655 Lone Oak Dr - Plan review memosI , , b. , I
MEMORANDUM
I ,y
TO: TOM STRUVE, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & EQUIPMENT
LEON WEILAND, CONSTRUCTION INSYECTOR
DALE WEGLEITNER, FIRE MARSHAL
ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCE5 COORDINATOR
GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER
JOHN GORDER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
KENT THERKELSEN, CffiEF OF POLICE
MARK ANDERSON, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
MIKE RLDLEY, SENIOR PLANNER
PAUL HEUER, SYSTEMS ANALYST
SCOTT PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
TOM PEPPER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
LANE WEGENER, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN
FROM: MIKE LENCE, SENIOR INSPECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2004
RE: ECOLAB - BLDG G(C.A.L.) ADDITION
, 655I:ONE OAKDRIVE-- ?
`LOT 1 BLOCK 1 CRAY 2rvn
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
,..
#32
Please return this form to mv attention with your signed comments and the date of review
within seven days. If you have any concerns with these plans, please so indicate on this form and
notify and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the
building permit be held, please fill out the proper "hold" reyuest form.
Comments:
Indicate any fees that are to be collected with the building permit:
AMOUNT
? Yes ? No landscape security required
? Yes ? No water quality dedication
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes ? No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
ZONING?
METER SIZE
Signature Date
r" •
4. The Premises complies with all setback and parking laws and regulations (including the
floor area ratio, off-street pazking and off-street loading):
XYes ? No
The Premises is located within a federally designated flood plain:
)krYes ? No
If yes, specify the nature of the zone: Zone C Community Panel # 270103000113, Panel
Date - August 11, 1978
6. There are no proposals for widening, closing (including temporary closings) or
realignment of access or abutting roads. If there aze, specify the same and its terms or
otherwise check here:
)R?None
Comments:
There are no contemplated pending special assessments affecting the Premises:
J31 Yes ? No
If there are, please specify the known or estimated amounts and computation of inferest, if any:
Currently there are no pending assessments on the Premises. The Citv's 2003-2007 CIP does not
call for any street reconstruction proiects in that area.
The Premises will be affected bv the extension of a trunk water main related to 3451 Marv Lane,
Lot 1 Block 1 Gift of Mary• however, there aze no dates for that project.
The Premises will be affected bv the uperade of Lone Oak Road (Ctv. Rd. 26). when that occurs,
Dakota CountXdoes not have that uSesade in its current 5-Yeaz CIP.
All appropriate and required city permits, licenses and approvals have been provided for
the intended use of the Premises:
gYes ? No
Comments:
If additional space is required for any of the above, please use the reverse side.