2000 Cliff Lake Rd - Structural Steel Special Inspection15
_u SEP23 4 1)1 U
M
B P# M-0 935
A Structural Steel Special Inspection
Final Report
Target Store T -0360 Remodel
2000 £-Hff-Road &J 17 L•kk - i
Eagan, Minnesota
Prepared for
Target Property Development
Project BL- 10- 05666N
September 21, 2010
Braun Intertec Corporation
BRAUN
BRAUN
!NTERTEC
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
September 21, 2010 Project BL- 10- 05666N
Mr. Dan Ahrens
Target Property Development
50 South 10th Street, Suite 400
TP3 -0710
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 -2054
Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal
Target Store T -0360
2000 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Ahrens:
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for
the Target Store T -0360 Remodel and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports.
Special Inspection and Testing Procedures
The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified
special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code,
Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications.
The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the
project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine
compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the
responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge or modify
the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this.
As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to
summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the
contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing
correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also
summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the
project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or
discrepancies observed.
Plans and Specifications
The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to
time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to
evaluate the work completed in the field.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Visual Examination of Field Welds
Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society
(AWS) D1.1 -2008, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans
and specifications.
Drilled in Expansion Anchors
Observations were preformed after the installation of the drilled in expansion anchors to determine if
they were installed according to the project documents. Items observed included the placement, if the
nuts were fully engaged, if the adjoining plies were in contact with one another and if the nuts were
snug tight.
General
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by
reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express
or implied, is made.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project.
After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require
additional information, please call Troy Baumann at 952.995.2554 or Mary Denne at 952.995.2510.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
/ 7
Troy W. Baumann
ICC Certified Special Inspector - Structural Steel and Welding
Michael M. ` euer, P
Vice Presi • ent- Principal Engineer
Attachment:
Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report
c: David Johnson, PE; Van Sickle Allen & Associates
Mr. Dale Schoeppner; City of Eagan Inspections Department
Struct Steel Final Rpt
Target Property Development
Project BL- 10- 05666N
September 21, 2010
Page 2
BRAUN
INTERTEC
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report
City of: Eagan, Minnesota
Project:
Target Store T -0360 Remodel
2000 Cliff Lake Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Braun Intertec Project: BL- 10- 05666N
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Date: September 21, 2010
Attention: Mr. Dan Ahrens
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995:2020
Web: braunintertec.com
In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code
and the agreed upon scope of services, the required special inspections and testing have been provided
for the following items:
Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily
Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and
specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding - related issues.
Drilled in Expansion Anchor Bolts. The drilled in expansion anchor connections detailed in the
attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements
of the plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. The procedures used by
the contractor to install the anchors were not documented by the special inspector as required. The
placement was done in accordance with the construction documents, the nuts were fully engaged, the
adjoining plies were in contact with one another and the nuts were snug tight. The installation was
found acceptable after review by the structural engineer.
Conclusion
Based upon the inspections conducted and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to
the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the
approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship
provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code.
Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws.pt the °r, ° ° �
State of Minnesota. ti v�i c..OF WI /,
4;1 !! ' 571
euer, P ent- Principal Engineer
SSIOItitX
ichael M.
Vice Presi�
License umber: 15571
September 21, 2010
Attachments:
Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 4
Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancy Log
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Project Manager:
Description and location of work completed:
List tests performed:
Signed:
c -\AGAR -0 \ , ct"•v. C1nca win
kve S - IJ tr-c
Print Full Name:
Th,t- T �loo
a oa'J CI; Lekko
Trtr k
City of e'n S CAN"
IMtt-V J QQ1nv.0
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
onV111
Client Project No.:
Temp /Weather:
Special Inspection Daily Report
Sv. -vt,.y
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations
4 1. Periodic a Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing
❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No
❑ Special Cases
Nl RRCC\2 Sv,RTort ' t „ R bv.zC G.. - 9,2-C
h/( t ‘94 1•-11 t � cty CAAmt,• ' 'v 3 Sk c1/•6.1)•142t 'fib
2 k -
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � �ti�'�t.� Awn" �ttoc fy
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No (°fi 2 � ' X4�:v w. Lh N'1
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Sv�2 fo
1 �,V_a ( O I SQ,,. ? t02 1 - 'L.I.00 t % %4i
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done i"n accordance with the approved plans, specifica pl M cable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above.
Date:
I.D. No.:
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative.
Page of
SIDRPT Rev 1 0/09
(L— t• - o�OtGto
tug VC S' -&S- S t F S 2_
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Project Manager:
Signed:
Print Full Name:
City of LQ av\
S
S 1�vck, tat, 41eQ
T4 50k- T 0 3��
2.DoO CV:4 LcA.Ite_
Description and location of work completed:
Type of Inspection:
❑ Continuous
,RP' Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
❑ Masonry
Welding & Bolting
❑ Piles & Piers
❑ Rebar Placement
❑ Concrete Placement
❑ Tendon Placement
❑ Foundations
❑ Fireproofing
❑ Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑
❑ Special Cases
cceNt as `!S, x.1,1 < <I y 1 I 7{, 41
List tests performed:
R o$ ■\) d`\ v k∎4 /LAW
tr-6 rov„ctA ?Lize si S 11L ev use.(.
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
g 00.0
Client Project No.:
Temp /Weather:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was clone in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above.
( Ki( TtM6n._,
Date:
I.D. No.:
Special Inspection Daily Report
rrnw..as Celr` a - 9 9
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative.
Page _ of
SIDRPT Rev 10/09
C Q- 4.
• Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
1 NTE RTEC
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Project Manager:
City of tj.
di 3
"</ir c a To36o
,Ro a C1. P[' tdc( kac i
Pt 44C
/4
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
Client Project No.:
Temp /Weather:
Page of
SIDRPT Rev 10/09
Special Inspection Daily Report
di_ /o•o,s
Type of Inspection:
❑ Continuous
Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
❑ Masonry
2'Weldin & Bolting
❑ Piles & Piers
❑ Rebar Placement
❑ Concrete Placement
❑ Tendon Placement
❑ Foundations
❑ Fireproofing
❑ Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑
❑ Special Cases
Description and location of work completed:
/) /C /L6M( ) ti:J6 c1 QWV�
jj
c JJ n /c ifo -) . L 2 : / ' / ' R 4 1/
,S IC.0 1 Si C I L.: ICJ !do :J C l c c-1 c i..
r4 j ig it kw:
lo if.S C1 EiliC 1 i 9 /
J t
pit( c jr) L ?J I t. 11. r 1. n of
Lo `S 1, m 01 eJ of
List tests performed:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No ❑
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above.
Signed:
Print Full Name:
�C Y"►C
l
(60lc.) k,
Wet); t E7rl 4fr('Sfo.
n
lC e, l . qt// CJc
COL) - nn k c_ gel , J
c luck b /C t ‘4.
Date:
I.D. No.:
7 -h.? ' /J
rS b .)(Co - 8 t
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative.
J /ruz
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
List tests performed:
Signed:
Print Full Name:
City of 4t A)
Date of This Report:
cf' c L �D3 C �? Project No.:
JOOD �:►: fp Ld1 L,J
Y
4
Description and location of work completed:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
/ bfC(;
Page _ of
SIDRPT
Special Inspection Daily Report
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement
Periodic .0 Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement
❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement
❑ Foundations
❑ Fireproofing
❑ Soils
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 7 (Listed Below) No ❑
❑ Special Cases
4/1,. kfac';citt, //ii: FL,, ) >>,
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Date: 2 " r /J
I.D. No.: „ j`�C), (:7 J.
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC /UBC, except cis noted above.
• Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Daily
Report
No.
Report
Date
Description
Resolution to
Discrepancy
Date
Corrected/
Observed by
Status
O/C
1 /j t
}f n
4 ) -,.) .
tf
c
2 f
/
/
BRAUN
1 NTE RTEC
Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancies
Items)eeding C orrrection or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect
Project Name. iC /J (L - rt /3t
Project Address ,� a l t ' I t Lt /tc C - - � r
The following items must be reviewed and approved by the engineer and /or corrected and /or re- inspected before work can
continue in the area.
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Contractor.
Page
SODIS
Rev 6/04
• Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957