12/14/2010 - City Council SpecialAGENDA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2010
5:30 P.M.
EAGAN ROOM
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
Q 1 III. TECH WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS/CONSULTANT'S
FINDINGS
P !l IV. 2011-2015 PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
(PRESENTED BY APRC)
V. OTHER BUSINESS
VI. ADJOURN
Agenda Memo
December 14, 2010, Special City Council Meeting
III. TECH WORKING GROUP
RECOMMENDATIONS/CONSULTANT'S FINDINGS
DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
• Provide direction with or without modification to the City Council's Finance
Committee recommendations regarding next steps for Eagan's broadband
initiatives, and direct the preparation of resolutions in support of those initiatives
to a future City Council consent agenda.
BACKGROUND:
• On November 9, 2010, the Finance Committee of the Eagan City Council met
with staff and the City's broadband consultant, Dr. Andrew Cohill, of Design
Nine, to hear a briefing of the draft findings and recommended action steps
regarding a potential colocation facility in Eagan.
• Prior to that, the recommendations had been reviewed by the Eagan Technology
Working Group.
• In 2009, the City Council will recall, Eagan was able to obtain passage of special
legislation permitting the use of a city parcel for a colocation facility.
• In furtherance of the City Council's 2009/2010 goal of addressing the "evolving
bandwidth, capacity and speed needs" in Eagan, the City Council retained Design
Nine in April, 2010 to follow-up on next steps recommended in an earlier report
accepted by the Council in February.
• Included in that report was a key recommendation to work with the local business
community to determine how a colocation facility could be built in Eagan to
attract additional providers, and serve as a redundant data center for Eagan
businesses and others needing off-site data storage.
• Working together with the Tech Working Group and following a summit with
local IT and business professionals in May, plus numerous additional
conversations, our consultant recommends five specific actions, which were
endorsed by the Finance Committee "as important to the long-term vitality of
Eagan" to position us a community of choice.
• Communications Director Garrison will introduce Dr. Cohill, who will be
speaking to us from Blacksburg, Virginia. His brief presentation follows. Tech
Working Group members may also be in attendance.
• Specifically, staff seeks direction on the five action items outlined in the
Summary of Recommendations.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft report from Design Nine without page number r�
• Colo Planning Recommendations PowerPoint on pages to7
• Scan of Current Conditions Memo on page-- -f + attachments.
a
0
0
N
00
0
0
N
C
V 0^,
W
H �
wH •�
c C
C N
Cd Cd
0- C
. O
C cs
CS V
CIS 0
0 V
a)
tIO G)CO `"
.
W
v)
a)
H
N
.0
N
D
CU
13.0
L
(d
17C
cis
(d
E
17
Cd
cli
C
cd
N
N
N
cuC
Ecd
v7
N
C
0
.15a
0
co)
N
a)
u
u
cd
a)
C
L
C
1—
a) a)
a)
Cao
0
4-
0
CZU
00
0
N
0
.L
a
CDJ
CU
C
cd
v)
N
N
cuC
.)
L
N
n
EC -1
co)
C
.0_
0
inN
CU
0
u
cd
C
L
4)
C
L
0
17C
cd
a)
E
(0)
0
L
t
cz
a.
a)
N
a) L
c• �
0 -°
0
N
C
c (d
cd
171 C
cd
• c
cn =
N
O o!
A. A
1)
c
0
N.
. 4-4
C CL
� O L
in'V i
• vl 0
C 0 -
.= v) L • 4-'
4.0 $:1)
p•
4- 0 L-
0
O
lac °-o a)
v0 N .V & C L L
co a)
O N c cd
U
LA o .. a
O -p & o Co • a' L
N o s c�
� it 0 0 0 v, c i �O
cd ▪ 0 ▪ O O N = tt c.4-1_
cd u o 0 0 - v 0 0- =
O o 0 o CU
a Ln Ln o L • - V al L
N N N •> 0
O L ♦♦® LE 0 o a
d
_J J O
I
>
a)
V, E a)
L
.0 X
CU
a)
c s
•v) a) ..
co _o 0.0
O -p c
N c M •0
0.0
CU C
C C s 0 O
.N ._ = 1-1 � i
0 0
L
a)
.— �
c bO +-
C O _oU
L � L s
Q) cd 'u •- c' CUH cu a cid U
N i d 0O '>
CA C v)Lns� G) N O
.(/)a) 4-) CL CO a
.N O u c 0
— 4)
c_0 o 41-1
o° a)
- co _
a)
IV c
W .N .> O • ▪ •= CO 0
X CI CO L a; > L
a) 0 = O .c N
L
>. al a U -o
0
.° a) o • s E c u
v) O w V- ) F Q
L O
► Meet the needs of
S
(s
�), Lt
L�� CI
3 I, ; ,8- v Q (•3
Lei`, y}
CL
r EN
N 0}�fCY
/
co) N V
O
'Ij al
o i L
.N N
o -0 X J••'
au
)
b.0 o -
O Q
of L .�
N
u - •X
a v co .Q c -
M G) L
L a) O
L O u O
Ld
aa) s use
CU U •�
a) = c s L 7
Ci-
e) . C s a
Z L Q Q a)
•,471
a) s
bro a) L E o -v al
-v_ cu ▪ (7 O a) a�o
Q 0u
N L O EN u E - cd u
O >
•fl
,c b.0 v�
• O a) - • 0a) 4-)0
CUCL
u
Q) G • Q O O O
LI 0 aa_ H E a
U �
04 H
at c
O
a ▪ •u
a a
4••' H
CI) OA
E C
a =v
O •=
CU
C
.0 b"0 0
•c
O
E
a)
N a O
CL
CCI a ,
E
0-v
CU ,>
•
al w D
N
.C1)
a)
E
E
0
0
a)
ce
17)
u
U
G)
eL
0
A
N
0
0
N
-10U
t
a
4-)E
V
0
G))
U
i-,
0
E
V
a)
L
0
a)
V
"O
L
0
E
--°v
0
a
criE
0
L
L
M
N
0
0
N
N
c
.N
L
a)
E
E
0
a)
4-1
cd
L)
V
0
N
1 -
CU a)
0
CL
L
171
0
cd
a)
•
L
1-
0
0
0
E
E
E
0
U
w
.c
N
aU
0
L
17.0
0
L
is-)
L
CU
(,.
a)
E
.47;
L
0
a)
> 0
L
u d)
cd _CI
_o 4---
CL � /34
s o
o
▪ a)
' 4) es 4-1
N L a)
0) L
L a •
c
O a
L
a) N
_ )cco lit •
• G)) c 0
E
c
13.0
c a)
criw
0
a)
0
L
L
a)
0
N
CCI
Revenue from partnership wil
411,11
City of Ea�ali MeMo
To: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
From: COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR GARRISON
Date: December 10, 2010
Subject: SCAN OF CURRENT CONDITIONS
According to industry experts, the Twin Cities currently has a shortage of data center
space, particularly for an additional co -location facility and common meet point for
providers that is located outside of downtown Minneapolis or St. Paul. Further, observers
note that businesses in need of specialized data center space are:
"being served in other parts of the country due to a
lack of qualified space locally."'
Further, if the City is able to attract private sector investment in a data center/colocation
facility in Eagan with southern route redundancy, a significant telecommunications firm
in Minnesota has indicated that they are worried about current redundancy in the
Minneapolis 511 building and would be "especially interested in your plan to develop a
data center in Eagan."
Small and mid-sized firms in Eagan had indicated to our consultant in his 2009 report the
need for more offsite data storage and critical redundancy. Large Eagan and regional
firms indicated in the follow-up to a meeting last May the need for secure data storage
and disaster recovery space. A small firm, outside of Eagan, looking to relocate its data
operations also has called frequently to inquire about data center options "south of the
river."
In the meantime, other localities are not standing still. The City of St. Paul recently
obtained a $245,000 grant to design a network build out for a Ramsey County -wide fiber
optic network. Anoka County recently received a $13.4 million federal broadband
stimulus grant (no longer available and metro cities didn't qualify) to extend a fiber optic
network. The City of Burnsville extended additional city fiber as part of its SCADA
(Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system for remote monitoring of unmanned
facilities and is currently in negotiations to lease its additional capacity to a telecomm
provider. A regional center is in discussions about its additional data center needs.
1 John Livingston, President of HyberData, November 5, 2010 letter.
The City of Eagan, through the valuable assistance of Eagan's Technology Working
group, has devised a carrier neutral approach to getting additional fiber capacity in
Eagan, ensuring southern route redundancy and to attract a colocation facility to Eagan.
Even before the recent news from Lockheed Martin of its intended facility closure, the
need was strong to take strategic steps to keep and add high tech jobs and investment in
Eagan.
We are confident that the attached summary of recommendations, if enacted, will
position Eagan well to continue to be a jobs leader. While directing that non -tax dollar
options be developed regarding current next steps, the Finance Committee endorsed all
five recommendations.
Attachments:
• Summary of Recommendations on page 0
• HyberData letter on pages 1 ( d aN, .
• Missouri Data Center article on page3'1 4-
• Finance Committee Notes pertaining to broadband discussion, November 9, 2010
meeting. (5— !L.
9
Summary of Recommendations
1. Authorize the City to encourage the private sector investment
needed to develop a colocation facility/data center on City land.
2. Make a clear policy commitment to extend public purpose City duct
and fiber to business parks and commercial areas in the City over the
next 3-5 years. Total investment contemplated at this time is not to
exceed $2 million to create a city owned open access fiber ring that
can be used by any carrier. Annual expenditures may vary based on
need. The Administrative Services Director will recommend the best
source of non -tax revenues to fund the project.
3. Make a clear policy commitment to ensuring southern fiber routes
out of the Twin Cities that connect to the colocation facility.
4. Authorize the City of Eagan's Community Development department
to develop, without delay, a well designed package of economic
development and financial incentives consistent with state law and
Eagan's interests for a qualified firm interested in establishing a
modern, energy-efficient data center and common meet point in
Eagan, including the cost to install City -owned fiber to most
commercial areas of the city, financial support for a southern route
connection, assistance with land acquisition and prospect
identification and directing staff to report back on how revenue from
such a partnership will pay back investment over time.
5. Authorize City officials to procure the services of a vendor (in a
process approved by the City Attorney) to work with service
providers and long haul carriers to establish routes and a common
meet point, to identify and meet with colocation prospects, to
develop marketing package and materials, and determine next steps.
/0
H YBER DATA
November 5, 2010
Tom Garrison
Communications Director
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Mr. Garrison:
HyberData, LLC
601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 1250
Minnetonka, MN 55305
952-224-5202
As you know the Twin Cities metro area is in need of additional Ethernet carrier
hotels situated outside the downtown Minneapolis or St. Paul areas. There is also a
shortage of data center space in the Twin Cities Metro area. Carrier hotels want to be
in or well connected to colocation facilities. The Metro area does not have a combined
large scale carrier hotel / colocation facility.
HyberData believes that current local demand can easily justify an additional 200,000
to 500,000 square feet of additional colocation data center space. Current exp .�,-;.'n
space requirements are being served in other parts of the country due to a lack of
qualified space locally. National studies indicate a market such as this is not over
served until it has in a surplus of 500,000 square feet of space. I estimate this market
would need to build almost 1,000,000 square feet of new space to replace its existing,
obsolete inventory.
Power, location, connectivity and flexibility are the essential components to a data
center's selection. Third -party providers build and manage these resources for small,
medium and an increasing number of enterprise users because of their ability to more
efficiently manage and construct them. This results in savings in both capital and time.
Yet it is carrier neutrality that will be the most valuable to the diverse and varied
interests of users of Ethernet services so proximity to a carrier hotel is of utmost
importance.
HyberData's design is modular, scalable, and addresses users with rapid growth and
varied densities who increasingly utilize the "cloud." We take advantage of the
Midwest's natural climate and combine that with improved operating parameters to
maximize the cost savings of free cooling (using the outside air temperature to cool a
data center). Data centers have improved significantly over the past ten years resulting
in a more reliable, lower cost operation. Improved connectivity has allowed
Minnesota's data centers to be useful to national users. We plan to capitalize on that
benefit.
Eagan's interest in expanding its business to business fiber network would be a
significant benefit to users wanting to connect to diverse carriers and colocation
facilities. The City of Eagan is a desirable location as it is along the north -south carrier
fiber corridor serving the metro area and is located south of the Minnesota River.
Eagan also has several business entities with significant network bandwidth users. The
aggregate usage of these users might be leveraged to motivate carriers to locate within
the City.
Companies continue to need more and improved data center space and will expand in
those facilities that provide them the operational advantages and connectivity they
want. The next best place that can provide this combination of infrastructure services
will receive most of the interest. I think that should be Eagan for the reasons I've
mentioned today.
Yours very truly,
ohn Livingston
President
HyberData®
October 2010
Tech -Savvy Missouri Turns Eyes On Data Centers
By Christopher Chung
Information technology firms are creating a buzz in Missouri, and no one minds the
background noise. In the last five months, two information technology giants, IBM
and Unisys, announced their decisions to move to Missouri. IBM will be opening a
global service delivery facility in Columbia, Mo., while Unisys has chosen St.
Louis as the site where it will develop applications for the Apple Mac, iPhone and
iPad for federal clients. Digital Realty Trust, a San Francisco real estate firm that
develops and manages data centers, recently expanded its data storage facilities in
St. Louis, and XIOLINK, a data center company based in St. Louis, is also
expanding in the area.
There are numerous reasons why Missouri is winning when it comes to site
selection for IT -related facilities and why the state has set its sights on attracting
new data center investment. High-tech firms benefit from low operating costs,
turnkey telecommunications infrastructure, a safe environment for protecting data,
a talented IT workforce, and aggressive incentives.
Missouri consistently ranks among the top five states for the low cost of doing
business. The Show -Me State has shown high-tech companies that it makes sense
to operate in a state where power is cheap and abundant and taxes are low.
Missouri has the third -lowest business energy costs in the country, the fourth -
lowest commercial electricity costs, and the fifth -lowest corporate income tax rate.
Firms that reap the benefits of having selected the state for their headquarters
include: IT solutions provider, Cerner Corporation; data center and cloud
computing services firm, Bick Group; Cass Information Systems, the nation's
leading provider of payment and information services for financial, accounts
payable, transportation, logistics and utility needs; and Savvis, the leading global
provider of managed IT infrastructure services.
With over 2 million high-speed lines including fiber, cable modem and satellite,
Missouri offers a turnkey infrastructure that substantially reduces start-up costs.
"Missouri is fortunate to have a number of high-speed broadband providers that are
well connected to the Internet backbone and that provide customers with ample
�3
bandwidth to meet their communication needs," said Richard Telthorst, President
and CEO of Missouri Telecommunications Industry Association, the trade group
for the industry in the state. "Companies want to know, 'Can you connect me with
the Internet? Can you give me a broadband pipe that is big enough for my needs
today and tomorrow?' The answer is yes, Missouri can." Telthorst also noted that
within the last 6 months, Missouri telecommunication providers have been awarded
more than $100 million in federal stimulus funds to further deploy high-speed
broadband throughout the state.
Another reason why Missouri is an ideal location for data centers is because the
state offers a safe and secure environment for digital warehouses. Missouri boasts
more than 15 million square feet of underground sites, providing natural climate
control, enhanced security and reduced vulnerability in a state that is already at a
low risk for natural disasters. Moreover, cooling components at data center
facilities in drought -free Missouri can be expected to operate continuously and
without failure. Water is plentiful in the state that sits at the confluence of the two
largest river systems, the Mississippi and the Missouri, in North America. In fact,
no drought -related Presidential Disaster Declaration has ever been recorded in
Missouri, even during the drought of 1976-77 that resulted in an emergency
declaration in 27 states, including five states in the Midwest. Strategically located
in the nation's center and at a low risk of terrorist attack, the state is highly
favorable as a disaster recovery area.
Missouri's tech talent runs deep, easily matching data center needs for highly
skilled IT workers. Firms that choose Missouri have access to graduates from
among 34 institutions in the state that offer a bachelor's or graduate degree in
computer science, and nine Missouri colleges and universities that offer college
degrees in electrical or computer engineering. The state offers aggressive incentive
packages to help seal the deal with companies considering a move to Missouri, yet
in the case of IBM and Unisys, officials from both companies commented that
more than state aid, an educated workforce was a primary factor for the decision.
The state touts a tech -savvy workforce, low power rates and overall business costs,
data safety and security. Firms that choose to store their valuable data in Missouri
(like Emerson Electric, Charter Communications and Suddenlink Communications)
can expect to find success.
Christopher Chung is Chief Executive Officer of Missouri Partnership, a public
private non-profit corporation working closely with the Missouri Department of
Economic Development and regional and local economic development
organizations around the state. Missouri Partnership will be exhibiting at the Data
Center World conference, to be held October 3— 6 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Data
Center World is presented by AFCOM, the premier data center association
representing 4,500 of the largest data centers around the world.
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES
NOVEMBER 9, 2010
12:00 — 2:00 p.m.
POLICE CONFERENCE ROOM
Committee members present: Mayor Maguire and Councilmember Bakken
City staff present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller,
Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke, Public Works Director Colbert,
Communications Director Garrison, Chief Financial Officer Pepper, City Engineer Matthys and
Superintendent of Utilities Schwanz.
Notes related to broadband discussion:
IV. TECH WORKING GROUP
RECOMMENDATIONS/CONSULTANT'S FINDINGS
City Administrator Hedges and Director of Communications Garrison provided an
overview of the Eagan Technology Working Group's recommendations. Mr. Garrison
introduced Andrew Cohill, Design Nine Consultant, who joined the conversation via conference
call. Mr. Cohill summarized his observations and proposed goals and recommendations for the
Committee's consideration.
The Committee discussed the feasibility for a colocation facility in Eagan. Mr. Cohill
noted the cost to extend the needed southern fiber could be approximately $1 million. Cohill
also noted that it would be doable to proceed with the colocation facility and the fiber extensions
at the same time, suggesting that four to six months would be realistic to get a commitment to
build a colocation facility. Mr. Cohill suggested a timeline of nine to twelve months to build the
facility. Mr. Cohill suggested the total anticipated investment for the project would be between
$1.5 and $3 million, noting that there would be an opportunity for revenue generation as well.
Mr. Cohill added that if the City proceeds with directing a colocation facility, the first step
should be to send letters to current providers such as Qwest to invite them onto the network,
emphasizing the opportunity to retain existing customers while attracting new customers.
The Committee reviewed possible funding sources for the City's monetary contribution
to the project, including the use of revenues from the antennae leases. The Director of
Administrative Services was asked to report back recommended funding sources for this project
as a result of an overall review of city funds.
The Finance Committee made the following five recommendations to be forwarded to the
City Council for their earliest consideration in December:
1. Authorize pursuit of a private colocation facility on City land big enough to support a
future meet point as a key strategy to keep and grow jobs in Eagan;
2. Make a clear policy commitment to extend public purpose City duct and fiber to
business, parks and commercial areas over the next 3-5 years to create an open access
fiber ring connected to the colocation facility that can be used by any carrier. Commit at
least $2 million in City funds to accomplish these connection and begin with the focus of
where the right-of-way is already crowded.
3. Make a clear policy commitment to ensuring southern fiber routes out of Eagan.
4. Authorize preparation without delay of a well-designed package of economic
development and financial incentives for a qualified firm interested in the City's vision to
have a modern energy efficient data center and common meet point. The City package of
incentives would include the commitment to invest in fiber to most commercial areas of
the City, financial support for a southern route, assistance with land acquisition, City data
on business locations and fiber routes, and in partnership with the Technology Working
Group, introductions to local companies that may wish to lease space in such a facility.
5. As marketing assistance may be necessary, work with the City Attorney and the Tech
Working Group to define a process to select a vendor to work with service providers and
long haul carriers to establish routes and common meet point, identify and meet with
prospects, and develop marketing package and materials.
(Refer to final Summary of Recommendations, page ID, , as recommendation wording was
revised following discussion and review with the City Attorney's office.)
1IP
Agenda Memo
December 14, 2010 City Council Workshop
V. 2010-2015 PARKS AND RECREATION CIP
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide feedback and direction to the APrC regarding the 2011-2015 capital improvement
projects outlined in this report.
FACTS:
• One of the primary responsibilities of the APrC is the annual preparation and updating of the
Departmental Capital Improvement Plan which serves as a blueprint and planning guide for
park projects. CIP projects must be either park development or improvement but cannot be
maintenance based.
• Funding for the CIP comes from the Park Site Fund (PSF), which is primarily money
collected from developments at the time of platting in lieu of land dedication.
• The CIP proposal presented by the APrC to the City Council encompasses 2011 through
2015. Historically after the review process the Council approves the first year (2011) as a
budget and the next years as a general plan subject to change as part of future reviews.
• The CIP has generally been driven by the projected ongoing balance of the Park Site Fund.
To provide a better view of the future, recent versions of the CIP have included all potential
projects though they may not be funded for years to come. There has also been considerable
discussion regarding the identification of alternative funding sources for the CIP.
• A number of projects in the proposed 2011 CIP represent the continuation of ongoing
programs and initiatives specific to replacement and upgrade. Examples include the
installation of playgrounds, transportation infrastructure improvements to Central Park,
upgrade to the skate park, pedestrian trail bridge at Bur Oaks Park and the removal of the
Deerwood house in Patrick Eagan Park.
• The CIP also includes two line item allocations that are renewed on an annual basis as
needed. These are the land acquisition "opportunity" fund which would be used to help
acquire priority open space should it become available and the "small projects" fund which is
used to complete smaller, unanticipated, capital projects or to help leverage additional
financial assistance from an association or alternative funding source.
• The revenue projection is conservative and does not include any large land acquisitions.
• The projected revenue is based upon much smaller developments that split an existing lot
into 2-5 new lots rather than developments of entire new neighborhoods.
ATTACHMENTS: I
• List of 2011 projects, Page 1 q
• List of 2011-2015 projects, Pages ` -&
17
2011 CIP project summary
• Central Park; Improve the transportation infrastructure in Central Park to provide safer
pedestrian and vehicle access.
• Playground Replacements (2);Continuation of the ongoing rotational replacement
program. Candidate sites include both Bur Oaks playgrounds.
• Deerwood house removal; Remove the Deerwood house in Patrick Eagan Park and
complete site improvements as part of the Patrick Eagan Park Master Plan.
• Skate Park Upgrade: Upgrade the existing skate park at Lexington Diffley.
• Pedestrian Trail Bridge: Install a bridge to connect the two separate sections of Bur
Oaks Park.
• Small Projects; Funding for opportunities and need.
• Acquisition; Funding for acquisition opportunities.
Ig
2011 - 2015
0
ca
EST. BALANCES
BALANCE - Jan. 1, 2011 = $1,128,000
2011 Beg. Balance $ 1,128,000
Estimated 2011 Revenues (+) $ 75,000
$ 1,203,000
Projects (-) $ 298,000
Estimated 2012 Balance = $ 905,000
FUNDING
PSF
V)
a
V)
a
V)
a
V)
a
P.-1
w
cip
a,
ESTIMATED
COST
$95,000
0
0
an
6969
0
0
o
000`0S$
0
0
00
N
69
000`0£$
czi
00
el
N
ER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Transportation Infrastructure
Improvement
Playground Replacements
Projected Bur Oaks (2)
Deerwood House removal/
site improvements
Skate Park Upgrade
Pedestrian Trail Bridge
Small projects
LOCATION
Central Park
CQ
H
Patrick Eagan Park
Lexington Diffley
Bur Oaks Park
Q
4
H
Sub -Totals
PSF = Park Site Fund
G:\Budget\P&Rec Pot Dev\Pot Proj BY YEAR 2011-2015 — Rev. 8/10/2010
2011 - 2015
O
EST. BALANCES
BALANCE - Jan. 1, 2012 = $ 905,000
2012 Beg. Balance $ 905,000
Estimated 2011 Revenues (+) $ 100,000
$ 1,005,000
Projects (-) $ 445,000
Estimated 2013 Balance = $ 560,000
FUNDING
PSF/P
~"w
a
CA
w
Up
VD
a
ESTIMATED
COST
0
C)
000`OL$
0
o
o
69
0
0
t
69z
0
0
o
6969
0
0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Ballfield Lighting Upgrade
Playground Installation
2 @ $35,000
Tennis Court Renovation
Phase 1 Park Improvements
Small Projects
0
d
0
Goat Hill
M
Northview Park
Cedar Grove
Crt
Sub -Totals
PSF = Park Site Fund
2011 - 2015
EST. BALANCES
BALANCE - Jan. 1 2013 = $ 560 000
2013 Beg. Balance $ 560,000
Estimated 2011 Revenues (+) $ 100,000
$ 660,000
Projects (-) $ 370,000
Estimated 2014 Balance = $ 290,000
FUNDING
A,
a
I-1,
V)
a
w
a,
w
V)
a
w
V)
a
w
V)
a
ESTIMATED
COST
0
-
EA
0
o
.--•�
EA
000`SZ$
0
0
M
EA
0
0
M
EA
0
0
M
EA
0
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Athletic Field Lighting
Playground Upgrade
3 @ $35,000
Signage System Upgrade
South Area Master Plan
Sun Shelter
Small Projects
LOCATION
n
H
n
H
Park Trails
Rahn Park
Captain Dodd
n
H
Sub -Totals
Gdget\P&Rec Pot Dev\Pot Proj BY YEAR 2011-2015 — Rev. 8/10/2010
2011 - 2015
EST. BALANCES
BALANCE - Jan. 1, 2014 = $ 290,000
2014 Beg. Balance $ 290,000
Estimated 2011 Revenues (+) $ 100,000
$ 390,000
Projects (-) $ 250,000
Estimated 2015 Balance = $ 140,000
FUNDING
P.
w
(
P.
V,
a
Cwi,
a
ESTIMATED
COST
000`051$
000`0L$
00
0
o
0
69
0
0
tnM
N
69
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Phase II Park Improvements
Playground Installations
2 @ $35,000
Small Projects
LOCATION
Cedar Grove
(20
H
Q
CO
H
Sub -Totals
as
G:\Budget\P&Rec Pot Dev\Pot Proj BY YEAR 201 1-2015 — Rev. 8/10/2010
EST. BALANCES
BALANCE - Jan. 1, 2015 = $ 140,000
2015 Beg. Balance $ 140,000
Estimated 2011 Revenues (+) $ 75,000
$ 215,000
Projects (-) $ 215,000
Estimated 2016 Balance = $ -0-
FUNDING
v)
CA
a
ESTIMATED
COST
0
v
EA
0
o
0
o
01
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
South Tract Park Improvements
Playground Installation
2 @ $35,000
Small Projects
LOCATION
Rahn Park
H
Q
H
Sub -Totals
G:\Budget\P&Rec Pot Dev\Pot Proj BY YEAR 2011-2015 — Rev. 8/10/2010
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
POTENTIAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Category/
Location
Estimated Cost
Potential
Funding
Park Development
1. Moonshine Park
$200,000
PS/LS
2. Section 16 - Federal Drive
$200,000
PS/LS
3. Section 11 - Thresher South
$200,000
PS/LS
4. Rahn South
$150,000
PS/LS
5. Holz Farm Park Phase III
Sub -Total
$150,000
$900,000
PS/LS
Park Improvements
1. Wandering Walk Trail
$100,000
PS
2. Bur Oaks Trail Paving
$90,000
PS
3. Thomas Lake Trail Lighting
$100,000
PS
4. Rahn Court Construction
$120,000
PS
5. Goat and Bridle Bldg. Expansion
$200,000
PS
6. Cedar Grove Enhancement Phase III
$100,000
PS/P
7. Irrigation of Festival grounds
$100,000
Sub -Total
$810,000
Lighting
1. Lexington/Diffley Fields (6 new)
$500,000
PS
2. Ohman Soccer Fields
$150,000
PS
3. Northview Fields 6-8 (3 new)
$180,000
PS
4. Thresher Fields
$100,000
PS
Sub -Total
$930,000
Master Plans
Sec. 16 - Federal Drive
$30,000
PS
Sub -Total
$30,000
TOTAL
$2,670,000
Misc
1. School Site Partnerships
TBD
PS/P/G
2. Acquisition Opportunities
TBD
PS/P/G
3. Grant Opportunity Match
TBD
PS/P/G
4. Fiduciary Responsibilities
TBD
PS/P/G
g:\Budget\Park Rec Poten Dev\Potential CIP Proj 8 10 10