Loading...
655 Lone Oak Dr - Plan review memosI , , b. , I MEMORANDUM I ,y TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSYECTOR DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCE5 COORDINATOR GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KENT THERKELSEN, CffiEF OF POLICE MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR MIKE RLDLEY, SENIOR PLANNER PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TOM PEPPER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN FROM: MIKE LENCE, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2004 RE: ECOLAB - BLDG G(C.A.L.) ADDITION , 655I:ONE OAKDRIVE-- ? `LOT 1 BLOCK 1 CRAY 2rvn The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. ,.. #32 Please return this form to mv attention with your signed comments and the date of review within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" reyuest form. Comments: Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit: AMOUNT ? Yes ? No landscape security required ? Yes ? No water quality dedication ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes ? No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required ZONING? METER SIZE Signature Date r" • 4. The Premises complies with all setback and parking laws and regulations (including the floor area ratio, off-street pazking and off-street loading): XYes ? No The Premises is located within a federally designated flood plain: )krYes ? No If yes, specify the nature of the zone: Zone C Community Panel # 270103000113, Panel Date - August 11, 1978 6. There are no proposals for widening, closing (including temporary closings) or realignment of access or abutting roads. If there aze, specify the same and its terms or otherwise check here: )R?None Comments: There are no contemplated pending special assessments affecting the Premises: J31 Yes ? No If there are, please specify the known or estimated amounts and computation of inferest, if any: Currently there are no pending assessments on the Premises. The Citv's 2003-2007 CIP does not call for any street reconstruction proiects in that area. The Premises will be affected bv the extension of a trunk water main related to 3451 Marv Lane, Lot 1 Block 1 Gift of Mary• however, there aze no dates for that project. The Premises will be affected bv the uperade of Lone Oak Road (Ctv. Rd. 26). when that occurs, Dakota CountXdoes not have that uSesade in its current 5-Yeaz CIP. All appropriate and required city permits, licenses and approvals have been provided for the intended use of the Premises: gYes ? No Comments: If additional space is required for any of the above, please use the reverse side.