Loading...
1016 Diffley Rd - Reference Docs for Permit BL83331A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Retail Building A 1016 Diffley Road Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Diffley Ventures, LLC Project AV- 04- 06040B September 9, 2008 Braun Intertec Corporation FIFTY YEARS K BRAUN � NTE RTEC September 9, 2008 Mr. David Stradtman Diffley Ventures, LLC 527 Marquette Avenue, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Retail Building A 1016 Diffley Road Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Stradtman: Project AV- 04- 06040B Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.corn Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Retail Building A and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractors work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust Visual Examination of Field Welds Visual examination of the field welds were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 -2006, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3 -1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Drilled in Expansion Anchors Observations were done after the installation of the drilled in expansion anchors to determine if they were installed according to the project documents. Items observed included the placement, if the nuts were fully engaged, if the adjoining plies were in contact with one another and if the nuts were snug tight. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Mary Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Daniel P. Graham ICC C ." i�eci- 1 ctor- Structural Steel and Welding - - Ivare y A. uber, PE Vice President - Principal Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Mr. David Krech; Krech Ojard & Associates Mr. Dale Schoeppner; City of Eagan Inspections Department Mr. Greg Bauer; Braun Intertec Struc Steel Final Report Diffley Ventures, LLC Project AV- 04- 06040B September 9, 2008 Page 2 BRAUN INTERTEC BRAUN INTERTEC Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan, Minnesota Project: Retail Building A Conclusion Attachments: 1016 Diffley Road Eagan, Minnesota License Number: 15329 September 9, 2008 Braun Intertec Project: AV- 04- 06040B In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection - related issues. Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding - related issues. The deck welding, and side -lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking - related issues. Based upon the inspections conducted, and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional E mri underthfi law. of he Sta f Minnesotati` ‘ s( A. HUr rl,. % Q,P . . s • LICENSED �, Ray A. Huber, PE : PROFESSIONAL; =' ENGINEER Vice President - Principal Engineer i • Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 3 Special Inspection Summary of Discrepancy Log ../,71:(.. TA 15329 • Q •••.. Op musIN;0•- Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Date: September 9, 2008 Attention: Mr. David Stradtman Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust BRAUN INTERTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: ava 4-15g. 16z 4..•Nutee.NAA-t List tests performed: Signed: Print Full Name: City of 06.s ,, e. tnA,t 54 t *I OCp dAkv,rle.A.y kuR. ela Project No.• 1,0i6 DA-6 RA s trke.wy of our knowledge, L ')Ot`d e ru\no,v. Date of This Report: Type of Inspection: I ❑ Continuous fi e' Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry 13 Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases D escription and location of work completed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Client Project No.: Temperature: To the bes t work inspected was clone in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. • Date: I.D. No.: Special Inspection Daily Report -kc4 No No 4v- o'•t - otot tO$ l 9 4Q1ak.: ? -?51-0% - White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page o1. SIDRPT k+re ° ota ACfoc:e kf S 2-0 D„� V t�.• J • 598 o L. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: City of &lam Stir- -h o. st-p,p « . Date of This Report: 9 -r-us 1 AdAc. f- t& L.0 6t Q Project No.• Q t/- 0q 0(00`1013. to llo ; C-9-6, , IZA a k Ovu,", DrDiption and location of work completed: I evei A- R 1- 5 W ()At T 4X3Zilst Signed: Print Full Name: Page t of k SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report Client Project No.: Temperature: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous ,0 Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases � sL tekr. D 4.c (3. ,I4S L p+ eG-si q tt" i- gos /-? L, t. „..A„„) ave c-s welre w-cv- ?? r 3 t 1"5 of G:. A - g f t I aleck Qt Co a t t p< to s t Lo. c % tIQac + co v. w titan 41%4 1/1"0,.. V1 CO, GA. L - 5n u5 k5 L.+ - o cf -s cv -e pa �•, � • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑ • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. Date: I. D. No.: f3- Ss- u g White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. (A'r Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Report No.: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Li City of -= cl r 1•V.e_y -..tAk S A 43 Date of This Report: /�2-1 S '-oFC D: r t/►'Nc,garptt& 4 W 6 Project v^Ou 0(0 o4 c toLto n: Le► A . i ✓(d ,�t�Ne� Client Project No s Temperature: Type of Inspection: ❑ Continuous Periodic Inspection Coverage: ❑ Masonry 12 Welding & Bolting ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ ❑ Special Cases Des tion and location of work completed: List tests performed: Signed: Print Full Name: ©vNi:1/2 RAYNS \v. L �c • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. cv€ cu,t Q G A �,G�tt ov. 41eck, — � a,5 +►repot rc-) Date: gp Yes ❑ Yes ❑ I.D. No.: Special Inspection Daily Report No No To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except as noted above. 1o9 Jc.V White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Page \ of SIDRPT Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Report No. Report Date Description Resolution to Discrepancy O/C Status g f ^° SF lat Ball c eVUZIS wa-/C /Not kt,.ct-u.\k¢c) t.1eN-E, 9f re 9-t=. ct % BRAUN 'Br likUtir INTERTEC jmk:mjs \frm\discrep.2 1/10/95 Summary of Discrepancies Needing Correction or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect Sheet of Project Name: Project Address: The following items must be reviewed or approved by the engineer and /or corrected and /or inspected before work can continue in the area. ,05 9'2008 12:51 FAX 651 487 1812 BRAUN INTERTEC May.28. 2008 5:56PM, Copeland Building 952 832 5301 Mar G, ., � .w. -wI+ IVI I' jard Ma, 27. 2008 12:421111 Copeland ; uildieg 952 832 3 1 ihsperlow is sabmiaodosare idr tivitasorgritatruidta260 t i c-s; d Gbcto- Makin a vainadoro st .5 )34& istel ccradvetin dim.% Ad8 4►d in **awe Q cry norDEAecuot VixproiaoT6a N) •Dtf ar m ' raltr Otgion Oita thsartibru rat Sloe. 'C a3pecia laspaptkn pn , � a et* et het reromoils9iisia#. s'i qtr': ka3ttts t t;oJ tb Ira .RIBt N oril 41w t.sn egrmildhsiverfosi doeu sdnottopienen: %to !> th inaretiorra sn6rrdavivEictfg eteebmR 7rm anu nom i tJf El7 ov °� *14. fie run ,l ' t1ttC� %y t aw sposib) 0' l`{'t ` nts i�b Iilss c�rtrnl �a 1�a 1 s� �r � t ita0P i+rajrar. anal a µ0� Plate MLP.4u IATOMTV Gitc ..s L�9 /�� • 4 1Vrtatattifili==.4141101164#1 :.#1461111031#14nita4106AVP Valet MiOnlims mirk , s 41111tleptotstratthtsifter t- , liiligisitster'E'oattlt i TA•m haft% Speard impetus- S[eretetast riegther 1• 7155527336 No, 2269 No. 2 bt3 F. 2 Duitc A ir 40 ondsircidairactionvt g' as wand Qoaepas ! *Ingo 12 lj 003/004 P. 2 �JG MAY 3 0 2008 Structural Testing and Special Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Nam o Pte rAo.Ce.. Project N. Location Permit No. Technical (2) Section . Astielo `1200 Description Report. F nem (5) Typcf o 3) iis - o 4) 5-4 1rLi Tecr -541 3. CA ...A416 41. u - Pe_111). Ina Notes: This schedule shall be ftlleil out and 'included in the Structural Testing and Special Inpectirn Program. (1.1 Permit No. to he provided by the Building Official. (2) Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program. (3) Usodescriptions per IBC Section 1704, as adopted by Iviinnesota Sue Building Code. (4) Special Inspector Technical, Special Inspector Structural, Testing Agency-. (5) Weekly, monthly, per per floor, etc. (6) Finn contracted' to perform. serviees„ CASEININ Page 13 675 +675 +5360 06/05/2008 11:38 EAGAN MAINTENANCE 4 CITY HALL DNSTR 952 632 53171 Jun, 5. 2008 12:31PM Copeland Building 952 832 5301 FAX flIANSNIITTAL Dote: dune 5, 2008 To: 3 Craig Novaczyk at City oY Bagsq (651-6754360) From: Craig ltorcier Project Diffiey Markeiplace Buiding A & Eagan Craig, Fullowhag is the Revised Code Review for Bonding A & H, I will get fall size tits skeots for you In the wail today+. Please call with any questions and or concerns at 952432 -5302. rb Craig P Per Project Manager COPELAND B U I L D I N G CORPORATION cc: Mark Sckaibly - Copeland Budding Corp (651-905- 3775) 5300 Hyldr►d Greens Drive Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) 832,5302 (952) 832.5301 Fax Pages (Includes cover): 2 NO.510 D01 No.2698 P. 1/2 1 06/05/2008 11:38 EAGAN MAINTENANCE 4 CITY HALL DNSTR qua• 4 7. tool 12:3214A Copeland Building 952 832 5301 a § 4 11 1 t tft viii g § es to z 0 us LU 1 /Z1 zz> p C (W t u w* ■ z W r • a k -.1 i f § 0 8 : Nci *. IQ i tic. 114 ku Z i g CO 2 a No.2698 P. 2/2 NO.510 D02 i City of Eaaali Mike Maguire MAYOR Paul Bakken Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Thomas Hedges CITY ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 -1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. March 27, 2008 Robert R. Copeland Copeland Building Corp. 5300 Hyland Greens Drive, #200 Bloomington, MN 55437 Dear Robert: We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above - referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed: 1. Soils Report. 2. Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule (form enclosed). 3. Energy Calculations. 4. Fire Protection System Plan Review Information (form enclosed). If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at (651) 675 -5683. Craig Novaczyk Senior Building Inspector Cc: Greg Thompsen, Planmark 6533 Flying Cloud Dr, #100 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 City of Eaaau MeMo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: /Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: March 18, 2008 RE: Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Signature 23 Date Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required CD /Bldg Insp /Forms/ /Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 4 11b° City of Eaaafl MoMo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections /Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: DATE: RE: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector March 18, 2008 Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. rifl a..o - Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature CD/Bldg Insp /Forms //Plan Review For landscape security required water quality dedication park dedication trail dedication tree dedication PRV Required Amount Date # 23 Zoning? ?to Meter Size REVISED 2 -07 x-4-- -e.o Lso eitio4-1 � ks - 1 ,� V 5. C1 eeQa 614_4 v �! 4X Lon c � cx...0 7 f (cce DriteitS 4 40 / ty of Eaaau MeMo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # _23_ Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering F` "` -rr.`/ D�r pat ., `�` 5 ✓ John Gorder, Engineering 1,56? /- -, 21 '5:36 Cr Dave Westermayer, Engineering y q Leon Weiland, Engineering \ � � f�, j rce�lt 5 /4c /ii/. Tom Struve, Maintenance _ 3 Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Sint Y S�✓h- T> ,k -4 4 2 7 c/ ac _ I ' 92 - Gregg Hove, Maintenance 1 ,j� 1 y /oo % 14 5'79. Jim McDonald, Police Department 53 _ � a3 o - Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah 37. _ x ;2i 3�r - 3 2i Sarah Brandel, Community Development ,/ 5 r 41f f 38. " k 2(53 v` = 18, 320 '' 2 FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: March 18, 2008 RE: Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: ®K EA, rx r . Se re✓rawal r /0s - , . 7� f `trvlee - o8- ' 8 ?rI) f / . /A4r � n rr�r.5 • Mtn -117/ 06/(7110915 avve 6z ` fr wlw O� ©l . � �l�tet Rlyl! t -far Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication ❑ Yes R No PRV Required ignature Date CD /Bldg Insp/Forms //Plan Review For R$VISED 2 -07 City of EaQau Memo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: March 18, 2008 RE: Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes k No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Ye ❑ No tree dedication ❑ % ❑ No PRV Required SignattJ f✓ "' Date 371P16 ? # 23 CD/Bldg Insp /Forms/ /Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 Comments: Signature CD/Bldg Insp/Forms // City of Eaaali demo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance / Eric Macbeth, Maintenance ✓ Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: March 18, 2008 RE: Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. # 23 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes 7 No tree dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No RRV Required Date lan Review For REVISED 2 -07 4 40 / City of Earn Demo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: March 18, 2008 RE: Plan Review For: Building A at 1016 Diffley Road (Retail Shell) The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. ature Date Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No landscape security required Zoning? ❑ Yes ❑ No water quality dedication Meter Size ❑ Yes ❑ No park dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No trail dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No tree dedication Yes ❑ No PRV Required # 23 CDBIig Insp/Formsl/Plan Review For REVISED 2 -07 c From: Craig Forcier [mailto :craig @copelandbuilding.co ( Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:35 PM ( To: Craig Novaczyk Cc: Schaibly (Scheibly) Subject: FW: Diffley Building A & B F S C St PE Th In Be Craig, Rylaur is correct. It appears that I missed that on your plans. . The s yo of E 009.11.1, l, the exception the Code i the 2006 is written. We have no IBC) in place that would conflict with the adopted Codes Thanks for consulting me on this, and thank Rylaur for catching RI Sir Cry Prc Co, P: F: C:( Craig Novaczyk From: Craig Novaczyk Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:59 PM To: 'craig @copelandbuilding.com' Subject: RE: Diffley Building A & B Craig Craig Novaczyk Senior Building Inspector ( City of Eagan O f City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road 1 Eagan, MN 55122 1 (651) 675-56831(651) 675 -5694 (Fax)1 cnovac k . cit ofea •an.com City THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND /OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. Craig, The plans that we submitted for the Permit on 1012 and 1016 Diffley Road had the s ooftHaltch's at 4' -6" long. Rylaur, through our shop drawing submittal process, changed the hatches to 8'-0" long, see attached Our question to you is, will the City require us to install the 8' -0" hatch as described by Rylaur and our shop drawings or can we install the 4' -6" hatch as per the permit drawings? Thank you for your help on clearing up this question. Sincerely, Craig P. Forcier Project Manager Copeland Building Corp. P: 952-832-5302 F: 952 -832 -5301 C: 612-554-8803 LO COPELAND B U I L D I N G CORPORATION From: A. Peter Hilger [mailto: philger @rylaur.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:24 PM To: craig @copelandbuilding.com 06/ 06/11/2008 Page lof3 ti Craig Novaczyk From: David Stradtman [DStradtman @rdcllp.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:21 AM To: A. Peter Hilger; Dale Schoeppner Cc: Mark Schaibly; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Just a couple follow up notes regarding this... 1. Space G - "hair" - this is Great Clips. I understand their specific plans have been submitted to the city. Their plans have a utility sink included. So, the issure should be moot as it relates to that space. 2. Spaces F and D - "Cleaners" and "Pet Food" - both of those deals have now fallen out. 50, we won't be completing those vanilla shell build outs until we have replacement deals in place. We will provide for the laundry tubs as we do rough ins and /or build outs in the future. 3. Space H - "Pizza" - we will add the rough in for the laundry tub. The tenant (Little Caesars) will complete that finish and have to comply with this requirement on their work. 4. Space E - "Nails" - same scenario as the Pizza space. We will provide the laundry tub rough in and the Tenant will then build it out to city requirements. Thanks all. Happy Thanksgiving. David W. Stradtman Director of Development Reliance Development Company 1000 Rand Tower 527 Marquette Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 612- 338 -1000 main 612 - 313 -0104 direct 612 - 508 -2609 cellular 612- 338 -8971 fax dstradtman @rdcllp.com Original Message From: A. Peter Hilger [mailto:philger @rylaur.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:03 AM To: 'Dale Schoeppner' Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; David Stradtman; bob @copelandbuilding.com; 'Craig Novaczyk'; 'Mike Lence'; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Dale, I have attached a sketch showing the proposed locations of laundry tubs. 1 Please note that each of the endcaps are under separate planning by the tenants (Pizza and Liquor store), so they are not reflected here. I trust this is not a problem. I have asked the contractor to proceed with this direction unless you advise otherwise. We will follow -up with a more formal change drawing. Thank you for your assistance. A. Peter Hilger, AIA Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Rd. Mahtomedi, MN 55115 (651) 631 -1300 ext 224 (612) 868 -3636 Mobile Original Message From: Dale Schoeppner [ mailto :DSchoeppner @cityofeagan.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 6:59 AM To: 'A. Peter Hilger' Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Thank You, Dale Original Message From: A. Peter Hilger [mailto:philger @ rylaur.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:32 PM To: Dale Schoeppner Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail Service Sinks Ok, Thanks, Dale. Its an interpretation thing I guess. We will locate with floor sinks or laundry tubs, as appropriate. A. Peter Hilger, AIA Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Rd. Mahtomedi, MN 55115 (651) 631 -1300 ext 224 (612) 868 -3636 Mobile Original Message From: Dale Schoeppner [ mailto :DSchoeppner @cityofeagan.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:31 PM To: 'A. Peter Hilger' Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Peter, 2 Sincerely, Dale Schoeppner 651 - 675 -5699 Original Message From: A. Peter Hilger [mailto:philger @rylaur.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:54 AM To: Dale Schoeppner Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com Subject: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Dale, I have been made aware by Copeland Building Co., the building contractor for the retail portion of the Diffley Marketplace projects, that the City, via Craig Novaczyk, is requiring a service sink in each tenant space. This is contrary to my interpretation of the Code. Iunderstand Craig is out of the office, so I am writing to you. There is nothing in Chapter 29 of the IBC that suggests a service sink is required in each occupancy as opposed to each building. As is the case with multi- tenant office buildings that may in fact have multiple occupancy groups within it, there is not a requirement that each suite have a service sink (or a toilet facility for that matter) when such facilities are provided in a common place accessible to all, as in a janitor closet. This has always been the accepted norm and supported by Code. We are taking, and for at least the past 15 years have taken, a successful position in multi - tenant retail facilities to provide a service sink in a common room accessible to all tenants, no different than a common mall. We have traditionally located this facility in the same room as the fire sprinkler riser, roof access, electrical service, and telephone demarc area, all of which are utilitarian functions commonly accessible to all tenants. In our specific case, we have identified and installed a common service sink under the roof access ladder. To require a service sink in each space is not supported in the Code, or if your department so believes it to be, then I would request a chapter and verse citation, as I will regularly accept misinterpretation on my part. However, this question has come up numerous times on other multi- tenant strip retail projects and has always been supported. The only exception to placing service sinks into an individual suite as part of a larger multi- tenant strip would be a restaurant or similar food use that as part of the kitchen and Dept of Health regulations require a service sink in proximity to the kitchen functions, or for other uses for which the tenant's indicate a need due to ongoing maintenance. Can you please re- examine your decision on this matter and advise? Thank you. A. Peter Hilger, AIA Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Rd. Mahtomedi, MN 55115 (651) 631 -1300 ext 224 (612) 868 -3636 Mobile 4 As you know, the service sinks, water closets, lavatories, drinking fountains and showers are all listed individually within all the occupancy classifications in table 2902.1. The code does state that the plumbing fixtures shall be provided for the type of Occupancies. I'm not aware of any place in the code that says the required water closets, lavatories, drinking fountains, showers and service sinks are to be accessed without having to go outside for the occupancy classifications in question. We are applying the same standard that is used when the other fixtures are required to be accessed and installed within the buildings. Exception "e" to this table specifically allows permanent facilities located either on site or available in an adjacent building for stadiums or grandstands. Dale Original Message From: A. Peter Hilger [mailto:philger @ rylaur.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 3:18 PM To: Dale Schoeppner Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence; cholzwarth @rylaur.com Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Thank you, Dale, for looking into this matter. I am puzzled though, since neither the IBC nor the State Amendments direct in the manner you suggest, (that I have found anyway), can you advise of chapter and verse where this.is required for my reference? Or is this strictly a "local" matter to which we must oblige. Thanks. A. Peter Hilger, AIA Rylaur, LLC 752 Stillwater Rd. Mahtomedi, MN 55115 (651) 631 -1300 ext 224 (612) 868 -3636 Mobile Original Message From: Dale Schoeppner [mailto:DSchoeppner @cityofeagan.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:55 PM To: 'A. Peter Hilger' Cc: 'Mark Schaibly'; 'David Stradtman'; bob @copelandbuilding.com; Craig Novaczyk; Mike Lence Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail - Service Sinks Peter, We have taken your request for clarification very seriously and have explored the code history and purpose relative to the service sink requirements of IBC table 2902.1. The service sink requirement for tenant spaces was a change that took place in 2003 when the 2000 IBC was adopted in Minnesota. We have been requesting the service sink installations since that adoption. From what I understand the main reason to require them was to prevent tenants from using the toilets as a mop basin. The two plans for Diffley Marketplace would require the tenants to travel outside "some at quite a distance" to use a service sink. This outdoor access would only encourage unsanitary practices from occurring. We are therefore requesting individual service sinks. If you have any more questions or concerns do not hesitate to contact me. 3 `FF. 1 0 Craig Novaczyk From: Pam Dudziak Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 3:49 PM To: 'bob @copelandbuilding.com' Cc: Craig Novaczyk Subject: RE: Diffley Marketplace Retail A &B Bob, The revised site lighting plan (received May 8, 2008) is acceptable, except for the wall packs on the two retail buildings. The revised plan uses 70w fixtures whereas the original approved plan uses 50w fixtures. We are comfortable with this change on the front of the buildings, but not the sides and rear where it is closer to the residential neighbors. The 50w fixtures should provide enough illumination for safety and security. Please modify the plan to use the 50w fixtures on the sides and rear of those buildings. The two retail building permits are acceptable from a zoning perspective. However, both the Site Lighting and Landscape Plans need to be updated in the permit sets to reflect the addition of the fence along the berm, and the modifications to the site lighting we have been discussing. Please send us four full -size sheets of each plan (2 for each building permit), so we can update the permit sets. The last comment relates to placement of RTU's, which is noted on Sheet A2.3 to meet City screening requirements. Please note that if upon installation, any units remain visible from off the property, additional screening measures will need to be installed, similar to what is being done on the Cub building. Thank you for your patience and cooperation. Let me know if you have any further questions. Pam Dudziak Tame fa Dudziak Planner, City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Ph: 651- 675 -5691 Fax: 651 - 675 -5694 From: Bob Copeland [mailto :bob @copelandbuilding.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:54 AM To: Pam Dudziak Subject: Diffley Marketplace Pam: Is the revised site lighting plan approved? We need the building permits for Buildings A & B. Craig indicated he does not have your approval yet. How is your review coming? Bob Copeland bob @copelandbuilding.com office 952 - 832 -5302 fax 952 - 832 -5301 cell 612- 791 -2370 5300 Hyland Greens Dr., #200 Bloomington, MN 55437