The URL can be used to link to this page

03/16/2010 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING March 16, 2010 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE f I II. ADOPT AGENDA III. RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS IV. CONSENT AGENDA (Consent items are acted on with one motion unless a request is made for an item to be pulled for discussion) �•a A. APPROVE MINUTES q B. PERSONNEL ITEMS �%a C. APPROVE Check Registers D. APPROVE Addendum to Utility Audit Agreement with Troy & Banks (cf E. APPROVE Final 2009 General Fund and Community Center Budget Adjustments SIP F. APPROVE Tree Maintenance Contractor Licenses for Outdoor Specialties and Natural Elements Lawn & Landscape, Inc. )'I G. APPROVE Temporary On -Sale Liquor License and waive license fee for the Eagan Foundation for a • wine tasting event on April 22, 2010 f -4 H. APPROVE off -sale liquor license for ACV LLC, dba Black Diamond Liquor, 525 Diffley Road, Suite 2050 �o�al I. ACCEPT a donation from Genisys Credit Union for a 2010 event partnership for several Parks and Recreation community events Pd� J. AUTHORIZE Application of a Grant from the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council for a Collaborative Grant with Eagan Parks and Recreation, Eagan Art Festival and local business partners K. ACCEPT a proposal to place community gardens in Woodhaven Park and direct staff to pursue an agreement that would allow this activity to occur on city property L. APPROVE Program Agreement for Urban Land Institute / Regional Council of Mayors Opportunity City Program APPROVE Contract for Active Living Dakota County Grant regarding bike /pedestrian connections P 3� N. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draft Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 7 and 10 of the City Code regarding obstructions in streets, and obstructions on public property �� O. AWARD Contract 09 -20, Fire Safety Center Site & Station Trail (Site Grading, Utilities and Street Improvements) P.31 P. AWARD Fire Safety Center Contracts (Fire Safety Building & Fire Station No. 2 — Building ��p Construction) 7. �p Q. APPROVE Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County (Yankee Doodle Road & Promenade 1G Avenue — Street Improvements) %3 7 R. RECEIVE Petition and schedule a Public Hearing to Vacate Public Right -of -Way (Wescott P. Woodlands) P 4,,S. APPROVE a Resolution Amending the Public Works 2010 -2014 Capital Improvement Program (Duckwood Drive Overpass — Street Improvements) �. o T. APPROVE Consulting Contracts for City Services on private property for lawn mowing, refuse removal, securing vacant buildings, and general maintenance U. APPROVE cancellation of Council work session on April 13 and schedule council work session for April 26 and 27 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUBLIC UTILITIES USER RATE CHANGES: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street Lighting, and Storm p Drainage /water quality. I. B. PROJECT 1015, Blackhawk Road, Street Improvements. VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS P A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND PRELIM INARYSUBDIVISION — US Home Corporation — A Planned Development Amendment to reduce the unit count and change the mix of housing types and a Preliminary Subdivision (Stonehaven) to create 264 lots and 7 outlots for 363 � dwelling units upon approximately 115 acres. IRAJ � B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — CITY OF EAGAN — A Guide Plan Amendment that would change the land use designation from SA (Special Area), to QP (Quasi Public), Rezoning from PD to Public Facility and a Planned Development Amendment to remove the approximately five acre site from the Planned Development. C. DIRECT IMPLEMENTATION OF A POLICY to Waive City Right of Way Fees for Applicants Deploying Fiber Optic Cables Directly to More Than 100 Eagan Homes or Businesses VIII. LEGISLATIVE / INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE IX. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY P, A. Call to Order B. Adopt Agenda C. Consent Agenda 1. Approve EDA Minutes D. Old Business _fa``��''� E. New Business T2 1. Cedar Grove Redevelopment District — Approve Grant Agreement with Dakota County CDA for 2010 Redevelopment Incentive Grant Program F. Other Business G. Adjournment X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA A. City Attorney B. City Council Comments C. City Administrator D. Director of Public Works E. Director of Community Development XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) XII. CLOSED SESSION XIII. ADJOURNMENT 401� City of Evan Wo TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 12, 2010 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MARCH 16, 2010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA After approval is given to the March 16, 2010 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the March 2, 2010 Regular City Council meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes 1�. March 2, 2010 Regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages J through N MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota March 2, 2010 A Listening Session was held at 6:00 p.m. prior to the regular City Council meeting. Present were Acting Mayor Fields, Councilmembers Bakken, Hansen, and Tilley. Mayor Maguire was absent. There were no visitors who wished to be heard. A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Acting Mayor Fields, Councilmembers Bakken, Hansen, and Tilley. Mayor Maguire was absent. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, City Planner Mike Ridley, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, City Attorney Mike Dougherty and Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk Mira Pepper. AGENDA Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Hansen seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A moment of silence was observed for Lt. Roy Prudencio of the Fire Department who recently passed away. Acting Mayor Fields noted that the Founders' Day Luncheon and State of the City Address will be held Friday, March 5. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Hansen seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 A. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the February 16, 2010 regular City Council meeting and the February 9, 2010 Special City Council Minutes as presented. B. Personnel Items. 1. The resignation of Dan Olsen, Park Maintenance, was recognized. C. It was recommended to ratify the check registers dated February 11, 2010 and February 18, 2010 as presented. D. It was recommended to approve the temporary 3.2 percent malt liquor (beer) license for the Eagan Lions Club for the Fourth of July celebration (July 2 -4, 2010) and waive the $25 license fee. E. It was recommended to accept a donation of $4,000 from City and County Credit Union for the 2010 Eagan Market Fest entertainment series and 50 percent of the cost for Market Fest bags for the grand opening promotion ($250 value). F. It was recommended to accept a partnership contribution of $1,500, limited number of items to be given away for Health & Wellness Night and volunteer support from Rasmussen College as a partner for the 2010 Eagan Market Fest event. G. It was recommended to acknowledge approval of Redevelopment Incentive Grant (RIG) from Dakota County Community Development Authority and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for Contract 10 -06 (Gold Trail / Woodhaven Park — Trail Improvements). H. It was recommended to approve the plans and specifications for Contract 10 -08 (Citywide Sanitary Sewer Lining) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 25, 2010 at the Utility Building, located at 3419 Coachman Point, Eagan, MN 55122. I. It was recommended to direct staff to prepare a submittal in response to the Google Fiber for Communities Initiative and to explore cooperative efforts in this regard if feasible. City Council Minutes March 2, 2010 Page 2 J. It was recommended to accept the donation of $300 from Dakota Electric to support the Home and Leisure Show. K. It was recommended to approve Tree Maintenance Contractor License for Precision Landscape & Tree, Inc. dba Precision Tree, 50 South Owasso Blvd. E., Little Canada, MN 55117. L. It was recommended to approve the final payment for Contract 08 -01 (Holland Lake Lift Station — Storm Sewer Improvements) in the amount of $33,876.97 to Geislinger and Sons, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. M. It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate public right -of -way formerly known as Old Sibley Highway and Old Sibley Memorial Highway and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 6, 2010. PUBLIC HEARINGS HUNTER LANE (GREENSBORO 2 "D ADDITION) RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the vacation of Hunter Lane within the Greensboro 2nd Addition. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. Acting Mayor Fields opened the public hearing. Two residents of Greensboro Drive expressed their support for the proposed vacation of Hunter Lane. There being no further public comment, Acting Mayor Fields turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Hansen moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of public right -of -way known as Hunter Lane within Greensboro 2nd Addition, reserving the trail, drainage and utility easement, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 PROJECT 1016R, AMES CROSSING ROAD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Ames Crossing Road street and utility improvements. Public Works Director Colbert introduced Kevin Kawlewski of WSB who provided an overview of the Feasibility Report for Project 1012. Acting Mayor Fields opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, she turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 1016R (Ames Crossing Road — Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications, and the acquisition of easements through quick -take eminent domain process, if necessary. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 PROJECT 1012, DUCKWOOD DRIVE / STATION TRAIL STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding street and utility improvements for Duckwood Drive and Station Trail. Public Works Director Colbert introduced Mark Kasma of Bolton & Menk who presented a report on the proposed project. Acting Mayor Fields opened the public hearing. Two residents asked questions which were addressed by staff. There being no further public comment, Acting Mayor Fields turned discussion back to the Council. 4 City Council Minutes March 2, 2010 Page 3 c., Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Hansen seconded a motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 1012 (Duckwood Drive and Station Trail — Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 There were no old business items. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — FACTORY MOTOR PARTS City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of 38 semi trucks /trailers and up to 60 fleet vehicles on property located at 2782 Eagandale Boulevard. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. David Sandvik, Factory Motor Parts, was present to answer questions. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of 38 semi trucks /trailers and up to 60 fleet vehicles on property located at 2782 Eagandale Boulevard, legally described as Lot 1, Block 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council, and proof of recording submitted to the City. 2. The outdoor storage shall be located in designated storage areas as indicted on the Site Plan submitted January 27, 2010. 3. The proposed plantings to provide screening of the outdoor storage from Eagan Industrial Road, as depicted on the Landscape Screening Plan submitted January 27, 2010, shall be implemented no later than October 31, 2010. INTERIM USE PERMIT — MAX STEININGER INC. City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for an Interim Use Permit to allow a concrete recycling processing and stockpiling facility to be located at 3089 Neil Armstrong Boulevard. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Applicant Greg Steininger was present to answer questions. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Hansen seconded a motion to approve an Interim Use Permit to allow a concrete recycling processing and stockpiling facility located at 3089 Neil Armstrong Boulevard, Lot 2, Block 1, Amoco 2nd Addition, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 The Interim Use Permit (IUP) shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council, and proof of recording submitted to the City. The permit shall terminate upon the earlier of either cease of use or three years from the date of City Council approval. The applicant shall immediately remove all outdoor storage or obtain an Interim Use Permit by June 1, 2010. The IUP shall be subject to an annual administrative review. The purpose of such review shall be to determine that the conditions of the permit are within compliance. The IUP may be revoked for failure to comply with any condition of the permit following notice of the noncompliance and a hearing by the City Council with all interested parties being given an opportunity to be heard. 57 City Council Minutes March 2, 2010 Page 4 ("111__ 5. The landscape berm shall be constructed per the Site /Grading Plan dated February 1, 2010. 6. Site operations shall occur as identified on the Site /Grading Plan dated February 1, 2010. 7. Dust control procedures shall be utilized. 8. The hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. 9. The operation shall be in compliance with all applicable State and local regulations. 10. In the event that the permit is terminated or not renewed, all materials and equipment shall be removed from the site within 90 days of termination. 11. No mining shall be allowed on the property. 12. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the City prior to the construction of the proposed storage /work areas. Detailed plans for this grading work shall be prepared and signed by a registered professional engineer. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with City engineering standards. The development is also subject to the City's codified land disturbance and erosion control regulations. 14. If recycled asphalt aggregate is used for the storage /work areas, the site will be subject to periodic review by City staff for adequacy of the material to control dust and drainage. The first review will occur two years following approval of this permit. If the material is determined to be inadequate, the City will require that it be replaced with bituminous asphalt. 15. All parking and storage areas shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration, erosion and sediment from being carried off site. 16. Prior to issuance of a Land Disturbance and Erosion Control Permit, the applicant shall have all wetlands fully or partially located on the site delineated by a Certified Wetland Delineator utilizing approved methods as stated in Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall have all existing wetlands assessed utilizing the Minnesota Routine Assessment. Any and all delineations shall be conducted during the growing season and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. If determined necessary by the wetland delineation, the applicant shall provide a wetland buffer /conservation easement to the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 18. Any proposals to impact any of the wetlands on the site by draining, filling, or excavating shall comply with Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall be in accordance with City Codes regarding Wetland Sequencing and Replacement Requirements and Wetland Submittal Requirements. 19. Approval shall be subject to compliance with City Code requirements relating to Wetland Buffers and Wetland Setbacks. INTERIM USE PERMIT — GREG PRUESSE City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for an Interim Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of up to six commercial vehicles upon the property at 4145 Old Sibley Memorial Highway. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. A representative for applicant Greg Pruesse was present to answer questions. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve an Interim Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of up to six (6) commercial vehicles upon the property at 4145 Old Sibley Memorial Highway, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Preusse 2 d Addition subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 1. This Interim Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council, and proof of recording submitted to the City. 2. The outdoor storage shall be located in designated storage areas. 3. The permit shall terminate upon March 2, 2015. 4. The Interim Use Permit shall be subject to an annual administrative review. The purpose of such review shall be to determine that the conditions of the permit are within compliance. The Interim Use Permit may be revoked for failure to comply with any condition of the permit following notice 20 City Council Minutes March 2, 2010 Page 5 of the noncompliance and a hearing by the City Council with all interested parties being given an opportunity to be heard. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS — THINK MUTUAL BANK City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for Conditional Use Permits to allow a drive through and a pylon sign for the proposed bank to be located at 4245 Johnny Cake Ridge Road. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Representatives of Think Mutual Bank were present to answer questions. A brief discussion was held. Councilmember Hansen moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive through for the proposed bank on property located at 4245 Johnny Cake Ridge Road legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Diffley Plaza, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council, and proof of recording submitted to the City. 2. The rooftop mechanical equipment shall meet screening requirements per City Code. 3. The trash enclosure shall comply with City Code requirements. 4. The applicant shall provide an elevation of the trash enclosure with the Building Permit submission. 5. A revised Photometric Plan shall be submitted to match the fixture schedule with the Photometric Plan. 6. Landscaping shall be provided, installed and maintained in accordance with the Landscape Plan dated October 21, 2009. Councilmember Hansen moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign for the proposed bank on property located at 4245 Johnny Cake Ridge Road legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Diffley Plaza, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council, and proof of recording submitted to the City. 2. All site signage shall comply with City Code requirements. 3. Sign permits shall be obtained from the City prior to installation of the pylon sign and building signs. 4. The pylon sign shall be located as shown on the Site Plan received February 3, 2010. 5. The sign shall be designed as depicted on the Sign exhibit received February 3, 2010. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE (LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK) DAKOTA COUNTY PARKS City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit to create a Comprehensive Sign Agreement for Lebanon Hills Regional Park to include four pylon signs for properties located at 1350 Carriage Hills Drive, 1100 Cliff Road and 860 Cliff Road; and a Variance to the height of the sign face for two signs for properties located at 1350 Carriage Hills Drive and 1100 Cliff Road. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Bruce Blair, Dakota County Parks, described the proposed signage. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to create a Comprehensive Sign Agreement for Lebanon Hills Regional Park to include four pylon signs for properties located at 1350 Carriage Hills Drive, 1100 Cliff Road and 860 Cliff Road, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 City Council Minutes March 2, 2010 Page 6 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of the date of approval and proof of its recording be provided to the City. 2. The Applicant shall enter into a Pylon Sign Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. The signs shall be located as per the overall Sign Plan received February 3, 2010. 4. A sign permit for each sign shall be obtained prior to installation. 5. All signage shall meet sign setback requirements. 6. The signs shall comply with all other applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions. 7. The proposed entrance pylon shall not exceed 10'4" in height. 8. The proposed kiosk pylons shall not exceed 9'1" in height. 9. Landscaping shall be restored to the current condition by August 1, 2010. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Hansen seconded a motion to approve a Variance to the height of the sign face for two signs for properties located at 1350 Carriage Hills Drive and 1100 Cliff Road, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 0 1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the Council. Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance. 2. The Applicant shall enter into a Pylon Sign Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. The signs shall be located as per the overall Sign Plan received February 3, 2010. 4. A sign permit for each sign shall be obtained prior to installation. 5. All signage shall meet sign setback requirements. 6. The signs shall comply with all other applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions. 7. The overall sign face shall not exceed 5" 4" in height. 8. Landscaping shall be restored to the current condition by August 1, 2010. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA There were no items that required action. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors who wished to be heard. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. Aye:4 Nay:0 Date N Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk U Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS There are no personnel items at this time. Agenda Infonnation Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting C. RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To ratify the check registers dated February 25, 2010 and March 4, 2010 as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Check registers dated February 25, 2010 and March 4, 2010 are enclosed without page number. /D Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting D. Approve Addendum to Utility Audit Agreement with Troy & Banks ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve an addendum to the utility audit agreement the City has executed with Troy & Banks. FACTS: • At its June 2, 2009 regular meeting, the Council approved retaining the utility audit/consulting firm of Troy & Banks to review the City's various utility accounts (electric, gas, telephone, wireless) for billing errors resulting in overcharges to the City. • Under the original agreement, Troy & Banks is to receive 40% of all refunds of past billings obtained from the utilities. To date, less than $300 in refunds has been received; however, the audits of street light electricity bills and telephone /wireless accounts have not been completed. • In its review of the primary gas /electric bills, Troy & Banks did not find errors but has indicated that five accounts could be placed under a more favorable rate structure. No changes in usage would be required under the alternative rate structure. Since the existing billing does not represent an error on the utility's part, Troy & Banks would not receive any fiends for their efforts in identifying these accounts under our agreement with them. • Troy & Banks has proposed an addendum to our agreement whereby they would receive 35% of future savings for a period of 24 months for the five accounts identified. • With this addendum, as with the original agreement, the City does not pay anything out-of- pocket for the audit. Only after savings have been verified and realized will a portion of the savings be turned over to Troy & Banks. ATTACHMENTS: The existing agreement is attached on page The proposed addendum is attached on page AGREEMENT UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNT AUDIT This Agreement is entered into as of June 2, 2009 between Troy & Banks, Inc. (713") and The City of Eagan, Minnesota with an address at 3830 Pilot Knob Rd, Eagan, MN 55122 (the "Client "). In consideration of the mutual agreements hereafter set forth, TB and Client agree as follows: The Client engages TB to conduct an audit or survey of Client's gas, electric, telecommunications and water /sewer utility ( "Utility ") service accounts for the purpose of securing refunds and credits resulting from discovery of charges or costs in excess of those permitted or allowed by applicable contracts, tariffs, statutes, rules and regulations and /or from overcharges or billing errors. TB agrees to conduct such audit. Overcharges — For any refunds, credits or rebates obtained by TB for prior overcharges, billing errors or costs in excess of those permitted by applicable contracts, tariffs, statutes, rules or regulations, TB shall be paid 40% of all monies refunded or credited to the Client. 3. TB has made and makes no guarantee or assurance of any credit or refund amount. 4. If Client does not receive refunds or credits there will be no fee for TB services. 5. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement between the parties. City of Eagan, Minnesota By. AV" V bIA44�_ Name: Mike Maquire Title: Mayor By: Name: Maria Petersen Title: City Clerk Telephone: _ 651 - 675 -5000 Telefax: 651 - 675 -5012 I __k Troy & Banks, Inc. 0 ,/Thomas T. Ranallo, President Corporate Offices: BUFFALO - NEW YORK 2216 Kensington Avenue Kensington at Saratoga Buffalo, NY 14226 (800) 499 -8599 (716) 839 -4402 Telefax (716) 839 -4452 Branch Offices: CALIFORNIA 398 E. Carob Ave. Fresno, CA 93654 CONNECTICUT P.O. Box 237 Manchester, CT 06045 FLORIDA 11048 Main Sail Dr. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33026 GEORGIA P.O. Box 923474 Norcross, GA 30010 NEW YORK 2121 Hillside Ave. #93 Long Island, NY 11040 (516) 746 -0992 62 Mallock Rd. Rochester, NY 14428 4764 Summerhurst Dr. Liverpool, NY 13088 NORTH CAROLINA 2411 Black Wolf Run Ln. Raleigh, NC 27604 TENNESSEE 904 Lake Haven Rd. Knoxville, TN 37922 e -mail: save @troybanks.com internet address: www.troybanks.com (3--z,--� TROY & BANKS Utility and Telecommunication Consultants Addendum to Troy & Banks / City of Eagan, MN Agreement dated June 2, 2009 This Addendum to Troy & Banks / City of Eagan, MN Agreement dated June 2, 2009 is entered into as of between Troy & Banks, Inc. ( "TB ") and 'r--va v, kq,v with an address at (the "Client'). In consideration of the mutual agreements hereafter set forth, TB and Client agree as follows: 1. Future Cost Reductions - For any reductions in future costs for electric and gas services resulting from TB analysis, the fee is 35% of the amount saved each month for 24 months. TB will document actual monthly savings obtained by analysis of tariff cost applications. TB will continue to monitor Client accounts to ensure that rates are the most advantageous for Client. 2. This addendum will not apply to telecommunications, water, or street lighting. [Client Name]�"-�l By: 7 Name:�� Title: Telephone: C1/ Telefax: 6 M Troy & Banks, Inc. Thomas T. Ranallo, President Agenda Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA: E. Approved Final 2009 General Fund and Community Center budget adjustments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve 2009 budget adjustments related to the Police, Fire, and Streets departments within the General Fund, as well as an adjustment to the Eagan Community Center Enterprise fund. FACTS: • Staff customarily presents budget adjustments for formal Council approval for the preceding year shortly after the budget year has been completed and preliminary year -end account balances are known. • The adjustments are retrospective and are formalized for reporting purposes only. They do not represent proposed spending changes. • Each increase in expenditure is matched by an equal increase to a revenue (or equivalent) and the budget remains balanced. ATTACHMENTS: • A detailed list of the proposed budget line -item adjustments is attached on page J'5_ 1� 2009 Budget Adjustments Line Items Debit Credit Description 1142.6226 35,400 JAG /Byrne Federal Stimulus Grant for equipment and 1142.4135 35,400 technology. Administered by Dakota County 1221.6129 30,000 1143.6143 3600.6810 30,000 Volunteer Firefighter pay; switching from yearly to monthly Federal Highway Enforcement of Aggressive Traffic (HEAT) and 1143.4135 4,600 Speed Grant - Increased traffic enforcement 1108.6457 13,500 1111.6226 1108.4822 13,500 Flint Hills revenue (EPN) - Reverse 911 Eagan Crime Prevention Association donation for surveilance 1111.4663 3,600 camera 1117.6112 10,900 1117.4135 10,900 Safe & Sober Grant - Increased DWI enforcement 6812.6630 9,500 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Donation - ECC 6812.4135 9,500 Senior center carpet replacement 2240.6535 2,300 2242.6535 2,400 2240.4140 4,700 State Grant - Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) 1143.6112 3,900 1143.6143 500 1143.6155 200 Federal Highway Enforcement of Aggressive Traffic (HEAT) and 1143.4135 4,600 Speed Grant - Increased traffic enforcement 1111.6226 3,000 1105.6355 600 Eagan Crime Prevention Association donation for surveilance 1111.4663 3,600 camera 1131.6112 2,600 1131.6143 200 1131.4135 2,800 Operation Nightcap Grant - Increased DWI enforcement 1104.6226 2,000 1104.4663 2,000 Wal -Mart donation for tasers 1127.6112 1,500 1127.6143 200 1127.6155 100 1127.4135 1,800 Underage Alcohol Compliance Grant 1108.6226 1,500 1108.4663 1,000 1101.4663 500 SuperValu donation for dispatch remodel 1101.6210 1,100 1101.4663 1,100 University of Delaware - Honorarium National Diversion Survey 1105.6212 600 1105.4663 600 Target Donation - surveillance equipment 1104.6228 400 1104.4691 400 Cash for ammo purchases Agenda Memo City Council Meeting March 16, 2010 CONSENT AGENDA: F. Tree Maintenance Contractor Licenses for Outdoor Specialties and Natural Elements Lawn & Landscape, Inc. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Tree Maintenance Contractor Licenses for Outdoor Specialties, 560 Lone Oak Road; and Natural Elements Lawn and Landscape, Inc. 8459 173rd St. W., Lakeville FACTS: Outdoor Specialties and Natural Elements Lawn and Landscape have applied for Tree Maintenance Contractor licenses for 2010 and all requirements of the application have been met and the fees have been paid. Staff recommends approval of both applications. ATTACHMENTS: None. The applications are available for review in the Administration Department. /(D Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010, Eagan City Council Meeting G. APPROVE TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND WAIVE LICENSE FEE FOR THE EAGAN FOUNDATION FOR A WINE TASTING EVENT ON APRIL 22, 2010 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the temporary on -sale liquor license and waive the license fee for the Eagan Foundation for a wine tasting event on April 22, 2010. FACTS: y The Eagan Foundation has requested a temporary on -sale liquor license be issued to them for a wine tasting event planned for April 22, 2010 at the Eagan Community Center. The 9 °i annual charitable event is being held to raise funds for the various projects of the Eagan Foundation. r The Eagan Foundation has requested that the $150.00 license fee be waived. The application form has been submitted and deemed in order by staff. Following Council approval, the application will be forwarded to the Department of Public Safety /Liquor Control Division for their approval. ATTACHMENTS (2): ➢ Letter and temporary license procedures enclosed on pages 117 1 42 through Z Al BRINGING NEIGHBORS TOGETHER February 21, 2010 Mayor Mike Maguire Thomas Hedges, City Administrator Eagan City Council Members City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Eagan Foundation 9th Annual Wine Tasting and Silent Auction Dear Mayor Maguire, Eagan City Council Members, and Mr. Hedges and City Staff: The Eagan Foundation again wants to thank the City of Eagan for its ongoing partnership with the Foundation in our efforts to make Eagan the best and most involved community in Minnesota. We are now planning our 9th annual Wine Tasting and Silent Auction to be held on Thursday, April 22, 2010 at the beautiful Eagan Community Center. This event is our primary fundraiser for the year and we expect in excess of 350 attendees at what has come to be a community signature event. We ask today that the Council waive, as it most graciously did in all previous years, the fee for the Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for that event. We have enclosed our application for the license, along with supporting paperwork. We will be forwarding more information to Council and staff about the Wine Event as the day draws near, but for now, please save the date — April 22, 2010 Please contact us at 651- 288 -09201 if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Janet Alland Eagan Foundation Wine Committee Chair Ruthe Batulis Program Administrator /6) Janelle Waldock Eagan Foundation, Chair ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE Of The Eagan Foundation, Inc. Site Plan. Please see attached. The layout is in general form and is not to scale. The exact placement and number of the tables may vary depending upon the number of vineyards represented, the number of silent auction items, and in order to allow for the efficient flow of people around the wine tastings tables, buffet and silent auction items. Narrative of Protective Measures and Methods. The area in which the wine tasting will occur will be in the Oaks Banquet Facility. Perrier Wines (1960 Cliff Lake Road, Eagan, MN 55122) is donating all of the wine for sampling and will have winery representatives at each table pouring the wines. The various wine representatives will be located only in the Oaks Banquet Room, and they will be providing small samples of wine to attendees. Green Mill is catering food for the event. The Oaks Banquet Room is self- contained; therefore no additional partitions are planned. All tickets sold for the event will be pre -sold; no walk -in purchases of tickets will be available, The tickets are only being sold by the Foundation Board members, Event Committee members and former Board members to known friends and associates, all of whom are adults over the age of 21 or are being provided to event sponsors. Tickets will also be available for the Eagan general public to adults over the age of 21 at locations where Board members work and control the purchase. There will be a sign -in table at the entrance to the Oaks Banquet Room where each attendee will check -in. The persons manning the check -in table will verify tickets and the age of any unknown ticket holders. Upon check -in, each attendee will proceed to the Oaks Banquet Room and receive a small distinctive wine glass (the Eagan Foundation logo will be etched into the glass) for sampling the wines. The wine representatives will not serve a sample of wine to any person who does not have one of the small distinctive wine glasses. The crowd will be controlled by the limited number of tickets sold and the fact that no walk -in sales will be available. Because only a limited number of tickets are being sold, parking and crowd overflow is not anticipated. Thus, no additional security force is expected to be used, Because of the distinctiveness of the small wine glasses, no wrist bands are expected to be used. Signs pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sections 340A.502 and .503, subdivision 2 will be posted at each entrance to the Oaks Banquet Room. The Eagan Foundation has not had any security issues or concerns arise in the previous five wine tasting fundraising events, and it does not anticipate any at this year's event. The Board members of the Foundation will monitor the flow of traffic of attendees around the silent auction tables, as well as the entire event for any situation that becomes a safety or security concern. The on -site manager position will actually be handled by several people. Dave Perrier is responsible for the wine representatives at each table, and each wine representative will be responsible for their respective table, and the Board members and Event Committee members will be responsible for all other aspects of the event. to Tt" 19 0 Ibb lag Pia Is QUO cpq TR K a (D Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010, Eagan City Council Meeting H. APPROVE OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ACV LLC, DBA BLACK DIAMOND LIQUOR, 525 DIFFLEY ROAD, SUITE 2050 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: None. FACTS: On Wednesday, March 10, the applicant withdrew the application for an off -sale liquor license due to an issue with the lease that he was attempting to execute with the landlord of 525 Diffley Road. The applicant was planning to purchase Black Diamond Liquor from current owner Brenda Szoka. a] Agenda Memo March 16, 2010 City Council Meeting I. ACCEPT a donation from Genisys Credit Union for a 2010 event partnership for several Parks and Recreation community events and approve the appropriate budizet adjustments to reflect the donation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Accept a donation from Genisys Credit Union in the amount of $5,750 for a 2010 event partnership for several Parks and Recreation community events and approve the appropriate budget adjustment to reflect the donation. FACTS: Genisys Credit Union approached the City of Eagan for opportunities to donate money or supplies that would help enhance several community events during 2010. • Genisys Credit Union identified the following community events for which they had an interest in partnering with Eagan Parks and Recreation: o Halloween Hodgepodge, an annual event very popular in the community. Genisys will donate 1,300 trick or treat bags to be distributed to participants along with a $2,500 cash contribution to the event. ■ Five hundred dollars in donation/sponsorship dollars were budgeted for 2010 to allow this community program to be hosted by interested local partners. The budget should be adjusted accordingly to reflect the change. o Eagan Fun Run, an annual race open to the public. Genisys will donate $750 as an event partner. ■ Five hundred dollars in donation/sponsorship dollars were budgeted for 2010 to allow this community program to be hosted by interested local partners. The budget should be adjusted accordingly to reflect the change. o Holz Farm Holiday event, a December event attended by hundreds of people each winter. Genisys will donate $500 towards entertainment for the event. ■ Donation /scholarship dollars were not budged for 2010 for this community program thus the budget should be adjusted accordingly to reflect the change. o Community puppet wagon, a traveling show that provides entertainment at 7 different park sites from June 14 through August 20, 2010. Genisys will donate $2,000 to this traveling entertainment series. ■ Donation/scholarship dollars were not budged for 2010 for this community program thus the budget should be adjusted accordingly to reflect the change. ISSUES: • None • Agenda Memo March 16, 2010 City Council Meeting J. AUTHORIZE the application of a grant from the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council for a collaborative grant with Eagan Parks & Recreation, Eagan Art Festival and local business partners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the submission of a grant from the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council for a collaborative grant with Eagan Parks and Recreation, Eagan Art Festival and local business partners which is due Monday, April 5, 2010. FACTS: • Metropolitan Regional Arts Council is offering Creative Intersections grants for up to $10,000 for "projects to support innovative partnerships that integrate arts and culture into plans for community development and enrichment." The grant requires the collaboration of a private non - profit organization, public /government, and businesses. The grant would be used to develop a strategy for long range art planning in our community, a series of community dialogues and implementation of selected projects. The planning and dialogues for this purpose would focus on developing cohesive art plan for existing city facilities as well as discussion of creative programming. The goal of the grant is to connect with the community in a unique way to enhance the vitality and quality of life in Eagan through the arts. • Implementation of the grant will span a 2 year time frame beginning in the summer of 2010. Grants are awarded with a dollar to dollar match, with 50% in cash. Cash match can include general operating expenses, earned income and other grants. • The grant submission deadline is April 5. 2010. ISSUES: • None a3 Agenda Memo March 16, 2010 City Council Meeting K. ACCEPT a proposal to place community gardens inWoodhaven Park and direct staff to pursue an agreement that would allow this activity to occur on city property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Accept a proposal from the Eagan Resource Center to create a community garden in Woodhaven Park and authorize staff and the City Attorney to develop a Use Agreement for the park property and designate the Director of Parks and Recreation to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. FACTS: • The Eagan Resource Center (ERC) provides assistance to the unemployed and underprivileged in the community. • The ERC is proposing to develop a garden on a portion of Woodhaven Park that would be used by their clients to raise fresh produce for themselves. The short shelf -life of produce makes it a difficult item to obtain and distribute through donations. • The ERC has received a grant to cover the costs associated with transitioning the site into a useable garden, this include plowing, tilling and soil preparation • There will be no cost to the City. • The adjacent Mount Calvary Church has indicated their support for the project and a willingness to allow gardeners to park in an adjacent lot. • The parcel of park property is approximately 150' x 100' in size and is currently unused for park or recreational purposes. It consists primarily of un -mowed vegetation and is subject to only minimal maintenance. There would be no impact on any scheduled park use. • ERC will assume maintenance responsibility for the site including the removal of trash and debris, and ensure adherence with the gardening rules and guidelines as agreed upon through the Use Agreement. • The site would be returned to grass at such time as the garden program ends. ATTACHMENTS Site plan with aerial, ERC letter fg. Q5 y, a,(Q a � �` C3 �...a: t!3 as _� �� a �� iJ �R� >: vZ� EAGAN+ March 3, 2010 Request for Use of City Land for Community Gardens The Eagan Resource Center requests the use of City of Eagan land located just North of Mount Calvary Lutheran Church parking lot, as referenced in the attached site plan, to develop a community garden called "Garden To Table ". A preferred usage agreement would be a simplified lease for the amount of $1.00 per year. "Garden To Table" community gardens will have the projected following outcomes: Outcome 1: Increase the fresh produce inventory by 5,000 -7,000 pounds at the ERC food shelf, which serves 450 "families" a month. Outcome 2: Establish garden plots to 20 - 25 needy families (approximately 100 individuals) who ordinarily do not have access to land. Outcome 3: Broaden awareness of the advancing partnership between the City of Eagan and the Eagan Resource Center to fight hunger. On behalf of the clients, staff and Board of Directors of the Eagan Resource Center, thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and for the opportunity to grow the partnership between the city and the food shelf in order to eliminate hunger in the greater Eagan area. I look forward to hearing from you shortly. Should you have questions, I welcome your call. Appreciatively, Lisa Horn, Executive Director Eagan Resource Center 651- 688 -3189 lisahorn @eaganrc.org Enclosure: Letter of support from Mount Calvary Lutheran Church for proposed usage. KIM Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting L. OPPORTUNITY CITY PROGRAM AGREEMENT — CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Program Agreement for Urban Land Institute /Regional Council of Mayors Opportunity City Program and authorize a $5,000 match and commitment of making City staff available to work with consultants to explore strategies to support a full range of housing choices. FACTS: At their regular meeting of February 1, 2010, the City Council gave direction for staff to submit a letter of interest to the Opportunity City Program and, if approved, to authorize the commitment of $5,000 from the City's fund balance for that purpose. ➢ The program involves a housing audit, a five year look -back at household and parcel level demographics that impacted housing decisions and assessment and recommended strategies for specific "opportunity" sites (typically new development or redevelopment areas) to support the development of housing choices that would meet the identified needs. ➢ The City has been informed that its letter of interest in has been approved and program representatives are prepared to move forward with related activities. ➢ City and CDA staff met with a ULI representative to overview the ways in which the Opportunity City study could complement the studies and programs the CDA provides. On that basis, the Program Agreement has been tailored to dovetail with related CDA activities. The Agreement has been reviewed by staff and is in order for consideration. ATTACHMENTS: (1) ➢ Agreement on pagesa� through Q-7 HOUSING INITIATIVE — OPPORTUNITY CITY PROGRAM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 2010, by and between THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA ( "ULI MN ") and THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA (the "CITY "). RECITALS A. The Urban Land Institute's mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. B. The Regional Council of Mayors (RCM), supported by ULI Minnesota, provides a non - partisan platform that strategically engages mayors and land use professionals to support a more connected, more sustainable and more prosperous region. C. The RCM Housing Initiative Opportunity City Program builds on the collaborative relationships among RCM and ULI professionals to identify and implement best practices that support a full range of housing choices for economic stability and regional prosperity with funding support provided by the Family Housing Fund. D. THE CITY OF EAGAN was been selected to participate in the Opportunity City Program and in working together will identify and implement tools and strategies to support a full range of housing choices. The approach will continue to serve as a model for other cities and be brought to scale at the regional level. E. Eagan's participation in the Opportunity City Program will be enhanced by Dakota County Community Development Agency's partnership with ULI MN providing county level community change information and a benchmark summary including a series of comparison charts and graphs related to demographic trends, household relocation patterns, housing accessibility and utilization, access to jobs and access to transit within Dakota County as well as a series of key indicators for all seven counties. i AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms hereof, the ULI MN and the CITY agree that the Opportunity City Program Agreement shall be as follows: ULI MN will provide the following to the CITY based upon the attached letter of need for assistance, work plan and timeline. ULI MN, through Bennett Community Consulting and its member and financial partners, will complete a housing audit that evaluates current housing goals, strategies and demographic trends, identifies gaps, reviews sites for future housing growth and redevelopment activities, and recommends modifications, additions and strategies for creating housing choices. ■ Excensus, LLC will produce a community change report for the CITY that will include demographic trends, household relocation patterns, housing accessibility and utilization, access to jobs and access to transit. The CITY will provide the following to ULI MN in support of the Opportunity City Program and in exchange for the services provided above. Funding match in the amount of $5,000 provided to ULI MN with the signature of the agreement. CITY staff support to assist the ULI MN staff and contractors in collecting information available to the City, coordinating City meetings and providing guidance for the completion of services outlined above. Consideration by policy leaders to work towards establishing the recommended tools and strategies (ie: changes and modifications to official controls) in support a full range of housing choices provided to the CITY as a result of the Opportunity City Program. Except as amended, the Agreement is and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written. The Urban Land Institute Minnesota in Its: Executive Director City of Eagan, Minnesota In Its: City Administrator 3C ) Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting M. DAKOTA COUNTY ACTIVE LIVING GRANT — CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve a contract with Dakota County awarding the City of Eagan $16,000 for the purposes of creating a bike /pedestrian connection program within retail service areas, authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and add a budget adjustment in the Department 2 (Engineering) 2010 budget. FACTS: ➢ City Engineering and Planning staff worked together on creating a grant proposal to support a program intended to enhance bike and pedestrian connections to existing retail service areas within the City of Eagan. ➢ While the City's public trail network is well developed, moving bikers and pedestrians from the public trail into a shopping or service area almost exclusively requires those users to interact or compete with motorized traffic within parking areas and drive aisles. ➢ Specifically, the goal is to create a program that will promote dedicated bike /ped access in and around retail service areas and assist staff in ranking proposals aimed at doing the same. y The grant proposal was successful and the City was awarded $16,000 based on an Estimated Budget created by the Engineering Division. The grant is provided by a combination of funding from the State Health Improvement Program (SHIP) and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, via a contract with Dakota County. The proposed Action Plan: These components will be developed for this program: general framework, proper documentation system, ranking criteria, public relations (outreach) and a plan roll -out. Responsible parties would include a consultant as the project lead. Engineering staff (specifically the Transportation Engineer) would take the lead, in- house, and support would be provided by Planning staff. The next steps will be to solicit RFP's based on the scope of work as outlined in the detailed Budget. The project is intended to conclude on or before June 30, 2010. Attachments (1) Exhibits 3 and 4 of the 21 page contract on pages and 31 Exhibit 3 Services Goal: To correct a common suburban oversight — the lack of true pedestrian connections from a public trail to a private business front door. Objective: To partner with private property owners to provide safe and convenient free - standing pedestrian connections. Action Plan: The following components will be developed for this program: general framework, proper documentation system, ranking criteria, public relations (outreach) and a plan roll -out. Responsible parties would include a consultant as the project lead. Engineering staff (specifically the Transportation Engineer) would take the lead, in- house, and support would be provided by Planning staff. The next steps will be to solicit RFP's based on the scope of work as outlined in the detailed Budget shown below. The project will conclude on or before June 30, 2010. Effectiveness: The success of this project will be tied to the quality of the public relations program created; subsequently, success will be measured by the buy -in /participation by the private property owners affected. Economic realities will also inform implementation, but having a solid program in place will bolster the effort when the economy recovers. NOTE: This service description is based on the grant application submitted by the City of Eagan. A copy of this document is on file with the contract. City of Eagan (2)- 11820.doc Page 16 SHIP -G (Rev. 08- 09).dot 3a Exhibit 4 Budget and Payment Estimated Budaet Amount 1. Project kick off meeting $ 500 2. Search for and summarize similar policies in other jurisdictions $ 750 3. Develop draft program framework and documentation $ 2,500 4. Develop draft ranking criteria $ 2,500 5. Project review meeting $ 500 6. Revise program framework and documentation $ 1,000 7. Revise draft ranking criteria $ 1,000 8. Develop draft marketing /public relations program $ 3,000 9. Project review meeting $ 500 10. Produce final program documentation $ 750 11. Produce final ranking criteria $ 750 12. Produce final marketing /public relations program $ 1,000 13. Project close out meeting $ 500 14. Roll out marketing /public relations program $ 750 Total $16,000 Payment: Use the invoice form on the next page of this Exhibit to make claims based on the budget as presented. City of Eagan (2)- 11820.doc Page 17 SHIP -G (Rev. 08- 09).dot Z3 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting N. ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS CITY CODE CHAPTERS 7 & 10 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the City Attorney to drai Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 7 and 10 of the City Code regarding obstructions and landscaping in streets, and obstructions on public property. FACTS: • On March 4, 2003, the City Council authorized the submittal of a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES), Phase II Program. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was included with this permit application. • The MS4 permit and SWPPP were modified June 1, 2006, as a result of a May, 2003 Minnesota Court of Appeals decision in which the court required the MPCA to provide the opportunity for public review of each MS4 SWPPP. • In the SWPPP, City staff detailed, with the guidance of the League of Minnesota Cities Guide Plan, the duties, practices and responsibilities of the City of Eagan that address the pollution abatement efforts required to meet the permit's Maximum Extent Practicable standard. • The NPDES Phase II Final Rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 (i.e. Eagan) to develop, implement, and enforce a program to address storm water runoff within its jurisdiction that discharges into its small MS4. Eagan's program must require control measures that enable the detection and elimination of illicit (non- stormwater) discharge into the storm sewer system to ensure compliance, to the extent allowable under law. • To develop a program consistent with this intent, Eagan must review /update existing or implement new enforceable City Ordinances that prohibit illicit discharge into the storm sewer system such as City Code Sec. 7.05 and 10.32, which prohibit illegal dumping. • Recent customer service inquiries which required responses from the League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust have indicated that a review of City Code Sec. 7.05 and 7.08 regarding the installation and maintenance of trees, shrubs and landscaping within or adjacent to a boulevard would also be appropriate at this tune. This ordinance language was last updated in November 1997. • City Council authorization would initiate the preparation of revised ordinance language as an amendment to the City Code that would address the City of Eagan's SWPPP and operational policies and practices. Future Council direction would be sought to have staff prepare draft ordinances for further Council consideration. • The expectation is that the proposed regulations would bolster the City's position to protect the public interest and to manage the connnunity's resources. Previous modifications to other relevant chapters in the existing code have already been approved as part of a comprehensive effort to address the SWPPP obligations. Section 4.33 was adopted October 21, 2008, and revisions to Section 4.32 were adopted November 18, 2008. • Information about any new ordinance language would be provided in a variety of formats upon City Council adoption. Publication of the information would be completed through a press release and in articles on the City's website, Eagan Business News and E -TV. 3$ Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting O. CONTRACT 09 -20, FIRE SAFETY CENTER/ STATION TRAIL SITE/ STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Award Contract 09 -20 (Fire Safety Center/ Station Trail — Site Grading & Utilities) to Miller Excavating, Inc., for the base bid for a total amount of $619,960.90 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Contract 09 -20 provides for the site grading, building pad preparation, and utility services, including sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer, for the Fire Safety Center as presented in a schematic design to the City Council on August 11, 2009. • On August 11, 2009, the City Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the Fire Safety Center. • On December 28, 2009, the City formally purchased four acres of property, fonnerly known as Carriage Hills Golf Course, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands. • On March 2, 2010, the City Council authorized the street and utility improvements for Station Trail, to be located within public right -of -way adjacent to the Fire Safety Center. • The Fire Safety Center and Station Trail improvements have been combined under one contract (Contract 09 -20), to increase economies of scale. On January 19, 2010, the Council approved the plans and authorized the advertisement for solicitation of competitive bids for Contract 09 -20. • At 10:30 a.m. on March 9, formal base bids from each bidder were received for this project. The base bids included disposal of the excess grading material by the Contractor on the adjacent Carriage Hills property (development pending as "Stonehaven" by Lennar). • Alternate bids for disposal of excess site grading material by trucking off -site were also received. Because the disposal of excess material is available on the Carriage Hills/ Stonehaven property, acceptance of the alternate bid is not necessary or recommended. • All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and accuracy on unit price extensions and summations. The base bid from Miller Excavating, Inc., has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and is in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid Summary, page. BID SUMMARY - CITY CONTRACT 09 -20 EAGAN FIRE SAFETY CENTER SITE IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO 1028 STATION TRAIL STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO 1012 Bid Date/ Time: 10:30 a.m., Thursday, March 9, 2010 Excess $83,850 NA NA $129,000 -35.4% Excavation Haul -Off G: Projects. &('ontr,icts!09- 20'Bid summary ReSLIHS 3�0 5 Low Base Bid Contractors Total Base Bid 1. Miller Excavating, Inc. $619,961 2 McNamara, Inc. $658,347 3.. Dennis Fehn Gravel & Excavating $669,274 4. Northwest Asohalt, Inc. $674,795 5. BCM Construction, Inc. $680,552 $298,350 -43.7% Total Bids Received: 24 Base Bid Range: $619,961 to $1,097,309 Excess $83,850 NA NA $129,000 -35.4% Excavation Haul -Off G: Projects. &('ontr,icts!09- 20'Bid summary ReSLIHS 3�0 liK pw��; . 1012 — Station $168,069 $168,100 Equal $298,350 -43.7% Trail 1028 — Fire $451,892 NA NA $757,350 -40.3% Safety Center Totals $619,961 NA NA $1,055,700 -41.3% Excess $83,850 NA NA $129,000 -35.4% Excavation Haul -Off G: Projects. &('ontr,icts!09- 20'Bid summary ReSLIHS 3�0 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting P. AWARD FIRE SAFETY CENTER CONTRACTS (FIRE SAFETY BUILDING & FIRE STATION NO. 2 — BUILDING CONSTRUCTION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve certain contracts related to construction of the Fire Safety Building & Fire Station No. 2 — Building Construction FACTS: • On January 19, 2010 the City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for the construction of the Fire Safety Center. • Bids were received on March 4, 2010 from contractors for the 26 different building construction disciplines within our specifications. • The City Council has directed that the bid results be presented to the Finance Committee (meeting scheduled for Monday, March 15, 2010) prior to consideration by the full Council. • A meeting of staff and representatives of the Architectural and Construction Management firms is also scheduled to prepare options for consideration of the bids by the Finance Committee. NOTE: • Information from the Finance Committee Meeting will be distributed to the City Council with the Administrative Agenda material on Monday the 15th and is expected to include the following: 1. A recommendation to remove this action from the March 16, 2010 City Council Agenda Cem 2. A recommendation and information on the contracts proposed for approval on this agenda and a recommendation for a method to proceed with a potential rebid of other contracts. ATTACHMENTS: (None) -6--/ Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting Q. PROJECT 925, YANKEE DOODLE ROAD /PROMENADE AVENUE PROJECT 1035, DENMARK AVENUE /PROMENADE PLACE ENGINEERING, RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION & CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve an Agreement for Engineering, Right of Way Acquisition and Highway Constriction for Project 925 (Yankee Doodle Road and Promenade Avenue Intersection and Street Improvements) and Project 1035 (Denmark Avenue and Promenade Place Intersection Control Evaluation) with Dakota County and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On December 4, 2006, the City Council approved a cost participation agreement with the Dakota County Transportation Department for a corridor study considering transportation improvements alone and adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road (County State Aid Highway 28), including the intersection of Promenade Avenue. • On March 20, 2007, the City Council reached consensus on the recommended alternatives for the West Segment (I -35E to Lexington Avenue) of the Yankee Doodle Road Corridor Study including relocation of the existing Yankee Doodle Rd/Promenade Ave intersection slightly to the east with a full phase traffic signal and all -way access, construction of a new public street from Yankee Doodle to Town Center Drive near the east property line of the Blue Cross Blue Shield office tower with a direct connection to O'Leary Lane to be further evaluated (Alt. 3W) and closure of the median opening on Yankee Doodle Road restricting access to right- in/right -out movements only at O'Leary Lane. • Also included in the current Capital Improvement Programs (2010 -2014) for both agencies as a result of the study are intersection modifications at Yankee Doodle Rd with Denmark Avenue and at Denmark Avenue with Town Centre Drive. All of these improvements have been merged into Project 925 to achieve an economy of scale benefit in design, right of way acquisition and construction costs and provides for extending County cost participation to these local street improvements. • A separate 2007 traffic study of the intersection of Demnark Avenue and Promenade Place (south driveway to Byerly's) indicated a failing Level of Service F for the west bound Promenade Place approach throughout the noon hour and afternoon peak hour with very significant delays for travelers. The agreement includes an evaluation of this intersection (Project 1035) due to its proximity to the proposed Yankee Doodle Rd improvements. • An agreement between the City of Eagan and the Dakota County Transportation Department has been prepared providing for each agency's cost responsibility for the engineering, right of way acquisition and construction. • As set forth in the agreement, the City's financial responsibility for the engineering costs will be based on the City's share of the final Yankee Doodle Road /Promenade Avenue traffic signal and street construction costs. The City will be fully responsible for all engineering and construction costs associated with the Denmark Avenue /Promenade Place intersection control evaluation. • The City will be responsible for 45% of the right of way acquisition for the Promenade Avenue construction. The City will be 100% responsible for the right of way acquisition costs associated with the construction of a roundabout or traffic signal at Denmark Avenue/ Promenade Place. • Public Works staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed this agreement and found it to be similar to other previous construction project agreements and in order for favorable Council action. I Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting R. WESCOTT WOODLANDS/ WESCOTT GARDENS/ WESSEL PONDS RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right -of -way (Wescott Woodlands) within the Wescott Gardens and Wessel Pond Additions and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 20, 2010. FACTS: • On March 3, 2010, City staff received a petition from Donald and Carol Hesse (3536 Wescott Woodlands), Tony and Lynn Vinge (3544 Wescott Woodlands), and Fred Wessel (3590 Wescott Woodlands) requesting the vacation of a portion of existing right -of -way (Wescott Woodlands) within Wescott Gardens and Wessel Pond Additions, located along the southeastern edge of the former Carriage Hills golf course property. • The public right -of -way was dedicated as part of the respective plats for the future construction of a public street to serve the area between Wescott Woodlands and Wescott Hills Drive. • The purpose of the request is to reduce the possibility of a future public street connection between Wescott Woodlands and Wescott Hills Drive. With the Council's consideration of the public street system and connectivity in conjunction with the proposed Lennar "Stonehaven" development (March 16) and the Duckwood Drive extension approved under City Project No. 1012 (March 2), it is appropriate for the City Council to also consider the vacation of this right -of -way. • Notices for a public hearing will be published in the legal papers and sent to all potentially affected and /or interested parties for comment prior to the scheduled public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page �. • Right-of-Way Vacation Sketch, page. �I Q �° 0 a D CID O 3 i q> City of Eap Engineering Department U Q o Proposed Vacation (D J Location z w J ,YANKEE DOODLE RD. L \�G Wescott Woodlands Proposed ROW Vacation L�t) Location Map w 0 7 3/11/2010 Fig. 1 3 a N PROPOSED DUCKWOOD DRIVE EXTENSION ��ttS co z Q 0 O O V) w G 30' RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED \\ PETITIONERS PROPERTIES . City of Eap Engineering Department #3536 3515 HESSE \ �5 X30' \\ VINGE\ \ WESSEL 4 \ \ 5 \ �5 G 3614 / \O 3622 3611 S �R Wescott Woodlands ROW Vacation 4 ( Vacation Exhibit 8 8 81? 3/11/2010 Fig. 2 01 = VINGE #3544 X30' \\ VINGE\ \ WESSEL 4 \ \ 5 \ �5 G 3614 / \O 3622 3611 S �R Wescott Woodlands ROW Vacation 4 ( Vacation Exhibit 8 8 81? 3/11/2010 Fig. 2 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting S. PUBLIC WORKS 5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DUCKWOOD DRIVE - BRIDGE /STREET IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve a resolution amending the Part III 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program (2010 -2014) to incorporate the placement of Contract 09 -18 (Duckwood Drive /Federal Drive - Bridge /Street Improvements) in 2011. FACTS: • On June 2, 2009, the City Council approved the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Public Works Infrastructure, Part III (2010- 2014). The CIP includes public improvements to streets, highways, trails, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and water quality. A divided 4- lane bridge connecting Duckwood Drive and Federal Drive was included as a "Future" improvement under the category of Overpasses and Interchanges. The CIP indicates that 100% of the construction cost would be the responsibility of the City's Major Street Fund. • On December 15, the Council awarded a Professional Services Contract for design of Contract 09 -18 to SRF Consulting Group, Inc. with the expectation that a final design with "shovel ready" plans and specifications would be completed by June 2010 in order to help Staff pursue construction funding opportunities. • At the Council Workshop on March 9, 2010, the City Council received an update of the status of the plan preparation for Contract 09 -18, information on the addition of right -turn lane designs on the portion of the plans addressing Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive and various funding scenarios for the project. The Council provided input and direction to City staff regarding the advancement of the construction schedule of said project. • As the funding opportunities for the estimated $6.7 million to construct Contract 09 -18 are limited, the potential for funding from the anticipated American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2010 (Stimulus II) appears to be the best opportunity to finance the bridge construction, as well as an opportunity to construct the project as soon as possible. • In order for Contract 09 -18 to qualify for Stimulus lI funding, the project will need to be able to be awarded or constructed in 2010. There is clear preference for projects that are available to be advanced for construction that would occur in 2010. • The plans for this future City "owned" overpass of a federal highway managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) clearly require MnDOT staff review similar to the Northwood Parkway Overpass design. MnDOT plan review is typically prioritized based upon the planned construction schedule for the improvements. • Even though the design and construction of the Northwood Parkway overpass was trouble - free, MnDOT staff is subsequently requiring an additional three months of review for the Duckwood Overpass as part of a Cooperative Agreement with the City. • In order to proceed with a plan review that would accommodate a successful application by the City for Stimulus II funding, MnDOT needs to receive formal input from the City stating a specific proposed schedule for the construction of Contract 09 -18. If the Council insists on the pursuit of federal fielding for the proposed project, it would be appropriate to incorporate these improvements into the 2011 schedule of the currently approved 5 -year CIP (2010- 2014). This official action will allow MnDOT to prioritize the review of this improvement. ATTACHMENTS: • Layout Design, page 46 • Resolution, page • Pro fonna update, pages S through Ta WWI ' § - CITY OF EAGAN A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PUBLIC WORKS 5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2010 -2014) TO INCORPORATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE DUCKWOOD DRIVE /FEDERAL DRIVE BRIDGE & STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN 2011 WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has submitted a Level Two Layout of transportation improvements known as Contract 09 -18, Duckwood Drive /Federal Drive Overpass of Interstate 35 -E (Bridge and Street Improvements), to the Federal Aid Program of the Metro District Office of State Aid, Minnesota Department of Transportation for review and layout approval; AND WHEREAS, said layout and eventual final plan approvals are required as part of Federal Highway Administration regulations that address transportation improvements that encroach the right -of -way of a federal highway; AND WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is the delegated authority for the permitting program for federal highways within the State of Minnesota; AND WHEREAS, the Level Two Layout was submitted without a designated construction schedule and accordingly without a priority review schedule; AND WHEREAS, funding opportunities for the estimated $6.7 million to construct Contract 09 -18 are limited and the potential for funding from the anticipated American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2010 (Stimulus II) appears to be the best opportunity to finance the bridge construction; AND WHEREAS, Contract 09 -18 will likely only qualify for Stimulus II funding if the project is able to be advanced for construction that would occur in 2010; AND WHEREAS, the Dakota County Transportation Department will also need to review and approve a portion of Contract 09 -18 that impacts County State Aid Highway 31 (Pilot Knob Road) right -of -way. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council hereby authorizes amending the Public Works 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program (2010 -2014) to incorporate the placement of Contract 09- 18 (Duckwood Drive /Federal Drive - Bridge and Street Improvements) in 2011. 2. The City Engineer is hereby directed to request Stimulus II funding for the City of Eagan to designate for the construction of Contract 09 -18. 3. The City Engineer is hereby directed to inform staff of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Dakota County Transportation Department of this official action and request an expeditious review and approval of all design aspects of Contract 09 -18 accordingly. 4[4 L x w CD ° N Cl) O r M C N E Q co E O O Q- 16 (1 U) O O O N le F Lr) (14 h 0) O a) 00 O E L C4+ N 00 Oi h Cl) Il- 'cr LO a p t0 (n N 0o N r — to to O N F- �� cN N m V r M 00 Iz r N N N 0) Q Vl O C m d N N 0) C x L V x O Z w w- U C r N ER O O C (n t1 w LL bH E � O p 'V Q p cn L LL. Q C N a 0 Q 0 m Q Q O C 'O 0� U Qa`0- C U) U CD U) a. w N - � W O 1` ti O 0o c0 61 N c0 00 lqt 011 N (O N N to M d' h 643 61. M N (O M a) M r I (D � ti (` a1 I-- LO O O L r N LO 00 of 00 N n N N to V N (D tiT ER1 N r (.0 q O Lo ' t0 W) r M — LO ti CY) (. b Iq O O (n It O N (O to O N t0 N (V M M ti c� G to L O +� 0 r r f- N m _ ' co OA r r CO (fl 00 LO CA M 0 L� L O tD d t0 0) M N O N ti N N 4 to tD (O dN M p eIS to 70 W. V _ — O r 00 O co M O (n 00 r T- N O V- N I- (O to 00 V1 O to 'ct O q* 00 r- M M t0 —�-+ C N N N 4 (O 00 h ateL T N o O Cl) L r aL+ O O Cl) tC Cl) A h N _ CA N N w RC C N N '. N N .- r O 64> a° _ N U CD ° N Cl) O r M C N E Q co E O O Q- 16 (1 U) O O O N m E L O a `L N v O �� aL Q -a 0) Q Vl N C m d N N 0) C x L V x O Z w w- U C R Co U) 0) O O C (n t1 w LL E T m O t .CL E � O p 'V Q p cn L LL. Q C N a 0 Q 0 m Q Q O C 'O 0� U Qa`0- C U) U U) a. w CD ° N Cl) O r M C N E Q co E O O Q- 16 (1 U) O O O N N H m X w Q L CG G V ILA 1 v, la7 r a, a o Iq L r C- o E N •� IN U J O O O V N O 0 0 0 0 0 O O N(D 00 O Ln V (o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O CO M N HCO cc O Ln N C� Cl 0 0 W 0 0 ' O O h W h O d co W co co Ln W O Ln O Ln O O O co O H 1- O O CO N� Lo 00 M O W rn Ln (D co O cc 1� M O O N �t O O 1` r V N N (0 N CO CO r CO Lo r r c V CO M co (f3 Cf) vl ' OOLnco 0000 O 00 W cc r O O W V 0 0 00 O 0 0 Ln w O O W 1� N O Ln O O ' O' C C ' Lr 00 N O N O Ln O r 0 CO O O O O 1- co O O m O N Ln V N 0 (O O � N co r co 6) LO Ln 1l- N O co w N r 69 Ml ' O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0) r r O LO N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 1� (O r C C C 0 C 0' C C ' CO 1 O N O W CO W O 1- O CO O O 00 T M N 1- M (fl Ln Ln (o O O (O co co 0) 'at M W co V O CO r co W CD r .-- N r O O O 613. co M ' 0 0 Ln 1- O O O O 00 O r r O L) N V O O O O O O T N O C� M CA O Ln O ' C ' O ' C C ' V r O O co Ln O 't co O O O O O W 1l_ V I- O V O co M co O N V M r (D r CD O (O co co r r- 69 NO O O "t Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D O Ln W Ln O LO O W O O V M (O Lo V Ln O O W O U) 1- 1` N N 1` 1` O N O U) M r- (O co M Ln N r V (fl V N N r of OOOLO000000 r O Ln O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Ln 1- O O LL7 O O O O N O m Ih O 0 Z O M 0 0 M M 1l- V C) V O co OQ') c- CO CO N LO 1- CD V' Ln N r M 69 C a+ y 0) WO a` N d :a O O h CD O O W O O C W r co V Ln fl- co N O N O O N co O O O h N' N O CD of LO of co N (D (D O M 00 r CD CO O O r- Lo � O N � ' O h r- CT P- ' ' ' ' Ln ' M ' Ln Ln Ln O r CA co CT c- r O f� W O) N Ln 00 N M .1 V ea O Ln 00 0) r 'I N N r CN N U) C N C 7 (ll fll E c U 0 o n C 0 (ll j N O U 06 O C C p MCI o o >, .� c a) o f >. E CE ?Q >_ TQ o '> i Y > -c O C U (ll O Q a- C .0 0) N O` L to -6 U LL C 06- a .0 � 'C a) '@ E J 0 N C N U N T V Q)Q o c C - C(n O Q @ .O O O ~ @ O> cn o E o LL �� LL O-0 ° n v Ln U) a� .° �° E E a� Q Q > O U M iv @ o o is (n (n OU - cn r N d' Ln CO 0) 1- r (D N CO N d 7 v c d C2 x w 0 H CT O O O O O O O O O O O O oc O O ' O O CD - Ln O) O N Ln Ln Ln O r CA co CT c- r N e} 00 00 V O .1 M L ' O' O O M — O O 1` co Ln In Ln V O r CD 'I LO (D O O O O c0 N O O O O N h O O O' O h O O O O r I-_ co O 1- Ln n 't 0) — — r CO Ln r h O O r N O O N Ln Ln ' C C Lf) r-- O 1-- Lf) N Ln N 0) CO 1- M r LCj O O O O r O O O O O O r- M O O ' 0 0 co O O 0 O M 0) (O O O � O N W V N O O — O Ln O O O O Ln O O O O O o N 1- N O O Cl CD Ln V O O LO LO M V 1- � co V M r CO Ln W (D O N co 1l_ W O m ' CA N V N r V CO v Ln N v -0 � L C O c O p LL C C C/) C i L LL LL N .T F C a cl) C L U cn 0 .0 @ - C io o cu LL cn in N V LO (D ti co O M Cl) M W N d CA CO CD 1- CO N W N M r CD 00 C 0 0_ oc co Ln h L It h Ln O r I O O N O ' C (fl Ln Cl) (fl O v ICT Cl) w M O O r LO O n O ' r W Lo 00 co M 000 ti Ln O CD f� M O N W ' T co V r LO W N r CT N Ln O O LC°n °o_ ti Cl) O (n M r- 000 N r h r Ln Ln 00 V W N MM 00 LO Cl) (D N I 19t N C O Q U_ c� a- C T V1 O C � E D U O o N a- �a m � Q � c U) 6 M M H m 2 w W 0 Z U Z m Q Z v LL d E c °o C j _ 4 E f6 O 3 d O LL Q E Q O c N co w O d O N N U (D V T r N of R of M N O � (0 O F W V Cf (D (D N (o oo r A m � C7 deb m Dco o E 01i E r r N ip c d d Nn �D r d C . G E�mcOi N� ° C (C A d y O K O W w M V N (O N N N r Of 6 C C r n N O ( j O _ 7 LL c y W O va d V h VI (D (O �'C O O N N _ a c E N ri LL y C W F w d w r N M 0) Q1 �N 7 W r LL O c W d O V M N O r 0) � (A •` O M M 6 C LL' cD (0 M d LL N C w N d Y L 0) (D M e- 3 O r 7 m r r Of N N ~ LL (0 O (O Y V V (O C (D r N A - V to F LL EA E y Y M (D V O 3` C W O r ri o cn cn F LL EA � (0 N 00 (D -- r R O y LL N N h w G o W al N v (n rnrco(O c0 V W U7 � N Oi O 0 0 0 0 0 0 (A V U2 (0 (D N7 n 0 0 0 00 0 (D lf] N O (D O v N N N O ' o 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 (n 0 [0 M (D V M N V IY (n c0 I� V N V 00 N N O : Of N N �IT.. I� N M c0 co (O O O o (D O N (D (0 N (0 (0 (0 M V m (0 O O ' O 00 O O O _ N V R (n O N O ry r N r � � 10 10 r r v v rn � rn(nrr V N M N O O V 00 V W (D co n V N d V C A O U ° d . a 2 h d o y O N a N (.j � O U N Q Z F a M O N r O N (O to (O r o0 00 (O r N r oo N (O Iw II w Lo h Lo w Oaf at 17 oo ' W co (O (O (O N N N w M O M M (O M T Of r N M M w r rn m ao 00 N r O N r (O V O w m m m O Q1 Of r r r w Of co N O N M V co Lo M o r oo m r co V to w N r O V (O 00 co r co oo 01 r r M M v N r v M w rorof m O M V a co N O 0 o i o 00 v w 471 Oaf O r r r w w w E E d T N M T Y y c Y � C H' ` d y F N of U C E vd o N O L u U 5 O e C CO LL A R � « � m 00 d (n o o r 'o E d E U LL W W r E a d 2 a 4-7 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting T. CONSULTING CONTRACTS FOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR 2010 - CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To APPROVE the Consultant Service pool for lawn mowing, refuse removal, securing vacant buildings and general maintenance for the pool of businesses on the attached list, authorize the City Planner and /or Senior Code Enforcement Technician as the signatory for work orders, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: ➢ In keeping with the Eagan City Policy for Engaging Professional Consulting Services, contractors have been solicited to submit bids for 2010 services. These are being presented to the City Council for their consideration of approving contractor for such services. ➢ The City of Eagan has a history of firing lawn maintenance contractors to cut long grass and weeds on properties where, after notification, the owner has failed to become compliant with City Code requirements. ➢ Ordinance Amendment No. 433 adopted November 6, 2008 amended City Code Sec. 10.01 regarding storage, deposit and disposal of refuse, and allows the City to abate public health and safety nuisances by disposing of refuse abandoned on a property. ➢ City Code Sec. 10.51 allows the City to abate nuisances by disposing of junk furniture, household furnishings and appliances abandoned outdoors on property. Property owners of record are billed for the services provided and costs are assessed against the property if the bills are unpaid. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Listing of Consultant Service Pool on page 4T. 48 2010 Consultant Service Pool — Code Enforcement Contractor List All contractors are required to carry workers compensation coverage. The contractors are required to provide Certificates of Insurance evidencing liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured party. Prices do not include sales tax. 1- 800 -Got Junk ?, Minneapolis MN Minimum Charge $119.00 Belfour Property Restoration, Savage MN General Labor $36.97 per hour LeMasters Restoration Inc., Burnsville MN General Labor $38.34 per hour Melby Landscaping Inc., Apple Valley MN General Labor $45.00 per hour Suburban Landscape Service, Eagan MN General Labor $50.00 per hour Top of the Line Landscape, So. St. Paul MN General Labor $67.50 per hour Tough Cut Services LLC, Bloomington MN General Labor $39.50 per hour Agenda Memo March 16, 2010 City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA: U. Cancellation of Council work session on April 13 and schedule Council work sessions for April 26 and 27. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve cancellation of Council work session on April 13 and schedule Council work sessions for April 26 and 27 FACTS: There are no items for consideration for a work session scheduled on April 13 resulting in the cancellation of that meeting. A Council work session is scheduled for Tuesday, April 27 for the purpose of interviewing Advisory Commission candidates. A work session is also scheduled for Monday April 26 and will be held only if there are enough commission candidates requiring the Council to conduct interviews on more than one evening. ATTACHMENTS: None SO Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Utilities user rates changes: water, sanitary sewer, street lighting, and storm drainage /water quality. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and adopt a resolution approving changes to public utilities user rates for water, sanitary sewer, street lighting, and storm drainage /water quality, effective July 1, 2010, and to incorporate such changes into the Fee Schedule. FACTS: • In 2009, the City engaged Springsted, Inc. to complete a rate study for all public utilities. The purpose was twofold: first, to assist the City in adopting a water rate structure that encourages water conservation, as required by State Statutes 103G.291 subd. 4; and second, to review all utility rates in relation to long -term operating and capital financing requirements, and recommend changes as appropriate. • In a special Council workshop on October 13, the Council gave direction to Springsted on conceptual aspects of the water and storm drainage /water quality rate structures. • On January 8, the Finance Committee (Mayor Maguire and Councilmember Bakken) met with Springsted representatives and staff, providing additional input on tiered water rates and on the timing of implementation of the new rates. • In a special Council workshop on February 9, Springsted presented its final report on rate recommendations for all public utilities. The Council then directed staff to schedule a public hearing for consideration of the rate recommendations. • Per Minnesota Statutes 462.353, the adoption of a fee schedule or amendments thereto requires publication at least 10 days prior to a public hearing. The notice was published on March 5. • Communications Director Garrison is working with Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke and Chief Financial Officer Pepper to develop a communications plan once the new rates are adopted. Information about the rate changes will be communicated to residents and businesses via the City's website, newsletter, E -TV, and inserts in utility bills. • Patty Kettles from Springsted will attend the public hearing. She does not plan to make a presentation, but will be available to answer questions. ATTACHMENTS: • summary of proposed changes in utility user rates is attached on page sD� • copy of the resolution adopting the rate changes is attached on page � . s Proposed Changes in Utility User Rates To be effective July 1, 2010 Sanitary Sewer Fixed quarterly admin. Fee Current Proposed % increase Water 2.55 2.70 5.9% Residential Fixed quarterly admin. fee $ 6.00 $ 6.00 0.0% Usage, per 1,000 gallons 4.99 5.18 3.9% Winter quarter usage 1.40 1.40 0.0% Usage in excess of winter quarter 1.40 1.75 25.0% Commercial /Industrial 5.90 6.13 3.9% Fixed quarterly admin. fee 6.00 6.00 0.0% Usage, per 1,000 gallons 11.28 11.71 3.9% Domestic meter (inside usage) 1.40 1.40 0.0% Irrigation meter (outside usage) 1.42 1.75 23.2% Sanitary Sewer Fixed quarterly admin. Fee 1.45 1.45 0.0% Usage (per 1,000 gallons) 2.55 2.70 5.9% Street Lighting Neighborhood lights, per quarter R -1/R -2 4.99 5.18 3.9% R -3/13-4 4.00 4.15 3.9% Multiple residential, per quarter 8.74 9.08 3.9% Non - continuous, per acre 5.90 6.13 3.9% Continuous -- lineal foot basis, per LF 0.0127 0.0132 3.9% Continuous - -per acre basis, per acre 11.28 11.71 3.9% Individual lights, per light, per qtr. (commercial) 100 WHIPS 35.46 36.83 3.9% 150 WHIPS 51.40 53.38 3.9% 200 WHIPS 45.25 46.99 3.9% 250 WHPS 57.23 59.43 3.9% Community /signal lights, per quarter R -1/11-2 1.85 1.92 3.9% R -3 1.48 1.54 3.9% R -4 1.09 1.13 3.9% Storm Drainage /Water Quality All properties except R -3 8.11 8.45 4.3% R -3 properties (20% credit) 6.48 6.76 4.3% 5 a. RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN APPROVING UTILITY USER RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2010 WHEREAS, various sections of the City Code provide for fees to be established by City Council resolution; WHEREAS, the City approved a fee schedule for 2010 at its January 5, 2010 meeting; WHEREAS, the City engaged Springsted, Inc. to complete a study and recommend user rates for the City's water, sanitary sewer, street lighting, and storm drainage /water duality utilities; and WHEREAS, the City desires to incorporate the recommended rate revisions into its fee schedule effective July 1, 2010; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proposed utility user fees as listed in the attached shall be effective July 1, 2010: Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Date: March 16, 2010 CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL C Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk CERTIFICATION 1, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the Cit� of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 16` day of March, 2010. Maria Peterson, City Clerk S3 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PROJECT 1015, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Project 1015, (Blackhawk Road - Street Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications and the acquisition of temporary trail construction easements, if necessary. FACTS: • Since 1990, the City has implemented a comprehensive Pavement Management Program that provides timely pavement rehabilitation to our local streets, significantly extending their overall life expectancy. During these past twenty years, the City has rehabilitated approximately 152 miles of local streets. • The structural mill and overlay resurfacing for Blackhawk Road (Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive) and a full pavement reconstruction for Blackhawk Road ( Deerwood Drive to Highway 13) in west - central Eagan has been programmed for 2010 in the City's 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program. • On June 2, 2010 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report considering a rehabilitation of these streets. • On February 16, 2010, the feasibility report for Project 1015 was presented to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for March 16 to formally present and discuss the report with the adjacent property owners. • An informational neighborhood meeting was held on March 10 for the adjacent property owners and representatives to discuss the proposed improvements. Of the 316 total properties (56 Single - Family Residential, 240 Townhome, 14 High- Density Residential, 3 Commercial/ Industrial, 3 City Park/ Public Facility) proposed to be assessed under this improvement, 4 residents representing 4 properties, and 1 property owner representing 1 commercial property attended the meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages through • Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, page through S� Mike Maguire March 10, 2010 Mayor Paul Bakken Honorable Mayor and City Council Cyndee Fields City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Gary Hansen Eagan, MN 55122 Meg Tilley Council Members Re: Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization City Project No. 1015 Thomas Hedges Dear Mayor and City Council: City Administrator Attached is our report for the Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization, City Project No. 1015. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost estimate, preliminary assessment roll, and schedule. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or Maintenance Facility under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 3501 Coachman Point Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Eagan. MN 55122 Minnesota. 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax J0 n P. Gorder 651 .454.8535 TDD Date: 3 " / y' (y Reg. No. 22813 Reviewed By: www.cityofeagan.com f Dept. of Public Works _ Date: Revie ed By: The Lone Oak Tree The symbol of Financ4 Dept. Date: strength and growth in our community. discuss the contents of this report. Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Sincerely, Eagan, MN 55122 - 1810 651.675.5000 phone 2 651.675.5012 fax ohn P. Gorder 651.454.8535 TDD Assistant City Engineer I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or Maintenance Facility under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 3501 Coachman Point Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Eagan. MN 55122 Minnesota. 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax J0 n P. Gorder 651 .454.8535 TDD Date: 3 " / y' (y Reg. No. 22813 Reviewed By: www.cityofeagan.com f Dept. of Public Works _ Date: Revie ed By: The Lone Oak Tree The symbol of Financ4 Dept. Date: strength and growth in our community. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction/ History ................................................................................ ............................... 1 Scope..................................................................................................... ............................... 3 Feasibility and Recommendations .......................................................... ............................... 3 StreetEvaluation .................................................................................... ............................... 4 ProposedImprovements ......................................................................... ............................... 4 Segment 1 - Mill & Overlay Segment 2 — Pavement Replacement/ Reconstruction Easements /Permits ................................................................................ ............................... 7 CostEstimate ........................................................................................ ............................... 8 Assessments.......................................................................................... ............................... 8 Residential Commercial/ Industrial Driveway Entrance Replacement Assessment Financing Options ............................................................... ............................... 13 RevenueSource ..................................................................................... ............................... 14 ProjectSchedule ..................................................................................... ............................... 15 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A - Preliminary Cost Estimates (Segment 1 & Segment 2) Appendix B - Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix C Figures - 1 Location Map - 2 A -E Street Assessment Area Maps - 3A/ B Typical Sections — Segment 1 & Segment 2 S7 March 2010 Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization Eagan, Minnesota Introduction/ History Streets - As a part of Eagan's Pavement Management Program, (PMP), the City evaluates streets within the community throughout their life cycle and implements appropriate maintenance strategies. In 1989, a Pavement Management System (PMS) was developed that allowed the City to evaluate the condition of the existing pavement surface for all the streets on a routine basis and schedule timely maintenance. A Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for street rehabilitation is developed from this information. The 2.9 miles of Blackhawk Road, a collector roadway running north -south in the west - central portion of Eagan, is identified for the 2010 street improvements. Figure 1, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project location. Blackhawk Road was constructed and reconstructed in various segments between 1969 and 1994, with the most recent construction as follows: • Cliff Road to Diffley Road — new construction - 1983 • Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive — reconstruction - 1988 • Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 — reconstruction — 1994 Because the condition of the existing pavement varies between the southern and northern portions of Blackhawk Road, for purposes of this report, Blackhawk Road will be presented as two segments: Segment 1) Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive, and Segment 2) Deerwood Drive to Highway 13. Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive (Segment 1) — This portion of Blackhawk Road was constructed and upgraded in various years between 1969 (earliest construction) and 1988 (most recent upgrade). Typical pavement wear, and pavement maintenance has occurred on this segment, with a bituminous overlay on one portion at approximately 20 years. Overlaying the pavement within this portion of Blackhawk Road, with the original overlay and construction presently at the 22 — 27 year time frame, will prevent further decay of the pavement surface, thus protecting and extending the structural life of the street. 1 S3Blackhawk Road I— _. .E ».. ere a.°sr ti;+ .x..: z a a,,. -... . Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous patching, crack sealing and seal coating have occurred. The City of Eagan's maintenance records indicate that the streets were seal coated at various times between 1986 and 2003. The Public Works maintenance program typically includes extensive patching during the summer prior to the overlay. The Public Works crews, as part of the Preparatory Pavement Management Plan, removed and replaced deteriorated pavement areas and placed leveling and maintenance overlays on Blackhawk Road, where necessary. These repairs alone will not substantially extend the life expectancy of the street pavement if not combined with the proposed bituminous overlay proposed with this project. Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 (Segment 2) — This portion of Blackhawk Road was reconstructed entirely in 1994. During the last five years, the street pavement has experienced severe "pavement tenting ", a condition that produces localized heaves that develop at pavement cracks or joints, during winter weather. This condition has significantly reduced the vehicle ride quality of this segment of Blackhawk Road, most noticeably during the winter season, but also, to a lesser extent, during non - winter months. While the pavement tenting phenomenon is not widespread, other cases have occurred in the state, including pavements in Chaska and Ramsey County. A study by the MN Local Road Research (funded by MnDOT) of various winter pavement tenting (including Blackhawk Road) indicate that the condition may be caused by increased use of winter road salt, and the moisture - holding properties of the higher cement contents in recycled concrete aggregate bases. 2 1 Blackhawk Road While typical pavement maintenance has occurred on this segment of Blackhawk Road, with seal coating occurring as scheduled (in 1998), other significant pavement maintenance measures (additional crack - sealing, patching) have also been performed by City public works crews in an attempt to reduce the amount of pavement tenting. Utilities - The Public Works Department has also inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer) in the entire project area and determined the system is in a good working order and that no major repairs are necessary. Scope This project will provide resurfacing (edge mill and overlay) for approximately 1.6 miles of Blackhawk Road from Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive (Segment 1), and the complete pavement reconstruction of 1.3 miles of Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 (Segment 2). Also Included in this project is the replacement of the damaged curb and gutter, adjustments and /or replacement to sanitary/storm sewer utility castings, water gate valves, concrete entrance aprons, pedestrian curb ramps, and street signage. Figures 2A - E, located in Appendix C, illustrate the project limits. Feasibility and Recommendations The project is necessary to prevent further decay of the pavement section, create a safer driving ; surface, increase ride ability, and add structural strength. The project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement will be combined with other street improvements within the City, providing for reduced costs through economies of scale. The project is feasible in that this type of improvement has been used successfully to extend and renew the life expectancy of numerous other streets throughout the City and the region. This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2010 — 2014) for the City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Management Program. It is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report in combination with other similar projects in the area. 3 Blackhawk Road Street Evaluation The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition for each street. The general categories that define PCI rankings are as follows: PCI Recommended Improvement 56-100 Routine Maintenance /Crack Seal /Seal Coat 36-55 Patch /Repair and /or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive (Segment 1) - The 2009 PCI rankings in this portion have an average pavement condition rating of 49 which falls in the rankings of the "Patch /Repair and /or Overlay" category. Therefore, with this rating and the age of the street, the 2010 construction season is the optimal time to construct the bituminous overlay on Blackhawk Road south of Deerwood Drive. Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 (Segment 2) - The 2009 PCI rankings in this portion have an average pavement condition rating of 51 which also falls in the rankings of the "Patch /Repair and /or Overlay" category. However, the severe tenting condition that occurs in the winter months causing poor ride - ability warrants consideration of complete pavement reconstruction in this segment. Proposed Improvements - Pavement (C 1 4 Blackhawk Road Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive (Segment 1) - The proposed street improvements for this segment are shown in Figure 3A. The existing street section for this portion of 44' to 48' wide Blackhawk Road generally consists of 7" - 10" of bituminous pavement supported by 9" gravel base. The existing bituminous surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb and gutter (6' -8' wide adjacent to outside curbs and median curb) to accommodate a 1'/2 -inch bituminous overlay. The overlay, combined with the existing street section, will provide a street section consistent with current City standards for collector streets. The combination of patching and overlay will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature extremes experienced in Minnesota. Bituminous overlays will show some continued frost movements and reflective cracking consistent with the underlying pavement. Routine maintenance will still need to continue under the City's Pavement Management Program. Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 (Segment 2) - The proposed street improvements for this segment are shown in Figure 3B. The existing street section for this portion of 36' to 44' wide Blackhawk Road generally consists of 5" — 8" of bituminous pavement supported by 10" - 12" recycled concrete aggregate base. Because of the severe winter tenting that occurs on this segment, it is proposed to completely remove the existing pavement and recycled concrete aggregate base, and replace it with new bituminous pavement (5.5" thick) and aggregate base (15" thick, 25% maximum recycled product). Detouring through vehicle traffic on this segment to allow for this construction will be necessary. Local traffic will be provided access during construction. Other Proposed Improvements Concrete curb & gutter - Damaged curb & gutter will be replaced if severely cracked, spalled, or settled. Boulevard turf will be removed and replaced. While the contractor who performs the work is responsible for its establishment in the first 30 days after placement, adjacent property owners are encouraged to consistently water the new turf, where possible, to help ensure its growth. Signage - All traffic control and street identification signage within the project limits will be replaced due to diminished reflectivity, deteriorated support posts, and the signs or posts no longer meeting City and State standards. � 5 a Blackhawk Road Sidewalk/ Path Pedestrian Ramps — Recent revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires jurisdictional agencies to provide detectable warnings at all existing pedestrian ramps of sidewalks and paths with public streets that are improved, including mill & overlay improvements. The most common method of providing this detectable warning is through the installation of truncated domes a minimum of two feet in length across the width of all pedestrian ramps. This project provides for the installation of several truncated dome pedestrian ramps on the concrete sidewalk and bituminous paths within the project area. Driveway Replacement — The lone commercial property (Diffley Square) within the project area was constructed with a bituminous driveway entrance and is proposed to be replaced. The entrance will be reconstructed with a 7" thick concrete entrance apron in accordance with Eagan Standard Detail 440. This driveway entrance replacement provides commercial entrances of adequate strength and width and is consistent with similar past projects in commercial/ industrial areas throughout the City and the other properties within the project area. lO 6 Blackhawk Road New Bituminous Trail - New 8 -foot wide bituminous trail is proposed to be constructed under this project along the east side of Blackhawk Road, from Cliff Road to Beecher Drive, within existing right - of -way. This sidewalk will provide for safe pedestrian and vehicle movement along Blackhawk Road from the existing trail system at Cliff Road to the existing Highline Park trail through the middle of the City. Intersection Pavement Markings/ Re- Configurations The two 3- legged intersections of Blackhawk Road with Silver Bell Road and Deerwood Drive currently produce vehicle delays during peak times that are reaching unacceptable levels. With future traffic growth projections in the area, the level of service is anticipated to decline. Reconfigurations of the intersections' pavement markings, with no physical changes to the roadway widths, are proposed with this project to provide a higher level of service and reduce vehicle delays. It is proposed to install dedicated turn lanes on the Blackhawk Road approaches of these intersections which are anticipated to reduce vehicle queues and delays during peak hours in a cost - effective manner. Easement/Permits All work will be in the public right -of -way. No additional easements will be necessary. A Dakota County permit will be necessary for work within Cliff Road (County Road 32) and Diffley Road (County Road 30) right -of -way. A MN Department of Transportation permit will be necessary for work within State Highway 13 right -of -way. Blackhawk Road Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 2010 construction costs and include a 5% contingency and indirect cost of 30 %, which include legal, administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows: Blackhawk Road Edge Mill and Overlay w/ Signage — Segment 1 $ 436,600 Reconstruct Pavement/ Agg Base — Segment 2 .................. $1,410,000 Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter ............................. $ 82,400 Concrete Entrance Replacement ......... ............................... $ 8,800 Bituminous Trail ................................... ............................... $ 51,000 Total $1,988,800 Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the total improvement with costs allocated in accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy. All assessments will be revised based on final costs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. City Special Assessment Policy 8 Blackhawk Road Assessment Ratio Property City Mill and Overlay (Segment 1) • Commercial /Industrial 100% 0 • Low - Density Residential (R1, 2, 3) 50% 50% • High- Density Residential (R4) 75% 25% • Public Facility/ Parks 75% 25% Remove & Reconstruct (Segment 2)* • Commercial /Industrial 100% 0 • Low - Density Residential (R1, 2, 3) 75% 25% • High- Density Residential (R4) 100% 0 • Public Facility/ Parks 100% 0 Repair Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 0 100% Concrete Entrance Replacement 100% 0 Bituminous Trail 0 100% 8 Blackhawk Road * While the City's Special Assessment Policy calls for 75% to 100% of Remove & Reconstruct pavement costs to be assessed, properties with access to Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 — Segment 2) are proposed to be assessed at a mill and overlay rate with a 20% credit proposed because the pavement condition of Segment 2 has prematurely deteriorated (4 years prior to an anticipated 20 -year pavement life cycle, 4/20 = 20 %). This reduced assessment rate is in accordance with a recent update (February 16, 2010) of the City's Special Assessment Policy addressing premature infrastructure failure. CSegment > — Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive Street Improvement Assessments A Low Density Residential (R -1, 2, 3) — Direct Access All single - family residential equivalent properties on Blackhawk Road — Segment 1 (26.75 Total Lot Equivalents, 22 Single - Family, 5 Townhomes at 0.75) as shown on Figures 2C -2E, having direct driveway access on to Blackhawk Road to be improved, are proposed to be assessed based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project improvements. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R -1, R -2, R -3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet). The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $1,270 per Single Family Lot and $953 per Townhouse Unit and is calculated as follows: 1) % Low - Density Residential Frontage — Segment 1 = 3,395 f.f./ 15,858 Total f.f. = 21.4% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost + Signage Cost) x 50% x 32/44 x 21.4 %] _ $33,980 [Total Residential Assessment (R -1, 2, 3)] 3) $33,980 (Total Residential Assessment) -> $1,270 / lot ; ( 26.75 Single Family Residential Lots — Direct Access 4) Town house => 75% of a SF Lot (0.75 x $1,270/ lot) _ $953/ Townhouse Unit Townhouse (R -3) - Indirect Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (99 total, 132 townhomes = 99 lot equivalents) as shown on Figures 2C -2E, having indirect driveway access, via privately maintained streets onto Blackhawk Road, are proposed to be assessed, based on t the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R -1, R -2, R -3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet).The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent is $95 per Townhouse unit and is calculated is as follows: 9 C(� Blackhawk Road 1) % Residential with indirect access = 1,254 front footage / 15,858 (total f.f.) = 7.9% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 50% x 32/44 x 7.9 %] _ $12,540 [Total Residential Assessment w/ indirect driveway] 3) $12,540 (R -1,2,3 Residential Assessment) 4 $127/ lot 99 Residential Lot Equivalents 4) Town house => 75% of a Single Family Lot (0.75 x $127/ lot) _ $95/ Townhome unit Townhouse (R -3) — Undeveloped/ Indirect Driveway Access - All undeveloped R3 residential - zoned properties (3 parcels — SE corner Blackhawk/ Diffley Road) as shown on Figure 2D, having indirect driveway access onto Blackhawk Road, are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R -1, R -2, R -3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet).The estimated cost per front foot is $10 per front foot and is calculated is as follows: 1) % R3 Undeveloped Residential Assessable = 506 f.f. / 15,858 (total f.f.) = 3.2% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 50% x 32/44 x 3.2 %] = $5,080 (R3 Und. Res. Assessment) 3) $5,080 (R3 Assessment) 4 $10/ front foot 506 Front Foot High- Density Residential (R -4) — All high- density residential properties on Blackhawk Road — Segment 1, as shown on Figures 2C -2E, having direct driveway access on to Blackhawk Road, are proposed to be assessed based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 75% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R4) based on a street width of 44 feet. The estimated cost per front foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $21 per front foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % High- Density Residential Assessable =994 f.f. / 15,858 (total f.f.) = 6.3% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 75% x 6.3 %] = $20,600 (HD Res. Assessment) 3) $20,600 (HD Assessment) --> $211 front foot 994 Front Foot 7 Zo Blackhawk Road Public Facility/ Community Parks — The Eagan Cemetary is zoned as a public facility, and Meadowland Park, a community park, have direct access on to Blackhawk Road and are proposed to be assessed under this project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 75% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable to these types of properties for collector streets, regardless of width. The estimated cost per adjacent front foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $21 per front foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % Public Facilities/ Parks Assessable = 423 f.f. / 15,858 (total U.) = 2.7% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 75% x 2.7 %] = $8,840 (Total Public Facility/ Parks Assessment) 3) $8,840 (Parks Assessment) 4 $21.00/ front foot 423 Front Foot Commercial/ Industrial - All commercial/ industrial lots (Lot 1, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza, aka Diffley Square Commercial Center) as shown on Figures 2C — 2E, having driveway access on to Blackhawk Road are proposed to be assessed. The City's Assessment Policy states that 100% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for commercial/ industrial streets, regardless of width. The estimated cost per front foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $27.70 per front foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % Commercial /Industrial Assessable = 315 f.f./ 15,858 f.f = 2.0% 2) [$436,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 100% x 2.0 %] = $8,730 (Total Commercial/ Industrial Assessment) 3) $8,730 (Commercial /Industrial Assessment) -) $27.70/ F.F. 315 F.F. Commercial /Industrial Driveway Entrance Replacement One adjacent commercial/ industrial property (4130 Blackhawk Road — Diffley Square) with a driveway not to current City standards is proposed to be assessed the total cost of driveway entrance replacement improvements based on the area of driveway installed. The total driveway improvement assessment is calculated based on the individual requirements needed to replace the existing bituminous entrance with a concrete entrance, in accordance with current City standards. The estimated cost of this driveway replacement is $128 per square yard replaced. 11 Blackhawk Road Ni F_ Segment 2 — Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 Street Improvement Assessments Low Density Residential (R1, 2, 3) — Direct Access All single - family residential equivalent properties on Blackhawk Road — Segment 2 (33 Total Lot Equivalents, all Single - Family) as shown on Figures 2A -213, having direct driveway access on to Blackhawk Road to be improved, are proposed to be assessed based on the amount of front footage adjacent to Blackhawk Road within the project. While the City's Assessment Policy states that 75% of the pavement reconstruction costs are assessable for residential properties (R -1, R -2, R -3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet), the assessments are proposed at a mill & overlay ratio (50 %) minus a 20% credit, proposed because the pavement condition of Segment 2 has prematurely deteriorated (4 years prior to an anticipated 20 -year pavement life cycle, 4/20 = 20 %). The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy for a standard mill & overlay improvement, with a 20% credit, is $990 per Single Family Lot Equivalent and is calculated as follows: 1) % Low - Density Residential Frontage — Segment 2 = 4,493 f.f./ 12,901 Total U. = 34.8% 2) [$322,600 (Mill & Overlay Cost + Signage Cost) x 50% x 32/44 x 34.8 %] _ $40,820 [Total Residential Assessment (R -1, 2, 3)] 3) $40,820 (Total Residential Assessment) _ $1,240 / lot 33 Single Family Residential Lots — Direct Access 4) Single - Family Assessment — 20% _ $1,240 — 20 %($1,240) _ $990/ Lot equivalent Indirect Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (75 total, 100 townhomes = 75 lot equivalents) as shown on Figures 2A -2B, having indirect driveway access, via privately maintained streets onto Blackhawk Road, are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. While the City's Assessment Policy states that 75% of the pavement reconstruction costs are assessable for residential properties (R -1, R -2, R -3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet), the assessments are proposed at a mill & overlay ratio (50 %) minus a 20% credit, proposed because the pavement condition of Segment 2 has prematurely deteriorated. The estimated cost to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy for a standard mill & overlay improvement, with a 20% credit, is $33 per Townhouse unit and is calculated is as follows: Q ZZ / Blackhawk Road 1) % Residential with indirect access = 454 front footage / 12,901 (total f.f.) = 3.5% 2) [$322,600 (Mill & Overlay + Signage Cost) x 50% x 32/44 x 3.5 %] _ $4,100 [Total Residential Assessment w/ indirect driveway] 3) $4,100 (R -1,2,3 Residential Assessment)_ $55 75 Residential Lot Equivalents 4) Town house => 75% of a Single Family Lot (0.75 x $55) _ $41/ Townhouse unit 5) Townhouse Assessment — 20% _ $41 — 20 %($41) _ $33/ Townhouse unit Commercial/ Industrial - All commercial/ industrial lots (Blue Cross/ Blue Shield MN) as shown on Figure 2A, having access on to Blackhawk Road are proposed to be assessed. While the City's Assessment Policy states that 100% of the pavement reconstruction costs are assessable regardless of street width, the assessments are proposed at a mill & overlay ratio (100 %) minus a 20% credit, proposed because the pavement condition of Segment 2 has prematurely deteriorated. The estimated cost to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy for a standard mill & overlay improvement, with a 20% credit, is $20 per front foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % Commercial /Industrial Assessable = 1,072 f.f./ 12,901 f.f = 8.3% 2) [$322,600 (Mill & Overlay/ Signage Cost) x 100% x 8.3 %] = $26,780 (Total Commercial/ Industrial Assessment) 3) $26,780 (Commercial /Industrial Assessment) _ $25/ F.F. 1,072 F.F. Commercial /Industrial 4) Comm/ Ind Assessment — 20% _ $25 — 20 %($25) _ $20/ Front Foot Assessment Financing Options The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over five years for low - density residential properties and ten years for high- density residential, commercial/ industrial, and park/ public facility properties, with the interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements, estimated at 6.5 %. The following payment schedules are based on an estimated 6.5% interest rate for the assessed amounts: Single Family Residential Lot — Segment 1 = $1,270 First Year Fifth Year Principal Per Year $254 $254 Interest Per Year 13 76 Blackhawk Road $96 $17 Cost Per Year $350 $271 Townhouse Unit - Direct Access - Segment 1 = $953 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $191 $72 $263 Fifth Year $191 $ 12 $203 Townhouse Unit - Indirect Access - Segment 1 = $95 $ 89,770 $ 346,830 Reconstruct - Segment 2 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $19 $7 $27 Fifth Year $19 $1 $21 Single Family Residential Lot = $990 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $198 $75 $273 Fifth Year $198 $13 $211 Per $10,000 Assessment - High- Density Residential/ Commercial/ Industrial/ Parks/ Public Facility First Year Tenth Year Revenue Source Principal Per Year $1,000 $1,000 A summary of revenue sources is listed below Interest Per Year $758 Cost Per Year $1,758 (Pi nFr; Project Property City Cost Assessment Contribution Mill & Overlay - Segment 1 $ 436,600 $ 89,770 $ 346,830 Reconstruct - Segment 2 $1,410,000 $ 57,410* $1,352,950 Repair Existing Curb $ 82,400 -0- $ 82,400 Concrete Entrances $ 8,800 $ 8,800 - 0- Bituminous Trail $ 51,000 -0- $ 51,000 Total $1,988,800 $155,980 $1,832,820 *20% credit on standard mill & overlay rate assessment provided 14 Blackhawk Road The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $1,832,820 (92% of total). Proiect Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council/ Order Public Hearing ................. ............................... February 16, 2010 Update - Special Assessment Policy - Premature Infrastructure Failure ...................... ............................... February 16, 2010 Informational Meeting .......................................... ............................... March 10, 2010 Public Hearing .......................................... ............................... March 16, 2010 Approve Plans and Specifications ............................. ............................... April 6, 2010 Award Contract ............................................. ............................... May 18, 2010 Project Completion ................... ............................... .....................September, 2010 Final Cost Report ................... ............................... .....................September, 2010 Final Assessment Hearing ............................................ ............................... Fall, 2010 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement . ............................... May 15, 2011 15 -7a Blackhawk Road Blackhawk Road City Project No. 1008 Appendix A - Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 - Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive - Street Overlay Part I - Project 1015 - Bituminous Street Overlay - Segment 1 ment 2 - Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 - Pavement Replacement Sub Total Part 1 $ 319,846.00 +5% Contingencies Contract Unit $335,838.30 Amount Item No. I Item Unit Qty Price To Date Part I - Project 1015 - Bituminous Street Overlay - Segment 1 To Date Part II - Project 1015 - Pavement Removal & Replacement - Segment 2 2021.501 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 2232.501 Mill Bituminous Pavement (1 1/4" depth) SY 10,700 $ 0.70 $ 7,490.00 2350.501 Type LVWE45030B Wearing Course Mixture TON 3,800 $ 66.00 $ 250,800.00 2350.505 Type LVWE450308 Wear Course - Street Patch TON 10 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 2,400 $ 4.00 $ 9,600.00 2504.602 Remove & Repl. Frame and Ring Casting (Manhole) EA 1 $ 675.00 $ 675.00 2504.602 Adjust Frame and Ring Casting (Manhole) EA 14 $ 400.00 $ 5,600.00 2504.602 Adjust Manhole Casting - Riser Adjustment EA 7 $ 175.00 $ 1,225.00 2504.602 Repair Gate Valve Mid Section w/ Cover EA 3 $ 155.00 $ 465.00 2504.602 Repair Gate Valve Top Section w/ Cover EA 3 $ 175.00 $ 525.00 2504.602 Adjust Water Valve Box EA 6 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 2582.501 Pavement Message Arrow (Left) - Epoxy EA 4 $ 105.00 $ 420.00 2582.501 Pavement Message Arrow (Right) - Epoxy EA 2 $ 105.00 $ 210.00 2582.501 Pavement Message Arrow (Right/Thru) - Epoxy EA 1 $ 160.00 $ 160.00 2582.502 4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 6,800 $ 0.45 $ 3,060.00 2582.502 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 13,200 $ 0.22 $ 2,904.00 2582.502 24" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 120 $ 5.30 $ 636.00 2582.502 24" Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 20 $ 5.30 $ 106.00 2582.502 12" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 180 $ 4.00 $ 720.00 2582.503 Zebra Crosswalk White -Epoxy SF 300 $ 3.00 $ 900.00 2582.501 Pavement Message (Only) - Only EA 2 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 2582.501 Pavement Message (Ahead) - Ahead EA 1 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 2582.501 Pavement Message (Stop) - Epoxy EA 1 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 2565.602 NMC Loop Detector 6'x 6' - Diffley Road EA 6 $ 1,000.00 $ 6,000.00 SP -1 Signage Remove & Replace LS 1 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 2563.601 Traffic Control LS 1.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 Part I - Project 1015 - Bituminous Street Overlay - Segment 1 ment 2 - Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 - Pavement Replacement Sub Total Part 1 $ 319,846.00 +5% Contingencies $15,992.30 Subtotal $335,838.30 +30% Indirect Costs $100,751.49 Total Part 1 $436,590 73 Contract Unit Amount Item No. I Item I Unit I Qty Price To Date Part II - Project 1015 - Pavement Removal & Replacement - Segment 2 2021.501 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement (5" - 7 ") SY 27,500 $ 0.70 $ 19,250.00 2105.501 Common Excavation (Recycled Aggregate Base) CY 9,100 $ 6.00 $ 54,600.00 2211.501 Aggregate Base, CI. 6 (15 ") TON 27,000 $ 10.00 $ 270,000.00 2331.609 Type LVNW45030C Base Course Mixture (4" - 2 Lifts) TON 6,800 $ 67.00 $ 455,600.00 2350.501 Type LVWE45030C Wearing Course Mixture (1.5 ") TON 2,600 $ 68.00 $ 176,800.00 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 1,600 $ 4.00 $ 6,400.00 2504.602 Remove & Repl. Frame and Ring Casting (Manhole) EA 1 $ 675.00 $ 675.00 2504.602 Adjust Frame and Ring Casting (Manhole) EA 20 $ 400.00 $ 8,000.00 73 2504.602 Repair Gate Valve Mid Section w/ Cover EA 3 $ 155.00 $ 465.00 2504.602 Repair Gate Valve Top Section w/ Cover EA 3 $ 175.00 $ 525.00 2504.602 Adjust Water Valve Box EA 3 $ 125.00 $ 375.00 2582.501 Pavement Message Arrow (Left) - Epoxy EA 7 $ 105.00 $ 735.00 2582.501 Pavement Message Arrow (Right) - Epoxy EA 1 $ 105.00 $ 105.00 2582.502 4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 5,000 $ 0.45 $ 2,250.00 2582.502 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 2,600 $ 0.22 $ 572.00 2582.502 24" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 40 $ 5.30 $ 212.00 2582.502 24" Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 80 $ 4.00 $ 320.00 2582.503 Zebra Crosswalk White -Epoxy SF 500 $ 3.00 $ 1,500.00 2582.501 Pavement Message (Ahead) - Ahead EA 3 $ 150.00 $ 450.00 2582.501 Pavement Message (Stop) - Epoxy EA 3 $ 150.00 $ 450.00 SP -1 Signage Remove & Replace LS 1 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 2563.601 Traffic Control LS 1.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2521.501 4" Conc Ped Ramp w/ Wet Cast for Truncated Dome Inse SF Sub Total Part II $ 1,031,284 Part II - Project 1015 - Bituminous Street Removal & Replacement - Concrete Curb & Gutter B618 (mainline & medians) LF 1,000 $ 16.00 $ Segment 2 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter D412 +5% Contingencies 330 $ $51,564.20 $ 4,950.00 2531.604 Subtotal SY 44 $ $1,082,848.20 $ 2,200.00 2531.618 +30% Indirect Costs 190 $324,854.46 Total Part II $1,407,703 Part III - Project 1015 - Repair Existing Curb & Gutter 2104.501 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 1,200 $ 6.00 $ 7,200.00 2104.503 Remove Bituminous Trail Pavement SF 800 $ 0.50 $ 400.00 2104.505 Remove Concrete Valley Gutter SY 44 $ 6.00 $ 264.00 2105.526 Select Topsoil Borrow CY 50 $ 22.00 $ 1,100.00 2211.501 Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 (100% Crushed) TON 10 $ 15.40 $ 154.00 2350.503 Type LVWE45030B Wear Course - 2" Trail Patch TON 10 $ 130.00 $ 1,300.00 2350.503 Type LVWE45030B Wear Course - Driveways TON 5 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 2350.505 Type LVWE45030B Wear Course - Street Patch TON 25 $ 100.00 $ 2,500.00 2504.602 Repair Residential Sprinkler Head EA 3 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 2504.602 Repair Sprinkler System EA 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 2506.602 R & R Frame & Ring Casting (CB) EA 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 2506.602 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (CB) EA 18 $ 250.00 $ 4,500.00 2506.602 Install 2 x 3 CB Erosion Barrier Shroud EA 4 $ 100.00 $ 400.00 2521.501 6" Concrete Walk - Bullnose SF 300 $ 6.00 $ 1,800.00 2521.501 4" Conc Ped Ramp w/ Wet Cast for Truncated Dome Inse SF 1260 $ 4.50 $ 5,670.00 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter B618 (mainline & medians) LF 1,000 $ 16.00 $ 16,000.00 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter D412 LF 330 $ 15.00 $ 4,950.00 2531.604 Concrete Valley Gutter SY 44 $ 50.00 $ 2,200.00 2531.618 Truncated Dome Detectable Warning Paver SF 190 $ 42.00 $ 7,980.00 2540.602 Repair Residential Landscaping EA 2 $ 165.00 $ 330.00 2575.505 Sodding, Type Lawn (Highland) SY 330 $ 7.00 $ 2,310.00 Part III - Project 1015 - Repair Existing Curb & Gutter Part IV - Project 1015 - Concrete Entrance Aprons 2104.501 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter $ 60,358.00 $3,017.90 $63,375.90 $19,012.77 $82,388.67 .11 11 Sub Total Part III +5% Contingencies Subtotal +30% Indirect Costs Total Part III LF 100 6.00 7� $ 60,358.00 $3,017.90 $63,375.90 $19,012.77 $82,388.67 .11 11 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement 2105.501 Common Excavation 2211.511 Aggregate Base, CL. 5 (100% Crushed) 2350.505 Type LVWE450308 Wear Course - Street Patch 2506.602 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (CB) 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter B618 2531.503 7" Concrete Apron Incl. Curb & Gutter (High - Early) 2575.505 Sodding 2575.551 Compost Grade 1 Part IV - Project 1015 - Concrete Entrance Aprons Part V - Project 1015 - Bituminous Trail (Cliff Road to Beecher Dr.) 2104.501 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter (Ped. Ramp) 2105.501 Common Excavation (P) SP -101 Trim Tree SP -102 Salvage & Reinstall Mailboxes 2105.526 Select Topsoil Borrow 2211.501 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) 2350.503 Type LVWE45030C Wear Course 2" Trail 2521.501 4" Conc. Ped. Ramp w /Wet Cast for Trunc Dome Inset 2521.602 Truncated Dome Detectable Warning Paver (2'x2') 2531.501 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter (Ped Ramp) 2563.601 Traffic Control 2575.505 Sodding - Highland, type lawn Part V - Project 1015 - Bituminous Trail 75- SY 75 4.75 CY 10 18.75 TON 10 15.00 TON 3 100.00 EA 2 250.00 LF 20 15.50 SY 75 50.00 SY 20 7.00 TON 5 27.00 $ Sub Total Part IV TON +5% Contingencies $ Subtotal TON +30% Indirect Costs Total Part IV L. F. 50 $ 6.00 $ C.Y. 300 $ 14.00 $ EA 10 150.00 EA 3 150.00 C.Y. 200 $ 22.00 $ TON 360 $ 16.00 $ TON 100 $ 68.00 $ $ 4.50 S. F. 100 $ EA. 24 $ 42.00 $ L. F. 50 $ 16.00 $ L.S. 1 $ 500.00 $ S.Y. 1600 $ 7.00 $ Sub Total Part V +5% Contingencies Subtotal +30% Indirect Costs Total Part V Total Project Cost 356.25 187.50 150.00 300.00 500.00 310.00 3,750.00 140.00 135.00 6,428.75 $321.44 $6,750.19 $2,025.06 $8,775.24 300.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 450.00 4,400.00 5,760.00 6,800.00 450.00 1,008.00 800.00 500.00 11,200.00 $ 37,368.00 $1,868.40 $39,236.40 $11,770.92 $51,007.32 $1,986,463.68 Blackhawk Road Street Improvements City Project No. 1015 Appendix B - Preliminary Assessment Roll CLIFF ROAD TO DEERWOOD DRIVE - Segment 1 R1, 2, 3 RESIDENTIAL - Direct Access BLACKHAWK ROAD (Blackhawk Circle - Bluestone Drive East) 10- 02000- 040 -75 Lot Lot 10- 16706 - 140 -07 Address P.I.N. Equivalent Assessment Total BLACKHAWK ROAD (Blackhawk Circle - Bluestone Drive East) 10- 02000- 040 -75 3 4001 10- 16706 - 140 -07 1 $1,270 $1,270 4007 10- 16706 - 130 -07 1 $1,270 $1,270 4010 10- 19910 - 020 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4049 10- 16706 - 150 -08 1 $1,270 $1,270 $1,270 Total 4 $5,080 $5,080 BLACKHAWK ROAD (Bluestone Drive East - Kathryn Circle) 4024 10- 02000- 040 -75 3 $1,270 $3,810 4056 10- 14390 - 010 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4060 10- 14390- 020 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4064 10- 14390 - 030 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4095 10- 02000 - 041 -77 1 $1,270 $1,270 4100 10- 02000 - 030 -78 1 $1,270 $1,270 4104 10- 02000 - 010 -78 1 $1,270 $1,270 4105 10- 02000 - 030 -77 1 $1,270 $1,270 Total 10 $10,160 $12,700 BLACKHAWK ROAD (Kathryn Circle - Diff ley Road) 4155 10- 11900 - 150 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4165 10- 02000 - 030 -79 1 $1,270 $1,270 4185 10- 02000 - 040 -79 1 $1,270 $1,270 4195 10- 02000- 050 -79 1 $1,270 $1,270 No Address 10- 02000 - 070 -79 1 $1,270 $1,270 Total 5 $6,350 $6,350 BLACKHAWK ROAD (Cliff Lake Road - Cliff Road) 4520 10- 17753 - 020 -01 1 $1,270 $1,270 4540 10- 17750 - 050 -02 1 $1,270 $1,270 4550 10- 17750 - 040 -02 1 $1,270 $1,270 4247 Total 3 $3,810 $3,810 BLACKHAWK ROAD (Diffley Road - Cliff Lake Road) 4235 10- 02900 - 010 -10 0.75 $1,270 $953 4241 10- 72975- 012 -07 0.75 $1,270 $953 4243 10- 72975 - 011 -07 0.75 $1,270 $953 4247 10- 72975- 022 -07 0.75 $1,270 $953 4249 10- 72975 - 021 -07 0.75 $1,270 $953 Total 3.75 $6,350 $4,763 71p R1, 2, 3 RESIDENTIAL - Undeveloped/ Indirect Access Address P.I.N. Front Footage Rate/ F.F. Total 4230/4232 10- 02900 - 040 -05 257 $10 $2,570 1832 10- 02900 - 030 -05 192 $10 $1,920 1834 10- 02900 - 010 -05 57 $10 $570 1836 Total 506 $30 $5,060 R1, 2, 3 RESIDENTIAL - Indirect Access SOUTHPOINTE TERRACE (Takes access off Blackhawk and Beaver Dam) Address P.I.N. Lot Equivalent Lot Assessment Total 1830 10- 72977 - 002 -03 1 $95 $95 1832 10- 72977 - 001 -03 1 $95 $95 1834 10- 72977 - 003 -03 1 $95 $95 1836 10- 72977 - 009 -03 1 $95 $95 1838 10- 72977 - 007 -03 1 $95 $95 1840 10- 72977 - 008 -03 1 $95 $95 1842 10- 72977 - 011 -03 1 $95 $95 1844 10- 72977 - 012 -03 1 $95 $95 1846 10- 72977 - 010 -03 1 $95 $95 1848 10- 72977 - 004 -03 1 $95 $95 1850 10- 72977 - 006 -03 1 $95 $95 1852 10- 72977 - 005 -03 1 $95 $95 1854 10- 72977 - 014 -03 1 $95 $95 1856 10- 72977 - 013 -03 1 $95 $95 1858 10- 72977 - 015 -03 1 $95 $95 1860 10- 72977 - 021 -03 1 $95 $95 1862 10- 72977 - 019 -03 1 $95 $95 1864 10- 72977 - 020 -03 1 $95 $95 1866 10- 72977 - 023 -03 1 $95 $95 1868 10- 72977 - 024 -03 1 $95 $95 1870 10- 72977 - 022 -03 1 $95 $95 1872 10- 72977 - 016 -03 1 $95 $95 1874 10- 72977 - 018 -03 1 $95 $95 1876 10- 72977 - 017 -03 1 $95 $95 1878 10- 72977 - 026 -03 1 $95 $95 1880 10- 72977 - 025 -03 1 $95 $95 1882 10- 72977 - 027 -03 1 $95 $95 1884 10- 72977 - 033 -03 1 $95 $95 1886 10- 72977 - 031 -03 1 $95 $95 1888 10- 72977 - 032 -03 1 $95 $95 1890 10- 72977 - 035 -03 1 $95 $95 1892 10- 72977 - 036 -03 1 $95 $95 1894 10- 72977 - 034 -03 1 $95 $95 1896 10- 72977 - 028 -03 1 $95 $95 1898 10- 72977 - 030 -03 1 $95 $95 1900 10- 72977- 029 -03 1 $95 $95 1902 10- 72977 - 038 -03 1 $95 $95 1904 10- 72977 - 037 -03 1 $95 $95 1906 10- 72977 - 039 -03 1 $95 $95 1908 10- 72977 - 045 -03 1 $95 $95 1910 10- 72977 - 043 -03 1 $95 $95 1912 10- 72977 - 044 -03 1 $95 $95 1914 10- 72977 - 047 -03 1 $95 $95 1916 10- 72977 - 048 -03 1 $95 $95 1918 10- 72977 - 046 -03 1 $95 $95 1920 10- 72977 - 040 -03 1 $95 $95 1922 10- 72977 - 042 -03 1 $95 $95 1924 10- 72977 - 041 -03 1 $95 $95 4425 Total 48 $4,560 $4,560 SLEEPY HOLLOW (Cliff Lake Townhomes) 1849 10- 17791- 145 -02 1 $95 $95 1851 10- 17791- 146 -02 1 $95 $95 1853 10- 17791- 147 -02 1 $95 $95 1855 10- 17791- 148 -02 1 $95 $95 4421 10- 17791- 133 -02 1 $95 $95 4423 10- 17791- 134 -02 1 $95 $95 4425 10- 17791 - 135 -02 1 $95 $95 4427 10- 17791- 136 -02 1 $95 $95 1868 Total 8 $760 $760 BUCKLEY BAY (Cliff Lake Townhomes) 1860 10- 17791- 126 -02 1 $95 $95 1862 10- 17791- 125 -02 1 $95 $95 1864 10- 17791- 124 -02 1 $95 $95 1866 10- 17791- 123 -02 1 $95 $95 1868 10- 17791- 122 -02 1 $95 $95 1870 10- 17791- 121 -02 1 $95 $95 1866 Total 6 $570 $570 CASEY TRAIL (Cliff Lake Townhomes) 1860 10- 17791- 114 -02 1 $95 $95 1861 10- 17791 - 127 -02 1 $95 $95 1862 10- 17791 - 113 -02 1 $95 $95 1863 10- 17791- 128 -02 1 $95 $95 1864 10- 17791- 112 -02 1 $95 $95 1865 10- 17791- 129 -02 1 $95 $95 1866 10- 17791- 111 -02 1 $95 $95 1867 10- 17791- 130 -02 1 $95 $95 1868 10- 17791- 110 -02 1 $95 $95 1869 10- 17791- 131 -02 1 $95 $95 1870 10- 17791- 109 -02 1 $95 $95 1871 10- 17791- 132 -02 1 $95 $95 Total 12 $1,140 $1,140 MICHAEL POINT DRIVE (Cliff Lake Townhomes) 1850 10- 17791- 144 -02 1 $95 $95 1852 10- 17791- 143 -02 1 $95 $95 1854 10- 17791- 142 -02 1 $95 $95 1856 10- 17791- 141 -02 1 $95 $95 1861 10- 17791- 115 -02 1 $95 $95 1863 10- 17791 - 116 -02 1 $95 $95 1865 10- 17791- 117 -02 1 $95 $95 1867 10- 17791- 118 -02 1 $95 $95 1869 10- 17791- 119 -02 1 $95 $95 1871 10- 17791- 120 -02 1 $95 $95 4420 10- 17791- 140 -02 1 $95 $95 or 4422 10- 17791- 139 -02 1 $95 $95 4424 10- 17791- 138 -02 1 $95 $95 4426 10- 17791- 137 -02 1 $95 $95 4132 Total 14 $1,330 $1,330 RAPTOR ROAD (Grevhawk 2nd Addition) 4120 10- 30976 - 140 -02 1 $95 $95 4124 10- 30976 - 130 -02 1 $95 $95 4128 10- 30976 - 120 -02 1 $95 $95 4132 10- 30976 - 110 -02 1 $95 $95 4136 10- 30976 - 100 -02 1 $95 $95 4140 10- 30976 - 090 -02 1 $95 $95 4144 10- 30976 - 080 -02 1 $95 $95 4148 10- 30976 - 070 -02 1 $95 $95 4152 10- 30976 - 060 -02 1 $95 $95 4156 10- 30976- 050 -02 1 $95 $95 4160 10- 30976- 040 -02 1 $95 $95 4164 10- 30976 - 030 -02 1 $95 $95 4168 10- 30976 - 020 -02 1 $95 $95 4172 10- 30976- 010 -02 1 $95 $95 1740 Total 14 $1,330 $1,330 TALON TRAIL (Grevhawk 2nd Addition) 1700 10- 30976 - 060 -03 1 $95 $95 1704 10- 30976- 050 -03 1 $95 $95 1708 10- 30976 - 040 -03 1 $95 $95 1711 10- 30976 - 150 -02 1 $95 $95 1712 10- 30976 - 030 -03 1 $95 $95 1715 10- 30976 - 160 -02 1 $95 $95 1716 10- 30976 - 020 -03 1 $95 $95 1719 10- 30976 - 170 -02 1 $95 $95 1720 10- 30976- 010 -03 1 $95 $95 1723 10- 30976- 180 -02 1 $95 $95 1724 10- 30976- 160 -04 1 $95 $95 1728 10- 30976- 150 -04 1 $95 $95 1732 10- 30976 - 140 -04 1 $95 $95 1736 10- 30976- 130 -04 1 $95 $95 1740 10- 30976 - 120 -04 1 $95 $95 1744 10- 30976 - 110 -04 1 $95 $95 1748 10- 30976 - 100 -04 1 $95 $95 1752 10- 30976 - 090 -04 1 $95 $95 1756 10- 30976 - 080 -04 1 $95 $95 1760 10- 30976 - 070 -04 1 $95 $95 1764 10- 30976- 060 -04 1 $95 $95 1768 10- 30976- 050 -04 1 $95 $95 1771 10- 30976 - 050 -01 1 $95 $95 1772 10- 30976 - 040 -04 1 $95 $95 1775 10- 30976 - 040 -01 1 $95 $95 1776 10- 30976 - 030 -04 1 $95 $95 1779 10- 30976 - 030 -01 1 $95 $95 1780 10- 30976 - 020 -04 1 $95 $95 1783 10- 30976- 020 -01 1 $95 $95 1784 10- 30976 - 010 -04 1 $95 $95 Total 30 $2,850 $2,850 -79 R -4 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Address P.I.N. Front Footage Rate/ F.F. Total 1800 -1831 Trailway Driv 10- 14389 - 020 -00 151 $21 $3,171 Eagan Cemetery 10- 14389 - 010 -00 130 $21 $2,730 4276 Blackhawk Rd 10- 02900 - 010 -06 110 $21 $2,311 4280 10- 02900 - 020 -06 137 $21 $2,870 4290 10- 02900 - 010 -08 272 $21 $5,712 4300 10- 02900 - 030 -08 194 $21 $4,081 10- 14325- 030 -02 Total 994 $126 $20,874 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Address P.I.N. Front Footage Rate/ F.F. Total 4130 Blackhawk Rd.` 10- 14388 - 010 -01 315 $27.70 $17,526 Eagan Cemetery Total 315 $27.70 $17,526 "Includes Estimated $8,800 Concrete Driveway Assessment PARK/ PUBLIC FACILITY Address P.I.N. Front Footage Rate/ F.F. Total Eagan Cemetery 10- 14388 - 010 -00 50.21 $21 $1,054 Eagan Cemetery 10- 02000 - 011 -80 147.45 $21 $3,096 Meadowland Park 10- 02900 - 014 -51 225.50 $21 $4,736 10- 01700- 011 -75 Total 1 423.16 1 $63 $8,886 DEERWOOD TO HIGHWAY 13 - Segment 2 R1, 2, 3 RESIDENTIAL - Direct Access BLACKHAWK ROAD (Hwy 13 - Robin Lane) Lot Lot 3635 Address P.I.N. Equivalent Assessment Total BLACKHAWK ROAD (Hwy 13 - Robin Lane) 3635 10- 01700 - 010 -78 1 $990 $990 3645 10- 01700 - 020 -78 1 $990 $990 3665 10- 01700 - 030 -78 1 $990 $990 3690 10- 01700- 011 -75 1 $990 $990 3701 10- 14325 - 010 -02 1 $990 $990 3705 10- 14325 - 020 -02 1 $990 $990 3709 10- 14325- 030 -02 1 $990 $990 3710 10- 01700- 030 -75 1 $990 $990 3713 10- 14325- 040 -02 1 $990 $990 3717 10- 14325 - 050 -02 1 $990 $990 3720 10- 01700 - 040 -75 1 $990 $990 3721 10- 14325 - 060 -02 1 $990 $990 3725 10- 14300 - 020 -00 1 $990 $990 3729 10- 14300 - 030 -00 1 $990 $990 3730 10- 01700- 050 -75 1 $990 $990 3733 10- 14300 - 040 -00 1 $990 $990 3737 10- 14300 - 041 -00 1 $990 $990 3741 10- 14300 - 050 -00 1 $990 $990 No Address 10- 01700 - 060 -75 1 $990 $990 MAN 3750 10- 01700 - 070 -75 1 $990 $990 1 Total 20 $19,800 $19,800 BLACKHAWK ROAD (Robin Lane - Blackhawk Circle) 10- 77100- 060 -06 1 3754 10- 63000 - 010 -01 1 $990 $990 3755 10- 01700 - 010 -81 1 $990 $990 3760 10- 63000 - 020 -01 1 $990 $990 3798 10- 14387 - 010 -01 1 $990 $990 3897 10- 16705 - 610 -06 1 $990 $990 3905 10- 16705 - 600 -06 1 $990 $990 3910 10- 02000 - 010 -03 1 $990 $990 3911 10- 16705 - 590 -06 1 $990 $990 3917 10- 16705 - 580 -06 1 $990 $990 3923 10- 16705 - 570 -06 1 $990 $990 3929 10- 16705 - 560 -06 1 $990 $990 3935 10- 16705 - 550 -06 1 $990 $990 3941 10- 16705 - 540 -06 1 $990 $990 $33 Total 13 $12,870 $12,870 R1, 2, 3 RESIDENTIAL - Indirect Access BLUEBILL DRIVE (Town View First Addition) 1724 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100- 060 -06 1 $33 $33 1726 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 050 -06 1 $33 $33 1727 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 040 -05 1 $33 $33 1728 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 040 -06 1 $33 $33 1730 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 030 -06 1 $33 $33 1731 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 020 -05 1 $33 $33 1732 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 020 -06 1 $33 $33 1733 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 010 -05 1 $33 $33 1734 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 010 -06 1 $33 $33 1738 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 040 -07 1 $33 $33 1740 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100- 030 -07 1 $33 $33 1741 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 040 -04 1 $33 $33 1742 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 020 -07 1 $33 $33 1743 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 030 -04 1 $33 $33 1744 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 010 -07 1 $33 $33 1745 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 020 -04 1 $33 $33 1747 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 010 -04 1 $33 $33 1751 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 040 -03 1 $33 $33 1753 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 030 -03 1 $33 $33 1755 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 020 -03 1 $33 $33 1757 BLUEBILL DR 10- 77100 - 010 -03 1 $33 $33 Total 21 $693 $693 BLUEBILL CIRCLE (Town View First Addition) 1729 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 030 -05 1 $33 $33 1758 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 010 -02 1 $33 $33 1760 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 020 -02 1 $33 $33 1762 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 030 -02 1 $33 $33 1764 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 040 -02 1 $33 $33 1766 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 050 -02 1 $33 $33 1768 BLUEBILL CIR 10- 77100 - 060 -02 1 $33 $33 Total 7 $231 $231 FLAMINGO DRIVE (Town View First Addition) 1708 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 060 -18 1 $33 $33 1710 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100- 050 -18 1 $33 $33 1712 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -18 1 $33 $33 1714 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -18 1 $33 $33 1716 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -18 1 $33 $33 1718 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 010 -18 1 $33 $33 1726 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -15 1 $33 $33 1728 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -15 1 $33 $33 1730 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -15 1 $33 $33 1732 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 010 -15 1 $33 $33 1736 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -14 1 $33 $33 1737 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 060 -13 1 $33 $33 1738 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -14 1 $33 $33 1739 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 050 -13 1 $33 $33 1740 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -14 1 $33 $33 1741 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -13 1 $33 $33 1743 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -13 1 $33 $33 1745 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100- 020 -13 1 $33 $33 1747 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100- 010 -13 1 $33 $33 1749 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 010 -12 1 $33 $33 1750 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 010 -11 1 $33 $33 1751 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -12 1 $33 $33 1752 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -11 1 $33 $33 1753 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -12 1 $33 $33 1754 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 030 -11 1 $33 $33 1755 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -12 1 $33 $33 1756 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -11 1 $33 $33 1757 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 050 -12 1 $33 $33 1759 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 060 -12 1 $33 $33 1760 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 060 -10 1 $33 $33 1762 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100- 050 -10 1 $33 $33 1764 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 040 -10 1 $33 $33 1766 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100- 030 -10 1 $33 $33 1768 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 020 -10 1 $33 $33 1770 FLAMINGO DR 10- 77100 - 010 -10 1 $33 $33 1742 FLAMINGO DR S 10- 77100 - 010 -14 1 $33 $33 Total 36 $1,188 $1,188 GOLDEN HILL TERRACE (Town View First Addition) 3760 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 010 -08 1 $33 $33 3762 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 020 -08 1 $33 $33 3764 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 030 -08 1 $33 $33 3766 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 040 -08 1 $33 $33 3768 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 050 -08 1 $33 $33 3770 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 060 -08 1 $33 $33 3776 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 010 -09 1 $33 $33 3778 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 020 -09 1 $33 $33 3780 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 030 -09 1 $33 $33 3782 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 040 -09 1 $33 $33 3784 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 050 -09 1 $33 $33 3786 GOLDEN HILL TER 10- 77100 - 060 -09 1 $33 $33 Total 12 $396 $396 r` GREY DOVE LANE (Town View First Addition) 3767 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 010 -19 1 $33 $33 3768 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100- 010 -20 1 $33 $33 3771 GREY DOVE LN 10 -77100 -020 -19 1 $33 $33 3772 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 020 -20 1 $33 $33 3773 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100- 030 -19 1 $33 $33 3774 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 030 -20 1 $33 $33 3777 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 040 -19 1 $33 $33 3778 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 040 -20 1 $33 $33 3780 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 050 -20 1 $33 $33 3781 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100- 050 -19 1 $33 $33 3784 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100- 060 -20 1 $33 $33 3785 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 060 -19 1 $33 $33 3786 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 070 -20 1 $33 $33 3790 GREY DOVE LN 10- 77100 - 080 -20 1 $33 $33 Total 14 $462 $462 RED ROBIN LANE (Town View First Addition) 3772 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 010 -17 1 $33 $33 3775 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 010 -16 1 $33 $33 3776 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 020 -17 1 $33 $33 3778 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 030 -17 1 $33 $33 3779 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 020 -16 1 $33 $33 3780 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100- 040 -17 1 $33 $33 3781 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100- 030 -16 1 $33 $33 3782 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100- 050 -17 1 $33 $33 3785 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 040 -16 1 $33 $33 3786 RED ROBIN LN 10- 77100 - 060 -17 1 $33 $33 Total 10 $330 $330 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Address P.I.N. Front Footage Rate/ F.F. Total 3545 Blue Cross Rd 10- 01700 - 010 -03 325 $20.00 $6,500 10- 14550 - 030 -01 747 $20.00 $14,940 Total 1,072 $40 $21,440 City of Eap Engineering Department Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization - Project 1015 S4 Location Map 1/15/2J0 Fig. 1 ^b A LEGEND /3545/ 1,072.0 F. F. / BCBS 1823 �� ♦ 1827 1819 1815 1851 1847 1843 1814 1822 1818 V,. 3635 I � � Comm. /Industrial i Townhouse (R3) Xx.txx: Single Family (R1) 3645 3665 j 3701 3705 3709 3713 3717 3721 SKY HILL PARK NORTH CRESTRIDGE LN. KYLLO LN. 3690 3725 3710 1 _ "^ 3720 5. �� 3729 ' 3730 �j 3733 yti <k� Obi F3737 10- 01700 - 060 -751 �;5�; -! k' I 13741 Y� 3745 3750 � <'X 3755 • � . v x c��{� 1 13754 D 3760 . '` f r Ii�<�`x <x ✓� �r/r =y71 f W4 1749 X U x ,Accessv��fzr� SKATER IR�7 \7 —� L�._ I �- – J `f� � � as w � i i :a: s. ca �•s � • � -a ea .l! a ira �7aya � • r � n of ♦ �� ♦ ,.�: � �_� _ - 17, - - - -, See Fig. 2B] =J gS" Blackhawk Road City of byfl Street Revitalization - Project 1015 Fig. 2A Engineering Department Assessments / Street Improvement Area - Segment 2 I< - Ln o -n WIWI yTown VieNi-. % SILVER BELL ROAD 7T,T Single Family (R1) T �,l o Q I. o U _J Q v6m -_ -- r76o 1762 �1 3897 3905 3911 3917 :r 3923 - i_ See Fig. 2A SR`C I R. 1743 -1 - -3798 ,0fI 1 I I \ I IL; i RIVERTON AVE. 1749 '._PALISADE C R. i / \ 17 0 ■L�17�_�5 I � COCHRANE AVE. DAVENPORT AVE. 3929: � � v B � — i 3935 I �� 39 / 3941 ._ 1_ LKHWK CIR. _- 1761 1� NOIvTH TURQUOISE TR_ 1� �I 760 I SARTELL AVE. 1761 GABBRO -- 17 (, it i i 1 �1. SEGMENT2 - - - - - - - _ SEGMENT 2 - - -� -- - -- - - -- - - - - -r. �,.,� DEERWOOD DRIVE - SEGMENT 1 SEGMENT 1 i 4700 7 , ,� � See Fig. 2C g(p Blackhawk Road City of Eap Street Revitalization - Project 1015 Fig. 2B Engineering Depcartm-=nt Assessments / Street Improvement Area - Segment 2 I Ot-t-, Fly. /-ED I 1750 SEGMENT 1749 SEGMENT 1760 - �- I -J-1 LEGEND -FLP - DEERWOOD DRIVE Comm./Industrial SEGMENT 4001'- SE G ENT1 401 Townhouse (R3) 4007 F- w Park / Public Facility 1771 1705 TACONITE TR.` Single Family (R1) Concrete Entrance Installation ----L - - - L--L--L—L 4024 BLUESTONE DR,- 4055 4056 4064 1771 4060 J CARNELIAN q.- QI MEAD F 01 OW�gRk RD. 'J 1, 4095 Y / I 1 �2 BOO L LY 1815 4105 l 4100 KATHRYN GIH, 4104 x 4155 2 - y 4165 u 4140 ri 4185 sq 4130 4195 77 Eagan I'- J Cernetary ia35 -4,1 184 0 r ;ORT� DIFFLEY ROAD See Fig. ED] Blackhawk Road City of Eap Street Revitalization - Project 1015 Fig. 2C Engineering Department Assessments / Street Improvement Area - Segment 2 Meadowland Park See Fig. 2E] Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization - Project 1015 Fig. 2D Engineering Department Assessments / Street Improvement Area - Segment 1 rw w mg, wmw U W-W, w M R R M R A MENNEN OMEN MOMME OEM NONE mom IMMMMMMMMM mmmmomom ■ENEM M MENEM MOEN • MEME MEMEMEN I No M ON NIMEM IMIIIMMII lyre VEEN ,'K ® • ® f+ vf Meadowland Park See Fig. 2E] Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization - Project 1015 Fig. 2D Engineering Department Assessments / Street Improvement Area - Segment 1 I(BEAR 'PA LL % 61A V Se Ilk Xx ,-i k_- W �� LO i LIJ < co i. W II z1� 10 % LIJ \ I � N N LLJ j, l 1 e ' OFF RoP, , �ra� o� Lu C, � �o e e e Site erg e c � ,\q - 12�- EDGE MILL (6' -8' wide) Typ. Z) UL. 0 1 C tSHJC Existing Typical Section Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive - Segment 1 ROW 90'- 100' 44 '- 48' (F -F) - 1112" 2360 WEAR COURSE BITUMINOUS OVERLAY BITUMINOUS TACK COAT l 7 " -10" BITUMINOUS SURFACE - -- - 9" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Bituminous Street Overlay go REPLACE EX. CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED Proposed Typical Section 9O Blackhawk Road Clty of Eanall Cliff Road to Deerwood Drive - Segment 1 Fig, 3A Engineering Department Typical Sections - Project 1015 I V - IL IlU l., I VLCU I, IJI 14 I1 RC I C AGGREGATE BASE Existing Typical Section Deerwood Drive to Hwy. 13 - Segment 2 G:7 �.� vf. V rlVVl \LVfll L UfI�JL ( MAX. 30% RECYCLED) EX. CURB & S DIRECTED Bituminous Street Overlay Deerwood Drive to Hwy. 13 - Segment 2 1 Blackhawk Road ' City of Eap Deerwood Drive to Hwy. 13 - Segment 2 Fig. 3B Typical Sections - Project 1015 CITY PROJECT NO 1015 INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING BLACKHAWK ROAD (CLIFF RD TO HWY 13) STREET REVITALIZATION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 2010 6:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Attendance: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer, 5 property owners representing 5 properties (see attached sign -in sheet). A. Presentation of Project Details • Gorder welcomed the property owners and presented project information, including details such as construction, costs, schedule and assessments. • Gorder also presented background information regarding the winter "tenting" and the associated poor ride quality on Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to Highway 13. Gorder also reviewed the recent update to the City's Special Assessment Policy regarding premature failure of infrastructure. B. Questions/ Comments • Two property owners (4280 and 4290 Blackhawk Road) questioned why their assessment is proposed to be more than a single - family home, because they live in single- family homes on the properties. They inquired as to their recourse to reduce their assessment to a single- family rate? There are four properties (4276, 4280, 4290, 4300 Blackhawk Road) that are either zoned High - Density Residential (R4) or guided as High - Density Residential in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. Although the properties are currently used for single - family homes, the City's Special Assessment Policy provides for properties to be assessed at their highest and best uses, as identified with zoning or the comp guide. They can request that the City Council grant a deferment of the additional assessment amount beyond the single - family rate, until such time that the properties redevelop to the high - density residential use. • Why is my single - family assessment rate higher in Segment 1 than the one proposed for Segment 2? All the assessments for properties adjacent to Segment 2 (Deeitivood to Hwy 13) are proposed to receive a 20% credit due to the premature failure (tenting) of the pavement in that area. The pavement was anticipated to last a minimum of 20 years, but is only 16 years old, and the credit is based on 4 years/ 20 years = 20 %. The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. qa NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING lbo Blackhawk Road Street Revitalization City Project 1015 City of EaV� Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:00 m. NAME 1. 2. 3. f 4. 5. 6.s�rC�L� 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. q 2 G: \Forms \Sign -In Sheets \SIGN- IN.SHT & logo.doc ADDRESS L Al -( � l 7 �•Z`��dLL��d "'o��ti Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (STONEHAVEN) — LENNAR ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to amend the Preliminary Planned Development to reduce the unit count and change the mix of housing types upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 264 lots and 7 outlots for 363 dwelling units upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: ➢ PD Amendment — At least 3 votes ➢ Preliminary Subdivision — Majority of Councilmembers present FACTS: ➢ The applicant proposes a PD Amendment to modify the number and type of housing units for this site. A Preliminary Subdivision is also proposed to establish the right -of- way and individual lots and outlots within the site. ➢ This site was the subject of litigation which was resolved with a Contingent Settlement Agreement in 2008, followed by the City's approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to Special Area and a Preliminary Planned Development. ➢ The Preliminary PD Agreement was executed in June of 2008, and provides for a variety housing types up to 480 units and 30 acres of open space on 120 acres. ➢ The proposed PD Amendment is for 363 units on 115 acres, a density of 3.14 units /acre, and approximately 35 acres of open space. ➢ Five different housing types are shown on the Site Plan: single- family homes on standard (85') lots, single - family homes on small (65') lots, twin homes, row townhomes, and a future senior housing multi- family building. ➢ A homeowner's association will be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements is to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. 9� ➢ The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the preliminary plat on February 16, 2010 and requested additional traffic analysis. The additional analysis has been completed and is included in the attachments below. It indicates that no significant traffic benefits would arise from additional connections between the proposed development and Wescott Road to the south. The Dakota County Plat Commission will take action on the Stonehaven plat on Monday, March 15 and should include any response to the traffic concerns with this action. Staff may update the City Council at the regular Council meeting on Tuesday. ➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on February23, 2010 and did recommend approval. ISSUES: ➢ Several residents spoke at the Public Hearing sharing concerns primarily with traffic; two speakers suggested land use alterations to the proposed plan. The Chair and City Attorney Bauer explained the APC charge was to make a recommendation on the plan presented by the applicant. 60 -DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: Extended to June 3, 2010 ATTACHMENTS (6): Location Map, pages q thf-" a- February 23, 2010 APC minutes, pagesq throughl6 Planning Report and correspondence, pagesj_0H througk3 ID Dakota County Plat Commission review letter, page� alb' Supplemental traffic report in res onse to Plat Commission request, pagc*211 — througt�O�p Additional correspondence, pages tj hrough�� 5� Eagan Boundary Right-of-way Location Map Parcel Area Park Area n Building Footprint r I L J L E-1 rl�T-7 L 7-D C KWY U 4n Subject S 8 "o IV j C1 a q C9 OR 1+1h I z -D �3 C, 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Stonehaven (Lennar) Application: Prelimlinary Subdivision; PD Amendment Case No.: 14-PS-02-01-10; 14-PA-03-01-10 City of Ea�afl THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are L + not responsible for errors or omissions. S Community Development Department Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 3 of 24 B. Stonehaven Applicant Name: US Home Corporation d /b /a Lennar Location: 3535 Wescott Woodlands; Carriage Hills Golf Course Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment to modify the unit mix and site layout. File Number: 14- PA- 03 -01 -10 Application: Preliminary Subdivision A Preliminary Subdivision of approximately 115 acres to create 264 lots and 7 outlots. File Number: 14- PS- 02 -01 -10 Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated February 18, 2010. She noted the background and history. Joe Joblonski, US Home Corporation / Lennar, discussed the site plan and highlighted the following: • Highest density on the north end of the property with reduction in density towards the south. Eliminated lots on the south end of the property to create additional buffer. • Eliminated a road connection opposite Wild Rose Court , will install a trail connection instead. • Added buffering and screening on the east and west sides of the property. Preserved significant trees throughout the site and will continue to work with City Forester on tree preservation. Chair Chavez opened the public hearing Paul Stutler, 938 Wild Rose Court summarized long history of City policy decisions involving this property. He commended Lennar for being responsive to resident concerns thus far. He stated the neighborhood is concerned with density, buffering, potential street connections, traffic and reduction in green space. He displayed an alternative design for the proposed development. He explained that the alternative plan provides park area for new and existing residents, resulting in a reduction in density and traffic. Dan Hoke, 898 Wild Rose Court discussed the quality of living that Eagan residents expect. He asked that the Advisory Planning Commission consider the alternative plan presented by Mr. Stutler to provide a public park feature within the development. He stated concern with increased traffic and the use of Wescott Woodlands. Mike Haugen, 946 Wild Rose Court stated support for the alternative proposal presented by Mr. Stutler and for decreased density and decreased traffic. Dan Bailey, 3662 Cardinal Way inquired about the location of single family homes on the plan. He stated concern with traffic on Falcon Way and Duckwood Drive along with the safety of children, and noted the presence of an in -home neighborhood daycare center. Jill Nichols, 922 Wild Rose Court, said she inquired of the City about the Comprehensive Plan prior to the purchase of her home in 2001 and was told the site was designated as green space into the future. She discussed her desire that the city follow through with providing green space for the area. Tony Vinge, 3544 Wescott Woodlands stated the lots are small and the homes are close V Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 4 of 24 together, showing the density. He stated concerns that private streets will not be maintained like public streets. He stated the plan is an improvement over the prior plan, but still needs additional consideration. Melvin Wong, 942 Wild Rose Court asked for additional information on the deviation regarding the townhomes and twinhomes. Phil Belfiori, 3671 Canary Way stated concern with increased traffic on Falcon Way, the elimination of a street connection to Wescott Hills Drive and the outlet to the south at Hunter Lane. Brad Newman, 3490 Wescott Woodlands displayed the previous plan and stated the Lennar proposal is an improvement with lower density and no intersection at Wild Rose Court, however the previous plan had more open space across from his house. He asked for plans for construction traffic access to the site, and street sweeping during construction. Jim Taylor, 934 Wild Rose Court stated support for the alternative plan displayed by Stutler for more open space and concern for the density and buffering. He also suggested developing the northwest portion of the site as retail could be beneficial to all concerned due to increased value and tax revenue to the city, and the reduction of density. There being no further public comment, Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Planner Dudziak explained the location of the townhomes, single family homes, twin homes, and larger single family homes. She explained the deviations to lot size and dimensions for the townhome and twinhome portions of the development. She stated 35 acres of green space is provided in outlots to be held in common ownership through the homeowners association. City Planner Ridley stated the proposed 35 acres of green space exceeds the City's requirement for a straight development of this size. He explained that the City will not own or maintain the green space and taxes will be paid on the property by the homeowners association with a conservation easement in the City's favor. John Gorder discussed the street plan, which he stated was developed in accordance with the clear and consistent direction in prior actions from the City Council. He discussed the Dakota County Plat Commission's findings and request for additional traffic studies, which are now underway and anticipated to be completed before the City Council's review of the proposal. Mr. Gorder discussed traffic flow, construction traffic, and speed of traffic with and without speed bumps. Member Supina inquired about trail access to the neighborhood park to the south (Mueller Farm Park) from the propsoed Stonehaven development or adjacent developments. He suggested a trail be extended to the park. Planner Ridley explained that the proposal provides a trail connection to the public street of Wescott Hills Drive, which, in turn, provides a public access to Mueller Farm Park. Member Daley inquired about the telecommunication plan for the proposed development. Mr. Ridley explained that the developer is required to submit a telecommunications plan; however qj? Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Pave 5 of 24 the final details of the plan would be discussed later in the development process. Member Filipi stated he understood the public's disappointment in the amount of green space, however, he explained that the amount of proposed green space far exceeds the City's typical requirement. Member Keeley moved, Member Heaney seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to amend the Preliminary Planned Development to reduce the unit count and change the mix of housing types upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands, subject to the following conditions as amended: General 1. The property shall be subdivided and platted prior to Final Planned Development approval. 2. This PD Amendment is for the creation of 264 lots and 7 outlots for 362 dwelling units consisting of a mix of 63 85' -foot single - family lots, 95 65 -foot single - family lots, 40 twinhome units, 65 townhome units and a future multiple - dwelling senior building of up to 100 units. 3. The developer shall execute a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement which includes the following plans. • Site Plan • Building Elevations • Site Lighting Plan • Landscaping Plan • Signage Plan • Off Street Parking Plan • Open Space and Maintenance Plan • Utility Plans (water, sewer and storm) 4. The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be recorded against the property at the Dakota County Recorder's office within 60 days of City Council approval. 5. A Final Planned Development Agreement shall be executed for each phase of the development prior to issuance of a building permit for the phase. The following plans are necessary for each Final Planned Development Agreement: • Final Site Plan • Final Building Elevations • Final Site Lighting Plan • Final Landscaping Plan • Final Signage Plan • Final Off Street Parking Plan • Open Space and Maintenance Plan • Utility Plans (water, sewer and storm) 6. A homeowner's association shall be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements shall be conveyed to and maintained by the homeowner's association, as well as the private streets, the townhome lots and any monument signs or other common amenities. All common lots shall be deeded to the homeowner's association. All association documents shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney. Airport Noise �7 Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 6 of 24 7. Sound attenuation construction standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA shall be employed for buildings within the one -mile buffer area of the 60 dB contour. Lots 8. All single - family lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 50 feet. 9. 85' wide single - family lots shall satisfy minimum R -1 zoning standards for lot dimensions and area. 10. 65' wide single - family lots shall satisfy minimum R -1 S zoning standards for lot dimensions and area. 11. In consideration of common open space provided within the development, a deviation in the minimum lot size and dimensions for twinhomes lots is permitted per the Preliminary Plat dated January 20, 2010, last revised February 3, 2010. Setbacks and Bulk Standards 12. Structure setbacks shall be consistent with those outlined in the City's zoning Ordinance for the corresponding type of housing as follows: 85' single - family (R -1 district), 65' single - family (R-1S district); Twinhomes (R. -2 District). 13. Minimum structure setbacks from Duckwood Drive shall be 40 feet. 14. Townhome setbacks shall be as foll Dws: a. 50' from Yankee Doodle Road b. 30' from Station Trail c. 30' from the perimeter of the situ d. 20' between buildings 15. Building coverage shall not exceed ;20% for each 85' wide single - family lot, and 25% for each twinhome and 65' wide single - family lot. The townhome units shall be entirely located within each unit's lot boundaries. 16. Building coverage for the future multiple family senior building shall not exceed 20 %. 17. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. 18. The future multiple family senior building may exceed 35 feet if the required additional setbacks are provided in accordance with the R -4 zoning district standards (an additional 3' for each 1' of building height over 31.5'). Parking 19. Each dwelling unit shall provide a minimum two -stall garage. 20. The private drives within the townhome portion of the development shall be signed "no parking" along both sides. 21. Parking lot and pavement setbacks for the future multiple - family senior building shall be a minimum of 20 feet from a public right -of -way to provide sufficient room for berming, screening, buffering and snow storage. Architectural Controls 22. Building elevation plans shall be provided with the Final Planned Development for each phase of the development. Such plans shall include specific architectural controls (i.e. design elements, building materials, etc.) that are consistent with the City's zoning ordinance, where applicable. Other Standards 23. This development shall comply with the provisions outlined in Section 11.70, Subdivision 21 of the City Code pertaining to site lighting, trash storage, walkways, interior storage space, etc. Detailed plans identified in Condition 4 demonstrating compliance shall be provided at the time of Final Planned Development. 24. Ownership and maintenance of the swimming pool and community building on Lot 1, Block 15, shall be the responsibility of the homeowner's association. Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 7 of 24 25. Prior to Final Planned Development approval, the developer shall provide detailed plans for the community building including building elevations and materials, as well as the size and location of the swimming pool. 26. The applicant shall submit a proposal /infrastructure plan to be approved by staff to provide telecommunications fiber to the home (FTTH) or conduit to all homesites to permit third party providers to install FTTH within the neighborhood. Landscaping 27. A detailed Landscape Plan, consistent with the design standards and specifications in the City's landscape ordinance (Section 11.70, Subdivision 12) shall be provided with the Preliminary Subdivision and Final Planned Development. 28. Consistent landscape design elements shall be incorporated throughout the site to provide visual connections between the various parts of this planned development. 29. Berming and landscaping shall be provided along Yankee Doodle Road to provide a buffer between the buildings and this principal arterial. 30. The Landscape Plan shall address screening /buffering on the north end of the west side of the development and the Carriage Hills condominium and shall include berms and plantings as necessary. 31. Prior to Final Planned Development approval, the applicant shall verify that the placement of landscaping does not interfere or conflict with utilities. 32. In accordance with Section 11,70, Subd. 12 -B -3 of the City Code, a financial guarantee for the landscaping shall be submitted with the Final Subdivision for each phase of the development. The guarantee shall cover two calendar years following satisfactory completion and shall be released only upon inspection and written notice of conformance by the city. For any landscaping that is unacceptable, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. Grading 33. Prior to final subdivision approval, detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan shall be prepared in accordance with current City standards and codes. 34. Prior to any grading of the Property, erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code, City engineering standards, and MN Pollution Control permit regulations. 35. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits shall be prepared by a designer who has current University of Minnesota Erosion/ Sediment Control Design training, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. 36. All personnel responsible for the construction and management of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion/ Sediment Control site management certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer. 37. The use of flagmen will be reviewed when the Development Agreement is prepared, and their use will be implemented by the Developer as determined to be necessary by the City. Storm Water Drainage 38. Storm water management systems for this development shall be constructed in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan (Dec. 2005), the City Water Quality Plan, and City engineering standards. Wetlands lob Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 8 of 24 39. In accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 4. B., the applicant shall have all wetlands fully or partially located on the site delineated by a Certified Wetland Delineator utilizing approved methods as stated in Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall have all existing wetlands assessed utilizing the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (Version 3.0 or later version). The delineation shall be completed prior to Preliminary Subdivision. 40. Any and all wetland delineations shall be conducted during the growing season (i.e., typically between April 15 and October 15) and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 41. Any proposals to impact any of the wetlands on the site by draining, filling, or excavating shall comply with Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall be in accordance specifically with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 5., Wetland Sequencing and Replacement Requirements and Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 11., Wetland Submittal Requirements. 42. All of the wetlands on the site shall have Wetland Buffers in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 6. 43. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall satisfy Wetland Buffer Vegetative Requirements in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 7. 44. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall be protected in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 8. 45. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall have markers in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 9. 46. The development of the site shall have wetland setbacks in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 10. 47. This development may be subject to cash dedications in lieu of the above wetland requirements, at the City's discretion. Water Quality 48. There shall be no -net increase, compared to existing conditions, in the amount of Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) leaving the site or 50 percent TP and 80 percent TSS must be removed from stormwater runoff, whichever is more restrictive. 49. The first one -half inch of stormwater runoff from any rainfall event shall be infiltrated or retained entirely on the site. 50. This development may be subject to cash dedications in lieu of the above water quality requirements, at the City's discretion. Tree Preservation 51. In accordance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, Eagan City Code Section 11. 10, Subd. 15.1, the applicant shall prepare and submit a Tree Preservation Plan with the Preliminary Subdivision application that: a) identifies all significant vegetation located on the application site, b) delineates limits of land disturbance and tallies significant vegetation proposed to removed, c) provides for any required tree mitigation, and d) indicates measures to protect significant vegetation intended to be preserved. 52. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to identify additional opportunities for preservation during the development and construction process. 53. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved. 54. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Streets/ Access/ Circulation /D;;� Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 9 of 24 55. Restricted access should be provided along the entire development adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. 56. All public and private streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City Code, with vehicle turnarounds to City and fire code requirements. 57. Continuous trails or sidewalks shall be provided between proposed Duckwood Drive and Yankee Doodle Road, to increase pedestrian circulation and connectivity. 58. All trails within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City engineering standards for width, structural dimension, and right -of -way dedication. 59. All concrete sidewalks within public right -of -way shall be a minimum of six feet (6') in width. 60. Direct driveway access to Duckwood Drive shall be prohibited. 61. Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. 62. The developer shall dedicate restricted access, in favor of the City, along the entire length of Duckwood Drive, and Wescott Woodlands within the development, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 63. Utilities 64. A sanitary sewer system to serve the development shall be constructed in accordance with the City Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, and City engineering standards. 65. If sanitary sewer lift stations are required to utilize the capacity of all trunk sanitary sewer districts, to adequately serve the development, the stations shall be installed at the developer's expense. 66. This development shall be responsible for the removal and abandonment of all septic systems and wells, in accordance with City and County requirements. 67. Lateral water mains to serve the development for fire and domestic uses shall be constructed in accordance with the City Water Supply & Distribution Plan, and City engineering standards. Easement/Perm its /Rig hts- of -Way 68. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage requirements. 69. All public and private streets, drainage systems, and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines, and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 70. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project shall be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 71. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. 72. The development shall dedicate conservation easements to the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, over those portions of the site that comprise the 30 acres of open space. These areas shall be shown and identified as Conservation Easement Area on the Final Site Plan prior to Final Planned Development approval. Parks and Trails 73. The development shall provide connections to the existing off -site Eagan trail system and access points at the perimeter of the development to primary off -site amenities. Connections points include the east and west end of Duckwood and Wescott Hills Drive to Yankee Doodle. Off -site amenities include Mueller Farm Park, O'Leary Park and Woodland Elementary School. `6�5 Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 10 of 24 74. This development shall fulfill the Park Dedication requirement through the designation of a proposed 35.76 acres of open space /natural area to be owned and managed as open space /natural area by the Homeowners Association. 75. A looping trail shall be installed through the open space with multiple points of access for residents and the public, possibly including benches and other furnishings, ownership and maintenance to be determined. 76. Trail dedication shall be satisfied through a combination of on -site trails, exclusive of sidewalks, and /or a cash payment consistent with the Eagan fee schedule, to be paid at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. 77. The developer shall provide an agreement, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, to allow the public full access to those portions of the proposed on -site trail system, constructed by the Developer to City standards, that are determined by the City to have public value. The provision of trail amenities may also be addressed in the agreement. 78. This development shall provide a maintenance plan, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for the open space that includes regular eradication of invasive and non - native species, enhancement of planted areas as appropriate, and routine maintenance including trash removal. 79. This development shall install "tot -lots" that include play structures in the townhome area. Such tot lots shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 80. A Construction traffic and roadway maintenance plan shall be submitted and approved by the City. After the motion was made and seconded, Member Dugan spoke about the APC's role in reviewing the proposal. He stated he will be voting in favor of the proposal due to the the existing approved Preliminary Planned Development that came about as part of the Settlement Agreement between the City and Wensmann and that the residents of the City did not support the referendum to acquire the property. Chair Chavez thanked the audience for their civil approach to the Public Hearing. He stated that this development proposal was not starting from scratch but rather a Planned Development Agreement already exists and is being amended. He stated the exchange is approximately 35 acres of green space for the smaller lot sizes. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7 -0. Member Keeley moved, Member Heaney seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 264 lots and 7 outlots for 362 dwelling units upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands, subject to the following conditions as amended: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, D1, and E1 2. The property shall be platted. Homeowner's Association 3. A homeowner's association shall be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements shall be conveyed to and maintained by the homeowner's association, as well as the private streets, the townhome lots and any monument signs or other common amenities. All common lots shall be deeded to the homeowner's association. All association documents shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney. IDy- Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page l 1 of 24 Sound Attenuation 4. The 2008 Preliminary PD Agreement required that buildings in this development utilize sound attenuation construction standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 d BA. Lots 5. All single - family lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 50 feet. Landscaping 6. Prior to Final Planned Development, the applicant shall verify that the placement of landscaping does not interfere or conflict with utilities. 7. In accordance with Section 11.70, Subd. 12 -B -3 of the City Code, a financial guarantee for the landscaping shall be submitted with the Final Subdivision for each phase of the development. The guarantee shall cover two calendar years following satisfactory completion and shall be released only upon inspection and written notice of conformance by the city. For any landscaping that is unacceptable, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. Telecommunications 8. The applicant shall submit a proposal /infrastructure plan to be approved by staff to provide telecommunications fiber to the home (FTTH) or conduit to all homesites to permit third party providers to install FTTH within the neighborhood. Grading /Storm Drainage 9. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan shall be prepared in accordance with current City standards and codes prior to final subdivision approval. 10. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits should be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. 11. All personnel responsible for the construction and management of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion /Sediment Control site management certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer. 12. Erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code and engineering standards. 13. This development shall be responsible for the construction of outlet pipes, with allowable storm water discharges for the storm water basins, in accordance with the City's current Storm Water Management Plan. Streets /Access 14. Restricted access should be provided along the entire development adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. 15. All public and private streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City Code, with vehicle turnarounds to City and fire code requirements. 16. Continuous trails or sidewalks shall be provided between proposed Duckwood Drive and Yankee Doodle Road, to increase pedestrian circulation and connectivity. 17. All trails within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City engineering standards for width, structural dimension, and right -of -way dedication. 18. All concrete sidewalk proposed within public right -of -way shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in width. Utilities J bS Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 12 of 24 19. This development shall be responsible for abandonment of the on -site well system, in accordance with City and County requirements. Rights -of Way /Easements 20. Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. 21. The developer shall dedicate restricted access, in favor of the City, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Duckwood Drive and Wescott Woodlands, within the development, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 22. Public right -of -way along Yankee Doodle Road shall be dedicated in accordance with Dakota County requirements. Wetlands/Water Quality 23. The applicant shall provide the following additional information: a. For modeling scenarios, using average annual precipitation based on the recent 10 -year historical amounts (i.e., 1990 -2008) versus the amounts over 50 years (i.e., approximately 1959 - 2009). b. Construction details of proposed infiltration basins for City review, specifically information on sub -soil work (ripping depth, etc.) to ensure infiltration basins function as intended. c. Soil- boring information below each of the proposed infiltration basin areas (matched up with proposed grades), to ensure that the infiltration basins could perform as intended. Even though the general USDA soils map shows most of the proposed infiltration areas with high likelihood of having "sandy loam" to at least the 60" below grade, there may have been substantial grading and alterations to the soil profile over the course of the golf course operation that have affected these conditions. Tree Preservation 24. In accordance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, Eagan City Code Section 11. 10, Subd. 15.1, the applicant shall prepare and submit a Tree Preservation Plan with the Preliminary Subdivision application that: a) identifies all significant vegetation located on the application site, b) delineates limits of land disturbance and tallies significant vegetation proposed to removed, c) provides for any required tree mitigation, and d) indicates measures to protect significant vegetation intended to be preserved. 25. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to identify additional opportunities for preservation during the development and construction process. 26. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved. 27. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 28. The applicant shall protect the preserved tree's critical root zones through the placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved on -site. 29. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 30. The applicant shall consider the additional preservation of specimen and other large diameter trees via the field review of specific tree location and proposed grading activities. t• Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 13 of 24 Parks and Trails 31. This proposal shall fulfill the Park Dedication requirement through the designation of a proposed 35.76 acres of open space /natural area to be owned and managed as open space /natural area by the Homeowners Association. 32. The development shall provide connections to the existing off -site Eagan trail system and access points at the perimeter of the development to primary off -site amenities. Connections points include the east and west end of Duckwood and Wescott Hills Drive to Yankee Doodle. Off -site amenities include Mueller Farm Park, O'Leary Park and Woodland Elementary School. 33. A looping trail shall be installed through the open space with multiple points of access for residents and the public, possibly including benches and other furnishings, ownership and maintenance to be determined. 34. Trail dedication shall be satisfied through a combination of on -site trails, exclusive of sidewalks, and /or a cash payment consistent with the Eagan fee schedule, to be paid at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. 35. The developer shall provide an agreement, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, to allow the public full access to those portions of the proposed on -site trail system, constructed by the Developer to City standards, that are determined by the City to have public value. The provision of trail amenities may also be addressed in the agreement. 36. This development shall provide a maintenance plan, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for the open space that includes regular eradication of invasive and non - native species, enhancement of planted areas as appropriate, and routine maintenance including trash removal. 37. This development shall install "tot -lots" that include play structures in the townhome area. Such tot lots shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7 -0. Just before the meeting adjourned, Member Dugan asked to add a couple of comments relative to Lennar's Stonehaven proposal. He stated the residents of the City had spoken via the referendum and that the City benefits with the proposed green space in that it will remain on the tax roll and will be maintained privately a] PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 18, 2010 CASE: 14- PS- 02- 01 -10; 14- PA- 03 -01 -10 (revised March 1, 2010) APPLICANT: U.S. Home Corp. d /b /a Lennar HEARING DATE: February 23, 2010 PROPERTY OWNER: Rahn Family APPLICATION DATE: February'), 2010 Limited Partnership REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak Planned Development Amendment LOCATION: S of Yankee Doodle Road, W of Wescott Woodlands COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SA, Special Area ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST U. S. Home Corporation, d /b /a Lennar, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to reduce the unit count and change the mix of housing types upon the subject site, and a Preliminary Subdivision (Stonehaven) to create 264 lots and 7 outlots for 363 dwelling units upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage in Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pave 2 and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan ". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Planned Development: City Code Chapter 11.60, Subd. 18, A., states the intent of the Planned Development zoning district as follows: Providing greater flexibility in environmental design and relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater creativity and environmental sensitivity. 2. Recognizing the economic and cultural advantages that will accrue to the residents of a planned community. Iq Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 3 Encouraging a more creative and efficient approach to the use of the land. 4. Encouraging the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, natural features, and open space. Encouraging a development pattern that is consistent with land use density, transportation facilities and community facilities objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUNDMISTORY The site was developed as a golf course in the mid -1960s and operated as such until 2005. In 2008, the property was rezoned from P (Parks) to PD (Planned Development). A Preliminary Planned Development Agreement was executed in June of 2008. At the time of Preliminary PD approval, the site consisted of approximately 121 acres. In 2009, the City acquired approximately four acres in the northeastern corner of the site for development of a new Fire Safety Center, with another 1.8 acres of right -of -way dedication, leaving approximately 115 acres for development. This site was the subject of litigation which was resolved with a Contingent Settlement Agreement in 2008, followed by the City's approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment that created a Special Area establishing a generalized land use plan for the site, and a Preliminary PD that established a conceptual Site Plan for various housing types on the site. The Special Area land use plan illustrates varying types of residential uses at low, medium and high densities, with low density uses located on the southern portion of the site progressing to high density uses on the northern portion of the site. The Site Plan included in the Preliminary PD shows of a variety of housing types and 30 acres of open space. Consistent with the Contingent Settlement Agreement, the open space was designed to maintain a buffer around the perimeter of the site between existing and proposed housing, as well as provide undeveloped space within the development itself. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands. The land is generally open with wooded areas, scattered wetlands, and rolling topography. The site was previously cleared for golf course use, however, the golf course was closed to operations in 2005. Site conditions generally consist of maintained turf, although approximately 25% of the site contains mature woodlands and /or individual trees. Existing buildings on the property include the former clubhouse, office, shed and maintenance facility. Access to the site is currently provided from the east off Wescott Hills Drive. Residential developments of varying densities surround the site to the west, south, and east. To the west and to the east just south of Yankee Doodle Road are multiple family developments //6 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 4 zoned R -4 and designated HD, High Density and MD, Medium Density. To the southwest, south and east are single family developments with zonings of PD, Planned Development, and R -1, single family residential, and a land use designation of LD, Low Density. To the north across Yankee Doodle Road is Faithful Shepherd School, zoned BP, Business Park. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — The applicant proposes a Planned Development Amendment to modify the number and type of housing units for this site. A corresponding Preliminary Subdivision is also proposed at this time to establish the right -of -way and individual lots and outlots within the site. The 2008 Preliminary PD provided for up to 480 units on 120 acres with a density of four units per acre. The submitted Site Plan provides for 363 units on 115 acres, or 3.14 units per acre. The proposal consists of five different housing types: single - family homes on standard (85') lots, single- family homes on small (65') lots, twin homes, row townhomes, and future development of multi - family senior housing. The proposal also incorporates more than 30 acres of open space around the perimeter and within the development. The Site Plan shows sidewalks and trails with internal loops and connections to external trails in several locations. Development monument signs are proposed in three locations -- at the east and west ends of Duckwood Drive, and adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road on the north end of the development. A tot lot is proposed in the open space of the townhome area. Additional tot lots are being considered for placement elsewhere in the development. Also a possible swimming pool and community building are proposed at the southern end of the development (Lot 1, Block 15). Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North School (Faithful BP, Business Park BP, Business Park Shepherd) South Residential PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density East Residential (Mary R -1, Single Family LD, Low Density residential Mother of Mercy Shelter) Residential; LB, Limited O /S, Office Service Business West Residential R -4, Residential Multiple; HD, High Density residential, PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density residential EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — The applicant proposes a Planned Development Amendment to modify the number and type of housing units for this site. A corresponding Preliminary Subdivision is also proposed at this time to establish the right -of -way and individual lots and outlots within the site. The 2008 Preliminary PD provided for up to 480 units on 120 acres with a density of four units per acre. The submitted Site Plan provides for 363 units on 115 acres, or 3.14 units per acre. The proposal consists of five different housing types: single - family homes on standard (85') lots, single- family homes on small (65') lots, twin homes, row townhomes, and future development of multi - family senior housing. The proposal also incorporates more than 30 acres of open space around the perimeter and within the development. The Site Plan shows sidewalks and trails with internal loops and connections to external trails in several locations. Development monument signs are proposed in three locations -- at the east and west ends of Duckwood Drive, and adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road on the north end of the development. A tot lot is proposed in the open space of the townhome area. Additional tot lots are being considered for placement elsewhere in the development. Also a possible swimming pool and community building are proposed at the southern end of the development (Lot 1, Block 15). Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 5 The current proposal consists of the following: Single Family Homes (85' lots) Single Family Homes (65' lots) Twin Units Row Townhome Units New Urban Townhome Units Senior Multi Family Units Other Multi Family (other) TOTAL Current Proposal 63 95 40 65 0 100 0 363 2008 PD 41 52 (60' lots) 39 96 72 60 120 480 The open space will maintain a buffer around the perimeter of the site between existing and proposed housing, as well as providing undeveloped space within the development itself. Planned Development Zoning - The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. Typically, specific minimum and maximum zoning standards do not strictly apply. However, the typical zoning district standards for the various housing types are used as a basis for comparison for those portions of the proposed Planned Development. The applicant proposes deviations from typical standards for minimum twinhome lot size and reduced setbacks between townhome buildings. The acceptability of such deviations is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Environmental Review — The 2008 Preliminary PD required that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be completed prior to Preliminary Subdivision or grading of the Property. An EAW was prepared as part of the City's acquisition for the new Fire Safety Center in 2009 and a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was made by the City Council on November 17, 2009. Homeowners Association — A homeowner's association should be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements should be conveyed to and maintained by the homeowner's association, as well as the private streets, the townhome lots and any monument signs or other common amenities. All common lots should be deeded to the homeowner's association. Compatibility with Surrounding, Area — The proposed development is similar in use to the surrounding area, which is developed with various types of residential uses. One exception is the area to the north across Yankee Doodle Road which consists of office, warehouse and school uses. Airport Noise Considerations — The City of Eagan considered airport noise as a factor in its Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. The Metropolitan Council has adopted an Aviation Chapter (/a Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 6 in Metropolitan Development Guide that anticipates the impacts from the continued operation of the airport at its current location. Historically, the City has attempted, where possible, to minimize land uses that would be in conflict with operations at MSP. The City's adopted Comprehensive Guide Plan currently designates the subject site as P, Parks, Open Space and Recreation. If the City determines that residential uses are appropriate on this site, regional policy provides guidance in gauging whether such uses can be compatible, provisionally or conditionally acceptable, or inconsistent. Based on the Metropolitan Council Policy Contours adopted in 2007, a majority of the site is located within the one -mile buffer area of the 60 dB contour, placing it within Noise Policy Zone 4. The Met Council has adopted new land use compatibility guidelines which incorporate the 2007 Noise Policy Contours that will be used in their review of this proposal. The 2008 Preliminary PD Agreement required that buildings in this development utilize sound attenuation construction standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA. Density — The proposed 363 units upon 115 acres results in a gross density of 3.14 units per acre. Lots — The proposal consists of 264 lots and 7 outlots. The lot allocation is as follows: 63 single - family (85') lots; 95 single- family (65') lots; 40 twinhome lots; 65 row townhome lots and one lot for senior housing (100 units). Seven outlots make up the approximately 35 acres of open space. Outlots A, E, and G make up the open space around the perimeter of the site. Outlot B is central to the townhome portion of the development and contains ponding and a proposed tot -lot. Outlots D and F make up the open space that contains a trail and runs north -south through the site. Outlot C is a 16' wide sliver of land extending westward from the site to Lexington Avenue which is noted "to be dedicated to neighboring parcels." Bulk Standards — The proposal includes four different housing types and future senior housing. This report discusses typical bulk standards and standards identified in the 2008 Preliminary PD and in the City Code for each type of housing proposed. Lot Size - The lots should satisfy typical zoning standards for the corresponding housing type. This is consistent with the 2008 Preliminary PD which contained the City Code standards for various housing types. Minimum lot width is measured at the minimum front building setback line. All lots should have a minimum street frontage of 50 feet. Two types of single- family homes are proposed, 85' wide lots and 65' wide lots. The 85' lots occupy the southern portion of the development site and are comparable to R -1 zoning. The 65' lots occupy the central portion of the site and are comparable to R- IS zoning. Twinhomes are proposed with separate lots for each unit. The twinhomes occupy the east central portion of the development and are considered the equivalent of an R -2, Residential 113 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 7 Double, use. Lastly, the row townhomes occupy the northwestern portion of the site and are comparable to R -3 zoning. In addition, approximately 35 acres of the site will be left in open space commonly held and maintained by the homeowner's association. This common open space can serve to offset some of the deviations to minimum lot size in the twinhome and townhome portions of the development. Lot 1, Block 4 is approximately 271' x 574' and 3.56 acres. This lot is identified for future development of up to 100 units of senior housing senior housing. Specific development plans for the senior housing are not included with this submittal. A Final Planned Development for the senior housing will be required for development of that portion of the site (Lot 1, Block 4). The Final PD will be subject to Site Plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission as well as the City Council. Typical lot size standards are as follows: R -1 Minimum Lot Width 85' Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.) 12,000 R -1 S R -2 R -3 65' 50' /unit N/A 8,000 7,500 /unit 6,000 85' lots single family (compare to R -1): The large single- family lots range from 12,016 sq. ft. to 24,774 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 14,411 sq. ft. All lots satisfy the minimum 85 lot width and 50' street frontage. 65' lots, single-family (compare to R -IS): The small single- family lots range from 8,716 sq. ft. to 15,523 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 10,037 sq. ft. All lots satisfy the minimum 65' lot width and 50' street frontage. Ti ,inhomes (compare to R -2): Most of the twinhome lots are smaller than 7,500 sq. ft. The lots range in size from 5,799 to 13,784 sq. ft with an average lot size of 6,989 sq. ft. Most of these lots provide less than the minimum 50' of street frontage and lot width. The applicant's narrative states that the proposed twinhome lot sizes are smaller for two reasons: "to include the central trail that runs through Outlot D" and "to maintain a preservation of open space," in particular a cluster of trees along Wescott Woodlands. This deviation in lot size can be accommodated through the PD zoning. The acceptability of the deviation is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Townhomes (compare to R -3): R -3 zoning typically requires a minimum of 6,000 sq. ft. per unit in townhome developments. These townhomes are proposed to be platted with much of the lot area in common space. The individual platted lots encompass an area only slightly larger than the unit footprint. With an average lot size of 2,068 sq. ft. per unit, and common area totaling 176,880 sq. ft. or 2,721 sq. ft. per unit, the townhome portion of the development provides approximately 4,790 sq. ft. of lot area per unit. Again, this is a i Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Paf:e 8 deviation that can be accommodated through the PD zoning. The acceptability of the deviation is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Setbacks — The 2008 Preliminary Planned Development established minimum structure setbacks for various housing types based on typical City Code standards. In this PD Amendment, all streets are proposed to be public. Minimum structure setbacks from local public streets are 30'. Duckwood Drive is a local collector street and as such, a 40' structure setback is required from Duckwood Drive. Side and rear yard setbacks will be required according to applicable zoning district standards for each housing type. These standards are outlined in the tables below. Setback Single - Family (large 85' lots Single - Family small 65'lots Front yard public street 30 feet 40 feet (Duckwood Dr.) 30 feet 40 feet (Duckwood Dr.) Side yard: Principal Structure 10 feet 6 feet Side yard: Garage /Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Rear yard: Principal Structure 15 feet 15 feet Rear yard: Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Setback Twinhomes Townhomes Front yard 30 feet 40 feet (Duckwood Dr.) 30 feet 50 feet (Yankee Doodle Rd.) Side yard 30 feet 30 feet Rear yard 30 feet 30 feet Between buildings NA 20 feet Building Heights — City Code limits building height for all residential uses to 35 feet. For multiple family (R -4), building height may exceed 35' if additional setbacks are provided. Lot Coverage — The 2008 Preliminary PD Agreement was based on a concept plan with some different housing types than are proposed with this amendment. However, the Agreement established building coverage not to exceed 20% for standard 85' wide single- family lots and for twinhomes. This is consistent with City Code which sets the building coverage for single - family and two - family residential districts at a maximum of 20 %, with the exception of R -1 S zoning, to which a 25% lot coverage ratio applies. In keeping with these standards, a maximum 20% lot coverage ratio should apply to the 85' wide lots and 25% to the 65' wide lots. In the twinhome portion of the development, a higher lot coverage ratio may be appropriate in consideration of the common open space and lot size deviations being with this proposal. The open space is to be held in conservation easement and preserves open space in common 115 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 9 rather than within individual lots. The acceptability of a higher lot coverage ratio in consideration of common open space is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Parking — Typical zoning standards require the following amount of parking for the various types of housing units: Single - family — at least two enclosed parking spaces per unit Twin Homes — at least two enclosed parking spaces per unit Town Homes /Apartments /Condominiums — at least one enclosed or underground space per unit, plus one outdoor parking space per unit. The proposed development satisfies these standards by providing a two -stall garage for each twin and townhome unit, and a three -stall garage for each single - family dwelling. Off - street parking is also available on individual driveways. On- street parking is available on public streets. Three parking stalls are provided at the end of each of the two long private drives within the townhome development (serving lots 27 -30 and 45 -47). However, these private drives are too narrow to provide additional on- street parking and should be signed "no parking" along both sides. Architectural Controls — While the City's zoning ordinance does not contain specific architectural requirements for residential uses, such standards can be adopted through the Planned Development. The ordinance does require generally that for twinhomes and townhomes "all exterior surfaces shall have an equally attractive or the same finish." The applicant has submitted building elevations and floor plans for each of the housing products proposed for this development. The submitted narrative indicates that homeowners will be offered "multiple elevations, different accent materials and coordinated exterior color package choices ... to eliminate the chances of a home exterior duplication." The narrative also speaks to energy efficient products and construction that will be incorporated into the buildings. Other Standards — The townhome and multiple family buildings should be designed consistent with the provisions outlined in Section 11. 70, Subdivision 21 of the City Code. Site Lighting — A plan was submitted which shows the location of standard street light poles. These will be installed along the public streets per typical Engineering and electric company standards. Other illumination of the site will be provided by exterior lights on individual dwelling units. No additional lighting along the trails within the open space and the internal parks in Outlots B and D is proposed. Photometric plans are typically not required for public street lights and were not provided. Trash Storage — Trash storage was not addressed, and is most applicable to the townhomes and senior building. It is likely that each unit in this development, including the townhome units, will 116 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 10 have an individual trash receptacle for each dwelling unit. Trash receptacles must be stored in accordance with City ordinances, either within the building or in a side or rear yard. Interior Storage Space — City Code requires that each townhome unit provide a minimum of 150 cubic feet of additional interior storage space; a storage room within the unit or garage may fulfill this standard. The townhome units proposed in this development each have an attached 2 -stall garage which would fulfill this requirement. Recreation area — Multiple dwelling complexes are required to provide 200 sq. ft. of recreation space for each 2- bedroom unit, and 300 sq. ft. for every 3- bedroom unit. This recreation area must be a minimum of 100 feet from any ponding area. This provision applies to the twinhomes, townhomes and future senior building. With over 30 acres of green space provided throughout the development, there is sufficient space reserved for recreation and preservation. The applicant has indicated that a tot -lot will be provided in Outlot B in the center of the townhome area. The developer should verify that the tot -lot will be more than 100' for the pond proposed in Outlot B at the time of Final Planned Development. Lot 1, Block 15, one of the 85' single- family lots, is identified for a possible future swimming pool and community building. If this common amenity is installed, its ownership and maintenance should be the responsibility of the homeowner's association. Prior to Final Planned Development approval, the developer should confirm the use of this lot as a single - family home, or the community building and swimming pool. If the latter, the developer should provide detailed plans for the community building including building elevations and materials, as well as the location of the swimming pool on the lot. Landscaping — The Landscape Plan shows 11 species of shade trees, 6 species of ornamental trees and 2 species of spruce trees are utilized throughout the development. Examples of shade trees include maple, birch, oak, and linden. None are ash trees due to concerns about the Emerald Ash Borer beetle. Ornamental trees include (crabapple, chokecherry, Japanese tree lilac, hawthorn, serviceberry). Graded areas near new stormwater ponds are proposed to be seeded with a native grass/ wildflower mix. A 6' strip of turf grass will be provided along both sides of the trails. In open areas along the perimeter in the northern half of the development site, a mix of spruce trees, ornamental trees, and shade trees are proposed in addition to the areas where natural buffers already exist. In the townhome portion of the development, a vegetative buffer consisting of spruce trees interspersed with shade and ornamental trees is proposed along Yankee Doodle Road. A row of spruce trees also is proposed along the northwestern edge of the site, between the proposed trail and the adjacent condominiums, and along Wescott Woodlands north of Duckwood Drive. The Landscape Plan shows a typical streetscape consisting of one shade tree near the street in the front yard on each lot within the single- family and twinhome portions of the development. The numerous close -set driveways in the townhome area restrict planting areas in the front of the 117 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 11 buildings. Some shade trees are located along Station Trail, with ornamental trees in some front yards and in the rear of each unit. Detailed foundation planting plans are provided for the twinhomes and townhomes and incorporate both evergreen and deciduous shrubs and some perennials with rock mulch. Prior to Final Planned Development, the applicant shall verify that the placement of landscaping does not interfere or conflict with utilities. As a collector street, Duckwood Drive will carry more traffic than the other public streets within the development, and has no direct driveway access. The Landscape Plan shows several trees per lot along Duckwood Drive to provide a greater vegetative buffer to the residences and yards along that street. In accordance with Section 11. 70, Subd. 12 -13-3 of the City Code, a financial guarantee for the landscaping should be submitted with the Final Subdivision for each phase of the development. The guarantee should cover two calendar years following satisfactory completion and shall be released only upon inspection and written notice of conformance by the city. For any landscaping that is unacceptable, the applicant should replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. Telecommunications — The City of Eagan created the Eagan Technology Task Force in February 2004. This group was charged with researching and providing recommendations relative to broadband and fiber optic telecommunications networks within the community. The Task Force created a report that was presented to the Eagan City Council in December 2004. Part of the Policy Framework states: The City should establish and maintain an environment to encourage and provide state of the art and diverse telecommunications infrastructures to assist in the recruitment and retention of residents, organizations and businesses of all sizes. Recognizing that telecommunications is central to economic development and quality of life, the City needs to maintain an ongoing effort to ensure that Eagan stays competitive in this important area. Due to the size and scope of the proposed development, the developer has an opportunity to create a world -class telecommunication neighborhood and should introduce these technologies in its development plans so that it is consistent with the Policy Framework statement above. Topography/ Grading; - The site is generally open with wooded areas and rolling topography. In general, the north portion of the site slopes to the north, and the south half slopes to the south. Existing elevations range from 860 to 920 feet. The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan should be prepared in accordance with current City standards and codes prior to final /Jg Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 12 subdivision approval. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits should be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. Also, all personnel responsible for the construction and management of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the development, should have received Erosion/Sediment Control site management certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer. Erosion control measures should be installed and maintained in accordance with City code and engineering standards. Storm Water Drainage — The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. The northern portion of the site lies within the LeMay Lake drainage district, City Drainage Basin D, and ultimately drains to the west. Four natural low areas within the site are designated as storm water basins in the City Storm Water Management Plan and are proposed for flood volume control for the development of this site. The Storm Water Management Plan also identifies the construction of outlet pipes with allowable storm water discharges for these basins, which should be a requirement of this development. Wetlands /Water Quality — According to the 2008 Preliminary Planned Development Agreement between the City of Eagan and Wensmann Realty, LLC, the following Development Conditions apply to Wetlands: 29. In accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 4 B., the applicant shall have all wetlands fully or partially located on the site delineated by a Certified Wetland Delineator utilizing approved methods as stated in Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall have all existing wetlands assessed utilizing the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (Version 3.0 or later version). The delineation shall be completed prior to Preliminary Subdivision. 30. Any and all wetland delineations shall be conducted during the growing season (i. e., typically between April 15 and October 1 S) and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 31. Any proposals to impact any of the wetlands on the site by draining, filling, or excavating shall comply with Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall be in accordance specifically with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. S., Wetland Sequencing and Replacement Requirements and Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. I I., Wetland Submittal Requirements. 32. All of the wetlands on the site shall have Wetland Buffers in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd 6. 33. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall satisfy Wetland Buffer Vegetative Requirements in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 7. 119 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pae,e 13 31. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall be protected in accordance with Eagan City Code §11. 67 Subd. 8. 35. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall have markers in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 9. 36. The development of the site shall have wetland setbacks in accordance with Eagan City Code §11.67 Subd. 10. 37. This development maybe subject to cash dedications in lieu of the above wetland requirements at the City's discretion. The City last approved a wetland delineation report for Carriage Hills in 2004. Integral to the development of Eagan's Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan (2007), the City classified some of the wetlands on the property. The City has conducted additional reviews of wetland conditions in 2008 and 2009. Both of these reviews suggested possible and slightly different wetlands determinations than the 2004 report. Although staff does not specifically expect major differences between historical and up -to -date delineations, the City considers wetland delineation reports valid for only three years. Furthermore, because of some questions raised by the recent reviews and some wetlands lack classifications, there is an obvious need to revisit wetlands on the site. Conditions 29 through 30 have not been met because an up -to -date wetland delineation has not been conducted during the 2010 growing season. Conditions 31 through 36 are subject to the wetland delineation. Condition 37 does not appear to be applicable to the proposed development plan. The developer has indicated the intention to comply with all Development Conditions for wetlands. Preliminarily, it appears the proposed development plan will meet these requirements with, at the most, only minor adjustments. Streets/ Access — Yankee Doodle Road (Dakota County Road 28) along the north edge of the site is a four -lane divided roadway with a raised center median. Full access with a center median opening is provided at the intersection of Wescott Woodlands/ Columbia Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. Full access directly to the site from Yankee Doodle Road will not be available, and is not proposed by the development. Local street access is proposed to Duckwood Drive to the west, and Wescott Woodlands to the northeast. Existing Duckwood Drive was designed and constructed as a collector street, with no driveway accesses or houses directly fronting on Duckwood Drive. To provide an adequate neighborhood (';0 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 14 collector traffic system for this area (Lexington to Elrene, Wescott to Yankee Doodle), an east - west collector street was anticipated, with the extension of Duckwood Drive from the west to connect with Wescott Woodlands on the east edge of the site. This collector is to provide adequate access and utility services to the site, including the Fire Safety Center. The City Council has authorized preparation of a feasibility report outlining the scope, schedule, and financing of the extension of Duckwood Drive across this property. The City Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing regarding these public improvements on March 2, 2010. Because the extension of Duckwood Drive is considered a collector street, the developer should dedicate restricted access, in favor of the City, to eliminate the possibility of driveway access to this portion of Duckwood Drive. Street connection/ access to Hunter Lane (south) and Wescott Hills Drive (southeast) is not proposed, in accordance with the concept plan approved with the preliminary planned development, and City Council direction on several previous development considerations. The north -south collector roadway was originally planned to be the extension of Wescott Hills Drive near the southeast edge of the site to its connection with Wescott Woodlands and Yankee Doodle Road. While Wescott Hills Drive was originally intended to be a collector street, it was constructed as a typical residential street, with direct driveway accesses and houses fronting on the street. In 1998, the City Council did not approve the connection of these two street segments. With consideration of a local street improvement project (City Project No. 1018) in the Greensboro Addition neighborhood, the City Council also directed that the Hunter Lane street not be available for connection by development of Carriage Hills, and that the street stub be physically removed. Because the property is adjacent to a County road, the Dakota County Plat Commission met on February 16, 2010 to consider the Stonehaven preliminary plat. The Commission indicated that the traffic effects of a southerly street connection of this development to Wescott Hills Drive or Hunter Lane be further studied before they would take action on the preliminary plat. A traffic study is currently underway that will detail the traffic impacts of a southerly connection. Based on the preliminary site plan submitted by the applicant, with the mixture of housing types, an estimated 2,200 daily trips would be generated by development of this site, with the traffic directed to and from the north (Wescott Woodlands) and west (Duckwood Drive) via Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. With the traffic distribution identified in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, approximately 25 percent (550 daily trips) of this traffic will be directed to /from the west and south via the Duckwood Drive/ Lexington Avenue intersection, and approximately 75 percent (1,650 daily trips) north/ west/ east via the Wescott Woodlands/ Yankee Doodle Road intersection. This additional traffic is not anticipated to affect the current level of service at the Duckwood Drive/ Lexington Avenue intersection. The additional traffic at the Wescott Woodlands/ Yankee Doodle Road intersection may warrant the installation of a traffic signal when the traffic warrants are met. /a I Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pate 15 The preliminary site plan indicates numerous trail and sidewalk segments adjacent to streets and in open space areas to provide pedestrian access throughout the site, and connectivity to local parks and schools. The concrete sidewalk proposed within public right -of -way should be a minimum of 6 feet in width. Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. The developer is proposing to direct all development sanitary sewer to existing sanitary sewer within Wescott Woodlands, which ultimately flows to trunk sanitary sewer north of the development. The excess capacities available in the trunk sanitary sewer within Wescott Road and Yankee Doodle Road, and their associated lateral sewer lines, have sufficient capacity to handle the average and peak flows from this site generated by the proposed mixed residential development and the surrounding existing development within the sub districts. Trunk water main of sufficient size and capacity to serve this development has been constructed through and surrounding the property, and is available for extension throughout the development. There is an existing well that served the Carriage Hills golf course that will no longer be needed with development of the site. This development should be responsible for abandonment of this well system in accordance with City and County requirements. Permits/ Right -of -Way — Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, should be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. Public right -of -way along Yankee Doodle Road should be dedicated in accordance with Dakota County requirements. Tree Preservation — A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are one - thousand one - hundred seventy -five (1,175) significant trees existing at this site. This individual tree resource is comprised of a large variety of hardwood and softwood deciduous trees (the majority being oak, ash, black cherry, elm, aspen, and cottonwood trees. Tree diameters range from 6 inches to 46 inches, averaging about 15 inches diameter. There are 21 specimen trees (greater than 30" diameter) on site, species being bur and /or red oaks and a few ash trees. In addition there are 80 hardwood deciduous trees (oak, black cherry and ash) that are in the 21" to 30" diameter range. According to the Tree Preservation Plan submitted, significant tree impacts will result in the removal of four - hundred twenty -eight (428) significant trees (36.4% of the total). Per the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal is set at 41.4% of the total significant trees. This allowable tree removal percentage was calculated by city staff based upon the square footage of single - family homes (40.0% allowable removal) compared to the square footage of multiple -unit dwellings (47.5% allowable removal). laa Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 16 Because the proposed significant tree removal is less than allowable significant tree removal there is no required tree mitigation. Staff is recommending that further examination is placed on the potential to preserve additional specimen trees and hardwood deciduous trees on site. There are several areas within the site where these trees are located in areas that may allow for tree preservation. The submitted tree inventory indicates that there are 21 specimen trees on site, 15 are proposed to be removed, and that there are 80 hardwood deciduous trees on site, 34 are proposed to be removed. Staff believes that through field review of precise tree locations and proposed grading activities, there exists a potential to preserve many more of these large trees. Parks — The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement requires that a minimum of 30 acres of the 120 acre site be designated as open space, equating to 25% of the site. Approximately 5 acres of the site has since been purchased by the City for the construction of a Public Safety facility leaving a balance of 114.88 acres. This development satisfies the open space requirement by providing for 35.76 acres of open space or 31.13% of the 114.88 acres. The Developer will seed any disturbed areas within the open space with an approved mixture of low maintenance native grasses, the balance of the open space would remain in a natural condition, all under a proposed conservation easement. The new Home Owners Association (HOA) would assume responsibility for the care and maintenance of the open space with consideration given to City standards for comparable public spaces. The neighborhood park for this service district is Mueller Farm Park which is located directly southeast of the development. Staff has suggested that the Developer also provide one or more tot -lots or play spaces within the development for the residents. The Developer will be constructing a play area within the townhomes as part of the existing agreement and is exploring other locations within the development. Trails — The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement includes provisions for the inclusion of a trail network that connects with the existing City system and affords the opportunity to move in and through the open spaces and natural areas. The Developer has proposed a network of public sidewalks along the new public streets and also a series of connecting trails that loop around the perimeter of the site. The City has requested that the looping perimeter /connecting trails and the corridor in which they are constructed become "public" trails, available to all City residents through an agreement to be drafted with the City Attorney's office. Under such an agreement the City would most likely assume some maintenance responsibility while the underlying title would remain with the HOA though the final terms are yet to be determined. That internal portion of the proposed trail system that is not deemed to have public value would remain the sole property and responsibility of the HOA. Applying the approved trail dedication rate of $250 per unit to the projected build out of 363 units equates to a required trail dedication of $90,750. City policy allows for credit to be given to a Developer for constructing trails that have a public value. The City Engineering Department has indicated that the 2010 lineal foot value of an 8' trail built to City standards is $15 per lineal !a3 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 17 foot. This would require the construction of a minimum of 6,100 feet of 8 foot wide public trail on the site. The proposed publicly accessible trails will exceed this amount thereby fulfilling the trail dedication requirements. Because of the more limited ability to function as a multipurpose surface, sidewalks are generally not included in the trail dedication calculation. Financial Obligation — The property owner has signed a waiver of objection to special assessments for the costs of construction of street and utility improvements on Station Trail and Duckwood Drive within the development, under City Project 1012. The property owner has also entered into an assessment agreement with the City providing for payment of trunk area and lateral charges associated with previous public improvement projects. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION The applicant is proposing a Planned Development Amendment to modify the number of type of housing units for this site. A corresponding Preliminary Subdivision is also proposed at this time. There is an existing Preliminary Planned Development for this site which was executed in 2008. The 2008 Preliminary PD provided for up to 480 units on 120 acres. The PD Amendment is for 363 units on approximately 115 acres. The proposed development plan follows a pattern consistent with the Special Area plan adopted for this site in 2008 -- lower density single - family units on the southern end of the site, and higher densities on the northern portion of the property. Deviations to lot size and dimensions are noted for the twinhomes and townhomes. The acceptability of these deviations is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. The proposed development also appears consistent with the intent of the Preliminary PD in providing for public streets, extensive sidewalks and trails, more than 35 acres of open space, and a mix of housing types. Tot lots and a possible community center and swimming pool are also provided. Landscaping creates buffers along Yankee Doodle Road and the east and west edges of the northern portion of the site (abutting Carriage Hills Condominiums, and Wescott Woodlands). An EAW was prepared and a negative declaration made on the need for an EIS in November 2009. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the plat on February 16, 2009 and has requested additional traffic analysis which is anticipated to be completed before the City Council meeting on March 16, 2010. An updated wetland delineation will need to be prepared. City staff anticipates only minor modifications to the plans, if any, as a result. The Tree Preservation Plan indicates tree removal within allowable limits and the City Forester suggests even more significant and specimen trees can be preserved through field review of precise tree locations and grading activities. The conditions of approval from the 2008 Preliminary Planned Development have been modified and edited based on the proposed Planned Development Amendment. Many of the conditions 1 a� Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pace 18 carried over to the Planned Development Amendment, a few were deleted, and new conditions pertinent to the present plan have been added. Conditions of Preliminary Subdivision approval are separately identified beneath that action item below. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to amend the Preliminary Planned Development to reduce the unit count and change the mix of housing types upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands. If approved, the following conditions shall apply: General 1. The property shall be subdivided and platted prior to Final Planned Development approval. 2. This PD Amendment is for the creation of 264 lots and 7 outlots for 363 dwelling units consisting of a mix of 63 85' -foot single- family lots, 95 65 -foot single- family lots, 40 twinhome units, 65 townhome units and a future multiple - dwelling senior building of up to 100 units. 3. The developer shall execute a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement which includes the following plans. • Site Plan • Building Elevations • Site Lighting Plan • Landscaping Plan • Signage Plan • Off Street Parking Plan • Open Space and Maintenance Plan • Utility Plans (water, sewer and storm) 4. The Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be recorded against the property at the Dakota County Recorder's office within 60 days of City Council approval. 5. A Final Planned Development Agreement shall be executed for each phase of the development prior to issuance of a building permit for the phase. The following plans are necessary for each Final Planned Development Agreement: • Final Site Plan • Final Building Elevations • Final Site Lighting Plan • Final Landscaping Plan • Final Signage Plan laS Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page ] 9 • Final Off Street Parking Plan • Open Space and Maintenance Plan • Utility Plans (water, sewer and storm) 6. A homeowner's association shall be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements shall be conveyed to and maintained by the homeowner's association, as well as the private streets, the townhome lots and any monument signs or other common amenities. All common lots shall be deeded to the homeowner's association. All association documents shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney. Airport Noise 7. Sound attenuation construction standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA shall be employed for buildings within the one -mile buffer area of the 60 dB contour. Lots 8. All single - family lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 50 feet. 9. 85' wide single - family lots shall satisfy minimum R -1 zoning standards for lot dimensions and area. 10. 65' wide single - family lots shall satisfy minimum R -1S zoning standards for lot dimensions and area. 11. In consideration of common open space provided within the development, a deviation in the minimum lot size and dimensions for twinhomes lots is permitted per the Preliminary Plat dated January 20, 2010, last revised February 3, 2010. Setbacks and Bulk Standards 12. Structure setbacks shall be consistent with those outlined in the City's zoning Ordinance for the corresponding type of housing as follows: 85' single - family (R -1 district), 65' single - family (R -1S district); Twinhomes (R -2 District). 13. Minimum structure setbacks from Duckwood Drive shall be 40 feet. 14. Townhome setbacks shall be as follows: a. 50' from Yankee Doodle Road b. 30' from Station Trail c. 30' from the perimeter of the site d. 20' between buildings /a� Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 20 15. Building coverage shall not exceed 20% for each 85' wide single - family lot, and 25% for each twinhome and 65' wide single- family lot. The townhome units shall be entirely located within each unit's lot boundaries. 16. Building coverage for the future multiple family senior building shall not exceed 20 %. 17. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. 18. The future multiple family senior building may exceed 35 feet if the required additional setbacks are provided in accordance with the R -4 zoning district standards (an additional 3' for each 1' of building height over 35'). Parking 19. Each dwelling unit shall provide a minimum two -stall garage. 20. The private drives within the townhome portion of the development shall be signed "no parking" along both sides. 21. Parking lot and pavement setbacks for the future multiple - family senior building shall be a minimum of 20 feet from a public right -of -way to provide sufficient room for berming, screening, buffering and snow storage. Architectural Controls 22. Building elevation plans shall be provided with the Final Planned Development for each phase of the development. Such plans shall include specific architectural controls (i.e. design elements, building materials, etc.) that are consistent with the City's zoning ordinance, where applicable. Other Standards 23. This development shall comply with the provisions outlined in Section 11.70, Subdivision 21 of the City Code pertaining to site lighting, trash storage, walkways, interior storage space, etc. Detailed plans identified in Condition 4 demonstrating compliance shall be provided at the time of Final Planned Development. 24. Prior to Final Planned Development approval, the developer shall confirm the use of Lot 1, Block 15 as a single - family home or the community building and swimming pool. If the latter, the developer shall provide detailed plans for the community building including building elevations and materials, as well as the location of the swimming pool on the lot. Jai Lennar (Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 21 25. Ownership and maintenance of the swimming pool and community building, if included, shall be the responsibility of the homeowner's association. 26. The applicant shall submit a proposal /infrastructure plan to be approved by staff to provide telecommunications fiber to the home (FTTH) or conduit to all homesites to permit third party providers to install FTTH within the neighborhood. Landscaping 27. A detailed Landscape Plan, consistent with the design standards and specifications in the City's landscape ordinance (Section 11.70, Subdivision 12) shall be provided with the Preliminary Subdivision and Final Planned Development. 28. Consistent landscape design elements shall be incorporated throughout the site to provide visual connections between the various parts of this planned development. 29. Berming and landscaping shall be provided along Yankee Doodle Road to provide a buffer between the buildings and this principal arterial. 30. The Landscape Plan shall address screening /buffering on the north end of the west side of the development and the Carriage Hills condominium and shall include berms and plantings as necessary. 31. Prior to Final Planned Development approval, the applicant shall verify that the placement of landscaping does not interfere or conflict with utilities. 32. In accordance with Section 11,70, Subd. 12 -13-3 of the City Code, a financial guarantee for the landscaping shall be submitted with the Final Subdivision for each phase of the development. The guarantee shall cover two calendar years following satisfactory completion and shall be released only upon inspection and written notice of conformance by the city. For any landscaping that is unacceptable, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. Grading 33. Prior to final subdivision approval, detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan shall be prepared in accordance with current City standards and codes. 34. Prior to any grading of the Property, erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code, City engineering standards, and MN Pollution Control permit regulations. lde Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 22 35. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits shall be prepared by a designer who has current University of Minnesota Erosion/ Sediment Control Design training, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. 36. All personnel responsible for the construction and management of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion/ Sediment Control site management certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer. 37. The use of flagmen will be reviewed when the Development Agreement is prepared, and their use will be implemented by the Developer as determined to be necessary by the City. Storm Water Drainage 38. Storm water management systems for this development shall be constructed in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan (Dec. 2005), the City Water Quality Plan, and City engineering standards. Wetlands 39. In accordance with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 4. B., the applicant shall have all wetlands fully or partially located on the site delineated by a Certified Wetland Delineator utilizing approved methods as stated in Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall have all existing wetlands assessed utilizing the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (Version 3.0 or later version). The delineation shall be completed prior to Preliminary Subdivision. 40. Any and all wetland delineations shall be conducted during the growing season (i.e., typically between April 15 and October 15) and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 41. Any proposals to impact any of the wetlands on the site by draining, filling, or excavating shall comply with Minn. Rules Ch. 8420 and shall be in accordance specifically with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 5., Wetland Sequencing and Replacement Requirements and Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 11., Wetland Submittal Requirements. 42. All of the wetlands on the site shall have Wetland Buffers in accordance with Eagan City Code 511.67 Subd. 6. tai Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 23 43. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall satisfy Wetland Buffer Vegetative Requirements in accordance with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 7. 44. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall be protected in accordance with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 8. 45. All of the Wetland Buffers on the site shall have markers in accordance with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 9. 46. The development of the site shall have wetland setbacks in accordance with Eagan City Code § 11.67 Subd. 10. 47. This development may be subject to cash dedications in lieu of the above wetland requirements, at the City's discretion. Water Quality 48. There shall be no -net increase, compared to existing conditions, in the amount of Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) leaving the site or 50 percent TP and 80 percent TSS must be removed from stormwater runoff, whichever is more restrictive. 49. The first one -half inch of stormwater runoff from any rainfall event shall be infiltrated or retained entirely on the site. 50. This development may be subject to cash dedications in lieu of the above water quality requirements, at the City's discretion. Tree Preservation 51. In accordance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, Eagan City Code Section 11. 10, Subd. 15. 1, the applicant shall prepare and submit a Tree Preservation Plan with the Preliminary Subdivision application that: a) identifies all significant vegetation located on the application site, b) delineates limits of land disturbance and tallies significant vegetation proposed to removed, c) provides for any required tree mitigation, and d) indicates measures to protect significant vegetation intended to be preserved. 52. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to identify additional opportunities for preservation during the development and construction process. l3D Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 24 53. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved. 54. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Streets/ Access/ Circulation 55. Restricted access should be provided along the entire development adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. 56. All public and private streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City Code, with vehicle turnarounds to City and fire code requirements. 57. Continuous trails or sidewalks shall be provided between proposed Duckwood Drive and Yankee Doodle Road, to increase pedestrian circulation and connectivity. 58. All trails within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City engineering standards for width, structural dimension, and right -of -way dedication. 59. All concrete sidewalks within public right -of -way shall be a minimum of six feet (6') in width. 60. Direct driveway access to Duckwood Drive shall be prohibited. 61. Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. 62. Restricted access, in favor of the City, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Duckwood Drive. Utilities 63. A sanitary sewer system to serve the development shall be constructed in accordance with the City Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, and City engineering standards. 64. If sanitary sewer lift stations are required to utilize the capacity of all trunk sanitary sewer districts, to adequately serve the development, the stations shall be installed at the developer's expense. 131 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 25 65. This development shall be responsible for the removal and abandonment of all septic systems and wells, in accordance with City and County requirements. 66. Lateral water mains to serve the development for fire and domestic uses shall be constructed in accordance with the City Water Supply & Distribution Plan, and City engineering standards. Easement /Permits /Rights -of -Way 67. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage requirements. 68. All public and private streets, drainage systems, and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines, and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 69. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project shall be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 70. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. 71. The development shall dedicate conservation easements to the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, over those portions of the site that comprise the 30 acres of open space. These areas shall be shown and identified as Conservation Easement Area on the Final Site Plan prior to Final Planned Development approval. Parks and Trails 72. The development shall provide connections to the existing off -site Eagan trail system and access points at the perimeter of the development to primary off -site amenities. Connections points include the east and west end of Duckwood and Wescott Hills Drive to Yankee Doodle. Off -site amenities include Mueller Farm Park, O'Leary Park and Woodland Elementary School. 73. This development shall fulfill the Park Dedication requirement through the designation of a proposed 35.76 acres of open space /natural area to be owned and managed as open space /natural area by the Homeowners Association. 74. A looping trail shall be installed through the open space with multiple points of access for residents and the public, possibly including benches and other furnishings, ownership and maintenance to be determined. 13� Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pate 26 75. Trail dedication shall be satisfied through a combination of on -site trails, exclusive of sidewalks, and /or a cash payment consistent with the Eagan fee schedule, to be paid at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. 76. The developer shall provide an agreement, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, to allow the public full access to those portions of the proposed on -site trail system, constructed by the Developer to City standards, that are determined by the City to have public value. The provision of trail amenities may also be addressed in the agreement. 77. This development shall provide a maintenance plan, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for the open space that includes regular eradication of invasive and non - native species, enhancement of planted areas as appropriate, and routine maintenance including trash removal. 78. This development shall install "tot- lots" that include play structures in the townhome area. Such tot lots shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 264 lots and 7 outlots for 363 dwelling units upon approximately 115 acres located south of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Wescott Woodlands. If approved, the following conditions shall apply: Standard Conditions The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: A 1, B 1, B2, B3, B4, C 1, C2, C3, D 1, and E 1 2. The property shall be platted. Homeowner's Association A homeowner's association shall be established for this development. All common property and open space in conservation easements shall be conveyed to and maintained by the homeowner's association, as well as the private streets, the townhome lots and any monument signs or other common amenities All common lots shall be deeded to the homeowner's association. All association documents shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney. Sound Attenuation 4. The 2008 Preliminary PD Agreement required that buildings in this development utilize sound attenuation construction standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA. 1,33 Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Page 27 Lots 5. All single - family lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 50 feet. Landscaping 6. Prior to Final Planned Development, the applicant shall verify that the placement of landscaping does not interfere or conflict with utilities. 7. In accordance with Section 11.70, Subd. 12 -13-3 of the City Code, a financial guarantee for the landscaping shall be submitted with the Final Subdivision for each phase of the development. The guarantee shall cover two calendar years following satisfactory completion and shall be released only upon inspection and written notice of conformance by the city. For any landscaping that is unacceptable, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. Telecommunications The applicant shall submit a proposal /infrastructure plan to be approved by staff to provide telecommunications fiber to the home (FTTH) or conduit to all homesites to permit third party providers to install FTTH within the neighborhood. Grading /Storm Drainage 9. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan shall be prepared in accordance with current City standards and codes prior to final subdivision approval. 10. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits should be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. 11. All personnel responsible for the construction and management of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion/Sediment Control site management certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City Engineer. 12. Erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code and engineering standards. l3� Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Pat4e 28 13. This development shall be responsible for the construction of outlet pipes, with allowable storm water discharges for the storm water basins, in accordance with the City's current Storm Water Management Plan. Streets /Access 14. Restricted access should be provided along the entire development adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. 15. All public and private streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City Code, with vehicle turnarounds to City and fire code requirements. 16. Continuous trails or sidewalks shall be provided between proposed Duckwood Drive and Yankee Doodle Road, to increase pedestrian circulation and connectivity. 17. All trails within the development shall be constructed in accordance with City engineering standards for width, structural dimension, and right -of -way dedication. 18. All concrete sidewalk proposed within public right -of -way shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in width. Utilities 19. This development shall be responsible for abandonment of the on -site well system, in accordance with City and County requirements. Rights -of Way /Easements 20. Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. 21. Restricted access, in favor of the City, shall be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Duckwood Drive. 22. Public right -of -way along Yankee Doodle Road shall be dedicated in accordance with Dakota County requirements. Wetlands /Water Quality 23. The applicant shall provide the following additional information: a. For modeling scenarios, using average annual precipitation based on the recent 10- year historical amounts (i.e., 1990 -2008) versus the amounts over 50 years (i.e., approximately 1959- 2009). Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 Paee 29 b. Construction details of proposed infiltration basins for City review, specifically information on sub -soil work (ripping depth, etc.) to ensure infiltration basins function as intended. c. Soil- boring information below each of the proposed infiltration basin areas (matched up with proposed grades), to ensure that the infiltration basins could perform as intended. Even though the general USDA soils map shows most of the proposed infiltration areas with high likelihood of having "sandy loam" to at least the 60" below grade, there may have been substantial grading and alterations to the soil profile over the course of the golf course operation that have affected these conditions. Tree Preservation 24. In accordance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, Eagan City Code Section 11. 10, Subd. 15. 1, the applicant shall prepare and submit a Tree Preservation Plan with the Preliminary Subdivision application that: a) identifies all significant vegetation located on the application site, b) delineates limits of land disturbance and tallies significant vegetation proposed to removed, c) provides for any required tree mitigation, and d) indicates measures to protect significant vegetation intended to be preserved. 25. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to identify additional opportunities for preservation during the development and construction process. 26. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved. 27. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 28. The applicant shall protect the preserved tree's critical root zones through the placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees /woodlands to be preserved on -site. 29. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. /3cl_ Lennar(Stonehaven) February 23, 2010 PaL,e 30 30. The applicant shall consider the additional preservation of specimen and other large diameter trees via the field review of specific tree location and proposed grading activities. Parks and Trails 31. This proposal shall fulfill the Park Dedication requirement through the designation of a proposed 35.76 acres of open space /natural area to be owned and managed as open space /natural area by the Homeowners Association. 32. The development shall provide connections to the existing off -site Eagan trail system and access points at the perimeter of the development to primary off -site amenities. Connections points include the east and west end of Duckwood and Wescott Hills Drive to Yankee Doodle. Off -site amenities include Mueller Farm Park, O'Leary Park and Woodland Elementary School. 33. A looping trail shall be installed through the open space with multiple points of access for residents and the public, possibly including benches and other furnishings, ownership and maintenance to be determined. 34. Trail dedication shall be satisfied through a combination of on -site trails, exclusive of sidewalks, and /or a cash payment consistent with the Eagan fee schedule, to be paid at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. 35. The developer shall provide an agreement, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, to allow the public full access to those portions of the proposed on -site trail system, constructed by the Developer to City standards, that are determined by the City to have public value. The provision of trail amenities may also be addressed in the agreement. 36. This development shall provide a maintenance plan, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for the open space that includes regular eradication of invasive and non - native species, enhancement of planted areas as appropriate, and routine maintenance including trash removal. 37. This development shall install "tot- lots" that include play structures in the townhome area Such tot lots shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 1 3cP '. Eagan Boundary Right -of -way Lo cation t M p j Parcel Area a� Park Area Building Footprint 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development /Developer: Stonehaven (Lennar) Application: Prelimlinary Subdivision; PD Amendment Case No.: 14- PS- 02- 01 -10; 14- PA- 03 -01 -10 4101� City of Ea �� THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Yp The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are not responsible for errors or omissions. S Community Development Department Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Stonehaven (Lennar) Prelim. Subd.; PD Amendment 14- PS- 02- 01 -10; 14- PA- 03 -01 -10 parcel bap information provided by Dakota County Land Survey Department Decmber 2005. N Zoning Information maintained by City Staff. City of Eap THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S ecm .. Exam �Lr'll'e•�'i�e9�s1� AN D '*�•. 110:. :'► �� ®gee FBI t; Subject NEW MIN P AM WTA � �'ee�s��o °� i ��• ate/ Pow Wid, is parcel bap information provided by Dakota County Land Survey Department Decmber 2005. N Zoning Information maintained by City Staff. City of Eap THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S ecm .. Exam �Lr'll'e•�'i�e9�s1� D 7-�Fe�ee M �. �! ©� Subject P AM WTA parcel bap information provided by Dakota County Land Survey Department Decmber 2005. N Zoning Information maintained by City Staff. City of Eap THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S F>J L) �D 71, ¢ L2 0� 04 LL < < < Z'Z�F 5c C) C'- C4 C4 C4 X= L) LU M.. E E. E_ E a. "i �n 16 oco v N -FI 1 d , s, VIII ` I - , l�dn 1u00 8Z ON OYCJ ).1N i07) - - - e e e n ti 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS (north) v u^ Z X u L£" jt r 1� i C I Z a u� Zr V , l�dn 1u00 8Z ON OYCJ ).1N i07) - - - e e e n ti 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS (north) v u^ Z X u L£" jt r 1� i l�dn 1u00 8Z ON OYCJ ).1N i07) - - - e e e n ti 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS (north) v u^ Z X u L£" jt r 1� i a -� Z . I x J J y _ f 1 a -� Z . I x J J 14/ L J EXISTING CONDITIONS (south) I rim C; Z E ��er y _ f 14/ L J EXISTING CONDITIONS (south) I rim C; Z E ��er �6O 2 ECi u eao� Ln a a _ E ri Y y :o Z a o ° 60; _ O -- -- -- - - cm T— NOLL 15 ` (OVOa 310A0 33NNVA) HL ON OVO8 A Nmz) Hsl 'ON dVA AVM d0 1N918 O'008 A1Nn00 V10NV0 na �a l� PRELIMINARY PLAT (north) z� F ` Z3 e� z c _r I �E z : 1 JJ o i of of �6O 2 ECi u eao� Ln a a _ E ri Y y :o Z a o ° 60; _ O -- -- -- - - cm T— NOLL 15 ` (OVOa 310A0 33NNVA) HL ON OVO8 A Nmz) Hsl 'ON dVA AVM d0 1N918 O'008 A1Nn00 V10NV0 na �a l� PRELIMINARY PLAT (north) z� F ` Z3 e� z c _r I �E z : 1 J r F o ' 4 - DUC✓W0.,0 D a. �4 - ro o - I z � Q� o 0 - o 0 no I - n 111 - _ � - n a , ; J�3 PRELIMINARY PLAT (south) I 4M h �T c _ v� J r F o ' 4 - DUC✓W0.,0 D a. �4 - ro o - I z � Q� o 0 - o 0 no I - n 111 - _ � - n a , ; J�3 PRELIMINARY PLAT (south) I 4: 77 b j5 Jl j -2=zmQu�'s v IA� PRELIM. SUBDISITE PLAN (north) o _ ohs k r e h 5 —I r 1 � C � nflp _ D on , i 1 fk /ham I I .r n 1 I z_E PRELIM. SUBD. /SITE PLAN (south) 5i N I n I z 4_ I I i Tj j c ri w � L' e 11 1 �. 1 - ' I - - !II T i � L H r Q — _ �i - 1� � J _ � r i G �r �l r` _ LJ a 5 I l Sao - L f � "ate I ✓ �' � `'�° � � s ,_ v _ w z� o J� e zo /; O -- — II J „ I _ I I. I — ° < V i �:_ — -- -- P2 o - z _ 0 W r F - o KOLs 66 L -- - ', 30VdS N3d0 o — – o 11-10uno — € Coll +0 IV14 - g — — _ to sz - -- i I a ,r. avoa 7nC130C as ON ayo�J uNno3 � 3 r Z` 1 • OPEN SPACE /PARKING /LIGHTING --L. & SIGNAGE PLAN (north) � 'J OPEN SPACE /PARKING /LIGHTING i & SIGNAGE PLAN (south) v I 1 � S - u i a lu u < a a m _ N N w i n ;t o I . _ I _ - v L 1 E = OPEN SPACE /PARKING /LIGHTING i & SIGNAGE PLAN (south) 3 C =- N z u� > c, Sr w t' i I ii J In M o NN — tl e ioilno HP v y o a -ohs o 5 G N N Go _ N U rnS r, ' r i - - - a Z° 0•� O � i I jjjjjj I I) 1 1 1 t _— ___ - ~ - 1 of } f` � ._ I . �7'.� • _- � _ s .1 ��I �� PRELIM. GRADING PLAN � '�' (sheet 10) <�o - -- - -_ WESCOTT-WOOnAIIDS Oe 1 I f316i1`.�785 1 (F �dj9j / Ppi '/ ~J�� . c � � I ( � h• ,ry,1 .... `B' G M5 a s ,( TON - t 3 N �a3mi f q Opp I_ Fop - H p co Rpw ATE Hot a � r m a 7 ''S IQ QI 4 9 _ 3 pPRELIM. GRADING PLAN I (sheet 11) ,a CD wl I ,-� C� Cg a �j U = °o O poo , 156 L€ ' N U � Q r V Z FC- LL 1 oss� e i N \ a ^ I I �-0 °gym a r� PRELIM. GRADING PLAN (sheet 12) � Z3z 9 = Z n � z 0 C Z g � a u a u7 c w = w w - _ N e i N \ a ^ I I �-0 °gym a r� PRELIM. GRADING PLAN (sheet 12) o t'. � � \ c^�. •�\ ri.Po ��.\.. �' ,>� sp' Sox -- N � —c+� v(--, i I � � � Y _ — - - 7 - -194 -�+SS .= 'l , \,. 1 •' l 1 i R 4 0� }5 ^63 iE :L — g Fp5 r fit t 1 " Z X99 s , a s s o26 G i I ^ J rJ6 /9 m f Fl 09.5 «. o� = rp c \ I 1 Iz PRELIM. GRADING PLAN (sheet 13) • t� �F'S �S �� _ a �... • ...... [0 Za Sop l � may= ' l — p)� LJ ' lo F- _ 7 • __ P o /_:" �a � . — I�, ��• `� — '„ <Q rooms Z3. Lc –Oaf � - t '�-- p ; Q i T m om Y In ' o f u ° 0 N IN IY ` cfl z eo .i' - z s ao -y ..Y co Y^ J oa 9 a` S7R�E7 q N 1pDG I1I p II) i @ . I - i ..... -:. i _ ATV Y f��Y, ^.!�( ✓ �I ' . // �J m _ a _ c , - ! PRELIM. GRADING PLAN ,I (sheet 14) lc -- — - — � 1 c. ... . ...................... I fl .......... - N-1 o 7T. w �� A 1. 3 a a, a � a - �o 7 < o w`x U V� - O J _ o 0 9.1" . kOw Q '•. I \ �h 0 q V > Mee -CC) 9m, - a c t/ c c r n I Vii'.. / J 1 /) C o � 3 �o�a< 3 PRELIM. GRADING PLAN I (sheet 15) gvuk ;\� �Poj\, 'n r-T =a ea F 'N n36 MR !M nt 'x JA g '12 XN -EN P€ , t. !ie T v if L - -- -- ------- PRELIM. GRADING DETAILS r _ � `�_� }tom' � !q\j ` � • � i� 8m'�I }m5 � ��t•` •� � lam¢ "', �` n "W I - cc 1,11 �� /xn- B I ; �S tj V Ln _ e W . �; s � � � �w� mss•` {�' i� I � Y r arx; l� —' - - - - -- 'gym -- _ _ -. _ --- -- _ -- -- Gb'Oa ��000G 31N1 -J7/0 8Z "ON Gd0'J J,iN -00 ASS PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN PLAN (north) t� • L� u_ f < � v x t- <3 z �s y3z I .w > — ° 3AIaO r _ � `�_� }tom' � !q\j ` � • � i� 8m'�I }m5 � ��t•` •� � lam¢ "', �` n "W I - cc 1,11 �� /xn- B I ; �S tj V Ln _ e W . �; s � � � �w� mss•` {�' i� I � Y r arx; l� —' - - - - -- 'gym -- _ _ -. _ --- -- _ -- -- Gb'Oa ��000G 31N1 -J7/0 8Z "ON Gd0'J J,iN -00 ASS PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN PLAN (north) t� • L� u_ f < � v x t- <3 z �s y3z I PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN PLAN (north) di UT zG B 1331 is 7 COCAADno 7 X a) �0 o) A 133' lS 9t 13345 ? PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN PLAN (north) di UT zG e a I 0 ° a n I 3A N3 co x A z, It ul b ^�W J 4 fj - ✓ - \\ V� clw co ° ° ° a 0 3 - 1 ?kLS 7 3� Q _ a f ° o - n o . ° d u. - a a `Ij z l ° zz { a 72 — a -- - ._ 1 0M 33NNd.t) 9d ON c d0H J.1nn0D _ ,= r 7 PRELIM. STORM SEWER & STREET PLAN (north) Z J O = 1f`� t r ! a Q ¢� oemdo . � U I mo 0 I a ° ' � a ¢7. v -, I j " < Q � _ x o LKW00D 400MJIJf14 _ d m i a 1 K — I e PRELIM. STORM SEWER & STREET PLAN (north) x ICI CW- JF <7 - I I PRELIM, LANDSCAPE PLAN (north) I' IIII i� PRELIM, LANDSCAPE PLAN (north) tff T--- T- a. T11 jy PRELIM. LANDSCAPE PLAN (South) y_ f l 5 II X �- I � I 1 � -� f? r�. I is 1� ( ROWHOME OVERSTORY DETAIL I BE z z� z, Z3 c r 0 0 0 3 0 I G F x 0 o o O O g I k �7 o F Ao� t R FI MY! Ijl ,4c I o> c� III ROWHOME FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE PLAN All TVVINHOKAE FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE PLAN I O All TVVINHOKAE FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE PLAN I P 1 I < 9 A M Z2'aL - MN: ......... ......... .77 �41 0 133�JS �C) _5 4r _340000-33ANVA5�-Bi\20N GV08 Ll Nn- TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (north) < J O z 117 m 75 3: < TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (north) < J O i. l6a TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (South) Ze a. Q aa��aw u PEI NX2M Y �uwa�oa 1112.,1 �LL)o p �W oQ a Y a� 4 i44 wig 3� es a5, a X8 2 o d dddd dddddddddddd d dddddd 5 :1 I I I�I 1111111 �k13 I i000e� i:l iii fitAr.a Y J t� f e c� I �1 A 1� I I� gK aHR yy to {t liv 11; p ' rd jif se it � L yy@@ 11��}s l sya }} i =tE TRAILS /SIDEWALKS t � • � >g5 ' � M 7, fld.w O C9 EL:JJ IL z Y a� 4 i44 wig 3� es a5, a X8 2 o d dddd dddddddddddd d dddddd 5 :1 I I I�I 1111111 �k13 I i000e� i:l iii fitAr.a Y J t� f e c� I �1 A 1� I I� gK aHR yy to {t liv 11; p ' rd jif se it � L yy@@ 11��}s l sya }} i =tE TRAILS /SIDEWALKS I _ i I Ta — - A i I I � � I � I i�Y li � I I &7 8 \v �ingie- raitilly (85') k 'r, WIL I. I -a 4 \ I I 1 1 l { I 1 I W? Single - Family (85') 6Za2 Y 1' L. NI •- I I F 7 , •yam _ k -< r, I 111 i I I I I i 1 �I r es Ili i O i I � T i I I � Single- Family r YO ° r° Ih 4, ^I li I III I t � , i I i ,43 x �l 1 _ � f I "` V 8 Single - Family (851) i I � dab I of Lj I � � _ - • � /7402 �3 O'.J�' � - _ � I i t. s z (,_ I IT Single- Family (85') Fitzgerald OE E wil A C C D Single-Family (65') 935 Wayzata Blvd. E., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 Fitzgerald 935 Wayzata Blvd. E., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952- 249 -3000 Plans and devotions are artist's renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding "under air" or "finished area" or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is o shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainly. Copyright 0 2009 lennor Corporation. tenor and the lennar logo are registered service marks of tenor Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 10/09 Pillsbury c B M . 7 7.- D Single-Family (65') 935 Wayzata Blvd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 H. al 0.4 .61. , M, '11, I'l, ii i1, I'l, '11, 1". -mm nn c B M . 7 7.- D Single-Family (65') 935 Wayzata Blvd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 0 a Pillsbury q! - MU'k-UkU� PLC. M-Ril, M 935 Wayzata Bivd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952- 249 -3000. Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and map -main options, which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensxxis and ekwalions without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or actual size. M�► statement, verbal or written, regarding under air" or' finished area' or ocher description or modifier of the square footage sae of arry home is a shorthand descripfion of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not fie construed to indicate certainty. Copynght ®2009 Lennor Corporation, tennar and the Lennar kgo are registered servioz marks of Lennar Corporation and /or ih subsidxsries. 9/09 L 5"I5J f 3 Lz Sinclair IL 71- C U Pry 'm . F- OF 7,0000/01' FJ - it sm -V--. 935 Wayzata Blvd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 Sinclair 0 L F ME fZ_-I� Rf:0R Single- Family (65') 935 Wayzata Bivd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952 - 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. leanar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specdications, dimensions and elewtions without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or actual sae. An�r statement, verbd or written, regard'mg 'ands air" or 'Finished area' or oar other description or mol'd'ier of the square footage size of arty home rs a shorthand descriptan aF the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not tie construed ro i�cale certainty. Copynght ®2009 Lennar Corporation. knnar and the lennar kgo are registered service ma►ks of Lennar Corporation and /or ih subsid'xnies. 9/09 =r- _,� Lt...i 8 J."i-�:�ti -If Ramsey we on Single-Family (65, 935 Wayzata Blvd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 g: P r r. � t we on Single-Family (65, 935 Wayzata Blvd. East, Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 Ramsey V & F;F— o 935 Wayzata Bivd. East, Wayzata, MN. 55391 • 952- 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without prior notice Stated dimensions and square Footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or achral size MX statement, verlwl or written, regarding under air a 'finished area" or anYY other description or modifier of the square foologe size of arty home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square (Dotage vvas estimated and shook) not be conshued to indicate certainty. Copyright ®2069 Lennar Corporation. Lennor and the Lennar logo are registered service marks of Lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 9/09 LE:C'-I' -Zt'wr. St. Croix A If 1 4� 7 is E 0 I .& s Vm Single-Family (65') 935 Wayzata Blvd. E. Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-249-3000 5] St. Croix ttttt. tttt. Single- Family (65') 935 Wayzata Blvd. E. Wayzata, MN 55391 e 952 - 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. Lennor reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, spedfiwtwns, dimensions and elevations wdhout prior rroGce. Stated dimensions and square kotage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or actual size. MY statement, verbal or written, regardi under air' or "finished area" or anyy other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand desaiphon of the manner in which the square footage was estimated a� should not be construed to indicate certainty. CopyngM ©2009 Lennor Corporaton. lennar and the lennor logo are registered service marks of Lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 10/09 19 a. Twinhome King5field 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Twinhome Plans and elevations are artists renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. Lennor reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations vritfrout prior notice Stated dimensions and square Footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or acfiwl size. My statement, verbal or written, regarding "under air' or "finished area" or any other description or modifier of the square Footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimaMd and shook! not be construed ro indicate certainty. Copynght ®2009 Lennar Corporation. lennar and the lennor logo are registered service marks of Lennar Corporation and /or its wbsidiories. 2/09 7: x r Twinhome 1:1 Kingston FF PARI. M 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Twinhome Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may conroin options, whic'a-- t srondard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes ro these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without prior notice Stated dimensions and square faoroge are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or aches) size. My statement, verbal or written, regarding "under air" or "finished area° or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square loge was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Copyright 0 2009 Lennar Corporation. Lennar and the Lennar logo are registered service marks of Lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 2/09 Twinhome Lakeview N &RI . 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artists renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, Ffm�ls ations, dimensions and ek vations without prior notice. Slated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the ny home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Copyright ©2009 lennar Corporation. l ennar and the Lennar kgo are registered service marks of lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 2/09 LEMNAR s= _ T d a"* r WT E -'- ■ n i11 ,._ Twinhome Lakewood ENOA, ff Z. - M, Twinhome 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may contain options, which are not standard on all models. lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specificatwns, dimensions and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's precise or actual size. My statement, verbal or written, regarding "under air" or "finished area° or any other description or modifier of the squore footage size of any home is a slwrtFiand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be conshued to indimte certainty. Copynght ®2009 Lennar Corporation. Lennar and the lennar kx�o are registered service marks of lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 2/09 LENNAM , t Madison IT LznHFV&M so= 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 9 954-249-3000 Madison 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and may conroin options, which are not standard on aB models. lennar reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without P_. or notice: Stated dimensions and square footage are appro�dmale and should not be used os representation of the home's grease or actual size. MY statement, or written, regarding under air' or "finished area' or any other description or modifier of the square fooroge size of any home is a shorthand descriphon of the manner in which the square F:oolage was estimoled and shook! not be construed ro indKate certainty. Copynght ©2009 lennor Corporation. lennar and the lennar logo are registered service marks of lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 2/09 NO ?a -- lips E!=,M a �s -- IJ, Townhome ,Jefferson 935 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 • 954- 249 -3000 Townhome Plans and elevations are artist's renderings and moy costa options, which are not standard on all models. Lennor reserves the right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home's predse or actual size. Anlr statement, verbal or written, regardin 'under air' or "finished area' or any other description or modifier of the square footage sae of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should rat be constived to indicate certainty. Copyright © 2009 lennar Corporation. Lennor and the Lennor logo are registered service marks of Lennar Corporation and /or its subsidiaries. 2/09 eau . . . . . . . . . . . . i vi I m I u O '4�F\ m IH v / ?v (P IZ m M zm O m m 1> O 0 m Ili m C) z Is (D I m m �o U) 0 z /III ri II 1 Semi:— �} Ibll LENNAFZ '1'1'711`1�1�-�', �l 7- .. . .. . ie IH v / ?v (P IZ m M zm O m m 1> O 0 m Ili m C) z Is (D I m m �o U) 0 z /III ri U) �z m m m m r- m 0 Ol Townhome LENNAFZ '1'1'711`1�1�-�', �l 7- .. . .. . �Illnun Ii y_� U) �z m m m m r- m 0 Ol Townhome C " LENNAFZ '1'1'711`1�1�-�', �l 7- .. . .. . C " .. .. . . . . . . .. N IT \ \� \ \}P «\� : \� rq m z ■ 31 0 U, z ■ m m z \\ X z / Town ome /\\ �� \ \ \� ~ � L E � �� ` � - - � \� � \ { { } \} } }( \ } } { }}�}\\ \\ \\{ ` }{ �j \\ �� { {� \ $ ��6 /� —'Z3 rl—1 111 7- 7 z CD \ f 0 z 01 ) Q 117 ■ 9 ■ \ z 1> N I m z I, mill Townhome (1) Fn m M r- m \( \ �\ \� /^ L E I-- �' T- US, E 1-7 / pp out � U � Q] C N L Q C N o j a) Q) a) M > Q a ° a p L a •� a C a � ° C C C N � O U o V) >- a N LO c -C o S � s a) C '0 o � vj Q . -a c 6 c a -a E° a L 2 o o v o (1) Q) i a 3 0 C3 > a°— c p E O p a O o L c p p Q p x a) O Q o 3 .� p s O o ` ai E c E U N s N cn • E a a_ o t- _ 0) ° i o o E V) = 3 p 3 rn� a — E Q a a 0 \L 4) o .O a) a •O' C LO = N Q) a) o c s > -0 a a) p p D E m m o a N a) c V) a o o n . c •N a O a> a a a� E N o O N m a ) N c a N O C p c aC � a o O aa ) = a V o p ° M ) ms a) Q M p , C " a E C N s p '= s o p O C) V O} : o C o ° O " O Q O N ) a7 O o ° -a c c (OD E a V a a o V V U V c M o E E a o 2 o o o_ a � °NN a vi - V r apN � N Q V N co N O Q aa ) a) O aE ) a) Q o c o a) aL o a) 00 a N X °) a c E c ° o o o o C: C).) o a o O V - a _ c °~ a c p o pn (1) i U — E a_ V a) a -a C - N L Q a p s a) o :I-_ a) ° ° °o a w Z Z � E ° n o N m ° s i a Ns s o a c a T a c s E > o Jm° c° a o C s C: O (D O ° a a o o W E o E O M Q p p p o c s o o o E a ° Z° a a) aai 6 T O N N C c 6 c o E 0 _ 0 o a O c a o O O -p Q a a a C V ° s O E U o a U o CD o a) o o o o N f _ E o M a> o c ° o c a E a a) o a rn c o a o o > -0 _ J c m N C a ) a s p O U O N Q N o a � 3 X E ° M a N s } O O o o C: (D E ° a .p _o _o o 0 E o a o a a E p 1 a 07 Q a L 4- a O a ° o ° 'D C) Qw . U o o c o a > m. - a o > s a c C o U m o 0° v) Q)° z) V E C)) o E } Q rn p ° o ° c ° c ° E E w - c a ° E N O N a� o c > ° o o aT U -a ° a V o o ° s p a o p p a C -0 C: C) � _ N a o e U C s N 2 -a a m O -a C N C O o a7 •'" - p ° o p O s c)) ° o° s ) E c p O CN a a a aN 3 ) a c° 3 o p Q a c-a o O E a O p C N— c a >j p c N - O O N C N p N j O s s p> �- ° , 0 c p C v a) s E ap C M a> 2'- Q) a ` O 6) a) `c (D o a p N a) c c S M. a) p 0 c_ o) o p L 3 N N a> .� �� V m o o N E a N ° ° o o a C N= p o '� O a a) N -a v O N° N o a D a a) ° N F °> c c E E c E° c O E E i s O p Q c o o n s o o o$ s i, c - c 3 V c o p s o S S L a° �- tea) s ors �°' o o 2 V) O. E °°° in a i?e Cif r a z z W J V_ -Q O C C O N C N C C _O d) 0 O o 0 S � Q C i` oo O m c Q> 0 O x c O 0 0- O O a .O O 0 2- N c Q) N 00 -O O O 0 _ -'O C C u 0) 4) u 0 Qi m> � 0 � C� C O> 0 0 0 O 0 N C c C c Q N N -O O N 'a N 00 O N> N 0 0 E 0 0 0 -O O c o D N O S 3 O Q N O N c C V N O 0 O -0 N �° c o _ c 7 N O 0 N u ...0 � -O v' W N J � O � 0_ J s s C o .� 0 O C) a } O "� N O -o 0 0 0 s O p = o 0— o 3 > o E a O o} 0 Q s Q) o s 'O Q) •c N ° .� O s N Oc O c w O C °c 0 0 c E 2 o =� 0 .E -a '3 s j ?} rn cn 6 .0 C V C �_ C C •E V V N LU —S O O V N C N O 0 o =- c E> 3 E -O a) V CY) - o o L o00 3� s O s c C 0 N E p N N N O I (} C N ` N = -Q 0 •+V E Q) 0 c N O 6 0 0 E N i Q O V O 0 O N 'U N O c `- O O c� v O O c o "' V 0 c` } O N >— o c 4- s Z 0 'N N N 0 s O s O C C O O O Q N O> O _o N c � c N �• N 0 V 5) a) 3 N 0 O 0 o_ U m 0 Q 0 -OO O o 0 N C N a) E O O E 0 0) 0 c O m 0 O } O O O 0- >' .O N 0 0 N -0 ` •` ON . c0 O C E N Q.2 N C N C N N 0 N o �' E ° s N L-. t o"> V C S EO L .'� N 4- U O > C) Q) C S C { Vs I— °) N i 30 C a o V c o E 0 E o n s — m N o Q a� D s-7 u- ._ E o o > c S � o 0) c _o "' o a� s 3 _ a� a) ' (D O c > m o CI- E , o s �- — O o N o E s s > E E N — O O >. OOO O O O 0 a - Q O :I-_ O (1) c O O O a) >' O cO > 0 Q) . O O 00 s O 0 O m U N V) 0 V) -o w -a y c Z m L N O C- N L O a) O C- 0 .j\0_ •C) L ME v o m c E s- c O 3 as � C N O >. C N � E E O 0 s � � N E c_ p O d) Q _o . N S ,C V V Z5 E Q O 0 V (D ] C X .? -0 0 .E E�- S � 0 0) C C :s E O 0 N N C M O c O Q - c c O N O a Q 0 V O S ,} C > C (o E N C O C3 U a) �L a0 ) d) 0 :I_ V V V V N CV 00 Q C) N � N 3 II o Q) O 0 0 O N > -0 c O Q 3 O 0 Ln � N 0) O 0 V V > E m V) s E O Q) O V -0 --a N o E Cn O rnt 0 0 ° �_ E — m E CD > > E E 0 C 0 -70 E 0 a) m CD C V) I 0 I I N cn a) I N N Q I vi co CV r-- 00 O o -0 O O LO CN O c M LO r CN 0 E o rn- o C E O _ss o V) v) 0) V V V V N CV 00 2N C) 10 � N M O 3 O O 0 0 II 0 o O 6 � N O o > O O Q E m V) s E m c rn o) 0 p •N � C C L - � C: 10 C O 0 O N I V 0 0 N � V � E -0 � •y m a) V rn O N N E E c -0 S c- vi co CV r-- 00 s o c E N N -0 -0 C) 2 m a -0 E E E o rn- o C E d) U _ss o V) v) 0) I I I I N C C 0 cn µ? N N - O - O Ln O Lo -Q M vn 'O r CO CN V V V N CV 00 2N C) 10 Q II N O 0 C O O Q 0 o O 6 � N 0 V V > O -0 -0 .� O E m V) s E m c rn o) 0 p •N � C C L - � s �-0 E E N 0 O 0 << C EO N < E 0 s I I ti c 0 C3 a?ti o � O O Lo O O vi co CV r-- 00 CV C 0 s Cn V) ro lq� z w a V J c� w CL V V C) N N o .> O O c c O O c c 0 C3 O O V V > OV N N -0 -0 N E E a) m Cn a) O O N C _ss E C C 0 C O s - N 0) CA-0 c 0- E 0 WO `o o C) E CD v) cI x c 0 OLr)Ovn0 3 M (V CV r-- CV O -0 0 z w a V J c� w CL _ V) O vi > Q) C C E > �S" •_- a O E a) > O p E �' n > E " c o �i s E > C s E c E c > a 3 C3 -0 `p N Q O N v c O -� O a�i � c •O a s -° °- O s o O -a > a) d V > _ > O > a) N a) O V)) 3 a) c} ` O a a) — a N O O O a) > v 0 U s o w .N a = o Q C E s C° > � > rn O ° p O O_ Q a ` ° } `_ ° ° ° O T 0-.0 E c3 — 0 0-a 0 o f o 3 a) O O > p a) cc > a) O a E s 3 C j 3 , > o V E n E E C) a U> � x o ° > o O O c m o > a� c a T a W a° a p c ° > n °_ Cu i •� ° E o o c ` a � o u E n > Q o V ° N E o O °° a E a > c s ° -r o w n Q O c V N. c -a O> c > a) s- i ?• `• • • aC .` Lu ° cn T> LU � o a O a) -0 a. J E w> ` a r c > 3 > > > C E o O a 0 ° 2Z' cs N V) Z os E ° o Q Q a a 4-- W cn n p > L V) Q u E w a � w N Z o p O -a c c > vi o c > 3 > C: 3 -� 0 .° c s s° a) o _ c m> > a mQ N` c c c v a) E O E > > > 2 T c > O O E a p a �6 . X > 0 `w a "_ O c) ` s aaj C 0 C > E .- T a) �_ s > C 0- S > a N Q 0 a) > C a) i 'n a) E a a) u -a —1 -C p >= o 3 � E cp Z) 0 c c� 0 o ° o �-° 0- 3 0)> ° a)-a _ �? cn Ein a o > ° v Q a Q > -� w D T a -0 3 > a o o - � = rn a) o c C o -a > > c E a > a a a) a) V c -a E c ? V c ti E> o T `c rn a> > N E > 3 C 0 3 > a s C - 3 0 > c C) c > N >� 0 _ > 0 > c° °).a a > E 3 O 0) V° s X OV �` O ,` a C `� OV Q O > C v>i E —p O n a) C) E E .X 0 0 'c c —° 0° s c ° o o °° E° _ > N O a c Q > E a- O� > � `a) ° m O_ ' �=' O v0 w > a o o > a a_ � �3 a-° O v> a) E= C x C c N a>i —° m e w v a s N> a > rn a 6--o c a a c 0 a O _ o E a o C a) a -° O c O> O a c E c a) N o a° Q) a c a -° o = v c —E 0 s-0 N O Q 0 O a p T > T— (D 0 0 CD ° E o o s s _ ° o= >> O o C C a) v _ O N N V 0 C T> i C a C a a N Q) >— Q +- t ° a a) 7 `� a) •� Q C a) > cn a s o ° a) o a 0 s a) c C O C O 1 - O o C a O > p U CL Z p U� p t_ w > O Q a cc V) O Q O_ Q' ti 0 ° C a V) • • • • • • • • • • • • z w a Cn (-11) z w w r a z z W J ° o o a) -0 O a) N N m a a ° c a) o 3 E m c c N N° °- E a°> E o U� ° E 0 o E -a O p 0 o c a c s 0 o a c°° o c° E o O o s o s c p V 0 0 _ 0 E 0 0 n V V c> 0 D O d— E O 0 D a) a 0 ° E D a) O L O 0 M— m 0 m 0 a a o 0 U :o �- 4.. m a o N a 0) - N 0 o c I- 0 o c 0 0 >, • — 0) E y) N a) `c a) 0 - N a) E 3 .c o N ° a a) c E 0 a 'E _0 E �' E 0_ m E a N — V ° a) a) i m c c 0 c (� 0 s N 0 � E E o c: a D O O O E O 0 o O Q E X ? M > O 0 3 N E ° a�i a) 0 s E E U m rn a a o 0 ° V} s-0 D I a) o 0 ° s 10 m s a s • E N 3 0 o° a a o V �n co mO ai o a) oE (D a) c 0> N cM O 0- c 4- a) O M= O c M 0 a - c E m L O O o o O N 0 - °° ° m ° o Q) E x p aa m Q a o o o m a o s o o c ' E a 0 E s °° s o o o ' E 0 s O •� c 0 E c °' a 0v)=LLinm� -O- (p� p a� o o 0 a�°i E: ocn =�iinm° 0 J E s 0 3 _ • • • • • • • V I— 2 V s N 0 .E 0 2 • • • • • • • N > c Q) O c a 0 a) O 0 O s 3 O Cal) a E 0) 0 0 a rn 3 o c rn E 'Q c O� c V N O a) ° a (n O V V 0 V 0 N L O O a s F 0 Q C C N - 0 O d) c -O O a) C) -� in N c a }� -0 a) -O 0— N a) 3 O 0 a O 3 o U) C rn 23) Cc: O V C O a) 0 U 0 = > c C — C C a) (D a) O N V) m N o •� p E N C3 V v E o ° H m 0 0 t/) 0 0 c I V) 0 0 O vii E O a L `N C in a) • L Q) . C O 0 a) C o ° c > 0 m N N -a s N `- c N rn° 3 m m N m E a— o `o N (/� a~ m E ° a o Q a -a O o o° o - 0� o ° Lo 3 s s U- a a s m 3 c O E n o ° c E o m a) a b`} O C = E m 0� M c I 3 0 os-0 E Us-av a O c° 3'� c E Use 10 > c _ 0 0 _ c a N O 0 o N c� a) w L= 0 c° o° ° y) r' c a) L a a `m c> aci c O m ai 0 O `m D o s s > m 0i o m 0 a) •..c L v) ~ a) E N O a s c %1 E E. N V N oO NJ a (n s M Q �s M E 3 i C C T O m N n C a C N ` O _0 C� 0 O U ac) s E Y� a a) 3 N °o a0i -a E O 0--o ° o° 0 N 3 'n co oo E �� 3 O O a`a ai c ; .� E s U �L ° ° a a) — o E 3 �_ -0 .� E s° L C _ O N a) 3 O N N a C o o c N V C a C: E N m a 4N ) N N a a a F • 0 a ° 2 0 o - O 0 F- ° - E co 0 ° 2 LZ n I E a O O 0 1: a � > a = a T • • • • • • • oZC71 c� r, L.LJ L Cn z a z z W J �-/)07 o a 0 O > C c -a O s a� t2 c N >> c d) O > N c � � � U o o ° � -o E � > � a o � > c n C >> U 0 a) c E> a) N w s O s E O d 3 -a a) O N > c a O C � N O d O > C c o> p > p C: ° a c CY) C) d d U a C E C C O . a J — s ° E d E a) > N N o 0 N s > o a a o a 0 C) —Q -p p s p E V O U c O c c > a O a) = �N a 6 0 Q) O c d) N> v p 0 D 0 .0 N > a o V o a) E> a o Q -o ?, ? 0 °) o o Q 3 E U> O a) d _N O O c 0 s V o >o ° N a C d > ? N -�d dQ >> E E C > 0 N N > U o > U o d, E U ° E c c o d s - s o o o E a 'a C: `> � o a) C) d -70 N ' v o° ° Eo U O CD O N 0 o d O o o . o a L>?3 N o o 0 m o s a a m 0) o ° s e d C O 0 o a o_ a) 0 -0 c > C) Q c c o .- d a C a) S d -° ° o -0 -p E ( ° j < N o O _U V a- N C ° s ) ao E -0 N - > Q a°s o o o o f o > c E >u u c 6 C'4 -a in (n w E E -8 E -o O o Q a) cC ° N C > N tN.. _ 0 0 s E 3 c o o > Q) a) > 0 c a) aa) .,) 0 C) 3° o •o ' > c > s o Q c U) > o o C 3 N N o o) N N S a L N N a) O M U —Q C O cE c s> v 0 O`> • E CD N o� > U 3 a Q o' a E C C N= " _0 c s> 3 W �O C O 0 � N m e o N > o 3 O mss= c a> a o-d 0> U a) c 0 O > o O E >> a) c a ° +. U= d) O O aj D7 O N N O C -�- 3 E' N c Q a U '` c O N > u� >• N o a T 0) s E •c ° 0 o- c o >, ° U o •- c Q° E> u o > o U 3 O rn 3 0 s 0 0 V Q o V) , s cn E >_ E �' o N o -0 o > a> c o N > ) > ° v c 0 0- 0 a C c a _ a 0 0 s o > a V— > s Q a a) O L 3> N � o IS m a E C) a) rn- N 2 w C s ,O w r 0 o O O N cn E c z) E - ri- a-0 c + >> 3 >- c_ > rn -a a d) N s— O d c N s ,E C C d 3 LU U) c E Q 0 `L c u 3 3> C a a �� U > E u a a O '� o O E o) 0 � o -0 °' O -a Q a = U ,° ° 'Q rn `v } s .o Q) > > Q) p v> E N C> c T_ + c Q c O 3 0 s T a Q •- m E 0 O> s c U 0 c Q _O o Q 0 C Q 0) U _N E ta s> 0 m E° 'o E 0 a E - V N> U cc —0 > cn O a) a o E p- -o cn a`�i Q } -o c o i — s o 3 Q N w o? a �� c c E c a) o °° N O o 0 s Q o E a °° �°°' N aj o a° 3 =_ axi fl m � ° s o aE) E N 3 0 ' E — 3 °c ° L E p Q 3 3 u c C N NO N> c c N � N O U _} O s o 0 o -° 3 O a °- c 0 w O E a) 0 c m N o ° '3 C -> O d � a O 3 0) c s -a U c -a C a c > N c U Q .} C N c G N > o u c O c 0 _d .- 0- O c— _.a -0 � '6 > .� a .L 0) Q Q) a) } s a) ^ L7 L E .� a 0) 0 0 .- 0 — a) c O E '� U° O U '� V .0 -a O> O o >-0 °O � o �; 0_ .O N N ON c o- E U Q E 3° 0 �° E a o o .E U ins Q- W c o °) Z � -0 Q o ° Is z w a CO 7 w 2 r a z z W J z w z w r r' o N 0 a g a� c U) N =p a c T Q E c -o o V O >? ° -a _ = c ai Qc o o _ O s >U� c O o o V Q c Q c V N O C N V _ E N N -> V Q= O a O O N E EO N S N o 3 ° V O O O O p d) O s N s N -O p a E - s LLI -70 U> S C Q C a • C > c E O E C N O a, 0 N _ _ c 3 ,� min E uu s o N r- o c o E 0 N a> N 0 m . a -p s 0 o c S O c _ s Q U cc N 3 E E s E c p E O LLJ c C O V) O_ u O O N p O- s -a O FO O O 3 L c °N t2 D o >. N a� m E E N .} o E E o p a E N ° U o O O O O O V c- 0 ` O i O O O �o s0 E s o s o m= o N E }N I o N 3 0 °o L O C 3 N Q >` p p 3 L ` c O ` N C Q N O C O C i N • C E 3 C s = C ] - -p I �o m ? Q m (D s p O N _� p i O ao -°p c N ' s rn }O E O E v O 0 O N O C - N o— a o d) u v 0) o° LL, O E ° E o c X >� U ° ° � ) ° m ° U > Z w V p ° O O XO O C n — > n O E�- ° > o E 3 O E CV O o c N s c O D a" U 0 CD 0 c 8 �E O -0 O O� v m -Co O U ° Y O Q Q w a3 . Q o cO c U = w o • • • • O c • c at)3 % -F 0 I'e low I or wo mc N o. i, �, V4,. io • t; V"4� -# -T — 4 1 ♦ .- .41 %-T T Av w bet NV�d 1d30NOO ad WI13Hd good '3 �! o Y✓ C y N c III { €s w R. yR _ W wr; � O� 4 0 z J� a �oomNOh} N �o Q��y�oF e o0 uuoa ��et o0 February 17, 2010 City of Eagan City Council and Advisory Planning Commission Eagan Municipal Center 3 83 0 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Comments regarding Proposed Stonehaven Development — Concerns regarding Increased Traffic on Falcon Way and Surrounding Neighborhood as a Result of Proposed Development. Dear City of Eagan City Council and Advisory Planning Commission: Thank you for your leadership and commitment in making the City of Eagan a wonderful place to live and raise a family. Please find below my comments related to the proposed Stonehaven Development. My comments focus on my concerns about the increased traffic that will be placed on Falcon Way as :result of the decision to not include any access to the south or southeast on either Westcott Hills Cr /Drive or Hunter Lane -- This decision will have negative consequences on Falcon Wav and the safety and character of the surrounding neighborhood by redirecting the majority of southbound, southeast bound and southwest bound trips from the new development onto Falcon Way. This additional southbound traffic on Falcon Way (and the return trips) may exacerbate an already difficult and potentially dangerous situation with turning southbound from Falcon Way to Lexington Avenue. The additional traffic on Falcon Way will also affect the safety and character of this "residential" street with more traffic competing with pedestrians, school bus stops, and children playing. The position that south/southeast /southwest bound drivers from the proposed development will desire to use the longer and more time consuming option of getting to Lexington Ave. via the Duckwood Drive is unrealistic and does not account for the pragmatic reality that most drivers will choose the shortest and fastest route to their destination. Most drivers will choose the shortcut /cut - through options on Falcon Way to save themselves time and distance. It is also stated in the August 2009 EAW for the proposed development that the increased traffic on Falcon Way will have a relatively "low impact ". If south/southeast /southwest bound trips from the new development will have a "low impact" then why did the City decide to not include any access to the south or southeast on either Westcott Hills Cr /Drive or Hunter Lane? How are the concerns of the residents in those neighborhoods different than the concerns of the residents living on or near Falcon Way? RECEIVED FEB 17 N10 -70 Based on the above mentioned concerns, I'm requesting that the City Council and Advisory Planning Commission consider the following actions and incorporate these actions as a condition of approval of the proposed development: 1. Continue the curb and Boulevard on the south side of Duckwood Drive to stop or limit traffic from turning south from the proposed development onto Falcon Way. 2. Or if 41 above is not feasible, incorporate a bump -out at the southwest quadrant of the Falcon Way/Duckwood Intersection to restrict south bound turns onto Falcon from the new proposed development. 3. In addition to construction of improvements to stop or limit traffic from proposed development on Falcon Way, incorporate signage to require no or limited access on Falcon Way from Duckwood Drive. 4. signage requiring that no construction traffic is allowed on Falcon Way during the many phases of the construction period on site. 5. Others? Thank you in advance for your consideration of these comments. I look forward to our continued discussions related to this very important issue related to the quality of life in our neighborhood. Sincerely, Phil Belfiori 3671 Canary Way _% I February 11, 2010 Robert Aland 3660 Falcon Way Eagan, MN 55112 Community Development Department 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Planned Development Amendment File # 14- PA- 03 -0I -10 and Preliminary Subdivision File 4 14- PS- 02 -01 -10 To The City of Eagan Planning Department, We purchased our home because of the proximity to the golf course. We were told the golf course would remain due to a city code (or something along those lines). If this development goes through, we believe it will decrease our property value. We enjoy the open space and believe Eagan needs more open space. The development would cause more traffic and degrade the quality of life in our neighborhood. Please do not allow this variance. Please call if you have any questions, Robert Aland 651 - 353 -1078 �a Michelle H. Harrington 3572 - 101 Blue Jay Way Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Phone 651.688 -7112 Email bsesmag@msn.com February 11, 2010 Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55122 Hi Tom, I am hoping that you can explain what is happening with this Carriage Hills development. Specifically the approval of the development company Lennar to consummate this project. I realize that Joe Jablonski is representative of US Home (includes Orrin Thompson) under Lenmr Corporation. However, when I went online to research Lennar I found the enclosed materials. I can assure you that living in an Orrin Thompson development that many of the lawsuits and defective construction problems presented in this information we (Lexington Place Condo home owners) have actually experienced. I believe our cost has been around 1.5 million and still climbing. All of it born by the home owners. There are many examples throughout the twin cities of people who purchased new homes from these developers and have never been able to live in them because of dangerous and faulty construction. This faulty construction had been approved by City inspectors as was our construction in Eagan. Woodbury is a good example if you care to look into it. Is there some explanation as to why the City of Eagan would partner or even approve of Lennar and the developers under that corporate umbrella where so much shoddy construction had lu.owingly been done? I am not sure if the City even has any responsibility to the citizens in this area. Can any developer just move in, have their plans approved by the planning committee, and then knowingly proceed with defective methods of construction in front of everyone? What happens next door to us, or anywhere in the City, that is bad for the home owner is bad for the City. Defective construction has proven to lead to abandoned homes that end up in foreclosure because the homes are not safe to live in. How can we protect ourselves against this? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Michelle Harrington PS: Note that all the online information stopped in the Fall of 2008. Apparently Lennar found away to shut them down. QnT RECEIVED FEB 18 2010 7 Leruiar Community awareness I Everything Lennar Page 1 of') Skip to main Content EverythirIg LENNAR Lennar Information 1 Lennar News slogs Contact Us Discussion Board Lennar signs News Official Contacts Petition Site Map Terms of Service Websites NOTICE:This is not the website of Lennar Corporation, nor is it endorsed by them, or affiliated with them in any way. The website of Lennar Corporation be found at wwv✓.lennar.com. can Our Supporters Home Search ° Lennar Community awareness SES `lugust 27. 2008 by root C -_ lie l Lennar in a Nut Shell Random image r-. z. After following Lennar Corporation for the past year and keeping up with the latest issues S. L. A. M. I think I have found a typical connection between all of them. The land. It would seem to _ me that Lennar targets land fills, bombing ranges, expansive soil sites, or just toxic in nature, and now.. Department of Defense military sites, to build on or near by. You can User login only imagine there is some overpaid corporate Einstein that brings these Ideas to the table as a profitable investment. The sad part is that Lennar actually goes through with building Usernarne: * and investing in these properties. At some point you have to imagine what kind of sales pitch you have to throw out there to convince anyone to build on top of LIVE BOMBS. Lennar Problematic Seriously, how can you sway a sales pitch to the corporate staff avoiding the dangers to Communities Password: potential clients (which are the homeowners in these situations) and persuading anyone ■ Bakersfield with the equivelance of a 3rd grade education to build on top of these conditions. It just • Bridgewater makes me wonder who is sitting around the Lennar corporate table during these meetings • Carriage Pointe in which things of this nature develop and progress into a reality. Lets take a looks at a ■ Diamond Lakes Log ii] few examples shall we? ■ Grand Hampton Create new account ■ Greenbrook Terrace Request new password ■ Hampshire Homes ■ Hannover Village Vista Lakes Orlando FI Heritage Harbour Featured Blogs ■ Hunters Point ■ CSchnack U.S. Corps of Engineers detonates unexploded World War II bombs discovered beneath an Hutto Highlands ■ Carl Grossmar, Orlando, Florida neighborhood. The discovery that the school and hundreds of nearby a ■ Hutto Parke ■ Donna Garber h homes were built on a bombing range has led to homeowner lawsuits and widespread fear v Indian Palms Francisco Da Costa among parents of students at the Odyssey Middle School, where the bomb below was . , , ,.I i ,i,o ■ Mike Crump detonated recently after being discovered beneath the school running track. Source ■ Legends of Hutto ■ Les Flores Recent blog posts ■ Martins Crossing Pinnacle Hill • We were on the ne.vs ■ The Legends again! Hampshire Homes Miramar, FI ■ Vista Lakes • Interesting Tax info. ■ Wescott Plantation • Lennar is H I S T O R Y Four months after telling CNN they would "do whatever it takes" to correct problems homes • Bayview Hunters Point caused when a buried trash pile became a sinkhole, a Florida construction company • t° ✓oodfield community continues to apparently has done nothing to compensate homeowners affected by the watery pit in take on Lennar - a front of their homes Company Status Rogue peveIODer. • Caravan For ) istice and • Implode -0 -meter the impendinc downfall • Lennar Bankruptcy of Lennar a Rogue ■ Lennar Google News Developer. The football field -size sinkhole began opening last March in front of 20 houses in the • Lennar News • LENNAR, (Life Enriched Hampshire Homes subdivision of Miramar outside Miami. At the insistence of Broward • Lennar SEC filing Plegat,vely Negating All County officials, builder Lennar Homes returned to the site and began removing mangled • Lennar Stock Status Reason 1 tires, twisted pieces of metal and other debris from the pit. In all, Lennar excavated 250 ■ Yahoo Discussion • My Christmas present truckloads of trash and construction debris, but admitted no wrong- doing. from. Lennar Source Lennar Chronicles • Cara van For Justice ■ Community Awareness SLAM joins thousands at ■ Everything's Included Sa.ram?nto to dialog ■ Lennar Deceives with Representatives on Hutto Parke Hutto, Tx ■ Lennar Nightmare equal terms. ■ Lennar Highlights • Stop Lennar Action Like other settlers, Hanson tilled the land under the tall grasses of the Blackland Prairie to ■ Lennar Inspections aIC) httn / /tvzk—_se irehhtitto- coml[-D /Community- Awareness %v 2/10 /2010 I, ennar Lawsuits I Everything Lennar Page 1 of 5 Skip to main content Everything LENNAR Lennar Information I Lennar News slogs Contact Us Discussion Board Lennar signs News Official Contacts Petition Site Map Terms of Service Websites NOTICE:This is not the website of Lennar Corporation, nor is it endorsed by them, or affiliated with them in any way. The website of Lennar Corporation can be found at www.lennar.com. Our Supporters Home Search - Lennar Lawsuits �E5 Lennar Lawsuits Lennar Chronicled Lawsuits from numerous regions are located in the child menu to the Random image ° right. If you find a pdf document online of a Lennar Lawsuit, please let us know either by ,_.;, comment or contact us. A S. L. A. M. Find tons of Lennar lawsuits documented here http: / /dockets.justia.com /search? q= Lennar +Corporation �. User login October 10, 2008 Username: * Wachovia Bank National Association v. Focus Kyle Group, LLC et al NY Southern Swain Lennar Problematic Other Contract Diversity Communities Plaintiff: Wachovia Bank National Association; Defendant: Focus Kyle Group, LLC, John A. Ritter, KB Home Nevada Inc., KB Home, Lennar Communities Nevada, LLC and others... • Bakersfield Passwords. * a Bridgewater September 17, 2008 ■ Carriage Pointe Hook v. U.S. Home /Lennar Corporation et al CO Boland Other Statutory Actions Federal • Diamond Lakes Question • Grand Hampton Log in • Greenbrook Terrace Create new account Plaintiff: Paula Rhoads Hook; Defendant: U.S. Home /Lennar Corporation, Old Republic ■ Hampshire Homes Request new password Insurance Co. /ICAP /A.G., Robert E. Kleinman, Mike Berry, Pete Havelka and others... a Hannover Village August 28, 2008 • Heritage Harbour Featured Blogs • Hunters Point Cioffi v. Lennar Corporation FL Southern Ryskamp Other Civil Rights Federal Question • • C.Schnack Plaintiff: Luciano Cioffi; Defendant: Lennar Corporation Hutto Highlands a Hutto Parke • Carl Grossman • Indian Palms • Donna Garber August 20, 2008 • Laurel Lakes • Francisco Da Costa OLA Ilc v. Builder Homesite Inc et al Legends of Hutto • Mike Crump All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & a Los Flores orders ■ Martins Crossing_ Recent blog posts TX Eastern Ward Patent Federal Question a Pinnacle Hill • We were on the news Plaintiff: OLA, Ilc; Defendant: Builder Homeslte, Inc., New Horne Technologies, L.L.C., • The Legends again! Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc., Centex Corporation and others... ■ Vista Lakes • interesting Tax info. ■ Wescott Plantation • Lennar is H I S T O R Y August 18, 2008 homes • Bayview Hunters Point Jones et al v. Lennar Homes, Inc. FL Middle Moody Other Contract Diversity • Woodfield community continues to Plaintiff: Shannon Wilson Jones, Stacy Wilson; Defendant: Lennar Homes, Inc. take on Lennar - a Company Status Rogue Developer. July 18, 2008 a Implode -0 -meter • Caravan For Justice and Jefferies et al v. Sunrise Hotel Corporation et al FL Southern Cohn Americans with • Lennar Bankruptcy the irnpendmg downfall Disabilities - Other Federal Question • Lennar Google News of Lennar a Rogue Plaintiff: Collette M.A. Jefferies, Lawrence T. Jefferies; Defendant: Sunrise Hotel ■ Lennar News Developer, Corporation, Lennar Corporation, Sandcastle Resorts and Hotels LTD., Leisure Colony • Lennar SEC filing • LENNAR, (Life Enriched MNGMT Corp., Issac Fagan and others... ■ Lennar Stock Status Negatively Negating All • Yahoo Discussion Reason) July 15, 2008 • h1y Christmas present Myers et al v. Lennar Corporation NY Eastern Bianco Other Personal Injury Diversity Lennar Chronicles from Lennar Plaintiff. Constance Myers, Mark Myers; Defendant: Lennar Corporation • Caravan For Justice - • Community Awareness SLAM joins thousands at • Everything's Included Sau June 24, 2008 amento to dialog • Lennar Deceives with Representa, ves on Spring Hill Farms Construction, Inc. v. Lennar Homes, Inc. FL Middle Covington Other a Lennar Nightmare equal terms. Contract Diversity • Lennar Highlights • Stou Lennar Action Plaintiff: Spring Hill Farms Construction, Inc.; Defendant: Lennar Homes, Inc. a Lennar Inspections Qt t http://w ,�,,A.v.searehhLlttO.com/LD/Lennar- Lawsuits �� 2/10/2010 Lennar Lawsuits I Everything Lennar Plaintiff: George Neyer, Marco Spataro, Robert Lebleu, Dennis Grynkiewicz, Jonathan McCarty and others... Defendant: Lennar Corporation November 29, 2007 Tew v. Lennar Corporation FL Middle Kovachevich Labor /Management Relations Denial of Overtime Compensation Plaintiff: Michael Tew; Defendant: Lennar Corporation November 28, 2007 Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 1.30 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al AZ Sedwick Land Condemnation Natural Gas Act Plaintiff: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC; Defendant: 1.30 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, 6.56 acres of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Lennar Communities Development, Inc., Hester R Bowers and others... November 26, 2007 Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v..39 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al AZ Sedwick Land Condemnation Natural Gas Act Plaintiff: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC; Defendant: .39 acre of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, .24 acre of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, Lennar Communities Development, Inc., Unknown Owners October 25, 2007 Lennar Corporation v. Barker - Coleman Development, LLC et al NV Sandoval Other Contract Diversity - Breach of Contract Plaintiff: Lennar Corporation; Defendant Barker - Coleman Development, LLC, Brett F. Coleman, Brett D. Barker September 18, 2007 Wells v. Lennar Corporation FL Southern Martinez Fair Labor Standards Act Denial of Overtime Compensation Plaintiff: Ronald Wells; Defendant: Lennar Corporation August 15, 2007 Lennar Pacific Properties Management Inc et al v. Dauben Inc court opinions & orders TX Northern Fish Trademark Trademark Infringement Plaintiff: Lennar Pacific Properties Management Inc, Lennar Corporation; Defendant: Dauben Inc August 10, 2007 Residents of Bayview Hunters Point v. Lennar Housing Development Inc. et al CA Northern Alsup Other Civil Rights Civil Rights Act Plaintiff: Residents of Bayview Hunters Point; Defendant: Lennar Housing Development Inc., Lennar Bayview Hunterspoint , LLC, Tabernacle Development Corporation, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, United States Navy and others... 3rd party defendant: San Francisco Public Housing July 23, 2007 Guadalupe v. Lennar Corporation FL Southern Graham Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act Plaintiff: Jeff Guadalupe; Defendant: Lennar Corporation April 18, 2007 Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc. et al v. Morgan FL Southern Graham Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) Plaintiff: Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc., Lennar Corporation; Defendant: Michael C. Morgan April 16, 2007 Atianbc Casualty Insurance Company v. Dardons Roofing Company, LC et al FL Middle Fawsett Insurance Diversity - Insurance Contract Plaintiff: Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company; Defendant: dardons roofing company, Ic, lisa ugalde, Lennar Homes, Inc. March 28, 2007 Kelly et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al MD Messitte Other Fraud Petition for Page 3 of llttp: /i�vivr" ..searchhutto.com/LD,/Ler nar- Lawsuits 2/10/2010 7 �n Lennar, The American Nightmare J Everything Lennar Page 1 of 5 Skip to main content Everything LENNAR e Bridgewater Lennar Information I Lennar News slogs Contact Us Discussion Board Lennar signs News Official Contacts Petition Site Map' Terms of Service Websites • Diamond Lakes NOTICE:This is not the website of Lennar Corporation, nor is it endorsed by them, or affiliated with them in any way. The website of Lennar Corporation be found at www.lennar.com. can Our Supporters Home • Greenbrook Terrace Request new password Search Lennar, The American Nightmare It would take me weeks to write all the details about our "new" house. Click HERE if you • Hannover Village .SE•S ;r" Our NEW LENNAR Home would like to see our house on OVD instead. c Cgi- c Random image GGG • Hunters Point [ My Wife and I both grew up in less than 800sf, mine a family of four, hers a family of S. L. A. M. EIGHT... It was our dream, as is the case for millions of Americans, to own a home... THE • Carl Grossman AMERICAN DREAM. ` Hutto Parke User login We worked very hard to give our daughter something we never had: a room of her own... hope on receiving one, we only have a drawing on how to brace it. The structural engineer Username: • Francisco Da Costa thinks that the truss on top of the monster crack rotated causing the crack. On top of this Lennar Problematic This house was our American Dream, instead it is now... Communities Password: * • Bakersfield e Bridgewater • Carriage Pointe OUR AMERICAN NIGHTMARE • Diamond Lakes Log in ] • Grand Hampton Create new account • Greenbrook Terrace Request new password Below are our major problems which we have dealt with, or we are currently dealing with. e Hampshire Homes It would take me weeks to write all the details about our "new" house. Click HERE if you • Hannover Village would like to see our house on OVD instead. • Heritage Harbour Featured Blogs • Hunters Point • C.Schnack • Hutto Highlands • Carl Grossman ROOF TRUSS ROTATING- We don't have a report for this yet and have almost given up ` Hutto Parke • Donna Garber hope on receiving one, we only have a drawing on how to brace it. The structural engineer ` Indian Palms • Francisco Da Costa thinks that the truss on top of the monster crack rotated causing the crack. On top of this • M,ke Crump we have a 2x2 ft hole in the ceiling for "explorative surgery" patched with plastic and duct Legends of Hutto tape. It is now leaking water and the carpet under it is wet. It's been over a month now • Los Flores Recent blog posts since the hole was made. We have a bucket so the carpet doesn't get wet and it is right Martins Crossing Pinnacle • We were on the news outside our bedroom. It is hard not to trip on it in the morning. • Hifl • The Legends again! ■ Vista Lakes • Interesting Tax info. • Wescott Plantation • Lennar is H 1 S T O R Y STRUCTURAL AND /OR FRAMING ISSUES - The drywall has more than 50 cracks and homes • Bayview Hunters Point one long crack in our staircase opened so much you can fit a finger in it. Drywall nails are " Woodfield community cont nues to popping in three of the upstairs rooms and the drywall is bowing in at least three places, take on Lennar - a We have 3 -4 new cracks per week and the old ones are getting larger. With the birth of Company Status Rogue Developer. the baby approaching we were anxious for news and we had to beg and plead with them • Caravan For Justice and to offer a solution to our distress. They offered us a "beef u that would cover anything p Y ■ Implode 0 meter the impending downfall of Lennar a Rogue 9 that will, if nothing else, "make the walls stronger ". We aren't questioning that this will fix • Lennar Bankruptcy • Lennar Google News Developer. the problem although this new finding and the "beef u fix g P" appears to contradict what • Lennar News • LENNAR, (Life Enriched two other engineers have said. However, it Is too soon to make any conclusion since we ■ Lennar SEC hlmg Negatively Neoa ting All haven't received the report yet. As usual we have to beg for a report from Lennar because , Lennar Stock Status Reason) ALL engineers will not send it directly to us until it is "approved" by Lennar. My • Yahoo Discussion • My Christmas present understanding is the house MOVED one inch and is still moving. In addition a wood truss from Lennar has rotated. The work would take a month (experiences with them tells us it will be much Lennar Chronicles • Caravan For Justice - longer) after already three months of distress, loss of work, loss of sleep, now we are • Community Awareness SLAM joins thousands at going to have our first daughter in a construction site or in a hotel. We don't think this is • Everything's Included Sacramento to dialog right! ■ Lennar Deceives with Representatives on • Lennar Nightmare equal terms • Lennar High) g`,ts • Stop Lennar Action LIST OF EXPLETIVES WHEN VIEWING OUR MONSTER CRACK FOR THE FIRST • Lennar Inspections Izz. h ttp: / /"i�,iv.s,2archhLIttO.com/LD /American - Nightmare 7-7 2/10/2010 Lennar, The American Nightmare I Everything Lennar h.e ct v k� j Page 3 of FOUNDATION CRACKING- Six (known) cracks have been discovered in the foundation, which grow larger as the days progress (they all started as small hairline cracks). Three cracks are between the basement and the crawl space and three cracks formed exactly opposite the largest crack on the outside foundation wall leading into the garage. SLAB CRACK- was a small hairline crack when we bought the house but has lengthened and widened beyond hairline size. There are at least two additional hairline cracks in the slab, however the large crack IS our concern for now. WINDOW PROBLEMS- Many of the house's windows are detaching from the frame and the stucco on the outside of some of the windows has detached. The last engineer that came out said this is normal but we don't think so. Condensation forms on the windows, sometimes covering 3/4 of the window. Water pools in the tracks and on the windowsill. MOISTURE IN GARAGE - The garage door is soaking wet. Warm cars can cause moisture inside the garage to form but the problem was present even when we didn't drive for two days (snow bounded). The door is dripping water, it freezes SOLID during the night, and the wood is very wet and is starting to rot. Sometimes it is so frozen ON THE INSIDE that the electrical garage door opener has trouble opening it. There is a lingering musty smell and even our cars have begun to smell like mold. FIREPLACE MANTEL CRACKED- Not a big deal, however it cracked when the big cracks started to appear thus it is worth to report. LIST OF SMALLER PROBLEMS (MANY SMALL PROBLEMS = BIG PAIN IN THE NECK) NO HEAT - Many of our heating vents produce no HEAT and no air comes through them. Ironically, this got even worse after the air duct cleaning. FIREPLACE- On numerous occasions we reported a lingering smell from the fireplace. We followed Lennar's CCR suggestion, which was to run it continuously for 12 hours. The company that installed the fireplace said that it should take one 12 -hour burn off cycle to eliminate the smell. The smell is present if we keep it on for more than a couple of hours and the smell stinks up the whole house. The fireplace makes cracking and hissing noises and the fireplace's mantel heats up excessively with two hours of usage (I compared it with our neighbors'). FRONT DOOR DEADBOLT- Our front door lock has NEVER worked since we moved in. We reported the problem on multiple occasions. It was not our largest safety concern but it worried us that the front door lock could be thrown with slight movement, especially after dozens of workers, contractors, strangers saw this first hand. It was finally fixed January 2, 2007 - MANY MONTHS after we reported it. EXPLORATIVE SURGERY'S HOLE IS LEAKING - It is dripping on the carpet. MOISTURE ON THE FRONT DOOR - Odd occurrence but nothing surprises us anymore in this house. Most of the moisture is accumulated on the deadbolt. DOORS - About 113 of the doors are missing a coat of paint and you can see the wood http : / /t�ANtiAr.searchhutto.com/LD /American - Nightmare 2/10 /2010 Lennar, The American Nightmare I Everything Lennar We built a website to describe how much we liked the community (during the first months) trying to help selling houses. Our neighbors bought their place because we helped overcome their final doubts. WE DO NOT THINK LENNAR IS DOING THE RIGHT THING CONTINUING TO DISRUPT OUR LIVES!!! WE LIVE IN COLORADO AND OUR FAMILY'S FUTURE HAPPINESS CURRENTLY RESTS IN LENNAR COLORADO'S HANDS! THEY CLAIM THEY ARE FOLLOWING "THE PROCEDURE" BUT I NEED TO KNOW AT WHAT POINT DOES LENNAR'S PROCEDURE ALLOW FOR THE END OF OUR LOSSES AND DISTRESS? 80192137 disclaimer v'v'ie.ving this ..e'osite .ou acre chat cou have read; and ajree t, ovrTerms of Service. aI,S- Page 5 of 5 http: / /"-�A-Y,,-.searchhutto.comfLD /American- Nightmare 7 1 2/10/2010 February 18, 2010 Paul and Stephanie Devine 3620 Falcon Way Eagan 55123 Tel 651- 686 -0633 To the City Engineer. RE. New Stonehaven Development and Resulting Increased Traffic Firstly, thank you so much for agreeing to this meeting. I am unable to attend in person due to an out -of -town family funeral occuring Tuesday. I write this on behalf of my family, we have been residents on Falcon Way since 1998 and residents of Eagan since 1995. We are concerned about the inevitable increase of traffic which will occur on our street with the new development on the former Carriage Hills golf course. Fortunately, I feel that a very simple, and cost - effective solution is readily at hand A curb "bump out" on the southwest quadrant of the Falcon Way/Duckwood Drive intersection, with a traffic yield sign placed facing Falcon Way will handily address the potential problem. Tonight, I counted six neighbors walking their dogs in the street during the "dinner hour' from 5.00 - 6:00 pm. Believe me, having lived here for twelve years, this is a most common and regular occurrence. People walk during the morning too and the highschool and junior high kids wait in the street during the early morning hours for the school bus. In the summer- this street turns into the pavement circling Lake Harriet! Walkers, bikers, roller bladers, young parents walking infants in strollers, children playing_.. and of course, that's one of the many reasons why we love it here. Believe me, it is busy Why not prevent a potential tragedy by a simple and small investment in a little extra concrete (and traffic sign) up front? We all know it just makes sense. I sincerely thank you for your consideratio of this ous issue Kind regarels, Stephanie Devine -- RECEi VEC Ftg 2 3 2010 Dakota C Western Scnice (' < "ount rater Y SUt��eYor's 00'7'X' 952 !4955 �aiaxie Avenue J)1 -7O87 Fax 952 - 891- 7127uitc11335 Pete V� A t1Ic u wta'.dakotacount . Y, MN 55124 February 22, 2010 v t,s City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Re: STONEHAVEN The Dakota Count Of the aboti, y Plat Commission met e referenced plat on Feb Dakota County Conti r The plat is adjacent to CS' 2010 buous Plat to consider the prehininar Ordinance, AH 78, and is therefore Y Plan The plat includes 385 units, lect to sub the due to the City own from 480 Y Purchasing 5 acres for with Previous concept The discussion centered a Ere station on the northeast Pt Plans• Part of the reduction is street system, around the lack of interconnection o corner of the property. Woodlands The Proposed plat connects to f the (throe h (on the east side the exi proposed streets g the middle of the connectin r sting roadway to the streets that could only to the north at y system via Wescott existing Plat connecting only to the CSAH 28 Both of Provide for connection to the south _ west ,, )' and Duckwood these connections CSAH 43 Drive Eagan staff indicated that [have been Wescott Hills Drive an There are two this C.t opposed in the past b Hunter Public Plat, Y Council is not like! y the respective Lane. y to suppoi t these co neighborhoods and The Plat commission re nnections as assessment of the guested the Part of different local street connection o understand the he update the develo plications the Ptions Pment traffic stud depending on how the local the develo This y to include an traffic staff to Pment would have will help the Count define in detail �� are connected. on the Count Y better study should hat traftc information t it Y roadway system, analyze the Y was asked t work following four local street connection include cenari stud With County 1) The Y• At a minimum, the Proposed develo os. Lexington Avenue p171ent access connections Ind North via Wescott Woodlands (West vla D uckwood Drive to 2) The Proposed develo Yankee Doodle Lane Pl��ent accesses with a connection Road) 3) The P to Wescott Road via Hunter Proposed development accesses with a roadway Wescott Hills Drive connection to Wescott Road via in24) The Proposed development accesses w' &3 Ith both additional southern connections listed °?/ 7 Depending on how long it takes to update the traffic study and allow for County review, the plat will likely be considered by the plat commission on March 15. The preliminary plat was tabled until an updated traffic study can be reviewed. Traffic volumes on CSAH 28 are 19,500 and are anticipated to be 26,500 ADT by the year 2025. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for residential units could be exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments along County highways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated into this development. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder's Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process that reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Please contact Gordon McConnell regarding permitting questions at (952) 891 -7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891 -7070. Sincerely, 7,� '�k Todd B., Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission Enclosure: March 2009 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines a�� ® CONSULTING GROUP, INC. E N G I N E E R S I P L A N N F R S I D E S I G N E P S MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Plath, P.E.. PTOE City of Eagan FROM: Patrick Corkle, P.E., PTOE, Principal Matthew Pacyna, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: March 12, 2010 SUBJECT: STONEHAVEN DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY EAGAN, MN INTRODUCTION MIAAFAVM IS FA RG0 SRF No. 0107073 Contained herein is an update to the Carriage Hills Special Area Traffic Study, dated August 10, 2009. The purpose of this update is to review future traffic operations based on the most recent Stonehaven development proposal and site plan. In addition to identifying development traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, this study also addresses Dakota County concerns regarding potential neighborhood connections and their impact to the adjacent roadway network. This study includes an updated development trip generation estimate, a neighborhood connection impact assessment, and an updated operational analysis based on potential development time horizons. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing traffic operations were analyzed at the following key intersections as part of the Carriage Hills Special Area Traffic Sturdy: • Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue • Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive • Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive • Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road Current traffic controls include signalization at all key intersections with the exception of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive. The intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive is currently unsignalized and has side - street stop control. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 1. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 55447 -4443 1 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429 An Equal Opportunity Emploget O N �Rr -�N W � � cNo N ,.. �� M N N Lo L169 (12 Z 21 (12) 554 (679) k an (135) 168) 38 o ,44 ^ t LSD Lo M - 0 m O N J Yankee Doodle`R-dd V (77) 8811 � 0 YADLE Ln C\1 (655)681 _ a M c Y PROMENADE PL 309) 99� o r r rn o rn O ' v 2 za) O y d \� N CENTRE OR,� � ct i N ,.. �— 65 (31) M N N Lo 23 (16) '� 1 4 21 (12) cwoo r. (44) 77 k (27) 66 oc N f� 168) 38 o Q - Side - Street Stop Control ^ t LSD Lo M - 0 m O N J a ° V LA. CT O K S - FL�G�KER' CIR. \ z w nil Z FRANC C1,aFFGN,��G1 a gPLD� K O� O Y U 0 WESTBURY L 192 (152 (Y `\ o 441 -119 212 ( ) Hurl( LEGEND �50 (246) La :sco (33) 63 k (149)174 —0 w o cn L J 754) 23 o Q - Side - Street Stop Control 3 Z FRANC C1,aFFGN,��G1 a gPLD� K O� O Y U 0 0 GO iFIj1� ° CT. O O 3 � pROSE C _ J � JAY w O m UMMING� O� BIRDLA. S� --� WAY U JAY \ \ \ /•��. FALC Y /. A O_t�Nlj � a Lz Q_ / S p "- -� - - -J G I CROSS RD / �O O G F BR7ARCR EEK RD. S T O NY 1 1 Z T O O./ OO U g KETTLE y 5 I SA AN r DANBURY Z cc, Existing Year 2009 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 Figure 1 WESTBURY PATH DEER CLTF_ LEGEND �( 5 XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume k (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume 4 (8) RRD'HLUKIIV - Signalized Control Q Q - Side - Street Stop Control 3 0 GO iFIj1� ° CT. O O 3 � pROSE C _ J � JAY w O m UMMING� O� BIRDLA. S� --� WAY U JAY \ \ \ /•��. FALC Y /. A O_t�Nlj � a Lz Q_ / S p "- -� - - -J G I CROSS RD / �O O G F BR7ARCR EEK RD. S T O NY 1 1 Z T O O./ OO U g KETTLE y 5 I SA AN r DANBURY Z cc, Existing Year 2009 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 Figure 1 - 83 (6) 642j8D5) 4 (8) RRD'HLUKIIV nkee ((83 LO ° rn 2LOOm a ° m � 0 YADLE RD. _ ^_ O 0 GO iFIj1� ° CT. O O 3 � pROSE C _ J � JAY w O m UMMING� O� BIRDLA. S� --� WAY U JAY \ \ \ /•��. FALC Y /. A O_t�Nlj � a Lz Q_ / S p "- -� - - -J G I CROSS RD / �O O G F BR7ARCR EEK RD. S T O NY 1 1 Z T O O./ OO U g KETTLE y 5 I SA AN r DANBURY Z cc, Existing Year 2009 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 Figure 1 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE March 12, 2010 City of Eagan Page 3 An operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at each of the key intersections to determine how traffic currently operates in the study area. All signalized intersections were analyzed using the Synchro /SimTraffic software (version 7). The unsignalized intersection was analyzed using a combination of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Synchro /SimTraffic software. It should be noted that where side- street stop controlled intersections are in close proximity to signalized intersections, Synchro /SimTraffic software typically provides a more accurate result of operations at these side - street stop controlled intersections. This is due to the consideration of signal timing impacts from adjacent signalized intersections on the side - street approaches. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates how well an intersection is operating. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. In the Twin Cities metropolitan area, LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers. For side- street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the minor approach. Traffic operations at unsignalized intersections with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support those volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side - street approaches in most cases. Results of the existing operations analysis shown in Table 1 indicate that all key intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing traffic control and geometric layout. It should be noted that the side - street delays at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive are approximately one -half minute during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. These side- street delays are generally considered acceptable and do not require mitigation. There were also no significant queuing issues observed at the key intersections. Existing signal timing obtained from Dakota County was used in the analysis. Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue C D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive A/C A/D Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive B B Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. a18 -3 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT March 12, 2010 Page 4 The proposed Stonehaven development is located in the southwest quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive. The site currently is occupied by the former Carriage Hills Country Club (now closed). The Stonehaven development is expected to be constructed in two phases (see Figure 2). Phase I of the development consists of 47 single family homes and is to be constructed by year 2012. Phase II of the development, which includes 111 single family homes, 100 senior housing units, 65 row townhome units, and 40 twin home units is expected to be constructed by approximately year 2020. The northern portion of the development will have access provided at Wescott Woodlands. The southern portion of the development will have access provided at Duckwood Drive. It should be noted that a new fire station is expected to be constructed in the northeast quadrant of the development site. TRAFFIC FORECASTS As previously mentioned, the proposed Stonehaven development is to be constructed in two phases. Phase I is to be constructed in year 2012, while Phase II is to be constructed by approximately year 2020. Based on existing area growth patterns and historical average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, an annual growth rate of approximately one percent was applied to the existing peak hour volumes to develop year 2012 and year 2020 background traffic forecasts. It should be noted that traffic forecasts were also compared to the Duckwood Overpass Traffic Study forecasts that were developed using the regional model. Year 2012 and year 2020 no build traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. As shown in Table 2, trip generation estimates for the proposed Stonehaven development were calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 8111 Edition. It should be noted that trip generation estimates for the fire station were not included due to the random nature of emergency calls. Furthermore, the actual trip generation volume for a fire station is relatively insignificant. Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates (Stonehaven Development) Land Use T ITE Code) Type ( Size (units) A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Dail Y In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out Trips Year 2012 — Phase I Single Family Lots (2 10) 47 9 26 30 18 450 Year 2020 — Phase II Single Family Lots (2 10) 1 1 1 21 62 71 42 1,062 Twin Home Units (230) 40 3 15 14 7 232 Row Townhome Units (230) 65 5 24 23 11 378 Senior Housing Units (252) 100 5 8 10 6 348 Total Development 1 363 43 135 1 148 84 1 2,470 .D:18 -q 0 i m n I m 2 Z m m n 0 CT„sn ri.°, G—I r I.1 00107073 March 2010 - a. �fj IZ Cr o t , n ❑a 7 ... Phase I �'Y+ Ads' 'il z r 9 rn � I I � �r ice_ Z 1J �-7 —t � �ocaaN I zzzzzz �zxoF 1 y F- r�rT_T^ r rl i j 1 / zz�z`zz�zZti xC rtl 711 % � DDD�DDnDD7m �� -17' 27 1Y.. C]�'_�^ =✓, 7�DD r- C�HyD2 m _71 K7C2'.ri� rz. z Site Plan Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan a 057 Figure 2 r4� o 70 (35) N ° 25 (20) 'Le r 1 25 (15) ake uc woo r, (45) 80 (30) 70 ' a° too (180) 45 �� 0 c O LI to U II w LA. CT O n E � � F,\CKER �GIR. Lb NNW o 0 0 � t I L175 (14 oeo 4 625 (805) III I l* 'ci50 (155) > U2 L � r4� o 70 (35) N ° 25 (20) 'Le r 1 25 (15) ake uc woo r, (45) 80 (30) 70 ' a° too (180) 45 �� 0 c O LI to U II w LA. CT O n E � � F,\CKER �GIR. Lb Yankee Doodle Rd (80) (80) 95 �h l I t I CLIFF W 90 (10) LEGEND 080 (75)0 > U2 L � Q n a `" ( 5 '� 0) ( 25) 315)100 —� 1 Lo ► 5 25 5 ( !9 PROMENADE PL c N N 1 w es( 35) 65 2 O a C J v 8(155)10 ►' I ti Lo / - - - -- ` N o _J�1� -- � C In O CD — — - X p w z�. nIk CENTRE r4� o 70 (35) N ° 25 (20) 'Le r 1 25 (15) ake uc woo r, (45) 80 (30) 70 ' a° too (180) 45 �� 0 c O LI to U II w LA. CT O n E � � F,\CKER �GIR. Lb 1F1' FRANC �S C y W O m O'S Y U a Z WESTBURYPATH� DEER CLIFF 90 (10) LEGEND 00 2 0 160 � - A.M. Peak Hour Volume n a `" ( 5 '� 0) ( 25) Hurl II o 1 Lo ► 5 25 5 ( !9 Signalized Control LaCE n \ es( 35) 65 2 �0 ► h C z 8(155)10 ►' I ti Lo 160) 25 ` N o - -- C In O CD 1F1' FRANC �S C y W O m O'S Y U a Z WESTBURYPATH� DEER CLIFF 90 (10) LEGEND ti ( I �'. XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume (910)775 i o 0 0 0 (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume o N Q !9 Signalized Control YANKEE DOODLE _ Jl S C Side - Street Stnn Control LEI I � Cn....rrimc. (:aoi r. Iv 00107073 March 2010 Year 2012 No Build Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan a � I Gp LFVI�'. J o C a o CT O O 00 L J'�ROSECT `�� W J� JAY 9 I 5 U - -- G �1 MMING O BIRDLA. WAY C\� U JAY FALCON Y W \\ O 3' -- _.- �C, GROSS Y'. I GR \U C" BRIARCR EEK_RD —� [,-T O ryy KETTLE +f [ANg `INT 'L Vi L O O U T � Cat'. O/j FF -a -, CSAVANNA H DANBURY _ \ r- ¢ z 0 p m m - Figure 3 ?--ALUKIN;�--T L 90 (10) o N f 715 (970) 5 (10) ikee Doodle Rd (10)125 (910)775 i o 0 0 0 130 ) 10 0 O o N Q m YANKEE DOODLE 0 RD O a � I Gp LFVI�'. J o C a o CT O O 00 L J'�ROSECT `�� W J� JAY 9 I 5 U - -- G �1 MMING O BIRDLA. WAY C\� U JAY FALCON Y W \\ O 3' -- _.- �C, GROSS Y'. I GR \U C" BRIARCR EEK_RD —� [,-T O ryy KETTLE +f [ANg `INT 'L Vi L O O U T � Cat'. O/j FF -a -, CSAVANNA H DANBURY _ \ r- ¢ z 0 p m m - Figure 3 s 'o D v ll 7� L J tF ll RTy � ° C o 190 (215) 845 (1255) 44 1� 55 (225) Yankee Doodle Rd h t (90) 1002 a (860)1225_ °3D, ob Y 325) 105 �' PROMENADE PL. o 0 0 0 _. __...._. C' �8 a ! J \o�N CENTRE _. DR. I f LA. J L �5 CT. 1 O K w Lec lake w O z Y IR. u= m = U F i o0 5 ° C o t-- 70 (35) o c o M N 1 35 (20) 25 (15) uckwood Dr. �60 (275) La (50) 90 `� T I (35) 75 , LI) (210) 55 a' o LO LO u -1I x o LA. J L �5 CT. 1 O K w Lec lake w O z Y IR. u= m = U F i o0 5 n C� L215 (170) C LO 1 135 (24 0) Hurl ]7WOOD CS �60 (275) La Scott Rd. (40) 70 h I (170)195 d cob ° o4 (175) 30 d1 N — Q L o n ' m _ � aio `t \ 2 Lo 95 (10) 945 (1575) 5 (10) o ^ 0 0 (70) 10� 0 v o T YANKEE 3 RD, O 00 L F V I �__� � DUC K \N -- JAY _ y jR I; ]7WOOD CS MMING — SIRDLA WAY C LFALCO'11 C— y w O m O 0 o ae > Q Y m�� Z Z U u O 0 II - b- x Of — — J � J WESTBU RY PATH _ _ a DEER CLIFF Q- J LEGEND Q XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Signalized Control Q - Side - Street Stop Control Year 2020 No Build tw�". Stonehaven Development Traffic Study G„SC--G -, I" City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 m O U o G a o O O 3 O - -1 DOSE CT CT. NI CL L-- w Z C J t -a OR O� CROSS ` RD O O� � CT GR � BRIARCR EEK RD. CS T O NY p NT O� �� KETTLE 9 O � w U i Uz RD. T i SAVANNA H a DANBURY �Q �p� GO of Ir o 0 w f c a�8 -� Figure 4 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE March 12, 2010 City of Eagan Page 8 The directional trip distribution for the proposed development is based on existing travel patterns and regional daily traffic volumes (see Figure 5). The distribution was also reviewed by City staff and determined to be appropriate. It should be noted that since the land use of the proposed development is all residential, no multi -use reductions were applied to the trip generation estimates. In order to be conservative, no additional multi -modal reductions were applied for transit or travel demand management. NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION ASSESSMENT The Carriage Hills Special Area Traffic Study, dated August 10, did not address potential neighborhood connections to the adjacent Greensboro Addition and Woodland /Sunrise Hills neighborhoods to the south and southeast, respectively. Although discussions with City staff indicate that these neighborhood connections are unlikely, it is important to determine the impacts if either or both of these connections were constructed. It should be noted that the City of Eagan recently vacated the right -of -way for the Greensboro Addition neighborhood connection via Hunter Lane. This was formally approved at the March 2nd, 2010 City Council meeting. However, a qualitative review of each adjacent neighborhood was still completed. Greensboro Addition The Greensboro Addition neighborhood is located directly south of the proposed Stonehaven development. Currently, 80 single family homes exist in the neighborhood. Existing access to and from the neighborhood is provided via Wescott Road. The potential connection to the Stonehaven development would be located at Hunter Lane. To determine the shift in travel patterns that potentially could occur if the Hunter Lane connection was constructed, a trip generation estimate was completed for the 80 single family homes (see Table 3). These trips were then distributed to the adjacent roadway network based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 5. It should be noted that the directional distribution was modified to identify a more detailed routing of development /neighborhood traffic based on this neighborhood connection. The travel pattern shifts at the key intersections due to the Hunter Lane connection are shown in Figure 6. The following conclusions address potential impacts of the Hunter Lane connection: • Neiahborhood traffic to /from the north will be more likely to use Duckwood Drive and Hunter Lane to access the neighborhood since it will provide a more direct route than via Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. o Some neighborhood residents, located primarily near the southern and eastern portions of the neighborhood, will continue to use their existing route. • Daily traffic volumes along Hunter Lane and Duckwood Drive (east of Lexington Avenue) are expected to increase by approximately 500 vehicles per day (vpd). • Daily traffic volumes along Wescott Road (between Greensboro Drive and Lexington Avenue) and Lexington Avenue (between Wescott Road and Duckwood Drive) are expected to decrease by approximately 500 vpd. • The changes in travel patterns will not significantly impact the operation of key intersections. a )'R' K a Y G C \N WOOD _PK Wy z 330 %�� 7 �N CENTRE GEh11Nl RD. _ J U 43 ii - 35% N° N° F` O YANKEE DOODLE RD. OR ._? —._ GO L F V iAMgRgC w Wq a / o O'Le l Lake O z 1 z DUC K W�� 0 TAN C N CT I ° -tr F w 0 TIMBE FLT' NA'A KCi E EN MPn�� U C O � % r �1 m tNnCRE5TAV:F R CL\FF 1 J . P� CRESTVIEW V9 00107073 March 2010 10% SIR � r JE - JAY f FaAv� 1S O a�UE C7 G 6P�D VU d C r P �E FALCON z9 Cow -- ) c n °V ERY RD.�� a U � 10% U m w 32 o - (31 %) BIRDI.A -_ - V.AY Y • 0!U <(3%) 3 Q a �� R O C s PC� OAKS _- ROSECT, Tq w m O °Q�t'P Q � Y" p2 °q KS �P. OI 0 ORE Pj I (3�) y P \ O 0� P o cT A O Cr Q SOUTH m HILLS �� Z WAY c�`_ HA y CJ, CRosS P O 0 W s O Q La e RD ° X00 Z �. 5% Q Q c,R - C� — -- °R r —SI.TT RD m .._ -- A O NY n O H D D E N BRIARCR EEK RD_ 5 T Z - p ° 5 , MEA D0 WESTBU RV PATH1 - KETTLE D N\ U O O O V Ng \Ni O O G TR. RD B EP F`� H/ I 0J Q l a_ SAVANNA M.- \N t � Pjr P A (\ I DAN BU RY \ Z \ R HI m °N O�� 1 Bald O� 9TER ORU w, � ti Zr Lake CI`\ �� m U 2 G o -. 5 �o> \C LEGEND - ' - X% Overall Directional Distribution ��- —i'• i(`iJ I (i I i i,d`.Ifi4K `I'_ L,)I' na z NO (X %) Scenario 2 (All Neighborhood Connections) Detailed Directional Distribution Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan Figure 5 L 0 z RTy LO (0) O O o ° O O 1 0 (0) .j 1141 -+ -1 ( -5) !e Doodle Rd v ° O r) (0)o O Q (0) Y Q PROMENADE PL c i J o I 28) a 0 z X y � N N +19(+13) W +5 ( +3) 'Le 0 (0) ake �`- (5) 0 �� clj c K i v Duc x - LA_ CT. _ -- FRIG KER CIR. N _ N \ o L -27 (-19) O O l �o 0) *4 �0) 0 I I (0)0� 1 C/+C\IM Hurl( \� La ti DUCE OOD SR FRANC IIII —�S r ON�M G � Om O ¢ r � O Y O U Li) o ` XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume Change Q (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume Change [X,XXX] - Approximate ADT Change - Signalized Control O - Side- Street Stop Control Hunter Lane Connection Impacts Stonehaven Development Traffic Study G", nx.Grcuir1- City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 000 t-0(0) 0 0 0 -1 ( -5) +1 ( +5) Yankee Doodle Rd (0) 0--+ co (-3) -3 3 ° ° + o (0) 0 i + Q u m d 0 YANKEE DOODLE RD. O —� [ -75] 0 L0 0 G _ FVIE z + _ CT O O O L _J RO =E CT._ _ N W I JE _ JAY ki, ) UMMING O BIRDLA S0 WAY _0 FALCON Y W O Q O O y Q = J m Z O R Op CROSS Q,. RD O - -cT— [ -500] BRIARCR EEK RD. S T O /yY O �+ w �INT \ \\j^ O v KETTLE C ___ - - -- R oT z RD a SAVANNAH O p C) F —.— RAF � ¢ DANBU RY � �� ,�P� /�' ^ �G O O m r N� �� \ a � w m� Figure 6A Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan Table 3 Neighborhood Trip Generation Estimates March 12, 2010 Page 11 Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size (units) A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out Tri s Greensboro Addition Single Family Lots (210) 80 15 45 51 30 766 Woodland/Sunrise Hills Single Family Lots (2 10) 238 45 134 151 89 2,278 Woodland/Sunrise Hills The Woodland/Sunrise Hills neighborhood is located directly southeast of the proposed Stonehaven development. Currently, 238 single family homes exist in the neighborhood. Similar to the Greensboro Addition neighborhood, existing access to and from the neighborhood is provided via Wescott Road. The potential connection to the Stonehaven development would be located at Wescott Hills Drive. Similar methodology from the Greensboro Addition neighborhood assessment was applied to the Woodland /Sunrise Hills neighborhood to determine the potential pattern shifts due to the Wescott Hills Drive connection (see Table 3). The travel pattern shifts at the key intersections due to the Wescott Hills Drive connection are shown in Figure 6B. It should be noted that depending on the location of the homes in the neighborhood, some residents are more likely than others to use the new connection. The following conclusions address potential impacts of the Wescott Hills Drive connection: • Neighborhood traffic to /from the north will be more likely to use Wescott Hills Drive via either Duckwood Drive or Wescott Woodlands to access the neighborhood since it will provide a more direct route than via Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. o Some neighborhood residents, located primarily near the southern and eastern portions of the neighborhood, will continue to use their existing route. • Daily traffic volumes along Wescott Hills Drive (at the connection with Duckwood Drive/Wescott Woodland) are expected to increase by approximately 1,500 vpd. • Daily traffic volumes along Wescott Road (between Wescott Hills Drive and Lexington Avenue) and Lexington Avenue (between Wescott Road and Duckwood Drive) are expected to decrease by approximately 1,500 vpd. • Daily traffic volumes along Wescott Woodlands are expected to increase by approximately 850 vpd. • Daily traffic volumes along Lexington Avenue are expected to decrease by approximately 850 vpd. • Daily traffic volumes along Yankee Doodle Road (between Lexington Avenue and Wescott Woodlands) are expected to increase by approximately 700 vpd. • Daily traffic volumes along Duckwood Drive (east of Lexington Avenue) are expected to increase by approximately 650 vpd. I I• AWKIN UN, No RT z O --�`H W ♦ w Z l_ +15 ( +10 0 0 0 0 (0) +26 ( +17) 0 0 o f 3 (8) 11 �,�. -3 ( -8) — �y r - +3 ( +8) f/ 1 Yankee Doodle Rd Yankee Doodle Rd (o) o� rr� (0) �� CC 0. o Q ( -30) -9 "0 o r o_ n +47) +14� + o Y PROMENADE PL c .� uo N +� m O v 0 2� a. 3 / 0 j \, / YANKEE POODLE RD O [ +700] _� - -- — —� sQ� I Z\ \� �N CENTRE DR. I�, GO L F V �� 00 (`-- I GT. I g� IT_ /� o0o ROSE CT 24 ( +16) C) - 0 (0) ake �� E, SAY w uc woo r. �- / D U C K% (o) o f `1 o� ( +15) +5 , < ti ° ( �R 0 I \ ( -15) 5 Q' rn m o a [ +6501 c V I - L_ DUCK) WOOD -- - - --- —� � C� -- O, J Chi –P� �`Iw FRANCT ��` � )cJ L, F - -�5 W�� UMMING O LA. CT 1 Z 6 r BIRDLA. S� U PO ➢ _ -- -_. WAY - -_ -- � YL� J/CIR. �� UAY \-; Z1Q- % pt \ y 1.,� � `j \\FALCON �G ' Y 4 -- 0 0 3 C .m L 85(57) o �0 (0) Hurl y CROS�S i � oA !��P o esco La e (0)0 J Y (0)o n (0) 0 2C IVR tip' \ ACT - - - -= - [ -1500] «l 1 BRIARCR EEK RD S T O iyy O a y o S \�0wr v �o o w KETTLE LEGEND — -- -- DA �- �� y �T,✓ z \ RD_ , n SAVANNA FI XX A.M. Peak Hour Volume Change a� DANBURY �. ( O (XX) - P.M, Peak Hour Volume Change I' of m — �� [X,XXX] - Approximate ADT Change - - Signalized Control �j \— `z O - Side- Street Stop Control -� _Wescott Hills Drive Connection Impacts Stonehaven Development Traffic Study Figure 6B c,:,.:r,.<,t:<„,•,< City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan March 12, 2010 Page 13 • Although the Wescott Hills Drive connection provides benefit along Wescott Road and portions of Lexington Avenue, traffic volumes along portions of Yankee Doodle Road increase. It should be noted that Yankee Doodle Road currently has the highest existing Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes (approximately 18,100 vpd) of all of the key roadways. Lexington Avenue carries approximately 15,700 vpd and Wescott Road carries approximately 10,500 vpd. • The changes in travel patterns will not significantly impact the operation of key intersections. Other Impacts The neighborhood connections are expected to have impacts to motorists other than neighborhood residents. These neighborhood connections have the potential to provide more direct routes for residents of the Stonehaven development, area schools (Woodland Elementary School, Faithful Shepherd Catholic School, etc.), and area recreation facilities (parks, trails, etc.). By providing more direct routes, there is the potential to minimize impacts to the county roadway system. This impact can be seen by comparing the Stonehaven development traffic distribution based on if the neighborhood connections were not completed (see Figure 6C) versus if the neighborhood connections were completed (Figure 6D). FUTURE OPERATIONS Since the Stonehaven development is expected to be constructed in two phases, operations for two future time horizons were reviewed to determine the impact during each phase of development. Similar to existing conditions, a combination of Synchro /SimTraffic and the HCM was used for the operations analysis. The following scenarios were reviewed: • Year 2012 No Build • Year 2012 Phase I Build (no neighborhood connection) • Year 2012 Phase I Build (with all neighborhood connections) • Year 2020 No Build • Year 2020 Phase II Build (no neighborhood connections) • Year 2020 Phase II Build (with all neighborhood connections) Year 2012 No Build Conditions To determine how well the existing roadway network will accommodate typical background I without Phase I of the proposed Stonehaven development, a year 2012 no build analysis was completed. Results of the year 2012 no build analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. Q-- )g--- l ko� LA J i 0 U N c 0 U O N O_ N o � � 59 (39) o ° 14 (S) 441 4 V 19 (12) vooa 0 (0) 0 (t5) 4 > o 0 (0) 0Z o O N O CT ,CCKER ICIR. FCC � U a C V t— 2 (7) r 4.-- 0 (0) �— o (0) (7) 22 (0)0 ICN CD (0) 0 o` o Y o Hu DUC TR FRANC E \ \\CT (/➢ 8P��1 O m O¢ Y U 0 0 11 rI - -I WESTBU RY PATH m L o> DEER CUFF �-; i L LEGEND m XX _ A.M. Peak Hour Volume Change l (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Volume Change - Signalized Control O - Side.-Street Stop Control ALIJ IN X w r!-a 0( o) 0(0) 4 (15) Yankee Doodle Rd (0) 0 _1 (0) 0—► o 0 0 o M (33) 10 °u g d D 3 YANKEE DOODLE RD. O U O Gp L F V t J o o CT, O O V) rte- ROSECr- o JAY w Q, O 1 U MMING�� RDLA 6\ \ - - - - -- WAY �_. FALCON w m� > z GP CROSS is i [GR BRIARCR EEK RD. 1S _T O /y CT w U �.— KETTLE. -- \\ O S D R a� SAVANNAH �1 G [DANBURY yP�� '/ /w�` G_O O v r G a \/ C m - - -- - -- OPs Stonehaven Development Trips - No Neighborhood Connections Figure 6C Stonehaven Development Traffic Study c,,......... G- - he City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 q o -zt .-- 17 (10) Yankee Doodle Rd (0) 0 h t (19) 5 Q N co � LI� PROMENADE PL 26 7 0 �r c _ � v _ Z w � i J a Q 28 J � ICENTRE DR. ko� LA J i 0 U N c 0 U O N O_ N o � � 59 (39) o ° 14 (S) 441 4 V 19 (12) vooa 0 (0) 0 (t5) 4 > o 0 (0) 0Z o O N O CT ,CCKER ICIR. FCC � U a C V t— 2 (7) r 4.-- 0 (0) �— o (0) (7) 22 (0)0 ICN CD (0) 0 o` o Y o Hu DUC TR FRANC E \ \\CT (/➢ 8P��1 O m O¢ Y U 0 0 11 rI - -I WESTBU RY PATH m L o> DEER CUFF �-; i L LEGEND m XX _ A.M. Peak Hour Volume Change l (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Volume Change - Signalized Control O - Side.-Street Stop Control ALIJ IN X w r!-a 0( o) 0(0) 4 (15) Yankee Doodle Rd (0) 0 _1 (0) 0—► o 0 0 o M (33) 10 °u g d D 3 YANKEE DOODLE RD. O U O Gp L F V t J o o CT, O O V) rte- ROSECr- o JAY w Q, O 1 U MMING�� RDLA 6\ \ - - - - -- WAY �_. FALCON w m� > z GP CROSS is i [GR BRIARCR EEK RD. 1S _T O /y CT w U �.— KETTLE. -- \\ O S D R a� SAVANNAH �1 G [DANBURY yP�� '/ /w�` G_O O v r G a \/ C m - - -- - -- OPs Stonehaven Development Trips - No Neighborhood Connections Figure 6C Stonehaven Development Traffic Study c,,......... G- - he City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 q 0 Q 000 0 17 (10) 4 (15 ) ;kee Doodle (0) 0R� Yankee Doodle Rd (0) 0� !-� 4- I�� (31) 9— ° (19) 5 —� Q N M ° O YANEE DOODLE (26) 7 —tea M �- PROMENADE PL. c w � ?ri) a J C -- — _ _ G __3 - - CENTRE DR. w o o co 59 (39) -� l4 11 (7) ake %_ ; / uc woo c .1� / DUCK j OD (0) 0 a I (15) 411► 0 0 ° o N _ L DUCK WOOD — __. FRANC O! 1 o Uj cc r 7 P �C� �0 L 4� �r -- O m O< 1 (2) r - - -1 x LO L0 N •( - 2 (1) Hurl @y �1�►�1(1) (l ° esco LLa}�e � (s)�z �' I (2) 1- P o N o (p)p� d�L 1 J WESTBURY PATH O I ED ER CLAFF LEGEND J XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume Change (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume Change - Signalized Control O - Side.-Street Stop Control a �x)I III CT. O s JAY 1 O O N 1 U MMING BIRDLA WAY O FALCON o Z a ° L CROSS �P RD /o BRIARCR EEK RD. S T O NY CC O [ KETTLE Y RD. 1 I aJ l -J [SAVANN A -H j QDANBURY / //\O \� ��P /j� \ \�`O.O o mfr- - � i � ICI � J w �° �%\ q �� a \ Stonehaven Development Trips - All Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study Figure 6D City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 X19 °15- 000 0 0 (0) 4 (15 ) ;kee Doodle (0) 0R� (0) 0 � o � (31) 9— ° m J 2 O YANEE DOODLE D — O a �x)I III CT. O s JAY 1 O O N 1 U MMING BIRDLA WAY O FALCON o Z a ° L CROSS �P RD /o BRIARCR EEK RD. S T O NY CC O [ KETTLE Y RD. 1 I aJ l -J [SAVANN A -H j QDANBURY / //\O \� ��P /j� \ \�`O.O o mfr- - � i � ICI � J w �° �%\ q �� a \ Stonehaven Development Trips - All Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study Figure 6D City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 X19 °15- Tim P1ath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan Table 4 Year 2012 No Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results March 12, 2010 Page 16 Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue D D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive A/C A/D Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive B C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D ( I ) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Year 2012 Phase I Build Conditions — No Neighborhood Connections To determine how well the adjacent roadway network will operate if Phase I of the Stonehaven development is constructed, but the adjacent neighborhood connections are not completed, a year 2012 build analysis was completed. Year 2012 Phase I build (with no neighborhood connections) traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. Results of the year 2012 Phase I build (with no neighborhood connections) analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. Table 5 Year 2012 Build - No Neighborhood Connections Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue D D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive A/C A/D Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive C C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Year 2012 Phase I Build Conditions — All Neighborhood Connections To determine how well the adjacent roadway network will operate if the neighborhood connections were completed, a year 2012 Phase I build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis was completed. Year 2012 Phase I build (with all neighborhood connections) traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8. Results of the year 2012 Phase I build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis shown in Table 6 indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. J n 0 i n i V JIiF =I1 Z w o 0 0 �� L175(14 °m X625 (805) 50 (1 55) I Yankee Doodle Rd 0 0 i.r� h (80) 95:!t 4l I W (710)800 —� Q M 10 0 II 320)105 0 0 �Oc:' Y LJ PROMENADE PL. c N r� o O 28 W O Z N CENTRE DR. J ai 90 ( �o o L 11\ O N 715 (970) y 5 (15) ikee Doodle Rd (10) 125-1 (91 0) 775-::1:.5 oN o n YANKEE DOODLE RD. GO F V I O O o � S L0 00 CD o L200 (160 v CD 85 (45) Hurl 1 30 (20) 'Le 30 (15) ake c(45 r. (45) 80 (155)180 (35)70-11 ' o o Lo rn � 180) 45 ° o d y v a - -- - CIR. tt — � S L0 00 CD o L200 (160 125(220) Hurl 1 55 (255) La !sco (40) 65 (155)180 �Lo N c O N _ I JAY_ -� / O O D DUCK \ z DUC WOOD FRANC gVUE —� /5 �U MMING LA. �_R�N CS. /➢ 7 GF WAY O ('� BPO 0 � Y 02 -- y9� C� w O m OQ Y U 0 160) 25 + a - - - -- a LO O O Ir o WESTBU RY PATH I ---- -- - - -- DEER 0 LEGEND a XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Signalized Control O - Side - Street Stop Control FALCON S 3 mS?a �-Q- 0 Q O U -L � - -SOU. \- - O 0 o CT. O� O p_ ROSE CT._ M -- Z O I _ � O \) '' CROSS ly- _ / RD' Q GR � cr O� MI BRIARCR EEK RD_ S T O /y� Q� I �}- p O� O VQ O INT KETTLE D6 N � O � RD. SAVANNAH c F O DANBURY GO F- G - - -- ON Year 2012 Phase I Build - No Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 �1 � l7 Figure 7 I i 6 t 5I 0 t I (820) 45 (145) Yankee Doodle Rd 95(80) � 8(740)10 M 290 95 — - 0 0 0 PROMENADE PL a — � x 1n1 � - F LIJ �\ �/ CENTRE DR. z \� _ ° f¢i U) o o '� 125 (75) N N ch 50 (35) 'Le 25 (15) a ke uc �oo) c � DUC K `N O �D 45 80 �) (55) 80 --4+ > o Ln Ln R. (160) 35 ° x p N O ��_ DUCK WOOD FRANC/ Y GfR m \ R" S LA CT 0 O v I � W 2 O O v °a o L90 (85) N M 125(220) *4l4 � 55 (255) (155)180 —0 - N (f60) 25-4 Q' L0 O O L0 (0 N d M i J L.__J L ZC z (DEER CL Hu La 'VL0 L1 I D � 7 Dw O m OQ Y U 0 Z . --- ' WESTBU RY PATH ; J LEGEND </ J XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume��. %' (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume !9 - Signalized Control Q - Side - Street Stop Control _ Year 2012 Phase I Build - All I Stonehaven Development Traffic Study c,.......<' G.,1, v i.< City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 s. v o o t - 90 (1 0) o N 710 (955) 10 (25) Kee u000ie rco (10) 125 900)765 �( 0) 25� Lo o \ o � YANKEE I I DOODLE RD 0 GO (FV JAY w m �\ UMMING ] \\ BIRC WAY JAY 0 m O U �' SC U) 0 o cr. O O 3 ROSE o _� Cr _ Ld 1_ FALCON > W r O O y c = 0. GROSS BRIARCR E_ EK RD. �S TONY `� 1 O [KETTLE- l �DAN �T Z )��Y RD. _ /� �a SAVANNAH i \ C,p�� O F� Q DANBURY — \FP�� z a -- > x� �✓' �� -- N lul Ir G�� c% ji hborhood Connections � )� -(9) Figure 8 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan March 12, 2010 Page 19 Table 6 Year 2012 Build — All Neighborhood Connections Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue D D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive A/D A/D Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive C C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Year 2020 No Build Conditions To determine how well the existing roadway network will accommodate typical background growth without the proposed Stonehaven development, a year 2020 no build analysis was completed. Results of the year 2020 no build analysis shown in Table 7 indicate that all key intersections, with the exception of one, will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing geometric layout and existing signal timing. The intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue will operate near the LOS D/E threshold during the a.m. peak hour and the LOS E/F threshold during the p.m. peak hour. Side - street delays at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive will be approximately one and a half minutes during the p.m. peak hour. Minor queuing will occur at the westbound left -turn lane along Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue. Table 7 Year 2020 No Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue E (D) F (D) Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive B/F (B /E) A/F (A /E) Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive C C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (I) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Note: Parenthesis indicated the LOS if the recommended improvements were implemented. Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE March 12, 2010 City of Eagan Page 20 To improve the poor level of service at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue, and to minimize the westbound left -turn lane queuing along Wescott Road at Lexington Avenue, minor signal timing changes should be considered. To address the side - street delays along Wescott Woodlands and Columbia Drive, addition of northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at Wescott Woodlands and Columbia Drive should be considered. These improvements will improve side- street delays to approximately one minute during the p.m. peak hour. Detailed analysis of this condition is shown in Appendix A. Other geometric improvements, including realignment of the offset north and south approaches of Wescott Woodlands should be considered as redevelopment occurs. As shown in the parenthesis in Table 7, all key intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS D or better tinder year 2020 no build a.m. and p.m. peak hour conditions with recommended improvements. For analysis purposes, the recommended improvements were carried forward to the year 2020 build analysis scenarios. Year 2020 Phase II Build Conditions — No Neighborhood Connections To determine how well the adjacent roadway network will operate if Phase II of the Stonehaven development is constructed, but the adjacent neighborhood connections are not completed, a year 2020 build analysis was completed. Year 2020 Phase II build (with no neighborhood connections) traffic volumes are shown in Figure 9. Results of the year 2020 Phase II build (with no neighborhood connections) analysis shown in Table 8 indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with previously recommended improvements. However, side- street delays at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands will be approximately two minutes during the p.m. peak hour. To address the side- street delays, installation of a traffic signal should be considered. It should be noted that a detailed warrant analysis was not completed as part of this study. Table 8 Year 2020 Build — No Neighborhood Connections Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue D D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive B/F (B) A/F (B) Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive C C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Note: Parenthesis indicated the LOS if the recommended improvements for 2020 Phase 11 build conditions were implemented. ':�L l g -aD 0 s HIN UN \ rn U-) n o Z Z� `° " 200 (225) o N / o o ~- o 0 95 (10) LO rn 4 860 (1265) _��' o m f 945 (1575) � ► 55 (225) 10 (25) D Yankee Doodle Rd t Yankee oodle Rd (90) 100 �� 1 1 (10) 135 f.l�► % > / (875)1110_ o`r'o ") c? (1100)122 —� o 0 0 - o r� rn (350) 110 ( ) 0— o LO o n Q G _PROMENADE PL_ o d� N -� r m N u �28� 3 O J YANKEE RD O __-- JUL-- SOU 0�N CENTRE DR. L_J G�F V { oz --- E { o CT. O � O N n �`� I to N C7 n v L 130 (75) 11 o I -- `ROSE CT 45 (30) Lee J w �- 45 (25) a ke 'K o OD J Y < Duckwood Dr. `) DUC (50) O 8 _ `W 1G - 1 ' � v 210 55 _ o r \> �M � DUG UR E OgL Pw� G D — �o G— oT � \ T D C, FRANC LA INGm B ._ _I - R_ — D L—A MM G KKE WAY ' _ J / _ V 0 C FALCON 70o � . O - y� O Ln co O O OG O L 220 (18 co o 135 (240) Hurry — - / \ �—�cP� � CROSS 60 N Wescott Rd. rake RD. (45) 75 l5 1� V S75 c°o °v N �O yl BRIARCR EEK RD. CST 0 - -- o� n Y WESTBURY PATH U KETTLEAN80 D 4_ / C- - -- UZ-N a �-� -- — R� RD. 4 S AVANNAH_LEGEND _ Q - XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume �,j ° R z �DANBDRY 0 (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume ° �� F � - Signalized Control - Q -- a � L h_ m�� - Side - Street Stop Control � JL Year 2020 Phase li Build - No Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study Figure 9 City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan Year 2020 Phase II Build Conditions — All Neighborhood Connections March 12, 2010 Page 22 To determine how well the adjacent roadway network will operate if the neighborhood connections were completed, a year 2020 Phase I1 build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis was completed. Year 2020 Phase 1I build (with all neighborhood connections) traffic volumes are shown in Figure 10. Results of the year 2020 Phase II build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis shown in Table 9 indicate that all key intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with previously recommended improvements. It should be noted that the neighborhood connections have a significant impact to the traffic volumes at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands. Thus increasing the likelihood of a traffic signal being warranted at this location. Table 9 Year 2020 Build — All Neighborhood Connections Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue D D Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive B B Lexington Avenue and Duckwood Drive C C Lexington Avenue and Westcott Road C D (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side - street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Ll y O z �1 NO RT lr O O LO -S- Q. L215 (235) ° ° M 890 (1280) L 105 (95) Ln 55 (210) n � 1 Dootlle Rd Wescott Rd. i Yankee (90) 100 h t t 'a (905)1240 -� Q M rn ° 320) 100 o� Q PROMENADE PL. o M m N N to O O 00 O M Lr) M N V *414 (50) 90 (70) 85 (190) 50 LA. CT. o I0 °- I CENTRE _ DR t 170 (105 -1-r 65 (40) i 35 (25) I O O O ai ° LO d ;! Ln L o cn M y V V R G a� _I D1 Z (DEER CL \FF i Fr,Ftin ke DUC KOD jR LWOOD..._. _ -- r FRANC _ HERON > `vim v o w O m OQ Y U Url y O 0 O WESTBURY PATH J XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume�� \ \k (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Signalized Control Q - Side - Street Stop Control S L o o L 95 (10) ° M f 945(1565) r- 15 (40) Yankee Doodle Rd (10) 135 o (1110)1210 o ° M 145) 35-� 0 �oG3' 0 UI YANKEE RD. _.. -_ .. - ----- — 0 Co LFV1� JAY -_._ �9 m [BIRDLA � U MMING �AY 0 m J O U SC 0 CT O O ��OSE CT UI FALCON > C O I J ? d O / 1 P. - - - -- - -_. /GF CROSS RD/ O 5� �' CT J GR BRIARCR E_EK RD. S T O Ny z 00 O i O KETTLE t R -9 0 - Dq U O RD, r i SAVANNAH a DANBU RY RG KP��ja ;�/ > i< O O 0 G' C 0 14 2 Year 2020 Phase II Build - All Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 � 1 1.1 f 31-3 Figure 10 0 L 105 (95) U') "� 135 (240) n � 1 60 (275) Wescott Rd. i (45) 75 t I N (170)195 (175) 30 ----------- �I c G a� _I D1 Z (DEER CL \FF i Fr,Ftin ke DUC KOD jR LWOOD..._. _ -- r FRANC _ HERON > `vim v o w O m OQ Y U Url y O 0 O WESTBURY PATH J XX - A.M. Peak Hour Volume�� \ \k (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Signalized Control Q - Side - Street Stop Control S L o o L 95 (10) ° M f 945(1565) r- 15 (40) Yankee Doodle Rd (10) 135 o (1110)1210 o ° M 145) 35-� 0 �oG3' 0 UI YANKEE RD. _.. -_ .. - ----- — 0 Co LFV1� JAY -_._ �9 m [BIRDLA � U MMING �AY 0 m J O U SC 0 CT O O ��OSE CT UI FALCON > C O I J ? d O / 1 P. - - - -- - -_. /GF CROSS RD/ O 5� �' CT J GR BRIARCR E_EK RD. S T O Ny z 00 O i O KETTLE t R -9 0 - Dq U O RD, r i SAVANNAH a DANBU RY RG KP��ja ;�/ > i< O O 0 G' C 0 14 2 Year 2020 Phase II Build - All Neighborhood Connections Stonehaven Development Traffic Study City of Eagan 00107073 March 2010 � 1 1.1 f 31-3 Figure 10 Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan CONCLUSIONS March 12, 2010 Page 24 Based on the previous analysis, the following conclusions and recommendations are offered for your consideration: • Results of the existing operations analysis indicate that all key intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing traffic control and geometric layout. • Greensboro Addition neighborhood traffic to /from the north will be more likely to use Duckwood Drive and Hunter Lane to access the neighborhood since it will provide a more direct route than via Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. o The changes in travel patterns will not significantly impact the operation of key intersections. • Woodland /Sunrise Hill neighborhood traffic to /from the north will be more likely to use Wescott Hills Drive via either Duckwood Drive or Wescott Woodlands to access the neighborhood since it will provide a more direct route than via Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. o The changes in travel patterns will not significantly impact the operation of key intersections. • Results of the year 2012 no build analysis indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. • Results of the year 2012 Phase I build (with no neighborhood connections) analysis indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. • Results of the year 2012 Phase I build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.rn. and p.rn. peak hours with existing signal timing and geometric layout. • Results of the year 2020 no build analysis indicate that all key intersections, with the exception of one, will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and. p.m. peak hours with existing geometric layout and existing signal timing. • The intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue will operate near the LOS D/E threshold during the a.m. peak hour and the LOS E/F threshold during the p.m. peak hour. • To improve the poor LOS at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue, and to minimize the westbound left -turn lane queuing along Wescott Road at Lexington Avenue, minor signal timing changes should be considered. • Side - street delays at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands /Columbia Drive will be approximately one and a half minutes during the p.m. peak hour. • To address the side- street delays along Wescott Woodlands and Columbia Drive, addition of northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at Wescott Woodlands and Columbia Drive should be considered. al 8 -aq Tim Plath, P.E., PTOE City of Eagan March 12, 2010 Page 25 • Results of the year 2020 Phase II build (with no neighborhood connections) analysis indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with previously recommended improvements. However, side - street delays at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Wescott Woodlands will be approximately two minutes during the p.m. peak hour. o To address the side- street delays installation of a traffic signal should be considered. • Results of the year 2020 Phase II build (with all neighborhood connections) analysis indicate that all key intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with previously recommended improvements. a[ 9_a-s- APPENDIX A SimTraffic Performance Report 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour Average of 3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SIB All Delay/ Veh (s) 53.1 29.7 81.1 40.0 56.1 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SIB All Delay / Veh (s) 46.6 30.8 20.4 9.5 22.2 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 42.3 32.2 24.8 20.2 27.7 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SIB All Delay / Veh (s) 12.8 2.4 34.2 55.4 11.4 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 77.8 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201No BuildlBaseWr 2020 AM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report T T R T T L L 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour Maximum Queue (ft) 801 823 333 184 197 81 Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave 87 Average Queue (ft) 491 510 84 25 27 33 33 35 42 95th Queue (ft) 1025 1042 380 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 80 245 740 826 450 68 79 386 392 194 348 471 Average Queue (ft) 42 52 423 454 58 24 30 207 229 8 178 224 95th Queue (ft) 74 147 735 784 307 60 59 329 353 97 321 455 Link Distance (ft) 3144 3144 2579 2579 86 43 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Queuing Penalty (veh) Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Storage Bay Dist (fi) 250 250 SB SB 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time (`i°) 26 33 3 3 5 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 33 2 6 22 28 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB B65 B65 SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R T T L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 801 823 333 184 197 81 86 93 87 Average Queue (ft) 491 510 84 25 27 33 33 35 42 95th Queue (ft) 1025 1042 380 179 195 67 69 74 76 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 1311 1311 2355 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 24 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 Storage Blk Time (°i°) 24 27 Queuing Penalty (veh) 86 43 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft:) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (0,1°) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LT R L T TR L T TR 323 58 118 96 182 399 410 31 72 107 142 25 46 38 86 162 169 7 23 30 253 49 96 74 161 314 325 23 61 77 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 275 200 300 250 1 1 H: 1Projects 170731T; >1Analysis120201No BuildlBasWr 2020 AM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour Average of3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 131 282 128 101 251 218 118 407 429 134 100 116 Average Queue (ft) 51 151 20 39 104 77 44 209 240 52 22 39 95th Queue (ft) 102 247 74 80 195 150 94 351 388 106 64 86 Link Distance (ft) 3232 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Network Summary Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 0 1 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB WB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L L T R LR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 136 25 7 32 57 296 Average Queue (ft) 51 1 0 2 20 100 95th Queue (ft) 100 11 6 14 47 235 Link Distance (ft) 2277 1346 1192 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 292 H:1 Projects 170731T: >IAnalysis120201No BuilMBaseWr 2020 AM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour Average of3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 45.9 148.9 38.3 44.8 80.6 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 28.9 23.8 20.4 21.0 21.9 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 37.1 53.1 28.4 34.2 37.6 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 8.8 2.4 83.5 59.7 6.9 Total Network Performance Delay/ Veh (s) 99.4 H. IProjects170731T SIAnalysis120201No BuildlBaselYr 2020 PM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report QO O --�P Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour Average of 3 Intersection: 'I : Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 84 86 566 604 446 181 409 1615 1640 475 178 169 Average Queue (ft) 35 40 298 317 90 103 160 1084 1116 176 84 82 95th Queue (ft) 69 72 489 520 346 161 442 2171 2199 552 149 147 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 300 3144 3144 275 Storage Blk Time (°ro) 2579 2579 5 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 15 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 Queuing Penalty (veh) 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 3 225 250 250 0 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time (°ro) 2 16 24 0 48 49 Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 78 1 108 106 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB ` Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 140 148 124 144 465 461 164 Average Queue (ft) 71 76 62 67 267 271 17 95th Queue (ft) 123 127 114 122 387 393 93 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 239 95th Queue (ft) 2330 2330 64 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 181 123 113 144 378 420 Link Distance (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2273 2355 2355 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 300 300 275 Storage Blk Time (°ro) 5 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 15 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexinaton Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 132 208 73 60 210 173 146 241 448 500 Average Queue (ft) 66 85 27 17 103 50 47 59 210 239 95th Queue (ft) 118 167 64 46 181 123 113 144 378 420 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 H:1 Projects17073 1TE�\Analysis120201No BuildlBaselYr 2020 PM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report a��l Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/4/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour Average of3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 78 270 236 441 276 98 111 198 213 312 496 523 Average Queue (ft) 28 135 78 242 146 47 43 105 103 139 258 289 95th Queue (ft) 63 225 162 405 250 80 88 182 186 231 445 479 Link Distance (ft) 3232 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time (°io) 2 0 16 1 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 1 66 5 2 13 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served L L LR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 27 25 78 138 Average Queue (ft) 6 4 20 44 95th Queue (ft) 24 19 56 101 Link Distance (ft) 1346 1192 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 424 H:1 Projects 170731TS1Analysis120201No BuilMBaseWr 2020 PM No Build.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 48 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A Average of3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 49.0 29.0 57.0 40.6 46.2 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 44.2 29.5 20.4 8.5 21.8 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 43.2 33.2 24.4 19.1 27.7 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 12.8 2.4 34.2 23.4 9.6 Total Network Performance Delay/ Veh (s) 68.2 H:1 Projects170731T ; >IAnalysis120201No BuildlBaselYr 2020 AM No Build imp A.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report T T R L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A 80 81 93 86 Average Queue (ft) Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave 29 33 33 35 40 95th Queue (ft) 697 732 207 66 70 75 74 Link Distance (ft) 1177 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft.) 81 258 788 806 450 60 73 372 384 193 287 361 Average Queue (ft) 43 50 401 425 48 23 30 200 221 12 150 197 95th Queue (ft) 74 145 706 734 276 56 58 315 342 104 241 399 Link Distance (ft) 3144 3144 1 2573 2573 Queuing Penalty (veh) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time (1,1o) 23 29 3 2 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 22 30 1 5 0 2 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 646 655 333 80 81 93 86 Average Queue (ft) 372 394 29 33 33 35 40 95th Queue (ft) 697 732 207 66 70 75 74 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 49 87 72 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 23 48 69 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 16 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 57 32 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 276 58 105 83 204 375 408 30 52 99 Average Queue (ft) 129 26 45 38 86 164 180 7 19 30 95th Queue (ft) 233 49 87 72 163 313 334 23 48 69 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 H: IProjects17073 1TSIAnalysis120201No BuildlBaselYr 2020 AM No Build imp A.syn SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build A.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A Average of 3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 130 255 127 101 251 188 127 376 443 137 100 110 Average Queue (ft) 55 149 21 40 107 74 46 203 243 53 19 34 95th Queue (ft) 109 245 75 81 196 136 98 341 393 107 61 79 Link Distance (ft) 250 3232 100 4935 Storage Blk Time ( 0/6) 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time (IN 3 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 0 1 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L L R L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 159 25 26 53 29 87 85 Average Queue (ft) 57 2 3 15 8 29 39 95th Queue (ft) 109 12 17 43 25 70 70 Link Distance (ft) 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( 0/6) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 155 H:1 Projects 170731TS1Analysis120201No BuilMBaseWr 2020 AM No Build imp A.syn SimTraffic Report X19 --3�S- Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A Average of 3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 34.7 46.9 53.1 45.3 43.9 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 26.9 26.4 18.4 17.4 19.1 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 39.4 43.0 30.1 38.2 37.9 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 8.7 2.3 46.2 30.7 6.0 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 70.3 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201No BuildlBasWr 2020 PM No Build imp A.syn SimTraffic Report �;Q 9 -3 � Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 86 80 384 398 237 211 306 674 706 475 239 251 Average Queue (ft) 38 41 239 252 32 111 100 376 407 50 123 118 95th Queue (ft) 72 76 351 368 140 181 226 608 661 291 225 225 Link Distance (ft) 3144 3144 2573 2573 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( ° /)) 7 12 0 21 21 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 38 1 47 45 0 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 169 184 38 123 136 424 452 156 Average Queue (ft) 67 68 1 66 67 262 274 20 95th Queue (ft) 123 131 22 112 121 375 391 105 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 5 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 15 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 134 208 74 60 233 149 119 147 316 339 Average Queue (ft) 67 83 29 18 98 43 37 52 168 190 95th Queue (ft) 117 154 69 47 178 102 88 114 273 305 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( ° /)) Queuing Penalty (veh) H: 1Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201No BuildlBaselYr 2020 PM No Build—imp A.syn SimTraffic Report ,=, � -7 Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 No Build P.M. Peak Hour - Improvement A Average of 3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB ' NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 71 266 242 383 306 95 118 189 207 319 543 544 Average Queue (ft) 27 139 82 200 143 48 47 104 105 145 310 336 95th Queue (ft) 61 236 169 331 256 79 98 176 182 245 464 479 Link Distance (ft) 3232 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 3 1 6 2 1 11 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 2 23 10 7 22 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L L L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 26 17 47 20 54 59 Average Queue (ft) 6 4 15 3 18 21 95th Queue (ft) 22 18 39 14 46 44 Link Distance (ft) 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 232 H:1 Projects 170731T: >1Analysis120201No BuiWBasWr 2020 PM No Build imp A.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 43.9 30.3 54.6 41.1 44.1 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 39.5 33.3 22.7 13.9 24.2 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 44.4 32.8 24.8 20.0 28.0 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 12.2 2.5 58.8 16.7 9.8 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 67.8 H:1 Projects 170731TS1Analysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 aim � S9 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 95 259 794 821 450 61 67 455 468 292 324 410 Average Queue (ft) 42 64 360 387 37 25 28 215 229 15 178 204 95th Queue (ft) 82 223 661 693 240 56 59 349 364 119 284 368 Link Distance (ft) 300 3144 3144 Storage Blk Time (96) 2573 2573 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 25 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time (9io) 18 24 4 3 0 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 26 2 6 0 5 7 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexinaton Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 697 684 496 87 93 86 87 Average Queue (ft) 350 371 32 38 36 41 42 95th Queue (ft) 582 609 210 76 74 77 79 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 2355 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1311 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 Storage Blk Time (96) 12 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 25 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( °%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LT R L T TR L T TR 218 45 184 154 265 480 486 72 101 114 122 27 76 57 85 193 200 16 31 43 203 46 141 106 161 377 386 47 81 93 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 275 200 300 0 0 0 0 250 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (fi) 145 327 138 95 172 167 102 380 399 162 75 92 Average Queue (ft) 51 152 22 48 98 78 40 213 243 60 14 32 95th Queue (ft) 102 255 77 88 159 137 83 347 383 123 46 73 Link Distance (ft) 250 3232 100 4935 Storage Blk Time (1 %) 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time (0 %) 3 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB ' SB Directions Served L L R L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 144 26 34 112 43 61 128 Average Queue (ft) 52 2 3 46 14 18 44 95th Queue (ft) 105 14 19 102 34 48 91 Link Distance (ft) 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time (1 %) 5 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 143 H:1 Projects 170731TS1Analysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 QA-41 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of 3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 35.5 60.9 53.4 46.8 49.7 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 29.9 25.6 26.4 22.7 24.7 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 39.0 45.8 30.0 47.3 42.7 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 9.5 2.8 105.0 64.3 8.5 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 79.9 H:1 Projects1 70731T:31Analysis120201BuildlNo ConslYr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 -r:�(g -qa, Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 89 102 387 413 356 162 390 1041 1089 475 201 206 Average Queue (ft) 37 41 252 265 40 98 102 538 578 114 133 129 95th Queue (ft) 72 78 354 374 196 139 263 1016 1076 445 201 202 Link Distance (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 300 3144 3144 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2573 2573 6 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 275 Queuing Penalty (veh) 200 300 12 22 Storage Blk Time ( ° /o) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 0 4 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( %) 8 15 31 31 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 52 70 70 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 198 207 144 144 417 434 178 Average Queue (ft) 83 86 68 74 282 291 22 95th Queue (ft) 150 154 116 120 388 406 108 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 367 Link Distance (ft) 2330 2330 2273 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 300 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 6 11 275 Queuing Penalty (veh) 200 300 12 22 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexinaton Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 186 199 113 84 226 269 264 268 424 446 Average Queue (ft) 88 78 45 34 103 90 91 108 187 201 95th Queue (ft) 159 143 89 64 188 192 190 195 359 367 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( ° /o) 0 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 4 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report ,--� 1 C<Z2:,-- 4 3 Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase 11 Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) - No Imps Average of 3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 187 370 229 413 439 152 116 200 236 400 653 645 Average Queue (ft) 36 139 80 224 145 55 43 116 124 207 318 334 95th Queue (ft) 104 245 156 358 301 101 90 183 206 375 597 585 Link Distance (ft) 1193 3232 0 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 100 Queuing Penalty (veh) 100 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 Network Summary 275 Storage Blk Time (°b) 5 10 2 11 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 44 8 63 16 Intersection:': Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 28 888 15 50 118 49 81 62 Average Queue (ft) 5 32 1 13 46 9 26 21 95th Queue (ft) 22 508 6 35 100 29 72 47 Link Distance (ft) 2573 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 381 H: IProjectsl 70731T: >IAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons—no imps.syn SimTraffic Report 'aI �- Lizl Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) Average of 3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 44.4 36.8 54.1 41.4 45.8 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 40.3 32.5 23.1 14.3 24.5 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 44.3 32.8 25.0 19.1 27.9 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 18.8 12.7 27.1 13.2 16.3 Total Network Performance Delay/ Veh (s) 72.9 H:1 Projects17073 1TSIAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraffic Report <7�7K-- 4-S Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report LT R LT R L T 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 263 Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave 162 267 503 505 80 93 107 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue(ff) 102 114 801 818 450 60 81 461 508 200 304 444 Average Queue (ft) 41 47 364 385 43 23 30 236 259 9 180 203 95th Queue (ft) 83 90 680 697 259 56 63 376 401 99 286 342 Link Distance (ft) 3144 3144 2573 2573 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 Queuing Penalty (veh) 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 19 24 3 7 6 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 26 4 12 5 7 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 606 641 333 86 100 86 87 Average Queue (ft) 338 357 19 38 38 42 42 95th Queue (ft) 539 569 151 75 77 78 81 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 12 15 Queuing Penalty (veh) 45 25 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 263 45 162 162 267 503 505 80 93 107 Average Queue (ft) 120 27 73 58 94 190 200 18 31 45 95th Queue (ft) 211 46 134 109 194 376 388 52 78 93 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 0 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 3 H:1 Projects1 70731T: >1Analysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraffic Report al 12- q� Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase 11 Build A.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) Average of 3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 145 327 132 95 172 167 102 372 399 155 84 92 Average Queue (ft) 51 151 21 48 98 77 40 213 243 59 15 33 95th Queue (ft) 102 252 76 88 159 137 83 348 386 121 49 74 Link Distance (ft) 3232 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB ` NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 167 1119 362 164 36 214 239 60 96 49 53 100 Average Queue (ft) 87 104 98 8 5 106 130 22 32 12 15 38 95th Queue (ft) 157 594 266 87 22 181 208 45 72 33 44 75 Link Distance (ft) 2573 2573 2271 2271 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 1 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 150 H: IProjects17073 1TSIAnalysis120201Build\No ConslYr 2020 AM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 c--4-q�7 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) Average of 3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 38.1 58.4 45.1 47.2 48.5 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 32.4 27.4 27.4 22.6 25.5 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 36.0 40.6 29.1 48.6 41.6 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 18.2 8.5 30.2 25.9 13.3 Total Network Performance Delay/ Veh (s) 81.1 H:1 Projects17073 ITSIAnalysis120201BuildlNo ConslYr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraff ic Report IQ4 �?- K Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report T T L L T 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) Maximum Queue (ft) 201 227 114 Average of3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave 436 173 Average Queue (ft) 85 97 69 70 288 288 15 95th Queue (ft) 151 174 111 117 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 118 114 395 420 442 140 524 1111 1131 475 180 193 Average Queue (ft) 31 38 274 290 48 93 109 516 548 141 115 106 95th Queue (ft) 73 74 373 393 204 133 302 912 960 492 177 160 Link Distance (ft) 3144 3144 11 0 2573 2573 0 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 22 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Queuing Penalty (veh) Movement EB EB WB WB Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( ° /)) 10 19 31 31 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 65 70 68 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 201 227 114 136 485 436 173 Average Queue (ft) 85 97 69 70 288 288 15 95th Queue (ft) 151 174 111 117 416 393 86 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 200 216 2330 2330 317 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2273 2355 2355 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1311 275 200 300 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 300 300 0 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 2 8 11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 16 22 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( °i')) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LT R L T TR L T TR 223 265 114 79 216 338 361 197 410 430 98 92 48 33 111 90 93 112 160 178 179 171 97 64 194 200 216 171 300 317 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 275 200 300 250 0 0 2 0 0 3 H:1 Projects1 70731TS,IAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/12/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (No Connections) Average of3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 114 288 279 311 246 135 90 190 189 455 732 696 Average Queue (ft) 31 131 70 198 140 56 36 111 117 232 341 366 95th Queue (ft) 74 209 114 317 230 107 81 179 200 438 595 606 Link Distance (ft) 2271 3232 1347 4935 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 100 200 250 275 300 275 0 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 3 0 19 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 22 0 105 14 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 52 373 424 55 50 242 205 86 43 47 62 Average Queue (ft) 8 113 137 13 21 78 100 24 9 14 19 95th Queue (ft) 33 286 313 41 46 167 188 55 27 40 45 Link Distance (ft) 2573 2573 2271 2271 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 3 3 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 0 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 404 H:1 Projects17073 1T: >IAnalysis120201Build\No Cons\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—No Cons.syn SimTraffic Report a I �)--(57b Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (All Connections) Average of3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 35.2 32.9 45.6 41.0 38.7 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay/ Veh (s) 41.3 29.4 25.2 16.7 26.1 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 45.0 35.8 21.8 13.9 25.6 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 19.7 14.0 27.2 15.1 17.6 Total Network Performance Delay/ Veh (s) 66.9 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201BuildlYr 2020 AM Phase II Build—All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (All Connections) Average of3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 112 96 648 523 450 53 53 382 417 176 248 225 Average Queue (ft) 36 34 315 335 16 24 25 229 247 18 144 149 95th Queue (ft) 72 69 473 468 154 48 51 332 361 105 217 220 Link Distance (ft) 1311 1311 3144 3144 300 2573 2573 Storage Blk Time ( °b) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 275 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave 200 300 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 4 225 250 250 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( °b) 4 13 19 5 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 19 2 9 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 597 654 500 135 92 73 73 Average Queue (ft) 314 342 23 40 37 41 38 95th Queue (ft) 482 527 182 93 74 73 63 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 45 149 125 2330 2330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 88 79 87 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( °b) 10 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave 200 300 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 266 54 242 143 154 474 491 128 130 127 Average Queue (ft) 139 29 79 68 72 214 231 41 27 33 95th Queue (ft) 252 45 149 125 128 429 455 88 79 87 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 0 1 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 4 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201Build\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build —All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build A.M. Peak Hour (All Connections) Average of3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 112 270 78 98 202 94 134 330 390 155 110 124 Average Queue (ft) 49 140 16 40 117 46 41 195 225 29 11 29 95th Queue (ft) 92 221 47 85 192 77 88 316 357 81 47 64 Link Distance (ft) 3232 4935 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 275 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( °o) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 160 333 374 31 52 222 222 55 112 43 66 107 Average Queue (ft) 94 90 114 8 14 108 126 24 49 13 15 43 95th Queue (ft) 172 244 272 27 41 179 207 52 96 35 44 76 Link Distance (ft) 2573 2573 2271 2271 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( °'o) 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 115 H:1 Projects 170731TSIAnalysis120201Build\Yr 2020 AM Phase II Build—All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Qle-ss Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (All Connections) Average of3 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 36.2 47.7 52.9 52.6 46.4 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 32.2 25.1 24.8 20.9 23.5 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 39.8 45.8 24.2 38.6 37.7 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Delay / Veh (s) 15.9 8.0 36.3 19.2 12.4 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 75.7 H:1 Projects1 70731T:)\Analysis120201BuildlYr 2020 PM Phase II Build—All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase II Build P.M. Peak Hour (All Connections) Average of 3 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 136 136 446 487 450 178 156 566 596 464 201 208 Average Queue (ft) 46 55 248 271 57 115 95 361 382 17 129 129 95th Queue (ft) 104 99 377 393 231 170 153 510 527 159 193 200 Link Distance (ft) 1311 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3144 3144 2573 2573 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 300 300 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft l Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 Queuing Penalty (veh) 300 250 17 27 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 225 250 250 Queuing Penalty (veh) Movement 275 300 300 Storage Blk Time ( ° /)) NB NB 6 14 0 19 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 45 0 40 46 Intersection: 1: Yankee Doodle Rd & Lexington Ave Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 118 136 110 182 162 441 438 132 Average Queue (ft) 73 77 4 74 85 307 309 25 95th Queue (ft) 127 127 37 140 151 424 422 106 Link Distance (ft) 1177 1177 164 139 235 2330 2330 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2273 2355 2355 1311 Queuing Penalty (veh) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 300 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft l 8 14 Queuing Penalty (veh) 300 250 17 27 Intersection: 2: Duckwood Dr & Lexington Ave 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 224 139 138 75 180 174 158 301 304 306 Average Queue (ft) 102 71 62 34 85 83 78 138 171 186 95th Queue (ft) 177 129 115 61 156 164 139 235 274 296 Link Distance (ft) 2306 2273 2355 2355 1311 1311 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft l 275 200 300 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 1 H:1 Projects 170731TS1Analysis120201Build\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report a��_ss Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 3/2/2010 Year 2020 Phase li Build P.M. Peak Hour (Ali Connections) Average of 3 Intersection: 3: Wecott Road & Lexington Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB W8 NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 376 280 396 289 71 89 236 216 133 557 659 Average Queue (ft) 27 156 91 209 143 37 31 102 98 66 316 342 95th Queue (ft) 60 287 194 353 227 61 70 193 190 122 461 513 Link Distance (ft) 3232 2271 4935 1193 2563 2563 2355 2355 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 200 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 275 300 1 275 Storage Blk Time ( %) 5 8 1 0 2 12 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 Network Summary 25 2 9 Intersection: 5: Yankee Doodle Rd & Columbia Dr Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 360 399 89 72 182 203 107 20 33 44 Average Queue (ft) 5 99 119 17 28 80 90 44 10 10 18 95th Queue (ft) 24 255 269 50 64 148 155 84 26 30 42 Link Distance (ft) 2573 2573 2271 2271 1347 1193 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 250 100 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 235 H:1 Projects17073 1TS1Analysis120201Build\Yr 2020 PM Phase II Build—All Cons.syn SimTraffic Report Page 3 Jon Hohenstein Subject: RE: [eagancoregreenway] Carriage Hills Development - Eagan City Council Meeting [1 Attachment] From: Paul Stutler <pstutler' i v alwo.com> Date: March 11, 2010 10:13:15 PM CST To: home <1),w[lcr11i._vafioo.co iii> Subject: [eagancoregreenway] Carriage Hills Development - Eagan City Council Meeting [1 Attachment] Reply-To:c::�i�� >r��lc�nlaa� cr�ah�7n��t�oup_�um lattacbmenf(s) from Paul Stotler included belowl As you may know, Eagan City Council will be considering a new development plan for the Carriage Hills golf course property. The new plan, the Lennar Plan, includes some high density development with some single family homes. Overall it has less density than the previous development plan. But we have very recently learned that it could cause Dakota County to order connections from the Woodlands neighborhood to Wescott Woodlands so that traffic would be routed through the neighborhoods. The new thoroughfare could greatly affect the safety, peace and quiet of our neighborhoods. An alternative plan, the Taylor Plan, includes much of the Lennar Plan, but also includes a city park. The park would serve these purposes: giving existing residents and new residents a local park to enjoy and it would decrease the density enough to kill Dakota County's need for connecting Wescott and Yankee Doodle on the east side of Woodlands School through Wescott Woodlands Drive. I have attached a copy of the Taylor Plan. The City Council is poised to act before the County determines the traffic question. We are asking the City to consider an approach along the lines of the Taylor Plan to eliminate the need for the County to make the road connections. If you share this concern, now is the time to voice your views to the City Council. The City Council meets on March 16 at 6:30 PM. They have reversed themselves three times on the property. Citizen involvement has made a real impact on the fate of this property. If you would like the traffic problems addressed, this meeting is the place to voice that concern. You can also contact City Council Members via this email address: citYcouncil - citwfeaclan.com You can also call each individual Council Member. Mike Maguire Paul Bakken Gary Hansen Cyndee Fields Meg Tilley 651 - 675 -5048 651 - 261 -2526 651 - 485 -9125 651- 686 -0351 651- 485 -5558 1 aft --�7 Page 1 of 1 alw 5�6 littp://xa-yimg.com/kq/groups/21916920/hr/I 9183393 53 /name /Taylor 3/12/2010 COMMERCIAL on WGi a( I ROW ROUSES • "-" _° 1 -1 COMMERCIAL . r OR 1' ";• SENIOR MOUSING - - 1 �.. • PARK OPEN SPACE . ...__ 1 , ,.. 1 7fl -65' LOTS • � J f J I ,y r I + r � I � ; •ice �� I � t _ J I f . - [ l I t,, w -- Hv c Jt .w i 1 � 3ji l 4 s . / F / �l alw 5�6 littp://xa-yimg.com/kq/groups/21916920/hr/I 9183393 53 /name /Taylor 3/12/2010 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010, Eagan City Council Meeting B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To direct staff to submit to the Metropolitan Council a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment (OR direct preparation of findings of fact for denial) to change the land use designation from SA (Special Area), to QP (Quasi Public), to allow for a Fire Safety Center for property located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. ➢ To authorize issuing a footing and foundation permit to allow for a Fire Safety Center for property located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least four votes FACTS: The 4 acre site is part of the former Carriage Hills Golf Course which closed in 2005. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Planned Development for residential development were approved in 2008. The existing Preliminary PD, pertaining to the entire 120 -acre former golf course, identifies the subject site for multiple- family residential use. ➢ In July 2009, the City Council approved the purchase of the subject property for relocation of the existing Fire Station number 2. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed and the City Council made a Negative Declaration on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) in November 2009. ➢ In January 2010, the City Council approved a subdivision to create a platted lot for the Fire Safety Center. ➢ Access to the site will be provided from Yankee Doodle Road (emergency vehicles only) and from Station Trail (a new road to be created with the development). The Advisory Planning Commission held a Public Hearing regarding the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Planned Development Amendment on February 23, 2010 and is recommending approval. 0-/? ISSUES: Since Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments are subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council, formal action on the associated Rezoning and Planned Development Amendment request will be withheld until the Metropolitan Council has responded to the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. However, it is appropriate for the Council to comment on the other requests at this time. Subsequent to review by the Metropolitan Council, if so directed, the following action items will come back before the City Council on a Consent Agenda: • To approve a Rezoning from Planned Development (PD) to Public Facility (PF) and a Planned Development Amendment to remove this property from the Planned Development. 120 -DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINES: May 20, 2010 ATTACHMENTS (4threugh Location Map, page Draft February 23, 2010, APC mutes, pages;throughg Planning Report on page hrough'Q4-n aa� Eagan Boundary Location Map Right -of -way OPara Park k A Arearea Building Footprint L9o �O C) L –� ❑ o� O - ❑ ❑ � lJ LJ - -_____ q C:) w . or:rrywtrrrre n •OQC7a a o ❑o 0o uoa ❑� o❑ ❑ o LJ � Door =�o� a ❑ p o❑ `� Q ❑ Q ' O ❑ I? cs c5 aQ Ada a ° .o a S7 � Q oo d Subject Site Q � a ° ID O f`I o ❑ �� oto ❑ 0 ❑ 4 � `� � � i} R °a i� o� � o� �� 8 ❑ � Q Q Gi Q o . 6 { 0 � it ran � c' �\ �\ c � � O d D jj ❑ � \ � 7� p p � p d b O OQC7�09� Q a Q � Q C O p b fl p p 0 o Q i] ❑ D O Q 0 ti d o d l Q O ❑ a o a pd fl _� O� a o a I❑ 4w p C— a p 0 C � p o❑ o ❑ poa❑ oo qa p o ° ° � o 97 1000 0 1000 2000 Feel Development/Developer: City of Eagan Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 14- PA- 01 -01 -10 oZ THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY N w e City of Eap The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are not responsible for errors or omissions. s Community Development Department Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Paae 14 of 24 C. Eagan Fire Station No 2 Applicant Name: City of Eagan Location: 1001 Station Trail; Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan fire Station No 2 Application: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Special Area(SA) to Quasi- Public File Number: 14- CG- 01 -01 -10 Application: Rezoning A Rezoning of approximately 5 acres from (PD) Planned Development to (PF) Public Facility. File Number: 14- RZ- 01 -01 -10 Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment to allow Public Facility building. File Number: 14- PA- 01 -01 -10 Planner Thomas introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated February 17, 2010. She noted the background and history. Chair Chavez opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Filipi inquired about the location and addressing of the building. Sam Bontrager, Architect, discussed the storage of two historical vehicles (police and fire). He explained that due to the small size of the vehicles, two double doors will be used approximately twice per year to move the vehicles in and out of the building. He stated the only public access to the building is from the south. City Planner Ridley clarified, public and volunteer firefighter access will be from the south off of Station Trail. Member Supina moved, Member Keeley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from SA, Special Area, to QP, Quasi - Public /Institutional, for a Fire Safety Center upon approximately 4 acres located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7 -0. Member Supina moved, Member Keeley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning from PD, Planned Development to PF, Public Facilities, upon approximately 4 acres located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7 -0. Member Supina moved, Member Keeley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment, to remove this property from the Planned Development, for this 4 acre site located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2, subject to the following condition: Advisory Planning Commission February 23, 2010 Page 15 of 24 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office, and proof of recording shall be provided to the City. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7 -0. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 2010 APPLICANT: City of Eagan PROPERTY OWNER: City of Eagan CASE: 14- CG- 01 -01 -10 14- RZ -01 -0 1 -10 14- PA- 01 -01 -10 HEARING DATE: February 23, 2010 APPLICATION DATE: Jan. 20, 2010 REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment PREPARED BY: Sarah Thomas LOCATION: 1001 Station Trail COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SA, Special Area ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from SA, Special Area, to QP, Quasi - Public /Institutional, for a Fire Safety Center upon approximately 4 acres located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. The applicant is also requesting a Rezoning from PD, Planned Development to PF, Public Facilities, and approval of a Planned Development Amendment, to remove this property from the Planned Development, for this 4 acre site located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: The city's Comprehensive Guide Plan was prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864. As defined by statute, the Land Use Plan is a guide and may be amended from time to time as conditions change. The city's Guide Plan is to be implemented by official controls such as zoning and other fiscal devices. The creation of land use districts and zoning is a formulation of public policy and a legislative act. As such, the classification of land uses must reasonably relate to promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. When a change to a city's Comprehensive Guide Plan is requested, it is the city's responsibility to determine if the change is in the best long -range interests of the city. The standard of review of a city's action in approving or denying a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment is whether there exists a rational .;Uv Planning Report — Fire Safety Center February 23, 2010 Page 2 basis. A rational basis standard has been described to mean having legally sufficient reasons supportable by the facts which promote the general health, safety and welfare of the city. Rezoning and Planned Development Amendment: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11. 50, Subd. 5 states in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two- thirds of all members of the council. 2. The City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUNDMISTORY The subject property was subdivided in 2009 to create a 4 -acre lot from part of the 75 -acre parent property, which is part of the former Carriage Hills Golf Course. The golf course closed to operations in 2005, and the property has remained vacant since that time. In 2008, the City approved a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Preliminary Planned Development plan for residential development on the entire 120 -acre golf course site. The northern approximately 1/3 of the property, was designated for high density residential use. In the Preliminary PD plan, the subject property was shown to accommodate two 30 -unit apartment buildings. On July 7, 2009, the City Council approved the purchase of this site for relocation of Fire Station No. 2, which is currently located north of Lone Oak Road on Lone Oak Circle. Subsequently, City acquisition of approximately four acres was negotiated with the owner, Rahn Family Limited Partnership, LLC. Zoning — In conjunction with the 2000 Comprehensive Guide Plan update, the zoning ordinance was amended in 2001 to establish a zoning district for parks and recreational open space (P, Park District) to correspond with the new land use designations of P (Parks, Open Space and Recreation) and PF (Public Facilities). The three golf courses in the city, as well as all the neighborhood and regional parks, received the Park District zoning designation in 2001 as part of a city -wide zoning map update to correspond to the amended zoning ordinance. The P zoning district allows golf courses and other uses as a permitted use with no restrictions on for - profit enterprises. In 2008, as part of the Wensmann proposal to develop the Carriage Hills Golf Course, the property was rezoned to Planned Development. Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan — The city's first comprehensive land use guide plan and map were prepared in 1974, after the golf course had been established on this site. That plan designated the property "Golf' and the map legend identified it as quasi - public and it remained so until 1991. In a comprehensive revision of the city's land use guide plan map in 1991, the City Council made a policy decision to change all schools, churches, parks, golf courses and other public or quasi - public properties to one of two designations, either P for Parks or PF for Planning Report — Fire Safety Center February 23, 2010 Page 3 Public Facilities to correct errors from previous maps and for consistency. This resulted in the PF designation for Carriage Hills Golf Course Property. With the city -wide update of the Comprehensive Plan in 2001, the PF (Public Facilities) land use designation was eliminated and the properties holding that designation were given a designation of either P (Parks, Open Space and Recreation), or QP (Public /Quasi- Public). The three golf courses in the city, including Carriage Hills, were designated P (Parks, Open Space and Recreation). In 2008, as part of the Wensmann proposal to develop the Carriage Hills Golf Course, the property was reguided to SA, Special Area #7, for Low, Medium and High Density residential development. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site consists of approximately 4 acres located in the NW `/4 of Section 14. The site is slightly wooded as it was previously cleared for golf course use; however, the golf course was closed to operations in 2005. A right -of -way easement for Yankee Doodle Road covers the northern 50' feet of the subject property. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: EVALUATION OF REQUEST Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: The applicant is proposing a change in the land use designation of this 4 -acre site from to SA, Special Area to QP, Quasi - Public /Institutional. The SA land use designation is typically used in areas "where unique circumstances exist that can best be dealt with in a manner specific to the area." The Special Area land use designation allows for the creation of a small area plan identifying a specific future land use plan and corresponding goals and policies for transitioning between existing and proposed future uses within the Special Area. The existing Special Area plan consists of a variety of housing types with a total not exceeding 480 dwelling units, and 30 acres of open space in a conservation easement. =11 Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Faithful Shepherd school BP, Business Park BP, Business Park East Dakota Woodlands shelter LB, Limited Business OS /Office Service South Vacant (former golf course) PD, Planned Development SA /Special Area West Vacant (former golf course) PD, Planned Development SA /Special Area EVALUATION OF REQUEST Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: The applicant is proposing a change in the land use designation of this 4 -acre site from to SA, Special Area to QP, Quasi - Public /Institutional. The SA land use designation is typically used in areas "where unique circumstances exist that can best be dealt with in a manner specific to the area." The Special Area land use designation allows for the creation of a small area plan identifying a specific future land use plan and corresponding goals and policies for transitioning between existing and proposed future uses within the Special Area. The existing Special Area plan consists of a variety of housing types with a total not exceeding 480 dwelling units, and 30 acres of open space in a conservation easement. =11 Planning Report — Fire Safety Center February 23, 2010 Paae 4 The applicant proposes the Quasi - Public /Institutional land use designation to allow for consistency with zoning of the property as PF, Public Facility. Rezoning: Public Facility Zoning - The purpose of the Public Facility zoning district allows for city, state, and federal government buildings. The Fire Safety Center is a permitted use in this zoning district. Planned Development Amendment: Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The existing Preliminary Planned Development identifies the subject site for multiple- family residential use. However, by processing a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, rezoning of the property to Pubic Facilities and amending the Preliminary PD Agreement, a fire station and associated public safety facility appears to be compatible with existing and anticipated future development in the surrounding area. Environmental Assessment Worksheet — The Preliminary PD established in 2008 identified that the proposed level of development of the 75 -acre parent property, triggered the need for a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) to be completed prior to any grading or development of the Property. Part of the negotiation with the property owner to acquire the subject site was the City of Eagan agreeing to manage the processing of the EAW. As a result, an EAW was completed and a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was made by the City Council on November 17, 2009. Airport Noise Considerations — The subject site is located in the Buffer Zone of Zone 4. A fire station is considered compatible within this zone. Description of Proposal — The project consists of a 38,750 SF building for Fire Administration offices, Fire Department and other public safety storage facilities. Six dormitories are also proposed as part of a student housing /training program the Fire Department has established. The proposed location provides a faster response time than the current Fire Station. Storm Drainage — A storm drainage and infiltration system will be constructed with the proposed building and Station Trail to provide service to this lot. Utilities — Existing sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, depth, and capacity are available from Wescott Woodlands for connection and extension by this development. Streets /Access /Circulation — Public street access is proposed at three driveway locations onto Station Trail, a street along the south edge of the development proposed to be constructed under a City public improvement project (City Project 1012). Station Trail will be extended west in the future to serve possible development of Carriage Hills. Planning Report — Fire Safety Center February 23, 2010 Page 5 Another driveway connection is proposed onto Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) to the north. Dakota County has indicated that this access will be allowed by permit, provided that it is used for emergency vehicles only. Pedestrian circulation in the area will be provided by a concrete sidewalk on Station Trail and a trail along Wescott Woodlands. Permits /Right -of -Way — A permit from Dakota County to allow construction of the emergency vehicle access onto Yankee Doodle Road will be required. Restricted access, in favor of Dakota County, will be dedicated along the entire development's frontage along Yankee Doodle Road. Wetlands /Water Quality — There are no wetlands on the property. Landscaping; — The Landscape Plan appears to be satisfactory. The Landscape Plan identifies two raingardens, one adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road and the other adjacent to Station Trail. A variety of deciduous trees, evergreens, understory trees, shrubs and perennials are dispersed throughout the site. Building foundation plantings and parking lot island plantings are provided. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION In summary, the applicant is requesting approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from SA, Special Area to QP, Quasi - Public /Institutional, a Rezoning from PD, Planned Development to PF, Public Facility, and a Planned Development Amendment to remove this property from the Planned Development, for this 4 acre site, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. The project consists of a 38,750 SF building for Fire Administration offices, Fire Department and public storage facilities. Six dormitories are also proposed as part of a student housing /training program the Fire Department has established. The proposed location provides a faster response time than the current Fire Station. The development will be environmentally friendly both in relation to building materials and landscaping. The Fire Safety Center appears compatible with anticipated and future development in the surrounding area. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from SA, Special Area, to QP, Quasi- Public /Institutional, for a Fire Safety Center upon approximately 4 acres located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. Planning Report — Fire Safety Center February 23, 2.010 Page 6 To recommend approval of a Rezoning from PD, Planned Development to PF, Public Facilities upon approximately 4 acres located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment, to remove this property from the Planned Development, for this 4 acre site located at 1001 Station Trail, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Fire Station No.2. If approved, the following condition shall apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office, and proof of recorded shall be provided to the City. �a� Eagan Boundary Location Map Right-of-way �Para Park k A Arearea Building Footprint fl ' � o ❑ E ❑ o� �lul w.o»� �{ ❑ G❑ ❑ - OBI(YAMKtl'DOODt! -R . a ED lU� �❑ O �d �o ❑D p o O OS3D9 L ��me ❑ 00 ooa o0 0❑ o00 000 ❑ 000�°O � o a d q ca 5 � Q o o Q �- ' Subject Site p � 3 ° q b QQ o 0 p. aao oa COP g q Oa 00 � Q p a ❑� I � ' � . � ❑. o� 0 � b P Q o 0 �� 3 � d4o � p � oo a p C D O q o paoo9 � O 4 Q e ° ❑ � o LJ ° b o a o a CI Z � 0 ❑ 0 T.T-1❑ �o _ ° p � o � p� $a P � � 4� 09❑ ❑ c p�oo p .�I-T� - T- � i�alp L7.V�1\ n r _ ,o C\ n� i �� 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: City of Eagan Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 14- PA- 01 -01 -10 Clty of Ea�� THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are v e not responsible for errors or omissions. S C--Ify D —I.p —t Dopsrt —nt I AIRE -VW ' .... .. . .. ... A KSS'l 45 Ut� Vm qW. tit _77 XA . 4Z, M. 20 PARKING SETBACK r, IT c N - 0 - 7 n - - BUILDING SETBACK ^ I oN< _ o zoy u, a O po O y c OZ A (n T r - - jZ Do, p o < 5 c O > O ; O D a3 m m n a 3 _ Revisions FIRE SAFETY CENTER SITE / Es '' �_�_ _ -- � STATION TRAIL City of c ' • 5'^ - - - -- - '- PROJECT # 1028 / 1012 - CONTRACT # 09 -20 - Engineenng DepaRmr_nt SITE PLAN BUILDING ELEVATIONS In O -s 4n ti ti O FM Jliq�jl LA W Nq p til L `7 --- RQ PUBLIC SAFTEY 0 ------- 0- ----- CENTER s PRELIMINARY C SEH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION H ti In O -s 4n ti ti O FM Jliq�jl LA W Nq p til L `7 --- RQ PUBLIC SAFTEY 0 ------- 0- ----- CENTER s PRELIMINARY C SEH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BUILDING ELEVATIONS 8, cl PUBLIC SAFTEY "CENTER 1, " lvs- z Jpm Will "E. 0- Mll fT 10 71 8, cl PUBLIC SAFTEY "CENTER 1, " lvs- z 8, cl PUBLIC SAFTEY "CENTER 1, " lvs- Will "E. 0- Mll 8, cl PUBLIC SAFTEY "CENTER 1, " lvs- PRELIMINARY W1 FOR CONSTRUCTION SEH 14 Will Mll Mi T1 9 21M" gi IYI PRELIMINARY W1 FOR CONSTRUCTION SEH 14 J� SEH Eagan Public Safety Facility 1001 Station Trail Eagan, MN 55122 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION Current Zoning: PD - Planned Development Proposed Zoning: PF - Public Facility New Public Safety Facility for the City of Eagan: Fire Administration offices, Fire Department, and Police Storage Facilities, approximately 38,750 Square Feet of program space broken out as follows: • West apparatus area: 5200 • East apparatus area: 5020 • Middle support area level 1: 3322 • Middle support area level 2: 3322 • Level 1 Training /Fire /Office: 9012 • Level I Police storage: 2855 • Level 2 Administration: 5016 • Level 2 Residential Dorm Area: 5000 Dormitories The residential dormitory area is for student housing / training program that the fire department has put in place. The program is to provide living quarters for students while in school and at the same time develop hands on training and 24/7 station call support. The Public Safety Facility material is as follows: Brick - 44% 9,299 sf Stone - 18.5% 3,932 sf Glass - 25% 5,293 sf Metal Panel - 12.5% 2,603 sf -;,' 3� _I Construction Bid Opening Date is set for March 4, 2010 and Constriction Start Date is set for April 1, 2010. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: Zoning Land Use • R4 — Residential Multiple • 13P — Business Park • I1 — Limited Industrial • PF — Public Facility • R2 — Residential Double • LB — Limited Business • Rl — Residential Single Family Impact on Surrounding Property and Land Uses: • Increased level of activity • Increased level of noise for response calls • Increased level of security for residents • Low level of public parking lighting and building lighting Impact on Subject Property: • Possible increase in storm water runoff but currently the civil drawings show all storm water is contained on site. • Removal of existing mature trees and replacement of trees removed Currently, the site chosen for the new public safety facility is in an area of the old golf course t1lat would have been very hard to develop into residential units due to the extreme contour undulation. The proposed building design for the public safety facility takes advantage of the uneven terrain by building into the side of the hill and also leaving the majority of the northeast corner of the site as is with minor disruption to existing grading and trees. Also, majority of the soil that is to be moved is replaced back on the site. The City of Eagan operates the second largest paid -on -call fire department in the State of Minnesota. They operate with an authorized strength of 150 volunteer firefighters and five fulltime administration staff. ;a j LiJi re nest of City Officials a fire station reloc time concert's in the In the 1990 s at the q by a consultant. The study leastudympecommendrd that fire station two berte° extensive as northern part of the city. Tl response times. Since then soon as possible to help it emergency p research has been completed to find a suitable site to relocate a fire facility to. roviding the The current site was selected for a number of reasons, all whiich ti tionalpstatisties show quickest response time possible to emergency calls or ximn ut 17 current that a fir doubles in size every minute and for emergency medical calls minutes can safety center in the heart of the City's busiest area and make a life or death difference. Thsa proposed site provides close pro volunteer firefighter homes, puts a y provided access to a major county road for quick access throughout the city. The site also affords the city to take advantage of some asrsome oak treles thatlare 50 s to incorporate green features into our project. The site Patel some will have to be removed for th project .e t While others will years old. Unfortur y be preserved. The trees that are removed will be reused m our p ad It will allow The site is also very public acilit and help educate the public on the visible to the OUT lonf a heavily used County o the city ndorsemrent olf geenrtechnology and the Green Globes process. Cities e Green Globes Globes is an online building and management environmental ental audit. it helps their buildings Green ty o rers measure the environm p property owners and manag 7 water, hazardous materials, waste against best practices in areas such as energy, . -1111 b t Green Building Initiative (GBI), a =etnet and indoor environment. It is a software based, online tool is green manag building certification. In the United States it is non- profit organization. n is to in 7 Initiative (GBI) is ',1.11 ot for profit organization effic' rinssiO and The Green Building green building ildin s ti promoting credible and practical g accelerate the adoption of building practces that result m g environmentally sustainable bu g levels that approaches for residential and commercial const c 5n1There are four rating buildings can achieve — 35 -54 %, 55-69%, 7o-84%. The Crty of Ear an has committed to achieving h at Ieast a 35 °'o rating level with the following goals: Geothermal heating and cooling system with vertical loop fields located beneath the public parking area. r insulation value in the tivalls and roof to rectum is needed ud cooling load, litghet r ('cothermal p thus reducing the size and number of t, p N40tion sensor lighting 7 t! i • Locating all offices and high -use spaces on the perimeter of the building to maximize natural daylighting benefits Clerestory windows in apparatus bay to reduce the amount of lighting fixtures needed • White membrane roof to help reduce turfing and h old grs ormwa ter underneath • Holding all stormwater on site by capturing the public parking lot and incorporating rain gardens Eliminating the need for an irrigation system for plants by installing native vegetation for minimal maintenance Planting a perimeter of no -mow grass and seeding the majority of the site with prairie grass unt of stormwater runoff from pervious Roof gardens to help reduce the amo material • Minimizing construction zone to preserve existing trees Promoting local material within a certain radius of the site Controlling construction site waste by recyclin� ar�wfloor / � unused material wall tile • Recycled content rn carpet squares, countertop • Milling existing trees that were on site for interior woodwork No Mow Grasses No -mow lawn mix is cosed of six slow growing fine fescue varieties, which are mpo more drought tolerant than standard lawn mixes due o lain deeper n °°nor st "lawn-like" turf can be mowed once a year when seed -heads appear look or it can be mowed every month or so at a height of 3.5-4" . l 4ngor a dark greensur idy look. The fine textured grass lies down by midsummer group, are carpet 3 -5" deep. No -mow grass is a fi fescue grass. leafed (0 3 2mnaw de grasses smaller species of grasses. They are slow growing, with blades that are very lax and flexuous so that then of the to Northeast and a upper at by mid- summer. They are found. throughout cool and Midwest. They tend to be qute shade tolerant and are, in fact, an important component in "shade grass" seed mixtures. Other key features of no -mow grass: • Reduce Watering • Reduce Maintenance • Reduce Chemical Use • Naturalize Area • Reduce Pollution By usinr� no -mow grass and prairie seeding, it eliminates burld naroerwater spigots for sprinkler irrigation system. Around the perimeter- of t landscaping purposes if needed. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 2010 Eagan City Council Meeting C. DIRECT IMPLEMENTATION OF A POLICY TO WAIVE CITY RIGHT OF WAY FEES FOR APPLICANTS DEPLOYING DIRECTLY TO MORE THAN 100 EAGAN HOMES OR BUSINESSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Council Directs staff to implement a policy in furtherance of its adopted broadband goals by encouraging fiber optic deployment directly to premises by waiving City Right of Way fees for applicants reaching more than 100 homes or businesses. FACTS: In its adopted 2009 -2010 goals the City Council called for: Ensuring "the economic competitiveness of Eagan's business and residential communities in the global marketplace by anticipating and addressing the evolving `infostructure' bandwidth, capacity and speed needs of Eagan's residents, businesses and employers." With the announced Google Community Fiber program and interest from emerging local Internet Service Providers (ISPs), there is an opportunity for Eagan to further encourage next generation Fiber to the Home (FTTH) and Fiber to the Premise (FTTP) business deployments by directing implementation of a policy waiving City Right of Way fees for providers willing to deploy high speed fiber optic cables directly to Eagan homes or businesses. Staff recommends that a threshold be set for such a policy [proposed at a minimum of more than 100 Eagan homes or businesses], to encourage providers seriously intent on fiber optic infrastructure deployment directly to a large number of Eagan premises. Directing implementation of such a policy not only demonstrates the City of Eagan is serious about attracting next generation broadband providers, but also the policy is another concrete step toward achieving the City Council's adopted broadband goals. Communications Director Garrison will be present to answer questions or provide further updates if needed. ATTACHMENTS: None a,�/ / AGENDA CITY OF EAGAN REGULAR MEETING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER MARCH 16, 2010 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ADOPT AGENDA C. CONSENT AGENDA 1. APPROVE EDA Minutes D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — Approve Grant Agreement with Dakota County CDA for 2010 Redevelopment Incentive Grant Program F. OTHER BUSINESS G. ADJOURN a�-� Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting March 16, 2010 NOTICE OF CONCURRENT ACTIONS The Council acting as the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority ( "EDA ") may discuss and act on the agenda items for the EDA in conjunction with its actions as a Council. A. CALL TO ORDER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To convene a meeting of the Economic Development Authority to run concurrent with the City Council meeting. B. ADOPT AGENDA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt the Agenda as presented or modified. C. CONSENT AGENDA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Consent Agenda as presented or modified. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — The minutes of the February 16, 2010 EDA meeting are enclosed on page<�q — ac G- MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Eagan, Minnesota February 16, 2010 A meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority was held on Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were President Maguire, Commissioner Bakken, Commissioner Hansen, Commissioner Tilley and Commissioner Fields. Also present were Executive Director Hedges, Community Development Director Hohenstein and City Attorney Dougherty. ADOPT AGENDA Commissioner Bakken moved, Commissioner Fields seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Bakken moved, Commissioner Fields seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 It was recommended to approve the minutes of the January 19, 2010 EDA meeting as presented. OLD BUSINESS There were no Old Business items. NEW BUSINESS NORTHEAST EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF SANDFORD AND PAVLIK PROPERTIES Community Development Director Hohenstein discussed a proposed stipulation of settlement for acquisition of the Marilyn Sandford property and the Frank and Patricia Pavlik property, both located in TIF District #2 -5. Commissioner Tilley moved, Commissioner Hansen seconded a motion to approve a stipulation of settlement for acquisition of the Marilyn Sandford property located in TIF District #2 -5. Aye: 5 Nay:O Commissioner Bakken moved, Commissioner Fields seconded a motion to approve a stipulation of settlement for acquisition of the Frank and Patricia Pavlik property located in TIF District #2 -5. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Q4'+ OTHER BUSINESS There were no Other Business items. M 1911N. 6110;IAM Commissioner Tilley moved, Commissioner Hansen seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Date Thomas Hedges, Executive Director a4-s Agenda Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting March 16, 2010 New Business 1. CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - APPROVE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH DAKOTA COUNTY CDA FOR 2010 REDEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or deny) a grant agreement with Dakota County CDA for a 2010 Redevelopment Incentive Grant. FACTS: • On February 9, 2010, the Dakota County Board approved a $250,000 grant to the City of Eagan for development preparation and enhancements within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. • An agreement between the EDA and the CDA is required to establish terms and uses of the grant funding. • The Dakota County Community Development Agency allocated funds for this program to assist cities and development entities in the County in meeting their redevelopment goals and to further the goals of the CDA. • The 2010 grant funds were approved for the following project activities: c Complete demolition work on two acquired properties, fonner Mediterranean Cruise and Sara's Laundry. (cost estimate $90,000) c Provide funding to construct a 1,250' trail from Cedar Grove Parkway along Gold Trail connecting the new Cedar Grove development and existing neighborhood to lower Woodhaven Park. (cost estimate, $55,000) c Provide additional funding to assist with utility and site preparation associated with the initial phase of the redevelopment. (remaining funds, $105,000) • The grant agreement requires a 2 to 1 matching amount which has been satisfied by the EDA through previous property acquisitions within the Cedar Grove area. • The agreement was reviewed by staff and found to be complete and ready for EDA President signature. ATTACHMENTS: • None aL[LQ Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting March 16, 2009 F. OTHER BUSINESS There is no other business to come before the EDA at this time. G. ADJOURNMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adjourn the Economic Development Authority meeting. aft