Loading...
610 Opperman Dr - 2010-02-22 Braun Intertec Field Test ResultsBRAUN NTE RTEC Client: Thomson Reuters Date: February 22, 2010 To: Craig Novaczwk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Thomson Reuters, 610 opperman, Eagan, mn Concrete Tests Masonry Tests Structural Steel Sent By: Phone: Rev. 8/6/04 This Transmittal is being Sent: For your approval 1 1 1 Holly J. Vetter 952 - 995 -2000 Sets 1 -4 Prisms -Set 1 Reports 1 & 2 Craig Novaczwk, City of Eagan Holder Construction Company, Mike Yelm William Janvrin, Thomson Reuters Mark Mielke, Van Sickle, Allen & Associates IEB 2 CEB 23 2010 As requested Letter of Transmittal Braun Intertec Project No: BL -10 -00105 Transmittal No: 4 Phone: 651 -675 -5694 Fax: 651 -454 -8535 X For your records Reports Dated 2/15 - 2/17/10 Report Dated 2/11/10 Dated 1/21 & 2/16/10 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55438 For review Information Sent 1 Copies 1 Reference Numbers 1 Comments /Clarification I Transmittal List I Information Sent Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1), Structural Steel (1) Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1), Structural Steel (1) Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1), Structural Steel (1) Concrete Tests (1), Masonry Tests (1), Structural Steel (1) • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: William Janvrin Project: BL -10 -00105 Thomson Reuters Thomson Reuters 610 Opperman Drive 610 opperman Eagan, MN 55123 Eagan, mn Client Project: FS 200 project Set Number: 1 Mix Design: P4191 Date Cast: 01/11/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 11:15 am Specified Air ( %): Not Required Date Received: 01/13/10 Specified Strength (psi): 4,000 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/2 Truck Number: 789 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.7 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 61 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. ( °F): 50 Cylinders Cast By: Petersen, Brian G. Liquid Added On Site: 3 GAL Water (per 3.00 cu. yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Gridline G -2 - 8.3 to 8.7, G.8 - 7.7 to 8.6, H.2- 7.7 to 8.6 Sample Location/Notes: Grid G.8 -7.7 Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 1 -1 1/18/10 2 5 7 39,620 3.99 12.50 3,170 4 N B2 1 -2 2/8/10 2 26 28 61,660 3.98 12.44 4,960 4 N E1 1 -3 2/8/10 2 26 28 63,250 3.98 12.44 5,080 I N E1 1 -4 2/8/10 2 26 28 61,250 3.98 12.44 4,920 4 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age - strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. X Types of Fracture 611 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 ver 1.3c Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Page 1 of 1 Report Date: 2/15/10 LIMS WO #: 1000102 Compression Test Results A �- Kehl, Chris I approve the document Feb 15 2010 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: William Janvrin Thomson Reuters 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Set Number: 2 Date Cast: 01/13/10 Time Cast: 10:30 am Date Received: 01/15/10 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/2 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.7 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 64 Air Temp. ( °F): 25 Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Gridline F to K.3 Sample Location/Notes: Grid F -8.8 Sample No. 2 -1 2 -2 2 -3 2 -4 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. X ver 1.3c Field Lab Test Break Cure Cure Age Date (days) (days) (days) 1/20/10 2 5 7 2/10/10 2 26 28 2/10/10 2 26 28 2/10/10 2 26 28 Types of Fracture 111 r TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Max. Load (pounds) Cylinder Diameter (in.) Page 1 of 1 Report Date: 2/15/10 LIMS WO #: 1000130 Compression Test Results Project: BL -10 -00105 Thomson Reuters 610 opperman Eagan, mn Client Project: FS 200 project Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: - 8.8 and G.2 - 7.5 to 8 Cylinder Area (sq. in.) P4191 Cemstone Not Required 4,000 804 Not Given 5 Petersen, Brian G. Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 50,610 4.00 12.57 4,030 2 N D2 67,140 4.01 12.63 5,320 1 N El 66,770 4.01 12.63 5,290 2 N El 67,230 4.01 12.63 5,320 1 N El Kehl, Chris I approve the document Feb 15 2010 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: William Janvrin Thomson Reuters 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Set Number: 3 Date Cast: 01/18/10 Time Cast: 9:50 am Date Received: 01/20/10 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 5 1/2 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 2.7 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 61 Air Temp. ( °F): 40 Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Grid J to J.4 from 7 to 9 Sample Location/Notes: Grid J -9 Sample No. 3 -1 3 -2 3 -3 3 -4 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. X ver 1.3c Field Lab Test Break Cure Cure Age Date (days) (days) (days) 1/25/10 2 5 7 2/15/10 2 26 28 2/15/10 2 26 28 2/15/10 2 26 28 Types of Fracture r TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Cylinder Diameter (in.) Compression Test Results Max. Load (pounds) Page 1 of 1 Report Date: 2/16/10 LIMS WO #: 1000221 Project: BL -10 -00105 Thomson Reuters 610 opperman Eagan, mn Client Project: FS 200 project Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Cylinder Area (sq. in.) P4191 Cemstone Not Required 4,000 772 Not Given 5 Petersen, Brian G. Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 58,920 3.99 12.50 4,710 4 N D2 76,810 3.99 12.50 6,140 4 N El 77,620 3.99 12.50 6,210 2 N El 77,240 3.99 12.50 6,180 5 N El Kehl, Chris I approve the document Feb 16 2010 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder Client: William Janvrin Thomson Reuters 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Set Number: 4 Date Cast: 01/20/10 Time Cast: 11:20 am Date Received: 01/21/10 Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) 4 1/4 Measured Air ( %): (ASTM C231) 5.1 Concrete Temp. ( °F): (ASTM C 1064) 70 Air Temp. ( °F): 25 Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior, Slab on Grade, Transformer Pad Sample Location/Notes: Transformer Pad Field Lab Test Break Cure Cure Age Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) 4 -1 1/27/10 1 6 7 4 -2 2/17/10 1 27 28 4 -3 2/17/10 1 27 28 4-4 2/17/10 1 27 28 X ver 1.3c T Types of Fracture TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Field Test Conditions Report Date: 2/17/10 LIMS WO #: 1000284 Compression Test Results Max. Load (pounds) Cylinder Diameter (in.) * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 ** Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Page 1 of 1 Project: BL -10 -00105 Thomson Reuters 610 opperman Eagan, mn Client Project: FS 200 project and Results ASTM C31* Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air ( %): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: Cylinder Area (sq. in.) 34- FKS4054 Cemstone 6.0 +/- 1.0 4,000 732 Not Given 5 Petersen, Brian G. Strength Fracture Capping Remarks (psi) Type Method ** Code(s) 61,090 3.99 12.50 4,890 4 N D2 76,040 4.00 12.57 6,050 2 N El 77,710 4.00 12.57 6,180 2 N E1 76,630 4.00 12.57 6,100 4 N El Kehl, Chris I approve the document Feb 17 2010 BRAUN INTERTEC Masonry Test Report Client: William Janvrin Thomson Reuters 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN, 55123 Project: BL -10 -00105 Thomson Reuters 610 opperman Eagan, mn, Chris R Kehl, ckehl @Braunlntertec.com PM: Form No: 18958.V1.00, Report No: CU:W10- 000031 -M1 (c) 2000 -2009 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com Minneapolis Laboratory Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952 - 995 -2000 Laboratory Results Reviewed by: 944 J Wayne Golembeck Concrete Laboratory Supervisor Date of Issue: 2/11/2010 Sample ID: Specification: Plant: Sampled By: Net Area (in Mortar Type: Grout Mix: W10-000031-M1 ASTM C 90 Not Given Brian G. Petersen 63.47 M Min. Curing Temperature ( °F): 60 Upper Bearing Plate Thickness (in): 3.50 Platen Assembly Length (in): 16.40 Sample Location: Grid Line J.3 from 7 to 9 Set No.: Supplier: Date Cast: Date Received: Type of Unit(s): Nominal Dimensions: Max. Curing Temperature ( °F): 60 Spherical Head Diameter (in): 13.10 Lower Bearing Plate Thickness (in): 4.10 Platen Assembly Width (in): 13.10 M -1 Not Given 1/13/2010 1/20/2010 Plain 8" x 8" x 16" 2/10/2010 ............. 2/10/2010 2/10/2010 28 28 7.65 7.65 7.64 15.80 15.79 15.78 15.60 15.63 15.60 1910 2330 2570 Specimen ID Date Tested Age (days) Width (in) M -1 \1 M -1\2 M-113 28 Height (in) Length (in) h/t Ratio Net Area (in Ultimate Load Net Strength (lbf) (psi) 1_1700 2.1 2.1 2.1 63.47 63.47 63.47 120640 147150 162150 Specimen ID Date Tested Age (Days) M -1 \4 M -1 \5 M -1 \6 Width (in) Height (in) Length (in) Gross Area Received Gross Net Volume Net Area (in Weight (lb) Volume (ft') (ft') 37.3 f 0.521 0.272 ............. 0.275 0.271 (in 62.04 66.62 61.75 Avg. Net Strength (psi): 2270 Specified Strength (psi): 1500 at 28 Days Sampled at project The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Page 1 of 1 BRAUN 1NTERTE Report No.: Description and location of work completed: a Signed: 1 a ' Print Full Name City of Eackak List tests performed: ( r' S 4, a lj K c (L no 4- CM ? � n r rtSp Date of This Report: Project Name: r. S2eo Project No.: Project Address: i /or) ? lPYibutN, f Client: Project Manager: Client Project No.: Temp/Weather: r— H`CX a .F . 2 b aq&E. Special Inspection Daily Report 1-zt—een f-- (a - 3 t ca F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ sonry ❑ Reber Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 1V. f / A • Are there any discrepancies noted from ibis day's observations? Yes,Ej No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Date: t -- g, l — ( D I.D. No.: 210 32_ White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Page C of l SIDRPT Rev 10/09 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1 NTERTEC Report No.: Project Manager: City of (.qua a V\ Date of This Report: Project Name: 77A60445041. Ce V 4 ,. S xeO Project No.: Project Address: (4 , bC) Qyt eniA&h.. Client: 1 o%41 ehaf 1.4..3-f.,,(4t ■ K."?(ac.ti,, 04: ht , o -rwt. ..arr: vo • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. 3 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: l Print Full Name: CD Client Project No.: Temp/Weather: Date: Cc ( 0 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. 2- /Co -- /D - caolo 5 I.D. No.: EIS.. y Zl9 JZ- 8 igq66 Page / of _G.- SIDRPT Rev 10/09 Special Inspection Daily Report Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous 9 ' Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry C Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Reber Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Description and location of work completed: e lik 75 001> - p � peA ��-� S4 „ t � 1 r �" e)r- : n. /► d Vn. SS, e n 1r,,e.Q Vi& S 1/x.0 uI Ci r ed 6fAtut4t. n.es io i V1.s 4- 4 t i ink: �1. `Q. X a� A.41 ,132. 6r) 145 _ t tr � M 4 r 1 ! • • b`-1 © r �1 it s � ec c N � vi P . ) C7 -Z i Z (5.0 e d 'e 4 5,4 otAt.d 3134 Y, o cx re..kip w se 1 d 5. no :e. t 4 vor oft s-t rocAu ra c T'o i' • ONe • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN 1 NTE RTE Special Inspection Daily Report City of 6GiV v` Cdpvt 4 btu v ATaCt t't Report No.: Z Date of This Report: Project Name:: tow 0 4 e � s z Project No.: Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Project Manager: Temp/Weather: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry tpr Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebor Placement O Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the archifecf or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Description and location of work complete List tests performed: Print Full Name: Cdt+ tnt, (1 /� /'� ,Q f/{' t -z . -- k e S 1 -1 s -tom a CIA" Kra Vou� cIn 1 Gttwet / at54.4 , 4-6 V "cri .V7 e4 i 'V l C_ .w i 4-. • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? YeseEr Yes. No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this projed? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved pions, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed:: • White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Date: 2 .. l l I.D. No.: `xie/2 C4' Z- Page of W- StDRPT Rev 10/09 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957