Loading...
12/02/1982 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL DECEMBER 2, 1982 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 4, 1982 3. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL None 4. OLD BUSINESS 5. NEW BUSINESS (1) Parks Dedication - 1983. (2) Recreation Brainstorming (3) Ponds and Lakes Study /System Plan (1) Snowmobile Route - Re- designation 1981 -82 Trail 6. OTHER BUSINESS /REPORTS 7. ADJOURNMENT TENTATIVE AGENDA (1) Winter Skating Program (2) • December 14, 1982 MOTION: As a result of the annual review of the City parks dedication fee the following recommendations are made: a. That no change be made in the residential development dedication fee currently in effect. This is based on a limited number of applicable land sales which reflect little or no change in pricing from last year. b. That a commercial and industrial dedication fee be established. It is suggested that the following fee schedule be made effective January 1, 1983. 1. Commercial: 7.5% net land or .04 per square ft. net land. 2. Industrial: 7.5% net land or .04 per sq. ft. net land. 3. Dedication credits: a. Up to 75% of derived fee for significant on site recreation facilities which are available for community use on a long term contract or commitment. b. Up to 25% of derived fee for on site storm water ponding and settling basins provided such improvementbenefits identifiable park and recreation water resources. 4. Determination of cash or acreage dedication and application of credits is determined by the City Council. Dedication is applicable at time of obtaining building permit. This recommendation is based on the following factors: a. The need for acquisition of park land and the development of existing parks is shown in the City Comprehensive Guide Plan on parks and in the current systems study of the parks and recreation program. The study further shows the greatest need in the northern area of the City. b. The current parks dedication on residential development has only provided for acquisition of local neighborhood parks with minimal improvements. The acquisition of community parks and purchase of athletic facilities parks development, trails and special use facilities will have to be financed from other sources. c. The Federal /State grants program for the period of 1977 to 1982 provided funds for Northview, coachman, Patrick Eagan, trails, tennis courts, Rahn acquisition, and Rahn development. (pending final approval and funding of $80,000) Total funding for this period was $569,000, or an annual average of .$94,833. This program is rapidly eroding toweard non- existence, therefore we cannot plan to use this program as a resource. Further, the current and forecasted future of our economy is not conducive to optimism in consideration of the extensive funding requirements being obtained through a voter referendum for a parks bond issue. d. The proposed commercial /industrial dedication fee appears equitable because these firms and their employees (both resident and non- resident) benefit from the quality of life as provided by City services and its community parks system. This proposal is also commensurate with parks dedication fees of similar suburban cities(see attached letter dated November 26, 1982 from Erkkila and Associates with enclosed list of fee schedules) Contacts with staff personnel of these cities confirm that they have a continuing business growth. e. We are aware of the need for a City in its inceptive stage to offer inducements to commercial and industrial firms to locate within its bounds. With approximately one third of the total commercially zoned land already developed and Highway # 494 and 35 -E progressing through our City it appears we have passed this initial stage. In fact, any delay in establishment of a commercial and industrial dedication fee would appear to increase the scope of unfairness to the future developers. f. Contacts with land developers who have commercially zoned land next to freeway interchanges and at other sites in the City reveal a pricing range from $1.00 to $4.50 per square foot. Again, our proposed cash dedication fee of .04 cents per square foot appears reasonable. -2- Every Thing You Wanted To Know About Commercial and Industrial Parks Dedication and Would Probably Ask. 1. WHAT IS THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS DEDICATION? The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee is asking the City Council to implement a requirement, similar in nature to the City's residential parks dedication requirements which would be applied to all commercial and industrial property which has not been issued a building permit. 2. UNDEP. WHAT AITTHORITY CAN THE CITY PO THIS? AND, WHAT ARE OTHER COMMUNITIES DOING? Under the same Minnesota statutes which allows communities to enact a parks dedication ordinance on residential property, many communities have enacted a dedication ordinance on commercial and industrial property. In fact, out of twelve communities recently surveyed ten have some form of cash commercial and industrial dedication requirements ranging from five percent to ten percent. 3. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY A 5% OR 10% DEDICATION? Like a residential dedication, communities require a cash dedication on commercial and industrial property. The percentage charged is generally applied against "market value" or "assessed valuation." Generally, communities have adopted a formula for the market or assessed valuation which is typically an averaged value. This average value can then be adjusted annually or when the value of the land increases significantly. Other communities do not adopt an "average value" and apply the percentage of parks dedication against the actual market or assessed valuation of that particular parcel. 4. WPAT ARE OTHER COWTJNITIES CASH DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS THEN? Each community is very different. But as an example, the City of Chanhassen's formula yields $1,035.00 per net developable acre. Plymouth recently raised their dedication requirements to approxi- mately $2,200.00 per acre; Lakeville $600.00 and Eden Prairie $1,400.00. These communities have a developed formula for an average value. Other communities have no such formula and rely upon the application of a required percentage on each parcel. 5. DOESN'T THIS COMMERCIAL AND INDITSTR.IAL REQUIREMENT DIRVE AWAY THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT? Conversations with representatives of comparable growth communities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area indicates this is not happening. In fact, just the opposite might he true. As an example, the Tenant Company - a manufacturer of industrial cleaning equipment - has recently purchased land in Plymouth and are now in the process of plann- ing the development of this site. Their parks dedication will amount to something in the area of $300,000.00. Plymouth has had the commercial and industrial dedication since 1976, and like Eagan, is show- ing significant growth in its commercial and industrial base. Eden Prairie recently reported several new and large firms moving into their community. One firm, a relatively large contracting firm with offices in other parts of the United States has located their head- quarters building in Eden Prairie. This firm met the 10% dedication requirement with a land dedication; plus the equivalency of 39° more than the requirement in additional land. This firm reported to the City that it chose Eden Prairie for its headquarters because 'we are sold on the quality of life in Minnesota and want to be a part of the community that is concerned about this.' Attached is a copy of an article from Houston. A publication of the Houston Chamber of Commerce. This article reports the following: 'Parks are not only a vital necessity for the psychological well being of a people, but also for the City's economy. Part of what these large corporations consider when they locate is the livability of the City. They're not just bringing in scientists, corporate presidents and analysts. They're bringing in spouses and children who look past a forty hour work week.' 6. WHY NOW? Several reasons; the necessity of acquisition and development of community parks and community athletic fields, community trails, as well as special use facilities will require significant funding. Grants • from Federal and State sources no longer seem probable. If the City is to have these types of facilities to keep up with its growth, this source of funding must seriously be considered. Other growth communities have found this approach to be fair and reasonable The community is in an enviable position for commercial and industrial growth. The completion of 494, I 3S -E and the Cedar Avenue bridge plus many other factors have contributed to make Eagan a growth community. The growth in commercial and industrial land is sure to increase very rapidly If more time lapses before a commercial and industrial dedication requirement is implemented, other tracts of commercial and industrial property will have avoided paying their fair share, increasing the inequity between those who paid and those who have not paid. 7. WHAT ABOUT THOSE THAT HAVEN'T HAD TO PAY THE COb'Uf'ERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEDICATION SO FAR? Those parcels which have been developed upon would not he subject to the • new dedication requirement. However, the committee's recommendation would be to collect the new cash dedication at the time of development, payable with the building permit. This would mean that parcels that have been platted but not yet built upon would be subject to the new dedication requirements. The Advisory Committee is recommending the dedication be placed upon parcels at the time the building permit is issued so as not to create a hardship on the developers at the time of platting. If applied at time of platting it would require the developer to carry this financial obligation until such time as the parcel is sold or developed. From the acreage numbers previously compiled by the planning staff; nearly 70% of the commercial and industrial zoned land in Eagan has not yet been platted; much of the land that has been platted is still not developed, and therefore would still be subject to the dedication requirements. Although several commercial and industrial parcels have been developed upon the majority of land in this zoning classification would be subject to the dedication requirements. 8. WHAT SPECIFICALLY IS THE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION? The committee is recommending a 7.5% commercial and industrial dedication requirement, based upon a formula for raw land cost; as established by the City Council upon recommendation by the Advisory Committee. The committee is recommending a 4it per square foot dedication. 4¢ would be applicable to net developable acres. This is the same as saying raw land has a value of approximately fifty -five cents per square foot. 9. WHAT IS THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND IN EACAN AND ELSEWHERE VALUED AT? Raw land costs are extremely variable. However, some of the unplatted -4- x • land in Eagandale Center is reportedly to be marketed for up to $1.00 per square foot. (Some of the platted parcels with streets and utilities in, are in excess of $3.50 to $4.00 per square foot) It has also been reported that land in the Lexington P.U.D. along Lexington and County Road 30 is being marketed for $2.50 per square foot. Land further away from County Road 30 is being marketed for "about $1.00." This is an asking price and terms of a purchase agree- ment would affect the final sale price. It's fair to say that the land might actually be sold at a 25% to 30% discount. This as a result of terms of sale. However, there are undoubtedly many parcels in Eagan which are valued less than $1.00 per square foot. The Advisory Committee is recommending an "average value" at approximately .55¢ a square foot. 10. HOW DOES THIS 4¢ FOR CO?'NERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPARE TO THE CITY'S CURRENT RESIDENTIAL DEDICATION? As an example, if you were to have ten acres of land zoned R -3; this could be developed into 7.8 units per net acre, and would result in a cash dedication requirement of $24,236.00. Compared to ten gross acres of commercial and industrial property, (assuming 90% as not developable) would produce a dedication requirement of $16,400.00. 11. WHAT DOES .04 COME TO ON A PER ACRE BASIS AND IS THIS A SIGNIFICANT COST? .04 comes to $1,822.40 on gross acres; however, the committee is recommend- ing net acres. Thus, the actual dedication would be less than $1,822.40 per gross acre. If you are to assume that this raw land is ultimately sold for $3.00 per square foot, parks dedication would ultimately represent about 1.3% of the total of that parcel to a builder /purchaser. -5- • • • 12. WHAT ABOUT CORPORATIONS WHO PROVIDE, SUCH AS SPERRY- UNIVAC, FOR RECREATIONAL AMENITIES WITHIN 'IHEIP. SITE? The Advisory Committee has recommended that certain credits be applied in instances in which significant on site amenities are available for the community. Further, the Advisory Committee is recommending a cash dedication credit for those developers who porvide on site ponding for storm water which would have a significant impact on identified water based recreational resources. December 15, 1982 -6- • • COMPUTATION FOR COMMERCIAL ? INDUSTRIAL PARKS DEDICATION Raw Land Cost 7.5% 10a Yield of 7.S% Per Square Foot Dedication Per fled. Per Per Cross Acre Square Foot Sq. Ft. Yield of 100 Per Gross Acre .40 .03 .04 $1,366.80 $1,822.40 .50 .0375 .05 $1,708.50 $2,278.00 .55 .04125 .055 $1,879.35 $2,505.80 .60 .045 .06 $2,050.20 $2,733.60 .70 .0525 .07 $2,391.90 $3,189.20 • DEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: DECEMBER 2, MEETING The December meeting appears to be shaping up as one with limited agenda items. A welcome relief for the committee after several months of several long and numerous special meetings. 1. The Advisory Committee has previously deferred the annual review of parks dedication until the system plan consultant could respond. It was originally hoped that the plan would be further along with the capital improvements portion and implementation plan near completion; thus providing some additional background for the dedication require- ments, while the planning process has not met this agressive time line, Mr. Erkkila has prepared at the committee's request a memo for considera- tion. Attached is the memo, materials from the system study referred to, and the previous memo from staff. 2. Enclosed is chart with the preliminary lake recommendations from the special meeting of November 18th. Please add this chart to your lake and pond materials. Staff will not be making any additional presentations at this time regarding the study, but will be asking the committee for general directions on these preliminary recommendations. Discussion on the two remaining park sites for concept plan development should also be a topic for committee discussion. 3. At the November meeting "homework" assignments were given to members as part of the recreational brainstorming. I_f members will complete as specifically as possible that page, the remaining portion can be completed with one -half hour. SNOWMOBILE ROUTE Members of the local snowmobile organization have again contacted the depart- ment requesting that Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Apple Valley to the highline trail; and the highline trail from Nicols Road to Pilot Knob Road again be designated for snowmobile trails for 1982 -83. These trails were approved last year on a "one year" designation subject to annual review. Several other conditions were part of the one year approval. The trails were to be used as access to Lebanon Hills Regional Park. System plan consultant and staff will be meeting with representatives of the snowmobile club on Tuesday November 30. The purpose will be to discuss this request, exchange information and to review the future of snowmobile trails in Eagan. Staff will be reporting on that meeting and asking for comment/ recommendation on the organization's request for snowmobile trails within the highline corridor. rKkJI© 65 a 4c�g Suite 100 2611 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, Mn. 55418 781 -6696 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • DESIGN • November 26, 1982 Park. Committee Members and Staff Eagan, Minnesota RE: Park Dedication Requirements /Implementation Strategies In materials distributed earlier, a comparison of park dedica- tion formulas was provided. In that comparison (also found on pages C -5 through C -7 in the new Park System Plan notebook) Eagan was compared to several other metropolitan communities. Two observations are immediately apparent. 1. The residential dedication formula for Eagan is apparently at the upper end of the observed range. It can also be noted that most of the rapidly developing communities are also the ones with the highest cash contributions. It may be fair to say it hasn't inhibited development activity to any noticeable level. 2. The commercial and industrial requirements of Eagan are clearly at the low end of the observed range.. In examining the relationship between high commercial and industrial dedications and development interest, the correlation is less clear than the similar comparison for residential development and dedication. The need for funds for park development in Eagan is acute. While it is uncommon for metropolitan communities to totally develop their park system on the basis of park dedication funds alone, there seems to be little or no advantage for communities to "undercharge" developments because their park dedication ordinance is not continually updated to the prevailing rate. For that reason, we do recommend that Eagan consider requiring a dedication from commercial and industrial development in addition to the existing residential requirements. • • Park Dedication Requirements /Implementation Strategies November 26, 1982 - page 2 Rather than indicate a singular approach, we shall propose a range of formula options to Eagan. Both the high and low recommendations have firmly based precedents set elsewhere in the metropolitan area. Most communities which require dedications from the commercial or industrial project, do use either a 5% or 10% dedication. "Low" Dedication formula for Commercial /Industrial Land 5% of the land or 5% of the assessed value of the undeveloped land with either a maximum or nominal fee of say $800 per acres. "High" Dedication Formula for Commercial /Industrial Land 10% of the land or 10% of the assessed value of the undeveloped land with either a maximum or nominal fee of say $2,200 per acre. In either situation, we recommend several further conditions be applied. 1. The City Council (not the developer) decides if land money or a combination is taken. 2. Trails, if any, shall be on easements through the property. No dedication credit should be given for easements but credit can be given for trail construction costs. 3 A credit can be given to projects which meet city park goals in some other fashion. For example, if on site stormwater ponding is pro- vided which improves the water quality in an adjacent lake being managed for fishing, a dedication credit would seem appropriate. Another example would be if the development provided it's own recreational facilities and these were shared with the general public, a dedication credit here would also be appropriate. The size of the credit should be proportionate to the cost or land area involved and be at the discretion of the City Council. In establishing a nominal or maximum charge per acre, some thought should be given to what the reasonable land value is on commercial or industrial land in Eagan. The $2,200 per acre charge (used in Plymouth) is equivalent to saying the land is worth 50c per square foot, $22,000 per acre if it is figured on a 10% dedication. • Park Dediation Requirements /Implementaiton Strategies November 26, 1982 page 3 • The $800 per acre charge is equivalent to saying the land is worth $16,000 per acre when a 5% dedication is used. Sincerely, Ct 1 Tim Erkkila, ASLA ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES TWE /sg CHART C -1 Communi Eagan Burnsville Inver Grove Heights Lakeville PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULES FOR SELECT SUBURBAN COMMUNITIES IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA Type of Use Eden Prairie. Residential: • Residential: 10% of gross land area Residential: 10% of gross land area Commercial: 5% of gross land area Industrial: 5% of gross land area Commercial Industrial: Residential: Commercial: Industrial: • • None None Land Dedication Cash Contribution Residential: 1 acre of land per 75 people in the subdivision based on the following densities: Single family - 3.5 people Two family - 6.0 people Apartments, condominiums, townhouses - 1 person per bedroom Commercial: Industrial: $400.00 per unit - single family/ two family $332.00 per unit - townhouse/ quadraminium S252.00 per unit - condominium/ apartment Utility easements must dedicate 50% of gross lard area when located along a proposed trail. Commercial: None, except in areas that are needed for the trails as Industrial: designated in the municipal trail plan. 10% of Assessor's market value 5% of Assessor's market value 5% of Assessor's market value 2% credit can be granted if on -site recreational amenities are provided. The credit is given at the discretion of the City Council. S325.00 per unit - single family detached S250.00 per unit - all other residential $1400.00 per acre S1400.00 per acre `Land dedication is only accepted if the area is designated in the Park Guide Plan. The City will not accept any lard under power lines, flood plains or on steep slopes. Trails: If the developer provides an easement and builds a trail, no dedication credit is permitted. Trails along streets shall be graded into the street right -of -way and the City shall build the trail. No dedication credit is permitted. S168.00 per unit on lots with sewer and water S 84.00 per unit on lots without sewer and water 5300.00 per unit 5300.00 per unit 5150.00 per unit plus S75.00 per bedroom above the first bedroom 5600.00 per acre 5600.00 per acre When a combination of land and cash are provided, the fair market value of the and is deducted from the cash contribution. • Com Type of Use Land Dedication Cosh Contribution Maple Grove Residential: Pork dedication is based on density: Maplewood Oakdale C -6 Gross Density /Acre Land Area 0 -3 units 4 -5 units 6 -8 units 9 + units 5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 10% + 1% for each unit over 8 units Commercial: 5.0% 5.0% Industrial: 5.0% 5.0% Residential: Pork dedication is based on density of the subdivision: Appraised Cash Value 5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 10% + 1% for each unit over 8 units Type of Unit People /Unit Cash Contribution/Unit Single family 4.1 Two family 4.1 Mobile home 2.5 Apartments and condominiums Efficiency 1.1 1 bedroom 1.4 2 bedroom 2.5 3 bedroom 3.3 4 bedroom 4.0 Townhouse 1 bedroom 2.0 2 bedroom 3.3 3 bedroom 4.0 4 bedroom 4.2 Residential: Dedication based on density: Commercial: 10% of lond area or Industrial: 10% of lend ores or 5326.00 326.00 199.00 87.00 111.00 199.00 262.00 318.00 159.00 262.00 318.00 334.00 Land dedicated to the City must have an equal appraised cash value as the required cash contribution. Commercial: 5% of gross land area 5% of appraised market value Industrial 5% of gross land area 5% of appraised market value 1 unit /acre 5% $275.00 1.1 - 3.0 10% 275.00 3.1 -4.0 11% 250.00 4.1 - 5.0 12% 250.00 5.1 - 6.0 13% 250.00 6.1 - 7.0 14% 220.00 7.1 - 8.0 15% 220.00 8.1 - 9.0 16% 220.00 9.1 - 10.0 17% 220.00 Over 10.0 Add 0.5% per unit 220.00 Cash value equivalent Cash value equivalent • • • Communi Type of Use Lard Dedication Cash Contribution Plymouth Rosemount Residential None 5390.00 per unit On large lots the minimum Fee is 5390 with no less than 2 units per acre. On• large lot with density less than 2 units per acre park dedication is required for possible future subdivision of the property (i.e., a two acre lot counts as 4 units resulting in 51,560.00). Commercial: 10% of gross or area 10% of Assessor's estimated land value of undeveloped land. Maximum fee is 52,200 per acre. Trails: No dedication credit is given for the trail easement or grading. A credit is given For the actual documented cost of trail paving. Residential: 4% x the number of units per acre of gross land area (example: 4% x 5 units per acre =20% lard dedication) Commercial: None Industrial: None Roseville Residential: 10% of gross land area for 10% of appraised cash value Commercial: any subdivision of 5 acres for any subdivision of 5 acres Industrial: and greater and greater Shoreview Residential: Park dedication based on density Dedication Credits: 4% x the number of units per acre of the raw lard value of the land in the development. Fair Market Value at Density /Acre Gross Land Area Time of Final Plat 0 -2 3% 3% 2.1 - 3 4% 4% 3.1 -4 5% 5% 4.1 - 5 6% 6% 5.1 and greater 10% 10% Commercial: 10% 10% Industrial: 10% 10% 5% credit if development has on -site stormwater drainage and ponding that does not increase the rate of runoff from the site. 2% credit if the development exceeds the minimum landscape requirements. White Bear Lake: Residential 10% of gross land area 5150.00 per unit Commercial: 5% of gross land area 5150.00 per each 4,000 Industrial: square Feet of floor area • • • MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: ANNUAL REVIEW - PARKS DEDICATION FEE September 1982 Background: The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee has previously established as an annual process a review of the parks dedication fees for modification which might be implemented with the beginning of the ensuing calendar year. Staff has been directed to prepare this years up- date for the committee. The last increase in the parks cash dedication was in 1981 when the City Council approved the parks committee's recommendation to increase the cash dedication amount to $400.00 per single family, $332.00 per townhouse unit and $252.00 for apartment units. That formula is based on a cost per acre of $10,000.00. This increase, effective January of 1982 was an increase from the previous parks dedication formula based at $7,500.00 per acre. This per acre cost, when the formula was applied, produced cash dedication requirements of $300.00 per single family, $250.00 per townhouse, and $187.00 for apartment units. In 1981 the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed recent land sales to assist in determining the average per acre cost. During last year there were eleven recent and significant land purchases for the committee to review. In preparing this years list of land sales, staff has only been able to identify four (4) significant purchases. One of which (Comsery site) was a sale for industrial usage. Consequently, because of this usage and the size of the acreage involved, this land sale is not being considered. Staff has also talked with Mr. John Hankinson of the Sienna Corporation re- garding three of the sales which were within the Lexington South P.D. This included the Hilltop Estates, the proposed Shefield addition, and the Oakwood Heights addition. Mr. Hankinson commented that during the last 12 to 18 months land prices have not increased significantly because of high interest rates and a depressed housing market. He indicated that as before most un- improved land sells from between $8,000 and $9,000 zoned for single family, R -2 from $9,000 to $11,500 and R -3 and R -4 from $11,500 on up. Again, land costs are significantly impacted by topography, number of units possible per acre, size of the parcel, existing utility assessments and closeness and proximity of sewer and water utilities. Mr. Hankinson offered that the land sales by the Sienna Corporation for the developments previously mentioned, were within the selling ranges previously mentioned. In June of this year a brief survey was conducted by Northwest Consultants concerning park dedication fees and schedules for several selected suburban communities within the metropolitan area. A copy of that survey is attached. In addition to these communities, staff has also recently contacted the communities of Chanhassen and Plymouth. Chanhassen reported that single family units are charged $415.00 and multiple and townhouse units range from $425.00 for a four(4) bedroom unit down to $200.00 for a one(1) bed- room dwelling. Further, the City of Chanhassen charges a recreational • 41) Annual Review - Parks Dedication Fee - Memo Page 2 charge of $1,035.00 per net developable acre for all commercial, office and industrial property. Plymouth reports their current cash dedication, in lieu of land, is based on a formula with a net per unit cost of approxi- mately $360.00 per dwelling unit. Commercial and industrial is based on 10% of the assessors estimate land value not to exceed $2,000.00 an acre. Staff Comments: Cenerally speaking it would appear that the Eagan formula for o raining cash dedication requirements seems to be comparable with most other communities. Limited land sales, with minor or no increase in costs, makes comparison with last years costs difficult. Therefore, if the Advisory Committee is to make a recommendation regarding increase in fees for 1983 it appears that such change be minor. The Advisory Committee may wish to review the information as presented. Staff would be happy to respond to questions in regards to this issue and provide additional information if requested or carry its recommendation to the City Council. EAGAN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3501 COACHMAN ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: SPECIAL MEETING - NOVEMBER 18, 1982 The s - lecial meeting of the Advisory Committee for the purpose of reviewing material relating to ponds and lakes; and trails will be at 6 :30 P.M, Thursday, November 18th., in the Police Department conference room. Mr. Erkkila will be making the presentation. cc: Tim Erkkila, Systems Plan Consultant Tom Hedges, City Administrator trig N1N& ekralP 6 A .oL1 HILL y 5LAGKNA61 K GA KL•so .J FI6 HAY NEIN� HUKAY LEMAY Mc.CAR`14Y rirr G?U I &LEY • JA z TpoMAS ST isHOMas 9 UoFFIG,I $4%MMIN K I G�ou Kgs 1% r KAtts gala, [AIMS 5TO 4 u Flo IJo -(56 I-10 u o ►Jo YI:S Ri LJ FIXTURE? IJO do Y�5 'Jo Mel rit "CHILD'S r01,1r, YES "61-1ILt7 F*J 7" Perri. F161.1 LAO uo Pte. FisH LAO IJo 10wI��N MGMI: kto "caws S Po1JD" IJo FUTURE? IJo IIJi�E+ r4 . MAMG U 1.FLY AS Rm DF THDa1Ay LAV' LJo YV7 Flo YES ua YEs kJO 144 IJo LJo Yes IJ kic to -1Z Igo 8-10 Fl 1 12-15 10 -I2 No v 4-6 2o•r6 too 1Jo Era; �+• MG*1'DICIZED Wog 4101 14011.14Mvtla 1-1014 -PA4) 1.10 rz. 1■104-IlottKaw 6 .V AS Malt 'aAM E A6 Ma) k ALL mimes. 4o 4 Motog 1.1 014• OK IZ .F 'Jo keG, I.1014- MaroiCILAP 1 .101.1 Mo1RIZED BLEG., 6106, A i .4o14. McrroKIZBD hIG*J-Mo tJo YE6 YE5 LID uo Y 140 Y IJo YES t40 P PArKII4 - rrra. `'HorE FAG. (frEli, KF•G•) MOMIC45 LAgtatEr - tl{AI.1 (01-1.f! SHOL LD Mc'r 5E ALLOWED ol1 t1i WON Vi (mon TNf VIgtO rp KI• ) 8Y C D 14G . • RNY I4O*M E K , I M rL I LATI0146 I.lo I M rrOV .u 6 i WI1kIC P G EVELoP I 14o Fog L DRIVE- UL.lua'IF� GY,AL O LY) ' AM E A5 A15 LAC.} oI= L-AIJp PROBLEMS HAe, U L, BU1" 140 GoIJt.EP'r �I ibK 6n. OAK'S rAKK 1.665. GIN corze-A ' NAVE LAila ACG6'.JS LAN RFL.At6p Tb ro65IDIL.E F Uf UKt. IJEI4H. MICK SPfaGIAL M4P'11 LA J P ACA.. LI ISITIOLI AKE E41.4 I REP. PeAtosrrIoLl CeRU IMP 4 CLAKIFtcArIOI•I ot= FIAlcrDSE. 1J0 PUBLIC ACGF.6s PRoM561? ADJAC -Oi . 1' Tb Pb'.r6I 61.4 FU IIJ EC U i &I1. PRICK LKE of FUTURE PARK DGD- IGAtIo1.1, is &Jt7r DETtRMIIJED. REQUIRES HAKE meoit. AND WATeg •