the Board.
The Board shall designate the City of Burnsville to act as
depository for the Task Force's funds. In no event shall there be
a disbursement of Task Force funds from the City of Burnsville
depository without the signature of the Task Force secretary/
treasurer.
7.3. The Board shall receive a monthly financial report of all
expenditures and receipts, and current fund balances from the
secretary/treasurer.
7.4. The members shall contribute their grant funds and required
matching funds to operate the Task Force. The required matching
funds from each member will be used to pay the 1995 salary of the
officer hired in 1988 to replace the officer assigned to the Task
Force.
7.5. The Board shall adopt a budget based upon grant funds, member
matching funds and money made available from other sources. The
Board may amend the budget from time to time.
7.6. The Board may not incur debts.
7.7. The Task Force's obligation to reimburse members for any
expense, furnish equipment, and the like is contingent upon the
Task Force receiving. at least $145,000.00 in grant funds in 1995.
If grant funds less than that amount are received, the Board may
reduce the level of expense reimbursement and cut back on equipment
and other purchases otherwise required by this Agreement.
8. Agent.
8.1. Each member shall assign one experienced, licensed peace
officer to serve on the Task Force on a full-time basis.
8.2. Agents shall not be employees of the Task Force. Agents shall
remain employees of the member that has assigned them to the Task
Force and shall be paid by that member, not the Task Force.
Page 3 of 6
8.3. Agents will be responsible for drug investigation, including
intelligence management, case development, and case charging.
Agents will also assist other agents in surveillance and undercover
operations. Task Force agents will work cooperatively with
assisting agencies.
8.4. Agents will be supervised by the Agent -in -Charge.
8.5. The member appointing the Agent shall furnish the agent a
weapon and a vehicle and pay any lease payments, insurance,
maintenance, and operating costs of the vehicle.
8.6. The members shall maintain the officer positions hired in
1988 to replace the officer assigned to the Task Force.
9. Agent -in -Charge.
9.1. From the agents assigned by members, an Agent -in --Charge shall
be appointed by the Board and serve at its pleasure. The Agent -in --
Charge must be a full-time, licensed peace officer of a member and
shall be paid a supervisor's salary by that member. The difference
between the rate of pay, if any, the Agent -in -Charge would normally
have received from the member and the rate of pay for the member's
first line supervisor, however, will be paid by the Task Force. The
Agent -in -Charge shall remain an employee of the member city or
County.
9.2. The Agent -in -Charge shall be in charge of the day-to-day
operation of the Task Force, including supervising the Task Force's
assigned personnel, subject to direction received from the Board.
The Agent -in -Charge is responsible for staffing, scheduling, case
assignment, case management, record keeping, informant management,
buy fund management, petty cash management, and intelligence
management. The Agent -in -Charge will be responsible to keep the
Board updated as to the Task Force's activity, which would include
major case development within member jurisdictions. The Agent -in -
Charge will supervise the drafting and execution of all search
warrants initiated by the Task Force Unit and will work
cooperatively with the agencies with venue over the case. The
Agent -in -Charge will be responsible for all buy fund monies and
petty cash funds and will provide Board members with a monthly
accounting of all funds disbursed and a written summary of activity
with the unit.
9.3. The Agent -in -Charge may exclude agents from further Task
Force involvement subject to review by the Board and approval of
the member that assigned the agent to the Task Force.
Page 4 of 6
10. Forfeiture, Seizures and Fines. Items that are seized by the
Task Force may be used to support Task Force efforts. The use of
these items must be approved by the Board. In the case of Federal
forfeiture actions, established Federal Rules shall be followed.
All remaining forfeited items shall be divided equally among Task
Force members. Fine or restitution monies ordered paid to the Task
Force by Court Order shall be used to offset equipment or operating
costs of the Task Force not funded by grant or matching funds.
11. Headquarters. It is anticipated that beginning in 1995, the
Task Force will be relocated frcm the City of Eagan to another
member's facility. All utilities, including electricity, heat, air
conditioning, and the like shall also be furnished to the Task
Force without cost.
12. Indemnification. Each member shall fully indemnify and hold
harmless the other members against all claims, losses, damage,
liability, suits, judgments, costs and expenses by reason of the
action or inaction of its employees assigned to the Task Force.
This agreement to indemnify and hold harmless does not constitute
a waiver by any member of limitations on liability provided by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466.
13. Duration.
13.1. This Agreement shall take full force and effect when all five
potential members, listed in paragraph three of this Agreement,
sign it. All members need not sign the same copy. The signed
Agreement shall be filed with the City of Eagan, who shall notify
all members in writing of its effective date. With the exception of
paragraph four of this Agreement, implementation is also contingent
upon receipt of grant funds. Prior to the effective date of this
Agreement, any signatory may rescind its approval.
13.2. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 1995, unless
extended by further written agreement of the parties.
13.3. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by the written
agreement of 3/5 of the members.
13.4. Upon termination of this Agreement, all property of the Task
Force shall be sold or distributed to the members in proportion to
the contributions of each member of this Agreement.
Page 5 of 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units, by
action of their governing bodies, have caused this Agreement to be
executed in accordance with the authority of Minnesota Statutes
471.59.
Approved by the City Council CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Approved by the City Council
��t.0 3 /SY
By
Date of Signature
Attest
Date of Signature
CITY OF BURNSVILLE
By
Date of
Attest
Date oSignature
Approved by the City Council CITY OF EAGAN
Approved by the City Council
Approved by Dakota County Board
Resolution No.
Dakota County Attorney's Office
Dakota County Judicial Center
1560 Highway 55
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
Telephone: (612) 438-4438
By
Date of Signature
Attest
Date of Signature
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
By
Date of Signature
Attest
Date of Signature
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
By
Rod Boyd, Sheriff
Date of Signature
Approved as to Form
By
Assistant County Attorney
Date of Signature
Approved as to Execution by
County
By
Assistant County Attorney
Date of Signature
Page 6 of
G7--112
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
POLICE FACILITY ALTERNATE/GENERATOR SCREEN WALL
P. Add Alternate #1, Police Department/Municipal Center Project, Emergency Generator
Screen Wall --In follow-up to the discussion held at the City Council workshop on October
11, enclosed on pages <-(p through . 7 is a memorandum outlining costs for Police
Facility alternate 1, which would provide for a screen wall for the emergency generator and
electrical transformer to screen those facilities from Piot Knob Road. The total cost of the
alternate in the original bids is $12,309.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve alternate #1 for the Eagan
Police Facility project for the emergency generator screen wall in the amount of $12,309 as
presented.
OCT -12-1994 12:01
E & V, INCORPORATED 612 559 5104 P.01/02
MEMO
TO: Jon Hohenstein City of Eagan
FROM: Cheryl Badinger E&V, Incorporated
DATE: October 12, 1994
RE:
City of Eagan - Police Facility
Screenwall at Emergency Generator
The cost for the screenwall at the Emergency Generator on the west side of the Police Facility is as
follows:
Bid Division 01: Concrete Footings, Foundation and Flatwork
Northland Concrete and Masonry ADD $3,200.00
Bid Division 02: Masonry
Northland Concrete and Masonry
Bid Division 05: Carpentry
Lund Martin Construction
Bid Division 08: Roofing and Related Sheet Metal
AWR, Inc.
Bid Division 28: Caulking
Carciofini Caulking Company
ADD $8,000.00
ADD $400.00
ADD $689.00
ADD
$20.00
TOTAL ADD $12,309.00
The screenwall at the Emergency Generator was Alternate No. 1 and the above costs were furnished at
bid time. Attached is a copy of the Accumulative Bid Tab for your reference.
Jon, if you have any questions, please contact me.
CLB
cc Dan Weatherman
Mike Stowe
R-99% 612 559 5104 10-12-94 11:54AM P001 #06
BID DATE: Jure 16, 1094
OCT -12-1994 12:01
r N
N
R-99%
E 8 V, INCORPORATED
612 559 5104 P.02/02
k?4
•';
•
88
88g
p
O
b
r
p
O
m
11.
N
h
.11
N
.
:
p
O
p
8
p
O
O
o
- :.
88
O
n
N
88
O
t0
N
88
4,
M
8N�
n
4,
N
8
0
r
N
�8�p
A
A
p
8
p
8
N
p
8O
8
p
Opo
��NII
Y
p
S
riN
I-:
'R•,�
0
O
8p►pNN
tqhO,.hAOO�.•aNO
MNMMYM
0
ON
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
N
8
N
163NgapN
8
8n.Ob1.°
y
0
0
Vi
8
N
8
iM�aiM
M
8
0
o
N
8
oAPs
0
0
lyt7yo�t.Er:HX8r
0
ONOp8_QQ8N.h
0
N
8
8
8
8
a
O.Fy!
yj
O
N
8
O
O
N
OF•
Tri
''
°'•
;
pp8888pp888G888po8�888
O
tG
N
O
1rO��
N
Pci
Iq
O§
h
N
N
F
Oi
N
0
spy
M
COi
�Opi
N
1.
1N7
V!
g
N
t
O
N
I 612,995.00
X88
'O
ig
4
I $151,996.00)
828888888
§
rte
_
t§
R!
H
N
R1
M
O
N
N
O§
Q!
�
Ls417,905.00
288888
tai
fD
WN
§§
1p
N
LO
N
8
8
A
�C^
Mry
:.;1
•
IJort lend Concrete and Masonry
`JorU land Comets and Masonry --
E
lis Fatxicatino. Inc.
o
1
0!
�Iewwe Doors, Inc.
ti
Rectural Sales of MN, Inc. _
Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. •
I!'jh
1
-4g:21
IJtsen Fire Protection - - -
121st.
5
f
111
§
I
RMV
.Sm
...i.1 !
:C
,;,u.,.::. ........ .
BD 01: Concrete Footings, Foundation & Fletwo
BD 02: Masonry and Stone
BO 03: Precast Plank
BD 04: Steel Supply and Erection
BD 05: Carpentry
BD 06: Hollow Metal Doors and Frames
BD 07: Hardware
m
fi
g
2
BD 09: Steel Studs and Drywall
'.9.-
°
BD 11: PaIntino and Wal CavednO
g
t*;;I:14;151
m
BD 13: Quarry and Ceramic Tie I
l'
mmm
i
4
1 BD 17: Etevator r`
1 BD 1& lockers add Benches 1
.-
mg
1 BD 21: Dumb Walter 1
BD 22 Plumbing --- - -
1
f:3g
s
&
2
g
4
2
LBO 26:Security System
BD 27: Detention Frames, Doors end Hardware
B0 26: Caulking
i
k
sw
N
r) vr
10
m
n
b
O
0
.-
Al
t9
V.
b
40
n
40
CO
N
N/3
N
A
N
N
N
c
!�7
612 559 5104
;1
.4
TOTAL P.02
10-12-94 11:54AM P002 #06
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/REBECCA MAURER
Q. Special Hunting Permit, Rebecca Maurer—Enclosed on page Sq is a letter from
Northwestern Mutual Life granting permission to bow hunt deer on the company's property.
Also enclosed without page number is a copy of Ms. Maurer's application. This has been
reviewed by staff and is in order for consideration by the Council at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Rebecca Maurer, as presented.
58
Suite 1490
8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard
Bloomington, Minnesota 55437
Telephone: 612 921-2100
Facsimile: 612 921-2094
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE
October 6, 1994
Ms. Karen Finnigan
City of Eagan
City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Permission to Bow Hunt Deer
SW 1/4 -11-116-23
Dear Karen:
NutualW��e m
I am writing to notify you that I have given permission to Richard J. Maurer,
J
J. Maurer and Jeff Adelmann, our tenants, and Scott Olson and Bob Sandeen to Jr., Rebecca
deer on the above referenced property during 1994. bow hunt
I am employed by The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companyth
parcel, and am responsible for its management. , e owner of this
Should you have any questions, please call.
Yours truly,
I►='1
Dale - iroo
u -
Regional Manager
DEH/nmp
cc: Richard and Rebecca Maurer
Scott Olson
Jeff Adelman
Bob Sandeen
THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY • Milwaukee
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/RICHARD R. MAURER, JR,
R. Special Hunting Permit, Richard R. Maurer, Jr. --Mr. Maurer has permission under the
Northwestern Mutual Life letter referenced in the previous item to bow hunt deer on
company property. A copy of his application is enclosed without page number for your
review. It has been reviewed by staff and is in order for consideration by the Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Richard R. Maurer, Jr., as presented.
HUNTING PERMIT/SCOTT E. OLSON
S. Special Hunting Permit, Scott E. Olson --As noted above, this application is covered
under the permission letter from Northwestern Mutual Life, allowing the applicant to bow
hunt on company property. A copy of the application is enclosed without page number for
your review. Enclosed on page (p ( is a letter from Northwestern Mutual Life giving their
permission for Clarence Adelmann to bow hunt for deer on their property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
license for deer for Scott E. Olson, Jeff Adelmann and Clarence Adelmann, as presented.
0
Jeffrey J. Steltz of 4309 Sunrise Road, Eagan has permission to
bowhunt on my Eagan property for t e 1994 bow and arrow hunting
season as regulated by the DNR and ,ti1lowed by Eagan City ordinance.
Property owner's Signature
i�
Date
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/JEFFREY J. STELTZ
T. Special Hunting Permit, Jeffrey J. Steltz--Enclosed on page (5 is a correspondence
from Ron Cornwell permitting the applicant, Jeffrey Steitz, permission to bow hunt on the
Bieter Company property. Also enclosed without page number is a copy of Mr. Steltz's
application in this regard, which is in order for consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
license for deer for Jeffrey Steltz, as presented.
(a
NORTHWESTERN.MUTUPL.MP ID:6129212100
Suite 1 490
8400 Norrnwndate lake Boulevard
Bloomington,. Minnesota SS437
Telephone: 612 921-2100
Facsimile: 617 921.209+
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE
October 14, 1994
Mr. John Hohenstein
City of Eagan
City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
OCT 14'94 8:40 No.002 P.02
Mrttlisresm
RR: Permission to How Hunt Deer
SW 1/4-11-116-23
Dear John:
I am writing to notify you that 1 have given permission to Clarence Adelmann, our to
to bow hunt deer on the above referenced property during 1994. nd111,
I am employed by The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, the owner
parcel, and am responsible for its management. of this
Should you have any questions, please call.
Yours truly,
fe?"444:41 ,,
Regional Manager
DEH/te
TTI( NORTHWESTERN MUYUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY *Milwaukee
29212100
10-14-94 08:46AM P002 #35
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/KEVIN MCGRATH
U. Special Hunting Permit, Kevin McGrath --Enclosed without page number is an
application from Kevin McGrath for bow hunting of deer at the Freightmasters location in
Eagan. Staff has requested a copy of the property owners permission letter and that will be
distributed to the Council when it is received. Pending receipt of the letter, the application
is in order for consideration by the Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
license for deer for Kevin McGrath as presented.
HUNTING PERMIT/TUDY FREUDENBERG
V. Special Hunting Permit, Judy Freudenberg --Enclosed on pageIl ) is a letter from
Thorson -Cornwell Co., providing permission to the applicants for the fo owing three permits
to bow hunt on company property in Eagan. Also enclosed without page number is a copy
of the application for Judy Freudenberg. That application is in order for consideration by
the Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Judy Freudenberg as presented.
• Thorson -Cornwell Co.
5200 Willson Road • Suite 201 • Minneapolis. Minnesota 55424
Telephone: (612) 927-7796
October 6, 1994
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
To Whom It May Concern:
The following three people have my permission to bow and arrow
hunt on what is known as the Bieter farm for the 1994 Bow & Arrow
Season:
Darrell Hyndman
Judy Freudenberg
Jon Cornwell
The Bieter farm consists of 92 acres at the northeast intersection
of 35E and Diffley Road.
Very truly yours,
Ron Cornwell
Owner
RC/ps
Life Director National Association of Homebuilders • Member - Minnesota Multi Housing iation - Licensed Real Estate Broker - Registered Professional Engineer
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/DARRELL HYNDMAN
W. Special Hunting Permit, Darrell Hyndman--This application is covered under the
permission letter from Thorson -Cornwell Co., noted previously. Enclosed without page
number is a copy of Mr. Hyndman's application. It is in order for consideration by the City
Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Darrell Hyndman, as presented.
HUNTING PERMIT/JON CORNWELL
X. Special Hunting Permit, Jon Cornwell --This application is likewise covered under the
Thorson -Cornwell Co. permission letter noted above. Enclosed without page number is a
copy of Mr. Cornwell's application. It is in order for consideration by the City Council at
this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Jon Cornwell as presented.
HUNTING PERMIT/JONATHAN YANTA
Y. Special Hunting Permit, Jonathon Yanta--Enclosed on page is a letter from Joseph
Flynn, a member of the applicant's hunting party, regarding this app cation for bow hunting.
According to Mr. Flynn, the City has permission on file from the property owner, Joseph
Kenneally, to allow bow hunting on his property. Enclosed without page number is a copy
of the application from Mr. Yanta which also includes William Kieffer as a member of the
hunting party. Mr. Yanta's permit has not been reviewed by the Police Department and,
consequently, approval of this permit is subject to police approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for Jonathan Yanta, Joseph Flynn and William Kieffer, subject to police
approval.
Le Ce
10-12-94 12:51P14 FROM JARDINE LOGAN
TO 9/6814612
/4M 71-16;9‘P
Ili sP nom)
ryl_g
_. bf- 'T//g4 _ _ _
AhoLi_w _TT
yoo (•L' P.� .._._TrfVis ,9-7,Ll 4-770,J _
71/EVA./T/4/ i-. _
G✓g7-6'7- cTY, _ 7"%"-_ was ..-
-Pd/L Mfrs-cd-�1.c _._..._.__.
-NT .... eivc 7ldi✓s
.71r Yov,
P003/003
//1//7
__ vs3 37.. _.
4,(603-0 763
PROM JARDINE L00AN
10-12-94 12:49PM P003 #08
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
HUNTING PERMIT/JAMES YANTA
Z. Special Hunting Permit, James Yanta--This application is covered under the permission
granted by Joseph Kenneally in the previous item. Enclosed without page number is a copy
of the application from Mr. Yanta. Mr. Yanta's permit has not been reviewed by the Police
Department, consequently, approval of this permit is subject to police approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a special bow hunting
permit for deer for James Yanta, subject to police approval.
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994, City Council Meeting
P . M
..............................................
NGS
...............
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
(WOODLANDS N 3RD ADDN/TRAILS END RD)
A. Project 648, Final Assessment Hearing (Woodlands N. 3rd Addition Trails End Road
- Streets & Utilities) --On September 20, the final assessment hearing was held for the
installation of streets and utilities under the above -referenced project. At that time, an
objection was made by the owners of Parcel 014-02 in Section 14 (Cydney & Scott Welter).
Their objection was based on the contention that their property does not benefit by the
project due to the land being undevelopable as a result of it being used as a demolition
landfill in the early 1980's. Subsequently, the City Council continued the public hearing
until October 18 to allow the Welters to submit substantiating information for the staff to
review and evaluate the basis of their claim. Enclosed on pages * through * is a
report prepared by the Engineering Division resulting from a review of the information
submitted and a research of City and County files. The result of this analysis indicates a
limited potential to develop this property to the maximum density allowed by the current
Land Use Guide Plan and/or zoning ordinances.
If the Council selects the option of deleting/reducing the assessment to this parcel and
respreading it to the remaining properties within the scope of the project, the City would
have to revise the final assessment roll and renotice a new public hearing.
The only other properties involved in this project are the Trails End Addition and
Woodlands N. 3rd Addition developments. The developers of the subdivisions have waived
their rights to object to the final assessments associated with this project, whatever they may
be.
The Assistant City Engineer will be available to present the results of staff's research and
analysis and discuss the options in further detail with the Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 648 (Woodlands N. 3rd Addition/Trails
End Road - Streets & Utilities) and authorize its certification to Dakota County. (If the
assessment roll is to be revised to accommodate respreading any assessments, a new public
hearing should be set for November 15, 1994.)
* This memo will be included with the Administrative Packet on Monday
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994, City Council Meeting
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
(DIFFLEY ROAD)
B. Project 607, Final Assessment Hearing (Diffley Road) --On September 20, the final
assessment roll was presented to the City Council and a public hearing was scheduled for
October 18 to formally present the final costs associated with the utility/trailway installations
and the upgrading of 2.5 miles of County Road 30 from Blueberry Lane to TH 3. Enclosed
on page 1 is a summary tabulation of the final assessment roll showing the final
assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the
public hearing held on March 17, 1992. All notices have been published in the legal
newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this final assessment
public hearing. Enclosed on pages —22through7Ce is a copy of the written notices of
objections staff has received at the time of this packet preparation. Any additional written
objections will be forwarded and distributed to the City Council with either the
Administrative Packet or at the public hearing itself.
Recognizing the limited time available to respond to detailed questions at these formal
public hearings, the City staff held an informational neighborhood '
me ting on Thursday,
September 22, at the City Hall. Enclosed on pages 77 through __is a summary
of the questions and issues that were raised at that meeting and staff's response for
Council's information.
Enclosed on pages throug is a memo from staff providing recommendations
for Council's consideration of ame ding the assessment roll as originally presented based
on additional research and evaluation resulting from the informational neighborhood
meeting and other comments received from affected property owners.
Representatives from the Dakota County Highway Department will be available at this
meeting to address any concerns associated with construction related issues. City staff will
be available to address any other questions or concerns relating to the assessment rates,
assessment process, etc.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and amend
the final assessment roll for Project 607 (Diffley Road - Street, Utility & Trailway
Improvements) as noted and authorize its certification to Dakota County.
� �J
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT NUMBER: 607
SUBDIVISION/AREA:
East Diffley Road
Street & Utilities
ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: October 18, 1994
PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 17, 1992
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED:
F.R. - Feasibility Report
$ANITART SEWER
FINAL
RATES
F.B.
RATES
❑ Trun',c
$30,998.70 LS N/A
❑X Laterals $17.92/ff $19.91/ff
4".Svc.$ 449.96/Svc.$541.67/Svc
❑ Service 8" Svc. 11,498.03/Svc $1,700.00/Svc
❑ Lat. Benefit/
Trunk
VIRAL
'ORM SEVER. RATES
❑ Trunk
❑ Laterals
❑ Lat. Benefit/
Trunk
P.B.
RATES
MAUR
❑ Trunk
['Laterals
8" Svc. $2,399.81/Svc
6" Svc. 1,420.68/Svc
['Service 11" Svc. 748.O0/Svc
S.F. Equiv. $15.30/ff
® Lat . Benefit/
Trunk $15.57/ff
MF/CI Equiv.
❑ WAC
$823.33/Svc.
499 n7/S"7c
$15.30/ff
$25.25/ff
STREETS
O Gravel Base
❑ Surfacing
® Res. Equiv. $45.80/ff $45.80/ff
❑ Multi Equiv. $74.55/ff $79.90/ff
❑X C/I Equiv. $94.00/ff .$107.10/ff
O Trail
,SERVICES
0 Water & San.
Sewer
STREET LIGHTS
❑ Installation
0 Energy Charge
CONTRACT * OF
p0. JARCELS TERMS
30-06 101
COMMENTS:
15 yrs.
INTEREST
RATE
6.5
rl l
AMOUNT CITY
ASSESSED FINANCED
$1,082,266.00 F.R$2,126,416.00 F.R.
$1.105.430.57 $2.739.909.20
Bannigan & Kelly, P.A. SEP 2 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR.
PATRICK J. KELLY
JAMES J. HANTON
JANET M. WILEBSKI
JOHN W. QUARNSTROM
The Honorable E.J. VanOverbeke
Eagan City Clerk
c/o Eagan Municipal Center
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
Dear Municipal Clerk:
1750 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
September 26, 1994
1612)22_4-3781
FAX (6I2) 223-8019
Re: Project 607, Diffley Road Reconstruction
PIN 10-02700-012-01 Ass4 p b
Pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. 5429.061, Subd. 1 and 2 thereof, as amended,
Remo C. and Karen R. Caponi, fee owners of record of the above -referenced parcel, tender
written objection to the proposed special assessments for Project 607, Diffley Road
Reconstruction. The purpose of this letter is to preserve the rights of said Remo C. and Karen
R. Caponi, as owners, to appeal said proposed assessment to Dakota County District Court
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 5429.081 thereof, as amended.
The grounds for said objection are as follows. Prior to the project, the primary access to
the Caponi parcel was by virtue of an easement to Lexington Way and then to Diffley Road. A
close examination of the site would reveal that there was a field access road occasionally used
providing access from Diffley Road to the Caponi parcel. As a result of the project, the primary
access from the Caponi parcel to Lexington Way was taken. It was not until the hearing before
Court-appointed Commissioners that the county and the city (this was a joint powers project)
realized that the deeded easement per Document. No. 756049 had been physically taken and
destroyed as a result of the project. It was not until July 5, 1994 that the city, at the behest of
the county, granted a replacement easement to the Caponis. That replacement easement
followed the original line of easement until it got north of the water tower and then parallelled
the southerly right-of-way line of Diffley Road easterly to Lexington Way. As to the field access
road, that opening was closed by the project and lies just easterly of the concrete median in
Diffley Road, the former location of the field access road. It is quite clear that direct access to
Diffley Road was not contemplated by Caponis' predecessors in interest. The grade differential
between Diffley Road and the useable portion of the Caponi parcel is 50 feet over a distance of
250 feet or a 20 percent average grade. For all 'practical purposes, access has been easterly
across the intervening property by easement to Lexington Way then to Diffley Road. For all
The Honorable EJ. VanOverbeke
Page 2 September 26, 1994
practical intents and purposes, assuming that single-family residential is the highest and best use
of the subject property as presently zoned, this parcel has no reasonably suitable or convenient
direct access to Diffley Road but rather takes its primary access from Lexington Way.
Before a city can Ievy a special assessment, it must establish that as a direct and proximate
result of the project, the fair market value of the property to be assessed has increased in market
value by an amount equal to or greater than the proposed assessment. In the present case, in
order to construct the project, the county and city were required to institute proceedings in
eminent domain to acquire additional right-of-way. To determine damages arising out of the
taking, the county retained the services of Thomas F. Metzen. He determined that the highest
and best use of the property first before and then after the taking was for some type of single-
family usage. He determined that as a result of the taking, the fair market value of the land only
before the taking was $187,380. After the taking, he determined that the fair market value was
$169,939. Damages arising out of the taking were $17,450. In making this determination, Mr.
Metzen was fully advised as to the components of the project. He knew that there would be a
water trunk in the south side of the Diffley Road right-of-way and he knew the nature and extent
of the design for the reconstructed Diffley Road. In his opinion, with the project in after the
taking, the property suffered a loss of $17,450.
The Caponis retained the services of Richard M. Parranto to determine the damages
arising out of the reconstruction of Diffley Road. Mr. Parranto also concluded that the highest
and best use of the Caponi property first before and then after the taking would be for single-
family residential uses. Mr. Parranto concluded that the total property was worth $374,000
before the taking and $281,000 after the taking. He attributed damages of $93,000 to the
construction of Diffley Road as it presently exists. Again, Mr. Parranto was fully aware of the
full design of Diffley Road and concluded that the subject property would be worth less after the
full construction of that road than before.
This matter was brought before three Court-appointed Commissioners. Those
Commissioners, after having heard the testimony of Mr. Metzen and Mr. Parranto but not having
determined what the access would be after the taking, concluded that as a result of the
reconstruction of Diffley Road, the Caponi property was diminished in value by $26,880.
The Caponis, through the undersigned, their attorneys, respectfully request that the city
council find that there is no special benefit accruing to the subject property. Special benefit is
to be defined as an increase in value directly attributable to the local public improvement. It is
quite clear that in this instance, there is no special benefit but rather a general benefit which
accrues to the community at large. For that reason, the constitution prohibits the special
The Honorable E.J. VanOverbeke
Page 3 September 26, 1994
assessment of this property and requires the community to spread the cost of this improvement
as a general obligation to the community at large..
Sincerely,
JB:cd
c Mayor Thomas Egan
Council Members:
Patricia Awada
Sean Hunter
Sandra A. Masin
Theodore Wachter
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
James F. Sheldon, Esq.
S. Todd Rapp, Esq.
Remo C. and Karen R. Caponi
September 23, 1994
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
Re: Project 607, Diffley Road Reconstruction
We have no access nor any utility connections to Diffley Road.
We were compelled to pay $8,000 in 1993 for street and utility
(water and sewer) improvements at our address, 4266 Rosemary
Court. This was the Lyman Development. We, therefore, should
not and will not pay for the Diffley Road work.
Respectfully,
Vi
Charles N. Duddingston
;27,75—
Carol M. Duddingston
Enclosures 3
Anthony Caponi 0 1215 Diffley Road 0 Eagan, MN 55123
OCT !4
To: Mayor Tom Egan and CiCouncilMembers
From: Anthony Caponi
Date: October 14, 1994
Re: Special Assessments for Project #10P607
I protest the special assessment in its entirety for parcel numbers:
10-02200-010-80
10-02200-010-84
10-02700-011-02
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: ALE
FROM: MICHAEL P FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1994
SUBJECT: CITY PROJECT #607 - DIFFLEY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
FINAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATIONAL MEETING
On Thursday, September 22, 1994, at 5:00 p.m, City staff hosted an informational
meeting for those property owners adjacent to Diffley Road who are proposed to be
assessed for a portion of the improvements. Attached is a list of those property owners
in attendance at the informational meeting. City staff was represented by Tom Colbert
and Mike Foertsch.
Following are the concerns or issues as identified by the respective property owner:
• Parcel #050-26 (Section 25)
This parcel is proposed a residential equivalent street assessment. The property owner
questioned the basis for allocating a street assessment to his parcel adjacent to a County
road. The property owner stated that he pays taxes to the County and why the County
road installation wasn't funded solely through the use of County tax dollars.
City staff provided the explanation of the City's Special Assessment Policy, the term and
interest rate of the proposed assessment, the City's policy which utilizes special
assessments versus an increase in the general property tax levy to fund roadway
improvements, and the rights of the property owners regarding a special assessment to
their property.
• Lot 1, Block 1, Deer Addition
A representative from the property owner questioned the parcel being assessed at the
public facility rate when the parcel was recently sold as a single-family residence. The
property owner requested the assessment be adjusted from the public facility to a
residential rate.
1 1
City staff researched the feasibility of sustaining a public facility rate benefit to the parcel
even though it was recently sold as a single-family residence. In reviewing the matter with
the City Attorney's Office, it was felt that the public facility assessment rate could not be
sustained if challenged and as a result the final assessment roll was modified to reflect
a single-family residence assessment rate versus the public facility rate.
• Parcel #020-60 (Section 24)
This property owner questioned the rationale for the street assessment and also the
location of his driveway. He also stated there was a temporary power pole placed on his
property which was not removed and it was his understanding that the power pole would
be removed when the project was completed. He also expressed concern with the pile
of refuse or garbage from the construction project which was left on the corner of his
property. The property owner also questioned the rationale for the street assessment
being levied for Diffley Road when he has public street access to Dodd Road along his
westerly property line.
City staff responded to the property owner's question of benefit with respect to his
driveway in reviewing the Special Assessment Policy of the City. The City's Special
Assessment Policy states that if a property has a direct driveway access to a street, the
property owner is responsible for at least a portion of the cost of the upgrade of the
adjacent street. The Policy also allows the option if the property owner would remove his
driveway from Diffley Road, there would be rio street assessment for Diffley Road. The
property owner has since contacted the County and is in the process of removing his
driveway from Diffley Road and will take access from the westerly adjacent Dodd Road.
With respect to the power pole which was left: in his yard as a result of the improvement,
representatives from City staff as well as the County reviewed the power pole location and
stated that the power pole will be removed.
With respect to the pile of refuse or trash left in the right-of-way by the contractor, none
was to be found when City staff and representatives from the County reviewed the site.
• Parcel #040-08, Auditor's Subdivision #42 (Section 25)
This property owner was not satisfied with the restoration (poor quality sod) and access
to her backyard as a result of the improvement. The property owner also had a
bituminous driveway onto Diffley Road prior to the improvement and after the
improvement was completed, her bituminous driveway was not extended past the County
road the same dimension as it previously existed. She stated the bituminous driveway
was extended for safety reasons in the past and requested that the bituminous driveway
be installed to the same length as existed before the improvement.
A representative from the City and the County reviewed the situations as identified by the
property owner. The backyard access that was not acceptable to the property owner
was reviewed by City and County representatives and found to be in at least the same
condition as before the improvement. With respect to the sod issue, when reviewed in
the field, there was no appearance of poor or bad quality sod adjacent to her property.
The property owner identified that her bituminous driveway was not extended beyond the
edge of the existing surface of the County Road. ith the improvement, a concrete
apron was installed in lieu of replacing the blacktop driveway. The County does not
replace blacktop driveways beyond the area encompassed by the concrete apron which
was installed as a result of the improvement. (Please refer to the attached correspndence
to Jerry Kingrey dated October 11, 1994.)
• Parcel 011-56 (Section 24)
This property owner expressed concern with the quality of the restoration resulting from
the improvement. The property owner stated the sod was poor, it couldn't be mowed
because it was to rough, and the sod died and was not rooted in an area next to the
trailway.
Representatives from the City and County reviewed the situation and the County stated
they will replace the sod in the Spring of 1995.
• The Property Owners Questioned the Responsibilities For Maintenance Adjacent
to County Roads and the Trailways As Installed
City staff responded in stating that current City Code identifies the adjacent property
owners as responsible for maintaining boulevard and ditch areas adjacent to their
property to the centerline of the public right-of-way. The City's policy for maintenance of
the City's trailways is that the system is a 3 -season trailway system . The property owner
nor the City are responsible for maintenance of the trailway system during the winter
months.
• Parcel #012-01 (Section 27)
This property owner was represented by legal counsel and questioned the difference
between legal access to his parcel versus physical access. Currently, the parcel takes
access through the City's park property adjacent to the Lexington Avenue Reservoir. The
representative questioned the Special Assessment Policy benefit as applied to this
situation where physical access to the parcel is not directly on to Diffley Road but through
City park property. The representative also questioned the legal burden of proof for
special benefit to the property for the improvements when the condemnation proceedings,
which affected the property for right-of-way acquisition, showed a decrease in property
value as a result of the right-of-way taking.
City staff has reviewed the issues identified by the representative of the property owner
with the City Attorney's Office. Given the fact that the property owner has filed an
objection to the special assessment, the issues as identified will be resolved either
through negotiation or through the district court process.
The meeting adjourned -t approximately 6:30 p.m.
Assis(ant City Engineer
MPF/jj
Attachment: Attendance List
October 11, 1994 Correspondence
?q
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
PROJECT 607
DIFFLEY ROAD
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1994 - 5:00 P.M.
NAME
I. el/N/1 JP7 7/d A w e
2. ,&,.� // AvVeloreC
��N
4.
eVrAl
5. G 1/l- l S
41
•
6. M � I,5 SA S7ver tv
7.'1alQ.C�.v, r�i t 1,1/ RAT
8. Vary
10. Eo6 rAtA)d.&--17-
11.7,4_eil-g-u,e-
FAwrrr
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
LTS15
i ADDRESS
r
5,30
hiff.d ge9,
115-0
X25/ fA l w So. k Qf) 5S123
t0 jl FFA .
I Di Foli eo d
7Pi,cFe/.
755 D/,q/'cfi fZc/
mad•,����3 (\cL
2'gs DiF68-,.
JAC Af--ry W(/,
RECEIVED OCT 13 ITh
October 11, 1994
Mr. Jerry G. Kingrey
c/o Dakota County Hwy. Dept.
14955 Galaxie Ave, 3rd Floor
Apple Valley, Mn. 55124-B579
RE: C.F. 30-06 (Eagan)
Parcel 9 (136), Crow
N
Dear Mr. Kingrey:
We were surprised to receive a letter from the City of Eagan advising
that the reconstruction and upgrading of County Road 30 was completed.
We have indicated to the city staff during a recent meeting a
number of items that we feel have not been completed properly.
The first of these is the fact that we still do not have access
to the East half_ of our lot. Prior to the road construction
we had a path through the trees to this part of our yard which was
used to get our 174IP tractor mower to this area. You will probably
recall at the condemnation hearing you assured both the Condemnation
Committee and our family that we would always have access to this
portion of the lot. At the present time we are unable to take
even our self-propelled mower through this path without either
sinking in the sand and dirt washed down from the side hill or getting
stuck. There is no way any type of a tractor mower could be taken
through this area in its present condition.
The side hill on the East half of our lot has been left in sad
condition. Before the construction this area was grasp that was
mowed. Now the hill is covered with stones as the dirt has all
washed down to the lower level. One area has a large pile of dirt
that has washed down from the upper hill. With the combination of
all the stones and ravines running down this hill, there is no way
this can be mowed. A section of this hill also had no seed put
on it and remains bare.
The sod in front of our house was poorly done as there are 1" wide
ditches around all sides of each roll of sod. This makes it very
difficult to mow.
The lower portion of our driveway was also blacktopped. This was
done for safety purposes in removing snow and also getting out
onto the road during the winter. This was not put back. Crushed
rock was put there instead. We feel this strip of blacktop should
be put back.
(Coni on pg. 2)
Mr. Jerry G. Kingrey Oct. 11, 1994
Beh the construction people and the county people spent a con-
siderable amount of time going up and down County Road 30 this
summer repairing sidehills, etc. but nothing was done to the
hill on the East half of our property. We believe this and the
other items mentioned above should be repaired before you consider
this project completed.
Very truly yours,
Ruth V. Crow and
Iva Ryder
cc: Thomas A. Colbert; Dir. of Public Wks.(Eagan) )
cc: Thomas Egan, Maynr (Eagan)
cc: City Council (Eagan)
cc: Thomas Hedges, City Administrator (Eagan)
cc: Dave Zech, Dakota County Design Engr.
TO:
MEMO
city of eagan
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
C/O THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
OCTOBER 13, 1994
PROJECT 607, DIFFLEY ROAD - UTILITY, TRAIL & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ADJUSTMENTS
The reconstruction of 2.5 miles of County road and the installation of utility improvements
affecting numerous unplatted parcels and property in development transition result in a
very complex project from both a design and final cost allocation perspective. As a result,
subsequent to the presentation of the final assessment roll to the City Council on
September 20, staff has been informed of several situations were further evaluation
warrants consideration of modifying the assessment roll when adopted by official Council
action. The following is a brief discussion of the individual parcels affected.
■ Lot 8, Block 1, Hawthorne Woods West Addition (Glenn Schedin)
At the time of the feasibility report preparation, this was a large, unplatted, homesteaded
parcel whose only public access was its frontage on the south side of Diffley Road east
of Dodd Road. Sanitary sewer and watermain laterals were being installed across the
entire frontage of this unplatted parcel. However, during the progress of this public
improvement, this property was subdivided and platted as a part of the Hawthorne Woods
West subdivision with driveway access, sanitary sewer and water service being provided
by the newly installed internal local street (Rosemary Court). With the existing homestead
being connected to the new subdivision infrastructure, the property owner indicates that
there is no need nor benefit from the street or utility improvements associated with the
Diffley Road project. After evaluation, staff can see the merits in this position and
favorable consideration of removing this parcel from assessments ($11,246.55) under
Project 607 can be given by the Council. Although unlikely, if this parcel ever were to
subdivide and/or connect to these installed improvements, comparable assessment
revenue can be collected through connection charges and/or subdivision agreements.
? 3
■ Parcel 10-03900-012-08 (Charles Duddingston)
This is an unplatted, homesteaded parcel adjacent to and east of the previous parcel who
at the time of the feasibility report preparation and public hearing had its only public
frontage on Diffley Road. With the subsequent development of the Hawthorne Woods
West subdivision, a 60' public right-of-way from Rosemary Court along with public utilities
were stubbed to this parcel. The existing homesteaded residence was also connected
to these utilities similar to the previous parcel. All conditions being similar to the issue
discussed in the previous parcel, it is also in order for Council's favorable consideration
of deleting the proposed assessments ($10,883.39) from this parcel also.
■ Parcels 010-84 & 010-80, Section 22; & 011-02, Section 27 (Tony Caponi)
In September of 1992, following the Council's approval of Project 607, these parcels were
rezoned to Public Facilities (PF) in anticipation of the institutional use of the property as
the Caponi Art Park. The final assessment roll was prepared based on this PF zoning
which has a higher assessment rate than the previous pending Agricultural zoning rate.
Presently, no public facility has been developed on the property nor is any anticipated
within the immediate future. Therefore, the City Council can recognize these parcels as
being similar to an Agricultural holding zone and modify the proposed final assessments
to be consistent with the Agricultural zoning. This will reduce the proposed final
assessments of $268,144.98 to $126,675.63..
■ Parcel 10-02400-020-60 (Larry Oldenburg)
This unplatted homesteaded parcel is located on the northeast corner of Dodd and Diffley
Roads. It currently has a direct driveway access to Diffley Road. According to current
City assessment policy, residential properties taking direct driveway access from a
community collector street will be assessed As entire frontage at one-half the residential
equivalent rate. Parcels that have alternate public frontage may remove any current
access and have the assessment deleted. Mr. Oldenburg will not be able to have this
direct driveway access removed prior to the final assessment hearing. However, staff has
indicated that if the appropriate permits are obtained, the driveway approach physically
removed, and a dedicated restrictive access easement conveyed to the City of Eagan
within 30 days of the final assessment hearing, the final street assessment of $10,848.19
will be removed prior to certification to Dakota County. This option should be formally
acknowledged by the Council in the adoption of the final assessment roll.
At this time, there are no other parcels that the staff has identified for special
consideration by the Council in adopting the final assessment roll. I will be available to
provide additional information as necessary prior to or at the final assessment hearing.
Respectfully submitted, cc: Gene Vanoverbeke, Director of Finance
Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
=g�
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994, City Council Meeting
VACATION/BIRCH STREET
C. Vacate Public Right -of -Way, Birch Street --On September 20, the City Council
received a petition to vacate a portion of Birch Street between Wescott Hills Drive and the
west end of the proposed Betty Lane cul-de-sac being platted within the Red Oaks Addition
subdivision. A public hearing has been scheduled for October 18. All notices have been
published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected parties informing them
of this hearing. As of this d t t has not received any objections to the proposed
vacation. Enclosed on pagd graphic and legal description of the public right-of-
way to be vacated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve
the vacation of that portion of Birch Street as described and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
CCWilt�-
O'LIARY PARK CARR/AG!
NW
0r, SCOTT
NI
WOW MIK
PAF/
IL it
COUPE
VACATION REQUEST SITE
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
VACATION REQUEST
BIRCH STREET
approved:
standard
plate #:
Description For'
Brod Stricker
erederick Scowl
1
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
...e unre.reI ..c
ammo. lest 1a.. I s est, I rye.
WOO IOVTM ROBERT ,HALL ROSEYOIMT, eeratUOTA Mee
suirvEro.rs CERTIFICATE
Jo T 3, Btocif 3
Ser, Plot of RSD MIS
en1vel'L-t7ee
VE.Ceorr 64406- / LOT 5 49'(0,4
COri /Ty/%%iAbl/ 5oT,t
Llr3 .€4077on/ 4
/7 ‹T
\B/ecT€61-7
I t !' wary LiA/B Oc ,V44 3E% /4• rz2.c%e13e0 �p o.:ar cF
�A560oTloA/ '5 �i
tN
Par of
T##E 1000,D%Ax/o5
,comely, 4W/rioN
U
L K BE -Tr}/
Scales 1 inch w 100 Leet
MOMS= MESCRIPTLORS TO VACATE 12101 ST1t1s:T
Description Al sat part of Sirch Street to sseres be Striekar property.
4
That part of Streit Street lying easterly of the-aaothetly ettaation 6f tb" ssat'11n.
of Lot 3, Block 3, •ESCO T GIDEN LOT'S DAKOTA MOIrTT, MINNESOTA and westerly of the
southerly extension of the omit line of said Lot 3, Block 3, 11GSCLrrr CAMDEN LOT'S
DAKOTA COUNT?, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Daketa County,
Sieg sots.
Description S' sat pert of Bird' Street es Vessel property.
All that part of Birch Street located in the Northwest Quarter of the Snstheast Quarter
of Section 14, Township 27, Rerw. 21, Dekota County, Stemmata, the north line of said
Birch Street being a moon line with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the
Southeart Quarter' all lying westerly of the east line of BOIICRtST, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Deteta County, Minnesota' LST the wast 30.00 Leet thereof.
I Mow NNW, lest ane sewer plek • elven eel
.none w eu «ew w rr.w.e..w_.w
Ow 1 se a Hol' 1grwee tool loris a Was
Se lees• se are el mow.
Ikea 09-13-94
OP -711-14 Devised ONIFT ptic..B .
1YED SEP 2 S 1194
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
D. Final Assessment Hearing, Delinquent Utility Bills --A public hearing is scheduled for
the October 18, 1994 City Council meeting, to receive input from affected property owners
regarding the assessment of . elinquent,}tility bills. The assessment roll consists of the
parcels as listed on pages %r through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to
approve the final assessment roll and authorize its certification to the county for collection.
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13 -OCT -1994 (10:24) page 1 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
3550310101 100020005025 49.15 AC
3550140201 100100006030 49.15 AC
3550980101 100140001301 14.92 AC
2550050501 100190001151 34.01 AC
1550480601 100340002076 15.52 AC
1551390601 100360001082 37.82 AC
1550900301 100360001281 37.82 AC
3550490101 100380008002 49.15 AC
3810800701 101122511001 87.23 AC
2350200802 101170007001 321.57 AC
2563730701 101370003001 47.08 AC
2342060704 101430103001 166.78 AC
2500680001 101499234001 102.83 AC
2500131404 101499306001 34.19 AC
3611530103 101630004001 180.72 AC
3611660602 101630017001 355.17 AC
3611720804 101630023001 185.95 AC
3611760406 101630027001 559.08 AC
3611770304 101630028001 635.93 AC
1260920205 101660212102 476.39 AC
1210120004 101715025002 311.61 AC
1211190201 101715307002 157.79 AC
1261270108 101740015100 143.54 AC
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13 -OCT -1994 (10:24) page 2 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
1261290905 101740015500 49.19 AC
1261350104 101740016000 19.38 AC
1262630505 101740206103 332.04 AC
1262560405 101740209103 116.89 AC
1262940803 101740213204 228.66 AC
1262920002 101740214002 58.02 AC
1263264202 101740302101 645.37 AC
1263263402 101740302201 382.75 AC
3630700702 101830009105 402.01 AC
2561430601 101997504002 14.47 AC
1550860901 102090004003 60.66 AC
3630120801 103288002100 45.05 AC
1550930001 103985001001 37.82 AC
1220550602 104430004002 88.71 AC
3650860401 104775008003 506.53 AC
3621810502 104810005000 325.89 AC
3550660901 104870001200 48.92 AC
1551150401 105360001002 37.82 AC
1213490404 105380104102 95.93 AC
3630656101 105540006001 23.17 AC
3623340101 105880002002 23.15 AC
3623380701 105880002003 23.15 AC
3623220501 105880008001 23.15 AC
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13 -OCT -1994 (10:24) page 3 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
3623240301 105880010001 23.15 AC
3623260101 105880012001 23.15 AC
3623310401 105880017001 23.15 AC
1281240005 106398301008 162.17 AC
1200190501 106585013001 17.79 AC
1264410001 106920010000 233.98 AC
2420510606 107300002016 194.03 AC
2420400004 107300006020 63.92 AC
3800200201 107587523004 15.92 AC
3801050001 107587821001 15.92 AC
3801040101 107587822001 15.92 AC
2400380803 107710002015 130.30 AC
1201300901 108195008005 17.79 AC
1201310801 108195008005 17.79 AC
1090020701 108435403001 708.87 AC
1090030604 108435404101 64.29 AC
1140570101 108435507005 186.11 AC
1140571901 108435507005 969.23 AC
2433570503 108446011002 247.80 AC
10773.41* <*>
3700850504 100130001005 266.68 CB
1312350002 101230106004 108.69 CB
1181160101 101350001007 14.32 CB
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13-0CT-1994 (10;24) page 4 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
2422440402 101435121003 20.91 CB
2521360402 101440104002 19.50 CB
2500760002 101499324001 16.79 CB
2501150303 101499363001 9.06 CB
3671060601 101550107005 48.21 CB
2330810903 101670405003 171.05 CB
2391400501 101670604007 24.59 CB
2391040903 101670613008 51.33 CB
3640611407 102096017004 79.19 CB
2460520601 102190008002 193.27 CB
2460190801 102190023001 10.86 CB
1290980002 102275015003 121.14 CB
1291290302 102275031002 37.24 CB
2530830501 102390022003 24.29 CB
3660780201 103200004000 58.50 CB
2391620803 103295103001 143.35 CB
2392160402 103295203009 203.81 CB
3682160101 103299001012 114.05 CB
1230500901 1039800006001 52.02 CB
1230390501 103980103010 37.15 CB
1231460503 103980301002 192.57 C8
1231720202 103980302008 5.92 CB
3610700104 104130004001 74.50 CB
q'd
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13 -OCT -1994 (10:24) page 5 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
8990300901 104290001001 1309.80 C8
3660080701 104290001002 928.06 CB
1112650501 104725241002 5.74 CB
1112680201 104725244002 5.45 CB
1263360801 105355004001 7.31 CB
1213510902 105380105202 93.48 CB
1228120001 105679006001 6.62 CB
3623390601 105880003003 9.19 CB
3623300501 105880016001 23.15 CB
1271390502 106398003013 5.88 CB
1270230403 106398011002 112.75 CB
1280990102 106398301002 130.87 CB
1281960302 106398403005 521.79 CB
3623090201 106399506001 13.57 CB
2563700001 106430002001 119.51 CB
3711490702 107250001004 43.99 CB
3710370201 107250019002 12.46 CB
1172750002 107297623001 71.21 CB
1224570007 107299711001 89.15 CB
1224570008 107299711001 69.24 CB
2420440602 107300005019 13.40 CB
3822800301 107583510002 14.67 CB
1202210901 107585201001 8.95 CB
REPORT SORTED BY PID
ACCOUNT -NUMBER
13 -DCT -1994 (10:24) page 6 of 6
PID AMT -OPEN ACCOUNT -STATUS
1250680402 107595020003 116.84 C8
1251660503 107595127001 6.60 CB
1257840702 107610005001 57.04 CB
2431150803 107650304012 228.23 CB
2400430101 107710003014 130.25 C8
1201290201 108195009205 18.04 CB
1212570402 108355007002 40.91 CB
1313620501 108375002001 6.43 CB
1083160001 108427524002 8.14 CB
1090060302 108435407001 50.09 CB
2433460901 108446004001 38.26 CB
6416.06* c*>
17189.47*
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
NEN Dustless
FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL/RED OAKS ADDITION
A. Final Subdivision Approval, Red Oaks Addition (Northwest of Woodlands) --Final
documents have been reviewed for the Red Oaks Subdivision and found in order. The
development contract and financial securities have been provided. With the vacation of the
Birch Street right-of-way approval earlier onCouncil agenda, approval of this final
subdivision will be in order. Enclosed on page (Pis a copy of the final plat as it appears
for recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final subdivision
for Red Oaks Addition.
s
EXHIBIT "A"
t 1113 '.111
1 Till t1/ '
1, , y'11, 1E t
I
11111'+'l; .�
'� jllt,li 11 !
1111141/lig1i111
11'1 11 1
111111111;1111111!1
11111,.1,1 1,11
1E 111.1,,11 11
1'' 1IiJ'- i
11
!i;111, 1111.
it 1,11; '17!.'1
11101'1 1,11
'11 1
1111-1111111,,!!1
81 III.
�'1}11111 -!►
!1 li.1
0
!r.
,
t
i
�1
:i
1 I�
111
1
1
1
1
1
1►'
11
1
1'
_1
11
!!!
11
11
1!
r
41,
aa-aMa1a•-actin a-Os;.`t. ){.a
O
P
1v
4L
v
10/
.sear. -�'
2.
z
N
0
r
} W
1 S
N
•
O
z
a
J
N6 --
z. 0
=
co
Sj
co
=
-Jo
Qa
2
2Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT
RED OAKS ADDN
B. Contract 94-16, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Red Oaks Addition - Streets &
Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on September 30, formal bids were received for the installation of
streets and utilities for the Red Oaks subdivision under the above -referenced subdivision.
Also, two miscellaneous storm sewer improvements were included with this project in hopes
that the economies of scale Awry would result in better unit prices for all individual
projects. Enclosed on page (4 y is a summary bid tabulation showing the relationship of
the low bid for each project to the engineer's estimate and/or feasibility report estimate.
After evaluating these bids, staff is recommending that the storm sewer improvement for
Pond AP -33 be deleted from the contract award consideration. Staff will work with the
riparian property owners of this pond to investigate feasible alternatives. The St. Francis
Woods Pond JP -65.1 had been bid previously under Contract 94-02, but was deleted from
that contract award due to excessively high ($53,006) bids. With design modifications and
a rebid under this contract, staff feels that bids received are acceptable for consideration of
contract award.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 94-16
(Red Oaks Addition, etc.) and award the contract to Ro-So Contracting, Inc., in the amount
of $79,444.50 (excludes Pond AP -33) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
G7
city of eagan
RED OAKS ADDITION
POND AP -33
ST FRANCIS WOODS ADDITION
CITY CONTRACT NO 94-16
BID DATE:
BID TIME:
Sep:mixt. 33, lag
10:30 A.M.
PROJECT 675 RAS 93-6 RAS 93-1
CONTRACTORS RED OAKS POND AP -33 POND JP 65.1
(Eagan Royale)
Ro-So Contracting $45,274.50 $17,870.00 $34,170.00
Ryan Contracting 51,216.50 15,375.00 40,140.00
Burschville Construction 56,863.25 13,315.00 53,200.00
Northdale Construction 65,985.00 18,705.00 49,475.00
Feasibility Report Estimate $44,000.00
% Over (+) Under (-) +2.90% N/A N/A
Engineers Estimate $42,576.50 $13,430.00 $32,275.00
% Over (+) Under (-) +6.34% +33.06% +5.87%
q8
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/TRANSPORT AMERICA
C. Conditional Use Permit, Transport America, to allow a truck and freight terminal and
Preliminary Subdivision consisting of approximately 10 acres at the northeast intersection
of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive --Transport America is requesting a preliminary
subdivision of property currently platted as Lots 9, 10 and part of 11, Sibley Terminal
Industrial Park, consisting of 2 lots on 10 acres. They are also requesting a conditional use
permit to conduct a truck and freight terminal in a light industrial zoning district on the
newly created Lot 2, Block 1, Transport America Add' 'on. A copy of the staff report
regarding this item is enclosed on pages Brougham
The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting
of September 27, 1994. There were no significant issues raised with the office and accessory
parking development. There were two issues raised with the trucking facility. First, the
current site plan provides inadequate employee parking for the trucking facility. The site
plan only provides 19 parking spots. There are 60 potential drivers for the 60 tractor
vehicles. In addition, there will be maintenance workers located at the site who repair and
maintain the trucking vehicles. In subsequent discussion with representatives of Transport
America, they believe that 30 employee parking spaces on site will be adequate. The
Council should note that at the current time, there is extensive on -street parking in the
vicinity of Transport America.
The second issue concerns whether the back area of the trucking facility where the trucks
are parked would be surfaced with a bituminous material or simply left with the existing
Class 5 coverage material. Noting that other trucking firms in Eagan have provided
bituminous surface and storm sewer facilities for their truck parking areas, the Planning
Commission is recommending that Transport America do likewise.
The Planning Commission is also recommending that the angle parking markings within the
right-of-way of Yankee Doodle Road, adjacent to the office building, be removed
immediately. Parallel parking against the curb would be allowed as on many City streets,
but angle parking into the street right -of -w, should be e ' ted in the view of the
Planning Commission. Enclosed on pages ( oi3 through a copy of the Planning
Commission minutes regarding this item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary
subdivision and conditional use permit for Transport America subject to the conditions set
forth in the Planning Commission minutes.
(7)
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 19, 1994 CASE #: 8 -PP -31-8-94
APPLICANT: Transport America HEARING DATE: September 27, 1994
PROPERTY OWNER: Robert Meyers PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Transport America Addn), Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION: SE 1/4 Section 8
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND)
ZONING: Light Industrial (LI)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Transport America is requesting a Preliminary Subdivision of property currently platted as
Lots 9, 10, and part of 11, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park consisting of two lots on ten acres
and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Transport America
Addition, to allow a truck and freight terminal in a Light Industrial (LI) zoning district
Iocated at the northeast intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive.
The subdivision results in Lot 10 being subdivided into two parts. One portion will be
combined with part of Lot 11 for the office use (Lot 1, Block 1, Transport America
Addition) and the other part will be combined with Lot 9 for the truck terminal (Lot 2,
Block 1, Transport America Addition).
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
A. Preliminary Subdivision
City Code Chapter 13, Section 13.20, Subd. 6. states: In the case of platting, the Planning
Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in
approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 2
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water
storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development
or use contemplated.
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to
cause environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed
in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for
maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden.
I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook
on Solar Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and
consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved
and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water
Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and
other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully
set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and
incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the
responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and
make the same available to the public.
(Oj
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 3
B. Conditional Use Permit
City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4, states that 'The Planning Commission shall recommend
a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it
finds that such use at the proposed location:
A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare
of the neighborhood or the City.
B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions.
C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in
appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not
change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer
systems and schools.
E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the
general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare
or odors.
F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic
congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets.
G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic
feature of major importance.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
Sibley Terminal Industrial Park was initially subdivided in 1964. Prior to being purchased
by Transport America, Lots 9 and 10 were used for a trucking business by Lessor's, Inc. and
Lot 11 contained two principal uses (Gressor Concrete Company and a 30,000 s.f. office
building formerly occupied by the National Guard). Transport America Addition
incorporates Lots 9, 10, and a portion of Lot 11.
I0#
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 4
Lot 11 was split for separate ownership via a Waiver of Plat approved by the City Council
on May 3, 1994. The Waiver allowed Lot 11 to be split and the portion containing the
office building to be sold to Transport America. A condition of approval placed on the
Waiver required Transport America to combine all three parcels.
'Truck and Freight Terminal" is listed as a Conditional Use in the Light Industrial Zoning
District; however, the City has no record of a permit being issued for Lots 9 or 10.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a CUP to allow this type of use on proposed Lot 2.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing office building (on proposed Lot 1, Block 1), which will be Transport America
Corporate Headquarters, is undergoing interior remodeling and the parking area is also
being expanded to accommodate approximately 150 office employees.
Transport America is currently using the existing building on proposed Lot 2 for
maintenance and service and the remainder of the lot for trucking terminal operations.
SURROUNDING USES
The following uses, zoning and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject
property:
North - Gressor Concrete/Shooting Range; zoned and designated Industrial.
South - Best Brands, Inc.; zoned and designated Industrial.
East - Aagard Disposal; zoned and guided Industrial
West - Dun & Bradstreet (Comserv); zoned and designated Industrial.
ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The applicant's Site Plan calls for the following improvements on both proposed lots:
Lot 1 Office: In addition to internal building improvements to the existing office building,
the construction of a 132 stall employee parking area.
Lot 2 - Truck Terminal: In addition to internal improvements to the existing truck service
and maintenance buildings, a fuel island with overhead canopy and three underground fuel
storage tanks have been added, and concrete landing gear pads have also been constructed
in four locations. The Plan also shows a future 6,300 s.f. truck maintenance building
addition.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 5
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
A. Preliminary Subdivision
j, - The City Code requires a 1/2 acre minimum lot size in the LI zoning district. The
applicant is proposing Lot 1 to be 3.3 acres and Lot 2 to be 6.7 acres.
Park Dedication - At their September 19, 1994 rneeting, the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and
Natural Resource Commission recommended a cash trails and water quality dedication.
The proposed development is located in the lower portion of drainage basin C. Runoff
from this site will be discharged to Pond CP -8, a designated sediment basin in the City's
water quality management plan; therefore, staff recommended a cash water quality
dedication for the site based on the net change in runoff characteristics from the site as a
result of implementing the proposed development plan.
Easements/Right-Of-Way/Permits - The proposed storm sewer line that will drain the
parking lot on Lot 1 crosses Lot 2. The developer intends to privately maintain this storm
sewer line and to prepare a private maintenance agreement.
B. Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Compatibility With Surrounding Area - The proposed subdivision and conditional use will
provide for office and truck terminal land uses that have operated at this location for many
years. All of the property surrounding this site, and in the area in general, is zoned and
guided for industrial development and both uses are consistent and common within the
Light Industrial Zoning District.
Conditional Use Findings - The Conditional Use Permit request substantially meets the
criteria listed previously.
SITE PLAN
,Setbacks - All structures and parking areas meet LI setback requirements.
Grading/Wetlands - A minimal amount of grading will be needed to prepare this site for
the proposed development. The developer proposes to add some berming to screen the
parking area along the Terminal Drive side of the site.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 6
The developer will be responsible for providing erosion control measures on this site to limit
the amount of sediments that could drain to the City's storm sewer system and Pond CP -8.
There are no jurisdictional wetlands on the site.
Utilities - The existing buildings on Lots 1 and 2 are currently connected to the City's
sanitary sewer system. The developer has constructed a new 6 inch water service to the
existing building on Lot 1. The existing water service to the old armory building on Lot 1
had a 2 inch water service and the developer plans to cap and abandon this.
The existing hydrants on Terminal Drive will provide adequate fire protection to this site.
Tree Preservation Polity - The Tree Preservation Plan submitted is acceptable. The plan
indicates that no significant trees will be removed as a result of site development; However,
eight existing trees will be relocated to allow for an entrance access redesign. Five 6"
diameter conifers and three 5" diameter deciduous trees (not significant size) will be
preserved as a result of transplanting on site.
Landscaping - The Landscape Plan submitted is acceptable. The Plan proposes additional
berming and continuing the existing landscaping theme from west to east. Included is the
relocation of some mature trees affected by the access reconfiguration to other portions of
the site.
Office Site
Parking - The City Code requires 160 parking stalls for 30,000 s.f. of office space and the
site plan provides 174 spaces on site. The Site Plan also shows 14 angle parking spaces on
Yankee Doodle Road (17 exist currently). These additional stalls are not needed and the
applicant should remove the angled striping from the public right-of-way. Parking on
Yankee Doodle Road at this location, if needed, should be limited to normal parallel street
parking.
Transport America has been informed that City Policy requires 10' wide parking stalls;
however, the applicant is proposing 10' wide stalls around the perimeter of the office
building (42 stalls) and 9' stall widths for the remaining on site employee parking spaces.
Access/Parking Lot Design - Access to Lot 1, Block 1, is provided via a shared access with
Gressor Concrete Company off of Yankee Doodle Road and two separate curb cuts off of
Terminal Drive. The design of the parking lots on Lot 1 are shown to include bituminous
or concrete surfacing and concrete curb and gutter around the edges.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 7
Storm Drainage - A storm drainage system is shown to be constructed to handle the runoff
from the new parking lot on Lot 1. The new storm sewer line will include 2 catch basins that
will be built along the concrete curb and gutter and drain in a northerly direction to an
existing 15 inch storm sewer line. The existing 15 inch storm sewer drains easterly to Pond
CP -8, a designated sediment basin in the City's water quality management plan.
Truck Terminal Site
Parking - The Site Plan provides 19 employee, 60 tractor, and 79 trailer parking spaces on
site. As proposed, an employee parking shortage is likely on this lot.
The City Code does not list required off street parking requirements for truck
service/maintenance land uses; however, thereis a potential for 60 drivers needing space
to park their personal vehicles on site while they are driving tractor trailers over the road
in addition to those employed on site as truck service/maintenance personnel.
Additional employee parking should be provided on this lot to serve the truck terminal
employees.
Transport America has been informed that City Policy requires 10' wide parking stalls;
however, the applicant is proposing 9' stall widths for the 19 on site employee parking
spaces.
Access/Circulation - Access to Lot 2, Block 1, is provided at a single point off of Terminal
Drive.
Parking Lot Design/Storm Drainage - The design of the parking lots for Lot 2 are not
shown to be constructed to City standards.
The 19 stall employee parking lot has an existing bituminous surface without curb.
Upgrading to City standard concrete curb and gutter would require a storm sewer system
to be extended 500 feet to drain the lot.
The applicant proposes the south half of the truck/tractor parking lot and drive area be
surfaced with bituminous while the north half will continue as an existing gravel surface.
The site plan does not show any curb or gutter to be constructed on this lot. The site plan
does show that concrete landing gear pads will be constructed in four areas of the parking
lot. Upgrading this parking lot with bituminous or concrete surfacing would require three
additional catch basins to handle the runoff from the 5.5 acre parking lot.
The preliminary drainage plan does not show any storm sewer improvements to handle the
runoff from the 19 stall employee parking area or the truck/trailer parking lot on Lot 2.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 8
The employee parking lot sheet drains to the southeast and drains overland to Terminal
Drive and the drainage from the truck and tractor parking lot flows overland in a northerly
direction to the northeastern corner of the lot where two existing catch basins collect the
runoff and route it to a sediment basin, CP -8.
The runoff generated from the tractor trailer parking area during a 5 year event is 19 cfs.
City standards allow a maximum of 4 cfs draining across a parking lot or along a curb.
When the runoff rate becomes 4 cfs or greater, then a catch basin needs to be added.
The City Code requires all parking areas for more than four vehicles to be constructed with
a bituminous or concrete surface and concrete curb and gutter. The City requires surfacing
for dust control, water quality, and aesthetic reasons; and concrete curb & gutter for
conveying runoff, defining the edge of parking areas, and because concrete is more durable
and long lasting that bituminous curbing.
The applicant believes the existing gravel parking area has been compacted over the years
to such a point that it acts as an impervious surface so dust control and water quality are
non -issues and that aesthetics are not a concern because the existing gravel parking area is
located over 300' from Terminal Drive and will not be visible to the public. In addition,
Transport America representatives state that a bituminous surface in this area will only be
ripped up by tractor trailer traffic maneuvering, while concrete surfacing is cost prohibitive.
Staff has reviewed the situation and the impact of dust control to neighboring land uses,
Gressor Concrete and Aagard Disposal should be minimal, the City's Water Quality
Coordinator prefers a cash water quality dedication because this site drains to a
sedimentation basin, and the aesthetics of the gravel surface will not effect the public
because it is the rear area of the 6.7 acre lot.
Allowing these modifications to the City Standards will set a precedent and there are a
number of similar traffic generators in the City have surfaced areas with concrete curb &
gutter: Dart Transit, UPS, West Publishing, Trans X, A & H Cartage, etc. and approved
future developments meeting City standards include: Freight Masters, Bob Martin Trucking,
and Air Plus Ltd.
The City Council has generally stated that development standards should be uniform
throughout the City; however, Council has also indicated a willingness to modify standards
in some instances involving redevelopment, and allow for phased improvements to achieve
compliance. The issue here is whether this is an instance in which the standards should be
modified. It should be noted that Transport America is not requesting to phase in
bituminous surfacing of the trucking area but is requesting to utilize gravel for the long
term.
RI
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 9
Water Quality - All of the runoff from this site drains to a sediment basin, Pond CP -8.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
Subdivision
The proposed subdivision provides lot sizes that exceed Light Industrial Zoning District
requirements.
Site Plan
1. OFFICE - The Site Plan meets City development standards. The plan provides storm
sewer construction, adequate parking and building setbacks, access, and landscaping. City
services are available to serve the site.
2. TERMINAL - The Site Plan provides adequate parking and building setbacks, access, and
landscaping and City services are available to serve the site; however, the plan does not
appear to provide an adequate amount of off street parking. Additionally, the applicant is
not proposing to construct storm sewer to serve the site or to surface the existing gravel
tractor trailer parking area.
Conditional Use Permit
The Conditional Use Permit request substantially meets the criteria listed previously. The
fact that proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Transport America Addition, has operated as a truck and
freight terminal for many years reflects that such a use can operate with other uses in this
area.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
Action: To approve/deny the two lot, 10 acre Transport America Addition Preliminary
Subdivision, subject to conditions listed below.
CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February
2, 1993 shall be complied with:
Al, Bi, Cl, C2,C3,D1,El, F1and G1.
Planning Report - Transport America
September 27, 1994
Page 10
Action: To approve/deny a Conditional Use Permit with Site Plan, to allow a truck &
freight terminal on Lot 2, Block 1, Transport America Addition, subject to conditions listed
below.
(Note: Conditions 5 and 6 is an additional condition that may be added if determined to be
appropriate by the APC & City Council)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded concurrent with the recording of the
final plat.
2. The Site Plan for the Terminal lot shall be revised to add more surfaced employee
parking.
3. The applicant/owner shall properly maintain all parking areas and premises.
4. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored within the each principal building
or in an enclosure attached to the principal structure and constructed of the same
building materials.
S. The applicant/owner shall construct a storm sewer system that will collect the miff
from this site and convey the runoff to the existing storm sewer system.
6. The parking lots shall be upgraded to City standards with concrete curb and gutter
and bituminous or concrete surfacing.
1 0
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined
in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the
rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements
centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to
accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the
plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and
location as determined necessary by engineering standards.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to
public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage
capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this
development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope
easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by
the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements
to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as
necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to
provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes,
engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final
plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be
prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a
cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.
11�
4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the
proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan
shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released
until one year after the date of City certified compliance.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the
appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat
approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory
agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as
recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication,
ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and
approved by Council action.
H. ether
1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall
be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission
Approved: August 25. 1987
LTS#5
STANDARD.CON
City Council
_September 15. 1987
Revised: July 10. 199Q
Revised: February 2. 1993
l��
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - TRANSPORT AMERICA
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $177.00 on the parcels proposed
for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat.
At this time, there are pending assessments of $2,150 on the parcel proposed for platting.
The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,
dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
None
L
•
//-3
! JCATI N
ZONING
rawfmowl. , VrslustArpg1:1
• ‘14 "-Am
' 4 7
•
w
1jr :0.11LarraC16-'
To • 1-i
1.1
•
•
GUIDE PLAN
0 s).1
;}
1it; 9
4 it
•Ct ca.
•-••4.-.r...::
. •
4.
..4 : .1°14'; .-"' 3* '-= 7 ,' •:::...., . ,:_;;,..a ----!:.--1- '..1 t
"- • - -..i. z ..... ... rzez,i.
. ... .. „,..r— ... ...—
... -- Ms •-•/'•
, t • ,
•••• ••••••
1. •
z
9.
...........
.......------
LE DRIVE
• -(
-- •
... • • ...........
SUBJECT SITE
4
AREA MAP
a
i
f
r
-'i
i,`
G'11;�
a
I
i
F
E
se
Yi
1;3
ay
N
U
t swot
& _
1
i
ti
u
A
i
jai
311H!
ii
[I!!!
S S
S
y
i9
11i=`;f
!HS//
1;
ss
iei
I
La�
!
i
a
i
1i
e11
ad!
S
1+5
F
II!!
i
1
1
F 1
i
Will
I9!
1.0
jai
--
• — ...
i -_a
et.—
•
.'7
CP -9 7/R. L..
698.E �JOH
702.0
' Dr • I
aik
DUS
CE
r
IAL
P-7.
O'M S
NO.
JOT
2ND A••.
5.0
SITE
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT
• MAP
CITY OF
EAGAN
CP
110190
X0011• MIA• If:>
VOW 11eM.. *..r
ORM MOM •fte..a —
maw LR WARM Immo . •
O.Ow1 LR flan,. beigne• 0
if0101 PO= Wel .M ♦ ♦ •. -0
abutot ermost . . r 1.....
owe swim w*TU Lava . . . .. . . 100.0
POMO MIN WARM Le ML • ,00.0
ellatINNe MOM
PAGE 15/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
TRANSPORT AMERICA
Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a truck and freight terminal in a 1-1
(Light Industrial) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of two
lots on 'approximately 10 acres located on Lots 9-11, Block 1, Sibley
Terminal Industrial Part at the northeast intersection of 'Yankee
Doodle Road and Terminal Drive in the SE; of Section 8.
Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley
highlighted the information presented in the City staff's planning
report dated September 19, 1994. Ridley noted the background and
history and the existing conditions of the subject property, the
surrounding uses and the compatibility therewith, and the proposed
site plans. Ridley specifically noted that with respect to the office
site, the City Code requires 160 parking stalls while the site plan
provides 174 on site. Ridley explained that because the plan provides
for more than adequate parking, the markings for angle parking on
Yankee Doodle Road should be removed. With respect to the truck
terminal site, Ridley noted that the City recommends additional
employee parking be provided where the site plan only provides for 19
employees. Ridley explained that the applicant's 60 potential drivers
will need space to park their personal vehicles on site. Ridley
further noted that the 19 stall employee parking lot has existing
bituminous surface but does not have the required concrete curb and
gutter. Accordingly, with the required curb and gutter improvement, a
storm sewer system to be extended 500 feet to drain the lot will also
be required. Ridley advised the Commission that the applicant, who
was not present at the hearing is opposed to surfacing the entire
parking area while he would be agreeable to paving the south half of
the truck/tractor parking lot. Ridley noted that these requirements
have been similarly required of Dart Transit, UPS, West Publishing,
Trans -X and A & H Cartage and also on recently approved developments
including Freight Masters, Air Plus, and Bob Martin Trucking.
The applicant nor a representative of the applicant was present
at the hearing.
Member Merkley expressed concerns regarding intensive traffic use
as a result of using the subject property as a trucking terminal. In
response to Member Merkley's inquiry, Project Planner Ridley advised
that other similar uses in the City have bituminous surfaces but that
public works advises that the quality or wear of bituminous surface
depends on the surface thickness. Member Merkley further stated that
this applicant is different from Lull Industries in which the
Commission did not require paved surfaces and curb and gutter edging.
Merkley reasoned that the type and volume of vehicular traffic is
SENT BY:
9-30-94 ; 8:35AM ;SEYERSON WILCOX SHEL 612 681 4612;# 3/13
PAGE 16/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINU'T'ES
September 27, 1994
significantly greater with Transport America_ Chairman Voracek
concurred with Member Markley and added that unlike Lull Industries,
storm sewer connection is available to the subject property.
Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the
Preliminary Plat consisting of two lots on approximately 10 acres
located on Lots 9-11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Part at the
northeast intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive in
the SE; of Section 8, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on February 2, 1993, shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C4, Di, El, F1, Gi, and H1.
All approved in favor.
Heyl moved, Isberg seconded a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
truck and freight terminal in a 1-1 (Light Industrial) district on
Lot 2, Block 1, subject to the following conditions:
1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded concurrent with
the recording of the final plat.
2. The Site Plan for the Terminal lot shall be revised to add
more surfaced employee parking.
3. The applicant/owner shall properly maintain all parking
areas and premises.
4. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored within
the each principal building or in an enclosure attached to
the principal structure and constructed of the same building
materials.
5. The applicant/owner shall construct a storm sewer system
that will collect the runoff from this site and convey the
runoff to the existing storm sewer system.
6. The parking lots shall be upgraded to City standards with
concrete curb and getter and bituminous or concrete
surfacing.
7. The applicant/owner shall immediately remove the markings
for angle parking in the right• -of -stay of Yankee Doodle Road
adjacent to the subject property,.
All approved in favor.
R-95%
612 432 3780
09-30-94 08:30AM P018 #39
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/EXTENSION
EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK
D. Planned Development Amendment/Extension, Eagan Heights Commercial Park, for
Town Centre 100 Addition --Martin Colon, representing the Eagan Heights Partnership, has
requested an amendment and time extension of the planned development agreement for the
Eagan Heights Commercial Park/Town Centre 100. The staff report on this item is
enclosed on pages 7.26 through i%
The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting
9f ptember 27),_,1994. The minutes of the Planning Commission are enclosed on pages
througll The key issue on which the Planning Commission focused was whether
a planned development, as proposed by Mr. Colon, would provide any additional benefit to
either the developer or the City compared to simply placing straight zoning on the various
remaining undeveloped parcels in the subdivision. The Commission asked Mr. Colon if he
could provide a more specific planned development that would address some of the
concerns of the neighbors, as well as the objectives of the City to achieve a more integrated
development plan. Mr. Colon generally acknowledged that the development of this property
was taking place in an incremental manner over time and that was a reality of the
marketplace. He did not feel that any more specific plans than that set forth at this time
would be possible for him to provide. Considering this entire discussion, the Planning
Commission recommends that the planned development agreement amendment and
extension be denied on the grounds that there was no significant advantage to either party
for the amendment. The Commission also recommended that a public hearing be initiated
to terminate the current planned development and replace it with straight zoning.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment/
extension of the Eagan Heights Commercial Planned Development as proposed by the
Eagan Heights Partnership subject to the conditions set forth in the staff report.
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 22, 1994
APPLICANT: Eagan Heights Ptnsp. HEARING DATE: September 27, 1994
PROPERTY OWNER Eagan Heights Ptnsp. PREPARED BY: Planning Division
REQUEST: Planned Development Amendrnent/Extension
LOCATION: North 1/2 Section 15
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CPD - Commercial Planned Development
ZONING: Planned Development
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Martin Colon representing the Eagan Heights Partnership has
requested a Planned Development Amendment/Extension for the Eagan Heights
Commercial Park/Town Centre 100.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The original Planned Development Agreement for the Eagan
Heights Commercial Park was executed on Jurie 6, 1985. This agreement included a sketch
plan designating general types of land use to be permitted in the 100 acre area. (Figure 1)
The Agreement also established major street layout and right -of way requirements including
major access points to Yankee Doodle and Lexington Avenue. Park dedication requirements
for the entire 100 acre area were set forth and included approximately three acres of land
adjacent to O'Leary Park (in Area 6) and $20,000 cash. Sidewalks were to be installed
adjacent to the major streets throughout the PD. In addition, a trail was to be installed
from O'Leary Park northward and around City Pond DP -20 (Areas 2 and 3) to Yankee
Doodle.
The term of the Planned Development Agreement was 10 years from the date of the first
City Council approval of the development plan, which was July 20, 1982. The Eagan Zoning
Ordinance provides that a Planned Development Agreement shall continue beyond its stated
expiration date unless specific action is taken by the City Council to terminate the
Agreement. The City Council, however, may not terminate the agreement before the
expiration date.
Land uses, densities, and setbacks were all to conform to normal zoning code requirements
for the applicable district. Issues such as assessments, street lights, and tree preservation
also were addressed in the manner of prevailing standard city code or policy. Special
screening through berming and evergreen plantings was to be provided between Area 8 and
the existing single family development to the south. Other conditions that would be binding
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 2.
on future development of the area included maintenance of a 650 foot buffer between the
Duckwood Estates and any commercial retail buildings within Areas 7 and 8. Conditional
use permits were required for any high rise buildings. A staging plan was to be required.
This staging plan (Figure 2) is marked "only a proposal and can be changed by Owner."
The original Planned Development was essentially a master subdivision and zoning plan for
the 100 acres. It was very general and schematic. With a few exceptions, such as specific
screening requirements for the residential area to the south, the details of developing the
area were to follow basic city ordinance requirements. Specific site plan review occurred
in conjunction with the subdivision and development of individual lots.
The original .PD Agreement has been amended twice (Figures 3 and 4). The amendments
modified the basic road alignment and shifted some of the general zoning designations. In
addition, the area has developed over time as a series of individual developments, with final
subdivision review and approval on a lot by lot basis. The following list provides a
chronological summary of these individual developments and amendments.
Date Development
Description
4/16/85 Town Centre 100 First Addition Daycare and 10 -story office building and
remaining outlots for development.
6/6/85 Original P.D. Agreement signed
9/2/86 Town Centre 100 Second Addition Signal Bank & law office
10//87 Town Centre 100 Third Addition Area west of Lexington and Yankee Doodle
Road and park dedication - O'Leary Park.
7/19/88 P.D. Amendment
Changed the road alignment on Town
Centre Drive (easterly portion intersecting
Lexington Ave.) to align more contiguously
with the western portion of Town Centre
Drive. Changed Area 4 from CSC to LB.
Changed Area 1 Outlot from CSC to LB.
Split Area 8 into 8a and 8b.
7/19/88 Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition Strip retail shopping center. (Treasure
Island etc...)
/c; 7
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 3
2/ 6/90
1/15/91
2/19/91
5/20/92
11/5/92
12/15/92
12/7/93
12/13/93
12/21/93
9/6/94
Town Centre 100 Fifth Addition
Town Centre 100 Ninth Addition
Town Centre 100 Eighth Addition
Town Centre 100 Tenth Addition
P.D. Amendment
Town Centre 100 Eleventh Addition
Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition
Final P.D. Agreement
Town Centre 100 Twelfth Addition
Final P.D. Amendment
Waterford Apartments (44 units)
Vehicle emissions testing station
Waterford Apartments (78 units)
Metropolitan Fed'l Bank/Edina Realty
Changing the zoning of Outlot A, T.C. 100
9th Addition, from PD -CSC to PD -LB and
the zoning of the northerly 3.2 acres of
Outlot E, Town Centre 100 1st Addition,
from PD -LB to PD -CSC.
Valvoline Rapid Oil Change
3 outlots - no physical developments
Mann Movie theater
Mann Movie Theaters
Changes to the Mann Theater
During discussions in 1993 concerning the Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition, the City Council
specifically called for development of a concept plan for the entire Town Centre Area before any
further development occurred. The desire to see an overall integrated plan for the area was again
expressed during discussions over the Mann Theatre location and design.
At this point, Martin Colon, representing the owners of the undeveloped Town Centre 100
properties, is attempting to provide this overall development concept as requested. He is also
requesting an amendment to the Land Use/Zoning Plan, as well as an extension of the term of the
PD. In related actions, he is also putting forward two specific development proposals. A Big
Wheel Rossi store is proposed for the outlot to the west of Valvoline. This will be considered at
the APC meeting of September 27 1994. Development of a Red Robin Restaurant is also under
discussion for the outlot immediately north of the Mann Theatre. This item is now scheduled for
the APC meeting in October, 1994.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The current existing and future permitted land uses in the Eagan Heights Commercial Park
Planned Development are depicted on Figure 5.
1a�
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 4
PROPOSED PD AMENDMENT
The basic text and sketch plans of the proposed amendment to the Eagan Heights/Town Centre
100 Planned Development is included in Appendix A. The amendment includes the following
features:
1. Land Use. The proposed Land Use Plan (Figure 6) is the same generalized land use and
zoning as the current Planned Development Agreement with one exception. The northeast
corner of the PD, currently designated for General Business (GB) and R-4 uses, is proposed
to be changed to CSC (Community Shopping Center). The GB district allows a variety of
businesses which tend to serve other businesses and industry, as well as residents. Examples
include lumber, heating, and plumbing shops; wholesale offices, sales, or showrooms; auto
accessories sales (service facilities subject to conditional use); storage facilities; and motor
vehicles sales. The CSC district is the major retail shopping and service zoning district and
permits shopping centers with a wide variety of stores including groceries, department stores,
variety stores, as well as restaurants, offices, and banks. Auto service stations are conditional
uses in both CSC and GB districts.
Mr. Colon proposes that the allowed land uses would be the same as those provided for in the
City's Zoning Code for the LB and CSC districts with a few exceptions. In the LB zone, the
following Conditional Uses would be prohibited: radio and television studios; on -sale liquor
in conjunction with a restaurant facility; restaurant - Class I - only those granted a permit
according to applicable City Code provisions to serve 3.2 beer or wine; and amusement devices
exceeding three machines at one licensed location or to be located within 200' of any other
licensed location. Within the LB district, the applicant is also proposing to eliminate the
permitted accessory use of private garages, off-street parking, and loading spaces as regulated
by the Zoning Code. It has been pointed out to Mr. Colon that prohibiting the off-street
parking as an accessory use would not be advisable because parking is a requirement for the
LB uses.
Within the CSC areas, the PD proposes that all uses currently permitted in the district would
be permitted. In addition, Mr. Colon is proposing that one of the requirements of the Zoning
Code be eliminated. That is that the opening of any automobile service station shall follow
and not precede the construction and occupancy of a minimum 20,000 sq. ft. of retail shopping
center floor space.
Mr. Colon has also expressed a willingness and desire to pursue the reclassification to R-3
(Townhouse) of the LB area south of Town Centre Drive and north of the Duckwood Estates.
He is not proposing this change at this time, however, staff discussed the possibility of
providing a more detailed and defined development concept for the remaining vacant parcels
in the 100 acre PD area. For example, some Planned Developments specify general types of
uses - retail, restaurant, auto service, office, along with a preliminary general site plan with
)a°\
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 5
approximate building locations, square footage, amount of parking, etc„ Mr. Colon's
development plans, however, are not sufficiently clear at this point and will be more market
driven. Therefore, he has explained that he simply cannot make any commitments to narrow
down the range of potential uses beyond that which he has proposed.
2. Sidewalks. The sidewalk plan is described as an expansion on the original development
framework criteria in that it provides for sidewalk on both sides of all interior roadways. It
should be pointed out, however, that sidewalks on both sides of these interior streets would
be a normal requirement under current straight zoning and subdivision requirements.
3. Trailways. The proposed trailway plan is not significantly different from the original one. The
trail between Town Centre Drive and Yankee Doodle Road now splits and goes around both
sides of the pond. This requirement has already been implemented as part of the Mann
Theatre development.
4. Architectural Standards. The applicant is proposing a very wide range of permissible building
materials. The emphasis is on compatible materials, not similar or identical materials
throughout the area. Other approaches to providing integrated architectural standards such
as more common individual signage requirements or build -to lines have specifically been
rejected in order to maintain flexibility for potential buyers of the properties.
5. Access Drive Locations. See Figure 7.
6. Identification Features. Figure 8 identifies the location of major, secondary, and minor
"features". These would include such things as entrance monuments, pylon signs, individual
ground signs, etc. It should be noted that any amendment to the Planned Development at this
point can only govern the development of undeveloped properties. Those areas that have been
developed and the properties put into Final Planned Development through construction would
not be subject to these revisions. For example, entrance monuments at the A-2 and B-2
locations would not necessarily come about as a result of this Planned Development
Amendment. The applicant is not proposing to construct these features, nor have the property
owners of these sites agreed to such improvements. It should be further noted that there is
an overall pylon sign agreement currently in effect for the Town Centre area, both Town
Centre 70 and Town Centre 100. The City's Sign Ordinance requires a Conditional Use
Permit be issued for every pylon sign in the City. The Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement,
in effect, is an overall Conditional Use Permit for all existing and future pylon signs in the
area.
7. Landscaping. The proposed landscape guidelines are general principles. A master list of plant
materials currently used within the Town Centre area is proposed to be included as part of this
revised Planned Development Amendment.
ego
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 6
8. Street Identification Signage. It is suggested that the existing street signage could be replaced
with decorative signs and the developer is agreeable to a maximum assessment of $5,000 on
the remaining undeveloped land to accomplish the new signage.
9. Decorative Lighting. The proposal suggests that decorative lighting could be placed along the
public streets, at access drives, identification features, or other similar access points. The
implication is apparently that these would be installed by the City because the developer
suggests waiving assessments for any land that they own or represent.
5VALUATION OF REQUEST
1. Planned Development Concept. The introduction of the Planned Unit Development as an
alternative to traditional zoning to regulate land use was first introduced in the late 1940's.
Cities were looking for a way to plan development to fit the particular physical conditions of
the land and especially as a way to insure better design and more open space. PUD's have
been most extensively used in residential areas. PUD's have also been used as a way to mix
different types of residential development such as single family with townhouses and possibly
a high-rise apartment building. In many residential PUD's, lot sizes have been reduced and
the housing essentially clustered in order to provide more common open space or the
preservation of natural resources. Essentially the net density of the area remains the same,
but the specific density may be clustered in certain areas of the overall site.
Planned Developments have also been used for very large areas such as new towns or major
subdivisions. In the latter case, as has been the case in Eagan, the Planned Development
neighborhood has not been very different from other neighborhoods. City zoning would
normally provide for the development of an overall neighborhood or series of neighborhoods
to include varying housing types, small shopping areas, and sites for parks, schools, churches,
etc.
Another reason that many cities have utilized the Planned Development approach has been
related to the desire to introduce more specific architectural and design controls than would
normally be provided in a traditional zoning ordinance. Finally, cities have used PD's to
permit a specific commercial or industrial project that is desired without opening the door to
the full range of uses that would be allowed by general zoning classification.
A basic premise of the PD approach is that it is an agreement that is supposed to benefit both
parties the developer and the City. The advantages to the developer of a Planned Unit
Development can be twofold. First, the flexibility provided may allow.for increased density
of development because of the transfer and clustering effect that would otherwise be
impossible with straight zoning requirements on lot size, setbacks, FAR, etc. The second
advantage is future certainty of the zoning for the site. Under normal zoning regulation, the
City reserves its right to amend the zoning of the property at any future time. Under the terms
LT3l
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 7
of the Planned Development Agreement, the City cannot amend the zoning on the property
during the term of the agreement.
In Eagan, the Council has approved both very general Planned Developments such as that of
the original Eagan Heights Commercial Park, as well as more specific Planned Developments
such as the Park Centre development on Cliff Road. The Park Centre PD identified more
specific uses such as banks, restaurants, offices, the square footage, the general layout and
arrangement of the lots and buildings, etc. However, this Planned Development has also been
significantly amended over time to accommodate market demands.
Many observers of the commercial development process have observed that the Planned
Development approach does not work as well for commercial development as for residential
because of more fluid market conditions. The detailed Planned Development approach does
work well with a major development that :is going to take place over a shorter time frame. A
Planned Development approach would also work well for a single owner of property that plans
to develop over time, such as West Publishing or Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
2. The Eagan Heights/Town Centre 100 PD Amendment. As presently proposed, the amendment
to the Eagan Heights Commercial Park PD does not appear to differ significantly from
applying straight zoning classifications to the remaining vacant parcels. As a practical matter,
the proposed limitations on LB permitted uses - essentially to prohibit restaurants as a
conditional use, does not appear to be very significant. The elimination of the requirement
that auto service stations in the CSC districts must be developed following a minimum 20,000
sq. ft. of retail space could be significant in that this would permit development of a
freestanding gas station. Whether this possibility is acceptable in the proposed locations is a
policy matter for the Commission and Council to consider.
OPTIONS:
In reviewing the proposed PD amendment, the APC and ultimately, the City Council have three
basic courses of action to consider.
1. Approve the amendment as proposed. If this option is selected, a term for the new PD should
be established. A five-year term could be considered. A new development agreement would
be drafted incorporating the proposed Land Use Plan, permitted uses, and other guidelines as
proposed.
2. Approve an amendment and term extension for the PD, but revise some of the proposed land
use classifications. Given the lack of certainty about the future plans for the area, the City may
want to narrow the range of uses permitted by right in the PD. For example, more property
could be designated in a less intense zoning category such as NB (Neighborhood Business) or
LB (Limited Business). Future amendments to the PD to permit more intense commercial
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 8
activities could be considered when a specific development proposal is presented. This would
obviously limit the developer's flexibility in marketing his property.
3. Deny the PD Amendment/Extension. Leave the current PD in place 9i move to terminate
the existing PD to be replaced with straight zoning. If this latter alternative is desired, it will
involve a two-step process. First, this proposed amendment must be denied. Second, a
separate public hearing must be conducted to terminate the existing PD and rezone the
remaining vacant, undeveloped land. The properties in the original PD are now zoned for
their specific use. For example, the Blue Cross property is a PD - ten story office building.
The existing developed properties would remain zoned PD/specific uses.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:
The Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development was first conceived in 1982. The area
has developed incrementally over time. The original development plan was quite general in terms
of land use. The original ten year term given the PD has expired, but no action has been taken
by the City to terminate the PD.
The City Council has been asking for a more definitive development plan for the remaining vacant
areas in the PD. The City Council and Advisory Planning Commission have expressed a desire to
see the final development of the area executed in a manner that will integrate the existing separate
developments into a unified sense of place.
In response to the City's request, Mr. Martin Colon, representing Eagan Heights Partnership, has
proposed an amended PD proposal, including a revised general Land Use Plan and associated
permitted land uses along with other related improvement plans and guidelines for sidewalks, trails,
access, etc.
The proposed Planned Development concept is very general and does not differ significantly from
the land use guidelines provided through application of the City's standard zoning and subdivision
policies and procedures.
A basic premise of the Planned Development alternative to traditional land use regulation is that
the benefits of increased flexibility and assurances provided to the developer will result in benefits
to the public, as well, by facilitating a higher quality development.
1 3 3
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 P.D. Extension
September 27, 1994
Page 9
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve or deny an amendment/extension of the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned
Development as proposed by the Eagan Heights Partnership.
If this item is denied, a recommendation on whether to continue the existing PD or to consider
termination and rezoning, after future public hearing, would be in order.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The term of this Planned Development shall be five years commencing with the date of City
Council approval.
2. A revised development agreement for the revised preliminary development plan shall be
executed.
1, 5
•
I
1?—M—L".••.,)
■/N 13OEM PI
•
1
. 1
.111 11tao
I •
• j3
s Q i II
�
o
1001011 , i t
3
1
3
f
1
•
boo/■1dIiII II
oi■■■e; I 3
3 3•
'
I
• I
•
1
aaee ■aaastt.�[ae�1 tf
I}•
0
3
1
S I
e43:11 1
11
a :
4
t
4
2
3.
2
3.
.•
H
•
LL
[� Mion* I)
Y
)..fAV
noir fit ■.
g
v a avaaa�
v, II
0 11"
5Cr
� sr _��
O II
...a.a■.,• i
o■.�lir ■
4oaa aaa1s a
▪ alisiNsfai
t -q3 ��. .•
3
o �e•
�eRIlutl•IIU'■"0•
1
5
i
a
Ci
.
•
5
••
1
i
a
t
•
• 5
a
1
5 r
'
II
• i••
11:1 y
iti'll I
- i
1
O
1
a e
-1
O
O
.
O
0
7 NI
n
�
r
•
I
. AV ItVWAN10
h••••• sqi
<
a
a
PROPOSED SKETCH
a co
W.
a'
°s. j
4 1
v
�+ Z,
X Q,
O 1:
V Y O.
sn ` V�
=
g p! .
t
's
.. a
W � 0X. mi. a
•
_ 0 ad II
Z.
Z � 4, 3Z
Q y !
z � �' Q
v W F r
O ` C
<. 1.' W p .
W 4w ▪ K• •j.4
•
1b
Y
(
a
J
(
U
H
z Et ?:
4 W Z
J E
CL a
o f
I U 0
U U
H N
W !- O
Y I Z
J
O Wo
• F-
VI 3 Q
O ZQ CtE=
CL a W O
LI. WKgIL
131
c
m
E
-v
c
E
z
c H
o 2
co 0
(/' N
'16
CD W
CP W
LL
(Ci 'ON '0U '0
.4197
A
N
0
a
0
a
-M
Y
I
Q
J
0
Z J W Q
ao z
H 0
41
Y S Z
2�
0 W� J
0 I= J
6 Q
0 Z tf -
s
lt0
ac Qt'
W
0 ee4:
.a.
c
a)
a
0)
0
a)
4.
c
0_
c
0
LO
i 1T
��r�� .�
0
-�1
jA
•
Il la- 11 ,•
1 1 1I 1.. .` V 111}I
1 I 11 1 IIII NLL
1
i lel l!n II 'I ItL
I 1 I i ." i41a a f.
1 1, , ..J -'141 .a0 \.
1 11 11 / / t' / '1i) ' p ?'
1111:01 ` r/ I 11I 11 1 11,k•+�•fr.
'1:11{1;`{ { Ills Nom, �•I ,
•►,
e.
i ll 1
r •' _11-.1-- 1 " I . � 1 A;1 %;:1{.)1';';
;`) -.i , . is yd�l
-11 I I, I
Ya( `1�T� GC\ `1 11•11'\`\M.L
1,1 I'
1
_ 1
i‘u \y
I.
i r
1
1 1m t=4 ., 1 =r ,r
T1 sin 1 1t ! _
er
' I 1111, - 21:',11--,'
..:.\...
;1..S. • , ltJI . rrs B i'•1 '
i;•'r:•ir.••!.•.: a 44 ei 11 -
::*::i:::;!:: ' - + :; r y 11 ,� - 1 ‘:1111:71....71'.:11; 1/(/, - 11
y't.a ��� �� 111 plp.���ti %
• 1. %• / •/�ss�.,1 «11111���_� �{{1141 iL/(-.
if ii
\ / ,� - i t;,• 1'11111
\I Il 1 ,1 `�• \ - - �,�Iv %1,11 11f ,
+ --
tok
41.
a.
•r _ -rrr ,••e-.. .
AMENDMENT TO THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CRITERIA
FOR TOWN CENTRE 100
OBJECTIVE
Appendix A
The main objective of this document is to further establiish and enhance the specific criteria and/or
restrictions to guide the physical development of land uses, amenities, site circulation, etc., within the
Town Centre 100 project in order to integrate various uses including but not limited to sidewalks.
trailways, architectural standards, landscaping, signage and site lighting into a unified whole and to create
a strong sense of continuity and compatibility.
SCOPE
The scope of design control established by this framework document will be to include performance
standards, selection criteria and restrictions related to the following basic categories:
I. Land Use
II. Sidewalks
III. Trailways
IV. Architectural Standards
V. Access Drive Locations
VI. Identification Features
VII. Landscaping
VIII. Signage (Street Identification)
IX. Lighting (Decorative)
I. Land Use
The objective is to provide an arrangement of land uses that is compatible with existing and future
on-site and off-site land uses in a logical extension of the existing Town Centre Shopping Centre,
Shopppes and other area uses. Exhibit A identifies the proposed arrangement of Community
Shopping Center (CSC) and Limited Business (LB) land uses. Exhibit Al is a modification of the
permitted and conditional uses for the LB and CSC Districts from the Eagan Zoning Code (Chapter
11) that will be allowed within the Town Centre 100 development. Setbacks will generally be
consistent with the zoning district criteria.
See attached Exhibit A - Land Use Plan
See attached Exhibit Al - Allowable Uses within the LB and CSC Districts
II. Sidewalks
The objective is to provide a system of sidewalks along the public streets to accommodate ease of
pedestrian movement by area residents and business users for access to the various area businesses
and for recreational purposes. This sidewalk plan expands on the original development framework
criteria in that it provides for sidewalk on both sides of all interior roadways. However, due to the
Appendix A
anticipated densities, uses and further requirements of this area, this is appropriate in order to
provide a safer, more unified and aesthetically pleasing area for all the community.
See attached Exhibit B -- Sidewalks and Trail Plan
M. Trailways
The purpose is to provide off-street recreational pedestrian routes to area amenities. Two routes will
provide access to a pond area and along the north side of O'Leary Lake. This revised plan is
designed to incorporate the trailways and sidewalks into the existing City Trailway System.
See attached Exhibit B — Sidewalks and Trail Plan
IV. Architectural Standards
The primary objective in establishing architectural standards is to ensure that the design and
construction of individual structures is compatible with plans for adjacent sites and consistent with
the overall image of the Town Centre 100 development. A prime development criteria for all
proposed projects shall be to maximize the development potential of all parcels and meet setback
requirements established by the zoning ordinances.
Exterior building materials shall be traditional materials; face brick and mortar, pre -colored
architectural masonry units (e.g., rock faced block, etc.), tile, stone, prefinished metal or
cementitious coatings are encouraged. Other quality materials will be approved if it can be
demonstrated that the resultant product will be compatible with the goals and objectives of the
development criteria. The high degree of visibility afforded this project dictates that quality
materials be used on all sides of structures. If metal frames, trim or panels are to be proposed, they
shall be of an anodized finish or of a durable painted finish. In reviewing building plans, emphasis
will be placed on durability and permanence of finish. Maintenance factors will be carefully
considered also.
Material colors shall include, but not be limited to, brown or gray earthtones for field areas and teal
blue, green or red for accent colors. The use of these colors will be promoted to maintain a
compatibility with other buildings within Town Centre.
The arch will also be promoted as a common element utilized elsewhere within Town Centre. This
element may be used as a part of building design, signage, identification features or other items as
appropriate.
V. Access Drive Locations
The purpose of identifying tentative access drive locations is to avoid traffic congestion that may
result from incompatible spacing and visual clutter of too many entry drives. Where possible, access
drives are aligned directly across the street from each other and set back an appropriate distance
from public street intersections. They will, though, be spaced frequently enough to provide
reasonable and logical access to each parcel as may be determined by existing access drives or with
future site plans.
See Exhibit C - Access Drive Locations
2 4 \
Appendix A
VL Identification Features
The objective is to provide an identifiable common theme throughout both the Town Centre 100 and
the original Town Centre 70 developments. A combination of different elements will be used in
creative arrangements to develop a hierarchy at project entries, focal points, street intersections, site
entry drives, etc. as may be appropriate. The elements will include, but are not limited to, signage
(entrance monuments, pylon signs, individual ground signs, etc.), low walls, pillars, bollards,
plantings, earth forms, decorative lighting, paving, etc. Common materials and colors similar to
those used for the architecture, will be used throughout. The hierarchy proposed is as follows:
A. Major Feature
These will be large in scale and mass and occur a major project entry or focal points along major
roadways. They will typically identify the Town Centre development and, potentially, site users.
B. Secondary Feature
These will be somewhat smaller in scale and mass than the major feature. They will occur at
intersections of interior roads or secondary project entry points. Site users will likely be
identified with signage.
C. Minor Feature
These will be lower in scale possibly using such elements as paving, low walls, earth form,
lighting, plantings, etc. to carry the common materials and color scheme to minor street
intersections, significant site entry points or secondary focal points.
D. Linear Feature
These will be small in scale potentially using such elements as low pillars, plantings, lighting,
etc. to identify site entry points.
See Exhibits D and E
NOTE: Subject to determination of future end users and site plans, user identification signage
(pylon and/or ground signs) may need to occur at other locations than these features.
Any other signage or feature locations will utilize the same common theme established
for the Town Centre by this criteria.
VIL Landscaping
The purpose of landscape design guidelines is to provide future development with a guide to aid in
the creation of a cohesive landscape image throughout the Town Centre property. The goal of the
design guidelines is to create an informal high-quality image. Design objectives would be applied to
all landscape planning as follows:
A. Create a sense of entrance into the development and into smaller areas within the overall
development.
Appendix A
B. Screen parking areas and utilities.
C. Provide seasonal interest.
D. Maintain visibility to Retail/Commercial buildings from the surrounding thoroughfares.
E. Utilize indigenous plant material when possible.
F. Stabilize slopes wherever they occur.
G. Maintain safe sight distances at all intersections.
H. Complement architecture.
I. Establish transitions to adjacent land uses and natural open areas.
J. Utilize complimentary berming for visual interest and functional purposes to accent
focal/identification features, screen parking, frame views, etc. where or as may be
appropriate.
NOTE: Attached to this framework document is Exhibit F listing the plant materials
which are currently used within this development.
VIII. Street Identification Signage
The objective is to provide a cohesive theme for all signage within the development. To this end,
the developer is willing to:
A. Replace existing street name signage with decorative signs.
B. Provide all appropriate regulatory signage (speed limit, stop signs, etc.)
C. Provide future effort to coordinate the appearance of any identification and other ground
signage between land uses.
D. The developer is agreeable to a maximum assessment of $5,000.00 on the remaining
undeveloped land to accomplish the above objectives regarding signage.
IX. Lighting (Decorative)
The objective is to provide another compatible, common amenity element throughout the
development by use of decorative lighting placed along the public street to augment the existing
street lights. It will be utilized at access drives, identification feature or other similar accent points.
The developer will waive any assessments for any land that they own or represent.
J \ t! Ali'
w W
W U
c 1_
ca
J
(1)
rn
0
0.
0
L
Z
Q
0 < a
L...tfl-
= ).w
��x D
.V+w O
a_ Z
Q
J
ICI. .'ON OIj 'OO) �pf,f3T�1+'l [ TJI!�p;31'_, .•.mm�uimL
� 41[x'
y
! w ,i
\'
a
J
U
N
z r1 }
ct J f Q
a f a
o Z
= v 0
U V
I- N
W F D
• 3o 2
N (7W G
(1) I D
W =� J
g Q E
D Zo
Wor
O U• 'i• ;
i0: i
Qo'-W33
a W .c m It 3 :5
-4115-
r _
AUGUST 12, 1994
7 Sidewalk and Trail Plan
EXHIBIT B
ICt' 'ON '013 OD) BEllarrI4D TJ)p• . Tnu �,
i
i_ 1
AUGUST 12.
Access Drive Locations
Z
F
9
w
0
.. ■ LL
(Cr ON 'Oil 'OD) 3OIr T1O1.01
C �C
a
-J
0
Z DC }
Q W Z
▪ f
a E D.
o f
z v 0
O v
1t_
w Fr
1: .w , z
V/ vW
O w�
W z. J
to g Q
o Za
a Q= Wo=
• G.1 rD• r
a QK-W33
a Wtrnit2W
iL(Ap
r.
AUGUST 12. 1994
F
0
N
U
LU
U
N
(C •014 S.222_31:1143
15 Zip re
- J
;Lnm,.mueraL
t
Lu l I w
N 9N 8
7553
t95-
moi]-0►10
.-I f 1 - rl
-r. ci rc C. L c
CC
a
-J
U
z a }
F
a o F
2 U
0
U U
w i-"'
o
1w' Io z
u) V W G
•� s J
W
O we
w I. J g
• g Li
O 20 a=
a (_ wox
m Qo w3 3
a w.tat'n
AUGUST '2, '994
PAGE 17/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND/OR
EXTENSION
EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK
Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a
Planned Development Amendment/Extension for Town Centre 100 located
in the north half of Section 15 south of Yankee Doodle, east of
Denmark Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue.
Community Development Director Reichert introduced this item. Ms.
Reichert highlighted the information presented in the City staff's
planning report dated September 22, 1994. Ms. Reichert noted the
background and history of the original Planned Development Agreement
for Eagan Heights Commercial Park, the existing conditions of the
subject property, and the proposed amendments to the Planned
Development. Ms. Reichert stated that the proposed amendments to the
Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development do not result in a
significantly different outcome than would be provided by straight
zoning of the subject property. Ms. Reichert concluded by advising
the Commission of its three options for action on this matter as
outlined in the staff's planning report.
The applicant, Martin Colon, explained to the Commission that the
market needs have fluctuated over the 12 years of the Planned
Development Agreement. He stated that over the last three to four
months, a study on his behalf was completed of the planned
development as it presently exists and how it may be improved. He
stated that no significant changes are proposed in the amendment
except a use change to CSC. He stated that a GB or R-4 designation is
not fitting for the northeast corner of the subject property and he
is currently looking for a higher and better use of the property.
Patrick Grundy, a homeowner of Duckwood Estates and spokesperson
for the other residents in the audience, stated that the homeowners
goal is for a 30 -day continuance of the matter in order that a
committee of all persons involved may be formed to examine the
residents concerns. He stated that the residents concerns are: (1)
unknown type or kind of business to be located at the subject
property; (2) the general aesthetics of any new building; (3) the
need for a 650 -foot buffer between Duckwood Estates and the
development; (4) the elimination of the proposed trailways that would
connect O'Leary Park to Duckwood Estates; and (5) the vehicular and
pedestrian traffic safety. Member Voracek inquired with Community
Development Director Reichert as to what are the advantages or
disadvantages for the City to approve the proposed amendment.
Reichert responded that as proposed, there are no additional
variations in standards that could not happen with straight zoning.
PAGE 18/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
Reichert further stated that if the issue was taken under a regular
rezoning procedure, the applicant would be required to have a
concept/site plan for a CSC District; Reichert noted that the
applicant does not have any concept plan for the subject property.
Chairman Voracek asked the same question to the applicant, to
which the applicant said "I'll ask the question back, why not approve
the requested amendment?" Voracek emphasized that his concern is that
a planned development is a contract between the City and the
developer, both of which should benefit in some way from the
agreement. Voracek explained that he fails to see any benefit to the
City for entering into the amended agreement. Voracek continued that
if there is no advantage to the City for a planned development
amendment, then he would recommend denial of the applicant's request
and replace the planned development zoning designation with straight
zoning. Member Miller added that residents deserve the right to know
what the use of the subject property is intended to be and should not
have to worry constantly that the use will always be changing.
Discussion ensued among the Commission members as to the
logistics of the three alternatives of action. Mr. Colon stated that
he is not interested in entering into a more detailed planned
development agreement, emphasizing that as a developer he cannot
specify building/architectural specifics without knowledge of what
business will occupy a particular piece of property. Mr. Colon stated
that he simply could not enter into a Planned Development Agreement
requiring more than a general use plan(s). The applicant further
stated that he is simply asking for a retail use and that the Code
specifically permits retail uses. He stated that he fails to see
where the size of the building or the architectural design are
relevant to whether a particular use will be permitted.
Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to deny the proposed
Planned Development Amendment and Extension thereof on the grounds
that there is no significant advantage to either party for the
amendment over the current Planned Development Agreement.
All approved in favor.
Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to set a public hearing to
terminate the current Planned Development and replace it with
straight zoning.
All approved in favor except Member Miller.
Agenda Information Memo
October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
TOWN CENTRE 100 FOURTEENTH ADDITIONIP
/TRLE S. INVESTMENTS
E. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Planned Development, Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
Addition, Triple S. Investments --Triple S. Investments is requesting a preliminary subdivision
approval of a .7 acre lot and final development approval on Outlot A, Town Centre 100
Thirteenth Addition, located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of O'Leary Lane. The
final planned development approval is to permit construction of a 6,000 square foot Big
Wheel Auto Parts store. The staff report on this item is enclosed on pages /S1< through
X 7(.
The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this item at its meeting
pf eptember 271_1994'. The minutes of the Planning Commission are enclosed on pages
1. 0—through 5 .
The major issue discussed by the Planning Commission was whether approval of this
proposed development, given the previous action by the Planning Commission to
recommend denial of the planned development amendment/extension, was in order. While
the Commission members expressed concerns with the continued development of auto -
related service uses adjacent to the ten -story office building and the implications for the
further development of the vacant properties in this area, they also felt that thedie had
somewhat been cast when the Valvoline site layout was originally approved. The
Commission, therefore, recommended approval of the preliminary plat and the planned
development, subject to the conditions set forth in the minutes.
Another issue that was raised at the meeting related to Condition 12 in which the window
signage would be pr hibi ed. A supplemental letter from the President of Big Wheel is
enclosed on page in which he states that he needs window signage in order to
compete. The issue of window signage was first raised with the Taco Bell on Cliff Road.
In that case, the Council had taken great care to ensure that the building was built of brick
and soon after it opened, the windows became covered with temporary painted advertising
signs. Given the proximity of this proposed auto parts store to the ten -story office building
and the Council's desire for quality development in this area, the Planning Commission and
staff felt that a prohibition on the window advertising would be in order.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary
subdivision for Outlot A, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition, consisting of one lot on
approximately .6 acres for Big Wheel Auto Store, subject to the three conditions set forth
in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes.
To approve or deny a final planned development for Outlot A, Town Centre 100 for a Big
Wheel Auto Store located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of O'Leary Lane subject
to the eighteen conditions set forth in the minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission.
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 19, 1994 CASE #: 15 -PP -15-5-94
APPLICANT: Triple S Investments HEARING DATE: September 27, 1994
PROPERTY OWNER: Geraldine F. Colon PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat and Final Planned Development
(Town Centre 100 Fourteenth Addition)
LOCATION: NE 1/4 Section 15
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
ZONING: Planned Development/Community Shopping Center (PD/CSC)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Triple S Investments is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval of a 0.7 acre lot and
Final Planned Development approval on Outlot A, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition
located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of O'Leary Lane.
The Final PD approval is for a 6,000 s.f. Big Wheel auto parts store.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
A. Preliminary Subdivision.
City Code Chapter 13, Section 13.20, Subd. 6. states: In the case of subdivision, the Planning
Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in
approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with
applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water
storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development
or use contemplated.
l��
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to
cause environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed
in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for
maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden.
I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook
on Solar Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and
consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved
and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water
Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and
other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully
set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and
incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the
responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and
make the same available to the public.
B. Final Planned Development.
Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 6, D., Final Development Plans; states: "Prior to the
construction or the issuance of building permits, the following information shall be
approved. This may be approved in stages as development ensues."
1. Final Plat: This shall be accordance with Chapter 13 of the City Code and revisions
thereto.
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 3
2. Final Building Drawings and Specifications: These shall be presented to the Building
Inspector for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission and Council.
3. Final Site Plans and Landscape Schedule: These shall be presented to the City staff
for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission and Council. These
shall be scaled drawings and include all site detail.
$ACKGROL'ND/HISTORY
All of the Town Center 100 Additions are within the 100 acre Eagan Heights Commercial
Park Planned Development (PD) which was created in 1982 for a term of ten years. Eagan
Heights Commercial Park has requested a PD Extension/Amendment for this entire PD.
The public hearing for this item is also scheduled for the September 27, 1994 Advisory
Planning Commission meeting.
As part of the Town Centre 100 Eleventh Addition (Rapid Oil Change), subdivided in June
1993, the City required a conceptual layout for the subject .7 acre parcel to illustrate
conceptual site development and shared access. In December 1993, Outlot A, Town Centre
100 Eleventh. Addition was subdivided (Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition) as three
outlots to allow for ownership changes but the subdivision did not include any development.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is relatively flat and contains no significant woodland resources.
SURROUNDING USES
The following uses, zoning, and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject
property:
North - Undeveloped; zoned PD; designated Commercial PD.
South - Undeveloped; zoned PD/CSC; designated Commercial PD.
East - Rapid Oil Change; zoned PD/CSC; designated Commercial PD.
West - Blue Cross/Blue Shield (ten story); zoned PD/CSC; designated Commercial PD.
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
A. Preliminary Subdivision
Lots - The proposed subdivision will consist of one 0.7 acre lot.
(�3
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 4
Right -Of -Way - The Yankee Doodle Road half r -o -w dimension north of the site is 75'.
Dakota County has reviewed the proposed plat in conjunction with the City's "ring road
study" and is recommending a 100' half r -o -w which will require the property owner to
dedicate an additional 25' of r -o -w.
The proposed building and required parking will not fit on this site if the additional 25' of
r -o -w is dedicated. Federal Land Company is requesting the City to approve their plan with
the existing 75' half r -o -w. The owner will then negotiate with Dakota County when it
comes time to record the plat.
Park Dedication - Park dedication requirements have previously been met.
Water Quality - Runoff from this site will discharge to Pond DP -5 and eventually reach
LeMay Lake after traveling through three nutrient basins and one stormwater basin. LeMay
Lake is designated as one of six Class I lakes in the City and is intended to have water
quality sufficient to support direct contact recreation. Because of the small size of the site,
staff is recommending a cash dedication for water quality.
B. Final Planned Development
Setbacks - The City Code requires a 50' building and 20' parking setback from county road
right-of-way (r -o -w). The proposed building setback from the north property line of 55'
should provide a uniform appearance with the adjacent building to the east that is setback
approximately 52'.
Parking - The City Code requires 40 on site parking spaces for a 6,000 s.f. retail building.
Based on experience with several other store in the metropolitan area, however, the
applicant maintains that peak parking demand for this store will not exceed 20 parking
spaces including employees.
Therefore, the Site Plan provides 25 spaces to be constructed initially, and 15 spaces shown
on site as "proof of parking", nine of these spaces are located north of the building and six
are located on the south side of the building.
These 15 spaces can be constructed if the anticipated demand is exceeded. The Final PD
Agreement should specify that future reuse of the building must comply with on site parking
requirements which may also trigger the need to construct additional parking in the proof
of parking area.
Although no parking stalls will be constructed north of the building the Site Plan shows a
aisle on this side that is not needed. The applicant should revise the Site Plan to remove
this additional drive area.
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 5
Access/Circulation - The site will have access via a shared private drive off of O'Leary Lane
that is also used by the oil change site to the east. The site will not have direct access to
Yankee Doodle Road. As proposed, no internal site circulation conflicts are anticipated.
The developer should prepare a shared access easement document to be reviewed by the
City Attorney and recorded with the plat.
Grading/Wetlands - The Grading Plan submitted is acceptable. A minimal amount of
grading will be required to prepare this site for the proposed building and parking lot. The
preliminary grading plan shows that the first floor elevation of the Big Wheel Store will be
at 8963 and the elevation of the existing Rapid Oil Change building to the east is at 893.2.
The existing parking lot that serves the 10 story office building west of this site is at
elevation 902.
The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures
in accordance with the City's erosion/sediment control manual standards.
The developer's wetland consultant reviewed the site for jurisdictional wetlands and found
none. Staff have confirmed this finding.
Storm Drainage - The Storm Drainage Plan submitted is acceptable. The preliminary
grading plan shows that the drainage from this site will be directed to an existing catch basin
located on the driveway opening on the Town Centre 100 11th Addition site. The existing
catch basin has capacity to handle the runoff of 2 cfs from this site plus the flow from the
adjacent existing site.
Utilities - With minor revisions, the Utility Plan submitted is acceptable. Sanitary sewer
service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing
12" sanitary sewer line that is located along the west edge of the site and along the south
side of Yankee Doodle Road. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the 12" line
and constructing a sewer service up to the proposed building. The sanitary sewer connection
shall include a manhole at the property line to allow the City to maintain and inspect the
sewer line.
Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an
existing 18 inch water main on Yankee Doodle Road and from an existing 12 inch
watermain on O'Leary Lane. The preliminary plan shows connecting to a 6 inch water main
stub on O'Leary Lane and running the 6 inch water line up to the proposed building.
The water main layout should include a hydrant on the Big Wheel site to improve the fire
protection to the site.
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 6
Easements/Permits - The developer should prepare a shared access easement document to
be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded with the plat.
The final subdivision shall include drainage and utility easements dedicated for all sewer and
water lines that will also provide service to other developments. The developer shall obtain
an easement for the proposed 6 inch water main that will serve this site as it crosses the
adjacent property.
Building Elevations - The applicant has agreed to construct the building with a brick exterior
although the plans submitted do not reflect this.The brick type and color should match the
brick used on the adjacent Rapid Oil Change building.
The customer entrance and six windows face west toward the ten story office building while
the north or Yankee Doodle Road side has no entrance and only three windows. Additional
windows should be added along this side so it will appear more like a building front when
viewed from the county road.
These plans should be revised to call out the brick exterior and show additional windows
on the north side of the building.
Trash/Recycling - The Plan calls for trash and recycling containers to be stored within the
building.
Signage - The Signage Plan submitted is not acceptable. The proposal includes signage on
the west side of the building which is not allowed. The City Sign Code allows signage only
on building sides facing major streets; therefore, building signage is only allowed on the
north side of the building. The building elevation should be revised to show building
signage on the north side of the building only.
The Site Plan shows a pylon sign on the northwest portion of the site; however, the Town
Centre Pylon Sign Agreement does not provide for a pylon at this location and the City's
300' pylon spacing requirement cannot be met as measured from the existing Rapid Oil
Change pylon sign.
The Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement was created to establish pylon sign locations
throughout the Town Centre development. The Agreement allows pylon sign approval at
these predetermined locations without a conditional use permit.
Federal Land Company would like to amend the Agreement by shifting a pylon sign allowed
elsewhere to this location, resulting in no net gain in the number of pylon signs.
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 7
Previous amendments have been made to this Agreement; however, the entire document
has not been updated as development has occurred. The owner/developer should apply to
amend the Agreement to allow a pylon sign at this location and provide the City updated
documentation regarding all existing and proposed pylons within Town Centre.
Landscaping - The Landscape Plan submitted is acceptable. The Plan will provide a
continuation of the landscaping in place on the property to the east. All landscaped and
green areas should be served by an underground irrigation system.
Tree Preservation Policy - There are no significant trees/woodlands on site.
Compatibility With Surrounding Area - An auto parts is not necessarily complementary with
the 10 story office building; however, the proposed auto parts store should be compatible
with existing and probable commercial development in this area. Future development of
the surrounding area will be clarified with City Council action on the requested
amendment/extension of this PD and the development plan adopted to be adopted by the
City for the O'Neil property to the north.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
Subdivision
Access and City services are available to serve the site and park dedication requirements
have previously been satisfied.
Final Planned Development
The site layout provides adequate parldng, sound internal circulation, the aesthetic elements
associated with the PD, and there are no tree preservation or water quality issues associated
with this property.
The Building Elevation Plan should be revised to call out the brick exterior and show
additional windows on the north side of the building.
The Developer/owner should apply to amend the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement to
allow a pylon sign for this lot.
iso
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 8
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To approve/deny the one lot Town Centre Fourteenth Addition preliminary plat and Final
Planned Development subject to the following conditions:
Subdivision
Standard Conditions
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as
adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993:
Al, B1, B3, Cl, C2, El, F1, G1, and H1.
Access
2. The developer shall prepare a shared access easement document for review and
approval by the City Attorney and record this document with the plat at Dakota
County.
Fight -Of -Way
3. This Preliminary Subdivision is approved subject to the existing 75' half r -o -w.
Final Planned Development
1. A 6,000 s.f. Big Wheel auto parts store is approved to be developed on Lot 1,
Block 1, Town Centre 100 Fourteenth Addition.
2. No provisions of the Site Plan, including but not limited to setbacks, easements,
right-of-way or other dedications as shown on Exhibit A, can be modified without
City Council approval.
3. This approval solely relates to Outlot A, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition.
4. The Final Planned Development Agreement for this lot shall be executed prior to
final plat approval. The following exhibits necessary for the Agreement shall be
provided as part of the final plat of this property:
• Final Site Plan
* Final Building Elevation Plan
* Final Sign Plan
* Final Landscape Plan
Planning Report - Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
September 27, 1994
Page 9
5. 25 parking spaces shall be constructed with initial site development and 15 spaces
parking spaces shall be shown on the Site Plan as "proof of parking" (nine of these
spaces located north of the building and six located on the south side).
6. The Site Plan shall be revised to remove the drive aisle area north of the building.
7. The building shall be constructed of brick that matches the type and color of the
brick used on the Rapid Oil Change building to the east.
8. The Building Elevation Plan shall be revised to incorporate additional windows along
the north side of the building.
9. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored within the building.
10. Building signage shall only be allowed on the north building face.
11. The developer/owner shall apply to amend the Agreement to allow a pylon sign at
this location and provide the City updated documentation regarding all existing and
proposed pylons within Town Centre.
12. Window signage is prohibited.
13. All green and landscaped areas shall be served by an underground irrigation van
14. The building and parking/drive aisles shall be maintained.
15. The driveway that serves this site shall be 30 feet wide and shall include a concrete
curb and gutter on both sides.
16. The sanitary sewer service shall include a manhole at the property line to allow the
City to maintain and inspect the sewer line.
17. The developer shall include a hydrant on the 6 inch water line to improve the fire
protection to the site.
18. The developer shall obtain an easement from the adjacent property owners for the
proposed 6 inch water main.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined
in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the
rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements
centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to
accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the
plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and
location as determined necessary by engineering standards.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to
public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage
capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this
development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope
easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by
the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements
to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as
necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to
provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes,
engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final
plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be
prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a
cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the
proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan
shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released
until one year after the date of City certified compliance.
D. Public Improvements
.1. if any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the
appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat
approval.
E. permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory
agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as
recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication,
ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and
approved by Council action.
H. Other_
1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall
be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission
Approved: August 25. 1987
LTS#5
STANDARD.CON
City Council
September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10. 199Q____
Revised:
/(0
February 2. 1993
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Town Centre 100 14th
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling 54,307 on the parcels proposed for
platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat.
At the time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting.
The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions
and land uses contained in the final plat.
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
Water Availibility Charge C/I $2,660/Ac .684 Ac 181
CENTRE M�..
O o scar, Tri
O
CIRA//GE i t
Nµ' HILLS GAcrE SI
WOODLAND
CT
*ay
17 "1"'
RWRK
wRt ♦q E
IwESCOTT
3
ocArIOIu
C*RR AGE
•uILS
:OLF
JUNSE
P
!Oi iIi I '
GUIDE pl Ail
�P l
PF
z —reeS-
l is 1
IA!
3 i :: :-
11�sI
�i:ii iI: Li
! i:: !Hi
- t
t2 i
.1 2 i1:!
11;f1
• :1 12 li /
ij _=..1 21 ti t! 2: I I
!: S i i.s i ;�
1 Ss 12! l.3 / If
IL `.
t_2 i Vit;_ Iff 2 i' -11 '-_ 1,
8 Y; ^ .t i=13 " 2 1 ; 2i' ::
2 2;5 2! 2: 2 i 1. IF t i
i ts, x i 3e — s !I C �-� il,;
1 ��F t " T;SE S= i :i tis i:: -h
E 2Y.. i MI i I l .::e III
� s j} is :i1 1:i
�i 3 ▪ ::s. !ili
t- 111E -iI '211 ll' 1 3:: $ t i 1 2:
-sZ_: iil /It:�:: t :; i:3 iix is
i;t=►•
8
(co
=it
}=7
)li
1
•
1
ov
■
,
■
r.,
111'
ifif
�|
114
,k A.
i \
k
!
1
11
|§
|
|
2
;it?
z
|
|
|
a
1
45
1z
0
X16 - •. ••
99
400
01
�TC1 11.10
d LJ I L 4 &1
FF>:
eel 3.2v
TO I.-II.I Lf—TR--
IOC Il 1U A.PDIT101.!
—)
90
of qoo
CI 49
9
9D
fit
'L.-.atil i 1 rte- !✓1--1 E.-17) L.i 1_t...-
0-\1.44-1G
1zG
ZIla. c
QT 7
V (01.41.f2-. r-16A.Pl►F
e7
PA.rz-1c..L.ca2 z-oticv
211
G
P..4,- coC2 WJ 0 K.11 Pe. -r2-
1 e11
.51
._.i
-
D
12.0-0 L.1�,c.F f3.c•rZ6E�QY
.5 c1.-
13
BIG WHEEL AUTO
ErcIViWCal 12"
I1 re_.4
E-74 t T 11.J Csl
PA, I=fLIP401
t�OT
r-XISTint Col Ii7n
,�'1'G GtJ-i Sl.:LJER
5 P.a22tL11.I Cs1
C..&S 'I Gr -I T
TO
t---11.-1100
0
0
O
N
r r-
Cx1.;;.Tin1U
"'U -..4I-4 L .
Erni ��NCr Cs+.ca�
4" !••••G.NI 1711,7-,?
�nI�+J
P -.1.45.•-•114e: Le..
I2c .c
0
•
f
KIrINv q 1.
-47.• .1
4.4 ,i•
I — _—___.__ —
- T/ -IJ-J [r¢_+-+ T :^..)=i ICC
71-4Ii►TT-'J•-1Th-t ^0,nTIL,N
-t-
,-rtT—I— I— I '9
I. 1 4-H
11t91 Przdor.T11 R 1 P<.It.4.J1 1 1
NEiJ Gwca�j
20
1
%
N
P.J1 C i
AL -
O )4 I OO • (yirf: clse
lot !t_I1w16.44.1
c.'rr�f•c.�
C. _rr,co Er
4 -11 -n -111-14-11-n-111-1 efJIL0IPY1 1,
rHL
0
c
TL
Gx I yrl N Col
13U I t�t711v C�
L
12x.2, t
PArZ-Lz-w [m :
1 c.r60-- Pe -a- 1lj-p F oF•'1JuILt0hJO1 .oaFro.
0,000 G'bF a -40 F'^1N
FSo n a Mo.:Rulrz
N J (o" "e_
V I N ts-
TY' .
0
-4 0 " .426.\/s6.11-.6.�
L.1.a7F1'z- H44-1o44e-r-1EP-JT POL►1 LY
C
!TY E..J Ii 1 szs 1.1 I L.L. TZ Ev IP. w PR.ti-I M l►.iarLY
Qt -.A.7" F720DA. IDL-`( r-EQuIrz� e c�
k
Iqq
LUALi-
(,a -O"
z --•.me!H
- i •
!h t f
5
i
O
13:1 Z
.O W
a
fits
1j:
1
iii-
{il
'_ili
1
1
ti
PAGE 19/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
TOWN CENTRE 100 FOURTEENTH ADDITION
TRIPLE S. INVESTMENTS
Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a
Preliminary Plat and Final Planned Development for Outlot A, Town
Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition, consisting of one lot on
approximately .68 acres for a Big Wheel Auto store located in NE; of
Section 15, south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of O'Leary Lane.
Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley
highlighted the information presented in the City staff's planning
report dated September 19, 1994. Ridley noted the background and
history of the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development and
the subject property, the existing conditions of the subject
property, the surrounding uses andthe compatibility therewith, the
site plan and the storm drainage, water quality, utility, excess, and
signage issues. Mr. Ridley specifically noted that Dakota County is
requesting a dedication of an additional 25' of right-of-way
resulting in a 100' half right-of-way on the subject property. Mr.
Ridley advised that the proposed building and required parking will
not fit on this site if the additional 25 -foot right-of-way is
dedicated. Mr. Ridley further emphasized that the signage proposal
includes a pylon sign on the northwest portion of the site which is
not provided for in the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement. Moreover,
Mr. Ridley stated that the 300 -foot pylon spacing requirement from
the existing Rapid Oil Change pylon sign could not be met
notwithstanding the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement.
Bruce Miller of Federal Land Company which is the developer of
the area, stated that the quality of the building materials is high
by using brick and glass. He stated that the proposed building
materials are very similar to that of the Valvoline Rapid Oil Change
building. He further stated that the proposed landscaping is similar
to that on the Valvoline Rapid Oil Change building. Mr. Miller stated
that the proposed use is consistentwith the original plan submitted
for the Valvoline planned development. approval.
Steve Schaller, a partner of Triple S. Investments and a co-owner
of Big Wheel Rossi, stated his objections to the staff's recommended
conditions of the Final Planned Development approval. He requested
that Condition No. 7 be revised to provide the word "matches" be
replaced to similar. Mr. Schaller also objected to Condition No. 8
opposing an alternative that the windows along the west side of the
building be moved to the north rather than requiring additional
windows on the north side of the building. Mr. Schaller explained
PAGE 20/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
that a method of merchandising their inventory is through displays on
pegboard walls of which is impossible if all walls are windows. He
further stated that the building will be less energy efficient with
additional windows on the north side of the building. Finally, Mr.
Schaller objected to Condition No. 12 in its entirety stating that
they market their product through temporary window signage which,
according to Mr. Schaller, is replaced every 30 days.
Edward Finney, of Duckwoods Estates does not object to an auto
service use but objects to the aesthetics issue of placing an auto
parts store next to a 10 -story building. Mr. Finney stated that he
attended the early planned development meetings in the 1980's at
which time the proposed uses for the site and its surrounding area
was office use. Mr. Finney expressed concern about the deviation from
the original plan. Mr. Finney further expressed concern as to whether
the subject property and surrounding area will become an auto mall
retail center. Member Merkley stated he was concerned with addressing
this item when the Commission moved to terminate the Planned
Development Agreement altogether. Mr. Colon stated that before the
City would approve the Valvoline use, it required a concept plan for
the subject property as well as a plan for the Valvoline property.
Mr. Colon stated that it complied with the City's request, the
proposed site layout is as previously presented during the Valvoline
use was approved. Mr. Colon stated he is now confused with the City
not wanting to approve the request when it is in compliance with the
original plan. Member Miller, Wallace and Segal concurred that the
proposed site layout is consistent with the concept plan presented
with the Valvoline project and is also compatible with the Valvoline
project.
Segal moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to approve the
Preliminary Plat for Outlot A, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition,
consisting of one lot on approximately .68 acres for a Big Wheel Auto
store located in NE; of Section 15, south of Yankee Doodle Road and
west of O'Leary Lane, with the following conditions:
Standard Conditions:
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of
plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2,
1993:
Al, B1, B3, Cl, C2, El, F1, G1, and Hi.
PAGE 21/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
Access:
2. The developer shall prepare a shared access easement
document for review and approval by the City Attorney and
record this document with the plat at Dakota County.
Richt-Of -Way :
3. This Preliminary Subdivision is approved subject to the
existing 75' half right-of-way. If Dakota County requires
additional right-of-way or easements. the Preliminary
Subdivision shall come back to the Advisory Planning
Commission for further review and recommendation to the City
Council.
All approved in favor.
Segal moved, Miller seconded, a motion to approve the Final
Planned Development for Outlot A, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth
Addition, consisting of one lot on approximately .68 acres for a Big
Wheel Auto store located in NE; of Section 15, south of Yankee Doodle
Road and west of O'Leary Lane, with the following conditions:
1. A 6,000 s.f. Big Wheel auto parts store is approved to be
developed on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Fourteenth
Addition.
2. No provisions of the Site Plan, including but not limited to
setbacks, easements, right. -of -way or other dedications as
shown on Exhibit A, can be modified without City Council
approval.
3. This approval solely relates to Outlot A, Town Centre 100
Thirteenth Addition.
4. The Final Planned Development Agreement for this lot shall
be executed prior to final plat approval. The following
exhibits necessary for the Agreement shall be provided as
part of the final plat of this property:
* Final Site Plan
* Final Building Elevation Plan
* Final Sign Plan
* Final Landscape Plan
5. Twenty-five parking spaces shall be constructed with initial
site development and 15 spaces parking spaces shall be shown
on the Site Plan as "proof of parking" (nine of these spaces
PAGE 22/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 27, 1994
located north of the building and six located on the south
side).
6. The Site Plan shall be revised to remove the drive aisle
area north of the building.
7. The building shall be constructed of brick that matches the
type and color of the brick used on the Rapid Oil Change
building to the east.
8. The building elevation plan shall be revised to add some
windows to the north side of the building.
9. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored within
the building.
10. Building signage shall only be allowed on the north building
face.
11. The developer/owner shall apply to amend the Agreement to
allow a pylon sign at this location and provide the City
updated documentation regarding all existing and proposed
pylons within Town Centre.
12. Window signage is prohibited.
13. All green and landscaped areas shall be served by an
underground irrigation system.
14. The building and parking/drive aisles shall be maintained.
15. The driveway that serves this site shall be 30 feet wide and
shall include a concrete curb and gutter on both sides.
16. The sanitary sewer service shall include a manhole at the
property line to allow the City to maintain and inspect the
sewer line.
17. The developer shall include a manhole at the property line
to allow the City to maintain and inspect the sewer line.
18. The developer shall obtain an easement from the adjacent
property owners for the proposed 6 inch water main.
All approved in favor except Member Merkley.
1
g
itt/HEE
PARIS FOR U.S CARS
(/nossI .'ua
2300 PILOT KNOB ROAD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55120-1116
(612) 452-7484 FAX (612)452-7389
October 6, 1994
The Honorable Mayor Egan
and City Council Members
City of Eagan Administrative Office
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Planning Report for Big Wheel/Rossi development
Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members:
We will appear before the City Council on October 18, 1994, seeking preliminary plat
approval for our project on Yankee Doodle Road near O'Leary Lane.
Condition 12 of the Planning Report prohibits all window signage. This condition will
have an adverse effect on our ability to be successful. We use window signage to
support nearly all of our media advertising. We feel this condition is also totally unfair
in that all of our competition in Eagan, as well as Inver Grove Heights, Apple Valley,
Burnsville and West St. Paul are able to use window signage to promote their
businesses. Our next door neighbor is allowed to use window signage. How will the
city benefit by penalizing us?
We want to assure you that our signs are professionally done and generally replaced
at least every thirty days. Therefore, they do not become ragged looking. We ask
that you consider the unfair nature of Condition 12, and eliminate it when the Council
takes action on our plat.
Sincerely,
4
/12-1,
/ Richard B. Shaller
President
sst
rtVICInN nF APCC'n PPCfll Ir'TS (n INC' — AP4r'n WAnFurll ICF
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
Eagan, Minnesota
October 4, 1994
A regular meeting of the Eagan 01Y council was held on Tuesday, October 4, 1994 at 6:30 p.m. at
the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Councilmembers Wachter, Awada, Masin and
Hunter. Also, present were City Admini$:tii*tiWftl04Wcommunity Development Director Peggy
Reichert, Director of Public Works Tom 0rs1ii67aiiif:Ci€i% Y Jim Sheldon.
PgRPA
Councilmember Hunter indicated he would like to discuss the Dakota County League of
Governments and the High School Site Selection Task Force under Legislative, Intergovernmental Affairs
Update. Mayor Egan noted that there are two additional personnel items to be considered under the
Consent Agenda. Masan moved, Wachter:seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye:
5 Nay: 0
MINUTE Qr SE ? MBER 2O 1994 REGUk.A1 MEETI
Councilmember Hunter requester :gist: i 4i0jl44i gt age be added on page 7 to read, "Barb
Squires, a local resident, asked for clarification.i5ri 'tile sch eNufe::'Staff responded that the study is scheduled
to be complete within six months." He also requested that a correction be made on page 11, to read that
Eagan students will be split between fiy_e schools instead of three. Wachter moved, Awada seconded a
motion to approve the minutes as corrected. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Mayor Egan noted that this is a lengthy agenda aqd::ask,ii that members of the audience keep their
comments brief and avoid repeating statements that:l ave;akeedy been made. He wants to be equally fair
to everyone who has an Item on the ageirda,::e4::he:aske people to respect that.
John Young, a property owner in Hailey's Add trFt itIfi*cated members of that area would like to
address the Council regarding the moratorium in the Southeastarea of Eagan. Mayor Egan noted that this
segment of the agenda Is for people who do not have an issue on the agenda. This will be discussed later.
NVENTiIO & YIS1TDRS'$uREAU UPDATE
Ann Carlon, of the Convention &.,Vi F.. Bureau,:..noted there is a nine member board for the
Convention & Visitors Bureau, and it will .sod n be ii cpandi d:#trtwelve members. She reviewed the Mission
Statement and various activities of the rentiori:{4.:Ylsitors Bureau. She stated that Eagan will have its
own section iri the Twin Cities Official Visitors Guide, Tioting Eagan is now the fifth largest area In the metro
area. Special events noted were the Kir g;Royai BM. Circus, the Eagan 4th of July Celebration, and the
Capons Art Park. They are developincj*_.FagRr#;: saa..Hp$pitality Association to draw attention to the
downtown area. Future events noted ii�eriW.: �a iker:3kxxjle Festival and a fall festival based on the
historical heritage of Eagan. Also reviewed were future conventions, and group tours. Councilmember
Wachter indicated he feels this Is a very ambitious agenda and he Is very Impressed. Hunter concurred,
noting that he appreciates how thorough and professional the budget Is. Mayor Egan stated he Is
impressed with the marketing plan.
Administrator Hedges made refer ti e�to•the•f• avotakle variance on the budget. He suggested that
when the Convention & Visitors Bureau :rides what theY:Pgip to do with that amount, that it be brought
back to the Council to be consistent wflh Council's conserViiiIiie approach to spending.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 2
.PONSENT AGENDA
In regard to Item G, Waterview F' i:Subdivision, Hunter asked whether the lots were modified to
maintain Card Street. Community Development .,4.iiector;.Rgi.Ghert indicated they were.
In regard to Item J, Election Judgep, Masin asked -Whether the high school students will actually be
election judges. Administrator Hedges i0i0ted they will be.
In regard to Item K, Wetlands Conservation Act Authority, Masin requested verification that
everything under the 10,000 square feet will not automatically be dismantled. Rich Brash verified that is
correct.
In regard to Item 0, Interim Use :{flrdinancet. Southeast Industrial Development MoratoriuL,Mayor
Egan noted this will be pulled for separa>e:?Jiscussli?tt;
In regard to Item P, Ordinance Aiiiendmerit : L1se of Car Wash in Neighborhood Business District,
Wachter suggested that architectural campatt:bili>y: e::added:.to the ordinance. Councilmember Hunter
expressed a concem about distinguishing:tiet eeii.ifitll=s`ietv�e:Gar washes and convenience car washes.
He feels it should be stated in the ordinance that convenience car washes only be allowed in a
Neighborhood Business District. He feels the full-service car washes are incompatible for Neighborhood
Businesses. Mayor Egan concurred, stating that this will be pulled for modification of the language.
In regard to Item Q, Eaaan Lions Club 25th Anniversa y Proclamation, Wachter drew attention to
what the Lions Club has done for the community.. ,Mayan Egan noted the dedication of funds for park
development.
A. personnel Items
Item 1. It was recommended to approve issuing'a' as st. for proposals for life, A,D & D and long-term
disability group Insurance coverage.
Item 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Andrew Cole as a young male development instructor
in the youth development program.
B. Plumbers Licenses. It was recommended tq approve the plumbers licenses for Hillcrest Plumbing, Mike
Peterson Plumbing, Rose Sewer &Water.,: ar d & eevitle:flaur 3 ing & Heating Inc. as presented.
•
C. Project 646, Receive Final Assessme6ifibil/OrdeiTOblic Hearina - Blue Cross Road Street Rehabilitation.
It was recommended to receive the finai.aessment.roii and order a public hearing to be held on November
1, 1994.
D. r• ect • 59 R - eiv - Final A sessrrierit''1=Tb11: v Merl; ' . •i H - - rin. - •..d R •.. treet and Trail
Construction. It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll and schedule a public hearing to
be held on November 1, 1994.
E. Project 660, Receive Final Assessment Roll(fer•.Pjt?lic Hearina - Wildemess Run 1 -4th Addition Street
pehabilitation. It was recommended to req h' fIi # it a8 essment roll and schedule a final assessment
hearing to be held on November 1, 1994;:::;:::::
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 3
F. Investigation Fees for permits to carry, handguns. It was recommended to approve the implementation
of a $10 investigation fee for processing $pglications for permits to carry handguns.
G. Final Subdivision, Waterview. It was tecor mende4 .tczapprave the final subdivision.
H. Final Subdivision. Bachel's Backvard .:It was recorninended to continue this final subdivision to the
October 18, 1994 City Council meeting.:::::::::
I. Final Subdivision. Pond View Townhomes 1st Addition Replat. It was recommended to approve the final
subdivision.
J. List of Election Judges for November..8.General Election. It was recommended to approve the list of
election judges.
K Pelegation of Authority for Wetlands inservatftiii:Act. It was recommended to delegate authority for
water bodies under 10,000 square feet to'tfte WaterResources Coordinator as presented.
L Preparation of Plans for Schwanz Lali;e:Cibitals:WatkiMUalliV Improvements. It was recommended to
authorize preparation of plans and specifications.
M. j3udaet Adoption, Convention and Visitors Bureau. It was recommended to adopt the budget as
presented.
N. Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Eae ai'd:Dakota Countv for Municipal Center Site
Improvements. It was recommended to .apprpitis; t e::#t*t amendment to the library site joint powers
agreement as presented. •
O. interim Use Ordinance. Southeast Inditstria#iiglonment Moratorium. This Item was removed for
separate discussion.
P. Ordinance Amendment, Amending Land Use Regulations, to Provide for the Use of a Car Wash In the
Neighborhood Business District. It was recommended to refer this item back to staff to redraft language
allowing only convenience -type car washes in a neighborhood business district.
O. Contract 93-02 Approve Final Payment/Authporize City Maintenance, Cedar Grove 3. 4. 5. 6 and 9th
Additions Utility and Street Reconstructiorf It: was; recprtit4:40ed to approve the eighth and final payment
in the amount of $10,835.70 to Valley :Pang, l*:ikritf.aiitlibrize acceptance of the improvements for
perpetual maintenance subject to warrari4i•provis164 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
all related documents.
R. Contract 93-10 Approve Final Payri .1Z:
itMt.411 : f ptenance. Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main ImproVefrierifs: `'1t'iiviss:•ii immended to approve the fourth and final
payment in the amount of $3,289.68 to Metro Utilities, Inc. and authorize acceptance of the improvements
for perpetual city maintenance subject to warranty provisions and authorize the Mayor the City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
S. Contract 94-05 Change Order No. 1 Dod C Pli .11:Street Construction. It was recommended to
approve the change order and authorize:ff ::Mayor and Citjr:_Glerk to execute all related documents.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 4
T. Contract 94-06 Change Order No.. 3. Wilderness Run Addition Street Reconstruction. It was
recommended to Approve the change ord and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
U. Proclamation. recognizing the 25th AnOi i r'yi7
ler ft ig: goition's Club. It was recommended to adopt
the proclamation as presented.
V. City Project No. 673, Trunk Highway/School Road Streets and Utilities. Authorization to Acauire
Easement/Right-of-wav through Condemnation. It was recommended to authorize acquisition of easements
and public right-of-way necessary for the project and to proceed through condemnation if necessary.
- W. Project 678, Deerwood Reservoir, Authorization to Acquire Property. It was recommended to authorize
the acquisition of property necessary to Olistruct the project through negotiations with the property owner
and condemnation if necessary.
X. Schedule Special City Council Meeting;:anvassfection Results. It was recommended to set a special
City Council meeting on Wednesday, Navern r..9. at. 5:30.
It was moved by Hunter, seconded•bji.Vllachtir; tii':approve the Consent Agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Mayor Egan noted that a correction needs to be made in the September 20 minutes, verifying that
the Council's intent was to appoint Wally Wall to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission. There being no
objection, that correction was noted.
O. Interim Use Ordinance/Southeast Industrial:ti sMa3ment Moratorium. Administrator Hedges
noted that the City Council determined that.an:at.a* ce:sbould be considered for a moratorium in that area
so staff and various commissions could tticik at that area: to determine the best long-term use for the area.
The moratorium allows for the process -rip... n... It was: the intent to include the neighborhood in the
planning process. The Planning Commission fig I substantial discussion and recommended approval of the
moratorium. They had an informational meeting ort Y1ii5: swell..: He stressed that this moratorium will not
change the zoning. The purpose of the moratorium is so tfre r:czn study the area to determine the best use
of the property in the future. Mayor Egan concurred, stating that the moratorium is to initiate the study.
The zoning Is not the issue tonight.
Gary Morgan noted that this moratorium will preclude businesses from expanding or modifying their
space. Changes to meet health and safety standards for employees will not be allowed. There are concems
as to whether they will be able to get lnstxrii2> e f tt sg.:maa.ifications aren't allowed. He expressed a
concem that this moratorium can be extetx1 d ftir:;):rt otith$•fieyond the expiration date. There was also
a concem that with a moratorium, banli• :;Y'iil not r•efii once their properties. If this moratorium isn't done
expeditiously, It will put people out of business or. into bankruptcy. He stressed that people want to be
involved in this discussion.
Counciimember Awada agreed ttlat•tfilt: edsis l:ilfi, he expeditiously and noted that the people
in that area will be involved in the process. She also suggested that If changes are needed for health and
safety standards, that they be allowed to appeal it to the Council. Hunter noted that that Is currently allowed
in the ordinance.
Gary Morgan added that there are sa+ret .iit$$e
:s1 s in this area that need conditional use permits
for outdoor storage. He feels these won't .t»:a ble:tt3:be:400 i. with a moratorium In place. Councilmember
Wachter stated that the Council wants to:lidve a good coriG3s study done but would like to have it done
in six months. Mayor Egan noted that tire will be a full in' 1 ement in this study by all affected parties.
EAGAN CITY COUNCtL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 5
John Young thanked the Council for the neighborhood meeting, and for allowing a process to
appeal items to the Council during this peri . He reviewed his plans for expansion. Councilmember Masin
stated she Is concerned about the financi burden it places on small businesses. She noted that there Is
so little commercial industrial property in District:.i .and w.pnOred whether the Council wants to take any
industrial property in this area. Mayor Egap at d t:there:a**ays to increase industrial property in that
area. Awada moved, Wachter seconded a miitiori foappros. Elie ordinance amending Eagan City Code
Chapter 11, entitled `Land Use Regulations: Zoning)" by adding Section 11.05 entitled "Interim Use: Study
Area'; and by adopting by reference Eadati:City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11.99. It was also directed
that City staff complete the land use study within six months of this date. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
pLBLIC HEARINGS
PROJECT 675 RED OAKS ADAiTION STREETS AND UTILITIES
Mayor Egan introduced this WI as Pr]]ect 675, Red Oaks Addition Streets and Utilities.
Administrator Hedges stated that the City6ouncil sCi uled a public hearing on this and a feasibility report
was prepared. Public Works Director Calberi::ex +ped:tha:lpcation, proposal and costs associated with
this Improvement. He indicated he has. iiot: t 000.:>a iy: i ections. Mayor Egan opened the public
hearing, and because there was no one wishing to speak, closed the hearing to public testimony. Wachter
moved, Hunter seconded a motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 675. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT/PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
MENDOTA ROAD AND LATS 7 & 8
Mayor Egan introduced this Item as vecatsng. 0fipage and utility easement/public right-of-way for
Mendota Road and Lots 7 and 8 of the Ri ,st:014ell 'Hcrtiestead. Administrator Hedges noted that there
was a public hearing on September 6th cin'the vacation ott#ie public right-of-way running parallel to the Soo
Line Railroad and drainage utility easements: Qi; the:R}obert O'Neil Homestead. At that public hearing, there
were some concerns expressed regarding the locatttiti:c :ttte:.city water main in relation to the easement.
Public Works Director Colbert explained the location slid noted they have not been able to reach
a resolution or receive enough information to proceed with this vacation. The applicant concurred with
staffs recommendation to continue this indefinitely until it can be resolved. Their application will be kept
active so they won't have to reapply. New notices will be sent when it comes back to the Council. Masin
moved, Hunter seconded a motion to continue this indefinitely. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
FINAL ASSESSMENT H fIIG'OROJECT 662
Mayor Egan Introduced this lten3.as.the final assessment hearing for Project 662, Cedar Grove Street
Reconstruction.
Public Works Director Colbert' e* t ih-ed tIte::: ` cion and project. He noted that the final
assessment roll was prepared in accordance with the adopted policy; however, the Council directed staff
to appraise approximately 5% of the affected properties to determine what the maximum benefit would be
as a result of this project. The results were presented to the Council, and the Council adjusted the pending
assessment roll to reflect those results. He note I ttiaUhe Ken Applebaum Addition was assessed on a front
foot basis because it is a multiple residentiaj itte:::: M * Egan then opened the public hearing.
•
Roland Higgs, 3941 Palisade Wa.y, .questioned what:prompted the street improvement. He feels it
was the water main. He feels the street was functional and':tiidn't need to be improved. Doesn't feel he
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE B
should be assessed for the street. He .was also concerned about the quality of the work and about
excessive material left in the area. He was:also concerned about excessive speeding in the area as a result
of the new roadway.
Public Works Director Colbert noted': hat. the:c.'ity .0Xperienced 13 water main breaks in the last
10 years In this area. It was felt that while.they were 'rei:oristiucting the streets, It would be beneficial to
replace the water main at the same time..:.Ae cost to replace the water main was not assessed. Because
the water main is 7-8 feet deep, there is a potential for settlement to occur along the water main, especially
when It goes through the winter and spring freeze/thaw cycle. Therefore, to ensure a high quality finished
product, ft was decided to delay the final lift of bituminous until late spring of next year so they can identify
any areas that have settled in the process. They will patch those areas and then put on the finial surface.
The street will be properly swept and cleaned up and because this street is being brought up to city
standards, it will be part of the city's roti.tki.O. street sweeping program.
The issues of noise and excessive:5peed wete:discussed. Councilmember Wachter noted that this
problem has been increasing throughout fii:6 community and suggested raised speed berms be investigated
and reiterated that he feels the speed lim :;ik:..agian.;should:be::no more than 45 miles per hour anywhere
besides the freeways.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Egan closed the hearing to public Testimony.
Public Works Director Colbert noted that the City is financing 55% of the cost of this project. Councilmem-
ber Wachter added that the project came in about $500,000 below the feasibility report. Mayor Egan stated
he feels this was a very successful project. Councilmember Hurter asked how long this street is expected
to last. Public Works Director Colbert indicated that stree no definite lift expectancy; however, with
routine maintenance, It should last 25 30 years,:ets lav
•
Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a ,motion to.:Ciose the public hearing and approve the final
assessment roll for Project 662 and order c i1 40..ion:.to. Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
RECONSIDERATION/CONDITIONAL USE/NATIONAL PROPANE CO.
Mayor Egan introduced this item as reconsideration of conditional use for National Propane
Company. Administrator Hedges reviewed the, history of this request.
Community Development Directs eicheit:l i 'ifre location and original request. She noted
they looked at different locations on tha:Site to pl4g:'the tank. There is one location in the back of the
building that would meet the setback requirement; however, It would take up parking, and SuperAmerica
doesn't want the tank at a site where th.O.annot 100 it under visual observation at all times. She noted
the distance from the curb line to the pt.4. 54' :_Ii t .3t.2S:#eet. She added that Pilot Knob Road will
likely be widened at that location in the at'i]'te;'s ii Ititt tat rea will be used for that.
Councilmember Hunter thanked the Fire Marshal for clarification of the Fire Code sections. He
asked whether the location just Inside the setback area by the original location would work. Community
Development Director Reichert noted that peopJe:.,a:parking in that area.
Bill Ferris, representing SuperArn.010;• oted tfieiii*Arying to keep a consistent traffic flow in that
area. It would be difficult if there is a v jiiCfe parked in froth of the tank at that location. He noted they
would consider that location if the Coupcil chooses. "'
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 7
Councilmember Hunter stated he:would have no objection to locating the tank in that area. Public
Works Director Colbert stated he doesn't:ej: it would create a traffic problem at that location; however, he
hasn't done any tum radius' to see if It wtiti d be a problem for Targe vehicles.
Councilmember Wachter asked l?i it i itp#;..... proposed to be widened. Public Works
Director Colbert noted that Dakota County, has it identified in their five year plan. Wachter stated that
because of that, he doesn't feel it should t ocated in the setback area. He would not oppose the location
suggested by Councilmember Hunter. H':feels there is a need for this type of service in the area. If there
are problems with ft in the future that are unforeseen at this time, the Council could ask them to remove It.
Mayor Egan concurred.
Councilmember Masin stated she.ieels the exchange program is a viable and safer alternative. Rich
Zehnder, of SuperAmerica, stated he feets:the exchar?ge program is a viable alternative for people with gas
grills; however, with the tank, they can fill.f>e cylindW cheaper, and also serve propane for forklifts, mobile
homes and recreational vehicles. Public;:Works Direeior Colbert noted that when he was considering the
traffic flow with the tank inside the setbackarea, he'iivas only considering passenger vehicles. Recreational
vehicles could cause some traffic flow ptpbl .3.') :tisaf .#vcaticm;
Community Development Director Reichert indicated she feels her staff can work with them on
finding a suitable location on the property. She suggested that conditions be added that It meet the Fire
Code, and that additional landscaping be required for screening. She noted that if they are unable to find
a suitable location, she will let the Council know.
Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a motion to iiovir i#Ie conditional use permit for SuperAmerica
for the outdoor storage of a 1,000 gallon-propaoa cEspenser on Lot 1, Block 1, SuperAmerica Addition,
subject to the following conditions:
1) That the tank be located on the:t3itum hog4:surface with approval of staff;
•
2) That it meet all Fire Code provisions;
3) That the perimeter of the tank be screened with appropriate landscaping as worked out with
staff.
Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Masin opposed.)
RESOLIJTIQN -ro*: l;:. ow BOW HUNTING
Mayor Egan introduced this as a r..sAlution to allow bow hunting in the City of Eagan.
Administrator Hedges gave the history.. .bow ,hunting, in the City of Eagan. He noted that there was a
request to reconsider the ban on bow:*.lyi> : is c3 The Q lriciI authorized preparation of an ordinance
amendment. It was noted that the origirial Yeq Jest was ife'firymotion; therefore a resolution was prepared
Instead to allow bow hunting within the city limits.
Betty Bassett, Indicated she lives next to the Minnesota River Valley that has had special hunts
sponsored by the DNR before, and is qui?:•poterned that there are many unauthorized hunters
participating in these hunts illegally. She # fs:I er•Q_ s. to be protection for their neighborhood and
subdivision. She is concemed for the saf t�i.of children.: y. can at least hear a gunshot; they can't hear
a bow and arrow.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 8
Norm Svien, stated he feel there.arg safe areas in the city to hunt. This is a cost effective way to
reduce the deer population. He needs Pg-j•Mission from the city to hunt on private property.
Kevin Reeve, of Eagan, indicated.:11.4.0gek.rwa.N..patural predators, and overpopulation causes
disease and starvation. He Is urnber being hit by cars. He feels hunting is
a natural concluded method of control.
Howard Goldman, representing Fii**Ads of Animals and Their Environment, stated that many animals
are not killed or tracked by hunters. Virtually every study comes to the same conclusion: wound rates on
bow hunting are very high. The average is over 50%. It is not an effective method of control Animals
deserve a quick and humane death. Bow hunting will not give that.
Councilmember Awada asked wpype DNiixpuld support bow hunting If the wound rate is as high
as the studies show. Mr. Goldman responded that lti probably because the DNR gets a lot of their money
from fees from hunters.
.•
- • ..
Brian Bebel, an Eagan resident:::000::W:t3PP.010:.Y.Ote Is based on sound Information. He
doesn't feel the statistics given are accuiatk::**.:1*;46*Vi;i0ded an animal. Is concerned about the
number of deer being hit by cars. He also noted that many wounded animals do not die as a result of their
wounds. Discussion followed on how the statistics were arrived at and how "wounded" was defined for
these studies.
Bruce Konold spoke in favor of the resolution, expressing a concern about starvation of deer.
John Parker, of the DNR, noted thatt4:0000.041.ation is going up. He noted that the terminology
used in studies is confusing. The term VOI:16(:14e.6ah mean several things. He feels bow hunting is safe
to do In this community and feels it is hiliftianc.:.. The D* report shows a wounding rate of 20%.
Councilmember Masin noted that deer MahadOplg.titris. not just an Eagan problem. She feels the
City needs help from the DNR on this issue. Mr. Parker ihdidatO they are working with the Dakota County
on a deer management plan. All they can do is work with citiesby doing surveys and giving information.
Wachter noted there are some properties currently getting the Green Acres deduction, planting com
to attract deer and then not even harvesting it. He disapproves of this.
John Witt, representing Minnesota:W,..:0ontar:sjiirj0:40 oke in favor of the resolution. Bow hunting
is a safe, effective method of control. ::::::::::•:•:-:•:•••••••-
:::]::::::
Rosalie Parranto, of Richard Lapg:stated st:i§..is opposed to bow hunting. She would like to see a
more humane way to control the deer 00Pulation.*:::::
Bob Pollick, of Inver Grove Heid.fii16eig'itiiidififito listen to the DNR on this Issue. The high
deer population is hurting his crops.
Betty Bassett stated she is against hunting. She Is opposed to cruelty and lack of fair play. If the
DNR endorses this, they should allocate the rewce,0o. control the population. The City doesnt have the
police force to regulate illegal hunting that.A4k4:00iikf.agan.
" •
Bill Schroeder stated he doesnliit his tax mortOpent on sharpshooters. Jeff Steitz spoke In
favor of the resolution.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 9
Unda Hatfield, of Friends of Anima(s:and Their Environment, indicated she served on the Minnesota
Valley Deer Management Task Force. ThOtssk force did not recommend bow hunting. They recommended
that if animals were to be killed, It should,•tie'through sharpshooting. She reviewed various aspects of the
results of the task force as to how to redu e..vp.t*Ofdeer•.egllisions and noted that the City of Eden Prairie
has a good deer management program akeview that document. She suggested the
tx#:�eioTti}iiisiit#�#:ifi�.:,
City survey their residents. She feels the..Gouncii is only hearing from people interested in bow hunting.
Bow hunting is not a good _management #oqi.
John Michael, an Eagan resident, spoke in favor of the resolution.
Mayor Egan then closed discussion to public testimony and tumed it over to Council members for
discussion. Councilmember Awada noted..that if this is passed, people still have to fill out an application
and have it approved by the Council. It vi!ili:only be al.owed in certain areas. Councilmember Hunter stated
he feels there needs to be control, and $ bke in sOport of the resolution. Councilmember Masin stated
she has learned a lot about deer management ihAe last year. She is concerned about the humane
treatment of deer, particularly starvation aiid car kilts:
Mayor Egan indicated he will not badi g.6:NS:vtit At:is: very complicated issue. He is aware that
the deer population is a serious problem, but feels it should be managed and regulated by the DNR. Bow
hunting is not a significant method of deer management. It is merely for sport. He feels it is inappropriate
for the City Council to be handling deer management. They are experts in this area. Eagan is now 70%
urbanized and doesn't feel it Is appropriate. The DNR should continue with their special hunts and leave
the city out of it. Wachter concurred, stating he only favors. trolled hunts. He doesn't feel tax dollars
should be spent on this. The DNR should be funding,tf;is;:: 1 is:up to the legislature to make sure they have
adequate funding. Awada moved, Hunter seco0d a :iris tion to approve the resolution. Aye: 3 Nay: 2
(Egan, Wachter opposed.)
jss
APPLICATION/BOW HUNTING' RM1T/NORM SVIEN
Mayor Egan introduced this item as an application for special bow hunting permit for Norm Svien.
Awada moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve the application for a special bow hunting permit for
Norm Svien and Mike Duggenburger as presented. Aye: 3 Nay: 2 (Egan, Wachter opposed.)
CONDITIONAL USE.PgRNI;T/RIG}:IFf :SOD AND BLACKTOP
•
Mayor Egan introduced this itsirr as a coi3i;#ii:ionai use permit for Richfield Sod & Blacktop, for
outdoor storage. Administrator Hedges.iruiicated that the Advisory Planning Commission considered this
Item In July.
Community Development Direcfor'R2rc i i;r64 afriieii the location and request. Staff is suggesting
some additional landscaping. They are not requiring a storm drain system at this time, but R does need to
be repaved. Staff will be monitoring the drainage on the property to make sure it is draining properly. The
Johnsons are concemed that they may be required to install storm drain in the future. Another issue was
whether the back should be paved. The J $ons. would like to leave R gravel; however, staff is
recommending pavement. The Planning . jOis 1 ji!i;litr,t d the number of vehicles to 15; however, the
Johnsons would like to be able to have ;Rl;k:::**.• •
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 10
John Johnson indicated they are:trying to purchase the property, but they need a conditional use
permit. He urged.Council approval. He f i?Is there is a need for a garden store operation in this area. He
expressed concerns over the landscaping requirement and the paving of the rear lot. He feels they need
the limestone rock to absorb some of the.:s!aateF.$Q;:ttt:.stone: sewer is not needed. He noted he has one
tractor trailer he would like to have allowed:iafi:thi::Rreipi:::::::::::
Councilmember Wachter stated ts:has been a problem area and he feels this is a viable solution
for this location. He feels staff can work With the applicants on the landscaping. As long as the neighbors
don't object, he doesn't feel the paving in the back is an absolute necessity due to the financial burden It
will place on the applicant. He doesn't have a problem with the tractor trailer.
Mayor Egan asked about the 15 vehicle restriction. John Johnson stated he reviewed the situation,
and feels they could possibly use moif.0./ehicles.•.43 the future. He doesn't want to restrict himself.
Community Development Director Reichsf :indicated she doesn't have a problem with that.
Community Development Directtir':Reicherf::iioted that the reason for paving is for dust control,
quality of runoff into the storm drain syst2m}:a ?.d:agsthatics,:::::tie concern is that the runoff has sediment
In ft and it gets into the water quality syste:iii :ttY:tt a:pWtiiticil has given applicants a couple of years
to come into compliance in cases of economic hardship. Discussion followed concerning whether this area
should be paved, and how this area will drain. Public Works Director Colbert stated he isn't concemed
about the quantity of water being drained; he is more concerned about the water quality. John Johnson
noted that there is a sedimentation pond also. He is concerned they will be forced to install storm drain
later if the area is paved. More discussion followed. •
Councilmember Hunter stated he feels:the000:0.:.should decide now whether or not paving in the
rear yard is necessary. If paving is not t; tj fired;:then the condition relating to drainage should stay in so
it can be revisited. He feels the City should assume part:t?f the risk on this. Public Works Director Colbert
stated he feels that is reasonable. Wachter adife¢:that:removal of underground tanks is expensive also and
places a financial burden on them. Councilmember',4wa0staSed she feels the reason for this condition is
so if the City decides to install storm drain in the area, tfie 8i44ir~ant can't object to the assessments in the
future.
Public Works Director Colbert stated that part of the concern is not knowing how the drainage
pattem will change based on the site improvements they do. Erosion may be a problem, and if it happens,
they would like to be able to require storm.drai,n to correct the problem. Rather than requiring them to
install storm drain now that may not b. needed). they:.thouight they would put It off until h was proved
necessary.
Councilmember Masin stated she:feels the p9pdition for future storm drain should be left In. Mayor
Egan concurred, stating he is cognizant :their effolts:#o redevelop this site. Councilmember Wachter noted
that other people have looked at this prop?rIy :ac d:jh i3t Oti*Ound tanks were a stumbling block. Council
members agreed they will act In good faith. dfftliattbeiditibti 8nd won't Impose anything unreasonable.
Ron Mielke, Ray Connolly Realty, explained some of the problems associated with the site that have
hindered redevelopment. He feels this request is a good proposal for the site and the applicants have done
a lot to Improve this property. He feels the applirargsl: requests are reasonable.
Councilmember Awada asked atg4Pie requesttii,1 aye the tractor trailer on the site. Hunter stated
he feels language should be added to siioiii+i one tractor tra l r;
EAGAN CrTY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 11
Considerable discussion followed:.poncerning the conditions related to the paving of the rear yard
and the storm drain. Hunter proposed tritillhe paving be phased in, and the condition relating to storm
drain be left in. He stressed that this is feififiis property only because it is a unique situation.
Hunter moved, Wachter seconde$*:iiii*.ld*OrOyg:io conditional use permit to allow outdoor
storage of vehicles, landscape material.and site plart Improvements on Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd
Addition, subject to the following conditio*
1) Submission and Implementation of a landscape plan for the berm area north of the site and the
area along Highway 13.
2) The applicant should upgrade. the parking and storage areas with bituminous surface and
bituminous curbing around *entire appa, to be phased in over two years.
::•:•:•: •:•:-:•:
3) The applicant shall properly:#!iiintain a8 surfaced areas, curbing and premises.
:•:•:.::
4) Customer parking spaces st)A11:100.0tect:13410:0#Ye:aisles delineated.
5) The applicant shall construct a berm along the north property line and railroad ties/timber bins
to screen the proposed storage.
6) Storage of vehicles not to exceed 20 shall be located in the northeast portion of the property
up against a hill. Dump trucks, pickup trucks.,andi sod trucks and trailers will be permitted.
One tractor trailer vehicle will be allowed
•
7) The City shall inspect the s$::.1.0tOortiOian00. with the conditional use permit one year after
approval and shall determine whether the titirm drainage system is creating any erosion or
other problems. As a result Of iiik*.igl.Psf;:.Aciciitional conditions may be imposed by the City
•
Council.
•
•
8) The applicant shall record the conditional use permit at the Dakota County recorder's office
within 60 days of Council approval.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Some discussion followed concerning what might be required if an erosion problem
develops. Public Works Director Colbert noted..that if the. paying doesn't have to be completed for two
years, they will be inspecting something ti*07;-:',990.iiiTtie condition giving one year to monitor the
property was assuming the paving was 1.0:11;i'di:iti6:0.0tiiaKfihey won't really know what the impact will
be if the paving isn't complete. After sori*:discussiddj-lunter and Wachter agreed to a friendly amendment
to Condition #7 to read that the City st*I::inspectipe site for compliance with the conditional use permit
one year from the date the blacktop is •• • •
::::•:•:•••:••
ORDINANCE' AlVIENDMENY/MASSAGE 'THERAPY
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 12
DeAnn Johnson, of LifeTime Fitness; asked why their license depends on whether this ordinance
passes or not. City Attorney Sheldon stated: that there is an existing ordinance that she can apply for a
massage therapy license; however, she would not qualify for a license under that ordinance because they
don't have a resident manager, and it cotes;witt Ale.:t e: f.:operation as stated in the ordinance.
Councilmember Wachter noted that.there was a problem with prohibiting the locking of doors while
a massage was being administered. He fOON that perhaps they could have an "occupied" sign on the door
and have a lock on the door that is only to:be locked from the outside. They could then lock the door when
the therapist leaves to protect their equipment.
Councilmember Awada stated she is comfortable with this ordinance, with Councilmember Hunter's
suggested change. Mayor Egan concurred:
Gigi Decker, Executive Director of: lassage:1herapy at Care Chiropractic, urged Council approval.
She expressed a concern about the regiii}ament ONiving to show compliance with all laws of sanitation,
and the requirement of having a medicaf:oertificate::atating the applicant has no communicable diseases.
She feels both requirements are very vagite.::;RQl0..c. ief.Q.eagan. noted that this language is in the existing
ordinance. Some discussion followed.
Gigi Decker also expressed a concern that the investigation fees are very high and about: language
that addresses coverage of the massage therapist and client. She feels that language is not really related
to legitimate massage therapy. Mayor Egan noted that this is also existing language. Councilmember
Wachter stated that if staff feels that language should stay in the.ordinance, he feels it should be left in. He
feels the fees are reasonable. Awada concurred. DeAnn,.Jo,.tsbn suggested that cities work together on
a uniform licensing system and investigation. Wacht,er::g><atad itis something they can work on.
Mayor Egan stated that if the rest:tif•the Councit:agrees, he doesn't feel they need the statement
from a licensed physician that the applicant.:is:ttt'e.of cot %municable disease.
Hunter moved, Awada seconded a motion to•eppt'pv$:the amendment of the City ordinance relative
to massage therapy, with the following revisions:
1. That Subdivision 3 B be amended by inserting the words "massage therapy" prior to the first
occurrence of the word 'services";
2. That the words, "All applicationa:.for. a license to...practice as a massage therapist shall be
accompanied by a medical .C6�ttif:Ow. fram:a pt%y. ician duly licensed to practice medicine in
the State of Minnesota stats :hat tFte; ficarif has no communicable diseases" be deleted
from Subdivision 5.
DeAnn Johnson expressed a di*ern ern that'both the establishment and therapist need to have a
license. There are many homebounda'.4:hai c i ed::p ciple that cannot get to a massage therapy
program that they would like to get to,'sucl'i:tglitiOtals:or:tiomes. She asked whether they could just
license the therapists. Hunter stated he is not comfortable with that since most of the ordinance deals with
on -premises requirements. He feels the city needs protection against illegal activities. Some discussion
followed. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
MASSAGE THEF301:: ;31rE*E/LIFETIME FITNESS
Mayor Egan introduced this iterm$ the massage the a y establishment license for LifeTime Fitness.
Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve a massage therapy license for LifeTime Fitness as
presented.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 13
MASSAGE THEIWIST UCENSE/UFETIME FITNESS
Mayor Egan introduced this itern'ii the massage therapist license in conjunction with LifeTime
Fitness. Hunter moved, Awada secondacta::r.1)001:10:Appr-pyR a massage therapist license for DeAnn
Johnson, subject to the submission of acklitii:00:V,ii:i64400:10:as noted in the report.
Councilmember Wachter asked Wtier his suggestion regarding the locks will be incorporated into
the ordinance. City Attorney Sheldon Iiidfcated he made a note of It, however, It wasn't part of the
amendment. Mayor Egan stated he feels the language should be brought back to the Council. City
Attorney Sheldon suggested it state, "Locks shall be keyed from the hallway only. The consensus of the
Council was to include that language in the ordinance amendment. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
INTERIM U94:FERMIVASPEN HILLS CHURCH
...•.•.•
Mayor Egan introduced this ItetnAls an !Dia= Use Permit for Aspen Hills Church, to allow a
temporary church at the southeast intersection of 1..one Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. Administrator
Hedges noted that the Advisory Planning C hearing on September 27th.
Community Development Director Reichert explained the location and request and noted that the
Planning Commission recommended approval of the request with two conditions. She noted that in the
past, the Council has been granting special use permits to activities that are not permitted by the Zoning
Ordinance and allowing them to operate for a specified period of time. She feels the City needs to get away
from this practice because it Is in effect granting permits contradictory to the zoning. She feels there are
some policy questions that need to be answered She feels an interim use permit would be
appropriate for this site because it is felt the.slia..44.be eloped for a more intense industrial use in the
future. The Planning Commission recorti.6itided that same landscaping should be done at this time.
Wachter moved, Masin seconded a mtn t pprove the interim use permit to allow Aspen Hills
Church to occupy the existing building on Lots 1-5; til. .:,E0gandale Center Industrial Park #3, subject
to the following conditions:
1) The permit must be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of Council action with
documentation provided to the City and the permit shall terminate three years from the date
of City Council action.
2) A landscape plan shall be s0040*ith:04f.i.OIS on screening the parking lot.
•
Hunter noted that the only reasonthe Couri&is deviating from the standards is because this is an
interim use. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
.........
INTERIM UtETegmaris.kfttimqER RECYCLE
Mayor Egan Introduced this item as an Interim Use Permit for Steininger Recycle, Inc., to allow
recycling of concrete along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Highway 149. Administrator
Hedges noted that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this on September 27 and are
recommending approval.
- -- --
Community Development Direct4iiffWchert exp14160lhe location and request She noted that an
Issue was raised about executing a warOf objection to Ei*ssments. She has had further discussions
with the Public Works Director, and they::clon't object to elimipating that condition.
.:.:.:.:.:.•
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 14
Greg Steininger, secretary of Steirjr3ger Recycle, Inc. urged Council approval and requested that
the Council eliminate the condition requirt.i4 ;xecution of a waiver on objection to assessments for Yankee
Doodle Road Project.
Wachter moved, Masin seconded a:r fit1 i ": ov ai7:Interim use permit for Steininger Recycle,
Inc. to allow concrete recycling and stockpiling in a light industrial district located west of Highway 14, south
of Yankee Doodle Road, subject to the f4tfawing conditions:
1) The permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of Council action and
terminate two years from the date of Council approval.
2) Safety fencing shall be required at the top of all steep hillsides.
3) Dust control procedures sh #:oe utiliz d
4) The hours of operation shatifbe limited 'to 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
5) A 150' long bituminous drivewa s#iajl; 8:iristafled: at the time of the Yankee Doodle Road
improvement.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/STEININGER CONSTRUCTION
Mayor Egan introduced this item as. a.g0.64. troy at:tise Permit for Steininger Construction Co., Inc.,
to allow outdoor storage of construction} aquifrm'erif at th& northwest Intersection of Mike Collins Drive and
Aldrin Drive. Administrator Hedges noted'that.the.Planning:Commission held a public hearing on September
27 and recommended approval.
Community Development Director Reichert expiator ::the location and request. Awada moved,
Wachter seconded a motion to approve a conditional use permit for outdoor storage and site plan for
Steininger Construction Co., Inc. on Lots 14-16, Block 3, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #4 located at the
northwest intersection of Mike Collins Drive and Aldrin Drive subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant shall have the Dakota County Auditor combine the three lots within 60 days of
City Council action.
2) The applicant shall record tiffii•ConditiOiiii Use Permit at the Dakota County Recorder's office
within 60 days of City Council action,.::..
3) The applicant shall proper ma r tairEih 1 $Bali' :area and premises.
4) The applicant shall expand the existing wetland by 3,425 square feet with an average depth of
four feet below the normal water level.
5) The applicant shall protect the existiftg.wgtland with an area of 6,000 square feet.
6) The proposed parking lot sh'a# drain to a pitypp*ed catch basin that drains to the new wetland
that will be located on theiiueSt edge of the slte::::.
EAGAN CRY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 15
7) A storm sewer outlet that connects to the existing storm water in Aldrin Drive shall be provided
for the wetland located on test edge of the site.
8) Tlhe sanitary sewer service shglkipclwie.gjpartpole.gthe right-of-way line of Mike Collins Drive.
..:.:.....::•:::•:•:•:.••::•:•:•:•:••••:'•*:':*:'*-.."
9) The driveway connection to. Afglrin.Drivd Vial( '15'e'Constructed with a concrete apron with a
minimum width of 30 feet.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/LULL INDUSTRIES
Mayor Egan introduced this Ite44 a Condkional Use Permit for Lull Industries, to allow outdoor
storage of equipment and materials west 1'.H. 13 ar north of Meadow View Road. Administrator Hedges
noted that the Planning Commission helcf*.public l*ing on September 27, and recommended approval.
Community Development DirectoTReiptxplaipeci:ttle:location and request. She explained some
drainage and ,erosion issues in the area JIm Vfsjoki � L1 lndustnes thanked the City of Eagan for
helping them to reestablish their name.
Wachter moved, Awada seconded a motion to approve a conditional use permit with a site plan for
Lull Industries for outdoor storage of parts and equipment on part of Govemment Lot 2, Section 9, located
on Sibley Memorial Highway subject to the following condition:
.....:•:•:•:•::-:•:.
1) The applicant shall record this ConditiOriO.PO:Oirmit at the Dakota County Recorder's office
within 60 days of City CourOiCilk:''....
...•...•.•
2) The applicant will be required't6::.60.0:triipt. p, watermain system with hydrants that are spaced
within 300 feet of the buildings to improv Tha prqtection to the site immediately upon the first
of any building expansion. •
3) The applicant shall properly maintain the parking and storage areas.
4) The applicant shall prepare a status report of the site conditions and an overall plan for
handling storm drainage erosion.prpblems for the Advisory Planning Commission review in
October 1995. As a result ot flts review abI�naI conditions may be imposed by the City
Council. ..:•:•:•:••••••••-•:-:•:•:- .:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
• •
:•.•:•:::-
5) The parking and long-term.:iwentory giAr:ag e area serving this development shall be surfaced
with bituminous or concrekiliavemerVii accordance with City Code requirements.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PREUMINARY PLAT/SKYUNE HEIGHTS
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 16
Community Development Director::Reichert explained the location and request. Hunter moved,
Awada seconded a motion to approve the pi .iminary subdivision consisting of two lots on 1.4 acres of land
at 1521 Lone Oak road, subject to the foliowing conditions:
1) The developer shall comply vii#t ptaiit]i�t#'itc3its of plat approval Al, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2,
C3, D1, El, F1, G1 and H1 akgdopted by Council action on February 2, 1993.
2) The existing shed located on The common lot line in between Lots 1 and 2 shall be moved prior
to final plat approval.
Aye:
3) A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit application.
4) This development will be re4,tiied to oblajn a cross easement from the owner of Lot 2, Block
3, Prettyman Heights for the p oposed:diiveway that will serve Lot 1 of this development.
5 Nay: 0
LEGISLATIVE/INTER ittiNME>+1TAt: AFFAIRS UPDATE
Councilmember Hunter gave an update on the High School Site Selection Task Force. He noted
that the task force narrowed it down to three sites. Staff will now try to negotiate with each of these sites.
School boundaries will then be considered by the task force.
Councilmember Hunter noted that he will be.990i on: Wednesday when the Dakota County League
of Govemments Is meeting, and wondered.wbetftef sortie ie else wanted to attend. Administrator Hedges
indicated he is planning on attending. C3.4i0ci1h6mber Aitiiada Indicated she will attend in his place.
ADM1 t#1..: A END
Change Order #1 Police Facility/Municipal Center Eitiitsision. Administrator Hedges explained the
change order. Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a motion to approve Change Order #1 to the police
facility/municipal center expansion in the amount of $7,928. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Correction/September 6 Reaular Council Minutes. Hunter moved, Awada seconded a motion to
approve a correction to the September 6, 1954: regular City Cquncil minutes relating to Consent Agenda Item
D, Resolution Adopting a Comprehensive Giiide:.l?ian..Mi:Ordm nt for Elementary School #18, to properly
reflect the zoning to PF (public facility). kye: 5 )C ::0
Project 647. Receive Final Assessment RoJSchedule Public Hearing (Englert Road Streets &
Utilities). Wachter moved, Hunter secai d .a.mat into. receive the final assessment roll for Project 647
and schedule a final assessment hearing t s bie 3eft3 ?tzn: ember 1, 1994. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Authorize Solicitation of Quotes for Snow Removal Services. Wachter moved, Egan seconded a
motion to authorize the competitive solicitation of contractual snow removal services for the 1994-95 snow
removal season. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Contract 94-17. Approve Plans antf t3geliflirat 9t s,fAuthorize Ad for Bids (Red Pine Lane. Street &
Utility Improvements). Hunter moved, Wti0i0i seconded' ttiption to approve plans and specifications for
Contract 94-17 and authorize a bid adv i'tisement for 10:304*., Friday, October 28, 1994. Aye: 5 Nay:
0
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 17
Yk§,..P. S:TC713E HEARD
Don K]ein, 4070 Dodd Road, addressed the Council relative to his assessment for getting sanitary
sewer to his property. He noted that when:l3>eewer.jOs4110io9..was made, he had no contact from the city
regarding what was planned or options ava}t tjp Chant. `ha?r #eptic system is showing signs of needing
replacement and they need to hook up to sewer. Upon inquiring with the City, they Indicated their intention
is for them to make a connection at the cuffs -sac on the east end of their property. He recently spoke with
someone in the Engineering Department wlio showed a different possibility closer to their home site. When
he spoke to a contractor, he indicated that wasn't feasible because of the elevation of the road. He felt it
would be cost prohibitive. If he has it installed at the original location, It will cost him $12,000-$13,000. He
feels that because they can't connect adjacent to their home site, It creates a financial hardship for them.
He asked the Council to consider to warring or reducing the sanitary sewer assessment. Discussion
followed concerning the costs involved.
Public Works Director Colbert n i3ed that Ore are over 1,000 feet of frontage on the property.
There was only 250 feet assessed for the'lateral benefit from the sanitary sewer that he would connect into
at either location. This property was not::at ss;ed::eny:mak;:area sanitary sewer when this sewer was
Installed in the area. The majority of the-bioPaitiit:.CdirislibiiiiiiiisseSsed. Recognizing the hardship, the
trunk area assessment will only be assessed for one lot, the existing homestead, at $775. The total
assessment amounts to about an 80% reduction. When the sanitary sewer was installed in 1987, they
acquired an easement from the Kleins to construct this line, and they were compensated $6,500 for that
easement, and there were no assessments levied as a part of the project at that time. The Kleins would like
further consideration for adjustment of the cost of connectipc o the sanitary sewer.
Public Works Director Colbert stated.0000g6i sIhat running the service across Dodd Road into
this line is costly. Another option wouId::b :-to. auger car: :jack under the roadway, which may be a less
expensive alternative. If cash flow beconies.a.txoblem, the City could install the service across the roadway,
and spread the cost of the assessment over.lt5: sThe.costs Involved are actually less than what other
properties in the area have paid, but they recognize't#iat.'tkae Keins have been a long term homesteaded
property owner for over 20 years.• .
Awada stated that $5,000 is a reasonable amount from the City's standpoint; however, she feels the
combination of the $5,000 along with the cost of running the line 400 feet is cost prohibitive. Wachter stated
he really can't make a justifiable position until he knows how much it will cost to auger under the roadway.
Public Works Director Colbert not thait:t i.s pati el::l ais:the ability to be split and a second service
could be provided for a house located wt iiaccesS�?pft:Elie cul-de-sac in the future. He would recommend
that they pursue service across Dodd Red If the service is run to the cul-de-sac, it will impact the ability
of that lot being subdivided and will havig;#p grant press easements. It would also go through the woods.
Mr. Klein concurred, stating they would fi ve.to r.gr.0v .a.lot of trees if a line is run to the cul-de-sac. Public
Works Director Colbert indicated he car #eck:fp : e h r:they could add this to an existing contract
with the use of a change order. If the 'Councq. agrees;'the ' bould finance it over 15 years as a public
improvement.
Mayor Egan stated he would like to do that. Wachter concurred, stating he can see why he doesn't
want to run the line through the woods. He feg:k:;IS:.up,to the Kleins whether they want to pursue this.
The City will be flexible. Hunter concurred5itirig*ss the City can finance the payments. He feels
the City has already done a lot to mitigatg #01r assessmerkf:He doesn't think the assessments should be
waived. Awada stated she would like toiiiicw how much It *fl cost to auger under the roadway. Wachter
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 18
stated he feels service should come from:.Dodd Road to keep the flexibility of the property so he can
develop It In the future. Hunter and Egari:: oncurred, stating it will preserve their development rights.
Awada moved, Wachter secondee a.m ion.tc>.:Wcr.4k with.staff to either auger directly across Dodd
Road, straight to the cul-de-sac connectiokOr: f Iiia ff a grope r y line, depending on which is more practical
and feasible, bearing in mind the subd'nlision and development Issues, with the understanding that the
Council will go along with the lower of thdp costs, with no further reduction in assessments, and that the
payments can be spread over 15 years. :AO: 5 Nay: 0 Some discussion followed.
ROUND TAOLE
Community Development Directpr.Reichert expressed a concern about violations to the outdoor
storage ordinance at Magnum Towing, which is located in Halley's Addition. They are In the process of
sending them a letter requesting that the : ome int'c ompliance. Councilmember Hunter suggested that
since they are looking at the long term use:nf this pi3fierty, that they persuade them that cleaning up these
types of problems might help their cause':'He stated:Tey should still send the letter asking there to come
Into compliance. Community Developmer}t::D7ie0003.giehwtrt.:poted that this situation has been there long
before the Issue of the moratorium and zorfirtg:i`,atriet#i:&i:>Fret;:8rea.
Administrator Hedges requested that special Council meetings be scheduled for October. Hunter
moved, Awada seconded a motion to set special Council meetings on October 11 and 18 at 5:00 p.m. Aye:
5 Nay: 0
Administrator Hedges referred to a memo frorri. Cald Coordinator Mike Reardon about appearing
on the 'Know It Alis' show. They need a Cowr3ci1:1en' bet to'participate on the team for Eagan to appear
against a team from Burnsville. Councitt iemt ' Masin viji:unteered to participate.
Councilmember Wachter asked abbot :hie::estatus of the Gil Amundson request. Community
Development Director Reichert indicated that their 66 i itant have not gotten documentation back to them.
As soon as they get it, they will place it on the next
Councilmember Wachter stated he attended the groundbreaking for the School of Environmental
Studies for School District #191. He feels it will be a wonderful opportunity for students at that school.
Councilmember Hunter that Gary Humphries, who served on the Site Selection Task Force, suggested that
Eagan get a magnet type school, along the.lines.. of trees or the environment.
Councilmember Wachter stated..mix'satisii dv tfi'th Information from the architect regarding the
Municipal Center expansion. He requested that ttii Rublic Works Director look Into the speed bumps to
control speeding. He reiterated that Eagan shouktgdopt a 45 mile per hour speed limit throughout the
community.
Mayor Egan noted that he spoke'with"o?ie`bf the bWi ers of Wescott Square, who Indicated that
several of the owners are Interested in discussing some sort of joint ownership of that complex.
Mayor Egan noted that Scott Wynn of Cedar Ridge Church called him about 45-60 volunteers
available from the Cedar Ridge School, and w ?red.whether they could be utilized In Public Works or
Parks and Recreation.
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; OCTOBER 4, 1994
PAGE 19
Community Development Directo(Nichert noted that the Steiner request is back on the Planning
Commission agenda for a conditional useii0Ormit. Staff has been working with them.
''' :0000400:04::
After several questions, Wachter Egan seconded a motion to approve the check register
dated October 4, 1994 in the amount of $0.85,560.45. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
ADJOURNMENT
Wachter moved, Egan seconded a motion to adjoum the meeting at 11:30 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
:j::::::: :•:•:-:. DLP
•:**::: ::.:.:.:
•:::::::
Date City Clerk
If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, braille, audio tape, etc., please contact
the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55..1..22,.::(.681-4600, (TDD phone: (612) 454-8535).
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that .411;p0rS004iaile equal access to Its programs, services,
activities, facilities and employment without:*40::tb. r40e, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status or status wffi:teNrd to put4ic assistance.
•
•
•.
• •
• • • • •
MINUTES 01=:A:Si'.kO#Pit: I ET. OF THE
E4:0i4N CITY COUNC iii
'>=agan, Minnesota
.e; f ?ber 27,19$4::
A special meeting of the Eagan City Couric ;iv B'held on Tuesday, September 27, 1994 at 5:00 p.m.
at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Councilmembers Wachter, Awada, and
Hunter. (Councilmember Masin arrived at 5:15 p.m.) Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges,
Finance Director Gene VanOverbeke, Police Chief Pat Geagan, Assistant to the Administrator Jon
Hohenstein, Cable Coordinator Mike Reards :> .CNef Building..Official Doug Reid.
RESOLUTION REGARDING PROI?DSEb LEGAL CITATION SYSTEM
Administrator Hedges stated he received a 031;
Mr. Stewart noted that a ramp will f i l: to be added t:cii* Council dias to meet ADA regulations.
A question was raised as to why this ramp is a d: iff. the. :may be removed in a couple of years. Mr.
Thorbeck indicated that It is an ADA requirerrieiit :::::::`'
The number of monitors in the new Council Chambers was discussed and whether Council members
will be sharing monitors. Dick Stewart indicated there will be 10 monitors to accommodate the largest
commission. Discussion followed on the costs associated with this electronic equipment. Wachter stated
he feels If the monitors won't be used substafltSedty: ri:th . cs : p city room, that some of them should be
moved to the new Council Chambers. AdmiinittittOf:tikfigii0030edAdm the Council that the community room
is intended to be used for overflow in the Council i i hers. Isli.iiStewart stated that if the council wants
to move the monitors, he will have to take another look at the tOtfn configuration.
A question arose as to what compt4.er: pa t s.arp.:ng ded with this system. Mayor Egan stated
he feels computer capabilities should be iristzttI d because: ti.ey will be utilized in the future. Hunter and
Awada disagreed, noting that technology changes so fast that the equipment will have to be replaced in
several years anyway. Wachter indicated he would like more information before making a decision on this.
Hunter stated that the two things that are needed are what the use factor will be in the existing Council
Chambers, and the costs associated with this equipment. Awada noted that some of this equipment isn't
needed now anyway. Mr. Stewart stated he can check with other metro cities to see what type of equipment
they have. Masin asked whether the new System. will have phone-in capabilities. Mike Reardon, Cable
Coordinator, noted the current system has'thia# i ap ty..
The Council indicated general approvalof the `c'ify.:haH floor plans, but asked for additional
information on the audio-visual system before giving. i val tF :that element.
•
Dewey Thorbeck reviewed the buil0.4:016t'erials and samples and showed several types of chairs
to be used for the lobby areas and Council:Chambers. The question again arose about moving the Council
dias. Administrator Hedges stated that possibility was explored by the steering committee and it was felt
It wasn't cost effective. Thorbeck added that it is actually cheaper to build a new one.
Dewey Thorbeck reviewed the carpeting to be used, and showed several types of lighting fixtures
and furniture for the lobby area. Awada staed:ah :dfoesfi'.0 I.snoney should be put into additional lighting
for this building since it is already over the'.6iigirr61estirtiat ::::Miihiter concurred that the extra lobby lights
are not necessary. Mayor Egan stated he feels the biuliding should mirror the image of the community. He
doesn't think the light fixtures should be eliminated Yet". _They 04 be taken out later if necessary. Wachter
stated he doesn't want the building to be exquisite; fit iyever, he Wants it to be something everyone will be
happy with. He would like to see how the bids &*t a in bef*ii making a decision on this. Thorbeck
indicated he could do the lobby Tight fixtures as a bid alternate and the Council can decide that when the
bids come in.
The Council reviewed and gave approval to the color samples for the building interiors following
questions concerning specific finishes and their cost. The Couifdl also reviewed several fumiture concepts
for the lobby areas and directed staff to incorporate simple, datable furniture with some light oak trim. The
Council reiterated its direction that used; an4l::t@c:pnditipned..tiamiture be used to the maximum extent
possible.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *.*..* * *
At this time the Council was joined by the BumsvilleCity Council and the Cable Comrnission to
discuss the Commission's role and activities. Cable Coordinator Reardon gave an update on rate regulation
and federal legislation affecting cable rates. The Councils discussed emerging cable television and the
Date
DLP
•
...:••• • ••••••••••••• •
City Clerk
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
LName: it
ecca 04 oL
vs�r
ti. Type of Game to be Hunted:
l)Qe l
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
R 1 6 4
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS
IN HUNTING PARTY
S. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
1 \ 2 (o e C C. G� I� GL L r -e.•
9. Address:
3 3 ? U `_ 4, x/iv (� jo .J`l L
Ei)-&- IAA Ai .3--f?)
10. Vehicle a 4
license #
P( c&
2'
6 c))%-1\
11. Police Approval/P= .' it No:
I' 4
12. Approval
�i' )%
Date:
2. Street Address:
3 3 7 0
— & / :v6-7704/
3. City/State/Zip Code:
P/44;
S (2
/
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife bunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Anv hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant,
A copy of this Wrmit and appropriate identification musi be carried at all times for verification by the Eaean Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
S. Property Location Description:�--, c/0irs
3
-3 0 -- Z C K/,(/ %a ti . �� C(.°3 1(C) t, 1I
Ci 2 . '_ '- Ya 44 ree Du 0 cl (- (ed (Z 0 4-c V e s
ti. Type of Game to be Hunted:
l)Qe l
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
R 1 6 4
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS
IN HUNTING PARTY
S. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
1 \ 2 (o e C C. G� I� GL L r -e.•
9. Address:
3 3 ? U `_ 4, x/iv (� jo .J`l L
Ei)-&- IAA Ai .3--f?)
10. Vehicle a 4
license #
P( c&
2'
6 c))%-1\
11. Police Approval/P= .' it No:
I' 4
12. Approval
�i' )%
Date:
13. Expiration
10/0 /5,-,
Date:
G\wp51\forms\huhii4rg.prnp )wised 10/94
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
L Names /9 166'17e d
e M4/9 -ug.
L -De,
z (FE-
F
S.Property Location Description:
3370 -- z,c /x4.7, N 8- 4 o res
--24/0 - ,% , , yo i,
2s //'f€ D v dot )e kc 1 2_ D 1 i
2. Street Address:
3 7 ci - Le((x/o-ia,f/ /}-vim
3. City/State/Zip Code:
e444,/,/, P14,41, s,s--/ a/
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife bunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even If the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Anv hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant,
A cony of this Permit and appropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property
a�
A/ '-T / wE-57-1W,ity ' wTut4-(—
owner must accompany
this permit application):
—S.
z (FE-
F
S.Property Location Description:
3370 -- z,c /x4.7, N 8- 4 o res
--24/0 - ,% , , yo i,
2s //'f€ D v dot )e kc 1 2_ D 1 i
ti. Type of Game to be Hunted:
De i.
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
13 n w g E- G-,
IDENTIFICATION OF
ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
R � c��� l' i lMzf v
��
9. Address:
.
3 3 7 0- Cc-K./NG-rm./
Ot'()---/INN IA -4 /4 1
LtC'�
10. Vehicle
License #
hod
1Y-41%
)�
0
11. Police Approval/Permit
''..
No:
12. Approval Date:
)tlit-ISLF .
13. Expiration Date:
tqlt_li77-
•
• ,
c\wpst\torms g.pe
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
1. Name: ,`
Liro LT, C))0/\
2. Street Address:
j/y3 i, f,`h y1 o.
3. City/State/Zip Code:
%T/ .,ii? 3 yO9
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned "agricultural." The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the bunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt onlv when accompanied by the applicant.
A cony of this permit and appropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written perjnission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
6)1-1‘..) C.� 'L r cf...
5. Property Location Description:
�t )/ -t1- 11(2-03
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
06'w
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
C'(arevire 4 Q
9. Address:
'/ 3M1),,,ch/✓e 5/0N/55%09
x,41 7 (.1':6f "/e_
Y
3 c L1 f-1 w y j3 �t «
_7 j %'2 Z
10. Vehicle
License #
YX6G634
173- AQv
11. Police A . prov 1/Permit No:
1110
,.';,.\•
12. Approval Date:
10111(1(f
13. Expiration Date:
)0 i y '-----
c\wp51 \forms
h
nting.
Revised 10
94
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
1. Name:
A —7_,
e---Yre
5. Property Location Description:
NO rtk e.0,< c 35E ± L i 1e,
2. Street Address:
1--1 30q uorism RR
3. City/State/Zip Code:
ED,Tr\ MA) SS fa
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned "agricultural." The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coindde with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Anv hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied bv the applicant.
A copy of this permit and appropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification bv the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Own is Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
RGX,Q,\ COrnWel.\
5. Property Location Description:
NO rtk e.0,< c 35E ± L i 1e,
+ v\+e r S e r=-\- i p t\ (B:t 1-c( CO .
q- Acres
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
C e -r-
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
Oct 1B i4Q�i -H,ry Dec.31s) IgTLI
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS
IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
�C',CCI"e , [ ' e,\�.Z
• J
9. Address:
�- O9 S U��r i5€ ROCC�
10. Vehicle
License #
5'�5 I�GZK
11. Police Approva /Permit No:
tit .74ii A.,
12. Approval
1,43/1k
Date:
lqi-i
13. Expiration
ioild ,—
Date:
\51\f
wporms\h`uhting4n Revised 1
LT
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
reet Address:
99 MERSEY PT.
3. City/State/Zip Code:
EAGAN, MN 55123
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow bunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural.' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the bunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Connell may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant,
A CODY of this permit and appropriate Identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
Freight Masters
5. Property Location Description:
3703 KENNEBEC DRIVE
EAGAN MN, 55121
1
i
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
WHITETAIL DEER
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
LEGAL 1994 BOW SEASON
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
KEVIN MCGRATH
9. Address:
3899 Mersey Pt.
10. Vehicle
License #
935HMX
1 'cake Ap
-)
.. / ' -
.. it No:
12. Approval
Date:
13. Expiration Date:
c\wp51\forms\hunting.prmvised 10/94
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
1. Name: Judy Freudenberg
S. Property Location Description:
Northeast intersection of 35E and Diffley Road
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
Deer
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
Fall 1994 Season
2. Street Address:
6800 W Old Shakopee Rd #207
3. City/State/Zip Code:
Bloomington, MN
55438
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special bunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural.' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Digit). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Anv hunter listed in this application may bunt only when accompanied bvlhe applicant,
A copy of ibis permit and appropriate identification myst be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
Ron Cornwell
S. Property Location Description:
Northeast intersection of 35E and Diffley Road
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
Deer
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
Fall 1994 Season
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
Judy Freudenberg
9. Address:
6800 W Old Shakopee Rd *207
Bloomington, MN 55438
10. Vehicle
License #
F07 359
11. Police Approval/Permit
RiNc.-.
No:
12. Approval
1 oN
Date:
•
kik
13. Expiration
1 tht_15—
Date:
c\wpS1\forms\hudt;hg.prvise d 10
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
1. Name:
Darrell Hyndman
5. Property Location Description:
Northeast intersection of 35E and Diffley Road
2. Street Address:
4319 Pleasant Avenue S
3. City/State/Zip Code:
Minneapolis, MN
55409
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow bunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special hunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even U the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant,
A copy of this Hermit and appropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
Ron Cornwell
5. Property Location Description:
Northeast intersection of 35E and Diffley Road
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
Deer
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
Fall 1994 Season
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
II. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
Darrell Hyndman
9. Address:
4319 Pleasant Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55409
10. Vehicle
License #
967 DLH
11. Police Approval
Permit No:
12. Approval
Date:
13. Expiration Date:
c\wp51\forms\hing.pevised 1
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
L Name:
Jon Cornwell
2. Street Address:
5400 Mt. Normandale Dr
3. City/State/Zip Code:
Bloomington, MN 55437
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City
Coundl, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special bunting permits will be considered for deer (bow bunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned 'agricultural' The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates esuibiisbed by ine Minnesoib Dc ri n i or i a u. ari�„ii. acs (ni at)., .. az--; Cou;-.41
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special bunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even U the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this annlication may bunt onlv when accompanied bv the applicant,
4 copy of this _permit and annrovriate ientification muss be carried at all limes for verification bv the Eagan_ Police
Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
Ron Cornwell
c 1 orms
S. Property Location Description:
Northeast intersection of 35E and Diffley Road
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
Deer
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
Fall 1994 Season
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
PP 8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
Jon Cornwell
9. Address:
5400 Mt. Normandale Dr
Bloomington, MN 55437
10. Vehicle
lOeIIse #
870 CSL
11. Police Approval Permit No:
-
12. Approval Date:
to1\Ll_�
13. Expiration Date:
)1)1)2.--
DI)zs
c\wp51\forms\6 ting{prn>E Revised 1
10-12-94 12:61PM FROM JARDINE LOGAN
10-11-94 04:59PM FROM C1TY OF EAGAN TO 922350?0 P001/001
TO 9/6814612
P002/003
SPECIAL AUmmG PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
L Num
"TO AM -Fri 0,0 YiWT4
2. Street Adana 3. C ty/State/Zip Code:
292 EWU/G 4VE S•1 Ml•NNC4#c1,is, /4A/, S 1It
IMPORTANT 1NFOMATION EQ$ THE APPLCANI'
NO RIFLE DEER TIMING WILL BE PERMITTED snaps dntlas those special bunting MIMS authorised by the Qty
Cesusdl, and oostrolled and concluded by tle Depart:sant of Natural Resinous forMldiifc soanesaaset pvrpeace. Applies dons
for spacial boating permits will be soael a.red for dear (bow koalas only), decks, argue sad pheasant any as pasta of
property of Ow acres or sore gad toxed'egrlculturol, The ma:dmum data of the beacon for each wildlife hatted shall
eelaeide with tle bootleg dates ettablieh.d by the Minnesota Depsrtsaat or Natural Resourode (DNR). Thu Bays City Comma
may, at Its dlaaetloe, redact the season for nett requested permit entail the DN& season. The rape testy Condi mel deny
say epplleat1oo for spedall hunting If the permit does mot serve the purposes oNtiditfe laaeasaneat, even if the applicant tis
eamplied with all d 16e requirements. Alm hnntrr IkIM ie Ale oonitratlne mewl:n t nntvwhen acremnnntect he the aenite*Mt<
A eo of thiejgragt aid appropriate ldentllisalinn-g1ut 1 e e st i1► than for ver►tintion in The EPoiiee
4. properly Owner's Naso (netttea permission tits the property owner gust *coo:spew ilia pursuit application):
-3-0 SE P1+ K E NA/5A-LY
S
-i c 4 Ra,i
.Arts 4S{#
lt✓nfsa
-fa f %v n -- f dr r� er
r oA) t»."K3 si" ! 101-14A of s' Ale
least. - 'rorn auvi, KeAr:rtII1 V
isor ivekfts on "off(/+y pr[✓ie✓,ty'grip cs
3. 'MOM Wolk' Deseriptlem ; tile's
c tdoe a vee,. i*,) Nero
�'mrX , � frt1c,'mnitY 38
37;s'.4i V0, co) far{y t')tk.nioh"
6. Type or Gatoe to be Beated:
ark_ ftEZY
4. Sped& Hantlej Daus G
Pitt ie 4- -) C1OJt. er
189'1 Ask?. -y Otte. le4IQ"
IDENTIFICATION OF
AIL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
1. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
7d nw41, '(aev+4
--o seek rt pin
i M i our" KceFfe r
-
Awarwitatimweirsamowowswarmsmossosi
I. Address:
29 27 CI0. Ave_ So,
Al, nevupJ, si /m/✓ say 1
tt417 ftivM ?fdis Or.
Qu✓niv. ret, Auf 51337
317iis i C, �� t .frui ss�68
-
11 %Wilde
Loose
zit • 12L
QMG-6sZ
317 —887
-
u Approval
-
Date:
13. Expieation
Data:
11. teaks Apprsreel/Peraelt Nei
R. -94X
PROM CITT OF PAGAN
FROM JARDINE LOGAN
612 681 4612
612 2235070
10-11-84 05:02PM P001 #37
10-12-94 12:49PM P002 #08
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
1. Name:
�I,te5fc
/c?a A, J?la,7 ere=4,1. g
/- ��a ,/�/71/-,g--Ar -7 /6.,- 3
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
P .Q e r - Oat° i)41-6(71-
2. Street Address:
C?/ �j A'i� 414/lee,
fai,e
3. City/State/Zip
ig0. j ,
i/ 5-37
2 -
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR TIJE APPLICANT
NO RIFLE DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City
Council, and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications
for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of
property of five acres or more and zoned "agricultural.* The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall
coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council
may, at its discretion, reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny
any application for special hunting If the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even If the applicant has
complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant,
A copy of this permit and appropriate Identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police
Department.
4. Pro rty Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application):
(,""r ,, r �`C./"C_,?�l„, Com'//- ,-G� ,),,�� �� - 1/�� lac G�'it%—
5. perty Location Description:
/c?a A, J?la,7 ere=4,1. g
/- ��a ,/�/71/-,g--Ar -7 /6.,- 3
6. Type of Game to be Hunted:
P .Q e r - Oat° i)41-6(71-
7. Specific Hunting Dates:
- .� /z --3I -�
y l7_ �y
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS
IN HUNTING PARTY
8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant):
9. Address:
4 6
10. Vehicle
License #
..... jawc, 0
./// - - , . - . 4 1 - 4 - 4 0 i - - e
11. Police Approval/Permit No:
12. Approval
Date:
13. Expiration
Date:
wpS1\forms \hunting.prm Revised 10/94