Loading...
04/08/1982 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission• • • ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 8, 1982 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 1982 3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS a) Cinnamon Ridge - Phase II b) Oakwood Heights Condominiums c) Midwestern Associates - Lone Oak Heights 4. OLD BUSINESS 5. NEW BUSINESS a) Recreation Brainstorming 6. OTHER BUSINESS /REPORTS 7. ADJOURNMENT TENTATIVE AGENDA a) Service Section 14 - Report b) Master Parks Plan - Revisions c) Teen Program d) Cedar Pond - Skating Program e) LAWCON a) Spring Parks Maintenance - Report b) May 6th A.P.R.C. Meeting - 6:30 P.M. Tour c) Parks Land Dedication /Park Plans • April 1982 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: CINNAMON RIDGE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 2nd Phase Background: The Cinnamon Ridge planned unit development, and Phase 1, was approved in the fall of 1981. The planned unit development parks dedication identified two park areas. The first park area is approximately 6 acres in size and is located on the north end of the plat. This acreage is beneath the NSP highlines and is also part of the storm water retention area. Con- sequently, only partial credit is to be given for this land. This triangular parcel is adjacent to existing City owned park land previously received as parks dedication. The second park area to be received is a 22 acre parcel located centrally with- in the development. To fulfill the total parks dedication requirement within the P.D., a cash dedication is anticipated in later phases of the development to make up the difference between the required dedication and the land to be received. Issue: Because the first phase of the development proposal did not include the park areas to be dedicated, no concept plans were developed identifying specific park uses. With the 2nd phase preliminary plat application now before the City, a concept plan is appropriate. Further, the original preliminary park configuration has been changed in the 2nd phase development plan. There- fore, staff has proceeded to work with a park planner in detailing potential parks development. The 2nd phase of Cinnamon Ridge has modified the shape of the park, and to some degree has lessened its suitability for development as a mini -park. Perhaps the most striking change has been in the long "finger - like" entrance to the park at the northwest. This entrance is nearly 450 feet long and is between twin homes. Staff, in working with a parks planner, has developed a preliminary concept plan, which was done in order to develop/ identify possible parks usage, identify any changes or problem areas in topography requiring modification, etc. Further, because the new shape of the park has had an impact on its use and suitability, it would seem appropriate that the City recognize the consequences of that and have the developer provide some commensurate development within the park. Concept Plan: The concept plan has been reviewed by staff as of Friday, April 2, but is not yet available for distribution to members of the Advisory Committee. This concept plan will be presented at the Advisory Committee meeting on April 8th for review. However, staff will be making the following recommendations concerning the centrally located 22 acre park. 1. That the developer provide a continuous 5 foot wide bituminous path- way through the park area connecting the two access points. 2. That the developer provide at the entrance points a bominite surface preceding the asphalt trail of 15 feet. 3. That the developer provide a bituminous mat suitable for use as a "half court basketball." 4. That the developer provide berming, as identified in the concept plan to highlight the entrance to the park. 5. That the developer revise the grading plan to correspond to the appropriate amenities as identified within the central park area. • • Cinnamon Ridge - Planned Unit Development - 2nd Phase - Memo April 1982 Page 2 6. And, that the developer provide a 5 foot wide bituminous trail of approximately 25 ft. in length into the 62 acre park in the north section. The developer has previously agreed to the grading and seeding of the park, which remains a condition of the plat. Staff has discussed these modifications with Mr. Steve Ryan of Zachman Homes who is in general agreement that these requests could be met if so recommended by the Advisory Committee. Staff has briefly reviewed the grading plan of the second park dedication of about 6 acres. Although the grading plan is very preliminary, staff has the following recommendations to make. 1. That a minimum .5% slope within the park be maintained to alleviate potential drainage problems in the south end of the park. 2. To provide a minimum of a 200' x 200' level play area in the south end of the park. 3. To preserve the existing vegetation along the south boundary of the park. These observations have not yet been discussed with Mr. Ryan however, but staff sees minimal variations to the existing plans to accomplish this change. The Advisory Committee may wish to consider the possibility of developing a preliminary sketch plan for the six acre park which is to be combined with the existing park acreage to insure that grades are appropriate for further park development. Action Requested: To review the concept plans for appropriateness and to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the park amenities as previously identified. April 1982 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: CINNAMON RIDGE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 2nd Phase Background: The Cinnamon Ridge planned unit development, and Phase 1, was approved in the fall of 1981. The planned unit development parks dedication identified two park areas. The first park area is approximately 6 acres in size and is located on the north end of the plat. This acreage is beneath the NSP highlines and is also part of the storm water retention area. Con- sequently, only partial credit is to be given for this land. This triangular parcel is adjacent to existing City owned park land previously received as parks dedication. The second park area to be received is a 22 acre parcel located centrally with- in the development. To fulfill the total parks dedication requirement within the P.D., a cash dedication is anticipated in later phases of the development to make up the difference between the required dedication and the land to be received. Issue: Because the first phase of the development proposal did not include the park areas to be dedicated, no concept plans were developed identifying specific park uses. With the 2nd phase preliminary plat application now before the City, a concept plan is appropriate. Further, the original preliminary park configuration has been changed in the 2nd phase development plan. There- fore, staff has proceeded to work with a park planner in detailing potential parks development. The 2nd phase of Cinnamon Ridge has modified the shape of the park, and to some degree has lessened its suitability for development as a mini -park. Perhaps the most striking change has been in the long "finger - like" entrance to the park at the northwest. This entrance is nearly 450 feet long and is between twin homes. Staff, in working with a parks planner, has developed a preliminary concept plan, which was done in order to develop/ identify possible parks usage, identify any changes or problem areas in topography requiring modification, etc. Further, because the new shape of the park has had an impact on its use and suitability, it would seem appropriate that the City recognize the consequences of that and have the developer provide some commensurate development within the park. Concept Plan: The concept plan has been reviewed by staff as of Friday, April 2, but is not yet available for distribution to members of the Advisory Committee. This concept plan will be presented at the Advisory Committee meeting on April 8th for review. However, staff will be making the following recommendations concerning the centrally located 21/2 acre park. 1. That the developer provide a continuous 5 foot wide bituminous path- way through the park area connecting the two access points. 2. That the developer provide at the entrance points a bominite surface preceding the asphalt trail of 15 feet. 3. That the developer provide a bituminous mat suitable for use as a "half court basketball." 4. That the developer provide berming, as identified in the concept plan to highlight the entrance to the park. 5. That the developer revise the grading plan to correspond to the appropriate amenities as identified within the central park area. Cinnamon Ridge - Planned Unit Development - 2nd Phase - Memo April 1982 Page 2 6. And, that the developer provide a 5 foot wide bituminous trail of approximately 25 ft. in length into the 62 acre park in the north section. The developer has previously agreed to the grading and seeding of the park, which remains a condition of the plat. Staff has discussed these modifications with Mr. Steve Ryan of Zachman Homes who is in general agreement that these requests could be met if so recommended by the Advisory Committee. Staff has briefly reviewed the grading plan of the second park dedication of about 6 acres. Although the grading plan is very preliminary, staff has the following recommendations to make. 1. That a minimum .5% slope within the park be maintained to alleviate potential drainage problems in the south end of the park. 2. To provide a minimum of a 200' x 200' level play area in the south end of the park. 3. To preserve the existing vegetation along the south boundary of the park. These observations have not yet been discussed with Mr. Ryan however, but staff sees minimal variations to the existing plans to accomplish this change. The Advisory Committee may wish to consider the possibility of developing a preliminary sketch plan for the six acre park which is to be combined with the existing park acreage to insure that grades are appropriate for further park development. Action Requested: To review the concept plans for appropriateness and to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the park amenities as previously identified. • • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION APPLICANT: ZACHMAN HOMES - STEVE RYAN LOCATION: OUTLOT B, CINNAMON RIDGE 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMI'riD: An application has been submitted for a preliminary plat, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots. LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned PD (Planned Development) and has an over- all density of 600 dwelling units in the 72 acres. It was determined when the PD was approved in August of 1981 that the land use was in conformance with Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. COMMENTS: As stated in the agenda, the applicant has submitted an application re- questing preliminary plat approval, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin hone lots located in part of Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition. There has been a miscommunication between the developer and staff, and the devel- oper is requesting besides the dwelling units listed above that also there be in- cluded 18 twin how lots and 72 townhome or condominium units. Since there was a miscommunication, staff had only advertised 42 dwelling units, and we are in the process of checking with the City Attorney to see if we can include the 18 addi- tional twin hone lots and the 72 condominium units. If this cannot be done, use will then continue the second portion of the plat until the April APC meeting. The staff report and information supplied by the developer includes the total amount of units and not only the phase that has been advertised. In reviewing the information submitted, the applicant has been very thorough in providing accurate information in regard to the Cinnamon Ridge development pro- posal. As stated in this report, the changes which have occurred are the reduc- tion of one single family lot, adjusting lot lines on the single family cluster lots and changing the mix of condominium units and tewnhome units. The original planned development had listed these- 16 family lots, 42 single family clus- ter lots, 50 twin hone lots and 192 condominium units. The revised plan will have 15 single family lots, 42 single family cluster, 86 twin home lots and 136 condominium units. NOTE: As you can see, the change from the PD is a net reduction of 21 dwelling units and the reduction falls by reducing the condo units by 56 dwelling units and increasing the twin home units by 36. CITY OF EAGAN CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO The applicant is proposing to construct Slater's Road and Cinnamon Ridge Trail to make a loop street with the Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. The Metcalf Drive and Slater's Road to Cliff Road will be constructed with the 3rd phase, or the plat- ting of Outlot A which would be the 72 condominium units on the west side of Cin- namon Ridge Trail. Therefore, Metcalf Drive will not be constructed with this 3rd Addition. Please refer to the memorandum prepared by Steve Ryan of Zachman Hanes for the detailed information regarding Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. Staff has reviewed the information submitted and all of the data is accurate in their calculation. The only additional information staff can provide are the conditions for the 3rd Addition. These are: 1) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 2) No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster hare development unless it relates to topographic conditions. 3) A development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to the construction of this phase. 4) The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engi- neer for the private drives for the cluster units. 5) All applicable ordinances in the City shall be complied with. 6) The Third Addition of the planned development shall be subject to the revised park dedication. DCR/jach ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 7) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right -of -ways and adjacent to private property. 8) A storm sewer system complete with temporary detention basins shall be constructed as a condition of this phased development. 9) The northern loop of Slater's Road and Cinnamon Trail shall be construc- ted as a part of this 3rd Addition .to provide for through - traffic move- ment. TAC /jach • • T0: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION - ZACHMAN HOMES The Public Works Department has the following counts for consideration of the above- referenced proposed plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water main facilities were provided to the general site as a part of Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition under Project 346. These utili- ties will be extended to serve this proposed 3rd Addition. STREETS With this proposed 3rd Addition, the Slater's Road/Cinnamon Ridge Trail northern loop will have to be completed as a part of this Addition to pro- vide through - traffic movement. As a condition of the preliminary plat ap- proval, it was stated that the Metcalf Drive connection to River Hills 9th Subdivision must be constructed as a part of the 3rd phase development along with the construction of Slater's Road to its intersection with Cliff Road. Although this preliminary plat is the 3rd Addition, it is only the second phase of their development and as such, the Metcalf Drive connection will not be a condition of this 3rd Addition preliminary plat approval. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The general drainage for this 3rd Addition is towards the north into the ponding area within the NSP easement along the northern boundary. This pond presently has a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east under the Cedar Avenue Freeway. A detention ponding area will be provided in the northwest corner of this plat in conformance with the approved grading plan and exca- vation permit issued with the 1st Addition. ASSESSMENTS Trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed against this property. The only future assessments an- ticipated with this 3rd Addition would be those directly related with the extension of the laterals necessary to service this 2nd phase. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -LAY Typical drainage and utility easements to incorporate the construction and extension of public utilities shall be provided as determined by the City staff. A 60' right -of -way for the Metcalf Drive connection shall be dedi- cated as a condition of this plat. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect pertaining to this report at the Planning Comission of March 23, 1982. TAC /jach • ZACHMAN HOMES March 10, 1982 Eagan City Council Eagan Planning Commission 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear City Officals: In looking toward the 1982 construction season, we see the slight possi- bility of a brightened economy and accordingly, an improved rate of housing sales and construction. As you may recall, the overall plan and first phase plat of Cinnamon Ridge was approved late last summer, forcing grading and utility construction into early winter. While we began marketing in late November 1981, our efforts were handicapped by the absence of a finished model home center, which is just now receiving its finishing touches. Despite the ill -fated timing of the first phase however, we find that our sales effort has been effective and the project appears destined for success. Consequently, we are now requesting your consideration of the second phase of Cinnamon Ridge, which involves development of the most northerly portion of the 72 acre Cinnamon Ridge project. Our proposal for this phase is fully consistant with the initial overal PUD approval, though it contains some minor modifications to density (reduced) and housing type (less condominium), both of which changes we anticipate being viewed positively, particularly by our surrounding neigh- bors. The specifics of our proposal are contained in the attached report. Respectfully; ZACHMAN HOMES, Stephe}i T. Ryan Director of Subidiv ions STR:cjc 7760 MITCHELL ROAD, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 1612) 937 -9520 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNAMON RIDGE 3rd ADDITION The area which comprises the proposed Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition is the north - end of Cinnamon Ridge project, legally described as Outlot B Cinnamon Ridge. (See Exhibit A). This same area encompasses approximately 31 acres,and as originally indicated, includes both the second and third phases of the overall project (see Exhibit B). We are requesting preliminary plat approval for tie entire northern area at this time, since our original project approval involved constructing the balance of the loop road connection during phase 2 and as such we will be dedicating that loop road with the next final plat. In the following paragraphs I will attempt to both cover the specifics of our current proposal as well as provide a comparison with our previous PUD approval. To assist in defining the major topics in the proposal, I have divided the discussion into the two areas of land use and transportation. LAND USE In reviewing the revised land use plan, (See Exhibit C) you may recall that the general placement pattern of the various land uses and housing types have changed very little. More specifically, the original plan indicated traditional single family lots adjacent to the Burnsville border (West edge) to smooth the transition from the existing single family homes in River Hills 10th Addn. This general pattern is re- tained, though, in the redesign, we have dropped one of the originally proposed lots. It should be noted that the lot which was dropped was not located abutting the border, and thus, the change does not reduce the amount border transition that previously existed. The single family cluster homes previusly propsed for the northwestern area of • the plat remain unchanged, though their location was adjusted slightly to accomo- date a change in the location of the NSP highline easement. On the eastern side of the plat, 84 units of eight unit building condominiums were originally proposed. This is the specific area which was originally identified as the third phase of the overall project. The revisions in this area involve a continuation of the present style of condominiums being constructed in the first phase; a reorientation of the buildings, such that their exposure to the Cedar Freeway is minimized and they are pulled further away from our nothern border; and a reduction of twelve units. In the original plan the balance (after 1st phase development) of the property located inside of the loop was identified as part of the second phase. The land uses in this area were indicated as eighteen units of twin homes, forty units of Condominium and approximately 21 acres of park. There are two modifications included in our current proposal regarding this area which need further discussion. First the forty units of condominiums have been deleted and replaced by thirty -six units of private association style townhomes. This change stems from our marketing experiences in Cinnamon Ridge thus far. Specifically, we have found extremely positive reaction to our (single family) cluster concept, due primarily to the fact that the concept matches housing type and lifestyle preferences at an affordable _price. At the same time, we are finding that many buyers have a preference for attached housing with the private association created lifestyle, but are not satisfied with accepting condominium housing in order to find the right price. In response to this marketing dilemma, we have found that a very pos- itive reaction exists towards two family attached housing constructed in a townhouse - like pattern, on a private street systme, with a Homeowners Association. This conce411 is viewed with enthusiasm since it provides the buyer with all of the perceived of single neighbor attached housing and managed property maintenance, and does so, at a price which is more affordable than the traditional twin home. • PROPOSED PLAN - CINNAMON RIDGE 3rd ADDITION Pg. 2 As a product of the townhome /condo revision, discussed above, the configuration of the park was changed from triangular to more rectangular. The park area,as now presented, is approximately 2.5 acres and includes larger entrance points along the public street. A final point regarding the revised design of the park, is that a through access (north to south) was incorporated in response to suggestions made by the park commission nearly one year ago. It is our impression that the the through access is superior to the previously approved configuration, in that it provides greater direct access to the northern portion of the development. A summary tabulation of land use specifics and changes is listed below. LAND USE BREAKDOWN COMPARISON Original Plan /Units LandUse /Housing Type Single Family Single Family Cluster Twin home Condominium Townhome • TOTAL Grc :s acreage: Gross density: Density net of park: Density net of Park & Public St. Density net of Park, Public street and Private Drives: Net Acreage & Building Coverage by Housing Type: 1. Single Family 2. Single Family Cluster 3. Twin homes 4. Townhome 5. Condo • 6 28 18 124 0 176 REVISED PLAN DETAIL BREAKDOWNS 31.12A 5.11 DU /A 6.94 DU /A : 7.94 DU /A 8.63 DU /A 1.51 A - 9.9% 5.06 A - 15.23% 2.15 A - 19.05% 4.17 A - 20% 7.23 A - 17.4% Revised Plan /Units 5 28 18 72 36 159 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNAMON RIDGE 3rd ADDITION Pg. 3 TRANSPORTATION Two topics exist within the general discussion of transportation: nature of road system & scheduling of construction (phasing). The nature of the road system, consistant with past approval$ is a system comprised of standard public roads and private driveways associated with the single family clusters, condominiums and now, the townhome revision. You will • recall that as the townhome area is a replacement for a previously approved condominium area , there is no additional private driveways, but rather simply a change of driveway alignment. , Regarding construction scheduling, as mentioned earlier, all of the public road with the exception of the Metcalf connection road would be constructed with the second phase. The final plat, when presented for phase 2, will include all of the single family, twin homes, park, single family clusters, townhome area, and right of way for the public street loop connection, leaving only the condo area (including the Metcalf connection road) as an Outlot to be final platted as the third phase in the future. As previously agreed, at such time as we final plat the third phase, we must dedicate the right of way for both Metcalf and the connection of Slater Road at Cliff through the South east corner of the overall property. This arrangement was originally agreed to since the additional road was not critical until such time as the condominiums in the third phase were constructed and because the construction of the second access point on Cliff simultaneous with. the Metcalf connection would remove any incentive (remote as it might be) to acce:... the site through River Hills 9th Addition to the north. Traffic generation for phase 2 is estimated to be distributed as follows: Single family 5 units = 50 trips per day Single family cluster 28 units = 224 " " It Twin homes 18 units = 126 " It " Townhomes 36 units = 252 " " " Peak hour trips = 65 trips 87 Units = 652 trips per day To assist in clarifing the previously discussed topics, , exhibits illustrating the preliminary plat, phasing, grading and utilities are included on the following pages. A final note regarding the exhibits concerns the grading and utilities plan. in that both are essentially identical to the original plans due to the minor nature of revisions. • • • •4S1 •rsireall OUTLOT B .4 \ a ZACHMAN HOMES INC. • • ••• •• T.11.77 NO OD ANC • T.11.17 DO BD LANE Q Pr .t 'se 111411 Iirtrs4.1•••• • • P/44 er 1 I 1%. ; • ' Ur • ■•• ) ) 111;•• Or weal... CINNAMON RIDGE • EAGAN. MINNESOTA 1 .1 V. CARTIER AVE • i ay • 41 • IIAKOta 1t4C. 4 1 ! yi • 1\ , auto si "41, • l a :a 4 . . z• 1 • MI IMO ••• 1 Fi St . FL r - 1 MCI L.] ZACHMAN HOMES INC. • + • • CINNAMON RIDGE EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 .� OP w a w • ARNOU¢c — PHASING PLAN • I • u • a o 0 I 0 IM ZACHMAN HOMES INC. • • • /.1L77.NOAD.1.1RE 11:17 80 BD. LANS • • • • . • , I . • •, „ • r .110. • • 1 ,L' / "" • .0 • 0., - ff. 1• CINNAMON RIDGE EAOAN, MINNESOTA gAH " • • • irt . • • • f • 2 •• CARTIER AVE. . . . I • 0 4 PRONT1101 SQAD • •••• . V II lee REVISED LAND USE PLAN • iv bey kg: LJ I• t . ZACHMAN HOMES INC. • — ' 13L�7 en BD. CAHl -- Oa. 4 ba! _.., • _ 1 I kr.I I i I r s AC:/ • //.. w W IT a�- r ki• Vi/ fir lS _ - .. . _-.I �. L � /' y ,, / / CARTIER AVL %< / • \\ / /N 4.4 .. / • l CINNAMON RIDGE THIRD ADDITION EAGAN, MINNESOTA , • ` roA µ' 1 y I-- row/mot / ��-- Ir.008 • er tr w moo II sir • OP or PRELIMINARY PLAT t 1 \ I r a'. ._. -j'/n 1 ZACHMAN HOMES INC. • • \� 7 - '1307 5411D• L ARE . r ` }— """ 1. � - ' -�` � J �111I' % � ........1e..11tilitt s ■ ' 1 OO 1 u r inoo i w or er it e c r .gg Yh .1• .74--- /.. (.\. --1-- 7,---\ ,i. (v- 7 ( r lY gi r a j sorm,to .4! _.., N 3,1 /I . / kr.U4/ IIr:LS ror.'r I:dio 1 I 1 I - 1 J___L .J_._i_.L.__J .. \,,, , d --- CARTIER AVL j } \\ / /N a4%Ne/., / .'...' • R '•• / *Q/ \ ' • � /! • 6 l • CINNAMON RIDGE mmm ADorno EAGAN, MINNESOTA -, ti iAowrAOr Al w ' PRELIMINARY PLAT ZACHMAN HOMES' INC. r • :t 8CDD.LAHS: • \ r' 2 ` • '�.' , t >NS go ; ; \ >. 1-7.:, ` • I r. •(�, i ,; ''� \ 4-Z,` - tr.' • f ?_i � \ ! ' 1 J \ X1 . ` ' 1 I i +. ",,5„:�= ����I``'''; 'i�. ; /'�' ' !o_'• `a - , ^� , `�����C ) / )�i� '''‘,... . / . • / • \ ,, T4 ,,, . . ‘ $ 1.4" . ',..-....'"?.;!,,,,, % "sy' .>: , N CINNAMON RIDGE TH+I1D ADDMON : PAGAN, MINNESOTA, �• lI tnniOlik f C i I �= i �• J I • Y , .J a .��..� • / CARTIER AVL • I Y ! � %, II M • GRADING 'KM!. • • • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: COUNTRY SIDE BUILDERS - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS The City has received a.preliminary plat of Oakwood Heights condominiums which is located in the Lexington planned development district. The application submitted is for 9.59 acres and contains 60 proposed condominium dwelling units. Because this preliminary plat is within the P.D. the Advisory Committee need not review for parks dedication. However, the Advisory Committee should make its recommendation concerning the necessity of a proposed tot -lot, which is shown on the preliminary plat as well as a bituminous trail running along Wilderness Run Road. The bike trail plan does show the continuation of the trail along this road- way extending to Dodd Road. Action to be Considered: A recommendation concerning tot -lot and bike trails as a condition of approval. • SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: COMMENTS CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS - JERRY LAGRO PART OF THE Nz OF THE SEa OF SECTION 26 PD (PLAITED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) WITH AN R -2, 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE MARCH 23, 1982 MARCH 18, 1982 DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMMED: An application has been submitted requesting a prelimi- nary plat, Oakwood Heights Condominiums, which consists of approximately 9.59 acres and contains 60 condominium dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the site is zoned PD (Planned Development District) and has a density of 3 -6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plat is part of the Lexington South Planned Development. The site is designated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan also as R -2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 3 -6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the applicant is proposing a town- house condominium development which is consistent with the 3 -6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, staff uses the R -3 zoning category with 6,000 square feet per unit density which would allow 7.26 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the maximum allowed units on the site at the 3-6 dwelling units per acre would be 58.5. The applicant is proposing 60 and the overall density of the development is 6.25 units per acre vs. the 6 units per acre allowed in the Planned Development zoning. The applicant is proposing to develop five 4 -unit condominium buildings, two 8 -unit condominium buildings and two 12 -unit condominium buildings for a total of 60 dwell- ing units. The site is bordered on the west, north and east by proposed park land and on the south by Wilderness Run Road. Enclosed is a copy of the land use in the Planned Development agreement for your reference. The site has a substantial d count of topographic relief as mentioned by the Engi- neering Report. This site also is wooded in certain areas so the design has been laid out in accordance with the topography and to preserve as many of the natural trees as possible. The applicant is proposing to provide access to this site from Wilderness Run Road. As mentioned above, park is surrounding all three sides of the development proposal. Therefore, there is no need to provide through access or continuity to other parcels of land adjacent to this development proposal. Therefore, the applicant is providing access to this site by private drives to • CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWUOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO provide his awn overall circulation for this particular parcel. ,The applicant is proposing a loop street through the southern portion of the site which will pro- vide access to 48 dwelling units. There is also a private drive running to the northern portion of this site which will provide access to the 12 northerly units Therefore, circulation in this plat is quite good although they are proposed to be private streets. The proposed development consists of 60 dwelling units and has a lot coverage of 18.4%. These densities were calculated not deducting the private street area. The private streets, if dedicated, would consist of approximately 2.2 acres and would allow a maximum of 57 dwelling units if calculated at the R -3 density, or 45 dwelling units, if calculated at 6 units an acre at the net density. The applicant is proposing to provide one garage space and 75 open parking spaces for a total of 2.25 parking spaces per unit. As you are aware, the Commission will be looking at the ordinance requirement to reduce the parking spaces fran 2.5 to 2 parking spaces per unit in multiple dwellings. Therefore, the applicant will be above the minimum parking requirements for the new ordinance. In reviewing the setbacks, it appears all setbacks are met between dwelling units and garage spaces with the exception there should be a 40' setback along Wilder- ness Run Road. Three of the four -unit buildings will have to be shifted to meet this 40' setback requirement. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A development agreement shall be completed prior to the construction of any of the dwelling units. 2) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 3) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Associa- tion bylaws for review. 4) The park dedication has been satisfied with the Lexington South Planned De- velopment. However, the tot lot provision shall be reviewed by the Advi- sory Park Committee for their recommendations. 5) A 40' setback for all buildings shall be required from Wilderness Run Road. 6) All other City ordinances shall be applicable for the overall development. ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 7) An 80' right - of-way should be dedicated for Wilderness Run Road in confor- mance with the existing street and utility easement adjacent to this plat. 8) Internal private drives shall be a minimum 28' in width constructed to a 7 -ton design with concrete curb and gutter. r • • CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE 9) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall'be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. 10) If installed privately, the utility layout and design shall he as approved by the City. 11) Trunk area storm sewer assessments shall be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 12) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this proposed plat. TAC /jach T0: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COPMuSSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS (COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS INC) The Public Works Department has the following information for consideration of approval for the above- referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water of sufficient size and capacity to service this proposed development was installed under Project 241 within Wilderness Run Road. Lateral extensions from these trunk utilities will have to be in- stalled through this development to provide individual services. STREETS Access to this proposed development will be provided by way of Wilderness Run Road which is presently being constructed under Contract 81 -14 (Pro- ject 345). Access throughout the plat is proposed by way of an internal private drive with two points of access onto Wilderness Run Road. Access to the garage units located on the northern portion of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail would be provided by way of a 650' private drive with a maximum slope of 8 %. Because of the existing topography, there is no practical way to have this private road looped with the other internal road and still be able to maintain a maximum of 8% grade. All private roads within this plat should have a minimum width of 28'. GRADING AND DRAINAGE There is a 50' differential from the northern end of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail down to Wilderness Run Road. Storm sewer laterals are presently being constructed within Wilderness Run Road from which exten- sions can be constructed to provide he required internal drainage. Be- cause of this deep topography, extensive erosion control measures will have to be implemented adjacent to Wilderness Run Road. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY While the City has obtained an 80' roadway and utility easement for Wild- erness Run Road, it is recommended that this entire 80' easement be in- corporated as a part of this plat and dedicated as public right - of-way in lieu of the 40' half right -of -way proposed with this plat. All other util- ity easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service will have to be dedicated based on the alignment of final detailed plans and specifications. If not dedicated with the final plat, it will have to be incorporated through a separate utility easement description to be dedicated to the City at a later date. A typical 10' drainage and utility easement should be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this plat. • • • CITY OF EAGAN OAKWOOD HEIGHTS - ENGINEERING REPORT MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO ASSESSMENTS Trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments have been levied along with lateral benefit from trunk utilities within Wilderness Rum Road under Pro- ject 241 previously. The only additional assessments that would be the responsibility of this proposed subdivision would be the trunk area storm sewer and any assessments associated with the internal streets and /or utili- ties if installed under a City contract. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Commission Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfull submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC /jach LOCATION MAP +` I tA 11 igel 6 �;.. 3_, imp, 0 1 . hk J 7. •w rq Oar 61.41• 16■•■■6 SLIME LAND SURVEYING INC. »..,..4,«.l +.Y. NOM 141111 w• r•1.Y • 0 6131 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT OFs OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS S v s,lrY. M • 04,00141 Mo111111 1411111111111 IW ion a 1.4 W14 »11 II t» Swot.. y4U1 of S»tw Y. 1•10114 II. 6 1.01 f7. W.a [4.!y. 0144.410 hurl. a 14114.: 1»1441. 11 to wtYesl 1•111 of 0.tl4l I, WNW. 11111 10111101. fa.las M t4, rotor. plat tW »I. 4.1• Ml•t• Cwt,. 01 11!+•..114 of ally to »1111 »11111.1.61 0111101 01011111 w . 1 al.l. o1 7 47. It.011»l, wl, • 114.111 .1141.16 tOeneo hat ally 1'» w 111 la Ur Nat, !..11111 [ 11 .I I 1» *ally .. • 1Yles o f t Yes Merl l » aWrfa 4h..4.. »4 la two. 1 11 .1 . W.» 0•rfa Il 1•n•11 11 •1 40Ias Y woo. last. 14.0141 M 4411 terse, • 11.1...6 of 146.111»1; IMaa as141l, • 11.1.' of 1.461 fool 1 ,•»»1111 .. r< 04. soot.... ». M • I7411170 oI 3111. it 1Mt a.1 a » 1»1 of 1 aryl 41 M »»I» 14 w.»1; W1• 104111 46 M.r.0 If *Nat. 14 Waal, [att. 1• Y W Iasi Ww11a.1 cares.. ...s• Of l , 1. t 14 1 »t, laud to 414 I 11111. M. • Y 1N..I Not along n .1J/ »t.Ya�..n twoave w .7 1• W r 4 11 Y.Ia 1 r ales of 100 YM,as tl womb. W1. W14 II 1 1»•16 aw,1 Y W.. W 1, » »114 1, a t4. 111 100400 1 W15IW . 1 41. at 216.11 foot lo t• a » 11 1w 1111.1 » e1 w Mlla » WY at 41.41 1. 414..1. 11 4116 1 41.11 Of W ...la».l 11111,11 G.. a a1fa I. 11 . n.» 61 .I4146.4 N »IW6 aa, ally all 1/411 1/411 I 041 111 o w. 41.)9 161; 0.4; fa4M 1 a Mato. Y 116 11 11 . W u a .1w. a1 I 111.14 *7 4 41414 I 0Mwa to at I 41 Y .lay. Y 144.6 Watt • 614 W41 al 410.11 N W 61St N WIa11. _Il Jr. Curry YY. lw {II » Ylw N114 wawa: C»ary.la .111»•• ISOO 0. 111.61.. Saran 114.1.... 111w•14 10130 EOM: I -1 Ipu 1.1 W 144.1! Il t1w N lama 11111. la.. 141 W .1.1.110 4»11.1.. W 11,.14 714. 1.1 I10a Mr tid .4 hw'4 11 • t4,' lael•W tY Mtl» Part... Oulu 100 11 Sad. 11114 .11,1 11w1a114. O1w•ela 1601 fatally cars If3 WI fall 1. I tr.. W correct .r•wd.11a •1 t .nay al l4. ■64.•111 N W 1W abeam W.cr1101 and al 401 1141!16 111 W1111141, 11 a1. Ira » » 4.41 1W. M4. Wt 1114 day 11 Nana 1111. Wlue OM 1..011116, 101, Y: W.-61Z1T s • f I • PICNIC REA I CONCRETE SIDEWALKS GRAVEL PATHWAY CONCRETE CURBS ASPNALTI PAVING . SITE PLAN PROPOSED. CITY, PATHWAY IYITEM so' ett 100' 10• SITE SIGN OENERAL NOTES 1. ALL ROADWAIWIDE S AND CUL-DE -SAC AREAS ARE t4'.0• t, ALL CURB RA011 AEC A MINIMUM OF S 3 DIMENSIONS BETWEEN PROPERTY LINES AND BUILDINGS ARE 30.0 MINIMUM 4 DIMENSIONS BETWEEN BUILDINGS ARE 30' -0' MINIMUM S DIMENSIONS DRTWEIN PROPERTY LINES AND ROADWAYS ARE 00 =0 MINIMUM V. EACH 11411 HAS 0041 ICAO. 4 tee GARAGE STALL WITH A 10' -0'0 LO' -0' DRIVEWAY FOR A0017101451 PARKING :BITE INFORMATION; PARKING PROVIDED GARAGE PARRIND DRIVEWAY PARKING (.UEST PARKING 517E AREA 354.510 50.11 • 5.11 KEES BUILDING BREAK. DOWN L• IL UNIT 0.M0014101UMS L4 U14111 3. 4 UNIT LONDON! 4.111013 00 UNITS L• 5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS 10 UNITS TOTAL GO UNITS • 0 1 1115 PER WIC UNIT BREAD DOWN 3 BEDROOM 4 UNIT! L BEDROOM 141011 LOFT 10 UNITS L DE 000011 30 UNITS 1 11101COM wilt DEN 15 UNITS TOTAL 60 UNIrO PARKING AT 0.03 STALLS PER UNIT . 133 STALLS 1.0 TOTAL - 136 00 STALLI I D STALLS • 4 Unit Building Front Elevation i w• 8 Unit Building Front Elevation, Yp o 12 Unit Building Front Elevation 1' Wood Siding j Brick Veneer! m• Brlok Veneer — Wood Siding • Side Elev.. yr Side Elevation ve . Side Elevation i re • M10 Sect. At Balcony r • III' iggt N = m ocn w2 003 oz =dam O -- c� 001E Y Z c m c U t¢O $ tOUwm I • 10 - 4Sr / // / / `._- .. / L // / ./ / / a. */ ro wf W.► ORADINO /EROSION CONTRO PLAN / 1 / 1 1 / 1/ / / / /,',/,; ,/ '/ e I ��5 ,/ ya �P • aq�o� , _ boo • / -.Roe. w s.u• - EROSION CONTROL. NOTES 1.- .........—. /.t•k «r...n» W.L «NA. W M• v1w f«ffl1Lfl .0 AT alr rO w«f bra... N •eww - M.r Y IA w. fr .+V• 1«t MY. e. ...w(M. 111\.x. r01 I.wwu(uw ww .4. N 401 M...+. nuww ✓1.+1 OMM1.ra « ..•.w• wr. • - '.t.• 1.0. kw. •. ••0 ..f. •f .....f oa WO./ Kw .qW r.}• .r0 /.T■.K Y ./ PK• } - Mrr.I w.uw Nc.v .f n+ •rsn ✓.- t...r9 NM• o+t.n.• o...w•.. MILLM n• +... c wnw. M lw ....w) M Id -.' ... tTl 0..400 ?Y1e.•i«WM.. • -J 1 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE QT. NARL {LAME MC LOOT [f MA NARSNALLL 1,•N IRA.INU• P••N•VLVAM.11 O {• l{ NM :0"tAN NtPI! /LAi1,NOlORf I St0 10 LL 6TDVAIA iNOf 0 .t• 21 RO RUS• IAN OLVA CI Al ANUS A U•TI IOLA 4'4 Poi N 9 9 RRD iN144E0 OWNOOG CORNUS •i0t ONI /{M •.,A' /OT Lb •• SMOOVN SUMAC km. 41 St 4' Poi LANDSCAPE PLAN I • so■o 10' 00' • • _ R II 7 _ NESS vCaUS .. ,., .00 II 1 CSCI GB/ ROSEMOUN • R -II 3 _B L -2 6 N . 1 1 f 1 1 �0 9 �..� s ac — ' - .. --- ---.,. at..Ei 11111 11 1111111111111 11111111?1111111111111Tt .R .. _ .. .... _ _ ..� - - ,- - - -. • - .- 4. o, • r 1 So8EC AroPE I1 \o ♦� • { d - 6 •kc 1 AlkN Illaint 1 fjtsiiiil 1 11111` 1111111111111 1 E • R.2 14 • • • • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION April 1982 RE: LONE OAK HEIGHTS - MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES The City has been reviewing a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights with several revisions having been made as a result of planning committee and public concerns. The preliminary plat was recently approved by the A.P.C. The parks dedication for the plat has previously been dedicated - Pilot Knob Park - and is fullfilled in its entirety. However, the Advisory Committee should review the plat for a recommendation concerning tot -lots and trail connections from the development to the park. • CITY OF EAGAN • a SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS APPLICANT: MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES - ORRIN AUNE LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 9 EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) WITH R -3 (RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE AND R -4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) UNDERLYING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights, which consists of approximately 14.09 acres and contains 125 dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R -3 (Residential Townhouse) and R -4 (Residential Multiple) with a PD (Planned Development) zoning overlaying the entire parcel. The land use guide designates the 14 -acre parcel as an R -3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6 -12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development will consist of approximately 10.1 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the Land Use Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: As you may recall, a public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the September 22, 1981 meeting to consider a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to several conditions. The City Council discussed the preliminary plat application for Lone Oak Heights at the October 20, 1981 meeting. In order to study the potential costs of dawn- zoning the subject parcel, the City Council con- tinued the preliminary plat application until the study could be completed. After reviewing the down-zoning study and after considerable discussion, the City Coun- cil denied the preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights at the January 19, 1982 meet- ing. The reasons for denial were: 1) The proposed north /south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School as it ran directly along the east boundary of the school. 2) The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .9 %. The R -4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20 %. 3) The proposal for parking for the overall development was less than the 2.5 spaces per unit requirement. CONITS The applicant is proposing to develop the parcel with condominiums and town- houses and quadraminiums. The proposed plan will consist of 2 condominium build- ings with 36 dwelling units each, 33 townhouses and 20 quadraminium dwelling units. CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO As stated earlier, the parcel is divided into two areas according to the zoning. The R -3 parcel consists of 7.5 net acres and would allow 54 dwelling units. The developer is proposing to develop 53 dwelling units in the R -3 parcel for a total of 7 dwelling units per acre. The R -4 parcel consists of 4.7 net acres with a density determined on a sliding scale. The two condominium buildings will be 3 stories and contain 36 one - bedroom units and 36 two - bedroom units. The zoning ordinance would require 194,400 square feet with a mix of bedrooms as proposed. The net area of the R -4 parcel is 206,944 square feet which is 12,544 square feet over the zoning ordinance requirement. Be- low is a density chart describing each of the parcels. PARCFT, ACRES LOT DWELLING DWG.UNITS PROPOSED REQUIRED USE COVERAGE UNITS ALLOWED PARKING PARKING Condominiums 4.7 12.6% 72 180 180 Townhouses 7.5 17.6% 53 54 132.5 132.5 Parcel No. 1 - Condominium Apartments - The applicant is proposing two 36 -unit condominium buildings. Each of the condominium buildings is 26,260 square feet in size. The net area of the R -4 parcel is 206,994 square feet. The lot coverage of the two condominium buildings is 12.69% which is under the 20% allowable cover- age requirement. There are 72 dwelling units on the R -4 parcel which is 4.7 net acres which equals 15.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing un- derground garages for the covered parking space requirements. There will be 1.5 open parking spaces per dwelling unit which meets the present requirement. If the City feels two parking spaces per dwelling unit is sufficient, the applicant would be agreeable to such a plan. All setback requirements have been met for the condominium buildings. Parcel No. 2 - Townhouse Development - Parcel 2 is proposed to be constructed with 20 quadraminium dwelling units and 33 townhouse dwelling units. The required site area for the 53 dwelling units is 318,000 square feet and the applicant is pro- viding 328,829 square feet. Therefore, the applicant is providing an additional 10,829 square feet of area in the R -3 parcel. The 33 townhouse units and 20 quad - raminium units have a total building area of 57,752 square feet which is 17.6% of the total area provided in the R -3 parcel. The 53 dwelling units are located on the 7.5 net acres of the R -3 parcel which equals 7 dwelling units per acre. The access to the property will be from Lone Oak Road on the north and Towerview Drive on the south. The applicant is proposing a 60' wide public street to run north/ south through the development. As stated earlier, one of the reasons the City Council turned down the original preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights was due to the fact that this proposed north/south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to the Pilot Knob School. In an effort to meet the City Council requirements, the devel- oper has relocated the road away from the school and centered on the property. • • CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE • PARKS AND OPEN SPACE There are still sane questions regarding the gas main which crosses the norther- ly portion of the property. Staff has been contacted by a representative from Northern States Power, and they would like this preliminary plat to be subject to the relocation of the gasline easement to the satisfaction of Northern States Power. The southwest portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob Park. The northerly portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob School. Therefore, there is open space immediately to the west to provide the park needs. It is staff's understanding that the applicant has dedicated the land for Pilot Knob Park. Therefore, there will be no park dedication for this proposed development. However, staff is requesting that there be a trail connection from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School some- where between the condominium project and the townhouse development. The appli- cant shall also provide one tot lot to provide the needs for the pre - schoolers within this development proposal. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated as to not interfere with any of the proposed buildings and also to the satisfaction of the Northern States Power Company. 2) The plat should be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff. 4) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5) The developer shall provide a tot lot for the proposed pre- schoolers with- in the development. 6) The developer shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominium and townhouse development. 7) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Asso- ciation bylaws for City review. 8) A development agreement and planned - development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat application. 9) The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission since the plat abuts two County roads. DMO /jack CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE FOUR ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 10) .A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right- of-way and along the west boundary line. In addition, drainage and utility easements incorporating the internal utilities re- quired to service this development shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. 11) The internal private road shall be constructed to a 28' minimum width with concrete curb and gutter to City approved plans and specifications. 12) Previously deferred trunk area water assessments and lateral benefit from trunk water main shall be assumed by this development as a condi- tion of final plat approval. 13) A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Tawerview Road. 14) Tawerview Road shall be ordered for improvement prior to final plat approval. TAC /jach • TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING CctMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS • i DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LDNE OAK HEIGHTS ADDITION (MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES) The Public Works Department has the following comments to offer for consid- eration of the above- referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation is available by way of the recent extension of the sanitary sewer from the east side of Pilot Knob Road under Project 347 in 1981. Water service is available from the existing 12" trunk water main on Lone Oak Road and the existing 12" trunk water main on Towerview Road. An internal water lateral connecting these two trunks through this plat will provide the internal water service of sufficient pressure and capacity to handle this proposal. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The general topography of this property slopes from the north and south to- wards the middle of this plat where there presently exists a 24" trunk stone sewer. This storm sewer has sufficient capacity to handle the anticipated drainage fran this proposed development. The internal laterals and catch basins will be required to convey the drainage to this trunk facility. STREETS Access to this proposed development will be provided by an internal public street connecting Lone Oak Road with Towerview Road. Lone Oak Road was re- cently upgraded to its final design standard as a part of the Pilot Knob Rd. upgrading in 1981. However, Towerview Road presently exists as a substan- dard gravel road providing access to the Univac water reservoir. Tawerview Road will have to be upgraded to the City standards from Pilot Knob Road to the west boundary of the park property adjacent to this development as a condition of this plat. This upgraded road will provide the acess to this plat and Sperry Univac's addition which is presently under construction. The developer is proposing to service the townhouse units adjacent to Pilot Knob Road by way of an internal looped private drive. This private road should be constructed to a minimum width of 28' with concrete curb and gut- ter to a 5 -ton design. _ EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY Sufficient right -of -way for Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road has been pre- viously acquired by the County in conjunction with the recent upgrading in 1981. A 30' half right -of -way shall be dedicated for Tawerview Road adja- cent to the southern boundary of this plat. The internal public road shall be provided by way of a 60' public dedication of road right -of -way. Typical CITY OF EAGAN ENGINEERING REPORT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 10' drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all private property and public right -of -way adjacent to or within this peat. Internal drainage and utility easements must be dedicated to provide for the installa- tion of public utilities to service this development. The exact location will be defined at the time of detailed plans and specification preparation. The location of the proposed westerly condominium facility requires the relo- cation of the existing Northern States Paver gasline easement. This relocation shall be in conformance with NSP requirements. ASSESSMENTS The following outstanding assessments will be the responsibility of this de- velopment as a condition of final plat approval. They are calculated in ac- cordance with the 1982 rates. However, they shall be levied at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 1) Trunk area water assessment (deferment from 1976) at $995 /acre 13,631.50 2) Lateral benefit from trunk water main (Tawerview Rd) at $18 /ft. 10,362.60 TOTAL: $23,994.10 0 There are presently several pending assessments associated with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road pertaining to street improvements and/or trunk storm sewer costs under Projects 200 and 177 respectively. All costs associated with the internal distribution of streets and/or utilities will be the responsibility of this subdivision. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Commission Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfully submitted, M E, Atit Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC /jach • • • C":11 Engineers Land Surveyors Planners CONSULTANT: VaIIey Engineering Co., Inc. LANE OAK HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EAGAN Telephone 447 - 2570 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Midwestern Associates, 8337 Delaney Circle, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. 55075 Telephone: 459 -7120 (Orin Aune) Valley Company, Inc., Ron Swanson/Steve Harvey, P.O. Box 478, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372, Telephone: 447 -2570 PROPERTY LOCATION: The proposed project is located in the Southwest Quadrant of Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. No. 26) and Pilot Knob Road (Co. Rd. No. 31). PROPOSAL: GENERAL: The site is presently zoned PD (Planned Development) with an underlying zoning of R -3 (Residential Townhouse District) and R -4 (Residential Multiple District). The city land use guide designates the site as R -3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6 -12 dwelling units per acre. The request is presently submitted with 125 dwelling units on 12.30 net acres giving an over all density of 10.2 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the land use guide plan. Lone Oak Heights was before the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission for a public hearing on September 22nd, 1981. The project was given preliminary approval at the time subject to several conditions. Following the Planning Commission approval there were several meetings before the Eagan City Council. On January 19th, 1982 at a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council the project was turned down for the following stated reasons. 1. The proposed north -south road (Shields Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School (the road on the original submittal ran along the east boundary of the school). It was agreed that the road should be a through street between Towerview and Lone Oak. LONE OAK HEIGHTS page 2 2. The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .9% i.e. the R -4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20%. As shown on the herein contained site data sheets the revised proposal has met or exceeded all of the lot area, coverage and density requirements as set forth in City Ordinance No. 52. The road has also been relocated away from the school and centered on the property. This meets the Council requirements and also is in harmony with the Dakota County requirements as set forth in the attached letter. (see Exhibit "A" attached hereto). DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: It is the intent of the Developer to develop the PD in phases beginning with the most northerly condominium building as Phase I and the quadraminium units as Phase II anticipating an absorption rate of 40 to 45 dwelling units per year. The estimated price range of the units would be $40,000 to $50,000 and would be sold in fee as individual units with two separate Home Owners Associations, one for the condominium units and one the townhouse quadraminium units. ' It is the intent of the Developer to provide the required landscaping, screening, etc., and to use construction materials in conjunction with architecturally designed facades for a pleasing visual effect. Each townhouse and quadraminium lot would have its own designed landscape plan consistent with its building type. All parking would be paved and non - landscaped areas would be sodded. The, proposed mininum set• -backs are consitent with the zoning ordinances for the total site. Financing for the PD would be through conventional methods and FHA and GI Guaranteed Home Loan programs through Banco Corp. The Developers Financial capabilities can be verified by personal statements and /or conformation from the Developers bank if required. CIRCULATION /POPULATION: The proposed PD will have excellent access to both county and state highways. - The toal site will have vehicular access to Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road via the proposed north south collocter street (Shields Lane) and Towerview Road as shown on the proposed plat. Pilot Knob Road has been upgraded to provide access to the proposed interstate 35E and 494 intersection. At present there is a city park adjacent to the southwestern boundary of the site and an elementary school on the northwestern boundary. The proposed PD provides for a walkway access to carry the present and future pedestrian traffic from Pilot Knob Road to the western boundary. It has been estimated that the population of the PD will be 342 of which 41 will be school age children. • • LONE OAK HEIGHTS page 3 TOTAL PLAT AREA Gross Area Less Shields Lane W Less Towerview R/W Net Total Plat Area • 630,710.2 Sq. Ft. 77,257.7 Sq. Ft. 17,629.4 Sq. Ft. 535,823.1 Sq. Ft. R -4 AREA, DENSITY AND LOT COVERAGE Gross R -4 Area Net R -4 Area Less Shields Lane RAI _ - 37,826.6 Sq. Ft. Net R -4 Area required Net R -4 Area Provided = 244,820.7 Sq. Ft. = 206,994.1 Sq. Ft. PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS 36 - 1 - Bedroom units @ 2,900 Sq. Ft. 36 - 2 - Bedroom units @ 3,100 Sq. Ft. Less credit for underground parking (per ordinance) (72 x 300) * Proposed R -4 is 94% of allowable density PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER ORD. Required 2.5 per unit = 72 x 2.5 Provided Total Provided on plan LONE OAK HEIGHT'S, EAGAN, MINNESOTA SITE DATA SHEET a = 14.479 Ac. + - 1.774 Ac. + -0.405 Ac. + 12.300 Ac. + 5.620 Ac. + -0.868 Ac. + 4.752 Ac. + • 104,400 Sq. Ft. = 111,600 Sq. Ft. • - 21,600 Sq. Ft. • 194,400 Sq. Ft. • 206,944 Sq. Ft. 180 Parking stalls 72 Garages 108 Parking Stalls 180 Parking units LANE OAK HEIGHTS page 4 COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R -4 2 Buildings @ 202 x 65 = 26,260 Sq. Ft./206,994 Sq. Ft. = 12.69% Allowable Coverage = 20.000 DENSITY 72 Du/4.752 net acres COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R -3 33 Townhouse units Building area 20 Quadraminium unit Building Area Total Building Area = 15.15 Dwelling units per acre R -3 AREA, DENSITY AND LOT COVERAGE Gross R -3 Area = 385,889.5 Sq. Ft. = 8.859 Acres + Less Shields Lane R/W = 39,431.1 Sq. Ft. - -0.905 Acres + Less Towerview R/W = 17,629.4 Sq. Ft. = -0.405 Acres + Net R -3 Area = 328,829 Sq. Ft. = 7.549 Acres + PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS Quadraminium Units = 20 Townhouse Units = 33 Net Proposed Dwelling Units = 53 Total Area Required by Ord. = 53 x 6000 Sq. Ft. = 318,000 Sq. Ft. Total Area Provided = 328,829 Sq. Ft. Proposed R -3 is 96.7% of allowable density or 54.8 D.U. allowed. R -3 Lot coverage = 57,752 Sq. Ft./328,829 Sq. Ft. = 17.6% Allowable Coverage = 20.0% Density 53 Du/7.549 net acres = 7.02 dwelling units per acre = 39,272 Sq. Ft. = 18,480 Sq. Ft. = 57,752 Sq. Ft. • • * LONE OAK HEIGHTS page 5 • • 1. , • • • . 4...,St s4u,, i cOlhArer r 1 i .% ! g 4 ' ".; .t. 5-- 4 t ,...- V, / Ft - .4 :_. It= '1r .-."--..:-€. ......._.A.c.os ' -, f., S.'1.___:_ - • ir r r — r --.---- ", --, -- N-_ 5•C I 4..17 .2_ _ _________,,..:_ t,.. • ' C:r....irr., ir.64.4 ,..., -r --i-.-- ' , ••• ' e4 . " ." ' i ' , .....'-' V - .. . po c -- 1 ... -1E4-, ;" • I! a:' ./ -•_'• ! kg _ •— ,---- /, ' , E '•J i l' f __/,••• ' 1 , S . .6 ? i , I MENDQTA s i te 1 cill I , ...-.... -- .. i 2 , i -- `:f -,•`' # I 1 iI " '" - , I I- '------ ..v. 4 • — 4 -'-' i -1.4 vr" : 4 , ....` 3 '..; .• S c • I I ;,,,..: •:i // J i 3 E I ■ , . ........:_: - -,- 7 - 4.. . E E • • - C . .1.• i fr _ 4. I $- , - - 7. z . _ , , z _ .• , .....,,, ....---.,. I / SITE LOCATION MAP • •°: P.. &•;__-... 5 4 11 4 .7E 1 1 • - . r'..4?!.. _, ••E 11! , ' , 11- . 4 OISE:am sC.S , •0 _..,/, a■ .1 11 11 T • _ zPo I Ito \ . 10-- as _.„,'" ■ s it."' .1 . - 7.•4 ' g - - . Ls7. - - ..c .. .---.----.7" - ) — . - - 17 -- -- - — . -r 1.6.___ _ ......____ ___._,, .,....____., _____ - .....: -_ . ,-,...., . e....„ '* ; -- ",__"'t 'y..”: SE I., . - : 4 •••• ,•• ...' e ....,<,,, - -- , -7,. — ' V • t.':..k - „.....„... ,,,,“ ,,......„,.., ...,..• : -. .. , ., , ,, N .• ...1;' 75( ' ., ---, • . -,.,•-••• i ......- •r? , .__.- , ,.. K -.'. i %Th ---.1. ,,,„,... 1 .7. _./ .",... • 1.::•..... . / ...--1-- . - . • ' il ”' 1.:.. - 1 ..^ '.,. ..? '!•.------ .-..,,. ..„, ,, . •', -•f.. ISL. -.-1 i,i .` . . _ , pp. - ..„.• 4 .,,.. • .777, tr- z•'' i . . i: z -... -,..,-,. 9 ., 1-.. ..,4 - ..'Ir ...... - , .... , , . _ - - • • ,.. slE . -,-- ig PoLict 4 7 tif l r•T -ft a -.... 3? . .1 , *. • .. t`C ..(y.t' 41 • :4 a . : , : eT.t....,./ ........-; ' •-•=4 ( •=4. - -1—_____ ,rzti v KCXV .• . :• ..V: --...... - ..' - r•:-7 ‘ ,...i i , ..r. • !, 1 -1 • y ,,---, y " .1, ' 7-. ,,.1..A .... 1 .:. ..- - - - p- ••••••-1 ,..r.,-...• r., 4-'•'',. 6. 4 • . ' - ,-•:-.. - •••,,•.."....:--- FL , W77711.‘ ■ ., ., .i=,.____.......„...=tati.,....t,,...0 -.... . ''' , * N . ' 5' '''''e • `......riL .." ,‘ ;.; .---' ""'"`"' - '--.* •!,-,•-•* . _ . 4 i.•. t . • ----- i-.7 -... .. -( 77,7 ../.i.4 ,''''',,.,.,e,■.,..1....n,-.....0....-...,,2-2 — ---- -\•.=--,-- ■• 4 . ''' - C•_-"3" - . 1 • • 4,7 1. __,.... .. .....--- ■••' I A A CI I -t9. 4.4..... ;,_ : 17;-,-:1=4,- , -11 7,-...-__ ' i • -. - --- . _CARrof LANA, - E ' .."-... PIP;g •-••••,# N‘ tr' t s 1 .... i ,,1 . Zi... -- l''/ 1 ' '-• , .■!: 1., • ! E ; , ! ,_____,,■•••- s e r ,17 ---. 0 : Jr% .... • ' 1 ; E ,.... .......- s i .,..._ : s_ 11-71.'7 tti .. • :.• • LANE OAK HEIGHTS page 6 DESCR PT10N5 FOP PFOPaCED PLAT The 'trtheast Quarter ' f the Northeast ?lister of Section. 9, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota excepting therefrom the following: 4 1. That part of the Northeast quarter (NE 1/4, of the Northeast quarter (NE 1/4) of Section Nine (9 Tourah.up Twenty-seven (2 Range Twenty-three (23), particularly described as folLowr; Beginning at the intersection of the East line of Oslu d Timberline Addition as platted and the North line of Section Nine (9), Towrs`ip Twenty -seven (27), Range Twenty-three (23); thence South along said East lire a distance of X60 feet to a point on said line; thence East along a line parallel to the north line of said Section a distance of 859 feet to a point: thence North along a line parallel to the east line of Oslund Timberline Addition as platted a distance of 560 feet to a point on the North line of sadi Section vine (9); thence West along the North line of said Section (9) a distance of 859 feet to the place of beginning. 2. That part of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 9, Township 27, Range 23, nakota Canty, Minnesota, described as follows: =orrnenci.»q at the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter ''.c^. 1 4; of Section. 9: theme mouth 0 degrees :2 - .`lutes 32 seconds West (for the purses of this :e the North line of the Northeast ':uar-ter ('E 1,'4: of the vortheas : ;NE 1/4'; of ;a_' Section 9 has an :>_ssumed bearing of 5o1,:th 39 degrees 53 minutes 2G seconds East to the .afth line cf the North. ESC.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter ;NE 1/4) of the Northeast 'tuarter 'NE _. 4:, said point being the point of begin_. of the land t _ degrees 02 = =� to be described: thence continuing 3a._. minutes 02 seconds :rest to the South line of said Northeast Quarter QCE 1/4; of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) : thence Easterly along the Salth line of said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4; of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1,`4) a distance of 666.41 feet; thence North 0 decrees 02 rincotes 02 seconds East to the South line of the North. 660.00 feet of said Northeast _ rter (E 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter ( NE 1/4); thence Westerly along the South line North 660.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (,E 1/4) to the point of beginning. 3. That part of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9. Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County ;, Minnesota, lying south cf the nort`. 33.00 feet thereof which lies east of Line 1 and west of Line 2 de.scribed as follows: Line 1 is a line 55.00 feet west of, as measured at right angles to and parallel with, the following described line. Beginning at the northwest rest corner of said Section 10: pence south along the rest line of said Section 10 a distarre of 482.39 feet: thence along a tangential c.1- :e to the right, laving a central angle of 1 decree 00 minutes 00 seconds and a tangent of . :' feet, a distance of 200.00 feet: thence southerly tangent to the last described -1r :e a distance of 259.33 feet: theme along a tangential curve to the left, having a central angle of 1 legree 30 mimites 30 seconds and a tangent of 100.00 feet, a distance of 200.00 feet: thence southerly tangent to the Last described curve a distance of 200.00 feet there heir iraLi g. 'tine 2 is aline 33.0: feet west of, as measured at right angles to and parallel with. a line _ra•.r. from a oci.t on the north, line of the northwest :.aster of Section 10, Twnship 27 Range 23, :akota County, Minynes -ta, distant 8.8G feet east of the northwest oorner thereof to a point on the south Line of the northwest 'quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section IC distant 10.30 feet east of the southwest oornner thereof. Tot: ether with he south 22.00 feet of the north 55. ^C feet of the northeast quarter of the northeast r r er of sail_ Section 9 what.'' lies west of the of :rementioned Line 1 and east of the west '19.30 feet of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section. 9. 4. T:at :art of the NE 1/4 of the 'E 1;•4 of 3ectior. 9, Trw+rh.ip 2 Runge 23 lying north and east :f Exception 4 3 (the Old rights for :ore 'ak Road and pilot Knob Road). • • • • February 1, 1982 Mr. Orin Aune Midwestern Association 1405 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Aune: As we discussed, upon review of the proposed plat at the southwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road, I submit the following: 1. Because of conflicts with heavy traffic on Pilot Knob Road, lack of right turn lane, grade conflicts and left turn congestion at the Lone Oak signal, only access from Lone Oak Road (300' west of intersection) and Tower View Road will be allowed. Sincerely, 7 Larry G. Figgins, P.E. Administrative Design Engineer LGF /bv DAKOTA KOTA I'O1'.VT ]" •DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 55 - HASTINGS, MINNESOTA S5033 EXH/ BIT ROBERT P SANDEEN. P E COUNTY ENG:N1.E4 TELEPHONE 612.317 O!98 F9EL R P IE�6RW A FOR T PLAT MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES .4O] LORE OAK ROAD EAGAN. MN 53.21 LONE OAK HEIGHT' VALLEY ENGINEERING CO, INC SUITE 204, WATERS EDGE OFFICE PLAZA PO. BOIL 4713 PRIOR LAKE. MNNESOTA 53372 TEIEPwONE (612) 447 -2570 r E LONE OAK ROAD (CO ROAD No 26 1 1 YALE 1 nes* A. • PO40 555Z1 I 1 - LONE OAK ( CO. ROAD NI • • ' LONE OAK \ \ \ • N \ \\, TO'WERV'EW SUITE 204. 'NATE PS EDGE OFFICE PLAZA PO BOX 4'8 PROP LAKE , MINNESO 55372 TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570 HEIGHT'S 8( ROA 0 /' I / 4 7 I , .•: .• • i -3C 571704 TOW VIRTER57444 11114110,11.5 A10•1 IIVORANT ASSOILY 0011111411E EMOTION 051570147 SY174470 SEWER -■-5 8 %N.. maa•f• %NV Ma ON, onwheillm• ••••• 8.= ••••■•• //• a••• •• • - ---,—. - - 0•••■•• — No •• leo MY.. •••••••••• LEGEND — -.MEM 4 • , ° LONE OAK 4 -- •tz; • " •-•■••. . sr.( SOTA 55 372 TL PHONE ( 612 ) 441 I 1 HEIGHT'S )/ 20 ' I R _ , ■ , ',....______ _ TOWERVIrty_ . ,--r ri titW u ' - 3 - --t0A p -7-----a- 7,. - / _ ./ th s , „......— —. \ ,.., / il . V. ...... :li Ile , ( 1 \ \ ; tii , I / ; ,, / I I I r • • t P sarroman par*ToM (omit aro • r_t 111. !P S LEGEND ---- ■ MY WIMPY WIER —s-......_ .---$......... S701110 WWII —11. ST--••■ —0-.41 .., •--, INITERIIPM . ' — VP --■ ......—F—... ...,4 CAT0061•11 (3 . 1. • ....'t ..--0■-,. ■■•••■•■•■• !MUNT "stow ---2.--, L___„,_ : COETE461)(t — E LL ---PPP--...—. I •••••• m•••• aim ma at rewrap. Arun •••••••••• ••I ••• • ••• • •••••••••• ••••••• ••••• Ow MI* of VI. at Wow.. awl itak...c1Z121•••••• - IB -- , r' 7 • rwR RI • COMMERC PLANNED DEVI R -4 RIDGE NB AtNIP VALLEY 3RC S,1Fd HIGH 'VIEW LI • A n 4 1 • 1 rD r• f T r T # T -7- �R© twin R -4 PAR • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: PARK LAND - SERVICE SECTION 14 April 1982 Background: At the March committee meeting the Advisory Committee requested a background report concerning park land Service Section # 14. This report was requested because of the development of the Carriage Hills - proposed Orrin Thompson development within this area. Service Section: This service section is bounded by County Road 28 on the north and Wescott on the south, Lexington on the west and Elrene on the east. Carriage Hills golf course is centrally located within the service section and comprises approximately 80 acres within the service area. South Hills, located in the southeast corner, has a majority concentration of residents, with scattered home sites throughout the remainder of the service section. Currently population estimate is 150. With the soon to be com- pleted Carriage Hills 1st addition, consisting of 144 units, the mixture and population density distributions of the area will change dramatically. Future Development: Carriage Hills 1st addition will account for approxi- mately 367 people (144 units x 2.55). Future development in this addition will account for an additional 300 units. The preliminary plat for Lexington Place - recently reviewed by the Advisory Committee and still in the prelimi- nary plat process - is proposed for 672 units or 1,713 people. Combined, the area population concentration may increase to between 2,845 and 3,000 people. (Note: 2.55 is the current resident per dwelling unit figure caculated for population estimates by the City) Park Site: The development sub - committee of the Advisory Committee has re- viewed a potential park site within this service section, generally located near Wescott Road. The City has been looking toward acquiring a neighborhood park in the area of between 10 to 12 acres. The general area is now zoned as agriculture and City assessment records indicate that there are three individual land owners who control the majority of the land within the general area identified as a potential park site. The City's planning director has indicated that there have been no conversation with developers concerning potential development of this area within the recent year although a recent check shows a "for sale" sign on the property. Summation /Consideration: The service section is currently being developed with some intensity along the western edge, although the area proposed for park land has yet to be of interest to developers. Parks dedication from the Carriage Hills and proposed Lexington Place developments should generate park fees of nearly $265,000. This fund could be used to finance a purchase of park land. Since the City is currently embarking upon its Master Parks Plan, direction to the consultant to pay particular attention should be given. Assuming the results of the Master Plan concurs with previous needs, the City may wish to begin negotiations to purchase the preferred park area or to purchase a major portion of the park with the dedicated park funds. Such a purchase might be a contract for deed or other form of negotiated, long term purchase agreement which would allow the City to acquire the property now and pay for it as dedicated funds become available. The option of buying a significant amount of the park land might also be reviewed with • Park Land - Service Section 14 - Memo April 1982 Page 2 park dedication being required as development occurs to enlarge the park to its ultimate size. Staff will review this park service section needs with the consultant to be sure that the City will be able to make a timely entry into an acquisition of park land. • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: MASTER PARKS GUIDE PLAN April 1, 1982 At the conclusion of the March 30th meeting, direction was given to review the proposed fee schedule and scope of services with Mr. Erkkila of Erkkila and Associates, to see what revision could be made. This review has now been concluded. In the process of the review, it was the intent to revise, delete, defer or refer to staff, those items that would reduce costs and yet maintain the in- tegrity and end product quality anticipated in the document. In presenting this to you for review, you may wish to refer back to the Scope of Services as an aid. Review is made of each segment within the Scope of Services, the proposed change and saving made from the originally proposed fee schedule. Section I: Inventory and Analysis Change: City Planner to collect and prepare update on demo- graphic analysis of each service area; do projections under direction of consultant. Rationale: This is one area not previously identifiable as being done by staff. The planning direction will be involved in other aspects of the project. Additional work beyond this does not seem advisable nor appropriate to the consultant. Section II: Neighborhood Workshops Change: Rationale: Saving: $400.00 Director of Parks and Recreation and Advisory Committee members ( 1 per session) to play increased role. Consultant has concluded that a reduction could be made with the knowledge that staff can prepare and take an active part in group sessions. Saving: $1,000,00 Note: It was also agreed that consultant and staff will con - duct one additional City wide meeting. This will allow those residents who were not able to attend their area meeting an opportunity to meet. This session will also include those groups who wish to represent special group needs. • Page 2 Section V: Public /Private Recreation Study Refer: Data Collection to Advisory Committee Rationale: Advisory Committee members could areas for review /data collection Director of Parks and Recreation to direct collection input; user etc. Consultant to do analysis, dation, etc. Section VI: Special Use Facility be assigned specific . Consultant and to act as "supervisor" types, availability, input, policy recommen- Saving: $900.00 Change: Refer issue relative to Ice Arena /Pool to Director of Parks and Recreation; all other issues to remain responsi- bility of consultant. Rationale: The Director of Parks and Recreation has had 12 years direct experience with pools /arena. Consultant will act as "supervisor" for this plan segment as well as performing other special use facility study. Section VII: Preliminary Plans Saving: $900.00 Change: Delete 2 undeveloped park concept plans. Rationale: The Scope of Services called out for development of "10 to 12" concept plans. A limit of 10 concept plans has now been agreed to rather than the 12 that were quoted. If during the planning process a lessor number of parks is to be considered, a further reduction in the contract will then be made. Saving: $1,600.00 Change: Delete 5 graphic revisions. Rationale: The consultant had included an option to revise 10 concept plans. Deletion of 5 of these possible re- visions would result in a saving. The contract will still provide some funding for 5 plan revisions, if they are not needed a reduction in the contract will be made accordingly. Section VIII: Final Plan /Documents Saving: $ 750.00 Change: Reduce copying and reproduction, lump sum estimate. Rationale: The consultant had included a lump sum allocation for printing, reductions, etc. This lump sum has been re- • Page 3 Section IX: Maintenance Plan duced - City to provide copying capabilities for in- ternal and public documents. Sufficient money to pro- duce 50 copies of the final document revisions. Saving: $2,000.00 Change: Refer to Director of Parks and Recreation for completion; consultant to review and critique; final revision pre- pared jointly. Rationale: This segment of the plan is significant for staff and City officials to better develop an understanding of the long range growth and the interrelationship of men,'equip- ment and service levels. Because of the frequent oppor- tunities to review aspects of the plan jointly during the process many of these implications will be discussed. Staff can prepare the plan; and present to the consultant for review and critique, with revision made as appro- priate. Saving: $2,300.00 Staff also reviewed the elements dealing with ponds and lakes, and horse/ snowmobile trails. No changes were made in these segments as staff would not be able to handle identifiable or separate tasks. Consequently, no changes are recommended. Saving made in the preceding would result in a contract price of $42,750.00. This fee could yet be reduced during the course of the study as previously identified. While this fee is still somewhat higher than the proposal from Brauer and Associates, this writer is of the opinion that Erkkila and Associates proposal will provide a broader service in better detail with greater public involvement and is superior to Brauer. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: CEDAR POND PARK - SKATING AREA April 1982 Background: At the March 4, 1982 Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee meeting, the winter skating report summarizing the 1981 -82 winter skating season was presented. At that time staff expressed some concern about the limited attendance at Cedar Pond Park. After discussion about the limited attendance and concern for the budget, it was the direction of the Advisory Committee for staff to prepare alternative recommendations for potentially reduced operations at this park for the 1982 -83 skating season. Review: Cedar Pond Park is a Class C rink which was opened on December 19 and closed on February 12th. This early closing was due to the fact that the maintenance tractor broke through the ice and the department's concern for public and staff safety. The departments attendance records indicate that the seasons highest attendance was 12 which occurred on the 30th of January of 1982. Averages, however, tell that there were between 3 to 5 skaters rer day. Attendance records also indicate that there were large numbers of "zeroes" recorded. Typically, it would be safe to summarize that there was greater attendance during the early part of the season, (December) but as the season progressed there were higher number of days without skaters. The department has maintained a warming house facility at Cedar Pond staffed with attendants. The review of this years actual cost for the warming house attendants during the past season was $764.15. Cost for maintenance of the skating facility, that is clearing of snow, brooming, flooding, are not kept on a per site basis. Consequently, staff is not able to provide you with accurate information in regards to these costs. Incidental costs related to fuel, electricity, and satellite expense was $354.59 for a total cost of $1, 118.74. Options: 1. Provide the same level of service in 1982 -83 as in the past; no change from 1981 -82. Rationale: Despite its limited attendance at this facility some services still need to be provided. Maintenance staff, which has been providing the Class C level of service is able to continue to provide this service with - out seriously jeopardizing the level of service to other skating facilities which services a larger number of skaters. Until such time as there is an increase in the number of hockey and /or open skating facilities at other neighborhood park locations, and the level of service not hindered at existing locations, maintenance staff could continue to maintain the Cedar Pond Park rink at its current status and level of service. 2. To close the warming house facility, but maintain the same level of mainte- nance service to maintain the skating rink. Rationale: Maintenance staff is still able to provide the existing level of service at the Class C facility in terms of snow removal, brooming and flood- ing. Until such time that there are demands placed upon the maintenance equipment and staff this level of service could be provided to this facility. • • Cedar Pond Park - Skating Area Memo April 1982 Page 2 By closing and removing the warming house facility, cost of attnedants is saved. Provisions for bench type seating to provide those skaters who still desire the opportunity to skate on the pond, should be provided to allow skaters to sit and rest. 3. Close the warming house, discontinue maintenance of the facility. Rationale: Because of the limited number of people attending this facility and making use of its services the City should seek to save the cost of warming house facility attendants and facility maintenance costs. The temporary warming house shelter could be moved to another location or utilized at such time as skating rinks are expanded in other popular neighborhoods. The pond is part of the storm water draining system and the safety of personnel and equipment is always in danger because of thin ice. The resources of staff and equipment could be better utilized at maintaining existing facilities, trails and /or better service provided. Rahn community hockey, Woodhaven and Carnelian rinks are all within 3/4 mile radius. Action: The three options and rationales present areas for discussion for the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee to make a determination and /or recommendation. Staff would prefer that the Advisory Committee make a determination prior to the 1983 budget preparation so operational cost can be anticipated and included in its planning for the next year. Or other direction from the committee as may seem appropriate. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: L.A.W.C.O.N. GRANT APPLICATION - 1983 On March 30th, the Metropolitan Council and State Planning Agency held its informational meeting concerning the next round of LAWCON Grant Applications. The deadline for fiscal year 1983 applications are due on April 30th. Because of Federal and State government cutbacks there is only one - million dollars of LCMR funds available. Based on the formula of appropriations to developed, developing and free standing growth centers, along with the priority given to water based recreational resources, it appears that Eagan would be competing for approximately $300,000 of grant funds. Although staff does not like to be pessimistic, the expectations of receiving any grant funds in the next fiscal year is not probable. Last year there was approximately 17 million dollars in funding requests from the State LAWCON program of which nearly half came from developing communities such as Eagan. It is the intent of the department staff to submit a grant application once again for the development of Rahn Park facilities. Staff would like to re- submit this application for several reasons; one because it is a significant and desirable project for the community and two to continue to keep the needs of Eagan for this facility in front of the appropriate departments of State government. Should funding levels ever increase again from the Federal govern- ment, the fact that they have had an opportunity to see this grant application previously would enhance its probability of approval at some later date. De- spite the fact that communities are limited to receiving approval of one grant per fiscal year, department staff is considering submitting applications for two to three additional projects. These include Coachman Park development, development of the Fish Lake Park property adjacent to Denmark, and an acquisition on Thomas Lake combined with development. A potential for these three has only been preliminary looked at by staff and bears further review and consideration before a final determination is made. The grant writing process is time consuming and requires conceptual sketch plans submission. However, the ranking for each of these three projects with the State seem appropriate. Briefly, Coachman Park is a low density area and is distant from similar recreational facilities. Consequently it may be ranked high. Fish Lake Park has previously been identified as a potential opportunity for fishing with access off of Denmark. Because water based resources have been ranked highly in the past, the development of this park could be seen as a highly regarded parks development project. However, there is additional data that must be accumulated and other obstacles cleared before this potential project might be submitted. Thomas Lake Park acquisition and development is a third potential application. Members of the sub - committee have previously looked at the proposed park land dedication Blackhawk P.U.D. as it abuts Thomas Lake Road. There is insufficient park property on the west to allow for access. It's possible that an application could be submitted for additional acquisition utilizing soft match from the park land dedication which would not then cost the City any "matched or hard dollars." Again while this is a water based project and does carry some merit there are a number of issues which would have to be negotiated with the property owner and an understanding developed before such an application is made. This memo is being provided as a informational item, no action by the Advisory Committee is necessary at this time. • • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMI'I"I'EE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: PARKS LAND DEDICATION /PARK PLANS April 1982 The following thought has occurred to me during the recent "park concept plan" review; which I would like to discuss with the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee. In the future, when plats contain proposed parks dedications, that the City employ a parks planner to review with staff the proposal. An analysis would be developed, with recommendations. In addition a concept plan would be de- veloped showing tentative park plans, tentative grades, etc. It would not be a detailed Master Plan. The intent would be to prepare a plan for the park that would meet the needs of the area and those that were identified as a re- sult of the Master Plan. Cost for this would be the responsibility of the developer! Cost for such a plan can vary - but could cost from $900.00 to $1,400.00 dependent on size, detail desired, revisions, etc. Action: The Director of Parks and Recreation would like to discuss this idea with the Advisory Committee on an informal basis. Action is not requested at this time. BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR 0 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS April 6, 1982 Mr. David S. Novitzki Manager Ft. Snelling State Park Highway 5 F, Post Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55111 Dear David: KV:bp CITY OF EAGAN 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE 454 -8100 It's been several weeks now since we met with the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District concerning the possibility of a boat launch facility on the south side of the Minnesota River beneath the Cedar Avenue bridge. I'm inquiring as to if you are aware of any further developments since that meeting in regards to he progress being made on this proposal? As you know, the City of Eagan, and particularly this department, is interested in seeing this project proposal proceed and developed to its utlimate design as early as possible. The City believes this would be a tremendous asset to •';is community as well as this region providing a desirable recreational resource. Please keep me posted on any development as you are made aware of them. If I can be of assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: COUNTRY SIDE BUILDERS - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM April 1982 The City has received a preliminary plat - of Oakwood Heights condominiums which is located in the Lexington . planned development district. The application submitted is for 9.59 acres and contains 60 proposed condominium dwelling units. Because this preliminary plat is within the P.D. the Advisory Committee need not review for parks dedication. However, the Advisory Committee should make its recommendation concerning the necessity of a proposed tot -lot, which is shown on the preliminary plat as well as a bituminous trail running along Wilderness Run Road. The bike trail plan does show the continuation of the trail along this road - way extending to Dodd Road. Action to be Considered: A recommendation concerning tot -lot and bike trails as a condition of approval. • • • April 1982 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: CINNAMON RIDGE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 2nd Phase Background: The Cinnamon Ridge planned unit development, and Phase 1, was approved in the fall of 1981. The planned unit development parks dedication identified two park areas. The first park area is approximately 6 acres in size and is located on the north end of the plat. This acreage is beneath the NSP highlines and is also part of the storm water retention area. Con- sequently, only partial credit is to be given for this land. This triangular parcel is adjacent to existing City owned park land previously received as parks dedication. The second park area to be received is a 21/2 acre parcel located centrally with- in the development. To fulfill the total parks dedication requirement within the P.D., a cash dedication is anticipated in later phases of the development to make up the difference between the required dedication and the land to be received. Issue: Because the first phase of the development proposal did not include the park areas to be dedicated, no concept plans were developed identifying specific park uses. With the 2nd phase preliminary plat application now before the City, a concept plan is appropriate. Further, the original preliminary park configuration has been changed in the 2nd phase development plan. There- fore, staff has proceeded to work with a park planner in detailing potential parks development. The 2nd phase of Cinnamon Ridge has modified the shape of the park, and to some degree has lessened its suitability for development as a mini -park. Perhaps the most striking change has been in the long "finger - like" entrance to the park at the northwest. This entrance is nearly 450 feet long and is between twin homes. Staff, in working with a parks planner, has developed a preliminary concept plan, which was done in order to develop/ identify possible parks usage, identify any changes or problem areas in topography requiring modification, etc. Further, because the new shape of the park has had an impact on its use and suitability, it would seem appropriate that the City recognize the consequences of that and have the developer provide some commensurate development within the park. Concept Plan: The concept plan has been reviewed by staff as of Friday, April 2, but is not yet available for distribution to members of the Advisory Committee. This concept plan will be presented at the Advisory Committee meeting on April 8th for review. However, staff will be making the following recommendations concerning the centrally located 21/2 acre park. 1. That the developer provide a continuous 5 foot wide bituminous path- way through the park area connecting the two access points. 2. That the developer provide at the, entrance points a bominite surface preceding the asphalt trail of 15 feet. 3. That the developer provide a bituminous mat suitable for use as a "half court basketball." 4. That the developer provide berming, as identified in the concept plan to highlight the entrance to the park. 5. That the developer revise the grading plan to correspond to the appropriate amenities as identified within the central park area. • • Cinnamon Ridge - Planned Unit Development - 2nd Phase - Memo April 1982 Page 2 6. And, that the developer provide a 5 foot wide bituminous trail of approximately 25 ft. in length into the 62 acre park in the north section. The developer has previously agreed to the grading and seeding of the park, which remains a condition of the plat. Staff has discussed these modifications with Mr. Steve Ryan of Zachman Homes who is in general agreement that these requests could be met if so recommended by the Advisory Committee. Staff has briefly reviewed the grading plan of the second park dedication of about 6 acres. Although the grading plan is very preliminary, staff has the following recommendations to make. 1. That a minimum .5% slope within the park be maintained to alleviate potential drainage problems in the south end of the park. 2. To provide a minimum of a 200' x 200' level play area in the south end of the park. 3. To preserve the existing vegetation along the south boundary of the park. These observations have not yet been discussed with Mr. Ryan however, but staff sees minimal variations to the existing plans to accomplish this change. The Advisory Committee may wish to consider the possibility of developing a preliminary sketch plan for the six acre park which is to be combined with the existing park acreage to insure that grades are appropriate for further park development. Action Requested: To review the concept plans for appropriateness and to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the park amenities as previously identified. • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: L.A.W.C.O.N. GRANT APPLICATION - 1983 April 1982 On March 30th, the Metropolitan Council and State Planning Agency held its informational meeting concerning the next round of LAWCON Grant Applications. The deadline for fiscal year 1983 applications are due on April 30th. Because of Federal and State government cutbacks there is only one - million dollars of LCMR funds available. Based on the formula of appropriations to developed, developing and free, standing growth centers, along with the priority given to water based recreational resources, it appears that Eagan would be competing for approximately $300,000 of grant funds. Although staff does not like to be pessimistic, the expectations of receiving any grant funds in the next fiscal year is not probable. Last year there was approximately 17 million dollars in funding requests from the State LAWCON program of which nearly half came from developing communities such as Eagan. It is the intent of the department staff to submit a grant application once again for the development of Rahn Park facilities. Staff would like to re- submit this application for several reasons; one because it is a significant and desirable project for the community and two to continue to keep the needs of Eagan for this facility in front of the appropriate departments of State government. Should funding levels ever increase again from the Federal govern- ment, the fact that they have had an opportunity to see this grant application previously would enhance its probability of approval at some later date. De- spite the fact that communities are limited to receiving approval of one grant per fiscal year, department staff is considering submitting applications for two to three additional projects. These include Coachman Park development, development of the Fish Lake Park property adjacent to Denmark, and an acquisition on Thomas Lake combined with development. A potential for these three has only been preliminary looked at by staff and bears further review and consideration before a final determination is made. The grant writing process is time consuming and requires conceptual sketch plans submission. However, the ranking for each of these three projects with the State seem appropriate. Briefly, Coachman Park is a low density area and is distant from similar recreational facilities. Consequently it may be ranked high. Fish Lake Park has previously been identified as a potential opportunity for fishing with access off of Denmark. Because water based resources have been ranked highly in the past, the development of this park could be seen as a highly regarded parks development project. However, there is additional data that must be accumulated and other obstacles cleared before this potential project might be submitted. Thomas Lake Park acquisition and development is a third potential application. Members of the sub - committee have previously looked at the proposed park land dedication Blackhawk P.U.D. as it abuts Thomas Lake Road. There is insufficient park property on the west to allow for access. It's possible that an application could be submitted for additional acquisition utilizing soft match from the park land dedication which would not then cost the City any "matched or hard dollars." Again while this is a water based project and does carry some merit there are a number of issues which would have to be negotiated with the property owner and an understanding developed before such an application is made. This memo is being provided as a informational item, no action by the Advisory Committee is necessary at this time. • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS - MASTER PARKS GUIDE PLAN March 15, 1982 City staff has reviewed consulting firms to perform the Eagan Master Guide Plan. Final interviews have been scheduled for March 30th at the Eagan City Hall. Interviews will begin promptly at 7 :00 P.M. with the firm of Brauer and Associates; followed by Erkkila & Associates at 8:15 P.M. Each firm has been requested to again present themselves and their approach to the project study. Time for some questioning is anticipated. Mayor Blomquist will chair the meeting, Dick Carroll will act as spokesperson for the A.P.R.C. in the absence of Mr. Martin. Should members have any questions in regards to this, please feel free to contact me prior to the 30th. • • Brauer & Associates, Inc.; Eden Prairie, Minnesota The Firm: The Firm: Represented by: Mr. Fred Hoisington; Project Manager Mr. John Worrall; Recreation Planner Brauer & Associates has been in business for approximately 20 years and have prepared numerous park guide plans and individual park projects. Recently, they have completed for the City of Plymouth, the Master Parks Guide Plan which emphasized the need for park land acquisition of 30 sites totalling nearly 400 acres. This project was co- ordinated by Mr. Worrall - who would be assigned to complete this project - along with Mr. Hoisington. Other member of the firm would be included as part of the project team. Erkkila $ Associates; Minneapolis, Minnesota Represented by: Mr. Tim Erkkila; Project Manager Mr. David Licht; Planning Erkkila and Associates was formed in 1979 by Tim Erkkila who's past experience was with Midwest Planning.. Recently, Mr. Erikkla has completed Master Parks Guide Plans for Maple Grove and Lakeville, as well as numerous individual park plans. Mr. Erkkila will be aided by Mr. David Licht of Northwest Consultants - who will conduct and prepare the public involvement process. Mr. Erkkila would be the project manager and conduct /prepare the study. TEEN VOLUNTEER PROJECT - PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES: 1. To provide a constructive volunteer /work experience for teens ages 13 through 15. 2. To provide the experience of application, interview and fulfillment of contract expectations. 3. To mold a cohesive group from individuals of diverse neighborhoods and schools. 4. To provide the opportunity for teens to develop pride in the City of Eagan Parks system. 5. A means to beautify and improve the City of Eagan. PUBLICITY, APPLICATION, SELECTION: 2nd Draft 2/26/82 1. The summer Newsletter, slated for mid -May delivery will be the major source of publicity. a. Teens may not always read, however their parents hopefully will. 2. Applicants will fill out a form as for regular employment. a. Devise a separate form for this - information such as: 1) Allergies b. Forms available at Parks and Recreation office. 1) Mail out 2) "Application day" at Cedarvale /Parks and Recreation office. 3. Interview by groups of 5 or 6 a. Groups comprised of teens from differing neighborhoods. 4. Criteria for selection a. Maximum number determined by budget - approximately 20. b. Interest, enthusiasm, availability. c. Mix of ages, neighborhoods. 5. If too many teens apply a. Select oldest first. b. Ratio of boys /girls the same as what apply. "CONTRACT" 1. A contract will be designed and a meeting of all those selected held to explain the departments expectations, specific aspects of the program and their responsibility. 2. The signed contract is their promise to follow through; also the de- partments affirmation to provide the experiences as stated. 3. Telephone call from the teen if they are ill on a project day.The week of the culminative activity: a. One "make -up day" if needed so that the contract can be ful- filled by a teen who missed one day. b. More than one miss abrogates the contract. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES 1. Parents transport children to the public works building or the site of the days activity. 2. Department provide a bus to pick up teens at: a. The 5 elementary schools in Eagan b. Or designated park sites. 3. Teens bused to: a. The activity site b. The public works garage. 4. Bus returns teens to pick up point. BUDGET 1. The dollars available must provide: a. Transportation for all activities b. The "contract" remuneration for each teen who successfully completes all projects. 1) 20 teens @$25.00 = $500.00 c. "Tickets" for culminating activity. d. $25.00 for incidental treats. PROJECTS 1. Time Frame 2. Projects to be provided: a. The five projects will be identified and the specific day each is to be accomplished will be provided at the beginning of the program. 1) This will allow parents to know specifically where their teens are. b. Examples of the types of projects possible are: 1. Weed a tree nursery 2. Paint garbage cans 3. Pick rocks at Northview Athletic 4. Collect trash at various parks - developed and /or undeveloped. 5. Weed play perimeters in parks 6. Paint a hockey rink 7. Dakota County Parks "if they contribute" 3. Rainy day alternatives: a. Have projects in reserve that can be done indoors providing space for the number of teens involved can be determined. SUPERVISION 1. A regular full time maintenance man Minimum number of 2 2. An adult volunteer a. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee b. Retired people c. A service organization SPECIAL EVENT a. Projects planned for 5 consecutive weeks, one day per week; always the same day. 1) A 6 hour project day 8:00 AM - 2 :30 PM would a) solve the maintenance man overtime possibility. b) Take into account a 13 year olds attention span. 1. The culminating activity will be selected by consensus by the group from a list of economically feasible possibilities. a. examples 1. Horse back riding 2. Apple river tubing -2- • TEEN WORK PROGRAM - TIME FRAME 3. Twins game 4. Valley Fair 5. SHAKES - all you can eat day 6. A movie 1. Finalize program content and budget by April 15. 2. Publicize in Newsletter - mid -May delivery. 3. "Applications" until June 1. 4. Interviews - in groups week of June 7. 5. First "work" day June 17 - - -- last July 15 (if Thursday is the day) 6. Special event the week of July 19. • KAL TEEN PROGRAM BUS RATES 2/25/82 1) $90.00 per day with driver furnished. 2) Without a driver it is $24.00 per day plus .20ct per mile and plus fuel. Maintenance and insurance would be provided by the City. SAFEWAY 1) $70.00 per day with driver furnished . x 5 = $350.00 2) Without a driver the rates would be negotiable, probably would compare with the KAL rates. CEDAR GROVE BAPTIST 1) The pastor is quite reluctant. ROSEMOUNT BAPTIST CHURCH 1) Has 12 buses "may work something out"