The URL can be used to link to this page

12/13/2004 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL — REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING DECEMBER 13, 2004 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA III. RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Pa. A. Donation of Artwork for the Eagan Community Center — Dakota County Technical Institute IV. CONSENT AGENDA 3 A. APPROVE MINUTES f;/2 B. PERSONNEL ITEMS CHECK REGISTERS . APPROVE Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of 2005 Community Development Block Grant Application /31/ , E. APPROVE Amendment to the November 16, 2004 Council minutes regarding a request by the Rotary Club pa F. ACCEPT Donation of Tractor on Behalf of the Friends of the Farm for Use at Holz Farm for Special Events f G. APPROVE the Waiving of Platting fees for the Caponi Art Park as requested by the Trust for Public Land Pxt H. APPROVE Terra Glenn 3`d Addition - Lundgren Brothers Construction, Inc.— Final Phase of Terra Glenn — Two lots, 12 townhouse units each lot located south of Yankee Doodle, west of the City's Maintenance facility pa61. APPROVE Transportation Trail System Policy 3c' J. APPROVE Plans and Specifications / Authorize Ad for Bids, Contract 04-10 (Water Treatment Plant — Landscaping) APPROVE Consulting Engineering Rates for 2005 — Contract Addendums APPROVE Final Payment for Contract 03-12, TH 13 and Silver Bell Road 3INM. RECEIVE Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing for Project 917 (Coachman Road — Street Improvements) 3 . APPROVE 2005 Enterprise Fund Budgets for Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street Lighting, Storm Drainage, Water Quality, It Civic Arena, Cascade Bay, and Community Center P APPROVE 2005 Enhanced 9-1-1 Fund, Special Revenue Budgets, including Housing Fund, Police Forfeiture Fund, Economic Recovery Grant Fund, Cedarvale Special Services District Fund, and Cable Franchise Fees Fund SlP. APPROVE 2005 Budgets for Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission and Burnsville/Eagan Community Television 53 Q. RECEIVE Bids/Award Contract 04-13 (Water Treatment Plant — F, F & E) / . APPROVE Plans & Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids, Contract 04-05 (Well #20 — Pumping Equipment) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS j5. A. 2004 PROPERTY TAX LEVY B. 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET 0. 6, C. 2005 CEDARVALE SPECIAL SERVICES DISTRICT BUDGET D. PROJECT 915, Ridgecliffe / Berkshire Ponds / Galaxie Avenue / Covington Lane (Street Improvements) 1 E. PROJECT 878, Cinnamon Ridge l'— 7th Additions (Street Improvements) I. OLD BUSINESS foil:2005 FEE SCHEDULE — Establishing Fees for Various City Services, Supplies and Materials �,`�3REZONING, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION— Pearlmont Heights, LLC - Rezoning from R-2 Residential Double to PD Planned Development, Preliminary Subdivision (Pearlmont Heights) of 12.44 acres to create 51 lots, preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twin homes for properties located at 1565 and 1535 Violet Lane in the NW 'A of Section 16. - f411 C. REZONING, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION — Cedarstone Development Company — Rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development , Preliminary Subdivision (Cedarstone of Wescott) of 5 acres to create 8 lots, Preliminary Planned Development for property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 'A of Section 14. p625CD. REZONING - Robert McDonald - Rezoning from Agriculture to R-1 for Property located at 1085 Wescott Road in the SW 'A of Section 14 60481E. CONTRACT 05-03 — Approve plans & specifications & authorize advertisement for bids, Contract 05-03 (Well #21 — Drilling and Equipment) VII. NEW BUSINESS I4/A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION — Ali and Debbie Awad — A preliminary subdivision (Awad Addition) of 2.9 acres to create 2 lots for property located at 2150 James Street in the SW '/ of Section 31. &MB. REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION — Epic Development, LLC — A Rezoning from Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential and a Preliminary Subdivision (Sweet Place) of 5.75 acres to create 8 Tots on property located at 4725 Robert Trail in the NW ''A of Section 36. 71VI I. CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE IX. NEW RUNWAY/AIRPORT UPDATE 34). ( A. Consider Common Interest Agreement with the City of Minneapolis IX. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (No items are scheduled at this time) * The Council acting as the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority ("EDA') may discuss and act on the agenda items for the EDA in conjunction with its actions as a Council. A. CALL TO ORDER 7 B. ADOPT AGENDA C. APPROVE MINUTES D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS P p 330 1. APPROVE RESOLUTION to Establish a Relocation Assistance Policy for Appeals for Properties Acquired by the City for Public Use or Public Purposes 3382. AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION of Joos Electric Property, 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway, and Schedule Public Hearing to Authorize Eminent Domain Process (If Necessary) on February 15, 2005 F. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Redevelopment District Update G. ADJOURNMENT XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) XIV. CLOSED SESSION XV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. city of eagan MEMO MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2004 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 13, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the December 13, 2004 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. Agenda Memo RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A: ACCEPT donation of artwork from Dakota County Technical School students to be displayed at the Eagan Community Center. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Accept donation of artwork from Dakota County Technical School students. FACTS: • Staff was contacted by Dakota County Technical School several months ago to see if there might be an interest in the City of Eagan displaying donated pieces of art designed by their art students. • Dakota County Technical School was particularly interested in providing pieces that might enhance the community center but would also provide an opportunity for student's art to be displayed publicly. • The first donation will consist of up to 20 pieces, some of which are seasonal works that are anticipated to be displayed in the Board Room. • Dakota County Technical School is interested in continuing donations that might be incorporated in other areas of the community center or other buildings as the city deems appropriate. • The artwork will become the property of the City of Eagan to be displayed at its discretion. • A representative of Dakota County Technical School will be at the meeting to present the artwork to the City Council. ISSUES: • None Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting ay : as The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the December 6, 2004 regular City Council meeting and the November 9, 2004 special City Council meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of the December 6, 2004 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages it through 7 . • Minutes of the November 9, 2004 special City Council meeting are enclosed on pages g' through /1 . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota December 6, 2004 A Listening Session was held at 6:00 p.m. in the Eagan Room prior to the regular City Council meeting. There were no visitors who wished to be heard. A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on December 6, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, Tilley and Maguire. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, City Planner Mike Ridley, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer John Gorder, City Attorney Mike Dougherty and Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk Mira McGarvey. AGENDA City Administrator Hedges noted that an additional item would be included on the Consent Agenda regarding setting the dates for two Council workshops. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONSENT AGENDA Items B, K, L, N, and 0 were pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Item P regarding the continuation of Cedarstone Development and the McDonald rezoning was removed from the agenda per the request of the applicant. Councilmember moved, Councilmember seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the November 16, 2004 regular City Council meeting as presented. B. Personnel Items. Pulled for Discussion 1. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Sherri Nichols as a part-time Clerical Technician III in the Community Development Department. 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Katherine Marsland and Tracey Roesler as part-time Fitness Instructors at the Community Center. 3. It was recommended to approve the hiring of John Mackovets as a part-time Fitness Attendant at the Community Center. 4. It was recommended to accept the resignation of Woodrow Kocurek, Mechanic in Central Services Maintenance. 5. It was recommended to approve the promotion of Captain Jim McDonald to Deputy Chief of Police. 6. It was recommended to approve the promotions of sergeants Greg Johnson and Jeff Johnson to the position of Lieutenant in the Police Department. C. Check Registers. It was recommended to ratify the check registers dated November 18, 2004, November 25 and December 2, 2004 as presented. D. 2005 Tree Contractor License Renewals. It was recommended to approve the renewals of existing tree contractor licenses for 2005, subject to review of applications and payment of fees. E. 2005 Tobacco License Renewals. It was recommended to approve the renewals of existing tobacco licenses for 2005, subject to review of applications and payment of fees. F. 2005 Pet Shop and Kennel License Renewals. It was recommended to approve the renewals of existing pet shop and kennel licenses for 2005, subject to review of applications and payment of fees. G. 2005 Trash Hauler License Renewals. It was recommended to approve the renewals of existing trash hauler licenses for 2005, subject to review of applications and payment of fees. H. Premise Permit Renewal. It was recommended to adopt resolutions approving a premises permit renewal for Mendota Heights Athletic Association to conduct a pull tab operation at La Fonda Restaurant and Valley Lounge. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes December 6, 2004 Page 2 I. 2005 Funding Application. It was recommended to approve the submission of the 2005 Funding application from Dakota County to operate a Recycling Program for the Cities of Apple Valley, Eagan and Burnsville. J. Bids — Fire Apparatus. It was recommended to approve bids and authorize the sale of two used fire apparatus. K. Emergency Preparedness Network Agreement. Pulled for Discussion L. Summit Pass. Pulled for Discussion M. Engineering Consultant. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Encompass, Inc. as the engineering consultant to prepare plans and specifications for the pool repair work at Cascade Bay. N. 2006 Fee Structure for Community Center. Pulled for Discussion O. APC Public Hearing — Mailed Notices. Pulled for Discussion P. Special Council meetings. It was recommended to schedule special Council workshops for December 11, December 15, 2004 B5 & 6. Promotions in Police Department. Chief of Police Therkelsen discussed the promotion of Captain Jim McDonald to Deputy Chief of Police and the promotions of Sergeants Greg Johnson and Jeff Johnson to the position of Lieutenant in the Police Department. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the Personnel Items listed in the Consent Agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 K. Emergency Preparedness Network. Chief of Police Therkelsen discussed the proposed agreement with Flint Hills Resources allowing them to utilize the City's Emergency Preparedness Network. Jeff Wilkes representing Flint Hills Refinery discussed the benefits of Flint Hills being allowed to use the Emergency Preparedness Network. Steve Sandberg, representing the Community Advisory Council to Flint Hills also spoke, expressing appreciation to the City for entering into the agreement with Flint Hills. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve an agreement with Flint Hills Resources allowing them to utilize the City's Emergency Preparedness Network. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 L. Summit Pass Speed Limit. City Administrator Hedges briefly discussed the background in regard to the request by Summit Pass neighborhood for a reduced speed limit and the resulting review by the Public Works Committee. Discussion was held regarding the use of this issue as a pilot project and the possibility of utilizing electronic (solar) speed limit monitoring devices. It was agreed to continue consideration of the Public Works Committee recommendation of a 25 MPH speed limit posting for Summit Pass. Mayor Geagan moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to continue consideration of the Public Works Committee recommendation to set a 25 MPH Speed Limit posting for Summit Pass. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 N. 2006 Fee Structure for Community Center. Council briefly discussed the charge for the Oak Room at the Community Center. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the Eagan Community Center 2006 Fee Schedule as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 O. APC Public Hearing regarding mailed notices. Discussion was held regarding review of the City Code relating to mailed notices. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to continue consideration of direction to the APC regarding review of the City Code in relation to mailed notices. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR 2005 — TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING City Administrator Hedges made a presentation regarding the proposed budget and property tax levy for 2005. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes December 6, 2004 Page 3 Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing for the 2005 Cedarvale Special Services District levy and budget considerations. There was no public comment. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to close the public hearing and set the 2005 Cedarvale Special Services District levy and budget considerations for the December 13, 2004 City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing regarding the proposed budget and property tax levy for 2005. Six residents spoke expressing their concerns regarding the proposed percentage increase in their property taxes compared to the proposed general levy increase. Concern was also expressed in regard to the percentage of their personal wage increases compared to their property tax increases; the impact on residents with a fixed income; and, use of the State market value homestead credit aid should it be reinstated in 2005. Administrative Services Director VanOverbeke discussed the impact of the State's limited market value phase-out as it pertains to inflation in property values. Councilmembers discussed the use of the market value homestead credit should there be a reinstatement of those funds. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to close the public hearing and set the 2005 General Levy and General Fund budget considerations for the December 13, 2004 City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VARIANCE — ERIK CHRISTENSON City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for a 5.2 foot variance to the minimum 30 foot structure setback from a public right-of-way for a garage and house addition on property located at 3637 Crestridge Court. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Erik Christenson discussed the proposed plans for his property. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a 5.2 foot variance to the minimum 30 foot structure setback from a public right-of-way for a garage and house addition on property located at 3637 Crestridge Court, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Buffer Hills, in the SW ''A of Section 15. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 912, WINDCREST / BIRCH PARK ADDITIONS / DEERWOOD DRIVE / DENMARK AVENUE STREET OVERLAY City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay project for Windcrest / Birch Park Additions / Deerwood Drive and Denmark Avenue. Assistant City Engineer Gorder gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. One resident inquired as to how four-plex townhomes are assessed. Public Works Director Colbert provided an explanation. There being no further public comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve Project 912 (Windcrest / Birch Park Additions / Deerwood Drive / Denmark Avenue — Street Overlay) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 914, TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay project for Trails of Thomas Lake / Thomas Lake Heights Additions. Assistant City Engineer Gorder gave a staff report. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes December 6, 2004 Page 4 There being no further public comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve Project 914 (Trails of Thomas Lake / Thomas Lake Heights Additions — Street Overlay) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 There was no Old Business to be discussed. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS There was no New Business to be discussed. CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE City Administrator Hedges provided an update on Caponi property acquisition. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to add to the regular agenda on an on- going basis "New Runway Update". Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors who wished to be heard. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to adjourn the regular City Council meeting at 9:00 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Date Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (651) 675-5000, (TDD phone: (651) 454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 2004 5:30 P.M. EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER EAGAN ROOM City Councilmembers present: Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, Maguire and Tilley. Staff members present: City staff members present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller, Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke, City Engineer Matthys, Public Works Director Colbert, Parks and Recreation Administrative Coordinator Mesko, Communications Director Garrison, Chief Financial Officer Pepper, City Planner Ridley and Community Development Director Hohenstein. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Fields moved, Mayor Geagan seconded a motion to adopt the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. III. EAGAN CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU (ECVB) BUDGET City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that by agreement renewed in October 2002, the Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau promotes the City as a tourist, conference, meetings and visitor destination. Hedges added that its funding source is primarily the City's local lodging tax, supplemented by a small amount of advertising and partnership income. Hedges summarized the 2005 ECVB budget and proposed initiatives. Communications Director Garrison and ECVB Director Carlon provided a brief presentation regarding the 2005 proposed budget. The City Council discussed partnership opportunities and the proposed budget. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to direct the ECVB budget to the December 13, 2004 City Council meeting for formal consideration. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 IV. CASCADE BAY BUDGET City Administrator Hedges introduced the preliminary 2005 Cascade Bay budget. Hedges noted the relatively low attendance in 2004 due to an extremely cool summer. Hedges also added that registrations for group sales were very high in 2004. It was noted that no rate change for 2005 was being recommended. Parks and Recreation Administrative Coordinator November 9, 2004 Special City Council Minutes Page 2 Mesko and Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke provided additional information about the proposed 2005 Cascade Bay budget, which the City Council discussed. Councilmember Carlson requested that staff come back with a recommendation on the currently vacant Cascade Bay Manager position, as to how the position can further be used during the off season. City Administrator Hedges noted that the review of the position will take place during the current organizational study which is scheduled to be concluded in January 2005. The Council discussed the repayment of the Community Investment Fund, which was used to fund a portion of the building expenses of Cascade Bay. The Council directed staff to explore options to repay the loan from the Community Investment Fund to be brought back to a City Council workshop. Council also asked staff to prepare a list of competing priorities within Cascade Bay for the City Council to address through the budget process. The Council directed that the Cascade Bay budget be included on the December 13, 2004 City Council agenda for formal consideration. V. GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (WMO) PRESENTATION City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the City Council had requested a presentation by members of the Watershed Management Organization (WMO). WMO Chair Jerry Walerak and three members of the WMO provided the Council with a presentation on the purpose, goal and mission of the WMO. Per the Council's request, Public Works Director Colbert provided an updated on the drainage issues at Lebanon Hills Regional Park. The consulting engineer to the WMO also discussed the impact of the watershed on JP47. The City Council and WMO concluded their conversations with the discussion regarding the Watershed Management Plan. The City Council thanked the WMO for their work and for attending the workshop. VI. CRITERIA FOR COMMUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that last fall when the Council revisited the schedule of trails, they requested that the staff provide them with the status of all remaining trails. Hedges also noted that this past spring, staff brought the results of the evaluation of the remaining uncompleted portions of the trail system for the City Council's consideration. It was at that time that the Council directed staff to create a community trail system policy. City Engineer Matthys and Director of Public Works Colbert provided an overview of the proposed community trail system policy. The City Council discussed the policy as well as timing of traffic signal lights, particularly at the intersection of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Road. Upon discussing the policy, the City Council directed that the community trail system be added to a regular City Council agenda as a revision to the 5 -year CIP. November 9, 2004 Special City Council Minutes Page 3 VII. LAND PRESERVATION DISCUSSION City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that at a recent workshop, the City Council directed staff to review options associated with preserving agriculturally zoned land. Community Development Director Hohenstein provided further introduction and discussed the purpose of agricultural preserves. City Planner Ridley addressed the role of agricultural preserves in the context of state law. There was City Council consensus to bring this item to a City Council land acquisition committee, made up of those Councilmembers serving on the Caponi Study Committee, which includes Councilmembers Carlson and Maguire. VIII. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF 2005 CDBG APPLICATION City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides block grant funding for programs that conform to national objectives and eligible activities that need community development block grant (CDBG) program regulations. Hedges added that the City of Eagan's CDBG allocation is administered through a sub -recipient agreement with the Dakota County CDA. Hedges also added that the CDBG fiscal year begins July 1 and in order to provide timely review of program applications, the application deadline for local governments is January 1, 2005. Community Development Director Hohenstein provided additional background on the item. Hohenstein added that in addition to fiscal year 2005 funding available, unexpended balances from previous years carry over for a total available funding of $265,900 for 2005. The City Council discussed the various alternatives to which CDBG funding could be allocated. The Council inquired about requirements for low and moderate income (LMI) persons and families. There was Council consensus to include the following proposed allocations in the CDBG application: $122,500 for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment area; $32,500 towards Cedar Grove LMI eligible acquisitions; $100,000 to swap with HOME funds (Scattered site CGD LMI); and $10,000 towards Youth and Family Development Services programming. The City Council took a short break. The City Council reconvened along with members of the Advisory Planning Commission and Economic Development Commission at 7:30 p.m. IX. JOINT MEETING WITH THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION (APC) AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC) A. Cedar Grove Redevelopment District — Master Developer Presentation — Mayor Geagan welcomed the Commission members. City Administrator Hedges provided an overview of the purpose of the meeting and presentation by the proposed Master Developer for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. He noted that time would be set aside for dialogue between the Commissions and the City Council following the Master Developer presentation. Members of the Commissions, staff, and audience introduced one another. Community Development Director Hohenstein provided additional background regarding how the Commissions and City Council have gotten to this point with the presentation tonight by the proposed Master Developer. /0 November 9, 2004 Special City Council Minutes Page 4 Representatives of Ryland Homes and Shaffer -Richardson provided a presentation on the refined site plan and development program for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. Following the presentation, the City Council offered their input on the proposed site and concept plan. It was suggested that the proposed plan is a housing development and mixed uses should be included. It was also suggested that more neighborhood businesses be included in the plan, as was consistent with previous plans. It was suggested that more character be added in the area with features such as additional bike paths, sidewalks and neighborhood businesses. It was also suggested that additional features that provide a "downtown/uptown" feel be added, such as mixed used buildings with businesses on the lower levels and residences on the upper level. Members of the APC and EDC provided their reaction and input to the concept plan. The City Council and Commission further discussed their reactions to the plan. The City Council recessed at 9:15 p.m. for a short break. The City Council and Commissions reconvened at 9:25 p.m. After additional discussion by the Council and Commission regarding the proposed plan, there was consensus by the City Council that a communications plan and timeline need to be developed with regard to the plan. The Council suggested open houses be held with businesses in the Cedar Grove Area, and it was also suggested that Cedar Grove homeowners be involved in the process. Cedar Grove business owners in the audience offered their input to the plan. The Mayor brought the discussion back to the Council. The Council asked staff to come back with a communications plan and timeline for the Council's review. The Council also asked for responses to the number of housing units being proposed in the development, the impact on the school district, and the impact on City services/tax impact. B. General Discussion of Commission Issues — City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that time had been set aside to discuss issues of interest to the City Council, Advisory Planning Commission and Economic Development Commission. Economic Development Commission Chair Wayne Gilbert addressed the Council and suggested that the Commissions and City Council meet on another night to discuss the issues of the APC and EDC given the late hour. Staff was directed to schedule a time when the EDC and APC can again join the City Council for discussion. X. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. XI. ADJOURNMENT The City Council adjourned at 10:00 p.m. l/ Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Retirement/Utility Maintenance Worker ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the resignation of Larry Cudo, Utility Maintenance Worker, who is retiring after almost 30 years of employment with the City of Eagan. Item 2. Clerical Tech/Community Development Department ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Jane Hovind as a full-time Clerical Technician III in the Community Development Department. Item 3. Planning Aide ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of a person to be named as a full-time Planning Aide. Item 4. Fitness Coordinator/Eagan Community Center ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of a person to be named as the full-time Fitness Coordinator at the Eagan Community Center. FACTS: • Interviews for this position were held on Wednesday and Thursday of this week. • Background and reference checks are currently being completed. Item 5. Promotion/Lieutenant ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the promotion of Police Sergeant Duane Pike to the position of Lieutenant. Item 6. Promotion/Sergeant ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the promotion of Police Officer Nathan Tennessen to the position of Sergeant. Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 7. 2005 Compensation/Non-Collective Bargaining Employees ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the following: a) For regular non -collective bargaining employees, a compensation rate increase of 3% across the board effective the payroll period closest to January 1, 2005, with the exception of the City Administrator whose compensation rate will not increase. b) Compensation rates for temporary/seasonal/recurring non -collective bargaining employees may be increased from 0% to a maximum of 3%. c) Car expense allowances for the City Administrator and Department Heads will be increased by 3%. d) Mileage will be set at the IRS rate (the 2005 rate is currently 41.5¢ a mile). If the IRS increases or decreases this amount, the City's amount will automatically adjust to the new rate. e) The City's contribution for family health insurance premiums will increase by half the total dollar increase to the balanced rate for 2005. f) Adjustments will be made to reduce the 2004 car allowance for the City Administrator by 22.4% and to increase 2004 vacation accrual by 1.45%. The City Administrator would be allowed to exchange the additional vacation accrual for cash payment. g) 2005 vacation accrual for the City Administrator will be increased by 3%. The City Administrator would be allowed to exchange the additional vacation for cash payment. FACTS: • These items are traditionally approved formally by the Council at the second regular City Council meeting in December for the following year. • All of the above actions are included in the 2005 budget. Item 8. Part-time Seasonal Winter Recreation Leaders— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Tyler Barthelemy, Erick Bertelsen, Kevin Blake Steven Bringgold, Jake Carleen, Jackie Carlson, Geoff Cleveland, Kelly Colbert, Nick Durand, Lucas Eggum, Michael Eilers, Luke Garrison, Kristin Giles, Wayne Gray, Jesse Guillette, Michelle Hanninen, Eric Holmay, Mike Kabakov, Alyssa Kane, Susan Kennon, Richard LeMay, Doug Lindow, Pat Lipinski, Kyle Manikowski, Mike Mason, Ryan Moy, Daniel Myers, Alyssa Myhre, Kelli Schlittler, Renee Schlittler, Mindy Sinclair, Brennan Squires, Dylan Squires, Matt Steele, Kevin Stevenson, Jessye Stock, Aaron Strey, Jeff Swenson, John Swenson, John Tatera, Ross Tervola, Matthew Thuente, Laura Wagner, Allen Wachter, Stephanie Westerlund, Jessica Wikstrom, Megan Williams and Kelli Wood as part-time seasonal winter recreation leaders. /3 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 9. Part-time Seasonal Winter Recreation Leaders/Site Coordinators— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Maggie Elliott and Katie Gerloff as part-time seasonal winter recreation leaders/site coordinators. Item 10. Part-time Seasonal Recreation Program Assistant— ACTION ssistantACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Meghan Chappuis as a part-time seasonal recreation program assistant. / 91 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting C. RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To ratify the check register dated December 9, 2004 as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Check register dated December 9, 2004 are enclosed without page number. Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution authorizing the City Administrator to submit the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program applications for 2005 to the Dakota County Community Development Agency. FACTS: • The CDBG fiscal year begins July 1. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides block grant funding for programs that conform to national objectives and eligible activities that meet CDBG Program regulations. • Eagan's FY 2005 available funding amount will be approximately $245,000. The City also has unexpended balances in the fund from previous years that total just over $10,000 for a total available for 2005 of $265,900. • At its workshop meeting of November 9, 2004, the City Council reviewed a range of options and gave direction to allocate $155,000 to property acquisition for blight removal activities and low and moderate income benefit in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, $100,000 to an exchange of current CDBG dollars for HOME program dollars for future scattered site affordable residential development within the district and $10,900 to youth and family programming for qualified participants in the Parks and Recreation Department. The Council indicated at that time that continued acquisition and redevelopment of properties in Cedar Grove is a top priority. • The Dakota County CDA administers the CDBG program and will review and forward the City's desired funding allocations to HUD for approval. ATTACHMENTS: • 2005 CDBG Allocation Budget on page �2 • Resolution on page ag /6 0 o z `n O O 0 0 0 aO o a) am am o1.6 o O Ln id o) Lr) o co co E -o T T N N 7 7 69 69 69 U) co O p O O O Q) Lf) Ln O 0 Q(.; O cN N 0'O T (Abri d m 0 0 O) .O 2005 Community Development Block Grant Fund Budget a) c0 Ln ti N E9 CO N 69 O 0 ti O_ 69 O Ccr7 a) E o >' o t > >a o O c a) 0 > o o o L fo U O -a ate) 0 U 0 rY O 0 0 69 O N a) M O N l� N 69 0 0 0 LL) O f: N N Swap with HOME Funds - Scattered Site CGD LMI N 69 N a) U a) E 0_ O > ) o E 0 E to O L n_ co c } O ~ Available Funding (Approximate) L O) ai -o > mL co en 7 (o o N o0 > o N ,0 0 U L O co -co ca O W EO L 2 O o L_ > U N a) C O (o M �-co J C E O .? -o a) f° co 0 a 0 To O C O 3 U co 0 0 o 0 (‚40) M 0 aa)) m ifi Q 0 O Z T N /7 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is a participating jurisdiction with the Dakota County CDBG Entitlement Program for Fiscal Year 2005 (ending June 30, 2006); and WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA is a Subgrantee of Dakota County for the administration of the CDBG Program; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA has requested FY05 CDBG applications to be submitted by December 31, 2004 based on a district formula allocation of funds approved in the 1984 Community Development Implementation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan hereby approves the following: 1. The FY05 CDBG application is approved by the City Council, and the City Administrator is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City. 2. The Dakota County CDA is designated as the administrative entity to carry out the CDBG program on behalf of the City, subject to future Subrecipient Agreements that may be required for specific CDBG-funded activities. This resolution was adopted by vote of the City Council on the 13th day of December, 2004. Pat Geagan, Mayor Attested this 13th day of December, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk Agenda Memo December 13, 2004 CONSENT AGENDA E. Amendment to the November 16, 2004 Council minutes regarding a request by the Rotary Club Facts: • On November 16, 2004 the Eagan Rotary Club requested permission to ask the liquor provider to waive the donation of wine placed on tables at the 2005 Art Gala event to be held at the Community Center. Council agreed to this request. • The Rotary Club also asked that rental fees be waived for the same event. Council denied this request. • In composing the minutes, the two requests were inadvertently combined into one motion for denial. • The November 16 minutes have been revised to show the separation of the requests. Attachments: Enclosed on page ,,1(J is page # of the November 16th minutes reflecting the change in action. /9 Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes November 16, 2004 1 Page 2 I. Contract 04-07. It was recommended to approve Change Order #2, Contract 04-07 (Lexington Ridge Court — Street Improvements) and authorize the mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. J. Extension for Development Contract. It was recommended to approve a one year extension for installation of a berm described in the Development Contract for the Diffley Plaza subdivision, located at the South West corner of Diffley Road and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. K. Joint Powers Agreement Development Review. Moved to Old Business L. DARE/POLICE Liaison Services Agreement. It was recommended to adopt a D.A.R.E. and Police Liaison Services Agreement between the City of Eagan and Independent School District #196. M. Contract 03-09. It was recommended to approve Change Order #8 to Contract 03-09 (Water Treatment Plant Expansion) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N. Contract 04-13. It was recommended to approve the Plans and Specifications for Contract 04-13 (North Water Treatment Plant — Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment) and authorize the solicitation for a competitive bid opening at 1 l a.m. December 9, 2004. Council agreed to move the following items from the Administrative Agenda and Legislative/Intergovernmental Affairs Update: Request from Eagan Rotary City Administrator Hedges discussed a request by the Eagan Rotary Club for permission to ask the liquor provider to waive the donation of wine placed on tables and a request to the Council that rental fees be waived for the 2005 Art Gala event. A brief discussion was held and Council agreed to allow the Rotary Club to ask the liquor provider to waive the donation of wine to be placed on tables at the Art Gala event, however it was decided to require that rental fees be paid. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve a request by the Eagan Rotary Club to waive the donation of wine placed on tables and deny a request that rental fees be waived for the 2005 Art Gala event to be held at the Community Center. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE Assistant to the City Administrator Miller provided update on the MSP Airport Noise Oversite Committee. PUBLIC HEARINGS WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding Part 2 of the required well head and source water protection plan required by the State of Minnesota of all communities with ground water sources for their drinking water supply. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report. John Greer, Barr Engineering gave a brief overview of the proposed Part 2 Plan. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the City's Wellhead Protection, Plan, Park 2. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 913, WALDEN HEIGHTS / TWIN VIEW MANOR / HILLCREST ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding Project 913 (Walden Heights / Twin View Manor / Hillcrest Additions street overlay. Assistant City Engineer Gorder gave a staff report. Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing ao Agenda Memo December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA F: ACCEPT donation of tractor on behalf of the Friends of the Farm for use at Holz Farm for special events. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Accept donation of tractor on behalf of the Friends of the Farm for use at Holz Farm for special events. FACTS: • Pearl Shirley of Farmington would like to donate a 1940's vintage tractor to the Friends of the Farm for their use at Holz Farm. The tractor was part of her husband's collection. • The existing tractors owned by the city are always in use during special events and the Friends of the Farm have long hoped to have a piece of equipment that could be used only for display. • This Ford 2N tractor would provide an additional program component by allowing visitors to sit on this piece of equipment and "pretend" they are working on the farm. • Based on an inspection, replacement parts required to get the tractor running are estimated at $500. The Friends of the Farm will be responsible for paying those costs. ISSUES: • None Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting G. APPROVE THE WAIVING OF PLATTING FEES FOR THE CAPONI ART PARK AS REQUESTED BY THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: FACTS: • City staff has been formally delivering the message from the beginning of the Caponi Art Park stakeholder meetings in late July of 2004 that the City had an interest in seeing the entire 60 acre Caponi Art Park being platted as part of the acquisition process. • This requirement is consistent with the process used in the acquisition and platting of the Anderson parcel. To assist in facilitating the acquisition of the Anderson parcel the City waived the application fees for the subdivision and rezoning ($550) and the escrow requirement ($1,500). • Regarding the Caponi property, TPL has again been desirous of using only a simple lot split on the south 40 acres as the method "to obtain subdivision approval of the property by the least cumbersome means." They have objected to using the full platting process as taking too long and costing too much. • TPL finally picked up the required application forms on November 10, but has not submitted an application to date. The next application deadline is December 15 for consideration on the January 25 Planning Commission Agenda. • The requested City Council action will formalize a previous informal indication that the City would assist in facilitating the platting of this property by waiving certain application fees related to development. • The fees in question include a subdivision application $612 and an escrow deposit requirement $1,500 to $4,800 from which the City's out of pocket costs would be reimbursed. Given the simple nature of the subdivision requirements on this parcel, out of pocket costs would be estimated to be on the low end of this range. This fee waiver request and City Council action is not intended to include any development fees such as deferred real estate taxes, levied and deferred assessments, or connection charges. • The request does include a payment for the cost of an independent engineering survey of the north 20 acres required from the applicant (TPL) as part of the application packet, that cost is unknown at this time but is estimated to be approximately $5,000. • In order to carry out the contemplated acquisition/ownership transactions, platting of the two 10 acre parcels north of Diffley is not technically required, however platting of the entire 60 acres into the various lots and blocks at this time is in the City's interest and is consistent with past practice. ATTACHMENTS: None Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting H. FINAL SUBDVISION TERRA GLENN 3R' ADDITION - LUNDGREN BROS. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Final Subdivision to create 2 lots with 24 townhouse units (Terra Glenn 3rd Addition) on property east of Blue Cross Blue Shield, South of Yankee Doodle Road west of the City of Eagan Maintenance Facility and north of Terra Glenn Addition in the NW 1/4 of Section 16. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL • Majority of Council Members Present FACTS: • On December 16, 2003 the City Council approved a Preliminary Subdivision (Terra Glenn) to create 54 single family lots and 24 townhome units. • The Preliminary Planned Development was approved with The Blue Cross Blue Shield Master Plan, and is being developed accordingly. • This development is being platted in phases, this is the third and final phase. • Phase one was approved on April 20, 2004 for 35 single family lots and outlots. Phase two was approved for 19 single family lots on October 19, 2004. • All documents and Agreements are anticipated to be signed and in order for execution at the regular meeting of the City Council. ATTACHMENTS (1): Final Subdivision on page.. -0/.. ay Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 I. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION TRAIL SYSTEM POLICY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Community Transportation Trail System Policy for staff implementation. FACTS: • Part of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan/Transportation Element relates to the community's Transportation Trail System. These segments of trails are primarily adjacent to the City's Collector/Arterial Street system or provide major non -vehicular transportation links (i.e. the Highline Trail). This is different from the Recreational Trial System (internal to City Parks) which is part of the Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan currently being updated. • Many of these transportation trail segments were constructed concurrently with the upgrade of the adjacent roadway. Now that the collector/arterial road system is nearing completion, there are several isolated segments of trails that have not been completed for a variety of reasons. • Last fall, when the Council discussed a proposed schedule for the trail along Federal Drive, they requested that the staff provide them with a status of all remaining trails so that they could consider establishing priorities. • On May 11, 2004, staff brought the results of the evaluation of the remaining uncompleted portions of the trail system for the City Council's consideration. The Council directed staff to create a Community Trail System policy. • On November 9 staff presented a draft policy with "test" results of all of the remaining proposed trail segments to the Council at a Workshop session. The City Council consented that the draft criteria/guidelines should be used to determine when any specific segment should be programmed into a CIP in the future (i.e. roadway improvement, petition, development, etc). ATTACHMENTS: • Community Trail System Policy, pages through 33 . CITY OF EAGAN COMMUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM POLICY Introduction The City of Eagan has an extensive trail/sidewalk/path system dedicated to the use of non -vehicular transportation. Users are primarily pedestrians and bicyclists, but may also be involved in other various multimodal transportation activities. Components of this system primarily include off-street facilities, but may include on -street striped lanes or paved shoulders in some areas of the city. The purpose of a trail system is to provide safe, pleasant places for exercise, relaxation or commuting for users of all ages and abilities. Some of the most popular everyday activities include running, walking, bicycling and in-line skating for exercise and pleasure. Participation in these activities generally occurs near the user's home and on a regular basis. The health of a community may be directly related to the usefulness of its trail system. A national effort is under way by health professionals to encourage the development of successful trail systems to support healthier choices by individuals. Not only are environmentally friendly alternatives to transportation provided by a successful trail system, but so are more reasons to exercise as a part of our normal daily routines. The reasons for providing healthy opportunities are no longer merely aesthetic or about the quality of life, but now also include financial benefits for all of us. As health care continues to loom as an important national issue, a successful community trail system can provide a critical local means to reduce the financial impacts we all want addressed. Three distinct types of trail facilities exist in Eagan. Local/neighborhood facilities provide access within smaller geographical areas, including residential neighborhoods or commercial areas. Park and recreational trails provide circulation within and between park and recreational facilities within the city. Transportation trails are typically located adjacent to major roadways and serve a broad range of functions from promoting non -motorized transportation by providing trail connections throughout the city to safely separating pedestrian/bicycle activity from automobile traffic. These Transportation trails are incorporated in to the City's Transportation Trail System and accordingly become a part of Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. For the purpose of this guideline the word trail or trails may define paths, trails and sidewalks. The word user or users may define pedestrians, bicyclists, in-line skaters, skateboarders and others who utilize the trail system. Objective While the Transportation Trail System is nearly completely constructed, there are unconstructed segments that require an analysis of their feasibility or practicality due to the City of Eagan's fiscal responsibility to its taxpayers. In 2004, the Engineering Division was asked by the City Council to evaluate the remaining unconstructed segments of the trail system and provide the Council with guidelines to establish the proper justification to construct any missing trail segments. Completion of subsequently determined segments would occur as part of the City of Eagan's 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Due to the public's expectation of prudent fiscal management, it is necessary to analyze these segments and rank them in order of importance based on the subsequent criteria. Removal of a previously proposed segment of trail from the comprehensive trail plan should be considered if, upon criteria examination, a trail is deemed inappropriate or unreasonable. The following criteria should be evaluated to ensure the utmost safety and practicality for the citizens of Eagan while bearing in mind proper fiscal responsibility. The guidelines should be used as a general method to rank all future trail segments to be constructed as public improvements. a� A. Comprehensive Trail System Standards An analysis of the area being considered for a trail installation shall include field observations and data collection to determine the appropriateness of the trail segment. Past practice throughout the development of the City of Eagan has included the following standards for off-street facilities: Street Classification Sidewalk or Trail Residential Street None Minor Collector 6' Sidewalk on One Side Major Collector 8' Trail and 6' Sidewalk B Minor Arterial 8' Trail on Both Sides A Minor Arterial or Greater 10' Trail on Both Sides B. Guidelines for Priority Determination The following criteria shall be considered in programming the previous standards in any such analysis. Each criterion is to be rated as indicated and added to all other relevant criteria to determine the overall rating of each considered trail segment. The total ratings will be used to prioritize the construction of the trail segments. The trail segment receiving the highest rating shall be considered first. 1. Accident Data The City of Eagan's first priority is public safety. Therefore, an accident study should be conducted when reviewing proposed trail segments. Locations experiencing pedestrian/vehicular accidents within the last five years should be carefully analyzed. Danger or hazards to users shall be prevented to the greatest extent possible. This prevention may include the removal of segments that have proven to be an attractive nuisance or deletion of dangerous segments from the comprehensive plan. Trails and the associated access points should be safe and easily accessible. Number of Pedestrian/ Vehicle Accidents Rating 0 0 1 5 2-3 10 4 or more 15 2. Athletic Facilities, Schools, Bus Routes, Parks Trail segments proposed in an area near schools, parks, athletic facilities or bus routes, should be strongly considered as these facilities are traditionally recognized as significant pedestrian traffic generators. These trails are not only important for the safe separation of the users from vehicles, but also essential to properly accommodate the higher than normal non - motorized traffic. Interconnection of school and park facilities should be supported to encourage the use of both facilities by users and create opportunities for sharing public facilities by multiple agencies. A 1/4 mile, or less, separation is typically expected to be attractive to users. Type of Pedestrian Generator (Sites) Rating Athletic Facility (Only) 5 Bus Stop (Only) 5 Neighborhood Park (Only) 1 Community Park (Only) 3 Regional Park (Only) 5 School (Only) 9 2 Sites within 1/4 mile 12 3 Sites within 1/4 mile * 4 Sites within 1/4 mile * * Add the ratings for each site and multiply by two 3. Connectivity The interconnection of trails should be encouraged wherever possible to form routes, loops or networks. Once formed, the connection of trails to these more formal trailways, typically trails within the Park & Recreational or Transportation categories, is important to the successful use of the overall system. As most residential neighborhoods within Eagan do not have trails, the connection of the neighborhoods, assuming the residential streets will function as Local trails, to these routes, loops or networks is essential to creating a thriving trail system. Likewise, the financialsuccess of consumer based commercial areas will be nicely augmented by the connection of such shopping/dining areas to a recognized trail system. Distance to a Designated Route, Loop or Network Rating Distance <'/4 mile 12 1/4 mile < distance < % mile 9 % mile < distance < 1 mile 6 Distance > 1 mile 3 4. Construction Cost/Constructability Some proposed trail segments may require more than typical construction activities such as, tree removal, clearing and grubbing, grading, cut and fill, retaining wall construction and wetland impacts. The cost of these activities should be carefully considered in comparison to alternative trail locations to ensure the most cost effective trail system. Typical trail costs per linear foot for a 10' wide bituminous trail is about $20. Construction Cost (per i * Rating Cost < $20 5 $20 < Cost _< $25 3 $25 < Cost < $30 2 Cost > $30 1 * 2004 Rates 5. County Highways It is financially beneficial for the City of Eagan to coordinate proposed trails along county highways as these improvements are eligible for 55% funding participation from Dakota County. County Highway Rating Yes 5 No 0 a9 6. Existing Trail The completion of existing trails with missing segments should be investigated using these criteria prior to filling these gaps. The appropriateness of the entire trail should be analyzed versus the possibility of removing the trail from the trail system. Likewise, the current trail system throughout Eagan has several streets with trails on both sides of the road. However, these criteria should be followed before constructing an additional trail adjacent to a street with an existing trail on one side. The existence of a trail in either case may not justify the addition of missing segments or parallel trails. Distances to existing trails shall be measured to trails on the same side of the street or to trail access points at designated street crossings. Distance to an Existing Trail Rating Distance <'/ mile 3 % mile < distance < 3 mile 2 3 mile < distance < 1 mile 1 Distance > 1 mile 0 7. Mixed Use Areas Areas which host a variety of activities, such as residences, bar/restaurants, stores, entertainment centers, an employment base or public facilities, in close proximity, typically % mile or less, often stimulate an increase in users. A mixture of uses in an area provides multiple destinations for users and enhances the opportunities to access trails at numerous times throughout a typical day. Zoning or Land Uses within '/ Section Rating I Use 0 2 Uses 2 3 Uses 5 4 Uses 9 8. Neighborhood Density The Neighborhood Density may be determined by dividing the number of Dwelling Units or Residential Population by the area (acres). Residential areas with Neighborhood Densities of 3 units/acre or more should be considered for trail connections to the City's trail system. Neighborhood Density Rating 3 < Density < 5 2 5 < Density < 8 4 8 < Density < 12 7 Density > 12 10 30 9. New Development/Reconstruction Opportunities exist for the cost effective construction of trail segments as part of the construction of new developments, redevelopment of areas and reconstruction or upgrade of existing streets. A new development or redevelopment of an area by a developer requiring city approval provides the opportunity for the developer to finance the construction of the trail segment as a condition of the development. The addition of a trail adjacent to a street scheduled for reconstruction often allows the trail to be constructed with the street at a cost savings due to the economy of scales. Construction Activity Rating New Development 10 Redevelopment 7 Street Reconstruction 5 10. Petition Any petition requesting the construction or incorporation of a trail should be reviewed with these criteria in order to determine the appropriateness of the trail segment. The support of the adjacent property owners for the construction of a trail segment is very desirable and may be necessary for Council support. Petition Rating 100% of Adjacent Owners 5 >50% of Adjacent Owners 3 <50% of Owners or None 0 11. Privacy The privacy of residents while they are within their homes or backyards that are adjacent to a trail segment is typically of great importance. In addition to the loss of privacy, residents' concerns also may include noise, litter, vandalism and reduced property values. The construction of trails that provide clear visibility in to the windows and backyards (portion of residential property not easily visible from public right-of-way; typically at rear of house) of private homes should usually be discouraged. Privacy Rating >30' from Window/Backyard 5 <30' from Window/Backyard 0 12. Safety The safety of the trail users is of utmost importance. Placement of trails in locations that would create hazards or provide less than expected levels of protection should be avoided. Topography that would require sharp curves or steep slopes or encourage fast speeds on the trail is not desirable. The frequency or likelihood of vehicles endangering trail users by crossing trails at driveways or street intersections should be minimized. To the extent possible, trails should be separated from roadways/driveways designated for vehicle use. If trails co -exist with roadways/driveways then routes should be selected with lower vehicle speeds & volumes. Safety Issues Rating 1 < Crossings per 'A mile <_ 5 5 5 < Crossings per 1/4 mile < 10 2 10 < Crossings per 'A mile < 15 0 0 < Grade < 8 5 Grade > 8 0 *Proposed trail routes not separated from roadways/driveways should be rated as 1 crossing for every 25' 3/ 13. Snow Plow Criteria Reference to the City of Eagan's Winter Trail Maintenance Policy and current plow routes should be included. The addition of trail segments that would continue existing plowed trail segments and meet the Winter Trail Maintenance Policy criteria should be considered. Winter Trail Maintenance Rating Yes 10 No 0 14. Speed Limits The 85th percentile speed on the adjacent street will indicate the maximum speed that 85% of the vehicle drivers are traveling. Higher speeds place a greater risk on users and require larger separation distances between the edge of the street and the trail. Proper separation may require the acquisition of additional right-of-way or easements. 85th Percentile Speed Rating 30 < Speed < 40 5 40 < Speed < 50 3 Speed > 50 1 15. Street Patterns Neighborhoods with small blocks or numerous neighborhood street intersections provide good alternative on -street routes for users. Trail connections to these neighborhoods typically would experience greater use than to neighborhoods with few neighborhood street intersections or many cul-de-sacs. Neighborhood Pattern Rating 5 < Intersections* < 10 2 10 < Intersections* < 15 4 15 < Intersections* < 20 7 10 Intersections* > 20 10 *Intersections per 'A section 16. Traffic Volume/Road Classification Vehicle volumes are higher on some roads than they are on other roads for valid reasons. The busier roads are chosen to be used by more drivers for reasons that they find personally beneficial. Trail users will typically come to conclusions similar to those of the drivers. The analysis of proposed trail segments must include the classification (traffic volume based) of the adjacent street. Roads with higher vehicle volumes should typically provide adjacent trails. The exception is that trails are not permitted along the interstate highway system (Principle Arterial). Road Classification Rating Residential Street 0 Minor Collector 5 Major Collector 6 B Minor Arterial 8 A Minor Arterial 10 Principle Arterial 0 C. Conclusion Priority of new trail placement shall be determined by the City Engineer utilizing this policy, concerns for public safety, engineering judgement and the CIP schedule. This policy covers trails that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Eagan. G:/Engineering/RM/Misc/2004Trail_Policy. doc Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 J CONTRACT 04-10, NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT - LANDSCAPING, FENCING & IRRIGATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Plans and Specifications for Contract 04-10 (North Water Treatment Plant — Landscaping) and authorize the solicitation for a competitive bid opening at 11 am, January 13, 2005. FACTS: • Contract 04-10 provides for the installation of security fencing, landscaping and irrigation improvements for the North Water Treatment plant and the overall Central Maintenance Facility. • The plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and found to be in order for Council consideration of authorization of competitive bid solicitation. 3L Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 K. 2005 CONSULTING ENGINEERING RATES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve an amendment to the Fee Schedule Appendix for the current Consulting Engineering Contracts for services to be provided in 2005. FACTS: • Each year the consulting engineering companies selected to provide services to the City of Eagan submit their proposed fee schedules for the upcoming year. According to the terms of the contracts, these proposed amendments to the original contracts must be approved by the City Council before implementation. The attached spreadsheets indicate the fees the consultants have requested for the council's approval. ATTACHMENTS: Consulting Engineering Fees, page 36 . Fee Increase Comparison, page 3s 2005 COMPARISON OF CONSULTING ENGINEERING FEES FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN CITY 1- = O, .0 O a $135.00 Department Head 1 $115.00 City Engineer 1 $105.00 Asst. City Engineer $85.00 Construction Manager $85.00 Public Works Coord. 1 $75.00 Engineer Technician $145.00 0 0 0 N 4) At Cost 1 LL Q' N Range Average $124.00 to $150.00 5137.001 $115.00 to $138.00 $126.50 $100.00 to $132.00 $116.00 $105.00 to $110.00 $107.50 $81.00 to $111.00 896.00 $75.00 to $108.00 $91.50 1 O O (0 O O o H O o O O at 69 $86.00 to $117.00 5101.50 $82.00 to $102.00 $92.00 $65.00 to 591.00 $78.001 0 0 O O FA O O o „7,, 2 O O O 0 4i $73.00 to $88.00 $80.50 $44.00 to $72.00 $58.001 $53.00 to $71.00 562.001 547.00 to $71.00 $59.00 1 $43.00 to $71.00 $57.00 L. SEH Range Average O ED O N 4> 0 o tO 69 O o 0 4, N H9 O in oD (+) 4i o O 0r 69- O o 0 0 H 893.00 to $127.00 $110.00 $82.00 to 5121.00 $101.501 $87.00 to 5122.00 5104.501 578.00 to $96.00 $87.00 $63.00 to $84.00 573.501 $38.00 to $63.00 $50.50 $47.00 to $84.00 $65.50 o L o en 4i O E 6 r 0 69 At Cost T U 0 o 0 49 WSB Public/Private o o N G9 o O .N- 4) o O 0 4) OO O 0)) 69 o a(D 49 O O r 49 O O ((00 49 O O (oD to O O (ND 49 $57.00 O O U) 09 O O 7 4f O O 1) 49 O O M 69 $150.00 1 0 O N GSA y 0 U S. Included I BRAA Municipal Private Range Average 0 O f 69 $133.00 O r 4) $114.00 0 N 4> O 0) 69 O 0W 49 $94.00 O 4! 1 $76.00 $54.00 1 OOO MNNC 69 69 49 $75.00 1 0 N 4> 0 0 0 a) H 2 0 0 N 4i 1 $96.00 to $156.00 $126.00 $102.00 to $113.00 $107.50 0 in 0 69 0 0 ai (9 2 0 0 (0 0) 4f 1 $89.00 to $102.00 595.50 $72.00 to 5102.00 $87.00 CO ri 4i 0 0 of CO 49 2 0 0 V r 43 1 $71.00 to $96.00 $83.501 $59.00 to $89.00 $74.00 O n 49 0 0 69 0 0 0 ai in 49 $41.00 to $59.00 $50.00 $40.00 to $47.00 $43.50 $150.00 to $195.00 $172.501 $110.00 to $145.00 $127.50 0 O H 0 u0 69 O O 49 575.001 At Cost CLASSIFICATION Senior Principal / Principal Principal Engineer / Sr Associate / Senior Proj Manager Specialist / Associate / Sr. Proj Manager Project Manager / Dept Mngr / Design Review Engr Registered Engineer/ Architect/ Natural Resource/ Senior GIS Specialist Landscape Architect / Hydrologist / Planner Project Engineer/Architect Senior GIS Designer / Water Resource / Senior Designer MIS Specialist Engineering Specialist / ROW Spec / Senior Agent System Integration Specialist / Senior Editor Graduate Engineer/Architect Senior Field Supervisor / Construction Observer Lead Technician/Engr Tech IV/CADD/Survey/Graphics Senior Technician/Engr Tech III/CADD/Survey/Graphics Engineering Technician II/Scientist I/CADD/Survey/Graphics Project Technician Administrative Assistant Word Proc/Admin Tech/Office Tech II Clerical/Assoc Tech/Office Tech I 3 -Person Survey Crew 2 -Person Survey Crew GPS Survey Equipment Total Station Equipment 1 GIS Workstation Equipment GPS Submeter Unit (per half day) 6) CO O 14I Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating, Stakes, Field Supplies, Telephone calls Etc. Daily Field Vehicle Allowance G:CONSU.TING ENG SERVICES/RATE SRF = SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SEH = Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. WSB = WSB & Associates N w W 1L _z 2 W W z z toZ < W 0 azLU 2 1— O LL ci) o Z U N O U 0 111 (1)W tr 0 Z CITY cu Z.C _o (q O CI. o N 0 O OO N LO pt. Director City Engineer Asst City Eng Const Mgr _ _I PW Coord Engineer Tech. $135.00 1_0°/0_1 $135.00 o 6l 0 '� 0 E9 0 tri 0 to 0 tri 0 to 69 6 0 0 •N - 69 At Cost 10% L At Cost 0 0 O o O e O o O 0 0 o O .19- O o 4-0 63 0 E9 0 0 CO 60, 0 to CO 63 0 (o 6 fA triO v 69 0 _N 69 LLO ce In O O CV o 0 0 N 0 O NI co 69 0 to O ,- 69 0 0 ,- 69 0 to tO O 69 OO O O 69 O O) 69 O O O o) 69 O in . O ; 0 0 N 0) 69 O O O h 69 O 0 O o) 69 O O o a0 69 O 0 W L) 69 O 0 N co 63 O 0 o) to 69 O 0 r-: to 69 Current Allowable IRS Rate 0) N 0 !0 O U a e O r) e �- 4 0 O. 7 0 O 0e. 6„ ..' N e 0) 4 0 O O e to V e 0) 7 0 O V 0 o O 0 N V' 0 7 0 O V 0 0 Nv M EA 0 69 O 0 (73 o tr? °N: 6) p to o 69 O O ri r 69 0 O cdao ti 69 0 )n 0) 69 O u) 0'.- 0 O 0 6i 0 O ri a0 6i o (n 0) 69 0 o NZ 69 O O ro O 69 O (r) of (!) b9 too (o O 69 0 LO v O 69 0 0 co O 69 W cri 0 p N e Or p N (0O O LO 69 $138.50 , 00 o tt) 0 d $104.50 0 ri CO 69 0 to ri t` 69 u0) O O 69 (O (ri (O 6) L O o o CO9 69 $0.375 $0.375 At Cost $10.00 day o M c•i ' ,6 sa r` o) ( N 0 O vi 0 O o c M o 0 O v in O .a- 69696, n N 0 �) N M 69 N o p ; to N O 0 69 0 O E9 O n CO 69 n ri n 63 O (•i CO 69 N (n u) 69 r O o (O CV WSB & ASSOCIATES 0 N e 0 o N0 0 O (N4 6i 0 N 6l $104.00 0 0)) 69 0 COO 69 0 ti 69 0 CO(0 69 o COO 6) 0 co 69 0 (! 69 0 O EA T $45.00 0 o '9 0 M 69 0 o Ul 6) r $126.00 1 Included in Above a a 7 00e00 V M c0 Nei 0 M_ ri 0 ri 0 4 00 pi 0 Pi D O N e O M4 e e0e0 co M r ,- 4 M M M 0 0 69 o 0 O) 69 O 2 0 v9 0 o 0 6i 1 $82.50 O O 4 r 6i O o ui co 6i O o r O 69 o (n O CO 69 O o ui (n 69 $49.00 $43.00 O o ri O 6> O to of N 69 I $145.00 l 0O 0 N N 69 0 of 6/9 co 0 0 N e Oo o N 0 0 N 69 69 0 o CO N a 0 to O 69 p O 7 0 a o O tfj o 69 o 0 n 0 ((9 p u) M 0 69 0 to M O 69 0 O C r 63 o 0 o I• EA 0 o O to 69 0 O of v 69 0°,z000 0 N 4- 0 n N 0 O CO 69 0 (fi N 69 0 O N 69 0 CO N- 69 At Cost At Cost o M 4V o O M O e tO O 0 M o c".5N e N M ,_O (.1 0 (•) r- (D 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O O O O _ 69 o tO o0c•i _O 69 0 O _N 69 0 to 0 69 O 0 cV 0) 69 O to N CO 69 O O o0 69 O 0 to I- 69 O 0 O CO 69 O O r- r 69 O to c0 CO 69 O cr) ri O4 EA O O [V 6) o O o M 69 O O 1.6O N 69 O O N 69 O O O r 69 CLASSIFICATION Senior Principal / Principal 1 Principal Engineer/Sr Associate/Sr Proj Mgr Specialist / Associate / Sr. Proj Mgr Proj. Mngr / Dept Mgr. / Design Review Engr. Registered Engineer/Architect/Natural Resource/Senior GIS Specialist Landscape Architect / Hydrologist / Planner Project Engineer/Architect Sr GIS Designer / Water Resource/Sr Designer MIS Specialist Engineering Specialist/ROW Spec/Sr Agent System Integration Specialist/Senior Editor Graduate Engineer / Architect Sr Field Supervisor/Construction Observer Lead Technician / Engr Tech IV / CADD / Survey / Graphics Senior Technician / Engr. Tech III / CADD / Survey / Graphics Engineering Technician II / Scientist I / CADD / Survey / Graphics Project Technician Administrative Assistant Word Proc/Admin Tech/Office Tech II Clerical/Assoc Tech/Office Tech I 3 -Person Survey Crew 2 -Person Survey Crew GPS Survey Equipment Total Station Equipment GIS Workstation Equipment GPS Submeter Unit (per half day) a) m co Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating, Stakes, Field Supplies, Telephone calls Etc. Daily Field Vehicle Allowance 8 c Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 L. CONTRACT 03-12, TH 13 & SILVER BELL ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the final payment for Contract 03-12 (Trunk Highway 13 and Silver Bell Road — Intersection Improvements) in the amount of $94,212.34 to Eureka Construction, Inc„ and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • Contract 03-12 provided for the construction of dual left turn lanes on northbound and southbound Trunk Highway 13 at the intersection of Silver Bell Road, as authorized by the City Council under City Project 880, respectively. • These improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department, and found to be in order for favorable Council action of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. 3f! Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 M. PROJECT 917, COACHMAN ROAD (SOUTH OF YANKEE DOODLE) STREET IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Draft Feasibility Report for Project 917 (Coachman Road — Street Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on January 18, 2005. FACTS: • On June 1, 2004 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report considering a street rehabilitation for Coachman Road, approximately 850 feet south of Yankee Doodle Road. • The bituminous overlay of this segment of Coachman Road is programmed for 2005 in the City of Eagan's 5 -Year CIP (2005-2009). • An informational meeting will be held with the adjacent property owners prior to a public hearing to review and discuss the proposed improvements. • A draft of this Feasibility Report has been prepared and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for January 18, 2005. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers. 39 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting N. Approve Proposed 2005 Enterprise Fund Budgets, Including Water, Sanitary Sewer, Streetlighting, Storm Drainage, Water Quality, Civic Arena, Cascade Bay, and Community Center ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the proposed 2005 budgets for the four Enterprise Funds: Public Utilities (Water, Sanitary Sewer, Streetlighting, Storm Drainage, and Water Quality), Civic Arena, Aquatic Facility (Cascade Bay), and Community Center. FACTS: • The City Council has previously reviewed all Enterprise Fund budgets. For those budgets wherein the Council directed changes to be made, the attached summaries reflect those changes. • User fees support all of these budgets. The Community Center Fund is also supported by antenna lease rentals on City facilities. • Staff is exploring options to repay the loan from the Community Investment Fund and a discussion agenda item is tentatively scheduled for a January City Council workshop. The 2005 budget is presented for approval as presented, discussed, and directed at the November 9 Special City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page / / is the Public Utilities Fund revenues and expenses summary. • Enclosed on page ',2 is the Civic Arena revenues and expenses summary. • Enclosed on page ((3 is the Aquatic Facility revenues and expenses summary. • Enclosed on page ci Itis the Community Center revenues and expenses summary. Y.o Public Utilities Fund 2005 Budget Revenue and Expense Summary Water Sanitary Street Storm Water Sewer Lighting Drainage Quality TOTALS Revenues: Service charges $ 3,816,400 $ 4,466,200 $ 435,200 $ 297,900 $ 695,200 $ 9,710,900 Connection permits 14,000 13,200 - 27,200 Meter sales 55,000 - - 55,000 Other 5,900 43,000 48,900 Total revenues 3,891,300 4,479,400 435,200 297,900 738,200 9,842,000 Operating expenses: Personal services 853,400 416,100 - 31,400 261,400 1,562,300 Supplies, repairs, maint. 207,100 81,100 - 12,200 28,400 328,800 Other services & charges 1,304,300 533,200 396,800 127,400 129,800 2,491,500 Merchandise for resale 53,000 - - 53,000 Capital outlay 97,300 247,800 1,000 105,000 451,100 MCES disposal charges - 3,253,500 - - 3,253,500 Total operating exp 2,515,100 4,531,700 396,800 172,000 524,600 8,140,200 Net income before depreciation & debt svc 1,376,200 (52,300) 38,400 125,900 213,600 1,701,800 Depreciation (1,266,500) (560,000) (31,200) (923,000) (58,000) (2,838,700) Debt service (prin + int) (879,000.) - - - - (879,000) Net income (loss) (769,300) (612,300) 7,200 (797,100) 155,600 (2,015,900) Other non -departmental revenues: Interest income 1,136,800 Connection charges 653,900 Antenna lease revenue 88,000 Other 18,700 Total - non -dept revenue 1,897,400 Net revenues in excess of (exp) $ (118,500) Li/ Eagan Civic Arena Fund 2005 Budget Revenue and Expense Summary Cash revenues Cash expenses Net cash profit Less other outlays: Debt service principal/interest Capital Expenditures (no set aside) Capital replacement set aside Excess revenues Carryforward from prior year Cumulative excess revenues 2002 Actual $ 811,169 550,667 2003 Actual $ 787,351 570,417 260,502 (125,184) (7,611) (33,100) 94,607 40,673 216,934 (128,834) (9,401) (36,000) 42,699 135,280 2004 Budget $ 815,800 644,200 171,600 (125,600) (10,000) (36,000) 177,979 2005 Budget $ 843,100 669,400 173,700 (127,700) (10,000) (36,000) 177,979 135,280 177,979 177,979 177,979 q.2 2005 9222 Cascade Bay rev -exp summary Aquatic Facility (Cascade Bay) Fund 2005 Budget Revenues, Expenses and Other Disbursements Revenues Daily Admissions/Season Pass Group Sales Concessions Classes / Camps Coca-Cola Marketing Rental Interest Other Total Revenues Expenses Personal Services Parts & Supplies Cost of Concession Sales Services & Other Charges Capital Outlay Sub -total Expenses Reserve for Renewal/Replacement Total Operating Expenses Non-Operatinu Disbursements Debt Service Payments Total Expenses/Non-Op Disbursements 12/10/2004 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Revised Buda Budstet $ 724,381 145,903 206,644 10,597 5,417 $ 802,392 $ 763,050 $ 773,600 $ 126,900 127,160 $ 136,200 $ 237,308 218,790 $ 216,700 $ 16,335 20,000 $ 20,200 $ 5,416 5,400 $ 13,871 7,000 $ 7,000 31,402 13,477 $ 1,944 1,200 $ 1,137,821 $ 1,204,166 $ 1,142,600 $ 1,153,700 $ 454,628 $ 484,185 $ 525,800 $ 536,000 52,032 $ 64,492 $ 74,800 $ 79,700 104,367 $ 120,884 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 88,770 $ 114,193 $ 176,800 $ 198,200 6,780 $ 18,660 $ 31,600 $ 21,800 706,577 802,414 919,000 945,700 50,000 67,000 64,600 64,600 756,577 869,414 983,600 1,010,300 159,738 161,574 159,000 160,400 $ 916,315 $ 1,030,988 $ 1,142,600 $ 1,170,700 3 2005 9223 Community Center rev -exp summary 12/10/2004 Revenues Community Center Enterprise Fund 2005 Budget Revenues, Expenses and Other Disbursements 2004 2005 Revised Proposed Budget Budget Other Revenue -Parks (non-taxable) $ 22,200 Equipment Rental 2,000 Park Program Revenue (non-taxable) 93,900 13,900 Concession Sales ( taxable) 40,000 31,900 Merchandise Sales ( taxable) 1,200 Merchandise Sales ( non-taxable) 1,400 Group Sales ( taxable) 65,570 95,700 Group Sales ( non-taxable) 4,800 Daily Admission ( taxable) 71,400 74,800 Daily Admission ( non-taxable) 21,700 Membership ( taxable) 371,400 574,200 Vending (non-taxable) 5,000 Room Rentals (taxable) 155,040 172,300 Facility Rental (taxable) 1,500 Contract Revenue 46,000 55,700 ECVB Rent 6,600 8,600 Total Revenues 849,910 1,086,900 Other Funding Sources Antenna Leases 290,590 292,300 Total Revenue and Other Funding Sources $ 1,140,500 $ 1,379,200 Expenses Personal Services $ 779,500 $ 826,200 Parts & Supplies 55,000 73,000 Services & Other Charges 288,000 339,200 Capital Outlay - - Sub -total Expenses 1,122,500 1,238,400 Merchandise for Resale 18,000 20,000 Reserve for Renewal / Replacement 120,800 Total Operating Expenses $ 1,140,500 $ 1,379,200 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting O. Approve 2005 Special Revenue Funds Budgets, including the Enhanced 9-1-1 Fund, Housing Fund, Police Forfeiture Fund, Economic Recovery Grant Fund, And Cable TV Franchise Fees Fund ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the 2005 budgets for the following Special Revenue Funds: Enhanced 9-1-1 Fund Housing Fund Police Forfeiture Fund Economic Recovery Grant Fund Cable TV Franchise Fees Fund FACTS: • For financial reporting purposes, it is required that the City Council adopt each of these budgets. • The purpose of each fund, the revenue sources, and the expenditure categories are listed on each budget page. • There are no tax levies related to these funds. ATTACHMENTS: • Enhanced 9-1-1 Fund budget on page_Y__‘__ . • Housing Fund budget on page �/ • Police Forfeiture Fund budget on age T� . • Economic Recovery Grant Fund budget on page • Cable TV Franchise Fees Fund budget on page 1/ S 112 Enhanced 9-1-1 Fund This fund accounts for State and County grant funds received to support the emergency 9-1-1 and reverse 9-1-1 systems. The fund was established in 2003 with a $124,561 transfer from the General Fund, which represented the balance in the General Fund of unexpended Enhanced 9-1-1 revenues since inception of State and County funding. Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2004 2003 Estimated 2005 Actual Actual Budget $0 $144,761 $121,161 Revenues: Intergovernmental State Grants 47,134 54,000 55,000 Interest on Investments 1,801 1,400 1,200 48,935 55,400 56,200 Other Financing Sources: Transfers In 124,561 Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 124,561 0 0 173,496 55,400 56,200 Expenditures: Professional Services - 1,000 600 9-1-1 Telephone Charges 28,735 21,000 25,000 Reverse 9-1-1 Charges - 18,000 20,000 Capital Equipment - 39,000 - Total Financing Uses 28,735 79,000 45,600 Fund Balance, End of Year $144,761 $121,161 $131,761 113 Housing Fund The purpose of this fund is to finance future housing -related developments within the City. The fund was established in 1998 as the consolidation of the Housing Revenue Bonds Fund and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund. The Housing Revenue Bonds Fund accounted for annual fees collected on the principal balance of revenue bonds issued under the City's name to finance multi -family housing developments. The HRA Fund accounted for the tax increment financing (TIF) proceeds and expenditures of the Cinnamon Ridge Apartments interest rate reduction program. The TIF district expired in 1997. A note issued by Cinnamon Ridge to the City in the amount of the total TIF proceeds, which were to be repaid per the original agreement, was accounted for in this fund. At the end of 1998, the City sold its interest in the note to a third party for $1,200,000. Closing on the transaction was completed in early 1999. As a component of the transaction, the proceeds of the closing were loaned to the Aquatic Facility construction fund and will be repaid over 20 years with the final payment in October of 2018. Funds Available, Beginning of Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Budget Budget $ 1,511,206 $ 1,669,336 $ 1,805,623 $ 1,979,976 Revenues: Housing Bond Fees 82,863 70,125 82,900 81,100 Interest on Investments 25,497 18,224 - - Total Revenues 108,360 88,349 82,900 81,100 Other Financing Sources: Interest on Loan 53,820 51,988 50,453 48,293 Principal on loan - - 45,000 50,000 Total Other Financing Sources 53,820 51,988 95,453 98,293 Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 162,180 140,337 178,353 179,393 Expenditures: Monitoring Fee 4,050 4,050 4,000 4,000 Total Expenditures 4,050 4,050 4,000 4,000 Funds Available, End of Year $ 1,669,336 $ 1,805,623 $ 1,979,976 $ 2,155,369 114 Police Forfeiture Fund This fund was created to account for money received from the court system and restricted to police operations. It is expected that transfers will be made from this fund to the General Fund where eligible expenditures are made. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Budget Budget Fund Balance, Beginning of Year $22,979 $24,086 $24,602 $25,452 Revenues: Interest on Investments 1,107 516 850 700 Total Revenues 1,107 516 850 700 Expenditures: Total Financing Uses 0 0 0 0 Fund Balance, End of Year $24,086 $24,602 $25,452 $26,152 �f 118 Economic Recovery Grant Fund This fund opened in 1995 with a grant from the State to establish a revolving loan fund for local businesses for the purpose of economic development. Loan recipients must meet certain requirements as set forth by the State for this program. A ten-year $250,000 loan was made with State funds to an Eagan business in 1995 to initiate the program. The loan was paid in full in 1996. Under the terms of the agreement with the State, $100,000 in principal plus interest collected to the point of payoff, will remain in the fund for loans to other qualifying businesses. The balance of the principal was returned to the State. Available to loan out, Beginning of year Cash Inflows: 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Budget Budget $169,379 $183,075 Loan repayment -principal 5,729 906 Loan repayment -interest 133 4 Interest on Investments 7,834 6,364 13,696 7,274 Cash Outflows: $190,349 $196,749 6,400 6,400 5,700 5,700 0 0 0 0 Available to loan out, End of year $183,075 $190,349 $196,749 $202,449 S� 9 196 Cable TV Franchise Fee Fund This fund was established to account for franchise fees paid to the City from the local cable franchisee. The money is restricted for communications and cable television related activities, primarily the Communications Dept budget and the City's share of the funding of the Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission (BETC) and Burnsville/Eagan Community Television (BECT). Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Budget Budget $1,896,213 $1,926,494 $1,878,410 $1,954,410 Revenues: Cable TV Franchise Fees 490,833 513,614 527,800 540,000 Interest on Investments 114,548 47,027 67,400 56,400 Total Revenues 605,381 560,641 595,200 596,400 Expenditures: BETC Funding 96,157 68,108 28,500 34,025 BECT Funding - 133,284 75,000 69,475 Equipment purchased 83,263 18,716 - - Community Room Remodeling 100,230 - - Other 1,694 281,344 220,108 103,500 103,500 Other Financing Uses: Transfer to General Fund 293,756 388,617 415,700 437,700 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 575,100 608,725 519,200 541,200 Fund Balance, End of Year $1,926,494 $1,878,410 $1,954,410 $2,009,610 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting P. Approve Proposed 2005 Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission and Burnsville/Eagan Community Television Budgets ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the proposed 2005 budgets for Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission (BETC) and Burnsville/Eagan Community Television (BECT). FACTS: • The City Council has previously reviewed a comprehensive 5 -year budget and capital plan for BETC/BECT on March 9, 2004. • The 2005 budget is in accordance with the plan presented in March; the City's contribution from franchise fees remains the same as it was in 2004 at $103,500. • The City of Burnsville plans to adopt both budgets at its December 20 Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page 6-01. is a summary of those budgets. S/ •"1` City of Burnsville t' Proposed 2005 Budget Burnsville Eagan Telecommunications 2004 Amended Budget 2004 Estimated Actual 2005 Proposed Budget Cable Community Cable Community Cable Community Commission Television Total Commission Television Total Commission Television Total Revenues / Sources Burnsville Contribution $ 28,500 $ 75,000 $ 103,500 $ 28,500 $ 75,000 $ 103,500 $ 34,025 $ 69,475 $ 103,500 Eagan Contribution 28,500 75,000 103,500 28,500 75,000 103,500 34,025 69,475 103,500 PEG Access Fees 620,000 620,000 620,000 620,000 - 640,000 640,000 Other 6,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 50,500 50,500 otal Revenues /Sources $ 57,000 $ 776,000 $ 833,000 $ 57,000 $ 780,000 $ 837,000 $ 68,050 $ 829,450 $ 897,500 Expenses / Uses Employee Services $ - $ 471,000 $ 471,000 $ 6,500 $ 482,411 $ 488,911 $ 7,000 $ 468,293 $ 475,293 Current Expenses 57,000 240,000 297,000 46,365 236,475 282,840 61,050 238,100 299,150 Capital Outlay 317,000 317,000 166,000 166,000 - 265,000 265,000 Total Expenses/Uses $ 57,000 $ 1,028,000 $1,085,000 $ 52,865 $ 884,886 $ 937,751 $ 68,050 $ 971,393 $ 1,039,443 Capital Reserve (Used) $ - $ (252,000) $ (252,000) $ 4,135 $ (104,886) $ (100,751) $ - $ (141,943) $ (141,943) Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Q. CONTRACT 04-13, WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANXION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the bids and award Contract 04-13 (Water Treatment Plant Expansion — FF&E) to INTEREUM Inc. in the amount of $83,813.69 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Project 868 provided for the expansion and renovation of the existing North Water Treatment Plant located on Coachman Road just south of Yankee Doodle Rd. This project also included the addition of new Administrative, Operations and Vehicle storage facilities. Contract 04-13 provides for the acquisition of some of the related office furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E). • On Nov. 16, the Council approved the plans and specifications for Contract 04-13 and authorized the advertisement of competitive bids. On Thursday, Dec. 6, formal bids were opened and the low bidder identified. These bids are now being presented to the Council for their consideration of awarding the contract to the low bidder. ISSUES: • Consistent with past acquisitions, the office furniture design was based on a major national vendor (Hermann Miller Systems) that supplies all government agencies through a competitive U.S. Cities open contract at substantial cost reductions. The bidding process was to solicit competitive bids for the supply and installation of this type of system. While only one bid was received to provide and install this system, it is less than 1% over the Architect's estimate and is deemed acceptable for consideration of contract award. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid Summary Sheet, page S3 Bid Date: Bid Time: CITY CONTRACT NO. 04-13 WATER TREATMENT PLANT — FF&E (Proj. 868C) Dec. 9, 2004 10:00 a.m. Engineer's Estimate: $83,140 12/09/04 G:SPECIFICATIONS'04/04-07/Bidder's List Bids Received By: Tom Colbert Wayne Schwanz syr Bidder 5% Bid Bond Bid 1. Intereum, Inc. YES $83,813.69 2. Commercial Furniture Systems YES No Bid 3. 4. 5. 6. 12/09/04 G:SPECIFICATIONS'04/04-07/Bidder's List Bids Received By: Tom Colbert Wayne Schwanz syr Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 R. CONTRACT 04-05, WELL #20 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the plans and specifications for Contract 04-05 (Well #20 —Pumping Eqpt.) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held on January 13, 2005. FACTS: • The initial drilling and development of Well #20 and related Well House structure was completed in 2002 under City Contracts 01-08 & 02-06 as part of the Central Park Pavilion/shelter improvements north of Central Parkway adjacent to Pilot Knob Rd. • Now that the Water Treatment Plant expansion is nearing completion, it is timely to put this well into service. In order to do so, it needs the final installation of the required pumping, electrical and mechanical systems. The installation of these improvements is all contained within the existing Well House and will not be noticeable to the general public. • Detailed Plans and Specs have been prepared by the City's consulting engineering firm of WSB Inc., reviewed by the Public Works Department and are being presented to the Council for their approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. ,; S Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEAMNPS A. 2004 (PAYABLE 2005) PROPERTY TAX LEVY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the proposed 2004 (payable 2005) property tax levy as follows: General Revenue: General Fund $ 17,168,300 Equipment Revolving Fund 821,261 Gen Facilities R/R Fund 121,551 Major Street Fund 1,131,802 Market Value Homestead Cr. 1,300,000 Subtotal General Revenue 20,542,914 Debt service: Community Center bonds Total City-wide Levy Cedarvale Special Services Dist. FACTS: 1,204,823 $ 21,747,737 2,000 • The City held a Truth -in -Taxation public hearing on December 6 to consider the 2005 General Fund budget and the payable 2005 property tax levy. • The State requires that the levy be formally adopted at a subsequent hearing. • The final levy must be certified to the County by December 28. • No changes have been made to the general City levy or the Cedarvale Special Services District levy as presented at the December 6 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page J is a copy of the resolution adopting the final levy. RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN LEVY OF PAYABLE 2005 REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held on December 13, 2004, at 6:30 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, all members being present, WHEREAS, upon motion by Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby is on record approving and certifying the levy of Real Estate Taxes for Eagan, Minnesota, which taxes are payable in 2005 as follows: Revenues: General Fund $ 17,168,300 Equipment Revolving Fund 821,261 Major Street Fund 1,131,802 General Facilities Renewal/Replacement Fund 121,551 Market Value Homestead Credit 1,300,000 Subtotal Revenues 20,542,914 Debt: Community Center/Central Park bonds 1,204,823 Total City -Wide Levy $21,747,737 Cedarvale Special Services District Levy $ 2,000 Dated: December 13, 2004 CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting B. Proposed 2005 General Fund Budget ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the proposed 2005 General Fund budget. FACTS: • The City held a Truth -in -Taxation public hearing on December 6 to consider the 2005 General Fund budget and the payable 2005 property tax levy. • The State requires the budget be adopted subsequent to the 2005 levy. • No changes were made to the budget pursuant to the Truth -in -Taxation hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on pages 51 through C are copies of comparative summaries of revenues and expenditures for the General Fund. 5-7 2005 Gen Fd revs by line item Comp Sum of Rev 8-24 2005 BUDGET GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2002 Actual 2003 Actual 2004 Budget 12/9/2004 2005 Budget General Property Taxes $ 14,745,862 $ 15,392,252 $ 16,253,700 $ 17,168,300 Licenses 174,993 256,801 272,800 259,800 Permits 1,871,615 1,223,888 936,500 1,004,900 Intergovtal Revenues 2,141,010 703,943 560,700 596,300 Charges for Services 1,483,821 1,454,632 893,200 923,000 Recreation Charges 465,823 484,014 614,000 683,200 Fines & Forfeits 304,959 251,042 306,500 281,200 Other Revenues 575,215 208,919 375,500 319,100 Program Revenues 1,043,936 966,421 1,150,100 1,276,900 Transfers 293,756 388,617 415,700 437,700 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 23,100,990 $ 21,330,529 $ 21,778,700 $ 22,950,400 59 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENL GOVERNMENT 01 Mayor & Council 02 Administration 03 Information Technologies 04 City Clerk 05 Finance 06 Legal 07 Comm Dev/Planning 08 Comm Dev/Inspections 09 Communications Gen Govt Total PUBLIC SAFETY 11 Police 12 Fire Public Safety Total PUBLIC WORKS 21 Public Works Engineering 22 Streets & Highways 24 Central Svces. Maint. Public Works Total PARKS & RECREATION 31 Parks & Recreation 32 Tree Conservation Parks & Rec Total GENL GOVT BLDG MAINT 33 Building Maintenance Total Expenditures - General Fund 41 Contingency --undesignated 2002 Actual $ 103,702 709,655 831,323 w/ Finance 1,029,702 374,778 661,342 688,268 293,417 4,692,187 7,801,239 1,044,500 8,845,739 1,187,294 1,324,452 481,324 2,993,070 2,790,855 279,199 3,070,054 597,796 $ 20,198,846 2003 Actual $ 117,257 627,147 954,583 203,025 774,573 353,032 600,284 835,129 388,988 4,854,018 8,337,148 996,845 9,333,993 1,174,957 1,282,469 442,683 2,900,109 3,023,997 318,014 3,342,011 569,598 $ 20,999,729 2004 Budget $ 114,900 639,700 939,800 276,800 799,500 429,700 655,100 906,700 416,200 5,178,400 8,210,100 1,190,300 9,400,400 1,282,200 1,410,400 492,000 3,184,600 3,112,900 313,900 3,426,800 550,200 21,740,400 38,300 2005 Budget $ 118,600 659,200 967,600 231,200 865,000 434,000 767,400 947,100 437,700 % Chg 3.2% 3.0% 3.0% -16.5% 8.2% 1.0% 17.1% 4.5% 5.2% 5,427,800 4.8% 8,719,700 1,260,700 9,980,400 1,314,900 1,452,800 458,500 3,226,200 3,345,100 377,200 3,722,300 553,700 22,910,400 40,000 Total Expenditures + Contingency $ 21.778.700 $ 22.950.400 6e) 6.2% 5.9% 6.2% 2.6% 3.0% -6.8% 1.3% 7.5% 20.2% 8.6% 0.6% 5.4% 4.4% 5.4% Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting C. Proposed 2005 Cedarvale Special Services District Budget ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the proposed 2005 Cedarvale Special Services District Fund budget. FACTS: • The City held a Truth -in -Taxation public hearing on December 6 to consider the 2005 Cedarvale Special Services District budget and the payable 2005 property tax levy. • The State requires the budget be adopted subsequent to the 2005 levy. • No changes were made to the budget pursuant to the Truth -in -Taxation hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page 6? is a copy of the 2005 revenues and expenditures budget for the Cedarvale Special Services District Fund . 6/ 119 Cedarvale Special Services Fund This fund was established in 1996 for the purpose of accounting for taxes collected and expenditures made pertaining to the Cedarvale area special services tax district established in 1995. The primary purpose of the tax district is to provide signage, sign maintenance and turf maintenance for the Cedarvale shopping center. Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Budget Budget 11,743 12,567 11,076 10,076 Revenues: Special Services District Taxes 2,880 2,312 2,000 2,000 Interest on Investments 571 253 300 300 Total Revenues 3,451 2,565 2,300 2,300 Expenditures: Mowing 2,450 3,158 3,000 3,300 Sign Maintenance 177 898 300 1,100 Total Expenditures 2,627 4,056 3,300 4,400 Excess of Revenue over Expenditures 824 (1,491) (1,000) (2,100) Fund Balance, End of Year 12,567 11,076 10,076 7,976 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 D. PROJECT 915, RIDGECLIFFE/ PARK RIDGE/ BERKSHIRE PONDS ADDITIONS/ GALAXIE AVENUE/ COVINGTON LANE - STREET OVERLAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Project 915 (RidgeCliffe/ Park Ridge/ Berkshire Ponds Additions/ Galaxie Avenue/ Covington Lane — Street Overlay) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: • Since 1990, the City has implemented a comprehensive Pavement Management Program that provides timely pavement rehabilitation to our local streets, significantly extending their overall life expectancy. During these past fourteen years, the City has rehabilitated approximately 67 miles of local streets. • The resurfacing of the streets within the RidgeCliffe/ Park Ridge/ Berkshire Ponds/ Covington Lane/ Galaxie Avenue (Berkshire to Cliff Rd.) neighborhood has been programmed for 2005 in the City's 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program. In September, 2003, advanced notices of this pending capital improvement were sent to all affected property owners. • On June 1, 2004, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule of the rehabilitation of the streets within the RidgeCliffe/ Park Ridge/ Berkshire Ponds/ Covington Lane/ Galaxie Avenue (Berkshire to Cliff Rd.) area, located south of Cliff Road, east of I -35E and west of Johnny Cake Ridge Road., • On November 16, 2004, the feasibility report for Project 915 was presented to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for December 13 to formally present and discuss the report with the adjacent property owners. • An informational neighborhood meeting was held on December 9 in the City Hall Council Chambers for the adjacent property owners and representatives to discuss the proposed improvements. Of the 509 total residential properties proposed to be assessed under this improvement, 7 persons representing 6 properties (< 1 %) attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages6ifthrough hC • Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, pages//through/4 city OF eagan Report for RidgeCliffe / Park Ridge / Berkshire Ponds Additions / Galaxie Avenue / Covington Lane Neighborhood Street Revitalization City Project No. 915 6� Eagan, Minnesota December, 2004 PAT GEAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TJLLEY Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator city of Cagan Municipal Center: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Phone: 651.675.5000 Fax: 651.675.5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Facility: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community December 9, 2004 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: RidgeCliffe/ Park Ridge/ Berkshire Ponds Additions/ Galaxie Avenue/ Covington Lane Street Improvements City Project No. 915 Dear Mayor and City Council: Attached is our report for the RidgeCliffe / Park Ridge / Berkshire Ponds Additions / Galaxie Avenue / Covington Lane Street Improvements, City Project No. 915. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost estimate, preliminary assessment roll and schedule. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and discuss the contents of this report. Sincerely, 9 John P. Gorder Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By: Dept. of Pubic Works Reviewed B : Finance Dept. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. X John P. Gorder Date: 2- 9-0 `f Reg. No. 22813 6s Date: (Z_9 - %4 - Date: TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal/Certification Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Scope 2 Feasibility and Recommendations 3 Street Evaluation 3 Proposed Improvements 4 Easements/Permits 5 Cost Estimate 6 Assessments 6 Low Density Residential 7 Assessment Financing Options 8 Revenue Source 9 Project Schedule .9 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix C Figures - 1 Location Map - 2/ 2A &B Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map - 3A & B Typical Section — Overlay 66 December 2004 Street Improvement Report RidgeCliffe / Park Ridge / Berkshire Ponds Additions / Galaxie Avenue / Covington Lane Street Improvements Eagan, Minnesota Introduction/ History As a part of Eagan's Pavement Management Program, (PMP), the City evaluates streets within the community throughout their life cycle and implements appropriate maintenance strategies. In 1989, a Pavement Management System (PMS) was developed that allowed the City to evaluate the condition of the existing pavement surface for all the streets on a routine basis and schedule timely maintenance. A Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for street rehabilitation is developed from this information. The approximately 4.6 miles of 32' wide local residential and 44' wide collector streets within the RidgeCliffe/ Park Ridge/ Berkshire Ponds Additions/ Galaxie Avenue/ Covington Lane neighborhood area are identified for street overlay improvements in 2005. Figure 1, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project location. The streets within the neighborhood were constructed from 1980 to 1986, as part of adjacent development. The eastern portion of Nokia Way, east of Lenore Lane, was constructed in 1995. It is included for consideration under this project to provide continuity in maintenance of the neighborhood area streets, and to achieve economies of scale in construction. Based on the data and engineering strategies available at this time, the City's current PMP incorporates local and ongoing maintenance strategies with seal coating occurring as needed at 5 to 7 years, again at 12 to 14 years with a bituminous overlay at approximately 20 years. Overlaying these roadways located within the project area, which are mainly in the 19 to 25 year g I3er:;shireP{:nJs.t dations. I'te.c 1 g loon 1.a rie time frame, will prevent further decay of the pavement surface, thus protecting and extending the structural life of the street. Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous patching, crack sealing and seal coating have occurred at appropriate intervals during the life of the street pavements. The streets in the neighborhood were seal coated various times between in 1986 and 1998. The Public Works maintenance program typically includes patching and refurbishing during the construction season prior to the overlay. The Public Works crews, as part of the Preparatory Pavement Management Plan, removed and replaced deteriorated pavement areas and placed leveling and maintenance overlays on portions of the streets under consideration, if necessary. These repairs alone will not substantially extend the life expectancy of the street pavements if not combined with the proposed structural bituminous overlay proposed with this project. The Public Works Department has also inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer) in the project area and determined the system is in good working order and that no major repairs are necessary. Scope This project provides for resurfacing (edge mill and overlay) approximately 4.6 miles of roadways. Figures 2, 2A & 2B, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project area. Included in this project is replacement of the damaged curb and gutter, adjustments and/or replacement to sanitary/storm sewer utility castings, and water gate valves. Ri dgeCIi i.:'.:' f i, i` idg , orkshftc Ponds Add itiou ;i Gt11%.:`,..1.L;,ilue' C. i' g1on Feasibility and Recommendations This project is necessary to prevent further decay of the pavement section, create a safer driving surface, increase ride -ability and add structural strength. This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement (resurfacing) is considerably less expensive than complete reconstruction of these streets. By resurfacing all of the streets within the neighborhood at one time, and economy of scale benefit will be realized. This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint in that this type of improvement has been used successfully to extend the life expectancy of numerous other streets throughout the City and the region. This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2005 — 2009) for the City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Management Program. It is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report. Street Evaluation The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition for each street. The general categories that define PCI rankings are as follows: PCI Recommended Improvement 56 - 100 Routine Maintenance/Crack Seal/Seal Coat 36 - 55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0 - 35 1 Reconstruct The 2004 PCI rankings for RidgeCliffe / Park Ridge / Berkshire Ponds Additions / Galaxie Avenue/ Covington Lane has a neighborhood weighted average pavement condition rating of 42 which falls in the rankings of the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" category. Therefore, with RidgeCl a : Ridge; Berkshire fonds Add itionY Sio,•enuel Covington Lane Pau.. ratings and the age of the streets, the 2005 construction season is the optimal time to construct the bituminous overlay on these streets. Proposed Improvements Pavement - The proposed street improvements are shown in Figures 3A & 3B. The existing street section for Galaxie Avenue (Berkshire Drive to Cliff Road) consists of a 4' /z " bituminous pavement supported by 12" gravel base and the local streets consist of a 3" bituminous pavement supported by 6" gravel base . The existing bituminous surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb and gutter (6'-8' wide) to accommodate a 1'/2 -inch bituminous overlay. The overlay, combined with the existing street section, will provide a street section consistent with current City standards for a residential street. The combination of patching, and overlay will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature extremes experienced in Minnesota. Bituminous overlays will show some continued frost movements and reflective cracking consistent with the underlying pavement. Routine maintenance will still need to continue under the City's Pavement Management Program. Concrete curb & gutter - Damaged curb and gutter will be replaced if severely cracked, spalled, or settled. It is estimated that approximately 15% (1.4 miles) of the existing concrete curb and gutter will have to be replaced. Boulevard sod will be removed and replaced by a new 2' wide roll behind each section of curb and gutter that is replaced. While the contractor who performs the work is responsible for it's establishment in the first 30 days after placement, adjacent residents are encouraged to consistently water the new sod to help ensure its growth. A guide to maintenance of the sod will be distributed to the residents prior to this construction activity. i' i:h c(. it: X'✓ j- :,, is �:•.t:, Berkshire Ponds Additions! {.iu;i:X.e;\ ' ii (_ ov ngton !.,ane Page Signage - Traffic control and street identification signage will be replaced if the reflectivity has diminished, support posts have deteriorated, or if the signs or posts no longer meet City standards. Example of a recent street overlay project in Eagan (Oak Chase 6th/Ches Mar East, 2002) Easement/Permits All work will be in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. It is anticipated that no permits will be required for the resurfacing project. Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid plan approval will be required for construction plans of the overlay on the municipal state aid collector routes of Galaxie Avenue and Covington Lane (Galaxie Avenue to Johnny Cake Ridge Road). I iri e.(.:lifle Park Eiji %e I .rks hire Ponds Mciitions! GL thi ;lt enuc! ('ovington Lane Pac.7 '7/ Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 2005 construction costs and include a 5% contingency and indirect cost of 30%, which include legal, administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows: Collector Streets (Galaxie Avenue — Berkshire to Cliff Road, Covington Lane — Galaxie Avenue to Johnny Cake Ridge Road) • Edge Mill and Overlay $ 176,250 Local Streets • Edge Mill and Overlay $ 437,580 Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter Total Project Cost Assessments $ 397,220 $1,011,050 Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the total improvement with costs allocated in accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for a mill and overlay improvement for local and collector streets. All assessments will be revised based on final costs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. City Special Assessment Policy Mill and Overlay • Low Density Residential (R-1,2,3) Repair Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Ridge( 1 Assessment Ratio Property City 50% 50% 0% 100% idgci 1i r sh€re. Ponds :\dd.Ui:l `,- i J1 ? : kN. e 1 le: (_ io it gion Lane Pa a Low Density Residential Lots (R-1, R-2, R-3) Direct Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (424 Total, 277 single-family, 196 townhouse units at 75% lot equivalents) as shown on Figure 2, having direct driveway access on to the streets to be improved are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the streets within the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R-1, R-2, R-3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet). The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $595 per Single Family Lot and is calculated as follows: 1) Total Frontage with direct access = 43,378/ 48,608 (Total F.F.) = 89.2% 2) [$437,580 (Mill & Overlay Cost - Local) x 50% x 89.2%] + [$176,250 (Mill & Overlay Cost - Collector) x 50% x (32/44) x 89.2%] _ $252,330 [Total Residential Assessment (R-1, 2, 3) w/ direct driveway] 3) $252,330 (Total Residential Assessment) $595 / lot 424 Equivalent Single Family Residential Lots 4) Townhouse => 75% of a SF Lot (0.75 x $595/ lot) = $446 / Townhouse Unit Indirect Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (28 Total, 7 single-family lots, 28 townhomes = 21 lot equivalents) as shown on Figure 2, having indirect driveway access, via privately maintained streets (Oakhill Court, Aspenridge Circle, Galaxie Court, and Galaxie Point — all intersecting with Galaxie Avenue), are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R-1, R-2, R-3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet).The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent is as follows: 1) % Residential (R-1,2,3) with indirect access = 1,883 front footage / 48,608 (total f.f.) _ 3.9% 2) [$437,580 (Mill & Overlay Cost - Local) x 50% x 3.9%] + [$176,250 (Mill & Overlay Cost - Collector) x 50% x (32/44) x 3.9%] = $11,030 [Total Residential Assessment (R-1, 2, 3) w/ indirect driveway] 3) $11,030 (R-1,2,3 Residential Assessment) -* $394/ lot (R-1,2) 28 Residential Lot Equivalents Town house => 75% of a Single Family Lot (0.75 x $394/ lot) = $296/ Townhouse iadgeClifi'ez Pim; Ridge/ Berkshire PondsAdditions/ Gali Avenue/ Cov noon Lane Paec 3 Assessment Financing Options The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over five years with the interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. The following payment schedule will result based on an estimated 5% interest for the assessed amounts: Single Family Residential Lot (w/ direct access) = $595 Townhome Lot (w/direct access) = $446 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $119 $30 $149 Fifth Year $119 $6 $125 Townhome Lot (w/direct access) = $446 Single Family Residential Lot (w/ indirect access) = $394 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $89 $22 $111 Fifth Year $89 $5 $94 Single Family Residential Lot (w/ indirect access) = $394 Townhome Lot (w/ indirect access) _ $296 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $79 $20 $99 Fifth Year $79 $4 $83 Townhome Lot (w/ indirect access) _ $296 2eC;lift. i ar! Etr 13erKsbi.re Ponos Additions/ (ial . ie A .CIi k (O'. O on 1 ane Payee 8 '79 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $59 $15 $74 Fifth Year $59 $3 $62 2eC;lift. i ar! Etr 13erKsbi.re Ponos Additions/ (ial . ie A .CIi k (O'. O on 1 ane Payee 8 '79 Revenue Source A summary of revenue sources is listed below: The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $747,690 (74% of total). Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council/ Order Public Hearing November 16, 2004 Neighborhood Meeting December 9, 2004 Public Hearing December 13, 2004 Approve Plans and Specifications February, 2005 Award Contract March, 2005 Project Completion September 1, 2005 Final Cost Report September, 2005 Final Assessment Hearing Fall, 2005 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement May 15, 2006 Iiia i,e,' Berkshire .,i ire P(ndS Add:lions,/ (1wIii venin Co; in lion Lane Pa, c 9 Project Cost Property Assessment City Contribution Mill and Overlay $613,830 $263,360 ($350,470) Repair Existing Curb $397,220 -0- ($397,220) Totals $1,011,050 $263,360 ($747,690) The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $747,690 (74% of total). Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council/ Order Public Hearing November 16, 2004 Neighborhood Meeting December 9, 2004 Public Hearing December 13, 2004 Approve Plans and Specifications February, 2005 Award Contract March, 2005 Project Completion September 1, 2005 Final Cost Report September, 2005 Final Assessment Hearing Fall, 2005 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement May 15, 2006 Iiia i,e,' Berkshire .,i ire P(ndS Add:lions,/ (1wIii venin Co; in lion Lane Pa, c 9 Appendix A -Street Overlay - City Project No. 915 Preliminary Cost Estimate RidgeCliffe/Park Ridge/Berkshire Ponds Additions/Galaxie Avenue/Covington Lane Local Streets I. Bituminous Street Overla Item Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Est. Cost Mobilization L.S. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 Mill Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 24,600 $1.15 $28,290 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture Ton 6,100 $36.00 $219,600 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 3,300 $2.00 $6,600 Adjust Valve Box w/cover Each 65 $175.00 $11,380 Repair Valve Top Section Each 8 $275.00 $2,200 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (Manhole) Each 92 $400.00 $36,800 Traffic Control L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000 Replace Traffic & Street Signs L.S. _ 1 $12,700.00 $12,700 Subtotal $320,570 + 5% Contingencies $16,030 Subtotal $336,600 + 30% Indirect Costs $100,980 SUBTOTAL 5437,580 II. Item Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Est. Cost Mobilization L.S. 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 Mill Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 9,600 $1.15 $11,040 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture Ton 2,500 $36.00 $90,000 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 1,400 $2.00 $2,800 Adjust Valve Box Each 10 $175.00 $1,750 Repair Valve Top Section w/ cover Each 3 $275.00 $830 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (Manhole) Each 37 $400.00 $14,800 4 -Inch White Striping L.F. 5,400 $0.50 $2,700 4 -Inch Double Yellow Striping L.F. 2,700 $1.00 $2,700 Traffic Control L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000 Subtotal $129,120 7-6 + 5% Contingencies $6,460 Subtotal $135,580 + 30% Indirect Costs $40,670 TOTAL $176,250 III. Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter Item Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Est. Cost Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 7,600 $5.00 $38,000 D412 Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 7,400 $20.00 $148,000 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 200 $21.00 $4,200 Cone Sidewalk R & R w/ Trunc Domes S.F. 320 $15.00 $4,800 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (C.B) _ Each 64 $300.00 $19,200 Remove & Replace Catch Basin Frame & Ring Cstg Each 2 $500.00 $1,000 Sod w/Topsoil S.Y. 2,100 $12.00 $25,200 Bituminous Street Patching Ton 500 $90.00 $45,000 Bituminous Driveway Patching S.Y. 600 _ $26.00 $15,600 Subtotal $291,000 + 5% Contingencies $14,450 Subtotal $305,550 + 30% Indirect Costs $91,670 TOTAL $397,220 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,011,050 Appendix B - City Project No. 915 Preliminary Assessment Roll RidgeCliffe/Park Ridge/Berkshire Ponds Additions / Galaxie Avenue/Covington Ln Street Overlay Parcel Lot Unit P.I.N. Equivalent Assessment Total Ridgecliffe 1st - 6th Additions & Park Ridge 1st -2nd Additions Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 1 1738 Nokia Way 10-63980-010-01 1 $595 $595 1736 Nokia Way 10-63980-020-01 1 $595 $595 4627 Halden Circle 10-63980-030-01 1 $595 $595 4623 Halden Circle 10-63980-040-01 1 $595 $595 4619 Halden Circle 10-63980-050-01 1 $595 $595 4620 Halden Circle 10-63980-060-01 1 $595 $595 4624 Halden Circle 10-63980-070-01 1 $595 $595 4628 Halden Circle 10-63980-080-01 1 $595 $595 1728 Nokia Way 10-63980-090-01 1 $595 $595 1726 Nokia Way 10-63980-100-01 1 $595 $595 1724 Nokia Way 10-63980-110-01 1 $595 $595 1722 Nokia Way 10-63980-120-01 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 12 $7,140 Rid ecliffe 1st Addition - Block 2 1737 Nokia Way 10-63980-010-02 1 $595 $595 1733 Nokia Way 10-63980-020-02 1 $595 $595 1731 Nokia Way 10-63980-030-02 1 $595 $595 1729 Nokia Way 10-63980-040-02 1 $595 $595 1727 Nokia Way 10-63980-050-02 1 $595 $595 1725 Nokia Way 10-63980-060-02 1 $595 $595 1719 Nokia Way 10-63980-070-02 1 $595 $595 1715 Nokia Way 10-63980-080-02 1 $595 $595 4658 Bamble Cirlce 10-63980-090-02 1 $595 $595 4650 Bamble Cirlce 10-63980-100-02 1 $595 $595 4657 Bamble Cirlce 10-63980-110-02 1 $595 $595 4661 Bamble Cirlce 10-63980-120-02 1 $595 $595 4665 Bamble Cirlce 10-63980-130-02 1 $595 $595 1705 Nokia Way 10-63980-140-02 1 $595 $595 1703 Nokia Way 10-63980-150-02 1 $595 $595 4666 Pello Circle 10-63980-160-02 1 $595 $595 4662 Pello Circle 10-63980-170-02 1 $595 $595 4658 Pello Circle 10-63980-180-02 1 $595 $595 4654 Pello Circle 10-63980-190-02 1 $595 $595 9r 4650 Pello Circle 10-63980-200-02 1 $595 $595 4653 Pello Circle 10-63980-210-02 1 $595 $595 4657 Pello Circle 10-63980-220-02 1 $595 $595 4661 Pello Circle 10-63980-230-02 1 $595 $595 4665 Pello Circle 10-63980-240-02 1 $595 $595 1790 Karis Way 10-63980-250-02 1 $595 $595 1794 Karis Way 10-63980-260-02 1 $595 $595 1798 Karis Way 10-63980-270-02 1 $595 $595 1802 Karis Way 10-63980-280-02 1 $595 $595 1806 Karis Way 10-63980-290-02 1 $595 $595 1810 Karis Way 10-63980-300-02 1 $595 $595 4650 Lenore Lane 10-63980-310-02 1 $595 $595 4644 Lenore Lane 10-63980-320-02 1 $595 $595 4638 Lenore Lane 10-63980-330-02 1 $595 $595 4632 Lenore Lane 10-63980-340-02 1 $595 $595 4626 Lenore Lane 10-63980-350-02 1 $595 $595 4620 Lenore Lane 10-63980-360-02 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 36 $21,420 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 4 4740 Hauge Circle 10-63980-010-04 1 $595 $595 4746 Hauge Circle 10-63980-020-04 1 $595 $595 4752 Hauge Circle 10-63980-030-04 1 $595 $595 4758 Hauge Circle 10-63980-040-04 1 $595 $595 4764 Hauge Circle 10-63980-050-04 1 $595 $595 4768 Hauge Circle 10-63980-060-04 1 $595 $595 4769 Hauge Circle 10-63980-070-04 1 $595 $595 4765 Hauge Circle 10-63980-080-04 1 $595 $595 4759 Hauge Circle 10-63980-090-04 1 $595 $595 4753 Hauge Circle 10-63980-100-04 1 $595 $595 4747 Hauge Circle 10-63980-110-04 1 $595 $595 4741 Hauge Circle 10-63980-120-04 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 12 $7,140 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 5 1719 Forssa Way 10-63980-010-05 1 $595 $595 1773 Covington Lane 10-63980-020-05 1 $595 $595 1769 Covington Lane 10-63980-030-05 1 $595 $595 1765 Forssa Way 10-63980-040-05 1 $595 $595 1761 Forssa Way 10-63980-050-05 1 $595 $595 1753 Forssa Way 10-63980-060-05 1 $595 $595 1743 Forssa Way 10-63980-070-05 1 $595 $595 1739 Forssa Way 10-63980-080-05 1 $595 $595 1733 Forssa Way 10-63980-090-05 1 $595 $595 1725 Forssa Way 10-63980-100-05 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 10 $5,950 �9 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 6 1766 Forssa Way 10-63980-010-06 1 $595 $595 1762 Forssa Way 10-63980-020-06 1 $595 $595 1758 Forssa Way 10-63980-030-06 1 $595 $595 1756 Forssa Way 10-63980-040-06 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 4 $2,380 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 7 4750 Narvik Drive 10-63980-010-07 1 $595 $595 4754 Narvik Drive 10-63980-020-07 1 $595 $595 4758 Narvik Drive 10-63980-030-07 1 $595 $595 4762 Narvik Drive 10-63980-040-07 1 $595 $595 4766 Narvik Drive 10-63980-050-07 1 $595 $595 4763 Flora Drive 10-63980-060-07 1 $595 $595 4755 Flora Drive 10-63980-070-07 1 $595 $595 4753 Flora Drive 10-63980-080-07 1 $595 $595 4749 Flora Drive 10-63980-090-07 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 9 $5,355 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 8 4749 Narvik Drive 10-63980-010-08 1 $595 $595 4751 Narvik Drive 10-63980-020-08 1 $595 $595 4753 Narvik Drive 10-63980-030-08 1 $595 $595 4759 Narvik Drive 10-63980-040-08 1 $595 $595 4763 Narvik Drive 10-63980-050-08 1 $595 $595 4765 Narvik Drive 10-63980-060-08 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 6 $3,570 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 9 4738 Narvik Drive 10-63980-010-09 1 $595 $595 4742 Narvik Drive 10-63980-020-09 1 $595 $595 4727 Lenore Lane 10-63980-030-09 1 $595 $595 4721 Lenore Lane 10-63980-040-09 1 $595 $595 4715 Lenore Lane 10-63980-050-09 1 $595 $595 4711 Lenore Lane 10-63980-060-09 1 $595 $595 4701 Lenore Lane 10-63980-070-09 1 $595 $595 4695 Lenore Lane 10-63980-080-09 1 $595 $595 4689 Lenore Lane 10-63980-090-09 1 $595 $595 1815 Senja Court 10-63980-100-09 1 $595 $595 1819 Senja Court 10-63980-110-09 1 $595 $595 1823 Senja Court 10-63980-120-09 1 $595 $595 1826 Senja Court 10-63980-130-09 1 $595 $595 1822 Senja Court 10-63980-140-09 1 $595 $595 1818 Senja Court 10-63980-150-09 1 $595 $595 4673 Lenore Lane 10-63980-160-09 1 $595 $595 gd 1819 Karis Way 10-63980-170-09 1 $595 $595 1823 Karis Way 10-63980-180-09 1 $595 $595 1827 Karis Way 10-63980-190-09 1 $595 $595 1831 Karis Way 10-63980-200-09 1 $595 $595 1835 Karis Way 10-63980-210-09 1 $595 $595 1839 Karis Way 10-63980-220-09 1 $595 $595 1847 Karis Way 10-63980-230-09 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 23 $13,685 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 10 open lot - private owner (corner Cliff and Lenore) 10-63980-030-00 4611 Lenore Lane 10-63980-010-10 1 $595 $595 4615 Lenore Lane 10-63980-020-10 1 $595 $595 4625 Lenore Lane 10-63980-030-10 1 $595 $595 4631 Lenore Lane 10-63980-040-10 1 $595 $595 4637 Lenore Lane 10-63980-050-10 1 $595 $595 4645 Lenore Lane 10-63980-060-10 1 $595 $595 4655 Lenore Lane 10-63980-070-10 1 $595 $595 1814 Karis Way 10-63980-080-10 1 $595 $595 1818 Karis Way 10-63980-090-10 1 $595 $595 1822 Karis Way 10-63980-100-10 1 $595 $595 1826 Karis Way 10-63980-110-10 1 $595 $595 1830 Karis Way 10-63980-120-10 1 $595 $595 1834 Karis Way 10-63980-130-10 1 $595 $595 1838 Karis Way 10-63980-141-10 1 $595 $595 1842 Karis Way 10-63980-151-10 1 $595 $595 1846 Karis Way 10-63980-161-10 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 16 $9,520 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 11 4606 Lenore Lane 10-63980-010-11 1 $595 $595 4612 Lenore Lane 10-63980-020-11 1 $595 $595 2 $1,190 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 12 1843 Covington Lane 10-63980-010-12 1 $595 $595 1839 Covington Lane 10-63980-020-12 1 $595 $595 1833 Covington Lane 10-63980-030-12 1 $595 $595 1827 Tampere Circle 10-63980-040-12 1 $595 $595 1823 Tampere Circle 10-63980-050-12 1 $595 $595 1819 Tampere Circle 10-63980-060-12 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 6 $3,570 Ridgecliffe 1st Addition - Block 13 . 1815 Tampere Circle 10-63980-010-13 1 $595 $595 1811 Tampere Circle 10-63980-020-13 1 $595 $595 1807 Covington Lane 10-63980-030-13 1 $595 $595 1801 Covington Lane 10-63980-040-13 1 $595 $595 1797 Covington Lane 10-63980-050-13 1 $595 $595 1795 Covington Lane 10-63980-060-13 1 $595 $595 1791 Covington Lane 10-63980-070-13 1 $595 $595 1718 Forssa Way 10-63980-080-13 1 $595 $595 1722 Forssa Way 10-63980-090-13 1 $595 $595 1726 Forssa Way 10-63980-100-13 1 $595 $595 1730 Forssa Way 10-63980-110-13 1 $595 $595 1734 Forssa Way 10-63980-120-13 1 $595 $595 1738 Forssa Way 10-63980-130-13 1 $595 $595 1746 Forssa Way 10-63980-140-13 1 $595 $595 1750 Forssa Way 10-63980-150-13 1 $595 $595 1752 Forssa Way 10-63980-160-13 1 $595 $595 1754 Forssa Way 10-63980-170-13 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 17 $10,115 Rid ecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 1 4700 Lund Point 10-63981-010-01 0.75 $595 $446 4701 Anne Point 10-63981-020-01 0.75 $595 $446 4705 Anne Point 10-63981-030-01 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Lund Point 10-63981-040-01 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 2 4700 Anne Point 10-63981-010-02 0.75 $595 $446 4701 Sunne Point 10-63981-020-02 0.75 $595 $446 4705 Sunne Point 10-63981-030-02 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Anne Point 10-63981-040-02 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 3 4710 Anne Point 10-63981-010-03 0.75 $595 $446 4711 Sunne Point 10-63981-020-03 0.75 $595 $446 4715 Surme Point 10-63981-030-03 0.75 $595 $446 4714 Anne Point 10-63981-040-03 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 4 4710 Lund Point 10-63981-010-04 0.75 $595 $446 4711 Anne Point 10-63981-020-04 0.75 $595 $446 4715 Anne Point 10-63981-030-04 0.75 $595 $446 4714 Lund Point 10-63981-040-04 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Rid l ecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 5 4710 Tana Point 10-63981-010-05 0.75 $595 $446 4711 Lund Point 10-63981-020-05 0.75 $595 $446 4715 Lund Point 10-63981-030-05 0.75 $595 $446 4714 Tana Point 10-63981-040-05 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Rid ecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 6 1748 Karis Way 10-63981-010-06 0.75 $595 $446 4711 Tana Point 10-63981-020-06 0.75 $595 $446 4715 Tana Point 10-63981-030-06 0.75 $595 $446 1746 Karis Way 10-63981-040-06 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 7 1742 Karis Way 10-63981-010-07 0.75 $595 $446 4723 Tana Point 10-63981-020-07 0.75 $595 $446 4725 Tana Point 10-63981-030-07 0.75 $595 $446 1740 Karis Way 10-63981-040-07 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Rid! ecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 8 4722 Tana Point 10-63981-010-08 0.75 $595 $446 4723 Lund Point 10-63981-020-08 0.75 $595 $446 4725 Lund Point 10-63981-030-08 0.75 $595 $446 4724 Tana Point 10-63981-040-08 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 9 4722 Lund Point 10-63981-010-09 0.75 $595 $446 4723 Anne Point 10-63981-020-09 0.75 $595 $446 4725 Anne Point 10-63981-030-09 0.75 $595 $446. 4724 Lund Point 10-63981-040-09 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 2nd Addition - Block 10 4722 Anne Point 10-63981-010-10 0.75 $595 $446 4723 Sunne Point 10-63981-020-10 0.75 $595 $446 4725 Sunne Point 10-63981-030-10 0.75 $595 $446 4724 Anne Point 10-63981-040-10 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 1 1766 Karis Way 10-63982-010-01 0.75 $595 $446 4681 Hirta Point 10-63982-020-01 0.75 $595 $446 ?,3 4685 Hirta Point 10-63982-030-01 0.75 $595 $446 1764 Karis Way 10-63982-040-01 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition — Block 2 4680 Hirta Point 10-63982-010-02 0.75 $595 $446 4679 Lista Point 10-63982-020-02 0.75 $595 $446 4683 Lista Point 10-63982-030-02 0.75 $595 $446 4684 Hirta Point 10-63982-040-02 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 3 4678 Lista Point 10-63982-010-03 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Horton Point 10-63982-020-03 0.75 $595 $446 4681 Horton Point 10-63982-030-03 0.75 $595 $446 4682 Lista Point 10-63982-040-03 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition — Block 4 4676 Horton Point 10-63982-010-04 0.75 $595 $446 4673 Stavern Point 10-63982-020-04 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Stavern Point 10-63982-030-04 0.75 $595 $446 4680 Horton Point 10-63982-040-04 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 5 4672 Stavern Point 10-63982-010-05 0.75 $595 $446 4671 Alta Point 10-63982-020-05 0.75 $595 $446 4675 Alta Point 10-63982-030-05 0.75 $595 $446 4676 Stavern Point 10-63982-040-05 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 6 4680 Stavern Point 10-63982-010-06 0.75 $595 $446 4681 Alta Point 10-63982-020-06 0.75 $595 $446 4685 Alta Point 10-63982-030-06 0.75 $595 $446 4684 Stavern Point 10-63982-040-06 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3" Addition — Block 7 4684 Horton Point 10-63982-010-07 0.75 $595 $446 4638 Stavern Point 10-63982-020-07 0.75 $595 $446 4687 Stavern Point 10-63982-030-07 0.75 $595 $446 4688 Horton Point 10-63982-040-07 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 5=e Rid' ecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 8 4688 Lista Point 10-63982-010-08 0.75 $595 $446 4687 Horton Point 10-63982-020-08 0.75 $595 $446 4691 Horton Point 10-63982-030-08 0.75 $595 $446 4692 Lista Point 10-63982-040-08 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 9 4690 Hirta Point 10-63982-010-09 0.75 $595 $446 4689 Lista Point 10-63982-020-09 0.75 $595 $446 4693 Lista Point 4694 Hirta Point 10-63982-030-09 10-63982-040-09 0.75 0.75 $595 $595 $446 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 3rd Addition - Block 10 1760 Karis Way 10-63982-010-10 0.75 $595 $446 4691 Hirta Point 10-63982-020-10 0.75 $595 $446 4695 Hirta Point 10-63982-030-10 0.75 $595 $446 1758 Karis Way 10-63982-040-10 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 2 4676 Traverse Point 10-63983-010-02 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Sorrel Point 10-63983-020-02 0.75 $595 $446 4679 Sorrel Point 10-63983-030-02 0.75 $595 $446 4678 Traverse Point 10-63983-040-02 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Rid ! ecliffe 4th Addition - Block 3 4670 Traverse Point 10-63983-010-03 0.75 $595 $446 4671 Sorrel Point 10-63983-020-03 0.75 $595 $446 4673 Sorrel Point 10-63983-030-03 0.75 $595 $446 4672 Traverse Point 10-63983-040-03 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 4 4670 Marquis Point 10-63983-010-04 0.75 $595 $446 4671 Traverse Point 10-63983-020-04 0.75 $595 $446 4673 Traverse Point 10-63983-030-04 0.75 $595 $446 4672 Marquis Point 10-63983-040-04 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 5 4676 Marquis Point 10-63983-010-05 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Traverse Point 10-63983-020-05 0.75 $595 $446 4679 Traverse Point 10-63983-030-05 0.75 $595 $446 Ss 4678 Marquis Point 10-63983-040-05 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 6 4676 Jackstone Point 10-63983-010-06 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Marquis Point 10-63983-020-06 0.75 $595 $446 4679 Marquis Point 10-63983-030-06 0.75 $595 $446 4678 Jackstone Point 10-63983-040-06 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 7 0.75 $595 $446 4670 Jackstone Point 10-63983-010-07 4671 Marquis Point 10-63983-020-07 0.75 $595 $446 4673 Marquis Point 10-63983-030-07 0.75 $595 $446 4672 Jackstone Point 10-63983-040-07 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 8 4670 Salem Point 10-63983-010-08 0.75 $595 $446 4671 Jackstone Point 10-63983-020-08 0.75 $595 $446 4673 Jackstone Point 10-63983-030-08 0.75 $595 $446 4672 Salem Point 10-63983-040-08 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 9 4676 Salem Point 10-63983-010-09 0.75 $595 $446 4677 Jackstone Point 10-63983-020-09 0.75 $595 $446 4679 Jackstone Point 10-63983-030-09 0.75 $595 $446 4678 Salem Point 10-63983-040-09 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 10 1807 Karis Way 10-63983-010-10 0.75 $595 $446 1805 Karis Way 10-63983-020-10 0.75 $595 $446 4674 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-10 0.75 $595 $446 4672 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-10 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 11 4676 Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-11 0.75 $595 $446 4678 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-11 0.75 $595 $446 4682 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-11 0.75 $595 $446 4680 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-11 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 12 4684 Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-12 0.75 $595 $446 4686 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-12 0.75 $595 $446 86 4690 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-12 0.75 $595 $446 4688 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-12 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 13 4692 Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-13 0.75 $595 $446 4694 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-13 0.75 $595 $446 4698 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-13 0.75 $595 $446 4696 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-13 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Rid ! ecliffe 4th Addition - Block 14 4700 Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-14 0.75 $595 $446 4702 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-14 0.75 $595 $446 4706 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-14 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-14 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 15 4708 Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-15 0.75 $595 $446 4710 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-15 0.75 $595 $446 4714 Lenore Lane 10-63983-030-15 0.75 $595 $446 4712 Lenore Lane 10-63983-040-15 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 4th Addition - Block 16 4716_ Lenore Lane 10-63983-010-16 0.75 $595 $446 4718 Lenore Lane 10-63983-020-16 0.75 $595 $446 4754 Flora Drive 10-63983-030-16 0.75 $595 $446 4752 Flora Drive 10-63983-040-16 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 1 4710 Osage Point 10-63984-010-01 0.75 $595 $446 4707 Homestead Point 10-63984-020-01 0.75 $595 $446 4709 Homestead Point 10-63984-030-01 0.75 $595 $446 4708 Osage Point 10-63984-040-01 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 2 4702 Otage Point 10-63984-010-02 0.75 $595 $446 4701 Homestead Point 10-63984-020-02 0.75 $595 $446 4703 Homestead Point 10-63984-030-02 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Osage Point 10-63984-040-02 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 0 2 Ridflecliffe 5th Addition - Block 3 4702 Snowbell Point 4701 Osage Point 4703 Osage Point 4704 Snowbell Point 10-63984-010-03 10-63984-020-03 10-63984-030-03 10-63984-040-03 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Rid ecliffe 5th Addition - Block 4 4708 Snowbell Point 4707 Osage Point 4709 Osage Point 4710 Snowbell Point 10-63984-010-04 10-63984-020-04 10-63984-030-04 10-63984-040-04 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Rid ecliffe 5th Addition - Block 5 4708 Hidden Point 4707 Snowbell Point 4709 Snowbell Point 4710 Hidden Point 10-63984-010-05 10-63984-020-05 10-63984-030-05 10-63984-040-05 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Rid ecliffe 5th Addition - Block 6 4702 Hidden Point 4701 Snowbell Point 4703 Snowbell Point 4704 Hidden Point 10-63984-010-06 10-63984-020-06 10-63984-030-06 10-63984-040-06 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 7 4702 Grenada Point 4701 Hidden Point 4703 Hidden Point 4704 Grenada Point 10-63984-010-07 10-63984-020-07 10-63984-030-07 10-63984-010-07 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 8 4708 Grenada Point 10-63984-010-08 4707 Hidden Point 4709 Hidden Point 4710 Grenada Point 10-63984-020-08 10-63984-030-08 10-63984-040-08 Subtotal 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3 $595 $595 $595 $595 $446 $446 $446 $446 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 9 4708 Markham Point 10-63984-010-09 0.75 $595 $446 4707 Grenada Point 10-63984-020-09 0.75 $595 $446 88' 4709 Grenada Point 10-63984-030-09 0.75 $595 $446 4710 Markham Point 10-63984-040-09 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 10 4702 Markham Point 10-63984-010-10 0.75 $595 $446 4701 Grenada Point 10-63984-020-10 0.75 $595 $446 4703 Grenada Point 10-63984-030-10 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Markham Point 10-63984-040-10 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 11 4702 Thrush Point 10-63984-010-11 0.75 $595 $446 4701 Markham Point 10-63984-020-11 0.75 $595 $446 4703 Markham Point 10-63984-030-11 0.75 $595 $446 4704 Thrush Point 10-63984-040-11 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 12 4708 Thrush Point 10-63984-010-12 0.75 $595 $446 4707 Markham Point 10-63984-020-12 0.75 $595 $446 4709 Markham Point 10-63984-030-12 0.75 $595 $446 4710 Thrush Point 10-63984-040-12 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 13 1786 Covington Lane 10-63984-010-13 0.75 $595 $446 4709 Thrush Point 10-63984-020-13 0.75 $595 $446 4711 Thrush Point 10-63984-030-13 0.75 $595 $446 1784 Covington Lane 10-63984-040-13 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 14 1794 Covington Lane 10-63984-010-14 0.75 $595 $446 1790 Covington Lane 10-63984-020-14 0.75 $595 $446 1788 Covington Lane 10-63984-030-14 0.75 $595 $446 1792 Covington Lane 10-63984-040-14 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Ridgecliffe 5th Addition - Block 15 1802 Covington Lane 10-63984-010-15 0.75 $595 $446 1798 Covington Lane 10-63984-020-15 0.75 $595 $446 1796 Covington Lane 10-63984-0301-5 0.75 $595 $446 1800 Covington Lane 10-63984-040-15 0.75 $595 $446 Subtotal 3 $1,785 72' Ridgecliffe 6"' Addition — Block 1 1849 Narvik Court 10-63985-010-01 1 $595 $595 1853 Narvik Court 10-63985-020-01 1 $595 $595 1855 Narvik Court 10-63985-030-01 1 $595 $595 1856 Narvik Court 10-63985-040-01 1 $595 $595 1852 Narvik Court 10-63985-050-01 1 $595 $595 1848 Narvik Court 10-63985-060-01 1 $595 $595 1844 Narvik Court 10-63985-070-01 1 $595 $595 1840 Narvik Court 10-63985-080-01 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 8 $4,760 Ridgecliffe 7th Addition - Block 1 1769 Karis Way 10-63986-010-01 1 $595 $595 1765 Karis Way 10-63986-020-01 1 $595 $595 1761 Karis Way 10-63986-030-01 1 $595 $595 1759 Karis Way 10-63986-040-01 1 $595 $595 1757 Karis Way 10-63986-050-01 1 $595 $595 1753 Karis Way 10-63986-060-01 1 $595 $595 1751 Karis Way 10-63986-070-01 1 $595 $595 1747 Karis Way 10-63986-080-01 1 $595 $595 1743 Karis Way 10-63986-090-01 1 $595 $595 1741 Karis Way 10-63986-100-01 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 10 $5,950 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 1 1907 Covington Lane 10-56750-010-01 1 $595 $595 1911 Covington Lane 10-56750-020-01 1 $595 $595 1915 Covington Lane 10-56750-030-01 1 $595 $595 1919 Covington Lane 10-56750-040-01 1 $595 $595 1923 Covington Lane 10-56750-050-01 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 5 $2,975 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 2 4742 Pondview Drive 10-56750-010-02 1 $595 $595 4733 Westwind Trail 10-56750-020-02 1 $595 $595 4735 Westwind Trail 10-56750-030-02 1 $595 $595 4737 Westwind Trail 10-56750-040-02 1 $595 $595 4739 Westwind Trail 10-56750-050-02 1 $595 $595 4741 Westwind Trail 10-56750-060-02 1 $595 $595 4743 Westwind Trail 10-56750-070-02 1 $595 $595 4745 Westwind Trail 10-56750-080-02 1 $595 $595 4747 Westwind Trail 10-56750-090-02 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 9 $5,355 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 3 4713 Westwind Trail 10-56750-010-03 1 $595 $595 90 4715 Westwind Trail 10-56750-020-03 1 $595 $595 4717 Westwind Trail 10-56750-030-03 1 $595 $595 4719 Westwind Trail 10-56750-040-03 1 $595 $595 4721 Westwind Trail 10-56750-050-03 1 $595 $595 4723 Westwind Trail 10-56750-060-03 1 $595 $595 4724 Westwind Trail 10-56750-070-03 1 $595 $595 4729 Westwind Trail 10-56750-080-03 1 $595 $595 4731 Westwind Trail 10-56750-090-03 1 $595 $595 4735 Pondview Drive 10-56750-100-03 1 $595 $595 4739 Pondview Drive 10-56750-110-03 1 $595 $595 1910 Covington Lane 10-56750-120-03 1 $595 $595 1914 Covington Lane 10-56750-130-03 1 $595 $595 1916 Covington Lane 10-56750-140-03 1 $595 $595 1918 Covington Lane 10-56750-150-03 1 $595 $595 1927 Covington Lane 10-56750-160-03 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 16 $9,520 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 4 4731 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-010-04 1 $595 $595 4725 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-020-04 1 $595 $595 4723 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-030-04 1 $595 $595 4721 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-040-04 1 $595 $595 4726 Westwind Trail 10-56750-050-04 1 $595 $595 4728 Westwind Trail 10-56750-060-04 1 $595 $595 4730 Westwind Trail 10-56750-070-04 1 $595 $595 4734 Westwind Trail 10-56750-080-04 1 $595 $595 4736 Westwind Trail 10-56750-090-04 1 $595 $595 4738 Westwind Trail 10-56750-100-04 1 $595 $595 4740 Westwind Trail 10-56750-110-04 1 $595 $595 4742 Westwind Trail 10-56750-120-04 1 $595 $595 4744 Westwind Trail 10-56750-130-04 1 $595 $595 4751 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-140-04 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 14 $8,330 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 5 4714 Westwind Trail 10-56750-010-05 1 $595 $595 4718 Westwind Trail 10-56750-020-05 1 $595 $595 4720 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-030-05 1 $595 $595 4722 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-040-05 1 $595 $595 4724 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-050-05 1 $595 $595 4726 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-060-05 1 $595 $595 4728 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-070-05 1 $595 $595 4730 Ridgewind Trail 10-56750-080-05 1 $595 $595 4715 Narvik Drive 10-56750-090-05 1 $595 $595 4719 Narvik Drive 10-56750-100-05 1 $595 $595 4723 Narvik Drive 10-56750-110-05 1 $595 $595 4727 Narvik Drive 10-56750-120-05 1 $595 $595 4731 Narvik Drive 10-56750-130-05 1 $595 $595 4735 Narvik Drive 10-56750-140-05 1. $595 $595 4739 Narvik Drive 10-56750-150-05 1 $595 $595 4741 Narvik Drive 10-56750-160-05 1 $595 $595 4745 Narvik Drive 10-56750-1700-5 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 17 $10,115 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 6 1837 Narvik Court 10-56750-010-06 1 $595 $595 1841 Narvik Court 10-56750-020-06 1 $595 $595 1845 Narvik Court 10-56750-030-06 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Park Ridge 1st Addition - Block 7 4734 Narvik Drive 10-56750-010-07 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 1 $595 Park Ridge 2nd Addition - Block 1 1903 Covington Lane 10-56751-010-01 1 $595 $595 1899 Covington Lane 10-56751-020-01 1 $595 $595 1895 Covington Lane 10-56751-030-01 1 $595 $595 1891 Covington Lane 10-56751-040-01 1 $595 $595 1887 Covington Lane 10-56751-050-01 1 $595 $595 1879 Covington Lane 10-56751-060-01 1 $595 $595 1875 Covington Lane 10-56751-070-01 1 $595 $595 1871 Covington Lane 10-56751-080-01 1 $595 $595 1867 Covington Lane 10-56751-090-01 1 $595 $595 1863 Covington Lane 10-56751-100-01 1 $595 $595 1859 Covington Lane 10-56751-110-01 1 $595 $595 1855 Covington Lane 10-56751-120-01 1 $595 $595 1851 Covington Lane 10-56751-130-01 1 $595 $595 1847 Covington Lane 10-56751-140-01 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 14 $8,330 Park Ridge 2nd Addition - Block 2 1902 Covington Lane 10-56751-010-02 1 $595 $595 1894 Covington Lane 10-56751-020-02 1 $595 $595 1886 Covington Lane 10-56751-030-02 1 $595 $595 1880 Covington Lane 10-56751-040-02 1 $595 $595 1870 Covington Lane 10-56751-050-02 1 $595 $595 1866 Covington Lane 10-56751-060-02 1 $595 $595 1862 Covington Lane 10-56751-070-02 1 $595 $595 1860 Covington Lane 10-56751-080-02 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 8 $4,760 9� Park Ridge 2nd Addition - Block 3 4733 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-010-03 1 $595 $595 4735 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-020-03 1 $595 $595 4737 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-030-03 1 $595 $595 4739 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-040-03 1 $595 $595 4741 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-050-03 1 $595 $595 4743 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-060-03 1 $595 $595 4747 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-070-03 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 7 $4,165 Park Ridge 2nd Addition - Block 4 4732 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-010-04 1 $595 $595 4734 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-020-04 1 $595 $595 4736 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-030-04 1 $595 $595 4738 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-040-04 1 $595 $595 4740 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-050-04 1 $595 $595 4742 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-060-04 1 $595 $595 4744 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-070-04 1 $595 $595 4746 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-080-04 1 $595 $595 4750 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-090-04 1 $595 $595 4752 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-100-04 1 $595 $595 4754 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-110-04 1 $595 $595 4756 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-120-04 1 $595 $595 4758 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-130-04 1 $595 $595 4760 Ridgewind Trail 10-56751-140-04 1 $595 $595 1848 Covington Lane 10-56751-150-04 1 $595 $595 Subtotal 15 $8,925 Oak 1 ointe of Ea . an lst Addition Block 1 1901 Oakhill Court 10-53775-080-01 0.75 $394 $296 1897 Oakhill Court 10-53775-090-01 0.75 $394 $296 1893 Oakhill Court 10-53775-100-01 0.75 $394 $296 1889 Oakhill Court 10-53776-110-01 0.75 $394 $296 1885 Oakhill Court 10-53775-120-01 0.75 $394 $296 1881 Oakhill Court 10-53775-130-01 0.75 $394 $296 1877 Oakhill Court 10-53775-140-01 0.75 $394 $296 1873 Oakhill Court 10-53775-150-01 0.75 $394 $296 1869 Oakhill Court 10-53775-160-01 0.75 $394 $296 1865 Oakhill Court 10-53775-170-01 0.75 $394 $296 1861 Oakhill Court 10-53775-180-01 0.75 $394 $296 Subtotal 8.25 $3,250 Oakpointe of Eagan 2"d Addition, Block 1 4685 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-010-01 0.75 $394 $296 4681 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-020-01 0.75 $394 $296 4677 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-030-01 0.75 $394 $296 4673 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-040-01 0.75 $394 $296 9.� 4669 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-050-01 0.75 $394 $296 4665 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-060-01 0.75 $394 $296 4661 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-070-01 0.75 $394 $296 4657 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-080-01 0.75 $394 $296 4653 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-090-01 0.75 $394 $296 4649 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-100-01 0.75 $394 $296 4645 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-110-01 0.75 $394 $296 4641 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-120-01 0.75 $394 $296 4637 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-130-01 0.75 $394 $296 Subtotal 9.75 $3,840 Oak Pointe of Eagan 2"d Addition, Block 2 4678 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-010-02 0.75 ' $394 $296 4670 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-020-02 0.75 $394 $296 4662 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-030-02 0.75 $394 $296 4654 Aspen Ridge Circle 10-53776-040-02 0.75 $394 $296 Subtotal 3 $1,180 Schindeldecker 4th Addition Fire Station 5 — City of Eagan 10-67603-010-01 3 $595 $1,785 Subtotal 3 $1,785 Galaxie Hill Oaks, Block 1 1747 Galaxie Court 10-28720-010-01 1 $394 $394 1743 Galaxie Court 10-28720-020-01 1 $394 $394 1746 Galaxie Court 10-28720-030-01 1 $394 $394 1750 Galaxie Court 10-28720-040-01 1 $394 $394 Subtotal 4 $1,580 Cliff Woods of Ea . an Block 1 4612 Galaxie Point 10-17900-010-01 1 $394 $394 4608 Galaxie Point 10-17900-020-01 1 $394 $394 4604 Galaxie Point 10-17900-030-01 1 $394 $394 Subtotal 3 $1,180 TOTALS Single Family = 285 Townhomes = 168 LE • 453 Total LE TOTAL $262,360 9s� 3 SILVER BELL RD 7 3 2D 0 0 cc m 0 Z u - DIFFLEY ROAD o CLIFF ROAD WALDEN HEIGHTS PARK 7 Project Location -v 5E G:Fecsibility Reports2005\915_Locotion_Mop City of Eagan APPLE VALLEY qs 10-21—D4 Ridgecliff / ParkRidge / Berkshire Ponds Add., Covington Lane / Galaxie Avenue Location Map - City Project 915 Fig. 1 ASSESSMENT AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS G:Feosibility Reports2005\Proj915RidgecliffCovington\StreetImprov Ridgecliff / ParkRidge / Berkshire Ponds Add., Covington Lane / Galaxie Avenue / Street Improvements / Assessment Area .6 City of Eagan City Project 915 N S NO SCALE ,1 ;, CLIFF % _I 7 W Lw Lam\ ti 0 d A. ) ROAD -- r i 1= NM >. IN MI IN M -. rr >s -111..111e---__ _ —ral—IIN I% , i 4606 - 1770 1766 1762. ' r A Qv \fit, J 1 V �•.`—"' N 1736.:4619 \ I 46041 ; NOKIA .1758 , j `"� r • C)�{ f' _ % ` 1738 ' ` A 4623 Y, v 4620 4608 1 , 4611 4612; , i : \s,..1.-:„..,.::::. : "4 i 1 ¢a 1 1740 , ' 1627 ■ ■ 1 ^- �� , \ 4624 1 11743 4615 ;P :.. GALAXIE I '4625,' 1765 1761 , , 1737 ■ \_ 1747,,.....__ CT. 4620 1769 WAY 1757 ■ 0 — - 1 4628 4�'ID /�� \�" .. LL�... ]733 in - ON I. .. MI W a6 4626 4653 4).1165 6-.1% V' ' 1731 ._ "726 1750 1746 1834 4637 0 Q 4654 0 "I4 4650_ 1729 >x� ■ 1830 ' -vJ - 184618421838 KARIC 1826 - 46450 � R 1822 `-.1 _ .--"'. 655: ' 1818 1814 1847 /8391535 - `--- --17241 4657.. 4657 .. 1725 4661 r „, ... 4658 �= 1715 ' 1719 f> • , 4662 4661 ,�"� '�'� 1722 1 \. I 1 _1 ,1 1 1727 465B 1790 1810 1806 1802 1794 1798 • `151849 IB41lL`� X` 1645' \ S 1837 •,,\ 1852 - 1823-: 1948 CT. "/"` 4735 ��4739 �%4741 4745 4750 4749 :. 4752 4751 —I 4753 • .4754 6)2 4676 4678 t ._ 4690 4682 T_ 4684468 69 6, '- 4688 4690 4692 "" 4694 696 4698, � J f s 1757 • �s 1753 . 1751 1747 ✓1 1743 - S;,' ...1741 a , 0 O JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE LANE 4741 1762 1758 1756 ;4 4758763 .1760 4765 ,1848 1795 O\Ziez • ..., 7 t �� /.�.`. .-;,...,,,. • 1797�� 1726 1.730;"/,.." 1754 MI tem \� /-• �s4 1 18111�("-O� witSS� .1736 1746 17521r $ 211P SO 1815 4I 1819 iR 1839 19 .85510511847 1843 1823 M-- -MINII NZ MI II 474E ■ 4747 , 4746 W 47.:::: 75 l (3 _ 4752 D 4759 ,4758 , Q { ■ 4765 4764, 4769 44776841 ,40 ■ 11111.11 IN ell0 LEGEND M RIM ASSESSMENT AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS G:Feosibility Reports2005\Proj915RidgecliffCovington\Streetlmprov_3B 11-12-04 c.--). City of Eagan Ridgecliff / ParkRidge / Berkshire Ponds Add., Covington Lane / Galaxie Avenue Street Improvements / Assessment Area City Project 915 Fig. 2B 60' ROW 32' (F—F) 3" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 6" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Existing Typical Section 60' ROW EX. D412 CURB & GUTTER EDGE MILL (6'-8' wide) Typ. 32' (F—F) 11/2" TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY REPLACE EX. CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 3" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 6" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Bituminous Street Overlay Proposed Typical Section G: FeasibitityReports2005\Ridgecliff_Etc Proj 915\3AA 10-11-04 (I'City of Eagan Ridgecliff / ParkRidge / Berkshire Ponds Add., Covington Lane / Galaxie Avenue Typical Section - Local Streets - City Project 915 Fig. 3A 0' ROW 44' (F—F) CONCRETE SIDEWALK ( VARIABLE ) 4 1/2" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 12" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Existing Typical Section Collector Streets ( Galaxie Avenue ) 80' ROW EX. B618 CURB & GUTTER EDGE MILL (6'-8' wide) Typ. 44' (F—F) < > 11/2' TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 4 1/2" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 12" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Bituminous Street Overlay REPLACE EX. CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED Proposed Typical Section G: FeosibilityReports2D05\412_Windcrest_\typical sections3B 10-11-04 .4;)City of Eagan Ridgecliff /Parkridge/Berkshire Pond Add./Covington Ln./Galaxie Ave. Typical Sections - Collector Streets - Project 915 Fig.3B CITY PROJECT NO 915 INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING RIDGECLIFFE/ BERKSHIRE/ GALAXIE/ COVINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2004 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Attendance: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer, 7 residents representing 6. properties (see attached sign -in sheet). A. Presentation of Project Details • Gorder welcomed the residents and provided project presentation, including details such as construction, costs, schedule and assessments. B. Questions/ Comments • Will there be any signal work done at Cliff and Galaxie as part of this project? Other than appropriate pavement markings to delineate the lanes, no signal revisions are proposed. The signal is maintained by Dakota County, and any street and signal revisions to accommodate left turns would need to be warranted, and initiated by the County. • I live in the Ridgecliffe townhomes off of Karis Way. We have a private street. How was the direct/ indirect access distinction made? The Ridgcliffe townhomes have drives leading off the public street that, even though they have street names, are considered driveways because they are built to a lesser standard than a private street, with no concrete curb & gutter, substandard width, and no turnarounds. • When Galaxie was shut down for work after the July 2000 storm, traffic was funneled through our neighborhood. Will this construction cause similar detouring of traffic? No. All work will be done under traffic with no detours through residential areas. • How is the curb & gutter replacement determined? City staff walks the curb lines, preferably after a rainfall, to determine which portions of curb are to be replaced due to severe cracking or poor drainage. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. F:\GROUP\ENGINEER\Russ Matthys\'04\Misc\Minutes - 915 Ridgecliffe etal.doc NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING RIDGECLIFF/PARK RIDGE/BERSHIRE PONDS/COVINGTON LANE/GALAXIE AVE PROJECT 915 NAME 7' 1. THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2004 — 7:00 P.M. ADDRESS 7S lcra 1hr- /i/ /7/x.1 3. / 'if'( iJ 4. /,' ?,l`� -�. � 2 L .A , 5. C'] 6. -) r )?, vf c1. j G'� i (�, 4, 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. G:FORMS/SIGN-I N.Sheet C o(c); �3 L-nC' y >V21-,751., Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 E. PROJECT 878, CINNAMON RIDGE ADDITIONS - STREET OVERLAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Project 878 (Cinnamon Ridge Additions— Street Overlay) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: • Since 1990, the City has implemented a comprehensive Pavement Management Program that provides timely pavement rehabilitation to our local streets, significantly extending their overall life expectancy. During these past fourteen years, the City has rehabilitated approximately 67 miles of local streets. • The resurfacing of Slater Road (north of Cliff Road) and Cinnamon Ridge Trail, all within the Cinnamon Ridge neighborhood has been programmed for 2005 in the City's 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program. In September, 2003, advanced notices of this pending capital improvement were sent to all affected property owners. • On June 1, 2004, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule of the rehabilitation of the streets within the Cinnamon Ridge area, located north of Cliff Road, west of Hwy. 77 (Cedar Avenue). • On November 16, 2004, the feasibility report for Project 878 was presented to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for December 13 to formally present and discuss the report with the adjacent property owners. • An informational neighborhood meeting was held on December 9 in the City Hall Council Chambers for the adjacent property owners and representatives to discuss the proposed improvements. Of the 262 total single-family and townhome properties, and 11 apartment properties proposed to be assessed under this improvement, 1 person representing 1 property (< 1 %) attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages/ (/through] • Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, pages through /Dj city of eagan Report for Cinnamon Ridge Additions Neighborhood Street Revitalization City Project No. 878 December, 2004 /O 9 Eagan, Minnesota PAT GEAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TILLEY Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator city of eagan Municipal Center: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Phone: 651.675.5000' Fax: 651.675.5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Facility: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community December 9, 2004 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Cinnamon Ridge Additions Street Improvements City Project No. 878 Dear Mayor and City Council: Attached is our report for the Cinnamon Ridge Additions Street Improvements, City Project No. 878. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost estimate, preliminary assessment roll and schedule. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and discuss the contents of this report. Sincerely, ti P. Gorder Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By: Dept. of PI 1 lic Works Reviewed : v: inance I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. -6 rig John P. Gorder Date: f 2 7 "° I Reg. No. 22813 jos Date: 12 O1 -04- 17, O4 tZ .,9 .611 Date: TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal/Certification Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Scope 2 Feasibility and Recommendations 3 Street Evaluation 3 Proposed Improvements 4 Easements/Permits 5 Cost Estimate 5 Assessments 6 Low Density Residential.................................................... .............. ............. 6 High Density Residential...... 7 Assessment Financing Options 8 Revenue Source 9 Project Schedule 10 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix C Figures - I Location Map - 2 Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map - 2A & B Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map — Larger Scale - 3 Typical Section — Overlay December 2004 Street Improvement Report Cinnamon Ridge Additions Eagan, Minnesota Introduction/ History As a part of Eagan's Pavement Management Program, (PMP), the City evaluates streets within the community throughout their life cycle and implements appropriate maintenance strategies. In 1989, a Pavement Management System (PMS) was developed that allowed the City to evaluate the condition of the existing pavement surface for all the streets on a routine basis and schedule timely maintenance. A Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for street rehabilitation is developed from this information. The approximately 1 mile of 32' wide streets within the Cinnamon Ridge Additions neighborhood area are identified for street overlay improvements in 2005. Figure 1, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project location. The streets within the neighborhood were constructed between 1982 and 1985, as part of adjacent development. Based on the data and engineering strategies available at this time, the City's current PMP incorporates local and ongoing maintenance strategies with seal coating occurring as needed at 5 to 7 years, again at 12 to 14 years with a bituminous overlay at approximately 20 years. Overlaying these roadways located within the project area, which are presently in the 20 to 23 year time frame, will prevent further decay of the pavement surface, thus protecting and extending the structural life of the street. Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 1 /a 7 Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous patching, crack sealing and seal coating have occurred at appropriate intervals during the Life of the street pavements. The streets in the neighborhood were seal coated in 1986, 1990, and 1998. The Public Works maintenance program typically includes patching and refurbishing during the construction season prior to the overlay. The Public Works crews, as part of the Preparatory Pavement Management Plan, removed and replaced deteriorated pavement areas and placed leveling and maintenance overlays on portions of the streets under consideration, if necessary. These repairs alone will not substantially extend the life expectancy of the street pavements if not combined with the proposed structural bituminous overlay proposed with this project. The Public Works Department has also inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer) in the project area and determined the system is in good working order and that no major repairs are necessary. Scope This project provides for resurfacing (edge mill and overlay) approximately 0.7 miles of roadways. Figures 2, 3A & 13, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project area. The neighborhood has numerous private street cul-de-sacs that intersect with the public streets. Maintenance of these private streets is the responsibility of the townhome associations and not included in this project. Included in this project is replacement of the damaged curb and gutter, adjustments and/or replacement to sanitary/storm sewer utility castings, and water gate valves. Cinnamon Ridge Additions Pase,e Feasibility and Recommendations This project is necessary to prevent further decay of the pavement section, create a safer driving surface, increase ride -ability and add structural strength. This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement (resurfacing) is considerably less expensive than complete reconstruction of these streets. This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint in that this type of improvement has been used successfully to extend the life expectancy of numerous other streets throughout the City and the region. This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2005 — 2009) for the City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Management Program. It is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report in combination with other similar projects in the area. Street Evaluation The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition for each street. The general categories that define PCI rankings areas follows: PCI Recommended Improvement 56 - 100 Routine Maintenance/Crack Seal/Seal Coat 36 - 55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0 - 35 Reconstruct The 2004 PCI rankings for Cinnamon Ridge Additions has a neighborhood weighted average pavement condition rating of 37 which falls within in the rankings of the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" category. The PCI ratings are within the limits of the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 3 /6 category. Therefore, with this rating and the age of the streets, the 2005 construction season is the optimal time to construct the bituminous overlay on these streets. Proposed Improvements Pavement - The proposed street improvements are shown in Figures 4. The existing street sections consist of a 3" bituminous pavement supported by 6" — 12" gravel base. The existing bituminous surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb and gutter (6'-8' wide) to accommodate a 11/2 -inch bituminous overlay. The overlay, combined with the existing street section, will provide a street section consistent with current City standards for a residential street. The combination of patching, and overlay will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature extremes experienced in Minnesota. Bituminous overlays will show some continued frost movements and reflective cracking consistent with the underlying pavement. Routine maintenance will still need to continue under the City's Pavement Management Program. Concrete curb & gutter - Damaged curb and gutter will be replaced if severely cracked, spalled, or settled. It is estimated that approximately 13% (0.3 miles) of the existing concrete curb and gutter will have to be replaced. Boulevard sod will be removed and replaced by a new 2' wide roll behind each section of curb and gutter that is replaced. While the contractor who performs the work is responsible for it's establishment in the first 30 days after placement, adjacent residents are encouraged to consistently water the new sod to help ensure its growth. A guide to maintenance of the sod will be distributed to the residents prior to this construction activity. Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 4 Signage - Traffic control and street identification signage will be replaced if the reflectivity has diminished, support posts have deteriorated, or if the signs or posts no longer meet City standards. Example of a recent street overlay project in Eagan (Oak Chase 6th/Ches Mar East, 2002) Easement/Permits All work will be in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. It is anticipated that no permits will be required for the resurfacing project. Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 2005 construction costs and include a 5% contingency and indirect cost of 30%, which include legal, administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows: • Edge Mill and Overlay $146,220 • Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter $103;870 Total $250,090 Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 5 /1/ Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the total improvement with costs allocated in accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for a mill and overlay improvement for local streets. All assessments will be revised based on final costs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. City Special Assessment Policy Mill and Overlay • Low Density Residential (R-1,2,3) • Multiple Residential (R-4) Repair Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter Low Density Residential Lots — (R-1, R-2, R3) Assessment Ratio Property City 50% 75% 0% 50% 25% 100% Direct Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (105.5 Total, 16 single-family, 119 townhouse units at 75% lot equivalents) as shown on Figure 2, having direct driveway access on to the streets to be improved are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the streets within the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R-1, R-2) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet). The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent is as follows: 1) % Residential (R-1,2,3) with direct access = 5,933 front footage / 11,129 (total f.f.) = 53.3% 2) [$146,220 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 50% x 53.3% = $39,070 [Total Residential Assessment (R-1, 2, 3 with direct driveway)] 3) $39,070 (R -L2, 3 Residential Assessment) -* $370/ lot (R-1,2,3) i. 105.5 Res. Lot Equivalents 4) Town house => 75% of a Single Family Lot (0.75 x $370/ lot) = $278/ Townhouse/ Condo Unit Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 6 Indirect Driveway Access - All residential equivalent properties (105.75 Total, 42 single-family lots, 85 townhomes/ condos = 63.75 lot equivalents) as shown on Figure 2, having indirect driveway access, via privately maintained streets, on to the streets to be improved are proposed to be assessed, based on the amount of front footage adjacent to the project. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for residential properties (R-1, R-2, R-3) based on a normal residential width street (32 feet). The estimated cost per residential lot equivalent is as follows: 1) % Residential (R-1,2,3) with indirect access = 2,326 front footage / 11,129 (total f.f.) = 20.9% 2) [$146,220 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 50% x 20.9% = $15,320 [Total Residential Assessment (R-1, 2, 3 with indirect driveway)] 3) $15,320 (R-1,2,3 Residential Assessment) 4 $145/ lot (R-1,2) i. 105.75 Residential Lot Equivalents 4) Town house => 75% of a Single Family Lot (0.75 x $145/ lot) = $109/ Townhouse/ Condo Unit High Density Residential Lots (R-4) All high density R-4 residential lots as shown on Figure 2, having driveway access on to the streets to be improved are proposed to be assessed. The City's Assessment Policy states that 75% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for these residential properties. The estimated cost per R-4 residential foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is $9.88 per foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % High Density Residential (R-4) = 2,735 f.f. / 11,129 (total f.f.) = 24.6% 2) [$146,220 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 75% x 24.6% = $27,020 [Total High Density Residential Assessment (R-4)] 3) $27,020 (High Density Residential Assessment) 4 $9.88/foot (R-4) 2,735 High Density Residential F.F Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 7 //3 Neighborhood Parks The City's Cinnamon Park is adjacent to streets within the project and is proposed to be assessed. The City's Assessment Policy states that 50% of the mill & overlay costs are assessable for neighborhood parks based on a normal residential street width (32 feet). The estimated cost per neighborhood park front foot is $6.59/ foot and is calculated as follows: 1) % Neighborhood Park = 135 f.f. / 11,129 (total f.f.) = 1.2% 2) [$146,220 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 50% x 1.2% =$890 (Park Assessment) 3) $890 (Neighborhood Park Assessment) $6.59/front foot 135 Neighborhood Park F.F Assessment Financing Options The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over five years with the interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. The following payment schedule will result for a single-family lot equivalent based on an estimated 5% interest for the assessed amounts: Single Family Residential Lot w/ direct driveway access = $370 Townhouse/ Condo Unit with direct driveway access = $278 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $74 $19 $93 Fifth Year $74 $4 $78 Townhouse/ Condo Unit with direct driveway access = $278 Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page $ / Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $56 $14 $70 Fifth Year $56 $3 $59 Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page $ / Single Family Residential Lot w/ indirect driveway access = $145 Townhouse/ Condo Unit w/ indirect driveway access = $109 Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $29 $7 $36 Fifth Year $29 $2 $31 Townhouse/ Condo Unit w/ indirect driveway access = $109 Revenue Source A summary of revenue sources is listed below: Principal Per Year Interest Per Year Cost Per Year First Year $22 $5 $27 Fifth Year $22 $1 $23 Revenue Source A summary of revenue sources is listed below: The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $167,790 (67% of total). Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 9 //% Project Cost Property Assessment City Contribution Mill and Overlay $146,220 $82,300 ($63,320) Repair Existing Curb $103,870 -0- ($103,870) Totals $250,090 $82,300 ($167,790) The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $167,790 (67% of total). Cinnamon Ridge Additions Page 9 //% Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council/ Order Public Hearing November 16, 2004 Neighborhood Meeting December 9, 2004 Public Hearing December 13, 2004 Approve Plans and Specifications February, 2005 Award Contract March, 2005 Project Completion August, 2005 Final Cost Report September, 2005 Final Assessment Hearing Fall, 2005 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement May 15, 2006 Cinnamon Ridge Additions Pagel 100 Appendix A -Street Overlay - City Project No. 878 Preliminary Cost Estimate Cinnamon Ridge Additions I. Bituminous Street Overla Item Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Est. Cost Mobilization L.S. 1 $2,500.00 $2,500 Mill Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 7,900 $1.15 $9,090 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture Ton 1,900 $36.00 $68,400 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 1,000 $2.00 $2,000 Adjust Valve Box Each 10 $175.00 $1,750 Repair Valve Top Section Each 5 $275.00 $1,380 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (MH) Each 42 $400.00 $16,800 Traffic Control L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000 Replace Traffic & Street Signs L.S. 1 $4,200.00 $4,200 Subtotal $107,120 + 5% Contingencies $5,360 Subtotal $112,480 - 30% Indirect Costs $33,740 TOTAL $146,220 II. Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter Item Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Est. Cost Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 1,500 $5.00 $7,500 D412 Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 1,200 $20.00 $24,000 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 300 $21.00 $6,300 Remove Conc. Valley Gutter S.Y. 50 $10.00 $500 Concrete Valley Gutter S.Y. 50 $50.00 $2,500 Conc Sidewalk R & R w/ Trunc Domes S.F. 400 $15.00 $6,000 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (C.B) Each 28 $300.00 $8,400 Sod w/Topsoil S.Y. 400 $12.00 $4,800 Bituminous Street Patching Ton 150 $90.00 $13,500 Bituminous Driveway Patching S.Y. 100 $26.00 $2,600 Subtotal $76,100 + 5% Contingencies $3,800 Subtotal $79,900 - 30% Indirect Costs $23,970 TOTAL $103,870 TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,090 1/ Appendix B - City Project No. 878 Preliminary Assessment Roll Cinnamon Ridge Additions Street Overlay Parcel P.I.N. Lot Equivalent Unit Assessment Total Cinnamon Ridge Carriage Homes - Condominium No. 41 4509 Cinnamon Ridge Trail (15650 Green Meadows Circle) 10-17400-166-00 0.75 $370 $278 4524 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-145-00 0.75 $370 $278 4474 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-204-00 0.75 $370 $278 4474 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-203-00 0.75 $370 $278 4476 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-198-00 0.75 $370 $278 4476 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-197-00 0.75 $370 $278 4478A Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-201-00 0.75 $370 $278 4478B Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-202-00 0.75 $370 $278 4480 Cinnamon Ridge Trail, Unit A 10-17400-200-00 0.75 $370 $278 4480 Cinnamon Ridge Trail, Unit B 10-17400-199-00 0.75 $370 $278 4482 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-196-00 0.75 $370 $278 4482 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-195-00 0.75 $370 $278 4484 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-190-00 0.75 $370 $278 4484 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-189-00 0.75 $370 $278 4486 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-194-00 0.75 $370 $278 4486 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-193-00 0.75 $370 $278 4488 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-192-00 0.75 $370 $278 4488 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-191-00 0.75 $370 $278 4490 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-187-00 0.75 $370 $278 4490 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-188-00 0.75 $370 $278 4492 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-181-00 0.75 $370 $278 4492 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-182-00 0.75 $370 $278 4494B Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-185-00 0.75 $370 $278 4494C Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-186-00 0.75 $370 $278 4496 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-184-00 0.75 $370 $278 4496 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-183-00 0.75 $370 $278 4501 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-173-00 0.75 $370 $278 4501 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-174-00 0.75 $370 $278 4502 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-159-00 0.75 $370 $278 4502 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-160-00 0.75 $370 $278 4503 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-180-00 0.75 $370 $278 4503 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-179-00 0.75 $370 $278 4504 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-164-00 0.75 $370 $278 4504 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-163-00 0.75 $370 $278 4505 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-176-00 0.75 $370 $278 //3" 4505 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-175-00 0.75 $370 $278 4506 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Apt. 18 10-17400-158-00 0.75 $370 $278 4506 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-157-00 0.75 $370 $278 4507 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-178-00 0.75 $370 $278 4507 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-177-00 0.75 $370 $278 4508 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-162-00 0.75 $370 $278 4508 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-161-00 0.75 $370 $278 4509 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-165-00 0.75 $370 $278 4510 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-152-00 0.75 $370 $278 4510 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-151-00 0,75 $370 $278 4511 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-172-00 0.75 $370 $278 4511 Cinnamon Ridge Trail #B 10-17400-171-00 0.75 $370 $278 4512 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-156-00 0.75 $370 $278 4512 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-155-00 0.75 $370 $278 4513 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-168-00 0.75 $370 $278 4513 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-167-00 0.75 $370 $278 4514 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-149-00 0.75 $370 $278 4514 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-150-00 0.75 $370 $278 4515 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-170-00 0.75 $370 $278 4515 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-169-00 0.75 $370 $278 4516 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-154-00 0.75 $370 $278 4516 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-153-00 0.75 $370 $278 4518 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-144-00 0.75 $370 $278 4518 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-143-00 0.75 $370 $278 4520 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-148-00 0.75 $370 $278 4520 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit B 10-17400-147-00 0.75 $370 $278 4522 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-142-00 0.75 $370 $278 4522 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Apt. B 10-17400-141-00 0.75 $370 $278 4524 Cinnamon Ridge Trail Unit A 10-17400-146-00 0.75 $370 $278 4528 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-121-01 0.75 $370 $278 Subtotal 48 $17,760 Cinnamon Rid a 1st Addition - Block 1 4594 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 4596 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 4590 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-011-01 10-17400-012-01 10-17400-021-01 0.75 0.75 0.75 $370 $370 $370 $278 $278 $278 4588 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-022-01 0.75 $370 $278 4582 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-031-01 0.75 $370 $278 4584 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-032-01 0.75 $370 $278 4578 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-041-01 0.75 $370 $278 4576 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-042-01 0.75 $370 $278 4572 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-051-01 0.75 $370 $278 4570 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-052-01 0.75 $370 $278 4564 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-061-01 0.75 $370 $278 4566 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-062-01 0.75 $370 $278 4558 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-071-01 0.75 $370 $278 /19 4560 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-072-01 0.75 $370 $278 4552 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-081-01 0.75 $370 $278 4554 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-082-01 0.75 $370 $278 4548 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-091-01 0.75 $370 $278 4546 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-092-01 0.75 $370 $278 4540 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-101-01 0.75 $370 $278 4542 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-102-01 0.75 $370 $278 4534 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-111-01 0.75 $370 $278 4536 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-112-01 0.75 $370 $278 4528 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-121-01 0.75 $370 $278 4530 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-122-01 Subtotal Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition - Block 2 0.75 18 $370 $278 $6,660 Dakota Electric Substation 10-03000-010-52 1 $370 $370 4585 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-010-02 1 $370 $370 4581 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-020-02 1 $370 $370 4577 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-030-02 1 $370 $370 4571 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-040-02 1 $370 $370 4565 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-050-02 1 $370 $370 4559 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-060-02 1 $370 $370 4555 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-070-02 1 $370 $370 4551 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-080-02 1 $370 $370 4545 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-090-02 1 $370 $370 4541 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17400-100-02 1 $370 $370 Subtotal 11 $4,070 Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition - Block 4 4496 Slater Road 10-17400-011-04 0.75 $370 $278 4498 Slater Road 10-17400-012-04 0.75 $370 $278 4502 Slater Road 10-17400-021-04 0.75 $370 $278 4504 Slater Road 10-17400-022-04 0.75 $370 $278 4510 Slater Road 10-17400-031-04 0.75 $370 $278 4508 Slater Road 10-17400-032-04 0.75 $370 $278 4514 Slater Road 10-17400-041-04 0.75 $370 $278 4516 Slater Road 10-17400-042-04 0.75 $370 $278 Subtotal 6 $2,220 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Block 1 4489 Slater Road 10-17402-010-01 1 $370 $370 4485 Slater Road 10-17402-020-01 1 $370 $370 4481 Slater Road 10-17402-030-01 1 $370 $370 4477 Slater Road 10-17402-040-01 1 $370 $370 4473 Slater Road 10-17402-050-01 1 $370 $370 Subtotal 5 $1,850 Sao Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Block 3 4474 Slater Road 10-17402-011-03 0.75 $370 $278 4476 Slater Road 10-17402-012-03 0.75 $370 $278 4470 Slater Road 10-17402-021-03 0.75 $370 $278 4468 Slater Road 10-17402-022-03 0.75 $370 $278 4464 Slater Road 10-17402-031-03 0.75 $370 $278 4462 Slater Road 10-17402-032-03 0.75 $370 $278 4456 Slater Road 10-17402-041-03 0.75 $370 $278 4458 Slater Road 10-17402-042-03 0.75 $370 $278 4450 Slater Road 10-17402-051-03 0.75 $370 $278 4452 Slater Road 10-17402-052-03 0.75 $370 $278 4446 Slater Road 10-17402-061-03 0.75 $370 $278 4444 Slater Road 10-17402-062-03 0.75 $370 $278 4438 Slater Road 10-17402-071-03 0.75 $370 $278 4436 Slater Road 10-17402-072-03 0.75 $370 $278 4430 Slater Road 10-17402-081-03 0.75 $370 $278 4428 Slater Road 10-17402-082-03 0.75 $370 $278 4414 Slater Road 10-17402-091-03 0.75 $370 $278 4416 Slater Road 10-17402-092-03 0.75 $370 $278 Subtotal 13.5 $5,000 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Block 4 4485 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17402-011-04 0.75 $370 $278 4487 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17402-012-04 0.75 $370 $278 4401 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-131-04 0.75 $370 $278 4403 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-132-04 0.75 $370 $278 Subtotal 3.0 $1,120 Cinnamon Ridge 2nd Addition 4497 Slater Road 10-17401-010-01 1 $145 $145 4499 Slater Road 10-17401-020-01 1 $145 $145 4501 Slater Road 10-17401-030-01 1 $145 $145 4503 Slater Road 10-17401-040-01 1 $145 $145 4505 Slater Road 10-17401-050-01 1 $145 $145 4507 Slater Road 10-17401-060-01 1 $145 $145 4509 Slater Road 10-17401-070-01 1 $145 $145 4527 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-080-01 1 $145 $145 4529 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-090-01 1 $145 $145 4531 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-100-01 1 $145 $145 4533 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-110-01 1 $145 $145 4535 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-120-01 1 $145 $145 4537 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-130-01 1 $145 $145 4539 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17401-140-01 1 $145 $145 Subtotal 14 $2,030 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Block 2 4467 Slater Road 10-17402-011-02 1 $145 $145 4465 Slater Road 10-17402-021-02 1 $145 $145 4463 Slater Road 10-17402-031-02 1 $145 $145 4461 Slater Road 10-17402-041-02 1 $145 $145 4459 Slater Road 10-17402-051-02 1 $145 $145 4457 Slater Road 10-17402-061-02 1 $145 $145 4455 Slater Road 10-17402-071-02 1 $145 $145 4449 Slater Road 10-17402-080-02 1 $145 $145 4447 Slater Road 10-17402-090-02 1 $145 $145 4445 Slater Road 10-17402-100-02 1 $145 $145 4443 Slater Road 10-17402-110-02 1 $145 $145 4441 Slater Road 10-17402-120-02 1 $145 $145 4439 Slater Road 10-17402-130-02 1 $145 $145 4437 Slater Road 10-17402-140-02 1 $145 $145 4431 Slater Road 10-17402-151-02 1 $145 $145 4429 Slater Road 10-17402-161-02 1 $145 $145 4427 Slater Road 10-17402-171-02 1 $145 $145 4425 Slater Road 10-17402-181-02 1 $145 $145 4423 Slater Road 10-17402-191-02 1 $145 $145 4421 Slater Road 10-17402-201-02 1 $145 $145 4419 Slater Road 10-17402-211-02 1 $145 $145 4413 Slater Road 10-17402-220-02 1 $145 $145 4411 Slater Road 10-17402-230-02 1 $145 $145 4409 Slater Road 10-17402-240-02 1 $145 $145 4407 Slater Road 10-17402-250-02 1 $145 $145 4405 Slater Road 10-17402-260-02 1 $145 $145 4403 Slater Road 10-17402-270-02 1 $145 $145 4401 Slater Road 10-17402-280-02 1 $145 $145 Subtotal 28 $4,060 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Block 4 4469 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-021-04 0.75 $145 $195 4467 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-022-04 0.75 $145 $195 4461 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-031-04 0.75 $145 $195 4463 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-032-04 0.75 $145 $195 4455 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-041-04 0.75 $145 $195 4457 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-042-04 0.75 $145 $195 4449 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-051-04 0.75 $145 $195 4451 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-052-04 0.75 $145 $195 4443 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-061-04 0.75 $145 $195 4445 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-062-04 0.75 $145 $195 4439 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-071-04 0.75 $145 $195 4437 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-072-04 0.75 $145 $195 4433 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-081-04 0.75 $145 $195 4431 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-082-04 0.75 $145 $195 4427 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-091-04 0.75 $145 $195 4425 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-092-04 0.75 $145 $195 4421 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-101-04 0.75 $145 $195 4419 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-102-04 0.75 $145 $195 4413 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-111-04 0.75 $145 $195 4415 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-112-04 0.75 $145 $195 4407 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-121-04 0.75 $145 $195 4409 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-122-04 0.75 $145 $195 Subtotal 16.5 $2,390 Cinnamon RidgOrd Addition - Block 5 4468 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-011-05 0.75 $145 $109 4470 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-012-05 0.75 $145 $109 4462 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-021-05 0.75 $145 $109 4464 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-022-05 0.75 $145 $109 4456 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-031-05 0.75 $145 $109 4454 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-032-05 0.75 $145 $109 4420 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-041-05 0.75 $145 $109 4422 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-042-05 0.75 $145 $109 4410 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-051-05 0.75 $145 $109 4408 Cinnamon Ridge Circle 10-17402-052-05 0.75 $145 $109 Subtotal 7.5 $1,090 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition - Outlot F Cinnamon Park - City of Eagan 10-17402-060-00 $890 Cinnamon Ridge 4th Addition - Block 1 4470 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-011-01 0.75 $145 $109 4472 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-012-01 0.75 $145 $109 4466 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-021-01 0.75 $145 $109 4468 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-022-01 0.75 $145 $109 4464 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-031-01 0.75 $145 $109 4462 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-032-01 0.75 $145 $109 4458 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-041-01 0.75 $145 $109 4460 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-042-01 0.75 $145 $109 4454 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-051-01 0.75 $145 $109 4456 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-052-01 0.75 $145 $109 4450 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-061-01 0.75 $145 $109 4452 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-062-01 0.75 $145 $109 4446 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-071-01 0.75 $145 $109 4448 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-072-01 0.75 $245 $109 4444 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-081-01 0.75 $145 $109 4442 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17403-082-01 0.75 $145 $109 Subtotal 12 $1,740 /.23 Cinnamon Ridge 5th Addition - Block 1 4438 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-011-01 0.75 $145 $109 4440 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-012-01 0.75 $145 $109 4434 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-021-01 0.75 $145 $109 4436 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-022-01 0.75 $145 $109 4430 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-031-01 0.75 $145 $109 4432 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-032-01 0.75 $145 $109 4426 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-041-01 0.75 $145 $109 4428 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-042-01 0.75 $145 $109 4422 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-051-01 0.75 $145 $109 4424 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-052-01 0.75 $145 $109 4420 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-061-01 0.75 $145 $109 4418 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-062-01 0.75 $145 $109 4416 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-071-01 0.75 $145 $109 4414 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-072-01 0.75 $145 $109 4412 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-081-01 0.75 $145 $109 4410 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17404-082-01 0.75 $145 $109 Subtotal 12 $1,740 Cinnamon Ride 60` Addition - Block 1 4406 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-011-01 0.75 $145 $109 4408 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-012-01 0.75 $145 $109 4404 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-021-01 0.75 $145 $109 4402 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-022-01 0.75 $145 $109 4400 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-031-01 0.75 $145 $109 4398 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-032-01 0.75 $145 $109 4396 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-041-01 0.75 $145 $109 4394 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-042-01 0.75 $145 $109 4392 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-051-01 0.75 $145 $109 4390 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-052-01 0.75 $145 $109 4388 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-061-01 0.75 $145 $109 4386 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-062-01 0.75 $145 $109 4384 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-071-01 0.75 $145 $109 4382 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-072-01 0.75 $145 $109 4380 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-081-01 0.75 $145 $109 4378 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-082-01 0.75 $145 $109 4374 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-091-01 0.75 $145 $109 4376 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-092-01 0.75 $145 $109 4370 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-101-01 0.75 $145 $109 4372 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-102-01 0.75 $145 $109 4368 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-111-01 0.75 $145 $109 4366 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 10-17405-112-01 0.75 $145 $109 Subtotal 16.5 $2,390 �a� High-Density Properties Parcel P.I.N. F.F. Rate Assmt. Cinnamon Ridge 7th Addition - Block 1 Cinnamon Ridge Limited Partnership 4598 Slater Road 4537 10-17406-020-01 4549 10-17406-030-01 4561 10-17406-040-01 4541 10-17406-050-01 4569 10-17406-070-01 4577 10-17406-080-01 4585 10-17406-100-01 Subtotal 1,341 F.F $9.88 $13,250 Cinnamon Ridge 7th Addition - Blocks 2 & 3 Cinnamon Ridge Limited Partnership 4598 Slater Road 4538 10-17406-030-02 4546 10-17406-010-02 4554 10-17406-040-02 4597 10-17406-010-03 Subtotal 1,394 F.F. $9.88 $13,770 Total Lot Equivalents = 211 (58 Single -Family, 204 Townhome/Condos), 8,259 F.F. High Density = 2,735 F.F. City Park =135 F.F. Direct D/W Access 16 SF LE 89.5 LE TH/Condo (119 Total) Indirect D/W Access 42 SF LE 63.75 TH/Condo (85 Total) TOTAL PROJECT ASSESSMENT $82,300 /JS *011 .IER „fir` 60114112alla‘* 16111 in i ^I G:Feosibility Reports20D5\878CinnomonRidge_Location mop CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 10-21-04 c> City of Eagan Cinnamon Ridge 1st - 7th Additions Location Map- City Project 878 � Loca p?� Fig. 1 N E NO SCALE 1 CITY OF BURNSVILLE DUTLOT C CITY DUTLDT E CITY OF EAGAN / i 1 I I 1 : t I ; I I I i ; I 1 I I >- I f , it I I Ill 11 1 I I , 1 . ,...---1 ii \ ' ili La > A \ \, II I I , c411 CL ii 'I II I 1 U -I I I '1,. \\ (-- t I • I C..) I I‘t '''''''.--,-----5.•.--- - ''''/I'I'''-•-• . '6' ill I 1 ‘ \\ A \ il 1 i 1 i " i i 1 : I i \I 11 1 1 1 1 \1\ \\ \ 0, \ \\ 0 \ \ \ \ i i I , 01 . \‘ 0, \\\ 4,1 i il \ \ \ \ 0 .-, 1 I 1; i I 1 1 .‘ \`...., 1 \ ? , \ \ 4 , ' 1 .,,I,, \ \ , i \ `; , ; , , 1 \ , t i l , i i \ N ‘ , 1 ,, \ 1 \ \ 1, \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ ", \ [\ ,i 1 1 \ 1 i 1 CITY OF BURNSVILLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 F G:Feosibility Reports2005\Proj876\StreetImprov City of Eagan WOOS IONE .011 WOW NOM CLIFF ROAD LEGEND MEI 4."t,Iat;;;;It°1'W.40;414;k:Ali, ASSESSMENT AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS 10-18-04 Cinnamon Ridge 1st - 7th Additions Street Improvements / Area Assessment Ma,/02y City Project 878 Fig. 2 lEf W E S DUTLDT E NO SCALE Y DF EAGAN City of Burnsville 1 </44 / 4441 ‘\ 4443 4445 ~ri 4 T \•\� Zri \ f44rl 57 /L1 `+449\ 4423 % }4409 ./4425,1% : 4214411\4 / \ r' 1 ; 4407 27 • 4405 /•'\ >/ v w \ 4 9 z --=f ��` 4403 r: \,/h,\ \ \442_9{ J\l� j44130 1 \// 4. c;ya \4459 a3- 4031 . ..' 4401 7 ` \,s/ ,/� 4437// /, 4463 Ny �J \, \~' \\ , ,1A \ \ 4455 Yah \;,4465 %''``- \•\ 4473 \4467/% 77 1 1 i' l' I. 1 1 1 1 I 1 ;-I 1 .1 k4476 ,/ DUTLOT 45fl /, \/\ .•, \.� 37 S "'o 545 Q\\U. ~ ' 4S\trey, 0 1 5442 g 4546 5 G:Feosibility Reports2005\Proj87BCinnamonRidge_Assess c) City of Eagan 454, LEGEND N MN MI MN (Di i CD I W I � LL ? i • it Q, ASSESSMENT AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS 11-1-04 Cinnamon Ridge 1st -7th Additions Street Improvements / Area Assessment Maphy City Project 878 Fig. 2A N 44 W E 50Q/2 NO SCALE ,4q.-7,-% YJ '*, v /; ,'k°�',02, CQN� De r (p�/ ito 4'''---3.>/ \\ \ \ p -4511.4113I 450 4529\ 53ti I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4591" 4565 571 '!F 577 . 4584 ._.-• 4588: ' "4590 - 45941 4567; 1 4596 CLIFF ROAD G:Feosibility Reports2005\Proj87BCinnomonRidge_Assess LEGEND — — ma on ASSESSMENT AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS 11-1-04 c> City of Eagan Cinnamon Ridge 1st -7th Additions Street Improvements / Area Assessment Map City Project 878 p2 Fig. 2B 60' ROW 32' (F—F) 3" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 6" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Existing Typical Section 60' ROW EX. B618 CURB & GUTTER EDGE MILL (6'-8' wide) Typ. 32' (F—F) > 1112" TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY > BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 3" BITUMINOUS SURFACE 6" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE Bituminous Street Overlay REPLACE EX. CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED Proposed Typical Section G: FeasibilityReports2D05\CinnamonRidge_878 \typical sections 10-11-04 City of Eagan Cinnamon Ridge 1st - 7th Addition Typical Sections - Project 878 /1/436 Fig. 3 CITY PROJECT NO 878 INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CINNAMON RIDGE STREET IMPROVEMENTS THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2004 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Attendance: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer, 1 residents representing 1 property (see attached sign -in sheet). A. Presentation of Project Details • Gorder welcomed the resident and provided project presentation, including details such as construction, costs, schedule and assessments. B. Questions/ Comments • There is an angle on Slater Road that is pretty severe in the winter. Will there be any modifications to road angles with this project? No. The curb and street layout will remain as is. There is not sufficient public right-of-way to construct any substantial curve modifications that would help the situation. • On another subject, how can we get the trail along Cliff Road, over Cedar Avenue, plowed in the winter? It is on our Winter Trail Maintenance schedule, but street plowing trails is the first priority after a snow. The trails are plowed after the streets have been taken care of. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. F:\GROUP\ENGINEER\Russ MatthysVO4\Misc\Minutes - 878 Cinnamon Ridge.doc /3/ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CINNAMON RIDGE 1ST — 7TH ADDITIONS PROJECT 878 THURSDAY , DECEMBER 9, 2004 — 6:00 P.M. NAME �. J 1. i cJ C ci m 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. G:FORMS/SIGN-IN.Sheet ADDRESS l51 11 L%L(QC/ice 47 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS A. 2005 Fee Schedule ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving the 2005 Fee Schedule establishing fees for various City services, supplies and materials. FACTS: • A comprehensive review of Eagan's fees compared to other metro area cities was completed a year ago in association with the Council's direction to increase total 2004 user fees by $150,000. Changes implemented by the Council in 2004 placed most fees at or near the median of comparable cities. • For 2005, many existing fees are proposed to be adjusted upward for inflation and/or other reasons. It is anticipated the revisions will continue to place Eagan's fees generally at or near the median of comparable cities. • New and revised fees related to wetlands conservation and water quality dedications have been recommended by the Advisory Parks Commission and incorporated into the proposed 2005 Fee Schedule. These fees are detailed in an attachment. • A summary of other notable changes has been prepared as an attachment. ATTACHMENTS: • A memo from Parks Administrative Coordinator Mesko outlining the wetlands conservation and water quality dedication fees is attached on pages /..94t through • A summary of other notable changes for 2005 is attached on page • A copy of the existing 2004 Fee Schedule marked up with proposed chafiges for 2005 is attached on pages %3Rthrough / 71 . • A copy of the resolution adopting the 2005 Fee Schedule is attached on page /33 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: city of eagan MEMO TOM PEPPER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHERRYL MESKO, ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR DECEMBER 8, 2004 2005 PARKS, TRAILS AND WATER QUALITY DEDICATION FEES At their November 30 meeting the Advisory Parks Commission recommended the following fee structure for 2005 parks and trails dedication. PARKS DEDICATION: 2004 2005 proposed Single Family $1913/unit $2009/unit Duplex 1909 2005 Townhouse/Quad 1734 1908 Apartment/multiple 1746 1921 Commercial $4970/ac $5218/ac Industrial 4317/ac 4532/ac TRAILS DEDICATION: 2004 2005 proposed Residential $197/unit $216/unit Commercial/Industrial 1033/ac 1137/ac WATER QUALITY DEDICATION FEES: • Eagan Code Ch. 13.20 Subd. 8.A.4. requires dedication of ponding areas in accordance with the City's stormwater management and water quality management plans. These regulations also provide, at the City's option, cash contributions be made to the water quality management fund in lieu of and/or in addition to ponding areas. • According to the regulations, such a "ponding area dedication shall be in an amount as determined by the council as reasonably necessary to comply with the city's water quality management plan. The cash contribution shall be based on a rate schedule established by resolution of the council from time to time." • Water quality dedication fees are collected when City requirements for stormwater treatment ponds are not fully met by new developments (e.g., for runoff from portions of sites or from small parcels). The fees are the calculated costs to construct stormwater treatment ponds based on the per -acre land values and per -cubic -yard excavation rate in the current Fee Schedule. • According to the City's water quality management plan, "land values for cash equivalent contributions will be consistent with the park land dedication ordinance." Currently, however, there are wide disparities between the per -acre land values for park dedications and water quality dedications: 2004 land values Land Use Parks W� Single Family $47,500 $35,250 Duplex $47,720 $35,250 Townhome/Quad $73,406 $40,980 Apartment/Multi $81,189 $44,715 Commercial $78,885 $65,800 Industrial $69,900 $65,800 2005 Recommendations: Examples of actual fees collected for selected 2004 developments Fees that would have been collected based on same acre value as the proposed 2005 parks dedication* $11,176 $15,814 $6,045 $8,554 $6,184 $8,750 $2,708 $3,831 $9,165 $12,968 $987 $1,397 $987 $1,397 $10,335 $21,999 $7,374 $9,422 $54,961 $84,132 *Also includes excavation rates at the proposed 2005 rate • Increase per -acre land values for water quality dedications to equal land values for park dedications. • Increase excavation rate from $5.30/cu. yd to $7.50/cu. yd. to fall more in line with actual excavation costs based on city costs for excavation projects under 20,000 cu. yards. NEW FEE PROPOSALS FOR 2005: 1. New Equipment Fee FACTS: • The aquatic plant harvester and conveyor are among the largest pieces of mobile equipment the City owns, yet they do not have hourly rates in the Fee Schedule. While there are no current plans to lease or contract this equipment, there may be reasons or requests for such in the future. • The harvester and conveyor would need to be operated together. The tandem -axle dump truck and the street sweeper have similar operations and functions. The current rate of each of these vehicles is $50/hour. /3S Advisory Parks Commission recommendation: Establish initial per -hour equipment rate of $50 for the combined harvester/conveyor. 2. New Fees for Wetland Conservation FACTS: • MN Rules Ch. 8420.0200 Subp. 2. C. provides that the City "may charge processing fees in amounts not greater than are necessary to cover the reasonable costs of implementing (Wetland Conservation Act Rules) and for technical and administrative assistance to landowners in processing other applications for projects affecting wetlands." • The City does not currently charge wetland application fees. Historically, only staff time spent reviewing development proposals has been accounted and debited to respective escrow accounts according to hourly staff rates in the Fee Schedule. A recent informal survey of some Metro cities indicates at least eight have fees for wetland applications. Advisory Parks Commission recommendation: Establish the following wetland application fees: 1. Exemption/no-loss determination 2. Replacement plan 3. Banking plan 4. Certificate of completion 5. Wetland decision appeal (refundable) 3. New Escrows for Replacement Plan Wetlands $100 (plus staff review time) $300 (plus staff review time) $300 (plus staff review time) $100 $500 FACTS: • Over the past year or so through the development contract process, the City has been requiring escrows for wetland replacement projects (for possible five years of monitoring and complete reconstruction). However, these escrows are not currently in the Fee Schedule. Advisory Parks Commission recommendation: Institute in the Fee Schedule the following escrows: 1. Monitoring (5 years @ $1,000/yr) $5,000 2. Reconstruction $10,000 /.3s 2005 Fee Schedule Summary of Notable Proposed Changes December 9, 2004 Page 7 Initial escrow deposits on subdivision, planned development and final plat applications are increased by roughly 50%. Escrows represent initial deposits, not actual charges. In the last year or two, the City has experienced a significant number of escrow accounts with negative balances, and collection of additional deposits has sometimes posed problems. Current deposit requirements have been at the same level since 1995, while staff rates and consulting fees charged against the deposits have escalated significantly. Page 8 Parkland, Trailway, and Water Quality dedications are increased per the Advisory Planning Commissions recommendations. (See memo from Parks Administrative Coordinator Mesko.) Page 13 Connection charges are increased by the Engineering News Review (ENR) index, per the City's standard practice. The ENR index for the past year was 8.5%. Page 14 Sanitary sewer rate is up from $1.82/thousand gallons to $1.86. The 2.2% increase reflects a pass-through of MCES rate increases. Page 14 Water rate is up from $1.00/thousand gallons to $1.05. The new rate is the same rate the City charged from 1994 to 1999. From 2000 to 2004, the rate was reduced to $1.00. In other words, the proposed rate is the same rate the City charged 11 years ago. Page 17 Street assessment rates are increased by the ENR index, per standard practice. Page 20 New wetland conservation fees and escrows are proposed. (See memo from Parks Administrative Coordinator Mesko.) Page 25 Equipment rate increases range from $2/hr to $10/hour for various units. No rate increases occurred in 2004. Staff charge -out rates are generally proposed to be increased $5/hour to reflect wage and insurance increases. Page 26 Financial Consulting services charge -out rate is increased significantly, although the rate charged by the consultant remains the same. In the past, we have charged out only the rate we pay him, but have not included administrative costs associated with the consultant currently absorbed by the City. Page 27 Antenna lease rentals are increased 6% per existing contract provisions. /3 2 city of eagan of 5 Schedule I3 4 - Approved by the City Council at its December 00, 200,E meeting. Fees are effective January 1, 200f 5 /3S' Table of Contents Page Licenses and Permits Alcohol 1 Other 2 Tobacco and Liquor License Violations 4 Development Review 5 Construction -related Permits 6 Escrow Deposits 7 Other Development -related Charges Park, Trail, Water Quality Dedication 8 Tree Mitigation/Replacement 8 Inspections Fees/Permits Building Permits 9 Mechanical Permits 10 Plumbing Permits 10 Other Inspections 11 State Surcharge 12 Utilities Fees/Charges Connection/Availability Charges 13 User Rates 14 Other Utilities Fees 15 Water Meters 16 Street and Trail Special Assessment Rates 17 Other Assessment -related Charges 17 Parks and Recreation Charges 18 Community Center Fees 21 Police Department Charges 22 Fire Department Charges 23 Fire Department Training Room Rental 24 Equipment and Staff Rates 25 Miscellaneous Fees/Charges 27 Summary of Connection Charges 30 / 39 2004' FEE SCHEDULE LICENSES AND PERMITS Alcohol Sales: Beer Application and investigation Off -sale license On -sale license Temporary license Fee $ 500.00 (1) 100.00 450.00 25.00 Liquor Application and investigation 500.00 (2) Off -sale license 200.00 On -sale license Annual sales < $275,000 5,300.00 Sales $275,000-550,000 6,300.00 Sales > $550,000 7,300.00 Sunday license 200.00 On -sale club license < 200 300.00 201-500 500.00 501-1,000 650.00 1,001-2,000 800.00 2,001-4,000 1,000.00 4,001-6,000 2,000.00 > 6,000 3,000.00 Temporary (up to 3 days) 150.00 Wine Application and investigation 500.00 (1) On -sale license 1,900.00 Sunday license 100.00 Daily consumption and display 25.00 Annual consumption and display 300.00 Daily sports or convention 50.00 Annual sports or convention 600.00 Duplicate license 5.00 Change in managers 300.00 (1) When wine and beer licenses are applied for by the same applicant, the total maximum application and investigation fee is $500.00. (2) Also requires additional fee of $200/person or entity beyond five having an interest in the proposed licensed establishment. A $1,000 escrow for up to five applicants residing outside of the state is required, plus $200/person beyond five with an interest. 1 200¢"FEE SCHEDULE LICENSES AND PERMITS (cont'd) Fee Adult establishments: Investigation $ 300.00 Annual license 5,000.00 Adult companionship/escort service provider: Investigation 300.00 Annual license (one license included w/ 850.00 adult establishment license) Amusement, mechanical 1-3 machines 4-9 machines 10-15 machines > 15 machines Contractors license — Plumbing or Sewer and Water Unlicensed Dance hall — initial investigation Dance hall — annual permit Dance, public — single event Dangerous dog registration Original registration, sign, and tag Registration renewal (2 -year) Development -related permits Dog license (2 -year) [Licenses are also available at all Eagan veterinary clinics.] Duplicate dog tag 25.00 200.00 350.00 500.00 Requires $1,000 escrow Requires $1,000 escrow per machine total total total MN Dept of Health Bond & Insurance Cert. ($25,000), and MN Master Plumbers Cert. ABC, LECET, or MUCA Pipelayer Training Certification & MN Dept of Health Contractor Bond Certificate ($25,000) 300.00 300.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 See pages 5 through 8. 14.00 2.00 Gambling — investigation Golf cart, motorized permit Golf driving range license Hunting, bow permit — resident Hunting, bow permit — non-resident 250.00 25.00 50.00 10.00 25.00 n•1 5- 2001 2001 FEE SCHEDULE LICENSES AND PERMITS (cont'd) Kennel permit - initial Kennel permit - renewal Massage therapy establishmt - investigation Massage therapy establishmt - license Massage therapist - investigation Massage therapist - license Massage therapist - off-site application Paintball facility - investigation Paintball facility - license Parade permit Pawn shop - investigation Pawn shop - license Pet shop license Fee $ 100.00 50.00 300.00 300.00 100.00 25.00 15.00 50.00 150.00 25.00 850.00 12,000.00 Rubbish hauler - comm'I, residential, recycling only, or construction/demolition debris 1st truck Each additional truck Shows (circus, carnival, etc.) Investigation License Stables license Tobacco sales license Tree contractor license includes 1 therapist license per owner 100.00 2LQO- no l ��L(% i1941-4 58:00 (DO 47a -2100 (pv,oto * yl Goer ;044 50.00 25.00 50.00 409:00-- 2O0.00 4 25.00 Apprvu-ct *3, e4fc .(l' vac. I /05 /171,1. 3 20041FEESCHEDULE TOBACCO LICENSE VIOLATIONS: Licensee: First violation at licensed premise Second violation within 24 months of first violation at licensed premise Third and subsequent violations within a 24 -month period at licensed premise Other individuals: LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS: Licensee: First violation at licensed premise Second violation within 24 months of first violation Third violation within 24 months of first violation Fourth and subsequent violations within 24 months of first violation $ 75.00 200.00 250.00 50.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 /93 4 plus seven (7) -day suspension of license plus thirty (30) -day suspension of license 200'�FEE SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW For the charges below that require escrow deposits, refer to p.7 for the amount. Application Type Fee Escrow required? Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500.00 Yes Conditional Use Permit (CUP) * 350.00 Yes Final Planned Development 350.00 Yes Final Plat 250.00 Yes Final Subdivision 250.00 Yes plus 3.00/lot Final Subdivision extension 75.00 No Interim Use Permit (IUP) * 250.00 Yes Planned Development – annual review 100.00 No Planned Development Amendment 150.00 Yes (separate from rezoning) Preliminary Planned Development 250.00 Yes Preliminary Subdivision * 350.00 Yes Rezoning * 350.00 Yes Site plan review 150.00 No Variance—residential * 200.00 Yes Variance—non-residential * 300.00 Yes Waiver of subdivision – duplex lot splits * 50.00 No Waiver of subdivision – single-family zoned * 300.00 Yes Waiver of subdivision – other * 150.00 Yes * Application to appeal is 50% of original fee. NOTE: Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Planned Developments, CUPs and IUPs do not require additional escrow if incorporated with subdivision application. iyy 2005I'FEE SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (cont'd) Driveway agreement preparation Lot combination agreement Vacation proceedings Fee $ 200.00 200.00 300.00 Industrial revenue bond and multi- 5,000.00 family housing bond processing Tax increment processing fee CONSTRUCTION -RELATED PERMITS Construction in City right-of-way/easement Driveway/sidewalk 500.00 20.00 Grading/excavation If preliminary platted 300.00 If not preliminary platted 0-5 acres 200.00 each additional acre over 5 50.00 Renewal 200.00 RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) MANAGEMENT FEES ROW registration fee ROW excavation permit ROW excavation fee (new development) Obstruction permit P74 6 40.00 180.00 90.00 50.00 plus out-of-pocket City costs on replacement easements and/or transfer of property if handled outside normal subdiv. process plus out-of-pocket City costs plus out-of-pocket City costs (600.00 maximum) 200,FEE SCHEDULE ESCROW DEPOSITS The City requires the following escrow deposits. The amounts represent initial deposits, not actual charges. Additional deposits may be required as City costs are incurred. Preliminary Subdivision application OR 260 Preliminary Planned Development OR 2,500 Waiver of Subdivision—other OR 4,5b0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Waiver of Subdivision - single family zoned %OO Final Planned Development 3,000 Planned Development Amendment 150O Final Plat gap Final Subdivision application -1-3 lots Final Subdivision application - 4 or more Tots Contract management < $150,000 estimated construction costs $150,001-$500,000 est constr costs > $500,000 estimated construction costs Conditional use permit (Not required if subdivision escrow has been collected as part of same application.) Interim use permit - when site plan is involved (Not required if subdivision escrow has been collected as part of same application.) Rezoning (Not required if subdivision escrow has been collected as part of same application.) Variance—residential Variance—non-residential /1f 7 Initial Escrow Deposit $ wee per acre -1;500 0- minimum for single fam -37098:60 minimum for C/I and townhomes/multiples 4498-.00- 2.00110a_ 1-7 00:00- 2.00Q 0O- 1- 000.00- 5®0:60 2,000.00 4,000.00 8% of costs 6% of costs 5% of costs 500.00 500.00 500.00 200.00 500.00 1,000.00 minimum 12,000.00 minimum 30,000.00 minimum 200# FEE SCHEDULE OTHER DEVELOPMENT -RELATED CHARGES Parkland dedication: Single-family Duplex Townhouse/Quad Apartments/Multiple Commercial (post -1/1/83) Industrial (post -1/1/83) Commercial/Industrial (pre -1/1/83) Trailway dedication: Commercial/Industrial Residential Fee $ 47943-1V-- per -4909:OO per --1-77-34.O0-- per X6-00- per --49-7`8.80 per 4734-7-:00- per 9-- per unit unit unit unit net acre net acre net acre _1T433789-- per net acre 1-97700 per unit Water quality dedication: Charges are based on the following per -acre land values: Single-family 47,500 -3572-50430 Duplex 47, 1?.') 362:00• Townhome 4o 40,980.00 Apartments, Schools & Churches g It iv) 447 5:00 - Commercial s F /I $ to" £x;800:00 Excavation rate /50 -x.30- per yard Tree mitigation/replacement: Refer to City Code section 11.10, subd. 15.1 for calculation. Individual trees Woodland areas 8 120.00 per diameter inch 1.20 per sq ft of woodland 2004FEE SCHEDULE INSPECTION FEES/PERMITS Building permits: Building permit fees are based on the 1997 UBC Fee Schedule. Permits are issued to specific Tots. A change in address or lot after issuance is subject to a $50.00 transfer fee. Permits with valuation exceeding $10,000 are subject to a Plan Check charge. In addition, there is a State surcharge on all permits; the surcharge fee schedule is on page 12. The following connection and availability charges are also collected with the building permit fees: Sewer availability charge (Met. Coun- i,.j ,p0 cil Environmental Svcs — SAC chg) $k50T99- (These fees are for Sewer availability charge (City) 100.00 single-family dwelling Water supply and storage (City) 1,009,60b&O9-eo permits; see pp.13 & 16 Water meter (5/8") 121.00 for fees for other Treatment plant charge (,%2.PO§88:60 construction types.) Building permit valuation < $500 501-2,000 2,001-25,000 25,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-500,000 500,001-1,000,000 > 1,000,000 Fee $ 30.00 30.00 plus 2.60/ $100 valuation* > $500 69.25 plus 14.00/ $1,000 valuation* > $2,000 391.75 plus 10.10/ $1,000 valuation* > $25,000 643.75 plus 7.00/ $1,000 valuation* > $50,000 993.75 plus 5.60/ $1,000 valuation* > $100,000 3,233.75 plus 4.75/ $1,000 valuation* > $500,000 5,608.75 plus 3.65/ $1,000 valuatn* > $1,000,000 Building permits for selected work at existing residences: Lower level remodel, deck, fireplace/fireplace stove, nail salon, greenhouse, reroof, siding, windows, tent (>200 sq ft, canopy >400 sq ft) 69.00 plus 1.00 State surcharge * or fraction thereof 9 200�FEE SCHEDULE INSPECTION FEES/PERMITS (cont'd) Mechanical permits: The Inspections Dept must verify the classification of each multiple -residence dwelling to determine the appropriate permit type. Residential (1-2 family, townhomes, condos) Fee New construction $ 70.00 per dwelling unit Modification/alteration (i.e., furnace,A/C,air exch) 30.00 (Permit not required for lower -level ductwork alterations.) Supplementary furnace 50.00 per dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial/Apartment buildings HVAC 1% of contract price ($50.00 minimum) Process piping systems 50.00 Plumbing permits: The Inspections Dept must verify the classification of each multiple -residence dwelling to determine the appropriate permit type. Residential (1-2 family, townhomes, condos) New construction Modifications that alter living area Add/replace softener, water heater Private sewage disposal system Additional, per as -built 90.00 50.00 15.00 100.00 10.00 Abandonment of private sewage disposal 50.00 system—demolition Turnaround 50.00 Reduced pressure zone (RPZ) backflow preventer 30.00 Lawn irrigation system 30.00 Commercial/Industrial/Apartment buildings All plumbing 1% of contract price RPZ – new/repair 50.00 Fire Suppression Permits: per dwelling unit (includes 40.00 County permit fee) ($50.00 minimum) per building 1°/0 of contract price ($50.00 minimum) i 99 10 20051/ FEE SCHEDULE INSPECTION FEES/PERMITS (cont'd) Other inspections fees: Electrical permits Plan check (applies if valuation > $10,000) Demolition permit Day Care Moving permit—building Sign permit Wind energy, radio and TV tower permit Underground storage tank installation/removal Fee Issued by the 65% $ 75.00 50.00 75.00 2.50 State of building permit fee plus cost of damage/ repairs. Escrow to be determined on case- by-case basis. per square foot Based on value—see building permit fee schedule 70.00 Building permit investigation fee 50% of plan check fee (applies to approved permits abandoned by applicant) Bldg/Plbg/Mech permit investigation fee Double the base fee (applies when work commences prior to permit issuance) Lot transfer or address change fee 50.00 Replacement building permit field card Duplicate certificate of occupancy Re -inspection fee After-hours/weekend inspection fee Address change after building permit issued Permit refunding fee State of MN contractor license verification Street name change application 11 5.00 5.00 50.00 per hr. – 1 hr minimum 50.00 per hr. – 2 hr minimum 50.00 50.00 5.00 100.00 plus out-of-pocket City costs 5 2004'FEE SCHEDULE INSPECTION FEES/PERMITS (cont'd) State surcharge The State of Minnesota requires the following permit surcharges to be collected by the City and remitted to the State Building Permits: Value -based permits < $1,000,000 valuation 1,000,001-2,000,000 2,000,001-3,000,000 3,000,001-4,000,000 4,000,001-5,000,000 > 5,000,000 Fee .0005 x valuation 500 + .0004 x (valuation — 1,000,000) 900 + .0003 x (valuation — 2,000,000) 1,200 + .0002 x (valuation — 3,000,000) 1,400 + .0001 x (valuation — 4,000,000) 1,500 + .00005 x (valuation — 5,000,000) Fixed -fee permits Permit amount 1,000 or Tess .50 Permit amount > 1,000 Permit fee x .0005 Mechanical, Plumbing, and Fire Suppression permits: Permit amount $1,000 or Tess .50 Permit amount > 1,000 Permit fee x .0005 /Si 12 200�FEE SCHEDULE UTILITIES FEES—CONNECTION/AVAILABILITY CHARGES Trunk charges: Sanitary sewer oversize Unplatted and platted Platted residential Water main oversize Unplatted and platted non-resid Platted residential Storm sewer oversize Single-family Multi -family Non-residential Lateral charges: Sanitary sewer Water main Single-family Multi -family and non-residential Storm sewer (based on pipe at 15' 12" storm sewer 15" storm sewer 18" storm sewer 21" storm sewer 24" storm sewer non-resid. Service Charges: Sanitary Sewer: 4" service 8" stub Water: 1" service 6" stub • Fee 2,235" $ -27060700- .1) B 5 i -.0000e Z,35b _274-65700 1 t!3v 0799— . 103 17▪ ..g75- • 1545 z.g7jr•154• ' c3.40 1,7,90 depth),,, 60 .leo 1,5, op 09 AO 19,lo Sanitary sewer availability (SAC): MCES portion—all property types(,4ij City portion—all property types top Water supply and storage: Residential Non-residential Treatment plant: All property types per acre per lot per acre per lot -695- per sq ft .148-75—per sq ft X42.5 per sq ft 49720- per centerline foot 49.76 per centerline foot 6260 per centerline foot 53.90 per centerline foot 55:0- per centerline foot x9790per centerline foot 64:30 per centerline foot Z3t50 per centerline foot -609;00-- 1,380700 -670.60- 2;310:80 17350700 100.00 11 (7(761 .938:09 31• 05 3741-5:00- 1012_ per service per stub per service per stub per SAC unit * per SAC unit * per SAC unit * per acre 58&80 per SAC unit * * SAC units are determined by Metropolitan Council -Environmental Services (MCES). 200 FEE SCHEDULE UTILITIES FEES—USER RATES Sanitary sewer Residential and Commercial/Industrial (Usage is based on lower of winter quarter and current quarter water usage.) Administrative fee All usage (min 3,000 gal/qtr) Sewer -only (no water connection) Manual reading/billing fee- deduct meters Water Residential and Commercial/Industrial Administrative fee All usage Hydrant/construction meter—minimum Storm water drainage All properties except R3 R3 properties (20% credit) Street/signal lighting Neighborhood lights Single-family, twin homes (R1/R2) Townhomes (R3) Multiple residential Non -continuous Continuous (per LF basis) Continuous (per acre basis) Individual lights 100 WHPS 150 WHPS 200 WHPS 250 WHPS Community and signal lights R1/R2 R3 R4 Non-residential /53 14 2.60 $ 1. Sb Fee --2.50-- per 4782 'per _34:65- per 10.00 per bill 1,000 gallons quarter meter, per read gSd -&4O per bill (.oS 4,00—per 1,000 gallons 5.00 per day ?.?la x700- per REF/qtr ,-((0 -5:60--per REF/qtr 4.249 3.4% 5. 4 AA. latr 434 49.zt. .53 .43 .32- 2.13 322.13 "3-.65—per 3-08 per x..00— per 4-12 per .108 per X96' per 22.80 38.90 38.60 40 -85 - per per per per 4:46- per 1--1.6 per .85 per 5:89-- per qtr/lot qtr/unit qtr/account qtr/acre qtr/LF qtr/acre light/qtr light/qtr light/qtr light/qtr unit/qtr unit/qtr unit/qtr unit/qtr 5:, 200f FEE SCHEDULE UTILITIES FEES—OTHER Fee Water shut-off 5 .00 $ 45.00 Water meter removal/replacement/resealing sj"o,00 3699 6 -Radio meter read -)' Utility bill late charge (7am -4pm) (7am -4 pm) nor UM it 141.0 Modaft 4 P •16 1.5% per month on unpaid balance per parcel Certification fee on delinquent utility bills Sewer permit—new or repair of existing Water permit—new or repair of existing Temporary construction hydrant meters (6 mo max) Permit fee Hydrant damage deposit 5/8" meter damage deposit 3" meter damage deposit 3" backflow preventer & cart damage deposit Trip fee (if required) 3/4" backflow preventer deposit 25.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 200.00 226.00 925.00 1,800.00 .op ClB 28.00 Scheduled after-hours work Call out -2.5 hour minimum OT labor rate Extended day OT labor rate Meter testing (charged only if meter tests correct) 5/8" through 1" IOD.o1„ 09 1 '/4" through 2" «•P 90ceO All other sizes Contract cost Water turn -on before all work satisfactorily completed (Fee includes refundable deposit of 170.00) 200.00 Private hydrants Maintenance/flushing Repair per month, 3 -month deposit required plus 15% admin fee to max admin of 60.00 plus 15% admin fee plus 15% 5bpo -eo ee, Vero Time and material plus 15% Utilities customer list Mailing labels Electronic transmission, weekly new customer list /675y 125.00 50.00 per year 200" FEE SCHEDULE UTILITIES FEES—WATER METERS Water meters (includes copperhorn/strainer, remote wire, and touch -pad meter) 5/8" x %" meter 3/4" meter 1" meter 1 '/z" meter 2" compound meter 3" compound meter 4" compound meter 6" compound meter 1 1/2" turbo meter 2" turbo meter 3" turbo meter 4" turbo meter 6" turbo meter Replacement remote wire (over 50') Replacement outside touch -pad meter #2 copperhorns only Meter strainers only 2" strainer 3" strainer 4" strainer 6" strainer Fee $ -1-21700 4-55700 20000 488700 1,$8$:00 2;407700 3429700 61-1-24700 X88.00 -992.00 1 38700- 2,38400- .00- &aiu Mehr- f' co(Se nd i.sgum it. Ce enc ~P•i5) /SS 16 .12 17.00 19.00 288.00 365.00 558.00 704.00 14t.De 125.0 `(,ou Z'Gr.oD 42)1 I,g44.� 2,282.00 3,5a3.06 (s,D?b.o• 4'31.0• I,1$Z.00 2,22L.00 3,51$.x' per foot 51, SCHEDULE STREET ASSESSMENTS Residential -32' wide Street surfacing Street surfacing with grading Street surfacing with storm sewer Street surfacing w/ grading and storm sewer Multiple and Institutional -44' wide Street surfacing Street surfacing with grading Street surfacing with storm sewer Street surfacing w/ grading and storm sewer Commercial/Industrial Street surfacing Street surfacing with grading Street surfacing with storm sewer Street surfacing w/ grading and storm sewer TRAIL ASSESSMENTS Fee $ -48785 _62420 _55-78- 84-95 5 4-07:413- -94.25 _94.25 --t3571-5- -90725 4-39785- 123:65 per FF 4 3.4.E per FF ?40o per FF (70,45 per FF 9(,20 per FF 7z.2D per FF (16.50 per FF 102,z5 per FF 14/,.66- per 4&.fosper FF 51,10 per FF /57.75- per 5'(.75per FF 134, IF per FF (gg .co Concrete -6' wide (includes $4.00/FF sod/grading) 5 per FF 31.S2 Bituminous -10' wide (includes $4.00/FF sod/grading) .20.1 per FF 21.$5 OTHER ASSESSMENT -RELATED CHARGES Reallocation of special assessments Assessment search Pending assessment report Final assessment report Copies of legal description, owners, etc. 5-6 17 150.00 10.00 25.00 .50 per page (10.00 minimum) 1.00 per page 5 200,' FEE SCHEDULE PARKS AND RECREATION CHARGES Residents Non-residents All facility rental fees and charges are subject to 6.5% State sales tax. The following facility rental fees require a $150.00 damage deposit (exception: see note at bottom), payable at the time of reservation: Trapp Farm, Thomas Lake, and Blackhawk Park pavilions: All day rental (10am-10 pm) $ 128.00 Half-day rental (10am-4pm, or 5-10pm) 85.00 Blackhawk kitchen 43.00 Enclosed park shelter buildings: All day rental (10am-10 pm) Half-day rental (10am-4pm, or 5-10pm) 128.00 85.00 Athletic facilities/shelters: Fields -youth tournament (per field per day) 48.00 Fields -all other users (per field per day) 70.00 Lights, if required (per field per hour) 53.00 Building cleaning (per day) 70.00 $ 176.00 122.00 48.00 176.00 123.00 96.00 140.00 106.00 85.00 Eagan Room -City Hall (NOTE: after-hours rental is 2 -hour minimum): Youth groups -8 am to 4:30 pm deposit only N/A Youth groups -after hours (per hr) 11.00 N/A Local civic groups -8 am to 4:30 pm deposit only N/A Local civic groups -after hours (per hr) 29.00 N/A Other citizen groups Per hour rental 29.00 50.00 Maximum one -day rental 256.00 266.00 For-profit organizations Per hour rental 69.00 75.00 Maximum one -day rental 410.00 410.00 Note: School organizations that have a joint powers agreement with the City may use the City's park shelters and pavilions free of charge. However the organization must pay a $300.00 damage deposit per pavilion, per event, per school. AS'? 18 200511FEESCHEDULE PARKS AND RECREATION CHARGES (cont'd) The following charges are subject to 6.5% State sales tax: Sunshelters (per day) Residents Non-residents $ 43.00 $ 64.00 Picnic kit (requires $50.00 damage deposit) 3 items 7.50 11.00 Each additional item 3.50 5.55 Chuckwagon grill (per day) 43.00 64.00 Canopy (per day) 70.00 90.00 Extra picnic tables, each 16.00 27.00 Tubing -Trapp Farm Park and Central Park 2.00 per day 2.00 per day Tubing reservations for groups of 20-80, (1.5 hour rental) Trapp Farm Park only 3.00 / person 4.00 / person Field/facility maintenance fees: Traveling youth teams (per team) 96.00 N/A Adult -up to 9 games (per team) 230.00 460.00 Adult -each additional game > 9 32.00 per date 54.00 per date Concessions permit (maximum of 3) Civic Arena rental Ice, prime time (2pm-10pm weekdays) Indoor turf Tennis courts (per court per hour) 215.00 N/A 150.00 per hr. 70.00 per hr. 150.00 per hr. 70.00 per hr. 3.00 4.00 At -f c� vv'(f re.m ti i % 4-tvt filth .1,,, ?.off h e pettisti4,44 414, Fec 5�A,.4.st *kid (e a tzt 244-1 bet, , a kateA 144 airc rwinviti 0-rwitie4 Fs / S8' 19 200511FEE SCHEDULE PARKS AND RECREATION CHARGES (Cont'd) Residents Non-residents Moonshine Park: Upstairs — retreat/meeting space (includes availability of overhead/coffee 8:OOam — Noon 1:OOpm — 5:OOpm 6:OOpm — 10:OOpm Full Day (8:OOam-10:OOpm) Downstairs — activity space 8:OOam — Noon 1:OOpm — 5:OOpm 6:OOpm — 10:OOpm Full Day (8:OOam — 10:OOpm) pot/kitchen) 75.00 75.00 91.00 213.00 64.00 64.00 80.00 187.00 85.00 85.00 101.00 235.00 75.00 75.00 90.00 208.00 Bandshell at Central Park: Permitted use in partnership with Eagan Parks and Recreation meeting community entertainment criteria: No permit fee Permitted use in conjunction with a Community Center paid permitted use — No permit fee Other use by groups or organizations for private gain - $50.00 per hour VA{i-a#140( cfN„x.tevuti.►, .epript6iitt .mss 1. Exemption/no-loss determination 2. Replacement plan 3. Banking plan 4. Certificate of completion 5. Wetland decision appeal (refundable) $100 (plus staff review time) $300 (plus staff review time) $300 (plus staff review time) $100 $500 W k ti cu v £4w 01-146- '145 1. Monitoring (5 years @ $1,000/yr) $5,000 2. Reconstruction $10,000 2004 FEE SCHEDULE COMMUNITY CENTER FEES The Oaks (350 capacity) Sunday - Thursday • 8:00 am -11:00 pm • 8:00 am — Noon • 1:00 — 5:00 pm Friday 8:00 am — 12:30 am Saturday 8:00 am — 12:30 am $ 600.00 200.00 250.00 600.00 800.00 North, South or Central Oaks (110 capacity/each room) Sunday — Thursday • 8:00 am —11:00 pm • 8:00 am — Noon • 1:00 — 5:00 pm • 6:00 — 11:00 pm 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 North, Central or South Meeting Rooms (20 capacity/each room) Sunday — Saturday • Resident 10.65/hr* • Non-resident/For Profit 13.85/hr* The Board Room (35 capacity) Sunday— Saturday • Resident 13.32.hr* • Non-resident/For Profit 17.31 /hr* *Requires a two-hour minimum rental Note: Deposit required for all rentals FITNESS MEMBERSHIP FEES Member enrollment fee — 1st family member Member enrollment fee — each additional family member Monthly fee — Resident/Corporate-1St family member Monthly fee — Resident/Corporate-each additional Monthly fee — Non-resident — 1st family member Monthly fee — Non-resident — each additional Daily admission to fitness center Group f. ess classes for members /60 21 69.00 10.00 29.00 24.00 34.00 34.00 6ec aXtfidAc/ p;y(b frr silver CCC, 411) 10.00 20.00 /month/member Community Center Rental Prices 2005 Prices do not reflect a damage deposit or a security fee. d�" - 0 1a ,+-:•-. �'t. ;f,;. �. -.. i a 5 �� } y- _ t� �iagq ;5 ir]-cr u ,,c , - t„ }..,t.• ... .' -it Cyt, X S*i3 Y • � 3 ��, L.{ r�f� [ .0 F � x .„, `�n�.�+ H( �it q'�s fir.. �.�.. ". f 4 �' •y , -Gr i+"�a'".• r ft . <i j -! "`�F - �'•.1 .}r 'i , � .. Full Day $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,100.00 8:00 am - Noon $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Unavailable 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 6:00 pm - 11:00 pm $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 N tr, • Cen,d , Si7 _ ..... 1 "Y" .4S & WT,�C,>p 5 y�. f'3 r+n:. ,..,. 1 f k 1i y MF r it fi °bn { : 0. t .c 9 <y'i JS c:. t•� Full Day $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Unavailable 8:00 am - Noon $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 6:00 pm - 11:00 pm $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 I Spaces v..w rs �".°.,�,.x5, 'C /��QQ 1 • , sium s � " �g, t, .h r �� ~`'�' w a.. i 3 c a p .. . r. 3� M ,yl ii7.si' 3d North, Central or South Mtg. Room $12.00/hr* $15.00/hr* $15.00/hr* The Board Room $16.00/hr* $20.00/hr* $20.00/hr* 4 The Lone Oak Room Ful/Lone Oak Room $45.00/hr* $55.00/hr* $55.00/hr* Haff Lone Oak Room $28.00/hr* $28.00/hr* $28.00/hr* Teen Center $45.00/hr* $55.00/hr* $55.00hr* Kids Kare $25.00/hr* $25.00/hr* $25.00/hr* North, Central or South Gym $50.00/hr $50.00/hr $50.00/hr Gazebo $50.00/hr $50.00/hr $50.00/hr Band Shell $50.00/hr $50.00/hr $50.00/hr * Requires a two hour minimum rental. /6/ FITNESS MEMBERSHIP FEES Member enrollment fee —1St family member 69.00 Member enrollment fee — each additional family member 10.00 Monthly fee — Monthly fee — Monthly fee — Monthly fee — Resident/Corporate-1St family member Resident/Corporate-each additional Non-resident —1St family member Non-resident — each additional Daily admission to fitness center OPEN GYM FEES Adult Open Youth Open Preschool Open (includes limited Blast use) Family Open — Adult Family Open — Youth BLAST FEES Daily admission 10 -Visit punch card (residents only) Private Rental Private Rental (w/8hour banquet room rental) BIRTHDAY PARTY FEES Standard Blast Package Blast Additional Guest (each) Teen Center — Package One Package One — Additional Guest (each) Teen Center — Package Two Package Two — Additional Guest (each) 21b 31.00 26.00 36.00 36.00 10.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 40.00 150.00 100.00 117.50 11.75 120.00 12.00 150.00 15.00 200�FEE SCHEDULE POLICE DEPARTMENT CHARGES Police/Fire reports: Accident report Incident report Initial report Subsequent additional pages AGI Fee $ 4.00 4.00 .25 per page A deitl, 1.Q.90 per repel* Phot rt4444 1"1/14 Mfart 35mm, first print 35mm, each additional Polaroid — color photocopy Digital — color print 10.00 .50 5.00 5.00 Viewing accident reports (commercial users) .50 per report Audio tapes (copy) Video tapes (copy) CD ROM (copy) Other Police charges: Alarm panel Contractual security 25.00 35.00 25.00 8.00 50.00 per month per officer per hour + 5% admin fee BCA urine or blood test kit 10.00 Driver's license printouts 5.00 Fingerprinting 10.00 Handgun application, permit to carry 10.00 Parking" sign agging ee 50.06}. /YwIR�C o 4. ? P •Zg Police records checkJcfearance letters Law enforcement agencies no fee Non -law enforcement agencies 5.00 Repeat nuisance call, for third and subsequent calls 250.00 per call in a 365 day period Street closure 22 25.00 plus $25.00 de•osi 5 200,1 FEE SCHEDULE FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES Fee Fire reports: SPO Personnel/Equipment: Manpower icj,on $ 42-66, per hr (1 hr min) Chief's vehicle, rescue truck, grass rigs 150.00 per hr (1 hr min) Pumper, tanker, emergency support vehicle 260,00 -ewro T' per hr (1 hr min) Command vehicle, aerial Safety house: Within City limits ,,pr, -G66:OO per hr (1 hr min) Fire prevention (schools, daycare) no fee Other special requests 25.00 Outside City limits County Mutual Aid cities (house only) (9206 125.00 County Mutual Aid cities, manpower, supplies I?51-50180 Others (house only) 115,°o 1.58760 Others - House, manpower, material 2,513p0208190 Hazardous material containment/cleanup: Personnel: _A1—t_he�.eafte Supplies: � Ftrstikellnrabseriaent Equipment Rescue boat Hazmat trailer per day + mileage per day + mileage per day + mileage per day + mileage _no fee. --- _12.00 actual cost nn fee per equipment rates above per person per hour (,t Pnowt-$NNum brn) 161,/bo-1-90.e0- per hour (1 hr min) lV,Ub 1-08TAe- per hour (1 hr min) /6 y 23 200, FEE SCHEDULE FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING ROOMS Room deposit of $150.00 to be paid at time of registration (After -hour rental is a 2 -hour minimum) RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT Small Large Full Small Large Full Room Room Room Room Room Room Youth groups 8am-4:30pm deposit only Youth gps after hours (per hr) 9.00 12.00 15.00 Local civic groups 8am-4:30pm deposit only Local civic gps after hrs (per hr)15.00 20.00 30.00 Other citizen groups Per hour rental Maximum one -day rental For-profit organizations Per hour rental Maximum one -day rental 15.00 20.00 30.00 250.00 30.00 50.00 75.00 250.00 Audio Visual Computer connection for and/visual Microsoft PowerPoint 75.00 200.00 deposit 125.00 lbw 24 N/A N/A N/A N/A 30.00 50.00 75.00 600.00 30.00 50.00 75.00 600.00 75.00 200.00 deposit 125.00 r 200,4FEE SCHEDULE E;wl M(v�T f � � i' ¥T (righe4 EQUIPMENT AND STAFF RATES Equipment( f4 rus-- Ar r.- 1&ar} Pick-up truck One -ton dump truck Single -axle dump truck Tandem -axle dump truck rGractor Backhoe/loader Front-end loader Road grader Street sweeper Roller or paver Air compressor Sewer fetter or sewer rodder Sewer vacuum—trailer or trailer roundsmaster mower Pump, 6" Pump, 8" Skid loader Chipper Tanker TV camera—service (1 hour minimum) TV camera—main line (1 hour minimum) Staff rates: Department Directors Assistant City Administrator City Engineer Maintenance Superintendent Assistant City Engineer/Sr. Building Inspector Building Inspector Park Planner/Landscape Architect Maintenance Supervisor City Planner Public Works Coordinator Water Resources Coordinator Construction Manager Utility Construction Inspector Operations Analyst, Eng. Technician GIS Technician a' F1W Maintenance Person—regular Maintenance Person—overtime Intern/Seasonal Survey crew (includes vehicle and equipment): 2 -person 3 -person f✓t�,.ic. ficSN eLt062A" +fl4C' - `t`�afi PDant I LPv - can Hourly Rate -lin $ -2s e� 30-00 -29.00- 32-00 4066- 45,00 5.A.00 5•5.p0 -20:00 25.00 -46:09 50.0D lo.oD .90.00 96.00 50:00- 55.00 25:60 30.00 20.00 25-.P0 1-65:00 (15-.00 165:00' 015.00 -243.00_ 30,90 49:90- 45'40 A-&.430- .a0 Sv. Ec 2.9:09- 2.5;0o 48:99 4.00 400.00 2 ..00 20.00 2100.V0 -4-35;00 1440.00 t1-0-.00) UU 115,9 115:00 (-2p,0O 11 0.00-- 115,00 -405.-00 (1 O.v© 55:00 90,o0 85 00 90,,00 .$ :00- 90'.0D 115 pc. .o es 0-e)0go,a0 1$p 10.00 449:00 may 85-00 Z0,00- .44:00- 00- .g1- %S.vo e— 55.00 X5:00- %p.m 35 09-� 40.00 420-00 (9 .O% 145:00 150 .490 „x,00 45.00 55 .0 2003 f X04. 200); FEE SCHEDULE City Attorney (Severson, Sheldon, Dougherty & Molenda) General legal Paralegal fees Development -related work City Council/APC meetings Consulting Financial Services Wobschall Ltd /6 26 12p50 $11 .O6• per hour 13.40 71.26- per hour 18�pv0-A6- per hour -3gz.co 47-0.50- per meeting gppc -4599 per hour 200, FEE SCHEDULE MISCELLANEOUS FEES/CHARGES Animal pickup Animal impound Antenna—Radio and PCS: Application Site survey Document preparation and plan review Landscaping Site rent, 1-9 antennas Site rent, each additional antenna Audio tapes—Board/Council meetings Fee $ 15.00 4.00 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 actual costs Ig n DO --1€0+5784 115-1-66790-- actual 0' actual costs Certification fee for unpaid false alarm or weed bills City Plans/Policies: Special Area Plans Comp. Water Supply/Distribution Plan Comp. Sanitary Sewer Policy/Plan Comp. Storm Water Management Plan: Spiral bound 3 -ring binder Landscape Policy, Shoreland Zoning Ordinance, Sign Regulations or Tree Preservation Policy Water Quality Management Plan Data processing reports Digital image photocopies Color: First 1 Each additional B&W: First 1 Each additional False alarm charges --commercial and residential: First 3 false alarms per year Each false alarm after 3 Fee schedule "ear *n pack"kiiivicorr4 27 25.00 3.00 50.00 50.00 35.00 50.00 3.00 50.00 per day over amt billed to City by pound per site per site per site escrow of $2,000 per site required per site per year per site per month 2o04- 1\1,00 (aft$ . ks116 per parcel actual cost + 10% 3.00 1.00 1.50 .25 no charge 100.00 2.00 5,oD 200iFEE SCHEDULE MISCELLANEOUS FEES/CHARGES (cont'd) Invoicing charge Lodging tax Mailing labels Fee 15% to max. of $10.00 3% of gross receipts actual cost + 10% Maps: City map (Lion's Club): First one free Each additional $ 1.00 Section maps: 1/2 section—property only 10.00 1/2 section—property and planimetric 50.00 1/2 section—property, planimetric, and contours 150.00 1/8 section—prop., planimetric and contours 40.00 1/2 section—aerial photo 6.00 % section—property only 5.00 Trunk water or sewer system map 2.50 Water quality classification map 5.00 Specialty maps Based on staff rates (p. 4) Zoning or Comp Guide maps: 11 x 17 color 5.00 22 x 34 color 15.00 34 x 48 color 25.00 GIS Utility As -Built (1/4 section -digital format) 40.00 Other digital data/mapping Based on staff rates (p. 2/) 50.00 Notary seal (non -City business): First 5 Each additional > 5 Patch – Eagan Historical Trail Photocopies Plans and Specifications Research of City records (beyond readily 'available material) ty_\4.‘•:(1 kilo" 3.00 each . 50 each 1.00 X90 . 25 per page 50.00 minimwmVarlo61ytarr•1 1310(4Ohs1-4•Ffr s.z5)- 1lZ"iM)wr-wnrn iniu Q�ti PkiRg rcsfir«h'�, —S; 1it 28 J49 5o ,o 0 SS. PO(k9125!.sq' ' 200 FEE SCHEDULE MISCELLANEOUS FEES/CHARGES (cont'd) Returned check or ACH transfer fee Fee $ 20.00 Zoning letter Standard Z.0.00 Specialty Based on staff rates (p. 2.) /�D 29 3 200/41 FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY OF CONNECTION CHARGES The following connection charges are provided for in the City Code. Some or all of them may be collected at the time of: 1) new development applications, 2) new connections to a utility system, 3) the issuance of building permits, and 4) enforcement of agreements; as appropriate in each individual circumstance. Fee Page Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) 9 & 13 Water Supply & Storage 9 & 13 Water Meter 9 & 16 Treatment Plant Charge 9 & 13 Plumbing Permits 10 Building Permits 9 & 12 Trunk Oversize Charges Sanitary Sewer 13 Water Main 13 Storm sewer 13 Lateral Charges Sanitary Sewer 13 Water Main 13 Storm Sewer 13 Sewer permit—new or repair of existing 15 Water permit—new or repair of existing 15 1'7/ 30 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN APPROVING THE 2005 SCHEDULE ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS WHEREAS, various sections of the City Code provide for fees to be established by City Council resolution; and WHEREAS, the City desires to recover certain user related costs through fees and reimbursement; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the fees as listed in the attached shall be effective January 1, 2005. Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Date: December 13, 2004 CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting B. PRELIMINARY SUBDVISION (PEARLMONT HEIGHTS) — TIM BOHLMAN ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Rezoning of 12.44 acres from R-2 residential double to PD, Planned Development, for property located at 1565 and 1535 Violet Lane in the NE '/4 of Section 16. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Preliminary Subdivision (Pearlmont Heights) of 12.44 acres to create 51 lots, for property located at 1565 and 1535 Violet Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 16; subject to the conditions in the Staff report. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Planned Development to create 24 twinhomes (48 units) with reduced setbacks on property located at 1565 and 1535 Violet Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 16; subject to the conditions in the staff report. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL • Majority of Council Members present Items in bold are new information FACTS: • At the regular November 16, 2004 City Council meeting the city council continued this item to the December 13, 2004 regular meeting in order to address Council and Public Works' concerns about design, setbacks, and lot coverage. • The revised narrative indicates a front setback from public right-of-way ranges from 20 feet to 30 feet (30 required) or 25 feet from back of curb on private street. • The revised site plan submitted now depicts the northern loop street (Lemieux Circle) as a private street. This addresses the public maintenance concern about reduced setbacks along Lemieux Circle as they meet the required 25 -foot setback from private streets, and maintenance will be the responsibility of the development's homeowners association. • The subject site is zoned R-2, residential double which allows twin homes. • The proposed planned development allows for variances to setbacks and platting. The development will be association maintained. • The developer is proposing an overall lot coverage of 20% rather than lot by lot. • Proposed gross density is 3.86 units/acre. The proposed net density is 4 units/acre. The comprehensive land use plan is LD, Low Density 0-4 units/acre. • Public street access is proposed from two public streets within the development. The site plan depicts the extension of a public street from Violet Lane to Lakeview Trail. • The APC held a public hearing on October 26, 2004 and is recommending denial. /%3 ISSUES: • The APC recommended denial based on the setback deviations from standard R-2 requirements, and lack of benefit to the City with the PD zoning. • The developer has submitted drawings with detailed dimensions of driveways for lots along the public right-of-way of the proposed extension of Violet Lane. These drawings show how off-street parking can be accommodated outside the portion of the driveways within public right-of-way, by the use of side -loaded garages (11 of 13 lots) and the meeting of the 30 -foot building setback requirement (2 of 13 lots) adjacent to Violet Lane. The side -loaded garages are still less proposed 10 feet less than the 30 -foot setback requirement, 20 feet from public right-of-way. The developer has indicated that if the development were to meet the required setbacks, the density desired by the developer could not be achieved. 120 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE • January 25, 2005 ATTACHMENTS (6): APC minutes on page „5hrough /2 Staff report on page /througha db Lot coverage spread sheet on pagep'7 Revised plat and site plan on pages rough ,90 Letter from neighbor on page (� Supplement to Proposal Narrative without page numbers City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2004 Page 4 C. Pearlmont Heights Applicant Name: Pearlmont Heights, LLC Location: 1565&35 Violet Lane, in the NE 1/4 of Section 16 Application: Preliminary Planned Development A Preliminary Planned Development to create 48 townhome units. File Number: 16 -PD -09-09-04 Application: Preliminary Subdivision A Preliminary Subdivision of approximately 12.44 acres to create 24 Tots for 48 twinhomes. File Number: 16 -PS -19-09-04 Application: Rezoning A Rezoning of approximately 12.44 acres from R-2, Residential Double to PD, Planned Development. File Number: 16-RZ-16-09-04 Planner Cartney introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated October 18, 2004. She noted the background and history. Applicant Timothy Bohlman explained the five different floor plans and the difference in square footage. He further explained that as each permit is pulled, they will be tracking the lot coverage and making sure that they have not exceeded the 20 percent allowable lot coverage. He addressed the tree mitigation and landscaping plans. Chair Heyl opened the public hearing. Kip Warner stated concern for the abundance of multifamily housing in the area, decrease in property value, and lack of park space. He asked if there would be street assessments for existing residents. Chair Heyl stated the property is already zoned R-2. And Assessments wouldn't apply. Bob Hunstad, 1502 Violet Lane stated concern for the increase in traffic and the chance that additional roads would be opened. Another neighbor stated concern for the increase in traffic and lack of sidewalks in the area and the proposed development. Michael McTeauge, 1486 Violet Lane asked at what time the applicant will obtain security on the property and when a connection would be established between Lakeview Trail and Violet Lane. Pat Gregg, 3554 Coachman Road stated concern for drainage in the area. There being no further public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. /7s City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2004 Page 5 City Engineer Russ Matthys explained that the street system in the area can easily handle the estimated 290 vehicle trips per day that would be generated from the development. He stated there is park property north of the site. He stated the "dead end" signage would not be removed until all of the streets were constructed and accepted by the City. He stated the proposed drainage will be adequate for the development. He stated there will be no special assessments for neighboring property owners due to the proposed development. Planner Cartney explained that the City does not have a code requirement to require a sidewalk in the development. Mr. Bohlman discussed the tree mitigation plan, particularly the North West corner, where the stormwater pond will be constructed and the Western elevation. He stated any damage done to adjacent properties will be corrected. He stated there will be no sidewalks in the development due to the lack of connection to other neighborhoods. He discussed the building materials and stated the starting price for the units will be $400,000, which is consistent with surrounding home values. Member Gledhill stated concern that the traditional R-2 setback requirements are not being met. He stated he will vote against the proposal. He stated disagreement with the applicants plan to wait until the permit process to determine if the 20 percent lot coverage has been exceeded. He was also concerned about the platting process and lot sizes, and that there this plan did not provide support for a PD zoning. Mr. Bohlman explained that the streets were changed from private to public. Member Leeder asked if decks or patios could be constructed, considering the setback requirements. Mr. Bohlman explained that a deck and patio is already considered into each plan. He stated his company does not have legal possession of the property; however he can assist in addressing security concerns. Member Bendt moved, Member Hansen seconded a motion to recommend approval to Rezone 12.44 acres from R-2 Residential Double to PD, Planned Development, for property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane. A vote was taken: Aye: Members Hansen, and Bendt. Nay: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gledhill. Motion failed 5-2. /7.4 City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2004 Page 6 Member Bendt moved, Member Hansen seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twin homes on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement with the City that shall be recorded at the Dakota County Recorder's Office. 2. The applicant shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City. The following exhibits are necessary for the Agreement: • Final Site Plan • Final Building Elevations Plan • Final Tree Preservation Plan • Final Landscape Plan • Final Lighting Plan • Final Signage Plan A vote was taken: Aye: Members Hansen, and Bendt. Nay: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gladhill. Motion failed 5-2. Member Bendt moved, Member Hanson seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 51 lots on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane subject to the following conditions as amended: 1. The property shall be platted. 2. All existing well and septic systems on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. 3. The existing home and outbuildings shall be removed prior to development. 4. If the developer petitions the City for the water main extension project, the public improvement project shall be approved by the City Council prior to final subdivision approval. 5. The developer shall construct an outlet skimmer structure on the existing storm sewer pipe, in accordance with City engineering standards 6. The public trail between Lots 14 and 15 shall be constructed by the developer with the development and prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 14 and 15. 7. The developer shall provide public trail easement over the proposed trail between Lots 14 and 15, prior to final subdivision approval, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 8. A temporary sign depicting the trails existence on Lot 14 and 15 is required by the developer. 9. The development shall be responsible for a cash park dedication / 7 7 City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2004 Page 7 10. The development shall include a 20' wide access/trail easement extending north and south from the curb line to the property line between lots 14 and 15, dedicated to the City. 11. A 10' wide bituminous trail extending the length of the easement, built in accordance with City standards, shall be installed by the developer in the easement between lots 14 and 15, prior to any construction on Tots 14 and 15. 12. The development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication, minus a credit of $1800 for the installation the trail in between Lots 14 and 15. 13. The applicant shall fulfill required tree preservation mitigation through the installation of one -hundred two (102) Category B trees, or an equivalent combination of Category A and Category C trees. 14. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off-site (i.e. park trees). 15. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre -construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 16. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements by creating a set of three stormwater treatment ponds. The stormwater treatment ponds should be constructed according to NURP standards with maximum depths of 6 feet, 10:1 aquatic benches from normal water levels, and outlet structures acceptable to the City Engineering Division 17. A homeowner's association document shall be submitted prior to Final Subdivision approval subject to the City Attorney's review. AH common areas shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association. 18. All common area, retaining walls and signage shall be maintained by the homeowners association. 19. The monument sign shall meet City Code requirements. 20. Maximum of 20 percent lot coverage. A vote was taken: Aye: Members Hansen and Bendt. Nay: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gladhill. Motion failed 5-2. Chair Heyl stated she is voting against the proposal for the following reasons: the underlying setbacks of R-2 zoning are not being met. The landscaping plan needs improvement. Provisions of the planned development zoning (11.60 18 A 1 and 3) are not met. There is no stated benefit to the city and it lacks creativity as well as an efficient approach to the use of the land. She further stated that she does not object to townhomes or parking in driveways. City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2004 Page 8 Member Gladhill moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend denial of Rezone 12.44 acres from R-2 Residential Double to PD, Planned Development, for property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane for the following reasons: Provisions of the planned development zoning (11.60 18 A 1 and 3) are not met. There is no stated benefit to the city and it Tacks creativity as well as an efficient approach to the use of the land. A vote was taken: Aye: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gladhill. Nay: Members Hansen, and Bendt Motion carried 5-2. Member Gladhill moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twin homes on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane for the following reasons: Provisions of the planned development zoning (11.60 18 A 1 and 3) are not met. There is no stated benefit to the city and it lacks creativity as well as an efficient approach to the use of the land. A vote was taken: Aye: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gladhill. Nay: Members Hansen, and Bendt. Motion carried 5-2. Member Gladhill moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 51 lots on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane for the following reasons: Provisions of the planned development zoning (11.60 18 A 1 and 3) are not met. There is no stated benefit to the city and it lacks creativity as well as an efficient approach to the use of the land. A vote was taken: Aye: Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Leeder, Chavez, and Gladhill. Nay: Members Hansen, and Bendt. Motion carried 5-2. /79 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: October 18, 2004 APPLICANT: Tim Bohlman PROPERTY OWNER: Lemieux Estate CASE: 16 -PS -19-09-04 HEARING DATE: October 26, 2004 APPLICATION DATE: September 29, 2004 REQUEST: Rezoning, Preliminary Subdivision, Preliminary Planned Development PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney LOCATION: 1565 & 1535 Violet Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density residential ZONING: R-2, Residential Double SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval to Rezone 12.44 acres from R-2, Residential Double to Planned Development, Preliminary Subdivision to create 51 lots and a Preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twinhomes (48 units) with reduced setbacks on property located at 1565 and 1535 Violet Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 16. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Rezoning: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subd. 5 states in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 2 A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Planned Development: /d/ Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 3 City Code Chapter 11.60, Subd. 18, A., states the intent of the Planned Development zoning district as follows: 1. Providing greater flexibility in environmental design and relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater creativity and environmental sensitivity. 2. Recognizing the economic and cultural advantages that will accrue to the residents of a planned community. 3. Encouraging a more creative and efficient approach to the use of the land. 4. Encouraging the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, natural features, and open space. 5. Encouraging a development pattern that is consistent with land use density, transportation facilities and community facilities objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The subject site contains two unplatted tax parcels, known as the Lemieux properties. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently two parcels each containing a single family home with detached accessory structures. Access is from Violate Lane. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. Planned Development Review Planned Development Zoning — The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. /8a Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Apartments R-4, Residential Multiple HD, high density residential South Twin homes, single family residences R-2, residential double and PD, Planned Development LD, Low density residential East Apartments R-4, residential multiple HD, High density residential West Single family homes PD, Planned Development LD, Low density residential EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. Planned Development Review Planned Development Zoning — The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. /8a Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 4 Amenities — There is a proposed public trail connection to the park to the north and the pond in the middle of the site with a fountain. There is also a village green area. Homeowners Association — The association will be responsible for maintaining all yards, open spaces, common area, any private roads, snow removal, exterior maintenance of the homes and special features within the site. Staff suggests the homeowners association also maintain the proposed monument sign. The fountain in the pond in the middle of the site should also be maintained by the association. Bulk Standards — As a Planned Development deviation from typical zoning bulk standards may be allowed. Simply for the purpose of discussion this proposal is reviewed under the R-2 Zoning District standards. Setbacks — The table below indicates the proposed setbacks for the twin homes and the R- 2 standards. Setback requirements are not established in a Planned Development zoning; however, the developer is proposing deviations from the R-2 standards. Setback Twin Homes Ordinance Proposed Front yard: public street 30 feet 15 feet Side yard: Principal Structure 0-10 feet 0-9 feet Rear yard: Principal Structure 15 feet 7 feet (platted property line 15 feet to perimeter) Side yard: Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Rear yard: Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Between units 20 feet 20 feet Setbacks are measured from the property line to the structure. The proposed plat allows for a five to seven foot setback around the perimeter of the lot (except at the front that is a zero foot setback). If the lots were not platted this way the structures would meet R-2 setbacks, except for the setback from public right-of-way. The developer has submitted a plan that illustrates all R-2 bulk standards being met (except front yard setbacks) including lot size per unit. However, the developer is proposing to plat the property in away to allow more common space to me maintained by the Homeowner's Association rather than individually owned/maintained. Building Coverage — The R-2 zoning district allows for a maximum of 20 percent building coverage. This percentage is normally calculated on a lot by lot basis. The applicant should determine the building coverage for the site; some planned developments have identified the building coverage as an overall calculation rather than a lot by lot basis. /P� Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 5 If, in the future, home owners want to deviate from the established building coverage a Planned Development Amendment or variance would be necessary. Building Height — Building height is limited to 35 feet in height for the twin homes. Landscaping — The landscaping plan should be revised to identify what the perennial plantings are and to include trees that are not part of the mitigation plan or identify what trees are existing 011 the landscape plan. The association should be responsible for maintaining all landscaping within the development. Parking — The zoning code requires at least two enclosed parking spaces for each dwelling unit. The site plan indicates there are at least two enclosed parking spaces for each dwelling unit. There are no visitor parking spaces provided, the City Code does not have specific requirements on visitor parking. Staff has concerns with the lack of visitor parking. Trash Enclosure — A trash enclosure location was not included on the preliminary plans for the town house development. The trash pick up should be on an individual basis, if a common trash area is available it should be in an enclosure. Exterior Materials — The building materials are going to be a variety of materials, vinyl siding, vinyl shakes siding, synthetic stone veneer with asphalt shingles. The color palette includes neutral colors such as clay, camel, sandcastle, acorn, and heather. Lighting — A lighting plan was not submitted, if lighting is proposed a plan should be submitted as part of the Final Planned Development. No light should reflect onto adjacent property or public right-of-way. Signage — A monument sign is proposed to be placed at the entrance of Violet Lane. The sign materials appear to be similar to the principal building materials. A more detailed sign plan is required with the Final Planned Development. The monument sign should conform to the city sign regulations for monument signs; seven feet total height with four foot maximum height of sign area. II. Preliminary Subdivision Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The subject site is surrounded by single family, two family, and multiple family dwellings. Twin homes are not out of character for this neighborhood, the property is currently zoned R-2, Residential Double. Density — The proposed gross density is 3.86 units/acre. The proposed net density is 4 units/acre. The comprehensive land use plan is LD, Low Density 0-4 units/acre. Lots — The proposed twin home lots range from 2,525 square feet to 4,500 square feet. There are 48 twin home lots and platted common area that is divided by the road. The R-2 zoning district icy Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 6 requires each lot to be 7,500 square feet in area for a twin home lot with 50 feet of public street frontage or 15,000 square feet for a double lot with 100 feet of public street frontage. The proposed lots street frontage ranges from 34 feet to 45 feet. Lot 49 represents common space, one lot can not be separated by a public street; therefore Lot 49 should be broken up into 3 total lots, total lot count including common area will be 51. Grading — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The existing site generally slopes toward the northwest and southeast with elevations ranging from approximately 890 to 860. The grading plan depicts numerous retaining walls throughout the site necessary to accommodate the proposed grades. The development's Homeowners Association should be responsible for the perpetual maintenance of the retaining walls throughout the site. Storm Drainage — The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with modifications. The storm water runoff from a majority of the development is proposed to drain overland or via storm sewer pipe to existing wetlands or storm basins on site. The developer proposes to excavate the wetland in the northwest corner to create an improved ponding area for water quality and runoff control. This wetland is drained to the west by an existing storm sewer pipe within the Hampton Heights Addition. The developer should construct an outlet skimmer structure on the existing storm sewer pipe, in accordance with City engineering standards. The high water level (100 -year, 1% event) for this pond is approximately 9 feet in elevation below the lowest entry of the existing houses within Hampton Heights Addition. Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth, size, and capacity are available within Violet Lane to the east of the site. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is also available within Violet Lane. As part of this development, a 30 -inch water main needs to be extended through the site from Violet Lane to Lakeview Trail, in accordance with the City Water Supply & Distribution Plan. This extension can be completed in one of two options: 1) as a petitioned public improvement project or 2) privately by the developer to be transferred to the City for future maintenance. If the project is petitioned, the public improvement project should be approved by the City Council prior to final subdivision approval. All existing well and septic systems on the site should be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. Streets/ Access/ Circulation — Public street access is proposed from two public streets within the development. The site plan depicts the extension of a public street from Violet Lane to Lakeview Trail. Existing Violet Lane and Lakeview Trail street stubs were designed and constructed with a 32 -foot width and adequate right-of-way to accommodate this street connection. The street plan submitted provides inter -connectivity between the existing and proposed neighborhoods in the area, and provides another traffic reliever outlet for the neighborhood bounded by I -35E to the east and Blackhawk Lake to the south. The estimated traffic from the development and street connection will increase traffic on Violet Lane, but not beyond the limits of what is typically defined as a local residential street. Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 7 The City Parks & Recreation Department is requiring the construction of a public trail between Lots 14 and 15 from Lemieux Circle to undeveloped City park land to the north. This trail should be constructed by the developer with the development and prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 14 and 15. A trail easement should be provided in text form and approved by the City Attorney. Easements/ Permits/ Right -of -Way - The developer should provide public trail easement over the proposed trail between Lots 14 and 15, prior to final subdivision approval. A trail easement should be provided in text form and approved by the City Attorney. The trail easement should not be shown on the plat; there should be no gaps in between the lots. Wetlands/Water Quality - The proposed development straddles the City's C- and J -watersheds, the C -district draining toward the river and the J -district draining toward Fish Lake. The developer proposes to meet the City's water quality requirements to treat stormwater on site by directing runoff to a set of three ponds that would be constructed on-site. A wetland area is located in the extreme northwest corner of the parcel. However, this wetland has been determined to be incidental (i.e., non -natural) because its creation is from historical stormwater runoff through a ravine that drains to it. The incidental characterization allows it to be excavated for an effective stormwater treatment pond without requiring replacement under state wetland conservation rules. Minimum requirements for volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the impervious proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and walks). This development would need to meet City standards for stormwater quality detention ponds. Tree Preservation - The tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are one -hundred seventy-four (174) significant trees in the inventory. The trees are elms, pines, ash, honeylocust, willow, cottonwood basswood and others. The development as proposed will result in the removal of one hundred -sixteen (116) significant trees (66.7 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple -lot, multiple -unit residential) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, there is required tree mitigation for this proposal. Required tree mitigation to replace trees removed in excess of allowable limits calculates to one hundred -two (102) Category B trees. The applicant has submitted a Tree Preservation Plan that shows the installation of one hundred twenty-nine (129) Category B trees. The applicant is proposing to transplant (within the development site) forty (40) significant trees. These trees are counted as being preserved within the submitted tree preservation plan. Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 8 The proposed development site also contains one -hundred eighty-four apple trees. These apple trees are not included in the inventory of significant vegetation because they are either in a state of decline or are too small in diameter to fit the city's definition of significant vegetation. Parks and Recreation - The proposed development is located adjacent to City owned, undeveloped park land, approximately 6.3 acres in size (Outlot H). The City parcel is heavily wooded with very steep terrain sloping east to west. There currently is no developed access into the City parcel. Access can be achieved on foot by traversing a steep wooded slope from the east through either an easement to the existing City lift station or an undeveloped parcel obtained by the City through tax forfeiture proceedings. Vehicular access is not possible. Future use of the property as a park remains undefined. Because of the topography and restricted access, options for improvement are limited. The residential neighborhoods surrounding the parcel are currently served by Blackhawk, Quarry and Sky Hill Parks. Concepts for future use may be addressed in the new Park Systems Plan. To effectively manage the parcel, an efficient access is necessary. Natural areas, especially those that are wooded, may be susceptible to disease or by the invasion of non-native species such as buckthorn, both which require physical intervention to control. For this reason, the developer, working in conjunction with park staff, is proposing the inclusion of a 20' wide access/trail easement and 10' paved trail, constructed to City standards extending to the property boundary, between lots 14 and 15. The trail will allow both residents and City staff access to the parcel for any future recreational or maintenance activities. Because the access corridor is being created via an easement versus a land dedication, there is no credit given towards the park dedication requirement. The park dedication shall be satisfied through a full cash dedication. The developer shall be given credit of $1,800 for the installation of paved trail through the access easement as described in the "Parks" section of the report. The credit being calculated in accordance with the lineal foot construction price of a 10' wide paved trail, constructed to City standards, as provided by City Engineers. (Trail Credit; 150'x $12 = $1,800) The balance of any trail dedication due after the credit shall be satisfied through a cash payment. Advisory Park and Recreation Commission — At the APrC meeting on October 18, 2004 the proposal was reviewed as a development item and the Commission recommended approval. The Commission suggested temporary signage on the trail easement between lots 14 and 15 to alert potential buyers of its existence. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The subject site contains two unplatted tax parcels, known as the Lemieux properties. The request is to rezone from R-2 residential double to PD Planned Development, a preliminary /g7 Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 9 subdivision creating 49 lots and a Preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twinhomes with reduced setbacks. The lots are proposed to be platted slightly different than a typical R-2 development. The plat basically outlines the twinhome reducing the setbacks to the property line, but not from the perimeter of the site. The applicant submitted a plan that shows the 7,500 square foot lot per unit can be achieved with this project. The proposed plat configuration is to allow more common space that is maintained by an association rather than individually owned/maintained. The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with modifications. The storm water runoff from a majority of the development is proposed to drain overland or via storm sewer pipe to existing wetlands or storm basins on site. Public street access is proposed from two public streets within the development. The site plan depicts the extension of a public street from Violet Lane to Lakeview Trail. Existing Violet Lane and Lakeview Trail street stubs were designed and constructed with a 32 -foot width and adequate right-of-way to accommodate this street connection. The street plan submitted provides inter -connectivity between the existing and proposed neighborhoods in the area, and provides another traffic reliever outlet for the neighborhood bounded by I -35E to the east and Blackhawk Lake to the south. The development as proposed will result in the removal of one hundred -sixteen (116) significant trees (66.7 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple -lot, multiple -unit residential) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, there is required tree mitigation for this proposal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval to Rezone 12.44 acres from R-2 Residential Double to PD, Planned Development, for property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane. To recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 24 twin homes on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement with the City that shall be recorded at the Dakota County Recorder's Office. 2. The applicant shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City. The following exhibits are necessary for the Agreement: • Final Site Plan • Final Building Elevations Plan • Final Tree Preservation Plan • Final Landscape Plan • Final Lighting Plan • Final Signage Plan To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 51 lots on property located at 1565 Violet Lane and 1535 Violet Lane. Subject to the following conditions: /Sr Planning Report — Pearlmont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 10 The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, 2, 3, 4, Cl, 2, 4, D1, E1 1. The property shall be platted. 2. All existing well and septic systems on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. 3. The existing home and outbuildings shall be removed prior to development. 4. If the developer petitions the City for the water main extension project, the public improvement project shall be approved by the City Council prior to final subdivision approval. 5. The developer shall construct an outlet skimmer structure on the existing storm sewer pipe, in accordance with City engineering standards 6. The public trail between Lots 14 and 15 shall be constructed by the developer with the development and prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 14 and 15. 7. The developer shall provide public trail easement over the proposed trail between Lots 14 and 15, prior to final subdivision approval, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 8. A temporary sign depicting the trails existence on Lot 14 and 15 is required by the developer. 9. The development shall be responsible for a cash park dedication 10. The development shall include a 20' wide access/trail easement extending north and south from the curb line to the property line between lots 14 and 15, dedicated to the City. 11. A 10' wide bituminous trail extending the length of the easement, built in accordance with City standards, shall be installed by the developer in the easement between lots 14 . and 15, prior to any construction on lots 14 and 15. 12. The development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication, minus a credit of $1800 for the installation the trail in between Lots 14 and 15. 13. The applicant shall fulfill required tree preservation mitigation through the installation of one -hundred two (102) Category B trees, or an equivalent combination of Category A and Category C trees. 14. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off- site (i.e. park trees). 15. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre -construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 16. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements by creating a set of three stormwater treatment ponds. The stormwater treatment ponds should be constructed according to NURP standards with maximum depths of 6 feet, 10:1 aquatic benches from normal water levels, and outlet structures acceptable to the City Engineering Division /s9 Planning Report — Pearimont Heights October 26, 2004 Page 11 17. A homeowner's association document shall be submitted prior to Final Subdivision approval subject to the City Attorney's review. All common areas shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association. 18. All common area, retaining walls and signage shall be maintained by the homeowners association. 19. The monument sign shall meet City Code requirements. /%, STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. if any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 LTS#S STANDARD.CON Revised: February 2, 1993 /72 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION-Pearlmont Heights -Preliminary Subdivision There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $1,230 on the parcels proposed to be subdivided. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the Subdivision. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcels. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final Subdivision. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT Storm Sewer Trunk USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT R2 $.095/Sq. FT. 61,426 Sq. Ft. $5,835 $5,835 LO -OL 1091 .0N 341 114 1%31 LSLd1091 71.5 ?MO ya a 03,0310 WIWN0 lr0 :IS N05030 NOILANOS30 3105 YN .0/511/0 31V0 -36rCS—•n wy3y7!5705.•.y{p .•»Nn r sel6nu�. i u -�{[ I, 1351 ,5505 Ni �3ry 1 ,d Neiman eim n dd l , 00 ow um5,841n�s 1� ..1nn, q ..0 Lq i...aq 1 ugtl ny1 WN LNW. 195,.4 I .14.4,45495, 0.55.0 Wwe r••• I. M....Mr ....NI a9 5...•N/o Iros-011017.9 910s-rnN99e) U.S. sir 'mw....a ea m..1 10.44 r•l•'rV Y lel 1.3 Ou/ seIefOOs$y y ' 'IO Lit/Or 777 SUNB33H 1NOW761Y3d i :0104 V1053NNIW 'NY3Y3 SIHDI3H 'NOW -120'3d 2 A ji N0rr.roF M, LOOK 3.91..2.000 : t. gar a• a z g Storm Sewer Trunk 'Y'::l1 lf.3IA33Y1 0 • fir.. t., iudcu -T- r. u:ro.ms 0505 [ ._ �II - O. I I lilItl III - .� ,1 11 ,IIII f i. !I1 UE -_ i g"z r - 711- .. N IIh I;I Irl 1/1 1111 \\11 1;1 1111 [/1 lir- III N lf1__1Jl' ;Ill ., rf� NARY PLAT 2 CC 0_ Location Map Eagan Boundary ' `' Street Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint nn � �/ (7-117 NIL a cz ca t 1' LS m 'Erna L3 J u'� ®r9':. C MI Yi Ilk MEM a g d Ma 1. re111111117 ■ - ri CU = R j~ 0 120 f .C_� D $130 I.� PSG a�IV I i�///'. �v'°.� il %: ,401: � °„ .:�Te61,4EMI511 . 7 k u - - , ... ... Sal® 7�.„.....„„_,, _ w —� ® / mvery wee 6 PA Site :-:/"ro g °"�,, . :k.riar .1toois.*t1Subject .,. 0 Eil 3 0 0 oc:3 c' oq�z� ro, i�®® ,wire cvrw ®i i■ , C:3 ° ' 0 01E03 EOM MI .rm�Qp ' 6 1 I TVA LI 1W-44 ctm . rAW11101.04"1„7::, �NI),2.44,4 i 1 .7° COMT1.101.• Win Elia 4 003 ��1 eI�/ vi w N<'4 r.VABaa,gPl g f:l.[l in e rima• i at Ike .r� ure„`�� Jft► riu_ �^ I • p7. ,, ... me G .r �m C41:�1WJ "d<rJ ° P tl«' I ll1 �42 � �v ® 'si®� /��— I �� 0,,e �: A D ka calill 11616 dly 0... AU 111 c Eau*_I ..,. z m i�` ® '®eek ®�f!: �Aiudir I ib i;D Q �i�� ®A s `� ®� '''��5 - E .i 1. �� ri®,� � ®��edoR4 W I.■II► ..� �T�� OP Nil. Tr. ...limi EL Idita ja I Ape. riti .440 a En kW a - ®©IZ, Al�` a Gp ;� . 00 oa`®e dd,� 10'4A®�10 � ® =ii iinffryo alit r� i IDQ11 iria -11111111/ _ PNA 1=AL gAEI 41 wig- AM Erni IfV r, LI 18 I I AllirA rE. • ..m, EZLZI AIZEll *404 !El smara � � 17 Irl A dC � _C`.� �� mga e. r e s10 1000 0 ate, �� -r, ¢V .:V ma m rPrP8 r,u4 1000 2000 ilital m& Feet Development/Developer: Pearlmont Heights Application: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Case No.: 16 -PS -19-09-04 l5..g."' n,. City of Cagan Community Development Department Map Prepared using ERSI AreView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided byDakota CountyOffice of GIS and is current as of January2004. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are not responsible for errors or omissions. N W+ E S Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Pearlmont Heights Case No. 16 -PS -19-09-04 City of Eagan Community Development Department 1 Parcel base map information provided Survey D.partmert Aurae 2003. Zoring information maintained byCity Staff. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. WE Zoning Map — Comprehensive Guide Plan / ..:::_ R= �� 41 9 0 o 7:" y Y Land Use Map QP ��.�/�fi� '� � 1 4 NI fru. -. rt : e �',;®e a oii �ffi lb PD �f. ', �e i -p o11..�. :®® 11 • �� I I IPI I lir �'� IP `� - �� SA ''. LB Current Zoning: fi($'» !-!i'__ P-4 _ „"�i,, — . `, Current Land Use Designation: 1 ,illk ' R-2 t�` ■L • I Residential Double District SA �in IIN MR LDNMILD! MI Low Density Residential OP 1111�o�' U'_ SA Si iIs_ •111111'•• D . / qi `VI ' ' NW , �.. �"� 1.01•11 '7"1-1-.1,-- 11.4 ro., DR " %IMO ' 4W1 :17 PD 600 0 600 1200 Foot �APR �=i1,,:��4Q /mom_ City of Eagan Community Development Department 1 Parcel base map information provided Survey D.partmert Aurae 2003. Zoring information maintained byCity Staff. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. WE — Comprehensive Guide Plan , 9 0 o 7:" i Y Land Use Map QP ��.�/�fi� '� � lb ,�,/T..' �f. ', �e i -p o11..�. :®® 11 �'� I [Pl I �� SA ''. fi($'» !-!i'__ . Current Land Use Designation: 1 ,illk , ■L • I SA LDNMILD! MI Low Density Residential M� ,'IIIkill=_�'I, 1111�o�' 1 SA Si iIs_ •111111'•• D . / �.. �"� - piss &MI 40 4 Ate" - 600 0 600 1200 Foot , „ / fn `(//.. Wl� I City of Eagan Community Development Department 1 Parcel base map information provided Survey D.partmert Aurae 2003. Zoring information maintained byCity Staff. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. WE z G) 0 0 z 0 0 rz V yJ I r __ - • 1 1 I I I 1 .1 I I I 1 1 1 140+2.27619 _J 639.67 1 -J-- LAKEVJXIV'.Y a_ltuS to r 9. TRAIL 1 T<z- t rte • - —r ti_ --moi ;•I�}Y" • v .r). 0-'0' `0 0 • ' O L -5S 4 /- - y. 7.PPLES TPEES ) " I =r— J:JJJ..7_V_�L.)�-1�)J.-AJJ.lA-'.r : J '(.7 '.0 0 ' a,0 G L,'.0 c. -I I J. ?-_-_;•0 "----,0 00O0O0cPc .1117 •,-- e. z; iv�"� �I ,• u 01 0 Oyu a O 0 O ,: ° ;o 9 Q 0 s QI Qom,.. J° 0 U c� o0 0 "0:' , . 0 • ..coot 0000 EVL E tz �€S 6:- 500.2.76T 110.07 71- r: jr 1,3 Vr-- I n1 9 ,,— OAK........E QST .D...-.-. y g= FA1is $ R R s N aN ? a w fil N b. t. F C: 0 a a 4 35S PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN. MINNESOTA 1 FOR: 1 PEARLMONr HEIGHTS, LIC[ John Oliver & As tes, li 1 r. t1+.ln. tn4 N.M. 200 gunwYy, MN 02.221 (666)661-6306 (n.Ve6f-J666,. _. 1 hereby caddy Nal 119 plan ec 5ppared by der Meitm ane maell 1 1 Odie b or Ne +' Minnedo 3. . .i , n.... DAZE: 9/15/04 DEISM 9T: DJL DRAWN 00. W 1 CHECKED 07.D iL DWG FILE: 19D1E1P1 TETT FILE w` NO DME DESERMTION IVld AM/NIL/11111E1d 0. cS.s- "Zit Eitr: ;414// / = —1i Fill , I __lit/ fil 1!! 1111 ll II -I k. Ii I Iti PI IT 7 - 13 I I . 11‘ 4 1 17 — il i/ LI 11 I ,. 1111 1 1r; III \I\ . \I \ - II\ 2 I \I \ \I \ N I 1. I ', [ m to .1 L ,,..3 _,I1-- , . 1 _J„IL___' ____iiim.72.jr_li_._.11-- n, . JIL 1 / J • , r• I 1 / 0. LAREVIEW TRAIL Ar,:r - ZSIc :g?! I " too EotE, NI 50. JJO, otos! 'POO 11 17. 30 30 !R :00,4Ott • grrtao Ceial EE 0 a j4040 a 1440:90 [ 50,,,,C Po, SOONN, to, TL 1 '1123. 00,24.16.E =03 `• -47rd, -r_ JO 111 11 JO 9' r4j ON, ei oloy) PArc 0:^! ,,o_1) 1! CZ (4,011 ,Y,'411 (111 1...N91,1,4 forpneo p.reA otax1001! 01 0(111135001!' 305 11! ft .t.7111115 Itr3a. (0108 ,P1M1,9 745l ,11113S 0111! IPV&I r+(0�, peso., 1,)1f,t1 st•Vt.O 1.1!,S, 5Syv rr ties rants - X 3 kt 0. ISM Mtn ”.to , MOO 0. 540090407 MOO 111 4 SOO 24 OST .110.07 _r It I. 0 01 31? - 122 ADDINC•H rn PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN. MINI4ESOTA FOR: IPEARLMONT wows, act John Oliver sso 04 MA*. And 1201 IC Tres* 04Q200 41.0,100014. NN 00000 , . (062)001-0046 (744000-2041 51O... d5 150 fl5s O. I hereby certify DIM NM plan prepared 47 .00 or under 090.400 004 5005 Ip500 Licensed Protege Use loos al Ihe114900*5.10. under SknO0 Douplm J. Utterx__ DAIL 9/15/D4 0.51.410.9 519. CUL DRAWN ITT: SRN CHECKED Nit tUL 0051 FILLIMIt•131 TEXf FILL NA. DAM DESCRIPTION PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN. MINNESOTA FOR: PEARLMONT NETGNTS, LLC CITC I VMIT PI AN John Oliver & Ass 401 W. A-.ubra , .0 a,ue ZOO DIPII•Vint. SIN iidr, (952)894-3041 (/Al)Y4-6046 Offers Itto dl0 Aaoet, 4anr.rtle end JMaelidn Confer, Mono.. brlIly that mo Men 2 yor t ecf Ilvebn and be 1611 Ir�Is M Reler. d6. .o,d. Ian of the ya 11 W nneaela. //y4"� ODouyke J Otero,D D6D6/15/0f Rey. 144 25466 DAIS. 41/15/0/ DESIGN BT: JCR DRAWN BY: DJL CHECKED m: JCB DWG EIlL 160IAIP1 TEXT FILL NA E111 N0.: 16D1.10-03 REV ND DATE DESCRIPTION m m m m 0 z . Sa ./_ '(lP ''.PPPLES iPEES 1 0'00C oo 0000crO .`0 ccdo t�m! • To' or- o■ ro O 0' 07 0 m 0 Dp 0 0 a 0 JJJ L .nr PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN. NIINNESO1A FOR. PEARLMONT HEIGHTS LLC nnl—t—flat T10,11.1 Col LI 2Z m 0 0 c 0 /A 0 0 0 °v John Oliver & Associates a.......-�.... w a...r• ny Re, ci)rN-. MW Hxaa.r Be, If. - el (F45) 1 no 3 5,2 ff 5 11011111111111111111111101i01IIIIII1 IIIIIill iiIiiiiiIiIIIIIIIIiiiIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIlII ... _ FI �I°IrI II�IIhIIIII�hIIIIIIIIIhIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIII'I1IIIiIII IIIIIIIIIIII� II c.N' R st this plan under eel Doesee Is 24. Ats.. ►r.rr.Nl. • ..d lrwtb-r Cm*, II .4. ser Sian , �y1[s�Doupba J. LIN.rw 301./15/134 Rep. Ne 256 DATE: 11/15/04 DESIGN BT: JCN DRAWN BY: JCH CHECKED ■Y: 39 DWG RIE: 16011.2P1 TOR PRE: NA nu NO.: 16011D 00 REV NO. 0 m 0 0 c coN DESCRIPTION 37 NV -1d ]dVOSGNV1 P 2 0 IllIONINICHINE 11:11111103111:111 SEE UIRGAMII PLJI�"� ~�J il Ri EA PUNGENS �• RIVER RIRCH I RONDLMCUST I (IDITSM TRYiN1TnOS 11ERUIS` PRAIRIfIRE CRABAPPLE CLUMIP MRI,US 'PRURWRE' BLACK NILS SPRUCE RGES GW1rA DDI54TA ' COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME _FMIERALD LUSTRE IJAPLE 111111121111 M L AND FULL CROWN STRAN',HT LEADER STRAIGHT TER AND RIA. CRDWN STR.vG t EEAADDER STRAIGHT LEADER aaB foil CROWN FULL ECRH REMARKS STRAIC_HT LEADER __ v r z rn n 2 m 0 1 m m m 11 ai 0,26 R 4 � R PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN. MINNESOTA FOR: PEARLMONT HEIGHTS, LLC f y BM M. pian under and IMI 1 Prafonlen of do 5 !, _1 bn``,``]Y—�Yaupbc J. Utterer DAR 9/15/04 DESIGN BY: JCR DRAWN BY: JLH CHECKED BY: JB DWG FILE: 16OILIPI 7E[Y f11E: NA (a (5. @ j O Q 3 D ? V.• CJ 3 @ �� J O Cn 0 7• o J J Q j x 6 O O@ Q Q Q .'nom @ c S cp �• CD 7 a.0 - n0' -,Z -< �3 (D O ( Q • (ACD Q@ C Q Q Q n on 7 ` 0 O @ '� O v;. 0•53 ?,-@ ` o '.,...)0.,--.70 r ..r N �_ CCDD` @ J Q @ d Q_ m• n s=7...: vD Q N X C (}Q cD L -< 'v n Q cbQQc . a - O 3 0 CD aD b U D_ Q-. OO @ — @ J @ p IT CD n D- = C 3 a. o 3 3 _ S :D =4 0 v,- O G Q? Q () Q r@ (..... Q Q d O @ Q.. (D . 3 -'. (D 8 O .. O ` _7 (D 4,_ ' cr. c c C @ , tom7 37 I f'< (D -C CD Cid ? dIHS213NMO '8 CINV1 d �6 O O Q 7 d d@ r3� @ O cD 3- @O Q. C vtT 2. `- 4 3 LrJ 3 d j O — . 7 r � < •.cod Q 3 �0 0- r Q - v.•7 d (5 J. 0 72. x o Q 4@ --6- J.@ cD ' ( (1 Cil - 0 -`" < 0 �..� 2 300 nn ca n@ w 7 Q dj 3 t<�D a;, d w@ 0 Q n a? j -.Q 7-'.". 7 .5 cr.) O " u'Q(0° `� o d 3, o n_ 0 3 c 3 rn ° f o" 3 S- Q a° Q .. -0 7 e(aQna. O - 7 < 3 n - n 57 5•:� 9. d C• 7-d O n Q Q@" _, @ _5'v,<zi-o a (? n d CI Q 3 J< C� �_ Cr 0 0 n0 a - G0 O C v. Q 7 p,Q x,J'il 3 7 Q rn .. 7' C 0' 0 (- (Cv n n .CD -' -- G J J O 9 m a 0—v1 ,� %- T 2 Y NOJiONOZELNI sI0taH JuouzjIEad 7 Q ZJ L` D :7.'8,32=77_,,:z ry 7 0 3 C , O (D (D C p g p CJ ° (D (D 7 ,: c p v. Q_ CJ C j (.O -« .c tD 5 C 7 n Q n t0 T5. C �. 0 D-3 • n c O N 0 0 2. t 6 0 p a Q 0 3 C Q Q p = n° n c0 0 3-- ( =("3-g08:` 7 cD Q6n c Ott p 7 .nTJ p r) VI 5SQ =a2 D( tD CD•R O O'(" ' mQ-Nm ron prn0°0- <_ mJ Q CD ' CD{ N 0 { D , D G -0 O O -02.5600 o° Q< .C—+ Q. o .a(1) O- O o C Q p O O Q ?• tQ �. -• m Q 7 O n N CD o- Q 5 O. Q Q �• Q (D 5 a . O :Y 3 �: -0 0 7 t] O m _3 c. - 0_ n m N 3' 7 -'0 -IS (D _ (D 0 2( Q 7 9,5_ Q P o Q, D N n 0 3 C 0 Q. 0 O DD O O : n (D 0 0 0� cD ar CC 7(D 7 3= Q (O C Q, < .. ,C„ C =� O K 7 z - cD O O 7- a "1., �. O O cD 7 t0 0 3 0 do o a rn o m ':( @ �. 7-__.- -x0 , p- vN, Q. O �., ` �. N N t 5-.-▪ 30(1).1. p D _.2Q ( (0 07a3p 0 70tD m a D 7 4. N O O_ (D w G N Q O PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT a.7 a a O 7 r oo..i :0(;)!..5%; . 7 7 (o cD a Q. @ C 5 N (D 3 C 7 7 C O c 3 1, 0 o. C p N ',°o 01D ? cD -� Q• m D' c (2• ° co m TCD � �n 7 0( QaD T'Q 7 0 L Da ID s O ° O O 0 Q m. m O 7 cD CnD O -- -0D- A x, O CD ? C Q C O (D •0 5-O Q 3 7 •< rD 5 N cJ J "'S_ O 7 Q M C. 0 n 0 C: . - O tv N N - rJ O t Q 70 3 ,^3_._ O u <D (U - (D O 2 Q W N j 0 x `^. 6 p i o O nt0 3.=0 (D - D 7 C^ (D < -- n (DSD til. "�00) ' Q t.7 •� O cD (D 0 Q 0 SCJ ° O 5-71)°g()0 O 7' --00=^0D ' p fi .c<',9, n 7 h3 7 n 0 C O �. 0 0 0- • 3' 0 m OC n C D Q Q O T v. O D J W m O J- 7 N (D CD 0 (D 7, (D. N ° p (D L 7 � C 0 N g•�O 7 9 0 O'5.0- Q = J 05-- ,,o 07 Q m p n p (0::::o O ct,p (DP man, — (o n 0 .0 3 i7 D n 0 7 0 f) d- � p C O -N« Q ,� � 63),5o.,'4.-0 O 6 Q C • - :D 0o m �0 mm o -a9 am 0 CD m '5,:o. tD CJ N Q O (-0 O° Q 0 'OMR < O O O 00n0' DC7 0 ,00=Q.3 p u CD tD ° oD O (D cD fl ca Q.0 o� :D -- 3 7 n _g7".:D :D ao3 3Sfl QNV1 QNV ONINOZ g 0- X O � Oi � c_3• D m+ m CQ D O mQ T 'CD3N ." -I tD (ilJOz 'a Qx Q 7 D aa FD - 00°°'7, ----'00°-m 3 f a p ° a 0aN '58 c 3 pQc c a 0Q0' 2c3o5Oo0°aro0c0 N�70 3m0,Vic0� 3030ao00 m roo0m° -a �. .crn o n QO 5QOc _O n: roOoO OO 2O Otpro 5 ( C @ aF'{ . r)<3 O5a r3Q D q. K. Q O<rog�.O`^QQt-Oj flt@Ja DQ On 0Q =. Q po O ac per, C _CO U' u. ofl@XOQ c6O ¢ j nNn C Q. rD 6 n OOoQ"'C' 7 O rn L O� fl j O C r`ro "'• CL O a CO -0 O4QQO O O rn C rn =- l a °a 065.- a- 6. C nNro p (DtJ 1 in ,< <yra a_ v. c J - 0 O 3 a 6-„,-.-<- --0 70 _ C -n 0 - .a Cia 3 5.-00030-f-7 �(_ N N a x TQfi O to W .tom0fl 7. 0 <3�.O . ptp3 ro O O 0Qcc�-oa1 ate• a< Xi 3 .c c 0ooO0o QPQ " ODCD P0C-sW f O Q Q O p•B a' QQ a„Cr•a o (-0=' Q4.,.. jcQ a _.O f a . • a A r•° D' (p 'O O Q 0c) 03j _°2n 3'3 ?O'c - 3sNo00<0.)a@tC p j - 0 5- c ocQQro ro OO.i83,• 'iam � n4 0O io 0 °o �' < = fl " Q 0 3 krn O D rn O m° o CO to " J a O OC J m Et rn 7 c o �Cp� 6 s- ° 0 a 5 3 co C 3a o6 �to : c5 o A 0., mn - a tD -o C - 6 to _ o t..CD vO 0 (p W C x7, 0 0. a Q i -_O3a ro0 ro D O Om0 p,:omamN;nO Oib- (7 •< D- Na n3 N•Q _C(N 0a -0o F 0 (--1.3Oif a cD X C 03 0 < (D a 17 '' tl "' t7 `0 6' 0 D. 7' < 3 o ro 2 a o O Q a 3 c n CD �3 2 5. O N n. Q O 0 40 O= o o .� m _v 0 4 O .6,(18,..-,,i; OoOO �o.o- _-� m J -0 0 0 - a o -C C Q o p r (D , {n 3 0- 3 CD O v a 0 .3 O Fd �. a 7 3• o c. p X. 3 ro mo'^ < < C z•QD0O Q 0 a-= Q a Ca 5 53 " J '- t -L-71 N ^ O <O •m a m roQ° 9. •.o 1.FICaQ ;pmeQ aQ ro0pg ao>00- °aoQa 0 m C?- o rnJ. 0tD 10 O CD , _ Q . a ' : F, o ='. N o 0 ccn a ro a 5 .-, 3..(3. -o TQ QQ?aQ p='D 0 N ,C --i N 0 ODOOO< D < m CD � a 0 -< 0i - ~fes s_? ap ` m. * -1 J ir, CD a Q- 7.- o ,-• ro n a 6 53 r n O Li SITE STATISTICS AND PROPOSED PROJECT STANDARDS 0 = CO QO°{ 5D° rQ . .O Q roo 50 J a3 a=N5t C a O p N ,76,Z 3'Q O T Q a c• 'n 3 3 (D CU - 0 tD - C 9 O• '' `7 ro Q O 0 CD CD • N' n ,3D a n *S (( 0 rn (D p �. Q n �. c 3 � c Q �. _ n CD rn 3 (Q Q • Q Q (Q �O 5 Cv`"-3CD Q< ° 0(D_ _ QQQ Q 0roO D vD co = =Q'D_ CN D 0 -DD = C O n _ 1 Q p a o Q • 6- ° -+ 6 m a3 a3� o ca— CQ o CD CD a 7 Q cn a (D 'J C) 7 Q CD �= •t "' n a 'O C "- Q_ ro CD Q 3 " n ro cr) rn OnDa.QO a n 7 CD _ Q Q cQ� <0 3ap c no QQ oa D Q CD _ O ,C DD D tO�D Q -C oa D aO CQ< (n m oo• O oa3 3fl3roF°-o-E CD' C-13 5-'" F-..- IN a„, z Q �Q , =P T :A -0o 3 fl°� Q•QJ 3- 0 D n o -. O • 39,-a-0-- D O O 3 (nD C 3 0- 0 Q Q O. "- a 5 (D CD -° 3 a (D Z •a ,-,2- 0 Q° N ro Q 3 G -4. Q 3 •" O CD O° O- ro C C ro Q ro? r ro Q `-"• Q Q Q 3 Q Q a0 o n __-0 m ro Q ro ro 3'(Q N 3 3 .--",)• �� 3 oa .Tz a��0 0 3 ,.,--4 p ro tp p'Q 2 -3 3C;] 'TT O c 52 -dr a .._ p zsn iDroQ roc 'OD 7' n j Q N Q - O DC - o C 7Q Q OT C5 Q i. NV1d ONIdVDSQNV1 a a� Q< - p 4 m Q p t? J cA On -• -- Q 5 6 CD CD - r T 7,• - (0 C O'D.;0° O O ry . Q - N n <CD Q O T3..-r•Q O CDOOQ3Eao_ (3 9-: 3o Qmo:� 3 n' c =;- 5 • J Q 5' Q a C•° 0 �• (? a 3 Q py ° Q I o o'co a0-67;0a0.00( ,^O :, OQC -c° 0 Q •: c J a5x_.33-0oroc.9ro (� Q 3 -< t4 3 = Si�. O ro ? cD �• O ° 00 Q z Q- Q • Q<3CcnQaro,. • Q O Q 5 O Q 7 O' Q _. 3 O „ .� 3 O ' 0 Q C O ro cD 'D m 3 O `-•' 0 Q p° O 0 (D 0 a3 o o :a� T 0- 0 -- o a Q n (Q Q E- 0 ao_`-, Q Q0 °o 0 C - p a O :00 3 ro `°-' 6(0 Q (� m , 33-o0Oroa' } o (3 �_ a c '" o 3 ° f 17 0 o 0 0 ao� a'2.0o@ -4 .?-3 C (D r ro, tC 7 D ° n0_ - O Op 0 a 5 Q 03 9 Q O o m '- 5 c o a° 6 a m 0 r5 a n o -'E C g3 �' O q O Q ro CD C gO -p Q ro N O n Q• IS-ro ro C C 3 �5-cJn'a o ,5F..�. CD Q �� c 3 n =Q o O D -OQ Q p ro . 6 Q 5 Q .J N 3 n F N 3 D a _ < O O n' ° < T C -'a°-°a ° 9o - gal) ogQ Q O 6 K r 0 O. o ro C QQ J C a• 0 Q o- 5- cQ`3• <oQ ate -•-• 0- O Z L ro -co a m 0 (`n O• 3 rnSCD - 0 T =' ( o 0 - T Q (D C Z-.4."- CD Q 0 < .. 3?J111o31IHO?W Q -+ Q54- D 3 a CD a' 313 (D N 3. N 0 • 0 D 3 ( . n D s' C O p" Q 9 30'-• 9ro Q D_ o 9 5 ,0Q -- aN 7 Q r Q -- Q 0 0 ro 7 n (Da Q Q O _ 0. O O O 3c03 (1) -• n O 3- - o Hro 0 Q 27 ro(°QC� O O 'O 9 Q 3 ' a T < 7 7 Q J O n o 0 Q 0(713):7, D O O 0 pD (D r; ro3 ° .- 3 J' NOIIVIOOSSV SN3NMO3WOH i O C A 18 2004 ��L LJi To: Eagan City Hall Council Chambers 15 October 2004 Fm: Jeffery Richards Eagan Home Owner Sub: Development of Pearlmont Heights Case # 16 -PS -19-09-04. Dear Sirs: I am a recent resident to the Eagan area and presently reside at 3562 Coachman Road in Eagan. You will note by my address that my property will be affected in some way by the development of the proposed Pearlmont Heights case # 16 -PS -19-09-04. My primary concern is the "green belt" that is directly behind by house, this is one of the major reasons among others that the decision to purchase the house was based on. My questions are as follows: 1). How close to my back yard will the development encroach. 2). How many trees will be felled 3). How close to my fence line will this take place. 4). How long will the construction take place. I plan to attend the hearing planed for 26 October 2004 and ask the same questions as indicated above. If possible could you please provide response via email, that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your help in this matter. Jeffery Richards 3562 Coachman Road Eagan, MN 55122 612 812 1527 jeffery_richards_737@yahoo.com RonClark Construction & Design peaft6norpote qec.e,ited E4lag, 7/L:Nagoota Product Stats Project Limits Unit Type Unit Name Base Area Porch Area 3-Car Area Unks Allocated Base Units Available* Final Total Unit Count** Max. Option Unks Avail.* Final Total Unit Count"' Max. Units UMW Allocated Units Available A Dif!ley 1343 127 N/A 8 0 48 0 48 48 48 0 B Sibley 2042 128 N/A 4 0 48 0 48 C Lexington 2042 128 N/A 4 0 48 0 48 Max. Area Area Allocated Ana Available D Wescott 2194 119 210 21 0 48 0 48 108,028 107,287 741 E Covington 2194 N/A 210 11 0 48 0 48 Porches Allocated --> 37 26 <— 3-Car Garages Allocated *Assumes non-real scenario of building out the remainder of the project in this single unit type The purpose of this data is to better track usage of available building area, thus avoiding over-allocation of area to any one unit which may result in the loss (0916 project of an entire buikting. Counts are automatically updated as units are entered below. —Due to the twinhome builcfing configuration this field cannot contain an odd number, sot is automatically adjusted downward to reflect the actual unit count that would result in that scenar *Twintiorne buildings must be comprised of two compatible units. Plans A and B can be paired only with the reverse 01919 same plan. Plans C. D, and E can be paired with its own reverse or that of either of the other two. Therefore, possible building configurations are AA, BB, CC, CD, CE, DC, DD, DE, EC, ED, EE. Individual Unit Allocation & Sales Data Unit No. Unit Type" Adj. Unit Choices Base Area Porch YIN Porch Area 3-Cif YIN 3-Car Area Total Area Thls Unit Sale Date MINDD/YY Start Date MWDDNY Finish Date MWDD/YY Close Date MMIDDIYY 1 (Model) A A 1343 Y 127 1470 2 (Model) A A 1343 Y 127 1470 3 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 4 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 5 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 6 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 7 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 8 A A 1343 Y 127 1470 9 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 r 210 2523 10 D C, D, or E 2194 r 119 Y 210 2523 11 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 12 D C. 0, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 13 0 C, 0, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 14 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 15 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 16 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 17 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 18 0 C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Iti 2313 19 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 fil 2313 20 E C, D, or E 2194 N 2194 21 E C, D, or E 2194 Y 210 2404 22 E WWWWWWW11.1 ksYs1515S dddcid OQQOOQQO 2194 Y 210 2404 23 E _ 2194 Y 210 2404 24 E 2194 Y 210 2404 25 E . 2194 Y 210 2404 26 E _ 2194 Y 210 2404 27 E _ 2194 Y 210 2404 28 E 2194 Y 210 2404 29 D 2194 Y 119 r 210 2523 30 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 31 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 32 D C, D, or E 2194 r 119 Y 210 2523 33 D C, D,orE_ 2194 Y 119 N 2313 34 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 N 2313 35 D C, 0, or E 2194 r 119 Y 210 2523 36 E C, D, or E 2194 N 2194 37 C C, D, or E 2042 Y 128 2170. 38 C C, D, or E 2042 r 128 2170 39 Et B 2042 Y 128 2170 40 B B _ 2042 Y 128 2170 41 B 8 _ 2042 Y 128 2170 42 El 13 2042 Y 128 2170 43 C C, D, or E 2042 Y 128 2170 44 C C, D, or E _ 2042 Y 128 2170 45 0 C, 0, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 46 D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 47 (Modell D C, D, or E 2194 Y 119 Y 210 2523 48 (Model) E C, D, or E 2194 Y 210 2404 The and allocations and related statistics shown above are just one example of how the project may be built out. The actual butid-out will largely be determined by market factors. The only other limitations on actual unit allocations are physical location within the project, topography, and Inc Project Limits parameters shown above. r 777cT 29 1004 L lVld Adb+NIVJfl IHd a3SIAEJd r.li 1 ; f' a /(':. v. 1j/ a Frill- ill :: I'll 111 1: =II :' .. 1 I I — --1111 1/1 !�I I'll 1;1 fit\ III I I ii1 � I' 4 1 „ ' h — 111 tl �;1 hl �I� s �11� �I� " �/1 s s1,4 H I ,,§ b RR Ai iS rt c Iim 110 • LAI•:EYIEW TRAIL r-_rr _ is�T�y`�� I -- —r ,xi R 1 • 1200 Its II 4 e aqr roar pa o-; •eaRu 04.0 • Ito irossuar re W. 1,00071, C IV 0 ,.0 • a e `Z. Ii m e _ A� qR MS I 4 — qL `p' �N :s �A. RR 4q At ss 1.0 v ZS �y H 7a A 121.0 WI( Sw is • I;w It— a I ,I 5702476V 13001 1 I:b - _ _ -yJ _ — _ —AaaA Axza—3. -- 9� 3. ▪ S0000.00T 1770S 8 b EFF: s - : rfU 'je8 9sref "; rxti ;; a$s •a'.: iat. �$x8 >;,L 1st. 113 J 8 a8 / !; 3. egA PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FOR: PEAALAIONT HEIGIIfTS LLC SUBDIVISION PLAN 1 1 3. 8 3. 2 ae It I( If g 3. 3 Fra ''Y rr[I 'IJOS MVOS John Olive, & Associates, Inc. 1201 D. T.vae. T.4 6.+a 200 “3 )+-046 2 Xes-304S on._ * 23. Rcvn, Drmru(. eM 0r..+Rrn nwile, Wm *Y 1,1 33000 5302476T 31007 ROYAL _4444 CIRCLE 1ST . 3.3Ticrii I hereby a.r12y that this pion prKanul by no or um..Y ▪ Wnlrion oM that I Ucerwad — tlr a.. uMe of . Y e6n,m.Mo Q DouYa. A Mery5 Diel/16/04 Ras. No_ Z:__ r ----.,-i g PIM 12/06/04 0ESICN 6Y: 414 D RMMN 6W. fila1 CNDLIOA 6y: .3D DMC Nur 16017131 113 ply: MA FILE NO.: 1601.10-03 OMT[ 060RWDON 3. n 671/01 - u. :i Nee uaa N k '4`a$ Stn, 5 sse 9!=- 1 '''/:r1 c Iim 110 • LAI•:EYIEW TRAIL r-_rr _ is�T�y`�� I -- —r ,xi R 1 • 1200 Its II 4 e aqr roar pa o-; •eaRu 04.0 • Ito irossuar re W. 1,00071, C IV 0 ,.0 • a e `Z. Ii m e _ A� qR MS I 4 — qL `p' �N :s �A. RR 4q At ss 1.0 v ZS �y H 7a A 121.0 WI( Sw is • I;w It— a I ,I 5702476V 13001 1 I:b - _ _ -yJ _ — _ —AaaA Axza—3. -- 9� 3. ▪ S0000.00T 1770S 8 b EFF: s - : rfU 'je8 9sref "; rxti ;; a$s •a'.: iat. �$x8 >;,L 1st. 113 J 8 a8 / !; 3. egA PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FOR: PEAALAIONT HEIGIIfTS LLC SUBDIVISION PLAN 1 1 3. 8 3. 2 ae It I( If g 3. 3 Fra ''Y rr[I 'IJOS MVOS John Olive, & Associates, Inc. 1201 D. T.vae. T.4 6.+a 200 “3 )+-046 2 Xes-304S on._ * 23. Rcvn, Drmru(. eM 0r..+Rrn nwile, Wm *Y 1,1 33000 5302476T 31007 ROYAL _4444 CIRCLE 1ST . 3.3Ticrii I hereby a.r12y that this pion prKanul by no or um..Y ▪ Wnlrion oM that I Ucerwad — tlr a.. uMe of . Y e6n,m.Mo Q DouYa. A Mery5 Diel/16/04 Ras. No_ Z:__ r ----.,-i g PIM 12/06/04 0ESICN 6Y: 414 D RMMN 6W. fila1 CNDLIOA 6y: .3D DMC Nur 16017131 113 ply: MA FILE NO.: 1601.10-03 OMT[ 060RWDON 3. n C L �'I �'�I In III '•I� ' I' jw ' I ( �I m t Y .. l;( r III 1�I 1',I I', I;i ; Llifi I/2 i;S 1--ifL —IL� —J —�14 Jim JAL J11 L J tl J,L -1�L — U 41 iegy FON otls Nis tot ex,s �42 x ROYAL SC07•167 450.02 0c._. •I::r: .. r J Ill r 014+ R !' • w. 2; PEARLMONT HEIGHTS EACAN. MINNESOTA FOR: PEAALMONT N TEPTT LLC SITE LAYOUT PLAN John Oliver & Associates, Inc. er Mw.6.w ..r u EDI P. T1*.* IVeil. s..N. 200 (M)11141-8046 ( 0'-6w 0/IF... b Maws JI.m.Yf. ..6 62..Elyw t NM,. I hereby p.10y 0l Ma pan prepared by ram sr under 00.. lens el Na%tC*'tann..l.. a „N'6' {eJ^�µ! '°L 01c2/06/04 Rep. NA__22112._. DATE: +2/06/06 DESIGN BY: JLII DRAWN S.`. CUL CHECKED BY: JCB 000 FILE: 1601A1P1 TEXT FILE MA F42 NO.: 1601.10-03 DATE DESCRIPTION 6 9 4'7 / i%/ v4 1 4,Aoe7f/'` do-e!rooy,4, , ivve"1-° d4"6 e?4 "te-pt5 A1 /•zeOL 41Az4,5,9 ,A4 471'e te/#1Z9d,t0r~e1Z i,,///34e4e4z,-c. e•-/ d -f7 /i,/ 2004 Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting C. REZONING, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT — CEDARSTONE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) Rezoning of 5 acres from Agriculture to PD, Planned Development for property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Preliminary Subdivision to create 8 lots on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14; Subject to the conditions in the staff report. To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) Preliminary Planned Development to create 14 twin homes with public and private streets and reduced setbacks to the public street for property located at 1044 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14; Subject to the conditions in the staff report. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL > Majority of Council Members present FACTS: Items in bold are new information > At the regular City Council meeting on November 4, 2004, the applicant was directed to work with the property to the west on a shared access and comprehensive plan for the two parcels. ➢ • The revised site plan depicts access for the development onto Wescott Road via public street in the southwestern corner of the site. Public street access for the possible future development of the adjacent 5 -acre property to the west (Parcel 030-53) is proposed through a 400 -feet long public street cul-de-sac along the common property line. > An application for rezoning to R-2, residential double, was submitted in March. At the May City Council meeting there was council consensus that the twin home proposal may be appropriate if handled as a Planned Development and the Commission and Council had the rezoning, subdivision and planned development plans before them at one time to review. 0 ni ➢ As presented, there are deviations to the R-2 standards regarding lot size and setbacks; access from Wescott is proposed by public and private roads. ➢ The subject site is surrounded by single family detached residential uses. Properties to the north and south are fully developed. The property to the east and west are zoned Agriculture and have potential to be developed further. > Conditions of approval regarding streets identified in the planning reports and at the public hearing for this development should still apply. > The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004 and is recommending denial. ISSUES: > The APC suggested public streets rather than private although members were concerned setbacks could not be met. > The APC concluded the Planned Development provided little benefit to the City and may not be consistent with the surrounding area. > The applicant has submitted a new narrative and a revised site plan for the purpose of addressing the APC concerns. > Street access for Lots lA through 3B, and for the future development of the adjacent 5 -acre property to the east (Parcel 050-53), is proposed via private street extension parallel to Wescott Road. The private street depicted on the revised site plan does not have an adequate turnaround as required. If approved the private street should be constructed with a turnaround in accordance with City code and engineering standards (add to conditions). > The revised plan still has setback deviations when compared to R-2, but provides public access to the west parcel and private to the east parcel. > The private drive to the north has front setbacks that range from 11 to 16 feet and the private drive to the south has front setbacks ranging from 21 feet to 21 feet. A private dead-end private street requires a minimum of a 20 foot setback. > The required setback from public right-of-way is 30 feet, Lot 8 is proposed at 26 feet. ➢ Perpendicular or diagonal parking areas are not allowed in public street right-of-way. 60 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE • December 21, 2004 ATTACHMENTS (4): September 28, 2004 APC minutes on .a throughc9/It Staff Report on pages 4./.6hrougla Applicant's revised narrative on pageshroughas- Revised Plat and Site Plan on pageeZhroughvSr City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 28, 2004 Page 3 B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION & PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT — CEDARSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. A Preliminary Subdivision (Cedarstone of Wescott) of approximately five acres to create 14 lots and a Preliminary Planned Development to allow twinhomes, located at 1055 Wescott Road the SW 1/4 of Section 14. Member Chavez was absent during the presentation of this item. Planner Cartney introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated September 22, 2004. She noted the background and history. Chuck Levin, Architect for the project introduced the development team and stated the need for a twin home development in the City of Eagan. He stated the units would be sold for $350,000 to $400,000. He discussed changes made to the plan such as density and access points. He stated 102 trees will be preserved, 30 trees will be relocated on the site, 24 overstory trees, 27 ornamental trees, and 16 coniferous trees will be added. He stated the monument sign would be located on the east side of the entrance. He discussed typical home features for the different units. Clark Wickland, discussed the concern for flooding. He stated the wetland area in the middle of the site would collect drainage then discharge into a storm sewer system after a certain level of elevation. Chair Heyl opened the public hearing. Sue Vuruno, 3708 Cardinal Way stated the site does not fit the proposed development. She stated concern with stormwater runoff and the distance between her home and the proposed homes. She stated concern with the access points. Bob McDonald 1085 Wescott Road stated concern for the density, compatibility, and emergency access. Steve Wolfrath 3720 Cardinal Way agreed with previous comments and asked the Advisory Planning Commission to protect the surrounding neighbors. Irwin Dahl 1025 Wescott Road stated concern for the density. Fred Ruppe 3704 Cardinal Way stated concern with light pollution and lack of children in the community, referring to the suggested empty nesters occupancy. There being no further public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Chair Heyl inquired about runoff to the north. She asked about private streets verses public streets. Assistant Engineer John Gorder stated there is adequate drainage for the property. City Attorney Bob Bauer explained that the developer has proposed private streets and that the developer has requested that the city obtain easements from the adjacent property owners to use the private road in the future and contribute financially to the construction and maintenance. He also explained that the city does not negotiate private easements between the developer and affected property owners. He further 3/3 City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 28, 2004 Page 4 stated that condition number 4 gives the developer the right to negotiate the private easements and if it cannot be obtained, one option requires the developer to dedicate and construct the public streets that would provide public access to the adjacent properties. Member Gladhill stated concern with consistency, density, and setbacks. Chair Heyl agreed with Member Gladhill and stated there should be a public street, which would not allow the setback requirements to be met. She stated concern for number of trips per access point. She further stated the Planned Development appears only to benefit the developer. She stated the 14 units are not feasible with the access and setback issues. She lastly stated that the proposed twinhomes are not consistent with the surrounding area. Member Bendt moved, Member Chavez seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Rezoning of five acres from Agriculture to Planned Development, for property located at 1055 Wescott Road. The reasons for denial are as follows: 1. Does not benefit the City of Eagan. 2. Not compatible with surrounding area because of setback of private or public roadways. 3. Not adequate access. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. Member Bendt moved, Member Chavez seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 14 twinhomes on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. The reasons for denial are as follows: 1. Does not benefit the City of Eagan. 2. Not compatible with surrounding area because of setback of private or public roadways. 3. Not adequate access. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. Member Bendt moved, Member Gladhill seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 8 lots on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW % of Section 14. The reasons for denial are as follows: 1. Does not benefit the City of Eagan. 2. Not compatible with surrounding area because of setback of private or public roadways. 3. Not adequate access. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. acv PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 21, 2004 APPLICANT: Cletis Levisay CASE: 14 -PS -14-08-04 HEARING DATE: September 28, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Same APPLICATION DATE: September 1, 2004 REQUEST: Rezoning, Preliminary PD, Preliminary Subdivision PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney LOCATION: 1055 Wescott Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential ZONING: A, Agriculture SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning of five acres from Agriculture to Planned Development, Preliminary Planned Development to create 14 twin homes and a Preliminary Subdivision to create 8 lots on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 'A of Section 14. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Rezoning: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subd. 5 states in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: 08' Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 2 A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Planned Development: 014 Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 3 City Code Chapter 11.60, Subd. 18, A., states the intent of the Planned Development zoning district as follows: 1. Providing greater"flexibility in environmental design and relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater creativity and environmental sensitivity. 2. Recognizing the economic and cultural advantages that will accrue to the residents of a planned community. 3. Encouraging a more creative and efficient approach to the use of the land. 4. Encouraging the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, natural features, and open space. 5. Encouraging a development pattern that is consistent with land use density, transportation facilities and community facilities objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The subject property is not platted. An application for rezoning to R-2, residential double, was submitted in March. At the May City Council meeting there was council consensus that the twin home proposal may be appropriate if handled as a Planned Development and the Commission and Council had the rezoning, subdivision and planned development plans before them at one time to review. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is heavily wooded; a single family home and a pole barn are present. Access is via Wescott Road. There is a large pond in the middle of the site. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: / 7 Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Single family residential PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a South Single family residential PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a East Single family residential A, Agriculture LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a West* Single family residential A, Agriculture LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a / 7 Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 4 * The property to the west of the subject site is also requesting approval of a rezoning, the request is to rezone to R-1, Single family residential. EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. Planned Development Review Planned Development Zoning — The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. The applicant's narrative indicates that as proposed the development "allows for a greater creativity and sensitivity to environmental features such as the existing wetland area and significant trees species. Residential units can be in closer proximity to one another, thereby creating a greater sense of community and pedestrian, not vehicular, orientation. Impact to the projects perimeter is also reduced due to the reduction of internal setbacks from potential property lines and/or right-of-way should the project be platted in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance." Amenities — There is a conservation easement planned for the pond in the center of the subject site. The pond will be preserved and utilized for resident's enjoyment. There is a path on the east side of the development for residents to access the gazebo which is also on the east side of the development. Homeowners Association — The association will be responsible for maintaining all common area. The association will be responsible for lawn care, snow removal, general maintenance of the ponds and stormwater management. Bulk Standards — As a Planned Development deviation from typical zoning bulk standards may be allowed. Simply for the purpose of discussion this proposal is reviewed under the R-2 zoning district minimum and maximum standards. Setbacks — The table below indicates the proposed setbacks for the twin homes and the R- 2 standards. Setback requirements are not established in a Planned Development zoning; however, the developer is proposing deviations from the R-2 standards. Setback Twin Homes Ordinance Proposed Front yard private street 20 feet 14.6-28 feet Front yard Wescott Road 50 feet 60+ feet Side yard: Principal Structure 0-10 feet 0-5 feet Rear yard: Principal Structure 15 feet 5 feet Side yard: Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Rear yard: Accessory Structure 5 feet 5 feet Between units 20 feet 20 feet /611 Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 5 Setbacks are measured from the property line to the structure. The proposed plat allows for a five foot setback around the perimeter of the lot. If the lots were not platted this way the structures would meet setbacks from the perimeter. Building Coverage — The R-2 zoning district allows for a maximum of 20 percent building coverage. The applicant provided the overall site building coverage, not lot by lot coverage. The overall building coverage is 14.5 percent. Technically the twin homes individually exceed the 20 percent lot coverage; however, each lot is adjacent to a significant amount of common area. If, in the future, home owners want to deviate from the established building coverage a Planned Development Amendment or variance would be necessary. Building Height — Building height is limited to 35 feet in height for the twin homes. The submitted elevation plans do not indicate building height, as part of the final planned development the height of the buildings shall be established. Staff suggests the development maintain the 35 foot height maximum. Landscaping — The landscaping plan appears adequate. The association should be responsible for maintaining all landscaping within the development. Parking — The zoning code requires at least two enclosed parking spaces for each dwelling unit. The site plan indicates there are two enclosed parking spaces for each dwelling unit. There are also four visitor parking spaces and some room in the driveways for parking. Trash Enclosure — A trash enclosure location was not included on the preliminary plans for the town house development. The trash pick up should be on an individual basis, if a common trash area is available it should be in an enclosure. Exterior Materials —The submitted color renderings indicate the siding will be fiber cement Hardiboard or equal. The colors are "Colonial Roughhewn" which is a light gray and "Rustic Cedar" which is a pale yellow or light brown, both neutral colors. The masonry is a veneer masonry on concrete block or poured foundations. The roof is a laminated fiberglass shingles GAF Timberline or equal (dark and light brown) a color rendering is available in the file. Lighting — A lighting plan was not submitted, if lighting is proposed a plan should be submitted as part of the Final Planned Development. No light should reflect onto adjacent property or public right-of-way. Signage — A monument sign is proposed at the entrance of the site. According to the site plan the sign is located three feet from the property line, the sign ordinance requires a 10 foot setback. As proposed the sign is 10 feet 6 inches in height and 14 feet wide. Technically this sign could be considered a pylon sign because it exceeds 7 feet in height. The sign materials are not identified on the plan, but appear to be brick and possible wood for the sign face. As part of the Final Planned Development a detailed sign plan should be submitted. The sign should conform to ai9 Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 6 monument sign requirements, no more than 7 feet in height with a four foot maximum height of sign area. Advisory Park and Recreation Commission — This proposal was before the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission (APrC) as a development item at the September 20, 2004 meeting. The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. II. Preliminary Subdivision Proposal — The applicant proposes to develop the 5 acre site with 14 twin home units, as proposed this will be a single phase development. Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The subject site is currently surrounded with single family residential uses. Properties to the north and south are fully developed. The property to the east and west are zoned Agriculture and have potential to be developed further. The subject site has a Comprehensive Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (0-4u/a). The Site Plan indicates the twin home proposal can achieve the required density. While a twin home development maybe compatible with the area, it would introduce twin homes into an area completely surrounded by detached single family. Density - The proposed overall gross density is approximately 2.8 units/acre. The proposed net density (minus 90% of the pond leaving 3.81 acres buildable) is approximately 3.6 units/acre. The property is guided low density residential allowing 0-4 units/acre. Lots — The R-2 district requires a double lot to be 15,000 square feet or a twin home lot to be 7,500 square feet per unit. The lots as proposed are not that of a typical R-2 plat. There is one parent parcel (Lot 1, 147,409 square feet) that contains lots 2 through 8. Lots 2 through 8 range from 7,038 square feet to 8,118 square feet. The intention of the plat is to condo the plat so that the home owners own their home and five feet around the foot print of the house and the rest is common area maintained by an association. The overall lot size intent is met, but is done in a different fashion. Grading/ Topography — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The site is heavily wooded with relatively flat topography, with elevations ranging from 984 to 908 over the 5 acre property. A wetland lies in the middle of the site. The preliminary grading plan shows maintaining a 30 - foot ungraded buffer area around the wetland. The developer should be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with City engineering standards. The development is subject to the City's codified land disturbance and erosion control regulations. aao Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 7 Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. A sanitary sewer pipe of sufficient size, depth and capacity is available along the west edge of the site within public easement. The development will connect to this sewer in two locations and will provide a pipe stub to the property to the east (Parcel 050-53) for its future use. Existing water main of sufficient size and capacity within Wescott Road right-of-way is available for connection and extension through the development. The developer should abandon all existing well and septic systems within the site in accordance with City and County standards. Streets/ Access/ Circulation — The developer is proposing to provide street access to the development via private streets, and one intersection with Wescott Road. Wescott Road is classified as an arterial roadway in the City's Comprehensive Plan and carries about 12,000 vehicles per day. Access management is critical along Wescott Road to preserve its intended purpose of vehicle mobility while maintaining its safety. The two 5 -acre unplatted parcels to the east (Parcel 050-53) and west (Parcel 030-53) will also require access to Wescott Road with their possible future development. The developer has prepared a concept plan showing how the adjacent properties can be provided street access (see attached concept plan). To reduce the number of access points along Wescott Road for these three remaining properties, this development should provide street connections to the adjacent parcels by one of two options: 1) extending City engineering -standard public streets with dedicated right-of-way through the development from Wescott Road to the parcels, or 2) providing private street extensions through the development from Wescott Road with easements in favor of the two adjacent parcels. The private easements should in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and should be executed with the adjacent property owners. The private streets proposed are at the minimum width allowed by City code (24 feet) for the number of units served. A public street will require a minimum of 28 - foot in width (face-to-face of curb), with a minimum of 50 -foot right-of-way width. If the adjacent property owners are not agreeable to the private easements, the street extensions should be constructed as public streets, to City standards for width, construction, and turnaround with dedicated right-of-way (option 1 above). The private drives should be constructed with a vehicle turnaround in accordance with City engineering and fire department standards. Storm Drainage — The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Most of the development's storm water runoff will drain via public storm sewer to a proposed storm water basin before discharging into the existing wetland (Pond JP -43 as designated in the City Storm Water Management Plan) in the center of the site. Pond JP -43 will then discharge to existing storm sewer within Wescott Road. The remaining storm water runoff from the development will flow off-site in rates and volumes less than current conditions. 00 i Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 8 Water Quality - This proposed 5.0 -acre residential development is located east of Fish Lake in the City's J -watershed. Some of the stormwater runoff generated by the built area of this development (2.0 acres) will drain to a treatment pond that is proposed to be constructed next to the 0.9 -acre wetland in the middle of the parcel. Runoff from the other proportion of the built development (1.6 acres) site will drain offsite. The wetlands and surrounding buffer areas comprise the remaining 1.4 acres of the property. Minimum requirements for volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the impervious proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and walks). The total impervious proportion of the proposed built area is 61.8 percent. To meet City water quality requirements, a minimum wet -pond volume of 0.27 acre-feet covering an area of 0.17 acre would be needed. The pond would have a maximum depth of six feet and a 10:1 aquatic bench beginning at the normal water level. The remaining 1.6 -acre built area of the development that will drain offsite is subject to a cash dedication in lieu of treatment ponding. Wetlands - There are four wetlands on this parcel, according to the delineation report prepared August 16, 2004. The largest wetland, which is approximately 0.88 acre in surface area, is in the center of the parcel. This is a Type 4 wetland, under the standard classification system of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Type 4 wetlands are inland deep fresh marshes with soils that are usually covered with six inches to three feet or more of water during the growing season. Vegetation includes cattails, reeds, and bulrushes. In open areas, pondweeds, coontail, and water lilies may occur. Along the southwest boundary of the parcel, a 285 -square -foot Type 1 wetland exists. Another small Type 1 wetland (183 square feet) is located northeast of this wetland. Type 1 wetlands are seasonally flooded basins or flats. Typically, soil iscoveredwith water or is waterlogged during variable periods but is usually well -drained during much of the growing season. Vegetation varies from bottom -land hardwoods to grasses. The edge of a fourth wetland is located along the eastern boundary of the parcel. This 732 - square -foot area is a Type 2 wetland. Type 2 wetlands are inland fresh meadows vegetated primarily by reed canary grass, with some lake sedge and river bulrush. None of the wetlands are designated public water wetlands by the Minnesota DNR. Therefore, all are under jurisdiction of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), which regulates draining and filling of all natural wetlands and excavation of certain types of natural wetlands. This program is administered by the City of Eagan, which acts as local government unit for WCA issues. Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 9 WCA Rules (Minn. Rules Ch. 8420) do not require wetland replacement for any excavation of Type 1 wetlands or for up to 2,000 square feet of fill in Type 1 wetlands. The developer proposes to fill both Type 1 wetlands (a total of 468 square feet of fill). The developer is proposing a conservation area under an easement that includes a 30 -foot buffer around most of the large wetland and the stormwater treatment pond. To reduce the number of access points along Wescott Road for the three remaining 5 acre properties, this development should provide street connections to the adjacent parcels by one of two options: 1) extending City standard public streets with dedicated right-of-way through the development from Wescott Road to the parcels, or 2) providing private street extensions through the development from Wescott Road with easements in favor of the two adjacent parcels. The private easements should in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and should be executed with the adjacent property owners. Tree Preservation - A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are two - hundred forty-five (245) significant trees in the inventory. There are a variety of tree species on- site. The development as proposed will result in the removal of one -hundred ten (110) significant trees (44.9 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple - lot, multiple -unit residential) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal less than the allowable amount, there is no required tree mitigation for this proposal. The applicant proposes to preserve 32 trees through transplanting within the site. In an attempt to maximize tree preservation, the applicant intends to preserve forty (40) trees adjacent to areas to be graded. The preliminary grading plan submitted shows proposed grade lines occurring inside the CRZ of trees that are to be preserved on site. To ensure survival of these preserved trees, staff is recommending that a long-term tree survival plan be prepared by a certified arborist and implemented on all trees with encroachment into the CRZ. Also staff is recommending that the applicant communicate with city forestry staff in the actual placement of tree protection fence around these trees. No encroachment is to occur inside tree protection areas. Parks and Recreation - Parks or trails dedication shall be satisfied through a cash dedication. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting to rezone 5 acres from Agriculture to Planned Development and develop 14 twin homes. The plat is proposed to consist of 8 lots 7 twin home lots and 1 parent parcel that is comprised of private streets, ponds, trails, a gazebo and common area. An association is planned to maintain the development. The subject site is currently surrounded with single family residential uses. Properties to the north and south are fully developed. The property to the east and west are zoned Agriculture and have potential to be developed further. Rezoning the subject property to Planned Development allows for further development of this lot. The subject site has a Comprehensive Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (0-4u/a). The Site Plan indicates the twin home Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 10 proposal is consistent with the required density. While a twin home development may be compatible with the area, it would introduce twin homes into an area completely surrounded by detached single family. The R-2 district was used for a comparison for this development since the Planned Development district does not have set standards. The proposal varies in setbacks and lot sizes when compared to the R-2 district requirements. The appropriateness of this use and proposal are for City Officials to determine. A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are two -hundred forty-five (245) significant trees in the inventory. There are a variety of tree species on-site. The development as proposed will result in the removal of one -hundred ten (110) significant trees (44.9 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple -lot, multiple -unit residential) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal less than the allowable amount, there is no required tree mitigation for this proposal. There are four wetlands on-site. WCA Rules (Minn. Rules Ch. 8420) do not require wetland replacement for any excavation of Type 1 wetlands or for up to 2,000 square feet of fill in Type 1 wetlands. The developer proposes to fill both Type 1 wetlands (a total of 468 square feet of fill). The developer is proposing a conservation area under an easement that includes a 30 -foot buffer around most of the large wetland and the stormwater treatment pond. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval to Rezone five acres from Agriculture to Planned Development, for property located at 1055 Wescott Road. To recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 14 twin homes on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW '/4 of Section 14. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement with the City that shall be recorded at the Dakota County Recorder's Office. 2. The applicant shall enter into a Final Planned Development Agreement with the City. The following exhibits are necessary for the Agreement: • Final Site Plan • Final Building Elevations Plan • Final Tree Preservation Plan • Final Landscape Plan • Final Lighting Plan • Final Signage Plan • Final building coverages for each lot (table form) Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 11 To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 8 lots on property located at 1055 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. Subject to the following conditions: The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, 2, 3, Cl, 2, Dl, and El 1. The property shall be platted. 2. The developer shall be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with City engineering standards. 3. The developer shall abandon all existing well and septic systems within the site in accordance with City and County standards. 4. This development shall provide street connections to the adjacent parcels by one of two options: 1) extending City standard public streets with dedicated right-of-way through the development from Wescott Road to the parcels, or 2) providing private street extensions through the development from Wescott Road with easements in favor of the two adjacent parcels. The private easements shall in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and should be executed with the adjacent property owners. Note: Option 1 will provide a smaller lot 1 and the dedicated public easement for the road extension must start at Wescott and extend through the development to the adjacent properties. 5. If the adjacent property owners are not agreeable to the private easements, the street extensions shall be constructed as public streets with dedicated right-of-way (option 1 above). 6. The private drives shall be constructed with a vehicle turnaround in accordance with City engineering and fire department standards. 7. To ensure survival of preserved trees (on site trees #3-5, 8-11, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 32, 37, 63, 78, 87, 88, 113, 117, 118, 120-122, 134, 137-141, 168-171, 173-175, 177, 187, and 188), a long-term tree survival plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist and implemented on all trees with encroachment into the CRZ. 8. The applicant shall communicate with city forestry staff in the actual placement of tree protection fence around these large preserved oaks. 9. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off- site (i.e. park trees). 10. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre -construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 11. A cash park and trail dedication is required. 12. A minimum wet -pond volume of 0.27 acre-feet covering an area of 0.17 acre shall be required. The pond shall have a maximum depth of six feet and a 10:1 aquatic bench beginning at the normal water level. 13. A cash dedication in lieu of treatment ponding shall be required for the remaining 1.6 acre built area. aas Planning Report — Cedarstone September 28, 2004 Page 12 14. The developer shall provide a conservation easement in favor of the city, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 15. A homeowner's association document shall be provided to the City Attorney prior to final subdivision approval and Lot 1 shall be conveyed to the association. .06 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 7 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON a�� FINANCIAL OBLIGATION-Cedarstone of Wescott- Preliminary Subdivision There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcel proposed to be subdivided. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the Subdivision. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for subdivision. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final Subdivision. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Water Trunk S.F. $12,395 Water Lateral S.F. $24.85/F.F. 230 F.F. 5,716 Storm Sewer Lateral S.F. 15.65/F.F. 230 F.F. 3,600 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .095/Sq. Ft. 23,108 Sq. ft. 2,195 Street Wescott Road S.F. 20.02/F.F. 230 F.F. 4,605 $28,511 a�9 Location Map OM 11111 REV a itriaig errip iir4.491 tit* foam isms OIL' fi17=®& i". am mar kvag.1-4040-: mot grifteg,„1-15s!soolome, ova COM WaY rieti•Aclat* Ittell0 I LAU a i'a 4 yy� sass u8 and r 111 c1 O OSA WANK" Pki eniattallitig owing FAWN. �ej ; p®k •1j ail 0 • lire MELMEIAt 4V." �L 1� ten Y -wat 44:144 ti ne u cal ima MA; Lacasislieti EY L7 Ci 0 Ila? tin lam kaila ssio Lam D ca 0 0 neffrillgr wora c CIEWSZE, �o Er; tWf'W4f� .440 ao�le, ,, .121 �irGi GC�� 4t> #0��41114 rig/►� ,alp csameset" Q zar° "�LA tk4 41 I / ��-Vi• ��1�tie toe 1 00100 raFi.>k • 1st"00,04 AY Eagan Boundary /V Street Centerline Parcel Area SiA Building Footprint Bairlaiirtrl mug Amt ® �iIste ®mer. 111V1_11.. ,rig i Ili 4401 fr7 1,04$V, Lks • c ..0 Witt vis to tettetal iW Toy WA A Isla'd 411 ui ® Lii Eu u 0 ICI e IENi "w� MaiLle C"�[C']e\1 3 4) 0•. to u k1 it a 0 arra 4010 0 c0 P 0 a a O 9 CJ -- a a LGA two 1 0 1000 0 1000 0 41 TOA ®® Era dr 01 PA [Re 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Cedarstone of Wescott Application: Perliminary Subdivision Case No.: 14 -PS -14-08-04 city of eagan Community Development Department 1i Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of January 2004. THIS MAP IS INT ERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County doo n nt ar ar accuracy of this information and are not respons missions. E Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Cedarstone of Wescott Case No. 14 -PS -14-08-04 Zoning Map Current Zoning: Ag Agriculture 600 0 600 1200 Feet A 11.1101 rU A PD 11111 11111 PF e•MIM.IMMIIMP I. AVG MAU ■ 111 Location 0114 g •difilk • 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 r°<<I Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Current Land Use Designation: LD Low Density Residential 600 600 1200 Feet 1-ILH City of Eagan Community Development Department Parcel base map Information proeldemy Dakota County Land Survey Department June 2003. Zoning in S nation maintained byCity Staff. 2, THIS MAP IR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota my of guarantee the accuracy of this information. N WE P.v,1.11AM\PAI PLAU1:%041. PLO11i-rAWM\PLM' 1.1-.4Wt,CCGNDVG is 09/ .... ... fr FDP rEEEe1.e�E lEEFri£fr'rr'rE?Err (q Pqq€Fq•= Rse r €g4 Wtf rrEBq 0 vi1EPEPEE P PkFF F{�{PEEP'E f'E Ei .jPFFPPE . Et',eT F P g FYF-- p P ®?PdiIFlEditt?.Ek�IEkt€F lfl�Et�k EFi r ® f—^—f cf(:.` I .. eeC0 000 s50 DPrPCDCDPOC'DCFC' %';; „r„ ® 1f1 Ifieiiii=EigtrFrgrffErFttttofiis iitit€iiEii•i'sd` ;�;ctCaa.:,gaga_a:a,FPFYYPFF a;1741- 1. 0 'iliiiiygii£{tFPF-{fFF�I{€�Egge`r•elE�Et? lliiiiiii F1 11114 lEk ii— 11-1!! C }CC^S:t `i: �rr•'eegs3xrEEiErf' 9M il:('('i-'pgie�e r- ii• r m^>aCjpSFD'PPiP'F'Ri(I'F,,..FFP E TPIP�Y�SPPF •4PF{;�`F Q�ggP 'sF;is:ztt 1;R:tI;;IIFli 6- 1 0 11 CEDARSTONE OP WESCOTT bI05S WESCOTT ROAD Ely EAGAGAN, MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REZONl.._, AND PREIJMINARY SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL ••mod Mel -. w « 6.N 1 ND PU,VLYC6 ,tee„ 11. 1 eon .1. m Meru. ektfly�.i NPxmA Zr mz --i z 0 P.%ms4A,TVAi PLAU17.040,£ PLDUTi-EAGANNPLAN-SM\D40NBPREPLAT.BNG A E V N I I 1 2 - Tr4 a� n COLN IEt - T— 6_ ........... msJ cpj}5, --PERDASE EMENT ER DDC. NO 665£5050 1 I W89.56'08"E 330.01 \ 5:urs",:r r---1_1 =: - a � fJ� sIS R. SIMiDING�'�a 4 SETBACK 41:,,k,. ....Z,‘"4,4, v6. o ks I , --1 m G - �� Ilk- mow:. N ; .Ir. sss`TM,r,, a r a J : as , . 0 0 LJ m 0 a pj.ir. '. / 1____�_ 45O R. NIGWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. N0. 4409111 ___ ' '..•' _____t `i s , --1 3-FROF ED - ESC-0-�F-RE�f,E}�---u---$ X1i NIC8107 EASEMENT PER BR. 176 Of OEM PG 174- IlD.Ot WESCOTT ROAD CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WESCOTT ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. REZONIRb; AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL Don ILII ADV PI AT II II 1I = 3 waV. *T-14.121.11.3.1 - 1 1 1 oupaµw•P«'6«..6 MaatiNy MIN «w.t Oval IAND «r•• c ti z rD- p r- mz 1i 2 P.N1IAWT\PAT AL .,04019 PLO11 f-EALAP'\PLAW-SM\Lu0G19S!TLIWG 6 m I 7, aaaa F CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 105S WESCOTT ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REZONIRGE AND PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL MI FM . r�ww.LMApaM I4 1 1 A,n -; Un .d Fx..1 I1 ESOTA Zr: pr •mz :m -I :Q \Pai PLaYT.\1•4035 P1901 Tl g 1 tl u G 3� 1. PPF € 11E1 E E 1 1 1 E ► ; aS .y c:``L2 L 4 1ti ti ` n 4 4 44 4 4 4a€ 4aEaE�aEaEaE� CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WCSCOTT ROAD EAGAN, NINNE507A REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. UBIVISION SUBMITTAL AND a€ 0 \UPI s� PnM.LIM$SPAT PLMITZ\W019 OLDY17oCoGooNOI. xx-SfT,D{D01991F.11T. JG Nd1d NOI1d0I111/4 a81.4A(113 ie p0 - F 19 ;11: fi � Ivo FA asap 1! £ 414 1; RR @ g 1s A _ALIS I g g7, 'z 1/1 141 Y y:11 ..0 WI PR 1111 P A g h ri 10! iggl 10i 11 1 5 9 5 0 5"ee 9 9 9 9 8� 4 :a 89 0 Cf89'56`08'E 33D.01 m, • z --0- 0N. _ 03 r L • m WESCOTT ROAD 0 0 m 0 m CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WESCOTT ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. REZON AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION S BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN i i d d e m .x.D9 ..wDT w.1 mw O.. n.dD..9.S . noon oo. prop•ri, by mow ...or Iwo dibbal j«crolslon .xeO1 nem 1w..' go* Liam. o 1*. r...1 m. 9..w ., onxxOSDI. : Zr .pr •mz :7▪ mD-i 0 u) -4 m -u r- 0 0 0 z 0 5 2 CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WESCOTT ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 8 PLANNED DEVEL'- ON AND PRELIMINAR R' .ON UBMIiTAL MASTER PLAN OPTION I M --y •nwy - FY - •pollaXn r nM1 .n 1.1*Mn• r - •n Yne n41•n •n! $I I n Nal, nWIUN CEI EERw- WNNESOTA nn 2.3 Flo 111 Qr rn m -zi z k Z 2|EJ |// I { °-■g` !gla1S2Pg |i !;!`§ \(FE{e \ �0 ! g mm -o -n m ->O > 3:1 (� ;2o !.1a *0 cp 7$7 �� / LiP\ _ / 0 Z• ac. az= <w' ..esiwww n YO �MO b•y•• w r+ 1. w Ww Nolging,11 sµ 1VJJ.D Ons NolswOens ANVNIN 13ad ONv 'DNIN0Z311 '1N311d013A30 O3NNVld ♦1053N4111 'anon 1YO11 13ODS3M SSW 1100s3M 40 3N01SWIO30 V OV08 110093M + I s __>L -.,r na son A au AI bid lbin)TYi ..1011 U CC... _% Cedarstone of Wescott PD Compliance Statement The Cedarstone of Wescott development plans propose a creative and efficient land use given the natural features of the project site and requirements of the community. It will result in low impact, secluded neighborhood friendly, environmentally sensitive project that protects the Neighbors' values and standard of living they are accustomed to. The Plan complies with the objectives and purpose of the City of Eagan Zoning Ordinance in that it allows for the creation of a Common Interest Community; provides economic advantage to residents of the planned community, preserves natural features and open space; provides roadway access to adjacent properties and is consistent with the permitted density of the Comprehensive Plan. Common Interest Community The plan proposes the creation of an Association to be responsible for the operation and maintenance of common facilities. It is proposed that the project be platted as a Common Interest Community (C.I.C) with residents owning only those areas associated with the immediate footprint of their respective living space. Creation and recording of the C.I.C. will occur after construction of individual buildings to assure proper placement of the cornrnon demising wall between units. Platting via the C.I.0 allows for greater creativity and sensitivity to environmental features such as the existing wetland area and significant trees species. Residential units can be placed in closer proximity to one another, thereby creating a greater sense of community and pedestrian, not vehicular, orientation. Impact to the projects perimeter is also reduced due to the reduction of internal setbacks from potential property lines and/or right-of-way should the project be platted in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Residential Double. Economic Advantage Residents of Cedarstone of Wescott will be provided with an economic advantage due to the economy of scale of providing snow removal, lawn maintenance and general maintenance of the common spaces for the entire development. Land Owners will pay their pro rata share for maintenance, which is to be managed by the association and assessed to individual property owners. RECEEITED E;w72004 c=q5i/ Preserves Natural Features The Cedarstone of Wescott project proposes to place a conservation easement over the entire area surrounding the central wetland area as it is an amenity to the project. The conservation easement will permit only specific uses within that area by members of the homeowners association and will prevent activities thought to be detrimental to its integrity. Signage will be posted near the areas perimeter to further protect it. All significant tree species to be preserved as part of the tree mitigation plan will be the responsibility the association to maintain and protect upon completion of the project. A representative of the Association will be available to work with City Staff should further tree removal of mitigation be required over the life of the project. Roadway Access The project proposes to provide access to the east and west adjacent properties for potential future development via granting of an access easement atop the proposed private drive. A private drive is proposed to run throughout the project site and access Wescott Road in the location of the current driveway apron as requested by City Staff. The access point will minimize disturbance of the existing vegetation adjacent to Wescott Road and maintain the natural buffer. A hammerhead turnaround is proposed near the north end of the site and is designed in accordance with the 2000 International Fire Code. An access easement is proposed over the entire length of the north/south drive adjacent to the west property for its potential future development. A private drive width of 24 feet is proposed for that area in anticipation of additional trips from the western property. The western property currently has access to Wescott Road via it current driveway apron. An access easement is proposed over the entire length of the east/west private drive adjacent to Wescott Road for future vehicular access to the east property. The private drive width in that area has also been increased to 24 feet to accommodate potential future development of that property. The eastem property currently has access to Wescott Road via it current driveway apron. Consistent with Permitted Densities The Cedarstone of Wescott project proposes to construct fourteen (14) residential units or seven (7) residential double buildings within a gross lot area of five (5) acres. The project area has a Comprehensive Land Use designation of Low Density (LD), which permits 0-4 units per acres. A density of 2.80 units per acre is proposed based on the gross lot area. The proposed density is consistent with the -surrounding properties and slightly less than those to the north. Summary The Cedarstone of Wescott project proposes to provide the City of Eagan with a creative and efficient land use that preserves the natural features of the property and provides economic advantage to residents of the planned community. Preservation of the wetland area will be provided via granting of a conservation easement and remaining open space maintained by the homeowners association. The requested density is consistent and well within the limits of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the requested zoning of Planned Development (PD) is consistent with the surrounding properties. Based on this information, the Cedarstone of Wescott project is in compliance with the Planned Development District section of the City of Eagan Zoning Ordinance and should be permitted to develop as such. Cedarstone of Wescott Project Narrative General Description The Cedarstone at Wescott project proposes to rezone from Agricultural to Planned Development with an underlying application of R-2 zoning. The project proposes to construct fourteen (14) residential double homes within an area of approximately 5.0 acres. A private roadway will serve the development and access Wescott Road at the current curb cut. An access easement is to be granted to the adjacent land owners to the east and west for future access to the respective properties. A conservation easement is to be applied over an existing wetland area near the center of the site to guarantee the preservation of that area. The wetland area will not be impacted as a result of this project. Existing vegetation is to be preserved in accordance with the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance. Comprehensive Guide Plan designation (existing and proposed) The subject property currently has a Comp Plan designation of LD -Low Density (0-4 units/acre). The development plan proposes to construct 14 residential double housing units on approximately 5.0 acres, which results in a density of 2.8 units/acre. Therefore, the project complies with the existing land use designation and an amendment will not be required. Zoning classification (existing and proposed) The subject property is currently zoned A — Agricultural. The development plan proposes to rezone to PD -Planned Development due to multiple housing units located within a single parent parcel and adhere to an underlying R-2 (Residential Double) zoning for net buildable area analysis and setback criteria. What you want to do; timing/phasing The project proposes to commence with clearing and grubbing of the subject area upon City Council approval of the Preliminary plat and Development Agreement. An October start date would allow for the construction of footing and foundation systems prior to the onset of winter construction conditions. Construction of the units would be market driven, though would most likely be completed within 1-2 years due to anticipated demands. Existing land uses on subject property RECEIVED -- 1 2004 (>944 4../ The majority of the subject area is primarily undeveloped and heavily wooded. A type IV wetland area occupies the central portion of the project site and amounts to approximately 0.9 acres. Three smaller type I and II wetland areas are located near the southern end of the project site and amount to approximately 0.03 acres. A one-story walkout single family home is located near the southwest corner of the property and a pole barn is located immediately west of the Larger wetland adjacent to the midsection of the west property line. A single driveway has access onto Wescott Road. Surrounding land uses and zoning within 660 feet Review of the Comprehensive Land Use plan indicates that the subject area is surrounded by LD -Low Density residential on all sides except for approximately 3-4 acres of QP- Quasi-Public/Institutional to the southwest in the southeast corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. Review of the Zoning Map indicates the subject area is bordered by two 5 acre parcels both zoned Agricultural to the east and west. That entire area of approximately 15 acres, which is zoned Agricultural, is surrounded by PD- Planned Development to the north, south and east. A limited area of R -1 -Residential Single Family is located to the north and west. An area of approximately 3-4 acres is zoned PF -Public Facility to the southwest. What impact does the rezoning have on surrounding property and land uses? The proposed development plan will impact the adjacent properties in a manner typical of any property being converted from an undeveloped to developed state. City services currently serving the adjacent properties will not be adversely affected due to the projects limited scope, identical zoning and similar density. Review of the Zoning Map indicates that only 46.6 acres or 0.2% of the City of Eagan is zoned R-2 Residential Double. Therefore, the proposed development will offer another housing type not readily available in the City of Eagan. Home Owners wanting to remain in the City and relieve themselves of the responsibilities associated with maintaining a larger home will have an opportunity to do so. The rezoning to Planned Development will allow adjacent land owners and members of the community to input into the ultimate design of the project given the submittal requirements for a PD, which requires building elevations and floor plans. As such, the project will be able to address individuals concerns regarding building heights and screening of vehicular movements within the site. The subdivision submittal requirements for R-1 (Residential Single Family) and R-2 (Residential Double) do not require individual building information. What impact does the rezoning have on the subject property? Rezoning of the subject property to PD will allow for the construction of multiple two- family homes atop individual lots all located within a single parent parcel. The proposed zoning is identical to approximately 75% of the surrounding zoning and is therefore compatible. Rezoning to a Planned Development will allow for the creation of a Common Interest Community (C.I.C) Plat to be recorded with the County. An Association will have control of all common areas and be a point of contact for the City when resolving any potential issue such as wetland or tree preservation once the project is complete. The Association will also be responsible for lawn care, snow removal and general maintenance of the areas surrounding the stormwater management system. What impact does the rezoning have on City services, such as sewer, water, stormwater run-off and roads? Sanitary Sewer The proposed development will be served by an existing 8 inch diameter lateral sewer line which runs the length of the property and parallels the west property line. It is not anticipated that the 14 units proposed will exceed the available capacity of the existing system. This will be verified with City Staff prior to design of the sewer system. Water The proposed development will be served by an existing watermain located in Wescott Road. An 8 inch diameter line will be extended northerly into the subject area and provide for fire suppression and domestic services. It is not anticipated that the proposed 14 units will exceed the available capacity of the existing watermain and will be verified with City Staff prior to design of her the northerly lateral extension. Stormwater A drainage area of approximately 14.5 acres, including the subject property, outlets into Wescott Road via a 12 inch flared end located on the southwest corner of the project site. The drainage area can be further divided into three subcatchment areas, each draining to a respective low -point somewhere within its boundaries. Each low -point is routed via corrugated metal pipe towards the 12 inch flared end at Wescott Road. The existing system may be prone to temporary obstructions as it is dependent on three corrugated metal pipe connections, each having an inlet located in a wooded area and requiring overland discharge towards the outlet into Wescott Road. The current development plan proposes to route storm water captured in common drive areas to a pond located near the west side of the existing wetland. The pond will be designed in accordance with National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design criteria. The pond will be connected to the 12 inch outlet pipe into Wescott Road and a 12 inch flared end will be provided to the land owner to the west. This system will reduce the potential for obstruction as the 12 inch flared end into Wescott Road will be removed and replaced with a direct underground connection. Therefore, drainage for the subject parcel and all area to the north and east should be improved as a result of this connection. Rezoning to a Planned Development will require that an association maintain the common areas. As such, one entity will be responsible for the maintenance of lawns and the associated costs. Research indicates that stormwater runoff from larger areas having a single entity responsible for lawn care generally reduces the concentration of pollutants when compared to areas managed by individual lot owners, given the financial impact of providing excessive lawn fertilizer applications. As such, contaminants such as nitrogen and phosphorous typically associated with lawn maintenance will most likely be reduced down stream from the project site. The current development plan proposes to design buildings to fit within the parameters defined by the sites natural features such as significant trees and wetlands. Furthermore, the project anticipates an "empty nest" target market, which generally prefers less lawn area and more vegetation for privacy. As such, the quantity of runoff should be equal to or less than the amount generated form a typical single family residential developments, which generally prefer larger open areas required for recreation. A preservation easement is currently proposed over the larger wetland area to protect its integrity and hydrologic/hydraulic benefits to the community. Traffic/Roads Review of the Trip Generation manual indicates that approximately 6 trips per day per unit can be anticipated for unit types similar to two-family homes. Therefore, approximately 84 trips per day (42 in /42 out) is anticipated for the current development plan of 14 two-family housing units. This is an increase of approximately 4 trips per day (2 in/2 out) or an additional 5% when compared to an 8 unit single family development, which produces 10 trips per day per unit. Due to the projects proposed access onto Wescott Road near Lexington Avenue and the minor increase in the percentage of trips beyond single family residential, the project should not adversely affect traffic. ocir Does the requested land use proposed by the rezoning result in a better use of the land? Explain. The requested land use proposed by the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding properties and in compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The requested zoning of Planned Development will result in better use of the land as an Association will be responsible for maintenance of all common areas via creation of a Common Interest Community (C.I.C) Plat to be recorded with the County. The Association will have control of all common areas and be a point of contact for the City when resolving any potential issue such as tree preservation and stormwater management once the project is complete. The integrity of the existing wetland will also be maintained via dedication of a preservation easement and ongoing observations by Association members. The approval process required for the requested zoning will allow adjacent property owners and residents of the community to input into the design of the project. The project will provide residents of the community wanting to remain in the City with an alternate housing type not readily available in the Community. City services will not be adversely affected. The quality and quantity of stormwater runoff may be improved when compared to a typical single family development due to the reduction in sodded areas and the Associations maintenance of common areas. Rezoning to the requested Planned Development with an underlying R-2 zoning will result in low impact, secluded neighborhood friendly, environmentally sensitive project that protects the Neighbors' values and standard of living they are accustomed to. �� Larkin Hoffman ATTORNEYS October 28, 2004 Mr. Michael Ridley Ms. Sheila Cartney City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 NOV 0 1 2004 Re: Cedarstone of Wescott Planned Development Dear Mike and Sheila: Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431-1194 GENERA: 952-835-3800 FAX: 952-896-3333 WEB: www.larkinhoffman.com Our firm represents Cedarstone Development Company ("CDC") in connection with its proposed residential planned development at 1055 Wescott Road, Eagan, Minnesota ("the Site"). CDC is proposing a 14 -unit townhome development on a 5 -acre parcel, purchased for this project. CDC is proposing single -story townhomes that vary with walk -outs, look -outs or slab on grade construction. Some units facing to Wescott Road may include story and a half or two story designs at the request of the home buyer. The proposed development is consistent with the Low Density residential guiding for the Site in the City's Comprehensive Plan; the proposed R-2/PD rezoning would, likewise, be consistent with the LD Comp Plan designation. Project Description and Amendment As originally filed, CDC proposed a private roadway through its development, with public access to Wescott Road. During the public proceedings before the City Council and Planning Commission, it became clear that some would prefer a public street connection within the development, linking the properties to the east and west of the Site. This plan change would ensure that the easterly and westerly properties will have direct access to a public street, albeit via the Site, potentially in lieu of direct access to Wescott Road. CDC is submitting a modified Site Plan reflecting a change to accommodate the City's interest in managing access along Wescott Road. The Plan shows a 50 -foot public right-of-way along the southern frontage of the Site, parallel to Wescott, with a 28 -foot roadbed. This public segment would be designed to allow for a connection from properties situated to the east or west at the discretion of the City. The planned access road would retain its private status, as originally proposed, at the point where it turns north into the Site. As part of its PD application, and in view of the change to the designation of the road segment along with south edge of the Site, Cedarstone is still requesting that it be allowed a 20 -foot setback from the new public street; this would be acceptable had the street retained its private Mr. Michael Ridley October 28, 2004 Page 2 designation. This change will allow Cedarstone to preserve more trees on the Site. In addition, the residential buildings will continue to be setback approximately 100 feet from Wescott Road. The balance of the Site Plan north of the new public road segment remains unchanged, as reviewed by the Planning Commission. Planned Development Justification The City Code enumerates PD standards applicable to the proposed townhome development at the Site. 1. Providing greater flexibility in environmental design and relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater creativity and environmental sensitivity. CDC's Site Plan seeks to preserve natural features within the Site by: • fitting proposed building pads into areas that allow for preservation of significant trees; • using a private road system to minimize impervious surface and run-off; and • imposing a conservation easement over the wetland complex and using association management to ensure protection of the Site. CDC is not proposing to fill wetlands (some minor areas are being filled) and is in compliance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. If CDC were to pursue straight rezoning of the Site the association management and conservation easement provisions would not be required. CDC is proposing a modification to its Site Plan to assist the City in resolving access issues for property outside of CDC's control; the PD allows the developer to accommodate the City's request for a public street along the Site's south edge to establish access rights for adjacent properties, while also giving CDC the right to request some setback relief. 2. Recognizing the economic and cultural advantages that will accrue to the residents of a planned community. The proposed Planned Development will allow for the preservation of natural features on the Site, supplemented by association management restrictions and a conservation easement over the wetland. No individual property owner will be able to alter the protected areas. In addition, this approach will maximize opportunities for managing impacts of the development for the adjacent residential neighborhood. Staggered building orientation along the north edge will vary the setback to adjacent residents, maximize the physical setback between buildings and avoid a "wall effect" typical with standard zoning. 3. Encouraging a more creative and efficient approach to the use of the land. c9- Mr. Michael Ridley October 28, 2004 Page 3 CDC's modified Site Plan is based on its desire to accommodate the City's access control objectives for adjacent properties, while also preserving the opportunity to provide an attractive and much-needed housing product for the City. There currently is a modest quantity of townhome product in the City at a time when the demographics favoring this type of product is growing rapidly. 4. Encouraging the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, natural features, and open space. CDC's Site Plan places a priority on preserving natural Site features, balanced against the economic realities of Site development. Tree preservation on the Site is within the City's Code standard. CDC is protecting the wetland area through a conservation easement, backed -up by association management limitations to restrict unilateral Site alterations. Individual building pads are being placed with a conscious desire to fit the existing topography. The City's Parks Commission recommended approval of the project. 5. Encouraging a development pattern that is consistent with the land use density, transportation facilities and community facilities objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed CDC development is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan LD guiding, and surrounding residential uses. Proposed unit density of 2.8 un/ac (gross density) and 3.6 un/ac (net density) is likewise compatible with the 0-4 un/ac standard in the City's Comp Plan. CDC's willingness to include public street segment allows the City, in turn, to address adjacent property access issues. The dedicated public street segment will be constructed in accordance with City standards. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this supplemental information to the City in connection with the ongoing review of the CDC project. Please call me if you have any questions. Peter J. Coyle, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Direct Dial: (952) 896-3214 Direct Fax: (952) 896-3265 Email: pcoyle@larkinhoffman.com cc: Cletis Levisay Patrick Plautz Chuck Levin Clark Wicklund 973072.1 EXISTING 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 12.7' PUBLIC 30' 0 A D 5' SIDE SETBACK ALLOWABLE AT A GARAGE WETLAND BUFFER ZONE REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR R2 • FRONT ON PRIVATE DEAD ENO ROAD: 20 FEET FROM FACE OF CURB • FRONT ON PUBUC ROAD: 30 FEET FROM R -0-W • SIDE : 10 FEET • REAR: 15 FEET REQUIRED ROAD WIDTHS • PUBLIC: 28 FEET WITHIN 50 R -0-W • PRIVATE: 20 FEET SERVING 5-8 UNITS 24 FEET SERVING 9-20 UNITS GENERAL NOTES: • AREA SHOWN IN GREY IS HOW ROAD IS DRAWN ON SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS • BUILDING OUTLINE SHOWN DASHED IS HOW BUILDINGS ARE DRAWN ON SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SEE LETTER FROM PETER COYLE OF LARKIN HOFFMAN TO RIDLEY AND CARTNEY DATED 10/28/04 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30' WETLAND BUFFER IN THIS AREA - 0 th b 07 LO UBL1C ROAD ci WESCOTT ROAD 4 2.61A. • ?V.-001010 CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT CEDARSTONE DEVELOPMENT PATRICK PLAUTZ V. CLETIS LEVISAY 11 CHARLES LEVIN ARCHITECTS ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC 10.28.04 0 30 60 90 NORTH 1I --s-j -•�� I I \ I I i 1 �S\ -\^`\\ \-)A, l\, t\\ € \\\, y \ y -•- ).r P.,AUTANTSPAT PLWTI\01019 PLOIJT2-CADNISPWhSHT\0900I9PREPLAT.Wc -vNI r- E I CO 8 - T- — 99, TA. »xcH. TnA.xT UTCITY EASEMENT . .....� PER DOC. NO. 605950 1. WS a .,N89'S6.08•E 330.01 — — — —� STs "Ac ewnwc 47i4.1.•,,,, 7, "SETBAa a� hqH %-1to 98 1l N see+lai_+M �a3.t3.: 3 P 11 O': i `:••:O•: i : ii`:� :::�:0•i': O.•ii•� i i ::4•• OO••�•i ii• D 1 �- ' ..l'iJ•O::isi:♦•.':�0:4:•i•�:O♦:::•i::ii••O :':♦.b �r 11 ��'}•i.'{. ••1•!♦•♦•♦•♦•!••♦••.♦.1.1.1♦. ♦.♦.,�:i••'•' ..--.111.... •C. ♦ .....:.::::412:..:::,....: ♦ :♦• ♦ 1•� 1•:11:••: • • •• .♦ .• .•.. Z '.' •4.„.2. i . i i :::::•:::::::::...::::::: •:i i� •i• -ii i� `:' r • . . i• •i!f' +F . ,44^••♦•0:•ii !ii+0"�w : ..• iii•+ . oIt. u.i:, .%„4 ii•:.:moi 4 , ••�' i 0::::::;%��':� 'I- -Till i "' } 4 �i•.i:0: ::•:i . .O`�00•00: '• O.O i • •{• ^ •i e`*= i h Q '.'4P+�•1 • • i• : t i♦1:: i 1i s•••: ii:•:....... is ii::� 1 , • 1�;::•i o y :• ••1111.♦.♦1.1.11 ••♦•♦.•••♦•1•{w•1�:•1•♦♦ j 1 •..• �•♦� :::::::• i':i• :•: 0: 0::::::::$:.$: : i: • +':i:O::i:Oi Oi::1 1 S i � • :• a•• 4:i1.1:.:::.):'i ': � i� i i�:� �'�L•O i ��:: i' i iii S 7.52. .-+: y�y1{+`�.••. f� {! �i::::♦1 i::.•♦•i s• 1::1::♦ • +•i .! . si i : :I fir• H • .>♦•♦ �♦:♦ :•i O • ♦� .90 r♦ , * •4w oil i"•p J 99955'261 �� i" m II F --H Yb sl :- 3� 3BT2 i 9 14 __, 990 1 o I- 4 \, i{1 co 1 iw 5 t ` l I If:l 1jJ I I_ _ 20 FT. BU9DWC Skai-"MS( — .M..E.................... 2Y0.65 rT.r• \,—— J : rij: ITr ET...N69.56.08-E 1I.::-..49A'tt'AILC:••.1 . I60NO.SE7BACN ---- ___________�---- SO FT. NGWAY GARMENT PER DOG NO. N0991 ___�v P f p-ED-NESC—O-f —R D! r, .>.y. --w-33 IT. HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DIF. 279 OF DEEDS PG 371- Z" - 1 J 8 WESCOTT � ROAD '%• IKI:lI:�Tw CED ONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WESCOTT ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. REZONING. AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY PLAT _. 46E Y ins 1 Mr.6y "•9h HMI •0. We, M•NIYa4A. •s.H•» VW,*.IM» IN .aP+•.YYA A• HIM IwY N .NunM N YINN[SOTA woo z 1�— Dr mz -4 IW M\ALLIANINPAT PLAIIT2\01019 PL011TZ-EAGAN\PLAN-SNTW10019SITE.OVG Q m z 5 1.189'58'08-E 130.01 GARAGE IV SIDE BUENOSSEYBACS 41lAIX IC SIDE SWIM MIX cal 'B.N'/ii.L�. iii l:�iiiiiisii�• i1ii.aiii rI � i,(0.,. �/v�/// r::��_ ; �/�////� Kiri% Ji'�////% . \ `/,7/./// '//////:` %//////�//////// ice.: ZU5.,/////% e e �/��1/ii%,mill iii/iiiii////y/////////////////////i %i% (AV////i: , gin;1 gich 1 IJ S8938'08'W 330.01.fl.......,.....,...,........... WESCOTT ROAD 1 1 b 1' .54 A 1 0 5 1 iI S CEDARSTONE OF WESCOTT 1055 WESCOTT ROAD EACAN. MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. REZON AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN I WNy err* Mal MN N1. pe11WYl. or 1Pnalw ',end M Mr 1l. Anal woo* Mal IM — y Domm111. n *orGalin of irDrFSDTA or M Iq-i a Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting D. REZONING — ROBERT MCDONALD ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR to direct findings of fact for denial) a Rezoning of five acres from Agriculture to R-1, Single family residential district for property located at 1085 Wescott Road. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL • Majority of Council Members present FACTS: Items in bold are new information • At the November 4, 2004 City Council meeting the Council directed the applicant to work with the Cedarstone developers on a comprehensive plan for the two parcels with a shared access. • The applicant has provided three concept plans for a shared access, which have not been reviewed by an Engineer. • No development is proposed at this time. • The property is surrounded by vacant land and single family detached uses. • The property to the east is currently requesting a rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development to allow twin homes. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 27, 2004 and is recommending approval of the R-1 zoning 60 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE • December 13, 2004 based on applicant's request to continue ATTACHMENTS (4): April 27, 2004 Advisory Plannin Commission Minutes page(s) o2,S'' Planning Staff Report pa e�ough 3 Concept plans on pages throw h v, h, Letter from applicant on page 7 5-6 City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 27, 2004 Page 4 B. REZONING — ROBERT F. MCDONALD A Rezoning of approximately five acres from A, Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential, located at 1085 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. Planner Cartney introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated April 14, 2004. She noted the background and history. Chair Heyl opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Chair Heyl stated her comments for the previous item should also be considered for this item. She stated she is in favor of approval of this proposal because it fits the area. Member Hansen moved, Member Bendt seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning of approximately five acres from A, Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential, located at 1085 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. All voted in favor. Motion carried 4-0. aC3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 14, 2004 CASE: 14-RZ-02-03-04 APPLICANT: Robert McDonald HEARING DATE: April 27, 2004 PROPERTY OWNER: Same APPLICATION DATE: March 17, 2004 REQUEST: Rezoning PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney LOCATION: 1085 Wescott Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential ZONING: A, Agriculture SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning from Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential for five acres located at 1085 Wescott Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 14. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Rezoning: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subd. 5 states in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property is not platted. c -k Planning Report — Rezoning McDonald April 27, 2004 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is heavily wooded, a single family home exists. Access is via Wescott Road. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: *The property to the east of the subject site is also requesting approval of a rezoning, the request is to rezone to Planned Development with anticipation of developing twin homes. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The subject site is currently surrounded with residential uses. Properties to the North, South and west are fully developed. The properties to the east are zoned Agriculture and have potential to be developed further. Rezoning the subject property to R-1, Single Family Residential allows for further development of this lot. The subject site has a Comprehensive Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (0-4u/a). R-1 zoning is compatible with this land use designation. Single family uses appear compatible with the surrounding area. Development is not proposed at this time. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential. The property is currently zoned Agriculture. Rezoning to R-1 could allow for future residential development of the subject site. The subject site is guided LD, Low Density residential (0-4u/a) R-1 zoning is compatible with the land use designation. A site plan was not provided with the application and development is not proposed at this time. X59 Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Single family residential R-1, Single family residential LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a South Single family residential PD, Planned Development LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a East* Single family residential A, Agriculture LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a West Single family residential R-1, Single family residential LD, Low Density residential 0-4 u/a *The property to the east of the subject site is also requesting approval of a rezoning, the request is to rezone to Planned Development with anticipation of developing twin homes. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The subject site is currently surrounded with residential uses. Properties to the North, South and west are fully developed. The properties to the east are zoned Agriculture and have potential to be developed further. Rezoning the subject property to R-1, Single Family Residential allows for further development of this lot. The subject site has a Comprehensive Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (0-4u/a). R-1 zoning is compatible with this land use designation. Single family uses appear compatible with the surrounding area. Development is not proposed at this time. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential. The property is currently zoned Agriculture. Rezoning to R-1 could allow for future residential development of the subject site. The subject site is guided LD, Low Density residential (0-4u/a) R-1 zoning is compatible with the land use designation. A site plan was not provided with the application and development is not proposed at this time. X59 Planning Report — Rezoning McDonald April 27, 2004 Page 3 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve a Rezoning from Agriculture to R-1, single family residential for property located at 1085 Wescott Road. a6� • What impact does the rezoning have on surrounding property and land uses? NONE • What impact does the rezoning have on the subject property? NONE • What impact does the rezoning have on City services, such as sewer, water, stormwater run-off and roads? NONE • Does the requested land use proposed by the rezoning result in a better use of the land? The results of the rezoning has no impact on the land as it is currently a single family home and is surrounded on all four sides by single family residential. • Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: LD — Low Density • Zoning classification — Existing: A - Agriculture Proposed: R-1 Residential Single Family • What do you want to do; Change the zoning on my property from (A) Agriculture to (R-1) Single Family Residential • Existing land uses on subject property — Single Family Residential • Surrounding land uses and zoning within 660 feet: R-1 Single Family Residential A — Agriculture, PD — Planned Development, PF — Public Facility (church) Location Map:, Eagan Boundary Street Centerline n Parcel Area ry Building Footprint �a \ r r®®� lliral ii ID �t® 1 v ` ry p IIIM Poll _....A. IWO ARY no -�a �y i v' 'yamC YTl, AIIIIIIt ®�• ahl'� Mgt .....4",„t _ 31,1 . E:., , ;^-Ar Ta' F.9 r �i-'�'3,1 �, � � �� Wilt 1 u �® �\ r� `� �� ®� � t, a ®Mtn J ,I® a tit;-+$ �� o .. ®mac. ® v 1 �2 ��' ®®; t p* v - yolEt ®� �G top n A� tAL`ri.," ��1 1M t� �F©�4 ®er tP� li ��®a® 041, ': a Ve lEil 40 44 = 6 III 11111,141V 0 ' � t 0�r ��AgO4 ` 1111:2� �® �" la* 1®®®♦ 9a ., f. ), ®®44' ' Alt® Subject Siteforir07 AA ' .... ® r ,,olweirma, WINS WOO e®® udder40 le 0 ®t m ,v o* ®� f> ' AditIMi. f? ®b �® ®�® 0 RiT1 i- lf-" IA* L s ill�� li ��c o f n _ Rap.. ��, `r U o ar_rieb uqo lea 4 RIP00,111"101, • ° Q.P.,c.0.7. —..—.. veal a f P ILW"1/0 'CIF. 4-40411 con ,, --, AN, ESZEMERszt, cNt .0611140,__ 00 III iktsp "You -,,,r min MESSITIEffste" „p i. ,411 wen ad Ch 'i ®A�® �-� �0�® v - t 3>'�® ®® , .''' _, ® fl r? 4j- No / #44*4441Fel am L'',,; r nimisomirNrviN). it:14;ov At. iiit 444 a wa - . imormassilikup #04,40-•4 4-- •144 . 4-tvo Mita :44;:tarletrils7g#4410114,11111 IMMO lin '3 r 7 legizi 40 ®®®2 , ® .''p add „IQ rJ�ILQr®1 ®�®a 'C4'7L'..„,„,„}„C11:3 PuJ l i�^m ® ,,, ®. ,, O', amoral c�ocraa®coasc rj�, ®�o i, ,. Po© i3 t 5 Eu c� C � ■ ®® ,® INJg ,• v t-o ( � 0 / �� 1000 0 tl �1 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Robert McDonald Application: Rezoning Case No.: 14-RZ-02-03-04 - _ - city of ectgtin Community Development Department Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided by Dakota County Offic IS an s current as of January 2004. THIS MAP IS E OERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota Cou o a tee the accuracy of this information and are not responsible for errors or omissions. N W .4*A"' E S Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Robert McDonald Case No. 14-RZ-02-03-04 Zoning Map Current Zoning: A Agriculture 600 0 000 1200 Feet V\a-i It* •• —11&4"vss !wry, ?Ph% lip A n I lit \ P ', 4 A 11111 1Iiil 411111 ims 444 1 PF A I 39• AIM S41§11111 113/41111a 11111111111011 61 ies • 11. 1 Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Current Land Use Designation: LD Low Density Residential (0-4 units/acre) 600 000 1200 Feet 114 LD • ,I ANIL 1 LD 11 ■ iiCH i • 411111 IFF4 LD QPlitm_dm (- •_ 411 - :- L 13). • • 11.♦ • City of Eagan Community Development Department Parcel base map informatio 2-7 THIS MA Dak•. County Land Survey Departmett June 2003. Zo ng in tion mai ned byCity Stat. REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. WE cIT) _ 11 11 I � Jl =tM \ �\1 \ �- � , _ ,, t ir...4 p-...../-----: ----.7m-'' '^n-... lik intik LEX-".15 TING HOUSE J—' ----- ( / \ — _i I —/ --— -- -� -- -/ 1 Ir N -Moo' aPP 9524321368 DEC.09'2004 13:45 9524321368 McDonald Construction December 9, 2004 Mr. Michael Ridley City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Wescott Properties Dear Mike, #1189 P.001/001 2004 Pursuant to the continuation of the public bearings on the applications of Cedarstone Development and McDonald Construction to rezone properties on Wescott Road in Eagan, I am writing to indicate to you and the City Council that at the December 13, 2004 Council meeting, McDonald Construction will withdraw our application for rezoning to R-1 and announce our intention to work cooperatively with Cedarstone in a new application for a R-2 planned development using similar performance standards as Cedarstone. While we have begun to look at possibilities for our property, we have yet to begin the planning/Engineering process in earnest and therefore are not ready to commit to a design concept at this point. We have commissioned a market research analysis and have contracted with a planning/Engineering firm for this project. In the meantime we are in discussions with Cedarstone about such issues as shared access, joint maintenance associations, unit design compatibility, etc. I will be at Monday's City Council meeting to discuss these matters and respond to any questions members of the City Council may have. In the meantime if you need to discuss this further, I can be reached at (612) 369-1829. Since Michael Fa McDonald Construction 7601 145th Street Wet • Apple Valley. MN 55124 (952) 432-760) • Fax (952) 432-1368 McDONALD 9 CONSTRUCTION Inc. Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 E. CONTRACT 05-03, WELL #21 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the plans and specifications for Contract 05-03 (Well #21 — Drilling and Pumping Eqpt.) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held on January 13, 2005. FACTS: • As the City continues to grow, there is a need to develop additional wells to provide the necessary potable water supply to meet the projected consumption demands. • The City has a Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan that identifies the best location for all future wells based on geology and ground water aquifers. • As identified in this Comp Plan and the City's 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan, the next well to be developed is located adjacent to Well #11 at 3616 Ashbury Rd. • Because this location is adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood, notices of this proposed well development and related construction activity were sent to all properties within 500+ ft. inviting them to an informational meeting on December 7. Of the 39 property owners notified, no one attended the meeting. ISSUES: • The development of a new well involves loud noises and ground vibrations during various stages of construction. If the contract is awarded, additional notices will be sent out informing them of the schedule and requesting access permission to perform an interior pre -construction survey of their homes to document before conditions in order to better address any potential claims from these vibrations. This has been standard procedure for recent well development adjacent to residential properties. We have not experienced any sustainable claims in any past similar projects. ATTACHMENTS: • Location & Notification Map, page • Project Schedule, page 1 . (2kr 0a, a o 2 o m r. Zoo D • W L/ ME, 0 O o�oo 0Wtyo 0 V:)...• m .6 5 a�4:N Ih Y 3 u m 0 0 a 0 6 Q O W O O U to U q1U BGG Preliminary Schedule Municipal Well No. 21 For the City of Eagan Authorization to Advertise for Bids December 13, 2004 Bidding Phase December 23, 2004 -January 13, 2005 Award Contract January 18, 2005 Construction February - October, 2005 Drilling/Driving Pipe February 15 - April 15, 2005 Develop Well April 16 - June 15, 2005 (a few days during which blasting may occur) Test Pumping June 16 — July 15, 2005 Final Well Testing/Site Clean Up July 16 — August 15, 2005 Install Pump, Piping, Electrical, etc August 16 — October 15, 2005 Minor Clean Up & Restoration October 16 — November 30, 2005 F. IWPWIMl380-I01Preliminary Schedule.r[f Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004, Eagan City Council Meeting VII. NEW BUSINESS A. PRELIMINARY SUBDVISION (AWAD ADDITION) — ALLI AWAD ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Preliminary Subdivision (Awad Addition) of 2.9 acres to create 2 lots, and a Variance to public street frontage; for property located at 2150 James Street in the SE 1/4 of Section 31; subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL • Majority of Council Members present FACTS: • The subject site is zoned R-1 single family residential. • Lot 1 will be 84,849 square feet and Lot 2 will be 32,738 square feet. Lot 1 has an existing house present which will remain after the subdivision. • Access to Lot 2 is via James Street, Lot one will have access via a shared driveway from Lot 2. • As proposed the subdivision meets the R-1 requirements. • The APC held a public hearing on November 23, 2004 and is recommending approval. 120 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE • February 17, 2005 ATTACHMENTS (2): APC minutes on page j2through 02 7,3 Staff report on pageg2 ? ythrough 8' .2 9/ City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 23, 2004 Page 8 D. Awad Addition Applicant Name: Ali and Debbie Awad Location: 2150 James Street, in the SW 1/4 of Section 31 Application: Preliminary Subdivision Preliminary Subdivision to create 2 Tots on 2.7 acres File Number: 31 -PS -21-10-04 Application: Variance Variance to public street frontage File Number: 31 -VA -17-10-04 Planner Cartney introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated November 12, 2004. She noted the background and history. Chair Heyl opened the public hearing. Mary Packwood, 2170 James Street stated concern for the view from her home to the pond and reduction of wildlife. She also stated concern for the proposed shared driveway. There being no further public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Chair Heyl inquired about condition number five (5) and how it would affect Ms. Packwood. Member Cartney stated they are allowed to remove 20 percent of significant trees, if greater, tree mitigation would be required. City Attorney Bauer stated his office would review the easement documents. He also stated that his purpose is only to make sure a record of a working easement is made. Chair Heyl stated understanding of Ms. Packwood's concerns; however stated the setback and tree mitigation requirements are code requirements and this is not a Planned Development so placement of the house must be decided by setbacks, not conditions. Member Hansen moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision of 2.9 acres to create two single family lots, for property located at 2150 James Street subject to the following conditions: The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, 4, C1, El 1. The property shall be platted. 2. A cash dedication for park and trails is required for both Tots. 3. Private utility service easements across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be dedicated to cover these utility services. 4. Private access easement across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be dedicated to cover the existing driveway serving Lot 1. City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 23, 2004 Page 9 5. This proposal shall be responsible for an individual lot Tree Preservation Plan at the time of building permit application for Lot 2. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. Member Hansen moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Variance to public street frontage for the subdivision of 2150 James Street. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. VII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (FOR THOSE NOT ON AGENDA) There were no visitors to be heard for items not on the agenda. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS City Planner Ridley stated a Workshop will be held at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday December 9, 2004. IX. ADJOURNMENT Member Leeder moved, and Member Bendt seconded a motion to adjourn the Advisory Planning Commission meeting at 8:10 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. Respectfully Submitted by: Camille Yungerberg Recording Secretary a 93 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: November 12, 2004 CASE: 31 -PS -21-10-04 APPLICANT: Alli Awad PROPERTY OWNER: Same REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision And Variance LOCATION: 2150 James Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single family residential HEARING DATE: November 23, 2004 APPLICATION DATE: October 20, 2004 PREPARED BY: Sheila Cartney SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision of 2.9 acres creating two single family lots and a Variance to public street frontage; for property located at 2150 James Street in the S/E '/4 of Section 31. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use 27y Planning Report,_- AwacLAsklitinn November 23, 2004 Page 2 contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Variance: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 3, B., 3, states that the Council may approve, approve with conditions or deny a request for a variance. In considering all requests for a variance, City Council shall consider the following factors: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property have no control. P--lanningReport-Awad-Addition November 23, 2004 Page 3 b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Code would deprive the applicant property use commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the provisions of this Code. c. That special conditions or circumstances do not result from actions of the applicant. d. That granting of the variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. e. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code or to property in the same zone. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The subject site has access from James Street and contains a single family home that was built in 1998. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is heavily wooded and contains a portion of an existing pond. SURROUNDING USES The property is surrounded by single family detached dwellings with a Low Density Land Use designation. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The site is surrounded by single family uses; the additional proposed dwelling appears compatible with the area. The density is 0.7 units/acre, which is consistent with 0-4 units/acre Airport Noise Considerations — The subject site is located outside of the airport noise contours. Density - The density is 0.7 units/acre which is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan of 0-4 units/acre. Lots — The proposed subdivision creates an additional single family lot for a total of two lots in the subdivision. Lot 1 will be 84,849 square feet and Lot 2 will be 32,738 square feet. Lot 1 has an existing house present which will remain after the subdivision. Both lots exceed R-1 lot size requirements. aid Planning Report—.A.lvadAddition November 23, 2004 Page 4 Setbacks — The R-1 standard setbacks apply to each lot. Front setback from public right — of — way is 30 feet and 50 feet from Trunk Highway 77, rear setback of 15 feet for principal structures and 5 feet for accessory, side setback of 10 feet for principal and 5 feet for accessory. The proposed parcels will meet or exceed these requirements. Lot Coverage — A maximum of 20% lot coverage is allowed and will easily be met with this development. Grading/ Erosion Control — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The site is heavily wooded and generally slopes to the west. Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. The existing house on Lot 1 is connected to the City sanitary sewer and water main system within James Street, to the north. These service pipes extend across proposed Lot 2. Private utility service easements across Lot 2, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, should be dedicated to cover these utility services. This existing system is of sufficient size, depth and capacity to serve the proposed house on Lot 2. The sanitary sewer and water main service work for Lot 2 will require the removal and replacement of a portion of the James Street pavement and curb section. Wetlands/Water Quality - There are no water quality or wetlands issues associated with this proposal. Streets/ Access/ Circulation — The driveway access for the existing house on Lot 1 is currently from the end of James Street to the north. The proposed house on Lot 2 is proposed to share this access location. The existing driveway extends across proposed Lot 2. Private access easements across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, should be dedicated to cover the driveway serving Lot 1. Tree Preservation - The existing 2.7 acre lot is proposed to be subdivided to create a new 32,738 square foot (,75 acre) parcel at the north end. The existing condition of this northern parcel is sparsely wooded with a mixture of small to medium diameter deciduous trees. An individual lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required at the time of building permit application for proposed lot 2. Parks and Recreation — Cash dedication for park and trails is required with this subdivision. Variance — Section 13.30 Subdivision 8 (C) states " The subdividing of land shall provide each building lot with a minimum of 50 feet of frontage directly abutting on a publicly dedicated street, subject to the following conditions: 1) In no instance shall a private easement satisfy the above requirement." The applicant is requesting a variance to this requirement. 277 P -la g-Report--A-wad-Add t -ion November 23, 2004 Page 5 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary subdivision to divide an existing 2.9 acre lot into two single family lots. The lots as proposed will meet the R-1 requirements; however one of the lots will not have public street frontage, therefore requires a variance. The driveway access for the existing house on Lot 1 is currently from the end of James Street to the north. The proposed house on Lot 2 is proposed to share this access location. The existing driveway extends across proposed Lot 2. Private access easements across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, should be dedicated to cover the driveway serving Lot 1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision of 2.9 acres to create two single family lots, for property located at 2150 James Street. If approved, the following conditions should apply: The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, 4, Cl, El 1. The property shall be platted. 2. A cash dedication for park and trails is required for both lots. 3. Private utility service easements across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be dedicated to cover these utility services. 4. Private access easement across Lot 2, in form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be dedicated to cover the existing driveway serving Lot 1. 5. This proposal shall be responsible for an individual lot Tree Preservation Plan at the time of building permit application for Lot 2. To recommend approval of a Variance to public street frontage for the subdivision of 2150 James Street. a �� STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. any 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON Revised: February 2, 1993 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION -Awad Addition -Preliminary Subdivision There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcel proposed to be subdivided. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the Subdivision. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for subdivision. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final Subdivision. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT None -0- Total aa� Preliminary Subdivision Submittal Narrative October 20, 2004 Ali and Debbie Awad 2150 James Street Eagan MN 55122 We own a 2.7 -acre lot at the end of James Street. Our lot is wooded and is adjacent to Cedar Avenue. We are proposing to subdivide our lot to create a new 32,738 sf parcel at the north end. Our existing house would remain on the southern 84,849 sf. Our property is currently zoned R1 and would remain zoned Rl. We believe our subdivision will require the following variances: Minimum street right of way frontage. Our property does not technically adjoin the James Street right of way. We request a variance to allow our subdivision to do the same. The front of our house faces Cedar Avenue (with plenty of frontage), we are proposing that the new lot and pad face Cedar Avenue as well. Driveway easement. We are proposing to have a shared driveway easement for access to our existing house. A shared driveway is required due to our limited road access. We believe that the addition of this new lot will have minimal impact on street traffic, drainage or utility use. The location of the new pad does not affect our existing neighbors view towards the pond. We welcome the thought of having more neighbors and having more eyes monitoring the James Street turn -around. We hope to be complete the subdivision process by late winter or early spring 2005 for possible sale and/or construction. We intend to have the utility connections, site work and grading done as part of the construction of a new home. We appreciate your consideration and are available to answer questions at any time. Home 651/707-0015 or Ali cell 612/282-3161 Sincerely, Ali Awad • Debbie Awad REcEE Y Locatiarr Eagan Boundary Street Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint „, • At 111 mitakibl 1g Ls im III la t n ni a MI az, u unwormi ” 1. 114 40 4 orIII BANti er owl otdille 1i NO. ow, lid iaS4 ag► iv �r! 0o De Fitt nal IVA v® Eca vi? Lb 4.4111 alliZia Ail umaceiNg v laCtO rartalri upawrizi s gsw Eno IWO 1. 11.10 III `O. • re pi, ig000 Cao.,,e, �. ...r An 121 W1 s 0 5 CGLIGIDizign armeszzp Nam Nth--- — �u ria CLEadii Prtirw4iLlft r AVM CO 19 ie riF mer-a i ■ uoov 110 1111 Mir 41 I- ..9) marl A atilrii ED 41-> `qv" ,'i:p omiii/1 AksiO. NorIWO 41/.4*frigra omaillOP .. • Ati _Avg low a. EMI Iglor r�LINNINrsaaIanameloo, CIES �pnL A4411V O uLC) 42 vaclasgszurtIl174k00 I tee "AL& d®ems �k��© fl . zi QM A. i Ailettg own At„, morra4.‘ 401111 a I 111111/4 i■ IU I "ro 0 vett g, • 00. 404 ri 110 ail 11;;;;Ti I II I 1000 (r. 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Awad Addition Application: Preliminary Subdivision & Variance Case No.: 31 -PS -21-10-04 city of ecigcm Community mem Department Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVlew 3.1. Parcel base map data provided by Dakota County Office of GIS and Is current as of January 2004. /, THIS MAP IS 1 TE E FERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota Co o u ee the accuracy of this Information and are not $ rs or omissions. E CnrrentZoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Awad -Addition Land Use Map Case No. 31 -PS -21-10-04 Zoning Map f I1 :11!1.1 11 ■ ' ly H or f *014 ,,,,, ...„ iitlir vi, ii: mum" .... .. A immi am 11111,... 1 J. IN a I Pitt sr MB 811 1 Current Zoning: `10 yiIlhi„ umniktill mem R.111 • Nal F•►�� Single Family Residential O //11 /.' akar IIIII =AM at�1 ,,_ .0. sum �o �� I IF s itookl, pkw ftp R-1 it- -rig' e in ■ .- - , II 000 0 000 7200 F..t .i/' ,6_ .b �i■ 1 III RI ' 1,16 Comprehensive Guide Plan ' UUItit A= ' I.I ILS = i I I `1 (� = Land Use Map�l �1�1��°iv I �J 1 F RZ I'li . •: rsp !: IM ..%• MAO/aro �M Current Land Use Designation:lis g roi if yi t .. LIF INN MO f I, Vi LD Low Density Residential �• ii �• Trign OhltZj ye 4F' + or 014)4 ?WI �pytt• IIII — 12L fil ei 000 0 000 1200 O..t7.411°'\=&----4-LD e/•1111/ D Parcel base map information provid.dby Dakota County L.ndS .v.y D.partmert Jun. 2003. N Zoning Information maintained bycity StafL City of Eagan E L, THIS MAP IS 1 EN ERENCE USE ONLY W Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota C t ntee the accuracy of this information. S PRELIMINARY PLAT 10 L.. mN so. (In) niK - +01,12 we .o W 0002 OAVOWId OWfl7O/1 ua-c¢ (2.�) -... loin +-1.2 rws ,1+,1+r Oslo _aYa'r XNd7 RT Of3a i arlf r 171' Nelle 10.110.4 'ipm " .Yid WYNJXJ79dd NOLIJUOY arlfr qui 1.13.4 E G 4L L B R .41 N. \ 1 1 . '111 \ - \1.t'"- I 111111% ``\\`= \\\\k 1 I1-+�.-I \ �• COQ \ / / \ -10 jliiil I , 1-111-" 111`, \\ • 1i,/;1,,); i`.'•:> !; 1 i `; `. 43. ' - s%/-/'.� 4"I 4Pfookr• ♦�'. ,,,,.-;:::-,..,:::_:_.-;.,:t----:-_::_-_--t-_„„.f.,-,--„-:: :::::: -\4r4 11 \\� - t=_ �_ __� - 1 �'� `. `> -- ��iia\.�!`iyr Ay-Yr� ----j / •/. \lino -'_.r— �= - 1 �,- , `. `•� \-,//'-===== '' = - -=_ --- - 1/f - K---. ice`_ -,, 1 '\-yam.. __ -1-_.=*: -_ S. - — -� _��--?QkP`4EHUE 1,4.A.Ij.-31 /lei/ .; •/, 8 \ , \ 71- • Z�U o� pm of Z oe z_( • iii '- _ ..'_ - ---''' ==�-- :-"'"- - -- - / --- -yam __X�. �- i // ' ... j/ / ' I, l :`I li 1 1!I� 1'.it 6. a 101§41 J1 sill [g.4 .1 cajg 11 11 EY o o a o , coa t tit ti 14 4:5 m • L U— ADDmlON GRADINC/177L/TY PLAN o.o R66•661666•6 HEDLUND Cait lac(u•fw3 Phonseim-11600 ) •••-•••• Zr) .[ m .owl.), VolW..... ww�su>.wM end Imy .ue �"n!..'.0ARAD g 4 411136160 � A I AWAD & DSDORLH LYNNE IDS hone fs,ss ,c CO1W-. is !_ c 11••••6 .. w 111576 In/DNIGVH s:::::::::,/,./.:;;;""----...... -.:• \ % 11;11;II1 \ — — 17_-_,_:-.:7.-1--z-4.---.7.--/ I —111 11Y II 111\'/lT ! i 1 1 .L 1 5 VI II T— J1 --T- ---- -�7•-• ix r r l h fill 1 r1Th 41 _ / [ I�_ 1� // i I 111 111 I �I,, _ -1 / j-•,'/rrj'nl --- - 1 1 -1 ...1(x111111 5\5' ,' - t R y-� -� / /�vl1I\jgl 1 5/ Y ' ------ � -=-- Z- -- /\ / ,r„ ij 1 i //i,�%_��-- ---- ;�/aiL-15x5 \ .i.' _ _ -, 11 - ' %, :%:F'` ..."1'` ='G.^:_= ;111 t• norm MOE'ITrwq it -r, 1 •\ �...`\ 1 .;ti�/ � � •1 ` 11 11 1 11 •--\_. ' 1 1 1 11 I 11 . 1� 1 1 11 l 1 1 ,_..;/-----,`\.`‘.\k 5 i -y`�1 iII1Il —21 ---= — __ -< sem-- -- F�hiF KaENUE ----� - -1 __t 55 'n' `"" A WAD ADDITION E IS77NC CONDITIONS 4pu® roe AIA -VELD t DEBORAH LYNNE AWAD (OM x-31.1 - r r t7- -_ 1 �u.1 V..w... Med Midata ME DT Y V , H z C) 0 z 0 �z c Agenda Information Memo December 13, 2004 Eagan City Council B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (SWEET PLACE) — EPIC DEVELOPMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Rezoning from A, Agriculture to R-1, Single -Family, upon 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail, in the NE 1/2 of Section 36. To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight lots upon 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail, in the NE 1/4 of Section 36, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Rezoning - at least three votes; Preliminary Subdivision — majority of Councilmembers present FACTS: • The site is located on Fitz Lake on the west side of Hwy. 3 north of Red Pine Lane. • There is an existing single-family home on the site which was built in 1972. The existing home is proposed to be removed. • The site is guided LD, Low Density residential, 0-4 units per acre. • The site lies within the shoreland overlay district of Fitz Lake, a general development waterbody, and a portion of the site lies within Fitz Lake. • The net developable site area is 3.78 acres; the proposed Blots result in a net density of 2.12 units per acre. • All lots meet the minimum size requirements for both R-1 and Shoreland zoning. • The site plan shows required minimum setbacks can be satisfied. • A maximum building to lot area coverage ratio of 20% applies to this development. • A maximum impervious coverage of 25% applies to each of the lots within this development. • Access into the site is provided via a public street from Hwy. 3 which ends in a cul-de-sac. • MNDOT suggests the developer implement modifications to Hwy. 3 to add bypass and turn lanes. • A conservation easement should be established over the shore impact zone to ensure long- term protection of natural vegetation within this area. • The developer has submitted a Tree Preservation Plan that satisfies mitigation requirements. • Some modification is necessary to the grading and storm drainage plans. • The development will be subject to cash dedications for parks and trails. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 28, 2004, and did recommend approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. a Pt ISSUES: • MNDOT has indicated that as a condition of permit approval for access to Hwy. 3, MNDOT will require: ► A flatter street grade (less than 1 %) on Sweet Street within 50 feet of its intersection with Highway 3. ► The removal of two existing driveways to the property. ► Access control dedicated to MNDOT along the frontage on Highway 3, except for the 60 -foot width covering the proposed street access. • While it is preferred to limit the impervious coverage of the entire development, the Shoreland Zoning ordinance limits impervious coverage to 25% per lot. The developer has indicated the development will not exceed 25% impervious area per lot. However, there was some question as to the total impervious area proposed by this development (both the lots and the new street). Staff hopes to clarify the calculations for the overall development and have an accurate figure by the time of the Council meeting. AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: January 14, 2005 ATTACHMENTS (2): es p g �/ g .213 �� November 23, 2004, APC Minutes, a through Staff Report, pageQ1 ? through X90 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA November 23, 2004 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 6:30 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chair Heyl, Members Dugan, Hansen, Bendt, Mathees, Leeder, and Gladhill. Also present were, City Planner Mike Ridley, Planner Sheila Cartney, Planner Pam Dudziak, City Attorney Bob Bauer, Assistant City Engineer John Gorder, and Recording Secretary Camille Yungerberg. AGENDA Member Leeder moved, Member Bendt seconded a motion to adopt the Agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. October 26, 2004 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Member Hansen stated he seconded the motion on page six (6), item C, rather than Member Dugan. Member Hansen moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to approve the October 26, 2004 Advisory Planning Commission Meeting minutes as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS Old Business A. Sweet Place Applicant Name: Rich Ragatz, Epic Development, LLC Location: 4725 S Robert Trail, in the NW 1/4 of Section 36 Application: Preliminary Subdivision A Preliminary Subdivision of 5.76 acres to create eight single family residential lots. File Number: 36 -PS -18-09-04 Application: Rezoning A Rezoning of approximately 5.76 acres from Agriculture to R-1, Single Family Residential. File Number: 36-RZ-15-09-04 Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated November 18, 2004. She noted the background and history. Chair Heyl opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. a9/ City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 23, 2004 Page 2 Chair Heyl requested that a condition be added to address the 25 percent impervious surface permit. Member Bendt and Member Gladhill inquired about the calculation of the 42 percent impervious surface. Perry Ryan, Ryan Engineering explained 30 percent impervious surface is standard. He referred to Lots 1, 2, and 3 and stated the impervious surface calculation was figured by using 25 percent of the area at an elevation higher than the OHWL of the lake. He stated he would accept an additional condition regarding Lots 1, 2 and 3, or all lots if that is what the City Ordinance requires. Member Gladhill moved, Member Leeder seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning from A, Agriculture, to R-1, single-family residential, of 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail (south of Cliff Road on the west side of Hwy. 3), in the NE % of Section 36. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. Member Gladhill moved, Member Bendt seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Sweet Place) to create eight lots upon 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail (south of Cliff Road on the west side of Hwy. 3), in the NE 1/4 of Section 36 subject to the following conditions as amended: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, D1, and El. 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan prior to final subdivision approval. 4. All lowest floor entries and windows for proposed houses within the development shall be constructed higher than elevation 925.5. 5. The developer shall construct an outlet skimmer structure and pipe from the new pond to the normal water level of Fitz Lake, in accordance with City engineering standards. 6. The new pond to be constructed with the development shall be graded to provide proper depth and function of the outlet skimmer structure, in accordance with City engineering standards. 7. All existing well and septic systems on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. 8. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for construction and access work within the Highway 3 right-of-way, prior to final subdivision approval. 9. The developer shall be responsible for all street and highway improvements on Highway 3 as required by MNDOT as a condition of access permit approval. 10. The developer shall be responsible for construction of a southbound right -turn lane and a northbound bypass lane on Highway 3, in accordance with MNDOT standards. 11. Public drainage & utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat to a minimum of three feet in elevation above the required high water level of Fitz Lake (Pond LP -26). City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 23, 2004 Page 3 12. The applicant shall be required to fulfill required tree preservation mitigation through the installation of forty-six (46) Category A trees, or an equivalent combination of Category B and Category C trees. 13. The applicant shall preserve, through contractual tree transplanting with a 95" tree spade, 20 existing spruce trees (# 8-22, 24, 28-31), to be moved to an area outside of construction limits near the north property line. Transplanted trees shall be maintained (mulched and irrigated) for a period of one year by applicant or hired contractor. 14. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that shows the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting). The protective fence shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off-site (i.e. park trees). 15. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that shows the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting). The tree protective fencing shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off-site (i.e. park trees). 16. The Applicant must contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre -construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 17. The applicant shall cooperate with city forestry and water resource staff, during the project pre -construction phase, to maximize tree preservation efforts in proposed pond areas. 18. The Applicant shall convey a permanent conversation easement over Lots 1-3 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for a buffer/setback area adjacent to the lake's ordinary high water level to facilitate protection of shore impact zone. 19. A stormwater detention pond should be constructed with a minimum wet -pond volume of 0.55 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.25 acres. 20. A Conditional Use Permit shall be obtained for any lot exceeding 25 percent impervious surface. All voted in favor. Motion carried 7-0. 2 93 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: November 18, 2004 APPLICANT: Epic Development PROPERTY OWNER: Mary and Joe Sweet REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: 4725 S. Robert Trail COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density ZONING: A, Agricultural CASE: 36-RZ-15-09-04; 36 -PS -18-09-04 HEARING DATE: November 23, 2004 APPLICATION DATE: Sept. 15, 2004 PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning from A, Agriculture, to R-1, Single -Family Residential, and a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight lots upon 5.75 gross acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail (south of Cliff Road on the west side of Hwy. 3), in the NE 1/4 of Section 36. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Rezoning: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subd. 5 states in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: a9y Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 2 A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 3 BACKGROUND/HISTORY The site is located west of Hwy. 3 and south of Cliff Road adjacent to Fitz Lake. There is an existing home on the property which was constructed in 1972. There are scattered trees and the property generally slopes down to the south toward the lake. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site lies within the shoreland overlay district of Fitz Lake, a general development waterbody, and a portion of the site lies within Fitz Lake. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the sub i ect nronertv: EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1, Single-family Residential. Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones. Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use." Density — City ordinance allows only 10% of the lake area to be included in the base site area for density purposes. Applying this standard, the base site area is 3.78 acres. The proposed eight lots on 3.78 acres results in a density of 2.12 units per acre. This is less than the four units per acre maximum allowed within properties designated as LD, Low Density. 0296 Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Single-family R-1, Single-family LD, Low Density South Single-family R-1, Single-family LD, Low Density East Hwy. 3/Single-family R-1, Single-family LD, Low Density West Single-family R-1, Single-family LD, Low Density EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1, Single-family Residential. Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones. Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use." Density — City ordinance allows only 10% of the lake area to be included in the base site area for density purposes. Applying this standard, the base site area is 3.78 acres. The proposed eight lots on 3.78 acres results in a density of 2.12 units per acre. This is less than the four units per acre maximum allowed within properties designated as LD, Low Density. 0296 Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 4 Lots – The property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District of Fitz Lake, which is classified as a General Development lake. The Shoreland Ordinance establishes standards for development which are to be applied in addition to the underlying or base land use zoning, in this case R-1 (Single -Family Residential). In the joint application of both base zoning and shoreland zoning standards, the more restrictive regulation applies. The Shoreland zoning distinguishes between riparian and non -riparian lots. Lots 1, 2 and 3 are riparian lots, and Lots 4-8 are non -riparian. The R-1 and Shoreland zoning standards are summarized in the following table. The governing standard is shown in bold italics. The Shoreland zoning for Fitz Lake requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. for riparian lots, 12,000 for non -riparian lots. Lots also must be 85 feet in width at the Ordinary High Water Level and minimum front setback line. A maximum impervious area of 25% is allowed and applies to the initial development. The R-1 standards apply for minimum lot size, width and setbacks because they are more restrictive than the shoreland standards. Maximum building height will be governed by both standards, as will be the maximum allowable building and impervious lot coverage. Impervious Coverage – The proposed impervious area is 42%. Some of this impervious area is attributable to street pavement and some to the development of individual lots, While it is preferable to minimize the impervious area for the entire site, the shoreland zoning states a maximum impervious of 25% per lot. A Conditional Use Permit is necessary to exceed the 25% maximum impervious area. Shoreland – This site is located in the City's L -watershed and is immediately adjacent to Fitz Lake in southeast Eagan. Fitz Lake is one of the City's priority Class II -Indirect Contact Recreation waterbodies, according to the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Fitz Lake is also State Public Water #19-0077P, according to the Minnesota DNR. Because the parcel is entirely within 1,000 feet of the lake's ordinary high water level (OHWL)-922.6 feet— it is therefore "shoreland" and subject to provisions of the City's shoreland zoning ordinance a 97 Lot Size Lot Width Width at Shoreline Setbacks Building Height (max.) Lot Coverage (max.) R-1 12,000 s.f. 85' N/A Front 30' Side: 10' house 5'garage Rear 15' 2 '/ stories 20% bldg. coverage area Shoreland Non -riparian Riparian Avg. Size 12,000 s.f. 15,000 s.f. 75' 75' Determined by applicable zoning district provisions 35' 25% impervious surface The Shoreland zoning for Fitz Lake requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. for riparian lots, 12,000 for non -riparian lots. Lots also must be 85 feet in width at the Ordinary High Water Level and minimum front setback line. A maximum impervious area of 25% is allowed and applies to the initial development. The R-1 standards apply for minimum lot size, width and setbacks because they are more restrictive than the shoreland standards. Maximum building height will be governed by both standards, as will be the maximum allowable building and impervious lot coverage. Impervious Coverage – The proposed impervious area is 42%. Some of this impervious area is attributable to street pavement and some to the development of individual lots, While it is preferable to minimize the impervious area for the entire site, the shoreland zoning states a maximum impervious of 25% per lot. A Conditional Use Permit is necessary to exceed the 25% maximum impervious area. Shoreland – This site is located in the City's L -watershed and is immediately adjacent to Fitz Lake in southeast Eagan. Fitz Lake is one of the City's priority Class II -Indirect Contact Recreation waterbodies, according to the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Fitz Lake is also State Public Water #19-0077P, according to the Minnesota DNR. Because the parcel is entirely within 1,000 feet of the lake's ordinary high water level (OHWL)-922.6 feet— it is therefore "shoreland" and subject to provisions of the City's shoreland zoning ordinance a 97 Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 5 (City Code §11.65). Generally, in shoreland districts, City jurisdiction exists landward of the OHWL, while State jurisdiction exists lakeward of the OHWL. An OHWL is established by the Minnesota DNR as the natural extent of a public water. It is a separate determination from (and perhaps a different level than) what the City refers to as the "high water level" for engineered stormwater management purposes. The intent of the City's shoreland zoning ordinance is "...to preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and provide for effective and efficient use of waters and related land resources" (City Code §11.65, Subd. 1.). Generally, the code establishes a comprehensive set of shoreland use requirements for lot and structure dimensions; types of structures; activities along shores and on adjacent steep slopes and for land disturbance; and types of developments. Eagan City Code §11.65 regulates vegetative and topographic alterations to the shore impact zone (a 25 -foot setback distance from the OHWL) on this parcel. Within the shore impact zone, clear cutting and intensive vegetative clearing is prohibited. Additionally, no live trees larger than six inches in diameter shall be cut, with a few exceptions. Limited clearing or cutting within the shore impact zone is allowed, again, with a few exceptions. To ensure continual protection of vegetation in the shore impact zone, a conservation easement should be established over the shore impact zone. Setbacks - Fitz Lake requires a 50 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL). Other yard setbacks are determined by the R-1 zoning district standards. The minimum setback for front yards is 30 feet, for rear yards is 15 feet, and for side yards is 10 feet for living space and five feet for a garage. Grading — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with modifications. The site generally slopes south to Fitz Lake adjacent to the property, with elevations ranging from 944 to 920 at the lake. The proposed houses on Lots 1 and 2 are shown with lowest entry elevation of 925, or below the City standard freeboard elevation of 925.5 adjacent to Fitz Lake. All lowest floor entries for proposed houses within the development should be constructed higher than elevation 925.5. Storm Drainage — The preliminary storm drainage plan is not acceptable. The storm water runoff from a majority of the development is proposed to drain southeast via public storm sewer to a new water quality pond on Lot 1 before discharging to Fitz Lake, (Pond LP -26 as designated in the City Storm Water Management Plan —1990). The developer should construct an outlet skimmer structure and pipe from the new pond to Fitz Lake, in accordance with City engineering standards. The new pond should be graded to provide proper depth and function of the outlet skimmer structure, also in accordance with City engineering standards. Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, depth and capacity is available for connection within Highway 3 right-of-way in the northeast corner of the development. � 9d Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 6 All existing well and septic systems on the site should be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. Wetlands — There is also a wetland "fringe" alongside Fitz Lake, according to a delineation report submitted September 29, 2004. However, most of this wetland is within the OHWL, and no wetland impacts are proposed by the developer. Water Quality — Because of the size and especially the location of this parcel, the development would need to meet City water quality requirements through construction of a detention pond. This pond cannot be constructed within the OHWL. Minimum requirements for volume and area of water quality detention ponds are based on the impervious proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and walks). The parcel is proposed to have a total impervious fraction of 42%, which is high for this kind of development. A minimum wet -pond volume of 0.55 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.25 acres would be needed to treat the stormwater generated by this development. Streets/ Access/ Circulation — Public street access for the development will intersect directly with State Highway 3. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) has permit authority regarding access to Highway 3. MNDOT has reviewed the proposed access, and as a condition of permit approval, will require the following: • A flatter street grade (less than 1%) on Sweet Street within 50 feet of its intersection with Highway 3. • The removal of two existing driveways to the property. • Access control dedicated to MNDOT along the frontage on Highway 3, except for the 60 -foot width covering the proposed street access. MNDOT also recommends the construction of a right -turn lane on southbound Highway 3 into the development, and a dedicated lane for northbound traffic on Hwy. 3 to bypass left -turning vehicles into the development. The developer should be responsible for construction of a southbound right -turn lane and a northbound bypass lane on Highway 3, in accordance with MNDOT standards. Easements/Rights of Way/ Permits - The developer should be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for construction and access work within the Highway 3 right-of-way, prior to final subdivision approval. The developer should be responsible for all street and highway improvements on Highway 3 right-of- way as required by MNDOT as a condition of permit approval. Public drainage & utility easement should be dedicated on the final plat to a minimum of three feet in elevation above the required high water level of Fitz Lake (Pond LP -26). X 99 Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 7 A conservation easement should be established over the shore impact zone to ensure long-term protection of natural vegetation within this area. Tree Preservation — A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are 153 significant trees in the inventory. 104 of the trees (68%) are pine, cedar or spruce and have diameter between 4 and 20 inches. The balance of the tree inventory is comprised of a variety of deciduous trees, including species such as box elder, elm, maple, willow, black cherry, cottonwood, crabapple, honey locust, and ash, and birch trees averaging 12" in diameter. The development as proposed will result in the removal of seventy-nine (79) significant trees (50.6 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple -lot, single -unit residential) is set at 40% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, there is a required tree mitigation for this proposal. Required tree mitigation to replace trees removed in excess of allowable limits calculates to thirty-four (34) Category B trees. The applicant has stated that they will submit a Tree Preservation Plan that shows the installation of forty-six (46) Category B trees. This amount will more than satisfy the required mitigation. This Tree Preservation Plan should be submitted to the City prior to commencement of any grading or construction activities. In an effort to maximize tree preservation, staff has had discussions with the applicant to preserve, through transplanting, some of the existing spruce trees located near the north property line. These relatively large spruce trees are currently serving as a visual and sound barrier for existing residences to the north. The applicant has had discussions with a tree spade operator who proposes to move the trees with a 95" tree spade. They will be moved next spring before tree growth begins, about 30 feet to the north, just south of the north property line. Staff is recommending that a one-year maintenance agreement (including mulching and needed irrigation be provided by the applicant or tree spade contractor. Also, both forestry and water resource staff have had discussions with the applicant in an effort to maximize tree preservation in the area of the proposed storm water pond, through slightly modifying the shape of the proposed pond. The exact shape and boundary of this pond shall be determined through cooperation of the applicant, his engineering firm and city forestry, water resources and engineering staff. Parks and Recreation — This development is subject to cash parks and trails dedications payable at the time of Final Subdivision at the rates then in effect. Based on the 2004 Fee Schedule, the per-unit rate would be $1,913 for parks and $197 for trails. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning from A, Agriculture, to R-1, Single -Family Residential, and a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight lots upon 5.75 gross acres located 3a0 Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 8 south of Cliff Road and west of Hwy. 3. The property is located within the Shoreland overlay district of Fitz Lake, a General Development waterbody. The net site area is 3.78 acres, and the proposed density of the development is 2.12 units per acre. The proposed development satisifies the shoreland zoning standards, with the exception of the impervious coverage area. The grading plan will need to be modified to adjust the lowest floor elevations of some of the homes, and the storm drainage plan needs to be revised. Existing well and septic on the site will need to be properly abandoned. On-site water quality ponding is proposed. On-site ponding should be located landward of the OHWL and should not disturb the fringe wetland associated with Fitz Lake. Additionally, to ensure continual protection of vegetation in the shore impact zone, a conservation easement should be established over the shore impact zone. Some modifications to the access plan, and addition of turn and bypass lanes on Hwy. 3 are necessary to satisfy MN/DOT requirements. A revised Tree Preservation Plan is needed prior to commencement of any grading or construction activity. This Tree Preservation Plan should show removal of 79 significant trees, and mitigation through on-site planting in the amount of 46 Category B trees. A cash park and trail dedication will be required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Rezoning from A, Agriculture, to R-1, single-family residential, of 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail (south of Cliff Road on the west side of Hwy. 3), in the NE 1/4 of Section 36. To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Sweet Place) to create eight lots upon 5.75 acres located at 4725 S. Robert Trail (south of Cliff Road on the west side of Hwy. 3), in the NE '/4 of Section 36. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 2, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, D1, and El. 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan prior to final subdivision approval. 4. All lowest floor entries and windows for proposed houses within the development shall be constructed higher than elevation 925.5. 5. The developer shall construct an outlet skimmer structure and pipe from the new pond to the normal water level of Fitz Lake, in accordance with City engineering standards. 3 0/ Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 9 6. The new pond to be constructed with the development shall be graded to provide proper depth and function of the outlet skimmer structure, in accordance with City engineering standards. 7. All existing well and septic systems on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development. 8. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for construction and access work within the Highway 3 right-of-way, prior to final subdivision approval. 9. The developer shall be responsible for all street and highway improvements on Highway 3 as required by MNDOT as a condition of access permit approval. 10. The developer shall be responsible for construction of a southbound right -turn lane and a northbound bypass lane on Highway 3, in accordance with MNDOT standards. 11. Public drainage & utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat to a minimum of three feet in elevation above the required high water level of Fitz Lake (Pond LP -26). 12. The applicant shall be required to fulfill required tree preservation mitigation through the installation of forty-six (46) Category A trees, or an equivalent combination of Category B and Category C trees. 13. The applicant shall preserve, through contractual tree transplanting with a 95" tree spade, 20 existing spruce trees (# 8-22, 24, 28-31), to be moved to an area outside of construction limits near the north property line. Transplanted trees shall be maintained (mulched and irrigated) for a period of one year by applicant or hired contractor. 14. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that shows the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting). The protective fence shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off-site (i.e. park trees). 15. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that shows the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting). The tree protective fencing shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site and off-site (i.e. park trees). Planning Report — Sweet Place November 23, 2004 Page 10 16. The Applicant must contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre -construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 17. The applicant shall cooperate with city forestry and water resource staff, during the project pre -construction phase, to maximize tree preservation efforts in proposed pond areas. 18. The Applicant shall convey a permanent conversation easement over Lots 1-3 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for a buffer/setback area adjacent to the lake's ordinary high water level to facilitate protection of shore impact zone. 19. A stormwater detention pond should be constructed with a minimum wet -pond volume of 0.55 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.25 acres. 3i3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope • easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 3ov 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON Revised: February 2, 1993 .3o s FINANCIAL OBLIGATION -Sweet Place -Preliminary Subdivision There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $7,951 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Water Trunk S.F. $1,040/Lot 7 Lots $7,280 Storm Sewer Trunk(1) S.F. $.095/Sq. Ft. 109,812 Sq. Ft. 10,432 $17,712 (1) Estimated Charge with an estimated easement area of 120,460 Sq. Ft. 306 Location Map Eagan Boundary % Street Centerline Parcel Area Building Footprint - ,pi.,:sirirL 6 DI:), ",,, 4 lar ' L.,%,,,...4,ir i,„,.., r 441-tu. , it I ' a a V",,:rWAil'i EM!!!!!!!IVEI PrefpfaivAlWinra ''''''s a 8 iv a" mi-raorA--411VII =Miff w iie LAkir ®1 It/� x oAv.Q444 i ®�.u.°.. � :Tit m I��0®®�0� am• . . ii&A/22 :aA.;;oosc pth veoe� �. tiiiiiiiiiiSall6AMMW d OSP ��=lf D ��W.°►Boo®oc�v�G.:��n� ��► 4.! Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Epic Development (Sweet Place) Land Use Map Case Nos. 36 -PS -18-09-04 & 36-RZ-15-09-04 Zoning Map Current Zoning: A Agriculture 600 0 600 1200 F..t :m:iit R-1 1-- uiw �' I `E PLocation:;��oI 1/:I�•. elli,w‘III t� , . i M A O` �� I6r1 aril 01. I • '�► `BM Il. � i Mg iii® PF Wil NB 1_1 ■ R-1 A ( I I/ pC1 7 I NM SW INNNI MO M MN MI MI 1', or ■ • • '. ■.. ■ •• ■ ■ ■is> ■ ■ ■ ■, R-1 11111 1111■, MIN Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Current Land Use Designation: LD Low Density 600 0 600 1200 F..t 'WW/L*! min ohms= .� ill LD � 1t■■■� Location ��;�� Wil• .■ /111111 4n01110 it '4 ''4: SZI 6 a--1 0. ♦♦ Anw 11111191*0 1 pm kr I c�WM* a' ** &Ala ; inlet 44Timo410, 00/ Z 111 • • Ili -- LD LD LD RC • IND QP 11111 hill f MIA -- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • City of Eagan Community Development Department Parcel base map information providedby Dakota County Land Survey Departmel6 June 2003. Zoning information maintained byCity Staff. Z The City of THIS MAP IS IN TE R ERENCE USE ONLY Eagan and Dakota rantee the accuracy of this information. N W� E EXISTING CONDITIONS/TREE INVENTORY STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 3 i / / / / L ] \tft a m As /1 s 3 j i 41'W 78276 STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 3 (SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL! . \0 00 o 1,.. 1, I IN)4:k\ i STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 3 (SOUTH ROBERT TRAILI as ‘\.'‘144'1\4‘”" \\1\4:;° y f • I1.= I'. I v L m 0 m z 0 -vnmit) 113000,0 U1 07U�. P3 "t 7`< a 0m z m 0 0 Z 0 z 0 0 z 0 m z 0 rn N PRELIM. GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN n� rn 0 3 3/73 1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN IP; s'1{ k 1111 I 11114 c N a_ 0 SWEET PLACE LOT AREA DATA utttttt t 11111111 J4444,W d 33333333 DEVELOPMENT DATA Storm Sewer Trunk • PRELIM. PLAT Agenda Memo December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting VIII. CAPONI PROPERTY ACQUISITION / CAPONI ART PARK UPDATE A. APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a memorandum of understanding between the City of Eagan and Mr. and Mrs. Anthony Caponi. BACKGROUND: • The memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the City and the Caponi's has been discussed between the two entities' attorneys over the past several months, and subsequently, the MOU Funding Source: Pooled funding (City, County, TPL, grants) has changed over time. • The Caponi Study Committee, made up of Councilmembers Carlson and Maguire, has also met on numerous occasions to formulate the goals and objectives of the memorandum. The Committee will meet again on December 13 at 5 p.m. to discuss the signed MOU and formulate a recommendation for the Council's consideration. • It has been the direction of the Caponi Study Committee to bring the MOA to the Council after the Caponi's submitted a signed copy, which took place on the afternoon of Friday, December 10. • It was the original intent of the City Council and the Caponi Study Committee that the City would enter into an agreement with the Caponi's to purchase a specific portion of the Art Park, but would not release the funding until all of the 60 acres of parkland had been secured. • After months of discussion and negotiations, rather than purchasing a specific parcel, all parties involved are comfortable with the concept of pooling the City's money with other entities (e.g. County, TPL, Caponi Art Park Board, etc.) in order to secure the 60 -acre Art Park. • As presented, the 30 -acres that make up parcels C and D will be preserved through funding from the Trust for Public Land, City of Eagan, Dakota County, and various State grants. Of those 30 acres, 10 acres will be solely owned by the City and 20 acres will be owned by the City pursuant to a joint power agreement with the County. • The remaining two parcels, A and B, are proposed to be conveyed to the Caponi Art Park (CAP), a Minnesota non- profit cooperation, with the Caponi's receiving a mortgage for the unpaid purchase price. • The 20 acres that make up Parcel B will be made subject to a conservation easement in favor of the City and County.. • Under the arrangement, the Caponi's will retain the right to utilize the 10 NW acres (Parcel A) for their homestead. Included on these 10 acres are the art park's sculptures, art work, studio, etc. • The MOU sets forth that the CAP will have five years to raise the necessary funding ($1.9 million) to purchase parcel A & B, with two possible outcomes: o First, if the CAP raises the necessary funding, the 10 acres that make up parcel A will be provided to the City under a conservation easement, thus securing the entire 60 acre art park; or, o If the CAP cannot raise the funding necessary to purchase Parcel A, then the Caponi's will retain the 10 acre parcel to be developed as they see fit; thus resulting in a 50 -acre art park. • It was the recommendation of the City Attorney that the Memorandum of Understanding, signed by the Caponi's, be presented to the Council for formal consideration. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed without page number is the proposed Memorandum of Understanding. • Enclosed on page3/9is a graphic of the four parcels that make up the Caponi Property. • Also enclosed, on pages,,36n1)are the meeting notes from the December 8, 2004 Caponi Stakeholders meeting. 3/C t 3 Proposed Partnership and Land Acquisition For Caponi Art Park and Learning Center PAREL C (NACRES) Funding Source: Pooled funding (City, County, TPL, grants) Funding Source: Pooled funding (City, County, TPL, grants) CAPONI STAKEHOLDERS MEETING Notes of the meeting of Wednesday, December 8, 2004 Attendees Tony and Cheryl Caponi Steve Cox, Attorney for the CAP Chip Lindeke, CAP Board Dick Schieffer, Attorney for the Caponi's Bob McGillivray, Trust for Public Land Mike Zender, Attorney, Trust for Public Land Al Singer, Dakota County Tom Hedges, City Administrator Gene VanOverbeke, City Director of Administrative Service Ken Vraa, Consultant for the City Mike Dougherty, Attorney for the City Paul Olson, City Parks and Recreation Notes: The discussion focused primarily on two topics, protection of the property through a PUD versus a conservation easement and, determining what the next step would be given the impending deadlines for funding and closing as described by TPL and the Caponi's PUD/Subdivision City Perspective; • The Council has given direction that the entire 60 acres must be art park to justify the financial participation of the City. An assurance that the properties will remain as an art park is also required. A PUD being the most desireable. • Properties must be platted before the City will take ownership. • The concept of PUD has been used successfully throughout the City. There are no residual rights to the property under a PUD. • A PUD negates the need for additional covenants and easements. • The CAP does not yet own any of the property. • A PUD can be made effective as of a predetermined date so as not to effect values. • A conservation easement (CE) may, serve the purpose, however, to provide the assurances desired by the Council, it would need to be superior to the mortgage on the north 20 acres and 10 acre Caponi homestead. To date, the Caponi's have agreed to make the CE superior on the 20 acres, the mortgage superior on the 10 acres. • A PUD is completed pre-closing • There are no issues or expenditures to ensure enforcement of a CE after closing. • The NE 10 acres would also be protected under the terms of the acquisition grants. • There has been no resolution on the issue of assessments. alt Caponi/TPL perspective; • A CE offers the same measure of protection for the property • A contractual agreement to complete platting, after the transaction has taken place, could be signed • The subdivision/platting process is time consuming and may jeopardize funding that TPL has available to make up the difference in purchase price. • The County has indicated that a PUD alone is not sufficient to ensure protection of the property as required under the County grant program. • Platting of the all of the property will necessitate additional expenditures for surveying and processing (The City has indicated a willingness to cost share) • Platting of the northerly property may necessitate the imposition of a 75' County ROW along both sides of Diffley (The City has expressed a willingness to request a variance) • The imposition of a PUD could impact the value of the property donated by the Caponi's to the CAP. • Donors will be less likely to contribute to the CAP for the acquisition of the north 20 and NW 10 if the properties are already protected from development by a PUD. This would also be a concern if the entire 60 acres were under a superior CE. • The Caponi's are not willing to make a CE superior to the mortgage on the 10 acre homestead. They are willing to make a CE superior to the mortgage on the north 20 acres. The mortgage(s) would be for 5 years. • Upon the payoff of a 5 year mortgage on the NW 10, approximately $2,000,000, the CE could then cover the property in perpetuity. Timelines • The next application deadline for platting/subdivision is Decemberl5 • The commitment from the St Paul Foundation to the Caponi's for funding expires at the end of December. A signed MOU or letter from the City is required. • Final action on the grant will be taken by the County Board on January 4, 2005. A decision on the method of property protection is required prior. (esp. middle 20) • The TPL option on the property expires January 23, 2005, closing 60 days latter. • TPL requires a signed purchase agreement with the City by January 4, 2005 to secure access to an internal TPL source for the " $191 K gap" in available funds. The funds may be lost to another TPL project after that date. Next Steps • TPL will submit a letter to Tom Hedges for inclusion in the packet for the CC meeting of December 13 outlining the actions they are requesting and the rationale/background. • TPL will make application for a plat/subdivision by the 12/15 deadline. The issue of a PUD versus a CE remaining open pending CC direction • TPL will attend the 12/13 CC meeting. • The Caponi's will review/modify the MOU in consideration of signing it prior to submission to the Council. 3i9 • Al Singer will present the issue to the County Board on 12/14, as an informational or action item pending action of the CC. Agenda Memo December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting IX. NEW RUNWAY/AIRPORT UPDATE A. APPROVE ENTERING INTO A COMMON INTEREST AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve entering into a Common Interest Agreement with the City of Minneapolis. BACKGROUND: • The City of Minneapolis has publicly stated that they are pursuing legal action with regards to the scaled back noise mitigation program included in the Part 150 program recently adopted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission's (MAC). • The City of Minneapolis is seeking participation from other communities surrounding the MSP Airport, and in particular those municipalities that have residential property within the 60-64 DNL Contours. • The City of Eagan has the option to enter into a Common Interest Agreement with the City of Minneapolis, which would provide both cities, and their respective legal counsel, the opportunity to confidentially share information, both orally and in writing, on matters pertaining to the process of investigating and bringing potential claims related to noise and noise insulation at and around the MSP Airport. • The City of Richfield, on November 23, 2004, entered into the same Common Interest Agreement with the City of Minneapolis as is being proposed for the City of Eagan. • By entering into the Common Interest Agreement, the City of Eagan would not be committing itself to support any legal action taken by the City of Minneapolis. • In short, the agreement allows the City of Eagan to learn more about the lawsuit being developed by the City of Minneapolis in order to determine whether the City of Eagan has any interest in supporting or joining the suit at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on pages,3.?through3s the proposed Common Interest Agreement between the City of Eagan and the City of Minneapolis. COMMON INTEREST AGREEMENT GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This Common Interest Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the understanding of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Minneapolis"), and the City of Eagan, Minnesota ("Eagan"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties", and their respective counsel with respect to the sharing of information by and between the Parties and their respective counsel in the process of investigating and bringing potential claims related to noise and noise insulation at and around the Minneapolis International Airport (the "Site"). 2. The Parties' Common Interest is the investigation and resolution of noise and noise insulation issues at the Site by means of joint advocacy in administrative, judicial, legislative and other forums. 3. The Parties and their respective counsel may make available to each other privileged information, both orally and in writing, including notes, memoranda, and research ("Common Interest Materials"), relating to the respective positions of the Parties in connection with the Site. The Common Interest Materials may reflect and incorporate confidential communications made by the Parties to their counsel, and by their counsel to them, and are protected by the attorney/client privilege from disclosure, and therefore are intended to be insulated from exposure beyond the confines of the Parties and their respective counsel. See e.g. Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum dated November 16, 1974, 406 F. Supp. 381 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). In addition, the Common Interest Materials are protected from disclosure as a result of the attorney work -product doctrine or other applicable privileges. See e.g. Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Corp., 26 F.R.D. 572 (S.D.N.Y. 1960). 4. The Parties and their respective counsel are making the Common Interest Materials available to each other because the Parties and their respective counsel intend to cooperate to reduce expenses, improve efficiencies, increase communications, and protect human health and the environment at the Site. Because of the privileged nature of the Common Interest Materials, those Materials will be made available with the express understanding that the Parties and their respective counsel shall not communicate the contents thereof to others, as the tender of this information is made not for the purpose of allowing unlimited publication or use, but in confidence, for the limited and restricted purpose of 3� a assisting the Parties and their respective counsel in preparing for or engaging in litigation related to the Site. 5. The Parties and their respective counsel understand that the purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate Common Interest representation by increasing the information flow between the Parties and their respective counsel. The Parties and their respective counsel recognize, however, that under some circumstances, information known to one Party and such Party's respective counsel will not be shared with the other Party to the Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Agreement is intended as, shall constitute, or shall be interpreted, construed or used as evidence of a waiver of any privilege, claim, right or defense, estoppel, or an admission as to any matter of law or fact, either as between the Parties or with respect to any person or entity not a party to this Agreement provided, however, that any Party shall be entitled to use this Agreement to enforce its terms. 7. If any person or entity requests or demands, by subpoena or otherwise, any Common Interest Materials from any Party, or from any Party's respective counsel or from any Party's agent, employee, consultant, or representative, such Party shall: (1) immediately notify the other Party, and (2) assert the Common Interest privilege with respect to the requested Common Interest Materials. Each Party and each Party's respective counsel shall take all steps necessary to assert all applicable rights and privileges with respect to such Common Interest Materials and shall cooperate fully with the other Party in any judicial proceedings related to the disclosure of the Common Interest Materials. 8. The intent of this Agreement is to preserve any privilege existing as to such Common Interest Materials while pursuing the Parties' common interest and to keep all Common Interest Materials confidential to the maximum extent allowed by law. Disclosure by a Party or a Party's respective counsel of materials or information exchanged pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver by the other Party of its right to assert a claim of attorney/client or work -product privilege with respect to that material or information. 9. This Agreement, its terms, the fact of its execution and all discussions among the parties, their attorneys, officers, directors, agents, consultants, representatives, and employees with regard to the Agreement, are themselves subject to the attorney/client and work -product privileges, and each Party and each Party's respective counsel.agree that such privileges shall be asserted in response to any subpoena or request for the production of the Agreement or in response to any inquiry as to its terms, the fact of its execution, or discussions relating to it. 2 3a3 10. This Agreement confirms an oral agreement previously reached between the Parties and their respective counsel. All Common Interest Materials previously exchanged between the Parties and their respective attorneys, officers, directors, agents, employees, consultants, and representatives, are subject to this Agreement. TERMINATION/WITHDRAWAL 11. Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement by giving written notice to every other Party of its election to withdraw. 12. Any Party that withdraws from this Agreement, together with such Party's respective counsel, remains subject to all confidentiality provisions herein as they pertain to information theretofore received, but not as to subsequent information. MISCELLANEOUS 13. Each Party understands and acknowledges that it is represented only by its attorney in this matter, that while the attorney representing the other Party has a duty to preserve the confidences disclosed to him or her pursuant to this Agreement, each will owe a duty of loyalty to his or her respective client only. Each Party will pay for the services of its respective attorney. 14. The Parties do not intend to have the sharing of confidences pursuant to this Agreement provide grounds for, or lead to, the future disqualification of their respective attorneys. 15. Minnesota law shall control the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. This Agreement may be enforced in the courts of the State of Minnesota by a temporary restraining order and injunction in the event of a breach or threatened breach. Any modification to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both Parties. The Parties contemplate that additional entities may be added to this Agreement in the future, provided that all then -existing signatories consent thereto. The addition of new co -parties to the Agreement may be effectuated by execution of a new counterpart signature and service of the counterpart signature upon counsel for each co -party. 16. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Parties and their respective counsel. 3 17. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a partnership, joint venture, and/or principal and agent relationship between the Parties and/or their respective counsel. 18. If any provision of this Agreement is deemed invalid or unenforceable, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 19. This Agreement constitutes the entire current understanding of the Parties and their respective counsel with respect to its subject matter and supersedes any previous oral or written agreements relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. 20. The Parties and their respective counsel acknowledge that this Agreement is the result of joint negotiations among the Parties, and agree that this Agreement shall not be construed or interpreted against any Party on the grounds of sole or primary authorship. 21. Each counsel signing this agreement represents that such counsel is duly authorized to conduct or discuss conducting the subject litigation on behalf of the party indicated. 22. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original. PARTIES: Dated: Dated: Attorney for City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Attorney for City of Eagan, Minnesota 4 3aS AGENDA CITY OF EAGAN REGULAR MEETING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER DECEMBER 13, 2004 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ADOPT AGENDA C. APPROVE MINUTES D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. APPROVE RESOLUTION to Establish a Relocation Assistance Policy for Appeals for Properties Acquired by the City for Public Purposes 2. AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION of Joos Electric Property, 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway, and Schedule Public Hearing to Authorize Eminent Domain Process (If Necessary) on January 18, 2005 F. OTHER BUSINESS G. ADJOURNMENT 3a6 Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting December 13, 2004 A. CALL TO ORDER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To convene a meeting of the Economic Development Authority to run concurrent with the City Council meeting. B. ADOPT AGENDA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt the agenda as presented or modified. C. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving the minutes of the November 16, 2004 EDA meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page Sat is a copy of the minutes of the November 16, 2004 EDA meeting. • Enclosed on pages is a copy of the resolution approving the minutes of the November 16, 2004 ED meeting. 3a 9 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Eagan, Minnesota November 16, 2004 A meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority was held on Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were President Geagan and Commissioners Fields, Tilley, Carlson and Maguire. Also present were Executive Director Tom Hedges, City Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, City Attorney Mike Dougherty, Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk Mira McGarvey. ADOPT AGENDA Commissioner Fields moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 APPROVE MINUTES Commissioner Fields moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to adopt a resolution approving the minutes of the September 21, 2004 EDA meeting as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SALE OF THE LACHENMEYER PROPERTY IN THE NICOLS RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO US HOME FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES Community Development Director Hohenstein discussed the sale of the Lachenmeyer property in the Nicols Ridge development area. Commissioner Carlson moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Resolution to authorize the sale of the former Lachenmeyer property at 3986 Cedar Grove Parkway to US Home Corporation for Redevelopment purposes. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Maguire moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Date Executive Director If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc, please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (612) 681-4600 (TDD phone: (612) 454- 8535. The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. 3;2r EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 16, 2004 REGULAR MEETING BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve the minutes of the November 16, 2004 regular meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director 3027 Agenda Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting December 13, 2004 1. APPROVE RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY FOR APPEALS FOR PROPERTIES ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC PURPOSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution to establish a Relocation Assistance Policy for Appeals for properties acquired by the City for public use or public purposes. FACTS: • As a part of its acquisition of properties for public use such as improvements or public purposes such as redevelopment activities, the City is required by law to compensate sellers for relocation expenses, in addition to the fair market value of their property. • The City retains the services of a relocation consultant to place a fair value on the costs of relocation for the occupants of such properties. The scope of the relocation costs vary by the nature and complexity of the business, equipment or furnishings that need to be relocated. The City may pay for the physical relocation of the property or pay the owner a comparable amount to relocate their own property. • While the sellers and the City typically arrive at mutually acceptable dollar amounts and relocation arrangements, occasions may arise in which that is not possible. The City Attorney is advising that a policy should be considered to establish a procedure for appeals of the relocation valuations determined by the City's consultant. Because the determination of appropriate relocation involves the application of both legal and valuation principles, the policy anticipates the hearing officer being a third party City Attorney, familiar with such matters. ATTACHMENTS: • City Attorney's memo on pages 33/- .33a2 • Draft Policy/Procedure onages 3 -33� • Resolutions on page 3 36-, j, j', 330 SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. SUITE 600 7300 WEST 147TH STREET APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-7580 (952) 432-3136 TELEFAX NUMBER (952) 432-3780 E-MAIL bauerr@seversonsheldon.com seversonsheidon.com TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community. Deve+'Tment Director FROM: Robert B. Bauer, City Attorney / DATE: December 3, 2004 RE: Relocation Assistance - Procedure for Appeals Enclosed please find the proposed Policy for Appeals concerning relocation assistance. In the event an individual believes that the City's relocation consultant has improperly determined eligibility for relocation and the amount of relocation, it is necessary for the City to have a formal appeal policy in place to allow for any person aggrieved by the decision of the City's relocation consultant to have a hearing and an opportunity for judicial review of the decision. A formal policy is now needed in light of the potential claim that may be asserted by Mr. Kopacek. The following is a brief summary of the relocatica appeal process: First, the. City's Consultant will determine the individual's claim and make appropriate recommendations to the City. In the event the person is dissatisfied with the determination by the relocation consultant, the person may, within 90 days after notification from the consultant, submit a request for a review of the consultant's determination. The next step is the determination of the hearing officer. We have selected the City Attorney for the City of Inver Grove Heights (the LeVander law firm) to serve as the hearing officer. In the event of any conflict, the City Administrator may select an alternate hearing officer. It is possible to have the City Administrator or City Council serve as the hearing officer, however, we believe it is more appropriate to have a disinterested third party hear the claim. Under Minnesota law, the hearing officer is required to conduct a formal hearing and have the hearing either tape recorded or have a court reporter present. The hearing officer would then submit a written decision to all parties and any person dissatisfied with the decision may take a direct appeal to the Minnf: sota Court of Appeals through a writ of certiorari. The "record" for the court of appeals will consist of that which is presented to the hearing officer, including a 33/ Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Director December 3, 2004 Page 2 transcript of the hearing. Formal briefs would be submitted to the court of appeals and a written opinion would be issued by the court of appeals. It is our suggestion that the policy be placed on the next agenda for consideration by the City Council. Once approved, we can then work with our relocation consultant concerning the Kopacek claim. Should you have any questions concerning the policy, please feel free to give me a call. 33=z RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS I. APPEALS POLICY. The following is the policy of the City of Eagan (hereinafter "City") regarding appeals from a determination by the City's relocation consultant concerning relocation assistance. A. Request for Review. Any person aggrieved by a decision by the City's relocation consultant may file written appeal with the City in any case where the person believes that the City has failed to properly determine or consider the person's eligibility for relocation assistance. i. Notice. A Request for Review should be sent to: City of Eagan Attn: Community Development Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 The Request for Review shall include a written summary of the reasons the person believes they are aggrieved by the relocation consultant's determination of the person's claim. The City will consider a written appeal regardless of the form. B. Time for Submission. A Request for Review must be submitted no more than 90 days after the person received the written notification of the relocation consultant's determination of said person's claim. II. REVIEW AND HEARINGS. The City Administrator may attempt to resolve the grievance on the basis of any new data which may be presented by the aggrieved party. Any case that cannot be resolved should be forwarded to a hearing officer. The hearing officer shall be the City Attorney for the City of Inver Grove Heights and in the event of a conflict, or such other hearing officer as may be determined by the City Administrator. A. Duties of Hearing Officer. It shall be the duty of the hearing officer to: (1) advise all parties as to the location and time which a hearing shall be held; (2) conduct the hearing only when proper notice has been given; and (3) see to it that any hearing is conducted in a fair and impartial manner. 3 33 Page 2/RELOCATION ASSISTANCE — PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS B. Record of Hearin,'s. The hearing officer shall use audio magnetic recording devices to keep a record of the hearings. If the hearing officer determines that the use of a court reporter is more appropriate, the cost of the court reporter shall be paid by the City. If the hearing officer determines that the use of an audio magnetic recording devise is more appropriate in a hearing, any party to that hearing may provide a court reporter at that party's expense. III. EVIDENCE IN THE CONTESTED CASE. The hearing officer may admit and give effect to evidence which possesses probative value commonly accepted by a reasonable prudent person in the conduct of affairs. All evidence, including records and documents, shall be made a part of the hearing record of the case. No factual information or evidence shall be considered in the determination of the case unless it is part of the record. Evidence may be received in the form of copies or excerpts of documents, or by incorporation by reference. IV. CROSS EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES/REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL. Every party shall have the right of cross examination of witnesses who testify, and shall have the right to submit rebuttal evidence. Every party shall also have the right to be represented by legal counsel or other representative in connection with the appeal, but solely at the person's own expense. V. DECISIONS/ORDERS. Every decision or order rendered by a hearing officer shall be in writing, shall be based on the record and shall include findings of fact and conclusions on all material issues. A copy of the decision and order shall be served upon each party or the party's representative by first class mail. The hearing officer shall also transmit to the City the entire record of the proceedings. The report or order of the hearing officer constitutes the final decision in the case and the hearing officer shall issue findings of fact, conclusions and an order with within 90 days after the hearing record closes. VI. JUDICIAL REVIEW. Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the hearing officer is entitled to judicial review under the provisions of MINN. STAT. § § 14.63 — 14.68. 33' Page 3/RELOCATION ASSISTANCE — PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS Dated: , 2004 CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Pat Geagan Its: Mayor By: Maria Petersen Its: City Clerk 33s- EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY FOR APPEALS FOR PROPERTIES ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve a Relocation Assistance Policy for Appeals for properties acquired by the City for public use or public purposes. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director 33L CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY FOR APPEALS FOR PROPERTIES ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the Eagan City Council to approve a Relocation Assistance Policy for Appeals for properties acquired by the City for public use or public purposes. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk 33 ? Agenda Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting December 13, 2004 2. AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF JOOS ELECTRIC PROPERTY, 3980 CEDAR GROVE PARKWAY, AND SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUTHORIZE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCESS (IF NECESSARY) ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the acquisition of the Joos Electric Property, 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway, and Schedule Public Hearing to Authorize Eminent Domain Process (If Necessary) on February 15, 2005 FACTS: • As a part of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District activities, the EDA and City Council have entered into a development agreement with US Horne for the development of the Nicols Ridge subdivision. Under that agreement, the developer is obligated to make good faith efforts to acquire the properties necessary to assemble the land for the project and, if such efforts are exhausted, the developer may request City Council consideration of public acquisition up to and including eminent domain proceedings, if necessary. • US Home representatives have been in negotiation with Joe Joos, owner of Joos Electric, for the acquisition of his property at 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway. Both parties have indicated to the City that they have exhausted their efforts to finalize a purchase agreement and believe that it is necessary for the City to take part in the transaction to complete it. US Home/Orrin Thompson has confirmed that request in writing. • Staff is requesting authorization from the EDA and City Council to enter into negotiations with the parties to finalize the purchase of the property and the relocation of the business. Staff is also requesting that the City Council schedule a public hearing to consider authorization of eminent domain, if such negotiations are not successful. ATTACHMENTS: • Developers letter on a e • Area map on page 3 • Resolutions on pages 3 Li/ 3 y.2. 333 /02/2004 15:29 FAX 9524737401 LUNDGREN BROS. ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES FAX (651-675-5012) and US MAIL December 2, 2004 Minnesota Calls Us Horne Mark A. Petersen Direct: 952-249-3010 Cell: 651-283-3097 Mr. Jon Hohenstein Community Development Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Re: Nicols Ridge Joos Electric Property Dear Mr. Hohenstein: Q001/001 mark.petersen?lennar.com As we have discussed, U.S. Home Corporation continues to negotiate in efforts to purchase the Joos Electric property in the Nicols Ridge development area. We have orally made to Mr. Joos our final offer to purchase the property. Mr. Joos is considering the offer, but has indicated that he will not make a final decision until he has received an indication from the City as to the amount that it will pay him in relocation expenses. We are, therefore, requesting that the City and the EDA proceed with quantifying the relocation expenses that it will pay to Mr. Joos so that Mr. Joos can consider our offer in full context. We ask that the City and EDA do so at the earliest time, as time is passing on the need to pursue condemnation if a final agreement with Mr. Joos cannot be struck. Please keep me updated on the agenda timing for this matter and whether 1 should attend the Council meeting where it is considered. Regards, rk Petersen Land Acquisition Manager cc: Bob Bauer Steve Grohoski David Hinners Lee Johnson Brett Perry 33y 545 Indian Mound E • Wayzata, MN 55391 • 952-473-0993 • FAX 952-476-0194 EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF JOOS ELECTRIC PROPERTY, 3980 CEDAR GROVE PARKWAY, AND SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUTHORIZE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCESS (IF NECESSARY) ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to authorize the acquisition of the Joos Electric Property, 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway, and Schedule Public Hearing to Authorize Eminent Domain Process (If Necessary) on February 15, 2005. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Jon Hohenstein, Secretary/Deputy Executive Director CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF JOOS ELECTRIC PROPERTY, 3980 CEDAR GROVE PARKWAY, AND SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUTHORIZE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCESS (IF NECESSARY) ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005 BE IT RESOLVED by the Eagan City Council to authorize the acquisition of the Joos Electric Property, 3980 Cedar Grove Parkway, and Schedule Public Hearing to Authorize Eminent Domain Process (If Necessary) on February 15, 2005. Motion by: Second by: Those in Favor: Those Against: CERTIFICATION I, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 13th day of December, 2004. Maria Petersen, City Clerk 3 Ya Agenda Information Memo Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting December 13, 2004 F. OTHER BUSINESS There is no other business to come before the EDA at this time. G. ADJOURNMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adjourn the Economic Development Commission meeting. 3Y3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum is entered into by and between Anthony "Tony" Caponi and Cheryl Caponi, husband and wife, (the "Caponis") and the City of Eagan, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, (the "City") to memorialize the understanding each has with respect to the acquisition and operation of the Caponi Art Park. 1. Property. Caponis are the fee owners of approximately 60 acres of land in the City of Eagan (Property), the legal description of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference on Exhibit "A". For ease of description, the Property will be identified in this Memorandum as follows: Parcel A: Northwest 10 Acres. A 10 -acre (more or less) parcel of land which is developed with a homestead, office and workshop, a driveway, sidewalks and other amenities, subject to life estates in the Caponis, in and to 1.37 acres thereof. Parcel B: The Middle 20 Acres. A 20 -acre (more or Tess) parcel of land which is developed with trails, a driveway, parking lot, the Diffley Road underpass, and other non-structural improvements, lying South of Diffley Road and North of Parcel D. Parcel C: Northeast 10 Acres. A 10 -acre (more or less) parcel of land which is undeveloped Tying North of Diffley Road and East of Parcel A. Parcel D: The South 20 Acres. A 20 -acre (more or Tess) parcel of land which is undeveloped and which lies adjacent to the South property line of the 60 acres of land described on Exhibit "A". 2. Goals. The goal of the City and the Caponis is to transfer ownership of the entire 60 acres to either public or non-profit entities for the continued use and further development of the Caponi Art Park for the esthetic enrichment of the residents of the City, for the purpose of retaining open space within the City and the County of Dakota, and for the cultural enrichment of the public at large. These goals will be achieved through (1) public and non-profit ownership of fee simple title to the 60 acres; (2) the establishment of conservation easements on various parcels; (3) a Maintenance Agreement entered into by all entities owning fee title to secure the future utilitarian needs of the Property; (4) an Operating Agreement entered into by all entities owning fee title to the Property for the purpose of producing and presenting cultural and educational programming to be undertaken by the Caponi Art Park Non -Profit Corporation. 3. Parcels C and D. The Caponis will convey an option to the Trust for Public Land, authorized to do business in Minnesota as The Trust for Public Land, Inc. (hereinafter "TPL") for the purchase of Parcels C and D at a purchase price of $2,261,000.00, said purchase price being in accordance with a certified appraisal dated March 26, 2004. The City will acquire an undivided interest from TPL in Parcels C and D for the sum of $720,000.00, provided, however, that in the event the entities providing additional funding for the purchase of Parcels C and D decline to acquire fee title, the interest of the City may be converted to fee simple title in the whole of the Parcels C and D. The County of Dakota will invest $850,000.00 toward the costs of acquisition of Parcels C and D through the County's Farmland and Natural Area Program. The County shall convey its funds to the City through a Joint Powers Agreement that stipulates that the City shall grant Dakota County a permanent conservation easement on Parcel D at no cost to Dakota County. TPL has secured an additional $691,000.00 in funding to provide the remainder of the purchase price under its Option Agreement from the following sources: a. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural and Scenic Grants Program ($200,000.00); b. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Remediation Grant Program ($300,000.00); c. The Trust for Public Land, authorized to do business in Minnesota as the Trust for Public Land, Inc. (approximately $191,000.00). 4. Parcels A and B. Parcels A and B will be conveyed by the Caponis to Caponi Art Park, a Minnesota Non -Profit Corporation (hereinafter CAP) subject to individual life estates retained by the Caponis in a parcel of land encompassing their homestead and out buildings. The net value of Parcels A and B (after deducting the value of the retained life estate) is $2,837,000.00, the Tentative Purchase Price. The Tentative Purchase Price will be further reduced by a gift from the Caponis to CAP in the amount of $956,500.00, which is calculated as follows: a. The appraised value of Parcel A ($1,278,000.00) less the appraised value of the life estate ($321,500.00) established the value of the Caponis' gift at $956,500.00. The Tentative Purchase Price of Parcels A and B ($2,836,500.00) less the Caponis' gift ($956,500.00) yields the Final Purchase Price to be paid by CAP for Parcels A and B ($1,880,000.00); b. The Final Purchase Price will be paid by the conveyance of a Mortgage by CAP to the Caponis with a term of 5 years. CAP shall convey a conservation easement on Parcel A to the City and shall convey a conservation easement on Parcel B to the City and the County of Dakota which are acceptable and approved by the City under its policies and by the County of Dakota as required by its policies in connection with the Farmland and Natural Area Program. The conservation easement on Parcel B shall have priority over the mortgage previously described and the conservation easement on Parcel A shall be junior to the mortgage previously described. 5. Interdependence of Conveyances and Funding Payments. Except for the Option Agreement between the Caponis and TPL, all payments of funds, grants, purchase money, or the Caponis' gift, and the corresponding conveyances, transfers of title, conveyance of conservation easements including all obligations described by the foregoing paragraphs are interdependent and shall occur substantially simultaneously. The time of performance of each obligation by any party described by the foregoing is the same as all obligations of all the parties. No party shall be required to perform any described obligation without concurrent performance of all described obligations by all parties. 6. Contingencies. The obligations of any party and the performance required of any party as described in the foregoing, is contingent upon satisfaction of the following conditions within 60 days of the execution of this Agreement by the City and by the Caponis: -2- a. The Caponis shall prepare and present to the City, a complete Business Plan describing the improvements, the land uses, and the conduct of programs on the Property, as they presently exist, together with a complete Business Plan for the improvements, land uses, and the conduct of programs on the Property which are contemplated for 2004, 2005 and 2006. b. The Caponis shall prepare and present to the City, a complete Operating Agreement to be executed by the City and the Caponi Art Park Board of Directors together with any other entity which holds a fee interest in the Property. The Operating Agreement shall be prepared in conjunction with the City through the offices of the City Attorney and shall address the responsibilities and obligations that each signatory to the Agreement shall have in the operations conducted on the Property. Provision shall be included to insure that oversight is maintained of compliance with the conservation easements, the open space requirements, the zoning regulations, and similar land use controls. c. The Caponis shall prepare and present to the City, a Maintenance Agreement setting forth the obligations and responsibilities of the City and the Caponi Art Park Board of Directors and any other entity having a fee interest in the Property for the future maintenance of the Property including, without limitation, parking lot, entrance, trails and walkways, grasslands, shrubs and over -story, sewer and water, electric and gas utilities, improvements not subject to life estate, Diffley Road underpass, fences, provision for liability and casualty insurance, and any other matters related to the ongoing maintenance of the Property and its improvements. d. The Caponis shall plat Parcels A, B, C and D and shall commence the platting process immediately upon approval of this Memorandum of Understanding and will be assisted in the platting process by TPL. All parties recognize that the County may request a further dedication of street right-of-way to a maximum of 75 feet on each side of the centerline of Diffley Road and that such dedication would impose hardship on Parcel A (destruction of fence and sculptured landscaping), on Parcel B (cutting into ampitheater hill, and closure or removal of the Art Park entrance) and on Parcel C (steep downward slope) and the City agrees to use its best efforts in obtaining a variance from Dakota County requesting that the right-of-way dedication be waived as to the property described in this subparagraph. 7. Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. Upon transfer of fee title to the Property (subject to the life estate described), the Caponis shall pay, or make appropriate arrangements for payment approved by the City and any other taxing authority, special assessments for public improvements, and ad valorem real estate taxes not deferred by special legislation. The obligation for payment by the Caponis described herein shall not preclude the Caponis and the taxing or special assessment authorities from negotiating and reaching agreement on the amount of the final payments based, without limitation, on the use to be made of the Property in relation to the improvements underlying the taxes or special assessments; the benefits to the taxing and special assessment authorities derived from the limitation of land uses available on the Property under this Agreement; and the benefit to the City of Eagan, the County of Dakota, -3- and the larger communities from the cultural, esthetic, open space and park uses; together with any other equitable considerations which may be persuasive. 8. Funding of Acquisition Costs. The City and the Caponis will provide mutual support to each other or any entity in efforts to obtain grants or any other funding which will be of assistance in effecting the conveyance of any interest in the Property to the entities contemplated by this Agreement. 9. Not a Contractual Obligation. This Memorandum of Understanding is not an enforceable contract. The parties shall use their best efforts to accomplish the goals hereof through the negotiation and drafting of separate, appropriate contract documents. The Caponis and the City hereby accept this Memorandum of Understanding and do hereby agree to use their best efforts in implementing the terms of this Agreement. Dated: l2 -- /D -- C4 Dated: /2 - /D - Anthony Caponi THE CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation Dated: BY: Pat Geagan, Mayor Dated: BY: Maria L. Petersen, Clerk RJS/10287/Memorandum of Understanding(Final-2) -4- Legal Descriptions: 10-02200-010-80 10-02200-010-84 10-02700-011-02 The Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 22, Township 27, Range 23 The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 22, Township 27, Range 23 Section 27, Township 27, Range 23, the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 and the West 99 feet- of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; except beginning at a point on the South line 170 feet East of the Northwest corner, thence West 170 feet along the South line to the Southwest corner North along the West line 570 feet deflecting right at an angle of 134 degrees, 30 minutes, 6 seconds, 406.60 feet in a Southeasterly direction to a point parallel with and 285 feet North of South line deflecting right 68 degrees, 19 minutes, 55 sec— onds in a Southwestly direction 309.23 feet to beginning; 2.45 acres more or less. (NOTE: Exception lies west of Quigley Lake). EXHIBIT A