08/05/1982 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission•
•
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
EAGAN CITY HALL
6 :30 P.M. - TOUR: SOUTH OAKS, LAKESIDE, WEDGEWOOD, CAPRICORN
7:30 P.M. - REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 5, 1982
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA /APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 8, 1982
3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
4. OLD BUSINESS
7. ADJOURNMENT
a) Brittany Manor - 4th Addition
b) Blackhawk Oaks
a) Recreational Program - Brainstorming
5. NEW BUSINESS
a) Designation for parks design /system plan
b) 1983 - Budget
6. OTHER BUSINESS /REPORTS
a) Update - Parks Maintenance
b) Committee Picnic Date
•
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
RE: PARKS DESIGN; PARK SYSTEMS PLAN
The parks system plan consultant is progressing on the plan in all
areas. With much of the inventory section completed, the consultant is
interested in determining which 10 park sites are to be designated for
concept plans. You will recall, the scope of services requires the con-
sultant to prepare 10 such park concept plans. Actual design work would
not be done at this time. However, the consultant would like to begin
the process of assembling and preparing the base maps for the parks to
be designed in preparation for design work. This will allow the consul-
tant to complete the design work on a timely basis.
The consultant and staff have reviewed all of the sites for possible
designation. Factors such as existing residential families, section needs,
site features, anticipated residential growth, are a few of the aspects
which have been weighed in considering which sites to select. In order
to provide the consultant some direction, and yet provide flexibility and
input from the Advisory Committee and City Council, the consultant /staff
are in agreement that there might be two groupings of five parks. The
top five priority parks are as follows.
Lakeside Park
South Oaks Park
Coachman Park
Capricorn Park
Wedgewood Park
These five parks have consistently ranked high during discussions.
Other parks being considered and reviewed include: Carlson Lake, Burr Oaks,
the proposed park land at Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Fish Lake, Pilot Knob,
Blackhawk, Windtree, Thomas Lake and Winkler /Jackson park area.
Issues: The director would like to review with the Advisory Committee the
criteria affecting the top five parks, and to begin discussions on what
other parks might be considered for this design work. The consultant would
hope that the Advisory Committee is in concurrence with the top five selection
in order to allow base map work to begin. The remaining five park sites
need not be determined at this time. However, some direction and discussion
in narrowing down the parks site should be initiated.
At a future Advisory Committee /City Council joint system plan meeting
an agenda item will include which of the five remaining park sites should
be designated for design work. At that time a decision will have to be
rendered concerning the remaining five parks.
If members of the Advisory Committee have any questions regarding any
of the parks being considered or concern for the criteria being used to
select park sites, or questions in regards to the parks themselves, please
feel free to contact the office prior to the Advisory Committee meeting.
•
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - BRITTANY 4TH ADDITION
APPLICANT: WILLIAM DOLAN
LOCATION: OUTLOT A, BRITTANY MANOR
EXISTING ZONING: R -2 (RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 27, 1982 /JULY 29, 1982
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 21, 1982
REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED
The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 6.75 acres
from R -2 (Residential Double District) to PD (Planned Development District) to
allow 18 single family lots.
The second application submitted is a request for preliminary plat approval for
Brittany 4th Addition which consists of approximately 6.75 acres and will contain
18 single family lots.
ZONING AND LAND USE
Presently, the parcel is zoned R -2 (Residential Double District) and would allow
only duplex or twin home units within this area. In the original plat approved in
1979, the applicant has received rezoning and preliminary approval for 10 duplex
buildings or 20 individual units. The Land Use Guide designates this area as R -1
(Residential Single District) with a density of 0 - 3 dwelling units per acre. The
applicant is proposing 18 single family units which would have a net density of 2.96
dwelling units per acre, which also would be in accordance with the land use desig-
nation.
CCITIENTS
The applicant is proposing to rezone Outlot A or the 6.75 acres from R -2 (Residential
Double District) to PD (Planned Development District) to allow 18 single family units.
The reason for the Planned Development zoning is that 9 of the 18 single family lots
are under the 12,000 square foot requirement and the only provisions for smaller single
family lots is through the Planned Development process in order to go below the 12,000
square foot minimum requirement.
On March 6, 1979 the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Brittany Manor and
rezoning from Agricultural to R -1 and R -2 in which Outlot A was zoned for 10 duplex
buildings or 20 units with access provided by the same cul -de -sac as proposed within
this current plan. Therefore, the only change in the plat is the reconfiguration of
the lot lines in order to provide 18 single family houses.
CITY OF EAGAN
WILLIAM DOLAN
JULY 27, 1982
PAGE TWO
If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions:
1. The preliminary plat should be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's
review and comment because it abuts Johnny Cake Ridge Road.
2. The development agreement shall be signed prior to the final plat of
Brittany 4th Addition.
3. Park dedication shall be provided as recommended by the Advisory Park
Committee.
4. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City Staff.
5. All access to the lots shall be provided from the cul- de-sac with no
direct access onto Johnny Cake Ridge Road.
6. A planned development.agreement shall also be required in that no more
than 18 single family dwelling units shall be allowed within Brittany
4th Addition.
DCRibar
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
7. An internal storm sewer system shall be constructed with the outlet
constructed to the controlled water elevation of Pond LP -4.
8. A minimum 15 foot utility easement shall be required for the trunk water
main looping to the Johnny Cake Ridge 1st Addition.
9. This development shall accept it's assessment for lateral benefit from
trunk sanitary sewer at the rates in effect at the time of final plat
approval.
•
•
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY
PLANNER
FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BRITTANY FOURTH ADDITION
The Public Works Department has the following comments for consideration
of the above referenced plat.
UTILITIES
Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth to handle this proposed
development is in place. A short sanitary sewer lateral would have to
be constructed to serve the lots adjacent to the cul -de -sac. Water main of
sufficient ressure and capacity pacity to handle this proposed development will
be installed under r
P o ect 364 within the street right
Y
of way and connect
to an existing trunk line lying north of this proposed development. This
g P P P
8
construction should completed in 1 .
P 93
GRADING /DRAINAGE
The general topography of this area provides for overland drainage to the
east and Pond LP -4. The proposed grading plan maintains this general
drainage pattern. However, some storm sewer is required which will dis-
charge into Pond LP -4. Although Pond LP -4 has no outlet, this parcel
is intended to drain into the pond as can be seen from the attached subdis-
trict storm sewer drainage map. Nevertheless, it is not anticipated that
this development will require the installation of the trunk storm sewer outlet
from Pond LP -4.
EASEMENTS & RIGHT OF WAY
A fifteen (15) foot utility easement will be required to loop the trunk water
main from Shelvin Court to the existing trunk water main in Johnny Cake
Ridge 1st Addition.
STREETS
Access to this proposed development will be off of Sherwood Way via a cul-
de -sac street. The length of this street is under the 550 foot maximum
length allowed by our subdivision ordinance.
ASSESSMENTS
As a condition of final plat approval, this development should accept its
assessments for lateral benefit of trunk sewer at the rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval. At this time, it would amount to $12,064.
Similarly, this development would be responsible for the assessment from
lateral benefit from trunk water main as proposed under Project 364.
•
•
Brittany Fourth Addition
Engineering Report
Page Two
Finally, any costs associated with providing internal streets and utilities
to service this development would be the sole responsibility of this develop-
ment.
TRAILS & SIDEWALKS
Since Shevlin Court is not a collector street, no sidewalks or bike trails
will be required along it.
I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report with the Planning
Commission at their meeting on July 27, 1982.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard M. Hefti, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
RMH /hnd
r
F-
2
Preliminary Plat of:
BRITTANY 4th ADDITION
a
7
u SS0 ar
.,o
L 5
�e.
•ti
.es
2
4
10. 400 fI
.1
WILLIAM G Al.MQUIST
- r-
50 TR
s iF
1S0 v.
11,
IOC, Y
3_ /"Sk
4.,11.0 if
/ /
/r
A,
10 /
,. 2t.„ 1- / 4,'
�\ / / 4 , / /
iL +.
11 ' /
v/ 1
� y/ J /
/ 0
/1'/
,
IF'
u e
SN E Wo I
—
1 ` —Pr
�
( \
BRITTANY 1 : ' . ��
1 1
1 1
\ \
1
1M
2
u
J)
PON
∎r AL A yt
MI!►M WATER
CLEV. 112 .o0
21117.7 *
OHNE te mitommtua
11111IMEMIE. f l e d
ttlinu e i
. ' O 22
16. CZ ME
va7 1441 a u
E
"MC TN
#4104P 41
r
=r? tip
• . I /�� r \lilll1*
4_ AU /I/EM lea!
At*P i
<•... tki
4 h d panurdi
.City of Eagan
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
RE: PARKS DESIGN; PARK SYSTEMS PLAN
The parks system plan consultant is progressing on the plan in all
areas. With much of the inventory section completed, the consultant is
interested in determining which 10 park sites are to be designated for
concept plans. You will recall, the scope of services requires the con-
sultant to prepare 10 such park concept plans. Actual design work would
not be done at this time. However, the consultant would like to begin
the process of assembling and preparing the base maps for the parks to
be designed in preparation for design work. This will allow the consul-
tant to complete the design work on a timely basis.
The consultant and staff have reviewed all of the sites for possible
designation. Factors such as existing residential families, section needs,
site features, anticipated residential growth, are a few of the aspects
which have been weighed in considering which sites to select. In order
to provide the consultant some direction, and yet provide flexibility and
input from the Advisory Committee and City Council, the consultant /staff
are in agreement that there might be two groupings of five parks. The
top five priority parks are as follows.
Lakeside Park
South Oaks Park
Coachman Park
Capricorn Park
Wedgewood Park
These five parks have consistently ranked high during discussions.
Other parks being considered and reviewed include: Carlson Lake, Burr Oaks,
the proposed park land at Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Fish Lake, Pilot Knob,
Blackhawk, Windtree, Thomas Lake and Winkler /Jackson park area.
Issues: The director would like to review with the Advisory Committee the
criteria affecting the top five parks, and to begin discussions on what
other parks might be considered for this design work. The consultant would
hope that the Advisory Committee is in concurrence with the top five selection
in order to allow base map work to begin. The remaining five park sites
need not be determined at this time. However, some direction and discussion
in narrowing down the parks site should be initiated.
At a future Advisory Committee /City Council joint system plan meeting
an agenda item will include which of the five remaining park sites should
be designated for design work. At that time a decision will have to be
rendered concerning the remaining five parks.
If members of the Advisory Committee have any questions regarding any
of the parks being considered or concern for the criteria being used to
select park sites, or questions in regards to the parks themselves, please
feel free to contact the office prior to the Advisory Committee meeting.