The URL can be used to link to this page

10/05/2004 - City Council Regular . .. '..1 '. AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL — REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING October 5, 2004 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA III. RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS IV. CONSENT AGENDA f a A. APPROVE MINUTES la B. PERSONNEL ITEMS 3 C. CHECK REGISTERS k t D. APPROVE the List of Election Judges for the November 2, 2004 General Election E. SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent Utility Bills F. SCH EDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent False Alarm Bills 29 G. APPROVE Agreement between Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and City of Eagan m 3 SH. APPROVE January Fitness Promotion for Eagan Community Center 36I. APPROVE 2005 Hours of Operation for Eagan Community Center 6 3 J. APPROVE Maintenance Agreement with MnDOT for TH 55 & TH 149 Frontage Roads K. APPROVE Final Payment and Authorize City Maintenance for Contract 02 -13 (July 2000 Storm Mitigation) r.„7 L. APPROVE Final Payment and Authorize City Maintenance for Contract 04 -12 (Raw Water Main — Terra Glenn) y 0M. RECE Final Assessment Roll and Schedule a Public Hearing for Project 884, Borchert Lane (Street & Utility Improvements) y iN. APPROVE Revised Preliminary Subdivision and Final Subdivision — Evergreen Enclave, Epic Development r O. APPROVE Easement Agreement for Project 884, Borchert Lane (Street & Utility Improvements) P ADOPT State Mechanical Code . DIRECT Community Development Department Review of Cul -de -sac Standards i R. ADOPT Resolution Regarding DSL Services in Eagan s ;54 S. APPROVE the Hiring of a Consulting Firm to Conduct an Organizational Study for the City of Eagan. T. APPROVE Bid Award to Pierce Manufacturing for Two Fire Apparatus Replacements (Fire Pumper / Pumper Tanker Trucks U. AUTHORIZE Transmittal of Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Submittal for Diamond T- Steeplechase Development Proposal to City Consultant For Review V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 66A. PROJECT 874, Final Assessment Hearing, TH 55 North Frontage Road / Gift of Mary (Street & Utility Improvements) ' b / B. PROJECT 898, Final Assessment Hearing, Terminal Drive (Street Overlay) f '/1C. PROJECT 894, Final Assessment Hearing, Coachman Land Company, Century Pointe, Donald Court (Street Overlay) 1 /00D. EASEMENT VACATION — Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements, Imre/Robert l O'Neil Homestead/Robins Addition (Grand Oak 5 Addition) VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS p/O3A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — Daren Gangelhoff— A Conditional Use Permit to exceed the 25 percent shoreland impervious surface coverage for a garage addition on Lot 3, Block 2, Autumn Ridge, located at 648 Crimson Leaf Trail in the NE 1 /4 of Section 25. P figjB. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — Viva Italia LLC — A Planned Development Amendment to allow a restaurant with on -sale liquor and outdoor seating and to amend the signage on Lot 1, Block 1, Centennial Ridge 2nd Addition, located at 1629 Lena Court in the NW ''A of Section 28; and approval of an On -Sale Liquor and Sunday License for Viva Italia LLC, dba Viva Italia. lo /3 y C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — Inland Commercial Property Management — A Planned Development Amendment to modify the existing pylon sign and add banners to light poles on Lot 2, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 23. ,Q /V 6 D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — Holiday Stationstores — A Planned Development Amendment to // expand the existing car wash and create an enclosed storage area on Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition, located at 1065 (((/// Diffley Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 23. /6,0E. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — TL Liquors — A Planned Development Amendment to allow off -sale liquor on Lot 1, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center, located at 1565 Cliff Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 28; and approval of an I Off -Sale Liquor License for Phuong La Nguyen, dba T.L. Liquors; and approval of a License to Sell Tobacco Products. ()16 F. REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION from the Northeast Eagan development moratorium to permit the submission of an application for a subdivision by CSM at Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Drive. , ` VIII. CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE IX. LEGISLATIVE /INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA XI. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * The Council acting as the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority ( "EDA') may discuss and act on the agenda items for the EDA in conjunction with its actions as a Council. A. CALL TO ORDER Drib B. ADOPT AGENDA /lb C. APPROVE MINUTES i D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS n 1'O1 . PUBLIC HEARING for the Consideration of the Sale of the Lachenmeyer Property in the Nicols r Ridge Development Area in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District to US Home for Redevelopment Purposes F. OTHER BUSINESS / 40/ g3 1. Redevelopment District Update V G. ADJOURNMENT • XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) XIV. CLOSED SESSION XV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. . i- MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2004 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 5, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA After approval is given to the October 5, 2004 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the September 21, 2004 regular City Council meeting and the September 13, 2004 special City Council meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of the September 21, 2004 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages 3 through ' . • Minutes of the September 13, 2004 special City Council meeting are enclosed on pages through l( . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE bp4 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL / _ Eagan, Minnesota September 21, 2004 A Listening Session was held by the City Council in the Eagan Room at 6:00 p.m. There were no visitors who wished to be heard. A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, Tilley and Maguire. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, City Planner Mike Ridley, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, City Attorney Mike Dougherty and Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk Mira McGarvey. AGENDA City Administrator Hedges noted that an additional item would be added to the Consent Agenda regarding construction deficiencies at Cascade Bay. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Aye:5 Nay: 0 A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the September 7, 2004 regular City Council meeting as presented. B. Personnel Items. 1. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Jessie Esselman as a part-time guest services representative at the Community Center. 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Jennifer Hotz, Will Lawler, Rebecca Newhouse and Tyler VondeLinde as seasonal landscape crew for the fall of 2004. 3. IT was recommended to approve additions /revisions to the City's Personnel Policy /Smoke -Free Workplace Policy Section, which will prohibit employees from smoking in any City vehicles or next to air intake equipment. C. Check Registers. It was recommended to ratify the check registers dated September 9, 2004, and September 16, 2004 as presented. D. Civic Arena Capital Funds. It was recommended to approve the early expenditure of $12,000 from the approved 2005 Civic arena budget and the re- allocated expenditure of $3,000 from the 2004 Civic Arena budget. E. Student Membership Promotion. It was recommended to approve a one -month student membership to be promoted, marketed and sold at the Eagan Community Center December 15 — December 30, 2004. F. Temporary On -Sale Liquor License. It was recommended to approve a temporary on -sale liquor license for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School and waive the $150.00 license fee. G. Ordinance Amendment. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of an Ordinance Amendment to modify Chapter 11, Section 11.70, Subdivision 21, relative to Trash Enclosures and direct the APC to hold a Public Hearing on the amendment. H. Contract 04 -04. It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 04 -04 (Lexington Avenue, Lone Oak Road to TH 55 — Street & Trail Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. I. Northeast Eagan Study Advisory Committee. It was recommended to approve the appointment of the Study Advisory Committee to Oversee the Northeast Eagan Land Use Study. J. Ordinance Amendment. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of an Ordinance Amendment to modify Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 9, Nonconforming Structures and Uses to reflect legislative changes made to the State Statutes regarding the same and direct the APC to hold a Public Hearing on the amendment. K. Findings of Fact. It was recommended to adopt the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Resolution of Denial for a 4.5% variances to lot coverage for Lot 8, Block 1, Marcella Woods. 3 Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes h September 21, 2004 DRAFT A F T Page 2 ' ` 1 L. Capital Improvement Plan. It was recommended to approve the Dakota County Transportation Department's draft 2005 -2009 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. M. Cascade Bay Construction Deficiencies. It was recommended to authorize the City Attorney to seek arbitration, for construction deficiencies at Cascade Bay and authorize the preparation of plans and specifications to correct the deficiencies. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT 893, DIFFLEY FRONTAGE ROADS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Final Assessment Roll for Project 893 (Diffley Frontage Roads — Street Overlay Improvements). Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 893 ( Diffley Frontage Roads — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 895, LAKE PARK SHORES / THOMAS LAKE ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Final Assessment Roll for Project 895 (Lake Park Sores / Thomas Lake Additions — Street Overlay Improvements). Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 895 (Lake Park Shores / Thomas Lake Additions — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 896, LAKESIDE ESTATES STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Final Assessment Roll for Project 896 (Lakeside Estates — Street Overlay Improvements). Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 896 (Lakeside Estates — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 897, WILDERNESS RUN 2 & 3RD ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Final Assessment Roll for Project 897 (Wilderness Run 2 " & 3rd Additions — Street Overlay Improvements). Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes D DA September 21, 2004 1` Page 3 Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 897 (Wilderness Run 2nd & 3 Additions — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 EASEMENT VACATION — LOT 4, BLOCK 5, PINES EDGE 1 ADDITION City Administrator Hedges stated that staff suggested this item be continued to allow time for the proposed vacation description to be revised from the original request. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of a public drainage and utility easement on Lot 4, Block 5, Pines Edge 1 Addition until October 19, 2004. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 OLD BUSINESS RECONSIDER PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (EVERGREEN ENCLAVE) EPIC DEVELOPMENT City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding changes to a preliminary subdivision (Evergreen Enclave) located at 4195 Lexington Way South that was approved on June 15, 2004. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Rich Ragatz, Epic Development, and Councilmembers discussed the proposed reduction of Outlot A from 2.8 acres to 1.5 acres, the conservation easement, the dedication of park land, and the possibility of a cash dedication as well. It was agreed to continue the item to allow time for revised plans to be submitted showing the agreed upon changes. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to continue consideration of a Preliminary Subdivision (Evergreen Enclave) to create 7 lots and a 1.5 acre outlot on 7.7 acres for property located at 4195 Lexington Way South to the October 5 2004 consent agenda. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 Mayor Geagan objected. NEW BUSINESS PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (SYCAMORE PLACE) EPIC DEVELOPMENT City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Preliminary Subdivision of 6 acres to create nine single family lots on property located north of the dead end street of Sycamore Court. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Rich Ragatz, Epic Development, discussed the proposed wetland replacement plan. Craig Murray, representing the Weston Hills Drive area, expressed concern regarding storm water drainage, the grading, amount of fill, wetlands, and safety concerns in regard to truck traffic through the neighborhood. Three other residents of the area expressed concern over the truck traffic issue, and questioned the variance for the cul -de -sac, and tree removal and replacement methods. It was requested that flagmen be provided during the period that trucks are in the area. It was also suggested that an escrow be established to ensure monitoring of the wetland. Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth, Public Works Director Colbert, City Attorney Dougherty, and City Planner Ridley addressed the concerns and questions of the residents. Councilmember Fields stated she would like to see an independent engineering study conducted on the storm sewer drainage plan and the wetland delineation plan, an escrow account established for monitoring of the wetland, restriction of hours of operation for the trucks hauling fill to the site, and flagmen provided during the times trucks are in the area. Other Councilmembers were in agreement with the proposed stipulations and also agreed to continue the item to allow time for the stipulations to be addressed. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes DRA September 21, 2004 1 Page 4 Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to continue consideration of a Preliminary Subdivision (Sycamore Place) of six acres to create nine single family Lots, for property located north of the dead end street of Sycamore Court in the SE 1/4 of Section 36 to the October 19, 2004 City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 REZONING, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CLUBVIEW ADDITION — MAX STEININGER City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a requested rezoning of five acres from A, Agriculture to PD Planned Development; a Preliminary Planned Development to allow an office on one lot, a contractor's yard and residential use on the other lot, and to enter into a sunset agreement to allow the continued residential use; and a Preliminary Subdivision (Clubview Addition) of five acres to create 2 lots, for property located at 3070 Lexington Avenue. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Rollin Crawford, representing the applicant, discussed the proposed project, addressing the alignment of the service drive. City Attorney Dougherty addressed the Council suggesting a closed session would be in order to discuss pending litigation with the applicant. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to recess the regular City Council meeting at 9:05 p.m. and convene a closed meeting to discuss current litigation. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 The regular City Council meeting was reconvened at 9:25 p.m. Councilmembers discussed the proposed access from Lexington Avenue and the proposed sunset agreement covering the access road and the existing home on proposed Lot 2. It was agreed to continue the item until confirmation is received from the Dakota County Plat Commission regarding the service drive access and the sunset agreements have been prepared for the Council's review.. Mayor Geagan moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to continue consideration of a Rezoning of five acres from A, Agriculture to PD Planned Development; a Preliminary Planned Development to allow an office on one lot, a contractor's yard and residential use on the other lot, and to enter into a sunset agreement to allow the continued residential use for the property; and a Preliminary Subdivision (Clubview Addition) of five acres to create two lots, for property located at 3070 Lexington Avenue. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE City Administrator Hedges provided an update on the Caponi Property Acquisition. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA Information was provided to the Council regarding School District 196's proposal to construct an additional parking lot adjacent to Braddock Trail; and a meeting which is scheduled for September 23 with Governor Pawlenty's Chief of Staff and representatives of the cities surrounding the MSP airport. The regular City Council meeting was recessed at 9:40 p.m. and a meeting of the Economic Development Authority was immediately convened. The regular City Council meeting was reconvened at 9:45 p.m. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors who wished to be heard. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes • LD September 21, 2004 �` T Page 5 ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to adjourn the regular City Council meeting at 9:45 p.m. and go into a Closed Session to discuss pending litigation. Date Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (651) 675 -5000, (TDD phone: (651) 454- 8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS City Councilmembers present: Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields and Maguire. Councilmember Tilley was out of town attending a conference. City staff present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller, Director of Communications Garrison, Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke, Chief Financial Officer Pepper, Director of Community Development Hohenstein, City Planner Ridley, Parks and Recreation Administrative Coordinator Mesko, City Engineer Matthys, Police Captain Swanson and Dispatch Supervisor Ruby. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION The Mayor called the meeting to order. He noted that Councilmember Tilley was out of town attending a conference. City Administrator Hedges requested that the Council add an item to the agenda to approve the extension of construction work hours for the MVTA Bus Garage. Hedges also noted that he received a request to add a discussion regarding agricultural preserve zoning classifications. Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye: 4, Nay: 0 II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. III. AUTHORIZE RFP FOR AUDITING SERVICES City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that an RFP for auditing services was slated for 2003; however, due to the need for consistency and continuity of auditing services with the implementation of GASB 34, last year the Council was agreeable to postponing the RFP until 2004. Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to authorize staff to issue a request for proposals (FRP) for auditing services. Aye: 4, Nay: 0 September 13, 2004 Special City Council Minutes IV. REVIEW CITY LOGO OPTIONS City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting the current inconsistencies with the use of at least five different fonts and four different tree shapes on City signs, vehicles, towers and letterhead. Hedges added that the standardizing of the City logo was made a key priority of the approved 2003 — 2004 Communications Department work plans and budget. Communications Director Garrison provided an overview of the proposed designs and introduced the representative of Sexton Design. The City Council reviewed and discussed the proposed fonts and logos and came to a consensus on the existing Lone Oak Tree and the font currently used in City publications. V. TECHNOLOGY TASK FORCE UPDATE City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that on March 16, 2004 the Eagan City Council approved the creation of a Technology Task Force and the hiring of a wireless broadband consultant to assist the work of the task force in completing its charge. Hedges introduced Communications Director Garrison who provided an overview of the task force's work thus far. Garrison also introduced Tom Barott, Chair of the Technology Task Force and Eagan resident, as well as Bill Coleman, Consultant from Community Technology Advisors Corp. Mr. Coleman provided an overview of the charge of the task force and their findings thus far. City Administrator Hedges noted the benefit of bringing the corporate community together through this endeavor. Communications Director Garrison noted the progress thus far with the willingness of Eagan's businesses and the Chamber in getting in touch with Qwest regarding their desire for additional high speed internet access within the community. The City Council discussed availability of high speed internet technology for residents and businesses, and discussed the need for competition. There was City Council consensus for the task force to remain active, and the Council agreed that the task force should approach the private sector, including Dakota Electric, to look for partnership opportunities. It was also suggested that partnerships be explored with other public agencies. The City Council thanked the task force for their work thus far and noted that they look forward to a final report this November. VI. GENERAL FUND BUDGET UPDATE City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that per the request of the City Council at the August 24, 2004 Special City Council meeting, staff prepared responses to the approximate twenty questions that were raised regarding the 2005 Preliminary General Fund Budget. The City Council discussed the responses to the questions that were raised, including the proposed Code Enforcement position in the Community Development Department. The Council inquired as to the job description for the position as well as how the position will be managed. In reviewing the budgetary shifts for 2005, the Council asked that staff come back with a table showing the percentages of increases and decreases that resulted in departmental budgets due to the shifts. The City Council discussed potential costs associated with the proposed City Charter and the increased demands that could result on City staff. There was discussion by the City September 13, 2004 Special City Council Minutes Council regarding the Police Dispatch Center and, in particular, the need for additional dispatchers. There was City Council consensus for staff to further research the matter and bring back information as to the number of dispatchers required in order to have two dispatchers in the Dispatch Center at all times. The Council also asked staff to look into the justifications for the need for 1.5 to 2 additional dispatchers. The Council discussed the proposed personnel addition in Tree Conservation. City Administrator Hedges noted that further information would be available regarding outside contractor price estimates for landscape maintenance City -wide. The City Council asked City staff to graphically demonstrate the City's projections for how long new construction revenue will off -set the tax capacity rate. Lastly, the Council asked staff to bring additional information back regarding web casting proposed within the Communications Department Budget. The City Council thanked staff for their work in preparing responses to the budget questions raised. VII. REVIEW OF DAKOTA COUNTY HIGH PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP (HiPP) FINAL REPORT City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the City of Eagan has been working with Dakota County and its cities over the past several months on the HiPP Study. Hedges added that the HiPP Study focused on identifying potential ways for cities and county government in Dakota County to form partnerships to provide better services for citizens at lower cost. Hedges added that while existing collaborative service delivery efforts among local governments in Dakota County already have been successful, the HiPP Study was an effort to find additional cost efficiencies and service improvements. The City Council reviewed the final HiPP report. The City Council discussed the six target opportunity areas identified in the report. City Administrator Hedges noted that a meeting would be taking place this week with the HiPP Steering Committee to determine the next steps for the cities and counties to determine feasibility of implementation of the recommendations. The Council noted the need for oversight and quality control in determining whether the recommendations are feasible to be implemented. It was suggested by the Council that City staff comment on the proposed six target opportunities, and in particular, how revenues and costs would be affected, as well as the pros and cons of each recommendation. VIII. LOW DENSITY (LD) COMP PLAN DESIGNATION City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the City Council asked staff to research the background related to the Eagan Comprehensive Plan 2000 LD Low Density residential (0 -4 units per acre) Comprehensive Guide Land Use Plan designation and to survey surrounding communities for comparison information. City Administrator Hedges also noted that the City Council requested a discussion regarding agricultural preserve zoning classifications as part of this agenda item. Community Development Director Hohenstein and City Planner Ridley provided an overview of their findings regarding the low density designation. The City Council discussed and inquired about the legal flexibility that the City has with regards to land use decisions. It was noted by the Council they do not want to have confusion or abuse of Comprehensive Guide designations. The City Council asked that staff inquire with the City Attorney as to his comfort level of what the City Council can do with /c September 13, 2004 Special City Council Minutes regards to density under current Comp Guide designations. The Council noted that they would like to know how much flexibility they have. The City Council and staff discussed the density ranges of neighboring cities. The Council asked that staff further look at the approach currently being taken by Burnsville. The City Council discussed the concept of agricultural preserve zoning classifications. The City Council noted that there may be parcels of land that the City will want to preserve that are currently zoned agriculture and guided low density. The Council directed staff to conduct research regarding agricultural zoning preserves in other cities and research the possibilities of drafting an ordinance to create a new zoning classification to preserve land. The Council requested that the City Attorney review the research to determine any legal challenges that could result in the new classification or unintended consequences. The Council also requested that staff look beyond Comp Guide designations or zoning designations to determine other ways in which property could be preserved. X. APPROVE EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION WORK HOURS FOR THE MVTA BUS GARAGE City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that in order to complete some of the construction of the MVTA Bus Garage, water needs to be turned off in and around the construction area. In order to do so, the contractor has requested that the construction work hours be extended one day during the week of September 13 through September 17 in order that the water can be turned off prior to 8:00 a.m. The contractor has spoken to the owners of neighboring businesses who consented to the extension of the construction work hours. Councilmember Fields moved , Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to approve the extended construction work hours for the MVTA Bus Garage (04 -BP -L) from 3:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. for one day during the week of September 13 through September 17. Aye: 4, Nay: 0 XI. OTHER BUSINESS There was City Council consensus to hold the annual Advisory Commission Bus Tour on Thursday, October 7, 2004. The Council requested that the Technology Task Force also be invited on the tour. XII. ADJOURNMENT The City Council adjourned their meeting at 8:30 p.m. // Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Park Maintenance Workers- - NO ACTION IS REQUIRED: FACTS: • In official action at the September 7, 2004 City Council meeting, the Council approved the hiring of two persons to be recommended as park maintenance workers. For the Council's information, the names of those persons are Ben Boeding and Dan Olsen. /2 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting C. RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To ratify the check registers dated September 23, 2004 and September 30, 2004 as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Check registers dated September 23, 2004 and September 30, 2004 are enclosed without page number. Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 CONSENT AGENDA: D. APPROVE LIST OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the list of election judges for the November 2, 2004 General Election. BACKGROUND: For the General election, the City of Eagan recruits student election judges from the area high schools. Students were recruited from Eagan, Burnsville and Eastview High Schools to assist at the polls. Students from Eagan and Burnsville High Schools will be participating. A list of the student judges is attached, in addition to the list of regular judges and absentee judges. ATTACHMENTS: • Attached on pages /-5 through;Yis the list of election judges for the General Election /17l. November 2, 2004 General: Absentee Election Judges Elaine Fischer Kim Hazel Pat Larson Mary Jane Pederson Ruth Perin Carol Tumini Lynn Wasvick Jackie Zinck Kathy Gauby Mary Ellen Elbert /5- Student Election Judges — November 2nd, 2004 General Election • Burnsville High School HEATHER ADAMS CHRISTINE ANDERSON DANA ANDERSON MARNE ANDERSON ARNOLD ANDREASEN VICTORIA ANDREWS JESSICA ANERSON BRIDGET BAFFNEY REBECCA BARKELY KATIE BARRY PAUL BJORKSTRAND TYLER BONEWELL CLAUDIA CAPPIELLO MARK DANIEL JESSICA DOWD BEN ENGEL BRIDGET GAFFNEY ASHLEY GAINOR ELISE GAYLE CAITLYN GOULD GERMAN GUSEYN -ZADE LIZ HOKS NICK HOLTAN SCOTT HOOSTAL ZACK HUEMANN JOE LARSON MEGAN LOWRY NICK MARKO CHRIS MCCANN AMANDA MILLER KEN NELSON BRIDGETTE PECHMAN DERRIK PELLANT DEREK RAJAVON SARAH ROBINSON SHANTELE SIEWERT ADAM SILEKY JESSICA SJOBERG MIKALA STEENHOLDT RACHAEL STEENHOLDT ALLISON WENINO LAUREN WESTER DANI WHITE KAROLINA ZIMON MO AHMED ERIC BRAAM NICK BROM KATIE BRUMMER REGINA CLINE DREW COLE SARAH COWLES ALYSSA DEHAAN WHITENEY ENGSTROM NOLAN GREEN JENNI HAGER CHRISTINA HANDT KENNY JACKELON SABRINA JAMES AMBER JOHNSON BEN JOHNSON ANDREW KANE MIKE KIEFFABER ALI KILLAM DREW KIPERTS TOMIKA KLADEK KATIE KNUTSON BRAD KROLL ELLIE KUNKEL JAKE LAWRENCE MEGAN LEA VANESSA LEONE 1 11 SARAH LEPAGE BRYAN MAGNUSON MARIA MARTIN ALLIE MCCARTHY HANAD MOHAMMED AMBER NESBITT TYLER NORDMARK EMILY ODENDAHL CORY OLSON KOSI ONYENENO SCOTT PARSONS HEIDI PRINSEN MARIUM PUNJWAND ASHLEY RIVIERE SVAD SAID SARA SAJADI JACOB SCEPUREK KRISTY TUPY MICAELA VEDDER STACI WATSON KEVIN WELLE STEPHANIE WHITENIGHT • Eagan High School LAUREN CORK AARON TESKEY JESICA SEVERSON KATIE FOLEY REBECCA ANDERSON MATT WEIL BRYCE NYEGGEN MEGHAN GLASS CHARLOTTE BUTLER ASHLEE CHERNE LEAH MOE DARCY WARD ALLISON GIRRES 1 /6 P.REC1 LAST. NAME 1 FIRST ,': I; 6'!ABBOTT JASON 20':AGRIMSON :LOIS_ 21AKUBUIKE i NGOZI 20;ALWAR ;GIRL 21': AIWA FR __ WTANUJA _f 16'AMELL 'LUCILLE 9 ';AN __ DERSON 7 CAROL- __ 7 : ANDERSON = 4-^- _..-.!DON _.__-- _11 ANDERSON , __+____ :PENNY 141ARAMBADJIS :DENISE 6ASTLEFORD .SHARON _ 4 BAHR :DARLENE 11BAlLEY - - - � - -- 'DAVID - �- 5'BAKE_R ';MARION 1BARI JOSEPH W 9.BARTLETT .__._ LINDA 1:BATTIS _..__. __.- . VIRGINIA 1 :BAUER FRAN _ 167BEAM .DICK 3BECK •SIDNEY - 4BELLILE i GROVER 17;BERKOPEC IJINNY - 21 BIANCHI -KNOD SHERRY 7'BJORK :IRMA 5'BLACK !NEAL _ ..._.. NE - - 15'BOHLIG GEORGE ___7 BOHLIG _ . -_.�__ 'JOAN_ ..__... _ 7 :BONN ETT 'JASON - 13BREUER :PENNY ` _ - 2 BRINK MURIEL 17 BRITTON KENNETH ___ 9'iBM ___ RO -- - ;,CA - ROL """ -. -._ _...._.TBROST _.._ . _ .._ KENT 14 :BRYAN RITA 14BURBACH TRICIA 9 BURKARD SHIRLEY 97BUTLER TERI 5CANNELLA ROBERT 18'CAREY :RODNEY 10 DOROTHY 5;CARNEY :PETER 17 :CASS :KATIE 21.CHRISTENSEN ;KATIE _-_ 7:CHRISTOPHERSON JUDY 21CISNEROS !MAUREEN 8CLOUGH i SONYA 5'COHOES KAREN ____ 16COLBERT SCOTT /2 PREC1 LAST NAME::'::.::.: 1 FIRST,.'".: 1 :COLEMAN iTONY 2 COLLINS : ROYCE - KATHY 1 1 COLOGNA DIANE 18'COMBS , PAMELA 5 COOK LARRY 11600K MIKE 14 CORDES :BARB 13 CRANE WENDY 4 DANNER 11.11ARdo 7 PEHNEL 'MICHELLE 87DEVINE :JUDY 171DICKINSON i ROBERT 21 iDIDRIKSON "ERIK 16 PINARDO BOB 11 : DIXON , DANIEL 11 DOLFHAY "MARGARET 121 :JAMES 20 DULAS DEANNE 15 DUNCAN 'MARGARET 8 ,DZI ELSKY "SHIRLEE 21 EDWARDS CONNIE 8 , PHYLLIS 10 'ERICKSON !CINDY 18iERICKSON DAVE 11 EVARTS .SUSAN 12 EYRE ELIZABETH 5 'FAIRCHILD 7CARALYNE 31FELBER :KATHY 15 FISCHER CHARLES 1 3 FLADMAR K :MARY 0 .FLOOD KAREN 20 FORSMAN :SON! 12ThOSS :MARY_ 1 7FOSTER 'LINDA 5 FOX :BARBARA • 13FREDLUND ROGER 20 f REUND !CAROL _ 1 2 GEAGAN SUE 9:GERLACH MARK 6 :GIEL :SHARON 16 GIGNAC :MILLIE 20 GLEWWE :CARL 1 3 !GLOVER KELLY 11-111 1476:6VE R . ROGER • 6 'GOEDKEN RONALD 17 GOESS , _ART ITGO E SS -1— BERNADINE • 6 !GOETZ RUTH _ 17:GOIN LIZ /4 PREC � LAST NAME FI R.ST 8!GONNELLA PAMELA 0 :GRASS DARELL 3 ;HAG BERG !MARY 17 IHAGEN KAY 4'HAGEN LORI 16:HAIR _ - ':TOM --- ____ - -_ 191HANSEN 'GARY 18 HANSEN JUDY 15HANSEN MARI V _ 7'HANSEN ;PAUL 13HANSEN SHERI -_- 19iHANSON - GARY _ __ 6HANSON _ -. 20"HANSON _ - TONI �. 10HARMON:JEAN -- - - - - -- 2`HARMONING RENAE 1 HARTLEBEN MILDRED 7 _ _ ! :EILEEN 3HASH HERDIS 10HASH 'ORLANDO ___ 13 HAUSLADEN ;NANCY �- 4HAUSLADEN RAY -_ -- OHAZEL -� - -� KIM 9 :HEALY !BEA _ -- 3'HEIR DONNA 181HOBOT DIANNE� -_ 2 HOESCHEN 'REBECCA 1 HOLMAN :DEBOR 14HOLZEMER _ 8 HUDSON� - � - - -- - BILL 10HUSEVOLD_ 4 ' , :SVEIN 8;IFFERT 'RICHARD 14INGERSON :NANCY -- 15'JABBRA VICKIE 11JACKSON :ELIZABETH 20 "JACKSON JAMES 11 JAFRI '.IRSHAD 14 JANDEWERTH : HENRY 16JEWETT :.SUSAN_ 16`JOHNSON 'CHARLOTTE 4!JOHNSON -- 'GARY_ 11 JOHNSON -_ GERALD _ 2'JOHNSON HOLLY _ '- 1O JOHNSON LUCIA 11 'JOHNSON PENNY 14JONES _ - CHRISTINE 12'JONES - ry :MARGIE 13JONES :MICHAEL -___ 19 :JORGENSON DARLETTE - PREC1 - LAST NAME FIRST 19 JUST MARY 16 !JUST 'IPHILLIP 2!:KAEDER PATRICIA� 21:KAESS MIKE B KAHN T -_- 'CARRIE 2:KAHN JAMES 91KAHNKE DEBRA - -- 14:KAMBEITZ BERNETTA 6!KENNELLY 'BETTY 9;KIEMELE MELINDA • _ 9rKING .._ ._ -- ROLANDO 1 KIRCH ,LOUANN DEANNA 6:KLANG SHIRLEE 12 ;KU NGNER :BILL__ 4 KLINGNER GINNY 3'KOHN CINDY ^r_ 6`KOHN ELIZABETH 7KREHL RHONDA 12KREITZ - ;ALICE 10 KRISNIK - _ YVONNE 2IKROGSTAD :JUDEE - -___ 15`:KRUEGER PAM ...__.- _.__._ 5!KRUGER REBECCA 14 KUCKER RACHEL 8 KULLER ABBEY 18TLABOU_NTY 'CHRISTINE 19LAGUIRE JANICE 1 12'LAGUIRE ,MIKE.__..._......____._. _- -- - -- M _---- .- . - -._. 6LANDGREBE CYNTHIA &'LANE !MARIE 4 LAPLANTE (JOHN 7!LARKIN JOHN -_ _.._... 6 !LARSON BETH . CARSON ^ -- :PAT .._._....__..._.__. __. ._.__._...O 7 LEE _DAISY __,_ 18!LEEAN DON 5 LEIBEL ARLENE 3iLEMAY RICHARD _ 9 LEWIS 'SHARON 12,LIEBENOW CAMERON 14 LIEBENOW ;LUELLA 17LIGHT • , LAURIE ___.___ 20LINK_ -- ARTHUR 121LODHI MUHAMMAD 14 LORSUNG ANDREA 6'LOUIS w CHARLEEN 15 LUCIANO ZENAIDA 12!,MACKEY -- _._...___ - T" - __ C20 PREC� LAST NAME FIRST 11 iMANKE 'JO ANN 8MARCH BARBARA AN 9iMARKEE WAYNE -� 19MARKO ..LINDSAY 2'MART 3MART SHIRR � -__- 8:MARTINELLI :JUDY -_- 11MATTSON RICHARD� MAWK JOHN 1MAYERS !AL - -� -� 101MAZIERSKI :ROSE ANN 7:MCCOY :MARY F � -_M -- - 2MCDONALD - - - - -- !KATHY _ - -- 8:MCGUIRE -- ___ - -� `MARY - - -�- 6MCLAUGHLIN_ _ iLAVER■E_ 18.'MCNEARNEY - :REGINA -` 4!MECKLEY :ROBERT 21MILLER SHARON 11..MIRICK 1ZELLA 17MORRISON KENNETH 6'MORTELL KATHARINA - _--- 19!MUNDALL +- _ - - - _ - - 'JUDY 8MUNSON RUTH 5MUNSTERMAN !MARY ' 6`MYERS :CHRISTINE 0 :NAMUR NANCY 7:NEIGER _ VIVIAN 2'.NELSON :JUDITH A 4 jNELSON .MICAH 21 iNEMETH DARREN 6NEWMAN MARIE 13'.NICOLAY :RICHARD 20 :NIESE _ :ANGELA 19 :NORBERG JARED 1'O'GORMAN LYNN 4 O'GORMAN 7MARK 17OHM 'ELDORIS 2 !OLSON DOUGLAS 13IOPRIS 'DOROTHY 8'ORTON :PHOEBE 16 :PARDUE 'JERRY 12.PASKETT �- - -- ' JIM --___- _._ -. -- 9:PATNODE JIM_ 15PATTNI 5 TI ATN._..�_ - 'KATHY 21 PAU L PATTI 6!PEARSON :DARLENE PEDERSON MARY JANE 18':PENNINGTON "LAKENYA 0 PERIN RUTH y.____._ -- c2 PREC� LAST NAME; FIRST • 20 ;PETERSON iJANE 17 .PETERSON JUDY 12;PETRASH 'LANESSA 17:PFEIFER CARLA 0 PHILLIPS CHARLEEN _ -_ 15;PILNEY ..- ^_ -_ - - -- :MARY - ._._.._ -.__ _^ 10'PIT_TENGER OLIVER - - _ 11IPOECHMANN_ _ NANCY . 7 PORTER MARILYN 3PREMIL JANINE 9' :PUDELL :DEB 4RAMSEY - � -- - OYRASK ____..____ -..-__ ;PAT _.._..- _._.___.. 4 REISDORFER :KATHY 21REISDORFER STAN 3!RENISH !SALLY 16 RESTAD : :ARLEN OIREYMANN 'PAT__ 8 RICKE :PATRICIA 12;RIEGER :LORRAINE 15 ::ROBRAHN ;SHARON 14ROHLAND BOB 10 'ROSS BETTY 18RUSSELL HEATHER 19iRUZICKA 'MARTIE 6TSAIMA JUDY 20'SAMES 'KAREN 7SANDISON BETTY 20 SCHAUBSCHLAGE KIM - 11SCHINDELDECKER :MILLIE 1;SCHMIDT 'BARB 15 SCHMITZ PAMELA _ 111SCHREIER !CINDY 17SCHRIBER ;ANDREW 16 SCHW_APP_AC_H_ DONALD - 5SCHWAPPACH ;KATHRYN _ 8:SCHWARTZ 'BEVERLY 9SCHWARTZ 'MELISSA 20'SEKTNAN -� - -µ ..DONALD - 17;SEVERSON JODY 19SEXTON MICHAEL 16 :SHEARON MARY 9.SHEGGEBY :CAROL 184SHELDON ARLENE 19:SHEPHARD = :JUDY 3!SHUMERROB _..._. - 1'SHUMER SUSAN 10,SIMPLOT ;JOHN 02- PREC1 ;' LASS' NAME. 1 FIRST • 14!SlROTIAK :ANDREW 10SKLUZACEK ;TED 13SKOG - - � !GREG 15 SMITH :NANCY I 14 SORENSON :SEDONIA (SID _ 17SQUIERS PHYLLIS 7SSTAMBAUGH 'CHAD 19!STEVENS DONALD 10:ST EVE NS JANET 1 STRICKLEN : MARILYN 9 STUEWE :MARIE 16SWE _ DEAN DICK_ 15'SWEDEAN - :JOYCE 8 SWIERCZEK .LINDA __ 6 TAUTGES 'HEATHER - 9 TAYLOR ;CEYLON 16JEICH 'JANE 15THOIUTAS 'ANN _ 9'THOMPSON WARREN 4;THORMAN 'KAREN - 21TIEDEMANN 'JAMIE OTILLEY ,KATIE 13 ;TRACY :SHARON 9TREMPER ;VICKI OTUMINI !CAROL 9TWEDT SARAH 3TTWOMEY RUTH 19TYRE (ROYCE _�� 10UECKER KAREN_ 1 USELMANN 'JOAN 6jUSMANI 'NAIYER 21VANDYCK 'LOIS 12':VARGHESE .SHAJI 19 VASATKA ALEX 7VIERRA ,BILL y- 13VIHOVDE CAROL 4 VIHOVDE FRED 1VIMR ;:ROSE 2VOGEL BOB 11VOLK 'ARDITH - 13 VOSSEN BETTY _5!WALD_O_ :HARRINGTON_ 11WAND �_. DELLA 20 ;WAND 'JOHN 14WANDERSEE KAY 2 :WARD _ JERRY 16;WARWEG CAROLYN 1WASHINGTON 'MARY_ OWASVICK LYNN a3 LINDA • 21WE/SE :SHARON 8 NE\�` 8|VVERT !SANDRA 20 ROQK M/A/S 15W LS[}N |TERESA �TH ;BARBARA 8 W1SNEW FRANK 21VNTT :ERICA 11 T � ----'��C� --� --' !JACKIE • Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting E. Certification of Delinquent Utilities ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To schedule a Public Hearing for Delinquent Utility Bills for November 4, 2004. FACTS: There are several delinquent utility bills that need to be certified to Dakota County for collection with the property taxes. Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 CONSENT AGENDA: F. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 4, 2004 TO CERTIFY DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set a public hearing for November 4, 2004 to consider the final assessment of the delinquent false alarm bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • On a semi - annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent false alarm balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. • The City currently has fie delinquent accounts in the amount of $797.50. Additional information will be provided at the time of the public hearing. ,6 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 City Council Meeting Consent Agenda G. APPROVE Agreement between Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and City of Eagan. FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve an agreement between the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and City of Eagan and authorize the Mayor to sign. FACTS: • The entire portion of the City of Eagan northwest of Highway 13 is included in the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, as shown on the attached map. The City's storm sewer infrastructure drains to that area along the Minnesota River. • The District's watershed management plan defines water management issues and defines the manner in which the District will address those issues. • One of the plan's implementation steps is that the District will enter into a joint resolution or joint powers agreement with each local unit of government within the District. The joint resolution/ agreement will address the respective roles of the District and the local unit of government in water management. • Such a joint powers agreement has not yet been executed between the District and the City of Eagan. • Among the goals of the District are: to keep regulation at the local level; to minimize costs to local governments; and to ensure local regulation is consistent with the District's watershed management plan. • The attached agreement will formalize the existing working relationship between the District and the City. It will facilitate more resources and funds being available to establish partnerships and to implement projects. CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: • Lower Minnesota River Watershed District map • Proposed agreement .29-39 et/re hu rr, • edorea rYlot/0 �C�7 C n are re e nc. f oSeel / er . ,22 L r � f' € a y ,; - tx Hennne'pi u Count) " s 4 '''',74, 4 - 41 „:".44';: , ' z 1 1. Corn t yt • b Fain; E t ( ,. + b 1 n - .'s t X2 ghts t ri ° t ; A 1494 j r a Eden - air i e I3 rs1r1 77 Sarver ' �^ r Bl tE tern "ty a z a , 21.2 4 169 a ; , _ • pxasf:a Chanhas.sen '' i , Eagan q s ki ®' Oakata t p " ., 13 5E t'aamty c. C*vfeShcp �.. �L 13 m C -" 3acksc+r, 16'- Scats - The Ltitil' NIiitatrk.ot�t Tow ,sh Coonttr I i +cr \!`atcrshQd »is3riet • i��y l0 � ' z : ,r water . ' o €q district o � N� X 41 , .4 A l '� p .0 .� +s E 1 3 Rx 1 2 3 Milts 031 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District M M /N-c '1 5 Edward A. Sclilampp, President Leo Fortier, Secretary Hennepin County Carver County Ron Kraemer, Vice President Len Kremer Assistant Treasurcr Dakota County Hennepin County Lawrence Samstad Treasurer Terry L. Schwalbe, Administrator Scott County Cell (952) 221 -1089 September 2, 2004 Eric Macbeth Water Resouces Coordinator City of Eagan 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 • Re: Water Resource Management Agreement Dear Eric: In the year 2000, then Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Administrator, Kevin Bigalke, sent you an agreement for water resource management. To date, we have not received any response from Eagan and we need to complete an agreement immediately. Attached is a copy of the cover letter sent June 26, 2000 by Kevin Bigalke and another copy of the agreement between your city and the LMRWD. Please present this to your city council as soon as possible and recommend entering into this agreement with the LMRWD. Upon council approval, have the appropriate person sign and date this agreement and return the original to our office no later than October 08, 2004. We will execute the agreement and return a copy to you for your files. Please contact me if you have any questions at 952- 496 -8842. Sincerel Aff■-. - 1°11 :-.•■•••••- --// Terry . Schwalbe District Administrator Scott County Government Center 200 4' Avenue West Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: (952) 496 -8842, Fax: (952) 496 -8844 E -mail terrys@lowermn.com COp June 26, 2000 Eric Macbeth Water Resources Coordinator City of Eagan 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Macbeth: The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) approved their 509c Water Resource Management plan in September, 1999. As stated in Section 6.2.3 of the LMRWD plan, the LMRWD seeks to enter into a joint resolution/agreement with the City of Eagan. Throughout the planning process, City of Eagan and other governmental agency staff participated by reviewing and providing comments on the plan. Based upon this input, the managers of the LMRWD believe that the good work the City of Eagan has implemented in enforcing water management regulations should remain in your control. The goals of the LMRWD as stated in Section 5.14 are: to keep regulation at the local level; to minimize costs to local governments; and to ensure local regulation is consistent with the LMRWD plan. By having this agreement in place, the LMRWD will have more resources and funds available to establish partnerships and implement projects. The purpose of the joint resolution/agreement is to define the respective roles of the LMRWD and the City of Eagan in water management. At this tune, the managers of the LMRWD request that you present this joint resolution/agreement to your City Council and recommend entering into this agree with the LMRWD. If you have any questions regarding the joint resolution/agreement or would like me to present the agreement to your City Council, please contact me at (952)496 -8842. On behalf of the managers of the LMRWD, we look forward to working with you and your staff on protecting the unique resources found in the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District. Sincerely, Kevin D. Bigalke District Administrator AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LOWER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF EAGAN Agreement Between Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and City of Eagan Whereas, The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) adopted and the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) approved the LMRWD Water Management Plan (Plan), which was prepared in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 103D and 103B, and Minnesota Rules 8410; and Whereas, The LMRWD Managers envision the District will provide leadership, encompassing (in descending priority) the roles of information and data provider; project facilitator; project proposer; and regulator regarding Minnesota River issues; and Whereas, The LMRWD Managers believe that regulation is more properly perfonned by local governmental units, provided that regulation by the local governmental units is consistent with the goals and policies of the LMRWD Plan; and Whereas, The City of Eagan is willing to perfonn review and permitting procedures necessary to implement the goals and policies of the LMRWD; and Whereas, Both parties wish to clearly define the respective roles of LMRWD and the City of Eagan, prior to and through the interim period between LMRWD Plan approval by BWSR and local plan approval by the LMRWD, and thereafter as the parties may agree. Therefore, be it resolved that the LMRWD and the City of Eagan agree to the following processes: The City of Eagan agrees to : 1. Implement water management policies, standards and criteria at least as strict as those in the LMRWD Plan and its amendments on all City of Eagan projects. 2. The City of Eagan shall submit project proposals to LMRWD for review and comment whenever the project meets any of the following criteria: • The project is a residential development affecting five (5) or more acres of land; • The project is a public /commercial/industrial development affecting one (1) or more acres of land; • The project involves construction or reconstruction of runoff management infrastructure where the contributing watershed is five (5) acres or more; • The project will result in diversion of surface water flows between defined subwatersheds; • The project will change intercommunity flowrates; • The project is located in the Minnesota River floodplain. 2 Where the LMRWD review identifies areas where the City of Eagan permits are less strict than the standards in the LMRWD plan, the City of Eagan shall incorporate the provisions of LMRWD comments into City of Eagan permits as necessary to enforce the LMRWD water management standards. 3. Submit amendments /revisions to city comprehensive plans to LMRWD for review and comment. 4. Inspect projects under construction, and enforce those City of Eagan permit provisions intended to implement the policies, standards and criteria of the LMRWD pursuant to this agreement. 5. LMRWD will administer its Minnesota River Floodplain Regulations in the City of Eagan until the City of Eagan adopts either a) a DNR- approved floodplain ordinance, or b) a floodplain ordinance that conforms with the LMRWD's water management plan. After the City of Eagan adopts such an ordinance, the City of Eagan will regulate floodplain activities, unless the City of Eagan gives the authority to LMRWD. The City of Eagan will require landowners to obtain permits prior to making alterations in the Minnesota River floodplain. 6. Be the designated local government unit (LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and rules, responsible for wetland regulation, including enforcement. LMRWD agrees to: 1. Review project plans and amendments /revisions to city comprehensive plans for conformance with LMRWD policies, standards and criteria, and provide review comments at no cost to the City of Eagan within [a mutually- agreed upon time to be specified]. 2. Conduct periodic inspections to monitor City of Eagan enforcement of LMRWD policies, standards, and criteria, and to work cooperatively to resolve conflicts over the implementation of LMRWD policies, standards and criteria. 3. Administer its Minnesota River Floodplain Regulations in the City of Eagan until the City of Eagan adopts either a) a DNR- approved floodplain ordinance, orb) a floodplain ordinance that conforms with the LMRWD's water management plan. After the City of Eagan adopts either a DNR- approved floodplain ordinance or a floodplain ordinance that conforms with this plan, it is the responsibility of the City of Eagan to regulate floodplain activities, unless the City of Eagan gives the authority to LMRWD. Landowners must obtain permits from the appropriate governmental unit prior to making alterations in the Minnesota River floodplain. Both parties agree this resolution shall be changed to account for changes in their relationship as occasioned by approval of the Local water management plan, approval of changes to the LMRWD Plan, or other circumstances affecting the management of water resources within the LMRWD and the City of Eagan. For example, as resource assessments and plans are completed, LMRWD will seek to amend this joint resolution to include specific limits and/or special resource protection methods /strategies in the watershed. This joint resolution is rescindable upon sixty days notice by either party. In the event this resolution is rescinded, or if the LMRWD determines, after a public hearing, that the City of Eagan has failed to enforce the standards and policies of the LMRWD, then the LMRWD will adopt regulations pursuant to the findings of a subsequent public hearing, and begin operating a permit program in the City of Eagan to enforce the standards and policies of the LMRWD. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Accepted , 20 Date 3� 3 Accepted , 20_ City of Eagan Mayor Date City Manager Date 4 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 City Council Meeting Consent Agenda H. APPROVE January Fitness Promotion for Eagan Community Center FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the proposed January fitness promotion for the Eagan Community Center. FACTS: • The January 2004 promotion was a very successful promotion that brought in approximately 160 new members. • The proposed January 2005 promotion, "Experience the Power of Fitness," will offer potential members a discounted enrollment rate of $49 to join (a $20 savings). • New members will also receive an Eagan Community Center t -shirt that features the new 2005 slogan and ECC logo. • Members will also be invited to a group equipment orientation session, free of charge that will introduce them to the facility and show them how to properly use the equipment • The January promotion will be advertised in newspapers, brochures, mailings, cable TV, and to corporations. CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: None 3 v Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 City Council Meeting Consent Agenda I. APPROVE 2005 Hours of Operation for Eagan Community Center FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the proposed 2005 hours of operation for the Eagan Community Center. FACTS: • The City Council annually reviews proposed hours of operation for the Eagan Community Center. • The proposed regular weekly hours for 2005 are: Monday — Friday 5:45 a.m. — 9:45 p.m. Saturday 8:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sunday Noon — 6:00 p.m. • The proposed holiday hours for 2005 are: New Years Day Sat., Jan. 1, 05 Noon — 4:00 p.m. Martin Luther K. Mon., Jan. 17 Normal Monday hrs Presidents Day Mon., Feb. 21 Normal Monday hrs Easter Sun., March 27 Closed Memorial Day Mon., May 30 8:00 am — Noon Independence Day Mon., July 4 8:00 — 4:00 p.m. Labor Day Mon., Sept. 5 8:00 am — Noon Thanksgiving Day Thurs., Nov. 24 Closed Day after Thanksgiving Fri., Nov. 25 8:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. Christmas Eve Sat., Dec. 24 8:00 am — Noon Christmas Day Sun., Dec. 25 Closed Day after Christmas Mon., Dec. 26 8:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. New Years Eve +Sat., Dec. 31 8:00 a.m. — Noon 4th of July hours may need to be adjusted to accommodate the 4th of July celebration. + = although the above will be posted hours, the ECC WILL be available for banquet room bookings on this evening this year. Because this holiday lands on a weekend, we stand a great chance of booking a reception. MOD's will cover the shift as normal schedule reflects CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: None 3' Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting J. APPROVE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR TH 55 & TH 149 FRONTAGE ROADS This item has been removed from the agenda. 3 7 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 K. CONTRACT 02 -13, JULY 2000 STORM MITIGATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the final payment for Contract 02 -13 (July 2000 Storm Mitigation — Storm Sewer Improvements) in the amount of $22,520.80 to Danner, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • Contract 02 -13 provided for storm water drainage system mitigation improvements in a portion of the areas affected by the July 2000 Super Storm, including Evergreen Park and Ponds AP -21, BP -2, BP -4, BP -15, BP -16, BP -18 & LP -63, as authorized by the City Council under City Projects 831 and 838. • These improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department, and found to be in order for favorable Council action of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. 38' Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 L. CONTRACT 04 -12, TERRA GLENN RAW WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the final payment for Contract 04 -12 (Terra Glenn — Raw Water Transmission Line Improvements) in the amount of $19,600.00 to Nodlund, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • Contract 04 -12 provided for the extension of a 24 -inch raw water transmission line across the Terra Glenn 1 Addition subdivision, to serve the future wells proposed within the North Well Field on Blue Cross Blue Shield property, south of Yankee Doodle Road and east of Blue Cross Road, as authorized by the City Council under City Project 901. • These improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department, and found to be in order for favorable Council action of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. 39 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 M. PROJECT 884, BORCHERT LANE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 884 (Borchert Lane — Street & Utility Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 1, 2004. FACTS: • Project 884 provided for the street upgrade and utility improvements of Borchert Lane, from Mike Collins Drive to the entrance to Thresher Park in northeast Eagan. • This project, constructed under Contract 04 -03, has been completed, all costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. • This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited properties. • The proposed assessments are based upon an independent appraisal of benefit for all assessable properties. The appraised assessable benefits are less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 20, 2003. Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting . �. REVISED PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL SUBDIVISION - EVERGREEN ENCLAVE (EPIC DEVELOPMENT) ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Revised Preliminary Subdivision and Final Subdivision (Evergreen Enclave) to create 7 lots and a 1.5 acre outlot on 7.7 acres for property located at 4195 Lexington Way South. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL ➢ Majority of City Council Members present FACTS: Items in bold are new information ➢ At the regular City Council meeting on June 15, 2004, the Council approved a preliminary subdivision (Evergreen Enclave) to create 7 lots and parkland dedication of a 2.8 acres (as an outlot) in lieu of cash. ➢ At the regular City Council meeting on September 21, 2004 the applicant requested the Preliminary Subdivision be reconsidered in order to reduce the size of the outlot (to be dedicated) from 2.8 to 1.5 acres. ➢ The council directed the applicant to provide the revised plat with an expanded conservation easement depicted for the October 5, 2004 Council meeting. ➢ The original application was for a Preliminary Subdivision to create 12 lots with four variances. ➢ The City Council directed the applicant to meet with the APrC and the APC to discuss issues that were raised by staff, and was directed to the June 15, 2004 meeting. The result of that workshop was the revised seven lot proposal. ATTACHMENTS (3): Revised plat with conservation easement on page 1/ ,- 1/3 Approved Plat drawing on page 44 9 . Applicant's narrative on page 4157 If/ Lid. YN 'HA +..6 4 ' Yl•■ 9D99-W, two ma Q - �- DD99�n (MO ••••• .l„ o" u) a .we 1 1 V rt. pin +••6.n .M .w�qm o ... -w•.. m w.. ••w .0 .1 GDD2 9�.cc .9=an. 8 8 44,4 d MI 1•45 4K .v.9 " .77: , n .•. =» . .9�Vt>tdYa °vs'A'dO '� -'y 377 IA'Z)Vd079d90 3Id9 d ,[] t tlLW .0M. . La 4.•44, .LTld •[YYNIJP179Nd /.i99ESY9AOJ 1 pp... .4 nw mw MY. 4.4 t .°.•,,61,m M. m,,,a,,, 9dYIJN9 F12.720272.9 , ,_as Mal Oe V �z O 9 °° <0 V §a : 4i t tar o zz ~ 1 W A 14 C_ c e6- A'. L - C ° v l ii yy , 3 1 ° h GW s a s 7 =i Apx ; t R co l O > trg V M1 W E p t°t ci mbI to o; _ y v t vw� Se/ 10' W c amt W L J • 0970i C9111.00M 007. I 3 . (Ydl NOd9NIX27 B D9ZLY /4.0/4.0141.041 D • I O 0•G2 0"66l C4 0 62L OW Q - - — _ — — , - - -- T — _ --- ,e/—L - - --1 I 4q I I / /■ � ( I .. c3 I I / /// Is , I �-j ) ) a // a I j ... / / I 8 C / \ \\ \\ / / 1 ■ W rl I 1-.... ' - ; I ili 1 �n - - -� 1 I • '; M j V � I r i —' I Z I 1 11 I 0 1 V .?I �, 1 1 I I/ ,. I / o --a- � I I / r I I _ I me/ / %. i ' 4, „M ,�� , i I 06 04 - 0 fr # " ob r 1 I I s 1 I F s En. I r —� 1 =8 s I W=; I I I \ 19'-o i 4102 I I I ...*,suo po-11 991OG Cn.L 2, 9 •n.N- Mn...A...\1... .••M..T9.. •9 n94iw7 • EXHIBIT A Conservation Easement That part of Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7, Block 1, Evergreen Enclave, according to the record plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7 distant 70.00 feet north of the southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence southerly along said west line and the west line of said Lot 2 a distance of 110.00 feet; thence easterly at right angles to said west line 140.00 feet; thence northeasterly to a point distant 40.00 feet southwesterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6 on the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of said Lot 6; thence northeasterly along said extension and said southeasterly line of Lot 6 to the intersection with a line drawn easterly at right angles to said west line of Lot 7 from the point of beginning; thence westerly to the point of beginning. Together with that part of said Lot 7 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 7 distant 70.00 feet north of the southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence easterly at right angles to said west line 90.00 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on said west line distant 90.00 feet northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly to the point of beginning. Together with that part of said Lot 2 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2 distant 40.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence easterly at right angles to said west line 90.00 feet; thence southwesterly to a point on said west line distant 90.00 feet south of the point of beginning; thence northerly to the point of beginning. - 0 02004 Z/3 I:1Epic Development \Evergreen Enclave \Evergreen Enclave Conservation Esmt Desc.DocLast Printed SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 . s.I l +.. .�>. -m. and ,., E •✓• •....• -• , v V' ...ON bY1®"6"O "WW1, 077 maxdOmra 3147 _ 1 h f a w. o.-, .....••.-• om' .w =z ..l„ ON/770JH �' .0 wa �,"' w ' °^ N 17d .LL771f7 IS ..• '.. V . 10. WI iu 4, .: i I +wNOWIGO .. n.. 54170X& Nird0WId9 ....a.. . Demas Tl !-7 N Mil; 0 �i }Z1 C) C Mill 3 3 1 F r:. IiE i ali fF �"_1 f l R ?= I Ili V$ A J .101) d'b v �Q cc I I 1 I I 1 k j1011.::�,.3 z;404 a O R i I I I' I I • �vo tl i i ll I I I I Iii lic I I I I ► ► 1I III c`•+ JL I I III ) d'+ 1: - 1 - I ;1::;44 , 1 — =.,- •—• — — S5 i� } , .. I .,%5 � s ' — I ° a n 11 r - / / `�i�/ / /� — 1 V � I II I I :. _� M _ 1 / / 4 I/ III '" J I e / I ('� / / / / \ I I II 1 / / T ' / t�= 1 " • 1 L / h/ a / • - �.. - - - II • 2 I ` , / // N q il I ..,---. i / / / �/ 1 u I T�_- . °il I / / -, .= • ` ---. � �/ / / / Nit ._; / / / / m II II ::c ___, L J ii 1 , 40 ; ....., .____, 1 il , �I 7 , / II / r - .d 1 , / 1 I I q 1 1 / / 1 I j » d ! I � 11 I 1 / --S... I I I 1 Ili I / o � I t I I I I j 1 J W I j 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I r7.1 I r- J I I I I i 1 II - I I 1 II � _ I 1 - _ . . .. I IIId IL d 1II 11 h I == , 1/ 11 . _......,.w..,.»,....,._._,,.; =: -_ • EPIC DEVELOPMENT, LLC MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Ridley, AICP City Planner From: Rich Raga.tz of EPIC Development, LLC RE: Evergreen Enclave Subdivision Michael: I am sending this memorandum requesting to revise the Preliminary Plat that was approved several weeks ago. All I am requesting is to reduce Outlot A from 2.8 acres to 1.5 acres. This is tel give more perceived value to the two western most lots in the plat. • The majority of this increased area would have a conservation easement over it and the rest of it would not allow the home to be built because of the contours not allowing gravity sanitary sewer to serve the home. My original site plan comprised 12 lots was reduced to 7 lots after the workshop session. This revised site plan was not considered a significant change and, thus, did not require going back'to Advisory Parks and Planning Commission. Reducing Outlot A from 2.8 acres to 1.5 acres is being considered a significant change. Rather than go all the way back to Advisory Parks and Planning Commission, on a change that I deem insignificant, I would rather just revise my Preliminary Plat. 1 look forward to revising my Preliminary Plat on September 21, 2004 under old business. Let me know if you need anything else and thanks for your help. Sincerely, litv Rich Ra.gatz EPIC Development, LLC (612) 730 - 2814 • V 3441 St, Paul Avenue /Minneapolis, MN 55416 / Office /Cell; 612.730.2814 / Home: 612.927.6588 / Email; rrosatziearthlink.net Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 O. PROJECT 884, BORCHERT LANE STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Easement Agreement for Project 884 (Borchert Lane — Street & Utility Improvements) with the owner of Parcel No. 10- 14700- 010-01 and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Project 884 provided for the street upgrade and utility improvements of Borchert Lane, from Mike Collins Drive to the entrance to Thresher Park in northeast Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. The improvements included the upgrade of 800' of rural section gravel roadway to a standard city street with public utilities. • On May 20, 2003, the City Council approved Project 884, including the acquisition of all necessary easements. • On March 1, 2004, the City Council awarded the contract to McNamara Contracting Inc. The construction activities started on April 26. • The storm sewer improvements associated with the Borchert Lane construction activities required the acquisition of a permanent easement from an adjacent property. • Cost estimates were included in the feasibility report for all required easements. The estimated value of the currently considered easement for the property was $15,000. The property owner has agreed to accept an offer of $8,044.00 if approved by the Council. • An agreement between the City of Eagan and the owner of Parcel 10- 14700- 010 -01 (Lot 1, Block 1, Borchert - Ingersoll Inc. 1 Addition), has been prepared and signed by the property owners agreeing to this acquisition cost for the necessary easements. • Engineering staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed the agreement and found it to be in order for favorable Council action. ISSUES: • If the City Council would desire to discuss this item, it would be appropriate to direct any discussion to a Closed Session. qg Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting P. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Adopt mandatory Minnesota State Building Code Chapters 1335 and 1346. FACTS: > The State of Minnesota officially adopted the 2004 Minnesota Mechanical Code, Chapter 1346, on September 20, 2004 and it would be appropriate to formally adopt these provisions into the City Code. > The floodproofing provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 1335, were left out of the last adoption cycle. The State has indicated that we should adopt this chapter to complete the minimum package of provisions that make up the Minnesota State Building Code. Eagan's only designated floodplain is the Minnesota River Valley. ISSUES:None ATTACHMENTS: (1) Draft ordinance on pages 1/8/ _ through Y . '7'2 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER FOUR, ENTITLED "CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATION" BY AMENDING SECTION 4.01 REGARDING BUILDING CODE ADOPTION; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Four is hereby amended by changing Section 4.01 to read as follows: Sec. 4.01. Building Code adopted. The Minnesota State Building Code (SBC) (2004), including the following chapters of Minnesota Rules: A. 1300 Minnesota Building Code; B. 1301 Building Official Certification; C. 1302 State Building Construction Approvals; D. 1303 Minnesota Provisions; E. 1305 Adoption of the 2000 International Building Code; F. 1307 Elevators Related Devices; G. 1309 Adoption of the 2000 International Residential Code; H. 1311, Adoption of the 2000 Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings; I. 1315 Adoption of the 2002 National Electrical Code; J. 1325 Solar Energy Systems; K. 1330 Fallout Shelters; L. 1341 Minnesota Accessibility Code M. 1346 Adoption of t the Minnesota State Mechanical Code as revised 2004; N. 1350 Manufactured Homes; 1 O. 1360 Prefabricated Buildings; P. 1361 Industrialized/Modular Buildings; Q. 1370 Storm Shelters; R. 4715 Minnesota Plumbing Code; S. 7670, 7672, 7674, 7676 and 7678, Minnesota Energy Code; anfl T. 1335 Flood Proofing Regulations; and the current edition of Minnesota State Fire Code, are hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein. One copy of said code shall be marked CITY OF EAGAN - OFFICIAL COPY and kept on file in the protective inspections department and open to inspection and use by the public. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 .entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation "' and Section 4.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Mira B. McGarvey By: Pat Geagan Its: Deputy Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: 2 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting )• CUL -DE -SAC STUDY — CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Direct Community Development staff to review cul -de -sac standards generally and prepare findings for review /discussion by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. FACTS: ➢ On several occasions recently, the APC has commented on the frequency of Variance requests to exceed the maximum 500' cul -de -sac length City Code requirement. ➢ At their regular meeting in August, the APC asked that staff seek direction from the City Council to review the cul -de -sac standards, survey other communities and provide this information back to the APC for a workshop discussion. ATTACHMENTS: None SD Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting R. ADOPT RESOLUTION REGARDING DSL SERVICES IN EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution urging Qwest to fully extend DSL services to all of Eagan. FACTS: • On September 13, 2004 the City Council heard an interim report and recommendations from the Eagan Technology Task Force regarding high speed Internet access for Eagan residents and businesses. • The Task Force determined that 50% of the phone lines into Eagan have no Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service available. • The Task Force has also determined that portions of Eagan's commercial, retail and small businesses as well as home -based businesses lack access to affordable high speed Internet services. • Lack of sufficient Internet access is a barrier to sufficient educational and economic growth. • Even though virtually all of Eagan homeowners have access to cable broadband services, the Task Force received significant feedback from residents through e- mails, surveys and focus groups that they want more competition and affordable choices which extended DSL would provide. • In previous published reports it was represented that Qwest would fully extend DSL service to Eagan by August of 2001. • The proposed resolution is consistent with previous City Council goals for city- wide Internet connectivity and with Council policy regarding resolutions. ATTACHMENTS (2): • Resolution urging Qwest to fully extend DSL services to Eagan on page SC)76 3 • July 13, 2001 news article on page ,.S`V . 5/ RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN To Fully Extend DSL Services to Eagan WHEREAS, Qwest is the primary telecommunications provider in Eagan; and WHEREAS, published reports previously suggested Qwest would full extend Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service to Eagan by the summer of 2001; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Technology Task Force has determined that such DSL service has only been extended to approximately 50% of Eagan telephone lines; and WHEREAS, Eagan residents have made it known via e- mails, surveys and focus groups that they desire more competition to and lower prices than cable modem service; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Technology Task force has confirmed that portions of Eagan's commercial, retail, home -based and small business community lack affordable high speed Internet service; and WHEREAS, lack of high speed Internet access is a barrier to sufficient economic and educational growth; and WHEREAS, Eagan prides itself on having excellent infrastructure such as roads, sewers, electrical and water service and affordable Internet access is critical to a successful community; and WHEREAS, Qwest has made some recent additions to its DSL infrastructure in Eagan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan urges Qwest to fully extend its DSL services to all of Eagan without delay and with all deliberate speed to be complete no later than December 31, 2005. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this signed resolution be sent to the ranking Qwest official in Minnesota and published in local newspapers. ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 2004. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL BY: It's Mayor SVZ. BY: It's Clerk CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular City Council meeting thereof assembled this 1 day of June, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk L 3 High -speed Internet access comes to Eagan Page 1 of 2 Friday, October 1, 2004 News... High - speed Internet access comes to Eagan Apple Walley Posted 7/13/01 Burnsville Eagan by Erin Johnson Farmington i Staff Writer Lakeville Eagan City Council Member Paul Bakken announced Tuesday that Eagan residents Rosemount 1 will get full delivery of DSL, a high -speed Internet service, by August. bune The announcement was the culmination of a year -long effort on Bakken's part to Sections... work with Qwest to establish DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) access for all areas of Eagan. Liters Staff coio,n5 Currently, DSL service is only available in the area around Lexington Avenue and hu j Yankee Doodle Road. That infrastructure is currently under construction and will be extended to other areas by the end of the summer. Arts Sports According to Qwest, the DSL connection provides Internet service that is up to 22 Announcement times faster than standard modems, which translates into less time spent waiting for downloads. DSL also works on existing phone lines, making a second line for an Real Estate g p g Story Archive Internet connection unnecessary. Public Notices In addition, users don't have to wait to log on because there is no dial -up; the service is always connected. Simply clicking an icon gets users onto the Web. The DSL access was a big priority for Bakken personally because, he said, "I'm a Thisweek Home geek." Page "I conduct a lot of my business over the Internet," he said. "I'm like most folks in Eagan who want more bandwidth (the amount of data allowed to travel over a Elections - network) and they want it now." Candidates & Another appealing feature of DSL, Bakken said, is that it allows users to talk on the Profiles phone and surf the Internet at the same time on the same line. Bakken said that residents in extended access areas are already seeing sign -up notices Purchase posted in their neighborhoods. Photographs "I'm just waiting for mine," he said. Advertising... View Classifieds ©Thisweek Newspapers Order Classifieds http://www.thisweek-online.com/2001/july/13internet.html 10/1/2004 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 City Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS: S. APPROVE THE HIRING OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO CONDUCT AN ORGANIZATIONAL STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of a consulting firm to conduct an organizational study for the City of Eagan. BACKGROUND: • Per the direction of the Council at the June 28, 2004 Special City Council retreat, the City's Senior Management Team has been in ongoing discussions regarding the scope of an organizational study to best position the City in the future by addressing the recent retirement of the City's Parks and Recreation Director, considering the reallocation of existing resources, and planning for other senior level staff retirements. • A committee of the Senior Management Team has met over the past few months to establish the goal of the organizational study and prepare the scope for the RFP. • The goal of the proposed organizational study is to provide a roadmap to the City of Eagan on the appropriate organizational model, staffing, and service delivery to best meet the current and future needs of the community, recognizing the constrained fiscal environment in which the City operates. • Recognizing that this organizational study is the first of its kind for the City in 20+ years, the Senior Management Team approaches the study as an investment in the City's future to ensure that the operations and organization remain strong and aligned with Council expectations. • The Senior Management Team approaches the organizational study as a needed and valuable investment to be made in order to preserve and strengthen a $40 million operation. • Per the direction of the Council at the August 17, 2004 Council meeting, an RFP was solicited for consulting services to conduct the organizational study. • The City received six (6) proposals in response to the RFP. The committee of the senior management team interviewed four of the six firms that submitted proposals. • The committee considered the firms' understanding of the project scope and deliverables, project cost, and comparable experience of the firms. • All of the firms interviewed commended the City for being forward - thinking in pursuing this study. • The final interview took place on Friday, October 1. At the time the packet was prepared, staff continued to conduct reference checks and negotiate a final cost for recommendation to the Council. • Look for additional information on Monday with regard to the firm being recommended for the Council's consideration. • If any member of the City Council would like to view any of the proposals submitted, please contact the City Administrator's office. Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting T. APPROVE BID AWARD TO PIERCE MANUFACTURING FOR TWO FIRE APPARATUS REPLACEMENTS (FIRE PUMPER / PUMPER TANKER TRUCKS) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the bid award to Pierce Manufacturing for two fire apparatus replacements (fire pumper / pumper tanker trucks). FACTS: • At the August 17, 2004 City Council meeting authorization was given to advertise for bids for two fire apparatus and the Equipment Revolving Fund —Fund Balance was approved as a funding source. • One combined bid was received and opened on September 28. • The bids for each piece of apparatus as well as for the loose equipment were all below the estimates as outlined in the enclosed summary. • The Eagan Volunteer Fire Department Truck Committee has reviewed the bids and is recommending acceptance including bid option 1 for the pumper and options 1 and 3 for the pumper /tanker at a total cost of $788,387.05. • The City is accepting sealed bids on the two units being sold until November 18. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page 5 is a copy of a memo from the Truck Committee summarizing the bids eceived from Pierce Manufacturing. • Enclosed on page S 8' is a copy of the funding summary as approved at the August 17, 2004 City Council meeting. 5--C 11a ■ 1. ti Eagan Fire Department MEMO DATE: September 30, 2004 TO: Chief Kriha and Gene VanOverbeke FROM: Truck Committee SUBJECT: Bid for Pumper and Pumper/Tanker We received one bid from Pierce Fire Apparatus for both trucks. This is the only company that bid on our new proposal. The following is a summary of our bids which came in below our estimated budget: Estimated Budget Pierce Bid Pumper $340,000 $341,200 Pumper/Tanker $425,000 $422,000 Loose Equip. $ 60,000 $ 25,187.05 Total $825,000 $788,387.05 The price of the pumper includes the option price of $8,500 for a Wilburt light tower and the price of the tanker includes an option price of $3,600 more for a Caterpillar engine which is recommended for the weight of this truck. We recommend that we award the bid to Pierce Fire Apparatus including Option 1 with the pumper and Option 1 and 3 with the pumper /tanker. In accordance with the bid, we have 30 days from today's date (9/28/04) to accept the bids. After this date, Pierce will add 2.5% to the price of the trucks and has the option to withdraw their bids. We are also recommending that both of these trucks have graphics to match the current Chiefs' vehicles and that the trucks are two -toned red with a black fire apparatus roof. Sources: Reallocation of 2004 Part 11 CIP $ 134,000 Sale of Unit 5 (Low end of estimate) 125,000 Sale of Unit 18 (Low end of estimate) 60,000 2005 Part II CIP Request 425,000 Not Identified 81,000 $ 825,000 Uses: New Unit 5 $ 340,000 New Unit 18 425,000 Equipment for New Unit 18 60,000 Total Uses $ 825,000 Additional Funding Requirement: 2005 Part II CIP Request $ 425,000 Not Identified 81,000 $ 506,000 Sgr Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting Consent Agenda U. AUTHORIZE TRANSMITTAL OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET SUBMITTAL FOR DIAMOND T- STEEPLECHASE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO CITY CONSULTANT FOR REVIEW ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize transmittal of the developer's Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Submittal for the Diamond T property/Steeplechase development proposal to SRF for review and coordination. FACTS: ➢ The City previously received a development application from Toll Brothers for a planned development and subdivision for property formerly operated as the Diamond T Ranch on Pilot Knob Road. The proposal did not meet thresholds for mandatory environmental reviews, but a number of environmental issues were identified through the application review process. These issues included stockpiling of manure, filling of a portion of the property with debris from the Metropolitan Stadium, degradation of ponds and wetlands due to the property's use as a riding stable and other issues related to its agricultural use. ➢ The developer performed Phase I and Phase II analyses of the property as part of its due diligence for site acquisition and worked with City, County and State agencies to develop abatement plans for the issues identified. ➢ Residents raised concerns regarding the completeness of such reviews and efforts and submitted a petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), as provided for under MN Rules Part 4410, to further clarify the impacts to the site from past activities and the proposed development and the remediation steps necessary to address them. ➢ At its meeting of August 17, 2004, the City Council received the petition and ordered an EAW to be prepared by the developer and reviewed by an environmental consultant hired by the City. The EAW process includes the submission of a draft EAW by the developer, preliminary analysis by the consultant, a public review and comment period and a final report by the City's consultant for Council review. ➢ On September 27, 2004, the developer submitted the EAW to the City. In follow up to the Council's previous direction, the action which is in order at this time is to formally transmit the document to SRF to begin the review, public input and report process. The costs of the consultant analysis and the review process will be borne by the developer. ATTACHMENTS: A copy of the Draft EAW submittal is available at City Hall for review. �9 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PROJECT 874, TH 55 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD/ GIFT OF MARY STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 874 (North Frontage Road/ Gift of Mary — Street & Utility Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 874 provided for the new street and associated utility installations, including sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer, of a portion of the north frontage road along Trunk Highway 55 east of Louis Lane, near the border with Inver Grove Heights. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 7, 2004, with a public hearing scheduled for October 5 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is equal to the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 17, 2002. The assessments are based upon the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for all such assessable properties. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. With the preliminary development of the property, the Gift of Mary property owner waived their rights to object to the proposed assessment for these improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages a through 6S ' 6r� FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - Project 874 ASSESSMENT - October 5, 2004 NAME - T.H. 55 /Gift of Mary Frontage Road IMPROVEMENT- December 17, 2002 Utility and Street Installation IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED F.R.= Feasiblity Report FINAL FINAL RATE F.R. UNITS RATE F.R. UNITS SANITARY STORM SEWER SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk H Lateral $24.00 $24.00 /F.F. ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET Er Trunk $2,115.00 $2,115.00 /Acre ❑ Gravel Base Lf Lateral $24.25 $24.25 /F.F. L( Frontage Road $131.85 $131.85 F.F. ❑ Service ❑ Multi Fam Equiv. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. B1 Driveway $5,378.73 N/A L.S. OTHER STREET LIGHTS 10 Service Pair $2,840.95 N/A L.S. ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED 03 -04 3 15 Years 4.50% $251,206 F.R.(1) $223,874 F.R.(1) $143,158.45(1) $333,439.65(1) COMMENTS: (1) The feasibility amounts and actual numbers are not comparable. The feasibility amounts contain estimated assessments in the amount of $104,114 for the Gift of Mary utility assessments that will be collected as connection charges when a building permit is issued for the property. 6/ MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GERALD it WOBSCHALL, FINANCIAL CONSULTANT DATE: September 10, 2004 SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL, PROJECT 874 STREETS AND UTILITIES The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearings on December 17, 2002 ordered Project 874. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements: sanitary sewer lateral, sanitary sewer trunk, water lateral, water trunk, T. H. 55 Frontage Road with storm sewer, and turn lanes on T. H. 55., were to be constructed and/or assessed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess the street with storm sewer drainage, sanitary sewer lateral and water lateral improvements using a linear method of assessment and trunk water using an area method of assessment. The proposed assessment roll included a comment and there is also an agreement with Gift of Mary to postpone the utility charges until connection to the City's utility system. Therefore, it is recommended this roll be adopted in accordance with the terms of the agreement with Gift of Mary. The construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract 03 -04 which has been completed. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 5, 2004. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $302,826.48 paid to the contractors for the construction of the following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of: engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $134,770.77 and easement costs totaling $39,000.85 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $476,598.10. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTSIMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST& EASEMENTS COST REPORT Street storm sewer $120,196.62 $92,493.50 $212,690.12 $178,920 Turn Lanes 37,109.92 16,515.51 53,625.43 16,690 Sanitary Sewer 17,181.00 7,646.28 24,827.28 39,500 Lateral Sanitary Sewer 49,808.20 22,166.78 71,974.98 95,660 Trunk Water Lateral 23,869.00 10,622.73 34,491.73 44,040 Water Trunk 48,973.55 21,795.33 70,768.88 100,270 Services 1,966.00 874.95 2,840.95 Concrete Driveway 3,722.19 1,656.54 5,378.73 Total $302,826.48 $173,771.62 $476,598.10 $475,080 2 692-- II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS Sanitary Sewer Trunk and Storm Sewer Trunk charges were levied to the properties in prior periods, therefore trunk charges for those improvements are not proposed for levy with this project. Water trunk assessments were proposed at the public hearing for this project and will be proposed in this assessment roll at $2,115 per acre. This is the 2003 fee schedule rate quoted in the feasibility study. B. UTILITY LATERAL AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Improvement with Drainage The frontage road was extended in an easterly direction from Louis Lane to the proposed Gift of Mary driveway access. The construction cost was $120,196.62. Other costs in the amount of $53,492.65, and easement costs in the amount of $39,000.85 were allocated to the construction costs resulting in an improvement cost of $212,690.12. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be assessed using a linear method to the property located on the north side of the frontage Road. The feasibility report called for this road to be assessed at the fee schedule rate of $131.85/F.F.. IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $212,690.12 1,564 F.F. $135.99/F.F. Because the improvement rate is greater than the Fee Schedule Rate of $131.85 the Fee Schedule Rate is proposed as the assessment rate. 2. Sanitary Sewer Lateral The sanitary sewer lateral improvement consists of 821 lineal feet of 8 inch PVC and other appurtenances with a construction cost of $17,181.00. Other costs that total $7,646.28 were allocated, which results in an improvement cost of $24,827.28. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be assessed using a linear method. The assessment rate was computed using the following: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $24,827.28 782 L.F. $31.75/L.F. Because the improvement rate is greater than the Fee Schedule Rate of $24.00/F.F. quoted in the feasibility study, the Fee Schedule Rate is proposed as the assessment Rate. In accordance with an agreement between the City and Gift of Mary Sanitary Sewer Lateral assessment is delayed until development of the property. Gift of Mary property will be charged at the Fee Schedule Rates in effect at the time of connection to the system. 3 6'3 3. Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvement The trunk sanitary sewer improvement consists of 140 lineal feet of 8 inch PVC and other appurtenances in jacked or augured casing pipe beneath T.H. 55 with a construction cost of 49,808.20. Other costs in the amount of $22,166.78 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $71,974.98. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the City's Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund. 4. Water Lateral Improvement The contractor installed 740 feet of 8 -inch DIP at a construction cost of $23,869.00. Other costs in the amount of $10,622.73 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $34,491.73. IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $34,491.73 782 L.F. $44.11/L.F. Because the improvement rate is greater than the Fee Schedule Rate of $24.25/F.F. quoted in the feasibility study, the Fee Schedule Rate is proposed as the assessment Rate. In accordance with an agreement between the City and Gift of Mary Water Lateral assessment is delayed until development of the property. Gift of Mary property will be charged at the Fee Schedule Rates in effect at the time of connection to the system. 5. Trunk Water Improvement The trunk water improvements consist of 157 lineal feet of 8 -inch DIP and other appurtenances with a construction cost of 48,973.55. Other costs in the amount of $21,795.33 were allocated, which results in an improvement cost of $70,768.88. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the City's Water Trunk Fund. In accordance with an agreement between the City and Gift of Mary Water Trunk assessment is delayed until development of the property. Gift of Mary property will be charged at the Fee Schedule Rates in effect at the time of connection to the system. 6. Service Pair The City paid $1,209.00 to install a 4 -inch PVC sewer service, and $757.00 to install a 1 -inch copper water service. $874.95 of other costs were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $2,840.95. The sanitary sewer service improvement cost is computed at $1,747.05 and the water service cost is computed at $1,093.90. Staff recommends this improvement be financed by the City's Sanitary Sewer $1,747.05 and Water Trunk $1,093.90 Funds. The property will be charged at the fee schedule rate in existence at time of connection to the City's utility system. In accordance with an agreement between the City and Gift of Mary Service Pair assessment is delayed until development of the property. Gift of Mary property will be charged at the Fee Schedule Rates in effect at the time of connection to the system. 7. Concrete Driveway Entrance The City paid $3,722.19 to install a concrete driveway entrance to the Gift of Mary property. $1,656.54 of other 4 7. Concrete Driveway Entrance The City paid $3,722.19 to install a concrete driveway entrance to the Gift of Mary property. $1,656.54 of other costs were allocated resulting in an improvement and assessable cost of $5,378.73. The concrete driveway improvement is proposed for assessment using the direct assignment method. IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $5,378.73 1 Unit $5,378.73/Unit C. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 15 years. The interest rate is 4.50% per annum on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY) Street with storm sewer $212,690.12 $103,106.70 ($109,583.42) Turn Lanes 53,625.43 (53,625.43) Sanitary Sewer Lateral 24,827.28 7,728.00 (17,099.28) Sanitary Sewer Trunk 71,974.98 (71,974.98) Water Lateral 34,491.73 7,808.50 (26,683.23) Water Trunk 70,768.88 19,136.52 (51,632.36) Services 2,840.95 (2,840.95) Concrete Driveway 5,378.73 5,378.73 0 Total $476,598.10 $143,158.45 $(333,439.65) The following City Funds will provide noted financing of the City Responsibilities for the Projects 874. FUND AMOUNT Major Street Fund $163,208.85 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 90,821.31 Water Trunk 79,409.49 TOTAL $333,439.65 5 ‚5— fy i • Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed Reviewed i Public Works Department Finance 1 y. artment 10-k —c:) 1, ` ( q7- Dated Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Daugherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I 6 N CD t- Q N O N O R d 4 4 O t` O J2 C) O N O O • c C O as O R N M N O O O EV_ C R as T r O ay O O O O ✓ C O O O O d E N c7 O co LA CO M O N E lA r r O r N O M CD N N W co O ti rn r` v CO O) a0 r r N . • O a) ._ O) aO co C r et N CO - I_ O 0 I— O u)OO N O N- 00 t- co O'1) N (D r lis r r O C`7 y co r co O � r co co CO CO d d • C 1".• — O V R O 1 O C U W E CA 1 1 1 < v '117 E gyp :n co . CO v U C CO O CD • v M O r I— CD N a7 ♦+ r r la O O O N N O • r O • ti CO 0 O ▪ O CV h E O O O la O O O r O N to CD O I 1 CV f: 10 fn N N y- 9 O O 0 O O O a O o 0 d000 01 CO CO a 0 0 N 9 0 0 L oa r T r Z / ▪ O O O w � O O 0 LONE OAK ROAD ' 0 10-02 [A L.._____J 1 t '' � -�. _ - ---- 060 02 NO SCALE f " - __._.. -- N 7 { i i :I ' f l 020 -02 ! 1 V - , ,,,77717/ , 1 I 1 1 „,„///// / f ,./ i \ \ ,, %,� ,,/ i,� r i / / //// i ',0 7/ . --_____ : -------- / : ' / 10- 0380 /// 02' / � / r , / /; //, /';\ B lock l .. / / / `� / '/, / /r Mary i ,.,� `` � 60 -0 '� t O f Ma r�r S r i , / ,,; // '. Gif 2,// ,/,„/ , / r : /y/ ! � \ ,f� a� 0 .r/ rr r , r" .. it / �r / ,/ // / / /, o ; , 2 / ,/ . . /' ; , i fit. � i 3 j /. (• - o , P <, � "co � ••; FF / ` t y go • 46Q � F F 4,-,') l i , (`\0 S�, ..'--- '.` \� � ti I i RUNk ti c3 . cb ___i LEGEND ry �ti 020 -03 i .(/) Assessable Frontage LOT 3 0 g } J r_t (street, sanswr & water laterals) • •... C5 010 -06 p �� Street Assessment Only �I I 7z ... ; Water Trunk Assessment �n�0' * Concrete Driveway Apron c-j. T.H. 55 Frontage Road / Gift of ► - C City Project No. 874 ee 1 Figure 2004 City of Eagan Parcels & Assessment Figure re 1 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 B. PROJECT 898, TERMINAL DRIVE STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 898 (Terminal Drive — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 898 provided for the bituminous overlay of Terminal Drive, west of Trunk Highway 13, north of Yankee Doodle Road. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 7, 2004, with a public hearing scheduled for October 5 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment costs are 25% to 30% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 16, 2003. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 27 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 27 parcels (Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages 2O through 76 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - 898 ASSESSMENT - October 5, 2004 NAME - Terminal Drive IMPROVEMENT - December 16, 2003 Mill and Overlay, and Driveway IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED F.R. = Feasiblity Report FINAL F.R FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral El Surfacing C/I $13.13 $17.54 /F.F. ❑ Service Driveway 64.84 95.55 /Sq. Yd. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ TraillSidewalk SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $230,700 F.R. $16,610 F.R. 04 -03 27 5 Year 4.50% $165,146.48 $28,012.63 COMMENTS: 47 4 * , r MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall DATE: September 10, 2004 SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No. 898 Terminal Drive- Street Overlay The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on December 16, 2003 ordered Project 898. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are mill and overlay of Terminal Drive, concrete entrances, and replacement curb and gutter from its intersections with State Trunk Highway 13 and Yankee Doodle Road. In the feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the mill and overlay improvement using a linear method and for the driveway improvements to use an assignment method based on the area of the installed improvement. This assessment roll is prepared using the methods presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No. 04 -03, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 5, 2004. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $152,182.35 paid to the contractor and $853.66 paid for street signs for construction costs totaling $153,036.01 for the following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $39,033.47 and easement costs in the amount of $1,089.63 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $193,159.11. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement. CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT Terminal Drive $69,551.08 $18,829.38 $88,380.46 $119,860 overlay Commercial driveways 61,173.91 15,603.06 76,776.97 110,840 Curb repair 22,311.02 5,690.66 28,001.68 16,610 TOTAL $153,036.01 $40,123.10 $193,159.11 $247,310 9/ 2 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Overlay The cost of the street overlay improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $250.00 $250.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 4,604 .90 4,143.60 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 850 1.50 1,275.00 Type 41 Wear Course Ton 1,843.76 30.75 56,695.62 Traffic control L. S. 1 325.00 325.00 Adjust water valve box Each 1 125.00 125.00 Adjust manhole casting Each 14 325.00 4,550.00 4 inch double epoxy Lin. Ft. 3,333 .40 1,333.20 Traffic sign L.S. 1 853.66 853.66 SUBTOTAL $69,551.08 Easement 1,089.63 Other costs @ 25.50% 17,739.75 Mill and Overlay Cost $88,380.46 B. Commercial Property Assessment Rate The assessment rate for commercial property was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE _ $88,380.46 6,730 F. F. $13.13/F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE _ $13.13/F.F. X 100% $13.13/F.F. �3 2. Concrete Driveways Concrete driveway aprons were constructed at a cost of $61,173.91. Other costs in the amount of $15,603.06 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $76,776.97. According to the feasibility report this improvement is to be 100% assessed. The assessment rate was computed using the following: IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE IMPROVEMENT COST BASIS RATE $76,776.97 1,184.17 SQ. YDS. $64.84/SQ. YD. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $64.84 /SQ. YD. X 100% $64.84/SQ. YD. 3. Curb and Gutter replacement The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $22,311.02. Other costs, in the amount of $5,690.66, were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $28,001.68. This improvement will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project have a term of 5 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of 4.50 % on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES /(RESPONSIBILITIES) IMPROVEMENT CITY'S IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY) Streets Resurfacing $88,380.46 $88,364.90 ($15.56) Driveway Installation 76,776.97 76,781.58 4.61 Curb Replacement 28,001.68 (28,001.68) TOTAL $193,159.11 $165,146.48 ($28,012.63) The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund $28,012.63 Total $28,012.63 4 P2-3 z 16 Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed Review• Rt— t ��• Public Works Departmen Finance D epartment 10 -1-04 (o °(LA94 Dated Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Daugherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I GRW 5 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P898 PID ADDITION NAME Street Concrete Proposed Estimated Overlay .Driveway Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 13831 - 010 -01 BEST BRANDS 2ND ADDITIO $3,781.44 $5,749.36 $9,530.80 $13,250.00 $3,719.20 10- 68050 - 010 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $3,886.48 $0.00 $3,886.48 $5,192.00 $1,305.52 10- 68050 - 010 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $6,459.96 $0.00 $6,459.96 $9,840.00 $3,380.04 • 10- 68050- 011 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $3,282.50 $7,522.74 $10,805.24 $20,168.00 $9,362.76 10- 68050 - 020 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $4,582.37 $4,114.10 $8,696.47 $12,240.00 $3,543.53 10- 68050 - 021 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $2,626.00 $4,444.78 $7,070.78 $10,869.00 $3,798.22 10- 68050 - 030 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,575.60 $5,034.18 $6,609.78 $9,466.00 $2,856.22 10- 68050 - 031 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,785.68 $0.00 $1,785.68 $8,312.00 $6,526.32 10- 68050 - 031 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,851.33 $5,187.85 $7,039.18 $8,878.00 $1,838.82 10- 68050 - 032 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,785.68 $0.00 $1,785.68 $2,385.00 $599.32 10- 68050 - 040 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,667.51 $5,280.57 $6,948.08 $2,280.00 ($4,668.08) 10- 68050 - 040 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $3,676.40 $3,156.41 $6,832.81 $10,169.00 $3,336.19 10- 68050 - 041 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,680.64 $0.00 $1,680.64 $2,193.00 $512.36 10- 68050- 050 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $3,755.18 $4,678.85 $8,434.03 $11,248.00 $2,813.97 10- 68050 - 050 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $3,479.45 $0.00 $3,479.45 $4,648.00 $1,168.55 10- 68050 - 060 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $2,967.38 $0.00 $2,967.38 $3,964.00 $996.62 10- 68050 - 061 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $5,869.11 $4,580.30 $10,449.41 $14,245.00 $3,795.59 10- 68050 - 062 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $1,050.40 $0.00 $1,050.40 $1,403.00 $352.60 10- 68050 - 070 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $4,162.21 $0.00 $4,162.21 $5,560.00 $1,397.79 10- 68050 - 080 -01 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $4,569.24 $9,128.18 $13,697.42 $12,127.00 ($1,570.42) 10- 68050 - 081 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $2,717.91 $9,068.52 $11,786.43 $9,367.00 ($2,419.43) 10- 68050- 082 -02 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRI $2,402.79 $0.00 $2,402.79 $8,946.00 $6,543.21 10- 75100 - 010 -01 TAN ME INDUSTRIAL PARK $3,387.54 $0.00 $3,387.54 $4,280.00 $892.46 10- 75100 - 020 -01 TAN ME INDUSTRIAL PARK $3,387.54 $0.00 $3,387.54 $4,280.00 $892.46 10- 75100 - 030 -01 TAN ME INDUSTRIAL PARK $4,503.59 $0.00 $4,503.59 $6,016.00 $1,512.41 10-77199-010-01 TRANSPORT AMERICA ADDI $2,704.78 $0.00 $2,704.78 $4,929.00 $2,224.22 10- 77199 - 020 -01 TRANSPORT AMERICA ADDI $4,766.19 $8,835.75 $13,601.94 $9,647.00 ($3,954.94) Summary for 'SA_NBR' = 10P898 (27 detail records) Sum $88,364.90 $76,781.58 $165,146.48 $215,902.00 $50,755.52 Friday, October 01, 2004 /tC Page 1 of 1 Eg RID 1-• ( )B. ‘ 111 ..,\) „oP ,„ 11°. 70 ---- , ‘.." ■'''- 46 - ------ - .......... 0'9P \ „... " . t.....--- ----- ...... 0......, . • . ,...\V N /7 • I ■ di al • 'Q- ‘ ' 1 // ■ . .7 ■ ■§‘ nY g . ',. 1. , i , ,,,,, \ • '''' , «, ,.. . , „ v\ ...-0- v .., ...., ., . , f n, ■ - ' ' / / . . . ' ' ' '4' ' Tif al - - '.( i ) F3z 6 I t r 1, A 6 ) . 12 • 4. I :..” i \ le - :\ C2 Z ingliaP I/ ; a II 1 C." Ce. all 1110 0 0 ‘ ?— I - 4 , 1 co _ , ul 0 =:1 , e 1 (PRIVA j i 1,.43 g , 2 ij I '' 4Z- . ' ,. 1(.7: SUN D.......1VE s . , b, 1 . 1 4 ' _ • "S. 1 -..". ...— - : , r Atili i , U.I I ' % I . 4 ' '\ # ! 1 40 1:: v....4 R- \•• K 0 Ac. ,o'" 0 - / 1 C? r •••<(.,<?-- P's - t3 53 4 A , / 0 ec cc\ N c E : --, .7( / • ,-;0 CP \ a. 8 '6 -• ,7,' ‘R P A I • t c_P 4, 1 .•-- . . 191 ,,,s6' , \\e''C 1 s ; .• k , • c 0 ' A I I • ' ' 1 e? 4° 1-,,,,, • ■ \11 SA ee P ,of .,,.. , oc YANK EE D9ODLE RD. „<',„,..,s - ef> = ,v .,-;‘. „ <:. ce o c. .. cp ,ccs k . C .C\ •A • $6 \'' .'e 'co < <co CP ' n e ? -------- c,...ev •C` 0 0 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 C. PROJECT 894, COACHMAN LAND CO., CENTURY POINTE, DONALD CT. STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 894 (Coachman Land Company, Century Pointe, Donald Court — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 894 provided for the bituminous overlay of Coachman Road, Four Oaks Road, Farnum Drive, Century Pointe and Donald Court, all north of Yankee Doodle Road. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 7, 2004, with a public hearing scheduled for October 5 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is about 20% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing January 20, 2004. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 27 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 420 parcels (Single- Family, Townhome, Condo, Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pageQ� through . 7? FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - 894 ASSESSMENT - October 5, 2004 NAME - Coachman Land Company, Century Point andIMPROVEMENT - January 20, 2004 Donald Ct Mill and Overlay IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED F.R. =Feasiblity Report FINAL F.R FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral H Surfacing Single $196.40 $250 /Lot ❑ Service Townhouse 147.30 188 Unit Apartment 8.08 10.00 /F.F. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk C/I 10.78 13.33 /F.F. Park 4.31 5.51 /F.F. ❑ WAC EI Concrete Driveway 64.15 95.55 Sq. Yd, SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $112,860 F.R. $160,730 F.R. 04 -03 420 5 Year 4.50% $86,453.54 $184,358.83 COMMENTS: 71a9 x ti MEMO �� city of eagan MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall DATE: September 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No. 894 Coachman Land Company, Century Point and Donald Ct Street Overlay The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on January 20, 2004 ordered Project 894. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage, of Century Point, Coachman Road, Donald Court, Farnum Drive, and Four Oaks Road and replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets on an as needed basis. In the feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the mill and overlay and the street and traffic sign improvements using linear methods. This assessment roll is prepared using the methods presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No. 04 -03, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 5, 2004. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $215,476.59 paid to the contractor for the construction of the following detailed improvements and $4,009.13 for street and traffic signage for a total construction cost of $219,485.72. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $51,326.65 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $270,812.37. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement. CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT Street resurfacing -44 $91,727.82 $21,450.51 $113,178.33 $123,700 Foot Street resurfacing -32 33,326.21 7,793.32 41,119.53 66,780 Foot Driveway entrances 11,504.63 2,690.35 14,194.98 19,110 Curb and gutter 61,867.06 14,467.59 76,334.65 39,300 Utility repair 21,060.00 4,924.88 25,984.88 24,700 TOTAL $219,485.72 $51,326.65 $270,812.37 $273,590 t ? 2 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Overlay- Coachman and Four Oaks Roads The cost of the street overlay improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $250.00 $250.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 6,935 .90 6,241.50 Sawcut bituminous pavement L.F. 129 2.00 258.00 Remove bituminous pavement S.Y. 505 5.50 2,777.50 Class V aggregate base TN 183.29 15.30 2,804.34 Type 32 Bituminous base TN 42 46.00 1,932.00 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 1,200 1.50 1,800.00 Type 41 Wear Course Ton 2,056.45 30.75 63,235.83 Adjust water valve box Each 7 125.00 875.00 Adjust manhole casting Each 15 325.00 4,875.00 4 -inch double solid line L.F. 4,375 .40 1,750.00 4 -inch solid line L.F. 7,984 .20 1,596.80 Traffic control L.S. 1 325.00 325.00 Traffic signs L.S. 1 3,006.85 3,006.85 SUBTOTAL $91,727.82 Other costs @23.38% 21,450.51 Mill and Overlay Cost $113,178.33 Century Point, Donald Avenue and Farnum Road UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $250.00 $250.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 2,857 1.00 2,857.00 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 400 1.50 600.00 Type 41 Wear Course Ton 765.76 32.80 25,116.93 Traffic control L. S. 1 325.00 325.00 Adjust water valve box Each 2 125.00 250.00 Adjust manhole casting Each 9 325.00 2,925.00 Traffic signs L.S. 1 1,002.28 1,002.28 SUBTOTAL $33,326.21 Other costs @23.38% 7,793.32 Mill and Overlay Cost $41,119.53 ?O 3 2. Computation of Lot Equivalents A. There are 4 single family parcels and 180 townhouse units lots proposed assessment. The lot equivalents are computed in the following manner: Residential Lot Property Class Lots Weighting Factor Equivalents Single Property 4 100% 4 Townhouse 181 75% 136 Total 185 140 The costs will be allocated between the property classes based on the ratio frontages affected properties to the total frontages in the project. Property Class Frontage Commercial Industrial 1,899 High Density 2,993 Residential 6,378 Neighborhood parks 655 Non - Assessable 2,390 Total Frontage 14,315 B. Commercial Property Assessment Rate The improvement cost for the commercial property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $113,178.33 41,119.53 154,297.86 14,315 F.F. $10.78 /F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $10.78/F.F. X 100% $10.78 /F.F. C. High Density Property Assessment Rate The improvement cost for the high density property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $113,178.33 41,119.53 154,297.86 14,315 F.F. $10.78/F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $10.78/F.F. X 75% $8.08/F.F. gy 4 D. Low Density Residential Property Assessment Rate The improvement cost for the low - density residential property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT SIZE SIZE ADJUSTED COST ADJUSTMENT IMPROVEMENT COST $113,178.33 32/44 $82,311.51 41,119.53 32/32 41,119.53 $123,431.04 SIZE ADJUSTED IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT COST FRONTAGE COST $123,431.04 6,378/14,315 F.F. $54,994.28 IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSABLE COST $54,994.28 X 50% $27,497.14 ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $27,497.14 140 UNITS $196.40/UNIT Single family properties are proposed for assessment at $196.40 per lot and townhouse properties are proposed for assessment at $147.20/Unit = ($196.40 X 75 %). E. Neighborhood Park Property Assessment Rate The improvement cost for the low- density residential property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT SIZE SIZE ADJUSTED COST ADJUSTMENT IMPROVEMENT COST _ $113,178.33 32/44 $82,311.51 41,119.53 32/32 41,119.53 $123,431.04 SIZE ADJUSTED IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT COST FRONTAGE RATE $123,431.04 14,315 F.F. $8.62/F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSABLE COST _ $8.62/F.F. X 50% $4.31/F.F. ?0? 5 C. Concrete Entrance Aprons Concrete entrance aprons were constructed at a cost of $11,504.63. Other costs in the amount of $2,690.35 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $14,194.98. According to the feasibility report this improvement is to 100% assessed. The assessment rate was computed using the following: IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE IMPROVEMENT COST BASIS RATE $14,194.98 221.27 SQ. YDS. $64.15 /SQ. YD. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $64.15 /SQ. YD. X 100% $64.15 /SQ. YD. 2. Curb and Gutter replacement The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $61,867.06. Other costs, in the amount of $14,467.59, were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $76,334.65. This improvement will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. 3. Utility Repairs A. Water Utility Repair The contractor furnished and installed 9 each valve top sections at $240.00 each. This results in a contract cost of $2,160.00. Other costs, in the amount of $505.12, were allocated resulting in a cost of $2,665.12. These repair costs are to be financed by the Water Division of the City's Utility Fund. B. Storm Sewer Repair The contractor removed, reconstructed and replaced various storm sewer appurtenances at a cost of $18,900.00. Other costs in the amount of $4,419.76 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $23,319.76. These repair costs are to be financed by the Storm Sewer Division of the City's Utility Fund. C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project have a term of 5 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of 4.50 % on the unpaid balance. 2 6 III. CITY REVENUES /(RESPONSIBILITIES) IMPROVEMENT CITY'S IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY) Streets Resurfacing $154,297.86 $72,259.07 ($82,038.79) Concrete driveway 14,194.98 14,194.47 (.51) entrance Curb Replacement 76,334.65 (76,334.65) Utility Repair 25,984.88 (25,984.88) TOTAL $270,812.37 $86,453.54 ($184,358.83) The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund $158,373.95 Water Division Utility Fund 2,665.12 Storm Sewer Division Utility Fund 23,319.76 Total $184,358.83 Gerald R. Wobschall �< Reviewed Reviewe ��- Alp 'V Public Works Dep. m t nt Finance f epartment Dated Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Daugherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I GRW c 7 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 00900 - 012 -51 SECTION 9 $426.69 $0.00 $426.69 $550.00 $123.31 10- 00900 - 014 -51 SECTION 9 $1,973.98 $0.00 $1,973.98 $2,530.00 $556.02 10- 00900 - 016-51 SECTION 9 $422.38 $0.00 $422.38 $530.00 $107.62 10- 00900-021 -31 SECTION 9 $196.40 $0.00 $196.40 $250.00 $53.60 10- 13150 - 010 -01 B B D ADDITION $2,123.66 $0.00 $2,123.66 $2,630.00 $506.34 10- 13151- 010 -01 B B D 2ND ADDITION $1,509.20 $0.00 $1,509.20 $1,870.00 $360.80 10- 13151 - 020 -01 B B D 2ND ADDITION $2,684.22 $0.00 $2,684.22 $3,320.00 $635.78 10- 16300 - 010 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10 - 16300 - CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 030-01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 040 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 050 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300-060 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300-070 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300-080 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300-090 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 100 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 110 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 120 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 130-01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 140 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 161 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 162 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 170 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 180-01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 201 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 202 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 210 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 220 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 230 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300- 240 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 -250 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 260-01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 270 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 F.3' Page 1 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 16300 - 280 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 290 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 300 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 310 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 0188.00 $40.70 10- 16300 - 320 -01 CAMERON COURT $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 16940 - 010 -02 CENTURY $3,266.34 $5,008.83 $8,275.17 $8,820.00 $544.83 10- 16940 - 020 -02 CENTURY $3,406.48 $5,468.15 $8,874.63 $14,290.00 $5,415.37 10- 16940 - 022 -01 CENTURY $441.98 $0.00 $441.98 $550.00 $108.02 10- 16940 - 030 -01 CENTURY $2,619.54 $3,717.49 $6,337.03 $9,110.00 $2,772.97 10- 16941 -010 -01 CENTURY 2ND ADDITION $2,802.80 $0.00 $2,802.80 $3,470.00 $667.20 10- 18075 - 020 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10-18075-030-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 040 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -050 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -060 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 070 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 080 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 090 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 100 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 110 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 120 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 130 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 140 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 150 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 160 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 170 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10-18075-180-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 190-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -200 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075- 210 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 220 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10-18075-230-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 240 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 250 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 344 Page 2 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18075 - 260 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 270 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 280 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 290-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 300 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 310 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 320 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -330 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 340 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -350 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075- 360 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -370-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 380 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 390 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -400 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 410 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 420 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 430 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 440 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075- 450 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 460 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 470 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075-480 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075-490 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 500 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 510 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 520-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 530-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 540-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 550-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 560 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 570 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 580 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 590 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 Page 3 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18075 - 600 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 610-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -620-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 630 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10-18075-640-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 -650 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 660 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 670 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 680-01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075- 690 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 700 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18075 - 710 -01 COACHMAN HIGHLANDS $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18100 -114 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.13 $15.74 10- 18100 - 116 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 117 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 118-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 119 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -120 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 121 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 122 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -123 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 124 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 125-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 126-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 127 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -128 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 129 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -130 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 131 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 132 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 133 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 134 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 135-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 136-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 e Page 4 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100 - 137 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 139-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 141 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 143 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 145-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 147 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 149 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 151 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 153 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 155-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 157 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 159-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 201 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 202 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 054.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 203 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 204 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 205-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 206-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 207 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -208 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 209 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 210 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 211 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -213 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 215-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 216 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -217 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 218 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 219 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 00.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 220 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -221 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 222 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 223 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 225-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 Page 5 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100- 227 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 228-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 229-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 230 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 231 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 232 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 233 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 516.34 10- 18100 - 234 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 235-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 237 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 239 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 241 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 243 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 244 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 245-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 246-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 247 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -248 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 249-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -250 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 251 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 252 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 253-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 255-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10 -18100 -257 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 259 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 261 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -263 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 265 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -267 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 269 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 271 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 273 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 275-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 ° Page 6 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR .10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100 - 277 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 279-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -281 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 283 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 285 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 287 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 301 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 303-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 304 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 305-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 306 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 307 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -308 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 309 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -310 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 311 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 313 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 315-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 316-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 317 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -318-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 319-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 320 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 321 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 322 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 323-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 325-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 327 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 328-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -329-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 330 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 331 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 332 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 333 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 / Page 7 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100 - 334 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 335-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 337-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 339 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 341 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 343 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 344 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 345-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 -346-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 347 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 348-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 349-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 350 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 351 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 352 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 353 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 355 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 357 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 359-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 361 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 363 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 365-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 367 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 369 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 371 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 373 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 375-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 377 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 379 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 381 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 383 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 385 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 387 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 401 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 Page 8 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100 - 403 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 404 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 405-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 406-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 407 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 408-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 409-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 410 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 411 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 412 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 413-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 415-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 438-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 440 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100-442 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 444 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 446-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 448-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 450 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 452 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 461 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 463 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 465-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 467 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 469 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 471 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 473 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 475-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 477 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 479 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 481 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 483 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 485-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 487 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 Friday, October 01, 2004 3 Page 9 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18100 - 488-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 489 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 490 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 491 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 492 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 493 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 494 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 495-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 496-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 497 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 498 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 499 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 500 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 501 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 502 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 503 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 504 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 505-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 506 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 507 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 508-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 509 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 510 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100- 511 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 512 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 513 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 514 -01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18100 - 515-01 COACHMAN OAKS $54.39 $0.00 $54.39 $70.73 $16.34 10- 18150 - 010 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 010 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 010 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 010 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 010 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 010 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 / Page 10 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR 10P894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18150 - 010 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 020 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150- 020-08 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150- 030 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 030 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150- 030 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 030-05 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 030 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 030 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 -030 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150- 040 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18150 - 040 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 1ST $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 010 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 010 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 010 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 010 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10 -18151 - 010-06 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 -010 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 020-02 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 020 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151- 020 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151- 020 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 020 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 -020 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 gS Page 11 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR IOP894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18151 - 030 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 030 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 030-04 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151- 030 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 -030-06 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151- 030 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151- 040 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10 -18151 -040 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 040-04 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 040 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 -040 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18151 - 040-07 COACHMAN LAND CO 2ND $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -010 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -010-03 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 010-04 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -010-05 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -010 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152- 010 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 010 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152- 020 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 020 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 030-02 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -030 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152- 030 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 030 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152- 030 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 030-07 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 030-08 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 040 -02 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 Friday, October 01, 2004 Page 12 of 13 Combined Assessment Roll SA_NBR IOP894 PID ADDITION NAME Street Driveway Proposed Estimated Overlay Entrance Assessment Assessment Variance 10- 18152 - 040 -03 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 040 -04 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -040 -05 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 -040 -06 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 040 -07 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 18152 - 040 -08 COACHMAN LAND CO 3RD $147.30 $0.00 $147.30 $188.00 $40.70 10- 27430 - 010 -01 FOUR OAKS ESTATE $196.40 $0.00 $196.40 $250.00 $53.60 10- 27430 - 020 -01 FOUR OAKS ESTATE $196.40 $0.00 $196.40 $250.00 $53.60 10- 27430 - 041 -01 FOUR OAKS ESTATE $196.40 $0.00 $196.40 $250.00 $53.60 10- 27500 - 020 -02 FOX RIDGE $4,233.92 $0.00 $4,233.92 $5,220.00 $986.08 10- 27500 - 030 -02 FOX RIDGE $1,494.80 $0.00 $1,494.80 $1,850.00 $355.20 10- 27500- 040 -02 FOX RIDGE $5,292.40 $0.00 $5,292.40 $7,300.00 $2,007.60 Summary for 'SA_NBR' = 10P894 (420 detail records) Sum $72,259.07 $14,194.47 $86,453.54 $112,816.00 $26,362.46 Friday, October 01, 2004 Page 13 of 13 ____ ____ i __ c,-,— ,.... , , / 1 GAP �� 1,�ir • �I� ® t �� \. 1 __,_ SCALE: 1" = 300' � �i H -" Z � � � � •9 � 1 � . 1 . D D , ,,� , O — J Z TA S Bia ES } '- 'r OUT LOT A s g ' Po F o U R ON 3 4 IA* ° g c yMq 4 � OvR 2 '' tai, d�.. N i ' C p ® - d O gKS Rp dl !kit titI l �iil a1 ® ':-Wil7r---/ ... - � .. cy ' ,, Od '..' 021 -31 7 -i ti S • L E hoes, 14 -1 m QS s � o U NOME n Li .CEDAR BLUFF Z 10tH _--1 p li ,^ 70WNHOME CONDOMIN UMS VA ' ' x'' a 'omen (00s 3` � ro j - 2 1 --------L ) (---) ,....• 1 1141441%‘‘ % , '--,:,.) , - ; 5 1 • I '' l 4 ./'' ,_ i r j a i I° ..,, 3 c� 111111 �„ I LETENDRE ST ASSESSMENT LEGEND T u '"' � E. I C/L 1 = Corner Lot Credit KARATZ 1 ; > 1 OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT ADD- � * $ 196.39 / Lot - Single Family ,,,.... - — ■ $ 4.31 / f.f. - Neighbor Park Rate O (�/ $ 147.30 / Unit - Townhouse . $ 8.08 / f.f. - High Density Residential I -i21) 7 „��,� ° °��° ^° �� $ 10.78 / f.f. C/I Properties __-- ---- ..--- - ..._...__—._._ _.. _J__ - G:Assessments /771 /Figl C.. -- an Land Co., Century Pte., Donald Ct. reet Overlay - Project No. 894 Assessment Map Fig. F 1 City of Eagan �� Sept. g. 2004 .L. - ) Vii � �� 024-0 � HMO SCALE: 1" = 300' � �� Ao — / MILT . .-- D D 0 MOM , (f) Wil If iv i im.-- Alitlito - L, _ LETENDR —�� 1 iii / KARATZ ADO. p.11 5 f 1°°°51 1 ♦. PONDING EASE. g O i � Q 3 OUTLOT A : s 3 l000sl 0 �� 0 . ` : : _ .- cc\ 70 ' ' Z 4 (coo, W — D Qi ►: Q 7 Q �� I = 01651 — b 8 �� ' U 'IN _ • I 1 O - 10 Q i 014 -51 Il laot5l :; 2 .- ` O ■ f 1 0 3 _ I. 1 Ioo.l REM O / � • ��•'` 1 L. ' l 012 -51 Ionia a OHM Iri qui r fa 2 I DONALD CT. ?It ► ' °• � 9 �• z J�J� __ — — ,. 401 CENTU �� ND ADD. '' r-- / ° �,N . — �� C� 1 — ' OBERT KARATZ ADD. 1 CENTURY _∎. PT. m `/ .,. 6 1 i 1N SSE • 1 _ 7 12 • , �( �� \DN ® PO 1 P er) 2 2 '' I a t �� o ASSESSMENT LEGEND _. GLN � 1 Concrete Driveway Entrance CO. RD. R/W MAP NO.5 — OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT YANKEE DOODLE ROAD * $ 196.39 / Lot - Single Family — — $ 4.31 / f.f. - Neighbor Park Rate $ 147.30 / Unit - Townhouse 1 — R r . $ 8.08 / f.f. - High Density Residential $ 10.78 / f.f. - 0/1 Properties G Assessments /894_1 b c Coachman Land Co, - Century Pt. - Donald Ct. r lay - Project No. 894 Fig. 1B City of Eagan sessment Map Sept. 22, 2004 Agenda Memo October 5, 2004 D. IMRE/ ROBERT O'NEIL HOMESTEADADDITIONS DRAINAGE & UITLITY EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the Public Hearing and continue consideration of vacating the public drainage & utility easements within the Imre/ Robert O'Neil Homestead Additions to be concurrent with the Final Plat approval of the Grand Oak Five Addition. FACTS: • On August 7, 2004, City staff received a petition from Matthew Miller of Interstate Partners, Inc., requesting the vacation of public easements located within the proposed Grand Oak Five Addition near the intersection of TH 55 and TH 149 in northeast Eagan. • All necessary replacement right -of -way and easements will be dedicated with the recording of the Grand Oak Five development plat. • Consideration of the Grand Oak Five final subdivision is scheduled for Council consideration on the October 19 Council meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected private utility owners informing them of this public hearing. No objections have been received to date. • The request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action in conjunction with the final subdivision and plat approval of Grand Oak Five by the City Council on October 19. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page X04. • Legal Description, graphic, page/0c2,. /sfr-d MENDOTA HEIGHTS I - 494 ��, • BLUE GENR4N \--irill'i.""--- L u E \ T C r / i ;94v/ 41 P C Y � •y�. b . N o SS K 1 0111■,._ r f 1 PROPOSED VACATION 1 LONE OAK ROAD iii ° ' T Z . IN > z 0 �4 W Q ce ` � [ —K_ o _, o Q ' NORT I IW00D en (V Z ?� �; p K k'Y 3 1 s Y 2 / = i YNIXFE IX W TRwitolvvym,. 55 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD • !WI • DR. y ' *1\1 (` e Dul . i -.1. F ---- Is tA IN IP 0 ° ?o DUCKWOOD DR. 441, _,3 O ilp : UF WESCOTT RO. 11 S . Imre /Robert O'Neil Homestead /Robins Additions 9/3/04 . ' I Drainage & Utility Easements Vacation - Location Map City of Eagan /0/ __ t f t 1 F----4 0 o �RAINAGE & EASEMENT UTILITY EA { T - PER IMP.E ADDITION o r 10 1 15 "o z DnTH o .. I f = 100 FEE �} N3U Q o N N I -�- -.- 5 C� Q j `n 5-�l -.4- z `` j m 7 0-67 Ln Lc; 10 1-a-15 __ 1 0 U) u7 } DRAIPJAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT-, w \'. 4 PER IMRE ADDITION 10 .- -0- 1-•-•15 I 0. 1L7 0 1 o o f fl I t i I 4 I I _ 15 =w v Please let this letter serve as Interstate Partners' formal request to vacate the easements m - 1 located within the following legal decription: a 1 p Lot 1, Block 1, Imre Addition; Lot 2, Block 1, Imre Addition; That part of Lot 3 { ` The Robert O'Neill Homestead, Dakota Co. Minn. Described as follows: �� ti, Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said Lot 3 and the Westerly f +� right of way line of State Highway No 49, thence Southerly along said right of way line 150.0 feet to the point of beginning, thence Southerly along said right of way line 160.0 feet, thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 3 a t - -- i distance of 245.0 feet, thence North parallel to the West line of said Lot 3 a 'F� distance of 158.98 feet, thence Easterly 263.48 feet to the point of beginning; r- Outlot E, Robins Addition; Part of Lot 5 lying N of N R/W of Trunk Highway No. 55, Robert O'Neill Homestead 1 kJ O /`/ wn° h ;-D., oTj� z "� -�'- r-y-1 J 4 R )g F U I ,.. t G 7 4 , -- s 9 �N' \ C/� may `�'fr sue ireby certify (hal this plan or apecfc Son visa 15 j l.C) U pared n� by me or under my direct supeion and that I \ .-- a duty licensed land surveyor ryor under tie laws of the I I to of Minnesotto a $ ad the 30th day of August 2004. ` THRE- BERGQl11 1NC i }_ 1 't : s S _, LC t iii �= --t TTT ,d 9. Pemberton, Minnesota Lcense No.40344 0 i''::1rv! T.,1110 0 ESMT VACATION SKETCH DWG Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2003 Eagan City Council A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — DAREN GANGELHOFF (648 CRIMSON LEAF TRAIL) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR to deny) a Conditional Use Permit to exceed the maximum 25% impervious coverage in a shoreland zoning district to allow a garage expansion on property located at 648 Crimson Leaf Trail, legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Autumn Ridge in the NE Y4 of Section 25, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Councilmembers present. FACTS: • The property is located within the shoreland overlay district associated with Hay Lake, a Class II — Indirect Contact Recreation waterbody. • The shoreland zoning ordinance restricts impervious coverage to a maximum of 25% of the lot size. • The property contains a single - family home and attached three -stall garage. The house is a walkout style and the property slopes down toward the rear of the lot. • The lot is 12, 027 sq. ft. in area. • The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the rear of the attached garage. • Impervious surfaces include the house, garage, driveway, a patio, porch and sidewalk. • The total impervious area with the proposed garage addition is 3,534 sq. ft. or 29.4% of the lot size. • The City has an approved and implemented Storm Water Management Plan. • Runoff from this lot drains to a pond for pre- treatment before draining to Hay Lake. • There is no anticipated negative impact to Hay Lake from the small scale increase of impervious coverage to the shoreland district from this project. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004 and recommended approval of the CUP. 60 -DAY STATUS: Deadline is October 16, 2004. ATTACHMENTS (2): September 28, 2004, APC Minutes will be distributed with the informational packet on Monday Staff Report, pages/0 through /,3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 22, 2004 CASE: 25- CU- 11 -08 -04 APPLICANT: Daren Gangelhoff HEARING DATE: September 28, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Daren Gangelhoff APPLICATION DATE: August 17, 2004 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 648 Crimson Leaf Trail COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential ZONING: R -1, Single - Family Residential SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to exceed the maximum 25% impervious coverage in a shoreland zoning district to allow a garage expansion on property located at 648 Crimson Leaf Trail, legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Autumn Ridge in the NE 1 /4 of Section 25. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivisions 4C and 4D provide the following. Subdivision 4C states that the Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. /r Planning Report — Gangelhoff September 28, 2004 Page 2 4. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. 5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 6. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. 7. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Subdivision 4D, Conditions, states that in reviewing applications of conditional use permits, the Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable conditions they deem necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses, to protect the value of other property within the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In all cases in which conditional uses are granted, the Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditions stipulated in connection therewith are being and will be complied with. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The Autumn Ridge subdivision was platted in 1990. The existing house and attached garage were constructed in 1991. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property contains a single - family home and attached three- stall garage. The house is a walkout style and the property , a .�� slopes down toward the rear of the lot. The lot is 12, 027 sq. ft . f y ` in area This parcel is located within the shoreland overlay district associated with Hay Lake, a Class II — Indirect Contact r� , Recreation waterbody according to the Water Quality 1r Management Plan. The shoreland zoning ordinance restricts impervious coverage to 25% of the lot size. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: /�J Planning Report — Gangelhoff September 28, 2004 Page 3 Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Residential R -1, Single - Family Residential LD, Low Density East Residential R -1, Single - Family Residential LD, Low Density South Park P, Park P, Parks and Recreational Open Space West Residential R -1, Single- Family Residential LD, Low Density EVALUATION OF REQUEST Description of Proposal — The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the rear of the attached garage. In addition the house, garage and driveway, other impervious surfaces include a patio, porch and sidewalk. The total impervious area with the proposed garage addition is 3,534 sq. ft. or 29.4% of the lot size. The applicant is therefore requesting approval of a conditional use permit to exceed the �oa5 0 4 � r ,,,� , F 25 /o maximum allowable impervious area. The applicant's narrative states that the existing 3 stall is only 19 feet deep and is too shallow to accommodate a � vehicle. The narrative further states that this garage addition "would allow room for safe inside parking" and "for year °� ft�� round storage of RV's (boats in the winter and snowmobiles x , . ° in the summer). Code Requirements — The shoreland overlay zoning limits the amount of impervious surface on a lot to 25% of the lot area. A conditional use permit is required to exceed this amount. In addition, a garage must be smaller in area than the dwelling, and total building coverage on the lot cannot exceed 20% of the lot area. Site Plan — The site plan shows the existing house, garage, patio, porch, sidewalks and driveway. The proposed garage addition to the rear of the existing garage is also shown. Building Coverage — The existing building coverage consists of the house (1054 sq. ft.) the garage (701 sq. ft.) and the porch (95 sq. ft.), and totals 1,850 sq. ft., or 15% of the lot area. The proposed garage addition is 309 sq. ft. in area ( -14' x 23'). With the addition, the garage would be 1,010 sq. ft. in area, which is slightly smaller than the house area of 1,054 sq. ft. Also, the total building coverage would be 2,159 sq. ft. or 17.9% of the lot area. This is less than the 20% maximum allowed by the zoning code. Impervious Coverage — The allowable impervious area is 25% of the lot size or 3,007 sq. ft. (25% of 12,027). The existing impervious area, which is the building coverage plus the driveway, sidewalks and patio, is 3,224 sq. ft., already exceeds the allowable maximum. The proposed garage addition would bring the total impervious area to 3,536 sq. ft. or 29.4% of the lot size. /& Planning Report — Gangelhoff September 28, 2004 Page 4 Storm Water Management and Water Quality — Eagan City Code (§11.65) stipulates that the impervious coverage of shoreland lots must not exceed 25 percent. However, because the City has approved and implemented a comprehensive storm water management plan, the Code allows the City to grant a conditional use permit for an increase in shoreland impervious coverage, provided the City has required "necessary water quality mitigation features to meet non - degradation standards for phosphorus for the nearest downstream recreational water body identified in the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan." There is no believed impact to Hay Lake from and no concern about increased impervious coverage of less than 5% above the 25% for this project. Storm water from this lot drains to LP- 48, which is upstream of Hay Lake and which pre- treats what would otherwise be direct runoff to Hay Lake. Because of the small scale increase of impervious coverage to the shoreland district from this project, no additional mitigation features are necessary or appropriate. Building Elevations — The addition is proposed to utilize architecture and materials that are similar and compatible to those on the existing home. The narrative states the lower portion of the addition to the rear of the attached garage. The proposed addition is 322 sq. ft. in area. In addition the house, garage and driveway, other impervious surfaces include a patio, porch and sidewalk. The total impervious area with the proposed garage addition is 3,534 sq. ft. or 29.4% of the lot size. The allowable impervious area is 25% of the lot size or 3,007 sq. ft. (25% of 12,027). The applicant is therefore requesting approval of a conditional use permit to exceed the maximum allowable impervious area. SUMMARY In summary, the applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to exceed the 25% maximum impervious coverage. The applicant proposes to construct a garage addition which will result in impervious coverage on the lot being 29.4% of the lot area. The property is located within a Shoreland Overlay District of Hay Lake, a General Development lake. As required for the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, the City does have water quality management plan in place, and there is stormwater treatment ponding the runoff from this lot must pass through before flowing into Hay Lake. Additionally, the proposal satisfies other zoning requirements in that the garage will remain smaller than the dwelling, building coverage will remain under 20 %, and required minimum setbacks are met. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to exceed the maximum 25% impervious coverage in a shoreland zoning district to allow a garage expansion on property located at 648 Crimson Leaf Trail, legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Autumn Ridge in the NE 'A of Section 25. /61 Planning Report — Gangelhoff September 28, 2004 Page 5 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval by the City Council. 2. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to construction of the addition. 3. The garage addition shall utilize exterior materials to match the principal building. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION- 25- CU- 11 -08 -04 — 648 Crimson Leaf Trail Lot 3, Block 2, Autumn Ridge There are pay -off balances of special assessments totaling $ -0- on the parcel proposed for the conditional use. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or conditional use. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT None Total • Eagan Boundary , � %Street Centerline Location Map 1 1 Parcel Area rnj Building Footprint ® , i • ft ��C ®t a o ®r e mid grat ik a�� 2 WAN ®�� , p� ov co ENE EA Skim GO ,_ 4,21. 144 eilg I 1 1511. 11131 P e irragl " c D la X70,9iFiE �� i ® i w ® hi ' iri rim r rain . d ` ° F i. ° t r - �i� CM ®f�:W.1 IA= �L llo _ufii� unarm o s s i L"l . p V n 17 t] � 'ENS „� a � inv gm n _ f�® . (j ®malt i t no r 1. -0 ®� ® ® °To x--- ® � � Subject Site ®�� ;: -te ®� o0 F ..� ce.3 E * it ..71/1ERSEI rung! I liP *mop- „„, , , , , ,, , lit e. # ..rit2 .,, ilmill a 1 er ii iii A .Ttlres it' . \ _ r 2121 � 4 0 )4 '' to tiro sky ' 4 41.1 11 / li1� WI 14 -4' 410 %OPP -ft Pellg” taina A iii;p i i i i ..,,,,,,,•.... PI- to aka, a� �.� illb I w 1� . ° 4 7 !�. ®a S'®. Ai1�1/Aspo∎ 1 . ® � ®a E ® ® ° 060 ® s c .s // =V ji did i -...R. B mi _ r -nava OrWs V, 10.7',"'" Eit VI P - se OVA AO \ ■ 41115,3 o alpirAWIPIpa IP e� e... ..n.e..„ -1---) ... ��p= m.a�a"` 4 7 . 115 0r 1 & �Id Ix.Erx ®�,.t E br - __ . , ® .'* 40 :. 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Daren Gangelhoff Application: Conditional Use Permit Case No.: 25- CU- 11 -08 -04 Map Prepared using of GIS y ORSI n Parcel base map data provided 4 (7710a N by Dakota Couunty Office of GIS and d is curreid as of f Januauary 2004. /, THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONL W E City of C'CI Jar! y Eagan Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this i T he City of Eaan nformation and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Gangelhoff CUP Land Use Map Case No. 25- CU- 11 -08 -04 Zoning Map fl !I=JI : A 14 Vp�� R.� og� :1 �M i111� oink /I j �� 1 INE lino PA* Ve Alm IN PF la r — �ti.A1/ . NI Location •, ' ` Current Zoning: E l■ M "' = , w me � f R -1 ■ ■////hI!il1//�"`-11i •∎ � �` , Residential illIllIl R -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 ow Single Family es ntial e ' UIIIIIII♦ A "' " P Da ..,e onsig 4.orir , mi 1 ., sr ■ .1" l'"■49,016071% ■ .:-: Ma ( il) 4 i 11%■■■•■merMAN I " Al " tf w IIIIIili1i fl WijM� a 600 0 600 1260 Feet � Ell Comprehensive Guide Plan .: H IL' -{ LD i ? !iI 9 t ) „.. Land Use Map ij m . • WI „II/II run 4, Ap veri4111161 ^sir , a ■ s, mi� �.�111/ It k goo . M IN Location �� St II : Current Land Use Designation: 1!11111' f∎11. PO `W, 1 Y' I ,11111111 apor LD t� - 2 1 , Low Density fi `'l UV S , i ■ mr. a.. islemp as• Ino 111■VOI : PAstwQ %V;w 1111111111 r fir ►i �a 9AR INalle C II 11 ■ 11111 Ni � � /� P► 600 0 600 1200 het I . . �; . Mg .= V � • �e�e Parcel base map information providedby Dakota County LandStwey Deparbnert June 2003 N Zoning information maintained byCity Staff. /// 4 of Eagan 7 W + Community Development Department `� , THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S (., VP) F. t 'd- L- uiR 2 1 _______7 -."` I 1 At E) i 11 1 1 1 , -f, - __ _-_,,, -_ FA 7 i.5 AT/ 1 0 K 1 4 1; ..—... ---. --- - ....--- .— 4.a!" - I - — 1 C.) 1 6 / TY OF .'"g'i':=-•'-/;,'"//1:',' AV-'''' 1 , 5■-:-. r R . 1 " 1., ...r i .z - P., I «/./ r 1 A I ; ... Yi I./1'4.'44 /L. °T. 1 v_ 1 '.:) A CV:- 71 - f,-7_ -- -,-....7 A:- ._ , _ _ — _ ... ' "•-a i - -* is - — ,T 'r/ C -2,..)--5 -J fzi 1 '''' 4. i#,...._- F17 g , .. I t..... . l.• & 7' I S 5 '. ? a )54 I .5 .....t _. ,- .,4:!---1",/ _., , ..' _ - ,4 :.-.. .--0 ! :._ - 2. ' c. ..." i 1 / -.' .• rjtir 1 _ 1 c -- -..-' / / / k J , ••• a n 1 ''' ' LI -/ 4 i .- IP-O .—. 1 1 ! - - ....T? • ■ _ j ' • — a r-- 71-- \\___./T ft fric 1,•,' f .4 .2 - ) 9 --- 1 141.PVF; ..._ -> - t4. A , 1 ..., le.1 c.-., A... F .' ,:r.i - ' •::‘,... -j ! , i -1 l...,.... , . 1 „ „,,,,,..,.,,,, L ,.. \ , ,,.,„ L. ___,-i- 4- 17:›31;1 •T'" : 7-57ti7i.:- __ _ _ _ — _I - 1-, -L--• \.;,. ---,----- -- -- --7 )7q7c`" - Ti i' A Hr 1 ri 9nnA SITE PLAN F ,Cf— 0,, /4>Z_ 1," 4,.. • 2: 11 ti b tit.A.3 - 6 Lvul 3e \ .. 0 C--J Mill t• 1 A • C.D I" •.: 4 CO I ---) r.1 I i 1 I 1 1 j CZ: • NI . 1 a — -- 3 i 1 ii . ;.,....., MI . , ; . k Z i e ......._. r z i 9) s cs ? 6 (4 1 k I ft 1 I itt‘i . . ‘ A. . ,-_- t • ; ut ■• . I 1 i . • . I I i -.! I i — -r -t • I — 11 I 1 . — • I — — . , L ' i : • • lb . I I 1 I r 4 I••• ■IIIMIMIN=.1. - . - - - . : . I 1 I I L • ! _ . _ _ _ ._ . — — — — , : t , 1 ..... . . _. . ----- L 1 al . _I. I . • , _ _ _ _ AIN- .. _ - • I I LI . • _I 1 I _ _ _ — — — — — — ! I , I • _—: 7 _ t_r---4. — '7' —__--t. — — 1 I E ELEVATIONS /43 .... „ ! ...(. Garage Addition Proposal 648 Crimson Leaf Trail The proposed addition to my existing garage would be approximately 14' X 23' feet. It would be added on to the back of the existing third stall and extend to the back of the house and be as wide as the current 3 stall. The back wall of the existing 3 stall would be cut out to accommodate a 10'x 7' opening to allow access to the new fourth stall. No interior garage door is planned at this time. The house has a walk out basement so the garage addition would be built on a hill. The lower half, below the garage floor, would be block foundation, matching the house foundation, that will be filled and a ceme it floor added. Above the floor would be the same construction materials as the house. Siding and soffits painted to match the house. Asphalt shingles to match the house. Utilities will be move to east side of addition out of sight from the street. See attached pictures for reference. The property is zoned low density residential and that will not change. The existing use of the property is single family home. Surrounding land uses are single family homes, Lakeside Park, Pinewood Elementary, a swamp and a power line. I plan on starting this project this fall and finishing up in the spring. The Garage addition itself will only be visible by my neighbor directly to the east of me and from the street looking in between my house and my neighbor's house to the east. On the south side of all adjacent lots, a buffer zone of trees separates the lots from the swamp and Lakeside Park and thus our houses are not visible from the south. The existing 3 stall is only 19 feet deep. It is not deep enough to accommodate any vehicle of normal size. This garage addition would allow room for safe inside parking of all vehicles keeping the driveway and streets clear. It would also allow for year round on site storage of RV's (boats in the winter and snowmobiles in the summer). The room for the addition would be built in a dead corner of the existing yard and would not take up any usable portion of the lot. // FAT` �UL�j $ a . � Ear Y� E �.. .i.. (� q U. NARRATIVE ' -- -•-"-& . --.-&-t, t. '4 -- -, 4, :-. 1 ..:. 1. : 4. t. I'' '. ; ,.S.. ,.:,,f:.7,..::: ` � ' ' � ,' is m ,. ..',t- - ..,, _....„....„,,.....„..,,,„,..„. _.. _ . 1 ,,,,.---.: - - " ,..---•''',f;fli ,,F -- '-'V' 4 - -Sa.' . " .- - - - �. . 4„. az .,, 4 g r ye s 4 u 1 �Ey d « � . ; sue, i gy J CO -kii_er----'1,' --:,?7±**,"!.--..'71.,12.;.--_14:---. -,--,,,,_: - , t .c r" Q • a I1. '• ' . ; , r=; �: J ` 'fi , � „�,,,,� V° g, s �e � r { 4E .• 1 "" ' - - -qp, (1) : . ems ` — '• r Ft _ .:?-' - __ ' *� _ 1 C 7 ; Y : J F g ''' 3 y x'! K r .'a ► t F � � ,- i Y 4 t J r � �F ' " , T ; S , `} mo w p S'. � 3 ! x i ' - nJ'_ a c • :., sue. , --- - [ +, am t c . . a y l; .. , v p7; yam. pro, M } a �"� - . X , x ' " � �.'b rte' „a y :,, yr- `'`. d_- rte" s, .- A + � - R�' "' fir -s ., t r r '$ mix " ',.1 y ,_ ..�� -. --.,. •s-''Y A } ' Wi n. _ a t 3 d ^ - 5 } �t ,:.i - y ?r zk � � • ��i w ,x.,,,,..,..,._„4.;,—.,4t..4. • '.�� ••�'� -- F 0.�' `s ,r %i� s„ '` °'a 1 . r z I a "' - _ _ r 4.1% ,.JS� ter"_ �� ` x A * � . 4 N � a aC- 'F ' t B3 Y y H3 - 4 } a � `f a t I, vli.,ftfaltc-f_.,s-_.., ' / 3 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — VIVA ITALIA, LLC (LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CENTENNIAL RIDGE 2 ADDITION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR to deny) a Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class I restaurant with on -sale liquor, and changes to the building signage and facade at 1629 Lena Court in the NW 1 /4 of Section 28, subject to the conditions in the staff report. To approve the On -Sale Liquor and Sunday license for Viva Italita, LLC, dba Viva Italia, at 1629 Lena Court. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes. FACTS: • The Planned Development was approved in 2003. • The applicant proposes to establish a Class I restaurant with on -sale liquor. The restaurant would be located at the west end of the building. • The restaurant is a permitted use within this PD. On -sale liquor requires specific approval through an amendment to the PD. A liquor license is also required. • Since the staff report was written, the applicant has withdrawn a proposal for outside seating, and revised the seating capacity of the restaurant, which affects the parking requirements. Parking • The revised seating capacity of the restaurant is 106 seats, which requires 35 parking stalls (106 @ 1 stall per 3 seats). The remaining retail space requires 31 stalls (6,182 sq. ft. @ 1 stall per 200 sq. ft.) Thus, the restaurant requires a total of 64 parking stalls; 57 stalls are provided on this lot. Therefore, this proposal results in a shortage of 7 parking stalls. • The applicant proposes that this parking shortage be accommodated through joint parking with the adjacent dental clinic to the east and through the construction of additional stalls. • Joint parking allows two uses with different operating or peak hours to use the same parking, thus reducing the total number of parking stalls. With joint parking, the City Code allows a reduction in the number of required stalls of up to 30. • A cross easement for parking and ingress /egress exists between the two buildings. The dental clinic and the restaurant have a one -hour overlap in operating hours between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m. • Additional parking is also proposed to address the parking shortage. The APC established conditions requiring an additional 5 stalls east of the pond, and proof of parking for additional stalls along the entrance drive. Signage • The proposal includes an amendment to allow a 7' x 7' square sign above the entrance, and to allow architectural modifications to the building elevation. • The proposed sign is different from other signs on the building and does not fit within the sign band on the building that was part of the original PD approval. //' • The proposal includes architectural columns to frame the main entrance to the restaurant. Such a feature was absent in the original PD approval. This feature would be added only to the restaurant portion of the building and would not apply to other tenant spaces. • The proposed restaurant will occupy the equivalent of three tenant spaces, 72 feet of the building frontage, and only this one sign is proposed. Advisory Planning Commission • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004, and recommended approval of the Planned Development Amendment. Liquor License • Daniel Sarno, on behalf of Viva Italia LLC, has applied for an On -Sale and Sunday Liquor license with the City of Eagan. The partners are Daniel Sarno and Kurtis Manley. • The restaurant will be located at 1629 Lena Court. • The applicants have submitted the required documents. They have been reviewed and deemed in order by City staff. • The Police Department has conducted an investigation and does not find any reason to deny the applicants the On -Sale Liquor and Sunday license. ISSUES: The applicant proposes up to twelve parking stalls along the entrance drive. While the APC discussed the conflict between those stalls and the access drive as well as a fire hydrant in that area, the APC recommended that proof of parking be shown along the length of the access drive, with the exception of two stalls next to the fire hydrant. Staff recommends that only the six stalls north of the residential street be shown to avoid parking conflicts with the residential traffic and with the hydrant. In addition, the APC did not identify what event or conditions would trigger installation of those stalls. 60 -DAY STATUS: Deadline is October 17, 2004 ATTACHMENTS (2): September 28, 2004, C Minutes will be distributed with the informational packet on Monday Staff report, pages /fthrough X3.3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 23, 2004 CASE: 28- PA- 24 -08 -04 APPLICANT: Daniel Sarno, Viva Italia, LLC HEARING DATE: September 27, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Commercial Property APPLICATION DATE: August 18, 2004 Development Corp. REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 1629 Lena Court COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RC, Retail Commercial ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Daniel Sarno of Viva Italia, LLC, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class I restaurant with on -sale liquor and outdoor seating, and to modify the approved building signage, at 1629 Lena Court (southeast corner of Diffley Road and Johnny Cake Ridge Road), legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Centennial Ridge 2 Addition, in NW ' /4 of Section 28. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two- thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property was platted in 2003 and the building is currently under construction. On May 20, 2003, the Council approved a Planned Development for this property. The Planned Development Agreement identifies the allowable uses as "a drug store, a Class I restaurant, a day //ff Planning Report — Viva Italia September 28, 2004 Page 2 care center; one two -story office building; and uses of the same character and intensity." Since on -sale liquor and outdoor seating are not specifically identified as allowable uses and the sale of liquor requires a license, an amendment to the Planned Development is necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property contains two commercial buildings with a shared parking lot. The smaller building to the east will be a dental clinic, and the larger building, where the restaurant is proposed, will be a multi- tenant commercial/retail building. Since the building is still under construction, only one other tenant (Fantastic Sam's) has been identified. Earlier this summer, the City approved a PD Amendment to allow a liquor store on the east end of this building. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Residential PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density East Pharmacy (under NB, Neighborhood Business RC, Retail Commercial construction) South Single - Family Residential PD, Planned Development MD, Medium Density West Office; Single - Family PD, Planned Development; RC, Retail Commercial, Residential R -1, Single - Family LD, Low Density Residential EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — The applicant proposes to establish a full service Italian restaurant with on -sale liquor and outdoor dining in the western tenant space within the building at 1629 Lena Court. The property is currently zoned PD, Planned Development, and is guided RC, Retail Commercial. The proposed restaurant will be located on the west end of the building and would occupy approximately 4,700 square feet. Seating capacity is proposed for approximately 130, with additional seasonal outdoor seating for 24. The restaurant is proposed to open at 4:00 p.m. and close at 11:00 p.m. during the week and 12:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The applicant is proposing to amend the building signage to allow a 7' x 7' square sign. The City's Sign Code states that all business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. While the proposed sign is larger than what the approved sign band might accommodate, the proposed restaurant would occupy three tenant spaces, but would have only the one sign. However, the design of the sign is different than the one other tenant's. �9 Planning Report — Viva Italia September 28, 2004 Page 3 City Code Requirements — The zoning code allows on -sale liquor as a conditional use in the NB, Neighborhood Business, and CSC, Community Shopping Center zoning districts. In addition, Chapter 5, Business Licenses, requires a liquor license for on -sale liquor. Evaluation — This site appears to be consistent with the licensing requirements. The property is guided for retail commercial uses, which includes restaurants and on -sale liquor. There are no protected uses (i.e., daycare centers, schools, churches) within 300 feet of the site. The property owner signed this application, consenting to the on -sale liquor and outdoor dining request. It is a question for city officials to determine whether this proposed use is consistent with this Planned Development, and is of the "same character and intensity" as the permitted uses identified in the Planned Development Agreement. Parking — Given past experiences with similar multi -tenant situations, staff has concerns about whether the parking on this site will be adequate to support this restaurant. The proposed restaurant requires 43 parking stalls. The proposed outdoor dining adds another 8 seasonal stalls, that are not typically counted for the total, but may exacerbate a shortage. The remaining retail space requires 34 stalls, for a total required parking for this building of 77 stalls. Lot 1 provides only 57 stalls of parking, resulting in a parking shortage of 20 stalls (28 with the seasonal outside seating). The applicant has two proposals for addressing the parking shortage — joint parking with the adjacent property and constructing additional stalls on Lot 1. The City Code provides for joint parking as a conditional use, and allows for a reduction of up to 30 required stalls. The City ordinance for joint parking also states that the total number of parking spaces shall be not less than the sum total of the separate requirements for each use during any peak hour parking period when the parking facility is utilized at the same time by two or more uses. The additional parking stalls are proposed to be added in front of building and along the entrance drive. The adjacent property, Lot 2, contains 42 parking stalls and is occupied by a dental clinic, and has 3,200 sq. ft. of space yet to lease. There exists a cross parking easement between the two lots such that all parking is available to all occupants in either building. With the proposed joint parking, there remains a shortage of 20 stalls (28 with outdoor seating). This shortage does not exceed the 30 stall reduction allowed by the City Code for joint parking. However, while the restaurant would largely have opposite peak hours from the dental clinic — the restaurant would open at 4:00 p.m. and the dental clinic closes at 5:00 p.m. — the dental clinic building contains space which has not been leased yet and the future tenant(s) may have hours that conflict with the restaurant operation. Additionally, the owner of Lot 2 has submitted a letter objecting to the proposal because it conflicts with her plans for future expansion and with her future tenants. The applicant has submitted a plan showing 17 additional parking stalls being added to Lot 1. That would reduce the parking shortage to three stalls (11 with outdoor seating). Five parking stalls are proposed to be added in the parking area in front of the building, and 12 stalls along the west side of the entrance drive. The five stalls in front pose no issues, however, staff has significant concerns about the proposed 12 stalls along the driveway and conflicts between the parking and the drive lane. This drive lane is the sole ingress and egress to the commercial /?c: Planning Report — Viva Italia September 28, 2004 Page 4 development and is shared by the residential neighborhood to the south for access to Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Therefore, only the five stalls east of the pond should be allowed. In summary, the proposal poses greater parking demand than the site was designed to accommodate. With joint parking, a reduction of up to 30 required stalls is allowed, and this proposal has 20 fewer stalls than would otherwise be required. Some additional parking stalls may be constructed on this site, however, a shortfall in the required parking would still exist for the restaurant. The peak traffic generation periods for the joint parking uses will not be in direct conflict, however, there will be overlap that City officials should consider. Therefore, it is appropriate as a condition of approval for the City to further amend the Planned Development to prevent any additional Class I restaurants or other uses with more intense parking requirements from locating in this development. Outdoor Dining — The outdoor dining is proposed to be located on the west end of the building. The outdoor dining area should be enclosed with a fence and gate, accessible from inside the building. The applicant should provide detailed information about the outside seating area and fence enclosure. Staff suggests that the enclosure for the outside dining should be a wrought iron fence, similar to that along the south boundary of the commercial development. Signage — The applicant is also proposing to amend the building signage. The Planned Development provides for a sign band above the tenant entrances. The applicant is proposing a 7' x 7' square sign to be located above the front entrance of the restaurant. The City's Sign Code states that all business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. The design of the proposed sign is different than the other tenant signs. The proposed sign is also larger than what the approved sign band might accommodate. However, the proposed restaurant would occupy three tenant spaces, but would have only the one sign. It is a matter for city officials to determine whether the proposed sign amendment is acceptable. Window signage shall be limited to operational information (i.e. hours of operation, open, close, etc.) SUMMARY /CONCLUSION In summary, Mr. Sarno is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class I restaurant with on -sale liquor store and outdoor dining, and an amendment to the building signage, for property located at 1629 Lena Court. The proposal for on -sale liquor satisfies the location standards of the ordinance; the operational standards are set out in the licensing section of the ordinance, and will be made part of the Planned Development Amendment Agreement. The applicant is proposing joint parking with the adjacent dental clinic. With joint parking, the City Code provides for a reduction of up to 30 required parking stalls when the uses have complimentary peak traffic times. A shortage of 20 parking stalls exists with this proposal. The applicant proposes to construct additional parking stalls which may alleviate some, but not all, of the parking shortage. Staff has serious concerns about the conflict most of the additional stalls /a Planning Report — Viva Italia September 28, 2004 Page 5 will create and request that the APC and Council carefully consider this potential when reviewing this development proposal. Building signage is proposed that is of a different design from other tenants and is larger than the sign band shown in the original development approval. It is a matter for City officials to determine whether the joint parking proposal and the amended building signage are acceptable. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment for allowing a Class I restaurant with on -sale liquor and outdoor dining in the building at 1629 Lena Court, on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Centennial Ridge 2 Addition. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. Allowable uses continue to be a drug store, a day care center and one two -story office building. With this Class I restaurant and its associated joint parking, no other Class I restaurants and no other uses that would require additional joint parking shall be allowed. 3. The operation of the restaurant shall comply and be operated in accordance with all relevant state laws and regulations regarding on -sale liquor. 4. Other than open/closed and hours of operation, window signage shall be prohibited. 5. The premises shall be open for inspection by the City and the City shall have the right to inspect the premises. 6. The applicant shall provide detailed information about the outside seating area and fence enclosure for incorporation into the PD Amendment Agreement. The outdoor dining area should be enclosed with a wrought iron fence and gate, accessible from inside the building. 7. Five additional parking stalls east of the pond shall be constructed prior to the restaurant opening. /22 Eagan Boundary Location Map / Street Centerline n Parcel Area Building Footprint a i I ri - . � et Li �J e -. . a t: N TACONITE TRAIL , ^° °�/ S ° EX D omb � ♦ 4 8 o ■ C, Oki C: 110 ‘ 46' ford P° Ile 1 // e // ❑ ,,� - t' = .. ® g u t:tto! / j ♦, , �� "" „ � �r a sk ' ,0 ' t 9 UNELJAN LAM n ,. via `tea a _ P p , _ _ It 9 _ � L ,�� rf ` / ' ,, �1�11 : .. Taw /I ```� \\ \� ism gp F 44,,, � ` anc R � �� `` ` � ♦ Subject Site , 1:—u ii _1111.. 0 Igo 1 1111 ►1111111111• ��.., ►� � •' t � cs /Ai Y I .� - C ■ _ > 111Cit* „ - RI 6 1101r"),, .E. ,� PI xit 1, =t :=:1 : E tli p 440k h i ,..i M W d ® ®� . - rt ® �� ®� �� mm 8 G � Q LGO� ~ ® Vrt. ti / / WO .4 r � ® m mm❑ a�7�I 4 ® p ® � ® s 47 lip ea it a � �Q • 1 1 1 1 & v3 . .Y{ Une Gt' < iti 00 / �l �® � at S ® ®� b c soe ca r v e a 21515V 1101M �� :��`:��'' ^ �� J a � � 7 � II i �� c'® • ®® 7 I 1000 0 100D 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Viva Italia, LLC Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 28- PA- 24 -08 -04 417° Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided \ N by Dakota County Office of CIS and is current as of January 2DDl. / � Cit / 1 THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ON W E city of Cagan T he City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this In conflation and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Viva Italia - PD Amendment Land Use Map Case No. 28- PA- 24 -08 -04 Nog n i 4 ♦♦ ♦♦fit i#4, a►� _ 'I' Zoning Map . '� �� ' �� : ' �� - ♦ --- PD �, `N� -I ♦ ► 11111 4 rR !►1 i ( i ji- , OOP �` ��t �\ �� ' ii . � 1� Locat ion ► :- = Elm -. . . ■ Current Zoning: ,�� ;�,��._ rte►_ ty i' Wil 111 ifs PD Planned Development 4 11 1/ 9'' r ot .111 74 w 4 iipkz : •Ipiirsigui.BaBc,...ihrt ,..6 mmmD •, .v.11, Ott ; ,', ,4 P �• � , PD ® ®® ea 4 ., Ilk t l / • ._ s� ®® 1111 * r? : PF III ® ®cD ® ® 600 0 600 1200 F..t , 1111 • ��> ♦ / .. D Comprehensive Guide Plan l , ; ?r :. `` ig. 4 L . M , s. Land Use Map .� . r"----1 ►1 ,r, ID G � � � w = r '' = 111 �� ,awl k m „„....,. '01111111111i` ! .� „ ' F AI l l t :: t %. Ai AIM= ” ,i ' � T • Current Land Use Designation: �iI� � ' �" k /� P RC , 011■ 0i* ♦ ate � f1111 i• ♦ ,4 e • . 111 Retail Commercial ` ♦� • ft � Ii1it' 1 100Al # MD i'1 `♦ MD &$ ® '1` l . ♦ ®� f l'--Nt. ...... 1....= ES E B fi3 '''''' :: ,P coo 0 600 1200 F..t R ` i fir MD OP '' Parcel base map information providetby Dakota County LandSvey Departmett June 20 • . 1 9 N k tr Zoning information maintained byCity Staff. / City of Eagan W E THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. S M41� ® :vaPaace�av� - €g� ri ill r -r .m -ayrw � C__ 0'lii!i!i' 1 �� 0 t SI L • [ i .,--=---- q 1 ° , $ PUP � � — 1.7.--A. � ■i O - ScY s-a��r:._ w Ne9�»�■ g a r 1 a ILifirm a5� : j ° m Z r i n eg g € � l i ' Pooh li 1 3 , D CIS a.....mmw•••I••NIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIII JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD ..\\,)4:..._. .., 6 7 - :\ X00 4 • ti . aa - \G� k r a I I A 1 \ ��,''e' r* b j t":11 411 di - . . l i ff Ogli f i W t 3 st. 1. 1 ..' . \ Ve .3s M� �Y I I D e ILLS ;awra.� \ g,, o !_ Y O , ...Ns >k,.. I MM II 1 II i o sla • ( °e %/ { { J .. I % g6 � 60 - ' ~ ,fiIli 1 j r I•l. F ;iz 71 S =1 1 NO 4 11 �1 ± §ri �i Ait ..!.�I _ L _ ni _ �.. - • L._._._._._._ { _ , . 'i± . i c= III I - Q Tz_ r { r+ Pi SAE 1 CL� x Pi 11 EG E Ei E g� E - � E ° 1 2 ... parm g6.ep g cxa r . s � sf 6 � . _� � �I � � all t ae e a F • � � � - 1 r44144 r E i l i ° 7! °p �a'• I �i4 di• s i i . • • E g ° • A R a` ; �$ la ; i a1 s i • • 6ry 1 € I � �' 6 Rig 1 C:: S 4 • 65 1 1 h ily 1 lioi 11 iff o o . g 11411.1 P j tli SITE PLAN /0 1, ,s ,„---- 1 > xl c m c Ci) ca r+ ••• 1:1) -a. C " D) NI = 0 r+ 0 A fa) r-h - C) ‘,,, - - - - ,-,- 4 •T - 1 "" .11 7 ; .' co -■;, ;.,.,\ 2. - ,,,' 3 ',.). _.7. -.. "7 7 .\ - - 7 T's - rZ -' r, >,:- 7 3 _ ';, 7 i , ..,-,,, .4 ,,,. --- ;:y.;,- , • = ,:. r_- "5 . m 7 ' c 4 S. _____ _ - 7 . ■1 33 t a L... -, ' _ • I t . Lt , 4 W , ,-.., ,i, vfi . C:24. 1 i ' r , ' - CD..,...:. .. •!- ..., :,-, r_ ..., ,' F. ' = \', , \ ' /' - " , -.N.,-*-1 - ,- , 1 , 3 ,A ___ . ' —.\ f ,, • - .. Q ' 1 i - -- , . _ __ Q ______ 4-t , : \ . e ...- - - It:1 - --, ,/. -;.„ - ., _,.-; ' . I co , --e ---,- )- ' i ., i '',7x - ..': ,:..- 4:. ' - ::''''; - - ::'"---.4' S.- T , -_--,..t ,..y , _ ' . ...-- ,.) -- • 0 0 ' ■ - -- - il ..1-,• t 12- .P- P. • ' - \i ' V . 4 k i _j' ' ' -I l / • : '-''L ••■--i''''-''',..;:.#'..-r...:' 11 CO ,.... ...), \... - - ' '- 0/J Jv P -1, 11i-u -1- - .'-- ' ' '''' - ' • - L'.. • ';. ,.. ' I', - ' , ' 1 ..z. ..i.'-i ,,- -- , 1 "I'', .i ,' c - (-- iT / \ 'I T tir - 1, l' ,11.1.1\4x./ . - - ! '-'-' .."` 1 ::'• . ' I — :‘4 ..7.. 4 A , kg. .. 144, 1 , ,y,';! 44,, --,, .. -..,,.g kl ._,., -,- ....._,__, ,-., ,-7 ,,-..,,...., , r t-1.-1-, , ..,. - -- ,.,:. , ... _ v.. ,..._,,,, k ,... -3,_.. . ,,..... ,./....:, . _ ... .,...:, ,,.„:„.„--, . 0 .. .-:. ___ - -14. 14 ir ..,.., „ , : t i Et , rsti ,.. _ ... , .1- , ' r ....„„,, ... .. ..., ,, ,,, - -- -• ,,,' ?. ' A 110' ,I ; ''"'q I - --. i... . ■ /_:..`,., zL I. ... ..-,... r, i _,.. ,.., ci- 1 - : 1 ". ' r ,.., . , . .. g. Y' •v _ - (. ' f . 1- ,,.. : -/,,,> PP' • t I, ;,__,_,T • -fr „, - 4 .,'. ..,_ .17 i ,.. 1-.1: , ,. - ..1 = i.,,,t 4 -: 'Atvie2 21: . ',:, 00 :;" t&,-;":1• .. 1 i . . - -- - I1, \ .- . - -: ':..1.-''::'" 1...4\ • I -- -,- ;I -- e --if - U'r . 1 1 . 14 ;. 7- `13 1 2-fTh . •. . 1 ......;:m,Eit. _ = ,._ i .., .. _._ , lt --- 1...1 • i_1 d ";:. E :1 r . P d -- 113 . 4. ,. .,;*..JE i__ 1 i _, . _ . _ i_ I H . ,. 7 4r1-.-, ,-, ■-• - c, , - - „.. ...‘, ,_-_ -3 ;•,;-:,- --; Tt 1 NI 7 ‘, i .L,-- 7 1 Ti %•-:,, ,- 1_ !c p .._ Cr. li FLOOR PLAN ,,,,,,,,..e• D X) C O c co n 4 1 y 01 � w, N W ? d m - -:.: -:c.. 3 m' ro 1 N m - O 1 M _ oar \.• :' : i >3 d FD Ok i -' . x t, , i. L Iv Ii i i . F ' k ' t_ !f 11 0 . ft l 1 r - -- S c 4 • — 1. 3 I c aR 1 co 1 t14 • SIGNAGE PLAN I ze=„1.......:2 (1) 5 : IlentaREP.RFnm.m 'om Yr ill I r-m m yr n„ }} !i ii =6lihm!! [� •_ - i - T P f P I S < ' I I A It. O I 1 1 33 yA C G 10- �.. � � C L J ; .. , I 1 1 6 p \` g t == ii.E..Laliuri.ai. O Rp t ,. \ \ . \ ',. r'l '.\ I Z V+ a / 1 t 1r � & $9 i Q5 1.1 Z ,li fi � EA R. : gil F zg i! 1 a i41 € g d' i ` � PMtg 6 i : gm JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD i ANL �. 1W--- „ il l I a as } r s`' ..- s P�i i r i \ % J E: ' I 1 ''4. I O • \ o` � � 4, F i ' 'I �'ia 1 1 _ ' a .. .- - --- � S 1 y l a 'a - i R I � rS�i7r� � i si rte ip '¢ I 111 04 s o I j g 4..„. ®iii i J JEIf llif ' F ■ m I r° E c.�.e:..:::ies."z 2 Z F3 1 • i AM6 >i ws { {� :6 • Ye.e� :.:a�u O — e ms:::a:aow:noun.. , . ' • _ - - - -_ ®' „ 2 m®® • n a s a �a 111 €a G €i_ E @ tltl 1,- 1 Al k Fl 1I1 tEA/ S RN 4I 6 � . Pi $6 -\ € iii; i li €� �^ 14 R jai C X £ 41 q tl tl .1 ii e %a m 1 I t R I . i 1,; : iE xa �E t g o 7 [ I R ' I i 3 o ' i R i l ; = Eit b S Z O K Z i �Z 1_ I 6 I E g R €d € Ir. { �L,c a ”' m p. o R. O , I 1. i 1H, ,!Ili €si .t, s.I. 1 PARKING PLAN 1 /car VIVA ITALIA!! Italian Restaurant 1629 Lean Court Centennial Ridge, Eagan A Traditional Italian Restaurant will occupy the premises. Noveinber2004, is our target day for opening to the public. Daniel Sarno with over 23 years of experience in the industry will be the Managing Partner of this full service establislunent. All meals will be regularly prepared on the premises. The principal part of the business will be service of meals and will be at least 50 percent of the gross revenue. Total capacity approximately 130 patrons The Dining room capacity will sit approximately 100 patrons. The Bar area capacity will sit approximately 30 patrons. The Outdoor Dinning area (seasonal) will sit approximately 24 patrons Hours of Operations will be as follow: Sunday trough Thursday 4:00 PM to 11:00 PM Friday and Saturday 4:00 PM to 12:00 PM NOTE: The Dentist's office hours are Monday- Thursday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM / RECE D /OS 1 8 2004 Viva Italia L.L.C. Daniel Sarno 1130 Northwood Dr. # 237 Eagan, MN 55121 Ms. Pam Dudziak City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1897 Dear Pam, Thank you for helping Kurt and myself through the process of obtaining a variance at Centennial Ridge for the purpose of opening an Italian Restaurant Please, review the following information: 1- Dental Office Parking The building is 3868 sq. feet. The furthest parking spot from the north of the building is 175 feet from our door The furthest parking spot from the south of the building is 240 feet from our door I shall get a letter of approval from the Dental Office to utilize their stalls Although I don't have the exact number of feet, the furthest spots at the Restaurants located of Yankee Doodle and Denmark, is higher. 2- Two Guys from Italy data Please, review the enclosed forms. I have utilize data from the last 3 years of operations (01', 02', 03) to determine the number of parking stalls that we would actually need. I broke it down by the hour! I have use worse case scenario, just to be safe. 3- Total Seating Although, we would like to have outdoor dinning, it is not a must. In my previous restaurants this was not taken under consideration, due to the fact that these area is seasonal, and being in MN, if we get lucky we'll be able to utilize the outdoor a maximum of 45 days. Keep in mind that this area face west, so during the hot days, people don't care to sit outdoors. 4- Bonfire Restaurant The shopping mall where this restaurant is located, has a lot more retailers that are open later hours, I can see how this is a problem. /199 REC ElvED r =P - 9 2004 5- Centennial Ridge During our hours of operations we will be sharing the parking lot with only 2 other retailers. I hope this answer all your questions. If you need further information please contact me directl, :t . 1 -618 -0139. ncer- i ID 1' 1` n iti) C : Kurt anley /84 6514526824 09/13/2004 15:24 FAX 6514528824 12001/003 6 91 4 a n c P. To Whom It May Concern: This letter is written at the request of Ms. Pam Dudziak with regards to the proposed restaurant at Centennial Ridge. I am the owner of the adjacent building; 1625 Lena Court, and do have some concerns with regards to the amount of parking that would be required to support a restaurant. It is my understanding that a 6,037 sq ft. restaurant with a total seating capacity of two hundred sixty -three is being proposed. Following the city code of one parking spot to three people requires a total of eighty -seven stalls. The entire development has only ninety -nine stalls with fifty -seven of those belonging to Manley Brothers. Another thirty stalls are required by the restaurant just to bring .it to code. This leaves only twelve stalls remaining for the rest of the development; just enough for my staff to park. Doing the math it does not take much to see that there is insufficient parking. We have not yet taken into consideration that I have an additional 3,200 sq. ft to lease, and Manley Brothers also has open tenant space. With that being said my additional concerns are as follows: • First and foremost my practice was built with future growth and expansion in mind. I will be hiring another dentist and auxiliary staff. This will extend our practice hours to include evenings and weekends; obviously overlapping with the hours of the restaurant. I find it impractical to agree to share our parking now only to reprieve six months later. • One tenant of our building that will be open for operation by December ls` is a Medical Spa. When asked about her hours of operation she stated mostly evenings and weekends. As the owner of the facility I must look out for the best interest of my tenants. Authorizing the use of her parking during her peak hours of operation is disingenuous to what I initially guaranteed with regards to parking. 1 also believe that agreeing to this makes my property less desirable to other future tenants. As a small business owner accessibility is of great concern. Having an insufficient amount of parking only devalues the property. • There is currently a single tenant, Fantastic Sams, in the building of question. The employees there are currently parking behind my building; utilizing spaces on my property. Thus far, on average, there are between six and eight employee cars utilizing the fifteen spaces available. That leaves only seven to nine remaining spots for my eight employees. This has not yet caused a great area of concern. However, as growth occurs within the businesses this will become a problem. I find it very hard to believe that placing a time on when people "can" park in those spaces would solve the problems that are going to occur with regards to the proposed restaurant. There is a fare amount of ambiguity involved that I do not have the time to constantly question and police. 1625 L• n,I Lntue1 5i.i1 A • C o,- MN 55122 +.Ir .1 • i.I I 11 Y\\t•1 \l,L ill' i \�I Cc G7c '1�'1'_�'F{' !. C.L >Il _� /, . 09/13/2004 15:24 FAX 6514528824 Z002/003 t f o r. , (0r I. tl 1 1 r 11 l 1. l i l • There is also some question as to the limitations and or flexibility of an agreement being signed to allow parking to only one business of a multi- tenant building. In other words with this agreement do the tenants of that building fall underneath the umbrella of utilizing my property, or is it specific to the restaurant? I do not think that it would be advantageous for me to assign that right to the entire development. That could potentially involve an additional four businesses utilizing the parking set aside for three. • With the way in which the buildings are situated it is advantageous for them to utilize our parking it is not however practical to assume that we are going to park on the west side of their building and walk across the entire length of the development. This is a real possibility for my staff, patients and tenants if all of our parking is being utilized by the patrons of the other building. Please take time to evaluate this situation thoroughly. Essentially it breaks down to shear numbers. There is not sufficient parking to support a restaurant now, and the development is less then fifty percent occupied. Why then would it seem feasible when it is one - hundred percent occupied? If the answer is simply because the restaurant is operating at different hours then thought has not be given to operating hours of potential tenants or the future growth of the development. S' -ely, Michelle Rademacher DDS -16 25 f \ • La / � / 'v 559.9.0 ICS, 6 1.40_'.4'1 ' I 1 • fl.Wo 651 ,4 LI.Ss + (J /3S/ Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AT CLIFF LAKE CENTRE — INLAND COMMERCIAL LLC ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow a reader board sign on the existing pylon sign for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road; subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow 30 inch by 80 inch banners on 17 light poles (as indicated on the site plan) for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road; subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow 30 inch by 12 inch tenant name signs attached to the approved banners (as indicated on the site plan) for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road; subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL > Majority of Council Members present FACTS: > The applicant is requesting to add an electronic reader board to the existing pylon sign at the entrance of Cliff Lake Centre, and to install banners on the parking lot light poles. • The reader board sign will be contracted out to the tenants; content and usage are regulated by the management company. > The proposed banners will be located on 17 light poles in the Center's parking lot. The applicant proposes to attach the tenant's name to the bottom of the banner. > The banners are currently on the light poles in the parking lot but without the tenant names. These banners are not part of the previous Planned Development sign plan and are in violation of the agreement. > The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004 and is recommending approval (on a split vote) of each request, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. /`3 ISSUES: ➢ APC members in opposition to the proposal stated concern with setting a precedent that may result in other commercial centers requesting additional signage. 60 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE October 12, 2004 ATTACHMENTS (1): Planning Staff Report pages /.6through /K Draft APC Minutes will be included with Additional Information on Monday /3S PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 3, 2004 CASE: 29- PA- 21 -08 -04 APPLICANT: Rick Plessner HEARING DATE: September 28, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Inland Ryan Cliff Lake LLC APPLICATION DATE: August 13, 2004 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney LOCATION: 1960 Cliff Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RC, Retail Commercial ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to modify the pylon sign and add banner signs to the light poles within the center's parking lot for property located at 1960 Cliff Road in the SW ' /4 of Section 29. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two- thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The Eagan Hills West Planned Development was approved in April 1979 and consists of a mix of commercial and residential development. The commercial portion consists of Cliff Lake Centre, which was platted in 1988 and constructed in 1988 -89. The PD Agreement stipulates that permitted commercial uses include those listed as permitted or conditional in the LB, RB, and CSC zoning districts. / 3� Planning Report — Cliff Lake Centre September 28, 2004 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The shopping center consists of two buildings adjacent to the west side of Cliff Lake and anchored to the north by Cub Foods and to the south by Target. The shopping center contains multiple tenants, and the two buildings are separated by an open space that contains a remote control car race track for Hobby Zone. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Cub Foods/Retail PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial Northeast Retail PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial South Target/retail PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial West Vacant PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — The applicant is requesting to add an electronic reader board to the existing pylon sign at the entrance of Cliff Lake Centre, and to install banners on the parking lot light poles. The applicant indicates the tenants of the Center have requested increased signage in numerous occasions. Reader Board sign — The applicant indicates the reader board will be operated from the management office t ` T located in Oakdale. The sign will contain no more s: than two lines with red lettering. The sign will be contracted out to the tenants; content and usage are �� ' �� , ��r regulated by the management company. The reader [g , - board is 3 feet by 10 feet, adding to the 95 square foot s 4 -- pylon will result in a 125 square foot sign which is x �� ' V permitted by the Sign Ordinance. The height of the 4 < „!1 1- sign is not proposed to change. . _ Existing /3 Planning Report — Cliff Lake Centre September 28, 2004 Page 3 Banners — The proposed banners will be located on 17 light poles in the 4 a' Center's parking lot. The banners have a dark green background with C I A p cream lettering and printing. The applicant proposes to attach the 41 V tenant's name to the lower half of the banner. The banner itself is 30 dt j inches by 80 inches and the name board is 30 inches by 12 inches which f i f , "': '" is placed below the banner (see attachment). The banners are currently s , Qip9 ' ' on the light poles in the parking lot but without the tenant names. These P k an banners are not part of the previous Planned Development sig n plan and t' p p p • g 7 are i n v of the agreement. O 4 , K (Existing banners) Sign Ordinance — The general sign standards of the sign code do not allow moving parts, or lights. The reader board sign, if permitted will not be allowed to scroll, change intermittently or flash (can change when changing tenants). The banner signage is considered product signage and by definition; product signage is only permitted on the building. Cliff Lake Centre currently has two approved freestanding signs, a pylon and a monument. A conditional Use Permit is not necessary because of the Planned Development zoning (planned Development amendment is necessary). The appropriateness of this request is for City Officials to determine. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to alter on -site signage. The request is for two different types of signage. The first request is to alter the pylon sign by adding a reader board and the second request is to allow banners on 17 light poles throughout the parking lot. The Centre has already installed the banners without approval of an amendment. The reader board sign will be located on the exiting pylon sign below the sign band. Tenants will lease out the reader board, the reader board will not have moving or flashing parts. Content and usage is regulated by the center's management company. The overall pylon sign size will continue to conform to City Sign ordinances. The proposed banners require an amendment to the approved Sign Plan for Cliff Lake Centre. The appropriateness of this request is for City Officials to determine. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a reader board sign on the existing pylon sign for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road . If approved the following conditions shall apply: /2 r Planning Report — Cliff Lake Centre September 28, 2004 Page 4 1. A Planned Development Amendment Agreement shall be executed and recorded. 2. The letters shall not scroll, intermittently change or flash, the content can change as the tenant message changes. To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow 30 inch by 80 inch banners on 17 light poles (as indicated on the site plan) for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. A Planned Development Amendment Agreement shall be executed and recorded. 2. The banners shall be located as indicated on the Site Plan dated received August 13, 2004. 3. The banner dimensions shall be 30 inches by 80 inches. 4. No tenant names or product advertising are permitted on the banners. 5. Banners that become torn or tattered shall be replaced. To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow 30 inch by 12 inch tenant name signs attached to the approved banners (as indicated on the site plan) for Cliff Lake Centre, located at 1960 Cliff Lake Road. If approved the follow conditions shall apply: 1. A Planned Development Amendment Agreement shall be executed and recorded. 2. The banners shall be located as indicated on the Site Plan dated received August 13, 2004. 3. The tenant banners shall be 30 inches by 12 inches. 4. The banners are limited to tenant names within Cliff Lake Centre. 5. Banners that become torn or tattered shall be replaced. /J Eagan Boundary Location Map ^\ Street Centerline Parcel Area 104 Building Footprint �` A tl i a i � Id �l t .. ;, i i 13 [ 1 wall t1 CCi C Gi�+ titi,/ ! 7.� ....444.6. i, 9 .-- / L. �l � Lal En u lna iL�ItiJ LIM to CA14p �D �� 404 �� 7. i. 4 4 �..- t R - v. s 1 f lJFa 1,-- • ' N. 0 O I. *. � Ei y . VQ ILL, ver l 1. 111121 .��,� � ® Q ��'� ` �, �J �� otz PP; • S'.. 441-4 > �a v � Min 4' � , � ® „ ,(4p- min:, � I's u r♦■��vu �....... �;, S ir l a a � ,� �� ... V GA i y � v ® � Vt�+ t � .� ut-t renal d I Str r t ' t CR a ♦ ■ f� ® Iiaa1J n %.7 vq. ® *v W C `, w � iC �^ e , min „Ng Pas � a�I 4 117 � � t � � ffi a�, El Inn PIN ∎1 4.,t�> .s # 1 . 4,4 7 4 1 Ls"i°��g 0 c 'tr aiL iG , � : ...13 1. SIN r� �. .K L °71U N` �: Ct�1s v°i ltrJ © ® ` 1^��!11��.I r � uiir� r 4 ®� c ! ufpi & [l ,�i � w, g . ,Nir ? . � ri WO t o V a i 4 Z 4. ..tea �� V . i ®. Luau "t1 �Et� b• J MEI r,E < t �. 1WI ft = e mi.r� .p ��.. � � E�.�� o W .,Es E mu e ' k f t milxn IV g ®• 4 YI`.r Y. Yi:ViYl :r �1r+I 0 LI rib let,' Lima ' l l i P 14G.rr111�S%"'"'"m Pro bb2.” " 'n U � L U r C �1.& v in ��M r zaa =J� ■J Pro Oal a 14 4.. rzlialli b II 13, 1 - 1 lrtrarse► \\ k$ .3�, � 1 �� Sub ect Site . cor 4 a a c f a:, ita z ,0 . m «'� ��5�1 , ® ® aka ® ® ® .4 G em v 110 „ „ a.J.101, MS IMF eI 4m �_' = s��o . �� 64 .. t 4' , 1 ri MIT I m 94 ia Er3 a // 1 L ° Mi l 13 t kJ Cvbn YA1 ...r 111....41.1. N... 3i ..Lift R e, 1;3 Ea ''' EN3 JO 0 0 (=LPIco■ c / ,, . liii co 0 '14 e th . l ' En 5 E l : 3 - AT E f ♦ Qe �® � w'a �� E- Fa q ^> �.' ® f ' + r f tz' .` ext tta e f RT t g F:9 V 1► Ott s0” F4 �' ! w. n. F' rA. t t 3CS O r . s � ■. 0..�� ~a 4i t3. fir ^� 6�ri�► �':B� ��e r : :. , ! ®• ` rp* . ® t © e �1. r ir:. fg F ri ti� v r+ea Po � ++ e t "4 ..r Vu at. IF�t __ No m ® \ : /' , sestra t om■ ®1 464_ `41 . .0 �, O E . � '� s 01 rti r y m ;�, v 1 atoms i r ° ' d . ia ... C • • 1 O % Q "I� a �4 V " Illi 14. 416 [11111111117 10 14110r4. '''' r "PA ,,,,,, lir -. ,,,,,,, � , ®� = arts e�� " iri®i.tt - -- airivO d IC EGGEuG�1 «� 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development /Developer: Cliff Lake Centre Application: PD Amendment Case No.: 29- PA- 21 -08 -04 N �., fi,"' Map Prepared using ERSI w 3.1. Parcel base map data provided 1 41 O ,xx by Dakota County Office of of GIS and is current as of January 2004 a ',; W E city f ea nn /l THIS MAP I5 INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Y v The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Cliff Lake Centre Land Use Map Case No. 29- PA- 21 -08 -04 _t 1 '_ l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 / .4../ I I I Zoning Map P / - PF PD / MO m Current Zoning: B B B mm P PD B 1 = 1 ® y P D PD Q � PD "c Planned Development ° .Q * CO m 00 Jr� J� Location t-4 _ PD PD PD ....v.. ! 3TAT 600 0 600 1200 Feet L...." ) /.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �_11 1 I I I I I 1 11 1 / �/ I I V Comprehensive Guide Plan - P Land Use Map If QP MD > 1 iT m ' P Current Land Use Designation: MD f / 000 :07 I i A 0 RC ( RC Retail Commercial Location RC P.0 I1- CO..nt7 3TATF 600 0 600 1200 Feet _ �v /TJ\ 1 Parcel base map information provid.. y Dakota County Land Survey Depertmert June 20 N Zoning information maintained byCity StafL / City of Eagan 2. w W E THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of t ormation. S 0 .."::..:,-,:',.....,7::'-::•,ti..-:-.'..17,t-4,-,:se --- r„.4.,.° .,..s -, - - 3,etz-- ,, '''' -;,,.,,A ft.t.)...iv:v.-.:.- .i?`" '',.k,-;`,gP,:::-IititiA:-.*: . '.:.:4.,.. '.-.."'-'L . .. „ . . . : • . 4,, .... , • ' - . :s :',',:;:,,,,,,,, ': - _ - _,4i,'"..-,, -., 4- ''' , ".;: tte;gr.'::::',.r:::,^-4,',._ ''',....J._____. ; . ' ';`.:7,',It:'7A1',A--",',174,trA,':;"4`741453:4-1ftf?;?•* 4,,,,,,.;YO ,..,...,.**? , s , '.. ,..t,,-- . , ..,..,74. - t '. •-• . ',. v ,77,--. . ! ' - " 1,....:,t, n.44: i..7.,,,,,,,,,::.%.:`•4;-..t,lt,:-.,:liff.:;‘, ‘;, ,.. .`""----- •; : '?,4-::::....t'..;V:P.,,,,g;‘ eri: ; . , ` ; g 11 : 5 , 1 ,4, :1-gC''':''''i''' - . .' ' -*---41 ' ',..: ''' ';':i:::%:^1.111:■.°L.k.':::-;`.. '.'■1 -.;)1. :11-g't i4";,..k.%'Ih4.4-'41;IT.O.it'::.;',..,,,%.":".* '', 1"•-:::-...,'''. 4:. fi&-0-?''.$,V47,.;./Z°1:?I'Ci';57,'-':5:::..'°.-: r' : , '7:::5■ 1- , P X 41; 4.,.44, rtii*1 ,0 4. , := , , ,, ,,v,:::,_ic,,,:, , , ,,., , .:::;* .47. . t, ' ,2t:. c:',.;•141"s4.4_11-Vt:--.P,F440.*,,-;11::":=7:;i.i"V7.--, ',..''="'.4t"r;:::....i'.=.;;'-.."?..,vi..,4?-;41-5,,,-. , Ok~' ,: 1-;„4 0 r- '' t 4,1=`• 5 ; ;- ' <4. 4 7 .7.77 , 4 $ 4.i7: ,17.' ,, , '' ▪ ° 0 .,7, • : : 7::,..-A.::;.,:.':":::4.";',77'" iiV:''-e:' i;-T'i''';1111.!;',..'i';.34R447.7: s t ,S..4 -,), S.",,,,T-'1,-,7f., ,.•,, '-',..,,,,,, ."..,..' '? - :'-'iss--.4e . : - , ... r.:‘ ,4.-'. ,1*P44.7,'Z's;!';..Kei,:r0,-SS:'W.ri-''' .. • ,,,,S'f;F:1:4-1.%-:,.,;. .VZ..-,.", il 34 7 ,t,....--$72W,.7.:-,-: ' , ; ..7. *A':!..z . c . z.c-`.; : jit,,,,, , ,;i,*', ...-..,,...0,-,:..f,"574i....,".F.,,,;.,-',,,-.5,4S:.,,-... '- ,--4.,..:..-.-e,r, -f,r;:ife-X-WqrAf-fAk.;4-7-7.4:-.4"e.Z.,..7,1-::'5'..";.:7fZ";:k `,:;,%,;..,....H 1.F1.5-41'6,1i5V47 -.:'-i..11 r5°?: ,:::44:44., T.,,,,:f,51,0 ALk,',--..:c.f;'--,4;.;:...:,--%-=‘,3iTei.4::' ' --:.-- r X-,4"Vt-;::?...,:,.r-..4.:;:...-..',-z*:w,..,-:..__:,,,,--,4,-:0f:..--;--i---i-L: -..,,..-.. -, ,;,i1:.: . ;:t.4:1,„,,,,, , „,-..! PvA=4-..*:?.4.4:-,t7:i:Zi?ii"--I .•..-:„.. .....=,...:-...7 4x,„..i.:1, ..:.=.::-.V‘..-.;..:: fi..7...--.L-4t';.:..,,',V,'.`.....----- -;.,,.<..f:if.,., , ;; , L , t; , r. , ::--: ,, - , ..„.„ z r--..,, ..--,,,-,." zw, ,-...,,,,-;,:`-..`,. *' ;,,,, :.:*, , f•+st':.,',.1.;,.=;,:„;,.-z ` .30-..,•;,,,,,;wr,.,, .,,,.,t,t,„,6 '.....-- :,,,,,:,.. ,,,;„' '4'.... - ' , ..0.°R,..kk. , , , 4 4 ...ja.: " . '- :,,r.."'..,:t.:2,;'',,,:!:::.;,-..--,•:,,',-*.l'.:.,".;*'1' , q , :, - ? - '..'; : '''11.. - •:,,,* ..10.,t,c'..;.1 -:[,-.;..,10.:,-';.1.3i;":",,Z4! w t-,2 Z,„, in :' ' ,-,;;;;,.% .;,...,,,,,, :57.; '4,, :,..„3, li.,,rot-:„.-,,:p.,,.:, .-k:':Z --. ..'"?'t,......% ' ',':."': ..,::..1.,..1-',..4,- 1‘ tE ' --.-,.1,41.14-- ..;-. "'"' a •c( V. ii CI M ' ' .'' F4I4j;..4.`r•U'i'!'1•71".::11',i;;IT:e.'-ak.;:,-*'?4;;W: .4 -. ''' '. I - I I ir. C = V, 4 II Et 8 el t .., . , c 6..i..m. ..., , c ,, . ■• eXA • 4, CI ,,t,',.. = m 4 tB t...-. ' az r: 0 < ra"if f4 (1) 0 1"....a 1.„. ..-- -•.,.„..,,,U.il M n W C ' • . 'Ll 1F-Zil '‘`-' . !, 1-- 11 1 C4 L -. if E ' ',, ill < ftsZ ,__S Ii L = 't i '.. inaLLL U.- z 0 0 kS) DZ w --- = Ci 1 1 .t...... ,....... , - _ w .. . 0 1 .2= Page 2 of 2 "- , :',',';':".---, ":"';',.7. ' ''''' ' , 1 " - .: :1- .'' ' ' ' ' '-''''''' ',' '''," ' ! ;;; ;Iti r ? ':', :" 7:1 ! :•I't ' ;'::1';' ,..!; ; - ,,,. , , , ,k ,, , I f• i:4 " .,.." Ap.Z.. ,:„ li:':, .:`,.,„:„.:', , ,Apia f $‘'.;. ,0—, ,,,,,4: z„,!'s. ..,-.,,,',..;',,,',,,- ,,...- ' ::, ',''' ' 4.:,'":',i'-:::',,i',.'.., , --- .,' --. - ,, . .- - I - --. ,'-. ' • - ':"..f.it'fr:t::-.) i A A -7: ..t.,,, , et ri ;:z, r 7 ,A` i 1 ''''' ,--, ,, : ';',.:'_ •:./''.,; ' ' >., „,„. ,„ , . .„....,,„.. -- ' ,-- —4,,, ;,-,,;;--;;;,:, .--A' \ , i I (), I C ( #4, . ... -,. ? .1 1 i , 4 ,,. ... ..., ... . C , , . .. ... ..„ . .„, enter w30. x h80" w30" x h80 Ate ..., % . .' tt,... : x-,,,,t 4 ‘. 1 ' 4 ° 3. • z '' 2no Od.ind Exe U Wild Bird Store ,. %,,,30xh12' kig:Ailiri: ,141-2,4.:I* w 30" x hi 2' Front 9P-yawv Back ,....z....,, ii k'( , , t...44 Y A .;•: :•;7..,:i",.4,, :::!'.•%""1"' iiiv4f4;0.,A /Y,_3 "" ,, ., 716/04 • s -' -7 ,, -...3" , ..,' , ' =''' I' -- - -.'". _- . , ..-.?-.Th'.' - z ,, ;a1--'''t -,- -.-- 14 .A,.. '•-• , °.`...v.1.1‘kat;' , .,..rtt - 7,,i-l'. 4 -7::-' , - -'kti,t-Zt 3 ,. - 1; , 'ITIP' . .-., -,t' 4 -,:-. , -: yi 4 *-t * - , - '-, : - .''' - t ` , , . , ^ ...+if '....". , :.'...* 5 i. '''....".-. ...... n • ., I; a■m dqp , , i, ,,,,,, j ,o „ 6 ----- f ,-....e-- --" ' \'` -gall . givrk 1 --2 ,,\\\--,.\... - ‘ 1 , V L ..). ii_ 1 IL 1 \ ' 1 :*8 t 47, .1. zi (., \ *. 0 '.3 ,...6%,....._ , ... f tialr '30 . ''. ..... , „ — — i Y,,, -.- i tit,iti - \ , „ ,.> — ..; r ' ' , \ 1P/7-: - 0 ,,,A - - - ..' a , s' ' - -- ." _- • e- voi - Aii6._ .. .,-;,..k 141.' ATP 49 - , , , i , i';' " •-----:-------',,, . i: ' ' > '''' t" '&.•':- ..: .., - _c, :t I i i ,.., ;,-' :2 i 1 1' I MI • „,,-..W._,: -, - - ,- - ---,,,-, Ltr - Ii II.." . , f t., 5 „ ,,,,1/4,17,,,_ 1 ,, : -W --- ,,,,,', •-• .`:`-4 • li ■ Ilifer. I i ' . • • .. ri 1 :1,--_--,...-6-.. T- MA) P-S Ir''' '-') t I: lwr ,- --:kf • ., , r■ ‘,. ?.. 1 s L'EGEND ... ---- b.' 6 C 4, i ' ..--\ „ , - D - ' ' 67 0 Flood Lights ,. : - 1 i , (_..) incandescent \ , „...,,,,,I i., w..‘„,...... , • . Wall Mount It -7;,- . iiiii \\ I L „ t, I . ■ 28' Light Standard s i -,.. -- I Note: Canopy has recessed xx ( D(Jal) 4 , , % 1 6 j,41.: 7___ H - r 1 incandescent lighting r 28 Light Standard No wall mounted lighting x (Single) Location : tni:nd Con P7coar",y Vono?ema:-, 1:12 CLIFF LAKE CENTRE a 2901 Butterfield fRcx3d Z el Oak Brook. Illinois 60523 1 94 0-20 00 CLIFF LAKE ROAD a 630 954-5656 EAGAN, MN 55120 Z – , Toll Free 877 206-5656 Title: Not to Scale Date: January 2000 SITE LIGHTING —7 , RECEZYr I ''-‘ 1 ' '-' - - e,....,u i -3 titu4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION LSE: The tenants of the Cliff Lake Centre have approached Inland on several occasions to request that consideration be given to increasing signage capacity and to improve the appearance of the center. In response to tenant's long standing and on -going requests for increased - visibility of the retail businesses located in the Cliff Lake Centre, we are requesting a two part amendment to the original signage plan: I. To add an electronic reader board to the existing large pylon sign at the entrance of the Cliff Lake Centre on Cliff Lake Road. 2. To. install banners on the parking lot light posts. The reader board will be operated from our management office located in Oakdale. It will have static messages contained in no more than two lines of text. The lettering will be red. The individual tenants will contract with Inland to arran ;e• for usage and approval of content. The dimensions of the reader board are 3' by 10'. These 30 square feet combined with the existing 95 square feet will total 125 square feet of signage. The banners have a dark green background with cream color printing. Attached to the banner will be a tenant name board. The banners are 30" by 80 ", the name boards are 30" by 12 ". The added color and placement of the banners will improve the appearance of the center as well as offer an opportunity for the tenants to display their business names. LOCATION: Reader Board: The pylon that will house the reader board is located at the main entrance to the center on :Cliff Lake Road. The area directly across the street from this entrance is currently undeveloped land that is zoned for commercial use. The Cliff Lake town home development across from Cub is the only residential area in the vicinity- of the pylon. Banners: The banners will be positioned on the seventeen parking lot light posts in the center, excluding the Target and Cub lots. There will be no changes to the surrounding landscape for with project. �� s Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SODERHOLM ADDITION) — HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR to deny) a Planned Development Amendment to allow an expansion of the car wash and construction of an enclosure for salt storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. To approve (OR to deny) a Planned Development amendment to expand the car wash for the Holiday store at 1065 Diffley Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition in the SW 1 /4 of Section 23, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. To approve (OR to deny) a Planned Development amendment to amend the car wash signage for the Holiday store at 1065 Diffley Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition in the SW 1 /4 of Section 23, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes. FACTS: • The Soderholm Addition was approved in 1990 and the Holiday was constructed in 1991. • Holiday proposes to construct an eight -foot addition to the east side of the car wash to allow the new car wash equipment to be separated from the wash area. • The car wash addition would encroach eight feet into the required 50 -foot building setback from Lexington Avenue. The 20 -foot pavement setback from Lexington Avenue will remain and the bypass lane east of the car wash will be retained. • The Soderholm PD prohibits outside storage and display. A 10' x 10' enclosure is proposed on the west side of the car wash in front of the store which will be used for salt storage. • The APC held a public hearing on September 28, 2004, and recommended approval of the Planned Development Amendment, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. 60 -DAY STATUS: Deadline is October 17, 2004 ATTACHMENTS: September 28, 2004, APC Minutes will be distributed in the informational packet on Monday Staff report, pages /ci throughf5 / %t PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 22, 2004 CASE: 23- PA- 22 -08 -04 APPLICANT: Holiday Stationstores HEARING DATE: September 28, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Holiday Stationstores APPLICATION DATE: Aug. 18, 2004 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 1065 Diffley Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RC, Retail Commercial ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to expand the existing car wash and amend the car wash signage, and to create an enclosed storage area for the Holiday fuel station and convenience store at 1065 Diffley Road in the SW 1 /4 of Section 23, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two- thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Soderholm Addition was platted in 1995 and the Holiday fuel station and convenience store was constructed in 1996. The Soderholm Planned Development is within the Lexington South Planned Development, which was initially approved in the mid 1970s and encompassed over 1,000 acres of land including residential, commercial and public uses. /� Planning Report — Holiday Stationstores September 28, 2004 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site contains an existing Holiday fuel station and convenience store, with a single drive - through car wash bay. There are 21 parking stalls in addition to the 16 stalls at the fuel pumps. The building is on the north part of the site, with the fuel pumps to the south. The car wash is attached on the east side of the main building. Existing signage consists of a pylon sign and building signs. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Daycare center/ pond/City PD, Planned RC, Retail Commercial water station/Qwest Development switching station East Sts. Mary and Martha PF, Public Facilities QP, Quasi - Public Church South Lexington - Diffley Athletic P, Park P, Park and Recreational Fields Open Space West McDonald's restaurant PD, Planned RC, Retail Commercial Development EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — Holiday Stationstores is proposing to construct an eight foot wide addition on the east side of the existing car wash, and a 10' x 10' addition to the west side of the front of the car wash. In addition, some changes to the car wash building signs are proposed. According to the applicant, the existing car wash needs to be replaced. The proposed addition will allow the new equipment to be separated from the car wash area "so that it doesn't get damaged so quickly by the moisture." The 10' x 10' addition on the west side of the car wash creates an enclosed storage shelter to be used for salt. The salt storage area is attached to the principal building. Access into the storage shelter is gained only from the outside. Site Plan — The site plan shows both of the building additions. The proposal results in a net loss of one parking stall. The proposed car wash addition encroaches eight feet into the required 50 foot setback from Lexington Avenue. The existing building was set back 50 feet from Lexington Avenue when it was initially built. The bypass lane on the east side of the car wash will be retained, with some modifications to the striping to avoid conflicts with parking stalls. Code Requirements — The following ordinance requirements were adopted in December of 2003. It is appropriate at this time to reevaluate the property against this ordinance. ( (, Planning Report — Holiday Stationstores September 28, 2004 Page 3 Section 11.70. Subdivision 19. Commercial Car Washes. A. Entry and exit doors shall be closed during wash/dry cycles. B. Stacking spaces shall be provided and oriented to prevent traffic backup on adjacent streets. C. Parking and stacking spaces shall be screened from view of adjacent residential use areas. D. Vehicular access points shall be limited to prevent traffic conflicts E. Vacuums shall not interfere with stacking spaces and not be in a yard adjacent to a residential use area. F. The entire area other than that occupied by structure or landscaping shall be a concrete or paved surface. G. Lighting shall have no direct source visible from the public right -of -way or adjacent land. H. Screening shall be provided as specified in this Code. The existing car wash design appears to satisfy conditions B -H. Condition A relates to car wash operation and should be included as a condition of approval. Building Elevations — The narrative states the existing building is "masonry construction with an illuminated fascia system and asphalt shingled roof. New additions would also be constructed using the same materials as the existing building." Setbacks — The proposed car wash addition will encroach approximately 8 feet into the required 50 foot setback from Lexington Avenue. When initially constructed, the building was located at the minimum required setback of 50 feet. Thus, the proposed addition to the east side of the car wash will be set back 42 feet at its closest point. A 20 -foot setback of the pavement to the Lexington Avenue right -of -way will be provided, as well as a bypass lane around the car wash. It is a policy matter for City officials to determine if this reduced setback is acceptable. Parking — There are currently 21 parking stalls on the site, plus an additional 16 stalls at the pumps for a total of 37 parking stalls. One of the existing stalls in front of the building will be lost with this proposal. City Code requires one stall for every 200 sq. ft. of floor area. With the proposed addition, the building area will be 5,413 sq. ft., which requires a total of 27 parking stalls. The 36 stalls that will remain satisfy this code requirement. Signage — The applicant is proposing to remove the panaflex fascia around the car wash portion of the building and replace it with two illuminated can signs. The "Touch Free Car Wash" can signs for the entrance and exit of the car wash are 26.25 sq. ft. in area each and are proposed to be mounted on the north and south ends of the car wash above the entrance and exit. These new can signs would replace the existing car wash "entrance" and "exit" signs. In addition the existing "Touch Free Car Wash" sign on the east side of the car wash will be eliminated. As informational signs, the proposed can signs are not "simple" because they include additional content that is not merely informational. In addition, the size at 26.25 sq. ft. is larger than maximum 16 sq. ft. allowed by the Sign Code. Therefore, these signs do not meet the exempt standards in the Sign Code for "simple informational signs." Business signs may include the /L Planning Report — Holiday Stationstores September 28, 2004 Page 4 business name or a product or service that the business offers. The "Touch Free Car Wash" entrance and exit signs may be considered business signs, however, the City's Sign Code allows only up to three business signs on the building and this proposal involves four signs. Compliance with the City Sign Code may be achieved by modifying the sign proposal to eliminate one of the building signs or by redesigning the car wash signs as "simple informational signs" less than 16 sq. ft. in area. With the Planned Development zoning, signage that is outside the parameters of the Sign Code may be allowed. However, it is a policy matter for City officials to determine whether the sign proposal is acceptable as presented, or should be modified to comply with the Sign Code. Existing building signage consists of the Holiday name and logo on three sides of the fuel pump canopy (a total of 93.3 sq. ft.) and on the north and south sides of the convenience store (34.9 sq. ft. each). No changes to these signs are proposed. Storage — The Soderholm Planned Development prohibits outdoor storage and display. Therefore, Holiday is proposing to construct an addition to the building that will be used for salt storage to protect the salt from the elements and enclose it to comply with city ordinances. A site visit by City staff showed other items currently being stored outside (firewood, ice, and propane). The applicant has been advised that such outdoor storage and display is prohibited by the Planned Development Agreement and the applicant has agreed to remove those other items. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION In summary, the applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to expand the existing car wash and amend the car wash signage, and to create an enclosed storage area for salt. The proposed car wash addition is located on the east side of the building and will allow the car wash equipment to be separated from the wash area. New building signage for the car wash is also proposed. A 10' x 10' enclosure is proposed on the west side of the car wash. This enclosure will provide a fully enclosed area for salt storage. The proposed car wash addition encroaches eight feet into the required setback from Lexington Avenue. A bypass drive lane and the required 20 -foot setback between the pavement and the right -of -way will be maintained. The proposed salt enclosure complies with City Code. The proposed car wash signage consists of two can signs at the entrance and exit of the car wash. These would replace existing signs on the north, south and east sides of the car wash. It is a policy matter for City officials to determine whether the proposed signage is acceptable. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval of a Planned Development amendment to create an enclosed storage area, for the Holiday store at 1065 Diffley Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition in the SW '/a of Section 23. . If approved the following conditions shall apply: / &D Planning Report — Holiday Stationstores September 28, 2004 Page 5 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. The new addition shall be constructed of materials that match the existing building. 3. No outside storage, sales, or display is permitted. B. To recommend approval of a Planned Development amendment to expand the car wash for the Holiday store at 1065 Diffley Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition in the SW 1 /4 of Section 23. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. The new addition shall be constructed of materials that match the existing building. 3. Entry and exit doors of the car wash shall be closed during wash/dry cycles. C. To recommend approval of a Planned Development amendment to amend the car wash signage for the Holiday store at 1065 Diffley Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Soderholm Addition in the SW 1 /4 of Section 23. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. Car wash signage shall be as presented and approved on the attached signage plan. /57 Eagan Boundary �� / Street Centerline Location Map n St reet Area at Building Footprint 4,.� a fr'''-` 0 ® 0 ®:LB<sJ fy • 51 ` z +#4�` 44 ® ■ Gr ° ic*i mu � a : .p��o� '404 te tra 9 <zt. illi I lid clit<ttrESCM 111 4 -. 4 4 4 44 l a end , ® 444 c ui GaOv i li fs 11=10 : is.i&E m ,"°. , ,,,, MEW 4.7117A‘ Ls. io -mama lir A - r te ® 1sr®® Vie. rf fi I 91 lin t ■ Ittl . o l Ilik CHO n a " ua v v awls 6,0 oP d @ �� Subject Site ,...„,. MAI EN P 09,:e. A . .,.,,, -4w, ,,„<,, , ,-4, , Mgr 6 3 Yet, ill 44 - - 17 ", L . 1 , TAIIII:Walif , I 1.12 Liti IM tatk., GEM Awn TLIffrf , El CA :- ce aem.,:,-- is VW RA 1111 im 1113 1141 s + �� i ►`' 4,s. � n tin L l IroG��C ISICCim • �� raga iitid ®� ■FAIIPIlliMeg �r � ® �' �� ` ► O'er ti !W W .4.04401, All Ma 1 GIG ` F qr d ��!�� ,- a° NIP �1� Mils 'pi t` \to n [ 1� 0� � - _; ., ahl �i� eA r 4 ., 1 16a �� al .17 '1 f7. r t ti �' 0 1 in wi Kil al A�ris i0® ors u i a .� iew is s 4 a� ®CCU'" .� ■ra L7 (I o t] Dii MO ® , , 67 ,ter _T - Z (2 i - � b � I! ee� ■ c,N OE' HO ��i� j I �� .IcD �Gr9� moo , milkal Lig I. riAtaiii-T—lita ", 1 Ex.s;44-giiiiv-acti. 1 �� t® AIN • e, . r a v , - for ®� � R -. �� r'a � .� 1 tk y et ®ti - two t � 4 y et s e e, �� ®� I �W a t R : .� l: T 1000 D 1000 2000 Feet I Development/Developer: Holiday Station Stores Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No..: 23- PA- 22 -08 -04 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVIew 3.1. Parcel base map data provided / 5: N by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of January 2004. / W E C1t OF C'CI Qr TNIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY V The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Community Development Deportment not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Holiday - PD Amendment Land Use Map Case No. 23- PA- 22 -08 -04 J it r P Zoning Map [ Q� C R' 1h1 A /I11I Ill f', Location Current Zoning: ° Tir _ PF I_ PD p ' �- PF Planned Development I I r PD 1� -1 P l O 111 Pre Wal111■ ■11rt1 f E >•�111a 1111r • ■ t■um omen! * ; . ' , tuuIuu .iir.0 _. 116 1 P ' , a Isi1111 111111�► o A rim ` "®F�1® bn, so o 100 1200 21201 . ■ 8 Comprehensive Guide Plan ■ Land Use Map I ► ,; LO L iii 1111 P `', l�catlon • •• - OP Current Land Use Designation: LD E aP 1 RC RC RC Retail Commercial LD ai r 11111111111► , P ra111111 MIRA= P 4 1�`�1N11 �■1V S t .... t.1 MI I ■ •It, � �a /1111 1111�� ■ 100 0 100 1200 F..t li t :: I" 1 - -- -- -10 g& 7 Parcel base map Information providedby Dakota County Land Survey Depertmart June 20 N Zoning Information maintained byCity Stan 4 CityofEagan 2 E a THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this info ion. S I . 1 I . o• '..."--,....„.._ .:, IT 1 7 . I ...% i :;•,,, 0 / i I N.1 % ,, I ..'11. 4' ,.. )1 • • . ,....\•••••■■.--...... ,...-J ( ,../) .. 1 /0 I C5 258.46 ;. • : _,.... ir --- ":, . ._ 111 sm........— C r a - o ....,..• v - - T. - . i '''.. _ ;T: -...• . '^....., N I 1 1 i 7 •.".■.... *;•.. ----- --. ._------ : I : . . ,...iPi '■ \ , .- i • • i 0 00 ; .: 0* . . . : { . ' .. ..‘ — • • .• • , .. 1 • i ":•••••`: ... • I "" .... .., .. -_. . • •. . •• - •• . (:::) ; .,.1 • ...\ • 1 • . I ;1 ': i 1 ..).10•7 ••0 P. . c,ri ' 1 IG. ;5 • 1 , 1 , .. -< ! , ''.., I :... \• , : ; • .....:\ ......:.,, 1 • . : • A-, N.-.,.. - -1 1 . .:0 : .1. •,-_, • , 0., :. .• • • ,I ,.• 0 ' 1 ••,:• ..........• . .. ..- .— .•.••• . •_: j-,-..... .- -, 1 ,.... I I, , .. ...„ ...,,.., , ..........i, , ,. 5 I ' I - 0 ao .. • - . I = I ' 1 ..• .. • 75 5 5 a I if 0 1 i C I • I ,, a o a . / ,... i P . . , . a o. a a I • . I 0 ......--! 317 i'41,:s _ --- ... f ."' I ■ .1 -•-■ I . ... N i - 5 ,./ 7. ...'.'" I 1.. •- i ,. .. # 7. )/ .- .. it 1' ' s. :D .\'' . • tt .,. • .- ...... P ' .. I ■p '.■,. ________________.---------_____—.-----___________. • „:- . , . j : CA% 7 *, , .. . \ 1) ■, , . R.: 0 .'• -'!•' • ..: z ,, -.. ,7 ..: ?.' .:•• ' F. • :,... -7 .1 •.", 1 ,:, :: - 1 - 4 -.2. :.-• - --.1 -2 - •.:tk . _ 7. c ", i',.' t •4 ' :-. •••• .. - , ....,, ■-• 0 0 0 • . * 1 i' ' . . ... , .. . .. ... I, : , • ' — ■7: ' f . : F', 5. !'.. ... . . . , ..., ,, ::. •,', ', ,' " . : — 4 . ' ' t , . • . :* '.. : .. 't 1. : i •. :;:' 1 1 - ■;, : .; '.', •;. '' 5. •.‘....:, .: '... : ;?... i i Si. a : '; "; . '.e. ,.' '. ' i ''• ' ;•4 -- A :; ;:. ,.: - E ',4 ::. 5 1... 2 a ..-,.., 4 i 4 ,... • , , , L •••-: ,. , • , a ,.,,;;',,•fi', •, r :A ,;_iiigAs. ; .1 !: t ,..,--- •, --- • .. •-:, i :: ‘i.., .... i .° , 1 .• " s,', ; ..4 4: • ( 4 1 r " ' • ---:- ' 9 ■ .. -- • r" . 1 -.: 4: ' j: • .:- 1- : •-• - .‘ .- .: - ; , . • - , -.. F. • ';. ,.. \ - ....I I . ..f.. 4C-..` , , , ' r• ; 1 "; 7 . 1: ' 4: ---v. -- 7, I ■ . ; .:..:. •.': ', 1 -, .. ■ :.•:, '''. .t' ': ':'.' - . - • — -7 '''t : 1 ...:...' ''''''''' .,, ..., 7_ .?...-7..%T . . . .. ,. . - i • ..V .. S. -•• ;, .: '••.; ...... •' .. l'.. ` ': .•'.: . ' 4....5 .. . EXISTING !r Ii c z j ( a 1 // i ,�% r ,. �♦ ( ) C ( n1 \ � • / L°5-= C =.7i 1 1 4rxi . . i gui- P A O ff, 4 7 a 4. N ! , A 1t f 1 0 1 gi "'- 0 m n NM L © cp E1 1 ; ° L J g a. � AI I Bill I 151-1 13, ' IIM IN A Dfr sr. I C C f� 1 1 ____ --- - ." -- el____________________________ __l__ ---------.------ 1 J__`__ L::: : F••t b ■ N O ° ) it iiiiP i. t ill IN r a =V t 1 STAT1ONSTORE #068 ; ' it a Site Plan _ g. -� :- Eagan, MN ' e F- �_s a - e4 SITE PLAN 47z /57-5.-- ,ti \I =D D 7/ � - 4. 1// /// / / / I j, �1 r II I I 0 N MI INF 1 11 1 llof d 1 I. I • — F1 IF 41 1777 77---74, 11 C el ii mom. pi -• `'• MI - 2 D' 111 1 ill r w--"- t % ' -- t - � ! 1 ; IIIIIIIIIilllll El 1 _ -JB�. 1. _ I 1 c.. 1 ---- , E. tt N u. ny rr 11 � � ..1 boy\ ~ r G3 .MCWIM'' a l'; II I I ti r ill/ � STAT(ONSTORE #058 - il.Ril d € e Floo Plan �- € ®, c _ __`: .F ( ;::11 j w r s e� ale 1;1'r FLOOR PLAN 3 5— / (z= ' Z L- w 7,u ''..-.C. iE III i1 1 (� n Ra . I'l �. , ° . �� ' Y z y 6 n I II 1 .!'1111[1,4 I ° ", IIII' - R 'u�i lll�'Ii �.'_�� - 111111 I _< IIII it*- X1 IIII a< IIII III II e < • o ,!' - _ „ '�I Il. = 1 ' I W' � - ° I I I I _ rn °q ill III Dil z z 1 1 1 m I I I I x: I in'' .1 s 7Z7.E. 21 rn i 11 1 I'Iili IIIIII IIII -?� p I�II I ��_ � 1 1 Z l o i l hI II 1 '� lA ! i�:I I r+ I rn f'i i O a$ l Il �I � -I I ( 1 �j _ lP S 1 I II II ' I . 1 1 ' I I11 I _ 1 i € 33 � I I i'i , IC I s�- ! I 1 �� I� z IIC �. I j V + ' I _I I. �� 11(� a I l IIII Z 11;1 !I - I' o i I p 1 , _ ~�_ ;2___;- z a 1 it _ ® N 1 11 II,, _ I'II I 1 I 1 1 1 I . _ Ns c IIII II ,I p VIII 11''ll1l �' 11'' 1 ,. _ 1 11 i! 1 i1 1' _ ! IIII Z I 1 - l I I IIII Il 11 I IIIII - �r.i. 1111 0 �� 1 111 1 E I l i - I ura1 �'. �II (5, 1 III ,,[14, a 1p. 1 j ' -f==:!:' I 1 II ; � I _ E I'1 1 II 11 III I _ e 1 1,II'� 11' = _ I. . a q r I I I I I 1 I I II I 1 __ ��1 �111 R . 'S POI ;kc II l f _ III I + 'Q�,ry��5x, �A A9 ,,�`{{'QQ >Y L , ) II I II 1 9t R 1 I: .Ill II, i 1 1 - - I�: 1 jllli I1 I I ' I 1;! II _ d 1 il '1 1 11 - 1 I I III [g[- rn II 11 p ' = I 1 111 11 _ j 1 III r 1 I I l� - I I I I I ,�.: il 111 1 ��d 11 � I A 1 1 I I 11'1 I,IIIII ' II'IIIII1 III I III' I II II _ • I I I I 1 u 1 1 III, II 1 I N' I Id; 1 li 21 241 I 1 !9I € `g °' i �z F e3 -'T C) g 1 E lOr I STATIONSTOIRE #068 - = f Lp7,, ,�r,tt,,�f lfS� F `J Q O. ::411! ji ` # r j LYi-Ci i �anx N 2 1' • . J as s R Fe a g. ELEVATIONS /5 ., . I 4 ift 1 II 11 1 a 1 .— _____ I 1 _ •0 I i : i 474 1 l' 1 ; \ \ ; ..,.. ..: r . ,. ' t ; I i _ ( i „,..1 . : „, All , !1i[A_ lie( :1' V -. 11,1t ,.. 44 •• ''' stillifi I illl :... , • i ......... IQ :p 1:•r ir .... I: iiiiit ;11:: ; • I HON • I IMMO ' ' 1 i 111:1 ! : ,1 .: . I. f /\, 4 i , ' ' 1 - / ) . I .; . \ . ,• 1 d 1, t..if / / 1■: , ..c / I ( :-....-- rn iT,:116:1 1 / . 11 r r - i l / :3; I: VW iA i l ' m rll < 1 I 1 1(.,,161'1:B r - 1,e.: 1, ! ',:....,,,,' III 1 / Il i'll'i ,., 1 II 1 1 ( ' 9 1 1. i!1 i;,;fit 1 ! 1111 I Ilk ' II 1 I A I :1P : 0 !Ili v qiio li il,tdp 4 • ,. ....... — i t i , . ' I ----L.— --- —. , I 4 Ii . ,.— Ala i ,,it I . -- , .., : ,.. _ s ! : ri In' w .....4.' I I % - ---- . '.. , Ji 11 • i P .., . I-- -.4.. ' = •-• , 1 r 11 i® III' 1 •.J r _, , - I, , , - - , - • , :.: ,r , -____ R. - - 1 • ■ 1111 , 11 . : .71 i i 1 , •:11 ' n i t/ I ; I; • I ; i • ; ; : i j . I . ,-•• ...:•--- I 13 I !--!------ - -- 1 E.---...-=---------- ..---- s k ...••••""""*"..■------1 s l ) I R G O N P A O S E D 4' i i i i 1 STATIONSTORE #068 P a :1.1 iiiir GE PLA.N r3 Lug © I rea 61. . ff • ,,.;! . .1 (4 EAGAN, MN SCALE: NONE . .4 • i ri i t 1 1 I SIGNAGE PLAN .;., : II... •.:...; • . . . , .. . .. . ;.,. .. ,.: _ : '..,, . ......_..•, .” Narrative Holiday Stationstores is proposing to add a 10 foot addition to the South and 8 foot addition to the East of the existing car wash portion of the building located at 1065 Diffley Road. The existing building is masonry construction with an illuminated fascia system and asphalt shingled roof. New additions would also be constructed using the same materials as the existing building. However, we would remove the panaflex fascia around the car wash portion of the building and replace it with two illuminated can signs. The purpose of the addition is three fold: 1) We would have a location to store and sell salt that would be totally enclosed versus stacking it up on the sidewalk or at the pump islands. The customer would purchase the salt at the register, and then obtain a bag from the enclosure, 2) To replace the existing worn out car wash. The car wash type would remain the same, however, it will now be new and improved; 3) To move the existing supporting equipment out of the car wash bay so that it doesn't get damaged so quickly by the moisture. All existing utilities, i.e., landscaping and drainage will remain the same. We will lose two parking stalls as a result of this addition, but will remain in compliance. We believe that the facility will operate comfortably with the loss of the two parking stalls. Ordinance requires one parking stall per 200 sq.ft. of building. At completion the building will have 5,413 finished square feet, which would only require 27 stalls. Our proposal provides for 32 parking stalls. Our existing building contains a gross building area of 4,750 square feet, which requires 24 parking stalls. The proposed building plan encroaches 8 feet upon the 50 -foot set back area. The City has recently banned our ability to sell packaged salt in front of our store. Our building addition proposal will locate the salt within an enclosed attractive shelter area built into the proposed car wash. The project, if approved, would begin this fall and be finished by the end of November 2004. R C E i V i i) SEP - i 2004 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting E. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AT THOMAS LAKE CENTER — PHUONG NGUYEN ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR to direct findings of fact for denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow an off -sale liquor store in Thomas Lake Center, located at 1565 Cliff Road; subject to the conditions in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. To approve the Off -Sale Liquor License for Phuong La Nguyen, dba T.L. Liquors, 1565 Cliff Road, Suite 18 & 19. To approve a License to Sell Tobacco Products for Phuong La Nguyen, dba T.L. Liquors, 1565 Cliff Road, Suite 18 & 19. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL ➢ Majority of Council Members present FACTS: ➢ The subject site is a retail strip center and the applicant proposes to occupy approximately 2,922 square feet at the eastern end of the Thomas Lake Center. ➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004 and is recommending approval of the PD Amendment, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. Liquor License ➢ Phuong La Nguyen has applied for an Off -Sale Liquor license at the address above. The partners are Phuong La Nguyen and Truong La. ➢ The applicants have submitted the required documents. They have been reviewed and deemed in order by City staff. ➢ The Police Department has conducted an investigation does not find any reason to deny the Off -Sale Liquor license. Tobacco License ➢ All requirements of the application have been met. ➢ The application has been reviewed by staff and deemed in order for approval. 1 ISSUES: > Similar to other recent Planned Development Amendments, the APC added a condition limiting window signage to open/closed and hours of operation. 60 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE October 17, 2004 ATTACHMENTS (1): Planning Staff Report pages /6 through /6g Draft APC Minutes will be included with Additional Information on Monday /'/ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 30, 2004 CASE: 28- PA- 23 -08 -04 APPLICANT: Phuong Nguyen HEARING DATE: September 28, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Har -Mar Inc APPLICATION DATE: August 18, 2004 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney LOCATION: 1565 Cliff Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RC, Retail Commercial ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow an off - sale liquor store in Thomas Lake Center, for property located at 1565 Cliff Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 28. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two- thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The original Planned Development proposal for the 600 acre Blackhawk Park Planned Development was submitted to the City in 1972 as "Eagan 500." The Blackhawk Park Planned Development Agreement was executed in June 1977 for a 15 year term. Thomas Lake Center was platted and the strip center on Lot 1 constructed in 1987. The Texaco (currently Holiday) on Lot 5 was constructed in 1989. Other free standing businesses and the additional parking for Life Time Fitness were constructed in 1995 and 1996. /602 Planning Report — TL Liquors September 28, 2004 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is located in Thomas Lake Center. The center contains a strip retail center, Bonfire Restaurant, Car Care Muffler and Brake, and Xpress Lube. The store is proposed to be located in a 2,922 square foot space in the eastern half of the in -lined center. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Lifetime Fitness PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial East Single family R -1, Single family LD, Low Density residence residential residential South Single family PD, Planned LD, Low Density residence Development Residential West Retail PD, Planned RC, Retail Development Commercial EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal — The applicant is proposing to introduce off -sale liquor store at Thomas Lake Center. Based on City approvals the applicant would like to open the store in October. The applicant indicated all signage will comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. There is no other off -sale liquor store located in Thomas Lake Center or in close proximity of Thomas Lake Center. Within the City of Eagan liquor stores are often located in strip centers. Code Requirements — Section 5.33 Subdivision 5: No license shall be granted for any building within 300 feet of any nursery, elementary or secondary school structure; daycare center structure; or church structure, except as provided herein. A license may be granted for any building within 300 feet of any of the above listed uses when the proposed license premises are listed uses are located within the same zoning district and planned commercial development. There is a daycare located within Thomas Lake Center; since the daycare is in the same planned commercial development of the subject site, the liquor store may be permitted. Planning Report — TL Liquors September 28, 2004 Page 3 SUMMARY /CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow an off sale liquor store in Thomas Lake Center. There are no other liquor stores in close proximity to the proposed location. The applicant is anticipating an October opening. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a liquor store in Thomas Lake Center, located at 1565 Cliff Road. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. A Planned Development Amendment Agreement shall be executed and recorded. 2. All signage shall comply with the City of Eagan Sign Ordinance. /651 ............... Eagan Boundary /�` � Street Centerline Location Map I I Parcel Area etsi Building Footprint J '°".1 - ® Ca ry v v ® � 6 ilki v �P ` s a ® ® 0� - P ® . ®t i® ii; M ME ®d o ` E I iiiisft...amel - fr 2 i / r r� D RI , ° °` !�►Q ®0 6 Is murk I r � A®IA ®' ` Rpm! � : �� lib �� ate, � a � !IIIf! ® Sub ect Sit _ � ��k i b�� off naB v y "Ga 44, 444114 ® � Gov -fi ©� ��► 7 JG ° ��r� , FAME. ., r Ir/ q i t: 0 A silk' ligeoa - V 0 .'.", '2N1 P*11,1%01'9'71 ran CI " * Irr da � r1LJ1LrJ 3I • -`�I 10. �5� ® � ® ® ® ".I�1 .114 a r le r! „..4 A et Milleer ' � ®®0 Ea epeia sti r -1 gti"' a i 8 � me 7 � ®, f °2-- �� ®ew ®t Tx � ®�O® b o a door = � � rs, ; Mu Gw , q o�Qa OP r, 0 ® s. p ®� a .�.ra•• 1.W ®a ®g s Gir w� �e� a se ea 6 . , ovQ, O Q� ∎® � , NI 0 CM Mt ett tv. a L E - _ 0 � � p 4411: tig ® al c� ®s �I s ��►" ir ;. As? .0 „?.31,,. ETh EI AD , wir l ipmj,1,........lipcj ra q fl A / 4/ co se ® ®, Til 1 1a � 5e� tint' . ,441 ML X ci 1 F-0 •'. VA. IIILV"la t lisarail El Ma lig, P-4 ' r° cik*Ar Ia. -Asuinor Emp go E wan n os.i li ti �,� i ��es° ' � - FAQ= f �i Ell �� I"4 *42 . 3G ae1 741/ Gil ��41 9 D e ®e ti deb d ®' ; q�4 o Iti�a L , 19 alct Eat a ° hal o ff . 1I ll 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: TL Liquors Application: PD Amendment Case No.: 28- PA- 23 -08 -04 /6c. „, Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided N by Dakota County Office of GIS and Is current as of January 2004. , z' . o / ' W + E City of eagcln THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. •uol ;euuo;ul sly; ;o Raeinaoe ay; oNueJen6 ;ou op A uno3 a ;oiled pue ue6e3 ;o 1113 eau S waLupedaa 4uawdolanaa Amunwwoo A1NO 3SI7 33N3H3A321 VOA 030N31NI SI dVW SIH1 s *.M 2 ue6e3 10 Aim u s 413. uop.uuoiul B. •2 H 'tool aunt w.ugaedaa F•unS Pue1 CO • a y .P odd .0 ..a.iul d.......11”..41 OW '*. . v i..! 00ri 009 0 009 ff.&41* ,, oir ft, 1 0, 11 6. ,114 Era law IM ■ . tit" .ft 4°' • v . 11 uol ;e3ol .. ink ' % ® ®®,J 41 d iIIIP1ka `` ` ®r®®®®® l e l ..,awwo a !Mali (a volt J-1113) sc •or+ •u•vt• 311 Mr 3a 1".1:41 :uogeu6lsaa asn puel ;uann3 1 1 L °' I a 11 117 vow ..)iia‘ r ■A Ar aw p� — aw 4 � ;` ,111� ii % ►' \ll�`a f dew asn puel ��I��1 �� ue1d aping anusuagaadwo3 - ■ WA < i.•d oar! 009 0 009 • i � a� ■l a l IP Oa Ilia NI: Mr, 444 � 4* - . ii :il s 0 ' 41183 ® ®® T Ee \ BEI f] EG Ei3 EG g P • ad ■■ ill '',,,•••••l ;uawdoleAaa pauueld gm 01111%! ad • .1 . • 1 _ 1la■ ■■,:d 1111114. ❑ � :6,0 ; uaaan 3 lail on. RI Lir , *1111./1 43$4 : �.. 1 �∎ ► ��∎� Z\C I I--1 dew 6uiuoZ 170-80-EZ 'oN ase3 dew asn pue, aawe3 ale, seuaogl ueid aping an!suaya.Iduao3 pue Buiuoz ;ua.Jan3 : ...., , , . , , 2 2/ .. I .... .. .. ti :. i-- ---- _=.,_ --- _ — _ - - --•__.._ ., ). g • N 00 02 IE I: i ...� s .. I 11 1 Ii y r 1 \ .7 ,I I 11 1 J1. 1 4 A,' Im M P1 t - .,� �\ h 10' x iC.'� �� i � 1 . ' . I I 1 ■ I _ tz -sa , 6 • ' i I (,� C ,. I I l" ':: I 1 v g b 7a I V r r y " - t I i x7 `;. I I Fp I _x,....,:. _nxus I I' > y I I 1 R7 •,' v '�.J sr I { 7 I • 1 1 I Ni s S I I j I ` N ORTH ■ b � , � $ � , O', 1 I I . 1 203.22 . _�1 i I ° I 1 q 4� I _ I — I' KI I � �I I �" 3 I- f I I I I I j Ul t I O i ai ( i1' ;, ,, .. 1 _ -- D .\ p • '/ m i �' +` i — rT1 7..,, i r STATE P.M O � O I { 1 ! r I i 7 —I _ rn 1.,. \-- i _ I —. I I I ; ' 1: t �i , 2 r '1. N _- _:._I.1 �`� ,,F I; I' + j' I I .� a i 7,_..w. %' _ ...,. .. .-•i ‘ • \ ,, %� .� `�' • L.) 114 .F \ '''ti --., s j ( - n \ — , • r N I \ ° --- t 3 .x �' /\ \ • , C`, - gip I • 1 ■ `` I NOR 1 I 11 , . - a \ ,\ � �, 9' • E t . . 1 . , , r,.. . t. :,.; 4 E f i,,.. gr ,„:" 7 i. ..1 v , G.:;1 ' ' 4 ...-47;' ,4; ;; IF i. in. . I I ' ",- X I , i ,...„ I I M HI 1 -[ ' �! .. ,t� , is < fl .. , _V 0 HI H I ,.. -- y-1 a -- I .. �'-- 192.07 _ —_=_ 1 .,Q• I • _ —� ^ •-....., N O'75'17• E .._._. . L O — .... j i THOM LAKE. ROAD • 1 . 1 • HAR - MAR , Incorporated 1880 Livingston Avenue, Suite 100 • West St. Paul, Minnesota 5511B 651- 645 -8111 • Fax 651- 646 -5633 Thomas Lake Center — TL Liquors (Written Narrative for Planned Development Amendment) Long time tenant (Spotlight Productions — Suite 18/19) has relocated to an industrial building resulting in a recent vacancy at Thomas Lake Center. Thomas Lake Center has felt the effect of Snyder's bankruptcy (9,300 sf end cap) for over a year and is happy TL Liquors has chosen to join our development. We believe TL Liquors will be very successful at our site. TL Liquors has signed a lease for the entire (former Spotlight Productions — Suite 18/19) 2,922 square feet contingent upon securing the necessary approvals from the City of Eagan. TL Liquors (with the approval and support of the Landlord) will submit all necessary approvals required by the City of Eagan. The timing of the project depends on the speed of approvals from City of Eagan. Tenant intends to have any necessary construction paperwork and/or drawings prepared on a parallel path so any required building permits can be quickly secured once the planned development amendment process is completed. The tenant build out for the space will be minor as the store will be mostly open with shelving to accommodate product. It is the desire of TL Liquors and the Landlord to have operations commence as soon as practical with the month of October targeted. All Exterior building signage will conform to the City of Eagan building code. Existing uses on the subject property include eating establishments, a cleaners, professional companies like State Farm Insurance and Edward D. Jones, a daycare center, Chiropractor, hair salon, a hardware store, and retail stores. Surrounding land uses are the Bonfire Restaurant (which has a liquor license), an automotive repair shop, gas and oil change companies, and one of the largest Life Time Fitness work out clubs in the state of MN. In the eyes of the Landlord we see no real impact on surrounding property uses. Having TL Liquors move into Thomas Lake Center reduces vacancy at the development and adds new service for the subject property that we currently do not offer. There will be no substantial impact on City services. 0 2004 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan City Council F. REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM MORATORIUM — CSM CORPORATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize acceptance of an application for a subdivision by CSM of property located at the northwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Drive in the SW 1 /4 of Section 1 in the Northeast Eagan Moratorium Area, Lot 1, Block 1, Blue Ridge 5th Addition. FACTS: • In July of this year, the City Council implemented a moratorium on development in northeast Eagan. The term is of the moratorium is nine months. • The purpose of the moratorium is to complete studies pertaining to the future development of the area. Topics of study include the evaluation of development alternatives for the area, fiscal impacts, commercial land supply, ecological impacts and transportation infrastructure, the relationship of airport operations and noise technology to the city's land use policies, the city's economic development policies, and the impact of major new residential development on the city's park system. • The moratorium states that "No portion of the Property shall be replatted or subdivided ...." The moratorium provides that "Upon the request of a property owner, the City Council may terminate the [moratorium] ordinance for a portion of the Property and permit [development applications] if the Council finds that the action proposed by the property owner for such property conforms to the current Comprehensive Plan and zoning code and does not conflict with the Purpose of the Moratorium." • CSM is requesting that the City Council exempt this property from the moratorium to allow a subdivision application to proceed. • Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney, have concluded that the appropriate action is for the Council to consider authorizing acceptance of the application and permit it to be processed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and Advisory Planning Commission. A final action to terminate the moratorium for a property should only be taken if the Council concludes at the end of the application review process that the proposed subdivision is to be approved. • CSM is proposing to subdivide a 20 -acre parcel at Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Drive, which is within the moratorium area, to create one lot for the existing building and one lot for future development. There is no development associated with the subdivision at this time. • The subdivision of the property is not contrary to the zoning code. The purpose of the subdivision is to create separate lots for the existing building and for future development, however, the proposed subdivision does not include any development at this time. For these reasons, the proposal does not appear to conflict with the purpose of the moratorium. ATTACHMENTS (2): Letter from CSM, page /7� Location Map, page / 7� /‘? 09/28/04 TUE 15:20 FAX 812 395 7002 CSM CORP 0 002 M 500 Washington Avenue South, Suite 3000 Minneapolis, MN 55415 DEVELOPING REAL ESTATE FOR PEOPLE, BUSINESS & COMMUNTTIF,S September 28, 2004 Ms. Pam Dudziak City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1897 Re: Waters Corporate Center CSM Subdivision Dear Ms. Dudziak; CSM has submitted documentation requesting the approval of a Preliminary Subdivision in the Waters Corporate Center. It has come to our attention that a development moratorium has been implemented in the northeastern part of Eagan, in which the Waters Corporate Center is located. The preliminary subdivision would split a 20.7 acre site into two parcels, which will provide CSM the opportunity for future development of the site. CSM has constructed a 43,000 square foot building on the property, and has no immediate plans for the construction of second building on the proposed subdivided parcel. The current building and proposed subdivision are consistent with the Zoning and Land Use Plan - Accordingly, CSM is requesting that the Preliminary Subdivision he exempt from the development moratorium, and that the subdivision process continue upon approval of the exemption. Sincere ; - s David A. Wisnewski, AIA Director of Architecture (612) 395 -7040 cc: Dave Carland Jx, Eagan Boundary Location Map \ Street Centerline 1 Parcel Area [ ,., ; =] Building Footprint i) I i J 41r t ,... / I 411% gy MIME i" , I 0 „,. g ®o ,, ., :( v � e ii k/ \ v ® Sub 'ect Site • ` _ j .,,,.,: - .I ; \ Vt r c \ lo p c 's., L. '�, o PB LI d LIMEMENIMMIlla v C3 .xt — . r �reu g n ' '',.;;:::::;;;, E . , MI & I II i ill 1 3 PAP ol LC it, a ilip3E1, 44b Min Eva M. fl 9 (1 . I — I — L i. �l O� /�. aw °", �.. I g LI 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development /Developer: CSM Corporation Application: Preliminary Subdivision Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided N by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of January 2004. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E 1. city of e�gan The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not gu tee the accuracy of this information and are Community Devtlopmant Dspartrrent S not responsible for errors or omissions. Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting VIII. CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: This information is being presented to provide an update and to provide the City Council with an opportunity to give additional direction as desired. There are no specific action items for consideration at this meeting and no formal City Council action is required. FACTS: • On Wednesday, September 22, a meeting was held. The group focused on the second draft of the Maintenance Agreement. • The next meeting of the group is scheduled for Wednesday, October 13. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on pages / 73 and / 9 is a copy of the Caponi meeting notes from the meeting held on September 22, 2004. (The same notes were also distributed with the Informative Memo dated September 24.) CAPONI GROUP Notes From Meeting of 9/22/04 In Attendance; Tony and Cheryl Caponi, Bob McGillvary, Mike Dougherty, Ken Vraa, Tom Hedges, Al Singer, Paul Olson, one other CAP member ( ?) The primary focus of the meeting was to review and discussion of the second draft of the Maintenance Agreement (MA), as prepared by Dick Schieffer, which included comments made by Mike Dougherty. Summary; • The County desires that "limited/modified" conservation easement over the middle 20 acres be completed or committed to. CAP will work with the County to prepare the document. Reference to it should be included in the MA. • No conservation easement (CE) is required on the NE 10 acres, the restrictions that exist as a result of the grant funding offer sufficient protection. The mention of a CE on the NE 10 can be stricken from the MA • A statement summarizing the restrictions on each parcel should be added to page 1 of the MA, under "Caponi Real Estate ". • LAWCON funding of the project will be recognized in the "Stakeholder" section • Tony commented that the issue of tunnel function/use should be discussed at a future date. • There was considerable discussion regarding winter maintenance of the entrance road and lot. The general consensus was that the CAP be the responsible for making contractual provisions for snow removal however, the issue will be addressed further in the yet to be finalized Operational Agreement (OA). • Reference to allowing CAP maintenance vehicles and equipment on the grounds needs to be included. • When referring to the City property to the east of the CAP property, the park name, "Lexington- Diffley Athletic Fields" should be used. • Inclusion of City and County review of plans for future trails on the property should be included in the Operational Agreement, there currently is no reference. • Rather than list specific actions, the term "management" could be used in the "Grasslands /Overstory" section. Essentially the CAP will be responsible for the management (maintenance) of the grounds required for programmatic activities, the City for natural resource and disease management. • Reference will be made for the allowance of "temporary" fences on the site when used in conjunction with programs /activities/improvements. • The LMCIT has been contacted regarding insurance provisions. • The issue of sculpture placement should be discussed in the OA versus the MA • A section referencing signage and the maintenance thereof is needed in the MA Misc; • A map of adjacent City utilities was distributed. / 23 • In regard to stormwater management, the City will review any development plan for the site in accordance with already established City development standards. • The MA will be executed at the time of closing • Dick is in the process of drafting the OA, completion is expected within the next several weeks • Mike will forward an "updated" version of the Memo of Understanding to Council members McGuire and Carlson for their review and input regarding content and process. Next Meeting; October 13 9:00 AM, City Hall / 75' AGENDA CITY OF EAGAN REGULAR MEETING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER OCTOBER 5, 2004 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ADOPT AGENDA / 0 C. APPROVE MINUTES D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS ego 1. PUBLIC HEARING for the Consideration of the Sale of the Lachenmeyer Property in the Nicols Ridge Development Area in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District to US Home for Redevelopment Purposes F. OTHER BUSINESS / g3 1. Redevelopment District Update G. ADJOURNMENT • I ' Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting October 5, 2004 A. CALL TO ORDER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To convene a meeting of the Economic Development Authority to run concurrent with the City Council meeting. B. ADOPT AGENDA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt the agenda as presented or modified. C. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving the minutes of the September 21, 2004 EDA meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page / 97is a cop of the minutes of the September 21, 2004 EDA meeting. / • Enclosed on pages / 7i is a copy of the resolution approving the minutes of the September 21, 2004 EDA meeting. ?6' MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Eagan, Minnesota September 21, 2004 A meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority was held on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were President Geagan and Commissioners Fields, Tilley, Carlson and Maguire. Also present were Executive Director Tom Hedges, City Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, City Attorney Mike Dougherty, Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk Mira McGarvey. ADOPT AGENDA Commissioner Tilley moved, Commissioner Fields seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 APPROVE MINUTES Commissioner Fields moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to adopt a resolution approving the minutes of the August 17, 2004 EDA meeting as presented. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SALE OF THE LACHENMEYER PROPERTY IN THE NICOLS RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO US HOME FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES City Administrator Hedges noted that this item is to be continued. Commissioner Maguire moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to continue the Public Hearing for the consideration of the sale of the Lachenmeyer Property in the Nicols Ridge Development Area in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District to US Home for Redevelopment Purposes to the October 5, 2004 EDA meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY, THE EDA AND UNITED PROPERTIES REGARDING THE RECORDING OF DOCUMENTATION CONCERNING THE PARTIES' PREDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY IN THE NORTH SUB- DISTRICT OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Community Development Director Hohenstein discussed the proposed Memorandum of Agreement between the City, the EDA and United Properties. Commissioner Carlson moved, Commissioner Fields seconded a motion to approve a Memorandum of Agreement between the City, the EDA and United Properties regarding the Recording of Documentation Concerning the Parties' Predevelopment Agreement for Property in the North Sub - District of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 OTHER BUSINESS REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UPDATE Community Development Director Hohenstein provided an update on the status of the redevelopment districts. / 27 ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Maguire moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Date Executive Director If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc, please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (612) 681 -4600 (TDD phone: (612) 454- 8535. The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 REGULAR MEETING BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve the minutes of the September 21, 2004 regular meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Jon Hohenstein, Secretary /Deputy Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 5 day of October, 2004. Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director / 27 Agenda Information Memo October 5, 2004 Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting E. NEW BUSINESS 1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SALE OF THE LACHENMEYER PROPERTY IN THE NICOLS RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO US HOME FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Resolution to Authorize the Sale of the Former Lachenmeyer Property at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway to US Home Corporation for Redevelopment Purposes. FACTS: • As a part of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District activities, the City Council and EDA previously authorized staff to acquire properties south of Cedar Grove Parkway for future redevelopment. A number of properties has been purchased at this time. They consist of the former Lachenmeyer, Instant Testing, Eagan Pet Clinic and Beebe properties. • US Home Corporation has expressed interest in acquiring the properties to redevelop them in future phases of the Nicols Ridge housing development. US Home has indicated an interest in acquiring the former Lachenmeyer property at this time. • The City's development agreement with US Home provides the parameters for establishing the price for such a sale and the developer. City staff and attorney have negotiated a purchase agreement with US Home, which is in order for consideration at this time. • In order for the City to sell property for development or redevelopment purposes, a public hearing is required. The council previously scheduled the public hearing for this item of September 21, 2004 and notice was published in the official newspaper. This action item was continued at the September 21 meeting to permit completion of the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: • EDA Resolution approving the sale of the property at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway to US Home Corporation on page /f?/ • City Council Resolution approving the sale of the roperty at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway to US Home Corporation on pages 13 • Purchase Agreement will be distributed on Monday. If the executed copy is not received from the developer, the item will be recommended for continuance at Tuesday's meeting. /go CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION APPROVING SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY TO US HOME CORPORATION FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3986 CEDAR GROVE PARKWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Eagan City Council to approve the sale of real estate located at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Located in TIF District No. 2 -3 to US Home Corporation for redevelopment purposes. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 5 day of October, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk • /g/ CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION APPROVING SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY TO US HOME CORPORATION FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3986 CEDAR GROVE PARKWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve the sale of real estate located at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Located in TIE District No. 2 -3 to US Home Corporation for redevelopment purposes. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Jon Hohenstein, Secretary /Deputy Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 5 day of October, 2004. Jon Hohenstein, Secretary /Deputy Executive Director /4?) Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting October 5, 2004 F. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Redevelopment District Update — Staff will provide a brief verbal update on other aspects of the redevelopment districts and respond to Council questions at this time. There is no other business to come before the EDA at this time. G. ADJOURNMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adjourn the Economic Development Commission meeting. /13