2805 Dodd Rd - 2007 Structural Steel ReportA Structural Steel Special Inspection
Final Report
Grand Oak 10 Office Building
Blue Gentian Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Prepared for
Interstate Partners
Project LV-06-00362A
January 26, 2007
Braun Intertee Corporation
`JAN 3 p 2607
i
January 26, 2007
Mr. Gregory Miller
Interstate Partners
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 175
Eagan, MN 55121
Braun IMertec Carporafion
11001 Hompshwe Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Project LV-06-00362A
Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal
Grand Oak 10 Office Building
Blue Gentian Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Miller:
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952 9952020
Web: 6rooninlerteacom
Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the
Grand Oak 10 Office Building and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports.
Special Inspection and Testing Procedures
The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special
inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC)
and the project plans and specifications.
The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractors work designated by the
project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine
compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the
responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the
construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this.
As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize
the results of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the contractor's site
representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies
observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies
documented in a Discrepancy Log and provided it to the contractor for their use. As needed, we also
contacted the project structural engineer for additional direction and clarification on specific issues related
to the drawings or discrepancies observed.
Plans and Specifications
The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time,
we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate
the work completed in the field.
Visual Examination of Field Welds
Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in general accordance with American Welding
Society (AWS) D1.1-2006, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project
plans and specifications. Visual examination of the light gauge metal stud welds was conducted in
general accordance with AWS D1.3-1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project
plans and specifications.
Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust
Interstate Partners
Project LV-06-00362A
January 26, 2007
Page 2
Bolted Connection Observations
Bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled and if the
splined end of the tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined
end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. In addition, each
connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another.
Deck Weld Observations
Deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS DL3-1998, Section 6.0
requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. In addition, the location and
the completeness of the side lap fasteners were observed and evaluated.
Anchor Bolt Observations
The anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully
engaged and snug tight. If required by the construction documents, we also observed if the plate washers
were installed.
General
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by
reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or
implied, is made.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After
review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional
information, please call Dan Graham at 952.9952524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION/
Daniel P. Graham
ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding
Michael M. euer, PE
Vice Presi ent-Principal Engineer
Attachment:
Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report
c: Mr. Louis Ho, Building Consulting Group
Mr. Scott Wiestling, Finn Daniels
Mr. Jack Grotkin, R. J. Ryan Construction Company
Mr. Craig Novaczyke, City of Eagan Inspections Department
Mr. Greg Bialon, Braun Intertec
aroun Interte Corpomdon Phone: 952 995.2000
11001 Hampshire Avenue 5 Fax: 9529952020
Minneapolis, MN 55438 Web: brouninterfeeoon,
Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report
City of Eagan, Minnesota Date: January 26, 2007
Attention: Mr. Gregory Miller
Project: Grand Oak 10 Office
Blue Gentian Road
Minnesota
Braun Intertec Proiect: LV-06-00362A
In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of
services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items:
Flting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed
general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no
Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports
were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.
Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections or review with the
structural engineer. The connections were found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or
unresolved structural welding related issues.
The deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were
observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are
Conclusion
Based upon the inspections performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the
best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved
plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions
of the International Building Code.
Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertee Corporation
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
;ichael fessional Engine under the laws of the% a 4 1W sota.
` .0 . NN
euer, PE a'?o
a rr e
Vice President-Principal Engineer _ •Q_
License Number: 15571°. 166,78
January 26, 2007
Attachments:
Special Inspection Daily Reports
Summary of Discrepancy Log
1 through 9
Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust
Page _ of
BRAUN
SIDRPT
I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
City of , .': ,
Project Name:°>n:;+{
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Date of This Report: 6 "- X - - '';
Project No.:
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
,:• Sri' -,?..
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Reber Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
Periodic "`Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engi neer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
Description and location of work completed:
-kn
i l )
? a:
1 il
's 4. •' ?.i VfT_.
!J? S
y?
r
ri
'
p
?V j
)rf ]?t)`
Clwl L" - C?Ch9L.'6?G P; .°?`.. ? l? "
s[C• l?.l?.t ? LJr ??Sr ?.c
17f•;i ,.' .?? . i . /'.. {
1
. 1 o
s
/L b4W-
?r
List tests performed:
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes ? No
Yes /? Nc,7 f
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
m:
Signed: Date: v 's3 '
F
Print Full Name:
I.D. No.: n is 6)euO
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
City of
`'• Date of This Report
Project No.: ?A
I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Page _ of_
SIDRPT
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Rebar Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
Periodic `Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
Description and location of work completed:
1 ; 1
1'/ ?t
/, J-
t
tR 1
I 1 ?
List tests performed: I:OCrr ??,• ,..1*
_VJ `VC ?4 O'Y.? d~,n? ?crC :?
1A? I r n, `
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ? No
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/LIBC, except as noted above-
Signed: li
Date:
Print Full Name: ff'v ?y<;./ r c I.D. No.: y ?? G? ' F"`
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Page tof
BRAUN
INTERTEC
SIDRPT
Special Inspection Daily Report
City of L=?,,nyo , lw .}
Report No.: S k, f S n ( ?_ Date of This Report: 8 f 7 ' O %o
Project Name: GGMAntA oo,-K to Project No.: L V ob - oo3(.?, i
Project Address:__ 1n'X1S,.e (2??
Client: Zkk/S-4c'1t? R? Client Project No
Weather Gam-.-r ! ('S kEga,-, Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Reber Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
Periodic Eir Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
De?s(:ription and location of work completed:
1 PC A& ,,Ic U ,
RoJ?s-- LQV2? ?D/ S'?`vcl?+.,rut tn?I?c.1 . Gr:?. f?-T ?-II
11
rt st "U+ocfer.Ped: C1
14
f^ jx:reda
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No ?
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ? S, ) f vw- s.
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. v: }'22.ot J
`%pi s r^' TJ ? 4 1$
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. L,OO?% Ho
Signed: tiOJ.? Date.:
Print Full Name: `C\L.- rG: ,S,•ti•_ I.D. No.: 1 Oy"Z(o
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmentat solutirms since 1957
Page \ of t
13RAU N SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of Lam vtiy?
/S?v CAW u? S ??? `l Date of This Report: 9-2 3 -0t,
C?1'mn?. _ _ l7aK 1 O Project No.: L V -'D In ^ 0 03 ?o Z?f
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Reber Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
Periodic JW Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
De;scjption and location of work completed:
e i
S Y? r',
?_ ?_' % O'k
1Joae 11?at?'oNn v.?`?? f?i t'1L0? tlo ?Wl? nJ'? COwD??EO?
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No 1`5F
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ??,? ts?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: --b- Date: Z3.Jrb
Print Full Name: I.D. No.: eu Ny6Qi('-46
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
Page_ of
SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of L?cti?
Sj,r sh. .l S?? ?S?
% vv.r']l
Date of This Report: $'; (^ O to
Project No.: L V-,x.^ chb?i fo ??
.J
SyLk?z?Izu as F'wr% Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Reber Placement ? Foundations ? Special cases
Periodic f9 Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
DeOption and location of work completed:
'?QMU C,
?E?21 Gv. b A° ?l°I S ..rr..? r n.a nfF lMi ^
K? o e
G r [? 3 - t i ckZ? r t ,? at cs
3 l2 i$
?S'Lt,tS rSY3 ?ls ? lcc ?S4 - ?a r1 ,c.,?a.t.?..
Lied:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No rr mt3
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: Date: Q? 3 f 0(a
Print Full Name: _a Ink Q` (q ?W- I.D. No.: j u (O? r°46
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solumms since 1957
Page 1 of I
BRAUN
SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
City of t, 0,-.? M 11i
5M V.C'u!u S bW J Date of This Report 7 ^
1^7r,..rJ 00.1F, to -
Owl•.Q (3v'14. r
Project No.: L V^ O(v- Oo %o ZA
Client: -?LE'Qi 11L.1?Q Pwr?hG+l Client Project No.
Weather: Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Rebor Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
.®ri'eriodic -PFiWelding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engi neer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
Description and location of work completed:
C?_CkC/ 4!.!K 4 aj ct A ,.n ( /`mil at" too., c l`Jrt , c?_- t`Y-J
List tests performed:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No 91
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes "a No ? I*fQpJ t-y3
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Q
Signed: %. Date: (^,(?. Uto
Print Full Name: _ %k-,,Lkq- GI.D. No.: v t o S'?E'a4 -~
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Page t of
BRAUN
SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
city of t=ic n,A
Report No.: 5?{y`?'c f?tt I S ?§21 •`' Date of This Report: 9-19-0c,
Project Name: G e':"'tk oak t7 Project No.: I V -or, - no 54,ZA
Project Address:
Client: ? G +hgm Client Project No.:
Weather:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Rebor Placement ? Foundations ? Special Cases
Periodic ..Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
PScription and location of work completed:
t .
fl - 3 f - t ! '3'r".l i*=- f od r - rt o C?.n!¢ Eec/? - 'J ?
?= -et- G„ ? G Z a,,.cSL f= q nt?4?S v? o?
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 9 No ? Peafo•+ to 3
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of he current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. c'-
Signed: Date: orc,
Print Full Name: K6kV,.Q \ ?? ?9 r v T 4 - o?
0.?. I.D. No.: !
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Gi,. C t4' j `lt 2bSY ln.1G! + ?`iS e4,CfkF4.-A%.t.•
Page \ of _21
BRAUN SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of Lac t`v`\
/ 5'-'.C'4c.? i S+- t Y L Date of This Report:
Project No.:
,. G'•-0
L.?J" l.Y " C7U)IcZ?
-2rSa?t?scc???} Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous Q- Masonry ? Rebar Placement ? Foundations
421 Periodic Welding & Bolting ? Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles & Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
? Special Cases
D,esFription and location of work completed:
-)__ O[1Y?.1 1f. ?..anw ??...
? ?i/Cg-}C?4 aP?C?g t- S?aQS? ?G.tJ '?C'?-QuE'/S o? Ca?ns{???
QQ ``r^te . 1 J?- "°? L ?t/f{
?Cl?l L/ ?° ??) ?\?Lr?P tl?IA ?. w•i ,ALA
V i4K?r +b\r-A o v Qn ti,a G.tn.,r>_ (40kr.1 IlAf 4o
o,t n l ?c ) t + W "H-1
_ n t u ?
i? xt n?b fc
CG.yk PIlk n0i' et^.S4c_a ryQtn? pr2ceLJ
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No El Re.(or*'m 3 4-40
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: Date: - I o- Z- OyO
Print Full Name: P- I.D. No.: SN J rt ('? dto
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Page ;_?Of
SIDRPT2
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report
" City of
.Ct? Cx Y--,
Report No.: ct 1, {+o Dare of This Report: L" - .'? tv k-,
Project Name: _ U /? GkL t i) Project No.: 003 6
Note
v
This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this
continuation)
C
.l 7?L1 ?'LS ? 4`
IU V7 f ('n P T. , l r. n ,.? I LI ?- P1 ...a. e3 Q CIA P n 4 _ ?^I
Se,°
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: ? --- Date: t?''??Qta
Print Full Name: ?JL,2.t Pr?I.D. No:
White copy to Braun fntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
Providing engineering and environmenml solutions since 1957
Page 1_ of L
BRAUN SIDRPT
INTERTEC Special Inspecti Daily Report
Report No,:
Project Name:
Proied Address:
Client:
Cityof rti A
I* I Date of This Report 1 -1 7-O 7
?G Project No.: LL V-dfi ^ Gti = (a
Weather: + n no
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type oflnspection: Inspection Coverage-
El Con -nuous
dk ,E-l, Masonry
1 9-W
ldi
& B ? Rebor Placement
? ? Foundations ? Special Cases
e
ng
olting Concrete Placement ? Fireproofing
? Piles $ Piers ? Tendon Placement ? Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ? (Listed Below) No ?
Description and location of work completed:
List tests Performed_
L?
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ? No
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ? No
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet_
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: `- _ Date:
Print Fu11 I.D. No.: C"Gy? 9`71 'J -
White ropy to Braun intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
T/T:d 9S62S662S6:01
Providaig mgmeering and environmental sofutiuru since 1957
:WOJd IdWSO L002-6T-
BRAUN'
INTERTEC
Summary of Discrepancies
Needing Correction or Review
by the Design Engineer or Architect
Sheet _ of
Project Name:
Project Address: ?-
r
t v;.
The following items must be reviewed or approved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or inspected before work
can continue in the area.
Report
No.
Report Date
Description Resolution to
Discrepancy O/C
Status
-l? ?h 15 S r v?q ?J 6I.??Q ??Q_? ?$ Q?'v.t%?
t?taa ? Sidl2?a ?.S}e s l.?t trG°9?
? ??
3 (ZQtk?r?utwf.4? ?t?$tt.? r?cLt:?°,reop a.ra.av.e? Gl?v'd
LL
n-Z 4
`
?2tir.? ?}jS gv tau d If St(o We t A¢r1 0.
Ft
l ?t
Al n
jmk:mjs\f mWmrcp.2 1/10/95